Fiscal Year 1982 I FY 1982 Statistical Highlights Fiscal Year 1982 ITEM APPROPRIATIONSI ($ Millions) New Work 2 Navigation................................... Flood Control Total ............................ Flood Control Mississippi River and Tributaries 2. Multipurpose, including power............ Beach Erosion Control....................... Total New Work................................. Other W ork5 ............... . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . ...... Total ................ . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . ........... NAVIGATION (Calendar Year)* Ton-Miles of Commerce (Thousands) Foreign, Coastal Ports ....................... Foreign, Great Lakes Ports ............... Domestic, Coastal (Intraterritory) not compiled)................................. Domestic, Great Lakes ....................... Dom estic, Inland ................................. Dom estic, Local ................................... TOTAL ......................................... Tons of Commerce (Millions) Foreign Coastal Ports ......................... Foreign Great Lakes Ports ................ Domestic, Coastal and Intraterritory. Domestic, Great Lakes ...................... Domestic, Inland ................................ Dom estic, Local .................................... TOTAL ......................................... FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED ($ Billions) .................... POWER Installed (Cumulative in millions of kw). Generated (Billions of kwh) .................. RESERVOIR STORAGE (Millions of acre-feet) All Purposes ....................................... Flood Control (Maximum) ................. W ater Supply...................................... Irrigation ......................................... PUBLIC ATTENDANCE AT RESERVOIRS (Millions of visitor days, calendar yeats). 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 552 607 485 395 357 261 358 774 772 873 802 895 859 1,004 221 193 264 580 650 631 (177) (145) (211) (158) (188) (173)4 (158)4 (122)4 (212)4 (77) 247 275 538 358 155 464 479 287 288 379 7 12 9 12 12 16 10 3 3 4 1,580 1,666 1,905 1,567 1,719 1,600 1,851 1,098 1,134 1,277 1,417 1,331 1,296 1,223 1,070 887 992 659 636 675 2,9974 2,997 3,201 2,790 2,789 2,487 2,843 1,757 1,770 1,952 58,929.2 60,569.8 59,940.5 58,925.6 58,925.1 50,979.6 43,521.7 44,019.1 40,406.4 35,294.0 33,679.6 43,146.4 42,108.8 37,734.3 34,347.9 29,944.8 26,800.0 41,400.0 634,765.3 631,149.2 532,290.2 540,373.2 343,536.6 322,932.3 315,834.9 322,802.2 327,649.2 62,148.4 61,749.1 77,971.9 76,284.0 52,416.9 70,684.2 68,516.8 78,880.4 83,765.1 231,184.1 227.343.0 217,090.2 209,266.2 201,784.2 197,072.8 180,399.2 183,202.6 171,890.9 1,315.6 1,596.4 1,710.2 1,339.8 1,262.3 1,164.2 1,222.3 1,460.1 1,386.3 1,023,636.5 1,016,085.1 931,846.4 928,297.6 692,527.4 477,181,0639,450.7 656,164.3 666,497.9 823.9 860.8 919.7 875.5 866.1 790.3 691.8 712.6 700.6 63.2 60.6 73.8 70.6 69.2 65.7 56.9 51.5 66.8 322.0 333.2 308.7 308.6 251.7 239.2 234.8 237.4 235.1 115.4 115.2 143.6 142.7 109.1 132.1 129.3 146.1 156.6 520.7 535.0 535.0 534.5 528.7 524.0 503.9 511.0 503.2 93.2 94.2 93.1 89.5 83.4 83.7 78.3 88.2 93.2 1,938.4 1,999.0 2,073.9 2,021.4 1,908.2 1,832.1 1,692.2 1,742.7 1,757.3 4.3 1.2 7.3 19.4 6.3 2.6 1.7 15.9 13.04 11.94 19.7 19.2' 19.0' 19.0' 17.9 16.4 16.0 14.9 14.4 14.0 75.8 77.3 77.8 81.2 83.6 64.0 108.0 82.9 76.8 71.1 269.0 268.5 263.3 263.3 262.9 252.0 250.6 248.3 244.6 243.3 123.0 122.7 120.4 120.4 120.1 104.0 102.9 101.0 99.2 98.7 9.2 9.1 8.9 7.8 7.7 7.6 7.3 7.2 6.8 6.5 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 6.8 480 469 457 449 439 424 391 376 352 344 1FY 1976 includes 1976T (Transition Quarter) figures cover 50Operation and maintenance surveys, administration and misc. period from July 1, 1975 through September 30, 1976. In- programs and activities. cludes supplemental appropriations. 6$102 million deferred in FY 82. 2Advance engineering and design, and construction. (Includ- 'Includes New Melones and Snettisham, built by the Corps ing major rehabilitation projects) Savings and slippage applied and operated by others. to projects. 3Included in Floor Control. *For further information on waterborne commerce, see Water- 4Revised figure. borne Commerce of the United States, published annually. It may be obtained by writing the District Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer District, New Orleans, P.O. Box 60267, New Orleans, Louisiana 70160. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page NEW ENGLAND DIVISION ................................................................................................................................. 1-1 NORTH ATLANTIC DIVISION: N ew Y ork, N Y , D istrict ..................................................................................................................................... 2-1 Philadelphia, PA , D istrict ................................................................................................................................... 3-1 B altim ore, M D , D istrict ...................................................................................................................................... 4-1 Norfolk, VA, District . ......................................................................... 5-1 SOUTH ATLANTIC DIVISION: W ilm ington, N C , D istrict .................................................................................................................................... 6-1 Charleston, SC, District ........................................................... 7-1 Savannah, GA, District ............................. ............... ...... 8-1 Jacksonville, FL , D istrict .................................................................................................................................... 9-1 M obile, A L , D istrict ............................................................................................................................................. 10-1 LOWER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY DIVISION; New Orleans, LA, District ....................................................... 11-1 V icksburg, M S, D istrict ..................................................................................................................................... 12-1 Memphis, TN, District ................................................................... .......... 13-1 St. L duis, M O , D istrict ...................................................................................................................................... 14-1 SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION: G alveston, TX , D istrict .................................................................................................................................. 15-1 Fort W orth, TX , D istrict ..................................................................................................................................... 16-1 Albuquerque, NM, District ................................................................................................................................ 17-1 L ittle R ock, A R , D istrict ........................................................ ................................................ ............... 18-1 T ulsa, O K , D istrict ............................................................................................................................................ 19-1 MISSOURI RIVER DIVISION: Kansas City, MO, District .......................................................................................................................... 20-1 Omaha, NE, District ........................................ ................................................ 21-1 OHIO RIVER DIVISION: O hio R iver .......................................................................................... ............................................................... 22-1 N ashville, TN , D istrict ...................................................................................................................................... 23-1 Louisville, KY, District ................................................... 24-1 H untington, W V , D istrict ................................................................................................................................... 25-1 Pittsburgh, PA, District ....................................................... 26-1 NORTH CENTRAL DIVISION: St. Paul, MN, District ................................................ 27-1 Rock Island, IL, District ........................................ ....... 28-1 Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN ........................................ 29-1 C hicago, IL, D istrict .................................... ............................ ................................ ..................................... 30-1 De troit, M I, D istrict .............................................. 331..-.1...................................................................................... Buffalo, NY, District .... ........................................................ 32-1 SOUTH PACIFIC DIVISION: Los Angeles, CA, District ................................................................ 33-1 San Francisco, CA, District ..................................................... 34-1 Sacramento, CA, District ....... ........................... ............................................ 35-1 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION: ...................................................................................... ................................ 36-1 NORTH PACIFIC DIVISION: Portland, OR, District .................................................................. 37-1 Seattle, WA, District ........................................ . ..................................................................... 38-1 Walla Walla, WA, District ...................................... ....... ............................................................ 39-1 Alaska District ....................................................................... 40-1 Board of Engineers for Rivers and H arbors ........................................................................................................ 41-1 M ississippi River Com m ission ....................................................................... ................. ........................ 42-1 Coastal Engineering Research Center ............................................... 43-1 California D ebris Com m ission ........................................................ .............................................................. 44-1 Waterways Experiment Station ................................................. 45-1 Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses ....................................... 46-1 Investigations of Projects Under Federal Power Act ........................................ 47-1 Regulatory, Sunken Vessel Removal and Mobilization Planning Activities ....................................... 48-1 International Boundary Waters Boards ....................................................................................................... 49-1 Construction Engineering Research Laboratory ........................................ 50-1 Engineer Topographic Laboratories ..................................................................................... ............ 51-1 Cold Regions Research Engineering Laboratory ........................................ 52-1 W ater Resources Support Center .......................................................................................................................... 53-1 APPENDICES: Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 1982 ....................................... .................... A-1 Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 1982 ................................................ B-1 Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 1982 ................................................ .................. C-1 Navigation Projects Under Construction September 30, 1982 ................................. .................... D-1 Multipurpose Projects Including Power In Operation September 30, 1982 ........................................ ............ E-1 Multipurpose Projects Including Power Under Construction September 30, 1982 ............................................ F-1 Flood Damages Prevented (By Region and by District) During Fiscal Year 1982 .................................... . G-1 IN D E X ................................... ........................ ....................................................... I NEW ENGLAND DIVISION* The New England Division, an operating division with both district and division functions, comprises all of New England except western Vermont and small portions of Massachusetts and Connecticut along their western boundaries, and includes small portions of southeastern New York, all embraced in the drainage basins tributary to Long Island Sound and the Atlantic Ocean east of the New York- Connecticut State line. It also includes Fishers Island, N.Y. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Aquatic Plant Control ................... 1-3 2. Boston Harbor, MA ...................... 1-3 3. Bridgeport Harbor, CT .................. 1-3 4. Bristol Harbor, RI ....................... 1-4 5. Cape Cod Canal, MA ................ 1-4 6. Chatham (Stage) Harbor, MA .......... 1-4 7. Clinton Harbor, CT ........................ 1-5 8. Connecticut River Below Hartford, CT ................................ 1-5 9. Corea Harbor, Gouldsboro, ME ........ 1-5 10. Fall River Harbor, MA .................. 1-6 11. Fore River, Braintree, Weymouth, MA .............................. 1-6 12. Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI ...... 1-7 13. Green Harbor, MA ......................... 1-7 14. Guilford Harbor, CT ................ 1-7 15. Hampton Harbor, NH ..................... 1-7 16. Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI ...... 1-8 17. Island End River, Chelsea, MA .......... 1-8 18. Kennebec River, ME ..................... 1-8 19. Kennebunk River, ME ................... 1-9 20. Mystic River, MA ........................ 1-9 21. New Haven Harbor, CT ................. 1-9 22. Norwalk Harbor, CT ...................... 1-10 23. Poitland Harbor, ME ................... 1-10 24. Saco River, ME ........................... 1-10 25. Sakonnet Harbor. RI ..................... 1-11 26. Sesuit Harbor, MA ....................... 1-11 27. Reconnaissance and condition surveys ...................................... 1-11 28. Other authorized navigation projects ...................................... 1-11 29. Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) ........................ 1-11 30. Authorized bridge alteration ........... 1-12 Beach Erosion Control Page 31. Clark Point, New Bedford, MA ........... 1-12 32. Cliff Walk, Newport, RI .............. 1-12 33. Oakland Beach, Warwick, RI ........... 1-12 34. Sherwood Island State Park, CT ....... 1-12 35. Inspection of completed beach erosion control projects ................. 1-13 36. Other authorized beach erosion control projects .................... 1-13 37. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization) ......... 1-13 Flood Control 38. Blackstone River Basin, MA and RI .... 1-13 38A. Pawtuxet River, RI ......................... 1-13 38B. West Hill Dam, MA ...................... 1-14 39. Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), MA ............ ........... 1-14 40. Connecticut River Basin, VT NH, MA and CT ......................... 1-14 40A. Ball Mountain Lake, VT ................ 1-15 40B. Barre Falls Dam, MA .................... 1-15 40C. Birch Hill Dam, MA ...................... 1-15 40D. Colebrook River Lake, CT ................. 1-16 40E. Conant Brook Dam, MA ................. 1-16 40F. Knightville Dam, MA .................... 1-16 40G. Lancaster, Israel River, NH ............ 1-16 40H. Littleville Lake, MA ...................... 1-16 401. North Hartland Lake, VT ............... 1-17 40J. North Springfield Lake, VT ............. 1-17 40K. North Stratford, NH ....................... 1-17 40L. Otter Brook Lake, NH ................. 1-1" 40M. Park River, Hartford, CT .................. -18 40N. Salmon River, Colchester, CT ......... 1-18 *All cost and financial statements and authorized legislation for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also apppear at the end of this chapter. 1-1 REWDRT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 400. Surry Mountain Lake, NH ................ 40P. Townshend Lake, VT .................. 40Q. Tully Lake, MA .................. 401. Union Village Dam, VT ............... 41. Housatonic River Basin, CT .............. 41A. Black Rock Lake, CT ...................... 41B. Hancock Brook Lake, CT .............. 41C. Hop Brook Lake, CT ................... 41D. Housatonic River, Pittsfield, MA ........ 41E. Housatonic River, Salisbury, CT ......... 41F. Northfield Brook Lake, CT ................ 41G. Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, CT ........ 1111. Thomaston Dam, CT .............. 42. Island Avenue, Qunicy, MA .............. 43. Merrimack River Basin, NH and MA ... 43A. Blackwater Dam, NH .................. 43B. Edward MacDowell Lake, NH ............ 43C. Franklin Falls Dam, NH .............. 43D. Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH ............ 43E. Phillips Lake, MA ............ .......... 44. New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA ................... 45. New London, CT .............. .......... 46. Saint John River Basin, ME .............. 46A. Dickey-Lincoln School Lakes, ME ....... 47. Sebasticook River, Hartland, ME ........ '18. Stam ford, CT ........ ........ ......... 49. Thames River Basin, CT, RI and MA .............. .......... 49A. Buffumville Lake, MA ..................... .1913. East Brimfield Lake, MA .................. 49C. Hodges Village Dam, MA ........... 49D. Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT......... 419E. West Thompson Lake, CT ............. 49F. Westville Lake, MA ....................... 50. Inspection of completed flood control projects... 51. Flood control reservoir operations .......... .. ........ 52. hurricane barrier operations........ Page 1-18 1-18 1-19 1-19 1-19 1-19 1-19 1-20 1-20 1-20 1-20 1-21 1-21 1-21 1-21 1-22 1-22 1-22 1-22 1-23 1-23 1-23 1-24 1-24 1-24 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-25 1-26 1-26 1-26 1-26 1-26 1-27 1-27 53. Other authorized flood control projects ....... .................. 54. Flood control work under special authorization .............. 55. Deauthorized Projects ............. General Investigations 56. Surveys .... ... .................... 57. Collection and Study of Basic Data ..... 58. Advance Engineering and Design ....... Tables Table 1-A Cost & Financial Statement ............... ... Table 1-B Authorizing Legislation .......... Table 1-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ......... Table 1-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects......... Table 1-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............ Table 1-F Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power ............... Table 1-G Deauthorized Projects ............ Table 1-H Navigation Activities Pursuant to Sec. 107 ............... Table 1-I Beach Erosion Activities Pursuant to Sec. 103 ............... Table 1-J Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Sec. 205 ............... Table 1-K Blackstone River Basin .......... Table 1-L Connecticut River Basin .. ...................... Table 1-M Housatonic River B asin .............. ............ Table 1-N Merrimack River B asin ................ ............ Table 1-0 Thames River Basin .............. Table 1-P Boston Harbor, MA ............... Table 1-Q Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ............. 1-2 Page 1-28 1-28 1-28 1-28 1-28 1-28 1-29 1-40 1-45 1-49 1-50 1-52 1-52 1-54 1-54 1-55 1-55 1-56 1-58 1-59 1-60 1-60 1-61 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. The program is conducted in all navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels and associated waters under the New England Division jurisdiction. Existing project. The purpose of the program is to eradicate or control aquatic plants that are causing or have the potential to cause major economic problems in the above waterways. The plant control is done in the interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health and research. The program is administered by the Chief of Engineers, under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, and in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 30 percent of the cost of controlling the aquatic plants, and in addition must hold the United States free from damages that may occur from control operations. Operations and results during fiscal year. The office received many requests from communities to help with their aquatic plant problems. Field surveys and meetings with local people were held to determine the extent and cause of the problems. In most cases, the problems resulted from excess nutrients washing into the waters from adjacent lands. This problem does not meet the criteria for Corps participation. 2. BOSTON HARBOR, MA Location.Harbor includes all expanse of tidewater lying within a line from Point Allerton to Point Shirley and extending from that line westward to mainland. This comprises an area of about 47 square miles, exclusive of the islands. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 246 and 248.) Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1917, 1938. Existing project.The existing project for Boston harbor, adopted in 1825 and supplemented by enactments through 1958, provides for the improvement of the harbor proper and its approaches. Fort Point Channel, Reserved Channel, Chelsea River and Weir River. For a more detailed description see page 3 of Annual Report for 1974. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing projects.) Existing project was completed in May 1966 with the construction of Chelsea River 35-foot channel and maneuvering basin. That portion of Fort Point Channel from northeasterly side of Summer Street Highway bridge to the easterly side of Dorchester Highway Bridge has been abandoned pursuant to P.L. 91-624 dated 31 l)ecember 1970. Remaining area of the authorized channel from the entrance to the northeasterly side of the Summer Street Bridge has not been abandoned. (See Table 1-P at end of chapter for total Federal cost of existing project to September 1979.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 156 wharves and piers in harbor, not including Mystic, Weymouth Fore, and Town Rivers, which are reported elsewhere. Of the terminals, 28 are publicly owned, 13 are open to public use, 73 have mechanical-handling facilities, and 70 have railroad connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. For a full description of channel facilities in Chelsea River refer to House Document 350, 87th Congress, 2d session (See Port Series No. 3, Part 2, Port of Boston, MA dated 1967). Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $80,481 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications, surveys, supervision and inspection. Contract costs were $136,110 for repairs to the Point Allerton Seawall. A contract for maintenance dredging of Presidents Road Anchorage, Chelsea River and Mystic River was awarded in June 1982 in the amount of $2,585,000. Earnings through the end of the year, were $1,498,000 for removal of approximately 400,000 cubic yards of material. 3. BRIDGEPORT HARBOR, CT. Location. On north shore of Long Island Sound, about 51 miles east of New York City. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 220.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1756 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 133 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation, see Annual Report for 1968. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project; for Black Rock Harbor breakwaters and Burr and Cedar Creek anchorage there is no reasonable prospect that required cooperation will be fortlcoming from local interests. For further details, see Annual Report for 1968. Terminal facilities. There are 35 waterfront facilities serving port of Bridgeport, all of which are used or in usable condition. Three wharves are owned by city of Bridgeport and three others may be used by public upon agreement with the owners or operators.- (See Port and Terminal Facilities of Southern New England No. 4, revised in 1952.) Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $40, 301 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications, surveys and preparation of an environmental assessment in connection with maintenance dredging proposed for a portion of Bridgeport Harbor and the Black Rock Harbor Channels. 1-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 4. BRISTOL HARBOR, BRISTOL, RI Location. Bristol Harbor is on the east side of upper Narragansett Bay, in Bristol County, about 13 miles southeast of Providence, Rhode Island. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 278, 353 and 1210) Existing project. The project provides for an offshore breakwater 1,600 feet long located about 400 feet west of the Coast Guard pier and extending generally in a northwesterly direction. Construction has not begun. Total estimated cost (Sept. 1982) is $7,000,000 of which $3,010,000 is non-Federal cost. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide, without cost to the United States, all lands, easements and rights-of-way necessary for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and provide a cash contribution currently estimated at 43 percent of project cost. T'erminal facilities. The developed waterfront of Bristol Harbor is concentrated along a half-mile stretch of east shore of harbor. In this section, there are six privately-owned landings, two owned by the Town, one by the State, and one by the Federal Government. All private landings are of granite construction and have truck access. Two have gasoline and one has diesel oil service; and are used primarily for landing shellfish. Town and State piers are open to public, and include facilities for about 50 small boats and finger piers for larger craft. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Advance engineering and design was continued. 5. CAPE COD CANAL, MA Location.This waterway is a sea level Canal; extending from head of Buzzards Bay, MA, to a point on Cape Cod Bay about 15 miles southeast of Plymouth Harbor, MA. In general direction Canal trends from Buzzards Bay easterly to Cape Cod Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 251 and 1208) Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Navigational improvements were completed in April 1963, with completion of East Boat Basin extension. Initial recreational development consists of public use facilities at various locations, was completed in February 1965. Improvements to public use facilities at the East Boat Basin were completed in May 1974. Construction of public use facilities at Bourne Scenic Park were completed in May 1976. Canal is crossed by two high-level highway bridges and vertical-lift railroad bridge. Initial major rehabilitation of Bourne Highway v'was completed in December 1965. Minor rehabilitation of stone breakwater was completed in October 1963. Major rehabilitation of Sagamore Bridge is now underway. Local Cooperation.Fully complied with. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Terminal facilities. There are seven terminals on the Canal, of which three are privately owned. Four are used for receipt and freezing of fish and two are used for receipt and storage of oil. Seventh terminal is State pier, owned by Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and on north bank of Canal of Bourne Neck. Terminals are adequate for purposes for which they are used. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contracts awarded and contract costs were: replacement of docks, pilings and dolphins in West Boat Basin $767,716; painting of railroad bridge $188,333; installation of fire alarm system in Administration Building $11,731; purchase riprap stone $37,050; replace OCTV cameras $104,932; replace test equipment for repair of Electronic Traffic Control System $23,805. Other costs by hired labor and contract were: railroad bridge, tower and signal system $178,033; condition surveys $18,972; operational costs for roads, bridges and project facilities $814,674; real estate activities $33,987; traffic control activities $910,038; administrative costs $190,167; contract specifications and drawings $86,615; contract supervision and inspection $55,312. The following contracts were awarded late in the fiscal year; replace and upgrade Electronic Traffic Control System $1,350,000; replace fender piles at Sandwich Bulkhead $12,965. No work was performed on either contract. Major Rehabilitation. Major rehabilitation of the two highway bridges crossing the Canal is now Underway. The rehabilitation consists of replacing the decks of both bridges, repair or replacement, where appropriate, of structural steel members and cleaning and painting superstructures of bridges. A continuing contract in the amount of $12,957,876 awarded in June 1979 for rehabilitation of the Bourne Bridge was completed in 1981. Another continuing contract, in the amount of $8,014,758 for the Sagamore Bridge, was awarded in April 1981 and continued throughout FY 1982. 6. CHATHAM (STAGE) HARBOR, MA Location. At northeastern corner of Nantucket Sound, about 16 miles east of Hyannis Harbor, MA, and 66 miles south of Providence Harbor at northern extremity of Cape Cod. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1209.) Previous Project. For details see Annual Report for 1942. Existing project. An entrance channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Chatham Roads into upper harbor. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Construction of existing project was initiated in September and completed in 1-4 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION October 1957. By 1961, a break in barrier beach connecting Morris and Monomoy Islands caused Federal Channel to fill in completely. Local interests dredged an emergency channel to obtain 8-foot depth in June 1962 and performed additional dredging in 1963. Minimal maintenance dredging by the Federal Government in April and May 1964,provided access to inner harbor for 1964 boating season. A new 10-foot channel through Harding Beach and construction of a dike from Harding Beach to Morris Island was completed in July 1965. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are three commercial wharves on north side of inner harbor open to public use to owners' convenience. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work has begun on the contract, awarded in the prior FY, for removal and disposal of a deteriorated timber pile jetty. Hired labor costs were incurred for supervision and inspection. Contract work was not complete at the end of the FY. 7. CLINTON HARBOR, CT Location. On north shore of Long Island Sound, about 10 miles west of mouth of Connecticut River and about 20 miles east of New Haven Harbor, CT. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 216 amd 1212.) Previous project. For details see page 640, Annual Report for 1894 and page 112, Annual Report for 1943. Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from Long Island Sound to upper end of wharves at Clinton, an anchorage area of saine depth opposite and above wharves, 50 feet wide south of channel and extending 600 feet above end of channel, with widths of 150 to 250 feet, and for maintenance of a stone dike closing a breach in the sandy peninsula which separates the river from outer harbor. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Project was completed in 1950. local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are several small private wharves, some of which are open to public use. These facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work has been completed on the maintenance dredging contract that was awarded in FY 1981. Total contract costs were $163,850. Hired labor costs of $68,067 were incurred for surveys, plans and specifications, supervision and inspection. 8. CONNECTICUT RIVER BELOW HARTFORD, CT Location. Has its source in Connecticut Lake in northern New Hampshire, flows southerly 380 miles and empties into Long Island Sound at Saybrook, CT, 14 miles west of New London. Hartford, now head of commercial navigation, is 52 statute miles, by channel, from mouth. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 215, 266, 267.) Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Eightmile River, CT, elimination as separate project: Provides for a channel 8 feet deep 75 feet wide from deep water in Connecticut River to Hamburg and for turning basin of same depth, 150 feet wide, approximately 300 feet long at Hamburg. Project was adopted by River and Harbor Act of 1910. Costs and expenditures were $9,000 all for new work. In accordance with River and Harbor Act of 1950, project for Connecticut River below Hartford was modified to include project for Eightmile River. Aforementioned Act also provided for an anchorage basin 6 feet deep and about 6.5 acres in area in upper cove in Hamburg. A channel 15 feet deep and 150 feet wide for a distance of 52 miles upstream to Hartford; two riprap jetties at the mouth of the river; and dikes, training walls, revetments and other regulatory works along the river between Hartford and Gildersleeve Island. The project provides for small-boat improvements at Wethersfield Cove; Eightmile River; Essex; and North Cove, Old Saybrook. For a more detailed description of project see page 7 of Annual Report for 1974. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Existing project was completed in September 1965 with the construction of channel and anchorage in North Cove, Old Saybrook, CT. For further details, see Annual Report for 1974. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. On both Connecticut and Eightmile Rivers there are two or three wharves at each of river towns, one or more in each town being open to public use. At Hartford and Middletown there is about one-half of wharf frontage along west bank of river. Facilities adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The dredging contract, awarded in the prior FY, was completed in the current year with an additional 99,900 cubic yards of material being removed. Total contract costs were $588,750. Another maintenance dredging contract, in the amount of $663,800, was awarded in August and 83,000 cubic yards of material were removed at a cost of $364,306. Hired labor costs of $192,328 were incurred for plans and specifications, environmental assessment, supervision, inspection, sampling and testing. 9. COREA HARBOR, GOULDSBORO, ME Location. Corea Harbor is located witflhin the village of Corea in the town of Gouldsboro, Hancock County, Maine. It is 130 miles northeast of Portland and 55 miles southeast of Bangor. 1-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Existing project. Provides for an anchorage basin 8 feet deep, 600 feet long in an east and west direction and 400 feet wide in a north and south direction. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Construction is underway. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide, maintain and operate without cost to the United States, an adequate public landing with provisions for the sale of motor fuel, lubricants and potable water open and available to the use of all on equal terms; provide without cost to the United States all necessary lands, easements and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project including suitable dredged material disposal areas with necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads and embankments therefor; hold and save the United States free from damages that may result from construction and maintenance of the project; accomplish without cost to the United States alterations and relocations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage and other utility facilities; establish regulations prohibiting the discharge of untreated sewage, garbage and other pollutants in the waters of the harbor users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control. Terminal facilities. There are 21 wharves, 15 of which are small and cannot be approached by vessels at low tide. The wharves are privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Plans and specifications were initiated and completed. A dredging contract was awarded in August 1982, in the amount of $354,300. Work is just beginning. 10. FALL RIVER HARBOR, MA Location. At mouth of Taunton River, on east side and at head of Mount Hope Bay, which empties into ocean through Narragansett Bay and Sakonnet River; it is about 18 miles northerly from Newport Harbor. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 13221.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1978. Deepening to 35 feet was completed in March 1959. The authorized deepening to 40 feet has not yet begun. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. For terms of local cooperation pertinent to remaining work authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1968, see Annual Report for 1975. Terminal facilities. In upper harbor there are several deep-draft terminals, two of which are in Somerset and three in Fall River, four more deep-draft terminals are located along the Tiverton waterfront in Rhode Island. These are modern terminals used in connection with electrical generating stations; receipt, distribution and storage of oil and petroleum products; and a State Pier for handling general cargo, and a permanent berth for the battleship Massachusetts. There are six other wharves with berthing depth of less than 25 feet used for mooring recreational and training craft, receipt and storage of petroleum products, boat servicing and repairs. (See Port and Terminal Facilities of Southern New England, No. 4 Revised in 1976.) Operations during fiscal year. New work: An extensive sampling and testing program has been conducted on the material to be dredged; update the benefits and costs; review all potentially feasible disposal options. A draft environmental impact statement was completed and released. 11. FORE RIVER, BRAINTREE AND WEYMOUTH, MA Location. The Weymouth-Fore River is located approximately nine miles from downtown Boston. It flows into Hingham Bay which forms the southern portion of Boston Harbor. The river forms a portion of the boundary between the cities of Weymouth and Braintree. Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep with a width from 60 to 100 feet. The channel would begin at the Federal ship channel in Quincy and extend 8,000 feet upstream to the Quincy Avenue bridge. The total estimated cost (June 1982) is $336,000 of which $118,000 is non-Federal cost. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Construction was completed in July 1982. Local cooperation. Local interests would provide a cash contribution of 50 percent of the cost of construction; provide without cost to the United States all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project including suitable dredged material disposal areas with necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor; hold and save the United States free from damages that may result from construction and maintenance of the project; provide and maintain berths, floats, piers, and similar marina and mooring facilities as needed for transient and local-vessels as well as necessary access roads, parking areas, and other needed public use shore facilities open and available to all on equal terms; establish regulations prohibiting the discharge of untreated sewage, garbage and other pollutants in the waters of the harbor users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or pollution prevention and control. Operations during fiscal year. New work; Plans and specifications were prepared and a dredging contract awarded in May 1982. A total of 24,400 cubic yards of material was removed and contract earnings were $222,000. 1-6 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 12. GREAT SALT POND, BLOCK ISLAND, RI Location. On west shore of Block Island, about 11 miles southwest by south from Point Judith Harbor, RI, and 18 miles southeasterly from Stonington Harbor, CT. (See U.S. Coast and Geoderic Chart 276.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 18 feet deep from ocean to pond 300 feet wide with a central depth of 25 feet for a width of 150 feet; a riprap jetty at the entrance on southerly side extending 350 feet beyond 18-foot contour (actual length 1,691 feet, including 837 feet built by State); stone revetment and sand fences to protect banks through original beach. Portion of project for widening and deepening channel, construction of north jetty, and dredging inner harbor channel and basin is considered inactive. Cost of this portion of project last revised in 1954 was estimated to be $452,000, exclusive of $8,000 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) South jetty was completed in 1905. Local cooperation. Not required on active portion of project. Terminal facilities. Consist of a wharf with about 600 feet of publicly available berthage and several privately owned and operated small wharves and piers. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract was awarded in July in the amount of $223,280 for maintenance dredging of Great Salt Pond and the Harbor of Refuge. At FY end, 52,.485 cubic yards of material had been dredged from Great Salt Pondat a cost of $173,200. Hired labor costs of $14,031 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications, surveys and inspection. 13. GREEN HARBOR, MA Location. On west side of Massachusetts Bay within the town of Marshfield about 30 miles southeast of Boston and 9 miles north of Plymouth Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 245.) Existing project. Provides for channel 6 feet deep (8 feet at entrance), 100 feet wide extending about 4,000 feet from deep water to head of navigation with small turning basin at upstream limit; 5-acre anchorage near Town Pier, 6 feet deep; sealing, rebuilding in part, and a 200 feet extension of existing west jetty at elevation +12, with dike to beach berm at elevation +14 feet, and raising east jetty to elevation +14. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Construction was completed in October 1969. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Major terminal facility is Town Pier in village of Brant Rock. Facility is a bulkheaded, earth-filled landing and parking area about 290 feet wide, extending 210 feet into harbor. A marina service is south of Town Pier; and a facility for recreational craft has been developed on south side of harbor near head of navigatior. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Final payment of an additional $17,165 was made on the dredging contract awarded in FY 1981. The total contract price was $263,235. In consultation with CERC and at a cost of $8,473, a wave study was initiated to evaluate shoaling patterns in the entrance channel. 14. GUILFORD HARBOR, CT Location. On north shore of Long Island Sound about 13 miles east of New Haven Harbor, CT. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 217 and 1212.) Existing project. An entrance channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide through the harbor from Long Island Sound to an anchorage basin in East River, length 0.8 mile; a channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide up Sluice Creek 880 feet to Whitfield Street; an anchorage basin 6 feet deep, 200 feet wide in East River, length 1,500 feet. Mean and spring tidal ranges are 5.4 and 6.4 feet, respectively. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Project was completed in April 1957. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. State wharf about 370 feet long provides adequate facilities for existing commerce. Town wharf on north bank of East River at foot of Whitfield Street is no longer useable. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract, started in October, was completed in December. A total of 72,000 cubic yards of material was removed at a total cost of $569,580. Hired labor costs of $89,136 were incurred for surveys, supervision and inspection. 15. HAMPTON HARBOR, NH Location. On New Hampshire seacoast 13 miles south of Portsmouth Harbor, 5 miles-north of mouth of Merrimack River at Newburyport, MA. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1206.) Existing project. Extending north jetty 1,000 feet, raising outer 300 feet of south jetty and constructing a 180-foot spur to high ground, and dredging to provide a channel 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide across entrance bar. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Project was completed in November 1965. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are seven piers in Hampton Harbor. State of New Hampshire maintains two pile and timber piers, two in Hampton about 1,500 feet north of entrance and one in Seabrook one-half mile south of entrance. Hampton pier has a 6-foot walkway to a float that has depths of 4 to 6 feet. Seabrook pier has a float and a water depth of about 3 feet at outer end. One landing is open to public. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 1-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 The maintenance dredging contract that was awarded in September 1980 was completed. An additional 26,200 cubic yards of material was removed at a cost of $160,400. Total contract costs were $335,000. Hired labor costs of $76,824 were incurred for surveys, supervision and inspection. 16. HARBOR OF REFUGE, BLOCK ISLAND, RI Location. On east side of Block Island, near south end of inner cur.ve of shoreline 13 miles southsouthwest from Point Judith Harbor and about 25 miles southeasterly from Stonington Harbor, CT (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 276.) Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation, see Annual Report for 1976. Completed in 1916 except for inactive portion. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Two wharves in harbor, both steel sheetpile bulkhead which comprises southern and eastern limits of basin. Total docking space amounts to 500 feet. No mechanical-handling facilities are available. One wharf owned by town and open to public, is considered inadequate for present general needs of boating in harbor. There is ample room for expansion of terminal facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: In July a contract was awarded for maintenance dredging of the Harbor of Refuge and Great Salt Pond. During the FY 4,545 cubic yards of material were dredged at a cost of $14,999. Hired labor costs of $22,046 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications, surveys, supervision and inspection. 17. ISLAND END RIVER, CHELSEA, MA Location. The Island End River is located approximately two miles north of downtown Boston in the heart of the Boston Metropolitan area. The river forms a portion of the boundary between the cities of Chelsea and Everett, and coincidentally Middlesex and Suffolk Counties. The Island End River flows into the Mystic River about one-half mile ipstream of the confluence of the Mystic and Chelsea Rivers in Boston's Inner Harbor. Existing project. The project provides recreationial boaters with a 100-foot wide access channel extending from the Mystic River for a length of approximately 2,500 feet to the site of a proposed marina facility and boat launching ramp, and would allow for an overall depth of 6 feet at mean low water. T1otal cost is $504,240 of which $192,363 is non-Federal cost. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Project was completed in April 1982. Local cooperation. Local interests would provide a cash contribution of 50 percent of the cost of construction; provide without cost to the United States all necessary lands, easements and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project including suitable dredged material disposal areas with necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads and embankments therefor; hold and save the United States free from damages that may result from construction and maintenance of the project; provide and maintain berths, floats, piers, and similar marina and mooring facilities as needed for transient and local vessels as well as necessary access roads, parking areas and other needed public use shore facilities open and available to all on equal terms; establish regulations prohibiting the discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the waters of the harbor users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of federal, state and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control. Operation during fiscal year. New work: The improvement dredging contract that was awarded in September 1981 was completed in April 1982 with earnings of $823,121...which included $500,535 of Contributed Funds Other. 18. KENNEBEC RIVER, ME Location. Drains a large number of lakes and minor streams, and flows from Moosehead Lake about 150 miles southerly and discharges into Atlantic Ocean about 25 miles east of Portland. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 288, 289 and 314.) Previous projects.For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. A channel 27 feet deep and not less than 500 feet wide, extending from mouth to bridge at Bath; thence to Gardiner a channel not less than 150 feet wide, 17 feet deep at Beef Rock Shoal, at foot of Swan Island, 18 feet deep through rock at Lovejoy Narrows, near head of Swan Island, decreasing to 16 feet deep at Gardiner; channel west of Swan Island, 100 feet wide, 12 feet deep, except at upper shoal, where depth was to be 15 feet; and channel 125 feet wide and 11 feet deep from Gardiner upstream to Augusta at head of navigation. Section of river included in project is about 44 miles long. Work includes dredging, rock excavation, and two riprap training walls. Portion of project for dredging 27-foot channel from Bath Iron Works Corp. to 0.6 of a mile above bridge at Bath is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion is $129,500. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Wharves sutiable for landing or loading are at Bath, Woolwich, Richmond, Randolph, Gardiner, Hallowell, and Augusta. Of the 24 wharves at Bath, 5 are publicly owned and 19 privately owned, about one-third are in poor repair and little used. Rail connections are available at 19 wharves at Bath. Depths alongside range from 12 to 25 feet. At othekr points named above there are 16 wharves in usable condition. All but one are equipped 1-8 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION with mechanism for handling passengers and freight. 7''hose open to the public on equal terms are two at Ilallowell and one each at Randolph and Augusta. None are publicly owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: T'he maintenance dredging contract that was awarded in September 1981, was completed in the current year with 53,300 cubic yards of material being removed at a cost of $435,864. Hired labor costs of $49,500 were incurred for surveys, supervision and inspection. 19. KENNEBUNK RIVER, ME Location. Source of Kennebunk River is in central part of York County in southwestern Maine. Stream flows about 15 miles southeasterly and discharges into Atlantic Ocean about 350 miles southwest of Portland, Maine. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1205.) Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1977. Project was completed in December 1968 with completion of rock removal at entrance to west channel. Extension of west jetty was completed in April 1965. Dredging and sand fence were completed in November 1965. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 22 landings 16 of which are private, 1 public, 2 yacht clubs, 1 hotel, and 2 boatyards. Marine railway facilities include two of 15-ton capacity, and one of 10-ton capacity. There are 4 berths and 10 moorings. Open storage, boat building, repairs, and supplies are available for pleasure and commercial craft. Public landing of granite block construction, has unloading facilities which include two tackle and falls on arms; and is used by fishing craft to transfer catches for transportation. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The contract for repairs to the east and west jetties was completed in the current FY. There were 1,707 tons of quarried stone placed on the east jetty and 1,597 tons installed on the west jetty. Total contract costs were $150,185. Hired labor costs of $26,523 were incurred for supervision, inspection and surveys. 20. MYSTIC RIVER, MA Location. Rises in Mystic Lake, MA, flows southeasterly 7 miles and empties into Boston Harbor near Boston Naval Shipyard. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 248 and Geological Survey Chart, "Boston".) Previous Projects. For details see page 1743 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 59 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Channel 35 feet deep, extending from limit of 35-foot channel of Boston Harbor at Mystic River Bridge to approximately 300 feet downstream of Malden Bridge, having width varying from about 940 feet at its lower end, to about 1,060 feet at a point about 1,200 feet below the Malden Bridge, thence decreasing to 150 feet at its upper limit; channel 20 feet deep from head of existing 35-foot channel to a point 800 feet above Malden Bridge, with widths decreasing from 150 feet at lower end to 75 feet through drawspan, thence increasing to about 340 feet to form turning basin above bridge; channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Boston & Maine Railroad (western division) bridge to about 2,500 feet above Wellington Bridge, about 1 mile, and thence 4 feet deep, gradually narrowing from 100 to 50 feet at upper end for about 2 miles to head of commercial navigation at Craddock Bridge in Medford. Project depths refer to mean low water. Mean range of tide is 9.6 feet at Mystic River Bridge, 9.6 feet .at Wellington Bridge, and 9.3 feet at Craddock Bridge. Extreme range is 13.7 feet. Federal cost of new work for completed project was $3,097,054, exclusive of amounts expended for previous projects. Project was completed in June 1958. For authorizing legislation, see Annual Report for 1967. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. In section of river benefited by 35-foot channel project there are on the south bank four wharves consisting of substantial stone or wooden bulkheads filled solid, aggregating over 4,000 feet of berthing space; also a lumber terminal, the largest of its kind on the Atlantic Coast, equipped with most modern mechanical appliances, has railroad connections and occupies 4,400 feet of waterfront. On north bank of river there is a large wharf used for receipt and shipment of oil on extensive scale; and adjacent thereto an extensive terminal used in connection with an iron works. There are several other wharves downstream of Malden Bridge and on west bank of Island End River used for receipt and shipment of coal, coke, tar, oil and in connection with a generating plant. None of the above is publicly owned or opened to general public use. In 20-foot channel section on south bank there are 1,850 feet and on north bank 1,235 feet of available dockage; none of which is publicly owned, two are open to public on payment of charges. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: In May a contract was awarded in the amount of $2,585,200 for maintenance dredging of the Mystic River, Chelsea River and President Roads Anchorage. At FY end, a total of 308,000 cubic yards of material had been removed from the Mystic River, at a cost of $947,200. Hired labor costs of $69,794 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications, supervision, inspection and surveys&. 21. NEW HAVEN HARBOR, CT Location. On north shore of Long Island Sound, about 67 miles east of New York City. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 218.) Previous project. For details, see Annual Report for 1915 and 1938. 1-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1978. Project is complete. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Port of New Haven is served by 53 waterfront facilities; 40 are within city limits of New Haven, and 5 in West Haven. Improved waterways within port area along which facilities are located include West River, Main Harbor, West and East Branches of Mill River, and Quinnipiac River channels. Facilities are all privately owned and operated with exception of city wharf and U.S. Coast Guard wharf. Depths alongside piers and wharves range from 35 to zero feet at mean low water. Nearly half of the facilities have rail connections either on or at rear which connect with N.Y., N.H. & Hartford Railroad and most are accessible by paved streets. Nineteen wharves have mechanical handling facilities, six wharves are open to public use upon agreement with the owners. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port and rerminal Facilities of Southern New England No. 4 revised 1964.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: In March, a contract was awarded for maintenance dredging of the Mill and Quinnipiac Rivers at a cost of $767,652. A total of 192,400 cubic yards of material was removed. Hired labor costs of $220,865 were incurred for preparation of an environmental assesment, surveys, plans and specifications, sampling and testing, disposal site monitoring, supervision and inspection. 22. NORWALK HARBOR, CT Location. On north shore of Long Island Sound, about 40 miles east of New York City. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 221 and 1213.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1973. Project was completed in 1950. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are two city wharves, neither of which is in usable condition. There are 19 private wharves in use or in usable condition, having a total berthing space of about 3,100 feet. One has rail connections. Private wharves are inadequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No.4 for Southern parts of New England (1952). Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: An additional payment of $312,670 was made in the current FY, due to the contractors claim for towing delays and survey differences on the dredging contract awarded in 1980. The total contract price was $1,819,000. Hired labor costs of $26,523 were incurred for supervision, inspection and surveys. 23. PORTLAND HARBOR, ME Location. On southwestern coast of Maine about 100 miles northeast of Boston, MA. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 13292.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1936. Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1978. Project was completed in 1966, except for ledge removal that was completed in 1968. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 37 waterfront facilities, of which 4 are not used. Seven wharves are publicly owned, 4 by the U.S. Government, 2 by State of Maine, and 1 by city of South Portland. Mechanicalhandling facilities are available at 24 wharves. Railroad connections have been made to 27 of them. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see page 13, H. Doc. 216, 87th Cong., and Port Series 1 for Ports of Searsport Harbor and Portland, Maine and Portsmouth, NH (revised 1964). Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: An additional $2,202,849 was paid on a claim relating to a 1979 dredging contract. The final contract amount was $4,905,842. Hired labor costs of $62,143 were incurred for claim negotiations and surveys. 24. SACO RIVER, ME Location. Rises in White Mountain region of New Hampshire at an elevation about 1,900 feet above sea level, flows about 105 miles in a general southeasterly direction, and discharges into Atlantic Ocean about 16 miles southwest of Portland Maine. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 231.) Existing project. For description of completed existing portion of project and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1978. The current project now under construction consists of dredging a 3-acre 6 foot deep anchorage, protected by a series of 11 ice breaker structures, to be located to the east of the existing city pier and adjacent to the existing Federal navigation channel in the Saco River. Also, the installation of two ice breaker structures, to be placed to the west of the city pier, for protection of the pier. Estimated federal cost is authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are five wharves of solid fill construction at Saco and Biddeford, none of which has railroad connection; and a small pier near mouth of river used for summer passenger business. Operations during fiscal year. New work: In September 1982, a contract, in the amount of $166,650 was awarded for improvement dredging and installation of ice breaker structures. 1-10 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 25. SAKONNET HARBOR, RI Location. Sakonnet Harbor, originally known as Church Cove, is located in the southwestern part of the town of Little Compton, Newport County, Rhode Island. It is about 30 miles southeast of Providence, and 5 miles east of Newport. The harbor is located at the eastern side of the entrance to the Sakonnet River, and directly adjoins the Atlantic Ocean at Block Island Sound. Existing project. This provides for a breakwater 400 feet long in a northerly direction; a 400-foot extension in a northeasterly direction; removal of rock nearest the wharf to a depth of 8 feet; dredging the harbor to a depth of 8 feet; a 500-foot rubble-mound breakwater and a 110-foot wide by 10-foot deep navigation channel. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Original breakwater completed in 1900, extended in 1957. Construction of the rubble-mound breakwater and the navigation channel was deauthorized in June 1982. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for features authorized through 1954. For portion of project authorized in 1981, local interests would be responsible for the operation and maintenance of an adequate public landing for the sale of fuel, lubricants, and drinking water open to all on an equal basis, and for providing all necessary land, easements and rights-ofway for construction and for providing disposal areas for dredged materials. The town would also hold the United States free from damages that may result from construction and maintenace of the project. Moreover, the local sponsor would provide and maintain berths and other mooring facilities for local and transient vessels as well as access roads, parking lots and other required public use shore facilities, open and available to all on an equal basis. Terminal facilities. There are four wharves in the harbor, none of which are publicly owned. The Sakonnet Yacht Club pier on the east side of the harbor projects about 300 feet from the shore has a float which makes it readily accessible to small craft. The three other wharves are located on the west side of the harbor. These wharves, for practical purposes, from one structure about 150 feet wide with two piers, 30 and 40 feet wide, projecting 35 and 70 feet therefrom. The piers are open to the public free of charge. The State highway located along two sides of the harbor provides access to the wharves. These facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operation during fiscal year. New work: The project approval and construction authorization, for the 500 foot rubble-mound breakwater and 10 foot deep navigation channel, was officialy withdrawn by the Chief of Engineers in June 1982. An unfavorable vote, by the town voters at a special town meeting held in May 1982, was the cause of the rejection. At the time of project deauthorization, a total of $206,000 had been expended for preparation of a detailed project report and plans and specifications. 26. SESUIT HARBOR, MA Location. Sesuit Harbor is located on the north shore of Dennis in Barnstable County, about 85 miles southeast of Boston, Massachusetts. The town of Dennis is bordered on the north by Cape Cod Bay, Brewster and Harwich on the east, Nantucket Sound on the south and Yarmouth on the west. Land area within the town is 20.66 square miles and has a tidal shoreline of 29.8 miles. Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep below mean low water and 100 feet wide from deep water in Cape Cod Bay to a point opposite the Dennis Yacht Club thence reducing in width to 80 feet at the entrance to the inner harbor basin, for a total channel length of 2,400 feet. The current estimated project cost is $189,100. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Project was completed in August 1982. Local cooperation. Local interests would be responsible for fifty percent of the project construction costs, as well as the costs for dredging of all berthing areas outside the limits of the federal project. They would also be responsible for provision of necessary lands, easements, rights-of-way; any necessary vegetation of disposal areas; holding the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance work. Local interests will perform the necessary dredging, construction and maintenance of additional berthing spaces as required for expansion of the project support facilities during the life of the project as well as establish regulations prohibiting disposal of pollutants into the waterway. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A dredging contract, in the amount of $152,124 was awarded in May 1982 and completed in August. A total of 28,000 cubic yards of material was removed and the contract earnings were $191,333 27. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 1-Q at end of chapter.) 28. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 1-C at end of chapter.) 29. NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Table 1-H at end of chapter.) 1-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Alteration of Bridges 30. AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION Location. Chelsea Street Highway Bridge MA. Construction was completed in October 1961 with a Federal cost of $138,518. In addition non-federal contributed funds amounted to $8,602. For details see page 63 of Annual Report for 1962. Beach Erosion Control 31. CLARK POINT BEACH, NEW BEDFORD, MA Location. Off Rodney French Boulevard West, in the City of New Bedford. Project is located along the west side of Clark Point Beach. Existing Project. Provides for the restoration of the west beach area on Clark Point by widening about 1,600 feet of beach to a minimum berm width of 100 feet by direct placement of sandfill and by extending of two existing groins to reduce the high losses of beach material (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project. Project was completed in May 1980. Local Cooperation. Local interests must contribute one-half of the first cost of improving the publiclyowned shore at Rodney French Boulevard West at Clark Point, prepare detailed plans and specifications for the work and undertake actual construction with subsequent reimbursement of Federal one-half share, maintain the protective structures during their economic life, control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers, and maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the Federal participation is based and its administration for public use during the economic life of the project. Formal assurance agreements were executed by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on March 26, 1980. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The Commonwealth of Massachusetts was reimbursed $228,080 as the Federal share of the completed project. 32. CLIFF WALK, NEWPORT, RI Location. In Newport, R.I., about 25 miles south of Providence, it faces the Atlantic Ocean near mouth of Narragansett Bay on south side of Aquidneck Island, and extends 3.5 miles southward from west end of Newport (Eastons) Beach to and around Lands End and thence northward to east end of Bailey Beach. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Coast Charts 236,353, and 1210.) Existing project. Provides for construction of improvements for shore protection at Newport, RI, extending 18,000 feet from west end of Newport Beach to east end of Bailey Beach; consisting of: Intermittent reaches of backfill, dumped riprap, stone mounds, slope revetment and breakwaters; concrete toe walls, seawalls and parapet walls; grading and surfacing Cliff Walk and providing drainage therefor. Mean range of tide is 3.5 feet and spring range is 4.4 feet. Latest approved estimate of cost is $3,281,000 of which $2,558,000 is non-Federal. Latest published map is in project document (H. Doc. 228, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Initial portion of the project was completed in 1972. Remainder of project could not be completed at that time due to lack of local funds. A second portion is now proposed to be accomplished in area near Salve Regina College. Congress appropriated funds in FY 1982. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work, non-Federal contributions were $955,237. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Plans and specifications, were completed for the reach at Salve Regina College, for which the Federal contribution was appropriated. 33. OAKLAND BEACH, WARWICK, RI Location. Oakland Beach is located at the southern extremity of Horse Neck in the northeasterly section of Greenwich Bay. It is bordered by Brush Neck Cove on the west and Warwick Cove on the east. Existing project. Provides for the direct placement of suitable sandfill on either side of the existing seawall that protects the parking area. Also the construction of five groin structures (the replacement of the jetty at the east limit of the study is considered a groin). The groins consist of one terminal structure located at each end of the beach, one at each end of the seawall and a low profile structure halfway between the west limit and the seawall. Also included is the construction of rock revetment placed in front of the seawall between the groins. The current project cost is $785,000 of which $215,000 is non-Federal. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Project was completed in 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The non-Federal cost, of the beach erosion project completed in the prior year, has been computed anrd a refund check for $33,825 was sent to the City of Warwick. 34. SHERWOOD ISLAND STATE PARK, WESTPORT, CT Location. In Westport, CT, approximately ten miles west of Bridgeport and 50 miles east of New York City. The beach is separated by Sherwood Point into two bathing areas known as East Beach and West Beach. 1-12 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Existing project. Provides for beach widening by direct placement of sandfill along 1,800 feet of West Beach, extending east from the existing Federal groin structures to Sherwood Point. Also included is the lowering of the landward portion of the existing groin and the construction of an intermediate low-profile groin structure approximately 900 feet west of Sherwood Point. The current project cost estimate is $1,596,000 of which $596,000 would be non-Federal (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Project construction has just been initiated. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to contribute, prior to construction, 30 percent of all project costs and must bear all project cost in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $1 million. Future nourishment would have to be borne by non-Federal interests since the $1 million Federal limitation will be incurred during initial construction. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A contract in the amount of $1,243,200 was awarded in September 1982 for the beach erosion control project. Earnings to date were $5,000. 35. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS. Inspections of beach erosion control projects were made at the following beaches in August 1982 Connecticut- Burial Hill, Calf Pasture, Compo, Cove Island, Cummings Park, Guilford Point, Gulf, Hammonassett, Jennings, Lighthouse Point, Middle Prospect, Sasco Hill, Seaside Park, Sherwood Island Park, Short, Silver to Cedar, Southport, Woodmont Shore; Massachusetts-North Scituate, Oak Bluffs Town Beach, Plymouth Town, Quincy Shore, Revere, Wessagussett and Winthrop; New Hampshire-Hampton and Wallis Sands State Beach; Rhode Island- Misquamicut, Sand Hill Cove and Cliff Walk. 36. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS. (See Table 1-D at end of chapter.) 37. BEACH EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 103, PUBLIC LAW 87-874 (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Table 1-I at end of chapter.) Flood Control 38. BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MA AND RI Works covered by this plan consist of a dam and reservoir on West River and local protection works at three cities on Blackstone River. Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized plan for a reservoir on West River and local protection works at Worcester, MA, and Woonsocket and Pawtucket, RI, substantially in accordance with House Document 624, 78th Congress, 2d session. Flood Control Act of 1960 authorized a local flood protection project at Lower Woonsocket, RI, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 87, 85th Congress, 2d session. Local protection nonstructural project authorized in 1982 for Belmont Park section of Warwick, RI along the Pawtuxet River. (See Table 1-K end of chapter on reservoir and local protection projects, Blackstone River Basin, for projects comprising authorized plan.) 38A. PAWTUXET RIVER, WARWICK RI Location. The Pawtuxet River flows in a northeasterly direction through West Warwick, Warwick and Cranston before it discharges into Narragansett Bay at Pawtuxet Cove. The watershed has a maximum length of 18 miles running west to east and 23 miles width from north to south. The drainage area at its mouth in Pawtuxet Cove is 230 square miles. The project is located in the Norwood section of Warwick, locally referred to as Belmont Park. Existing project. Consists of acquisition, demolition and removal from the flood plain a total of 59 homes; acquisition of 19 privately-owned vacant lots; construction of 17 above-ground utility room additions to residences which experience basement flooding; and the installation of an automated flood forecasting and warning system. The current estimated project cost is $3,700,00 with the Federal government paying 80 percent of the project cost up to a Federal limit of $4 million. After implementation, the City of Warwick would be responsible for the cost of operating and maintaining the flood forecasting/warning system. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for authorizing legislation.) Project implementation was begun in September 1982 with property acquisition. Local cooperation. Local interests must implement acquisition and removal of properties and pay 20 percent of project costs unless total project costs exceed $5,000,000--in which case local interests incur all costs above that figure. Operations during fiscal year. Detailed Project Report was completed, project was authorized pursuant to the continuing 'authority provided by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended, and initial aquisition took place in September 1982. 1-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 38B. WEST HILL DAM,MA Location. Dam is on West River, MA, 3 miles above its confluence with Blackstone River and 2.5 miles northeast of Uxbridge, MA (See Geological Survey maps - Blackstone, MA and RI, Milford, MA, and Grafton, MA) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Work on contract for dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in June 1959 and completed in June 1961. Construction of recreational facilities was completed in June 1967. Cost of new work for completed project was $1,367,000 for construction and $940,000 for lands and damages including highway and utility relocations, a total of $2,307,000. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1944, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations consisted of ordinary operation and maint. enance. 39. CHARLES RIVER (NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE AREAS), MA Location. The Charles River extends inland from Boston Harbor southwesterly toward the Massachusetts- Rhode Island border and is some 80 miles long with a watershed covering 307 square miles. Existing project. The project provides for Federal acquisition and protection of 17 natural valley storage areas totalling an estimated 9,000 acres in what is known as the Middle and Upper watershed of the Charles River. The acquisition in fee or by easement of the major natural valley storage areas within the Charles River watershed is intended as a multiplepurpose project for flood control, recreation, and fish and wildlife management. The latest approved cost estimate (October 1981) for new work is $8,020,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Land acquisition is continuing. To date a total of 2,946 acres have been acquired in fee at a cost of $1,752,093 and restrictive easements have been obtained for 4,744 acres at at cost of $538,894. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to prevent modifications or alteration of existing roadways, utilities, bridges, culverts, and any other improvements that might affect the drainage characteristics of the natural storage areas; adopt and enforce regulations to restrict development of flood plain lands; and operate and maintain the existing dams along the Charles River. Local assurances have been received. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Real Estate appraisals, boundary burveys, negotiations and closings were continued. 40. CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT, NH, MA AND CT Location. Works covered by this project are a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Connecticut River in Vermont, New Hampshire and Massachusetts, within a radius of 230 miles from Hartford, CT, and local protection works at several cities in the basin. Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended by Act of May 25, 1937, authorized construction of 10 reservoirs on tributaries of Connecticut River in accordance with plans in House Document 412, 74th Congress, 2d session, as the same may be revised upon further investigation of 1936 flood. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved a general comprehensive plan for control of floods and other purposes in Connecticut River Valley, as set forth in House Document 455, 75th Congress, 2d session, and authorized $11,524,000 for construction of local flood protection projects in the plan. Act of October 15, 1940, modified Act of June 18, 1938, to provide additional protection at East Hartford, CT, as set forth in House Document 653, 76th Congress, 3d session. Act of August 18, 1941, modified comprehensive plan approved in 1938 to include improvements recommended in House Document 653, 76th Congress, 3d session, and House Document 724, 76th Congress, 3d session, with such further modifications as may be found justifiable in discretion of Secretary of the Army and Chief of Engineers. Latter Act also authorized to be appropriated additional $6 million for local protection works and $10 million for reservoirs. Act of October 26, 1942, further modified plan by including construction of Gully Brook conduit at Hartford, CT. Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized expenditure of $30 million inaddition to previous authorization for comprehensive plan approved in 1938 and modified plan by directing specific consideration of an alternative plan of Vermont State Water Conservation Board instead of Williamsville Reservoir in West River Basin, VT; directing consultation with affected States during course of investigations and transmission of proposal and plans to each affected State for written views and recommendations for reservoir projects heretofore authorized for construction at Cambridgeport, Ludlow, South Tunbridge, and Gaysville, and resubmission of projects or modifications for construction of Sugar Hill site. Flood Control Act of 1950 modified project for flood control at Hartford, CT, authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938, as amended, to include Folly Brook dike and conduit. Flood Control Act of 1954 modified plan for flood control in Connecticut River Basin to provide for construction of a reservoir on Otter Brook at South Keene, NH, in lieu of any reservoir or reservoirs heretofore authorized. This Act further modified plan for West River Basin of Connecticut River in Vermont to consist of three reservoirs at SBall Mountain, The Island, and Townshend sites, in * lieu of plan of eight reservoirs authorized in Flood Control Act of 1944. Flood Control Act of 1958 modified 1-14 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION plan for flood control in Connecticut River Basin to include construction of Littleville Reservoir on Middle Branch of Westfield River, MA, and Mad River Reservoir on Mad River, above Winsted, CT. Flood Control Act of 1960 included authorization in Connecticut River Basin of plan for flood protection on Chicopee River, MA, substantially in accordance with House Document 434, 86th Congress; plan for flood protection on Westfield River, MA substantially in accordance with Senate Document 109, 86th Congress; plan for flood control and related purposes on Farmington River, CT, substantially in accordance with House l)ocument 443, 86th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1968 included authorization in Connecticut River Basin of plan for construction of Beaver Brook Reservoir, on Beaver Brook in Keene, NH, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 60th, 90th Congress; and plan for flood protection on Park River, CT, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 43, 90th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1970 deauthorized the construction of a reservoir at Claremont, NH. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 deauthorized the construction of Gaysville Lake, Vermont project. Flood control projects at Cambridgeport Lake, Brockway Lake, Victory Lake, South Tunbridge Lake, Ludlow Lake and The Island Lake, Vermont; Honey Hill Lake, West Canaan Lake, and the Alternative to Sugar Hill Reservoir, New Hampshire were deauthorized in August 1977 in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resource Development Act of 1974. The authorization for Beaver Brook Lake, New Hampshire project expired in April 1978 due to lack of local cooperation. Local protection projects at Gardner, MA, Hartford, VT and Wethersfield CT authorized and constructed in accordance with section 205 of 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-L at end of chapter for reservoirs and local protection works proposed for construction in modified comprehensive plan.) 40A. BALL MOUNTAIN LAKE,VT Location. Dam is on West River, 29 miles above its junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, VT. It is 2 miles north of village of Jamaica, VT. (See Geological Survey map for Londonderry, VT) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for project was $10,448,000 for construction and $350,000 for lands and damages, a total of $10,798,000. Recreation facilities to be constructed are estimated at $200,000. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1957 and completed in November 1961. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in June 1975 and completed in June 1977. Additional recreation facilities construction is scheduled for FY 1983. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract, in the amount of $131,806, for construction of an "A" frame restroom, was awarded in September 1982. Work has not yet begun. 40B. BARRE FALLS DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Ware River in town of Barre, MA, 31.9 miles above confluence of Ware and Swift Rivers. It is 13 miles, northwest of Worcester, MA (See Geological Survey maps Barre, MA, and Wachusett Mountain, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of completed new work is $1,928,800 for construction and $39,000 for lands and damages including highway relocation, a total of $1,967,800. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1956 and completed in May 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. In June 1981, a contract was awarded to furnish and install an emergency generator in the control tower. The contract, in the amount of $16,571, was completed in October 1981. 40C. BIRCH HILL DAM,MA Location. Dam is on Millers River, 27.3 miles above its junction with Connecticut River. It is 1.3 miles east of South Royalston, MA and 7.5 miles northwest of city of Gardner, MA (See Geological Survey maps for Royalston and Winchendon, MA - NH and Templeton, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $1,775,500 for construction and $3,075,000 for land and damages, a total of $4,850,500. Total includes $32,000 as local share for construction of recreation facilities. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in June 1940 and completed in February 1942. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests have contributed $32,000 as their required 50 percent cost sharing of recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and rmaintenance activities. In September 1982, a contract was awarded to repair the access road. The contract is expected to be completed in November 1982. 1-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 40D. COLEBROOK RIVER LAKE, CT Location. I)amsite is in town of Colebrook, Litchfield County, CT, on West Branch Farmington River about 3.9 miles upstream from its confluence with Still River at Riverton, CT, and about 1.5 miles upstream from Goodwin (Hogback) Dam. (See Geological Survey map for Winsted, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $8,342,000 for construction and $5,922,000 for lands, damages, and relocations, a total of $14,264,000. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1965 and completed in June 1969. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in August 1969 and completed in June 1970. Local cooperation. Water supply contract was signed by Hartford Connecticut Metropolitan Water District. Repayment will be made in accordance with provisions of 1958 Water Supply Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A road improvment contract, awarded in July 1981, was completed in April 1982. The contract cost was $57,434. 40E. CONANT BROOK DAM, MA Location. Site is in south central part of Massachusetts in town of Monson. Damsite, across Conant Brook, is about 2 miles southwest of community of Monson. (See Geological Survey map for Monson, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $1,936,000 for construction and $1,015,000 for lands, damages, and relocationof roads and utilities, a total of $2, 951,000. Construction of dam, highway relocations, and appurtenances was initiated in June 1964 and completed in December 1966. Local cooperation Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 40F. KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Westfield River, 27.5 miles above its confluence with Connecticut River. It is 4 miles north of town of Huntington, MA, and about 12 miles west of city of Northampton, MA (See Geological Survey map for Westhampton, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost for new work was $2,594,440 for construction and $821,200 for lands and damages, a total of $3,415,640. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1939 and completed December 1941. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 40G. LANCASTER, ISRAEL RIVER, NH Location. Lancaster, New Hampshire is located at the confluence of the Connecticut and Israel Rivers and at the intersection of U.S. Routes 2 and 3. The Israel River, a tributary of the Connecticut, has a length of about 21 miles and a drainage of 135 square miles. The Israel River enters the Connecticut River from the east. Existing project. The local ice jam flood protection project provides for an earth and rock-filled embankment weir, 160 feet long, protected by layers of gabions. Gabions are rock-filled baskets. The weir has a top width of six feet. The upstream face is sloped at 3 horizontal to 1 vertical. A three foot deep gabion lined stilling basin is provided at the downstream toe of the weir. The top of the weir is nine feet higher than the invert of the stilling basin and six feet above the upstream river invert. A steel sheet pile cut-off wall along the center of the weir prevents water from flowing through the structure. A 3-inch concrete cap was placed over the gabion wires to prevent cutting of or damage to the wires by ice flows and debris. Fish passage through the wier is assured by four concrete sluiceways. The sluiceways are four feet wide and are provided with stop-log slots. Stop-logs will be inserted each year in the late fall to ensure a winter pool behind the weir. They will be removed each spring. An impervious earth fill dike was constructed across a low swale near the right (facing downstream) abutment tQ prevent the river from taking that course when restricted by ice jamming at the weir. The current estimated project is $551,605. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Project was completed in 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: There was an additional expenditure of $13,970, as a result of a modification in a contract completed in the prior year. 40H. LITTLEVILLE, MA Location. Dam is on Middle Branch of Westfieid River 1 mile above its confluence with main stem of Westfield River and 25.2 miles above confluence of Westfield River with Connecticut River, in town of Chester. (See Geological Survey map, Chester, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual 1-16 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Report for 1975. Total cost of new work was $5,863,400 " for construction and $1,150,000 for lands and damages, including relocation of a highway, utilities, cemeteries, and structures, a total of $7,013,400. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated under a multicomponent contract in June 1962 and completed in September 1965. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, and Title III, Water Supply Act of 1958 applies and fully complies with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 40.1 NORTH HARTLAND LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on Ottauquechee River, 15 miles above its junction with Connecticut River and 1 mile northwest of North Hartland, VT. Reservoir extends upstream 5.5 miles. (See Geological Survey map for Hanover, NH. - VT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost for new work is $6,349,500 for construction and $963,000 for lands and damages (including highway and utility relocations), a total of $7,312,500. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in June 1958 and completed in June 1961. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 40J. NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, VT Location. Dam is in town of Springfield, VT, on Black River, 8.7 miles above its junction with Connecticut River, and 3 miles northwest of Springfield, VT. (See Geological Survey maps - Ludlow, CT and Claremont NH). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost for new work is $4,782,000 for construction and $2,050,000 for lands and damages, including highway, cemetery, and utility relocations, a total of $6,832,000. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in May 1958 and completed in November 1960. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract, in the amount of $15,500 for replacement of the generator in the intake tower, was awarded in June 1982 and is scheduled for completion in November i1982. Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 40K. CONNECTICUT RIVER, NORTH STRATFORD, NH Location. The town of North Stratford, a rural community in Coos County, is located about 20 miles from the Canadian border in extreme northern New Hampshire. The erosion site is located along the east bank of the Connecticut River just north of the bridge of Bloomfield, Vermont. Existing project. Provides for construction of 250 linear feet of stone slope protection along the riverbank adjacent to the fire station. The total estimated cost is $180,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Project was completed in 1982. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract, that was awarded in September 1981, was completed at a total cost of $112,135. 40L. OTTER BROOK LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Otter Brook, 2.4 miles upstream from its junction with The Branch, which flows 2.5 miles to Ashuelot River at Keene. (See Geological Survey maps - Keene, NH - VT, and Monadnock, NH). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Total cost of new work was $2,782,100 for construction and $1,378,400 for lands and damages, including highway relocation, a total of $4,160,500. An estimate of $170,000 for construction of recreation facilities. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 and completed in August 1958. Construction of additional recreation facilities is scheduled for fiscal year 1982. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract, awarded in September 1981, for construction of a storage building foundation, was completed at a cost of $15,900 in November 1981. New work: In July 1982, a contract was awarded for renovation of the change house in the amount of $111,700. The contract is expected to be completed in fiscal year 1983. 40M. PARK RIVER, HARTFORD, CT Location. On the Park River in the City of Hartford, Hartford County, Connecticut. (See Geological Survey map of Hartford North, Connecticut.) Existing project. Authorized as a modification to completed Hartford, CT local protection project. (For details on completed project see Annual Report for 1960). Two sections of reinforced concrete conduit 1-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 totalling 2,569 feet with width of 34 feet and height of 26.5 feet on the Park River; one section of reinforced concrete conduit 103 feet long, 36 feet wide and 27.5 feet high on the South Branch; two sections of reinforced concrete conduit 1,364 feet long, 22 feet wide and 25 feet high on the North Branch; a reinforced concrete junction structure to combine the flows from the North and South Branches and distribute them to the Park River and auxiliary conduits and thence to the Connecticut River; circular auxiliary conduit approximately 9,200 feet long to be constructed as a deep tunnel in rock with an inside diameter of 22 feet and lined with 9-inch thick precast concrete walls, an inlet structure and an outlet structure; a concrete headwall at the entrance to the North Branch conduit extension; and two pumping stations on the banks of the Park River. The latest approved cost estimate (October 1981) for new work is $1,300,000 for lands including relocations and $59,877,000 for construction, a total of $61,177,000. Total includes local costs of $1,200,000 for lands and $100,000 for relocations, a total of $1,300,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Construction was completed in 1981. Resolution of claims and administrative close out to be accomplished: Local cooperation. Provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way for construction and operation of project; hold and save the United Sates free from damages due to construction works; maintain and operate all works after completion; upon completion of conduit construction replace pavements , sidewalks, drainage and other appurtenances, including those at Broad Street, Flower Street and Laurel Street and bear cost of removal, replacement and modification to sewers, drains, utilities or highways beyond the area required for excavation and construction of the project; prevent changes in headpool ponding areas which would decrease the effectiveness of the improvements and if ponding areas and capacities are impaired, promptly substitute equivalent storage capacity; and undertake all practical measures to prevent pollution from entering the Park River conduit system. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Administrative closeout of construction contracts was coImpleted. 40N. SALMON RIVER, COLCHESTER, CT Location.The towns of Colchester and East Hampton are located in the western section of New Iondon County, approximately 14 miles southeast of Hartford, Connecticut. From its headwaters in Bolton, Connecticut, the Salmon River flows southeasterly for 20 miles to its confluence with the Connecticut River in East Hampton, Connecticut, about 4 miles downstream of the problem area at the Colchester- East Hamnpton town line. Existing project. Provides for the construction of 250 feet of "Doublewal" precast concrete block slope protection along the right bank of the river adjacent to the Brown's Mill Road. The total estimated cost is $235,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Project construction is underway and 95 percent complete. Local cooperation. Local interests would provide, without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and utility relocations necessary for project construction, operation and maintenance of the project, except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United Sates in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; annual operation and maintenance costs will be equally divided by the two towns. Operations during fiscal year. New work: In February 1982, a contract was awarded in the amount of $159,250. Earnings at fiscal year end were $166,750. 400. SURRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Ashuelot River, 34.6 miles above its junction with Connecticut River and 5 miles north of Keene, NH - (See Geological Survey maps for Keene and Bellows Falls, NH - VT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project is $2,448,610 for construction and $385,000 for lands and damages, a total of $2,833,610. Total includes $140,000 for additional recreation facilities. Project is complete except for construction of additional recreation facilities. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1939 and completed in June 1942. Initial phase of additional recreational facilities completed in September 1969, secondary phase in 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operationy during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract, awarded in the prior fiscal year, to replace the heating system in the utility building, was completed in October 1981 at a cost of $9,800. 40P. TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on West River, 19.1 miles above its junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, VT, and about 2 miles west of Townshend, VT. Reservoir extends upstream about 4 miles. (See Geological Survey maps - Saxtons River, VT, and Londonderry, VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $5,530,000 for construction and $1,870,000 for 1-18 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION lands and damages including highway relocations and utilities, a total of $7,400,000. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1958 and completed in June 1961. Initial phase of additional recreational facilities completed in October 1969. Secondary phase completed in September 1971. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 19:38 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract, awarded in the prior fiscal year, to replace the heating systems in the control tower and operators quarters, was completed at a cost of $9,850 in l)ecember 1981. Another contract, awarded in September 1981, for sediment excavation, was completed at a cost of $199,400 in July 1982. 40Q. TULLY LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on East Branch of Tully River, 3.9 miles above its junction with Millers River. Itis 1 mile north of Fryville, MA, and 3.5 miles north of Athol, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Royalston, MA - NH). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Total cost of new work is $1,298,800 for construction and $368,000 for lands and damages, a total of $1,666,800. Total includes $40,000 as local share of recreational facilities. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in March 1947 and completed in September 1949. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development, in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreational Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract, awarded in February 1982, for replacement of the heating system in the utility building, was completed in June 1982. The contract amount was $8,940. 40R. UNION VILLAGE, DAM, VT Location. Dam is on Ompompanosuc River 4 miles above its junction with Connecticut River. It is onefourth mile north of Union Village, VT, and 11 miles north of White River Junction, VT, and Mount Cube, NH - VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Total cost for new work is $3,186,860 and $908,300 for lands and damages, a total of $4,()95,160. Total includes $84,462 for recreation facilities. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in March 1947 and completed in June 1950. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year.Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 41. HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CT Authorized improvements in Housatonic River Basin are comprised of seven flood control reservoirs on tributaries of the Naugatuck River, principal tributary of Housatonic River, and six local protection projects, five of which are along Naugatuck River and one on Still River. Naugatuck and Housatonic Rivers converge 12 miles above mouth of Housatonic River. A project for emergency snagging and clearing of the Blackberry River, a tributary of the Housatonic River, was authorized under authority contained in Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Emergency bank protection projects at Alford, Green River, Massachusetts and at Sheffield, MA, and Salisbury, CT along the Housatonic were authorized under authority provided by Section 14 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. A project for local flood protection along the Housatonic River in Pittsfield, Massachusetts was authorized under authority provided by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project; also Table 1-M on dams and reservoirs and local protection projects for Housatonic River Basin.) 41A. BLACK ROCK LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is on Branch Brook about 2 miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck River in towns of Thomaston and Watertown, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost for new work for completed project was $5,223,700 for construction and $2,958,600 for lands and damages, including roads and utilities relocation, a total of $8,182,300. Project is complete. Road relocation completed in November 1967. Contract for construction of dam and appurtenances was awarded in July 1967 and completed in July 1971. Local cooperation Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 41B. HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Hancock Brook in town in Plymouth CT, about 3.4 miles above its confluence with Naugatuck River. (See Geological Survey map for Waterbury, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $1,595,000 for construction and $2,585,000 for 1-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 lands and damages including relocation of roads and railroads, a total of $4,180,000. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in July 1963 and completed in August 1966. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests are specifically required to establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 41C. HOP BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is on Hop Brook in city of Waterbury and towns of Middlebury and Naugatuck, CT, about 1.4 miles upstream of confluence of Naugatuck River and Hop Brook. (See Geological Survey map for Waterbury, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Latest approved cost estimate for new work is $2,708,100 for construction and $3,450,000 for lands, rights-of-way, and relocation of roads, a total of $6,158,100. Total includes $125,000 for recreation facilities. Project is complete except for construction of additional recreational facilities. Construction of dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in December 1965 and completed in December 1968. Construction of a public use facility was completed in November 1973. Construction of an additional restroom was completed in 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A road improvements contract, that was awarded in September 1980, was completed in August 1982, at a cost of $58,000. Another contract, in the amount of * $26,600, for repairs to the access road and recreational area, that was awarded in March 1982, was completed in May 1982. 41D. HOUSATONIC RIVER, PITTSFIELD, MA Location. The city of Pittsfield is located in Berkshire County, approximately 6 miles east of the Massachusetts-New York border and about 40 miles northwest of Springfield, Massachusetts, where the confluence of the East and West Branch Housatonic Rivers form the headwaters of the main stem. Existing project. Supplement the existing 8 foot high by 15 foot wide stone arch culvert under the Penn Central Railroad embankment with a new 15 foot diameter pipe culvert. Construct an improved cliannel by clear cutting the existing stream bank extending about 2,000 feet upstream from the railroad culvert. The total estimated cost is $540,000 of which $85,000 is non-Federal cost.(See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Construction has just begun. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide, without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations or alterations, highway or highway bridge construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction, operation and maintenance of the project, except where such damages are due to fault of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project for flood control. Formal assurances have been provided. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contract plans and specifications were prepared and a construction contract was awarded in September 1982. The contract amount was $375,265 and there were no contract earnings in the current year. 41E. HOUSATONIC RIVER, SALISBURY, CT Location. Salisbury is located in Litchfield County which is in the northwest corner of Connecticut about 10 miles south of Great Barrington. This is a rural area geared primarily to an agricultural economy; however, there is industry in the area and there is a very popular recreation and vacation area nearby in the Berkshire Hills. Salisbury is serviced by two highways, 41 and 44. Existing project. The emergency bank protection project consists of the construction of the gabionade with riprap for control of current bank erosion along Dugway Road at two different locations contiguous to the Housatonic River east of Salisbury.The current project cost is $96,700. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Project completed in 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Administrative closeout costs of $6,101 were incurred for construction project completed in fiscal year 1981. 41F. NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Northfield Brook about 1.3 miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck River, in town of Thomaston, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $1,856,000 for construction and $975,000 for lands and damages, including roads and utility relo- 1-20 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION cations, a total of $2,831,000. An estimate of $30,000 for recreation facilities to be constructed. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated in May 1963 and completed in October 1965. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated inlN ovember 1966 and completed in August 1967. Additional facilities are scheduled for fiscal year 1983. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. New work: Design costs of $7,039 were incurred in preparation for water supply project in recreation area to be undertaken in FY 1983. 41G. SQUANTZ POND, NEW FAIRFIELD, CT Location. New Fairfield is located in western Connecticut adjacent to the New York-Connecticut state line and immediately north of the city of Danbury, Connecticut. Squantz Pond is the westernmost of the Candlewood lakes located in New Fairfield and the adjacent communities of Sherman, New Milford, Brookfield and Danbury. Existing project. Provides for a timber bulkhead varying in height up to 4 feet above the beach surface and constructed 3" X 12" pressure treated timbers. rlThe below grade portion of the bulkhead would be back filled with gravel and provided with sand on the beach side. The total estimated cost (September 1981) is $113,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Construction is 5 percent complete. Local cooperation. Local interests would provide, without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way and utility relocations necessary for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation and maintenance of the project, except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States. Operation during fiscal year. New work: Work on contract, awarded in September 1981, was continued. FY earnings were $10,300. 41H. THOMASTON DAM, CT Location. On Naugatuck River about 30.4 miles above its junction with Housatonic River and about 1.6 miles north of Thomaston, CT. Reservoir extends upstream about 6.4 miles. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $6,382,000 for construction and $7,900,000 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations, a total of $14,282,000. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was started in May 1958 and completed in November 1960. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1944 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract, in the amount of $20,750 for miscellaneous repairs to the service building, was awarded in July 1982 and completed in August. A second contract, in the amount of $22,160 for repairs to the access road, was awarded in April 1982 and completed in June. 42. ISLAND AVENUE, QUINCY, MA Location. The City of Quincy is located on the coast, approximately ten miles southeast of Boston. Island Avenue extends along the east side of Quincy Bay on the western slope of Great Hill in the Houghs Neck section of Quincy. The erosion site is directly south of the Nut Island peninsula where the Metropolitan District Commission (MDC) Nut Island wastewater treatment plant is situated. Existing project. Provides for riprap revetment along a 265-foor long reach of shoreline, roadway and main trunk sewer line against a 100-year coastal storm event. Current total estimated project cost is $155,000. Construction contract has been awarded with work to begin in early FY 1983. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, damages and rights-of-way; hold and save Federal government harmless; and operate and maintain upon project completion. Formal assurances have been provided. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contract plans and specifications were prepared. Contract in amount of $87,370 awarded in September 1982. 43. MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, NH AND MA Works covered by comprehensive plan are on Merrimack River and its tributaries on New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Flood Control Act of 1936 authorized construction of a system of flood control reservoirs in Merrimack River Basin for reduction of flood heights in Merrimack Valley. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes as approved by Chief of Engineers pursuant to preliminary examinations and surveys authorized by Act of June 22, 1936, and modified project to provide in addition to construction of a system of flood control-reservoirs, related flood works which may be found justified by the Chief of Engineers. All operations pertaining to flood control in Merrimack River Basin are now carried on under and 1-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 reported under projects for individual units of comprehensive plan referred to above. No further expenditures are contemplated under general project for flood control in Merrimack River Basin. For final cost and financial summary, see Annual Report for 1946. A comprehensive plan for development of water resources of the North Nashua River Basin, a principal tributary of the Merrimack River, was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act substantially in accordance with Senate Document 113, 89th Congress. Plan provides for construction of coordinated system for four reservoirs and three local protection projects f'r flood protection, water supply, recreation and allied purposes. The 1966 Flood Control Act also authorized construction of Saxonville local protection project substantially in accordance with Senate Document 61, 89th Congress. An emergency bank protection project at Amesbury, MA was authorized under authority provided by Section 14 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (S(ee Table 1-N at end of chapter for reservoirs and related flood control works included for construction undler comprehensive plan.) 43A.BLACKWATER DAM, NH Location. Dam is on Blackwater River, NH 8.2 miles above confluence with Contoocook River and 118.8 miles above mouth of Merrimack River. It is in the town of Webster, just above village of Swetts Mills, 12.5 miles by highway northwest of Concord, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Penacook and Mount Kearsarge, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $767,000 for construction and $553,000 for lands and damages, a total of $ 1,320,00. Total includes an estimated $80,000 for construction of public use facilities. Project is complete except for construction of public facilities. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1940 and completed in November 1941. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 43B. EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Nubanusit Brook, a tributary ol' Contoocook River, one-half mile upstream from village of West Peterborough, NH and 14 miles east of Keene, NH. (See Geological Survey map for Peterboro and Manadnock, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed ilmprovement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Completed cost of project was $1 ,7)08,:8() for construction and $306,000 for lands and clamlages, a total of $2,014,300. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in March 1948 and completed in March 1950. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 43C. FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, NH Location. Dam is on Pemigewasset River NH, main tributary of Merrimack River, and about 2 V2 miles upstream of Franklin NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Penacook and Holderness, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $6,19.0,500 for construction and $1,760,000 for lands and damages, total of $7,950,500. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1939 and completed in October 1943. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 43D. HOPKINTON-EVERETT LAKES, NH Location. Hopkinton Dam is on Contoocook River, NH, 17.3 miles above its junction with Merrimack River and about one-half mile upstream from village of West Hopkinton. Everett Dam is on Piscataquog River, NH, 16 miles above its junction with Merrimack River and about 1.3 miles southeast of village of East Weare. Two interconnecting canals were provided to enable the two reservoir areas to function as one. (See Geological Survey map for Hillsboro, NH, and Concord, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $12,715,400 for construction and $8,737,000 for lands and damages, including relocating of roads, railroads, cemeteries, and utilities, a total of $21,452,400. Project is complete. Construction of two dams and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1959 and completed in December 1962. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in November 1974 and completed in September 1975. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational-development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract in the amount of $22,460 to repaint the access bridges at Everett Lake wascompleted in October 1981. A road improvements contract in the amount of 1-22 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION $24,200 was completed in October, 1981. In November 1981, a contract was awarded to replace the tower heating system at Hopkinton Lake. The work was completed in March 1982 at a cost of $16,500. 43E. PHILLIPS LAKE, MA Location. On Phillips Brook one-half mile north of its confluence with the North Nashua River in Fitchburg, Worcester County, Massachusetts about 45 miles west of Boston. (See Geological Survey map for Fitchburg, MA.) Existing project. Single purpose flood control project consisting of an earth-filled dam, 1,700 feet long having a maximum height of 48 feet. A chute spillway with an ogee weir 200 feet long will be located in left abutment. A concrete inlet structure with an ungated 54-inch opening will conduct normal river flows through the dam. Storage capacity will be approximately 1,600 acre-feet, equal to six inches of runoff from a net drainage area of five square miles. The reservoir would be operated as an integral unit of the comprehensive water resources development plan for the North Nashua River, a tributary of the Merrimack River. The latest approved Federal cost estimate (October 1981) for new work is $3,500,000 for lands including relocations and $17,300,000 for construction, a total of $20,800,000. The total includes a local share of $310,000 for construction of recreation facilities. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Preconstruction planning has been terminated due to lack of local support and deletion of funds from FY 1982 Budget by Congressional representative. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to protect channels downstream of the reservoirs from encroachments which would adversely affect operation of the system; hold and save the United States free from all damages due to water rights claims resulting from construction and operation of the reservoirs; exercise to the full extent of their legal capability, control against removal of water in the basin which will affect the development of dependable stream regulations and make a cash contribution of $310,000 as their share of recreational facilities. Operations during fiscal year. All work on reformulation studies, including engineering and economic analyses of potentially feasible structural and non-. structural alternatives to the authorized dams for flood protection of Fitchburg, were terminated due to lack of local support and deletion of FY 1982 funding. 44. NEW BEDFORD, FAIRHAVEN, AND ACUSHNET, MA Location. Main harbor barrier is across New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbor in vicinity of Palmer Island. Supplemental dikes and walls are provided in Clark Cove area of New Bedford and Fairhaven. (See Geological Survey maps for New Bedford North, New Bedford South, Marion, and Sconticut Neck, MA and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 249, 252,1210.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of completed project is $17,997,900 for construction, and $616,500 for lands, rights-of-way and relocations, a total of $18,614,400. This total includes local costs of $590,560 for lands and relocations and a $6,513,763 cash contribution. Project is completed. Construction of barrier and appurtenances was initiated in October 1962 and completed in January 1966. Construction of the pumping station was initiated in October 1962 and completed in June 1964. Local cooperation. Local interests had to contribute 30 percent of first cost, including lands and rights-of-way; contribute capitalized value of annual maintenance and operation ($1,520,000) for main harbor barrier; hold the Unitd States free from damages; and maintain and operate improvement except main harbor barrier after completion. Total costs for all requirements of local cooperation were $7,014,323. Local requirements fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The following contract work was performed: dewater, clean and paint barrier sector gates $250,290. Operation costs were project operations $102,501; administrative activities $5,585; real estate activities $2,500; contract drawings and specifications $61,705; contract supervision and inspection $31,728. The following contracts were awarded late in fiscal year: replace security fencing $18,889; modify existing emergency generator for automatic operation and sound proofing $41,950. There was no work performed on either contract. 45. NEW LONDON, CT Location. In the city of New London, CT about 45 miles southeast of Hartford, CT, and 50 miles southwest of Providence, RI. (See Geological Survey map for New London, CT.) Existing project. The hurricane protection project consists of approximately 715 feet of rock-faced earthfill dike arnd 800 feet of I-walls around the northerly shore of Shaw Cove and the regrading of approximately 21 acres of land along the west shore of the Cove to elevation 12.5 feet mean sea level. Top of dike and floodwalls will be 14.5 feet mean sea level. Appurtenant structures will include a street gate, pressure conduit and a pumping station to discharge interior drainage. Latest estimate (October 1981) for the project is $9,870,000 for construction and $1,130,000 for lands and damages including relocations, a total of $11,000,000 for new work. Total includes local costs of $1,130,000 for lands and relocations and a $2,170,000 cash contribution. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Project is under construction and is approximately 75 percent complete. Local cooperation. Local interests must:(a)Provide lands and rights-of-way for construction; (b) make alterations and relocations; (c) bear 30 per- 1-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 cent of construction cost with credit allowed for (a) and (b); (d)hold the United States free from damages; and (e) maintain and operate all works. Estimated costs to local interests are $1,130,000, for lands and relocations and a cash contribution of $2,170,000, a total of $3,300,000. Assurances have been provided. Operations during fiscal year. New work: I)esign of remainder of project was continued. Substantial progress was made on the part III pressure conduit contract that was awarded in September 1981. Earnings to date are $850,000. A contract was awarded in May 1982 for part IV - Dikes and Walls. Fiscal year earnings were $889,375. 46. SAINT JOHN RIVER BASIN, ME Comprehensive plan for water resources development within the basin was comprised of the multiplepurpose Dickey and Lincoln School Reservoirs on the upper Saint John River. Projects were authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965 substantially in accordance with plans included in report of Department of Interior and Corps of Engineers dated August 1964 which is supplement to July 1963 report of International P'assamaquoddy Tidal Power Project and Upper Saint John River Hydroelectric Power Development. *The Dickey Dam component of the project was deauthorized by Public Law 97-128 on 29 December 1981. Local protection project at Fort Kent authorized by Chief of Engineers on 25 September 1975 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-F at end of chapter for authorized multiple-purpose projects including power.) 46A. DICKEY-LINCOLN SCHOOL LAKES, ME Location. On Upper Saint John River near village of I)ickey, Maine, about 340 miles north of Boston, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Allagash, ME.) Existing project. Plan consists of Dickey and Lincoln School Reservoirs functioning as a single coordinated unit. Dickey Dam, on Saint John River immediately above its confluence with the Allagash River, would consist of two rolled earthfill embankments about 10,200 feet total length with maximum height of 8:835 feet. Five earthfilled perimeter dikes acting in conjunction with the dam would impound a reservoir with total capacity of 7,700,(000 acre-feet of which 2,900,000 acre-feet would be actively utilized for power and flood control purposes. Reservoir area at maximum operating level is 86,000 acres and its upper reaches extend into the Canadian Province of Quebec. Power facilities would be provided at the dam consisting of 4 units at 190,000 kilowatts each, one of which would be a reversible unit, for total of 760,000 kilowatts. The outlet works would include two 26 foot diameter tunnels; a low level diversion tunnel at streambed elevation and an intermediate level tunnel approximately 110 feet above streambed. A chute-type spillway with 600-foot long curved crest would be located between the two embankments. Drainage area controlled is 2,725 square miles. Basic provisions would be included in the initial project to accomodate future installation of two additional 190,000 kilowatt reversible units at Dickey. Provisions include excavation of forebay and tailrace channels, construction of headworks and powerhouse foundation, and increasing the height of Lincoln School Dam. Lincoln School Dam, 11 miles downstream from Dickey Dam, would consist of an earthfill embankment, a powerhouse in the right abutment, and a gated spillway structure between the embankment and powerhouse. Overall length would be 2,100 feet and maximum height 90 feet. Power facilities would include two 30,000 kilowatt units and one 10,000 kilowatt unit for a total 70,000 kilowatts. Concrete spillway structure would be 294 feet long and contain four 60-by-50-foot taintor gates. A public highway would be constructed across the dam and spillway. The reservoir would have 32,450 acre-feet of usable storage for regulation of Dickey Dam discharges, power pondage and afterbay storage for the Dickey pumpback operations. Drainage area above Lincoln School is 4,086 square miles. Approved estimate (October 1982) for new work is $67,110,000 for land including relocations and $727,890,000 for construction, a total of $795,000,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Estimate (June 1982) for a Lincoln School only project is $155,000,000. Deauthorization of the Dickey Dam component was recommended by the Congress and enacted into law on December 29, 1981. At the direction of Congress, a study is being conducted to determine the engineering, economic and marketability feasibility of a Lincoln School only project. Local cooperation. No local cooperation requirements were stipulated in the authorizing document. Operations during fiscal year. Study of feasibility of a Lincoln School only project was initiated. 47. SEBASTICOOK RIVER, HARTLAND, ME Location. Hartland is situated on the Sebasticook River in Somerset County, approximately 50 miles west of Bangor and 30 miles north of Augusta, ME. Existing project. Provides for a system of earth dikes and floodwalls to protect a major tanning company, removal of the Right Mill Dam and construction of an earth dike across the bypass channel to protect residential and commercial properties, and construction of a water supply pipeline to ensure continued fire protection and process water. Estimated project cost is $1,500,000. Construction contract was awarded in September 1982. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide 1-24 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION without cost to the United States all lands, easements and rights-of-way necessary for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction or maintenance of the project; prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project for flood control purposes including no new construction between the Great Moose Lake Dam and Main Street below elevation 240 feet NGVD. Formal assurances have been provided. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was completed and a contract in amount of $1,170,000 was awarded in September 1982. 48. STAMFORD, CT Location. In Fairfield County on north shore of Long Island Sound, about 30 miles east of New York City and 20 miles southwest of Bridgeport, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement see Annual Report for 1974. Latest approved estimate for new work is $10,066,000 for construction, and $1,880,000 for lands and damages and relocations, a total of $11,946,000. Total includes local costs of $1,183,000 for lands and damages and a cash contribution of $3,368,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Project was completed in 1969. Final project cost for computation of the 30 percent portion to be borne by the City of Stamford has yet to be determined. Local interests still owe a substantial amount based on recent claims settlements. Local cooperation. Local interests will provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; make modifications to existing storm drainage system which may be required to obtain full benefits of protection plan, all necessary modifications to existing sanitary sewer facilities required to prevent entry of tidal-waters, and all changes, alterations and additions to or relocations of any buildings and utilities made necessary by construction of project; bear 30 percent of total first cost, estimated at $3,584,000 and consisting of cost items listed above plus a cash contribution estimated at $2,488,000; contribute in cash, in lieu of cost of annual maintenance and operation of tidal portion of East Branch barrier which is to be operated and maintained by the United States, an amount presently estimated at $880,000; maintain and operate all works after completion with exception of tidal portion of East Branch barrier and aids to navigation; and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances received and cash contributions have been deposited. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activity. New work: Interest claim was settled. 49. THAMES RIVER BASIN, CT, RI, AND MA Works covered by this plan are a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Thames River in Massachusetts and Connecticut, within a radius of 45 miles from Norwich, CT, and a channel enlargement on Shetucket River where it discharges into Thames River at Norwich. Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, approved plan for a system of reservoirs and channel improvements in Thames River Basin in accordance with House Document 885, 76th Congress, 3d session, and authorized $6 million for initiation and partial accomplishment of project. Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944, authorized completion of approved plan. Flood Control Act of July 14, 1960, authorized project for West Thompson Reservoir, substantially as recommended in Senate Document 41, 86th Congress, 2d session. (See Table 1-0 at end of chapter on reservoirs and local protection districts, Thames River Basin, for projects comprising approved plan.) 49A. BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Little River, 1.3 miles above its junction with French River and 8 miles northeast of Southbridge, MA. Reservoir extends upstream about 1.7 miles northerly and 1.9 miles southerly. (See Geological Survey maps - Webster, MA and CT, and Leicester, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report of 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $2,157,600 for construction and $841,000 for lands and damages including highway relocations, a total of $2,998,600. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 and completed in June 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 49B EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 64.5 miles above its confluence with Shetucket River and 1 mile southwest of village of Fiskdale, MA. (See Geological Survey maps - Whales, MA and CT, Southbridge, MA and CT, East Brookfield, MA, and Warren, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $1,337,000 for construction and $5,720,000 for lands and damages including highway relocations, a total of $7,057,000. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1958 and completed in June 1960. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1-25 REPORT OFTHE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 49C. HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MA Location. Dam is on French River, 15 miles above its confluence with Quinebaug River, at Hodges Village in town of Oxford, MA, about 5 miles north of Webster, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Webster, MA, and CT, Leicester, MA, Worcester South, MA, and Oxford, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $1,317,100 for construction and $3,144,000 for lands and damages including highway, railroad, and utility relocation, a toal of $4,461,100. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works, initiated in March 1958, was completed in December 1959. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 49D. MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CT Location. Dam is at Mansfield Hollow, CT, on Natchaug River, 5.3 miles above its confluence with Willimantic River. It is 4 miles northeast of city of p Willimantic, CT. (See Geological Survey maps for Spring Hill and Willimantic, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $4,108,000 for construction and $2,340,000 for lands and damages, a total of $6,448,000. Project is complete. Construction of dam, initiated in 1949, was completed in May 1952. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 49E. WEST THOMPSON LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River in town of Thonlpson, CT. Site is in village of West Thompson, 2 miles upstream from city of Putnam, CT. (See Geological Survey map, Putnam, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $5,008,200 for construction and $1,965,000 for lands, damages and road relocations, a total of $6,973,200. Total includes $58,000 for recreation facilities. Project is complete. Construction of dam, road relocation, and appurtenances was initiated in August 1963 and completed in October 1965. Initial phase of recreation facilities was completed in May 1976. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 49F. WESTVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 56.7 miles above its confluence with Shetucket River, in towns of Sturbridge and Southbridge, MA, and 1.3 miles west of center of Southbridge. (See Geological Survey maps - Southbridge, MA and RI, and East Brookfield, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Cost of new work for completed project was $2,285,000 for construction, and $3,400,000 for lands and damages (including relocation of highways, utilities, cemeteries, and structures), a total of $5,685,000. Project is completed. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in April 1960 and completed in August 1962. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 50. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS In accordance with provisions of the Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended, local flood protection works constructed with Federal funds are transferred to local interests to operate and maintain. To insure compliance with regulations prescribed for their operation and maintenance, regular inspections of the following projects were made during the fiscal year. CONNECTICUT: October 1981 and April 1982 - Ansonia, Derby and Stamford; October 1981 and May 1982 - Pawcatuck, Hartford, Wethersfield and East Hartford; April 1982 - Winsted, Torrington, Danbury, Waterbury, East Branch, Hall Meadow, Mad River, Sucker Brook and Norwalk; May 1982 - New London, Salisbury and North Canaan. MAINE: May 1982 - Harpswell, Indian Island, Blaine, Fort Kent, Lubec, Whiting, Beals and Cherryfield. RHODE ISLAND: October 1981 and April 1982 -Woonsocket. VERMONT: April 1982 - Weston. NEW HAMPSHIRE: October 1981 and May 1982 - Nashua; April 1982 - Keene, Wilton, Charlestown, 1-26 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Shelburne, Lincoln and West Stewartstown; May 1982 -- Farmington. MASSACHUSETTS: October 1982 and April 1982 -Haverhill and Lowell; October 1982 and May 1982 -Springfield, Northampton, Holyoke, West Springfield and Chicopee; November 1982 and May 1982 - Saxonville and Charles River Dam; April 1982- West Warren, Lancaster, Canton, Scituate, Three Rivers, Gardner, Blackstone, Ware, Fitchburg, Hayward Creek and Smelt Brook; May 1982 -Amesbury, Lee, Alford, Sheffield and Worcester. 51. FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Operation of completed flood control projects during the fiscal year, including Corps operated reservoirs, hurricane barriers and local protection projects, accounted for substantially increased estimated d(amages prevented over all prior years. The current year's figure of $236,300,000 exceeded the previous record of $139,600,000 recorded in fiscal year 1979. A coordinated system of reservoirs, many of which are multip urpose in nature and all containing significant amounts of storage for flood control purposes, has been -established in five major flood producing basins in New England. During periods of floodflows, regulation of reservoirs is fully coordinated within each basin dependent upon its location in the watershed, its available storage capacity and origin of flood. In addition to flood control releases, water supply and flow augmentation releases were made from selected reservoirs. I)uring the year, New England experienced two significant flooding events with the first flood occurring on the weekend of 17-18 April, when temperatures in the sixties and low seventies coincident with moderate to heavy rain, were experienced in Vermont and New Ltam pshire. Due to the existence of a heavy snowpack, the situation became critical in the Connecticut River lBasin. As a result, the main stem of the Connecticut River from White River Junction, Vermont to Hartford, Connecticut reached bankfull capacity on 19-21 April. In addition, the Ashuelot River swelled to bankful capacity causing the level at the Keene USGS gage to hover near flood stage for several days. Damages prevented amounted to 56.5 million in the Connecticut River basin. The Merrimack River rose to about 80 percent of channel capacity at Concord, New Hampshire and Corps reservoirs were throttled as a precaution. On 5-7 June, an intense storm deposited heavy rainfall over Connecticut, Rhode Island and southern Massachusetts. The highest amounts of precipitation, ranging from 10-15 inches, occurred in the small coastal watersheds of Connecticut thereby causing widespread flooding in southern New England. Parts of Conneccticut were declared disaster areas as a result. Hydrologic data collected and analyzed by U.S. Geological Survey indicated that peak flows in most of the coastal watersheds of Connecticut exceeded 100-year recurrence intervals. Record amounts of flood control storage, utilized at Corps flood control reservoirs and local protection projects, prevented approximate damages of $179,800,000. Connecticut River Basin. During the April flood, peak flood control storage amounted to 44 percent at both Ball Mountain and Surry Mountain, 38 percent at Townshend and 31 percent at Otter Brook. Peak storage amounts during the June event were 43 percent at Colebrook and 39 percent at Littleville and at Knightville. The following projects were regulated for canoeing activities: Ball Mountain - October 1981, May 1982 and August 1982; Knightville - April and May 1982; Littleville - April 1982; Birch Hill - April 1982 and Tully - April 1982. Water and fish releases were made at Colebrook Lake throughout the year. Thames River Basin. Storage utilized in the Thames River basin during the June flood ranged from 30 percent at Hodges Village to 66 percent at Mansfield Hollow. Peak storage totals in June at Mansfield Hollow and East Brimfield (37 percent) exceeded previous maximum storages. The Mansfield Hollow recreation pool was raised for reservoir canoe races in September and Westville and East Brimfield were regulated for combination of river cleanup and canoe races in April. In addition, West Thompson Lake was raised on several occasions to accommodate AKC retriever trials. Merrimack River Basin. Peak storage capacities utilized by reservoirs in the Merrimack River basin ranged from 8 percent at Hopkinton-Everett to 17 percent at MacDowell. Housatonic River Basin. Regulation of reservoirs in the Housatonic during June resulted in peak storage totals of 53 percent at Hop Brook, 50 percent at Black Rock and 35 percent at Thomaston. Peak storages at unmanned projects included 58 percent at Hancock Brook and 30 percent at Northfield Brook. Record amounts of flood control storage were utilized at each of the above projects. Blackstone River Basin. West Hill Dam in the Blackstone River basin utilized 44 percent of storage capacity during the June flood event. 52. HURRICANE BARRIER OPERATIONS Four hurricane barriers located along the southern coast of New England protect coastal communities from tidal flooding associated with hurricanes or severe coastal storms. The Corps operates the navigational elements of the Stamford, Connecticut and New Bedford-Fairhaven, Massachusetts barriers. The Fox Point, Rhode Island and Pawcatuck, Connecticut barriers are operated by the local communities. A brief resume of operations for the fiscal year follows: Stamford Barrier. The barrier gates were operated 1-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 on 8 occasions for coastal storms, however, all operations were marginal in nature and no flood control benefits were realized from the closures. New Bedford-Fairhaven Barrier. On 4 occasions the barrier gates were closed. The operations were marginal in nature and there weren't any flood control benefits gained from the closures. Fox Point and Pawcatuck Barriers. There were no operations at these barriers during fiscal year. 53. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 1-E at end of chapter.) 54. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preaut horization). (See Table 1-J at end of chapter.) Snagging and clearing activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Poww'ouw River, Amesbury, MA. Fiscal year costs were $4,000. Emergency Bank Protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act. Fiscal year costs were as follows: Connecticut R., No. Stratford, NH (See Section 40K of Text) $144,827 Ilousatonic R., Derby, CT 3,448 Housatonic R., Salisbury, CT (See Section 41E of Text) 6,102 Island Avenue, Quincy, MA (See Section 42 of Text) $31,770 Kennebec R., Richmond, ME 7,500 Kennebec R., Skowhegan, ME 3,968 Little Pamet R., MA 6,500 Mill River, CT 2,710 Salmon R., Colchester, CT 194,516 Spring Point Shoreway So. Portland, ME 3,176 Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, CT (See Section 41G of Text) 24,404 St. Croix R., Calais, ME 3,442 West Branch, Westfield R., Huntington, MA 20,654 West River, Jamaica, VT 5,035 Westfield R., West Springfield, MA 3,160 Zircon Brook, Rumford, MA 4,392 Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for fiscal year were $125,239 for disaster preparedness. Streambank erosion control evaluation and demonstration act of 1974 as amended in 1976 (Section 32 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974. P.L. 93-251). Costs for the fiscal year were $86,632 for demonstration project proposals. Total cost to 30 September 1982 were $1,194,474. 55. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Table 1-G at end of chapter.) Project approval and construction authorization for Sakonnet Harbor, RI, was officially withdrawn by the Chief of Engineers as of 18 June 1982. General Investigations 56. SURVEYS Costs for the fiscal year for surveys from regular funds were $2,744,488 of which $382,593 was for navigation surveys; $579,016 for flood damage prevention studies; $149,703 for coordination studies; $460,639 for special studies; $832,722 for comprehensive studies; $21,062 for restudy of deferred projects; $306,947 for review of completed projects and $11,806 for supplemental pre-authorization studies. 57. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The Division Engineer is the U.S. member on Saint Croix River Board of Control. Annual inspections are made of conditions on the Saint Croix River and a continuing program of compilation of basic hydrologic information is carried out. Division Engineer's representatives during the past year kept closely in touch with developments in the basin and cooperated with their Canadian counterparts assisting in development of basins' resources. Total costs for the fiscal year were $7,469. Total costs to 30 September 1982 were $132,436. Flood plain studies comprise compilation and dissemination, upon responsible local request, of information on flopds and potential flood damages, including identification of areas subject to inundation by floods of various magnitudes and frequencies, and general criteria for guidance in use of flood plain area; and engineering advice to local interests for their use in planning to ameliorate flood hazard. Total costs for the fiscal year were $174,574. Total costs to 30 September 1982 were $4,288,241. Total costs for the National Program of Inspection of Dams for the fiscal year were $26,619 of which $16,102 was for inspection and $10,517 was for inventory. 58. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Advance engineering and design costs were $59,294 for the navigation project at Bristol Harbor, RI (See Section 4 of Text). 1-28 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 1. Aquatic Plant Control 2. Boston Harbor, MA 3. Bridgeport Harbor, CT 4. Bristol Harbor, Bristol, RI 5. Cape Cod Canal MA New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 7,000 6,951 7,000 6,582 10,000 5,584 5,000 9,793 - 25,313,083' - 25,313,083' 132,797 130,531 74,675 13,941 82,023 834,128 143,195 815,704 - 4,491,11938 - 4,491,11938 49,912 47,912 65,378 63,856 50,000 100,000 34,997 83,452 2,849,417 3,203,731 40,931 44,406 75,000 89,372 - 53,000 - 45,368 3,049,400 3,185,120 2,532,814 3,149,829 45,906 40,710 13,288 21,892 1,654 1,654 100,000 22,793 4,816,821 3,965,408 G. Chathain (Stage) Harbor, MA 7. Clinton Harbor, CT Minor rehab. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - - - 390,677 - - - - 390,677 875,000 6,850,000 9,240,000 7,475,000 25,735,000 704,115 6,800,607 9,437,523 7,426,768 25,664,013 -5,800 -2,250 15,558 15,558 22,352 22,352 36,623 6,334 6,700 23,479 33,130 215,100 22,280 222,201 266,70546 266,70546 1,381,98220 1,368,47220 104,957 104,957 712,834 709,085 1-29 165,496 165,406 7,482,9432 7,462,2232 1,881,88240 1,813,63940 238,288 229,713 1,654 1,654 32,795,750 4' 5 32,710,9114'5 64,726,309 63,203,684 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 1-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 8. Connecticut River New Work below Hartford, CT 9. Corea Harbor, Gouldsboro, ME 10. Fall River, Harbor, MA Contributed Funds (Other) 11. Fore River, Braintree & Weymouth, MA (Contributed Funds) 12. Great Salt Pond Block Island, RI 13. Green Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 763,534 668;969 47,000 47,991 1,089 499,692 414,605 37,200 35,150 44,000 43,546 1,541,18510.11 1,541,18510o. 83,500 790,000 906,650 10,649,816 '2 226,380 589,547 815,033 10,352,25712 30,000 25,511 25,000 380,000 34,075 88,845 - 325,000 200,000 11,005 294,647 212,183 30,332 125,605 2,050 26,939 11,216 3,680 3,680 27,941 27,941 27,915 27,915 60,000 60,000 556,407 265,146 73,150 73,150 6,092,72614 6,069,015 '4 1,992,013'm 1,992,013'" 37,200 37,200 58,000 193,000 35,352 198,742 - 25,153 - 25,153 - 250,000 - 94,372 3,999 226,499 3,999 220,531 -6,988 -70 12,000 282,000 110,000 10,605 204,257 167,204 4,000 34,392 31,535 73 375,739 336,594 25,153 25,153 250,000 94,372 189,037' 7 189,03717 527,154 521,186 254,512 254,512 992,197 966,446 168,000 158,342 1-30 ----------- NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 14. Guilford Harbor, CT 15. Hampton Harbor, NH 16. Harbor of Refuge Block Island, RI 17. Island End River Chelsea, MA (Contributed Funds- Required) (Other Contributed Funds) 18. Kennebec River, ME 19. Kennebunk River, ME 20. Mystic River MA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - 56,900 649,693 - - 25,281 681,312 16,244 358,166 35,400 198,000 15,542 30,420 323,867 237,202 65,120 57,738 100,000 87,884 21,000 30,558 75,000 135,000 34,927 169,624 - 314,500 - - - 286,893 - 779,000 50,000 - - 775,035 15,328 15,328 15,500 14,112 46,193 46,193 14,222 14,222 137,2224^ 137,22245 1,164,032 1,164,032 200,00018 200,00018 1,434,958 1,433,274 576,856 576,856 1,314,186 1,306,804 331,000 322,993 314,500 286,893 829,000 775,035 - - 1,599,9403 - - 1,599,9403 24,000 519,571 1,761,797 10,342 532,867 1,761,331 90,000 22,876 99,400 166,710 - 0 - 0 - 1,018,542 - 1,009,340 350,33452 350,33452 813,889 813,834 3,222,777 3,222,777 1,865,413 1,856,211 1-31 -- ------ REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 21. New Haven Harbor, CT 22: Norwalk Harbor, CT 23. Portland Harbor, ME 24. Saco River ME 25. Sakonnet Harbor, RI 26. Sesuit Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 31. Clark Point MA 32. Cliff Walk RI (Contributed Funds) 33. Oakland Beach, Warwick, RI (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost - 4,205,24622 - 4,205,24622 1,019,527 848,846 488,703 650,976 150,274 2,141,000 148,196 741,961 91,588 1,155,078 111,641 1,075,600 60,500 1,185,231 88,810 362,522 9,334,28523 9,251,534w 531,129' 531,12931 3,642,78126 3,640,10726 S- - - 9,588,71028 - - - 9,588,7102 524,200 2,295,000 310,000 2,328,445 7,400,095 216,525 2,541,651 397,620 2,328,943 7,400,096 77,000 25,303 30,000 64,720 21,016 61,000 61,728 (6,199) 45,410 37,958 (43,162) 62,892 9,894 39,000 36,804 2,032 25,000 38,348 11,274 11,424 50,000 33,656 240,000 34,785 40,464 40,714 (7,824) 14,866 18,000 114,824 11,903 120,829 - 106,000 - 104,005 - 228,081 - 228,081 - 230,000 - 79,533 49,000 395,000 30,233 416,515 - 215,000 - 170,382 0 (8,092) 0. 44,618 1,054,983 845,497 1,496,371 1,496,055 764,65421 764,65121 137,016 137,016 237,123 234,451 106,000 104,005 228,081 228,081 520,49113 370,02413 955,237 955,237 570,000 559,120 215,000 215,000 1-32 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 34. Sherwood Island State Park, CT (Contributed Funds) 38A. Pawtuxet River Warwick, RI 3813. West Hill Dam, MA 39. Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), MA 40A. Ball Mountain Lake, VT 4013. Barre Falls Darn, MA 40C. Birch Hill Darn, MA. (Contributed Funds) 401). Colebrook River Lake, CT New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 28,000 130,000 160,000 16,525 139,192 48,612 - - 596,000 - 60,000 - 32,498 80,000 89,094 504,830 391,159 968,802 372,802 140,000 121,592 . - - - 2,306,902*3 S- - - 2,306,90239 377,500 149,000 183,600 187,000 1,914,884 189,010 333,118 174,244 185,689 1,896,784 1,700,000 1,693,135 985,000 1,033,000 1,100,000 1,303,469 1,037,653 1,119,443 7,535,000 7,535,000 - 221,000 11,018,9626 - 60,336 10,858,2986 228,700 465,500 274,500 254,000 542,724 355,720 368,174 270,347 3,672,139 3,662,391 - 1,967,819 - 1,967,819 172,200 176,500 234,300 247,200 169,593 173,823 219,729 254,804 2,370,027 2,355,092 - - - 4,815,67941 - - - 4,815,6794' 232,300 193,000 234,900 298,000 2,811,527 187,563 220,530 253,331 239,837 2,748,552 32,00030 32,00030 - - - 14,263,971 - - - 14,263,971 87,300 219,800 207,200 176,000 1,440,044 83,468 196,652 165,219 219,707 1,409,559 1-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 I()E. Conant Brook Danm, MA IOF. Knightvillc 1)am, MA 400. Lancaster, Israel River, NH 4011. Littleville Lake, MA 401. North Hartland I.ake, VT 40J. North Springfield Lake, VT 40K. Connecticut River, No. Stratford, NH 40L. Otter Brook Lake, NH 40M. Park River, Hartford, CT (Other Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Main t. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost - 2,950,530 - 2,950,530 67,700 77,373 47,800 48,119 60,800 57,866 58,000 54,872 765,680 759,168 -6,000 - - - 3,415,6404" 63,302 - - - 3,415,6404 4 151,800 237,000 368,400 606,100 3,464,304 310,200 229,493 271,722 622,331 3,355,113 385,000 -41,000 44,125 71,066 184,195 148,932 15,980 16,064 551,605 551,605 - 7,013,412 - 7,013,412 173,100 237,900 212,600 221,800 150,965 242,928 222,372 213,191 56,762 1,000 1,000 2,038,091 2,020,367 - 7,312,225o - 7,312,225�o 202,300 483,400 185,500 256,000 203,340 226,211 422,311 272,950 2,633,515 2,622,096 - 7,312,22525 - 7,312,2252 231,800 582,600 297,700 296,000 226,554 335,301 518,041 313,424 - 184,000 - 35,173 (4,000) 144,827 - 185,000 1,232 -- 48,856 190,200 188,000 210,100 302,000 185,232 203,456 196,899 299,122 11,975,000 11,455,000 4,365,000 14,010,347 14,423,500 4,836,262 - 183,000 7,500 139,448 26,000 61,045 3,720,797 3,691,027 180,000 180,000 4,345,4483 4,209,30443 2,271,014 2,254,340 281,919 59,876,919 864,059 59,809,340 246,000 234,993 1-34 ._ - - -- - NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 40N. Salmon River, Colchester, CT 400. Surry Mountain Lake, NH 10lP. Townsend Lake, V'T1 40Q. 'T ully Lake, MA ((Contril)uted Funds) lOR. Union Village Dlam, VT 41 A. Black Hock Lake, CT 11f. H IncOCk lBrook Lake, C'I' 41. C. liop Brook Lake, C' I' 11I). Ilousatonic River, Pittsfield, MA New Work Approp. - Cost - New Work Approp. 140,000 Cost 36,475 Maint. Approp. 199,600 Cost 210,814 New Work Approp. - Cost - Maint. Approp. 172,200 Cost 177,359 New Work Approp. -157 Cost 662 Maint. Approp. 168,700 Cost 144,382 New Work Contrib. - Cost - New Work Approp. 80,000 Cost 42,676 Maint. Approp. 233,700 Cost 183,989 New Work Approp. - Cost - Maint. Approp. 171,600 Cost 182,316 New Work Approp. - Cost - Maint. Approp. 48,800 Cost 67,201 New Work Approp. 10,000 Cost 13,770 Maint. Approp. 212,300 Cost 203,579 New Work Approp. 45,000 Cost 73,430 8,000 7,916 -3 103,494 38,000 204,000 30,736 194,516 4,000 4,028 256,000 211,600 580,000 239,695 217,233 558,862 294,500 310,000 422,000 249,637 286,020 471,918 198,400 236,400 291,000 225,408 232,818 265,168 4,462 41,786 250,000 233,168 2,833,61033 2,833,61033 3,064,143 3,029,600 7,398,4134U 7,398,413 4 3,406,571 3,382,910 1,666,7527 1,666,7527 2,385,586 2,356,033 40,000ao 40,000�* - 4,095,160*' - 4,095,160*' 182,100 183,200 280,000 240,142 173,965 235,444 2,561,156 2,504,287 - 8,182,300 - 8,182,300 148,000 137,700 162,500 138,047 155,370 163,710 52,800 52,269 8,538 95,537 73,600 74,191 4,748 - 4,178,911 - 4,178,911 61,000 56,261 335,900 307,300 375,500 256,604 320,967 432,924 13,003 23,221 - 460,000 2,534 72,045 2,334,935 2,310,452 588,000 200,415 1-35 1,444,409 1,442,191 756,749 751,927 - 6,151,5623: 2 - 6,151,562:12 "---- -- -- .. _ REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 '1E. lHousatonic R., New Work Salisbury, CT 41F. Northfield Brook Lake, CT'r 411. Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, CT 4111. Thomaston l)am, CT 42. Island Avenue, MA 43A. Blackwater Dam, NH .1:1I. Edward Macl)owell Lake, NH 4:3(C. Franklin Falls D)am, Nil 431). Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH North Nashua River, MA Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 18,300 17,203 108,500 100,300 121,474 106,584 85,000 79,495 93,700 88,620 89,000 31,044 (500) 6,102 20,000 7,039 81,000 82,780 24,000 24,404 102,800 102,800 2,850,512 2,837,551 1,039,411 1,035,468 113,000 55,448 - 14,282,112 - 14,282,112 236,600 328,300 219,100 279,500 207,698' 322,949 241,387 279,613 - 16,000 - 12,695 116,000 31,770 184,400 167,000 199,900 167,000 270,180 169,458 215,952 153,854 2,870,267 2,855,809 132,000 44,465 1,319,74637 1,319,74637 2,018,785 2,004,651 - - - 2,014,253w3 - - - - 2,014,25336 130,500 222,500 200,800 199,000 2,485,192 141,783 206,652 213,344 187,080 2,469,273 - 7,950,48738 - 7,950,48735 178,500 478,300 320,400 364,000 193,274 414,820 377,872 277,490 302,200 334,000 378,600 507,000 315,696 331,016 325,239 517,152 1,350,000 1,550,000 904,611 1,933,063 75,000 (40,000) 98,196 11,298 3,702,037 3,605,934 21,452,440" 21,452,440' 4,144,340 4,095,699 3,235,00027 3,235,00027 1-36 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 43E. Phillips Lake, New Work Saxonville, MA (Contributed Funds) 44. New Bedford, MA (Contributed Funds) 45. New London, CT (Contributed Funds) (Other Contributed Funds) 46(A. Dickey-Lincoln 'School Lakes, ME 47. Sebasticook River ME 48. Stamford, CT (Contributed Funds) (Other Contributed Funds) 49A. Buffumville Lake, MA MA 58,162 58,400 1,263,098 6,503 - 150,000 57,800 175,602 50,000 18,628 -3,497 0 30,983 0 5,321 10,000 10,314 300,000 300,000 4,218,700 4,217,559 8,503 8,503 - 11,510,088 - 11,510,088 Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,778,600 1,674,032 155,181 2,501,114 2,400,730 - 6,513,76329 - 6,513,76329 2,000,000 2,345,703 665,000 410,000 667,821 523,521 850,000 270,000 250,000 745,451 51,000 573,505 - 131,000 1,756,000 968,130 55,000 34,153 860,000 1,695,000 1,560,148 1,262,532 30,000 54,398 - 2,037,600 27,658 2,027,900 96,000 133,600 94,541 119,902 - 96 83,894 6,937,046 6,934,014 1,750,00019 1,719,15719 131,000 83,894 0 13,255,300 418,227 13,045,345 20,000 573,475 25,069 171,361 2,023 703,475 301,346 9,790,300 9,779,658 100,600 118,000 1,561,372 96,314 121,346 1,542,880 - - 3,367,97024 - - 3,367,45324 - 210,000 - 209,969 - 2,998,6039 - 2,998,6039 125,800 196,400 198,800 207,000 133,881 181,672 213,059 182,146 1,997,922 1,971,962 1-37 113,800 111,000 120,700 527,000 226,324 103,825 114,792 444,272 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 49B. East Brimfield New Work Lake, MA Approp. - - - - 7,057, 0 438 Cost - - - - 7,057,0438 Maint. Approp. 118,500 150,500 177,800 166,000 1,780,583 Cost 131,277 148,218 175,367 160,056 1,769,442 ,9C. Hodges Village New Work Dam, MA Approp. 158 - - - 4,461,07342 Cost 968 - - - 4,461,07342 Maint. Approp. 155,600 194,900 128,500 168,000 1,828,498 Cost 160,447 179,642 142,947 162,332 1,818,907 491). Mansfield Hollow New Work Lake, CT Approp. - - - - 6,447,16416 Cost - - - - 6,447,16416 Maint. Approp. 173,500 234,800 149,500 206,000 2,263,297 Cost 170,978 228,251 167,188 179,166 2,233,331 49E. West Thompson New Work Lake, CT Approp. 56,000 2,003 - 25,000 6,998,22048 Cost 16,582 41,421 - 7,812 6,981,03248 Maint. Approp. 134,900 192,000 188,500 257,000 1,818,898 Cost 135,054 165,364 200,240 252,752 1,798,130 49F. Westville Lake, New Work MA Approp. - - - - 5,684,68347 Cost - - - - 5,684,6834 7 Maint. Approp. 140,600 180,500 168,300 229,000 1,857,796 Cost 189,032 179,818 165,378 224,705 1,849,840 'Includes $1,465,123 for previous projects. Includes "Excludes $9,000 for subproject "Eightmile River, $935,303 emergency relief funds and $1,030,806 public CT." works funds. 12Includes $366,348 for previous projects. 2 Includes $17,879 for previous projects. Excludes 13Completed except for inactive portion. $17,767 contributed funds. 14Includes $330,204 for previous project. :'Includes $509,411 for previous projects. '5 Includes $81,410 for previous project. 'Includes $6,138,157 from public works funds and '6 Includes $68,717 Code 711 funds. $4,849,740 from emergency relief funds. Excludes $115,432 "7 Improvement adequate for commerce. contributed funds. 1 8Excludes $193,761 contributed funds. Includes $389,929 Code 711 funds and $412,988 Code '"Exctudes $22,517 expended to date for land cond- 713 funds. emnations. "Includes $262,724 Code 711 funds. 20 Includes $83,276 for maintenance of previous project. Includes $3,695 Code 711 funds and $115,138 Code 713 21 Excludes $21,928 expended from contributed funds. funds. 22Includes $331,626 for previous projects. Includes f Includes $208,100 Code 711 funds. $290,877 National Industrial Recovery Funds and $59,207 "Includes $71,943 Code 711 funds. public works funds. ' Includes $287,374 for previous projects. Excludes 23Includes $32,570 for previous projects. $130,410 contributed funds. 24Cash for construction only. Excludes $199,410 expended to date for land condemnations. 1-38 _I _____ NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 Total Cost to FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 "Includes $59,536 Code 711 funds. ""Includes $66,120 for previous projects. 27Excludes $1,370,000 Public Works Administration funds expended on Fitchburg, MA. 2"Includes $692,435 for previous projects. 'Cash for construction only. Excludes $164,020 expended to date for land condemnation. :") Recreational Cost Sharing. :" Includes $162,517 for previous project. Excludes $31,500 contributed funds expended. 'Includes $143,538 Code 711 funds. I lncludes $143,997 Code 711 funds. I Includes $179,728 Code 711 funds. :- Includes $4,671 Code 711 funds. :' Includes $6,432 Code 711 funds. :' Includes $2,881 Code 711 funds. :1 Includes $378,450 for previous project. Excludes $147,887 expended from contributed funds. 39 Includes $18,310 Code 711 funds. 4~ Includes $11,949 for maintenance of previous project. 41Includes $618,469 Code 711 funds and $32,000 Code 713 funds. 4 2Includes $6,255 Code 711 funds and $40,158 Code 713 funds.. 4 Includes $164,688 Code 711 funds. 44Includes $199,304 Code 711 funds. 45 Excludes $25,000 contributed funds expended. 4, Includes $7,889 for previous project. 47Includes $67,667 Code 711 funds. 48Includes $287,420 Code 711 funds. 49 Includes $245,168 Code 711 funds. 5o Includes $228,236 Code 711 funds. 5' Includes $84,462 Code 711 funds. 52Excludes $88,914 expended from contributed funds. 1-39 See Section -~-I-n-- Text Project Funding REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 1-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized .July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 M:rc'h 2, 1825 .June 14, 1880 Aug. 5, 1886 Sept. 19, 189(0 ,July 25, 1892 July 13, 1892 .June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 .June 13, 1902 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 30, 19:52 1)o. Autgust 26 1937 Oct. 17, 1910 Sept. 7, 191() Mar. 2, 1915 July 21. 19,16 July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 August 13, 1968 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text). Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious Aquatic Plant growths from the waters and streams in the U.S. Research and planning costs to be borne by U.S. Provided for continued research. BOSTON HARBOR, MA (See Section 2 of Text). Preservation of islands by seawalls. Weir River (Nantucket Beach Channel) 9 ft. deep, 100 ft. wide to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket. Fort Point Channel." Weir River (Nantasket Beach Channel) 9 ft. deep, 150 ft. wide to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket. Weir River (Nantasket Beach Channel) from mouth of Weir River to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket Beach 12 ft. deep, 150 ft. wide. Channel 15 feet deep from Long Island to Nixes Mate Shoal (Nixes Mate of Nubble Channel). Channel 27 feet from Nantasket Roads to President Roads. I)redge Chelsea River channel to 18 feet. For 30-foot channel from sea to President Roads through Broad Sound by less direct route than 35 and 40 foxt channels. For 35-foot channel from sea to Boston Naval Shipyard, Chelsea and Charles River Bridges. Elimination from project of removal of Finns Ledge at outer entrance. Dredge Chelsea River channel 25 ft. Depth of 40 feet (45 feet in rock) in Broad Sound Channel. Present project dimensions of channel from President Roads to Commonwealth pier No. 1, East Boston and anchorage area north side of President Roads. Present project dimensions of that part of approach channel to U.S. Navy drydock No. 3, at South Boston between Main Ship Channel and U.S. harbor line. Chelsea River, channel 30 feet deep. Reserved channel 30 feet deep. Abandons seaplane channel authorized in 1940 River and Harbor Act (HI. I)oc. 262 76th Cong., 1st sess.) Extension of 40-foot channel. Extension of President Roads anchorage. Reserved channel 35 feet deep, 430 feet wide, extending 1 mile from 40-foot main channel to L St. Chelsea River Channel and Maneuvering Basin 35 feet deep. BRISTOL HARBOR, BRISTOL, RI (See section 4 of Text). Construction of a rubblestone breakwater 1,600 feet long. CHATHAM (STAGE) HARBOR, MA (See Section 6 of Text). H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 87-874, 87th Cong. H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong. Annual Report, 1881, p. 518 H. Ex. Doc. 206, 48th Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report, 1885, p. 543. Annual Report, 1890, p. 503. Annual Report, 1893, p. 769. Annual Report, 1887, p. 517. Annual Report, 1893, p. 766. H. Ex. Doc. No. 162 53d Cong., 3d sess., Annual Report 1895, p. 648 H. Doc. 133, 55th Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report, 1898, p. 886. H. Doc. 119, 56th Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report, 1901, p. 1096. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Mar. 11, 1913 H. Doc. 272, 62d Cong. 2d sess.' H. Doc. 931, 63d Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 244, 72d Cong., 1 sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29., 74th Cong., 1st sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc, 24, 74th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 225, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' Public Law 420, 78th Cong. H. H. H. Doec. 733 Cong., 2d sess.' Doc. 244, 80th Cong., 1st sess.' Doc 349, 84th Cong.i H. Doc. 350, 87th Cong., 2nd sess.' H. Doc. 174, 90th Cong., 1st sess. 1-40 ---- -~--- Docu~m-~e--npt-s-p--- ------Z- __ _ NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 2, 1882 Mar. 2, 1915 June 10, 1872 Mar. 3, 1881 June 25, 1910 Feb. 27, 1911 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 May 24, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 19505 July 11, 196() (Sec. 107) Aug. 30, 1935 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1960 June 3, 1896 ,June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1945 Jt M Entrance Channel 10 feet deep, 150 feet wide from Chatham H. Doc. 456, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Roads into upper harbor. Annual Report 1942. CLINTON HARBOR, CT (See Section 7 of Text). Maintenance of a stone dike closing a breach in sandy peninsula which separates river from outer harbor. 8-foot channel and anchorage. CONNECTICUT RIVER BELOW HARTFORD, CT (See Section 8 of Text). Jetties at the mouth. The Hartford dike. Channel and turning basin in Eight-mile River. Present project dimensions of channel over Saybrook bar. Dikes, training walls, and revetments. Present project dimensions of channel and additional dikes, training walls, revetments, and accessory works. Park River declared nonnavigable. Channel and anchorages, North Cove, Old Saybrook. Channel, anchorage, and turning basin, Eight-mile River. Channel and anchorage in Essex Cove. Channel and anchorage in Wethersfield Cove. COREA HARBOR, GOULDSBORO, ME (See Section 9 of Text). Anchorage basin 8 feet deep, 600 feet long and 400 feet wide. Construction of an access channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, extending from deep water to existing anchorage basin, a distance of approximately 2,000 feet. In addition the existing 5.5 acre anchorage would be expanded 3 acres. FORE RIVER,BRAINTREE AND WEYMOUTH, MA (See Section 11 of Text). A channel 6 feet deep with a width from 60 to 100 feet. It would begin at the Federal ship channel in Quincy and extend 8,000 feet upstream to the Quincy Ave. Bridge. GREAT SALT POND, BLOCK ISLAND, RI (See Section 12 of Text). Channel and jetties. Extending south jetty and dredging. Channel and basin in inner harbor. GREEN HARBOR, MA (See Section 13 of Text). uly 14, 1960 as Channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide from deep water to head amended in 1965 of navigation; anchorage near town pier, sealing, rebuilding in part and extension of existing west jetty. GUILFORD HARBOR, CT (See Section 15 of Text). tar. 2, 1945 Entrance channel 100 feet wide, 6 feet deep; a channel 60 feet wide, 6 feet deep; an anchorage basin 6 feet deep, 200 feet wide. S. Ex. Doc. 84, 47th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 240, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Present project dimensions approved by Chief of Engineers, Dec 22, 1887. Present project dimensions authorized by Chief of Engineers in 1889. H. Doc. 327, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1294, 61st Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 132, 65th Cong., 1st sess.4 H. Doc. 49, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Ltr. Sec. War, Apr. 21, 1937. H. Doc. 368, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 4 H. Doc. 666, 80th Cong., 2nd sess.4 Chief of Engineers, Oct. 18, 1961. Chief of Engineers, Nov. 15, 1960. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 27, 74th Cong., 1st sess.' P.L. 86-645, Sec 107, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers August 14, 1981. P.L. 86-645, Sec. 107, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, June 4, 1981. H. Doc. 57, 54th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. Annual Report for 1900, p. 1276. H. Doc. 330, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Dec. 15, 1965 H. Doc. 149, 77th Cong., 1st sess. 1-41 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Acts TABLE 1-B (Continued) July 14, 1960 as amended in 1965 July 14, 1960 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 4, 1913 Oct. 17, 1940 July 4, 1,836 March 3, 1899 March 2, 1907 Sept. 4, 1954 July 14, 19(60 as amended July 14, 1960 as amended in 1965 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized HAMPTON HARBOR, NH (See Section 15 of Text). Extending north jetty 1,000 feet, raising outer 300 feet south jetty and constructing 180-foot spur to high ground, channel 8 feet deep, 150 feet wide across entrance bar. ISLAND END RIVER, CHELSEA, MA (See Section 17 of Text). A 100-foot wide access channel extending from Mystic River for a length of approximately 2500 feet to the site of the proposed marina facility and would allow for an overall depth of 6 feet. KENNEBEC RIVER, ME (See Section 18 of Text). Channel between Augusta and Gardiner, ME Channel below Gardiner, ME. Channel west of Swan Island. 27-foot channel from mouth of Bath. SAKONNET HARBOR, RI (See Section 25 of Text). Breakwater. Prolonging old breakwater and raising it to 8 feet above mean low water, to width of 15 feet. Rock removal near breakwater. Breakwater extension and harbor dredging. A 500-foot rubble-mound breakwater and a 110-foot wide by 10-foot deep navigation channel. SESUIT HARBOR, MA (See Section 26 of Text). Channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide. CLARKS POINT BEACH, NEW BEDFORD, MA (See Section 31 of Text). CLIFF WALK, NEWPORT, RI (See Section 32 of Text). Improvements for shore protection along the Cliff Walk. OAKLAND BEACH, RI (See section 33 of Text). Beach erosion control. SHERWOOD ISLAND STATE PARK, WESTPORT, CT (See Section 34 of Text). Beach erosion control. Documents Section 107, P.L. 86-645, Chief of Engineers, February 18, 1964. P.L 86-645, Sec. 107, as amended, Authorized by Chief of Engineers, April 6, 1981. H. Doc. 262, 56th Cong., 1st sess.4 H. Doc. 321, 59th Cong. 2nd sess.4 H. Doc. 746, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess.4 S. Doc. 55, 77th Cong., 1st sess. 4 H. Doc. 154, 20th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 81, 55th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report 1897, p. 934. H. Doc. 99, 56th Cong., 2nd sess. and Annual Report 1901, p. 1148. H. Doc. 436, 82nd Cong., 2nd sess. P.L. 86-645, Sec. 107, as amended, Authorized by Chief of Engineers June 25, 1981. P.L. 86.645, Sec. 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, February 6, 1980. Section 103 of the 1962 Rivers and Harbors Act. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Nov. 17, 1978. H. Doc. 228, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Section 103 of the 1962 Rivers and Harbors Act. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, April 30, 1980. Section 103 of the 1962 Rivers and Harbors Act. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, September 30, 1981. 1-42 ~"x--~I-I-- ~-"^ ~- -'------ NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-B (Continued) Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized June 30, 1948 Mar. 7, 1974 June 30, 1948 July 2.1, 1916 Aug. 13, 1968 July 24, 1916 June 30, 19.18 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 Nov. 17, 1966 PAWTUXET RIVER, WARWICK, RI (See Section 38A of Text). Flood damage reduction through aquisition of land and improvements in the flood plain. Demolition and removal of acquired structures. Flood proofing certain dwellings and installing a flood forecasting system. CHARLES RIVER (NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE AREAS) MA (See Section 39 of Text). Federal acquisition and perpetual protection of 17 crucial natural valley storage areas totaling 8,422 acres in what is known as the Middle and Upper watershed of the Charles River. LANCASTER, ISRAEL RIVER, NH (See Section 40G of Text). Construction of a gabion overflow weir for local flood protection. CONNECTICUT RIVER, NO. STRATFORD, NH (See Section 40K of Text). Emergency bank and shoreline protection. PARK RIVER, HARTFORD, CT (See Section 40M of Text). Flood protection on Park River in Hartford, CT SALMON RIVER, COLCHESTER, CT (See Section 40N of Text). Construct 250 feet of "Doublewal" precast concrete block slope protection along the right bank of the river adjacent to Brown's Mill Road. HOUSATONIC RIVER, PITTSFIELD, MA (See Section 41D of Text). Supplement the existing 8-foot high by 15-foot wide stone arch culvert under the Penn Central Railroad embankment with four 10-foot diameter concrete pipe culverts. HOUSATONIC RIVER, SALISBURY, CT (See Section 41E of Text). Emergency bank and shoreline protection. SQUANTZ POND, NEW FAIRFIELD, CT (See Section 41G of Text). Provide for a timber bulkhead varying in height up to 4 feet above the beach surface and constructed of 4"x6" pressure timbers. PHILLIPS LAKE, MA (See Section 43E of Text). Flood control, local protection project on Phillips Brook north of its confluence with the North Nashua River in Fitchburg. 1-43 Documents P.L. 858, Sec. 205, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, June 1982. Chief of Engineers report dated December 6, 1972. P.L. 80-858, Sec. 205, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 11, 1978 P.L. 79-526, Sec. 14, as amended Authorized by Chief of Engineers, November 3, 1980. S. Doc. 43, 90th Cong., 1st sess. P.L 79-526, Sec. 14, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. September 24, 1980. P.L 80-858, Sec. 205, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, August 1981. P.L. 79-526, Sec. 14 as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, December 3, 1979. P.L. 79-526, Sec. 14 as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, November 3, 1980. S. Doc. 113, 89th Cong., 2d sess. - -- - REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 'TABLE 1-B (Continued) Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 22, 1976 Oct. 27, 1965 July 1.1, 1960 NEW LONDON, CT (See Section 45 of Text). Hurricane barrier protecting city of New London from tidal damage. DICKEY-LINCOLN SCHOOL LAKES, ME (See Section 46A of Text). Construction of multi-purpose project on the upper St. John River to provide for power, flood control and recreation. STAMFORD, CT (See Section 48 of Text). Hurricane barrier protecting areas of Stamford from tidal damage. H. Doc. 478, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 236, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 210, 86th Cong., 1st sess. 'Contains latest published maps. See also Annual Report, 1911, p. 1178 (seawalls and Nixes Mate Channel) and Annual report, 1903, p. 770 (Fort Point Channel). 'Authorized in part by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. aA portion deferred for restudy. 4Contains latest maps. "Inactive. "A portion has been abandoned pursuant to P.L. 624, Dec. 31, 1970. 1-44 Documents -~-~- -- --- NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1982 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report For Construction Maintenance (Construction) Andrews River, MA' 1981 $ 219,042 ' 5 $ 379,753 $ 187,500 Apponaug Cove, RI' 1964 156,8742 20,4536 13agaduce River, ME:'" 1912 28,000 39 Bar Harbor, ME5 1932 406,591 2,187 BIlss I larbor, ME" 1965 188,859 13,187 Bass Harbor Bar, ME' 1920 4,076 8,828 Beals Harbor, ME' 1959 184,880 23,305 Belfast Harbor, ME' 1971 61,561 224,449 Bellamy River, NH' ' 1897 34,643 - Beverly Harbor, MA' 1951 246,048 16,821 100,000 Boothbay Harbor, ME' 1953 18,000 22,983 Branford I larbor, CT' 1978 9,537 975,345 Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, ME' 6 1976 277,420 13,186 lBucksport HIarbor, ME' 1907 18,421 13,593 Bullocks Point Cove, RI' 1979 170,902 69,343 123,757 Bunker Harbor, ME' 1969 95,372 28,406 Buttermilk Bay Channel, MA' 1960 31,676 59,288 Camden Harbor, ME' 1960 102,400 125,936 Canapitsit Channel, MA'' 1899 9,113 12,279 Cape Porpoise Harbor, ME' 1977 175,037 347,865 20,000 Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, ME' 1964 190,438 9,021 Cathance River, ME' -' 1884 21,000 - Coasters Island Harbor, RI'' 1911 5,500 13,161 Cobscook Bay, ME' a 4 1866 4,173 - Cocheco River, NH'-'4 1913 119,089 42,617 Cohasset Harbor, MA' 1979 267,76738 207,196 127,000 Connecticut River (above Hartford), CTr8 1932 116,324 15,822 Cotuit Harbor, MA'R 1962 8,541 - Criehaven Harbor, ME' 1939 40,776 8,125 Cross Rip Shoals Nantucket Sound, MA' 1954 24,200 54,328 Cuttyhunk Harbor, MA' 1978 27,167 931,55825 11,643 l)amariscotta River, ME'' 1906 5,000 905 I)eer Island Thoroughfare, ME'"4 1916 40,000 I)orchester Bay and Neponset River, MA" 1968 94,584 301,944 D)uck Island Harbor, CT' 1953 482,166 370,617 1)uxbury Harbor, MA' 1978 421,29729 731,785 35,00030 East Boothbay Harbor, ME' 1953 6,500 17,238 Eastport Harbor, ME' 1979 638,67539 168,338 Edgartown Harbor, MA' 1978 65,61435 32,589 10,000 Essex River, MA' 1948 21,759 83,93814 Exeter River, NH'4 1913 27,454 3,032 Falmouth Harbor, MA' 1978 123,763 248,454 35,000 Fivemile River Harbor, CT' ' 1969 35,490 152,377 Frenchboro Harbor, ME' 1978 $ 657,345 $ 15,953 Georges River, ME' 1978 25,788 224,719 Gloucester Harbor, Annisquam River, MA' 1981 1,296,9342' 1,332,796 25,000 Greenwich Bay, RI' 1893 2,000 6,527 Greenwich Harbor, CT' 1969 198,758 204,872 100,000 IHarbor of Refuge, Pt, Judith, RI' 1979 2,714,5104' 1,434,539 17,587 HIlarraseeket River, ME '4 1896 30,963 5,309 Hay (West Harbor), Fisher's Island, NY' 1931 8,401 3,032 I lcndrick's t hrbor, ME' 1957 28,204 6,325 Hingham Harbor, MA' 1954 28,316 90,759 I lousatonic River, CT2 1979 859,691 2,304,694 222,010 1-45 _~_1___1 _ ___ _ ___ REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1982 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report For Construction Maintenance (Construction) Hyannis Harbor, MA' 1975 Ipswich River, MA 1969 Isle Au Haut Thoroughfare, ME 1980 Isle of Shoals Harbor, ME and NH' 1977 Jonesport Harbor, ME 1981 Josias River, ME' 1977 Kingston Harbor (North Plymouth), MA' 1895 Lagoon Pond, Martha's Vineyard, MA' ,6 1976 Lamprey River, NIH'' 1913 Iittle Harbor, NH'"4. .2 1977 Little Harbor, Woods Hole, MA"'-4 1906 Iubec Channel, ME' 1956 Lynn Harbor, MAL9 1956 Machias River, ME' 1972 Malden River, MA".20 1922 Matinicus Harbor, ME' 1962 Medomak River, ME' 1953 Menemsha Creek, MA' 1981 Merrimack River, MA' 1940 Mianus River, CT 1978 Milford Harbur, CT 1981 Moosabec Bar, ME' 1930 Mystic River, CT' 1957 Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), MA'' 1965 Narraguagus River, ME' 1969 New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA ' 1953 New Harbor, ME' 1966 New Haven Breakwater, CT' 1950 New l.ondon Harbor, CI' 1980 Newburyport Harbor, MA5 1981 Newlxrt harbor, RI' 1953 Niantic Bay and Harbor, CT' 1972 Northeast Harbor, ME' 1954 Owl's Head Harbor, ME' 1968 Patchogue River, CT' 1977 Pawcatuck River, RI & CT' 1978 Pawtuxet Cove, RI' 1975 Penobscot River, ME' 1969 Pepperell Cove, ME5 1969 Pig Island Gut, ME'," 1966 Pleasant Bay, MA 1971 Pleasant River, ME' 1892 Plymouth Harbor, MA' 1978 Pollock Rip Shoals, Nantucket Sound, MA' 1956 Portsmouth Harbor & Piscataqua R., ME, & NH'1981 Potowomut River, RI' 1882 Providence River & Harbor, RI5 1976 Provincetown Harbor, MA' 1979 Red Brook harbor, Bourne, MA9 1972 Richmond Harbor, ME 14 1883 Richmond's Island Harbor, ME'' 1882 Rockland Harbor, ME" 1976 Rockport Harbor, MA' 1979 484,499 5,618 137,653 80,691 214,388 115,565 8,940 99,098 19,980 133,227 18,000 380,322 755,576 32,000 104,853 14,00021 17,000 56,92646 369,891 132,435 90,50647 11,400 197,582 502,6612 821,144 1,857,618 118,62024 1,242,246 638,77436 565,225 733,524 66,464 138,942 124,158. 150,000 318,78731 295,356 501,020 171,351 191,753 3,500 2,127,218 32 33 1,083,504 5,384,04348 5,000 25,417,0222" 3,548,95442 38,764 20,000 119,844 1,948,462 22,000 1-46 237,21312 32,947 140,747 643,364 122,173 6,587 33,563 257,685 5,224 23,941 178,866 180,794 45,097 8,989 92,359 622,346 158,224 160,465 573,884 25,227 104,932 431,854 33,965 708,967 21,705 40,273 278,034 3,347,211 94,768 52,239 17,334 13,867 518,188 574,861 143,817 603,055 18,958 26,215 - 217 846,66534 846,590 1,041,388 50 3,751,497 298,636 - 1,808 452,800 194,963 103,001 26,813 80,990 62,000 12,500 46,500 11,380 14,000 20,385 7,015 67,500 4,383 100,000 20,000 295,356 541,611 99,707 760,000 255,000 - _._._.,_ NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1982 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report For Construction Maintenance (Construction) Rockport Harbor, ME'' 1915 32,000 - Royal River, ME' 1977 336,704 256,374 49,56227 Rye Harbor, NH' 1965 130,342 29,368 61,338'7 St. Croix River, ME' 1950 179,550 36,392 19,892 Sakonnet River, RI''o 1909 38,427 1,559 Salem Harbor, MAs 1969 1,693,202 349,443 Sandy Bay (Harbor of Refuge), Cape Ann, MA'R 1922 1,925,553 16,060 Sasanoa River, ME'" 4 1915 35,000 124 Scarboro River, ME' 1976 392,635 1,238,293 10,000 Scituate Harbor, MA' 1971 379,851 100,103 69,976 Scarsport Harbor, ME' 1966 572,56816 23,035 Seekonk River, RI' 1954 672,214 793,234 67,792 South Bristol Harbor, ME' 1971 89,593 11,052 2,663 Southport Harbor, CT' 1962 96,9277 214,175 18,525 Southwest Harbor, ME' 1962 180,042 15,971 7,501 Stamford Harbor, CT 1980 892,82487 1,669,41845 169,636 Stockton Harbor, ME ':" ' 1915 33,000 23,216 Stonington Harbor, CT' 1959 377,328 123,060 Stony Creek, Branford, CT' 1978 112,487 235,929 Sullivan Falls Harbor, ME' 1914 19,871 - Taunton River, MA5 1948 442,895 32,917 Tenants Harbor, ME' 1920 18,750 13,292 'Thames River, CT' 1967 1,471,919 1,422,580 Union River, ME:I S 1912 146,855 113,939 Vineyard Haven, MA' 1943 27,186 8,699 Wareham Harbor, MA5 1896 95,997 10,296 Warren River, RI' 1890 5,000 - Warwick Cove, RI' 1975 155,430 36,594 107,220 Wellfleet Harbor, MA' 1981 157,63449 857,408 32,000 Wells Harbor, ME' 1979 360,973 1,500,046 212,000 Westcott Cove, CT' 1978 55,960 203,834 21,000 Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT' 1972 19,308 180,824 Westport River, MA"9 1942 - Weymouth Back River, MA' 1944 48,740 7,184 20,000 Weymouth-Fore & Town Rivs., Boston Hbr., MA 1979 29,875,45343 1,201,38644 440,237 Wickford Harbor, RI"' 22 1973 233,410 70,435 49,094 Wilson Point Harbor, CT"4 1895 54,177 - Wiinnipesaukee Lake, NH' 1952 7,500 29,870 Winter Harbor, ME"6 1976 162,937 Winthrop Iarbor, MA' 1895 8,992 38,515 Wood Island Harbor, and Pod at Biddeford, ME' 1957 143,112 14,707 12,000 Woods Hole Channel, MA' 1940 230,000 51,718 York Harbor, ME 1977 239,654 346,566 32,161 'Comleted Completed except for inactive portion. 2 Excludescosts of $137,583 for local cooperation require- 6Authorized by the Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86- ments, which includes $104,583 cash contribution. 645, Sec. 107). 'Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th 7Includes $37,714 emergency relief funds. Excludes Congress, lstsession. $18,525 contributed funds, of which $1,785 was for work ' No commerce reported. outside approved project. 1-47 __ REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS "Inactive. "'Awaiting local cooperation. Improvement to be restudied. '"Commerce included under Tiverton Harbor, RI. " Authorized work remaining on project is comprised of an incomplete land an inactive portion. '2 Excludes $129,757 expended for rehabilitation; breakwaters repaired in 1961. 1: Recommendation for abandonment of existing project made in I. I)oc. 467, 69th Congress, 1st session. Portion of project authorized by the Chief of Engineers (P.L. 86-645, Sec. 107) is complete. 14Excludes $5,000 contributed funds expended. ' Excludes $187,500 contributed funds expended. '"Costs to local interests for berth improvements are estimated to be $60,000. 17 Excludes $81,548 contributed funds "other" expended. '"Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 411, 64th Congress, 1st session, and in River and Harbor Committee I)oc. 3, 65th Congress, 1st session. '"Improvement to be restudied. " Under State maintenance. ~' Includes $21,000 for previous projects and excludes $25,000 contributed funds. -2' Portion of project authorized by Chief of Engineers. 2' Excludes $211,649 expended for rehabilitation; jetty repaired in 1963. '1All assurances of local cooperation have not been fulfilled. Public landing at Back Cove has not been constructed. Portion of project authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86-645, Sec. 107). 2~ Excludes $50,000 contributed funds expended for maintenance. 2(i II. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. recommended eliminating maintenance dredging. 27 Excludes $49,562 contributed funds "other" expended. 28 Final fund adjustment made FY 1978 ($52,323.28). 29Includes $37,000 for new work for previous project. 3"Excludes local requirements of $65,000' consisting of $13,000 for public wharf and $52,000 for additional construction costs. 31 Includes $133,357 for previous project. 32Includes $188,647 for previous project. 33Excludes $894,475 major rehabilitation for Long Beach Dike. 34 Includes $2,013 for previous projects. In addition $400 was expended for maintenance of contributed funds. 35Includes $15,614 for new work for previous projects. 36 Includes $40,800 for previous project. 37 Includes $135,143 for previous project. 38Includes $10,000 for previous project. 39 Excludes $141,530 expended contributed funds "other". 40Excludes $1,926,000 expended for major rehabilitation. 41Includes $12,000 for previous project. 42Includes $215,801 for previous project. 43Includes for previous projects $735,900 (Weymouth, Fore R.) and $25,000 (Town R.). 44 Includes for previous project $5,250 (Weymouth, Fore River) and $12,577 (Weymouth Town River). 45 Includes $59,420 for previous project. 46 Excludes $12,500 expended from contributed funds. 47 Excludes $11,380 contributed funds expended. 48Includes $130,393 for previous projects. Excludes $99,707 contributed funds expended. 49 Includes $11,350 for previous project. Excludes $32,000 contributed funds expended. 1-48 -- NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to Amount See Annual Sept. 30, 1982 Expended by Project Report For Construction Local Interest Burial Hill Beach, Westport, CT1 Calf Pasture Beach Park, Norwalk, CT' Compo Beach, Westport, CT' Cove Island, Stamford, CT' Cummings Park, Stamford, CT' Guilford Point Beach (Jacobs Beach), Guilford, CT' Gulf Beach, Milford, CT' It lammonasset Beach, Madison, CT' Hampton Beach, Hampton, NH1 Jennings Beach, Fairfield, CT' Lighthouse Point Park (Area 9), CT' Lynn-Nahant Beach, MA Matunuck Beach, South Kingston, RI2 Middle Beach, CT' Misquamicut Beach, Westerly, R1' Nantasket Beach, MA' North Hampton Beach, North Hampton, NH4 North Scituate Beach, Scituate, MA' Oak Bluffs Town Beach, Martha's Vineyard, MA' Plum Island, MA2 Prospect Beach, West Haven, CT'P Quincy Shore Beach, Quincy, MA' Revere Beach, Revere, MAR Sand Hill Cove Beach, RI' Sasco Hill Beach, Fairfield, CT' Seaside Park, CT' Short Beach, CT' Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, CT Southport Beach, CT' Town Beach, Plymouth, MA Town Neck Beach, Sandwich, MA Wallis Sands State Beach, Rye, NH' Wassagusset Beach, Weymouth, MA' Winthrop Beach, MA' \Vo odmont Shore, Milford, CT' 'Completed. 'Project is to be included in Point Judith water resources development plan authorized by 1962 River and Harbor Act. :Additional Federal participation will be required based on Public Law 87-874. 'Project inactive. Project is completed at no cost to Federal Government by using fill from federal navigation improvement at Housatonic River. 6 Project is complete. In addition to uncompleted work, there are three additional groins, construction of which is deferred until it is determined that they are necessary. 7 Excludes $118,215 expended for work beyond scope of project. "Excludes $73,800 for previous project. Excludes $142,965 contributed. 1-49 1958 1964 1962 1961 1963 1961 1958 1956 1966 1956 1961 1961 1958 1963 1971 1963 1969 1976 1977 1958 1962 1981 1959 1961 1958 1964 1960 1964 1961 1966 1971 1960 1961 $ 5,810 56,286 84,544 47,131 26,886 15,620 21,303 163,183 260,868 14,401 3,930 8,810 14,512 106,552 273,334 118,882 104,573 621,440 253,713 40,143 23,759 150,000 5 62,560 17,631 5,490 65,131 180,944 176,5676 53,838 $ 11,612 120,179 169,089 94,262 53,771 31,241 42,606 326,366 385,641 28,802 7,859 17,620 29,024 106,522 198,583 104,875 240,819 1,242,880 142,965 82,000 47,518 329,921 270,695 35,263 10,981 435,942 200,208 353,134 111,6797 - REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Project Alley Bay, Beals, ME:' ". Alford, Green River, MA '.4 Amesbury, Powwow River, MA3' Ansonia-l)erby, CT' Bound( Brook, Scituate, MA'' (Canton, MA'' Charles River Dam, MA:' Charlestown, NH:'. Chenrryfield, ME:' . ' Chicopee, MA"'' Chicopee Falls, MA:' Ccheco River, NHI-' Connecticut River, W. Stewartstown, NH:'. lI)anhury, CT' Derby, CT ' East Branch Dam, CT' East Hartford, C1'' Fitchburg, MA (See No. Nashua River) 'olly Brook, Wethersfield, CT''' Fort Kent, ME:'." Fox Point Barrier, RI: Gardner, MA:'.' IIall Mealdow Brook D)am, CT' Hartford, CT' Ilartford, White River, VT'"' Hayward Creek, Quincy-Braintree, MA3,' Holmes Bay, Whiting, ME IHolyoke, MA:' I lousatonic River, Sheffield, MA' Iluntington, MA:' "'"' Johnson Bay, Lubec, ME:' Keene, Nil: Lee, Housatonic River, MA : ' � l owell, MA:' I~ower Woonsocket, RI:' Mad River lake, CT' Merriconeag Sound, Harpswell, ME:' Nlonoosnoc Brook, MA':' Monoosnoc Lake, MA'2 Nashua, NI:' Nookagee Lake, MA Northampton, MA:' North Canaan, Blackberry River, CT'' North Nashua River, Lancaster, MA:' 4 Norwalk, CT'' Norwich, CT' Old Town, Penobscot River, ME' 4 Pawcatuck, CT' Prestile Stream, Blaine, ME3 Riverdale, MA:' Saxonville, MA3 Shelburne, Androscoggin River, NH"' Smelt Brook, Weymouth-Braintree, MA'4 Springdale, MA' For Last Full Report See Annual Report For Cone 1979 1977 1978 1977 1974 1964 1981 1976 1963 1954 1978 1963 1976 1978 1977 1973 1951 1979 1979 1976 1970 1970 1960 1973 1979 1980 1953 1981 1960 1980 1955 1976 1945 1977 1973 1980 1967 1967 1950 1976 1950 1977 1979 1952 1960 1978 1966 1980 1952 1981 1977 1978 1952 Cost to September 30, 1982 Contributed struction Funds $ 190,500 41,419 132,113 18,266,040 47,300 180,6705 41,168,493 113,330 203,000 1,433,6007 2,183,912 183,100 54,703 13,143,000 7,582,642 1,959,836 2,135,000 i- 220,284 1,981,124 11,112,801 495,691 2,572,357 6,094,1009 332,236 2,235,470 207,390 3,418,000 202,608 3,900 105,082 44,100 37,852 490,600 ", 6,600,681 4,773,020 107,681 270,0008 563,677 680,00017 73,865 81,671 52,150 1,209,000 148,045 644,311 73,674 1,138,000 4,217,559 37,657 1,803,739 700,000 $ - -21 92,891 5,544,64015 385 411,292^ -- __2 _19 7,637 3,679,500 ' 15,500 2,781,100 24,447 - - 1,266,63820 - - 327 2,800 - - 214,106 25,000 - -. 1-50 TABLE 1-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS -- -9 - -- " NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report For Construction Funds Springfield, MA 1950 577,00018 5,350 Stony Brook, Wilton, NH3 4 1973 19,500 - Stucker Brook Dam, CT' 1976 2,227,712 58,800 'Three Rivers, MA:' 1970 1,577,18912 Torrington, East Branch, CT3 -4 1963 389,200 - ''ornington, West Branch, CT'4 1963 228,300 - 'Trumbull Lake, CT' 1973 1,463,799 - Ware, MA'' 1963 400,000 - Waterbury-Watertown, CT'4 1963 263,300 - Westerly, RI 1966 - - Weston, VT'-" 1957 13,000 1,800 West Springfield, MA: 1954 1,334,00016 -- West Warren, MA34 1964 389,200 41,000 Whitmanville Lake, MA 1979 605,023 - Winsted, CT' 1954 245,500 - Woonsocket, RI' 1962 4,040,000 224,500 Worcester Diversion, MA:' 1978 5,086,859 79,300 'Inactive. 2 Excludes $1,147,169 expended from Contributed Funds, Other. : Completed. 'Authorized by Chief of Engineers. Reflects FY 1967 settlement of outstanding claims. 'Completed except for inactive portion. Includes $295,000 Public Works Administration funds. "Excludes $147,366 flood control and coastal emergency funds expended. "E'x cludes $835,000 Public Works Administration funds. "' Emergency Bank Protection. "' Excludes $794,374 Public Works Administration funds. "2Excludes $565,168 Contributed Funds, Other. 'T"'bOe restudied. 14Cash for construction only. Excludes $245,000 expended for land condemnation. '5 Excludes $1,652,273 Contributed Funds, Other. '6 Excludes $245,000 Public Works Administration funds. 17 Excludes $280,000 Public Works Administration funds. '8 Excludes $355,000 Public Works Administration funds. 'Excludes $346,653 Contributed Funds, Other. 20 Excludes $488,920 Contributed Funds, Other. 21Excludes $727,460 Contributed Funds, Other. 2 2Excludes $12,000 expended for land condemnations and $25,184 Contributed Funds, Other for relocations. 1-51 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 1-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to September 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report For Construction Funds Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project, ME' 1935 6,384,394 - ' Work discontinued in 1937. Facilities transferred to War Assets Administration. TABLE 1-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Funds Expended Full Report See Annual Date Contributed Project Report For Deauthorized Federal Funds Alternative for Sugar Hill Reservoir - Aug 1977 $ - $ - Andover Lake, CT - Aug 1977 - - Bagaduce River, ME (uncompleted portion) - Oct 1978 - - Baker Brook, MA 1972 Nov 1979 94,000 - Beards Brook Reservoir, NH 1949 Aug 1977 78,000 - Beaver Brook Lake, NH 1973 Apr 1978 - - Bennington Reservoir, NH 1949 Aug 1977 205,000 - Brant Rock Beach, Marshfield, MA 1961 Nov 1979 - - IBridgeport Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1980 Nov 1979 - - B3rockway Lake, VT 1946 Aug 1977 - - Cambridgeport Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - Chicopee, MA (uncompleted portion) 1954 Aug 1977 - - Claremont Lake, NH 1968 Dec 1970 242,700 - Clyde, RI 1948 Apr 1951 8,800 - Connecticut River below Hartford 1979 Oct 1978 - - CT (uncompleted portion) Cotuit Harbor, MA 1962 Oct 1978 8,541 - F"ivemile River Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1969 Oct 1978 - - Gaysville Lake, VT 1970 Oct 1976 206,600 - (Greenwichl Point Beach, CT 1959 Oct 1978 - - Housatonic River, CT (uncompleted portion) 1979 Nov 1979 - - Honey IHill Lake, NH 1949 Aug 1977 92,000 - Ludlow Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - Manchester Harbor, MA 1949 Nov 1979 23,986 - Marblehead Harbor, MA 1968 Oct 1978 43,711 - Mattapoisett Harbor, MA 1950 Oct 1978 - - Mountain Brook Dam, NH 1949 Aug 1977 57,000 - Mystic, CT 1968 Aug 1972 67,700 - Nupatr(ee Beach, RI - Nov 1979 - - 1-52 .-~ .--- ---- NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Funds Expended Full Report See Annual Date Contributed Project Report For Deauthorized Federal Funds Narragansett Pier, RI 1966 Nov 1970 115,590 - North Andover and Lawrence, MA 1949 Aug 1977 20,000 - Norwalk-Wilton, CT 1973 Nov 1979 - - l'awcatuck River, RI & CT (uncompleted portion) 1979 Nov 1979 - - Pawtucket, RI 1949 Nov 1977 - - I'Point Judith, RI 1968 Nov 1977 198,477 - PI'ontiac I)iversion, RI 1948 Apr 1951 24,200 - Provincetown Beach (Herring Cove), MA 1961 Oct 1978 - - (uncompleted portion) Provincetown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1979 Oct 1978 - - Saco River, ME (uncompleted portion) 1979 Oct 1978 - - Sakonnet Harbor, RI 1982 Jun 1982 176,000 - Sandy Bay, Cape Ann, MA (uncompleted portion) 1922 Oct 1978 - - South Coventry Lake, CT 1951 Aug 1977 96,000 - South Tunbridge Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - Stamford Harbor, CT (2 projects uncompleted portions) 1979 Oct 1978 - - Stonington Harbor, ME 1961 Nov 1979 2,543 - Stratford, CT 1973 Mar 1977 934,500 - Sugar Hill Reservoir, NH 1946 Dec 1944 - - The Island Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - Thumperton Beach, Eastham, MA 1961 Nov 1979 - - Wareham-Marion, MA 1965 Aug 1977 81,715 - Victory Lake, VT 1967 Aug 1977 168,400 - West Brookfield Reservoir, MA 1948 Jul 1960 67,000 - West Canaan Lake, NH 1948 Aug 1977 92,000 - Westfield, MA 1967 Sep 1969 507,200 - Westport, CT 1965 Feb 1970 29,634 - Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT 1972 Nov 1979 - - (uncompleted portion) Williamsville Reservoir, VT 1949 Dec 1944 146,500 - 1-53 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 1-H NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Study Identification Costs Ash Creek, CT (Recon RPT.) 7,500 Basin Cove, ME (Recon RPT.) 1,776 Buttermilk Bay MA (DPR) 18,534 Eel Pond MA (DPR) 13,921 Green Hlarbor, MA (Recon RPT.) 7,145 Ilousatonic River, Shelton, CT (Recon RPT.) 5,000 Kennebunk River, Kennebunk, ME (DPR) 13,860 Oak Bluffs Harbor, MA (Recon RPT. & DPR) 7,909 Patchogue River, CT (DPR) 83,371 Perkins Cove, Ogunquit, ME (Recon RPT) 7,500 Pines River, Revere, MA (DPR) 34,350 Plymouth Harbor, MA (Recon RPT) 917 Popponesset Bay, Mashpee, MA (Recon RPT) 5,000 Provincetown Harbor, MA (DPR) 17,543 Rockport and Old Harbors MA (DPR) 55,762 Saco River, ME (DPR) 1,381 Shquatucket Harbor, Harwich, MA (Recon RPT & DPR) 30,797 Saugus and Pine Rivers, MA (DPR) 41,130 Scituate Harbor, MA (Recon RPT.) 5,000 Squirrel Island, ME (Recon RPT.) 5,000 Stonington Harbor, ME (DPR) 48,041 Wood Island Harbor, Biddeford, ME (Recon RPT.) 7,500 TABLE 1-I BEACH EROSION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 103, PUBLIC LAW 87-874 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Study Identification Costs Belfast City Park, Belfast, ME (DPR) 7,740 City Park Beach, Warwick, RI (DPR) 61,565 Cornhill Beach, Truro, MA (Recon RPT) 175 Dane Street Beach, Beverly, MA (Recon RPT.) 5,000 Lynch Park Beach, Beverly, MA (Recon RPT.) 5,000 Seaview and Parkers River, MA (Recon RPT & DPR) 62,748 West Hlaven Beaches, CT (DPR) 28,567 Willard Beach, ME (DPR) 38,940 Woodbury Beach, Beverly, MA (Recon RPT.) 5,000 1-54 -~-- NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-J Study Identification FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Costs Beaver Brook, Keene, NH (DPR) Blackstone River, Cumberland, RI (DPR) Eagle Lake, Holden, MA (Recon RPT) Easton Pond, Newport, RI (Recon RPT) I lousatonic River, New Milford, CT (DPR) Mascoma River, Lebanon, NH (Recon RPT) Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI (DPR) Pemigewasset River, Plymouth, NH (Recon RPT) Point of Pines, Revere, MA (DPR) Quinnipiac River, CT (Recon Report) $ 89,246 71,544 4,800 5,000 11,949 4,400 67,355 6,800 35,348 750 TABLE 1-K BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MA AND RI (See Section 38 of Text) RESERVOIR Miles Above Estimated Federal Cost Mouth of Black- Reservoir Lands stone Height Capacity and Nume Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total \VWest lill ' Worcester, MA 25.8 51 Earthfill 12,400 $1,367,000 $94,000 $2,307,000 ' Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 'See individual report for details. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Above Estimated Cost Mouth of Black- Lands stone and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Worcester, MA 48 Diversion tunnel and channel $4,923,500 $1,179,0002 $6,102,500 Woonsocket, RI 15 Channel improvement 3,740,100 1,069,0003 4,809,100 Lower Woonsocket, RI 13 Floodwall, conduits and channel improvement 8,356,239 435,000 8,791,239 'Includes relocations 2$158,000 Federal; $1,021,000 non-Federal. :'$300,000 Federal; $769,000 non-Federal. 1-55 '- -- -~- -'-~I--- REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 1-L CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT, NH, MA AND CT (See Section 40 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS Miles Above Estimated Federal Cost Mouth of Conne- Reservoir Lands cticut Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total Vermont: Union Village2 North Hartland' North Springfield Ball Mountain2 Tlownshend New Hampshire: Surry Mountain 2 Otter Brook2 Massachusetts: Birch Hill2 Tully 2 Barre Falls' Knightville2 I4ittleville2 Conant Brook 2 Connecticut: Colebrook River 2 Mad River Sucker Brook White River Junction White River Junction Springfield Brattleboro Brattleboro Keene Keene Gardner Athol Worcester Northhampton Northhampton Springfield Winsted Winsted Winsted 'Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. "For details, see individual report. 3Non-Federal cost. 4Non-Federal $670,000; Federal $1,540,000. 1-56 228.4 211.7 191.3 178.2 168.3 174.4 171.2 153.3 148.7 130.2 102.8 102.0 122.0 116.0 120.0 118.5 170 185 120 265 133 86 133 56 62 62 160 150 85 223 178 68 Earthfill Earthfill Earthfill Rockfillearth Earthfill Earthfill Earthfill Earthfill Earthfill Rockfillearth Earthfill Earthfill Rockfillearth Rockfillearth Earthfill Earthfill 38,000 71,400 50,600 54,600 33,200 32,500 18,300 49,900 22,000 24,000 49,000 32,400 3,740 98,500 9,700 1,480 $3,186,860 6,349,500 4,782,000 10,448,000 5,530,000 2,445,000 2,782,100 1,775,500 1,339,000 1,928,800 2,594,440 5,863,400 1,936,000 8,342,000 3,380,000 2,550,000 $908,300 963,000 2,050,000 350,000 1,878,000 385,000 1,378,400 3,075,000 368,000 39,000 821,200 1,150,000 1,015,000 5,922,000 2,210,0004 180,0003 $4,095,160 7,312,500 6,832,000 10,798,000 7,400,000 2,830,000 4,160,500 4,850,500 1,707,000 1,967,800 3,415,640 7,013,400 2,951,000 14,264,000 5,590,000 2,730,000 ----- ' NEW ENGLANI) DIVISION TABLE 1-L (continued) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Above Estimated Cost Mouth of Conne- Lands cticut and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Charlestown, NH 181 Riverbank protection $ 114,000 - $ 114,000 Chicopee, MA 80 Wall and levee 1,738,000 $ 250,000 1,988,000 Chicopee Falls, MA2 83 Wall and levee 2,600,000 '70,000 2,670,000 East Hartford, CT 52 Wall and levee 2,135,000 271,000 2,406,000 Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT2 50 Channel improvement 220,300 - 220,300 Gardner, MA 163 Dam and levee 493,900 35,000 528,900 Hlartford, CT 52 Wall and levee 6,930,0004 1,150,000 8,080,000 Hartford, VT 216 Channel improvement 332,000 - 332,000 Holyoke, MA 85 Wall and levee 3,418,000 150,000 3,568,000 Hluntington, MA 100 Riverbank protection 4,000 - 4,000 Israel R., Lancaster, NH2 314 Gabion overflow weir 475,000 - 475,000 Keene, NH 167 Channel improvement 44,000 - 44,000 Northampton, MA 94 Wall and levee 960,000 150,000 1,110,000 North Stratford, NH2 345 Slope protection 170,000 - 170,000 Park River, CT2 51 Conduit 59,877,000 1,300,000 61,177,000 Riverdale, MA 80 Wall and levee 1,138,000 50,000 1,188,000 Salmon R., Colchester, Ct2 38 Slope protection 235,000 - 235,000 Springdale, MA 84 Wall and levee 700,000 57,000 757,000 Springfield, MA 76 Wall and levee 932,000 272,000 1,204,000 Three Rivers, MA 98 Wall and levee 1,580,000 700,000 2,280,000 Ware, MA 110 Channel improvement 400,000 85,000 485,000 Weston, VT 195 Channel improvement 13,000 2,000 15,000 West Springfield, MA 76 Wall and levee 1,579,0003 30,000 1,609,000 West Warren, MA 111 Wall and levee 390,000 64,000 454,000 Winsted, CT 115 Channel improvement 246,000 30,000 276,000 'To be borne by local interests. Also includes local interests portion of relocation. 2For details see individual report. a Includes $245,000 Public Works Administration funds. 4Includes $835,000 Public Works Administration funds. 1-57 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 1-M HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CT (See Section 41 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS' lall Meadow East Brnnch" 'IThomaston Northfield Black Rock Hancock Br. lop Brook Miles Above Mouth of Naguatuck Height Reservoir Capacity Estimated Federal Cost Lands and Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages2 Total Torrington, CT 41.0 73 Rock and 8,620 $1,852,400 $1,290,000 $3,142,000 earthfill Torrington, CT 43.7 92 Earthfill 4,350 1,509,800 1,290,000' 2,799,800 Torrington, CT 30.5 142 Rock and 42,000 6,382,000 7,900,000 14,282,000 earthfill Torrington, CT 30.6 118 Earthfill 2,432 1,856,000 975,000 2,831,000 Waterbury, CT 29.0 154 Earthfill 8,700 5,223,700 2,958,600 8,182,300 Waterbury, CT 25.0 57 Earthfill 4,030 1,595,000 2,585,000 4,180,000 Waterbury, CT 15.9 97 Earthfill 6,970 2,702,000 3,450,000 6,152,000 'For details of projects, see individual reports. 2Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. :I'n cludes cost of lands borne by local interests. a For last full report, see Annual Report for 1970 5For last full report, see Annual Report for 1973. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT' location Alford, Green River, MA Ansonia-IDerby, CT l)anhury, ("CT l)erby, CT North Canaan, Blackerry River, CT Pittsfield, MA Salisbury, CT Sheffield, MA Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, CT Torrington, East Branch, CT Torrington,West Branch, CT Waterbury-Watertown, CT Miles Above Mouth of Housatonic Estimated Cost River Type of Structure 111.0 Earth dike and stone slope protection 13.0 Wall, levee, channel improvement and pumping station 56.0 Walls, channel improvement and bridge replacement 12.0 Walls, levees and pumping station 83.0 Snagging and clearing project 133.0 Stone arch culvert 76.0 Gabionade with slope. protection 96.0 Stone slope protection 43.0 Timber Bulkhead 51.0 Dike and channel improvement 52.0 Walls, dikes and channel 32.0 Wall, dike and channel Construction $ 41,400 Lands and Damages 2 $ - Total $ 41,400 17,850,000 1,178,000 18,995,000 13,182,000 7,583,000 73,900 443,000 100,000 203,000 113,000 389,200 228,300 263,300 1,862,000 15,044,000 647,000 8,230,000 - 73,900 85,000 528,000 - 100,000 - 203,000 - 113,000 - 389,200 - 228,300 - 263,300 ' For details of projects, see individual reports. To be borne by local interests. Includes relocations. 1-58 --------- -- 1 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-N MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, NH, AND MA (See Section 43 of Text) RESERVOIRS Miles Above Estimated Federal Cost Mouth of Merri- Reservoir Lands mack Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total Franklin Falls' Franklin, NH 118.2 140 Earthfill 154,000 $ 6,190,500 $ 1,760,000 $ 7,950,500 lackwater' Concord, NH 118.8 75 Earthfill 46,000 847,000 553,000 1,400,000 Hopkinton-Everett 2t . Concord, NH 87.3 115 Earthfill 157,300 12,715,400 8,737,000 21,452,500 Edward MacDowell2 Keene, NH 161.3 67 Earthfill 12,800 1,708,300 306,000 2,014,300 Monoosnoc' Leominster, MA 100.6 71 Earthfill 2,000 3,430,000 370,000 3,800,000' Phillips " Fitchburg, MA 105.4 48 Earthfill 1,600 13,450,000 7,350,000 20,800,0006 Nookagee Fitchburg, MA 107.9 106 Earthfill 8,100 15,476,000 5,742,000 21,200,000 Whitmanville Fitchburg, MA 110.6 76 Earthfill 9,350 11,590,000 6,210,000 17,800,000 ' Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocation. 2 For details, see individual report. ' Project deferred, cost not revised on current price basis. "Substituted for Bennington and Beards Brook. Distance and height are for Everett Dam. Distance and height for Hopkinton Dam are 118 miles and 76 feet, respectively. SIncludes Non-Federal reimbursement. SBased on "large" Phillips plan which would eliminate Nookagee Lake. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Above Mouth of Merrimack Estimated Cost Lands and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Amesbury, Powwow and 3.0 Wall and revetment 133,400 $ - $ 133,400 Merrimack Rivers, MA2'' Nashua, NH 2 55.0 Wall and levee 270,000 3,000 273,000 5 Lowell, NH 2 39.0 Wall and levee 490,600 90,000 580,600 Monoosnoc Brook, MA' 98.4 Channel improvement 310,000 90,000 400,000 North Nashua River, MA 2. 100.5 Channel improvement 3,235,000 - 3,235,000 Saxonville, MA2 69.0 Wall, levee, channel 4,218,700 530,000 4,748,700 'To be borne by local interests. "Project completed. :;Project deferred. Cost has not been price basis. 4 For details, see individual report. 5 Excludes $15,000 expended from contributed funds. revised on current 1-59 IE'OIt'' OI'' '11H CIIIEI OLFFE NGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 'i'ABLE 1-0O TIIAMES RIVER BASIN, RI AND MA (See Section 49 of Text) RESERVOIRS Name Hiodges Village I u ffunville 2 East Brimfield 2 Westville 2 West IThompson'2 Mansfield Hollow'2 Nearest City Webster, MA Webster, MA Southbridge, MA Southbridge, MA Putnam, CT Willimantic, CT Miles Above Mouth of Thames Height River (feet) Type 74.5 74.4 82.8 75.2 59.3 40.0 55 66 55 80 70 70 Earthfill Earthfill Earthfill Earthfill Earthfill Earthfill Estimated Federal Cost Reservoir Capacity (acre-feet) 13,000 12,700 30,000 11,000 25,600 52,000 'Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2 For details, see individual report. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Location Norwich, CT Miles Above Mouth of Thames River Construction $1,337,000 2,157,600 1,337,000 2,285,000 5,014,300 4,108,000 Lands and Damagest $3,144,000 841,000 5,720,000 3,400,000 1,965,000 2,340,000 Estimated Cost Type of Structure 15.0 Channel improvements Lands and Construction Damages' $1,209,000 $72,000 1 Borne by local interests. TABLE 1-P BOSTON HARBOR, MA Total Federal Cost for Existing Project to September 1982 (See Section 2 of Text) Regular Public Works Emergency Relief 'Excludes $17,767 contributed funds. 1-60 Total $4,481,000 2,998,600 7,057,000 5,685,000 6,979,300 6,448,000 Total $1,281,000 Funds New Work $21,881,851 1,030,806 935,303 $23,847,960 Maintenance $7,444,344 $7,444,3441 Total $29,326,195 1,030,806 935,303 $31,292,304 -- ---- '-" NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-Q RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Date Survey Date Survey Project Conducted Project Conducted Connecticut Greenwich Harbor Stonington harbor Mlaine Josias River Kennebec River Saco River Scarboro River Wells Harbor Dec 1981 Feb 1982 Mar 1982 Nov 1981 May 1982 Nov 1981 Feb 1982 Massachusetts Falmouth Harbor Fall River Harbor Hingham Harbor New Hampshire Portsmouth Harbor 1-61 Mar1982 Jun1982 Oct 1981 Dec 1981 NEW YORK, N.Y., DISTRICT* This district comprises western Vermont, small portions of western Massachusetts, Connecticut, and eastern and south-central New York, including Long Island, and northeastern New Jersey, embraced in the drainage basins tributary to Lake Champlain and St. Lawrence River system east thereof and to Atlantic Ocean from New York-Connecticut State line to but not including Manasquan Inlet, N.J. It exercises jurisdiction, however, over all matters pertaining to improvement of Great Lakes to Hudson River waterway. Under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, the District Engineer, as Supervisor of New York Harbor, also exercises jurisdic tion under the laws enacted for the preservation of the tidal waters of New York Harbor, its adjacent or tributary water, and the waters of Long Island Sound. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Aquatic Plant Control ..................... 2. Bay Ridge-Red Hook Channels, N.Y. ......... 3. Buttermilk Channel, N.Y. ................. 4. East Rockaway Inlet, N.Y................. 5. Fire Island to Jones Inlet, N.Y............... 6. Flushing Bay and Creek, N.Y............... 7. Hudson River,N.Y. ...................... 8. Jones Inlet, N.Y. .......................... 9. Long Island Intra Coastal W/W, N.Y. ........ 10. Moriches Inlet, N.Y. ....................... 11. Narrows of Lake Champlain, N.Y. ........... 12. Newark Bay Hackensack Passaic Rivers, N.J. . 13. New York & New Jersey Channels .......... 14. New York Harbor - collection and removal of drift ................................... 15. New York Harbor-entrance channels & anchorage areas ...................... 16. Shark River, N.J ....................... 17. Shooters Island, N.Y. & N.J. ............ 18. Supervisor of New York Harbor ............ 19. Reconnaissance and conditions surveys ....... 20. Other authorized navigation projects ........ 21. Navigation work under special authorization... Page 23. Other authorized beach erosion control projects 2-11 24. Beach erosion control work under special 2-2 authorization ............................ 2-11 2-2 2-2 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-4 2-5 2-5 2-5 2-6 2-7 2-7 2-8 2-8 .2-9 2-10 2-10 2-10 2-10 2-10 Beach Erosion Control 22. East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part I) .................. 2-10 Flood Control 25. Ardsley, N.Y. ........................... 2-11 26. Elizabeth, N.J. ........................... 2-12 27. Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, N.Y. .... 2-12 28. Liberty State Park Levee & Seawall, N.J ...... 2-15 29. Passaic River Basin, N.J. & N.Y. Phase I ...... 2-15 30. Sawmill River Elmsford-Greenburg, N.Y. ..... 2-16 31. South Ellenville, N.Y................... 2-16 32. Staten Island, N.Y. ........................ 2-17 33. Yonkers, N.Y. .................... .... 2-18 34. Inspection of completed flood control projects . 2-18 35. Other authorized flood control projects ....... 2-18 36. Flood control work under special authorization . 2-19 37. Emergency streambank and shoreline protection under special authorization .......... 2-19 38. Debris removal work under special authorization ...................... ....... 2-19 General Investigations 39. Surveys ................................. 40. Collection and study of basic data ............ 41. Deauthorized projects ................... . 2-19 2-19 2-19 *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 2-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in New York District. Existing Project. Provides for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligator-weed, Eurasian water milfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths, from the navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation public health, and-related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide 30 percent of the cost of the program except as modified by 1962 River and Harbor Act and agree to hold the United States free from damages. Operations and results during period. During the first year of a ten year control program for removal of nuisance aquatic plants in Lake Champlain, a contract for removal of 226 acres of these plants was completed at a cost of $171,000. The second segment of the control program will be undertaken during the summer of 1983. Condition as of September 30. Reconnaissance report covering the aquatic plant problems of the North Atlantic Division area was completed in August 1967. Planning for the waterchestnut control in the Hudson-Mohawk basin was completed by the New York District, contracts for $181,562 accomplished during FY1971 through FY1976. Reconnaissance report for Lake Champlain, Vermont and a General Design Memorandum have been completed. 2. BAY RIDGE AND RED HOOK CHANNELS, N.Y. Location. These channels lie along east shore of Upper Bay, New York Harbor and, with Buttermilk Channel, form an easterly channel along Brooklyn waterfront from the Narrows to East River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 369 and 541.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938, pages 1768 and 195, respectively. Existing project. A channel 1,200 feet wide and 40 feet deep at mean low water from the Narrows to Bay Ridge Avenue, Brooklyn, thence 1,750 feet wide to junction of Bay Ridge and Red Hook Channels, thence 1,200 feet wide through Red Hook Channel to junction with Buttermilk Channel and a channel of same depth extending into Gowanus Bay from junction of Bay Ridge Channel with Red Hook Channel, narrowing uniformly in width to about 500 feet at 28th Street, Brooklyn. Section included in project is 4 miles long. Mean tidal range, 4.7 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.6 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 5.2 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $4,277,197, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978. Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. The U.S. Hopper Dredge Goethals was employed from November 10, 1981 to November 24, 1981 in Bay Ridge Channel. Removed 110,399 cubic yards, place measurement, of material at a cost of $625,823. A continuing contract was awarded August 16, 1982. Work commenced September 27, 1982. Removed 47,800 cubic yards, place measurement, of material at a cost of $965,132. Reconnaissance Surveys cost $8,041. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced March 1901 and completed June 1940. 3. BUTTERMILK CHANNEL, N.Y. Location. Connects deep water in Upper Bay, New York Harbor, southwest of Governors Island, with deep water in East River northeast of Governors Island, and, with bay Ridge and Red Hook Channels, forms an easterly channel along Brooklyn waterfront from Narrows to East River. It lies between Governors Island and Borough of Brooklyn, New York City. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 541 and 745). Previous projects. For details see page 205, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. A channel 1,000 feet wide, 40 feet deep at mean low water for width of existing 500-foot channel and 35 feet deep for remaining 500-foot width of existing channel. Suitable widening at junctions with east River and Anchorage Channel to 35 feet deep and with Red Hook Channel to 40 feet deep and for additional widening with Anchorage and Red Hook Channels to provide a minimum clear channel width of 2,100 feet to 35 feet deep. Section included in project is 2.25 miles long. Mean tidal range 4.4 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.3 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.8 feet mean low water up to 5.2 feet above mean high water. New work for completed projected cost $4,093,951, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978. Operation and results during period. The U.S. Hopper Dredge Goethals was employed from November 1, 1981 to November 10, 1981. Removed 46,020 cubic yards, place measurement, of material at a cost of $448,000. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project commenced October 1903 and was completed March 1965. Easterly 500-foot width of channel, from Anchorage Channel to East River, was completed to a 40-foot depth in May 1935. Westerly 500-foot channel, including widening the junction with East River, was completed to a 40-foot depth in May 1935. Westerly 500-foot channel, including widening the junction with East River, was completed to a 35-foot depth in July 1961. Widening the junctions with Anchorage and Red Hook Channels 2-2 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT was completed in March 1965. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1982 was $8,331,475, $122,051 public works funds and $3,971,900 regular funds, a total of $4,093,951 for new work and $4,237,524 for maintenance. 4. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Long Island between main body of island and western end of Long beach. It is 10 miles east of Rockaway Inlet and about 27 miles by water south and east from the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. A channel 12 feed deep at mean low water and 250 feet wide from 12-foot contour in Atlantic Ocean for about 0.6 mile to 12-foot contour in Long Beach Channel protected by a jetty. Mean tidal range, 4.3 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.2 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 5.6 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $603,969, including $100,000 contributed funds. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 39 terminals in Oceanside, Island Park, Long Beach, and East Rockaway. Nine of these are oil terminals, one of which has a railroad spur. Other terminals are repair and mooring docks with a berthage of 7,655 feet. Of these, 21 have marine railways and 1 has mechanical-handling facilities. There are public wharves at East Rockaway and Woodmere. Waterfront on northside of Long Beach has been bulkheaded. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during period. Maintenance dredging of the East Rockaway Inlet channel was combined with the Periodic Nourishment Contract #2 for the East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet Beach Erosion and Hurricane Protection Project. Periodic Nourishment Contract #2 was awarded on May 28, 1982 at a cost of $5,888,900. The contract was completed on August 2, 1982. Operation and Maintenance funds in the amount of $988,914 were used for the channel portion of this contract. Periodic Nourishment Contract #1 completed in FY 1980 was also combined with the Operation and Maintenance dredging of East Rockaway Inlet channel. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began February 1933 and is 100 percent complete. East jetty, 4,250 feet long, was completed in July 1934. Project channel was completed in May 1935. 5. FIRE ISLAND TO JONES INLET, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Long Island, about 50 miles by water south and east of the Battery, New York City. It is the main entrance into Great South Bay from the Atlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 578.) Existing project. A jetty extending generally southwest and south for 5,000 feet from high ground on Democrat Point at west end of Fire Island, and a channel 10 feet deep and 250 feet wide from deep water in ocean to deep water within inlet. Mean tidal range at ocean and inlet ends of Democrat Point are 4.1 and 2.4, respectively. Mean range of spring tides on the ocean side is 5.0 feet. Irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 2.5 feet below mean low water up to 6.2 feet above mean high water on the ocean side. New work for completed project cost $684,545, including $90,190 contributed by local interests. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None within area immediately adjacent to Federal improvement. In Great South Bay there are 28 boat repair and storage yards, 3 commercial fish terminals and 3 ferries, with a total berthage of 25,440 feet. Twenty-eight terminals have marine railways and 13 are public wharves. In addition, Patchogue River has 12 boat repair and storage yards, 1 ferry, and 3 fuel oil terminals, with a total berthage of 8,380 feet. Fourteen have marine railways and 2 are public wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. In addition to the commercial facilities there are numerous privatelyowned terminals. Operations and results during period. At the request of local interests, Operation and Maintenance dredging of the Inlet has been postponed until an Inlet Dynamic Study is completed. The residents of Oak Beach contend that dredging the Inlet exposes Oak Beach to direct wave attack, thereby causing an erosion problem. The Inlet Dynamic Study is scheduled for completion in the spring of 1983, at which time future Operation and Maintenance dredging will be reassessed. Cost for FY1982 was $5,614. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced June 1939. Jetty was completed in 1941. Since a November 1953 survey revealed a channel with dimensions substantially the same as those authorized, work under existing project was considered complete November 1953. Jetty has surpassed its capacity as a sand entrapping agent and, when examined in June 1969, was found to be in poor condition. 6. FLUSHING BAY AND CREEK, N.Y. Location. On north shore of Long Island, opening into East River, 12 miles by water northeast of the Battery, New York City. Bay is 1.8 miles long in a northwest-southeast direction and from 0.4 to 0.8 mile wide. Flushing Creek enters bay from southeast and is about 1.1 miles long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 226.) Presious projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1932, and 1938; pages 1772, 169, and 168, respectively. Existing project. (a) A bay channel with a depth of 15 feet at mean low water, and 3000 feet wide from deep water in East River 1.8 miles to maneuvering area; (b) thence a creek channel with a depth of 15 feet at mean low water and 200 feet wide to Northern Boulevard Bridge, thence decreasing uniformly in width to 170 feet at a point 50 feet downstream from Van Wyck expressway Bridge, a distance of about 1.1 miles; (c) a 2-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 branch channel with a depth of 15 feet at mean low water and a width of 200 feet from bay channel maneuvering area 0.1 mile long; (d) an irregularly shaped maneuvering area about 2,000 by 750 feet with a depth of 15 feet at mean low water except approach to west side of municipal boat basin which will remain at 12 feet at mean low water; (e) an anchorage basin about 2,100 by 1,800 feet, encompassing about 84 acres with a depth of 6 feet at mean low water; and (f) riprap revetment of 1,400 feet extension of earth dike. Mean Tidal range, 6.5 feet at mouth of Flushing Bay, 6.8 feet at Northern Boulevard Bridge; mean range of spring tides 8.1 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 4 feet low water to 7.6 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $14894,282, including $419,879 contributed by local interests; and excluding $8,752 expended by local interests for required work, $580,435 contributed, other, funds, and amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish lands, easements and rights-of-way for maintenance and for aids to navigation upon request of Chief of Engineers; hold the United States free from damages; make necessary removals or relocations of pipelines, cables and other utilities and all necessary protective measures to bridges and other structures crossing or adjacent to the waterway; and maintain necessary mooring facilities and utilities for recreational boating open to all on equal terms. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1965, Vol. 2, Part 2, pages 244-248. Operations and results during period. A contract was awarded April 28, 1982 for removal and satisfactory disposal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 15 feet below mean low water. Work commenced June 14, 1982 and was completed August 25, 1982. Removed approximately 250,000 cubic yards, place measurement, of material at a cost of $1,599,894. Reconnaissance surveys cost $21,560. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced April 1963 and was completed October 1964. 7. HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. Location. Originates in Adirondack Mountains, about 250 miles in a direct line and 315 miles along its course from the Battery, New York City, and flows generally southerly into New York Bay. Section under improvement extends from New York City about 156 miles to Waterford. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 282, 283, 284, 747, and 748.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938, pages 1764 and 226, respectively. Existing project. A channel 600 feet wide from new York City to Kingston and thence 400 feet wide to Albany, with widening at bends, a turning basin 700 feet wide and 1,200 feet long at Albany, and 2 anchorages, 1 near Hudson and 1 near Stuyvesant, each 400 feet wide and an average length of 2,400 feet; all with depths of 32 feet in soft material and 34 feet in rock to 2,200 feet south of the Mall Bridge; thence 27 feet deep and 400 feet wide to 900 feet south of the Mall Bridge; thence 14 feet deep at lower low water and generally 400 feet wide to Federal lock at Troy; and thence of same depth and 200 feet wide to southern limit of State barge canal at Waterford; and removal of State dam at Troy and construction of a lock and dam about 2.50 miles below Waterford. Channel is to be formed by dredging and rock excavation, and maintained by dredging and constructing new, and raising and repairing old, longitudinal dikes, built partly under previous projects and partly by the State of New York. Mean range of pool elevation above Federal dam at Troy, in seasons of moderate rains, is about 2.2 feet, as determined in 1934. Mean tidal range is about 4.8 feet between May and October and 5.1 feet between July and September at Federal dam at Troy and about 4.8 feet between May and October and 5.0 feet between July and September at Albany, extreme range due to freshets is 33.1 and 25.9 feet, respectively normal pool level above Federal dam from Troy to Waterford is 14.33 feet above mean sea level. In tidal section of river below dam, assumed lowest low water plane from Troy to Albany is 3 feet below mean sea level. (See Table 2-C for features of lock and dam included in existing project.) New work for completed project cost $39,050,019 exclusive of amounts of expended on previous projects. Widening to form harbors at Albany and Troy, N.Y., to 12 feet deep at a cost of $552,000 (1954) and completion of 27-foot channel at Albany at a cost of $458,000 (1957) are inactive. Construction of dikes at a cost of $642,000 (1957) was placed in deferred for restudy category. All three features of work are excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. Construction of mooring facilities has been authorized. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish suitable spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 6, revised 1979. Operations and results during period. By use of Government plant and hired labor, stumps and snags which formed a potential menace to navigation, and other obstructions, were removed from the shores and channel of the river at a cost of $182,478 for maintenance in FY1982. Government plant and hired labor were employed intermittently through the fiscal year in performing surveys to restore horizontal and vertical controls at a cost of $119,022 for maintenance in FY1982. Government plant and hired labor were employed intermittently through the fiscal year on repairs to Cedar Hill Dike at a cost of $135,023 for maintenance in FY 1982. The lock and dam in Hudson River at Troy, N.Y. were operated and maintained. Operation of Lock for 1982 navigation season was suspended December 8, 1981 and resumed April 26, 1982. Cost incurred was $521,103 for Operation and Maintenance in FY 1982. Recommendations for major rehabilitation of Troy Lock and Dam were reviewed in FY 1982. A large-scale 2-4 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT repair is being considered instead of major rehabilitation at this time. Plans will be developed in FY 1983. Cost incurred during the period were $3,234. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began in July 1910 and was substantially completed in November 1965. New lock and dam at Troy, removal of dam at Troy and construction of 15,545 linear feet of dikes also are complete. In reconstruction of old dikes 39,676 linear feet were raised to adopted crest height. Channel from New York City to Albany is complete to a depth of 32 feet except for the 1,500 linear-foot section at the northern end of the 32-foot project which has never been dredged to project depth. Additionally, the 1,300 linear feet of the 27-foot project remains undredged. Channel from Albany to Waterford is complete to a depth of 14 feet except for a small part of the widening to form a harbor at Troy. Work remaining under the project consists of completion of the 12-foot harbor at Troy and dredging the 27-foot and the remainder of the 32-foot channels at Albany which are not deemed necessary at this time; and reconstruction of dikes. Started coordination with State regarding mooring facilities. (See Table 2-D for total costs of existing project to September 30, 1982. 8. JONES INLET, N.Y. Location: A small inlet on south shore of Long Island connecting Hempstead Bay with Atlantic Ocean, 37 miles by water southeast of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352). Existing project. An entrance jetty and a channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide, from that depth in the ocean through the inlet to Loop Causeway Bridge over Long Creek. Section included in project is about 2.1 miles long. Mean tidal range varies from 4.2 feet at ocean entrance to 3.1 feet at Loop Causeway Bridge; mean range of spring tide varies from 5 to 3.7 feet, respectively; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 8.5 feet above mean high water. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for future maintenance as required, and must maintain a channel 12 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide from Loop Causeway Bridge over Long Creek to head of navigation in Freeport Creek at Mill Road. Terminal facilities. Within area tributary to Jones Inlet there are a number of privately owned small wharves and 40 boat repair and storage yards. The latter are equipped for repair of pleasure craft and fishing vessels. In addition, there are nine public wharves open to the public free of charge, with a total dockage of 2,180 feet. Additional terminals would have to be constructed for receipt of commercial freight in any sizable quantity. Operations and results during period. A contract was awarded March 5, 1982 for removal and satisfactory disposal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 12 feet below mean low water in Jones Inlet, N.Y. Work commenced April 30, 1982 and was completed on June 14, 1982. Removed 93,478 cubic yards, place measurement, of material at a cost of $1,314,945. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced August 1953 and completed June 1959. 9. LONG ISLAND INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, N.Y. Location. Extends from East Rockaway Inlet, on the south side of Long Island, to Great Peconic Bay at eastern end of Long Island. Section included under this project extends from Great South Bay opposite Patchogue to the south end of Shinnecock Canal. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 578.) Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep at mean low water from the federally improved channel in Great South Bay, opposite Patchogue to south end of Shinnecock Canal. Section included in project is 34 miles long. Mean tidal range varies from 1 foot in Shinnecock Bay to 0.7 foot in Patchogue Bay; mean range of spring tides varies from 1.2 feet to 0.8 foot; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 1.8 feet below mean low water to 12 feet above mean high water. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests must furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. There are 17 boat repair and storage yards within the area immediately adjacent to the Federal improvement. There is ample room for expansion and development of terminals when future commerce warrants. Operations and results during period. A contract was awarded July 29, 1982. Work commenced August 26, 1982 and was completed September 25, 1982. Removed approximately 90,000 cubic yards, place measurement, of material at a cost of $816,138. Reconnaissance survey cost $50,136. Condition as of September 30. Work under the existing project was commenced October 1939 and completed September 1940. 10. MORICHES INLET, N.Y. Location. On the south shore of Long Island, about 80 miles by water east of the Battery, New York City. It is an opening through the narrow sandy barrier beach on the south shore of Long Island which separates the Atlantic Ocean from a series of interconnected bays. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. Provides for a channel, 10 feet deep at mean low water and 200 feet wide extending from that depth in the Atlantic Ocean to Moriches Bay, a distance of 0.8 mile; thence a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to the Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, a distance of 1.1 miles; rehabilitation of the existing jetties and revetments; seaward extension of the east jetty to the 12-foot contour and seaward extension of the west jetty a distance of 400 feet; construction of a fixed by-passing 2-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 facility to transfer sand from the east side of the inlet to the west side. Mean tidal range in the ocean at the inlet is 3.3 feet and in the bay at Westhampton Beach is 0.6 foot. Irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 1.7 feet below mean low water up to 15.7 feet above mean low water at the bay. Estimate of cost for new work is $5,680,000 (October 1982); including $50,000 from Coast Guard and $2,630,000 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. The River and Harbor Act of July 14, 1960 provides that local interests shall, prior to construction, agree to contribute in cash 45 percent of the cost of construction by the Corps of Engineers and agree to contribute in cash 50 percent of the maintenance, operation, and replacement, or perform work of equal value when and as acceptable to the Chief of Engineers; and, provided further that in connection with the improvement of the inlet, local interests, prior to construction, agree to (a) make the cash contribution either a lump sum prior to commencement of the work, or in installments prior to commencement of pertinent work items, in accordance with work schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; (b) furnish, free of cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rightsof- way and suitable spoil-disposal areas for the initial work and for subsequent maintenance when and as required; and (c) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and maintenance of the project; (d) provide and maintain suitable terminal facilities when and as required for the accommodation of vessels thatwould navigate the inlets and adjacent bays, open to all on equal terms; and (e) maintain for the duration of the economic life of the project, continued public ownership of the publicly owned shores and their administration for public use, and continued availability for public use of the privately owned shores upon which a portion of the 'Federal share of the cost is based. Terminal facilities. No terminals are within the area immediately adjacent to the Federal improvement. However, numerous public and private terminal facilities are available in Moriches bay and in the connecting canals. Several yacht clubs, boatyards, and public wharves and landings, and numerous private landings are located in Moriches Bay. The yacht clubs and boatyards have equipment for servicing boats. There are boat basins open to the public. The facilities existing in the bay are considered adequate for present and probable future needs under present conditions of Moriches Inlet. There is room for expansion should future commerce warrant. Operations and results during period. Preconstruction planning resumed in October 1977. Coordination cQntinued with Federal, State and local agencies on current problems and need for all project purposes (i.e, navigation; beach erosion control; water quality improvement). Formulated plans for a single purpose navigation project. In January 1980, a breach occurred adjacent to the eastern jetty. Emergency funds ($11.3 million) were authorized under the authority of PL84-99 to close the breach. About 1,185,000 cubic yards of sand fill were used to effect closure of the breach by March 1981. Condition as of September 30. Construction has not been initiated. Preconstruction planning (advance engineering and design) is continuing with the view to determining the best alternative plan for providing navigation improvements in view of existing conditions. 11. NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, N.Y. AND VT. Location. This waterway, 37 miles long, comprises southern end of Lake Champlain and extends from Whitehall to Crown Point, N.Y. Project extends 13.5 miles from Whitehall, N.Y. at southern extremity of lake, northerly to Benson Landing, Vt. (See Lake Survey Chart 14784.) Previous projects. For details, see Annual Reports for 1932, and 1963, pages 256 and 177, respectively. Existing project. A channel extending from Whitehall, N.Y., at head of Lake Champlain, to Benson Landing, 12 feet deep at low lake level and generally 150 feet wide, and installation of fender booms at Putts Rock, Putts Leap, Narrows near Dresden, Pulpit Point and Cedar Mountain. Reference plane of low lake level is 93 feet above mean sea level. Section included in project is about 13.5 miles. Usual annual variation of lake level is 5.8 feet and extreme variation varies from 0.6 foot below up to 8.8 feet above low lake level. Widening channel throughout its entire length to project width of 200 feet is inactive and excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion, revised in (1954), was $1,573,000. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. In Whitehall Harbor consisting of three timber wharves, aggregating 4,200 feet in length. State of New York constructed a barge canal terminal at Whitehall, just south of terminus of canal, which has been equipped with a 5-ton hand-operated derrick and a store-house. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during period. Government and hired labor were employed intermittently during the fiscal year in removal of stumps and snags at a cost of $9,415. Government plant and hired labor were employed in replacing deteriorated fender booms at a cost of $3,722. Supplies and equipment cost $1,201. Total costs for the project were $14,338. Condition as of September 30. Work under the existing project was commenced June 1919 and is about 77 percent complete. A channel 12 feet deep at low lake level and least a width of 150 feet has been excavated throughout the length of the improvement, except at the Elbow (Putts Leap and Putts Rock). (Fender booms opposite the Delaware and Hudson Railroad trestle have been removed as they are no longer considered necessary 2-6 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT for navigation). The work remaining to complete the project consists of widening the channel throughout its entire length to the project width of 200 feet. 12. NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK AND PASSAIC RIVERS, N.J. Location. Newark Bay is an estuary about 1.25 miles wide and 6 miles long extending southerly from confluence of Hackensack and Passaic Rivers to New York and New Jersey Channels. Hackensack River rises near Haverstraw, Rockland County, N.Y., and flows about 45 miles into Newark bay. Passaic River rises in highlands of northeastern New Jersey and flows about 80 miles into Newark Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 285 and 287.) Previous projects. For details see 1926 Annual Report, pages 265 and 266; and Annual Reports for 1929, 1938, 1954, and 1976, pages 301, 244, 134, and 2-11, respectively. Existing project. A main channel 700 feet wide to the branch channel to Port Newark, thence 500 feet wide to a turning basin 1,300 feet long and 900 feet wide at the junction of the Hackensack and Passaic River channels, length about 4.7 miles; a maneuvering area south of the Central Railroad of New Jersey Bridge 2,200 feet long and 300 feet wide with depths of 38 feet in the south half and 35 feet in the north half; a combined bend cutoff and maneuvering area at the south side of the junction with Elizabeth branch channel; and widening of bends at the Kill Van Kull and Port Newark Channels. (Authorized depth 35 feet except as noted above) (adopted 1966). At Port Newark-A branch channel 800 feet wide leading to an inshore channel 400 feet wide 1.6 miles (adopted 1945). Authorized depth 37 feet in rock and 35 feet in soft material; a pierhead channel 200 feet wide along the east bulkhead between the Port Newark and Elizabeth branch channels, length 4,100 feet Authorized depth 35 feet (adopted 1962). At Elizabeth Marine Terminal-a branch channel 500 feet wide, length about 1.4 miles; a pierhead channel along the east bulkhead 290 feet wide, length about 1.1 miles; a south channel along the south bulkhead 290 feet wide, length about 2,600 feet; a southern approach area just above Central Railroad of New Jersey Bridge enlarged for turning and maneuvering, with a maximum length of about 2,700 feet and width (between the pierhead channel and Newark Bay channel) of about 800 feet. Authorized depth 35 feet (adopted 1962). Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1954 provides local interests furnish lands, rights-of-way, and suitable spoil-disposal areas for initial construction and future maintenance; provide depths commensurate with channel depth in approaches and berths at terminals of Companies which would use improvement; and hold the United States free from damages. River and Harbor Act of 1962 provides that local interests must provide lands, easements and rights-of-way for maintenance and construction, hold the United States free from damages, provide and maintain adequate public terminal and transfer facilities, and accomplish without cost to the United States, removal or relocation of pipelines, cables and other utilities. Assurances were furnished by Port of New York Authority and accepted June 12, 1964. Local cooperation required by previous modifications is fully complied with. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. A contract was awarded May 28, 1982. Work commenced July 9, 1982 and was completed August 29, 1982. Removed approximately 553,951 cubic yards, place measurement, of material at a cost of $2,218,610. Reconnaissance surveys cost $106,941. Condition as of September 30. Work under the active portion of project began June 1976 and is 100 percent complete. Work remaining to complete existing project consists of: deepening the Hackensack River channel to depths of 32 feet and 15 feet. Work was initiated for modification of project consisting of additional widening at junction with Kill Van Kull by deepening to 37 feet a triangular area at the eastern end of the 30 foot channel south of Shooters Island. Two contracts for the removal of all material including ledge rock to 37 feet mean low water were completed at a total cost of $3,772,631. There is a claim outstanding. 13. NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS Location. Extends from deep water northwest of Sandy Hook, through Lower New York bay and Raritan bay, to Perth Amboy, and thence through Arthur Kill, lower Newark Bay, and Kill Van Kull to deep water in Upper New York Bay. This route is approximately along boundary line between States of New York and New Jersey. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 285, 286, and 369.) Previous projects. For details see 1963 Annual Report pages 184 and 185. Existing project. A channel through Lower New York Bay, Raritan Bay, Arthur Kill, lower Newark Bay, and Kill Van Kull to Upper New York Bay, depths of 37 feet in rock and 35 feet in soft material throughout, 600 feet wide across Lower New York Bay and Raritan Bay and in Arthur Kill to a point 1,000 feet north of Smith Creek, widened to 800 feet in vicinities of Seguine Point and Wards Point, respectively; thence 500 wide to a point 1,000 feet south of Piles Creek; thence 500 to 600 feet wide and passing north of Shooters Island and protected by a dike on its northern side to junction of channel into Newark bay; thence 800 feet wide through Kill Van Kull to Constable Hook; thence 1,000 feet wide from a point opposite the east end of Constable Hook to a point near the intersection with the channel along New Jersey pierhead line; and thence 1,400 feet wide through Kill Van Kull to Upper New York Bay; with an anchorage 38 feet deep to accommodate five vessels south of Perth Amboy, all with suitable easing at bends and junctions. Section included in project is 30.8 miles long. In addition, 2-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 construction of a dike north of Shooters Island and two secondary channels 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide, one south of Shooters Island and the other in Raritan Bay connecting with Raritan River, were completed under previous projects and maintained under existing project. A triangular area at the eastern end of the 30 foot channel south of Shooters Island was deepened to 35 feet in order to provide additional widening in the vicinity of Bergen Point and is included in the Newark bay project. All depths refer to plane of mean low water. Mean range of tides varies between 4.7 and 5.1 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.7 to 6.3 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.9 feet above mean high water. Anchorage at Sandy Hook, and cutoff at junction of Main Ship Channel are deferred for restudy and excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion (1957) is $2,150,000. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for the middle section of Arthur Kill where local interests must furnish spoil disposal areas for maintenance. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. The U.S. Hopper Dredge Goethals commenced work in the Kill Van Kull entrance on January 2, 1982 and worked until January 8, 1982. Removed a total of 16,488 cubic yards, place measurement, of material at a cost of $284,593. Contract awarded May 28, 1982 in channel North of Shooters Island, N.Y. Work commenced July 31, 1982 and was completed on September 16, 1982. Removed approximately 474,800 cubic yards, place measurement, of material at a cost of $1,648,158. A continuing contract was awarded July 29, 1982 in Perth Amboy Anchorage. Work commenced August 20, 1982 and was continuing at the end of the fiscal year. Removed 408,900 cubic yards, place measurement, of material at a cost of $1,709,359. Reconnaissance surveys cost $60,199. Conditions as of September 30. Work under active portion of existing project began in October 1933. Work completed consists of providing authorized project depth and widths throughout entire channel from Lower New York Bay to Upper New York Bay and providing depths of 37 and 25 feet in Perth Amboy Anchorage. In addition to above mentioned work, construction of a dike north of Shooters Island, two secondary channels 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide, one south of Shooters Island, the other in Raritan Bay connecting with Raritan River were completed under previous projects. Work remaining under existing project consists of dredging cutoff at junction of Main Ship Channel to dimensions authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 30, 1935, and May 17, 1950, dredging anchorage in vicinity of Sandy Hook. (See Table 2-D for total cost for existing project to September 30, 1982.) 14. 'NEW YORK HARBOR COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Applies to Lower and Upper Bays, New York Harbor: East River, Harlem River, Hudson River Channel, N.Y., New York and New Jersey Channels, Newark Bay, N.J., and their tributaries. Existing project. Provides for collection, removal and disposal of drift, derelict vessels, deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores of New York Harbor and tributary waters, and for the repair of certain other piers, wharves and shore structures. Work authorized before Act of 1970 was restricted solely to removal of drift from waterways and was funded as a maintenance activity. Estimate of first cost of improvement under Act of 1974 is $91,800,000 (October 1982) including $30,600,000 cash contribution from local interests, plus $51,500,000 to be contributed for repair and disposal of deteriorated shore structures in use. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation conditions of the plans currently under review by the Chief of Engineers provide that local interests must furnish all lands, easements and rights-of-way required for the improvement; hold the United States free from damages; enact and enforce local legislation to prevent creation of sources of drift, contribute in cash one third of the first cost of the Federal work, and make necessary repairs to deteriorated structures in use so as to eliminate them as a source of drift. These conditions are subject to approval by Secretary of the Army and the President, as stipulated in Section 113 of the authorizing law, Public Law 91-611. Operations and results during period. New work: Liberty State Park Contract IVB was completed at a cost of $1,197,974. East River-Manhattan Waterfront contract was completed at a cost of $1,477,806. A contract for removal of Piers 17 and 18 on the East River was awarded on April 12, 1982 for an estimated cost of $219,609, and is 50 percent complete. Engineering and design for the balance of project continued. Maintenance. U.S. Debris Boats Driftmaster, Gelberman and Hayward and auxiliary plant were assigned the work of removing and disposing of drift. Removed and disposed of 524,647 cubic feet (4,098 cords) of driftwood, ranging in size from small blocks to timbers of large dimensions, including piles and pieces of wreckage at a cost of $2,850,029 in FY1982. Conditions as of September 30. Work authorized under River and Harbor Acts of 1915, 1917 and 1930 is continuous maintenance for which no percentage of completion exists. For work authorized by the 1974 Water Resources Development Act, removal of drift sources has commenced at Liberty State Park, New Jersey, and on the East River in New York. Liberty State Park Contracts I, II, III, IVA and IVB have been completed. The East River contract has also been completed. Contract for removal of Piers 17 and 18 (East River) was awarded on April 12, 1982 for $219,609. 15. NEW YORK HARBORENTRANCE CHANNELS AND ANCHORAGE AREAS Location. In Upper and Lower bays New York Harbor is 330 miles southwest by water of Boston Harbor, Mass., 2-8 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT and 165 miles northeast of entrance to Delaware Bay, N.J. The Upper Bay extends about 5.5 miles southerly from junction of Hudson and East Rivers opposite the Battery, New York City; to the Narrows. Lower Bay extends about 9 miles from the Narrows to the sea. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12327, 12334, 12335, and 12349.) Existing project. Ambrose Channel 45 feet deep and 2,000 feet wide, extending about 10.2 miles from the sea to deep water in the Lower bay; Anchorage Channel, an extension of Ambrose Channel, with same depth and width, in the Upper bay, opposite anchorage grounds, about 5.7 miles long; a southerly entrance channel, Sandy Hook Channel (East Section) 35 feet deep and generally 800 feet wide extending 3.4 miles from 35-foot ocean contour to Bayside Channel along an alignment generally west of the South Channel; and elimination from authorized project of that portion of Bayside-Gedney Channel east of junction with new southerly entrance channel; for Bayside Channel 35 feet deep and 800 feet wide, extending about 3.7 miles from junction with new southerly entrance to junction with Main Ship Channel; Main Ship Channel 30 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide, extending about 5.3 miles from Bayside Channel to deep water in Lower bay; a channel along New Jersey pierhead line connecting Kill Van Kull with deep water in Anchorage Channel, south of Liberty Island anchorage, 20 feet deep for 500 feet wide with widening at bends to 800 feet and about 3 miles long; an anchorage in vicinity of Liberty (Bedloes) Island (about 160 acres in extent) 20 feet deep; and for removal of Craven Shoal to 30 feet deep; for a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 2.3 miles long, extending from bell buoy 23 to Hoffman and Swinburne Island; for an anchorage area in Red Hook Flats to depths of 45, 40 and 35 feet and an anchorage area in Gravesend Bay to 47 feet deep. Project depths refer to mean low water. Mean tidal range is 4.7 feet at Fort Hamilton; mean range of spring tides, 5.7 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.2 feet above mean high water. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised Vol. 2, 1978. Operations and results during period. The U.S. Hopper Dredge Goethals was employed from November 24, 1981 to January 2, 1982 in dredging to remove shoals in Ambrose Channel. Removed 507,376 cubic yards, place measurement, of material at a cost of $1,464,678. A contract was awarded May 28, 1982 in Sandy Hook Channel. Work commenced July 11, 1982 and was completed on August 21, 1982. Removed 352,166 cubic yards, place measurement, of material at a cost of $1,953,840. A total of $49,850 was expended in FY1982 for engineering and design of maintenance dredging specifications for work to be accomplished in FY 1983. Reconnaissance surveys cost $269,013. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began in 1885 and is 100 percent complete. Main Ship and Bayside-Gedney Channels were completed to 30 feet deep in February 1891. Deepening of Bayside- Gedney Channel to 35 feet for a width of 800 feet was completed in June 1939. Ambrose Channel was completed to 40 feet deep for a width of 2,000 feet in April 1914 and substantially completed to 45 feet deep for a width of 2,000 feet in 1951. Relocation of Anchorage Channel was completed to 40 feet deep in October 1932. Center 800 feet was dredged to 45 feet in June 1947 and westerly 600-foot strip in April 1948. Easterly 600-foot strip was substantially completed in June 1953. Channel between Staten Island and Hoffman and Swinburne Islands was completed in December 1920 up to within 300 feet of southerly limits of project. Dredged channel meets all needs of navigation and no further work of improvement is contemplated for the present. Channel along New Jersey pierhead line from Kill Van Kull to Anchorage Channel was completed in March 1939. Widening at bends near southerly and northerly ends authorized in 1948 was completed in November 1960. Red Hook Flats anchorage was completed to depths of 45, 40 and 35 feet in October 1976. Anchorage Channel was relocated to the westward in 1982. Red Hook Flats Anchorage was accbrdingly increased in area. No dredging was required. Liberty (Bedloes) Island anchorage was completed to 20 feet in October 1944. Sandy Hook Channel (east section) was completed to a depth of 35 feet in June 1963. Gravesend Bay Anchorage was completed to a 47-foot depth in November 1977. 16. SHARK RIVER, N.J. Location. A small stream entering Atlantic Ocean 20 miles south of Sandy Hook on the New Jersey coast. Forty miles by water south of the Battery, New York City. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 795 and 1215.) Existing project. A 1.7 mile channel 18 feet deep at mean low water and 150 feet wide across the bar at entrance to inlet; thence 12 feet deep and generally 100 feet wide through main channel and south channel to Route 35 bridge; thence 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide to upper limit of the Belmar municipal boat basin, with additional depths and widths where necessary and practicable to produce satisfactory current velocities at bridges: and an anchorage 12 feet deep over about 7.3 acres east of Route 4-N bridge. Mean tidal range at mouth is 4 feet; mean range of spring tides 4.8 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 2.6 feet below mean low water up to 8.4 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost was $150,000. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests are required to furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for maintenance. Terminal facilities. Two yacht basins are located on south shore of lower portion of Shark River. One is publicly owned and has a berthage of 2,600 feet. Several boatyards, boathouses, and landings for commercial and recreational craft are located in the lower portion of Shark River. Operations and results during period. A continuing contract for maintenance dredging of channel to restore project depths was awarded in FY1981. Work started on 2-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 September 23, 1981 and was completed February 24, 1982. 80,938 cubic yards, place measurement, of material were removed under the contract in FY1982 at a cost of $544,293. Reconnaissance surveys cost $236. Condition as of September 30. Work under the existing project was commenced June 1947 and was completed October 1947. 17. SHOOTERS ISLAND, N.Y. & N.J. Location. Shooters Island is located in the southernmost end of Newark Bay, about 500 feet off Staten Island, with largest portion in New York (Richmond County) and remainder in New Jersey (Hudson and Union Counties). Existing project. The removal of Shooters Island was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1976, PL94-587. The project plan consists of removal of all material, exclusive of drift sources, within the area defined by the Federal channels north and south of Shooters Island to a depth of 35 feet below mean low water, the material to be used for fill along the Arthur Kill. It includes the removal of soft material (4.5 million cubic yards) and rock (800,000 cubic yards) with disposal of the material at Howland Hook and other landfill areas in the vicinity. Total project cost is estimated at $72,600,000 with $1,000,000 estimated for preconstruction planning. It is estimated that project planning will take 4 years and project construction will take 4 years. Local cooperation. Local interests would provide all necessary lands, easements, rights-of-way and disposal areas for the project; hold the United States free from damages; accomplish any necessary relocations; and make a cash contribution if determined appropriate. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during period. None. Conditions as of September 30. The Senate Appropriations Committee Report 95-1069 on FY1979 Appropriations Bill directed the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to prepare a report on the environmental impacts, cost sharing, and other aspects of the project. The report was submitted on August 6, 1979 recommending no Federal funds be provided. Due to no recent interest the study was classified inactive in March 1982. 18. SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR (Prevention of Obstruction and Injurious Deposits) The District Engineer, New York District, was designated Supervisor of New York Harbor under the provisions of the River and Harbor Act of June 29, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 441-451), as amended July 12, 1952. Under this Act, the Supervisor of New York Harbor is charged with the mission of preventing the deposit of obstructive and injurious materials in New York Harbor and its adjacent and tributary waters, including Long Island Sound. The River and Harbor Act of August 18, 1894 (33 U.S.C. 452) makes it unlawful for any person or persons to engage in fishing or dredging for shellfish in any of the channels leading to and from New York Harbor, or to interfere in any way with the safe navigation of those channels by ocean steamships and ships of deep draft; the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403,407,409) prohibits obstructions to navigable waters such as unauthorized structures, unauthorized fill, deposit of refuse, and willful or negligent abandonment of vessels. Other laws relating to the supervision of New York Harbor and its tributary waters are the Clean Water Act, the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1969, the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, the Federal Power Act of 1920, the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Deepwater Port Act of 1972, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, and the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act. Direct supervision of the waters under the jurisdiction of the New York District was accomplished by means of two patrol vessels whose scope of duty includes surveillance of the waterfront for unauthorized construction or fill, surveillance to the 3-mile limit of tows enroute to dumping grounds in the Atlantic Ocean to ensure that material is not illegally deposited in the waters of New York Harbor, and investigation of wrecks and abandoned vessels. In addition to the patrol vessels, whose range of patrol was limited to New York Harbor, inspectors utilizing government vehicles equipped with two-way radios patrolled shorefront facilities and property. These inspectors operate out of field offices located: at Bell Meade and Jersey City, New Jersey; Floyd Bennet Field, Fort Totten, Troy and Riverhead, New York; and Burlington, Vermont. Their duties include inspection of authorized construction, fill or excavation in waterways, including wetland areas, to ensure that work is performed in accordance with the Corps permit. The inspectors also patrol all waterways in their respective areas and inform the public of the Corps role and jurisdiction as well as provide assistance in the preparation of permit applications. (See Table 2-E at end of chapter.) 19. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See table 2-F at end of chapter.) 20. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 2-G at end of chapter.) 21. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 645, 86th Congress as amended (Preauthorization). (See Table 2-N at end of Chapter.) Beach Erosion Control 22. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY INLET & JAMAICA BAY, N.Y. (PT.I) Location. Atlantic coast of New York City, between East Rockaway and Rockaway Inlets, and the lands 2-10 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT within and surrounding Jamaica Bay. The coastal area (about 10 miles long) is a peninsula in Queens County separating the ocean and the bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 12327, 12350, and 12326.) Existing project. The project provides for approximately 8.7 million cubic yards of sand fill including the advanced placement of a two year supply of beach nourishment, and Federal participation in the cost of periodic beach nourishment of the shore protection works for 10 years after completion of the initial beach fill. Federal participation (50 percent) includes $8,930,000 (October 1982) first cost and $17,870,000 for periodic beach nourishment, a total of $26,800,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way, including borrow areas; bear 50 percent of total first cost presently estimated at $26,800,000 consisting of a cash contribution of $8,930,000 the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs and values have been determined and $17,870,000 for periodic nourishment, total non-Federal cost $26,800,000, hold the United States free from damages; maintain, during economic life of project, continued public ownership and use of non-Federal publicly-owned shores upon which Federal participation in beach protection is based; maintain and operate all works after completion, control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; local cooperation agreement was executed by the State May 17, 1974 and approved for Secretary of Army May 31, 1974. On May 22, 1974 sent to State an approved Escrow Agreement. Operations and results during period. Periodic Nourishment Contract #2 and groin construction at Beach 149th Street completed in August and September 1982, respectively. Condition as of September 30. Advance engineering and design is completed. Final Environmental Impact Statement on file with Council of Environmental Quality on April 16, 1971. Initial beach restoration completed in FY1977. Contract for first increment of periodic nourishment completed in May 1980. Contract for second increment of periodic nourishment was completed in August 1982. Contract for construction of stone groin at Beach 149th Street was completed in September 1982. Completion of 10-year periodic nourishment remains. 23. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 2-H at end of chapter.) 24. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach Erosion Control activities pursuant to Section 103 Public Law 826, 84th Congress as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 2-0 at end of Chapter.) Flood Control 25. ARDSLEY, N.Y. Location. The Village of Ardsley in Westchester County, New York is located on the Saw Mill River approximately 5 miles upstream from its junction with the Hudson River, (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, White Plains, N.Y.) Existing project. The Federal Flood Control Project provides for relocation of the existing channel from the upstream limit of the project downstream for approximately 990 feet, and providing 155 feet of concrete flume upstream from the Old Ashford Avenue bridge. Upstream of this flume along the left bank of the Saw Mill River, 510 feet of levee would be constructed along the modified channel with an additional 340 feet of closure levee. Below the Old Ashford Avenue bridge, a 60 foot L-type flood wall would be built adjacent to an existing building and capping on additional 70 feet of existing flood walls downstream of this building. Between the Conrail Railroad Bridge and Elm Street in the downtown portion of the project, 145 feet of flood wall would be constructed on the right bank of the river. A pumping station, ponding area, drainage ditches and other drainage structures will be provided. The total estimated Federal cost for the project is $4,600,000 exclusive of land, relocations and other work to be provided by local interests at an estimated cost of $900,000 (October 1982). Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way, including spoil areas, within the areas necessary for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages; maintain without expense to the United States all works after completion; provide without cost to the United States for relocation of utilities and resurfacing of a parking lot; protect the channel and flood control works from future encroachment or obstruction, including waste disposal, that would reduce their flood-carrying capacity; agree to take appropriate measures to control development of the fringe areas not protected by the improvement, with a view to preventing an undue increase in the flood damage potential; provide a pumping station or additional gravity outlets, due to the modification of or encroachment upon, such area by local interests; agree to adopt and enforce adequate land use and control measures in the area within the village along the Saw Mill River that will not be protected by the recommended project; agree to be bound by and to incorporate into, any contract for construction, the prescribed Equal Opportunity Clause, and to cooperate actively in obtaining the compliance of contractors and subcontractors with said Equal Opportunity Clause, in accordance with Title V of Civil Rights Act of 1964 as it pertains to civil works projects; at least annually notify interests affected that the improvements will not provide protection from floods greater than the design condition. New York State is the Local Cooperating Agency. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, by letter dated January 25, 1982, reaffirmed the State's intention to cooperate in the proposed plan. Operation and results during period. Preconstruction planning continued. 2-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Condition as of September 30. Plan of Study approved in March 1979. Preconstruction planning started in February 1979. Preconstruction planning continued through Fiscal Year 1982. 26. ELIZABETH, N.J. Location. In city of Elizabeth, N.J. (Union County), extending 4.2 miles upstream from mouth of Elizabeth River at Arthur Kill. The river continues 7.7 miles northward through Union and Essex counties to its headwaters in East Orange, N.J. (See Geological Surveys quadrangles, Roselle, Elizabeth, Caldwall and Orange; and Army Map Service quadrangles, similarly designated.) Existing project. Includes an improved channel with levees and/or walls where necessary between Bridge Street and Arthur Kill (2.1 miles); a concrete channel between Trotter's Lane and U.S. Highway No. 1 (1.4 miles); closure to high ground at upstream and downstream ends; interior drainage, including 5 pumping stations and 11 ponding areas; reconstruction or replacement of 16 bridges and associated street regrading; and utilities relocations. Total estimated Federal cost is $54,600,000. Total estimated non-Federal cost for all requirements of local cooperation excluding maintenance is $12,900,000 including $1,170,000 cash contribution. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent maintenance, the costs and values incurred in the interest of hurricane tidal flood protection to be credited to required local contribution to the project first costs allocated to hurricane tidal flood protection; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate completed works including all dredgingrequired in the channel to maintain the design depths in the tidal reach; reconstruct all bridges and approaches except railroad bridges, and relocate existing sewerage and drainage facilities, streets, utilities, and other structures, such costs and values incurred in interest of hurricane tidal flood protection to be credited to required local contribution to protect first costs allocated to hurricane tidal flood protection; bear 30 percent of first costs allocated to hurricane tidal flood protection, including the two items listed above pertaining to lands, reconstruction and alterations, and a cash contribution now estimated at $1,170,000 to be paid either in a lump sum before starting construction, or in installments before starting construction, or in installments before starting pertinent work items in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers; take necessary action to protect channels from future obstruction or encroachment including waste disposal that would reduce their flood-carrying capacity; take appropriate measures to control development in partially protected areas and fringe areas not included in the project with a view to preventing an undue increase in flood damage potential; maintain existing natural detention areas along the Elizabeth River between Union Avenue and Trotters Lane free from encroachment so as not to reduce their detention capacity; to provide any additional gravity outlets or pumping station capacities made necessary by any modifications or encroachments on the ponding areas; bear any increased Federal costs for the improvement that rhay result from any future requirements for parkway developments; and at least annually, notify interests affected that the improvements will not provide complete protection from fluvial floods greater than in July 1897. Agency responsible for local cooperation in City of Elizabeth (with concurrence of Union County and State of New Jersey). Signed assurances of local cooperation were accepted by the District Engineer on January 9, 1970. Operations and results during period. Construction of the Downstream Section was completed December 17, 1981. The Upstream Section of the project was awarded in March, 1982 at a cost of $20,904,464 through September 30, 1982 and is 32 percent complete. Condition as of September 30. Advance planning (begun January 1966), leading to first construction (Ursino Basin) add the Penn-Central Bridge and downstream dredging contracts, has been completed. General design memorandum and its supplement submitted. Penn-Central Railroad Bridge agreement executed. Environmental impact statement submitted to the Council on Environmental Quality on April 20, 1971. Upstream Ursino Basin construction complete. Contract, executed with New Jersey Department of Transportation on June 2, 1977 for placement of 132 foot section of flume to be accomplished in conjunction with bridge replacement, has been completed. Contract for the Downstream Area Arthur Kill to U.S. Highway 1, was awarded September 29, 1978 and completed in December 1981. Upstream contract was awarded in March 1982. Project scheduled for completion in December 1985. 27. FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, N.Y. Location. That portion of Atlantic Coast of Long Island in Suffolk County extending from Fire Island Inlet easterly to Montauk Point, N.Y.-about 83 miles long. This frontage, comprises about 70 percent of total ocean frontage of Long Island. Fire Island Inlet is about 50 miles by water east of the Battery, New York City. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 13209, 12354 and 12353.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in improvement to prevent beach erosion and hurricane damages by: widening beaches along developed areas between Kismet and Mecox bay to a minimum width of 100 feet at elevation 14 feet above mean sea level; raising dunes to an elevation of 16 feet above mean sea level from Fire Island Inlet to Hither Hills State Park, at Montauk and opposite Lake Montauk Harbor; planting grass on dunes; constructing gated interior drainage structures at Mecox Bay, Sagaponack Lake, and Georgica Pond; constructing not to exceed 50 groins, if needed; and Federal participation in cost of beach nourishment for not to exceed 10 years from year of completion of a useful nourishmentunit. Total estimated Federal cost is $217,000,000 (October 1982) which includes participation in periodic 2-12 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT beach nourishment for 10 years at $180,000 annually. Total estimated non-Federal cost for all requirements of local cooperation is $119,800,000 inclusive of $83,800,000 cash contribution by local interests. Project cost estimate reflects revised cost sharing provisions of 1962 River and Harbor Act. Increased Federal participation from about 53 percent due to an adjustment of cost sharing in accordance with Section 31 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 to about 70 percent of first cost of project construction, excluding annual nourishment costs. Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1960 provides that before starting construction, local interests give assurance they will (a) provide lands, rights-of-way, including borrow areas, for construction; (b) make alterations and relocations of buildings, streets, storm drains, utilities, and other structures made necessary by construction; (c) bear 30 percent of total first cost estimated at $119,800,000 to consist of items listed in (a) and (b) above and a cash contribution estimated at $83,800,000 or, if any section is undertaken by separately apportionment of first cost will be as shown in District Engineer's report, with due regard to change in public use and ownership and other changes before construction; provided that cash contribution be paid either in a lump sum before starting entire project, or in installments before starting pertinent items, in accordance with construction schedules as required by Chief of Engineers, final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs and values have been determined; (d) hold the United States free from damages; (e) maintain all works and undertake periodic beach nourishment after completion, except that for 10 years after completion of a useful nourishment unit Federal Government would contribute, dependent on conditions of public use and ownership and other changes at time of construction an amount for entire project now estimated at $180,000 annually; (f) maintain during economic life of project continued public ownership of non-Federal publicly owned shores and continued availability for public use of privately owned shore equivalent to that upon which recommended Federal participation is based; (g) adopt appropriate ordinances to provide for reservation of dunes and their protective vegetation; (h) control water pollution to extent necessary to safeguard health of bathers; (i) obtain approval of Chief of Engineers of detailed plans and specifications for work contemplated and arrangements for its prosecution before starting any work on beach protection phase of project for which Federal participation is planned, if undertaken separately from recommended combined project; and (j) contribute in cash toward cost of hurricane protection works constructed under this plan, in addition to apportionment required in (c) above, an amount equal to increased Federal cost resulting from separate construction of beach protection work referred in to (i) above. Responsible agency is State of New York. On July 30, 1963, the State reflected the desires of Suffolk County, requested the inclusion of a minimum of 13 groins in initial construction of Moriches-Shinnecock reach. Chief of Engineers concurred in inclusion of up to 13 groins. Assurances were executed by Superintendent of Public Works, State of New York, on August 14, and accepted by the District Engineer August 20, 1963. On February 5, 1964, the State requested consideration of a plan, as proposed by Suffolk County, for initial construction of 13 groins of which 11 would be in the Moriches- Shinnecock reach, and 2 in the Southampton-Beach Hampton reach in vicinity of Georgica Pond; and that sandfill and dune construction be withheld for the present except for 1 mile on each side of Shinnecock Inlet. On February 27, 1964, the Chief of Engineers accepted the proposals, in part, and supplemental assurances were executed by State of New York on April 20, 1964, and accepted by District Engineer April 27, 1964, as follows: the State of New York now elects to proceed with authorized combined beach erosion control and hurricane protection project for South Shore of Long Island; that Superintendent of Public Works hereby reaffirms his assurance of August 14, 1963, relative to complete project; that State of New York, as cooperating agency, will now agree that artificial fills will be added when and to extent found necessary by the Chief of Engineers, but not earlier than 3 years after completion of groins unless both the State of New York and the Chief of Engineers mutually agree to an earlier placement; that the superintendent agrees for State of New York to contribute the full amount of any increase in Federal costs resulting from the separate construction of the groins and subsequent fill; and that the State agree that construction of the two groins in the Georgica Pond area will depend on a favorable finding, following a study by the Chief of Engineers. Study was completed July 31, 1964, recommending construction, and approved by the Chief of Engineers on September 22, 1964. By letter dated November 5, 1964, the New York State Department of Public Works confirmed that title to all properties and interests in properties necessary for constructing the 11 groins was fully vested in Suffolk County. By letter dated December 7, 1964, the Department stated that the county had obtained easements or fee title for the parcels necessary for constructing the two groins. New York State Department of Public Works furnished $884,600 and $830,330 required contributed funds October 30, 1964, and September 7, 1965, respectively, for construction of 11 groins in Moriches-Shinnecock reach, and $439,900 on January 22, 1965, for construction of 2 groins in Georgica Pond area of the Southampton-Beach Hampton reach. The completed 2 groins and 11 groins were accepted by the New York State Department of Public Works for maintenance on May 11, 1966 and April 10, 1967, respectively. On March 22, 1965, the State recommended that planning priority be in the order: Southampton-Beach Hampton (drainage structures first); Shinnecock Inlet- Southampton; Beach Hampton-Montauk Point; and Fire Island Inlet-Moriches Inlet. Planning on the drainage structures was initiated but was suspended, based on: meeting of October 28, 1965 with the Georgica Pond Association and the Preservation Society of East End wherein concern was indicated regarding the effects of the proposed drainage structure on ecology, salinity, pond level and aesthetic values; meeting with the Congressional representatives, State legislators, Federal 2-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 agencies and local officials held on May 26, 1966; and resolution of the Suffolk County Board of Supervisors adopted June 13, 1966 requesting advancement of the planning of the Fire Island Inlet-Moriches Inlet reach (Fire Island National Seashore). On June 16, 1967, the New York State Department of Public Works requested that the following works be undertaken as immediate priority items: in Moriches-Shinnecock reach, beach and dune fill at 11 groin site, construction of four groins west of the completed 11 groins, beach and dune fill east of the 11 groins; in Southampton-Beach Hampton reach (at East Hampton), construction of two additional groins, and the outlet structure at Georgica Pond. On March 18, 1968 the Suffolk County Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution supporting construction of 4 groins in Reach 2 (Moriches-Shinnecock) and 2 groins in Reach 4 (Southampton- Beach Hampton). On April 22, 1968 the Board adopted a more inclusive resolution authorizing participation in beach erosion and hurricane protection for the Moriches-Shinnecock reach and in the Georgica Pond area of the Southampton-Beach Hampton reach. On December 24, 1968, the Commissioner of the New York State Conservation Department executed the second supplement to the assurances of local cooperation, which was accepted by the District Engineer on January 24, 1969. The reaffirmed previous assurances contained provisions for constructing four additional groins in an area extending 6,000 feet west from the most westerly groin in the existing eleven-groin field in the Moriches Inlet to Shinnecock Inlet Reach, and for placing beach and dune fill in this area to the full design cross section as defined in the authorized project report, except for the portion of the dune mean sea level elevation 16 feet and 20 feet. Thus this stage construction established the top of dune to an elevation of 16 feet m.s.l. with a 65 foot width at that elevation and the top of berm to 14 feet m.s.l. with a 100 foot width at that elevation. These assurances also required that the State obtain and provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, to permit entry for the period of construction, and that the necessary rights will be obtained, as required, of lands, easements and rightsof- way, for maintenatle and repair of the groins, dunes, and berms, and to insure the integrity of the completed structure. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Continued study of coastal protection needs for present and future conditions. Planning was completed in period for another increment of work at Westhampton Beach in the Moriches Inlet to Shinnecock Inlet reach, consisting of placement of beach and dune fill in the initial 11 groin field constructed in 1966 and along the 9,500 feet of shore westward of the existing groin field. The draft Environmental Impact Statement on the entire project was revised and a final Environmental Impact Statement prepared for review and approval prior to submission to the Council on Environmental Quality. At the request of the local cooperating agency a Phase I design study was initiated in the Fire Island Inlet to Moriches Inlet reach of the project. This was terminated June 6, 1978 when the Council on Environmental Quality recommended the project be reformulated. Active scoping for reformulation commenced in July 1979. Operations and results during period. Continued common base studies for reformulation. Public scoping meetings October 1980. Interagency scoping review meeting January 1980, with Federal agencies agreeing, but New York State having strong reservations. District Engineer of New York formalized his decision March 1980. Governor of New York and Council on Environmental Quality informed May 1980. Plan of study submitted July 1980. Initiation and the continuation of reformulation studies. Condition as of September 30. Engineering and design began November 1962 and project construction commenced in January 1965. Two groins in Reach 4: Southampton-Beach Hampton, Section 3, were initiated in March, and completed in September 1965, at a total cost of $720,950 of which $382,109 were incurred against required contributed funds. Eleven groins in Reach 2: Moriches-Shinnecock, Section 2, were initiated in January 1965, and completed in October 1966 at a total cost of $2,854,565 of which $1,370,191 were incurred against required contributed funds. Initial beach fill placement for 750,000 cubic yards in Reach 2, Section 1A was completed on May 23, 1969. On August 4, 1969 work started on 4 groins and sandfill in Reach 2, Section 1A and was completed November 14, 1970. 3,083 tons of stone and 1,111,000 cubic yards of sand was placed. Total cost for all Section 1A was $3,663,455 including $1,791,428 required contributed funds. Planning for another increment of work at Westhampton Beach underway. Funds in amount of $70,000 were allotted on April 14, 1977 for initiation of the Phase I study in Reach I, Fire Island Inlet to Moriches Inlet. Environmental Impact Statement on entire project prepared. The final Envirnomental Impact Statement was filed with Environmental Protection Agency on January 28, 1978. On March 7, 1978 Department of the Interior supported by other agencies referred the Environmental Impact Statement to Council on Environmental Quality as unacceptable. On June 6, 1978, the Council on Environmental Quality agreed with the unacceptable finding and recommended project reformulation. Subsequent to strong objections on the project's final Environmental Impact Statement, meeting were held in September 1978, January and July 1979 with Department of Interior, Environmental Protection Agency and other interested Federal agencies. Subsequently, the Federal agencies have agreed to a basis for the reformulation of the Fire Island to Montauk Point project, including a general agreement on the studies necessary to answer the outstanding concerns. Public meetings were held in October 1979 in order to delineate the full scope and level of effort needed to reformulate the project. A final scoping session was held January 17, 1980 and agreement reached between the Federal agencies although New York State had strong objections. A plan of study was submitted in July 1980. Reformulation will result in a new General Design Memorandum. However, because of New York State's inability to financially participate in construction at West Hampton Beach, reformulation will be indefinitely postponed after FY1983. Completion of the remaining scopes of 2-14 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT work for reformulation, engineering and design, and construction of the project remain. Coordination made with the Departments of Interior and Commerce and the Environmental Protection Agency to develop an acceptable solution to mitigate immediate threats to property and human welfare at Westhampton beach where serious erosion is occurring. The interim plan has been accepted by the Departments of Interior and Commerce in letters dated December 22, 1978 and December 21, 1979, respectively. Subsequently, in a letter dated January 18, 1979, Council on Environmental Quality approved the Corps' intention to take interim remedial action in cooperation with the interested agencies. The supplemental General Design Memorandum and the Environmental Analysis have been completed. Plans and specifications have been completed. Initiation of construction in Westhampton, scheduled for FY1981, has been indefinitely postponed due to NY State's inability to financially participate in the project at the present time. It should be noted that the proposed work at Westhampton Beach is a remedial measure to alleviate the present erosion problem. Upon completion of the reformulation study, the recommended plan of study will be implemented for the entire Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point Reach, including Westhampton Beach. 28. LIBERTY STATE PARK LEVEE AND SEAWALL, N.J. Location. At Liberty Park, in Jersey City, Hudson County, New Jersey, directly behind Ellis Island and the Statue of Liberty, in Upper New York Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12334.) Existing project. Construction of a protective levee and seawall and associated landfill along the Park shoreline, approximately 7,000 feet long, extending from south of Liberty Island to North of Ellis Island. Estimated first cost of improvement under the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 is $37,000,000 (October 1982) including $9,900,000 cash contribution from local interests. Local cooperation. Local cooperation conditions provide that local interests must furnish all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way for the project and contribute 30 per centum of the total project costs exclusive of land costs. Operations and results during period. A contract was awarded in March 1982 at a cost of $2,710,000 for construction of the first area of the project at the southern extremity of the park. The costs of this contract are borne entirely by the State of New Jersey. Coordination and preconstruction planning for the remainder of the project continued. Condition as of September 30. Local-financed construction of the first area of the project was undertaken this year at an estimated cost of $2,710,000. Preconstruction planning for the remainder of the project continued. 29. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, N.J. & N.Y. Location. The Passaic River Basin, comprising 787 square miles in northeastern New Jersey and 148 square miles in southern New York State, is located in the greater New York City Metropolitan area. The Passaic River Basin is roughly elliptical in shape -26 miles long and 56 miles wide-and contains portions of Bergen, Essex, Morris, Passaic, Hudson, Somerset, Sussex and Union Counties in New Jersey. The Basin also includes parts of Orange and Rockland Counties in New York. Previous projects. Two Federal flood control projects have been completed by the Corps of Engineers in the Passaic River Basin. A $67,400 desnagging, debris removal and channel restoration project was completed in 1951 along Beaver Brook and the Pequannock Township Ditch, tributaries of the Pompton River in Pequannock Township, N.J. Along the Pompton River, a channel clearing project including shoal removal and channel restoration was implemented in the two-mile reach from the Delaware, Lackawanna and Weestern Railroad Bridge to the Erie Railroad (Greenwood Lake Branch) Bridge. This work, in Pequannock Townwhip, Wayne Township and Lincoln Park Borough, N.J., was completed in 1954 at a cost of $50,000. Existing project. The project was authorized for Phase I advance engineering and design study in Section 101(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 in accordance with the February 18, 1976 report of the Chief of Engineers. The estimate of Federal Cost under the authorizing legislation is $1,200,000,000 (October 1982), plus a $2,820,000 cash contribution from local interests, and $137,180,000 for items of work to be contributed by local interests. The recommended plan for flood protection, navigation, hurricane protection and recreation, included a flood detention reservoir, channel diversions and modifications, levees and floodwalls, and streambank filling and grading. These works would provide protection against a storm with a recurrence interval of 235 years, which is 20 percent larger than the October 1903 flood of record. Six independent tributary local protection plans were also recommended. However, because of a lack of public support for structural components of the project in the New Jersey portion of the Basin, the entire project is being reformulated during the Phase I study. The House Public Works Committee Report (94-1702) on the 1976 Water Resources Development Act directed "...the reformulation of the plan for water management and flood control for the entire Passaic Basin." This report further states that local opposition to any plan which relies upon extensive use of dikes, dams and levees, such as those proposed in previous survey reports, mandates that the following alternatives, or any combination thereof, shall be the only ones surveyed and considered: (a) A full range of nonstructural flood control alternatives to include land acquisition, flood plain mapping, floodproofing, developing early warning systems and reloca- 2-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 tion of buildings; (b) A tunnel diversion plan; (c) A system of tunnels addressing the needs of the entire basin; (d) Plans that combine local protection works where locally acceptable and nonstructural solutions including improvements to stream carrying capacity in accordance with different needs in the Lower Basin and in the Central basin; (e) Evaluation of fulfilling water supply objectives together with flood control; (f) Aquifer recharge and underground storage; and (g) Reservoir management in the headwaters. The Phase I Study is evaluating these alternatives in the formulation of revised plans. Condition as of September 30. The reformulation study was initiated in October 1977 under the existing authorization and Congressional Guidance in House Report 94-1702. The Study schedule runs through August 1985 at an estimated cost of $14 million. During FY1982, major effort was directed toward the continuation of plan formulatin of Basin-wide alternatives for the major flood damage areas along the mainstem Passaic. This involves the analysis of alternatives including channel modifications, levees and floodwalls, tunnel diversions, detention basins, and preservation of natural storage. Investigations have shown that aquifer recharge is not a feasible measure for flood damage reduction in the Passaic Basin. Plan formulation has been completed for tributary flood damage areas along the Ramapo and Mahwah Rivers at Mahwah, N.J., and Suffern, N.Y., and the Molly Ann's Brook at Haledon, Prospect Park and Paterson, N.J. These areas are being considered under the interim flood protection guidance provided by the Congress and are scheduled for recommendation prior to the completion of the overall study report. Plan formulation continues on other local damage areas in New Jersey along the Saddle River, the Upper Rockaway River, and the Ramapo River at Oakland. 30. SAW MILL RIVER AT ELMSFORD AND GREENBURGH; N.Y. Location. On the Saw Mill River in the town of Greenburgh, N.Y. One portion known as Babbitt Court lies along the river immediately south of the Village of Elmsford. The second portion of the project, known as the Elmsford-Greenburgh area, is north of the Village of Elmsford, separated from Babbitt Court by approximately 4,000 feet. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, White Plains, N.Y.) Existing project. In the Babbitt Court area, the project provides for approximately 1,450 feet of levees and flood walls with associated ponding and interior drainage facilities. Within the Elmsford-Greenburgh area, the existing channel is to be widened and deepened for 2,450 feet with an additional 600 feet of channel modification on the tributary Mine Brook. Levees and flood walls will be constructed on both banks of the Saw Mill River totalling approximately 4,500 feet and extending along Mine Brook to high ground. Ponding areas, a pumping station and other drainage structures will be provided. The total estimated Federal cost for the project is $5,010,000 exclusive of land, relocations and other work to be provided by local interests at an estimated cost of $1,420,000 (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way for construction, including borrow, ponding, and waste disposal areas; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate completed works; provide all alterations, relocations, and necessary replacements of existing facilities, including bridges, highways, sewers, (including those storm sewers and drains required to convey interior drainage to improved channels of ponding areas) utilities, and railroad modifications and relocations other than bridges and bridge approaches; protect the channel and other flood works from future encroachment or obstruction, including waste disposal, which would reduce or otherwise impair their floodcarrying capacity, or provide a pumping station or additional gravity outlets, as appropriate, to compensate for any loss in ponding area effectiveness due to modification of or encroachment upon such areas; take appropriate measures to control development in partially protected areas and fringe areas not included in the project with a view toward preventing an undue increase in the flood damage potential; and at least annually, notify those affected that flooding will still be possible from large floods. New York State is the Local Cooperating Agency. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, by letter dated June 12, 1974, indicated the State's intention to cooperate in the proposed plan. Operation and results during period. During Phase I preconstruction planning the authorized project was found to be no longer economically justified. Project reformulation to develop an alternative plan of improvement is continuing. Condition as of September 30. Plan of Study approved January 28, 1977. Preconstruction planning started in February 1977. Indications from Phase I Planning accomplished to date, are that some features of the authorized project are no longer economically justified. Alternative flood control measures are being considered during reformulation. 31. SOUTH ELLENVILLE, N.Y. Location. In Ellenville, N.Y., on North Gully just above its confluence with Sandburg Creek, which discharges into Rondout Creek at Napanock, N.Y., about 2 miles downstream from Ellenville. (See U.S. Geological Survey, Ellenville quadrangle; Army Map Service, Ellenville quadrangle.) Existing project. Includes: a 2,300 foot concrete chute, a crib dam to prevent debris from entering chute; 380 feet of walls and a stilling basin; 823 feet of levees to protect against backwater from Sandburg Creek; a ponding area, drainage ditches and other interior drainage facilities. Physical model study to determine design of stilling basin required and authorized on August 28, 1970. Existing project, also known as "North Gully at Ellenville, N.Y.," is one of three physically and functionally independent projects included in Rondout Creek and Wallkill River, N.Y. and N.J. Survey Report. 2-16 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT Estimated Federal cost for new work is $7,370,000 (October 1982), exclusive of lands, relocations and other work to be provided by local interests at an estimated cost of $710,000. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must, prior to construction, give assurances they will furnish all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction of improvements; perform all alteration of highways, highway bridges, utility and related facilities made necessary for construction of project; hold the United States free from damages; protect channels, ponding areas and other flood works from future encroachment or obstruction that would reduce their flood carrying capacity and control development of fringe areas not protected by proposed improvement with a view to preventing an undue increase in flood damage potential; and maintain and operate completed works. Agency responsible for local cooperation is State of New York. The Commissioner, New York State Department of Conservation (now Department of Environmental Conservation) executed assurances of local cooperation on March 5, 1968 which was accepted by the District Engineer for the United States on March 25, 1968. To comply with Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (PL91-611), the preparation of an agreement of Local Cooperation is being initiated to replace the signed assurance. Implementation of project dependent upon N.Y. State's decision on proposed relocation of Route 52 located within project area. Operations and results during period. Continued coordination with the State of New York. Condition as of September 30. Preconstruction planning was started in January 1967. Model study completed in January 1972 and final report from Waterways Experiment Station received on May 4, 1974. General Design Memorandum submitted and returned for revisions. Environmental Impact Statement submitted to Council on Environmental Quality on July 27, 1971. Completion of engineering and design and construction remain. 32. STATEN ISLAND, N.Y. Location. About 13 miles of coast along southern and eastern coast of Staten Island (a New York City borough) from Ft. Wadsworth at the Narrows to Tottenville at the mouth of Arthur Kill along Lower New York and Raritan Bays. (See National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration Charts and Geological Survey maps for New York and vicinity, Staten Island and Sandy Hook Bay area.) Existing project. Provides shore and hurricane protection between Graham and Oakwood Beaches and at Tottenville Beach; shore protection at Great Kills Park and between Arbutus Lake and Sequine Point. Improvement includes 2.6 miles of beach fill and dunes at Tottenville Beach and between Graham and Oakwood Beaches; 2.2 miles of beach fill only at Great Kills Park and between Arbutus Lake and Sequine Point; 2.9 miles of levees at Tottenville Beach, Graham Beach and between Oakwood Beach and Great Kills Park; two groins at Tottenville Beach and Sequine Point; interior drainage facilities including four pumping stations between Graham and Oakwood Beaches; and relocations. ENGCW-EZ April 7, 1970 5th Indorsement to NANEN-Br September 30, 1969 letter submitting Feasibility Study authorized continuing Design Memorandum to incorporate extension from Graham beach to Ft. Wadsworth. Total estimated Federal cost is $21,500,000 (October 1977) which includes participation in periodic beach nourishment for 10 years at $112,000 annually. Total estimated non-Federal cost for all requirements of local cooperation is $11,200,000 including $8,470,000 cash contribution, $1,520,000 for lands and relocation, $1,210,000 estimated annual beach nourishment cost for a 10-year period, and excludes annual nourishment costs thereafter and annual maintenance and replacement costs. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way for construction; alter and relocate buildings, streets, storm drains, utilities and other structures; bear 34 percent of total first cost, estimated at $11,200,000 to consist of the two items listed above and a cash contribution now estimated at $8,470,000 which excludes $1,210,000 for 10-year nourishment, or, if any section is undertaken separately the apportionment of first cost will be as shown in District Engineer's report, with due regard to change in public ownership and other changes before construction, provided that cash contribution be paid either in a lump sum before starting entire project, or in installments before starting pertinent items, final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs and values have been determined; hold the United States free from damages; maintain completed works and provide periodic nourishment during economic life of the shore protection works subject to Federal participation in cost of periodic nourishment fcr an initial period of 10 years, non-Federal share of such costs for the 10-year period is presently estimated at 31 percent for Graham Beach to Oakwood Beach reach, 33 pecent for Tottenville Beach reach, 30 percent for Great Kills Park reach, and 62 percent for Arbutus Lake to Sequine Point reach; maintain during economic life of project continued public ownership and administration of public use of non-Federal publicly owned shore upon which recommended Federal participation is based; adopt appropriate ordinances to provide for preservation of dunes; and control water pollution to safeguard the health of bathers. If local interests elect to incorporate features in highway or other developments in the waterfront area which serve the purpose of hurricane protection. United States shall participate in cost of such features on a basis such that overall Federal cost for hurricane protection shall not be greater than that which would apply in the absence of such features, and such that any resultant savings in overall cost of combined features shall be shared equitably between the United States and local interests on the basis of cost allocation and cost apportionment approved by the Chief of Engineers, provided that such participation in the combined features shall be subject to the undertaking of any necessary remaining hurricane protection works by the United States. New York State Department of Public Works in letter dated December 1965 stated it was prepared to execute assurances when plans are in final form. 2-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 General Design Memorandum No. 1, Ford Wadsworth to Great Kills Park, Ft. Wadsworth to Arthur Kill project Staten Island, New York submitted for review on June 30, 1976. Based on review of General Design Memorandum No. 1, additional engineering studies will be required subject to reconfirmation of New York State's intent to provide local cooperation required. In July 6, 1977 letter, New York State requested to reconfirm their intent to provide items of local cooperation for the project in light of New York City's fiscal condition. On October 30, 1977, State of New York requested that reconfirmation of local cooperation be deferred one year. No answer has been received to date and the project has therefore been placed in a deferred status. Operations and results during period. None. Condition as of September 30. Preconstruction planning was started in January, 1966 and is about 99 percent complete. Feasibility Study of project extension from Graham Beach to Fort Wadsworth was authorized November 16, 1967 and is complete. Coordination was initiated with the National Parks Services in connection with the Gateway National Recreation Area. In April 1974 local interests submitted their formal intent to support the modified plan. Draft Environmental Impact Statement furnished to Council on Environmental Quality on March 23, 1976. Public meeting on General Design Memorandum design plans for Ft. Wadsworth to Great Kills Park portion of project held on April 22, 1976. Final General Design Memorandum continued. By June 21, 1976 letter to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation advised of the local desire for the concrete floodwall plan and their intent to support this plan. On October 30, 1977, State of New York requested that reconfirmation of the local cooperation be deferred one year. Project was placed in a deferred status on January 31, 1978. Additional engineering studies and Post Authorization Change Report required on General Design Memorandum No. 1 when and if local cooperation reconfirmed by New York State. 33. YONKERS, N.Y. Location. On Saw Mill River in Yonkers, N.Y. About 1 mile upstream from junction of Saw Mill and Hudson Rivers. (See Geological Survey, Yonkers quadrangle.) Existing project. Project provides for: constructing a 20-foot wide concrete channel extending 3,781 feet along most congested reach of the channel; improving channel in other reaches (5,689 feet); constructing floodwalls (5,370 feet), one closure structure, closure levee, various interior drainage facilities; reconstructing or raising of nine bridges, and miscellaneous utility changes. Estimated Federal cost of new work is $12,530,000 exclusive of land, relocations and other work to be provided by local interests at an estimated cost of $2,550,000. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way for construction, including borrow, ponding, and waste disposal areas; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate completed works; provide all alterations, relocations, and necessary replacements of existing facilities, including bridges, highways, sewers, including those storm sewers and drains required to convey interior drainage to improved channels or ponding areas, utilities, and railroad modifications and relocations other than bridges and bridge approaches; protect the channel and other flood works from future encroachment or obstruction, including waste disposal, which would reduce or otherwise impair their flood-carrying capacity, or provide a pumping station or additional gravity outlets, as appropriate, to compensate for any loss in ponding area effectiveness due to modification of or encroachment upon such areas; take appropriate measures to control development in partially protected areas and fringe areas not included in the project with a view toward preventing an undue increase in the flood damage potential; and at least annually, notify those affected that flooding will still be possible from large floods. New York State is the Local Cooperating Agency. An agreement of Local Cooperation was signed by the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation on April 9, 1974, and signed by the New York District Engineer on April 30, 1974 for the United States and approved by the Secretary of the Army on May 17, 1974. The City of Yonkers, through the State, furnished $93,000 (contributed, funds "other") for non-Federal design costs. Operations and results during period. Construction of Contract #2 continue. Condition as of September 30. Started preconstruction planning December 1970. Phase I General Design Memorandum completed on October 1, 1973 and approved on April 19, 1974. Phase II General Design Memorandum completed and approved June 1, 1976. Agreement of Local Cooperation executed with New York State. Final Environmental Impact Statement and supplement in Federal Register on May 13, 1974, and August 13, 1976, respectively. Addendum filed with Council on Environmental Quality on August 25, 1976. Initial plans and specifications for Contract #1 completed and construction contract for this increment awarded August 30, 1974. Construction of Contract #1 completed. Construction for remaining increment of project (Contract #2) continued. Completion scheduled in January 1983. 34. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections of completed flood control works are performed semi-annually to determine the extent of compliance by local interests with the requirements of operation and maintenance. 35. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 2-I at end of chapter.) 2-18 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT 36. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress as amended (Preauthorization) (See Table 2-P at end of Chapter.) Natural Disaster and Emergency Flood Control Activities- advance preparation, emergency operations. rehabilitation, emergency drinking water and advance measures (Public Law 84-99 and antecedent legislation). Under "Advance Preparation," the New York District completed revisions of various emergency manuals, attended meetings and seminars dealing with emergency preparation and response and provided in-house training to District employees who would be involved in emergency operation. Under "Advanced Preparation" the District also maintained its stock of flood fighting supplies and equipment. Under "Emergency Operations" the New York District provided technical assistance to the County of Suffolk, City of Plattsburgh and the Towns of Catskill, Lewis, Corinth, and Greenville all in New York State and the Town of Denville in New Jersey. During FY1982 approximately 17,000 sandbags were distributed to local and county agencies. 37. EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION Activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress as amended (Preauthorization) (See Table 2-Q at end of Chapter.) 38. DEBRIS REMOVAL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Activities pursuant to Section 202, Public Law 587, 94th Congress as amended (Preauthorization) The authorization for this work expired in fiscal year 1979. 39. SURVEYS (See Table 2-J at end of chapter.) 40. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for the period of $174,686 for flood plain management services are set forth in Table 2-L at the end of chapter. (See also Table 2-K on completed flood plain studies.) 41. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS A total of 19 projects were deauthorized by Congressional Action pursuant to Section 12 of Public Law 93-251, Water Resources Development Act of 1976. (See Table 2-M at end of chapter.) 2-19 TABLE 2-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects 1. Aquatic Plant Control 2. Bay Ridge & Red Hook Channels, N.Y. 3. Buttermilk Channel, N.Y. 4. East Rockaway, N.Y. 5. Fire Island To Jones Inlet, N.Y. 6. Flushing Bay and Creek, N.Y. 7. Hudson River, N.Y. 8. Jones Inlet, N.Y. 9. Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, 'N.Y. (Required Contributed Funds) Total Cost to FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 September 30, 1982 45,000 10,741 45,000 23,198 Funding New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 523,000 6 223,000 9 -- - 422 57,000 ] 57,000 74,000 61,635 84,00 150,771 - 1,598,000 - 1,590,956 - 448,000 - 448,000 20,000 29,365 10,600 1,039,000 10,600 988,914 - 5,614 - 1,602,000 - 1,599,894 5,000 5,733 2,094,400 1,371,089 1,151 867,000 1,579,814 -31,390 2,451 656,400 661,987 18 488,000 482,930 876,000 1,726,700 284,400 1,315,000 873,938 1,721,005 292,184 1,315,000 35,000 35,000 887,000 816,138 2,128,000 1,818,710 2,128,000 1,818,710 444,000 - 444,000 - 2-20 513,806 496,268 5,523,29731' 5,523,29731 21,270,988 21,263,944 - 4,239,773 4,239,773 83,9694 533,3344 5,103,502 5,053,415 594,35532 594,35532 2,904,704 2,910,318 2,113,50291 2,102,9059,11 2,327,0909 2,324,9849 44,249,8035.6 44,249,865 24,313,159 24,204,080 1,822,53010 1,822,53010 9,329,210 9,329,209 235,964 235,964 3,253,862 3,196,000 9,182 9,182 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects 10. Moriches Inlet, N.Y. (Required Contributed Funds) 11. Narrows of Lake Champlain, N.Y. 12. Newark Bay, Hackensack & Passaic Rivers, N.J. 13. New York and New Jersey Channels 14. New York Harbor- Collection and Removal of Drift (Required Contributed Funds) 15. New York Harbor- Entrance Channels and Anchorage Areas 16. Shark River, N.J. (Other Contributed Funds) Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint.& Oper. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 230,000 25,000 168,177 62,948 - 3,390,000 23,000 23,000 2,000,000 2,215,839 -260,000 - 249,480 140,500 140,500 1,400,000 764,038 2,001,000 2,026,586 420,000 265,867 8,644 1,654,726 2,288,438 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 20,000 20,000 371,146 1,931,000 1,920,480 493,250 493,250 1,700,000 1,684,529 4,808,550 4,809,503 1,065,128 659,227 - 210,200 6,618 - 100,000 47,534 24,400 24,400 Total Cost to FY 82 September 30, 1982 60,390 43,446 16,000 14,453 - 2,224,000 - 2,218,610 2,617,600 2,616,513 584,000 1,251,792 2,195,700 2,215,037 2,752,200 2,752,459 333,000 93,429 9,626 100,000 98,362 437,500 2,895 3,632,000 3,623,281 1,100,000 1,293,239 4,435,000 4,363,879 3,025,000 2,850,030 286,222 727,405 970 550,000 545,294 332,188 931,000 910,339 9,422 9,422 3,390,000 43,446 681,81112 681,81112 855,69513,14 854,12713,14 28,384,510 28,384,511 15,999,03625 15,999,03625 73,052,43515,16,17 73,052,43515,16,17 28,764,35918 29,119,02918 454,773 454,773 10,029,000 9,804,004 42,192,89619 42,387,71819 6,775,01319 6,600,30219 3,906,023 3,624,223 45,009,71020 45,009,71020 19,143,824 18,904,761 150,000 150,000 1,125,404 1,119,060 437,500 335,083 2-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 2-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section ... _._ FY 79 100.000 in Text Projects FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 17. Shooters Islands, N.Y. 18. Supervisor of New York Harbor 22. East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part I) Required Contributed Funds) 25. Ardsley, N.Y. 26. Elizabeth, N.J. (Other Contributed Funds) 27. Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, N.Y. (Federal Funds) (Required Contributed Funds) 28. Liberty State Park Levee & Seawall, N.J. 29. Passaic River Basin, N.J. & N.Y. Phase I 30. Sawmill River, Elmsford-Greenburg, N.Y. 31. South Ellenville, N.Y. 32. Staten Island, N.Y. 33. Yonkers, N.Y. (Other ontributed Funds) Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 3,184 2,500,000 2,610,334 90,189 2,272 2,200,000 2,409,616 61,200 81,453 68 98,000 647 804,200 882,000 804,200 881,233 300,000 1,250,000 76,509 948,577 30,000 751,752 58,093 861,766 100,000 100,000 77,847 83,684 ,700,000 5,810,000 ,032,798 5,345,348 - 416,444 - 721,605 287,000 600,000 283,212 627,312 75 1,003,200 1,002,417 - 420,000 29,365 6,000 100,000 88,736 3,614,000 3,792,146 266,834 482,853 1,500,000 1,478,528 78,000 87,078 2,700,000 2,645,950 48,376 3,357 2,552,000 2,114,363 156,081 2-22 284 745,000 745,758 3,800,000 3,664,868 3,457,300 3,479,764 48,886 7,650,000 7,841,068 1,136,380 882,918 1,710,000 1,723,778 138,155 - 6,000 20,519 1,798,000 1,845,076 5,638 1,682 2,475 1,115,834 38,850 141,804 Tobtal Cost to September 30, 1982 100,000 99,006 26,171,447 26,170,863 12,750,356 12,514,406 14,677,301 12,192,607 300,000 299,153 35,493,800 35,320,842 2,148,958 2,399,910 8,751,438 8,745,828 13,97324 13,97324 4,012,930 3,788,341 180,043 180,038 10,351,7003 10,283,6953 490,000 482,400 289,700 284,647 695,000 693,788 12,529,900 12,422,759 568,050 571,867 - 42,539 - 14,000 62,043 3,699 26,441 2,307,000 2,506,700 2,278,837 2,507,415 200,000 71,000 126,366 87,849 - - 10,000 43 1,840 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1. Of which $12,500 is for North Atlantic Division accounts. 2. Of which $12,127 is for North Atlantic Division Accounts. 3. Includes $1,040,000 for new work and $1,040,000 expended for the portion under construction general. 4. Excludes $100,000 for new work expended from contributed funds and includes $82,600 for new work expended from public works funds. 5. Deferred. 6. Includes $5,112,594 for new work for previous project. 7. Includes $238,350 for new work expended from public works funds and $31,461 emergency relief funds. Excludes $81,373 expended from contributed funds, other. 8. Excludes $454,273 expended between August 18, 1915 and June 30,1935, for operation and care of lock and dam at 'lroy, N.Y., under permanent indefinite appropriation. Excludes $23,735 reimbursement for repairs to Troy Lock. 9. Includes $628,502 for new work and $210,365 for maintenance for previous projects. 10. Excludes $1,822,530 for new work expended from contributed funds. 11. Excludes $419,879 for new work expended from contributed funds and $58,425 contributed funds from other, and $8,752 expended by the Worlds Fair Corp. for riprap protection of rubble dike. 12. Includes $115,000 for new work for previous projects. 13. Includes $19,140 for maintenance for previous projects. 14. Includes $31,166 for U.S. Lake Survey Revisory and Inshore Sounding Program. 15. Includes $12,809,975 for new work for previous projects and $6,621 for new work for Lemon Creek, Staten Island, N.Y. 16. Excludes $7,712 for new work expended from contributed funds. 17. Includes $807,000 for new work expended from public works funds and $2,023,308 for new work expended from emergency relief funds. 18. Includes $1,160,380 for maintenance for previous project, and $1,621 for maintenance of Lemon Creek, Staten Island, N.Y. 19. Includes $2,491,206 expended to date for construction of a landbased overfire air pit incinerator ($1,493,393 in maintenance funds and $997,813 in O&M funds). 20. Includes $116,530 applied to removing wrecks authorized by acts prior to adoption of existing project. 21. Includes $673,155 for new work for previous project. 22. Includes $1,836,403 for new work expended from contributed funds. 23. Excludes $285,600 for new work expended from contributed funds. 24. For pilot program to improve coastal storm warnings. 25. Includes $1,490,713 for maintenence for previous projects. 26. Includes $77,182 for new work for previous projects. 27. Includes $66,000 for maintenence for previous projects. 28. Includes $673,155 for new work for previous project. 29. Excludes $292,685 for new work expended from Ordinance funds and $66,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 30, Includes $111,419 for maintenance for previous projects. 31. Includes $1,246,100 for new work for previous projects and $64,560 extended from public works funds. 32. Excludes $90,190 for new work expended from contributed funds. 2-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 2-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts _ Work Authorized Documents River and Harbor Act of 1958 Section 104 and Harbor Act of 1958 Section 302 River and Harbor Act of 1965 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 July 3, 1930 June 13, 1902 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Control and Progressive eradication of obnoxious Aquatic Plant growths. Provided that all research and Planning cost to be borne fully by the United States. Modified project to include control of waterchesnut. BAY RIDGE AND RED HOOK CHANNELS, N.Y. (See Section 2 of Text) Channel 40 feet deep and 1,200 feet wide. Dredging to obtain first a depth of 35 feet, subsequently increasing depth of 40 feet for full width. Widening of Bay Ridge Channel to 1,780 feet. BUTTERMILK CHANNEL, N.Y. (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 1,200 feet wide and not less than 30 feet deep. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, N.Y. (See Section 4 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide, and a jetty. FIRE ISLAND TO JONES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 5 of Text) Construction of jetty. Channel 10 feet deep. H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 337, 54th Cong. 2d sess. (Annual Report 1899, P. 1177). Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 44, 71st Cong., 2d sess. 1 H. Doc. 122, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. (Annual report 1901, p. 1299) H. Doc. 19 71st Cong., 1st sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 33, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 762, 80th Cong., 2d sess.' FLUSHING BAY AND CREEK, N.Y. (See Section 6 of Text) 15 foot bay, creek and branch channels; 15-foot maneuvering area; 6-foot anchorage basin; revetment of dike extension; and abandonment of portion of creek channel and repair of dike. HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. (See Section 7 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep from Hudson to Waterford, remove State lock and dam at Troy and construct a new lock and dam. 2 Channel 27 feet deep from Hudson to Albany, N.Y. H. Doc. 551, 87th Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 719, 61st Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 350, 68th Cong., 1st sess.' 2-24 Oct. 23; 1962 June 25, 1910 Mar. 3, 1925 TABLE 2-B (Contini Acts July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19354 June 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 P.L. 89-72 Mar. 2, 1945 August 26, 1937 July 14, 1960 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 July 25, 1912 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Mar. 22, 1945 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT led) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Channel 27 feet deep below Hudson Operation and care of lock and dam at Troy were included in project July 1, 1935. Relocation of 12-foot channel between Troy and Waterford. Deepen channel between Albany and Waterford to 14 feet with no change in depths for harbors in front of Albany and Troy. Deepen channel between New York City and Albany to 32 feet and construct a turning basin and 2 anchorages. Mooring facilities. JONES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 8 of Text) Construction of jetty and channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide LONG ISLAND INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, N.Y. (See Section 9 of Text) Channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide. MORICHES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 10 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide. NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, N.Y. AND VERMONT (See Section 11 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide. NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK AND PASSAIC RIVERS, N.J. (See Section 12 of Text) 16-foot channel in Passaic River Widening 16-foot channel in Passaic River 20-foot channel in Passaic River.7 10-foot channel in Passaic River. 30-foot channel in Passaic River. 35 and 37 feet in main channel of Newark Bay and branch channel to an inshore channel at Port Newark terminal and remove portion of rock area at Bergen Point to same depths. H. Doc. 1387, 62nd Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 441, 59th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 441, 59th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 707, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 284, 69th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 156, 71st Cong., 2d sess.1 S. Doc. 250, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 2-25 Documents H. Doc. 210, 70th Cong., 1st sess. 1 S. Doc. 155, 72nd Cong., 2d sess.i H. Doc. 572, 75th Cong.,. 3d sess.' H. Doc. 228, 83d Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 409, 77th Cong. H. Doc. 181, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 126, 86th Cong., 1st sess.' REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 2-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 1966 Sept. 6, 19335 Aug. 30, 1935 May 28, 19356 May 17, 1950 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 4, 1915 Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 7, 1974 July 5, 1884 Modification of local cooperation for 10-foot channel in Passaic River. 34-32-foot channel in Hackensack River including approach channel in Newark Bay from branch channel at Port Newark Terminal and a 25-foot turning basin. 35-foot channels at Port Elizabeth. Widening 35-foot channel in Newark Bay, provision of two maneuvering areas, widening entrance into Port Elizabeth and Port Newark branch channels, deepening and widening Newark Bay 32-foot channel, and provision of a turning Basin at junction of Hackensack and Passaic Rivers; and deepening 12-foot channel in Hackensack River to 15 feet. Additional widening at junction with Kill Van Kull by deepening to 35 feet a triangular area at the eastern end of the 30-foot channel south of Shooters Island. NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEYS CHANNELS (See Section 13 of Text) Anchorage off Perth Amboy to 35 feet. Channels 35 feet deep from lower bay to upper bay, except between vicinity of Smith Creek and vicinity of Piles Creek to 30 feet with anchorage 38 feet deep at Sandy Hook and Perth Amboy. Channel 35 feet deep from vicinity of Smith Creek to vicinity of Piles Creek. Widen entrance to Kill Van Kull to 1,400 feet narrowing to a minimum width of 1,000 feet. NEW YORK HARBOR, COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT (See Section 14 of Text) Allotment from appropriations made for New York Harbor and its immediate tributaries may be used for collection and removal of drift in these waterways. Carrying on this work as a separate and distinct project. Increase scope of project to include removal and disposal of derelict vessels, some deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores; and the repair of other shore structures; all subject to approval by Secretary of the Army and the President. Removal and disposal of derelict vessels, some deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores and the repair of other shore structures. NEW YORK HARBOR, ENTRANCE CHANNELS AND ANCHORAGE AREAS (See Section 15 of Text) Main-Ship-Bayside-Gedney to 30 feet for width of 1,000 feet (dimensions fixed by Secretary of War, Dec. 27, 1886, by authority of act of Aug. 5, 1886). H. Doc. 430, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 252, 82d Cong., 1st sess.i H. Doc. 289,88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 494, 89th Cong., 2d sess.i Report on file in the Office of the Chief of Engineers. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 17, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 133, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 233, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 108, 89th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 91-611, 91st Cong., H.R. 19877. P.L. 93-251, 93rd Cong., H.R. 10203 Annual Reports 1887, p. 62 and 1888, p. 63 2-26 TABLE 2-B (Continu Acts Mar. 3, 1899 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 August. 26, 1937 July 3, 1958 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 31, 1982 Mar. 2, 1945 Water Resources Development Act 1976, P.L. 94-587 1965 Flood Control Act 1974 Water Resources Development Act Section 201 Flood Control Act of 1965 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT red) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Ambrose Channel (East Channel) to 40 feet. Maintenance of entrance channel under 1 head. Anchorage Channel, extension of Ambrose Channel into Upper Bay. Removal of Craven Shoal Channel between Staten Island and Hoffman and Swinburne Islands. Relocation of southerly section of Anchorage Channel. Dredging south end of Red Hook Flats, Liberty Island Anchorage, and channel along New Jersey pierhead line. Deepen Bayside-Gedney Channel to 35 feet for a width of 800 feet. Deepen Ambrose and Anchorage Channels to 45 feet for a width of 2,000 feet. Dredging South Channel, Elimination of portion of Bayside-Gedney Channel. Deepen and expand Red Hook Flats Anchorage. Deepen Gravesend Bay Anchorage. Further expansion of Red Hook Flats Anchorage and the relocation of Anchorage channel. SHARK RIVER, N.J. (See Section 16 of 1ext) Channel 18 feet deep, 150 feet wide across entrance bar, 12 feet deep 100 feet wide to Route 35 bridge, 8 feet deep 100 feet wide to upper limit of Belmar boat basin; and 12-foot anchorage. SHOOTERS ISLAND, N.Y. & N.J. (See Section 17 of Text) Removal of the island within area defined by Federal channels north and south to a depth of 35 feet below mean low water. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY INLET AND JAMAICA BAY, N.Y. (PART 1). (See Section 22 of Text) Hurricane barrier, dikes, levees, floodwalls, fill placement, stoplog structures, stairways, ramps, road raising, fishing platforms, annual nourishment. Authorized beach erosion control aspect to be constructed independent of the hurricane flood protection aspect of the project. ARDSLEY, N.Y. (See Section 25 of Text) Channel improvement, concrete flume, flood walls, levees, 'various drainage structures. Documents H. Doc. 159, 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Annual Report 1899, p. 1279) H. Doc. 518, 63d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 557, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 625, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 18, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 183, 73d Cong., 2d sess' H. Doc. 133, 74th Cong., 1st sess.' Senate Commerce Doc., 75th Cong., 1st sess.' S. Doc. 45, 84th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 17, 89th Cong., 1st sess. OCE Letter 31 Mar. 1982 H. Doc. 102, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 215, 89th Cong., 1st sess.1 H. Doc. 215/89/1. 2-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 2-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents 1965 Flood Control Act 1960 River and Harbor Act 1974 Water Resources Development Act 1976 Water Resources Development Act 1976 Water Resources Development Act Section 101(a) 1965 Flood Control Act 1962 Flood Control Act 1965 Flood. Control Act 1965 Flood Control Act ELIZABETH, N.J. (See Section 26 of Text) Channel improvement, flume, levees, floodwalls, bridges, interior drainage facilities. FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, N.Y. (See Section 27 of Text) Raising dunes, widening beaches, interior drainage structures, groins, beach replenishment, annual nourishment. Project modified to provide that non-Federal interest shall contribute 30 percent of the first costs. LIBERTY STATE PARK LEVEE AND SEAWALL, N.J. (See Section 28 of Text) Approximately 7,000 feet of seawall and elevated pedestrian walkway. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, N.J. & N.Y. PHASE I (See Section 29 of Text) Advanced engineering and design study, involving reformulation of plans for flood control and water resource management. SAW MILL RIVER at ELMSFORD and GREENBURGH, N.Y. (See Section 30 of Text) Levees, floodwalls, channel improvement. SOUTH ELLENVILLE, N.Y. (See Section 31 of Text) Levees, drainage ditches, walls, a concrete chute and a crib dam. STATEN ISLAND, N.Y. (See Section 32 of Text) Beachfill, groins, drainage facilities, four pumping stations. YONKERS, N.Y. (See Section 33 of Text) Channel improvement, concrete flume, flood walls, closure structure, various drainage facilities, reconstruct or raise nine bridges. Doc. 249, 89th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 425, 86th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 93-251, 93rd Cong., H.R. 10203 H. Rpt. 94-1702 H. Doc. 94-465, 94th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 113, 87th Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 181, 89th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 258, 89th Cong., 1st sess.1 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Widening to form harbors at Albany and Troy to 12 feet deep considered inactive. 3. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. 4. Public Works Adminstration, Sept. 6, 1933. 5. Public Works Administration. 6. Emergency Relief Act of 1935. 7. Portion from 3,000 feet above Lincoln Highway Bridge to Jackson Street Bridge complete. From Jackson Street Bridge to Nairn Linoleum Works considered inactive. 2-28 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-C HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. FEATURES OF LOCK AND DAM INCLUDED IN EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 7 of Text) Location: Below Waterford Above Battery, New York City Locks: Clear Width Greatest length available for full width Lift at lowest stages Depth on miter sills: Upper (at normal pool level) Lower (at lowest low water) 2.2 miles 153.8 miles 44.4 feet 492.5 feet 17.3 feet 16.3 feet 13.0 feet Character of foundation: Rock Kind of dam: Fixed Crest Type of construction: Concrete Completed: 1917 Cost: $1,463,014 TABLE 2-D TOTAL COSTS FOR EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 See Section Operation of Text Project Funds New Work Rehabilitation Maintenance and Cost. Total 7. Hudson River, Regular $38,560,839 - $ 440,095 $482,930 $40,996,684 N.Y. Public Works 238,350 - - - 238,350 Emergency Relief 311,461 - - - 311,461 TOTAL $39,110,650 - $ 440,095 $482,930 $41,546,495 13. N.Y. and N.J. Regular $57,412,152 - $3,623,281 - $64,106,719 Channels Public Works 807,000 - - - 807,000 Emergency Relief 2,023,308 - - - 2,023,308 Contributed 7,712 - - - 7,712 TOTAL $60,250,172 - $3,623,281 - $66,944,739 TABLE 2-E SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR (See Section 18 of Text) STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES-FY 1982 1. Number of Patrols a. Shore 1,505 b. Vessel 1,130 c. Air (helicopter) Total 2,635 2. Number of Inspections a. Shore Facilities 14,050 b. Vessels 2,410 Total 16,460 3. Disposition of Cases a. After-the-fact Permit Applications Accepted 150 b. Permit not required or already under permit 35 c. Submitted for litigation to OCE or USAttorney 4 d. Cases pending as of October 1, 1981 1 Total 190 2-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS FY 1982 Name of Project NEW JERSEY Keyport Harbor, N.J.................. ....... Newark Bay, N.J....... ........................ New York and New Jersey Channels, N.Y. & N.J....... Raritan River, N.J...... ........................... Sandy Hook Bay, N.J......................... Shark River, N.J ............ ............... Shoal Harbor and Com pton Creek, N.J.................. Shrewsbury River, N.J .............................. NEW YORK Bay Ridge and Red Hook Channels, N.Y................. Bronx River, N.Y..... ............................ East Chester Creek, N.Y................... East Rockaway Inlet, N.Y........................ Flushing Bay and Creek, N.Y. ....................... Glen Cove Harbor, N.Y......................... Great Chazy River, N.Y . ........................... Great South Bay, N.Y .............................. Hudson River Channel, N.Y.......................... Hudson River, N.Y. City to Waterford, N.Y............. Huntington Harbor, N.Y......................... Jamaica Bay, N.Y ..... ........................... Lake Montauk Harbor, N.Y ....................... Long Island Intracoastal Waterway ................ M ilton Harbor, N.Y.................................. Newtown Creek, N.Y............ .. ............... New York Harbor, N.Y............ ............ Tarrytown Harbor, N.Y.............................. Wallabout Channel, N.Y. ...................... Mar., Apr., May 1982 Nov., Dec. 1981, Feb., May 1982 * Oct., Nov. 1981, Feb., Mar. 1982 Dec. 1981 * May 1982 Sept. 1982 Oct. 1981, July 1982 Apr., May 1982 * * Oct. 1981 * May 1982 * May, June 1982 * Oct., Dec. 1981, Mar., Apr., June, July, Sep. 1982 Mar. 1982 * *Items for which no date is furnished reflect costs for gathering data only. Total Cost of Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys in FY1982 was $726,686. 2-30 TABLE 2-F Date Survey Conducted NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-G OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Burlington Harbor, Vt. 1 Channel between North and South Hero Island, Lake Champlain, Vt. 1,2 Coney Island Inlet, N.Y. East Chester Creek, N.Y. East River, N.Y. Echo Bay Harbor, N.Y.' Glen Cove Creek, N.Y. Gordons Landing, Lake Champlain, Vt. 1,2 Gowanus Creek Channel, N.Y. Great Chazy River, N.Y. Great Kills Harbor, N.Y. 1 "2 Great Lakes to Hudson River Waterway, N.Y. Great South Bay, N.Y.' Greenport Harbor, N.Y.' Harlem River, N.Y.' Hempstead Harbor, N.Y. Hudson River Channel, N.Y. Jamaica Bay, N.Y. Keyport Harbor, N.J. 1 Lake Montauk Harbor, N.Y. Larchmont Harbor, N.Y. Lemon Creek, N.Y. (Inactive)2'3 Little Neck Bay, N.Y.1 Mamaroneck Harbor, N.Y. Manhasset Bay, N.Y. (Inactive)3 Matawan Creek, N.J. (Active)' 5 Mattituck Harbor, N.Y. Milton Harbor, N.Y. New Rochelle Harbor, N.Y. 1,2 Newton Creek, N.Y. (Active)" 5 Northport Harbor, N.Y.' Orowoc Creek, N.Y. (Inactive)3 Otter Creek, Vt. Peconic River, N.Y.' Peekskill Harbor, N.Y.' Plattsburgh Harbor, N.Y.1 Port Henry Harbor, N.Y.' Port Jefferson Harbor, N.Y. Raritan River to Arthur Kill Cutoff Channel, N.J.' Rondout Harbor, N.Y.' Rouses Point, Lake Champlain, N.Y.' Sag Harbor, N.Y.' St. Albans Harbor, Lake Champlain, Vt. 12 Sandy Hook Bay, N.J.' Sandy Hook Bay at Leonardo, N.J. 1 " 2 Saugerties Harbor, N.Y.",2 Sheephead Bay, N.Y.' Shinnecock Inlet, N.Y. Shoal Harbor and Compton Creek, N.J. Shrewsbury River, N.J. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co. bridge across Arthur Kill, N.Y. Sumpawanus (Babylon Creek) Inlet, N.Y." ,2 Tarrytown Harbor, N.Y.' Ticonderoga River, N.Y. (Inactive)2 Wallabout Channel, N.Y.' Wappinger Creek, N.Y.1' 2 Washington Canal and South River, N.J.' Waycake Creek, N.J.2,3 Woodbridge Creek, N.J.' 1966 1909 1973 1975 1981 1953 1981 1892 1972 1980 1962 1976 1974 1953 1969 1969 1980 1981 1968 1976 1970 1937 1969 1981 1948 1968 1981 1976 1971 1974 1956 1949 1977 1953 1951 1972 1931 1977 1972 1972 1895 1964 1917 1957 1967 1968 1948 1961 1978 1979 1973 1895 1974 1895 1953 1950 1953 1949 1953 706,4149 31,000 111,371 592,0564,23 32,723,662 64,584 29,76035 34,750 346,831 18,000 137,30115 5,64413 266,857 74,681 3,616,119 39,468 6,771,87037 4,545,753 40,475 791,68017 76,065 6,62119 1,741,21020 513,764 21,000 177,92541 151,37323 73,2148 1,168,354 78,64425 60,254 25,000 19,400 198,415 69,40627 221,12834 810,500 142,437 98,468 121,80528 3,125 508,93629 56,470 81,905 33,828 1,145,45821, 22 7,730,476 7,000 69,836 16,500 18,174 13,000 206,11631 49,823 283,556 1,288 284,109 755,0424 3,012,76939,40 11,571" 126,820 115 255,291 292,919 88,029 457 1,290,469 21,720 480,777 76,49716 24,970,637 2,604,54738 215,951 1,236,709 267,768 1,621 537 551,677 4,636 165,341 935,786 525,520 142,411 1,626,35124 1,487 4,951 27,059 116,509 66,037 229,111 1,299 359,294 2,019,141 260,441 249 11,710 385 154,565 93,964 169,18130 5,364 22 373,940 1,732,88010 13 431,199 1,260 36,312 44,691 212,82732 2,781 178,398 2-31 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 2-G (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 1. Completed. 2. No commerce reported. 3. Awaiting local cooperation. 4. Costs for previous projects only. 5. A portion of this project is classified "inactive." 6. Includes $69,036 for new work and $26,921 for maintenance for previous project. Excludes $10,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 7. Excludes $419,879 for new work expended from contributed funds and $58,425.contributed funds other and $8,752 expended by the Worlds Fair Corp. for riprap protection of rubble dike. 8. Includes $43,175 for new work for previous projects. 9. Includes costs of maintenance prior to July I, 1986. Excludes $1,425,133 for rehabilitation. 10. Includes $286,606 for maintenance for previous projects. 11. Includes $10 for maintenance for previous projects. 12. Excludes $29,774 for new work expended from contributed funds. 13. Includes $4,813,400 for new work expended from emergency relief funds. 14. Excludes $94,366 for rehabilitation. 15. Excludes $104,805 for new work expended from contributed funds. 16. Includes $64,034 for maintenance for previous projects. 17. Excludes $104,805 for new work expended from contributed funds. 18. Excludes $19,546 for new work expended from contributed funds and $31,454 to be contributed. 19. This amount also included in costs for New York and New Jersey channels. No work has been done on the existing project for Lemon Creek. 20. Excludes $1,741,210 for new work expended from contributed funds. 21. Includes $220,894 for new work for previous projects. 22. Excludes $36,311 for new work expended from contributed funds. 23. Excludes $119,276 for new work expended from contributed funds. In addition, excludes $72,619 for new work expended from contributed funds, other. 24. Includes $1,490,713 for maintenance for previous projects. 25. Excludes $15,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 26. Includes $16,369 for maintenance for previous projects. 27. Excludes $10,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 28. Excludes $66,758 for rehabilitation. 29. Excludes $53,790 for new work expended from contributed funds. 30. Includes $15,000 for maintenance for previous projects. 31. Excludes $365 for new work expended from contributed funds. 32. Includes $84,934 for maintenance for previous projects. 33. Uncompleted portion deauthorized on August 5, 1977. 34. Includes costs for new work $171,427 and maintenance $20,646 for previous projects. 35. Deferred. 36. Excludes $71,423 for rehabilitation. 37. Includes $346,797 for maintenance for previous project. 38. Includes $2,961 for maintenance for previous project. 39. Includes $6,187,694 for new work for previous project. 40. Includes $37,664 for maintenance for previous project. 41. Excludes $34,580 for new work expended from contributed funds. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost Full Report See Annual to Sept. 30, 1982 Operation and Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Atlantic Coast of N.J., Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlets1 1959 - - Fire Island Inlet to Jones Inlets, N.Y. 1981 18,044,667 217,899 North Shore of Long Island, Suffolk County, N.Y. 1979 8,880,000' - Perth Amboy, N.J. 1966 - - 1. Deferred. 2-32 TABLE 2-H TABLE 2-I Projects Adams, Hoosic River Ba Bennington, Vt. Byram River at Pember' East Barre Dam, Winoo, East Rockaway Inlet to and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. Herkimer, N.Y. Hoosic Falls, Hoosic Rive Lamoille River, Vt.: Har Mississquoi River at Ric North Adams, Hoosic Ri North Ellenville, N.Y. Rahway, N.J. Rahway, South Branch, Raritan Bay and Sandy Rosendale, N.Y. Rutland, Otter Creek, V Sandburg Creek, Spring South Amsterdam, Moha South Orange, N.J. Wappinger Creek at Plea Waterbury Reservoir, W Winooski River, Vt.' Wrightsville Dam, Winoc NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual O Report For Construction M] sin, Mass.' 1964 6,282,3072 1974 670,000 wick, Conn. 1,3 1959 363,515 ski River, Vt.' 1963 2,832,084 Rockaway Inlet (Part II) 1976 1,185,365 1973 1,301,2759 er Basin, N.Y.' 1956 1,064,626 ,dwick Dams 4'5'9 1939 - hford, Vt. 1,3 1965 221,476 ver Basin, Mass. 1968 15,409,3257 1978 3,900,650 1971 973,1428 N.J. 1979 15,863,723 Hook Bay, N.J. 1981 11,061,256. 1975 3,684,966 t.4 1963 211,015 Glen, N.Y. 1976 109,702 awk River, N.Y.1 1967 1,564,976 1981 6,857,484 asant Valley, N.Y. 1,3 1959 142,075 'inooski River Basin, Vt. 1976 883,769 1940 5,897,427 oski River Basin, Vt. 1970 1,549,929 1. Completed. 2. Excludes costs of $913,360 under other contributed funds. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended. 4. Inactive. 5. Includes $23,507 emergency relief funds. 6. Excludes cost of $2,718,624 under other contributed funds. 7. Excludes cost of $21,000 under other contributed funds. 8. Excludes cost of $51,500 under other contributed funds. 9. Uncompleted portion has been deauthorized on August 5, 1977. 10. Entire project deauthorized August 5, 1977. 2-33 peration and aintenance 262 8,200 - REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 2-J SURVEYS (See Section 39 of Text) Study Class Cost Navigation Studies $848,100 Flood Control Studies 708,513 Beach Erosion Studies 0 Special Studies' 612,061 Total Surveys 2,168,674 'Includes review of Authorized Projects, Inventory of Dams, Coordination Studies with Other Agencies, Planning Assistance to States, International Water Studies and $78,566 by North Atlantic Division. TABLE 2-K FLOOD PLAIN STUDIES COMPLETED DURING THE PERIOD (See Section 40 of Text) Location Requesting Agency Date Completed Federal Cost NONE -PROGRAM TERMINATED TABLE 2-L COSTS FOR FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES (See Section 40 of Text) Studies and Services Cost Flood Plain Technical Services $ 40,439 Flood Plain Management Unit 67,891 Flood Plain Management Unit-North Atlantic Division Office 66,356 Total $174,686 2-34 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-M DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Section 41 of Text) For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed Operation See Annual and Funds Funds and Projects Report For Authority Expended Construction Expended Maintenance Bronx River, N.Y.4 6 1981 Aug. 1982 1,149,946 1,159,94612 10,000 1,947,8536 Brown's Creek, N.Y. 1980 Aug. 1977 33,976 33,9768 - 505,369 Cheesequake Creek, N.J.4 6 1953 Aug. 1982 40,000 40,000 - 30,675 Coney Island Creek, N.Y.4.6 1952 Aug. 1982 69,489 69,489 - 1,622 East Rockaway (DEBS) Inlet, N.Y. 1963 Aug. 1977 503,969 603,96913 100,000 829,421 Elizabeth River, N.J. 1948 Aug. 1977 60,481 60,481 - 59,391 Glen Cove Harbor, N.Y. 1966 Aug. 1977 165,882 165,882" - 2,455 Huntington Harbor, N.Y. 1953 Aug. 1977 49,035 68,5814 14 19,546 51,566 Irvington Harbor, N.Y. 1947 Aug. 1977 - - - - Lamoille River, Vt. 1939 Aug. 1977 49,837 49,837 - - Portchester Harbor, N.Y.2.3 1967 Aug. 1977 433,470 433,4704 - 441,656 Proctor, Otter Creek Basin, Vt. 6"' 1937 Aug. 1977 - - - Rahway River, N.J. 7 9 1948 Aug. 1982 - 37,000 - 3074 Raritan River, N.J. 4.6 1981 Aug. 1982 1,551,470 1,617,470' 66,000 10,113,903 Rome, Mohawk River, N.Y.6.7 1959 Aug. 1982 7,000 7,000 - - Swanton Harbor, Vt. (Inactive)6 1888 Aug. 1977 - 70,5004 - 235 Waterbury (1941 Act), Vt.7 6 1951 Nov. 1981 9,253 9,253 - - Waterford, N.Y.6 .' 1939 Aug. 1982 - - - - Westchester Creek, N.Y. 1981 Aug. 1982 175,933 175,933 - 2,921,311 1. No commerce reported. 8. Excludes $71,423 for rehabilitation. 2. Completed. 9. Deferred. 3. A portion of this project is classified "inactive." 10. Under Section 12 Public Law 93-251. 4. Uncompleted portion deauthorized. 11. Includes $93,882 for Rehabilitation. 5. Excludes $19,546 for new work expended from contributed funds 12. Includes $10,000 expended from contributed funds. and $31,454 to be contributed. 13. Includes $100,000 expended from contributed funds. 6. Inactive. 14. Includes $19,546 expended from contributed funds. 7. Entire proiect deauthorized. 15. Includes $66,000 expended from contributed funds. TABLE 2-N SECTION 107 CONTINUE DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (See Section 21 of Text) Name of Project Cost to Sept. 30, 1982 Sheepshead Bay, N.Y. $85,807 COMPLETE DETAILED PROJECT REPORT Whale Creek, Matawan, Twsp, N.J. $ 4,460 TABLE 2-0 SECTION 103 COMPLETE PREAUTHORIZATION RECONNAISSANCE REPORT (See Section 24 of Text) Name of Project Cost to Sept. 30, 1982 Long Island Sound, Orchard Beach, N.Y.C., N.Y. $ 838 2-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 SECTION 205 CONTINUE PREAUTHORIZATION RECONNAISSANCE REPORT (See Section 36 of Text) Name of Project Cost to Sept. 30, 1982 Claverack Creek, Stockport, N.Y. $ 7,500 Sawkill Creek, Kingston, N.Y. 7,500 COMPLETE PREAUTHORIZATION RECONNAISSANCE REPORTS Belcher's Creek, West Milford, N.J. $ 4,226 Esopus Creek, Ulster, N.Y. 126 Nannyhagen Brook, N.Y. 4,260 Ramapo River, Monroe, N.Y. 5,000 Sheldon Brook, Tarrytown, N.Y. 2,406 Winooski River, Richmond, Vt. 7,500 START DETAILED PROJECT REPORT Kayaderroseras Creek, Ballston, Spa, N.Y. $ 5,362 CONTINUE DETAILED PROJECT REPORTS Missisquoi River, Vt. $ 15,299 Nannyhagen Brook, N.Y. 13,456 Sauquoit Creek, Whitesboro, N.Y. 73,420 Yonkers, Nepera Park, N.Y. 93,601 COMPLETE DETAILED PROJECT REPORTS Barney Brook, Irvington, N.Y. $ 2,385 Branch Brook, Mt. Kisco, N.Y. 1,601 Hutchinson River, Maintstream, N.Y. 197 Patroon Creek, Albany, N.Y. 73,093 Peckman River, Little Falls, N.J. 193 Schoharie Creek, Fulton, N.Y. 16,512 CONTINUE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Pine Brook, Manalapan, N.J. $ 2,846 COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION Chappaqua, N.Y. (Sawmill River) $186,878 2-36 TABLE 2-P _ _ TABLE 2-Q NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT SECTION 14 COMPLETE RECONNAISSANCE REPORTS (See Section 37 of Text) Name of Project Hudson River, Troy, N.Y. Kaaterskill Creek, Palenville, N.Y. Sandburg Creek, Ellenville, N.Y. Station Road, Irvington, N.Y. Unnamed Tributary to Hudson River at Coxsackie, N.Y. Van Road, Jewett, N.Y. Zimmerman Creek, Village of St. Johnsville, N.Y. Cost to Sept. 30, 1982 $ 6,959 7,144 5,000 6,789 1,748 7,500 12,500 COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION AND PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Ho-Ho-Kus Brook, Waldwick, N.J. $103,331 2-37 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT. * This district comprises a portion of southeastern New York, eastern Pennsylvania, western and southern new Jersey, northern and southeastern Delaware, and a small part of northeastern Maryland embraced in the drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean from Manasquan River, N.J., inclusive, to south boundary of Delaware. It also includes Chesapeake and Delaware Canal and approach channel thereto in Chesapeake Bay and Elk River, Md. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Absecon Inlet, N.J. ............ . 2. Barnaget Inlet, N.J. .............. 3. Cold Spring Inlet, N.J. ........... 4. Delaware River between Philadelphia, Pa., and Trenton, N.J... 5. Delaware River, Pa., N.J. and Del. Philadelphia to the Sea ........... 6. Delaware River at Camden, N.J. ... 7. Harbor of Refuge, Delaware Bay, Del. .............. 8. Indian River Inlet and Bay, Del. ... 9. Inland Waterway, Rehoboth Bay to Delaware Bay, Del. .............. 10. Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, Del., and Md. .. 11. Manasquan River, N.J. .......... 12. Mispillion River, Del. .......... . 13. Murderkill River, Del.......... . 14. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .................. 15. New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway .. 16. Schuylkill River, Pa. ............. 17. Ttckerton Creek, N.J. ........... 18. Wilmington Harbor, Del. ......... Beach Erosion Control 19. Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration .................. 20. Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization ...... Flood Control Local Protection 21. Beltzville Lake, Pa. .............. 22. Blue Marsh Lake, Pa. ............ 23. Cape May Inlet to Lower Township, N.J. ................ Flood Control Local Protection cont. Page 3-2 3-2 3-3 3-3 3-4 3-5 3-5 3-5 3-6 3-7 3-8 3-9 3-9 3-9 3-10 3-11 3-11 3-12 24. Delaware Coast Protection, Del. ... 25. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............ 26. Francis E. Walter Dam, Pa. ....... 27. General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, Pa. .................. 28. Hay Creek, Birdsboro, Schuylkill River Basin, Pa. ....... 29. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............... 31. Pottstown and Vicinity, Schuylkill River Basin ................... .. 32. Prompton Lake, Pa. ............. 33. Tamaqua, Pa. ........ ........ . 34. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ....................... General Investigations 35. Surveys ........................ 36. Collection and Study of Basic Data .................... 37. Advance Engineering and Design .. Tables Page TABLE 3-A Cost and Financial 3-12 Statement .............. TABLE 3-B Authorizing Legislation .. 3-13 TABLE 3-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..... TABLE 3-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects .. 3-13 TABLE 3-E Other Authorized Flood 3-13 Control Projects ........ TABLE 3-F Multiple Purpose Project 3-14 Including Power ........ TABLE 3-G Deauthorized projects ... Page 3-14 3-14 3-15 3-15 3-16 3-16 3-17 3-17 3-18 3-18 Page 3-18 3-18 3-18 Page 3-19 3-23 3-27 3-28 3-29 3-29 3-30 *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 3-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Navigation 1. ABSECON INLET, N.J. Location. On New Jersey coast about 65 miles north of Delaware breakwater, between Brigantine Beach on the north and Absecon Beach on the south. It forms entrance to harbor at Atlantic City, N.J. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 826 and 1217). Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1936, page 319. Existing project. This provides for an inlet entrance channel 20 feet deep at mean low water and 400 feet wide, for an entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the inlet channel into Clam Creek, and for a turning basin 15 feet deep within Clam Creek. The act authorizing the inlet entrance channel also provides that should the channel at any time have deleterious effect on the .Atlantic City Beach, work upon the improvements may cease; it being understood that the project is adopted on the basis that the interests of the beach in front of the city are superior to those of the inlet. The total length of the section included in the project is about 1.5 miles. The extreme tidal range, due to ocean storms, is about 11 feet. Project was completed May 1957. Inlet channel was completed in 1938. Dredging entrance from inlet channel into Clam Creek was completed in 1957. The cost for the completed project was $307,712. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests are required to furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for maintenance when-and as required for the dredging of the entrance channel into Clam Creek and the turning basin within Clam Creek. Terminal facilities. See pages 239 and 240 of Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Water and sediment testing at Clam Creek, engineering survey and benefit cost review performed. 2. BARNEGAT INLET, N.J. Location. On east coast of New Jersey about 50 miles south of Sandy Hook, between Island Beach on the north and Long Beach on the south (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Chart Nos. 825 and 1216). This inlet is main entrance to Barnegat Bay, largest of the bays on New Jersey coast which are separated from the ocean by narrow barrier beaches. Existing project. Provides for a channel 8 feet deep through inlet and 10 feet through outer bar, channel to be protected by two converging stone jetties extending to 12-foot contour in the ocean and spaced 1,000 feet apart at outer ends; a channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics extending in a northwesterly direction from gorge in inlet to Oyster Creek Channel just northwest of Sunset Shoal, thence via Oyster Creek Channel to deep water in the bay; and maintenance of a channel 8 feet deep and 200 feet wide' to connect Barnegat City harbor with main inlet channel. Total length of section included in project is about 4.5 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Extreme tidal range at inlet is from about 2 feet below mean low water to about 3 feet above mean high water. Project was completed in 1940. (For details, see page 203, Annual Report for 1964). (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing projects.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are four docks or terminals in inner harbor at Barnegat Light which furnish adequate facilities for present commerce of locality. 3-2 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Dredging performed by U.S. Hopper Dredge Fry during the period of 1 October 1981 through 20 October 1981, 16 April 1982 through 12 May 1982, and 16 August 1982 through 30 September 1982. Removed a total, of 105,000 cubic yards of material. Other work performed was engineering survey and supervisor and administration. 3. COLD SPRING INLET, N.J. Location. In Cape May County, southern New Jersey, about 3 miles east of Cape May City and about 16 miles northeast of Delaware breakwater. Inlet connects Cape May Harbor and New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway with the Atlantic Ocean and is about 1 mile long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 234,827 and 1219). Existing project. This provides for an entrance channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide, protected by two parallel jetties, and extending from the 25-foot depth curve in the Atlantic Ocean to a line 500 feet harborward of a line joining the inner ends of the jetties; thence 20 feet deep and 300 feet wide to deep water in Cape May Harbor. The total length of the section included in the project is about 2.25 miles. Extreme tidal range, due to ocean storms, is about 11 feet. Project was completed in 1942. (For details see page 238, Annual Report for 1962.) (See table at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Complied with Act of 1907, except work of deepening and enlarging inner harbor, which is 80 percent complete. Terminal facilities. See page 238, Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Economic evaluation conducted. 4. DELAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, PA., AND TRENTON, N.J. Location. Rises in southeastern New York, flows generally southerly 367 miles, forming boundry line between New York and New Jersey on the east and Pennsylvania and Delaware on the west, and empties into Delaware Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1218, 280, 294, 295, and 296.) Previous projects. For details see page 1778 of Annual Report for 1915, page 311 of Annual Report for 1924, page 220 of Annual Report for 1934, and page 296, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A channel from Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, 23.5 miles to upstream end of Newbold Island 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with suitable widening of bends, including relocation of channel at Delair Railroad bridge, and reconstruction of bridge, thence 5.5 miles to upper end of Trenton Marine Terminal, 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with a turning basin 800 feet wide and 1,700 feet long at the terminal; and maintence of a channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide from upper end of 34-foot channel to Penn Central Railroad Bridge at Trenton, dredged under a previous project. Project also provides for an auxiliary channel 20 feet deep and 200 feet wide east of Burlington Island, extending easterly from main channel to upper end of U.S. Pipe and Foundry Co.'s property at East Burlington, with a turning basin 450 feet wide at upper end; for initial excavation, only, of a cross channel 8 feet deep and 200 feet wide through artificial island opposite Delanco, N.J., and for construction such bank protection works as may be necessary. Section included in project is about 30.5 miles long, excluding auxiliary channel east of Burlington Island, which is 1.4 miles long, and cross channel opposite Delanco. Lower end is about 55 miles above river mouth at Liston Point and about 105 miles above Habor of Refuge at mouth of Delaware Bay. Freshets, which occur usually during February and March, attain a height of 9 to 20 feet above mean low water in vicinity of Trenton. Navigation is occasionally suspended during a portion of winter months due to ice. Existing project is 90 percent complete. A 40-foot channel under the 1954 modification from Allegheny Avenue to upper end of Newbold Island was completed April 1964. Work remaining is dredging from upper end of Newbold Island to Trenton Marine Terminal and widening turning basin at terminal which is in deferred category. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) (See Table 3-C at end of chapter for total cost for exisiting project to Sept. 30, 1982.) Local cooperation. Modification authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act provides local interests must provide suitable terminal facilities, furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance, and hold the United States free from damages. Local interests complied 3-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 with requirements, except city of Trenton has not provided suitable terminal facilities. Terminal facilities. There are 21 piers, wharves, and docks from Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, Pa., to Trenton, N.J. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port Series No. 8 (revised 1966) Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance contract: Dredging in the 40 foot channel was performed by the American Dredging Company. Removed a total of 1,211,512 cubic yards of material. Stream gaging performed by USGS. Maintenance, hired labor: Performed on-going real estate functions, channel examination, surveys, environmental monitoring related to maintenance dredging, general maintenance engineering and design and supervision and administration. 5. DELAWARE RIVER, PA., N.J., AND DEL., PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA Location. See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1218, 394, 295, and 280. Previous projects. For details see page 1779 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 299, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a channel from deep water in Delaware Bay to a point in the bay, near Ship John Light, 40 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide; thence to Philadelphia Naval Base, 40 feet deep and 800 feet wide, with 1,200-foot width at Bulkhead Bar and 1,000-foot width at other bends; thence to Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, Pa., 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend and 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide through Philadelphia Harbor, along west side of channel; and for anchorages at Reedy Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus Hook, and Mantua Creek, each 40 feet deep and 2,300 feet wide with respective lengths of 8,000, 5,200, 13,650, and 11,500 feet; anchorage at Gloucester 30 feet deep and about 3,500 feet long. Project also provides for construction of dikes and training works for regulation and control of tidal flow; for maintenance of an area on north side of channel opposite Philadelphia Naval Base between Shipway 3 and Schuylkill River to 40 feet deep and a width of 150 feet on Mifflin Range and of 200 feet on West Horseshoe Range; and for maintenance of any areas dredged by local interests to 35 feet deep between channel and a line 100 feet channelward of pierhead line between Point House wharf and Philadelphia Naval Base, when in opinion of Chief of Engineers such areas are so located as to be of benefit to generate navigation. Section included in project is about 96.5 miles long. All depths refer to plane of mean low water. Under influence of heavy and long-continued winds extreme tidal range is about 14 feet. Normal maximum velocity of tidal currents in the dredged channel varies between 2 and 3.5 miles per hour. Storm tides may increase maximum to as much as 4.5 miles per hour. Estimated cost for new work is $71,630,000 (July 1972) exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Channel to 37 deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend and 37 feet deep'and 60 feet wide through Philadelphia Harbor along east side of channel and Port Richmond anchorage to 37 feet deep, except for that portion of channel which forms a part of 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide channel portion of project is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1960) of this portion is $2,951,000. Existing project, excluding work deferred for restudy, is about 66 percent complete. The 40-foot channel from naval base to the sea was completed in 1942. Dredging Naval Base to Allegheny Avenue to 40 feet deep was completed in 1962. Enlarging anchorage at Marcus Hook was completed in 1967. Work remaining is to construct new anchorages at Reedy Point and Deepwater Point, and enlarge Mantua Creek anchorage, channel dredging from 35 to 37 feet deep over a width of 500 feet through Horseshoe Bend and about 600 feet through Philadelphia Harbor, and deepening Port Richmond Anchorage to 37 feet, all of which have been deferred for restudy. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) (See Table 3-C at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1982.) Local cooperation. Requirements under 1938 river and Harbor Act for maintaining channel and anchorage in Philadelphia Harbor annually by cities of Philadelphia and Camden were removed (see 1962 Annual Report for details). Terminal facilities. There are 217 piers, wharves, and docks between Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia and the sea, 135 on waterfront of Philadelphia, Camden, and Gloucester, and 82 below Philadelphia. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further 3-4 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT details see Port Series Nos. 7, revised 1967, and 8, revised 1966 - Corps of Engineers). Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Dredging was performed at New Castle Range by American Dredging Company from 29 November 1981 through 24 December 1981 and from 15 September 1982 through 30 September 1982. Removed a total of 584,285 cubic yards of material. Other work performed, environmental assessments, removal of shoals, sturgeon studies, handling shore pipeline, raising and construction of banks, maintenance of disposal areas, engineering surveys, general maintenance, and supervision and administration. Maintenance, hired labor: Dredging performed by U.S. Hopper Dredge Goethals and Fry. Removed a total of 1,966,459 cubic yards of material during the period of 1 October 1981 through 23 June 1982. Other work performed, environmental monitoring, general maintenance of scrapper pan and crane for disposal area, sturgeon study, channel realignment, plans and specifications, preparation of disposal area, unclassified excavation, constructing and raising banks, handling shore pipe, submerged pipeline, snagging and clearing, engineering and design and supervision and administration. 6. DELAWARE RIVER AT CAMDEN, N.J. Location. Camden, N.J., on east bank of Delaware River, is directly opposite city of Philadelphia, Pa. It is about 51 miles above mouth of river and about 101 miles above Harbor of Refuge at mouth of Delaware Bay. (See U.S. Coast Guard and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 295 and 280.) Previous projects. Adopted by River and Harbor Act of June 25, 1910. No work was done on this project. for further details, see page 321, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. See page 217, Annual Report for 1962. Project was about 36 percent complete. Work remaining is deepening channel from 30 to 37 feet which was placed in deferred restudy category. Controlling depths at local mean low water were as follows: In February 1962, 11.8 feet at northerly end of 18-foot channel opposite Cooper Point; and 30 feet in front of marine terminal. Project depths are well maintained in 30-foot depth section of channel. Cost for new work for completed portions of project was $464,906 and $15,000, Federal and non-Federal funds, respectively. Deepening 37-foot portion of project previously deferred for restudy reactivated in 1981. Study was initiated in FY82 and expected to be completed in 1984. Estimated cost of this portion, as revised in October 1982 was $5,750,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 55 piers, wharves, and docks near project area along Delaware River waterfront at Camden and Gloucester, N.J., including 3 oil terminals on Petty Island. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. incurred for existing projects. No cost 7. HARBOR OF REFUGE, DELAWARE BAY, DEL. Location. At lower end of Delaware Bay, a few miles from Atlantic Ocean on Delaware side of bay. It is about 120 miles south of New York Harbor, about 114 miles north of entrance to Chesapeake Bay and about 101 miles from Philadelphia, Pa. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1218, 1219 and 379.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1874, Chart II, page 146; page 330; and 1938, page 330. Existing project. Existing project was completed in 1951. Controlling depth at low water in channel in July 1963 was 16.8 feet. For details see page 229 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. See page 229 of Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year. No cost incurred in FY 82. 8. INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DEL. Location. Indian River rises in Sussex County, Del., and flows easterly 13 miles into Indian River Bay which is a shallow lagoon 6 miles long and 2 3-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 miles wide on the Delaware Coast about midway between Cape Henlopen and the Maryland State line. The inlet is an opening through the barrier beach separating Indian River Bay and the Atlantic Ocean. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1219.) Previous projects. Adopted by River and Harbor Act of August 2, 1882. For further details see page 744, Annual Report for 1888. Existingproject. This provides for the fixation of the inlet by the construction of two parallel jetties of steel-sheet pile and stone design extending to approximately the 14-foot depth curve in the ocean, and for dredging an entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide, for a distance of 7,000 feet inshore from the jetties; thence a channel 9 feet deep, 100 feet wide in the bay, and 80 feet wide in the river, to and including a turning basin 9 feet deep,. 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at Old Landing; thence a channel 4 feet deep and 60 feet wide to the highway bridge at Millsboro. The project also provides that the interior channel dimensions may, in the discretion of the Chief of Engineers, be modified as found desirable to increase the hydraulic efficiency of the channel, without increasing the cost. The total length of the section included in the project is about 13.75 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range at the highway bridge is about 6 feet. Existing project was completed in 1951. For details see Annual Report for 1963. The cost for new work for the completed project was $511,210, exclusive of $10,000 expended on previous projects and exclusive of $210,000 contributed funds. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests are required to furnish suitable areas for disposal of dredged material during maintenance as and when needed, and provide terminal facilities. Terminalfacilities. There is a privately owned basin with berthing facilities for small boats located .75 mile west of the highway bridge near the inlet and .25 mile north of the inlet channel, connected therewith by a channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide; a U.S. Coast Guard wharf on the north side of the inlet channel in the same locality; and two wharves at Oak Orchard in Indian River Bay. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract; Continued water and sediment testing and rehabilitation of jetties. 9. INLAND WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DEL. Location. A tidal canal in southeasterly part of Sussex County, Del. It extends 12 miles northward from Rehoboth Bay through high land west of town of Rehoboth to Gordon Lake; thence through marshes back of Cape Henlopen to Lewes River; thence down Lewes River to its junction with Broadkill River near its mouth. An entrance to the waterway from Delaware Bay is about 4 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 379, 1218. and 1219.) Previous projects. A canal along a slightly different route formed a part of projected waterway from Chincoteague Bay, Va. to Delaware Bay, begun in 1886 and abandoned in 1905. Existingproject. This provides for an entrance channel near Lewes 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide protected by two parallel jetties 500 feet apart; thence a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide to South Street Bridge at Lewes, and a basin of the same depth 1,200 feet long and up to 375 feet in width at the latter point; thence a channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide (40 feet wide through Deep Cut near Rehoboth) to Rehoboth Bay; a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the entrance to Broadkill River; two parallel rubble jetties 725 feet long at the Rehoboth Bay entrance; and the construction of one highway bridge and one railroad Bridge at Rehoboth. The total length of the section included in the project is about 12 miles. The cost for new work for the completed portion of the project was $561,514, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and $60,000 contributed funds. The extension of the jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance is considered to be inactive and is excluded from the foregoing cost. The cost of the portion was last revised in 1960 and was estimated to be $816,000. Existing project is about 70 percent complete. For details on completed work see page 241 of Annual Report for 1963. Work remaining, extension of existing 3-6 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT jetties at Delaware Bay entrance, is considered inactive. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests must furnish suitable terminal facilities and necessary spoil-disposal areas. Terminal facilities.. See page 228, Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Stream gaging continued. Maintenance, hired labor: Continued 216 study at Roosevelt Inlet. Performed bank stabilization along Lewes and Rehoboth Canal. 10. INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DEL., AND MD. Location. Begins at Reedy Point on Delaware River, about 41 miles below Philadelphia, Pa., and passes through sea level Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, a distance of 14 miles, to Back Creek, at Chesapeake City, Md. It then passes for 5 miles down Back Creek, thence 9 miles down Elk River to Chesapeake Bay and thence 18 miles down Chesapeake Bay to a point near Pooles Island. A branch channel connects Delaware River at Delaware City, Del., with main channel at a point about 1.5 miles west of Reedy Point. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 294, 1226, 570, and 572.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1934, page 242, and Annual Report for 1938, page 312. Existing project. A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to water of natural 35-foot depth in Chesapeake Bay including a cutoff at Penn Central Railroad crossing, and having a minimum radius of curvature of 7,000 feet at bends; a high-level, fixed railroad bridge with vertical clearance of 135 feet and horizontal clearance of 600 feet at the railroad crossing over the cutoff (economic study of railroad crossing requested by Office of Management and Budget resulted in construction of a single track vertical lift bridge in lieu of a high-level fixed railroad bridge); high-level fixed highway bridges over canal at Reedy Point, St..Georges, Summit, and Chesapeake City; a bascule drawbridge across Delaware City Branch Channel; extension of entrance jetties at Reedy Point; and anchorage in Elk River, 35 feet deep and 1,200 feet wide, with an average length of 3,700 feet; enlargement of anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to afford an area about 400 feet wide, 1,000 feet long, and 12 feet deep; dredging Delaware City branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, and deepening existing basin to same depth; revetment of banks of canal as required between Delaware and Elk Rivers, and on banks of Delaware City Branch Channel east of Fifth Street Bridge; and construction of bulkheads. Total of section included in project, excluding Delaware City Branch Channel, which is about 2 miles long, is about 46 miles. All depths refer to plane of low water in Delaware River. Extreme tidal range is from 6.3 feet above mean high water to 3 feet below mean low water. Existing project is about 89 percent completed. Channel 27 feet deep and 250 to 400 feet wide, Delaware River to Pooles Island, completed in 1938. High-level fixed highway bridges were completed at St. Georges (4-lane) in 1942; at Chesapeake City (2-lane) in 1949; and at Summit (4-lane) in 1960. Relocation of Penn Central Railroad bridge was completed December 21, 1965. enlargement to 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide St. Georges and Summit bridges and Summit and Goose Island was completed on June 20, 1972 and February 18, 1972, respectively. Removing the old Penn Central railroad bridge was completed on January 21, 1972. Channel work for Part II is about 87 percent complete. Work remaining consists of completing channel enlargement to 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide between Reedy Point Bridge and St. Georges Bridge; widening and deepening the channel between Delaware River and Reedy Point Bridge, the completion of recreation facilities, and miscellaneous completion items. Deepening Delaware City Branch Channel from 6 to 8 feet from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with the canal has been deferred for study. Original cost of canal including purchase was $10,709,755; estimated cost of new work for modifications of 1935 and 1954 is $139,574,000 (October 1977). Total estimated cost of new work including original purchase is $151,683,755. Portion of project comprising completion of Delaware City Branch Channel from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with canal is to be restudied and excluded from 3-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 foregoing estimate. Estimated cost of this portion is $145,000 (July 1954). (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1954 provided that local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way required for bridges. Assurances accepted and approved February 16, 1955. Requirements for Summit and Reedy Point Bridges have been met. Terminal facilities. Ample mooring facilities at eastern and western ends of canal and bulkheads at Delaware City and St. Georges were constructed by the United States. A small-boat harbor was provided and a wharf constructed at Chesapeake City. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Maintenance dredging in the Upper Chesapeake Bay was performed by the North American Trailing Company during the period of 22 October 1981 through 1 January 1982. Removed a total of 337,604 cubic yards of material. Other work performed, replacement ofj oint seals at Reedy Point Bridge, repair of night lighting system, modification of main span bearings and neoprene joints at St. Georges Bridge, monitoring the effect of maintenance dredging at C and D Canal, maintenance of closed circuit television and microwave system, banks and disposal areas, rip-rap, preparation of disposal areas and rehabilitation of Summit Bridge. Maintenance, hired labor: Maintenance dredging by U.S. Hopper Dredge Coember and Goethals was performed from 9 January 1982 through 7 April 1982. Removed a total of 308,969 cubic yards of material. Other work performed, maintenance of roadways, building, grounds, riprap, banks and disposal areas, engineering surveys, plans and specifications for spot shoals and ICP dredging, environmental monitoring, general maintenance engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 11. MANASQUAN RIVER, N.J. Location. This small stream flows in eastern part of New Jersey, rises near Freehold, flows easterly and empties into the Atlantic Ocean, about 26 miles south of Sandy Hook. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 795.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1909, page 186, and Annual Report for 1938, page 269. Existing project. A channel 14 feet deep and 250 feet wide, protected by jetties and other works, extending from the Atlantic Ocean to inner end of north jetty, thence 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide to within 700 feet of New York and Long Branch Railroad bridge, thence of same depth and narrowing to 100 feet wide to within 300 feet of bridge; for a widening on northerly side of channel of 200 feet for 3,150 feet to a depth of 8 feet; for a 19-acre anchorage to 10 feet deep on south side of channel and for a 27.5-acre anchorage to 12 feet deep about 0.5 miles west of route 35 highway bridge. Section included in project is about 1.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 3.7 feet at inner end of inlet and 4 feet at ocean end; mean range of spring tides, 4.4 and 4.8 feet, respectively; irregular fluctuations due to wind and barometric pressure vary from 2.7 feet below to 7.5 feet above mean low water at inner end of inlet. Project, excluding 10- and 12-foot anchorages, cost $518,243. Estimated cost (1958) for 10- and 12-foot anchorages portion of project considered inactive is $504,000. Existing project was completed in June 1963. Dredging 19 acre anchorage south of channel and 27.5 acre anchorage west of highway bridge is in the inactive category. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1945 provides that local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances to date have been complied with. Terminal facilities. Five landings with a total wharfage of 700 feet used by commercial fishermen, and 7 landings and boat basins for pleasure craft. Existing facilities are considered adequate *for present requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Work performed, repairs on bulkhead caps. Rehabilitation, contract: Continuing contract to complete rehabilitation of North Jetty. Rehabilitation, hired labor: Work performed, engineering and design and supervision and administration related to rehabilitation of North Jetty. 3-8 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT 12. MISPILLION RIVER, DEL. Location. Rises in Kent and Sussex Counties, Del., flows northeasterly 15 miles along the boundary line between the two counties and empties into Delaware Bay about 16 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1218.) Previous projects. For details see page 1786, Annual Report for 1915, page 448 of Annual Report for 1918, and page 327 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Project is about 31 percent complete. Four cutoffs for 6-foot channel were completed in 1923; 6-foot channel from Delaware Bay to Milford in 1924; and jetties at the mouth in 1939. Work remaining is dredging channel to 9- foot depth, 800 feet wide in Delaware Bay to the mouth, thence 60 feet wide to Milford, with the provision of three cutoffs to eliminate bends, and a turning basin at Milford. Controlling depths at mean low water: In October 1964 from Delaware Bay to mouth 7.1 feet, and thence to fixed highway bridge at Milford, 6.1 feet. For details see page 243 of Annual Report for 1957. Local Cooperation. Assurances required by 1954 River and Harbor Act have not been furnished. For details see page 243, Annual Report for 1957. Prior requirements fully complied with. Terminal facilities. For details see page 244, Annual Report for 1957. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Environmental monitoring. 13. MURDERKILL RIVER, DEL. Location. Rises in Kent County, Del., flows northeasterly 19 miles through county, and empties into Delaware Bay about 25 miles above Cape Helopen. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1218.) Existingproject. Provides for a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water, 150 feet wide in Delaware Bay to mouth, and thence 80 feet wide to Frederica, 7.5 miles above mouth. Total length of section included in project is about 8.5 miles. Extreme tidal range is from about I foot below mean low water to about 2 feet above mean high water. Estimated cost for new work revised in 1954 is $38,000. Portion comprising widening channel to project width throughout its length is to be restudied and exlcuded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion last revised in 1954 was $86,000. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of July 13, 1892 (H. Ex. Doc. 21, 52d Cong., Ist Sess.). (See page 981 Annual Report of 1892.) Latest published map is in House Document 1058, 62nd Congress 3d Session. Existing project about 30 percent complete, including revision to be restudied. Channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide was completed in 1911. Work remaining is widening the channel to project width. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are a number of light timber wharves on both sides of river near mouth and two wharves at Frederica, all privately owned. Facilites are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Maintenance dredging of Cedar Creek was performed by Cottrell Engineering Corporation during the period of 10 September 1982 through 13 September 1982. Removed a total of 19,678 cubic yards of material. Maintenance, hired labor: work performed, plans and specifications, engineering surveys and supervision and administration related to maintenance dredging. 14. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization). Study Identification Assawoman Bay, Del (RECON) Cedar Creek, Sussex City, Del (DPR) Dredge Harbor, Delran, N.J. (DPR) Petty Island, Back Channel, Camden, N.J. (DPR) Municipal Marina, Pleasantville, N.J. (DPR) River Front Park Marina, Toms River, N.J. (DPR) Little Assawomen Bay, Del (RECON) Fiscal Year Cost $ 387 150,077 28,267 110,422 39,004 1,651 478 3-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Fiscal Year Cost $ 46,667 55 15. NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY Location. A sea level inland water route approximately parallel with New Jersey coast, extends from Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, about 26 miles south of Sandy Hook, N.J., to Delaware Bay about 3 miles above Cape May point. Waterway extends through inlet and up Manasquan River about 2 miles; thence by Point Pleasant Canal through high ground for 2 miles to head of Barnegat Bay. It then passes through a series of bays, lagoons, and thoroughfares along New Jersey coast to Cape May harbor; thence across Cape May County to Delaware Bay through a land cut by way of New England Creek basin. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 234, 795, 825, 826, 827, 1216, 1217, 1218, and 1219.) Existing project. This provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and generally 100 feet wide, extending from the Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, N.J., to Delaware Bay above Cape May, N.J., by the further improvement of Manasquan River and Inlet, N.J., and the present New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway, and by the construction of a canal of similar dimensions from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay via the New England Creek basin, with adequate jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance. The total length of the project is about 117 miles. Normal tide range in sections of the waterway remote from inlets is 0.5 foot. Estimated cost for new work is $71,549 (July 1969), exclusive of $1,824,940 Navy Department funds and $99,000 contributed by local interests. Portion of project extending from Manasquan River to Cape May Harbor is to be restudied and excluded from new work costs estimate. Estimated cost of this portion is $6,470,000 (July 1954). Existing project was adopted by 1945 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 133, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.). Latest published map is in project document. River and Harbor Act of 1946 (Public Law 525, 79th Cong., 2d Sess., as extended by Public Law 240, 82nd Cong.), authorized use for a period not to exceed 6 years, of funds from appropriations heretofore or hereafter made for maintenance and MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGE PURSUANT TO SECTION III, PUBLIC LAW 90-483 3-10 Study Identification Delaware River, Pennsville, N.J. Indian River Inlet, Del. improvement of rivers and harbors, for maintenance of canal from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay constructed as an emergency wartime project with Navy Department funds, including cost of maintaining temporary railroad and seashore highway bridges over canal. Existing project is about 25 percent complete. A canal 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay was completed in 1942; two parallel stone jetties at Delaware Bay entrance and a temporary highway and a railroad bridge in 1944, all with Navy Department funds. Work remaining, dredging a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet to Cape May Harbor, has been deferred for restudy; however, the project between Ottens Harbor and Richardson Channel and from that point to Cape May are being maintained to 10 feet and 12 feet, respectively, since they were originally dredged to these depths by the State. Local cooperation. The project is subject to the conditions that the State of New Jersey cede to the United States all right, title, and interest that it has acquired to lands, easements, rights-ofway, and structures other than bridges for the Bayhead-Manasquan Canal; that the State of New Jersey furnish, free of cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and disposal areas required for construction of the Cape May Canal and for improvement of the proposed waterway and for their subsequent maintenance; that local interests provide, maintain, and operate suitable bridges over the waterway; that the State of New Jersey donate to the United States the navigation aids in use on the present New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway; and that the State of New Jersey hold and save the United States and its agents free from any claims for damages resulting from the work of improvement. Compliance with these conditions was completed January 15, 1954, except that local interests are required to furnish disposal areas for the construction and the subsequent maintenance of the proposed improvement. Terminal facilities. See Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Dredging performed by Barnegat Bay Dredging Company during the period of 22 April 1982 through 29 September 1982. Removed a total of 448,000 cubic yards of material. Other PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT work performed, stream gaging, and bank stabilization at Cape May Canal. Maintenance, hired labor: Work performed, investigating, and repairing bulkhead caps, bank stabilization, engineering surveys, general maintenance engineering and design and supervision and administration. 16. SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA. Location. Rises in Schuylkill County, Pa., flows generally southeasterly 150 miles, and empties into Delaware River at Philadelphia, Pa. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 295 and 280.) Previous project. For details see page 325, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. This provides for a channel 33 feet deep and 400 feet wide in Delaware River to the mouth and within the river to 29th Street, .75 mile above the mouth; thence the same depth and 300 feet wide to Passyunk Avenue Bridge, 3.5 miles above the mouth; thence 26 feet deep. and 200 feet wide to Gibson Point, 4.5 miles above the mouth; and thence 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide to University Avenue Bridge, 6 miles above the mouth, including widening at bends. The total length of the section included in the project is about 6.5 miles. All depths refer to the plane of meanlow water. The extreme tidal range, due to freshetssand prolonged heavy winds, is about 14 feet. The cost for new work for the completed existing project was $2,809,007. Existing project was completed in September 1962. For details see Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. The River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946, imposed the condition that the city of Philadelphia agree to remove 60,000 cubic yards, place measurement, of material annually from that portion of those portions of the project which the District Engineer may designate until such time as adequate municipal sewage-treatment works are constructed and placed in effective operation. Compliance with this condition has been met through the completion of sewagetreatment works by the city of Philadelphia. All other requirements have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 38 wharves, piers, and docks within limits of improvement. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No. 7-Revised 1967-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Stream gaging performed by USGS. Maintenance, hired labor: Performed general maintenance, engineering surveys, chemical analysis, and plans and specifications related to dredging. 17. TUCKERTON CREEK, N.J. Location. This creek rises in Ocean County, N.J., flows southerly 7 miles, and empties into Little Egg Harbor about 8 miles north of Little Egg Inlet (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 825 and 1216.) Existing project. This provides for a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide from the head of Marchelder Channel in Little Tuckerton Bay to the mouth; thence 75 feet wide to Parkers Landing, 1 mile above the mouth; thence 60 feet wide to West Tuckerton Landing, 1.75 miles above the mouth; thence a channel 5 feet deep and 60 feet wide to just above Scow Landing, 2 miles above the mouth; an thence a channel 3 feet deep and 40 feet wide to the mill dam at Tuckerton 2.25 miles above the mouth. The total length of the section included in the project is about 3.5. miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The mean tidal range is 2.5 feet. The extreme tidal range is from about I foot below mean low water to about 1 foot above mean high water. The existing project was completed in 1925. The cost of new work for the complete project was $60,242. (See table at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are a number of wharves and piers of pile-and-timber construction along the creek. There are also four boatyards with marine railways, and repair and storage facilities located at Tuckerton. One wharf at Tuckerton is publicly owned. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. 3-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Operations during fiscal year. None. 18. WILMINGTON HARBOR, DEL. Location. Formed by Christina River, which rises in New Castle County, Del., flows north-easterly 16 miles, passing through city of Wilmington, Del., and empties into Delaware River about 29 miles below Philadelphia, Pa. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 294.) Previous projects. For details see page 1785 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 308 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. This provides for a channel 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide from west edge of Delaware River ship channel to Lobdell Canal, a distance of about 1.2 miles; thence 21 feet deep and 250 feet wide for the distance of .8 mile to the mouth of Brandywine River; thence the same depth and 200 feet wide for a distance of about 2.2 miles to a point approximately 4.2 miles from the Delaware River ship channel; thence decreasing a depth of 10 feet in a distance of 750 feet to Penn Central Railroad bridge No. 4; and thence 7 feet and 100 feet wide for a distance of about 5.6 miles to Newport, Del., approximately 9.9 miles above Delaware River ship channel, including a turning basin 35 feet deep opposite the Wilmington Marine terminal and extending upstream from the mouth to Lobdell Canal, 200 feet wide, 2,900 feet long on the north side of the channel and decreasing to a length of 2,000 feet on the north side of the basin. It also provides for the removal of about 1,200 of the outer end of a stone-filled, pile-and-timber crib jetty constructed 2,150 feet long on the north side of the entrance; for a steel sheet-pile jetty 2,300 feet long, with 120-foot inshore wing, on the south side of the entrance, and for a V-shaped stone-filled pile-and-timber jetty at the mouth of Brandywine River 430 feet along the north side of Brandywine and 260 feet long on the Christina. depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range, due to prolonged heavy winds, is about 13 feet. Existing project was completed in 1962. (For details see page 222, Annual Report 1962.) (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 18 piers, wharves, and docks within improvement. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No. 8, revised 1966,-Corps of Engineers). Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance contract: Maintenance dredging in the Christina performed by Langenfelder and Son Inc. during period of I October 1981 through 31 March 1982. Removed a total of 829,800 cubic yards of material. Other work performed, stream gaging and environmental monitoring. Maintenance, hired labor: Condemnation of land at Cherry Island Disposal Site. Performed engineering surveys, enviornmental monitoring, raised banks at Wilmington Harbor, construct banks at Edgemoor Disposal area. Other work included plans and specifications, general maintenance engineering and design and supervision and administration. Beach Erosion Control 19. SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEMONSTRATION Location. Demonstration projects were undertaken at a total of 16 sites nationwide, 6 of which are located in the Delaware Bay and include Pickering Beach, Kitts Hummock, Slaughter Bowers Beach, Broadkill Beach, and Lewes, Delaware. The latter three sites were only monitored as there are presently Federal and State projects in progress. Existing project. 'Section 54 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 authorized a nationwide, 5 year program to test and evaluate low cost shoreline erosion control measures, both structural and vegetative, which can be implemented by individual private property owners. The emphasis of the program was not to solve individual problems, so much as to explore the effectiveness of various ways to control erosion at different types of shorelines, and provide this information to private and public landowners. The construction and evaluation at all sites are completed and information dissemination has been started Operations during fiscal year. New work, contract: Conducted public information workshops, other work included preparation and dissemination of information brochures. New work, hired: Only costs incurred were in support of information dissemination program. 3-12 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT 20. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public law 87-874 (Preauthorization). Project Port Mahon, Del. Fiscal Year Cost $53,367 Flood Control 21. BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA. Location. Damsite is on Pohopoco Creek about 4.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Lehigh River and 4 miles east of Lehighton, Pa. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Map for Lehighton, Pa.-1960.) Existing project. A multiple purpose development project providing water supply, flood control, and recreation. Plan of improvement provides for an earth and rock fill dam 4,200 feet long rising 170 feet above creekbed; a spillway around north end of dam; and gatecontrol outlet works discharging through a conduit on rock along right abutment. The lake, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, has a reservoir capacity of 68,250 acre-feet at spillway crest level with 1,390 acre-feet of inactive storage, 39,830 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 27,030 acre-feet for flood control. The cost of project was $22,931,400 including $6,100,000 required non- 'Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project. The construction of the dam and appartenances was completed in 1971. Local cooperation. Project was approved subject to certain requirements of cooperation by local interests as defined in approved House Document. Resolution of Delaware River Basin Commission providing assurances of repayment of water supply and pollution control costs was accepted June 7, 1965. A contract for repayment of water supply costs was signed October 16, 1966. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Work performed, stream gaging, monitoring of equipment, installation of safety fencing, and operation and minor maintenance. Maintenance, hired labor: Performed periodic inspections, inclinometer readings, instrument and survey analysis, downstream slope erosion study, water quality testing, evaluation of wet wells, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 22. BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA. Location. Damsite is on Tulpehocken Creek about 1.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Plum Creek and about 6 miles northwest of Reading, Pa. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Bernville, Pa.) Existing project. This is a multiple purpose development project providing water supply, flood control, and recreation. Construction started in 1974 and was completed in 1980. The dam is 1,775 feet long and rises 98 feet above creekbed, with a spillway about 1,500 feet south of dam, and gatecontrolled outlet works discharging through a conduit on rock along right abutment. The lake, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, has a capacity of 50,010 acre-feet at spillway crest level, with 3,000 acre-feet of inactive storage, 14,620 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 32,390 acre-feet for flood control. (For details see H. Doc 522 87th Cong., 2d Sess.) Cost of project (October 1982), $63,042,392 includes $16,132,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2d Sess., contains latest published maps). Local cooperation. Project was approved, subject to certain requirements by local interests, as prescribed in House Document cited above. Delaware River Basin Commission on December 29, 1964, adopted a preliminary resolution providing for repayment of water supply costs. Operations during fiscal year. New work, contract: Reimbursement received from DRBC for water storage, and from Heidelburg Country Club and Pennsylvania Gaming Commission due to lower appraisal values. Relocation of utility lines continued. New work, hired labor: Performed historical appraisal of Skinner Property. Other work included engineering and design and supervision and administration. 3-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Maintenance, contract: Work performed, stream gaging, periodic surveys, water quality monitoring, maintenance of campgrounds, mowing and fertilization of lawn, janitorial services, trash removal, installation of water tanks for fire hydrants and drilled wells at recreation area. Maintenance, hired labor: Performed regular reservoir operation and maintenance, periodic inspections, maintenance of Skinner Camp, engineering and design and supervision and administration. 23. CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TOWNSHIP N.J. Location. The proposed project is located in Cape May County and extends along the beach front from the northern side of Cape May Inlet to the boundary of Lower Township, and Cape May City. Existing project. The proposed project consists of a sand bypassing system on the northeast side of Cape May Inlet consisting of a weir-breakwater and deposition basin, with construction of the weir-breakwater being deferred pending demonstration of need; The placement of sand on the beach to provide a berm having an elevation of 8 feet above NGVD and a maximum width of 180 feet between Cape May Inlet and Wilmington Avenue, hence a width of 25 feet to the Third Avenue groin in Cape May City; Construction of two groin extensions in Cape May City; Maintenance of two new and seven existing groins in Cape May City; Periodic nourishment of the beaches to maintain the project cross-section during the life of the project. Estimated cost of the project (October 1982) is $15,600,000. The existing authority is for Phase I studies as provided by Section 101 (a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 in accordance with the provisions of House Document.94-641. Planning and Engineering studies were initiated in FY 1978. The Phase I GDM was completed in September 1980 with release of Division Engineer's notice. Final action on the Phase I GDM taken by OCE in December 1981. Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation were furnished by the State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection in letter dated 20 April 1972. Operations during fiscal year. Detailed engineering investigations were initiated in FY 1982. The study plan has been completed and surveys, environmental and technical investigations are underway. Completion of studies and a Phase II GDM is schedule for fiscal year 1983. 24. DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DEL. Location. The project is located in Sussex County, Delaware, on the Atlantic Ocean and starts immediately south of Delaware Bay extending in a southerly direction a distance of 24.5 miles to Fenwick Island on the Delaware-Maryland border. Existing project. Provides a plan of improvement which consists of the construction of dunes and beach fill; the construction of bulkheads at Rehoboth and Dewey beaches; periodic nourishment of the beaches; placement of sand fences; planting dune grass and maintenance and replacement of existing structures. (For details, see S. Doc. 90, 90th Cong., 2d Sess.) Estimated cost of project (October 1982) $291,000,000 includes $172,000,000 required non-Federal costs. The construction of the feeder beach north of Indian River Inlet was completed in 1973 and nourished in 1978. Other work undertaken has been engineering and design associated with the rest of the project. Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation were provided by the State of Delaware, January 13, 1981. Operations during'fiscal year. None. 25. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 3-14 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT 205, Public Law 838, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Study Cobbs Creek, Haverford Township, PA Darby Creek, Darby Borough PA Lambertville, NJ Liberty Sullivan County, NY Mill Creek Bucks County, PA Monocacy Creek, Bethlehem, PA North Branch, Newton Creek, Woodlynne, NJ Wallkill River, (Black Dirt Area), NJ Fiscal Year Cost $31,968 87,352 12 14 67 -509 10,186 35,426 Also feasibility study pursuant to Emergency Bank Protection Authority provided by Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. Study Darby Creek, Landsdowne, PA Kaempfer Brook, Liberty, NY Mill Creek, Lower Southampton Township, PA Fiscal Year Cost $ 952 98 510 Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs were $202,856 for advance preparation and $33,000 for rehabilitation and $801 for emergency operations. 26. FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM, PA. Location. Reservoir is in northeastern Pennsylvania on Lehigh River between White Haven and Stoddartsville. Dam is about 0.4 mile below mouth of Bear Creek, about 60 miles above confluence of Lehigh River and Delaware River at Easton, Pa. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Stoddartsville, Pa.) Existing project. Plan of improvement authorized by 1976 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 587, 79th Cong., 2d Sess.) provided for a single purpose flood control reservoir. Modification of project, authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.), provides for a multiple- purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present single-purpose flood control project. Plan of improvement requires altering spillway increasing height of dam, extending outlet tunnel by addition of a concrete conduit, and constructing new dikes and raising existing dikes. Modified dam will rise 263 feet above riverbed and be 3,500 feet long. Reservoir modification, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, will have a reservoir capacity of 180,000 acre-feet spillway crest level with 2,000 acre-feet of inactive storage, 70,000 acre-feet for water supply and recreation and 108,000 acre-feet for flood control. Estimated Federal cost of new work (October 1982) is $74,500,000 including $66,700,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Project as authorized under the 1946 Flood Control Act was completed June 1961. Settlement for lands was completed October 1962. The advance engineering and design for the modified project is now underway. Local cooperation. None required under 1946 Flood Control Act. Under 1962 Flood Control Act, project was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 522 cited above. The Delaware River Basin Commission reiteriated its sponsorship for the modified project in August 1982. Operations during fiscal year. New work, contract: Performed survey analysis at Lehigh River, Luzerne and Carbon County, Pa., and sediment analysis at Harrisburg, Pa. New work, hired labor: Performed electrogamma and temperature logging of borings and dye testing. Maintenance, contract: Performed operation and minor maintenance, periodic dam survey, stream gaging, water quality testing, and installation of safety fencing. Maintenance, hired labor: Performed operation and minor maintenance, seepage studies, and survey analysis. Other work included installation and reading of inclinometers and piezometers, engineering and design and supervision and administration. 27. GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA. Location. In Dyberry Creek valley in central part of Wayne County, Pa., between borough of Honesdale and village of Tanners Falls. Dam is about 3 miles above confluence of Dyberry Creek 3-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 and Lackawaxen River in Honesdale and 29 miles above confluence of Lackawaxen and Delaware Rivers. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Honesdale, Pa.) Existing project. A single-purpose flood control reservoir with a capacity of 24,500 acre-feet formed by an earth embankment, about 1,225 feet long at crest and rising 109 feet above creekbed. It also has a tunnel with intake structure and a chute-type spillway with a stilling basin in left abutment. Reservoir controls runoff from a drainage area of 65 square miles which is 91 percent of watershed of Dyberry Creek and 39 percent of Lackawaxen River watershed above Honesdale, Pa. Construction of project was authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 1 13, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.). Federal cost of new work was $4,064,510. Non-Federal funds not required. Project was completed in June 1960. Local cooperation. A with requirements of 1 accepted July 30, 1956. 1 Annual Report for 1962. assurances of compliance ocal cooperation were For details see page 251, authorized in 1976 under the provisions of Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965. However, the project as now recommended by the findings of the advance engineering and design would consist of landfill place in a redevelopment area along Hay Creek. A Post Authorization Change Report has been submitted to the office of the Chief of Engineers for approval. Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation were received from the Borough of Birdsboro, Pennsylvania, in a letter dated 16 January 1973 which was signed by the Borough Manager. Continued interest in the project has been re-established in letters dated 13 September 1977, and 26 August 1980. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Work included engineering and design associated with public involvement and coordination, engineering reports and study management. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, contract: Performed stream gaging and dam surveys. Maintenance, hired labor: Performed operation and minor maintenance, dam safety inspections, instrumentation and survey analysis, and supervision and administration. 28. HAY CREEK, BIRDSBORO, SCHUYLKILL RIVER BASIN, PA. Location. The project is within the urban community of Birdsboro, Berks County, Pennsylvania, at the confluence of Hay Creek and Schuylkill River. The project as now recommended starts near the Armorcost Road Bridge in Hay Creek and extends upstream to the Conrail Railroad Bridge. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement includes a 3,750 foot combination earth levee and concrete flood wall beginning at a point just below East Main Street and proceeding upstream approximately 900 feet above First Street. Included also are 2 new raised bridges to replace those at East Main Street and First Street and modification to an existing railroad bridge, as well as interior drainage facilities. Project was 29. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To ascertain whether local interests were maintaining and operating completed projects as required, inspections were made as follows: PROJECT Lehigh River at Allentown, PA Lehigh River at Bethlehem, PA Chester River at Chester, PA' Rancocas Creek at Mount Holly, NJ Delaware River at East Branch, NY INSPECTION DATES I October 1981 13 April 1982 19 November 1981 20 April 1982 13 November 1981 13 April 1982 12 November 1981 6 April 1982 2 December 1981 4 May 19Q2 The inspection of beach erosion control projects from Cape May, NJ, to Barnegat Light, NJ, was performed on 28 and 29 October 1981. Local interests are satisfactorily maintaining and operating projects in accordance with regulation. Costs during the period were $2,193. Total costs were $80,809. 3-16 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT 31. POTTSTOWN AND VICINITY, SCHUYLKILL RIVER BASIN, PA. Location. The authorized project is located in Pennsylvania along the Manatawny Creek and the Schuylkill River in the City of Pottstown, Montgomery County, and the communities of South Pottstown and Kenilworth, Chester County, Pennsylvania. Existing project. The physical construction as authorized would consist of channel improvements along the Schuylkill River and excavation of an area under an arch of the existing High Street bridge on the Manatawny Creek. The Schuylkill River channel would be widened to a width of 275 feet for a distance of about 7,600 feet. Stone protection would be provided along the channel where flow conditions require it. Excavated material would be utilized to develop open space areas along the river. Estimated cost of the project (October 1982) is $5,138,000. Existing project was authorized in 1974 under Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act. However, the findings of the advance engineering and design in 1978 indicated that there were not enough benefits to justify any Federal project at Pottstown. Those findings were reevaluated in 1982 and the conclusion still remained that there were no economically justified projects. Congress will be apprised of this conclusion. Local cooperation. Local interests (the Borough of Pottstown, Pennsylvania) furnished assurances of local cooperation by letter dated 28 September 1970. The borough reaffirmed the assurances by a resolution dated 8 January 1973. Operations during fiscal year. New work, contract: Economic study performed. New work, hired labor: Performed economic study, Stage 2 design and cost estimates, plan formulation and evaluation, real estate study and report preparation. 32. PROMPTON LAKE, PA. Location. In Lackawaxen River Valley in central part of Wayne County, Pa., between borough of Prompton and village of Aldenville. Dam is within corporate limits of Prompton, 4 miles upstream from Honesdale, Pa., and approximately 30 miles above confluence of Lackawaxen and Delaware Rivers. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Honesdale, Pa.) Existing project. Plan of improvement authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.) provide for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. Modificaton of project authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.) provides for multiplepurpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present single-purpose flood control project. Plan of improvement requires construction of a control tower with gates and service bridge, placing an impervious blanket on valley walls and floor upstream from dam, widening spillway, and clearing land and relocating roads in reservoir. Dam, completed under 1948 Flood Control Act which will not be modified, is 1,230 feet long and rises 140 feet above riverbed. Existing spillway, cut into rock of right abutment, will be modified and present uncontrolled outlet works discharging into a concrete coduit along right bank, will be provided with gates and a control tower. Reservoir modification, a unit of coprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin has a capacity of 52,000 acre-feet; 3,500 acre-feet for inactive storage, 28,200 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 20,300 acre-feet for flood control. Estimated Federal cost of new work (October 1982) is $38,100,000 including $33,550,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Project as authorized under the 1948 Flood Control Act was completed in November 1960. (For details, see page 358, Annual Report for 1963.) Work accomplished under the 1962 Flood Control Act was advance engineering and design. Local cooperation. Project modification was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 522 cited above. Assurances of compliance under Flood Control Act of 1948 have been met. Delaware River Basin Commission on March 18, 1966, gave their view that the need for water supply was not urgent at that time. However recent studies conducted by DRBC have determined that there is now a need for water supply. Therefore resumption of planning will take place when funds are made available. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, 3-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 contract: Performed operatio and minor maintenance, periodic dam surveys, and stream gaging. Maintenance, hired labor: Performed operation and minor maintenance, water control management, survey analysis, engineering and design and supervision and administration. 33.. TAMAQUA, PA. Location. The authorized project is located in Tamaqua Borough and Walker Township, Pennsylvania. Both municipalities are within Schuylkill County. Existing project, The project as authorized will provide a 2,930 foot long tunnel, 10 feet in diameter with appurtenant structures, through Sharp Mountain. It will extend from Wabash Creek on the west boundary of Tamaqua to the Little Schuylkill River just south of its confluence with Wabash Creek. The proposed improvement includes an intake structure, a stilling basin, and a 70-foot long highway bridge. Estimated cost of project (October 1982) is $8,570,000 including $150,000 required non-Federal costs. The Phase I portion of the advance engineering and design was completed in 1981. The findings from that phase resulted in the addition of a small dry dentention dam to the project plan. Local cooperation. The Borough of Tamaqua is the local sponsor. The Borough, by letter of 25 June 1968, indicated its intention to comply with the items of local cooperation. The assurance was reaffirmed by the Borough on 2 September 1977, and again on 2 September 1980. Operations duringfiscal year. New work, hired labor: Performed foundation and material investigation and study management. 34. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Project Salem River Maurice River General Investigations 35. SURVEYS Costs for the period were $565,269 for navigation studies; $697,249 for flood control studies; and $126,313 for special studies, a total of $1,388,832. 36. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs and expendistures during the period for flood plain information studies were $221,205. 37. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN The total costs for this category amounted to $192,365. Of that amount, $76,474 was for the Phase II advance engineering and design on the proposed Cape May Inlet to Lower Township, N.J. project (see paragraph 22 of this report for a full description of the project); $62,612 was for the studies associated with the Delawre River at Camden, N.J. project (see paragraph 6 for a full description), $25,606 was expended under the Legislative Phase I AE&D studies, for Wallkill River (Black Dirt Area), N.Y. Further studies of that area are now being done under Section 205, Public law 838, 80th Congress. The final $27,673 was for the completion of the Legislative Phase I, AE&D studies of proposed improvements for Barnegat Inlet, N.J. The proposal consists primarily of a new south jetty at the inlet (see paragraph 2 for a description of the existing project at the inlet). Date Survey Conducted 9, 10 & 12 March 82 18 May 82 3-18 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY79 FY80 FY81 FY82 Sept. 30, 1982 1. Absecon Inlet, N.J. (Regular Funds) 2. Barneget Inlet, N.J. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Cold Spring Inlet, N.J. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Delaware River between Philadelphia, Pa. and Trenton, N.J. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Delaware River Pa., N.J. and Del., Philadelphia to the Sea (Regular Funds)** 6. Delaware River at Camden, N.J. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 8,000 12,546 24,400 23,720 808,756 205,400 815,941 203,897 121,000 127,971 174,350 174,470 84,900 62,943 9,000 10,908 201,000 210,550 -20,981 2,427 - 534,209' - 534,2091 6,000 5,795,3622 3,584 5,792,7832 - 448,849 - 448,849 362,500 8,348,135 365,491 8,346,049 - 300,000 - 300,000 - 879,275 - 879,275 - 1,883,507 414 1,883,452 - 1,134,346 - 1,134,346 -150,0003 - 150,0003 - - - 72,147,8004 - - - 72,147,8004 400,500 3,240,000 3,158,000 25,243,7355 372,082 3,271,657 3,167,472 25,242,1945 - - - 15,000 - - - 15,000 - - - - 57,879,8726 - - - - 57,879,8726 11,860,244 14,897,900 13,908,163 13,794,188 246,268,5677 11,877,621 14,850,493 13,957,353 13,743,314 246,149,7627 - - - -508,324 - - -- 508,324 - 3,000 - 2,615 27,000 27,222 - 464,906 - 464,906 -163 362,799 - 362,799 - 15,000 - 15,000 3-19 TABLE 3-A I 1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 3-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY79 FY80 FY81 FY82 Sept. 30, 1982 7. Harbor of Refuge Delaware Bay, Del. (Regular Funds) 8. Indian River Inlet and Bay, Del. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 9. Inland Waterway, Rehoboth Bay to Delaware Bay, Del. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 10. Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, Del. and Md. (Regular Funds) ** II. Manasquan River, N.J. (Regular Funds) ** (Contributed Funds) 12. Mispillion River, Del. (Regular Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost - 5,162,23010 - 5,162,23010 - 721,000 - 531,555 133,000 129,182 40,000 35,100 394,000 412,481 12,826,000 12,871,902 110,000 100,576 660,000 621,963 30,000 30,186 836,200 795,533 48,400 53,407 2,949 8,140,300 7,173,706 89,700 107,234 2,555,000 2,346,583 40,000 32,068 13,000 201,354 403,000 442,491 81,400 80,925 26 8,508,000 9,472,669 -169 172 3,640,000 2,263,314 518,000 520,638 -1,091 1,138,363" 1,138,363" - 511,2108 - 511,2108 - 2,753,923 634 2,737,055 - 1,323,775 - 1,323,775 - 210,000 - 210,000 - 561,514 - 561,514 11,000 1,160,978 11,175 1,160,178 - 60,000 - 60,000 - 132,535,59112 - 132,532,30112 7,078,400 113,833,93013 6,836,659 113,400,32613 557,24921 557,24921 100,000 3,081,55722 4,612 2,986,16922 - 7,410,60025 1,378,056 7,165,51625 300,000 300,000 -4,020 1,400 377,84823 377,84823 1,248,56624 1,241,62924 253,491 253,491 3-20 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 3-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY79 FY80 FY81 FY82 Sept. 30, 1982 I 12A..._. l__. t .... .._ i 1,. Muraerkill River, Del. (Regular Funds) 15. New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway (Regular Funds) ** (Contributed Funds) 16. Schuykill River, Pa. (Regular Funds) 17. Tuckerton Creek, N.J. (Regular Funds) 18. Wilmington Harbor, Del. (Regular Funds) ** (Contributed Funds) 21. Beltzville Lake, Pa. 22. Blue Marsh Lake, Pa. new WorK Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 3,000 6,768 616,500 609,969 992,000 998,355 116,000 115,710 721,000 729,452 4,581 5,888 170,000 163,484 37,630 37,630 956,355 949,839 - - 71,549'4 -- 71,54914 889,000 1,446,100 16,664,571'5 719,388 1,554,708 16,598,191 5 - - 1,196,581 - - 1,196,581 -71,000 1,225,000 -74,182 1,226,976 7,500 7,357 - 99,000 - 99,000 - 3,334,00716 - 3,334,00716 108,000 22,291,933 104,454 22,286,180 -7,014 60,242 60,242 623,917 623,917 - - - - ,954,725'7 - - - - 1,954,725'7 1,438,800 2,129,500 1,603,300 1,524,100 23,554,165 1,499,867 2,126,142 1,593,509 1,501,336 23,513,422 - - -- 60,000 - - - - 60,000 100 279,000 288,510 6,648,900 8,944,290 298,000 227,892 405,800 387,020 700,000 1,085,782 704,600 685,710 539,000 532,531 169,000 179,688 674,000 673,539 342,400 364,321 22,931,831 22,931,130 2,905,375 2,875,063 - 63,180,300 -93,855 63,042,392 794,200 2,534,100 836,190 2,486,126 3-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 3-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY79 FY80 FY81 FY82 Sept. 30, 1982 23. Cape May Inlet *** to Lower Township, N.J. 24. Delaware Coast Protection, Del. 26. Francis E. Walter Dam Pa. 27. General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, Pa. 28. Hay Creek, Birdsboro, Schuykill River Basin, Pa. *30. Liberty State Park Levee & Seawall, N.J. 31. Pottstown and Vicinity, Schuykill River Basin, Pa. 32. Prompton Lake Pa. 33. Tamaqua, Pa. New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work 37,948 -47 33,130 320 5,600 1,457 - 376,000 - 282,652 234,000 226,500 224,838 247,578 320,000 299,741 - 150,000 27 150,000 - 1,428,953 - 1,428,904 - 11,503,43219 91,375 11,501,45919 423,300 446,749 3,396,821 3,381,376 4,073,105 - 4,073,105 60,000 64,402 135,305 139,339 84,000 20,063 -36 135,000 151,430 Approp. 150,000 Cost 174,195 *Transferred to New York District 20 February 1980, advice number 1-743. **Total adjusted to correct discrepancies in prior years. ***For Construction, General funds only on legislative Phase I AE & D. 55,100 56,066 100,000 84,425 49,400 46,295 50,000 22,178 -62,043 1,595 - 125,000 - 118,140 154,400 151,749 75,000 70,910 116,000 121,186 35,149 38,000 40,266 -1,000 13,622 299 5,133 969,364 967,875 364,305 328,918 81,95726 64,25827 487,336 485,610 - 4,609,48320 - 4,609,46920 149,300 147,927 3,739 1,595,162 1,573,305 525,000 517,209 3-22 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1. Includes $226,497 for new work for previous projects. 2. Includes $235,786 for maintenance for previous projects. 3. Includes $50,000 Navy Department Funds. 4. Includes $2,489,173 for new work, for previous projects, $105,000 for preauthorization studies and minus $142,015 adjustment (new work) to Delaware River, Philadelphia to Sea project from this project under 1954 modification. 5. Includes $552,720 for maintenance for previous projects. 6. Excludes $12,976,058 for new work for previous projects and $142,015 adjustment form Delaware River, Philadelphia to Trenton, N.J. under 1954 modification. 7. Includes $1,025,409 for maintenance of previous projects. 8. Excludes $10,000 for previous project. 10. Includes $2,749,452 for new work for previous projects. 11. Excludes $1,089 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, fiscal year 1963. 12. Includes $10,709,755 for new work for previous projects. 13. Includes $6,903,748 for maintenance for previous projects. 14. Excludes $1,824,940 Navy Department Funds. 15. Excludes $286,953 Navy Department funds expended for maintenance. 16. Includes $525,000 for previous projects. 17. Includes $402,121 for new work for previous project, and $206,177 emergency relief funds. 19. Includes $40,000 appropriated and expended under Code 710 Recreation Facilities. 20. Includes $74,000 appropriate and $66,498 expended under Code 710 Recreation Facilities. 21. Includes $39,000 for new work for previous projects. 22. Includes $2,054 for maintenance for previous projects. 23. Includes $148,798 for new work on previous projects. 24. Includes $61,172 for maintenance on previous projects. 25. Includes $555,600 for previous project. 26. Includes $60,000 appropriated N.Y. Dist. 27. Includes $42,301 expended N.Y. Dist. TABLE 3-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents ABSECON INLET, N.J. (See Section 1 of Text) An inlet entrance channel 20 feet deep. A channel 15 feet deep into Clam Creek and a turning basin. BARNEGAT INLET, N.J. (See Section 2 of Text) An 8-foot depth through inlet to Oyster Creek Channel across inner bar, 10-foot depth through outer bar and for jetties. A channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics from gorge to Oyster Creek Channel, and thence to deep water in bay. Maintenance dredging of channel to connect main inlet channel with Barnegat City Harbor. COLD SPRING INLET, N.J. (See Section 3 of Text) An inlet channel 25 feet deep and jetties. A 20-foot channel to deep water in harbor. DELAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, PA., AND TRENTON, N.J. (See Section 4 of Text) A channel 28 feet deep, 300 feet wide between Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, Pa. and Delair Bridge. Channel 25 feet deep from Delair Bridge to Trenton, N.J., and maintenance of 12-foot channel from upper end of 25-foot project to Penn Central R.R. Bridge at Ferry St., Trenton. Auxiliary channel, 20 feet deep east of Burlington Island. A cross channel 8 feet deep, opposite Delanco, N.J. Anchorage at mouth of Biles Creek A channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide between Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, Pa., and upstream end of Newbold Island, thence 35 feet deep to Trenton Marine Terminal and turning basin to 800 feet wide. Relocate channel at railroad bridge at Delair and suitably reconstruct bridge. Construct necessary bank protection works; and eliminate authorized anchorage near mouth of Biles Creek, Pa. H. Doc. 375, 67th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 504, 79th Cong., 2d sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 73d Cong., 2d sess.' Rivers and Harbors Comittee Doc. 85, 74th Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 358, 79th Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 388, 59th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 262, 77th Cong., Ist sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 71 st Cong., Ist sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 73d Cong., Ist sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 66, 74th Cong., Ist sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 90, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 679, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 358, 83d Cong., 2d sess.' 3-23 TABLE 3-A (continued) Sept. 22, 1922 July 24, 1946 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 March 2, 1907 March 2, 1945 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19352 Aug. 30, 19352 Aug. 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 Sept. 3, 1954 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 3-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19353 June 20, 19384 Mar. 2, 19455 Mar. 2, 19455 Mar. 2, 19455 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 June 3, 1896 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 July 25, 1912 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 DELAWARE RIVER, PA., NJ., AND DEL., PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 35 feet deep from Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, Pa., to Delaware Bay. Anchorages 35 feet deep at Port Richmond and Mantus Creek, a 30 foot anchorage at Gloucester, N.J., and extend 1,000 foot channel in Philadelphia Harbor to Horseshoe Bend. An anchorage 35 feet deep at Marcus Hook, Pa. A channel 37 feet deep from Philadelphia-Camden Bridge to Navy Yard, thence 40 feet deep to deep water in Delaware Bay. A 37-foot depth in channel from Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, Pa., to Philadelphia-Camden Bridge and in anchorage at Port Richmond. A 37-foot depth in an enlargement of anchorage near Mantua Creek and Marcus Hook. Maintain enlarged channel opposite Philadelphia Navy Yard. A channel from Allegheny Ave., to Naval Base 40 feet deep, 400 feet wide along west side of channel through Philadelphia Harbor and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend. Anchorages at Reedy Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus Hook, and Mantua Creek 40 feet deep and 2,300 feet wide with mean lengths of 8,000, 5,200, 13,650 and 11,500 feet respectively. HARBOR OF REFUGE, DELAWARE BAY, DEL. (See Section 7 of Text) Breakwater construction Construction of 10 ice piers Construction of 5 additional ice piers Channel 18 feet deep to Queen Anne pier at Lewes, Del. (No work has been done on this channel). Channel 15 feet deep to pier of Atlantic Fisheries Co. about 0.7 mile east of Queen Anne pier. INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DEL. (See Section 8 of Text) A 15-foot inlet channel, steel and stone jetties, 6 foot channel from end of inlet channel to deep water in the bay and authority to modify interior inlet channel. A 9-foot channel from inlet to-Old Landing, including basin, and 4-foot channel to highway bridge at Millsboro INLAND WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DEL. (See Section 9 of Text) For a 6-foot depth canal to connect Rehoboth Bay and Delaware Bay. For a 6-foot depth entrance near Lewes, for jetties, for widening the canal from Broadkill River to Lewes, and basin. For a 10-foot depth from Delaware Bay to Lewes and in basin, and for extending jetties. 6 3-24 H. Doc. 733, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 71st Cong., 2d sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 73d Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 159, 75th Cong., 3d sess." H. Doc. 580, 76th Cong., 3d sess." H. Doc. 340, 77th Cong., 1st sess.' Specified in Act. H. Doc. 358, 83d Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 185, 85th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 112, 53d Cong., 1st sess. (subproject, approved by War Department, Apr. 23, 1900). (Subproject, approved by War Department, June 30, 1902.) Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15, 70th Ist sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 56, 74th Cong., 1st sess.' River and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 330, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 823, 60th Cong., Ist sess. and Rivers and Harbors Comittee Doc. 51, 61st Cong., 3rd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc 56, 75th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 344, 77th Cong., 1st sess.' PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 3-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 7, 1939 Sept. 3, 1954 H. Doc. 201, 72d Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Does. 18 and 24, 73d Cong., 2d sess.' Public Law 310, 76th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 123, 83d Cong., 2d sess.' INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DEL. AND MD. (See Section 10 of Text) A sea level channel 27 feet deep, 250 feet wide from Delaware River to Elk River and 400 feet wide down Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to deep water at or near Pooles Island; alter existing bridges over canal; enlarge Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, with a basin same depth, and revetment of both banks east of Fifth Street; enlarge anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to 400 feet wide, 1,000 feet long and 12 feet deep; extend jetties at Reedy Point; and construct bulkheads. Construct a 4-lane high-level fixed highway bridge at or near St. Georges. A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay at water of that depth in the bay, including a cutoff at Penn Central Railroad crossing, with a minimum radius of curvature of 7,000 feet at bends; a high level fixed railroad bridge over cutoff; high level fixed highway bridge at Reedy Point and Summit; and an anchorage in Elk River 35 feet deep an 1,200 feet wide, averaging 3,700 feet long. MANASQUAN RIVER, N.J. (See Section 11 of Text) Channel 8 feet deep and provision of works designed to secure channel. Widening channel on northerly side. Deepening channel to 12 and 14 feet, 10 and 12 foot achorages. 7 SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA. (See Section 16 of Text) Depths of 35 feet from mouth to Girard Point, thence 30 feet, 26 feet, and 22 feet to University Avenue Bridge, Philadelphia. A depth of 30 feet instead of 35 feet between the mouth and the conditional restoration and maintenance of the channel below Passyunk Ave., by the United States. A depth of 33 feet from the channel in Delaware River to Passyunk Ave., restoration of the project channel dimensions between Passyunk Ave., and University Ave., and full maintenance of the entire project. WILMINGTON HARBOR, DEL. (See Section 18 of Text) Depths of 21, 10, and 7 feet and jetties. Purchase or construct a dredge and auxiliaries including a wharf and depot, and maintenance of project. Entrance channel and basin with 25-foot depth and construction by local interests of new south jetty. A 30-foot depth between Delaware River and Lobdell Canal and modification or removal of a portion of north jetty. Completion of new south jetty by the United States; subject to provision that city of Wilmington reimburse the United States for cost, without interest, of any part of structure that may subsequently be occupied and utilized for city activities. 3-25 H. Doc. 482, 70th Cong., 2d sess. Senate Committee Doc., 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 356, 77th Cong., Ist sess.' H. Doc. 1270, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 40, 71st Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 699, 79th Cong., 2nd sess.' H. Doc. 66, 54th Cong., Ist sess. Annual Report, 1896, p. 973; Annual Report, 1897, p. 1250.' H. Doc. 359, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 114, 67th Cong., 1st sess. and S. Committee Print, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 32, 73d Cong., 2d sess. July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 July 24, 1946 June 3, 1896 July 25, 1912 Sept. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19358 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 3-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 17, 1940 Permit temporary occupancy by city of Wilmington of any part of south jetty for H. Doc. 658, 76th Cong., city activities under revocable license, provided occupied portion of jetty is 3d sess. properly maintained without expense to the United States. July 14, 1960 A 35-foot depth between Delaware River ship channel and Lodbell Canal S. Doc. 88, 86th Cong., including turning basin of same depth, opposite Wilmington Marine Terminal, 2d sess. 200 feet wide, 2,900 feet long on north side of channel, and 2,000 feet long on north side of basin. 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Also Public Works Administration, September 6, 1933, and Emergency Relief Administration, May 28, 1935. 3. Also Public Works Administration, September 6, 1933. 4. Channel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Naval Base to Philadelphia-Camden Bridge, deferred for restudy. 5. Channel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Philadelphia- Camden Bridge to Allegheny Avenue, deferred for restudy. 6. Extension of jetties considered to be active. 7. The 10 and 12 foot anchorages are considered inactive. 8. Also May 28, 1935, under Emergency Relief Administration. 3-26 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 3-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost To September 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Completed Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance Absecon Creek, N.J.' COMPLETED 1969 11,935 167,682* Appoquinimink River, Del. COM PLETED 1931 36,973 41,270 Big Timber Creek, N.J.' COMPLETED 1962 58,6652 53,986* Broadkill River, Del. COMPLETED 1976 68,228 243,641 Cohansey River, N.J. COMPLETED 1938 146,756'7 745,931 Cooper River, N.J.' COMPLETED 1962 33,102 379,244* Double Creek, N.J.' COMPLETED 1912 7,800 -5 Inland Waterway from Chincoteague Bay to Delaware Bay COMPLETED 1981 168,412!" 98,3609' Little River, Del. COMPLETED 1980 12,016 288,310 Mantua Creek, N.J. COMPLETED 1966 169,687k 339,340* **Neshaminy State Park Harbor COMPLETED 1968 128,2032' 54,601 Oldmans Creek, N.J. COMPLETED 1941 31,188 32,125 **Pepper Creek, Del.' COMPLETED 1965 138,09422 1,797* Raccoon Creek, N.J. COMPLETED 1981 83,66520 341,734 St. Jones River, Del. 1961 -- Delaware Bay to Lebanon' ~" COMPLETED - 207,102 66,093 Jetties and new entrance at mouth9 -- Salem River, N.J. 1961 - 1,792* Delaware River to fixed bridge' 2 COMPLETED - 107,634's 288,987 Penns Neck Bridge to fixed bridge' 4 Schuylkill River above Fairmount Dam, Pa.' COMPLETED 1955 4,291,810 -S Smyrna River, Del. 1949 -- Delaware River to Wharf at Smyrna Landing'5 COMPLETED - 198,844 197,327 Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed bridge' SEE TABLE 3-G Toms River, N.J. 1950 Channel 5 feet deep' COMPLETED - 10,050 33,311 Channel 12 feet deep9 SEE TABLE 3-G - - - Tuckerton Creek, N.J. COMPLETED 1972 60,242 623,917* Woodbury Creek, N.J.' COMPLETED 1940 27,09316 56,474 For Last Cost To September 30, p982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Inactive Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance Alloway Creek, N.J.' INACTIVE 1931 21,398 35,761 Aquatic Plant Control 1975 87,594 Chester River, Pa. INACTIVE 1931 6,000 1,139 Dennis Creek, N.J.' INACTIVE 1897 4,701 Goshen Creek, N.J.' INACTIVE 1905 15,359 870 Ice Harbor at Marcus Hook, Pa.' - 6 IN ACTIVE 1928 208,964 14,336 Ice Harbor at New Castle, Del.' ,6 NACTIVE 1898 224,704 Leipsic River, Del.' INACTIVE 1931 36,956 32,345 Little Egg Harbor, N.J.I 4 INACTIVE _ 7 15,048 Rancocas River, N.J. INACTIVE 1942 44.500 13.090 3-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 3-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (Cont'd.) For Last Cost To September 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Deferred Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance St. Jones River, Del. 1961 - - Delaware Bay to Lebanon' ," - 207,102 66,093 Jetties and new entrance at mouth9 DEFERRED - - - Salem River, N.J. 1961 - 1,792* Delaware River to fixed bridge'2 - 107,6341' 288,987 Penns Neck Bridge to fixed bridge'4 DEFERRED - I. Completed. 13. Exclusive of $51,825 contributed by local interests. 2. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds expended for new work. 14. Defferred. Dredged under previous project to 9 foot depth. 3. Includes $6,000 new work and $63 maintenance funds 15. Includes $55,085 new work and $22,723 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. expended on previous projects. 4. Abandonrment recommended in House Document 467, 69th 16. Includes $2,950 new work funds expended on previous Congress, Ist Session. projects. 5. .Maintenance assumed by local interests. 17. Includes $36,000 for new work for previous projects. 6. Harbor not now required by commerce. 18. Entire amount expended on previous project repealed in 7. Last appropriation for project was in 1852. No information 1905. is at hand relative to work done. 19. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds and includes $25,330 for 8. Includes $3,000 for new work for previous projects, maintenance for previous projects. 9. Deferred. 20. Includes $757 new work funds expended on previous projects. 21. Excludes $327,957 contributed funds allotted expended for 1 I. Includes $54,590 new work on $28,935 maintenance funds new work. expended on previous projects. 22. Excludes $38,988 Non-Federal Funds 12. Includes $55,809 new work and $48,000 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. *Operation and maintenance figure includes cost incurred for preparation of environmental impact statements. **Projects authorized by the Chief of Engineers. TABLE 3-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost To September 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance' Atlantic City, N.J. INACTIVE 1972 2.083,289 Ocean City, N.J. IN ACTIVE 1969 395,831' Stone Harbor, N.J. INACTIVE 1961 Barnegat Light, N.J. DEFERRED 1964 70,908 Cape May City, N.J. DEFERRED 1961 22.957' Long Beach Island, N.J. DEFERRED 1964 40,665 North Wildwood, N.J. DEFERRED 1961 Rehoboth Beach to Indian River Inlet, Del.4 1965 326,116 Ventnor, Margate and Longport, N.J. DEFERRED 1961 I. Operation and maihtenance required by law to be assumed by local interests. 2. Excludes $58,585 Accelerated Public Works funds expended for extension to two groins. 3. Excludes cost of $1,146,325 to local interests and $272,766 Federal participation expended under Public Works Acceleration Program for Extension of five existing groins completed I I May 1964. 4. This project was included in and modified by the Delaware Coast project. 3-28 PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 3-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROjECTS For Last Cost To September 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allentown, Lehigh River, Pa. COMPLETED 1961 1,615,581 -' Bethlehem, Pa. COMPLETED 1966 4,520,995 -1 Mt. Holly, N.J. COMPLETED 1946 283,665 -' Aquashicola Reservoir, Pa.2 DEFERRED 1963 -- Maiden Creek Reservoir, Pa.2 DEFERRED 1963 - -' 1. Maintenance assumed by local interest as required by authorizing 2. New project deferred. project. TABLE 3-F MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECT INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost To September 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Tocks Island Lake, Pa., N.J. and N.Y.2 1979 65,106,260' Tocks Island (Relocation of U.S. Route 209 only) Pa.2 1979 195,223 - 1. Includes $3,489,088 for AE&D. 2. National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 terminated Corps' authority to proceed with the project. Legislation would be required to proceed with the project. 3-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 3-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Date Federal Contributed Report See Annual And Funds Funds Navigation Projects Report For Authority Expended Expended 3 OCT 78 Appoquinmink River, Del.' 1931 HD 95-351 $ 78,243 5 AUG 77 Delaware River, Mouth of Neversink 1917 HD 94-192 2 NOV 79 Maurice River, N.J.2 1948 Section 12 PL 93-251 $ 281,034 2 NOV 79 Oldmans Creek, N.J.3 1941 Section 12 PL 93-251 $ 63,313 2 NOV 79 Rancocas River, N.J. 4 1942 Section 12 PL 93-251. $ 57,590 2 NOV 79 Smyrna River, Del.5 1949 HD 95-157 $ 396,169 Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed Bridge 2 NOV 79 Toms River, N.J.6 1950 Section 12 PL 93-251 $ 43,361 Channel 12 feet deep Flood Control Projects 2 NOV 79 Lehigh River At Bethlehem, Pa.7 1966 Section 12 PL 93-251 $4,520,995 1. Includes $36,973 new work, and $41,270 for maintenance. 2. Includes $100,984 new work, $43,000 new work previous project, and $137,050 for maintenance. 3. Includes $31,188 new work, and $32,125 for maintenance. 4. Includes $44,500 new work, and $13,090 for maintenance. 5. Includes $143,759 new work, $55,085 new work, previous project, $174,602 for maintenance, and $22,723 maintenance, previous project. 6. Includes $10,050, new work, and $33,311 for maintenance. 7. Maintenance assumed by local interest. 3-30 BALTIMORE, MD, DISTRICT* This district comprises the watershed of Susquehanna River and its tributaries from headwaters in south central New York State through central Pennsylvania to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; watershed of the Potomac River and its tributaries from headwaters in Maryland, eastern West Virginia, and northern Virginia to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; District of Columbia; and southwestern portion of Delaware. It includes that portion of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries north of Smith Point, MD, on western shore of the bay, and includes that portion of Maryland between Chesapeake Bay and Atlantic Ocean. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD and VA ................... 4-3 2. Baltimore Harbor, MD, Collection and Removal of Drift ............. 4-4 3. Black Walnut Harbor, MD .................. 4-4 4. BonumCreek, VA ......................... 4-4 5. Duck Point Cove, MD ...................... 4-5 6. Fishing Creek, MD ........................ 4-5 7. Herring Bay & Rockhold Creek, MD ........... 4-5 8. Honga River and Tar Bay (Barren Island Gaps), MD .................. 4-5 9. Knapps Narrows, MD ...................... 4-6 10. Little Wicomico River, VA.................. 4-6 11. Lowes Wharf, MD .......... ........ 4-6 12. Monroe Bay and Creek, VA ................. 4-6 13. Muddy Hook/TylerCove, MD .... ........... 4-6 14. Neale Sound, MD ....................... 4-7 15. Northeast River, MD ...................... 4-7 16. Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD ..................... 4-7 17. Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, DC, Collection and Removal of Drift ............ 4-8 18. Prevention of Obstructions & Injurious Deposits, Baltimore Harbor, MD .... 4-8 19. Rhodes Point to Tylerton, MD ............... 4-8 20. Rock Hall Harbor, MD ...................... 4-9 21. Slaughter Creek, MD ....................... 4-9 22. St. Jeromes Creek, MD ................. 4-9 23. Tilghman Island Harbor, MD ................ 4-9 24. Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare, MD ........... 4-10 25. Washington Harbor, DC .................... 4-10 26. Wicomico River, MD ..................... 4-11 27. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ........ 4-11 28. Navigation work under special authorization ........................... 4-11 Beach Erosion Control 29. Colonial Beach, VA ........................ 4-11 Flood Control Page 30. Bloomington Lake, MD and WV .... ......... 4-12 31. Bull Run, PA ............................ 4-12 32. Cumberland, MD, and Ridgeley, WV .......... 4-12 33. Fourmile Run, VA . ..................... 4-12 34. Lackawanna River Basin, PA................ 4-13 34A. Aylesworth Creek Lake, PA ................. 4-13 35. Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, PA ....................... 4-13 36. Southern New York Flood Control Projects ...................... 4-13 36A. Addison, NY ........................... 4-13 36B. AlmondLake,NY ........................ 4-13 36C. Arkport Dam, NY ........................ 4-14 36D. Avoca, NY ........................... 4-14 36E. Binghamton, NY ......................... 4-14 36F. Canisteo, NY ............................. 4-14 36G. Corning, NY .......................... 4-15 36H. East Sidney Lake, NY ...................... 4-15 361. Elmira,NY .............................. 4-15 36J. Hornell, NY .............................. 4-15 36K. Lisle, NY ........... ... ................. 4-16 36L. Oxford, NY .............. ........... 4-16 36M. Whitney Point Lake, NY .................... 4-16 36N. Whitney Point Village, NY .................. 4-16 37. Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA ........ 4-16 38. Susquehanna River Flood Control Project, NY and PA ...................... 4-17 38A. Cowanesque Lake, PA .................. .... 4-17 38B. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA ............... 4-17 39. West Branch of Susquehanna River, PA ........ 4-17 39A. Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA ..................... 4-17 39B. Curwensville Lake, PA..................... 4-18 4-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Flood Control (Cont'd) Page General Investigations (Cont'd) 39C. Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA ............... 4-18 40. Wyoming Valley, PA ................... 4-18 41. York Indian Rock Dam, PA .................. 4-18 42. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ....................... 4-19 43. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations .................... . ...... 4-19 44. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ........................ . 4-19 Water Supply 45. Potomac Estuary Pilot Water Treatment Plant, DC ..................... 4-19 46. Washington Aqueduct...................... 4-19 General Investigations 47. Surveys ................................. 4-20 48. Collection and Study of Basic Data ............ 4-20 49. 50. Continuation of Planning and Engineering .......... .......... 4-20 Advanced Engineering and Design ............................. 4-20 Tables Page Table 4-A Cost and Financial Statement ............ 4-21 Table 4-B Authorizing Legislation ................. 4-27 Table 4-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .................. 4-33 Table 4-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ................... 4-35 Table 4-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................... 4-36 Table 4-F Not Applicable Table 4-G Deauthorized Projects .................. 4-37 *All cost and financial statements and authorizing legislation for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. Additionally, all tables which are referenced in text appear at the end of this chapter. 4-2 Page BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT 1. BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS, MD AND VA Location. Baltimore Harbor is at the head of the navigable portion of Patapsco River about 12 miles from Chesapeake Bay. The Patapsco River rises near town of Westminster in Carroll County, MD, and flows generally southeast for about 65 miles to enter Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12278.) Existing Project. a. A uniform main channel depth of 50 feet between Cape Charles, VA, and Fort McHenry at Baltimore, MD, with dimensions as follows: (1) Cape Henry Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide from the 50-foot depth curve in the Atlantic Ocean to that depth in Chesapeake Bay, a distance of 2.3 miles; (2) York Spit Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide connecting the 50-foot depth curves in Chesapeake Bay near York Spit, a distance of 18.2 miles; (3) Rappahannock Shoal Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide connecting the 50-foot depth curves in the Chesapeake Bay opposite the Rappahannock River, a distance of 8.9 miles; and (4) Baltimore Harbor Approach Channels: 50 feet deep and generally 800 feet wide, widened at the approach and bends, from the 50-foot depth curve in Chesapeake Bay opposite the mouth of the Magothy River to Fort McHenry on the Patapsco River, a distance of 19.9 miles. b. Branch channels with dimensions as follows: (1) Connecting Channel to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal Approach Channel: 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 13.0 miles long from the Cutoff-Brewerton Angle in the main channel to the 35-foot depth curves in the natural channel on the east side of Chesapeake Bay which is part of the inland waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay. The channel includes the Brewerton Extension and Swan Point and Tolchester Sections; (2) Curtis Bay: 50 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 2.3 miles long from the main channel to and including a turning basin at the head of Curtis Bay; (3) Curtis Creek: (a) a channel, 35 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide, from the 50-foot channel in Curtis Bay to 750 feet downstream of the Pennington Avenue Bridge; (b) a channel, 22 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide, from the 35-foot channel to and along the marginal wharf of the Curtis Bay Ordnance Depot; (c) an irregular shaped 3-acre basin, with a depth of 18 feet, adjacent to the head of the 22-foot channel; (d) a basin, 15 feet deep and 450 feet wide, from the end of the 22-foot channel to the end of the marginal wharf; and (e) a channel, 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide, from the 22-foot channel south of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Bridge to the vicinity of Arundel Cove, a distance of 2,800 feet, thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for a distance of 2,100 feet, with an anchorage basin, 700 feet square, adjacent to the channel and southwest of the wharf of the Coast Guard Depot at Curtis Bay; (4) Middle Branch: (a) Ferry Bar East Section: a channel, 42 feet deep and 600 feet wide, from the main channel at Fort McHenry to Ferry Bar, a distance of 1.4 miles; (b) Ferry Bar West Section: a channel, 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide, from the Ferry Bar East Section to Ferry Bar, a distance of 0.8 mile; (c) Spring Garden Section: a channel, 27 feet deep and 250 feet wide, from Ferry Bar to and including a turning and anchorage basin immediately below the Western Maryland Railway Bridge, a distance of 1.0 mile; and (5) Northwest Branch: Federal maintenance of 39-foot or 35-foot deep channels after either depth has been provided by local interests: (a) East Channel: a channel, 49 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1.0 mile long with a turning basin at the head of the channel from that depth existing at the time of construction; and (b) West Channel: a channel, 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1.2 miles long with a turning basin at the head of the channel from that depth existing at the time of construction. c. The following anchorages: (1) Quarantine Anchorage: 35 feet deep, 3,500 feet long, and 600 feet wide; (2) Riverview Anchorage No. 2: 30 feet deep, 2,400 feet long, and 1,300 feet wide; (3) Riverview Anchorage No. 1: 35 feet deep, 4,500 feet long, and 1,500 feet wide; and (4) Fort McHenry Anchorage: 35 feet deep, 3,500 feet long, and 400 feet wide. The mean range of tide is 2.8 feet at the Cape Henry Channel, 2.3 feet at the York Spit Channel, 1.4 feet at the Rappahannock Shoal Channel, 0.8 foot at the Craighill Entrance, 0.9 foot in the Cutoff Section, 1.1 feet at Fort McHenry, and 1.2 feet at Pooles Island in the upper Chesapeake Bay. Depths refer to mean low water. Estimated cost for new work is $470,530,000 which includes: $8,330,000 for completed work through the River and Harbor Act of 1945; $62,200,000 (October 1980 prices) for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1958 of which $57,900,000 is Corps of Engineers, $60,000 is U.S. Coast Guard and $4,240,000 is non-Federal; and $400,000,000 (October 1982 prices) for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970, of which $230,000 is U.S. Coast Guard, and $399,770,000 is Corps of Engineers and non-Federal. Widening 35-foot depth from Port Covington Channel from 150 to 400 feet to Ferry Bar, widening 27-foot depth channel from 150 to 250 feet to Hanover Street Bridge, and providing a channel 27 feet deep by 250 feet wide to Western Maryland Railway Bridge with an anchorage and turning basin at upper end is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing estimate. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion is $1,603,000. Local cooperations. Fully complied with for improvements authorized under River and Harbor Act of 1945 and prior acts. River and Harbor Act of 1958 requires local interests furnish lands, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal area for construction and future maintenance, hold the United States free from damages, and provide and maintain all necessary alterations in sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utilities. Local interests gave formal assurance that terms will be complied with. River and Harbor Act of 1970 requires local interest to: (a) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of dredged material and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the costs of such retaining work; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages that may result from the construction and maintenance of the project; (c) provide and maintain at local expense adequate public terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms, and depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving terminals commensurate with the depth provided in the related project area; (d) accomplish without cost to the United States such utility and other relocations or alterations as necessary for project purposes; (e) prohibit erection of any structure within 125 feet of the project channel or turning basin; and (f) establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the channels, and harbor by users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control. Local interests have furnished assurances that terms will be complied with. 4-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Terminal facilities. The Port of Baltimore has 45 miles of waterfront of which 25 miles are industrially developed. There are 94 covered and open overseas piers for the loading and discharging of 173 ships, providing 84 general cargo, 65 specialized cargo, and 24 public bulk cargo berths. The existing ground storage is equivalent to 53,700 railroad cars of cargo. There are 31 public general merchandise warehouses, with 4.9 million square feet of storage space and 4.7 million cubic feet of cold storage space. Eight ship-building, ship repair, and ship dismantling yards are available for handling up to 90 vessels. The three grain elevators in the port have a capacity of about 13 million bushels. Latest description of terminal facilities is in "Port Series No. 10 (revised 1978)" on Port of Baltimore, MD, (issued by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors). Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging under the River and Harbor Act of 1958 is discussed below. Preconstruction planning under the River and Harbor Act of 1970 began October 1976 and continued in FY 1982. The FY 1982 planning costs were $33,677. Maintenance, Baltimore District: Condition surveys of the project channel were made at a cost of $63,502. Maintenance dredging of the inbound side of the Cutoff Angle and eastern most 6,000 feet of the Brewerton Channel, by contract, began on March 11, 1982 and was completed on April 23,1982. A total of 923,512 cubic yards of material was removed and deposited in the approved Patapsco River Mouth open water disposal area at a cost of $1,758,582. Maintenance, Norfolk District: Maintenance dredging of the Cape Henry Channel, by the government hopper dredge, GOETHALS, began on January 9, 1982 and was completed on January 14, 1982. A total of 27,478 credited cubic yards of material was removed and deposited in the approved Dam Neck open water disposal area at a cost of $225,960. Maintenance dredging of the Cape Henry Channel, by contract, began on September 22, 1982 and was still in progress at the end of the fiscal year. An estimated 75,000 credited cubic yards of material was removed and deposited in the approved Dam Neck open water disposal area at a cost of $419,000 as of September 30, 1982. 2. BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Project applies to Baltimore Harbor, MD, and its tributaries. Existing project. Provides for collection and removal of drift from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary waters, and authorizes Secretary of the Army to allot such amounts as may be necessary for work from appropriations for maintenance and improvement of existing river and harbor works or other available appropriations, and that t his work shall be carried as a separate and distinct project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. Purpose of work is to afford relief from variable conditions of obstruction. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Secton 1 this text. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations, by hired labor, consisted of collection and disposal of 19,980 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. 3. BLACK WALNUT HARBOR, MD Location. A large tidal cove on east side of Chesapeake Bay at south end of Tilghman Island near entrance to Choptank River, about 50 miles south of Baltimore, MD. It is about 4,500 feet long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Existing project. Channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide to and including an anchorage basin of same depth 400 feet square. Mean range of tide is about 1.4 feet. Greater fluctuations are caused by prolonged high winds on Chesapeake Bay. Harbor is well sheltered except from the south. Cost of new work for completed project was $32,631. Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests are to furnish spoil-disposal areas for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. A few small timber wharves at Fairbank, one of which is publicly owned. Similar facilities exist at Bar Neck. There is also a small marine railway and boat-repair yard on Barney Cove, the western prong of the harbor. Sufficient areas are available for erection of additional terminals, if required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging by contract was completed May 7, 1982. Approximately 42,540 cubic yards of material were dredged hydraulically and deposited in an upland contained dredged material placement site at a total project cost of $247,632. 4. BONUM CREEK, VA Location. A tidal estuary of the Potomac River, enters its right bank 18 miles upstream from Chesapeake Bay. It is in Westmoreland County, VA, about 90 miles southeasterly of Washington, DC. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 558.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 6 feet deep from that depth in the Potomac River to and including an anchorage basin at the same depth 160 feet wide and 200 feet long in front of the proposed public landing to be provided by local interests. Project also provides for the entrance channel to be protected on both sides by jetties, the north jetty being about 700 feet long and the south jetty being about 300 feet long. Cost of new work for completed project was $205,998 for construction, of which $202,000 was for the Federal cost, exclusive of aids to navigation and preauthorization studies and $3,998 was the non- Federal contribution. Local cooperation. Local interest must furnish lands, and rights-of-way for new work and future maintenance; hold the United States free from damages; build and maintain a suitable public landing with adequate approaches thereto; make alterations, relocations, and removals as required of utility facilities, and wrecks and stakes; establish a competent public body to regulate the harbor facilities; and make a lump sum cash contribution of 2 percent of the first cost of general navigation facilities. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted on January 11, 1967. Terminal facilities. Several small privately owned piers or wharves are available on Bonum Creek. Local interests constructed an oyster packing house and a public landing. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the project channel, by contract, began on March 5, 1982 and was completed on March 19, 1982. A total of 30,624 cubic yards of material was removed at a cost of $82,472 and 4-4 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT deposited ashore in an approved diked disposal area furnished by Westmoreland County, VA. 5. DUCK POINT COVE, MD Location. A tidal cove about 4,000 feet long on east shore of Fox Creek, about 2.5 miles above mouth. Fox Creek is a shallow tidal estuary about 4 miles long entering Honga River about 4 miles above its junction with Hooper Strait, which, in turn, con-. nects with Chesapeake Bay on east side, at a point about 15 miles north of mouth of Potomac River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Existing project. A channel 60 feet wide and 6 feet deep, from that depth in Fox Creek to a mooring basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 300 feet long, roughly parallel to county road at head of waterway. Cost of new work for completed project was $25,289. Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests must, for future maintenance, hold the United States free from damages to oyster beds and furnish spoil-disposal areas. Assurances were accepted by the Chief of Engineers October 26, 1949. Terminal facilities. There are three privately owned packinghouse wharves on north bank of Duck Point Cove which are open to the public for transaction of business with the owners. Facilities are adequate for present needs. The commissioners of Dorchester County constructed a public terminal. Sufficient areas are available for construction of additional terminals if, and when, necessary. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging by contract was completed on May 25, 1982. Approximately 36,956 cubic yards of material were dredged hydraulically and deposited in an upland contained dredged material placement site at a total project cost of $177,607. 6. FISHING CREEK, MD Location. A narrow winding tidal stream which enters Chesapeake Bay from the west 56 miles south of Baltimore and about 26 miles south of Annapolis, MD. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12266.) Existing project. A channel 7 feet deep with widths of 100 and 60 feet from deep water in Chesapeake Bay to an anchorage of same depth, 120 feet wide and 400 feet long, located in marsh 500 feet above mouth of creek, and twin stone jetties at entrance; north jetty is about 1,050 feet long, and south jetty about 1,100 feet long. The mean range of tide is about 1 foot. Cost of new work for the completed project was $111,242. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas as needed for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Seven hundred feet of bulkhead wharf are available on the south side of entrance channel running west from bay shore, and U.S. Navy Department constructed a pileand- timber wharf on west side of basin. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A hydrographic survey was conducted and engineering and design work was accomplished at a cost of $39,600 in preparation of proposed maintenance dredging. 7. HERRING BAY AND ROCKHOLD CREEK, MD Location. Herring Bay is a wide-mouthed indentation on the west side of Chesapeake Bay about 20 miles below Annapolis, MD. It is about 3 miles long from north to south and penetrates the shore for a depth of about 1 mile. Rockhold Creek, which is about 2.5 miles long, is an estuary which extends northward from the northerly end of Herring Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Existing project. Provides for channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from 7-foot contour in Herring Bay to vicinity of county wharf on Rockhold Creek, with turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 150 feet long at head of channel, and a stone breakwater approximately 900 feet long east of entrance channel. Mean range of tide is about 1.5 feet and extreme tidal range about 4 feet. The Federal cost of new work for completed project was $50,591. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are to furnish disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. Consists of a public wharf on Rockhold Creek about 600 feet below the county bridge, open to all, together with a few private landing stages. No freight-handling devices are installed on any of the wharves which are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the project to a depth of 6 feet, by contract, began on September 8, 1981 and was completed on December 7, 1981. A total of 36,309 cubic yards of material was removed at a cost of $243,150. 8. HONGA RIVER & TAR BAY (BARREN ISLAND GAPS), MD Location. Honga River is a tidal estuary of Chesapeake Bay and penetrates Dorchester County on Eastern Shore of Maryland between Hooper Islands and the mainlands; Tar Bay lies between Barren Island and the mainland and Hooper Islands. Fishing Creek connects Tar Bay and Honga River. Back Creek is a branch of Honga River extending into Hooper Islands, the mouth is about 2 miles south of Fishing Creek. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep at mean low water from 7-foot contour in Chesapeake Bay, through Tar Bay and Fishing Creek to 7-foot contour in Honga River, 25,300 feet long, and a channel in Back Creek 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from 7-foot depth curve in Honga River to a point near head of Back Creek with a turning basin of same depth 150 feet long and 200 feet wide at head of channel, about 5,500 feet long. Mean range of tide is about 1.4 feet. Federal cost of new work for completed project was $66,119. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. Numerous small private wharves are scattered along Fishing Creek and Back Creek. A public wharf is on Fishing Creek. A public wharf, 4 oyster houses, and a marine railway are on Back Creek. Facilities are adequate for existing and reasonably prospective commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging by contract was completed November 18,1981 at Tar Bay and Barren Island Gaps. Approximately 177,661 cubic 4-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 yards of material were dredged hydraulically and deposited in open water at the northeast corner of Barren Island. The dredged material was successfully vegetated and developed as a 56-acre habitat development project at a cost of approximately $142,000. The maintenance dredging was completed at a cost of $473,534. A contract was awarded in July 1982 for maintenance dredging of the East Section (Honga River). Dike construction was started in September 1982. 9. KNAPPS NARROWS, MD Location. A small channel separating Tilghman Island from mainland of eastern shore of Chesapeake Bay about 40 miles south of Baltimore, MD. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Existing project. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water, 75 feet wide, widened at the bends from deep water in Chesapeake Bay to deep water in Harris Creek, Md. Mean range of tide is 1.4 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $46,121. Existing project channel was authorized by the Public Works Administration, September 16,1933, and later adopted by 1935 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests must furnish spoil disposal areas as needed for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. A bulkhead wharf exists on each side of the southerly abutment of the bridge across the Narrows. There are several small-boat landings within the Narrows and several marine railways for repairing boats of a few feet in draft. A bulkhead landing is available for public use at the turning basin. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging by contract was completed in December 1981 on the Harris Creek section of the Knapps Narrows project. Approximately 49,176 cubic yards of material were removed hydraulically and deposited in an upland contained dredged material placement site at a cost of $304,252. 10. LITTLE WICOMICO RIVER, VA Location. A tidal estuary 6 miles long in Northumberland County, VA, flowing southeasterly to Potomac River, which it enters on right bank one-half mile upstream of its mouth and about 108 miles downstream from Washington, DC. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12233.) Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 4,800 feet long, extending from deep water in Potomac River to deep water in Little Wicomico River; two stone jetties, extending to 8-foot contour in Potomac River; and bulkhead walls from inner ends thereof extending sufficiently into Little Wicomico River to stabilize the dredged inner Channel. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal ranges in Potomac River at entrance are: Mean 1.2 feet; irregular, 2.5 feet; and extreme, about 7 feet. Mean tidal range within the river is about 1 foot. Federal cost of new work for completed project was $81,885, exclusive of $5,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two wharves open to the public and numerous small wharves and stagings for private use, an oyster shucking and packing plant, and a marine railway and boatbuilding yard. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract for replacement of the south timber bulkhead commenced on May 28, 1982. Contract amount is $198,844. 11. LOWES WHARF, MD Location. Lowes Wharf is in Ferry Cove, also known as Haddaway Cove, a small indentation on the eastern shore of Chesapeake Bay about 6 miles north of the Choptank River and 13 miles west of Easton, MD. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep at mean low water from the 7-foot depth curve in Ferry Cove to and including a basin of the same depth, 200 feet wide and 300 feet long on the south side of Lowes Wharf. The mean tidal range is 1.4 feet; however, greater fluctuations frequently result from prolonged or high winds. The cost of new work for the completed project was $21,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. Lowes Wharf, a solid-fill pier, with a seafood house located on the outer end, is the only terminal facility in Ferry Cove. The pier is public and is open to watermen at all times. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging was completed in September 1982. 12. MONROE BAY AND CREEK, VA Location. Monroe Bay is an indentation on the right bank of Potomac River in Westmoreland County, VA, 34 miles upstream of Chesapeake Bay and 75 miles downstream from Washington, DC. Monroe Creek is a tidal stream 5 miles long which flows southerly and discharges into Monroe Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 558.) Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 950 feet long, through the bar at the entrance, and within the creek a channel 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 2,500 feet long, with turning and anchorage basin 500 feet wide at upper end in vicinity of Colonial Beach waterworks. The mean range of tide is 1.6 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $12,460. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are numerous wharves and landings in the creek, of which 3 are open to the public. There are two marine railways. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the entrance channel to Monroe Creek, by contract, began on February 24, 1982 and was completed on March 2, 1982. A total of 14,597 cubic yards of materialwas removed and deposited ashore in an approved disposal area at a cost of $79,194. 13. MUDDY HOOK/TYLER COVES, MD Location. Muddy Hook Cove is a small indentation about 0.7 miles south of Hoopersville on east side of Middle Hooper Island. Middle Hooper Island is one of a chain of islands separating Honga River from Tar Bay and Chesapeake Bay on 4-6 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT III_ i i I the Eastern Shore of Maryland. Tyler Cove is s small tidal indentation on north side of Fishing Creek which separates Hooper Islands from the mainland. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12230.) Existing project. An entrance channel 60 feet wide and 6 feet deep from that depth in Honga River to and including an anchorage basin of same depth, 160 feet wide and 400 feet long, in Muddy Hook Cove. Project also provides an entrance channel, 60 feet wide and 6 feet deep, from existing channel in Fishing Creek, (See Honga River and Tar Bay project), into Tyler Cove and includes an anchorage basin 200 feet wide, 250 feet long, and 6 feet deep. Federal cost of new work for completed project was $61,917. Existing project was approved for accomplishment under general authority provided by section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands, pay for dike construction and provide rights-of-way for new work and future maintenance; hold the United States free from damages; build and maintain a suitable public landing with adequate approaches thereto at each location; accomplish alterations, relocations, and removal, as required, of sewer, water supply, drainage and other utility facilities, and piers and stakes. Terminal facilities. Local interests have, under terms of local cooperation, provided a public landing at Tyler Cove. A few privately owned piers are on Muddy Hook Cove. Local interests provided a public landing at Muddy Hook Cove, in accordance with the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract was awarded for maintenance dredging of Tyler Cove in July 1982. Dike construction began in September 1982. Engineering and design in connection with proposed dredging of Muddy Hook was completed in September 1982. 14. NEALE SOUND, MD Location. A tidal estuary of Wicomico River, Charles County, MD, near the junction of Potomac and Wicomico Rivers, 38 miles upstream of Chesapeake Bay and 70 miles downstream from Washington, DC. Neale Sound is 1.5 miles long and flows southeasterly parallel with Potomac River, from which it is separated by Cobb Island and a marshy barrier shore which is breached in a number of places. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 558.) Existing project. A channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide through lower entrance into Wicomico River and a second channel 6 feet deep at upper entrance extending from deep water within the sound through a marshy barrier at head of Cobb Island to deep water in the Potomac with widths of 60 feet within the sound and 80 feet elsewhere. Mean range of tide is 1.9 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $12,600, exclusive of $1,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are to furnish releases from damages and spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. Four wharves open to the public, numerous small privately-owned wharves and stages and two small marine railways are located on the waterway. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the upper entrance channel to Neale Sound, by contract, began on November 16, 1981 and was completed on December 24, 1981. A total of 23,525 cubic yards of material was removed and deposited ashore in an approved disposal area at a cost of $133,960. 15. NORTHEAST RIVER, MD Location. A tidal waterway extending southwestward 5.5 miles from the junction of its branches in the town of North East to the head of Chesapeake Bay, 6 miles north of entrance to the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1226.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep at mean low water from that depth in river to foot of Church Street in the town of North East, enlarged at its upper end to form a basin 120 feet wide and 300 feet long. Mean range of tide is 2.25 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. There are a few lightly constructed landings for small boats scattered along the waterfront on North East. There are two fish-packing plants, two marine railways, several bulkhead wharves, and a number of small boathouses. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design in connection with proposed maintenance dredging was completed in September 1982. 16. OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND SINEPUXENT BAY, MD Location. Ocean city is on a barrier island between Sinepuxent Bay and Atlantic Ocean about 35 miles south of entrance to Delaware Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1220.) Existing project. This provides for an inlet channel 300 feet wide and 16 feet deep from the 16-foot depth curve in Atlantic Ocean through the inlet to the channel in the Isle of Wight Bay, protected on the south side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 6 feet above mean low water and a top width of 12 feet, and on the north side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 9 feet above mean low water and a top width of generally 20 feet, thence generally 200 feet wide and 16 feet deep to the project harbor; a depth of 14 feet and 150 feet wide to the head of the harbor, a length of approximately 3,400 feet; a channel 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide in Sinepuxent Bay from the inlet to Green Point, and thence 100 feet wide in Chincoteague Bay; and for a channel 6 feet deep and 125 feet wide from the inlet channel to a point opposite North Eighth Street in Ocean City, thence 75 feet wide into the Isle of Wight Bay. Depths in the inlet channel and harbor refer to project datum. Depths in the bay channels refer to mean low water. The elevation of mean low water in the bays above mean low water in the ocean at Ocean City varies from about 0.8 foot in the vicinity of the inlet to 1.7 feet at their heads. The mean range of ocean tide is 3.4 feet. The extreme range is from 3 feet below mean low water to about 3.5 feet above mean high water, a total of 9.9 feet. In the bays the mean range of tide varies from approximately 2.5 feet at the inlet to 0.3 foot at their heads. Greater fluctuations are caused by prolonged high winds. Federal cost of new work for completed project was $1,190,530, exclusive of $500,000 contributed by local interests. 4-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests must furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. On bay side of Ocean City: two storage basins, for pleasure and small commercial craft, and numerous privately owned pile-and-timber piers and bulkhead wharves. At project harbor: a public landing about 1,000 feet long, several privately constructed bulkhead wharves open to the public for transaction of business with the owners, and a boat repair yard with a marine railway capable of handling boats up to about 150 tons. All piers and wharves are accessible by highway. Port facilities have been expanded to include all available space in the Fish Harbor. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the Inlet Harbor by contract began February 22, 1982 and was completed April 8, 1982. A total of 32,523 cubic yards of material was removed and deposited on an upland disposal site and beach at a cost of $216,596. Preparation of the general design memorandum for rehabilitation of the south jetty continued at a cost of $172,093. 17. POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA RIVERS, DC COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Project applies to the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, Washington, DC and their tributaries. Existing project. Collection and removal of drift from the waters of the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tributaries in the Washington Area from the head of tidewater to Mount Vernon, VA. Total length of project, considering both sides of the waterway, is about 50 miles. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Section 25 this text. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations by hired labor consisted of collection and disposal of 178,200 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. 18. PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS & INJURIOUS DEPOSITS, BALTIMORE, MD Location. Project applies to tidal waters of the harbor of Baltimore and its adjacent and tributary waters, and all tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries within State of Maryland. Existing project. Continuous patrol and inspection of Baltimore Harbor, Chesapeake Bay, and its tributaries to prevent and detect violations of the River and Harbor Act of June 29, 1888, Sections 10 and 13 of the River and Harbor Act of March 3,1899, Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and other related Federal laws. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations, by supervisor of Harbor of Baltimore, included: 1,200 inspections; 580 detailed investigations of violations of Federal laws with cease and desist orders issued in 189 cases; 131 cases sent to U.S. Attorney for further action; and 225 cases were closed. Fines in the amount of $27,000 were imposed. 19. RHODES POINT TO TYLERTON, MD Location. Rhodes Point and Tylerton are two settlements about 1.5 miles apart on Smith Island, between Chespeake Bay and Tangier Sound, about 60 miles north of Virginia Capes and about 110 miles south of Baltimore. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Existing project. Channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide from that depth in Tyler Creek to and including'an anchorage basin of the same depth 150 feet wide and 400 feet long at Tylerton; channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from that depth inShanks Creek to and including an anchorage basin of the same depth 100 feet wide and 409 feet long at Rhodes Point; channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from that depth in Big Thorofare River to Tylerton; channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from Rhodes Point to Tylerton. Mean range of tide is 1.7 feet. On January 22, 1982, the Chief of Engineers under authority provided by Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized a channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide a distance of about one mile from the anchorage basin at Rhodes Point through Sheep Pen Gut to deep water in the Chesapeake Bay. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work authorized prior to 1982, except that local interests must furnish all lands and rights-of-way for future maintenance, as needed, and maintain a suitable public landing at Rhodes Point and Tylerton. For work authorized by the Chief of Engineers January 22, 1982 local interest must: a. Provide without cost to the United States all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project including suitable spoil disposal areas with necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefore, or the cost of such retaining works; b. Hold and save the United States free from damages that result from construction and maintenance of the project, but not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; c. Accomplish without cost to the United States all alternations and relocations of buildings, transporation facilities, storm drains, utilities, and other structures and improvements made necessary by project construction; d. Provide and maintain without cost to the United States adequate public terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms; contribute, in cash, all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $2,000,000; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in navigable waters by users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; comply with applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-946; 84 Stat. 1894) and implementing regulations; and comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352, 78 Stat. 241, 252). Terminal facilities. There are numerous pile-and-timber wharves along waterfronts at Rhodes Point and Tylerton. Facilities are privately owned, but open to the public without charge when not in use by the owners, and are adequate for existing commerce. Sufficient space for construction of additional facilities is available, if required. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Plans and specifications were prepared and a dredging contract was awarded August 23, 1982. Work will not begin until October 1982 due to environmental restrictions on dredging. 4-8 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT 20. ROCK HALL HARBOR, MD Location. Shallow, open cove on east side of Chesapeake Bay immediately to the south of Swan Point and 23 miles southeast of Baltimore, MD. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 548 and 1226.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from 10-foot depth curve in Swan Creek Inlet to a channel of same dimensions, 700 feet long parallel to harbor terminals at Rock Hall; an anchorage basin of the same depth, 100 feet wide, 250 feet long in a northwesterly extension of the channel fronting the harbor terminals; an anchorage basin 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 350 feet long on an extension of the center line of the 10-foot basin; with an anchorage basin 8 feet deep, 200 feet wide and 600 feet long attached to and extending in a southwesterly direction from the west end of above mentioned 8-foot basin; with twin breakwaters at the harbor entrance. On May 29, 1980, the Chief of Engineers under authority provided by Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized construction of the following work: Raising the existing west and east breakwaters from four feet to seven feet above mean low water and extending the west breakwater 400 feet at an elevation of seven feet above mean low water; relocating the existing entrance channel at a depth of 8 feet and width of 100 feet; a new channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from the new entrance channel to the existing anchorage basin; a new channel, 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from the end of the existing channel near the County wharf to and including an anchorage basin, 250 feet square, in the eastern end of the harbor. The total cost for this Work is $1,744,518, of which $1,071,718 is Federal cost and $672,800 is required local cash contribution. In addition, local interests contributed $106,600 for the retaining dike, bulkheads, and embankments. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work authorized under River and Harbor Acts of 1937 and 1948, except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. For work authorized by the Chief of Engineers May 29, 1980, local interests must, among other requirements, provide without cost to the United States all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and contribute, in cash, 36.9 percent of the first cost and all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $2,000,000, to be paid in a lump sum prior to start of construction, or in installments prior to start of pertinent work items. For details see page 4-9 of Annual Report for 1979. Terminal facilities. There are several private terminals: a marine railway, a public timber-pile wharf, and a public bulkhead wharf about 500 feet long. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A contract for dredging and breakwater construction was awarded March 30, 1981 and was completed May 19, 1982 at an FY 1982 cost of $531,802. 21. SLAUGHTER CREEK, MD Location. This is a waterway about 8 miles long and tidal throughout connecting with Little Choptank River 5 miles from its mouth. It lies in Dorchester County, MD, between Taylors Island and the mainland of the eastern shore of Chesapeake Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Existing project. This provides for dredging a channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide at mean low water through the bar at the mouth, a distance of about one-third of a mile, the lower end of the section extending about 900 feet into Little Choptank River. The mean range of tide is about 1.5 feet and the extreme tidal range is 2.9 feet. The cost for new work, made in 1911, is $4,140. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There is one solid bulkhead wharf about 300 feet long, served by this improvement. It is privately owned but open to general public use, and is considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging by contract was completed on November 3, 1981. Approximately 36,956 cubic yards of material were dredged hydraulically and deposited in an upland contained dredged material placement site at a total project cost of $176,707. 22. ST. JEROMES CREEK, MD Location. St. Jeromes Creek is a tidal estuary in St. Marys County, MD, 2.5 miles long flowing in a southeasterly direction and entering the western shore of the Chesapeake Bay, 6 miles north of Point Lookout, at the mouth of the Potomac River. The creek is 86 miles northerly of Norfolk, VA. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 557.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 7 feet deep from Chesapeake Bay to the Vicinity of Airedele, thence 60 feet wide to deep water in the creek, with a turning basin of the same depth 200 feet wide and 300 feet long opposite Airedele. The project is 4,900 feet long. The plane of reference is mean low water. The tidal ranges are: Mean 1.3 feet, and extreme, approximately 7 feet. The cost to the Federal Government for new work, for the completed project was $17,857, exclusive of amounts expended under previous projects. Local cooperation. Fully complied with, except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. There are numerous privately-owned wharves, 2 of which are open to the public. It is considered that the present terminal facilities are adequate for present and prospective commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the project channel, by contract, began on March 24, 1982 and was completed on April 26,1982. A total of 56,617 cubic yards of material was removed and deposited ashore in an approved disposal area at a cost of $222,234. 23. TILGHMAN ISLAND HARBOR, MD Location. This harbor (also called Dogwood Harbor) is about 60 miles southeast of Baltimore Harbor on eastern side of Tilghman Island, which lies between Chesapeake Bay and Choptank River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 78.) 4-9 REPORT OF, THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 6 feet deep from that depth in Harris Creek to and including an anchorage basin of irregular shape 500 feet long by 200 feet wide, with a 6-foot depth. On October 20, 1980, the Chief of Engineers under authority provided by Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized construction of a breakwater at the harbor entrance. The estimated first cost of this work is $249,000, of which $245,000 is Federal cost and $4,000 is required local cash contribution. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work authorized May 13,1966, except that local interests must furnish all lands, and rights-of-way for future maintenance as needed and maintain a suitable public landing as needed with adequate approaches thereto. For work authorized by the Chief of Engineers October 20, 1980, local interests must: (a) Provide without cost to the United States all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project including suitable spoil disposal areas with necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; (b) Hold and save the United States free from damages that may result from construction and maintenance of the project, but not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (c) Accomplish without cost to the United States all alterations and relocations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities, and other structures and improvements made necessary by project construction; (d) Provide and maintain without cost to the United States adequate public terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms; (e) Contribute, in cash, 1.7 percent of the first cost (including contract price, engineering and design, and supervision and administration, excluding the costs of lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations) of all items of work to be provided by the Corps of Engineers, the amount presently estimated at $4,000 to be paid in a lump sum prior to start of construction, or in installments, prior to start of pertinent work items, in accordance with work schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers; (f) Establish regulations prohibiting discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the waters of the harbor by users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; (g) Comply with applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-646; 84 Stat. 1894) and implementing regulations; and (h) Comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Terminal facilities. Consist of one pier operated by a local seafood packer for transfer of seafood to processing plant. Local interests will construct a public landing and approach road thereto in accordance with terms of local cooperation as part of project development. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A contract for constructing the breakwater authorized October 20, 1980 was awarded April 15, 1982. The FY 1982 cost was $50,439. 24. TWITCH COVE AND BIG THOROFARE, MD Location. A tidal waterway about 4 miles long traversing Smith Island, MD, southeasterly from Chesapeake Bay on the west to Tangier Sound on the east. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Existing project. A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Twitch Cove on Tangier Sound through Big Thorofare, thence through canal at Ewell, MD, thence through Levering Creek and Big Thorofare to vicinity of Swan Point, thence of same depth and 100 feet wide through offshore bar to deep water in Chesapeake Bay, with twin stone jetties at entrance, north jetty is about 2,080 feet long, and south jetty about 1,800 feet long; and anchorage basin 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 700 feet long connecting with west side of existing project channel at Ewell; extension of existing project channel in Levering Creek, 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long; and a channel 4 feet deep and 25 feet wide around point between Big Thorofare and Tylers River. Mean range of tide is 1.7 feet, and extreme tidal range is 3 feet. Federal cost of new work for completed project was $193,175. Local cooperation. Fully complied with, except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. Numerous privately owned pile-andtimber wharves and bulkheads at Ewell are open to the Public for business transactions with the owners. A county wharf is also at west end of town. Five crab houses are on Levering Creek, and one oyster house on project waterway west of Town of Ewell. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the project, by contract, began December 16, 1981 and was completed April 18,1982. A total of 35,685 cubic yards of matdrial was removed and deposited at upland disposal sites at a cost of $614,416. 25. WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC Location. Within District of Columbia at junction of Anacostia River with Potomac River which flows southeasterly 108 miles to Chesapeake Bay. It is southerly 202 miles by water from Baltimore, MD, and northerly 195 miles from Norfolk, VA. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12289.) Existing projects. A combination and extension of latest projects for Potomac River at Washington, DC, and Anacostia River, DC. The Washington Harbor project provides for a channel in the Potomac River from Giesboro Point to Key Bridge, a second channel from Giesboro Point to the end of Washington Channel, and a third channel from the mouth of the Anacostia River to the foot of 15th Street, SE, with turning basins opposite the Naval Weapons Plant (800 feet wide and 2,400 feet long) and at the head of the Anacostia Channel (400 feet square). Channel dimensions are 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide except upstream from Anacostia Bridge were the width is reduced to 200 feet and from Giesboro Point to a point 3,000 feet downstream of Arlington Memorial Bridge and above Easby Point where channel dimensions are 20 feet deep and 200 feet wide. Channel lengths including turning basins are: Virginia Channel, 5,000 feet; Washington Channel, 10,000 feet; and Anacostia River, 15,000 feet; and operation and maintenance of inlet gates and lock and outlet gates of Tidal Basin constructed under a previous project to flush Washington Channel. Plane of reference is low-water datum which is 0.35 foot below mean low tide as observed from 1932 to 1942. Tidal ranges are: mean, 2.9 feet; irregular, 4.5 feet; and extreme, 10.7 feet. Federal cost of new work for completed project was $162,006. 4-10 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT I f I I l Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are four wharves generally of bulkhead type on Virginia Channel that are privately owned and not open to the public except by special arrangement. On Washington Channel there are four piers under jurisdiction of District of Columbia, two of which are open to the public and one open to the public by special arrangement. In Anacostia River there are four privately owned piers and eight governmental piers and slips. None of the piers are open to the public except by special arrangement. Terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract for repair of the tidal basin inlet gates was awarded on September 17, 1982. Contract amount is $353,269. 26. WICOMICO RIVER, MD Location. Wicomico River has its source in northern part of Wicomico County, MD, and flows generally southwardly emptying into Monie Bay, a tributary of Tangier Sound on each side of Chesapeake Bay about 85 miles southeast of Baltimore. Webster Cove is site of improved small-boat harbor on southeast bank of Wicomico River about 3 miles above the mouth. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 567 and 1224.) Existing project. Channel 14 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Chesapeake Bay to Salisbury, section included in project is 37 miles long, including about 12 miles from mouth of river to Chesapeake Bay; 14 feet deep in channels and turning basins in north and south prongs with channel widths of 100 feet, and a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide extending from 6-foot contour in Wicomico River to and including a basin in Webster Cove of same depth, 100 feet wide and 400 feet long; and extension of basin 200 feet long and 100 feet wide on each side. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet and extreme tidal range is 4.4 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $421,609, exclusive of amounts expended on previous project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with, except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed and hold the United States free from such damages as may occur to public or leased oyster beds. Terminal facilities. Present waterfront at Salisbury consists of pile-and-timber bulkheads with earthfills. Some wharves have warehouses and factories with mechanical freighthandling facilities and rail sidings. All terminals are privately owned. A shipyard, with two marine railways with capacities of 1,200 and 500 tons, respectively, is on right bank of river below prongs. Areas for development of new terminals on north prong are limited. Areas for considerable expansion of terminal facilities are available on main river. There is a pile-and-timber wharf about 4 miles above mouth of river at Mount Vernon. A wharf of similar construction is at White Haven. There is a county wharf at head of basin in Webster Cove, a pile-andtimber pier at oyster house on southwest side of basin, a T-shaped pile-and-timber pier at cafe on southwest side of basin and several small timber piers on walkways that local interests constructed around the basin. Fueling facilities are available at the T-shaped pier. Sufficient areas are available for construction of additional facilities when required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract awarded in the amount of $454,392 for maintenance dredging of the Great Shoals channel. Dredging to commence in FY 83. 27. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 4-H at end of chapter.) 28. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year cost was $95,127 for Lower Thorofare, MD. Beach Erosion Control 29. COLONIAL BEACH, VA Location. Colonial Beach, Westmoreland County, VA, is located on the right bank of the Potomac River 40 miles upstream from its mouth at Chesapeake Bay and 69 miles downstream from Washington, DC. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 558.) Existing project. On May 29, 1980, the Chief of Engineers under authority provided by Section 103 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized construction of the following work: Extending and widening the existing Central Beach area downstream from Hawthorne Street southward to provide an additional beach area of about 107,200 square feet, stablizing with vegetation about 200 feet of the bank behind the beachfill and constructing four segments of offshore breakwater with estimated lengths of 200 feet each, to stablize the beachfill area; and extending and widening the existing beach at Castlewood Park to provide an additional beach area of about 59,300 square feet; constructing three segments of offshore breakwater with estimated lengths of 200 feet each of two of the segments and 300 feet for the third segment; removing debris in the beachfill area; and constructing a 100-foot long terminal groin at the southern end of the Castlewood Park beachfill. The estimated cost of this work is $1,114,000 of which $557,000 is Federal cost and $557,000 is required local cash contribution. Local cooperation. Among other requirements, local interests must provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way and relocations required for construction including periodic nourishment and provide a cash contribution equal to 50 percent of the final project construction cost (excluding lands and relocations). Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: The construction contract was awarded January 26, 1982, and construction is 98 percent complete. The FY 1982 cost was $350,926. 4-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Flood Control 30. BLOOMINGTON LAKE, MD & WV Location. Project is located on the North Branch Potomac River on the state line between Garrett County, MD, and Mineral County, WV. The damsite is located approximately 7.9 miles upstream from the confluence with Savage River at Bloomington, MD. It is also about 5 air miles southwest of the tritowns of Luke and Westernport, MD, and Piedmont, WV. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, "Kitzmiller" and "Westernport," MD.) Existing project. The improvement consists of a rolled earth and rock fill dam with an impervious core and an 800-foot long dike on the left bank. Top of dam is 296 feet above streambed with a total length of 2,130 feet. When filled to spillway crest, reservoir will extend about 6.6 miles upstream and inundate 965 acres. Flood control storage of 36,200 acre-feet is provided. Storage available for low flow augmentation for water supply and water quality improvement is 92,000 acre-feet. The reservoir controls a drainage area of 263 square miles. Recreation facilities are being provided for picnicking, camping and boating. Estimated cost (1982) of new work is $174,300,000 of which $57,868,000 is required non-federal reimbursement. Local cooperation. See page 4-15 of 1977 Annual Report for requirements. A water supply contract between the Federal Government and the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission in concert with the Fairfax County Water Authority, VA, and the District of Columbia has been executed for repayment of all water supply costs. The first of 50 annual payments began in July 1981. Federally approved water quality standards being put into effect by Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia are considered satisfactory assurances of intent to control pollution. Satisfactory assurances have been received from Maryland, West Virginia, and Virginia that they will protect downstream channels from'encroachment that would adversely affect operation of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: The project became operational for water supply, flood control, and for water quality control in July 1981. Relocation of West Virginia Route 46 continued and is essentially complete. Construction of campground and picnic facilities was awarded October 20, 1981 and is 80 percent complete. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 31. BULL RUN, PA Location. In Loyalsock Township which is located on the left or north bank of the West Branch of the Susquehanna River just downstream from Williamsport, PA. The proposed project would provide protection to Loyalsock Township from the limit of the Williamsport Project at Millers Run aproximately one mile downstream along the West Branch of the Susquehanna River. Existing project. Provides for alteration of 4,100 linear feet of the proposed highway embankment design by providing an impervious core which will serve as a levee to provide protection from flood stages on the West Branch Susquehanna River, tie back levees from the highway embankment to high ground, and a pumping facility at Bull Run to provide protection from backwater from the West Branch and frominterior drainage on Bull Run. Estimated Federal cost (1982) for new work is $2,902,000. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests must assume responsibility for all costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $3,000,000. An agreement for local cooperation complying with Section 221 of the 1970 Flood Control Act was accepted for the Secretary of the Army on September 21, 1977. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction was essentially completed at an FY 1982 cost of $317,073. 32. CUMBERLAND, MD, AND RIDGELEY, WV Location. On North Branch of Potomac River, 21 miles upstream from its junction with South Branch of Potomac River and 197 miles upstream from Washington, DC. (See Geological Survey Quadrangles, Frostburg and Flintstone, MD, WV, and PA.) Existing project. Channel improvements of North Branch of Potomac River from Western Maryland Railway bridge in South Cumberland upstream to mouth of Wills Creek, with levees and fill along left bank and levees along right bank from downstream corporate limits of Ridgeley, WV, to a point about 150 feet above Johnson Street Bridge; channel improvements along Wills Creek from its mouth upstream to a point in the Narrows about 500 feet upstream from highway bridge on U.S. Highway 40; levee and floodwall in West Cumberland, MD, on left bank of North Branch of Potomac River from mouth of Wills Creek upstream to Kelly Boulevard; levee and floodwall in Ridgeley, WV, on right bank of North Branch of Potomac River from Carpenter Avenue upstream to Patapsco Street near upstream corporate limits of Ridgeley, WV; interior drainage facilities in Cumberland and West Cumberland, MD, and Ridgeley, WV; removal of Chesapeake and Ohio Canal dam and construction of a new industrial dam on North Branch of Potomac River immediately above mouth of Wills Creek; and alteration and reconstruction of highway and railroad bridges. Federal costs of new work for the completed project was $15,633,970, which includes $49,998 emergency relief funds and is exclusive of $197,513 public works acceleration funds. Estimated cost to local interests is $2,900,000 of which $1,402,001 is contributed funds and $1,497,999 is for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Removal of gravel deposits, grass cutting of areas channelward of levees, and removal of brush and debris from channel were accomplished as required in channel area. 33. FOURMILE RUN, VA Location. The project is located in the City of Alexandria and in Arlington County, VA, on Fourmile Run immediately above its confluence with the Potomac River at Washington, DC. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets for Alexandria, VA, Annandale, VA, Falls Church, VA, and Washington West, DC, MD, and VA.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a floodwall protection system, an improved channel, and replacement of two highway and four railroad bridges. Total estimated cost (1982) of new work is $54,219,000 of which $2,439,000 is non- Federal. 4-12 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT Local cooperation. See page 4-17 of the 1977 Annual Report for requirements. Agreements for local cooperation complying with Section 221 of the 1970 Flood Control Act and Subsection 84 (b) of the 1974 Water Resources Development Act were accepted for the Secretary of the Army on April 23, 1974. Agreements for local cooperation concerning recreation cost sharing were accepted for the Secretary of the Army on May 30, 1974. An interjurisdictional agreement among Alexandria, and Falls Church and Arlington and Fairfax Counties was executed in March 1977 for implementing a watershed control program. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A contract for removing silt from the downstream reach of the channel improvement was awarded November 6, 1981 and is 97 percent complete. The FY 1982 cost was $2,272,844. 34. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA Flood Control Act of 1962 authorized construction of Aylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local protection works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, PA, substantially as recommended by Chief of Engineers (S. Doc. 141, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). The Basin includes an area of 346 square miles p northeastern Pennsylvania. 34A. AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA Location. Project is located in Lackawanna County on Aylesworth Creek about one mile above its confluence with the Lackawanna River, near the community of East Jermyn, PA. Existing project. Provides for an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 90 feet above streambed and a top length of 1,200 feet. The spillway located adjacent to the left abutment is an open cut channel 80 feet wide with a concrete sill. The outlet works consist of a 3-foot diameter uncontrolled conduit. Project will control a drainage area of 6.2 square miles and provide flood control storage of 1,700 acre-feet equivalent to 5.1 inches of runoff from the drainage areas. The lake will extend about 4,600 feet and inundate 87 acres when filled to spillway crest. Recreation facilities constructed by local interest include a bathing beach, bathhouse, and picnic area. Federal cost of new work was $2,268,200 of which $2,153,559 was for construction and $114,641 for lands and damages. In addition $52,200 Federal and $52,200 non-Federal funds were expended for construction of bathhouse facilities under recreation facilities for completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. The Aylesworth Creek Reservoir Park Authority, representing the Boroughs of Archbald and Jermyn, operate and maintain limited day use facilities including a small beach. In September 1978 a cost sharing agreement for construction of bathhouse facilities was signed. The cost for the facilities which were completed in July 1979 was $104,400, of which $52,200 was Federal and $52,200 was non-Federal. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 35. RAYSTOWN LAKE, RAYSTOWN BRANCH, JUNIATA RIVER, PA Location. Damsite is on Raystown Branch, about 5.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Juniata River. Project is about 10 miles south of Huntingdon, PA. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Huntingdon, Mt. Union, Broad Top and Everett, PA.) Existing project. The rock and earthfill dam rises 225 feet above streambed with a gated concrete spillway and auxiliary spillway in the right abutment. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 762,000 acre-feet, of which 248,000 acre-feet are for flood control, 476,000 acre-feet for recreation and water quality control, and the balance for sediment reserve. At full flood control pool elevation, reservoir would inundate 10,800 acres and extend 34 miles upstream. Recreation facilities are provided for boating, fishing, camping, swimming, hunting, and picnicking. Federal cost for new work was $77,408,700 of which $46,120,931 was for construction and $31,287,769 was for lands and damages including relocations. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the project continued. A contract for repair of concrete in warmwater chute, awarded August 27, 1981, was completed January 8, 1982 at a cost of $136,040. 36. SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Authorized plan provides for construction of reservoirs and related flood control works for protection of towns in New York and Pennsylvania. The improvements are located in the upper watershed of Susquehanna River to and including Chemung River. 36A. ADDISON, NY Location. At confluence of Tuscarora Creek and Canisteo River in the City of Addison, NY. (See Geological Survey map for Addison, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 3,100 feet of earth levee and 700 feet of concrete floodwall on right bank of Canisteo River, extending from high ground on Steuben Street near Baltimore & Ohio Railroad to mouth of Tuscarora Creek; removal of existing dam, mill, and raceway from channel; construction of about 2,200 feet of earth levee on left bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending from Tuscarora Street to Canisteo River; construction of 4,600 feet of earth levee on right bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending from high ground at southwest edge of village to high ground at southeast edge of village; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 36B. ALMOND LAKE, NY Location: Dam is located two miles upstream from Hornell, NY, on Canacadea Creek, a tributary of the Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for Hornell, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 1,260 feet long rising 90 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and a gated outlet conduit in the left abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5-foot by 10-foot service gates and three emergency gates of the same size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 14,640 acre-feet at spillway crest. The 4-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 III _ I i project controls a draining area of 56 square miles, 36 percent of the watershed of the Canisteo River upstream from Hornell, NY. Recreation facilities include a boat-launching ramp and dock, bathing beach, picnic area, and tent and trailer camping area. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests have developed recreational facilities at the lake in conjunction with the Federal Government. These facilities are operated and maintained by the Steuben County Board of Supervisors. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. 36C. ARKPORT DAM, NY Location. Dam is located five miles upstream from Hornell, NY, on the Canisteo River, a tributary of the Chemung River which flows into the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Arkport, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 1,200 feet long, exclusive of spillway, rises 113 feet above streambed, with a concrete spillway and an ungated outlet in the right abttment. The outlet structure consists of an 8-foot diameter reinforced concrete lined conduit, 660 feet long. A cast iron nozzle is placed in the lower end of the conduit, reducing the outlet size to 4 feet 4 inches. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 7,950 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 31 square miles, 20 percent of the watershed of the Canisteo River upstream from Hornell. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 36D. AVOCA, NY Location. On the Cohocton River of Village of Avoca, NY, about 30 miles upstream from confluence of Cohocton and Chemung Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Avoca, NY.) Existing project. Provides for improvement and realinement of about 8,300 feet of Cohocton River channel, extending from above Erie Railroad to below junction of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; construction of about 8,500 feet of earth levee on left bank of Cohocton River, extending from high ground above Alexander Avenue to about 1,300 feet below junction of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; and 4,500 feet of earth levee on right bank of Salmon Creek, extending from high ground above Alexander Avenue to Erie Railroad; a new highway bridge for U.S. Highway 15 over Cohocton River, raising of Erie Railroad bridge 4 feet; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 36E. BINGHAMTON, NY Location. At the confluence of the Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers in the City of Binghamton, NY. (See Geological Survey map for Binghamton, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of earth levees, concrete floodwalls, and appurtenant drainage structures, consisting of about 850 feet of channel excavation and about 1,375 feet of earth levee along Phelps Creek, Town of Port Dickinson; new concrete wall on right bank of Chenango River, extending downstream from high ground near city limits to existing floodwall below DeForest Street, a distance of about 520 feet; about 150 feet of concrete wall just below Cutler Dam; about 180 feet of concrete wall at pumphouse near McDonald Avenue; raising existing earth levees on right bank of Chenango River, extending from Cutler Dam downstream for about 1,220 feet; about 2,915 feet of earth levee on left bank of Chenango River north of city limits in Village of Port Dickinson, extending from Church Street to high ground just north of city line; about 3,900 feet of earth levee on left bank of Chenango River, extending from DeForest Street to Cutler Dam; new concrete floodwalls and riverbank revetment for about 5,570 feet extending on left bank of Chenango River from Cutler Dam to junction with Susquehanna River; about 540 feet of new concrete floodwall and raising about 1,085 feet of concrete floodwall on right bank of Susquehanna River, extending from Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad downstream to Tompkins Street Bridge; about 1,940 feet of earth levee; about 1,940 feet of concrete floodwall and capping about 125 feet of concrete floodwall, on right bank of Susquehanna River from Stuyvesent Street to mouth of Chenango River; about 8,380 feet of earth levee, about 2,180 feet of new concrete floodwall and raising about 125 feet o~xisting floodwall on left bank of Susquehanna River extending from Pierce Creek to high ground at State Highway 17; a debris dam and flume between Corbett and Hotchkiss Streets and a concrete pressure conduit, 1,060 feet long to carry flow of Park Creek from Vestal Avenue to Susquehanna River; about 665 feet of levee extending from Erie Railroad to high ground along right bank of Chamberlain Creek near the mouth; closure structures at Erie Railroad and at Court Street; a weir, a drop structure, and about 1,800 feet of earth levee, about 2,235 feet of channel excavation, about 645 feet of channel paving and raising, about 470 feet of existing concrete floodwall, and about 200 feet of new concrete floodwall for improvement of Pierce Creek from its mouth to about 1,000 feet above Conklin Avenue; and appurtenant drainage structures. Improvement, supplemented by authorized flood control dams above the area, will provide protection for City of Binghamton against a flood discharge about 20 percent greater than maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935 on Chenango River and in March 1936 on Susquehanna River. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 36F. CANISTEO, NY Location. On Purdy and Bennetts Creeks in Town of Canisteo, NY, situated along the south side of Canisteo River, at the confluence of Bennetts Creek and Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for Canisteo, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 8,000 feet of earth levees on right bank of Canisteo River, extending from high ground 1,570 feet west of State Highway Route 21 above Town to a point at intersection of Ordway Lane and East Main Street; about 7,400 feet of earth levee on left bank of Purdy and Bennetts Creeks, extending from Main Street Bridge to high ground above Greenwood Street; 1,000 feet of earth levee on right bank of Bennetts Creek extending upstream from Main Street Bridge; a concrete check dam with wing levees from Greenwood Street; a new highway bridge at Greenwood Street; alterations to existing timber check dams in Bennetts Creek; channel excavation in Bennetts and Purdy Creeks; and appurtenant drainage structures. 4-14 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 36G. CORNING, NY Location. On Chemung River in City of Corning, NY, about 44 miles upstream from confluence of Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Corning, NY.) Existing project. Flood protection for this community was originally authorized by Flood Control Act of 1936. Plan of improvement provides for construction of a pumping station, earth levees, and concrete floodwalls, consisting of: about 4,300 feet of earth levee, enlargement of about 8,610 feet of existing earth levee and about 3,100 feet of concrete floodwall on right bank of Chemung River, extending from Erie Railroad Bridge to high ground at Park Avenue below city; about 200 feet of concrete floodwalls; about 2,500 feet of earth levees and enlargement of about 11,500 feet of existing earth levee on left bank of Chemung and Cohocton Rivers, extending from Erie Railroad Bridge over Cohocton River mouth of Post Creek; about 2,500 feet of earth levee and enlargement of about 4,700 feet of existing earth levee on right bank of Post Creek from its mouth to Watkins Street; realinement of about 3,000 feet of channel, about 8,800 feet of earth levee, about 3,000 feet of channel excavation, a pressure conduit about 400 feet long, a drop structure and a weir for improvement of Cutler Creek, extending from its mouth to high ground at Deckertown Road and Hornby Road; and appurtenant drainage structures. Flood protection on Monkey Run was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1950. Plan of improvement provides for construction of 2,010 feet of open flume, 2,320 feet of pressure conduit storm sewers, and appurtenant facilities between existing improved channel above Sixth Street and Chemung River at a point immediately east of Pine Street East. Modified improvement will provide protection for City of Corning against a flood discharge in Chemung River approximately equal to maximum flood of record, which occurred in May 1945, and on tributary streams against floods of greater magnitude than known to date. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 36H. EAST SIDNEY LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located near East Sidney, NY, on Ouleout Creek, about five miles above confluence of the creek with Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Franklin, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill and concrete structure, 2,010 feet long, including spillway, rises 130 feet above streambed and consists of a concrete gravity-type section with a compacted earth-dike section at the right abutment. The outlet works consist of five rectangular conduits each 3.5 feet by 5.85 feet and 105 feet long. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 33,500 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project'controls a drainage area of 102 square miles which is 93 percent of the Ouleout Creek drainage area, and 5 percent of the watershed of the Susquehanna River upstream from Binghamton, NY, exclusive of the separately controlled Chenango River. Recreation facilities include a bathing beach, picnic and camping areas, and boat-launching and docking facilities. Local cooperation. None required. The Town of Sidney, NY, cooperated in the development of recreation facilities and operates and maintains all the facilities with the exception of the recreational pool, which is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 361. ELMIRA, NY Location. On Chemung River in City of Elmira, NY, about 27 miles upstream from confluence of Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Elmira, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 17,700 feet of earth levees, and about 4,100 feet of concrete floodwall on right bank of Chemung River, extending from South Hoffman Street to a point below city near upper end of Big Island; about 12,100 feet of earth levee and about 6,300 feet of concrete wall on left bank of Chemung River extending from Durland Avenue to Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad at mouth of Newton Creek; about 10,000 feet of earth levee on right bank of Newton Creek, extending from about intersection of Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad and east Church Street to high ground near intersection of Sullivan and Warren Streets; about 4,300 feet of earth levee on right bank of Divan Creek; about 2,000 feet of concrete conduit inclosing Hoffman Brook from West Second Street to Chemung River; clearing islands and riverbanks of trees and brush for about 3.5 miles in Chemung River; about 14,300 feet of earth levee on left bank of Seely Creek, extending from Erie Railroad to high ground approximately 1,000 feet northwest of intersection of South Broadway and Pennsylvania Avenue; a pumping plant for disposal of interior drainage; an interceptor sewer about 6,000 feet long varying in size from 48 to 96 inches in diameter; and appurtenant structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 36J. HORNELL, NY Location. On Canisteo River in City of Hornell, NY, about 42 miles upstream from confluence of Canisteo and Tioga Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Canisteo, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realinement and construction of earth levees, concrete floodwalls, and check dams consisting of: realinement of about 4,600 feet of Canisteo River channel, and about 5,800 feet of earth levee on its right bank, extending from Seneca Street upstream to junction of Pittsburgh, Shawmut & Northern Railroad and Erie Railroad; construction of about 4,500 feet of earth levee, extending on both sides of Seneca Street from Canisteo River to Wrightman Avenue and junction of Cleveland Avenue and Bethesda Drive; construction of about 7,200 feet of earth levee, about 2,500 feet of concrete floodwall, and raising about 1,500 feet of existing concrete floodwall, on right bank of Canisteo River, and about 12,000 feet of channel improvement, extending from Seneca Street to Erie Railroad; construction of about 2,500 feet of earth levee, about 2,100 feet of concrete floodwall on left bank of Canisteo River extending from a point opposite Walnut Street to Erie Railroad; a ring-earth levee about 2,800 feet long around sewage-disposal plant on left bank of Canisteo River; about 4,500 feet of realinement and improvement of Canisteo River 4-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Channel with about 4,500 feet of earth levee on its right bank extending from Cedar Street downstream to about 1,400 feet above East Avenue; about 2,400 feet of channel paving, 1,400 feet of earth levee, raising about 1,900 feet of concrete floodwall, and construction of one check dam on Canacadea Creek; about 1,600 feet of channel paving and construction of three check dams on Chauncey Run with about 300 feet of new wall and about 300 feet of capping; a weir, a check dam, 3,030 feet of channel paving, 4,800 feet of floodwalls and levees, and related work on existing walls, on Crosby Creek; removal of 6 bridges, erection of 4 bridges, miscellaneous bridge structures, and 3 drop structures; and appurtenant drainage structures and small stream control works. Improvement, supplemented by Arkport and Almond Reservoirs above the area, provides protection for City of Hornell against a flood discharge approximately double maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Rehabilitation of a portion of the Canacadea Creek floodwall, was completed at a total cost of $400,518. Engineering and design for the left bank of Thatcher Street was started at a cost of $22,974. 36K. LISLE, NY Location. On Tioughnioga River in Village of Lisle, NY, about 12 miles upstream from confluence of Tioughnioga and Chenango Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Lisle, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realinement and construction of earth levees and concrete floodwalls, consisting of: relocation of about 3,000 feet of Dudley Creek Channel, extending from 1,200 feet west of intersection of Cortland and Main Streets to confluence with Tioughnioga River, realinement of some 5,700 feet of Tioughnioga River Channel east of Village; about 4,150 feet of earth levee and 970 feet of concrete wall on right bank of Dudley Creek and Tioughnioga River; realinement of some 5,700 feet of Tioughnioga Street to railroad crossing on River Street; raising about 1,860- feet of Delaware, Lackawanna & Western single track railroad over the levee; relocation of about 1,600 feet of Cortland Street; a new bridge over relocated Dudley Creek; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 36L. OXFORD, NY Location. On Chenango River in the Village of Oxford, NY, about 40 miles upstream from confluence of Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Oxford, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of earth levees and clearing of Chenango River channel, consisting of about 2,100 feet of earth levees on left bank of Chenango River, extending from high ground near Cemetery Drive and running mostly along railroad to high ground near Main Street; removal of dam and island below Main Street; raising Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad over levee; and appurtenant closure and drainage structures. Improvement provides protection for Village of Oxford on left bank against a flood discharge substantially larger than maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 36M. WHITNEY POINT LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located near Whitney Point, NY, on the Otselic River about 0.7 of a mile upstream from its confluence with Tioughnioga River. (See Geological Survey map for Whitney Point and Willet, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 4,900 feet long, exclusive of a spillway, rises 95 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and gated outlet in the left abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5-foot by 10-foot gates and one emergency gate of the same size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 86,440 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 255 square miles, the entire watershed of Otselic River, or 16 percent of the Chenango River watershed upstream from Binghamton, NY. Recreation facilities, constructed in cooperation with local interests, provide for swimming, picnicking, camping, boating, fishing, and hunting. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests operate and maintain all of the recreation facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 36N. WHITNEY POINT VILLAGE, NY Location. On Tioughnioga River at the confluence of Tioughnioga and Otselic Rivers, tributaries of Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Whitney Point, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realinement and construction of earth levees, consisting of realinement of about 1,800 feet of Tioughnioga River channel, above confluence with Otselic River; about 7,100 feet of earth levee along right bank of Tioughnioga River, extending from high ground on Main Street above village to Collins Street just below village; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 37. STILLWATER LAKE LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Location. Dam is on Lackawanna River, 39 miles from mouth of stream and about 4 miles upstream from Forest City, Susquehanna County, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheet, "Honesdale, PA.") Existing project. Dam is earthfill type, rising 77 feet above streambed, with a controlled outlet conduit and side channel spillway in left abutment. Reservoir capacity is 12,000 acrefeet, of which 11,600 acre-feet is flood control storage and remainder utilized to maintain existing water supply reservoir for Forest City, PA, at this site. Reservoir area of 422 acres, and pool extends about 2.1 miles upstream. Reservoir controls 52 percent of watershed above Carbondale, 26 percent above Olyphant, and 17 percent above Scranton. Federal cost of new work, completed in 1965, was $5,725,700 of which $4,500,500 4-16 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT was for construction and $1,225,200 was for lands and damages. Local cooperation. None required. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. 38. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY AND PA Plan of improvement authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act provides for construction of Cowanesque Lake, PA, Tioga- Hammond Lakes, PA, local protection works at Elkland, PA, and Nichols, NY, and channel improvements at Cortland, NY. This project plan supplemented the comprehensive flood control program for Southern New York and Northern Pennsylvania which included Southern New York flood control project and Stillwater, Genegantslet, and South Plymouth Reservoirs. 38A. COWANESQUE LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on Cowanesque River about 2.2 miles above its confluence with Tioga River at Lawrenceville, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, PA.) Existing project. Provides for an earthfill dam, 3,100 feet long and rising 151 feet above streambed, with an uncontrolled spillway in right abutment and a gated conduit in valley floor. Flood control storage is 82,000 acre-feet, equivalent to 5.6 inches of runoff from drainage area. Relocation of the Town of Nelson to a new townsite was authorized by Section 121 of the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. Estimated Federal cost (1982) of new work is $106,000,000 of which $60,820,000 is for construction and $45,180,000 is for lands and damages and relocations (which includes $5,755,000 for the relocation of the Town of Nelson). Local cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976, which authorized relocation of the Town of Nelson, provides that before the Secretary of the Army acquires any real estate property for the new townsite appropriate non-Federal interests shall furnish binding contractual commitments that all lots in the ,new townsite will be either occupied when available, will be replacements for open space and vacant lots in the existing town, or will be purchased by non-Federal interests at the fair market value. The required contractual agreement for local cooperation was executed with Nelson Township on August 25, 1977. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A contract for construction of the Tompkins boat launch was awarded August 7, 1981 and is 98 percent complete. A reformulation study addressing the feasibility of adding water supply to the project, initiated in June 1979, was completed July 1982. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 38B. TIOGA-HAMMOND LAKES, PA Location. The dams are located in Tioga County, PA, upstream from the confluence of the Tioga River and Crooked Creek. Tioga Dam is located on the Tioga River and Hammond Dam on Crooked Creek, approximately opposite the Tioga damsite, about 3.3 miles above its mouth and less than one mile from the Village of Brooklyn. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, PA.) Existing project. Tioga Dam is 2,600 feet long, rising 140 feet above streambed, with a controlled outlet conduit. Hammond Dam is 5,900 feet long, a maximum height of 121.5 feet above streambed, with a concrete spillway. Both dams are of earth and rockfill construction. The Tioga-Hammond Lakes project controls total drainage area of 402 square miles, with Tioga Dam controlling 280 square miles of the Tioga River Basin and Hammond Dam controlling 122 square miles of the Crooked Creek Basin. Recreation facilities are provided for swimming, camping, picnicking, boating, and fishing. Estimated Federal cost (1982) of new works is $192,700,000 of which $134,300,000 is for construction and $58,400,000 is for lands and damages and relocations. Local cooperation. None required. However, construction of the Mill Creek Area recreation facilities has been deferred indefinitiely until such time local interests agree to bear one-half of the construction costs and all of the operation and maintenance costs for those facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A contract for modification to the Mansfield sewage line, awarded August 28, 1981, was completed. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 39. WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA A system of three flood control reservoirs in headwaters of West Branch Susquehanna River, PA. The reservoirs, to be known as Curwensville, Alvin R. Bush, formerly known as Kettle Creek, and Foster Joseph Sayers formerly known as Blanchard, are on West Branch about 2.5 miles upstream from Curwensville, PA; on Kettle Creek 8.4 miles above the mouth and 17 miles upstream from Renovo, PA; and on Bald Eagle Creek about 1 mile upstream from Blanchard, PA, respectively. In accordance with the terms of local cooperation, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania furnished assurances that it will coordinate operation of George B. Stevenson Reservoir, formerly known as First Fork Reservoir, with operation of Curwensville, Alvin R. Bush, and Foster Joseph Sayers Reservoirs to secure optimum flood control benefits from system operation. George B. Stevenson Reservoir on First Fork Sinnemahoning Creek in Cameron and Potter Counties, PA, was constructed by Commonwealth of Pennsylvania at a first cost of $12,240,000 and an estimated $30,000 annually for operation and maintenance. 39A. ALVIN R. BUSH DAM, PA Location. Alvin R. Bush Dam (formerly Kettle Creek Dam) is located on Kettle Creek about 8.4 miles above the mouth and 15 miles upstream from Renovo, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Keating, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 1,350 feet long, rises 165 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled spillway located in rock adjacent to the right abutment, and a horseshoe-shaped outlet tunnel with 3 service gates. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 75,000 acre-feet at spillway 4-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 crest. The project controls a drainage area of 226 square miles or about 92 percent of the Kettle Creek watershed recreation facilities. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. A contract to repair concrete trash rack was awarded on April 22, 1982 and is to be completed in November 1982. 39B. CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on West Branch of the Susquehanna River approximately 2.5 miles upstream from Curwensville, Clearfield County, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Curwensville, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 1,850 feet long, rises 131 feet above the streambed, with an open-cut concrete sill 1,750 feet from the left abutment. The outlet works located in the left abutment consist of a 15-foot diameter circular outlet conduit with 3 slide control gates 5.5 feet wide and 12 feet high. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 124,200 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 365 square miles, or about 98 percent of the West Branch Susquehanna River at Curwensville and about 75 percent at Clearfield. Recreation facilties include a seasonal recreational pool of 790 acres, access roads, parking areas, beach area, boat dock and launching ramp. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. Remedial grouting of right abutment was completed in June 1982 at a cost of $189,785. 39C. FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS DAM, PA Location. Dam is located on Bald Eagle Creek in Centre County, PA, about one mile upstream from Blanchard and about 14 miles above the confluence of Bald Eagle Creek with the West Branch Susquehanna River at Lock Haven, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Howard, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 6,835 feet long, rises 100 feet above the streambed, with an open-cut concrete chute and uncontrolled concrete weir 600 feet wide located in rock in a saddle adjacent to the left abutment. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consist of a 15-foot diameter circular outlet conduit with two hydraulicallyoperated wheel gates 7 feet wide and 15 feet high. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 99,000 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 339 square miles or 88 percent of the drainage area above Beech Creek and 43 percent of the Bald Eagle Creek drainage area. Recreation facilities include a summer recreation pool of 1,730 acres, a conservation pool of 630 acres for the preservation of fish life, access roads, parking areas, boat docks and launching ramps, and camping areas. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 40. WYOMING VALLEY, PA Location. The project is located in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, on the Susquehanna River. The project area is limited to the four existing Federal flood control projects. These levee improvements are in Plymouth, Kingston-Edwardsville, Swoyersville-Forty Fort, and Wilkes-Barre and Hanover Township. Existing project. The four projects consist of levee, sheet piling, floodwall, and associated interior drainage structures along both banks of the Susquehanna River which provide flood control benefits estimated at $42.6 million annually. The proposed remedial measures to protect against levee failure under future high discharge conditions consist of: weighted filter drains on the landside of the levees to protect against erosion due to seepage in certain areas; stability berms and toe protection on the riverside of the levees in certain areas to stabilize the riverbank and protect against erosion due to river flows; stabilization of sheet piling in certain areas; and additional relief wells to control the underseepage in other areas. Local cooperation. Lands and relocations for construction of the existing projects at an estimated cost of $1,000,000 were provided by the Boroughs of Kingston, Edwardsville, Plymouth, the City of Wilkes-Barre, Hanover Township, and Luzerne County. These entities also operate and maintain the existing projects. Updated assurances have been obtained during the ongoing preparation of the General Design Memorandum. Additional local costs in connection with the proposed remedial work are expected to be minor and are being addressed during preparation of the General Design Memorandum. Operations and results during fiscal year. General Design Memorandum studies were initiated, and FY 1982 costs were $667,635. 41. YORK, INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA Location. On Codorus Creek 10 miles above its confluence with main Susquehanna River. Codorus Creek with its tributary branches in York County in south and central parts of Pennsylvania (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, "Pennsylvania- York and Hanover.") Existing project. Construction of Indian Rock Dam, an earth and rockfill dam about 1,000 feet long at top, rising 83 feet above the streambed, with a reservoir providing for controlled storage of 28,000 acre-feet at elevation of spillway crest. Dam is on main branch of Codorus Creek about 3 miles above York. Outlet works are in right abutment and uncontrolled spillway is 'on right bank, discharging upstream from tunnel outlet. Reservoir will control entire drainage area of main branch of Codorus Creek and 41 percent of drainage area above York. Plan also provides for improvements in Codorus Creek Channel in vicinity of and through City of York for about 22,969 feet extending from 300 feet above Richland Avenue to a point downstream from Pennsylvania Railroad crossing known as Black Bridge. Improvements, which will increase channel capacity to 24,000 cubic feet per second, include widening and deepening channel, constructing bank protection, removing York Roller Mill Dam, and construction of a low water channel about 3,900 feet long in vicinity of York Roller Mill Dam. Cost of new work for completed project was $5,061,167, of which $4,566,446 (regular funds) and $11,588 (emergency relief funds) were for construction and $483,133 (regular funds) was for lands and damages. 4-18 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Boundary monumentation contract awarded on July 20, 1982 with an anticipated completion date of June 1983. 42. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Projects in New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, District of Columbia, and Virginia were inspected during the period by hired labor. See Table 4-I. 43. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Operations and results during fiscal year. The operation of George B. Stevenson Dam, PA, was coordinated with the operation of Alvin R. Bush, Curwensville, and Foster Joseph Sayers Dams in the West Branch Susquehanna River Basin in order to secure optimum flood control benefits from the system operation. Costs during the period were $21,410. Supplemental instructions for the operation of Savage River Dam, MD, were provided, during periods of high water, to insure maximum protection for downstream localities. Costs during the period were $43,266. 44. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs were $146,635 for the Disaster Preparedness Program and $17,194 for the Advance Measures at Forty-Fort, PA. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $153,489 for Conklin-Kirkwood, NY. Nonstructural study and $24,632 for Swatara Creek, Pine Grove, PA. Water Supply 45. POTOMAC ESTUARY PILOT WATER TREATMENT PLANT, DC Location. The project is located in Washington, DC, on the north side of the District of Columbia's Water Pollution Control Plant (Blue Plains), about 600 feet east of the Potomac River shoreline. Existing project. The project consists of a water treatment plant with a maximum capacity of one million gallons per day that includes advanced treatment processes and an evaluation laboratory. Local cooperation. On June 28, 1977 the Government of the District of Columbia issued a real estate permit for the construction of the pilot plant on 1.5 acres of land available at the Blue Plains wastewater treatment facility in Washington, DC. A review during preconstruction planning determined that cost sharing for the pilot plant by local governmental entities is not required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: The two year operation and evaluation program which was initiated on March 16, 1981 is proceeding as scheduled. The plant remains fully operational and data from eighteen months of operation has been collected and analyzed. Work remaining includes six months of testing and evaluation at the plant; preparation of a final report on the feasibility of using the Potomac Estuary as a source of potable water supply; and plant deactivation. 46. WASHINGTON AQUEDUCT Location. The diversion dam and raw water supply intakes at Great Falls, the two collecting conduits, part of Dalecarlia receiving reservoir, the booster pumping station, and the Little Falls raw water pumping station are located in Maryland. All other structures of the water supply system including parts of the raw water collecting system, two purification plants, pumping stations, storage reservoirs, and transmission mains are in the District of Columbia. Federal owned water mains are maintained in Virginia and Maryland. Existing project. Control of the water supply system is vested in Chief of Engineers (See Acts of March 3, 1859, and March 2, 1867, November 22, 1973 and Sec. 1800 of Revised Statutes). The project includes: administration; operation and maintenance of the collection, purification, pumping, and transmission facilities; protection of the water supply system; engineering; and construction of major water system additions and improvements. Authority to supply water to Arlington County, the City of Falls Church, and other jurisdictions in Virginia is contained in Public Law 119, 69th Congress, approved April 14, 1926; and Public Law 118, 80th Congress, June 26, 1947. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-19 of the Fiscal Year 1981 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year: New Work: The status of construction work authorized with "no year" funds at the end of FY 82 was 25 percent complete for the Water Treatment Plant Wastewater Disposal and 30 percent complete for the McMillan Water Treatment Plant Replacement. Maintenance (operation): An uninterrupted and adequate supply of purified water was furnished to the District of Columbia; Arlington County, and Falls Church, Virginia; and to Federal establishments in the District of Columbia, Arlington County, Virginia and Montgomery and Prince Georges Counties in Maryland. Total consumption for Fiscal Year 1982 was 74,798 million gallons; the maximum daily consumption was 261 million gallons and average daily consumption was 204.9 million gallons. The amount furnished Arlington County and Falls Church, Virginia was 38.4 million gallons per day. The Corps of Engineers was reimbursed in the amount of $3,485,900 for water furnished to the Virginia communities by the Washington Aqueduct. The treatment water, delivered to the 1.1 million consumers served by the Washington Aqueduct, met or surpassed all Water Quality standards promulgated by the U.S. En- 4-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 vironmental Protection Agency under the Safe Drinking Water Act (P.L. 93-523). General Investigations 47. SURVEYS Costs for the period were $3,180,886 of which $11,571 was for navigation studies, $518,733 for flood damage prevention studies, $2,302,179 for special studies, $150,578 for comprehensive basin studies, $155,944 for coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests, and $41,881 for supplemental preauthorization (Phase I) studies. 48. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for flood plain management activities and general planning guidance during the period was $178,141. Providing assistance and guidance to local interests on methods and procedures for preventing and reducing flood damages was in progress at end of fiscal year. The national program of inspection of dams, authorized by Public Law 92-367, was administratively completed in fiscal year 1982. Fiscal year expenditures under this program totaled $127,437 of which $88,246 was for inspection of dams and $39,189 was for inventory of dams. 49. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING The City of Harrisburg, Dauphin County, PA, lies on the left bank of the Susquehanna River and is located 115 miles north of Washington, DC, 195 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA, and 170 miles southwest of New York City, NY. Continuation of planning and engineering is proceeding under the authority of the Susquehanna River Basin Study. The plan of improvement for the South Harrisburg area includes a floodwall 3800 feet long, a pump station and floodgates for interior drainage, a dry detention dam along Asylum Run (a small tributary of Paxton Creek), an enlarged earth and concrete channel for Paxton Creek about four miles long, and minor recreation and fish and wildlife facilities. Preparation of a combined General Design Memorandum *was initiated during the fiscal year. Estimated planning and engineering cost is $2,900,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $373,222. 50. ADVANCED ENGINEERING AND DESIGN The existing Francis E. Walter Dam is located in northeastern Pennsylvania on the Lehigh River between White Haven and Stoddartsville about 0.4 mile below the mouth of Bear Creek about 60 miles above the confluence of the Lehigh River and Delaware River at Easton, PA. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Stoddartsville, PA.) The project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1962, P.L. 87-874 dated October 23, 1962. The plan of improvement would provide for modifying the existing single purpose flood control project by raising the existing dam 29 feet thereby adding water supply and recreation purposes. Preparation of the combined General Design Memorandum continued during the fiscal year. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $6,000,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $868,994. 4-20 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT TABLE 4-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 1. Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD and VA 2. Baltimore Harbor MD Collection & Removal of Drift 3. Black Walnut Harbor, MD 4. Bonum Creek, VA 5. Duck Point Cove, MD 6. Fishing Creek, MD 7. Herring Bay & Rockhold Creek, MD 8. Honga River and Tar Bay, (Barren Island Gaps), MD 9. Knapps Narrows, MD 10. Little Wicomico River, VA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp.. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contrib. Approp. Cost 160,000 233,939 203,8802 211,608' 161,000 160,268 25,000 86,190 4,287,438' 3,799,863' 197,089 198,013 4,171 4,171 5,879,000 5,892,023 2,795,1098 3,277,146' 151,300 150,241 22,906 21,019 5,800 5,800 25,906 25,906 8,594 8,594 196 17,174 17,174 306,902 306,902 12,339 12,339 15,000 14,358 33,997 33,677 3,626,3498 2,657,421' 44,326,7121 44,317,1021 31,705,86010 30,729,27610 248,200 2,467,210 240,536 2,456,970 - 32,631 - 32,631 319,914 412,349 321,801 412,349 115,595 115,595 202,00011 202,000 144,576 144,576 - 25,289 - 25,289 229,000 293,964 219,749 284,072 - 111,242 - 111,242 54,000 540,563 39,604 526,167 - - 50,591 - - 50,591 45,075 276,485 435,036 42,813 273,267 429,556 - - 66,11912 - - 66,11912 57,881 1,397,000 2,366,684 55,917 882,730 1,850,449 - - 46,12118 - - 46,12118 55,608 332,992 1,274,126 54,261 334,339 1,274,126 - - 81,88514 - - 81,88514 54,390 277,244 825,374 54,133 277,499 825,373 - 22,000 22,000 - 22,000 22,000 4-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 11. Lowes Wharf, MD 12. Monroe Bay and Creek, VA 13. Muddy Hook/ Tyler Cove, MD 14. Neale Sound, MD 15. Northeast River, MD 16. Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD 17. Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, DC, Collection & Removal of Drift 18. Prevention of Obstructions & Injurious Deposits, Baltimore Harbor, MD 19. Rhodes Point to Tylerton, MD New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contrib. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 35,707 35,707 9,806 9,806 3,825 3,825 4,141 4,141 555,955 556,101 335,285 332,502 191,225 191,225 383,859 383,859 339,308 403,024 248,254 248,254 13,354 12,153 11,600 11,600 51,904 49,742 10,500 10,500 801,000 797,873 468,300 452,506 306,300 306,191 20,000 16,121 97,127 98,328 213,500 68,123 28,750 28,750 156,929 159,091 33,391 33,390 21,000 21,000 74,829 74,829 12,460 12,460 197,741 197,741 64,001 64,001 232,202 86,825 28,750 28,750 12,60015 12,6001" 289,770 289,770 28,48916 28,48916 172,044 172,044 - 350,193"7 - 350,19317 557,500 6,169,908 480,186 6,089,467 459,800 4,555,175 467,292 4,546,873 284,000 4,159,040 243,179 4,118,110 335,000 74,181 355,000 90,302 231,424 231,424 4-22 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 20. Rock Hall Harbor, MD 21. Slaughter Creek, MD 22. St. Jeromes Creek, MD 23. Tilghman Island Harbor, MD 24. Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare, MD 25. Washington Harbor, DC 26. Wicomico River, MD 29. Colonial Beach, VA 30. Bloomington Lake, North Branch Potomac River MD & WV New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contrib. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contrib. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contrib. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 36,000 32,600 579 579 84,000 85,596 20,262 20,262 700,000 343,219 715,000 240,000 18,708 18,708 137,178 137,093 11,137 9,936 45,000 33,845 367,473 367,473 51,132 51,132 20,172 20,717 443,362 442,111 34,835 34,498 81,182 81,182 148,952 151,063 26,534,000 27,230,000 29,216,325 26,746,695 - 10,000 - 3,990 31,000 28,444 844,000 831,869 110,000 72,424 18,197,000 16,978,570 311,100 316,897 213,000 1,338,16018 531,802 1,294,54418 - 75,08819 - 75,08819 - 715,000 437,000 677,000 - 4,140 - 4,140 122,000 389,572 115,532 383,018 - 44,35720 - 44,35720 259,652 371,386 257,787 368,319 110,000 291,83021 50,439 217,80521 - 368,306 - 368-306 - 193,175 - 193,175 767,885 1,855,242 768,221 1,855,242 - 3,191,07722 - 3,191,00722 581,750 4,499,71423,24 109,910 4,025,31923,24 - 471,609 ' - 471,6092" 822,079 4,274,00628 330,789 3,770,58626 22,000 22,000 21,999 21,999 370,000 350,926 480,000 370,299 1,750,000 2,928,555 611,500 599,866 568,000 511,138 480,000 370,299 172,792,300 171,826,207 932,600 920,753 4-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 31. Bull Run, PA 32. Cumberland, MD and Ridgeley, WV 33. Fourmile Run, VA 34A. Aylesworth Creek Lake, PA 35. Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, PA 36A. Addison, NY 36B. Almond Lake, NY 36C. Arkport Dam, NY 36D. Avoca, NY 36E. Binghamton, NY New Work Approp. Cost Contrib. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contrib. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 105,466 260,000 34,376 34,376 8,625,000 10,396,272 715,633 822,059 5,200 28,700 54,147 53,538 249,000 1,054,116 1,349,159 1,370,264 15,575 15,575 141,767 140,381 53,398 54,384 15,289 15,289 16,142 16,142 -350,000 1,473,000 973,795 1,052,535 - -260,000 106,000 -106,000 28,591 11,591 3,374,000 3,334,501 716,566 737,930 153,335 83,214 111,363 1,249,700 1,243,020 9,981 9,981 167,543 166,122 54,439 55,397 10,225 10,225 17,197 17,197 37,900 52,363 -60,000 2,842,000 317,073 2,743,859 - 15,633,97027,28 - 15,633,97027,28 54,000 412,699 54,281 410,443 666,000 2,735,000 51,937,300 616,904 2,272,844 51,321,152 - - 2,924,842 67,299 - 2,924,842 49,700 119,729 - 2,320,400 - 2,320,400 55,400 609,177 48,757 601,833 - - 77,408,700 - - 77,408,700 1,503,300 1,934,238 9,369,739 1,348,765 2,053,846 9,307,996 21,377 14,814 122,600 124,646 165,700 151,227 23,100 22,911 27,900 25,193 - 827,050 - 827,050 20,600 117,906 27,109 117,852 - 5,760,211 - 5,760,211 233,600 2,027,568 221,471 2,014,316 - 1,910,00029 - 1,910,00029 118,400 1,053,311 126,940 1,046,378 - 436,37480 - 436,37480 23,400 22,701 298,635 297,747 - 2,952,00081 - 2,952,0008" 11,100 297,981 13,726 297,900 4-24 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 36F. Canisteo, NY 36G. Corning, NY 36H. East Sidney Lake, NY 361. Elmira, NY 36J. Hornell, NY 36K. Lisle, NY 36L. Oxford, NY 36M. Whitney Point Lake, NY 36N. Whitney Point Village, NY 37. Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 25,506 25,183 22,751 25,001 147,627 146,521 16,871 5,231 5,231 126,369 92,008 15,900 15,900 10,464 10,464 263,368 269,145 12,728 12,728 98,948 98,203 21,561 24,134 24,606 24,606 149,088 149,174 12,519 12,519 664,200 277,799 28,081 28,081 8,536 8,536 122,667 117,866 10,582 10,582 88,204 88,943 41,100 38,538 43,900 43,881 151,500 153,272 -5,000 18,100 13,994 60,800 481,037 32,300 30,241 21,624 21,624 161,500 167,763 22,900 18,780 111,000 111,920 - 1,183,11192 - 1,183,11182 37,681 474,861 38,020 472,038 - 3,322,00099 - 3,322,0009" 44,300 498,758 41,993 496,432 - 6,049,504 - 6,049,504 187,600 2,207,601 172,623 2,192,469 - 6,883,305 - 6,883,305 15,700 167,149 16,342 163,685 - 4,558,69894 - 4,558,698" 148,419 2,314,812 150,972 2,314,590 35,700 33,824 12,400 9,863 661,1993b 661,199"8 548,322 544,387 131,00036 131,00038 144,732 142,195 - 5,421,539 - 5,421,539 235,900 2,620,997 195,765 2,579,993 24,700 25,794 424,096 424,096 225,261 222,235 - 5,725,700 - 5,725,700 114,500 1,270,569 111,732 1,267,684 4-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 38A. Cowanesque Lake, PA 38B. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA 39A. Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA 39B. Curwensville Lake, PA 39C. Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA 40. Wyoming Valley, PA 41. York, Indian Rock Dam, PA 45. Potomac Estuary Pilot Water Treatment Plant, DC New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 24,490,000 10,913,000 2,878,000 28,866,737 10,679,151 2,438,893 - 90,700 481,200 - 82,245 482,553 11,710,000 16,455,618 456,325 440,151 155,381 148,574 309,555 301,301 266,048 46,249 191,874 203,717 7,455,000 7,194,556 646,324 656,397 135,880 142,132 510,821 519,199 331,200 266,444 279,952 281,082 355,000 292,233 819,900 817,049 200,600 200,761 236,400 232,284 314,000 383,567 248,100 248,152 270,000 1,040,052 675,350 680,662 -30,000 286,038 1,095,864 1,019,593 106,030,700 105,794,551 1,247,250 1,245,460 185,899,800 185,516,895 3,170,665 3,085,256 - 7,103,001 - 7,103,001 330,300 2,347,712 237,872 2,253,945 - 20,396,060 - 20,396,060 543,000 4,104,298 546,095 4,101,835 - 30,887,063x" - 30,887,063x" 345,547 3,151,062 342,872 3,147,771 800,000 1,120,0008 667,635 987,63539 5,061,16740 - 5,061,167'0 290,700 3,117,073' 1 267,909 3,093,12141 2,506,000 2,100,000 3,500,000 4,200,000 18,196,000 2,916,639 1,891,094 3,193,963 4,570,942 17,434,580 1. Includes $8,764,003 for previous projects. 2. Includes -$12 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 3. Includes $3,300 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 4. Includes $32,000 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 5. Includes $30,931 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 6. Includes $14,109 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 7. Includes $15,177 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 8. Includes $1,663,300 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 9. Includes $696,090 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 10. Includes $399,802 for previous projects. 11. Excludes $3,998 contributed funds. 12. Excludes $2,200 contributed and includes $27,668 emergency relief funds. 13. Includes $46,121 public works funds. 14. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 15. Excludes $1,000 contributed funds. 16. Includes $20,640 for previous projects. 17. Includes $283,008 public works funds and $67,185 emergency, relief funds; excludes $500,000 contributed funds. 18. Includes $87,757 for previous project. 19. Includes $9,762 for previous project. 20. Includes $26,500 for previous project. 21. Includes $30 for previous project and excludes $14,200 contributed funds. 22. Includes $3,029,001 for previous project. 4-26 1 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT 23. Includes $1,831,609 for previous project. 24. Excludes $4,000 for emergency dredging under provisions of Section 3, 1945 River and Harbor Act. 25. Includes $50,000 for previous project and excludes $14,000 contributed funds. 26. Excludes $33,000 contributed funds. 27. Includes $49,998 emergency relief funds. 28. Excludes $1,402,001 contributed funds and $197,513 public works acceleration funds. 29. Includes $62,577 emergency relief funds. 30. Includes $109,944 emergency relief funds. 31. Excludes $163,096 contributed funds. 32. Includes $207,520 rehabilitation funds. 33. Excludes $34,729 contributed funds. 34. Includes $250,899 emergency relief funds and excludes $15,000 contributed funds. 35. Includes $71,557 emergency relief funds. 36. Includes $73,465 emergency relief funds. 37. Excludes $263,900 contributed funds in accordance with the Tri-party Agreement for construction of sanitary system for public use. 38. Excludes $1,125,000 for Phase I under General Investigations beginning October 1, 1978. 39. Excludes $1,106,083 for Phase I under General Investigations beginning October 1, 1978. 40. Includes $11,588 emergency relief funds. 41. Includes $15,000 for deferred maintenance. TABLE 4-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS, MD and VA Aug. 8, Branch channel 35 feet deep to head of Curtis Bay, and one 35 feet deep and H. Doc. 799, 1917 400 feet wide from Fort McHenry to Port Covington entrance channel, 64th Cong., 1st sess. thence 150 feet wide to Ferry Bar, and thence 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Hanover Street Bridge, widen approaches and bends, and enlarge anchorage basin near entrance. Inclusion of Patapsco River and tributaries into one project for Baltimore Harbor.2 Jan. 21, Change in location of anchorage near upper end of Fort McHenry Channel. 1927 Jul. 3, Increased anchorage facilities. Rivers and Harbors 1930 Committee Doc. 11, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Jul. 3, For 37-foot depth in that portion of channel to Baltimore lying between 37-foot H. Doc. 86, 85th 1930 depth curve near Baltimore Light to Sparrows Point entrance channel; widen Cong., 1st sess. angle between Fort McHenry and Ferry Bar Section; and for width of 400 feet in Curtis Bay section. Oct. 17, For 22-, 18-, and 15-foot channels in Curtis Creek from 22-foot depth below Adopted as a national 1940 Pennington Ave. Bridge to upper end of marginal wharf of U.S. Ordnance defense project. (No Depot. printed report.) Mar. 2, Uniform main channel 39-feet deep from the ocean through York Spit section H. Doc. 741, 1945 - and Craighill entrance to Fort McHenry, additional anchorage area, 2,400 79th Cong., 2nd sess. feet long, 1,200 feet wide, and 30 feet deep; a connecting channel 400 feet wide and 27 feet deep from Cutoff Brewerton Angle in main channel to Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay; a channel in Curtis Creek 200 feet wide and 35 feet deep from head of existing 35-foot project channel in Curtis Bay to a point in the creek about 750 feet below Pennington Ave. Bridge. Mar. 2, A channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 22-foot depth curve south of In accordance with 1945 Baltimore & Ohio R.R. bridge about 2,800 feet to vicinity of Arundel Cove, plans on file in the thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for about 2,100 feet; with an anchorage Office, Chief of basin about 700 feet square adjacent to channel southwesterly of Coast Engineers. Guard wharf. 4-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents July. 3, Main channel 42 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide in Cape Henry section at 1958 entrance to Chesapeake Bay and in York Spit section; 42 feet deep and 800 feet wide in Rappahannock Spit section and in approach channel to Baltimore Harbor from Craighill entrance to Fort McHenry, with widening at entrance and bends; channels 42 feet deep and 600 feet wide in Curtis Bay and Ferry Bar sections of harbor; a connecting channel 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide from main channel to approach channel to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal; and for three disjointed sections of channels of same depth and width in Chesapeake Bay leading to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal; and to provide Federal maintenance of 39-foot depth in Northwest Branch, in areas dredged to that depth by local interests. Dec. 31, Deepening of the Cape Henry Channel to 50 feet at the existing width of 1970 1,000 feet, with widening at bends; deepening of the Spit Channel to 50 feet at the existing width of 1,000 feet, with widening at bends; enlargement of the Rappahannock Shoal Channel to a depth of 50 feet and a width of 1,000 feet; deepening of the main ship channel from Chesapeake Bay to Fort McHenry to a depth of 50 feet at the existing width of 800 feet, with widening at bends and at the Craighill Entrance; deepening of the Curtis Bay Channel to a depth of 50 feet at the existing width of 600 feet, and deepening of the 950-foot wide and 980-foot long turning basin at the head of channel to the same depth; deepening of the Northwest Branch-East Channel to a depth of 49 feet from the depth existing at the time of construction at a width of 600 feet, and deepening of the 950-foot wide and 950-foot long turning basin at the head of the channel to the same depth; and deepening and extension of the Northwest Branch-West Channel to a depth of 40 feet from the depth existing at the time of construction, at a width of 600 feet, and with an irregularly shaped turning basin at the head of the channel 40 feet deep and about 2,000 feet long with a maximum width of 1,150 feet. BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD-COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Jun. 30, Collection and removal of drift from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary 1948 waters. BLACK WALNUT HARBOR, MD Mar. 2, A channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide to and including an anchorage basin 1945 of same depth 400 feet square. May 12, 1966 Sec. 107 Jul. 14, 1960 BONUM CREEK, VA A channel 60 feet wide and 6 feet deep from that depth in the Potomac River to and including an anchorage basin of the same depth, 160 feet wide and 200 feet long. Protection of the entrance channel on both sides by jetties. The north jetty is about 700 feet long and south jetty is about 300 feet long. DUCK POINT COVE, MD Mar. 2, A channel 60 feet wide and 6 feet deep, from that depth in Fox Creek to a 1945 mooring basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 300 feet long, roughly parallel to county road at head of waterway. FISHING CREEK, MD Aug. 26, A channel 7 feet deep with widths of 100 feet and 60 feet from deep water in 1937 Chesapeake Bay to an anchorage of the same depth, 120 feet wide and 400 feet long, located in the marsh 500 feet above the mouth of the creek and twin stone jetties at the entrance. HERRING BAY & ROCKHOLD CREEK, MD Jul. 3, A channel 60 feet wide, 5 feet deep, from the 6-foot contour in Herring Bay to 1930 the 3-foot contour in Rockhold Creek. Jun. 20, For the present project channel dimensions, 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide, the 1938 turning basin 7 feet deep, and a stone breakwater 900 feet long. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 181, 94th Cong., 1st sess. River and Harbor Act of 1948. H. Doc, 217, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Detailed Project Report, August 1965 H. Doc. 241, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 241, 75th Cong., 1st sess. River and Harbors Committee Doc. 34, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 595, 75th Cong., 3rd sess. 4-28 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents HONGA RIVER AND TAR BAY (BARREN ISLAND GAPS), MD Aug. 30, Channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from the 7-foot contour in Chesapeake 1935 Bay through Tar Bay and Fishing Creek to the 7-foot contour in Honga River. Jun. 30, Modification providing for a channel in Back Creek 7 feet deep and 60 feet 1948 wide from the 7-foot depth curve in Honga River to a point near the head of Back Creek, with a turning basin of the same depth, 150 feet long and 200 feet wide. KNAPPS NARROWS, MD Aug. 30, A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water, 75 feet wide, widened at the bends 1935 from deep water in Chesapeake Bay to dqep water in Harris Creek, MD, with a turning basin west of the drawbridge, 7 feet deep at mean low water, about 320 feet long and 120 feet wide. Project channel was authorized by the Public Works Administration September 16, 1933 and later adopted by 1935 River and Harbor Act. LITTLE WICOMICO RIVER, VA Aug. 30, A channel 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Potomac River to deep water in 1935 Little Wicomico River; two stone jetties 1,000 feet and 1,300 feet long at the entrance; and 1,004 linear feet of timber bulkhead to stabilize the dredged inner channel. LOWES WHARF, MD Sep. 3, A channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep at mean low water from the 7-foot 1954 depth curve in Ferry Cove and to including a basin of the same depth, 200 feet wide and 300 feet long on the south side of Lowes Wharf. MONROE BAY AND CREEK, VA Jul. 3, A channel 8 feet deep, 100 wide, and 950 feet long, through the bar at the 1930 entrance, and within the creek a channel 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 2,500 feet long, with turning and anchorage basin 500 feet wide at upper end. MUDDY HOOKITYLER COVE, MD Dec. 4, 1964 Sec. 107 Jul. 14, 1960 An entrance channel 60 feet wide and 6 feet deep from that depth in Honga River to and including an anchorage basin of same depth, 160 feet wide and 400 feet long, in Fishing Creek into Tyler Cove and includes an anchorage basin 200 feet wide, 250 feet long and 6 feet deep. NEALE SOUND, MD Aug. 26, Channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide through lower entrance into Wicomico 1937 River and a second channel 6 feet deep at upper entrance extending from deep water within the sound through a marshy barrier at head of Cobb Island to deep water in the Potomac with widths of 60 feet within the sound and 80 feet elsewhere. NORTHEAST RIVER, MD Aug. 26, Channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in the river to the foot 1937 of Church Street in the town of North East, enlarged at its upper end to form a basin 120 feet wide and 300 feet long. OCEAN CITY HARBOR & INLET & SINEPUXENT BAY, MD Aug. 30, Construction of an inlet between the Atlantic Ocean and Sinepuxent Bay, 1935 s 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide, protected by jetties; a channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the inlet to Ocean City, 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Green Point, and 100 feet wide into Chincoteague Bay. Aug. 30, Modification providing a 10-foot by 100-foot channel from the inlet to the 19354 west side of the bay with 2 turning basins; a channel 6 feet deep and 125 feet wide from the inlet channel to opposite North 8th Street, Ocean City, and 75feet wide into Isle of Wight Bay. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 35, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 580, 80th Cong., 2nd sess.1 H. Doc. 308, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 24, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 90, 82d Cong., 1st sess.1 H. Doc, 172, 70th Cong., 1st sess.' Detailed Project Report, May 1964 H. Doc. 159, 75th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 248, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 60, 74th Cong., 1st sess. 4-29 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Sep. 3, Modification providing for raising the north jetty to an elevation 9 feet above 19456 mean low water, and a channel 300 feet wide and 16 feet deep from the ocean through the inlet to the Isle of Wight Bay channel, thence 200 feet to the project harbor, and a depth of 14 feet in the project harbor. Channel depths refer to project datum. POTOMAC & ANACOSTIA RIVERS, DC-COLLECTION & REMOVAL OF DRIFT Oct. 27, Collection and removal of drift from waters of the Potomac and Anacostia 1965 Rivers and their tributaries in the Washington, D.C. area from the head of the tidewater to Mount Vernon, Virginia. PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS & INJURIOUS DEPOSITS, BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD Aug. 28, Continuous patrol and inspection of Baltimore Harbor, Chesapeake Bay, and 1958 its tributaries to prevent and detect violations, and issue permits as required for transporting and depositing waste materials in navigable waters. (The project is limited to the tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries that lie within the State of Maryland.) RHODES POINT TO TYLERTON, MD Jan. 22, 1982 Sec. 107 Jul. 14, 1960 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug 1, 1968 Sec. 107 Jul. 14, 1960 A channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide at mean low water from the northern limit of existing Rhodes Point to Tylerton Federal navigation channel, a distance of about one mile, through Sheep Pen Gut to deep water in the Chesapeake Bay. A channel 4 feet deep at mean low water and 50 feet wide from Tylerton to Rhodes Point via Rhodes Point Gut. Modification providing for a channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from that depth in Tyler Creek to and including an anchorage basin of the same depth 150 feet wide and 400 feet long at Tylerton; channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from that depth in Shanks Creek to and including an anchorage basin of the same depth 100 feet wide and 400 feet long at Rhodes Point; channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from that depth in Big Thorofare River to Tylerton; channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from Rhodes Point to Tylerton. ROCK HALL HARBOR, MD Aug. 26, Channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in Swan Point Inlet to a 1937 channel of the same dimensions, 700 feet in length parallel to the harbor terminals at Rock Hall; an anchorage basin of the same depth 100 feet wide and about 800 feet long in northwesterly extension of the channel fronting the harbor terminals; and twin breakwaters at the harbor entrance. Jun. 30, Deepening the approach channel to 10 feet and widening to 100 feet from the 1948 10-foot contour in Swan Creek Inlet to the existing channel parellel to the harbor terminals; deepening to 10 feet and widening to 100 feet the existing channel parallel to the harobr terminals; deepening to 10 feet the eastern 250 feet of the present basin; deepening to 8 feet the western 350 feet of the present basin; and a new anchorage basin 600 feet long, 200 feet wide and 8 feet deep attached to and extending from the west end of the existing basin. May 29, Raising the existing west and east breakwaters from four feet to seven feet 1980 above mean low water and extending the west breakwater 400 feet at an Sec. 107 elevation of seven feet above mean low water; relocating the existing entrance Jul. 14, channel at a depth of 8 feet and width of 100 feet; a new channel, 8 feet deep 1960 and 100 feet wide, from the new entrance channel to the existing anchorage basin; a new channel, 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from the end of the existing channel near the County wharf to and including an anchorage basin, 250 feet square, in the eastern end of the harbor. 17. 4-30 H. Doc. 444, 82d Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 286, 89th Cong., 1st sess. River and Harbor Act, June 29, 1888 as amended by Public Law 85-802, dated August 28, 1958. Detailed Project Report, June 1981 H. Doc. 51, 82d Cong., 1st sess.1 Detailed Project Report, February 1968 H. Doc. 204, 75 Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 273, 80th Cong., 1st sess.' Detailed Project Report, December, 1978 18. 19. 20. BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents SLAUGHTER CREEK, MD Jul. 25, A channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide at mean low water through the bar at 1912 the mouth, a distance of about one-third of a mile, the lower end of the section extending about 900 feet into Little Choptank River. ST. JEROMES CREEK, MD Aug. 26, A channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide at Airedele, thence 7 feet deep and 60 1937 feet wide to deep water in the creek, with a turning basin of the same depth 200 feet wide and 300 feet long opposite Airedele. 23. May 13, 1966 Sec. 107 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 20, 1980 Sec. 107 Jul. 14, 1960 TILGHMAN ISLAND HARBOR, MD A channel 60 feet wide and 6 feet deep from that depth in Harris Creek to and including two anchorage basins of the same depth, 300 feet by 70 feet and 500 feet by an average width of 110 feet. Modification to provide for construction of a breakwater at the harbor entrance. TWITCH COVE AND BIG THOROFARE, MD Jul. 25, A channel 4 feet deep and 25 feet wide from Tangier Sound into Big Thorofare 1912 River, and one of same dimensions around point between said river and Tyler River. Jul. 3, A channel 5 feet deep at mean low water and 25 feet wide from Twitch Cove 1930 on Tangier Sound through Big Thorofare River to a point on Levering Creek about 800 feet north of canal at Ewell, MD. Aug. 30, A channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from Twitch Cove through Big 1935 Thorofare River to a point on Levering Creek about 800 feet north of canal at Ewell, MD. Jun. 20, 1938 Present project dimensions of main channel with twin jetties at entrance. May 17, Anchorage basin.7 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 700 feet long on west side of 1950 project channel at Ewell, Md., and an extension of existing project channel in Levering Creek, 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long. WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC Aug. 30, Provides for: (a) Virginia Channel, from Giesboro Point to area for 25,000 1935 square feet; (b) Washington Channel, from Haines Point to head of Washington Channel, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide; (c) Anacostia River from Giesboro Point to Anacostia Bridge, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with turning basin 800 feet wide and about 2,400 feet long of same depth opposite Naval Weapons Plant; (d) Anacostia River from Anacostia Bridge 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide to turning basin 400 feet square of same depth at foot of 15th Street S.E. Channel lengths including turning basins are: Virginia Channel, 25,000 feet; Washington Channel, 10,000 feet; and Anacostia River, 15,000 feet; and (e) operation and maintenance of inlet gates and lock and outlet gates of Tidal Basin constructed under a previous project to flush Washington Channel. 26. Sep. 19, 1890 WICOMICO RIVER, MD Channel 9 feet deep from Main Street Bridge to about 2 miles below. Jun. 25, Extend 9-foot depth into north prong from Main Street Bridge to the Salisbury 1910 Dam and turning basin. 22. 4-31 21. H. Doc. 87, 62nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 174, 75th Cong., 1st sess. 1 Detailed Project Report, August 1965. Detailed Project Report, July 1980. H. Doc. 285, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 313, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 67, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 49, 75th Cong., 2d sess.1 H. Doc. 340, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 22, 74th Cong., 1st sess. 2 H. Doc. 20, 51st Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report 1890, p. 947. H. Doc. 569, 61st Cong., 2d sess. 24. 25. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, Extend 9-foot depth into south prong to head of navigation at Cathell St., 1919 including a turning basin, and extend project down to mouth of river in Monie Bay. Jul. 3, A 12-foot channel below the Main Street Bridge. 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 A 14-foot channel, 150 feet wide; depths of 14 feet in the north and south prongs and a basin 6 feet deep at Webster Cove and approach channel thereto of the same depth. Sep. 3, Enlarge existing basin at Webster Cove, by dredging an extension 6 feet deep, 1954 100 feet wide, and 200 feet long on each side of existing basin to form a T-shaped harbor. COLONIAL BEACH, VA Sep. 15, Extending and widening the existing Central Beach area, stabilizing the 1980 bank behind the beachfill with vegetation, and constructing four segments of offshore breakwater; and extending and widening of the existing Castle Beach area, constructing three segments of offshore breakwater, removing debris in the beachfill area, and constructing a 100-foot long terminal groin at the southern end of Castlewood Park beachfill. Oct. 23, 1962 BLOOMINGTON LAKE, MD & WV Construction of Bloomington Lake project. BULL RUN, PA Dec. 2, Consists of an impervious core incorporated in the proposed highway embank- 1976 ment of the Williamsport Beltway to utilize it as a levees, closure structures, pumping stations and tie-back levees. Jun. 22, 1936 Jul. 24, 1946 Jun. 25, 1970 Jul. 17, 1970 Mar. 7, 1974 CUMBERLAND, MD AND RIDGELEY, WV Levees, retaining walls, movable dam, and channel clearing for Cumberland, West Cumberland and South Cumberland, MD, and Ridgeley, WV Levees, wall, channel improvement, remove Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Dam and construct new industrial dam. FOURMILE RUN, VA Construction of a levee and floodwall protection system with associated interior drainage facilities, an improved channel, and replacement of two highway and four railroad bridges. Modification providing for channel capacity of 27,000 c.f.s.; increase channel bottom widths along Fourmile Run; deletion of pumping stations, ponding areas, and levees, except for a short levee on Long Branch; and the addition of recreation as a project feature. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA Oct. 23, Construction of Aylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local protection 1962 works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, Pennsylvania. Oct. 23, 1962 June 22, 1936 modified by Acts of June 28, 1938; RAYSTOWN LAKE, RAYSTOWN BRANCH, JUNIATA RIVER, PA Construction of dam and appurtenant facilities. SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Construction of detention reservoirs and related flood control works for protection of Binghamton, Hornell, Corning and other towns in New York and Pennsylvania. H. Doc. 1509, 63rd Cong., 3rd sess. Senate Committee Print, 75th Cong., 3rd sess.1 H. Doc. 619, 81st Cong., 2d sess.' Detailed Project Report, May, 1980 H. Doc. 469, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Detailed Project Report October 1976. H. Doc. 101, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. Report on file in Office, Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 358, 91st Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 141, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 565, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2d sess. 4-32 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 18, 1941; Dec. 22, 1944; May 17, 1950; and Jul. 3, 1958 37. STILLWATER LAKE, LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Aug. 18, Construction of a flood control reservoir. H. Doc. 702, 1941 77th Cong., 2d sess. 38. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY AND PA Jul. 3, Construction of Cowanesque and Tioga-Hammond reservoirs, local flood H. Doc. 394, 1958 protection works at Elkland, PA, and Nichols, NY and channel improve- 84th Cong., 2d sess. ment at Cortland, NY Oct. 22, Modification in connection with the construction of Cowanesque Lake to 1976 relocate the Town of Nelson, PA, to a new townsite. 39. WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA Sep. 3, Construction of three flood control reservoirs. H. Doc. 29, 1954 84th Cong., 1st sess. 40. WYOMING VALLEY, PA Oct. 22, Authorized the phase I design memorandum stage of advance engineering H. Doc. 482, 1976 and design. 94th Cong., 2d sess. 41. YORK, INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA June 22, Construction of Indian Rock Dam and channel improvements on Codorus H. Doc. 702, 1936 Creek. 77th Cong., 2d sess. 45. POTOMAC ESTUARY PILOT WATER TREATMENT PLANT, DC Mar. 7, To construct, operate, and evaluate a pilot project on the Potomac Estuary H. Doc. 2, 1974 for the treatment of water at an estimated cost of $6,000,000. 93rd Cong., 1st sess. 1. Contains latest published maps. September 16, 1933. The site chosen for the inlet under this 2. Exclusive of portion considered inactive. Inactive authorization was that opened just south of Ocean City by portion is widening 35-foot depth channel from 150 to 400 feet natural forces during a severe storm in August 1933. This from Port Covington to Ferry Bar, widening 27-foot depth eliminated the necessity for an 8-foot channel from the inlet to channel from 150 to 250 feet to Hanover Street Bridge, and Ocean City. providing a channel 27 feet deep by 250 feet wide to Western 4. Included in Emergency Relief program 1935. Maryland Railway Bridge with an anchorage and turning 5. Raising of the north jetty to an elevation of 9 feet above basin at the upper end. mean low water was accomplished with maintenance funds in 3. Included in Public Works Administration program 1956. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS TABLE 4-C Cost To September 30, 1982 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Accotink Creek, VA' Completed 1878 $ 5,000 $ - Anacostia River and Flats2 Deferred 1953 3,910,582 - Annapolis Harbor, MD Completed 1946 34,250* 15,623 Aquia Creek, VA Inactive 1928 52,465' 11,770 4-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS TABLE 4-C (Continued) Cost To September 30, 1982 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Back Creek, MD Betterton Harbor, MD Branson Cove, Lower Machodoc River, VA Breton Bay, MD5 Broad Creek River, DE Broad Creek, MD Cambridge Harbor, MD5 Chester River, MD Choptank River, MD"1 Claiborne Harbor, MD' Corsica River, MD Crisfield Harbor, MD Cypress Creek, MD Elk and Little Elk Rivers, MD15 Fishing Bay, MD Goose Creek, MD18 Herring Creek, MD Island Creek, MD Island Creek, St. Georges Island, MD La Trappe, MD Little Creek, Kent Island, MD Lower Machodoc Creek, VA Lower Thorofare, Deal Island, MD Madison Bay, MD18 Manokin River, MD 2 Middle River and Dark Head Creek, MD Nan Cove, MD18 Nanticoke River at Bivalve, MD' Nanticoke River (including Northwest Fork), DE and MD" Nanticoke River, MD Neabsco Creek, MD Neavitt Harbor, MD 8 Nomini Bay and Creek, VA' 7 Occoquan Creek, VA16 Parish Creek, MD Patuxent River, MD15 Pocomoke River, MD5 Potomac River and Tributaries at and below Washington, DC, Elimination of Waterchestnut Potomac River at Alexandria, VA Potomac River at Lower Cedar Point, MD Potomac River at Mount Vernon, VA1' Potomac River below Washington, DC Potomac River North Side of Washington Channel, DC' Queenstown Harbor, MD Shad Landing State Park, MD St. Catherines Sound, MD St. George Creek, MD St. Michaels Harbor, MD18 St. Patricks Creek, MD St. Peters Creek, MD18 Smith Creek, MD Susquehanna River above and below Havre de Grace, MD2 7 Completed Inactive Completed Inactive Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1946 1960 1950 1950 1964 1962 1979 1981 1979 1978 1948 1980 1947 1932 1979 1973 1961 1948 1981 1980 1958 1904 1980 1977 1919 1947 1965 1975 1976 1971 1978 1968 1946 1971 1963 1905 1980 1977 1965 1920 1950 1976 1956 1958 1966 1981 1971 1964 1956 1963 1936 1974 23,061 3,482 15,755 47,9248 64,510' 28,227 195,9748 70,4959 96,796 42,974 39,071'" 349,154" 3,057 90,12116 33,874 75,900 284,800"9 6,230 23,836 8,064 23,00021 9,916 44,65822 125,550 34,78824 38,7152" 34,86126 240,817 143,134 73,243 14,600 36,500 78,446 66,25328 19,17029 14,000" 191,72681 95,214 10,234 17,000 153,836 1,744,692"2 72,8588 ' 33,531" 29,947" 16,723" 15,752" 46,740' s 5,252 293,570'0 10,441 11,554 12,621 114,373 81,219 654,258 1,106,47310 94,095 86,857 56,974 505,3931' 3,787 44,89217 650,125 8,312 9,258 5,608 317,21020 40,475 1,108 1,634 320,942 15,500 32,724 16,506 126,973 310,946 55,6998" 3,215 42,063 171,6099" 52,317 1,168,035 184,394 491,500 6,216 63,209 1,810,373 27,461" 34,942 2,228 231,74087 4,097 8,688 9,206 3,894 376,289 4-34 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS TABLE 4-C (Continued) Cost To September 30, 1982 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Susquehanna River at Williamsport, PA'S Completed 1974 57,031' _ Town Creek, MD Completed 1950 43,220 5,209 Tred Avon River, MD Completed 1979 523,130 13,843 Tuckahoe River, MD Completed 1980 9,727 23,489 Tyaskin Creek, MD Completed 1923 16,29742 18,530 Upper Machodoc Creek, VA Completed 1971 20,281 13,715 Upper Thorofare, Deal Island, MD Completed 1980 62,446 327,625 Warwick River, MD Completed 1973 22,041' 91,528 1. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized 23. Abandonment recommended in 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th August 5, 1977. Cong., 1st sess.) 2. Project deferred for restudy. 24. Includes $2,000 expended outside project limits. 3. Includes $8,476 for previous project. 25. Excludes $111,581 expended by Navy Department and 4. Includes $31,065 for previous project. $54,000 from contributed funds. 5. Unconstructed portion of the project is inactive. 26. Excludes $565 contributed funds. 6. Includes $37,500 for previous project. 27. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized 7. Includes $50,000 for previous project. November 6, 1977. 8. Includes $61,321 for previous project. 28. Includes $25,000 for previous project. 9. Includes $38,041 for previous project. 29. Includes $19,170 Works Progress Administration 10. Includes $4,573 for administrative closeout of funds. FY 81 contract. 30. Includes $10,617 for previous project. 11. Authorization for the unconstructed portion of the 31. Includes $20,500 for previous project. project was withdrawn by the Chief of Engineers January 22, 32. Excludes $389,000 contributed funds. 1979. 33. Excludes $101,162 Public Health Service funds 12. Includes $30,000 for previous project. expended for waterchestnut removal. 13. Includes $87,740 for previous project. 34. Includes $19,000 for previous project. 14. Includes $2,839 for previous project. 35. Excludes $24,125 contributed funds. 15. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized 36. Excludes $600 contributed funds. November 2, 1979. 37. Includes $15,208.08 for administrative closeout of 16. Includes $79,626 for previous project and excludes FY 81 contract. $8,414 contributed funds. 38. Excludes $1,000 contributed funds. 17. Includes $24,321 for previous project. 39. Excludes $6,984 contributed funds. 18. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 40. Includes $22,905 Works Progress Administration 19. Excludes $10,306 contributed funds. funds and $97,390 for previous project. 20. Includes $139 for administrative closeout of FY 81 con- 41. Excludes $40,000 contributed funds. tract. 42. Includes $10,158 for previous project. 21. Excludes $1,100 contributed funds. 43. Includes $6,000 for previous project. 22. Includes $5,000 for previous project. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 4-D Cost To September 30, 1982 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Oxford, MD.' Completed 1978 $ 97,7502 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 2. Excludes $80,648 contributed funds. 4-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 4-E Cost To September 30, 1982 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Anacostia River and tributaries, Flood Protection and Navigation Improvements, DC and MD Completed 1980 $6,042,325 $ 1,407,6551 Anacostia River and tributaries, Prince Georges Co., MD2 Completed 1977 1,000,0008 - Bainbridge, NY ,' Completed 1959 382,000 - Bath, NY5 Completed 1970 638,332 - Bayard, WV' Completed 1965 55,218' - Bridgewater, VA' Completed 1953 136,500 - Conklin-Kirkwood, NY' Completed 1955 71,000 - Cortland, NY' Completed 1970 324,486 - Elkland, PA Completed 1971 1,297,850 - Endicott Johnson City and Vestal, NY Completed 1979 7,034,5348 - Forest Heights, MD' Completed 1964 430,0009 - Greene, NY' Completed 1951 37,000 - Kingston-Edwardsville, PA Completed 1979 4,731,39410 Kitzmiller, MD' Completed 1965 501,5001 Lock Haven, PA'" Active 1980 450,00018- Nichols, NY Completed 1974 1,487,800 - Norwich, NY' Completed 1950 94,500 - Painted Post, NY 6 Completed 1970 414,181 - Plymouth, PA Completed 1958 1,911,689" - Savage River Dam, MD Completed 1954 2,271,9391" 33,999 Scranton, PA 16 Completed 1971 2,006,800 - Sunbury, PA Completed 1953 6,063,000" - Swoyersville and Forty Fort, PA Completed 1968 2,728,113 - Tyrone, PA18 Deferred 1980 6,401,016 - Unadilla, NY Completed 1970 1,000,000" - Upper Marlboro, MD' Completed 1965 590,013 - Verona Lake, VA'" Deferred 1978 992,000 - Washington, DC and Vicinity Completed 1953 331,927" Wilkes-Barre, Hanover Township, PA Completed 1958 3,853,4572 - Williamsport, PA Completed 1979 12,964,893" - 1. Includes $645 for administrative closeout of FY 81 13. Excludes $481,000 for Phase I funded under General contract. Investigations beginning Octobet 1, 1978. 2. Local interests will not accept operation and 14. Includes $4,357 emergency relief funds. maintenance responsibility of the project until the severe 15. Includes $200,000 expended from contributed funds. erosion and sedimentation of the project caused by tropical 16. Unit of Lackawanna River Basin Projects. storm Eloise is corrected and the project is restored to 17. Excludes $140,504 contributed funds. design condition. 18. The unconstructed portion of the project was 3. Excludes $357,022 contributed funds. reclassified to the deferred category January 8, 1981. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 19. Excludes $132,578 contributed funds. 5. Unit of Southern New York Flood Control Projects. 20. Authorized for the design memorandum stage of 6. Excludes $182,672 Public Works Acceleration funds advanced engineering and design. and $4,290 contributed funds. 21. Cost of previous project. Includes $106,500 emergency 7. Unit of Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects. relief funds. 8. Excludes $154,694 contributed funds. 22. Includes $872,715 emergency relief funds. Excludes 9. Excludes $87,720 contributed funds. $36,375 emergency relief funds expended for new work 10. Includes $1,162,548 emergency relief funds and before adoption of project. excludes $225,877 emergency relief funds expended prior to 23. Includes $1,887 emergency relief funds and excludes adoption of project. $110,835 contributed funds. 11. Excludes $6,616 contributed funds. 12. Authorized for Phase I design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design. 4-36 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS TABLE 4-G For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Almond Village, NY" ' Broadwater Creek, MD Cadle Creek, MD2 Channel Connecting Plain Dealing Creek and Oak Creek, MD Coan River, VA Copes Corner Lakes, NY' Cuckold Creek, MD' Cunninghill Cove, MD' Davenport Center Lake, NY2 Fall Brook Lake, PA' Genegantslet Lake, NY 1970 1949 1949 1940 1937 1970 1978 1977 1970 1970 1954 1950 1937 1950 1950 1949 1941 1974 1953 Governor's Run, MD Harpers Ferry, WV Hellens Creek, MD Lake Ogleton, MD Mill Creek, MD Moorefield, WV Sixes Bridge Lake, MD & PA' South Plymouth Lake, NY May 26, 1953 1941 Flood Control Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Jan. 22, 1979 1960 River and Harbor Act Jan. 22, 1979 1960 River and Harbor Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Oct. 3, 1978 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 29, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 4-37 $ 24,622$ 212 112 106,7008 5,720 11,200 286,4008 46,100 214,5788 7,9288 100,0368 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS TABLE 4-G (Continued) For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Waterway from Little Choptank River to 1939 Aug. 5, 1977 Choptank River, MD 1974 Water 305 - Res. Dev. Act West Oneonta Lake, NY2 1970 May 6, 1981 1974 Water 189,100' - Res. Dev. Act 1. Local cooperation withdrawn, project authorization expired May 26, 1953. 2. Unit of Southern New York Flood Control Projects. 3. Cost for preliminary work only. 4. Project authorization was withdrawn by the Chief of Engineers. 5. Unit of Lackawanna River Basin Projects. 6. Authorized for the design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS TABLE 4-H Date Survey Project Completed DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Potomac River below Washington November 1981 MARYLAND Broad Creek July 1982 Chester River July 1982 Crisfield Harbor March 1982 Fishing Bay May 1982 Herring Creek July 1982 Nanticoke River April 1982 Nanticoke River (Including Northwest Fork) July 1982 Pocomoke River July 1982 Rock Hall Harbor April 1982 Smith Creek September 1982 Susquehanna River above and below Havre De Grace June 1982 Upper Thorofare Deal Island May 1982 4-38 BALTIMORE, MD. DISTRICT INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PROJECTS TABLE 4-I Project Date Inspected DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Anacostia River Washington, DC & Vicinity MARYLAND Anacostia River Basin Cumberland Forest Heights Kitzmiller Savage Upper Marlboro NEW YORK Bainbridge Bath Cincinnatus Conklin-Kirkwood Cortland Endicott-Johnson City and Vestal Greene Nichols Norwich Owego Painted Post Port Dickenson Sherburne Unadilla PENNSYLVANIA Elkland Kingston and Edwardsville Milton Plymouth Scranton Sunbury Swoyersville-Forty Fort Tyrone Wilkes-Barre Hanover, Township Williamsport S. Williamsport WEST VIRGINIA Bayard October 1981 October 1981 October 1981 October 1981/September 1982 October 1981 September 1982 September 1982 October 1981 October 1981 October 1981 October 1981 October 1981 October 1981 October 1981 October 1981 October 1981 October 1981 October 1981 October 1981 October 1981 October 1981 October 1981 October 1981 November 1981 September 1982 November 1981/September 1982 November 1981 October 1981/September 1982 November 1981/September 1982 November 1981 November 1981/September 1982 October 1981 November 1981 September 1982 4-39 NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT* This District comprises the State of Virginia, except the Potomac, Roanoke and Ohio River Basins; the entire area on the eastern shore of Virginia except for the project for Pocomoke River, Maryland and Virginia. On the west shore of Chesapeake Bay, all waterways south of Smith Point, Virginia, at the mouth of the Potomac River except the project for Little Wicomico River, Virginia. North Carolina, only the Chowan River Basin downstream to and including the mouth of the Meherrin River, and the Dismal Swamp Canal Route of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway to the Albemarle Sound. West Virginia, only the James River Basin. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA., and St. Johns River .............. 2. Baltimore Harbor and Channels (Norfolk District) ............. 3. Channel to Newport News, VA ......... 4. Chincoteague Inlet, VA ................. 5. Hampton Roads and Harbors of Norfolk and Newport News, VA Collection and Rem oval of Drift ....................... 6. James River, VA . ................. 7. Lafayette River, VA .................... 8. Lynnhaven Inlet, VA .............. 9. Norfolk Harbor, VA................... 10. Quinby Creek, VA ........ ....... 11. Supervision of the Harbor of Hampton Roads (Prevention of Obstructive and Injurious Deposits) ......... . ............ 12. Tangier Channel, VA .................. 13. Thimble Shoal Channel, VA .......... . 14. Tylers Beach, VA.......... ....... 15. Waterway on the Coast of Virginia. 16. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ........................... Page Flood Control 19. Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, VA. 20. Richmond Filtration Plant, VA ......... 5-2 21. Virginia Beach Streams, Canal Number 2, VA ............. . 5-2 22. Flood Control Work Under 5-3 Special Authorization ................... 5-3 5-4 5-4 5-5 5-5 5-6 5-7 5-8 5-9 5-9 5-9 5-10 5-10 General Investigations 23. Surveys...... ........................... 24. Collection and Study of Basic Data ..... 25. Continuation of Planning and, Engineering ..................... Page 5-11 5-12 5-12 5-12 5-13 5-13 5-13 Tables Table 5-A Cost and Financial Statement . 5-14 Table 5-B Authorizing Legislation ....... 5-17 Table 5-C Data Relative to the completed Locks ....................... 5-21 Table 5-D Other Authorized Navigation Projects .................... 5-22 Table 5-E Other Authorized Beach Erosion ....................... 5-24 Table 5-F Other Authorized Flood Control ............... ....... 5-24 Table 5-G Reconnaissance and Condition Survey ............. 5-24 Beach Erosion Control 17. Virginia Beach, VA................. 5-11 18. Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization ............... 5-11 5-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Navigation 1. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (NORFOLK DISTRICT) Location. Two inland water routes approximately paralleling Atlantic coast south of Norfolk, Va., between a point in Southern Branch of Elizabeth River, Va., 2,500 feet upstream of Norfolk & Western Railway bridge and Virginia-North Carolina State line in North Landing River, a distance of 27.2 miles; and 64.6 miles between mouth of Deep Creek, Va., and mouth of Pasquotank River, N.C. These routes are shown on Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12206. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 90 to 250 feet wide following Southern Branch of Elizabeth River, 5.2 miles, Virginia Land Cut, 8.3 miles, and North Landing River, 13.7 miles; and construction of a tidal guard lock at Great Bridge, Va. It also provides channels 10 feet deep at mean low water and 80 to 100 feet wide in Deep Creek, 3.1 miles, Turners Cut, 4.3 miles, and Pasquotank River, 35.1 miles; maintaining Dismal Swamp Canal, 22.1 miles, to about 9 feet deep mean canal level over a width of 50 feet; protection of banks in Turners Cut with sheet pjling, and cutting certain sharp points in Pasquotank River to shorten its course. (See Table 5-C at end of chapter on Data Relative to Completed Locks included in Project.) Project includes operating and care of completed locks; dams and bridges, under maintenance. Southern Branch of Elizabeth River and Deep Creek sections of the two routes are tidal, mean range being about 3 feet with extremes of minus 3.5 and plus 9.6 feet. Remaining sections are nontidal with fluctuations of 1 to 2 feet in level due to winds. Cost for new work for completed project was $3,396,276. Protection to canal property at Great Bridge portion is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $265,000. For details of previous projects, see page 476 of Annual Report for 1938. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities ar considered adequate. See Annual Report for 1970. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and ordinary maintenance of the project consisting of real estate management services, condition and operation studies, operation and care of locks, bridges, spillways, wharves, canal equipment, grounds, roads, buildings, etc. with Government plant and hired labor were carried on at a cost of $1,229,167. Permanent operating equipment used on both routes was purchased at a direct cost of $20,443. A contract in the amount of $204,687 was awarded in March 1982 to repair Butterfly Valves at the Great Bridge Lock. Total contractor's earnings amounted to $195,000 during the fiscal year. Maintenance repairs to bridges, dolphins, lockgates and bulkheads on both routes with government plant and hired labor were accomplished at a direct cost of $68,317. Maintenance engineering and design and supervision and administration costs, less credits for collections for quarters and damages to government property amounted to $85,334. 2. BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (NORFOLK DISTRICT) Existing project. Provides for deep water approach channels in Baltimore Harbor. Northern portion including Baltimore Harbor is under jurisdiction of Baltimore District. Portion under jurisdiction of Norfolk District is more fully described below. 2A. CAPE HENRY CHANNEL, VA. Location. At mouth of Chesapeake Bay opposite Cape Henry. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12222). Existing project. A channel about 2.3 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 50 feet deep at mean low water through shoal at mouth of Chesapeake Bay opposite Cape Henry. Under ordinary conditions mean range of tide 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation due to combined effect of wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 2B. RAPPAHANNOCK SHOAL CHANNEL, VA. Location. In lower Chesapeake Bay opposite mouth of Rappahannock River and about 50 miles 5-2 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT* northerly from Atlantic Ocean at entrance of Chesapeake Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12225). Existing project. A channel about 9.9 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 50 feet deep at mean low water between contours of that depth in Chesapeake Bay, opposite Rappahannock River. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation due to combined effect of wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 2C. YORK SPIT CHANNEL, VA. Location. In lower Chesapeake Bay opposite mouth of York River and about 20 miles northerly from Atlantic Ocean at entrance of Chesapeake Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12221). Existing project. A channel about 18.2 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 50 feet deep at mean low water between contours of that depth in Chesapeake Bay opposite York Spit. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation, due to combined effect of wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. For details of previous projects see Annual. Report for 1932. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities.. These three channels form the access between lower and upper Chesapeake Bay. Operations during fiscal year. Operation of the project was accomplished at a cost of $5,022. Maintenance engineering and design and supervision and administration amounted to $46,108. A combined maintenance dredging contract for dredging Cape Henry Channel and Thimble Shoal Channel was awarded in July 1982 in the amount of $4,388,710of which $2,266,745 was for the Cape Henry Channel. Contractor's earnings on this portion of the contract from September 22-30, 1982 amounted to $419,000 when an estimated 75,000 cubic yards of material was removed. Contract is scheduled for completion by November 1982. During the period January 9-14, 1982, the hopper dredge Goethals removed 27,000 cubic yards of material at a direct cost of $225,960. Periodic maintenance dredging will be continued to maintain full project dimensions. 3. CHANNEL TO NEWPORT NEWS, VA. Location. West of north entrance to Norfolk Harbor Channel connects deep-water and James River with Hampton Roads. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12245). Existing project. A channel 45 feet deep at mean low water and 800 feet wide from that depth in Norfolk Harbor Channel about 4.5 miles to Newport News and 2 deepdraft anchorage berths opposite Newport News 45 feet deep over 1,200 swing radius. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.7 feet and extremes 2.1 and 3 feet. Extremes of regular fluctuations due to combined wind and tides referred to mean low water are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. For previous project see page 459 of 1938 Annual Report. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Latest published description of terminal facilities is in Port Series No. 11 revised 1971, part 2 on Ports of Hampton Roads, Virginia prepared by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Since 1959 piers 3, 4 and 5 have been replaced by a new cargo pier. Container handling facilities have been added and the capability of the port for handling general cargo and coal has increased. Operations during fiscal year. A maintenance dredging contract in the amount of $873,650 was awarded in April 1982. There were 569,342 cubic yards of credited material removed during the period April 24 thru June 23, 1982. Total contractor's earnings amounted to $776,012. Miscellaneous operating costs amounted to $2,724. Maintenance engineering and design and supervision and administration including quantity surveys amounted to $60,228. Periodic maintenance dredging will be continued to maintain full project dimensions. 4. CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA. Location. Chincoteague Inlet at the southern end of Assateague Island provides access to the Atlantic Ocean from the inland waterway near the town of Chincoteague, Virginia. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12211). 5-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Existing project. Provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar in the Atlantic Ocean and to the mouth of the inlet; thence, a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the inlet through the canal and then along Chincoteague Channel to a point approximately 2,000 feet north of the state highway bridge to Chincoteague, a distance of about 6.6 miles. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet. All depths are referred to mean low water. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. For details see Annual Report for 1974. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities at Chincoteague are considered adequate for current and prospective traffic. Operations during fiscal year. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded in July 1982 in the amount of $556,500. Dredging was accomplished between July 10, 1982 and August 2,,1982 with 109,420 cubic yards of credited material being removed at a direct cost of $534,500. Operation and ordinary maintenance of the project was accomplished at a direct cost of $7,443. Maintenance engineering and design and supervision and administraton including quantity surveys amounted to $78,839. Annual maintenance dredging will be continued. 5. HAMPTON ROADS AND HARBORS OF NORFOLK AND NEWPORT NEWS, VA. - COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Hampton Roads is a natural harbor 300 miles south of New York and 180 miles south of Washington, D.C. Its principal tributaries are James River, affording a natural deep harbor at Newport News, Virginia; Elizabeth River, with its Southern, Eastern, and Western Branches providing harbors for Norfolk and Portsmouth, Virginia; and Hampton Creek, serving the harbor at Hampton, Virginia. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts No. 12248, 12245, and 12253.) Existing project. Collection and removal of drift in Hampton Roads and its tributary waters authorizes the Secretary of the Army to allot necessary amounts of work from appropriations for maintenance and improvement of existing river and harbor works or from other available appropriations and that this work shall be carried on as a separate and distinct project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. The purpose of work is to afford relief from variable conditions of obstruction. No advance estimate of the amount of work is required. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Norfolk Harbor, Virginia and Channel to Newport News, Virginia. Operations during fiscalyear. Operation of the project incinerator amounted to $16,778. Maintenance operations, amounting to $71,474, consisted of collection and disposal of an estimated 68,640 cubic feet of a variety of floating refuse, ranging from discarded furniture to heavy timber and piling. Operation and maintenance and supervision and administration costs amounted to $28,859. o _ 6. JAMES RIVER, VA. Location. The river is formed by junction of the Cowpasture and Jackson Rivers in Botetourt County, Virginia, flows easterly 340 miles, and empties into Hampton Roads at Newport News, Virginia. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts No. 12248 and 12251.) Existing project. A channel 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the mouth to Richmond Deepwater Terminal, and thence a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the deepwater terminal to Richmond Lock; a mooring basin 35 feet deep, 180 to 220 feet wide and 2,100 feet long along side the channel opposite waterfront at Hopewell; enlargement of the turning basin at Richmond Deepwater Terminal to 825 feet wide, 2,770 feet long and 35 feet deep; a turning basin in Richmond Harbor 200 feet wide, 600 feet long and 18 feet deep; and construction of spur and training dikes. Depth of channels are referred to mean low water. Total length of channel included in the project is 87 miles, which is the navigable section. Mean tidal ranges under ordinary conditions for different parts of the river are: mouth, 2.6 feet; Jamestown, 2 feet; City Point, 2.6 feet; and Richmond, 3.2 feet. Spring tide ranges under ordinary conditions at the same localities are mouth, 3.1 feet; Jamestown, 2.4 feet; City Point, 3 feet; Richmond, 3.2 feet. Ordinary fluctuations of stage at Richmond, due to floods, are 6 to 12 feet above mean low water. Extreme fluctuations 5-4 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT* are 16 to 32 feet. Flood heights below Richmond diminish rapidly. The extreme according to available information is about 11 feet lower at Dutch gap, 14 miles below .and 17 to 18 feet lower, 20 miles below. Estimated (1971) total cost for new work is $71,145,940 including required non-Federal cost for conditions of local cooperation imposed by the River and Harbor Act of 1930, 1945, and 1950, estimated (1939) to be $1,949,700; and by the River and Harbor Act of 1962, estimated (1971) to be $2,950,000. For previous projects, see Annual Report for 1938. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. Fully complied with for conditions imposed by River and Harbor Acts of 1930, 1945, and 1950. The conditions imposed by the River and Harbor Act of 1962 have not been complied with. Terminal facilities. River commerce at Richmond is handled by city--owned terminals, city wharf, Richmond dock, and 16 privately-owned wharves within or in the immediate vicinity of Richmond Harbor. The city's Upper Terminal, located on the north bank within the manufacturing section of Richmond, provides for 750 feet of concrete wharf and 80,000 square feet of warehouse and transit shed. The other terminal is located approximately 4 miles downstream from the Upper Terminal which provides about 1,250 feet of wharf and 2 concrete warehouses with about 190,000 square feet of floor space. This deepwater terminal at the head of the 25-foot deep improved channel serves ocean-going vessels and larger ships engaged in coastwide trading. Below the deepwater terminals the improvement is served by 42 wharves. Richmond terminals and wharves together with wharves between Richmond and the river's mouth are adequate for river's commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Operation of the project including condition surveys and special studies and reports amounted to $131,611. Contract dredging of the Lower James River was completed June 16, 1982 when 1,068,936 cubic yards of credited material was removed at a direct cost of $1,865,988. A continuing contract in the amount of $1,144,355 for dredging the Richmond Deepwater Terminal and Shoals between Richmond Deepwater Terminal and Hopewell, Virginia was awarded in September 1982. Cost incurred for contractor mobilization and disposal site preparation amounted to $210,000. Miscellaneous costs relating to kepone monitoring amounted to $174,631. Maintenance engineering and design and supervision and administration for operations and maintenance including quantity surveys and value engineering amounted to $441,218. Maintenance dredging will be continued to maintain full project dimensions. 7. LAFAYETTE RIVER, VA. Location. This river is a tidal estuary of Hampton Roads, formed by two branches lying wholly in the city of Norfolk, Va. The two branches, each about 2 miles long, flow from the northeast and southeast and join at a point about 3.5 miles above the mouth. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12245.) Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from deep water in Hampton Roads to the Hampton Boulevard bridge, thence 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide, and 100 feet long, a total length of approximately 4.0 miles. East Haven is located at the upstream limits of the Lafayette River project, immediately downstream of the Granby Street Bridge, and provides for a channel 50 feet wide and 6 feet deep from that depth in the Lafayette River to the upstream end of the creek, a distance of approximately 2,500 feet. All depths referred to mean low water. For details of prior projects see 1969 Annual Report. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details, see Annual Report for fiscal year 1979. Terminal facilities. See Annual Report for fiscal year 1979. Operations during fiscal year. Project was credited with $13,576 in contributed funds as a result of final audit of FY81 contract. Maintenance dredging will continue on a periodic basis. 8. LYNNHAVEN INLET VA. Location. On south shore of Chesapeake Bay, 5 miles west of Cape Henry, and 10 miles east of Norfolk, Va. Inlet connects Lynnhaven Roads, a part of Chesapeake Bay, with a network of inland waters in northern half of city of Virginia Beach. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1222). Existing project. An entrance channel from Chesapeake Bay through Lynnhaven Inlet, 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide; a mooring and turning basin, 5-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS. U.S. ARMY 1982 inside of Lynnhaven inlet, 10 feet deep, 1,100 feet long, and 750 feet wide; a channel 9 feet deep and 90 feet wide to extend from the mooring and turning basin into Broad Bay; via Long Creek-Broad Bay Canal; and a channel through the Narrows connecting Broad and Linkhorn Bays, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide. Depths are referred to mean low water. Mean range of tide in Lynnhaven Inlet is about 2 feet with extreme fluctuations of 1.5 feet below and 9.5 feet above mean low water. Range in Lynnhaven Bay is a little more than 2 feet, in Broad and Linkhorn Bays, fluctuations in water level are caused by local winds. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with, except local interests must furnish spoil-disposal areas as needed for future maintenance. For details see page 308 of Annual Report for 1965. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. For details, see Annual Report for 1970. Operations during fiscal year. A combined contract for maintenance dredging of Lynnhaven Inlet and new work dredging of the Long Creek modification in the amount of $493,880 was awarded in April 1982. There were removed 203,973 cubic yards from Lynnhaven Inlet and Entrance Channel and 8,282 cubic yards of credited material from the Long Creek modification. Total contractor's earnings amounted to $464,760, with work completed on July 11, 1982. Maintenance engineering and design and supervision and administration including quantity surveys amounted to $84,965. Engineering and design including plans and specifications and supervision and administration relative to the Long Creek modification amounted to $11,645. Periodic maintenance dredging will be performed as required. 9. NORFOLK HARBOR, VA. Location. Norfolk, Virginia is 187 miles south of Baltimore, Maryland and 30 miles from entrance to Chesapeake Bay at Cape Charles and Cape Henry. Harbor extends 18.3 miles from 45-foot contour at Hampton Roads to a point 2,500 feet above Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge over Southern Branch of the Elizabeth River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 12245 and 12253.) Existing project. A main channel 45 feet deep, 1,500 feet wide, from that depth in Hampton Roads near Fort Wool to a point just south of Norfolk International Terminal Piers; thence, at same depth 800 feet wide to Lamberts Point; thence, 40 feet deep and 750 feet wide to mouth of Southern Branch of Elizabeth River; and 450 feet wide up this branch to the Belt Line Railroad bridge, including an approach in turning area to same depth and a maximum width of 830 feet opposite Norfolk Naval Shipyard, extending downstream 3,250 feet from Belt Line Railroad bridge; thence 40 feet wide, 375 feet wide and 1 mile long to Norfolk and Western (formerly Virginia Railway bridge); thence, 35 feet deep, 250 feet wide and 3.1 miles long to a point 1,900 feet above Norfolk and Western Railway (Gilmerton's Bridge); thence, 35 feet deep, 250 feet to 500 feet wide to a point 1.6 miles above Interstate 64 high level bridge. A turning basin at the mouth of St. Julian's Creek, 35 feet deep and 400-600 feet square, and a turning basin at the mouth of Main's Creek 35 feet deep and 600 feet square, the upstream end of the project. A channel in Eastern Branch, 25 feet deep, 500 feet wide and 1.09 miles long from 40-foot channel to Norfolk and Western Railway bridge; thence, 25 feet deep, 300 feet wide 0.55 mile long to Campostella Bridge; thence, 25 feet deep, 200 feet wide and 1.2 mile to Norfolk and Western Railway bridge (formerly Virginia Railway bridge); and for maintenance at a depth of 25 feet of existing turning basin and 5.5 acres in extent at head of existing project just below the Norfolk and Western (formerly Virginian) Railway bridge. A channel in Western Branch, 40 foot channel in Elizabeth River, 24 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 0.78 mile long; thence, 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide for 0.37 mile to West Norfolk Highway bridge; thence, 18 feet deep, 150 wide, 0.57 mile long. A channel in Scotts Creek between 40-foot channel at mouth and a point 100 feet above former location of Atlantic Coast Line Railroad bridge (about 0.73 miles upstream), 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide. Anchorage areas on west side of 40 foot channel opposite Lamberts Point and south of Craney Island aggregating 173 acres, consisting of 1 anchorage space 1,500 feet square and 38 feet deep; 1 anchorage space 1,500 feet square and 35 feet deep; and 1 anchorage 1,000 feet wide, 3,000 feet long and 20 feet deep. Another anchorage of 45 acres and 12 feet deep near Pinner Point. Two anchorages opposite Sewells Point 45 feet deep over a swinging radius of 1,200 feet and a trapezoidal shaped disposal area of about 2,500 acres of flats adjacent to the north of 5-6 NORFOLK. VA DISTRICT* Craney Island, inclosed by stonefaced levees, 3 sluiceways in west levee, and an access road. Facilities for unloading of hopper dredged material consisting of mooring dolphins; a mooring barge anchorage 100 by 600 feet, 21 feet deep, with approach channel 300 to 3,600 feet; 30-feet deep connecting anchorage with Norfolk Harbor 45-foot channel; and a 28-inch discharge pipe line to the leveed area. Facilities for contract rehandling of bucket dredged material consisting of a rehandling basin 1,000 by 1,200 feet, 40 feet deep, protected by a spur levee extending 2,350 feet from main levee and provided with approach exit channels, 200 feet wide by 18 feet deep to Norfolk Harbor 45 foot channel and a pipe line trestle from rehandling basin to leveed area. All depths are referred to mean low water. Mean tidal range is 2.7 feet, and extreme is 3.4 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuations, due to combined effect of tides and winds referred to mean low water on -3.5 feet and +9.6 feet. Eastern Branch, 30-foot channel portion is considered inactive. For details of previous projects see Annual Report for 1938. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Latest published description of terminal facilities is in Port Series No. 11 (revised 1971, part II) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Operations during fiscal year. Contract work initiated in fiscal year 1981 amounted to $60,811 of construction funds for ocean disposal studies for the Norfolk Harbor project. Operation of the Craney Island portion of the project including condition and operation studies, office studies and reports, care of buildings, grounds, utilities, roads, levees, plant and hopper dredge pipeline and supervision and administration amounted to $449,730. Permanent operating equipment for use at Craney Island amounted to $10,251. A contract awarded in August 1982 in the amount of $240,000 for testing embankment material at the Craney Island facility was in progress at the end of the fiscal year. Total contractor's earnings at years end were $177,700. In addition, a contract to raise the west dike at the disposal facility was awarded in September 1982 for $183,650 with the contractor earning $50,000 by years end. Other engineering work on the Craney Island Management Plan to include aerial photography, boring and foundation tests, drainage plan, etc., amounted to $469,112. Operation of the Norfolk Harbor portion of the project including condition surveys, care of buildings and grounds, commercial statistics and budgeting and scheduling amounted to $607,142. A maintenance dredging contract in the amount of $2,977,244 for the 45-foot channel awarded in August 1981 was completed in January 1982. There were removed 1,556,466 cubic yards of credited material at a direct cost of $2,306,732. In addition to the 45-foot channel maintenance dredging, a continuing contract for maintenance dredging of the Southern Branch 35- foot channel awarded in August 1981, in the amount of $594,804, was completed in October of 1981. There were 32,011 cubic yards of credited material removed at a direct cost of $20,943. Toll charges for disposal of material into the Craney Island rehandling facility amounted to $121,798. A maintenance dredging contract in the amount of $2,206,155 for the 45-foot channel was awarded in September 1982 with dredging to begin in FY 83. Cost incurred at years end was $125,000 which financed the contractors mobilization effort. A contract for replacement of Pier No. 1 at the Fort Norfolk facility was awarded in July 1982 in the amount of $731,658. Total contractor's earnings at years end was $156,999. In addition, a contract for repair of the seawall at Fort Norfolk was awarded in September 1982 in the amount of $128,230. There were no contractor earnings by years end. Maintenance dredging of Craney Island Rehandling Basin was completed between the period January 11-September 30, 1982. There were removed an estimated 2,285,000 cubic yards of credited material financed by user tolls. Total contractor earnings amounted to $2,448,291. Maintenance engineering and design, value engineering, and real estate activities and supervision and administration including quantity surveys amounted to $282,520. Condition surveys of the Sewells Point anchorage area was conducted in April 1982. Maintenance dredging of project channels and maintenance of pertinent project features will continue as required. 10. QUINBY CREEK, VA, Location. A natural channel on Atlantic Ocean side of Delmarva Peninsula about 32 miles north of Cape Charles and about 33 miles south of 5-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Chincoteague, Va. Creek extends in a generally southeasterly direction between Quinby Landing at Quinby, Va. and head of Tony Rock Drain, in Upshur Bay, a distance of 6,900 feet. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12210). Existing project. Provides for a channel 8 feet depth in Upshur Bay to point 600 feet bayward from Quinby Landing, thence 60 feet wide to Quinby Landing, a total distance of about 6,900 feet and a turning and mooring basin of the same depth, 200 feet wide and 400 feet long opposite public terminal and landing. Mean range of tide is 4.4 feet. Existing project was adopted by River and Harbor Act of 1950. (H. Doc. 241, 81st. cong., 1st sess. which contains latest published map.) Project is complete, for details see Annual Report for 1964. Local coop;'ration. Fully complied with for initial construction. 'ocal interests must provide spoildisposal areas .or maintenance. Terminal facilities. There are two open-pile wooden wharves and about 125 feet of wooden bulkhead at Quinby, Va., which are privately owned. In addition, a number of berthing spaces, a wooden dock and launching ramp were constructed which are open to all on equal terms. These facilities are connected to the State Highway system by a suitable access road and are considered adequate. Operations during fiscal year. A maintenance dredging contract awarded in March 1982 for $192,345 was terminated on July 26, 1982 for contractor default. Contractor removed a total of $37,524 cubic yards of credited material at a direct cost of $76,287. Surety will complete contract in FY of 83. Maintenance engineering and design and supervision and administration including quantity surveys amounted to $67,792; perodic maintenance dredging will continue. 11. SUPERVISION OF THE HARBOR OF HAMPTON ROADS (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIVE AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS) Laws enacted for the preservation of the Harbor of Hampton Roads, Virginia, its adjacent Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries as lies within the State of Virginia and so much of the Atlantic Ocean and its tributaries as lies within the jurisdiction of the United States, within or to the east of the State of Virginia, are administered by the Supervisor of the Harbor of Hampton Roads. Laws relating to the supervision of the Harbor of Hampton Roads and its tributary waters are the New York Harbor Act of 1888, as amended, the River and Harbor Act of 1899, the Clean Water Act, the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuary Act of 1972, the Coastal'Zone Management Act of 1972, the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, the Federal Power Act of 1966, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Deepwater Port Act of 1974, and the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act. Direct supervision of the harbor was exercised by means of four patrol vessels (382 patrols, 3056 manhours) involving debris removal, maintenance of buoys and fish stake limits, investigating reports of sunken vessels, navigational hazards and providing support for Federal dredging projects. Surveillance of the harbor, the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries with respect to the regulatory permit program was conducted by means of three small outboards, 7-8 motor vehicles, and commercial aircraft for aerial surveys. The outboards were involved in 14 patrols (56 man-hours) involving primarily compliance surveys of permitted dredging projects. The motor vehicles were used to investigate 375 complaints of unauthorized activities. Commercial aircraft involved 36 flights (108 man-hours) of which ten were used to photograph confirmed violations. An educational program continued in an effort to inform the public of the need and requirements for Department of the Army permits. This program was effectual through press releases, public notice, public talks and personal interviews with interested agencies, committees and private industries. Agreements and the monthly joint interagency meeting were continued with various Federal, State, and local agencies having related or similar responsibilities and functions to obtain maximum results with minimum cots by eliminating duplication of effort. The joint permit application and the joint public notice adopted between the Norfolk District and the State of Virginia have continued to result in decreases in the numerous forms of paperwork required to process a permit application. The Norfolk District's Regulatory Functions Branch continued to maintain the Northern Neck Project Office and the Eastern Shore Project Office in 5-8 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT* Accomac, Virginia. Each of these project offices provide readily available Corps personnel to assist waterfront owners, contractors, and the general public with their questions and problems on waterfront construction and the permit requirements of the Corps regulatory program. Summary of legal action during fiscal year. Disposition of legal action to end of fiscal year for violations of Federal Statutes is as follows: Eleven cases were referred for litigation, of which four were resolved through consent decrees and total payments of $5000 in civil penalties. Of 191 confirmed violations investigated this fiscal year, seventy-three were resolved through voluntary restoration, thirty-nine were resolved through after-the-fact permits and the remaining seventy-nine were pending at years end. 12. TANGIER CHANNEL VA. Location. A tidal channel about 2 miles long extending from Tangier Island, Virginia, northeasterly to deepwater in Tangier Sound, Chesapeake Bay and northwesterly to deep water on Chesapeake Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart No. 12228.) Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from 8-foot contour to Tangier Sound to day marker No. 4, and thence 8 feet deep and 60 feet wide to the town of Tangier, with an anchorage basin adjacent of town 400 feet square and 7 feet deep. A channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide for about 4,000 feet from the anchorage basin northwesterly across Tangier Island to Chesapeake Bay. Mean range of tide is 1.7 feet and extreme tidal range is 4.7 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish spoil disposal area as needed for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Accomack County constructed a public dock in 1961. There are four privately-owned docks adjacent to existing project and two marine railways. Operations during fiscal year. A maintenance dredging contract awarded in August 1982 in the amount of $326,460 was in progress at the end of the fiscal year with completion scheduled for November 1982. An estimated 65,000 cubic yards of credited material was removed from September 18-30, 1982 with contractor's earnings amounting to $300,000. Engineering and design real estate and supervision and administration including quantity surveys amounted to $60,094. Periodic maintenance dredging will continue. 13. THIMBLE SHOAL CHANNEL, VA. Location. In lower portion of Chesapeake Bay between Hampton Roads and the ocean, 20 miles northeast of center of Norfolk Harbor, extending southeasterly 12 miles from a point 1.25 miles east of Thimble Shoal Lighthouse toward entrance to Chesapeake Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1222.) Existing project. Provides for dredging a channel 12 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 45 feet deep at mean low water with auxiliary channels 450 feet wide and 32 feet deep at mean low water adjoining each side of 1,000-foot channel. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation, due to combined wind and tides referred to mean low water, and minus 3 feet and plus 7 feet. For details of previous projects see Annual Report for 1932. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Project serves as an entrance channel to Hampton Roads. See "Norfolk Harbor, Va,." "Channel to Newport News, Va.," etc. Operations during fiscal year. The maintenance dredging contract awarded in September 1981 was completed in December 1981 at a direct cost of $2,769,705 with 512,470 cubic yards of credited material removed. A combined maintenance dredging contract for dredging Thimble Shoal Channel and Cape Henry Channel was awarded in July 1982 in the amount of $4,388,710 of which $2,121,965 was for the Thimble Shoal Channel. Contractor's earnings on this portion of the contract amounted to $1,868,000 when there were removed 315,527 cubic yards of credited material. Maintenance engineering and design and supervision and administration to include quantity surveys amounted to $153,972. Periodic maintenance dredging will continue. 14. TYLERS BEACH, VA. Location. On south shore of James River in Isle of 5-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Wight County in a deep indentation known as Burwells Bay about 13 miles above the mouth of the James River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12248.) Existing project. Provides for harbor of refuge 6 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 300 feet long, just south of Tylers Beach, and a channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide and about 2,350 feet long from that depth in Burwells Bay to the harbor of refuge. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project was modified in 1981 to provide for construction of two 370-foot placed stone revetment/jetty structures along the banks of the inlet throat leading to the harbor. Mean range of tide is 2.4 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see Annual Report for 1967. Terminal facilities. A public landing has been constructed by a local interest under the requirements of local cooperation. Watermen basing operations at Tylers Beach have constructed mooring facilities in the harbor of refuge for their vessels. Existing facilities are considered adequate. Operations during fiscal year. Final payment for monitoring work in progress at the end of FY 81 was completed at a cost of $961. Construction of the Section 107 modification awarded in September 1981 was completed in March 1982 at a cost of $184,000. Engineering effort and supervision and administration related to the Section 107 modification amounted to $5,137. Periodic maintenance dredging will continue in order to provide full project dimensions. 15. WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA Location. Between barrier beach along Atlantic Ocean on the east and Virginia portion of mainland peninsula on the west. It extends for 83.7 miles from south end of Chincoteague Bay through a number of creeks, throughfares, and bays to enter Chesapeake Bay in the vicinity of Fisherman Island, just south of Cape Charles on the southern tip of the peninsula. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart Nos. 12211, 12210, and 12221.) Existing projects. An island waterway 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Chesapeake Bay to Chincoteague Bay, Virginia. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet. Greater fluctuations in water level are caused by high winds and storms. A modification of the project approved during 1970 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 authorizes relocation of portions of the waterway and widening to 100 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. For details see Annual Report for 1969. Operations during fiscal year. Condition surveys of 5 separate reaches of the project were performed from May-June 1982. A maintenance dredging contract awarded in January 1982 in the amount of $1,094,527 was completed in April 1982. There were removed 585,353 cubic yards of credited material at a direct cost of $1,137,563. Maintenance engineering and design, economic studies and supervision and administration costs including quantity surveys amounted to $340,532. Tide gauging work performed by hired labor and NOAA amounted to $51,721.In addition, a contract for construction of Tide Gauge Platforms was awarded in July 1982 for $11,495 and completed in August at a cost of $11,495. Real estate activity costs and long term disposal analysis amounted to $136,953. Periodic maintenance will continue as required. 16. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Two detailed project reports: Back Creek, York County, Va. and Little Creek, Gloucester County, Va. were in progress at the end of the year. Two negative reconnaissance reports: Drum Point Creek, Chesapeake, Va. and Morattico Creek, Richmond County, Va. were completed during the year. The Little Creek, Gloucester County, Va. reconnaissance report was completed and approved for further studies. Detailed studies on Bushy Park, Middlesex County, Va. were terminated due to lack of local cooperation. The study on Chincoteague Inlet, Va. has been deferred. The detailed project report on Long Creek, Lynnhaven Inlet, Va. was completed. 5-10 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT* Beach Erosion Control 17. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA. Location. On the Atlantic Seaboard, 22 miles north of Virginia-North Carolina State line, 3.5 miles south of Cape Henry, and 19 miles east of Norfolk, Va. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12207.) Existing project. Federal participation in restoration and protection of shore of Virginia Beach between Rudee Inlet and 49th Street by artificial placement of sand to provide a minimum beach width of 100 feet at elevation 7 feet above mean low water, and maintenance of such beach by periodic replenishment of losses to insure continuous protection; including construction of a groin system to be undertaken at such times as estimated annual charges there-with would be less then the annual cost of beach replenishment alone. The United States shall participate in the first cost of the project to the full extent of its proportionate share of cost as a landowner, plus one third total first cost of restoring and protecting all publicly-owned sections of the shore. The 1962 modification provided that the United States shall further participate in periodic beach nourishment of the beach in the amount of one third the cost for 25 years from date of commencement of operations in placing an initial quantity of nourishment material equal to deficiency in the design beach at that time. Section 103 of the 1962 River and Harbor Act increased Federal participation to one-half of the cost incurred after October 23, 1962. Estimated Federal cost (1982) is $5,500,000. Estimated cost to local interests is $5,500,000. Construction of the groin system is not included in the above estimate. The 1962 estimate for this work was $549,000 Federal cost and $531,000 cost to local interests. The 1974 modification provides for structural and nonstructural improvements. Structural measures would be provided for the 6 mile reach of shoreline between Rudee Inlet and 89th Street. This would include raising the beach to elevation 10 feet and a width of 100 feet, driving a sheet pile wall just seaward of the existing bulkhead from Rudee Inlet to 57th Street; and raising and strengthening sand dunes from 57th to 89th Streets. The estimated cost (1982) of the structural improvements are Federal $35,000,000 and non-Federal $18,200,000. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 5-11 of Fiscal Year 1981 Annual Report. Necessary changes in requirements will be made if the 1974 modification is constructed. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction Planning of the 1974 modification was continued at a cost of $199,509. Local interests were reimbursed $333,404 for the Federal share of periodic nourishment of the beach, and Federal costs pertinent thereto amounted to $19,181. Preconstruction planning is continuing on the 1974 modification and beach replenishment is continuing on the 1962 project. 18. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION None this fiscal year. Flood Control 19. GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA. Location. Site of proposed Gathright Dam is on Jackson River, a tributary of James River at mile 43.4 and Alleghany County. Gathright Dam site is in reach of Jackson River know as the Gorge. About 19 miles upstream from Covington, Va. at the elevation at the top of the conservation pool, Gathright Reservoir will extend upstream about 9 miles (see Falling Spring and Mountain Grove, Virginia-West Virginia quadrangles of geological survey.) Existing project. Gathright Dam consists of a 1,172-foot long rolled rock filled dam with an impervious core, with a top at elevation 1,684.5; outlet works consisting of a concrete intake structure located in the right back 500 feet upstream from the axis of the dam: a 1,075-foot long outlet tunnel through the right abutment and a stilling basin; and a 2,450-foot long fixed crest emergency spillway excavated in a low saddle in the divide at Fortney Branch, about 2.5 miles south of the dam. Discharges through the maximum conservation pool elevation 1,582 will be provided for water quality control. The reservoir area at elevation 1,582 will be 2,530 acres. A total of 302,000 acre-feet of storage between elevation 1,582 and the spillway crest (elevation 1,663.5) will be reserved for flood control. At the spillway crest the reservoir will have an area of 4,540 acres. Last approved estimated Federal cost (1979) is $83,000,000. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. 5-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Operations during fiscal year. Final punch list items and miscellaneous work for Morris Hill Recreation area and the Administration-Visitors Center amounted to $20,614. Contract and in-house work for project piezometers amounted to $18,816 during the fiscal year. Contract work for paving project spur road and installation of french drains under roadway surface was completed during the fiscal year at a direct cost of $70,316. Miscellaneous hired labor, surface instrumentation, stream gaging, litigation, construction facilities, buildings, grounds, utilities, and permanent operating equipment amounted to $159,569. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs of the project amounted to $257,907. Operation and maintenance of the completed portions of the project amounted to $683,273. Project is complete and became operational for flood control in December 1979. 20. RICHMOND FILTRATION PLANT, VA. Location. The city of Richmond's Water Filtration Plant lies on the north side of the James River. The plant is separated on the south from the river by the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway embankment. The Old James River and Kanawha Canal forms the plant's northern boundary. The canal is owned by the C & O Railroad Company; however, the city of Richmond has acquired all water rights. (See Richmond and Bon Air, Virginia quadrangles of geological survey.) Previous projects. None. Existing project. The project will provide for protection of the filtration plant proper. The basic plan provides for inclosing three sides of the plant and tying into high ground. The walls will have an average height of about 9 feet with a top elevation of 117.0 feet m.s.l. The degree of protection provided is equivalent to the Standard Project Flood. A total of 11.5 acres will be protected from the design flood having a recurrence of 360 years over the project economic life of 50 years. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 5-13 of FY 81 Annual Report. Requirements may change if legislation is enacted regarding new cost-sharing proposals. Operations during fiscal year. Phase II engineering continued with the completion of plans and specifications during the fiscal year at a cost of $25,595. In addition, contract work for design of flood gates across the Kanawha Canal was completed at a cost of $24,734. All preconstruction planning is complete. 21. VIRGINIA BEACH STREAMS CANAL NUMBER 2,VA. Location. The canal number 2 watershed with a drainage area of about 37 square miles lies within the city of Virginia Beach. The city consist of 255 square miles of primarily low, flat terrain with about 75 percent of the area below elevation 15-feet, mean sea level. The existing canal, from the Eastern Branch of the Lynnhaven River to the North Landing River is about 12 miles long and follows a north-south alignment. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12205.) Previous projects. None. Existing project. The project will provide for construction of a new canal for a length of 2.6 miles and channelization of an existing canal for a length of 1.1 miles. The canal bottom width will range from 45 feet to 80 feet and a depth from -4 feet mean sea level to -8 feet mean sea level with a flow capacity great enough to carry a 100 year flood. Its construction will require dredging 680,000 cubic yards of material. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 5-14 of FY 81 Annual Report. Requirements may change if legislation is enacted regarding new cost-sharing proposals. Operations during fiscal year. Phase II planning in progress at the beginning of the fiscal year was completed. Work on plans and specs was initiated and in progress at years end. Costs amounted to $139,577. 22. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Three negative Reconnaissance reports were completed during the year: Garden Creek, Mathews County, VA; Glasgow Area, Rockbridge, VA and Scottsville, VA. 5-12 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT* 23. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS SURVEYS Total cost of surveys during the fiscal year amounted to $829,767 of which $168,212 was for navigation studies; $345,196 was for flood control studies; $92,850 was for Beach Erosion Control studies; $2,000 for review of watershed plans of the Soil Conservation Service; $22,000 for technical participation in Water Resources Planning by the Commonwealth of Virginia; and $199,509 for Flood Control, Local Protection, Legislative Phase I studies. 24. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the fiscal year cost of Collection and Study of Basic Data was $120,669. Major emphasis during the fiscal year was on management and technical services under Flood Plain Management. 25. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING During the fiscal year a work plan for the 55-foot deepening of Norfolk Harbor and Channels, Virginia was completed. In addition, extensive environmental studies of both physical and numerical model studies, sediment analysis and biological baselines were initiated. Preliminary channel design, to include hydrographic surveys and mapping was begun. Public involvement and agency coordination were also initiated and a cultural resource survey of the 55- foot channel and anchorage plan was completed. Total cost during the year amounted to $2,490,984. Work on this CP&E study is continuing with completion scheduled for May 1986. 5-13 TABLE 5-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 In Text 30 Sept 1982 1. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, between Norfolk, Va. and the Saint John's River, Fla. (Norfolk District) (Regular Funds) 2. Baltimore Harbor Channels (Norfolk District) (Regular Funds) 3. Channel to Newport News, Va. (Regular Funds) 4. Chincoteague Inlet, Va. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Hampton Roads and Harbors of Norfolk and Newport News, Va. Collection and Removal of Drift (Regular Funds) 6. James River, Va. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost Recreation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,736,937 1,688,000 2,444,800 2,025,000 1,665,970 1,767,686 2,443,074 1,598,261 (-)12 32,000 14,108 1,663,300 3,330 30,931 15,177 696,090 - 1,505,550 - 1,505,550 - 838,964 - 838,964 162,000 429,000 855,713 639,131 163,479 435,114 853,155 620,913 214,000 133,000 177,000 105,493 216,376 140,867 148,731 117,604 262,000 1,597,195 1,124,000 2,811,254 261,840 521,781 1,895,528 2,823,448. - 50,000 16,000 - - 66,000 50,000 5-14 3,688,372' 3,688,372' 37,343,4952 36,870,6752 479,947 479,947 59,871 59,871 8,015,0703 8,015,0703 7,470,4863 6,503,2763 8,955,974 8,955,974 4,320,634 4,320,634 227,000 227,000 2,371,844 2,350,533 3,850 3,850 2,253,112 2,235,134 7,639,9094 7,639,9094 22,418,051 21,906,607 294,456 244,456 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT* TABLE 5-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Total Cost To in Text 30 Sept 1982 7. Lafayette River, Va., (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 8. Lynnhaven Inlet, Va., (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 9. Norfolk Harbor, Va. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 10. Quinby Creek, Va. (Regular Funds) 11. Supervision of Harbor of Hampton Roads, Va. (Regular Funds) 12. Tangier Channel, Va. (Regular Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 130,000 17,977 - (-)1,068 (-)20,224 7,659 106,205 (-)13,576 15,643 19,313 16,365 41,982 15,643 19,313 16,365 41,982 - 125,000 111,424 13,576 - 5,000 81,000 24,629 - 4,179 77,949 28,501 26,238 47,091 74,724 472,034 26,238 47,091 74,724 472,033 - - - 7,017 - - - 2,620 - - - 112,358 - - - 102,900 2,010,880 2,850,000 1,998,099 2,774,403 30,152 60,811 2,661,800 2,965,500 2,836,562 6,310,744 2,896,837 2,946,346 2,315,198 4,777,927 30,000 125,544 - 30,000 125,544 - 286,050 - 144,129 194,400 151,000 235,000 192,000 177,393 169,070 228,949 190,547 65,382 254,560 60,864 434,918 65,178 254,764 60,862 360,094 5-15 242,047 242,047 153,598 153,598 188,962 188,962 445,354 445,354 1,475,573 1,475,572 98,664 94,267 139,158 129,700 36,399,1156 36,395,6505 53,778,3026 51,690,0016 179,480 179,480 104,176 104,176 690,081 546,818 4,152,928 4,144,223 116,550 116,550 1,809,963 1,735,137 TABLE 5-A (Cont.) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SSeeee Section Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 TToottaall CCoosstt TToo In Text 30 Sept 1982 13. Thimble Shoal Channel, Va. (Regular Funds) 14. Tylers Beach, Va. (Regular Funds) 15. Waterway on the Coast of Va. (Regular Funds) 17. Va. Beach, Va. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 19. Gathright Dam & Lake Moomaw, Va. (Regular Funds) 20. Richmond Filtration Plant, Va. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 21. Va. Beach Streams, New Work Canal Number 2, Va. Approp. Cost 12,718 59,693 1,117,000 4,211,000 12,718 59,693 312,346 4,791,677 - - 15,000 182,933 - - 8,796 189,137 (-)1,491 30,031 244,815 23,846 3,063 30,031 244,815 23,846 81,000 224,000 460,000 1,696,000 83,808 224,343 461,065 1,678,264 56,000 300,000 326,000 364,000 153,751 294,771 344,457 352,585 8,658,000 2,500,000 1,846,000 (-)14,000 7,956,185 6,600,227 2,236,333 527,222 711,000 876,000 989,000 729,000 700,437 847,395 984,540 683,273 100,224 198,000 98,000 45,908 185,974 120,375 7,000 50,329 100,000 82,000 120,000 85,000 96,548 84,244 24,232 139,577 'Includes $292,096 for previous projects. 2lncludes $52,804 for previous projects. 3Cost prior to 1942 are included in the project "Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD" (Baltimore District). Cost listed are for York Spit Channel, VA; Rappahannock Shoal Channel, VA; and Cape Henry Channel, VA. 4lncludes $763,000 for previous projects. 5lncludes $2,561,704 for previous projects and new work. 6Includes $72,039 for previous projects. 5-16 13,534,967 13,534,967 10,861,294 10,637,317 261,201 261,201 404,943 404,943 850,498 850,498 8,121,332 8,102,064 3,130,195 3,118,423 204,683 204,683 80,670,527 80,476,804 3,854,000 3,746,761 478,224 476,820 387,000 344,601 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT* TABLE 5-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (NORFOLK DISTRICT) (See Section 1 of Text) Mar. 3, 1899 Existing project dimensions and original route, waterway from Norfolk, Va. to sounds of North Carolina July 25, 1912 July 25, 1912 Mar. 3, 1925 Original route to Norfolk-Beaufort Inlet section Purchase of Albemarle & Chesapeake Co. Canal Purchase of Lake Drummond Canal (Dismal Swamp Canal) July 3, 1930 Construct a tidal lock at Great Bridge at a cost not to exceed $500,000 June 26, 1934 Operating and care of works of improvement provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors Mar. 2, 1945 Construct dikes for protection of canal property against floodtides H. Doc. 317, 54th Cong., 1st sess. AR 1896 H. Doc. 131, 55th Congs., 3d sess. AR 1899 H. Doc. 391, 62d Congs., 2d sess. H. Doc. 589, 62d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 67th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 23. 71st Cong., 1st sess.' Not available H. Doc. 117, 76th Cong., 1st sess. July 3, 1958 Dec. 31, 1970 July 3, 1958 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 4, 1913 July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 Dec. 31, 1970 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Jan. 21, 1927 Oct. 27, 1965 BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (NORFOLK DISTRICT) (See Section 2 of Text) CAPE HENRY CHANNEL, VA. (See Section 2 of Text) A channel 42 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide Channel depth increased to 50 feet RAPPAHANNOCK SHOAL CHANNEL, VA. (See Section 2 of Text) Channel 42 feet deep and 800 feet wide Channel width increased to 1,000 feet and depth increased to 50 feet. YORK SPIT CHANNEL, VA. (See Section 2 of Text) Channel 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide Channel width increased to 1,000 feet Channel depth increased to 37 feet Channel depth increased to 39 feet Channel depth increased to 42 feet Channel depth increased to 50 feet CHANNEL TO NEWPORT NEWS, VA. (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 35 feet deep, 400 feet wide Channel 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide Channel 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide Channel 40 feet deep, 800 feet wide, two deep-draft anchorage H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Report Sept. 21, 1970 H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Report, Sept. 21, 1970 H. Doc. 186, 57th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 190, 62d Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 29, 71st Cong., 1st.sess. H. Doc. 741, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Report Sept. 21, 1970 H. Doc. 550, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 486, 67th Cong., 4th sess. H. Doc. 143, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 5-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 5-B (Cont.) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents berths opposite Newport News to a depth of 40 feet and 1,200 foot swinging radius Oct. 27, 1965 Channel 45 feet deep, 800 feet wide deepening of four 40-foot anchorages to a depth of 45 feet. CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA. (See Section 4 of Text) July 14, 1960 Existing project (Sec. 107) HAMPTON ROADS AND HARBORS OF NORFOLK AND NEWPORT NEWS, VA. COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT (See Section 5 of Text) May 17, 1950 Collection and removal of floating debris in Hampton roads and its tributary waters JAMES RIVER, VA. (See Section 6 of Text) July 5, 1884 Channel 22 feet deep from mouth of Richmond and construct spur and training dikes June 13, 1902 Extension of improvement to Richmond lock gate Mar. 3, 1905 Form a turning basin by widening channel at Richmond July 3, 1930 Channel 25 feet deep mouth to Richmond Deepwater Terminal Aug. 26, 1937 Removal of Trigg cofferdam Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Oct. 23, 1962 Aug. 26, 1937 July 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) July 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) Oct. 23, 1962 July 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) Turning basin at Richmond Harbor Maintaining turning basin at Richmond Deepwater Terminal Channel depth increased to 35 feet to Richmond Deepwater Terminal LAFAYETTE RIVER, VA. (See Section 7 of Text) Channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from deep water in Hampton Roads to Hampton Blvd. bridge. Knitting Mill Creek modification East Haven Creek modification LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA. (See Section 8 of Text) Existing project. Long Creek, Lynnrhaven Inlet modification NORFOLK HARBOR, VA. (See Section 9 of Text) Hampton Roads and Elizabeth River Mar. 2, 1907 Channel 30 feet deep to Navy Yard H. Doc. 381, 59th Cong., 1st sess. 5-18 H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Approved in 1972 Specified in Act S. Ex. Doc. 714, 47th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 314, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 68 74th Cong., 1st sess.2 H. Doc. 738, 77th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 191, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 586, 87th Cong.,2d sess. Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 5. 75th Cong., 1st sess. Approved in 1967. Approved in 1979 H. Doc. 580, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Approved in 1982 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT* TABLE 5-B (Cont.) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 30, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 June 30, 1948 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 22, 1976 Depth of 35 feet to Navy Yard. Depth of 40 feet and width of 750 feet to mouth of Southern Branch. Widen 40-foot channel to 1,500 feet from 40-foot contour in Hampton Roads to a point just south of Norfolk International Terminal. 45 feet deep Ft. Wool to Lambert Point, 800 feet wide Norfolk International Terminal to Lambert Point. SOUTHERN BRANCH Channel with a depth of 22 and 25 feet. Depth of 40 feet and width of 450 feet from mouth to Belt Line RR Bridge. Channel 30 feet deep and 375 feet wide to Virginia Ry. bridge: thence 25 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide to Norfolk & Western RR Bridge. Depth of 25 feet and width of 200 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to a point 2,500 feet above with a turning basin 500 feet square. Approach and turning area 40 feet deep and a maximum width of 830 feet opposite Norfolk Naval Shipyard: thence a channel 35 feet deep and 375 and 250 feet wide to a point 1900 feet above Norfolk & Western RR bridge and a turning basin 35 feet deep and 600 feet at upstream end. 45 feet deep Belt Line bridge to Old Virginia bridge, 35-foot deep turning basin opposite St. Julians Creek. Extend existing 35-foot project to a channel 35 feet deep and 250 feet wide upstream 1.5 miles to the Norfolk and Portsmouth Belt Line RR bridge and a turning basin at the mouth of Mains Creek 35 feet deep and 800 feet square. H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 122, 83rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 226, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 182, 73d Cong., 2d sess. 2 H. Doc. 545, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 355, 94th Cong., 2d sess. EASTERN BRANCH Mar. 2, 1907 Width of 500 feet and depth of 25 and 22 feet. Removel of shoals at mouth. Mar. 3, 1925 Depth of 25 feet and width of 200 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to Virginia RR bridge. July 3, 1930 30-foot channel to a point opposite terminal of Imperial Tobacco Co. in Berkley. Mar. 2, 1945 Depth of 25 feet and width of 300 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to Campostella bridge. WESTERN BRANCH Mar. 4, 1913 Channel 24 feet deep and 300 & 400 feet wide to West Norfolk highway bridge. July 3, 1930 For 18-foot channel to a point about 3,000 feet above West Norfolk highway bridge. H. Doc. 373, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act H. Doc. 226, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 37, 71st Cong., 1st sess.3 H. Doc. 224, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 556, 62nd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 265, 70th Cong., 1st sess. 5-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 5-B (Cont.) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents SCOTTS CREEK July 3, 1930 Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide to a point 100 feet above the Atlantic Coast Line RR bridge. ANCHORAGES June 25, 1910 30-foot anchorage at Lambert Point Aug. 8, 1917 12-foot anchorage at Pinner Point Sept. 3, 1954 An anchorage 38 feet deep and 1,500 feet square: anchorage 35 feet deep and 1,500 feet square: and an anchorage 20 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 3,000 feet long. Oct. 27, 1965 Two anchorages opposite Sewells Point 45 feet deep with 1,200-foot swinging radius. QUINBY CREEK, VA. (See Section 10 of Text) May 17, 1950 Existing project. TANGIER CHANNEL, VA. (See Section 12 of Text) Mar. 2, 1919 Channel from Tangier Sound and anchorage. Jan. 3, 1934 Changed channel and anchorage dimensions. (P.W.A. Act) and Aug. 30 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Modified project dimensions. July 14, 1960 Channel across Tangier Island. (Sec. 107) THIMBLE SHOAL CHANNEL, VA. (See Section 13 of Text) Aug. 8, 1917 A channel 40 feet deep and 750 feet wide. Sept. 3, 1954 Channel width increased to 1,000 feet with side channels on either side 32 feet deep and 450 feet wide. Oct. 27, 1965 Channel 45 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide. TYLERS BEACH, VA. (See Section 14 of Text) July 14, 1960 Existing Project. (Sec. 107) July 14, 1960 Jetty Modification. (Sec. 107) WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA (See Section 15 of the Text) June 25, 1910 Existing project adopted. Mar. 2, 1945 Project modified. Oct. 27, 1965 Project widened to 100 feet, partially relocated, and (Sec. 107) incorporated in Delaware Bay-Chesapeake Bay Waterway in Delaware-Maryland-Virginia. H. Doc. 189, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 605, 63rd Cong., 2d sess.' S. Doc. 122, 83rd Cong., 2d sess.1 H. Docs. 187 & 143, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 241, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 107, 63rd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 51, 72nd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 141, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Approved in 1964 H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 122, 83d Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Approved in 1966. Approved in 1981. H. Doc. 957, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 268, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Approved in 1970. 5-20 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT* TABLE 5-B (Cont.) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents VIRGINIA BEACH, VA. (See Section 17 of Text) Sept. 3, 1954 Project authorized. H. Doc. 186, 83rd Cong., 1st sess. Oct. 23, 1962 Project modified. H. Doc. 382, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Mar. 7, 1974 Project modification authorized for Phase I Advanced H. Doc. 365, 92nd Cong., 2d sess. Engineering and Design. GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA. (See Section 19 of Text) July 24, 1946 Project authorized. H. Doc. 325, 61st Cong., 2d sess. RICHMOND FILTRATION PLANT, VA. (See Section 20 of Text) Oct. 22, 1976 Project authorized. H. Doc. 543, 94th Cong., 2d sess. VA. BEACH STREAMS, CANAL NO. 2, VA. BEACH, VA. (See Section 21 of Text) Oct. 27, 1965 Project authorized. H. Doc. 640, 94th Cong., 2d sess. (Sec. 201) 'Contains latest published map. 3For latest published map, see H. Doc. 1246, 62d Cong., 3d 2lncluded in Emergency Relief Administration Program sess. May 23, 1935. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLORIDA: TABLE 5-C DATA RELATIVE TO THE COMPLETED LOCKS (See Section 1 of Text) Dimensions Greatest Length Depth on Width Avail- Year of able Miter Sills Opened Miles Cham- for Full Character to from Location ber Width Lift Upper Lower of Navi- Cost Norfolk, Va. feet (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Foundation gation 12.4 Albemarle and Chesa- 75 600 2.7 1 1 Piles in sand 1932 $499,913 peake Canal (Great Bridge, Va.) Dismal Swamp Canal (Deep Creek) 52 300 and shells 12 12 12 Natural earth with cutoff walls 1940 $348,879 5-21 10.7 TABLE 5-C (Cont.) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLORIDA: DATA RELATIVE TO THE COMPLETED LOCKS (See Section 1 of Text) Dimensions Greatest Length Depth on Width Avail- Year of able Miter Sills Opened Miles Cham- for Full Character to from Location ber Width Lift Upper Lower of Navi- Cost Norfolk, Va. feet (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Foundation gation 33.1 Dismal Swamp Canal 52 300 12 12 13 Natural earth 1941 $373,556 (South Mills, N.C.) with cutoff walls 116 feet at mean low water. TABLE 5-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1982 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report ' Expended From For Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Appomattox River, Va.' Aberdeen Creek, Va.2 Blackwater River, Va. Active portion2 11 Broad Creek, Va. 2 Deep Creek, Newport News, Va. 2 Cape Charles City Harbor, Va. Carters Creek, Va. Active portion2 3 Channel from Phoebus, Va. to deepwater in Hampton Roads2 Channel connecting York River, Va. Back Creek to Slaights Wharf 2 Chesconessex Creek, Va.2 Chincoteagute Bay, Va.2 Chincoteague Harbor of Refuge, Va. Chowan River, N.C. 2 Cockrells Creek, Va. 4 Cranes Creek, Va. Davis Creek, Va.2 Deep Creek, Accomack Co., Va. Dymers Creek, Va. 2 Greenvale Creek, Va. 2 1980 1975 1975 1962 1980 1981 1951 1944 1950 1968 1980 1978 1975 1949 1978 1971 1974 1953 1980 $870,341 $863,140 109,643 200,893 342,118 27,888 288,278 622,644 28,398 11,500 14,855 25,516 25,126 49,396 107,220 6,274 97,612 83,000 5,582 20,003 151,735 81,770 2,054,201 451,237 3,277 32,442 36,874 31,889 177,556 24,471 29,198 158,323 39,675 4,610 198,420 5-22 19,300 1,200 2,500 5,700 4,000 2,910 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT* TABLE 5-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1982 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Hampton Creek, Va. Horn Harbor, Va. 2 Hoskins Creek, Va. 2 Jackson Creek, Va.2 Jarvis Creek, Va.4 Kings Creek, Va.4 Lafayette River, Va. Little Machipongo River, Va.2 Little River (Creek), Va.2 13 Locklies Creek, Va.2 Merherrin River, N.C. 2 Milford Haven, Va.2 Mill Creek, Va.2 Mulberry Creek, Va.2 Nandua Creek, Va.2 Nansemond River, Va.8 Newport News Creek, Va.2 Nottoway River, Va. 2 Occohannock, Creek, Va. Active portion 2 Onancock River, Va.2 5 Oyster Channel, Va.2 Pagan River, Va. 2 6 Pamunkey River, Va. Active portion 2 Parker Creek, Va.2 Parrotts Creek, Va.2 Portsmouth Harbor, Va. Channel to Nansemond Ordnance Depot 2 Queens Creek 2 Rappahannock River, Va.9 10 12 Rappahannock River at Bowlers Wharf, Va.4 Starlings Creek, Va.2 Taskinas Creek, Va. Totuskey Creek, Va. Urbanna Creek, Va.2 7 Whitings Creek, Va. Winter Harbor, Va. 2 Willoughby Channel, Va.2 Wishart Point Channel, Va.2 York River, Va. Active portion2 1981 1964 1977 1971 1979 1957 1981 1972 1966 1928 1950 1950 1937 1950 1950 1978 1962 1981 1951 1963 1979 1950 1964 1974 1957 1947 1979 1978 1950 1981 1975 1970 1963 1971 1981 1953 1975 1958 186,237 13,987 44,100 8,500 39,259 5,593 255,624 15,000 168,623 11,581 47,734 24,568 5,445 2,393 6,988 167,477 135,600 44,295 13,859 187,914 119,117 51,425 31,376 15,530 37,045 165,566 26,949 414,633 66,242 7,479 167,869 55,724 21,630 171,334 8,500 118,762 1,116,952 88,488 622,801 34,437 153,598 54,343 442,033 9,560 49,591 32,322 4,346 2,458 39,804 426,777 147,570 78,283 427,233 285,282 284,381 161,183 140,973 37,771 66,162 101,803 1,649,163 603,632 135 450,693 106,868 112,333 291,048 42,485 102,243 180,904 295,212 5-23 62,969 500 175,386 16,955 43,000 1,350 2,000 500 2,973 30,625 TABLE 5-D (Cont.) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 'Includes $22,500 for previous projects. 7In addition, $61,087 was expended for rehabilitation. 2Completed. 8lncludes $30,000 for new work and $7,000 for 31n addition, $700 for maintenance was expended from maintenance for previous projects. contributed funds. 91n addition, $168,091 was expended for rehabilitation. 4lnactive. 10Includes $197,146 for previous new work projects. 5lncludes $33,549 for new work and $24,754 for "Includes $15,000 for new work for previous projects. maintenance for previous projects. '12ncludes $113,500 for previous maintenance projects. 6 lncludes $20,671 for new work for previous projects. 13Federal funds expended by the U.S. Navy for new work. TABLE 5-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1982 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Anderson Park, 1979 $471,474 - $176,671 Newport News, Va. Hampton Institute 1976 $156,906 - $175,845 TABLE 5-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1982 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Buena Vista, Va. 1977 $417,9001 - - Newmarket Creek, Va. 1970 1,000,000 $11,237 $550,097 Norfolk Floodwall, Va. 1973 1,851,933 28,659 516,256 Salem Church Lake, Va. 1976 1,896,7161 2 'Preconstruction planning terminated. 2lncludes $144,785 for previous projects. TABLE 5-G RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Name of Project Date Survey Conducted CONDITION SURVEYS Chincoteague Channel Swash Bay-White Trout Creek Hog Creek Cedar Island Bay Chesapeake Bay to Magothy Bay Jun. 82 May 82 May 82 May 82 May 82 5-24 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT* TABLE 5-G (Cont.) RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Date Name Survey of Project Conducted CONDITION SURVEYS (Cont.) Goose Hill Channel Dec. 81 Dancing - Swann Channel Dec. 81 Sewells Point Anchorage Apr. 82 York River - Poropotank Bar Aug. 82 Skiffes Creek Aug. 82 RECONNAISSANCE SURVEYS Urbanna Creek Jun. 82 5-25 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT* This district comprises central and eastern North Carolina and a.portion of south-central Virginia, embraced in drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean from the southern boundary of Virginia to the Shallotte River, inclusive, with exception of the Meherrin River Basin above Murfreesboro, N. C., the Chowan River Basin above the confluence of the Nottaway and Blackwater Rivers, and the Pasquotank River and its tributaries for navigation only. It includes a portion of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway from the northern boundary of North Carolina to Little River, S. C., and a portion of the waterway from Norfolk, Va., to the Sounds of North Carolina, south of the north shore of Albemarle Sound. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R& H Actofl965)........................6-2 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns River, Fla. (Wilmington District) ............. 6-2 3. Beaufort Harbor, N. C. ..................... 6-4 4. Belhaven Harbor, N. C..................... .6-4 5. Cape Fear River, N. C. Above Wilmington..... 6-4 6. Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N. C.. .... .6-5 7. Far Creek, N. C.. ..................... 6-5 8. Lockwoods Folly River, N. C.................6-5 9. Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N. C..............6-6 10. Morehead City Harbor, N. C..................6-6 11. Neuse River, N. C ........................ 6-7 12. Ocracoke Inlet, N. C. ...................... 6-7 13. Pamlico and Tar Rivers, N. C................. 6-8 14. Roanoke River, N. C........................6-8 15. Rollinson Channel, N. C. .................... 6-8 16. Shallotte River, N. C..........6-8 17. Silver Lake Harbor, N. C....................6-9 18. Smiths Creek, Pamlico County, N. C.. ..... 6-9 19. Stumpy Point Bay, N. C ................... 6-9 20. Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N. C ............... 6-10 21. Waterway Connecting Swanquarter Bay with Deep Bay, N. C. ...................... 6-10 22. Wilmington Harbor, N. C............... . 6-10 23. Wrights Creek, N. C ..................... 6-11 Beach Erosion Control 24. Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N. C. .............. 6-11 Flood Control Page 25. Adkin Branch, Lenoir County, N. C...........6-12 26. Black River, Harnett County, N. C............6-12 27. Cape Fear River Basin, N. C ............... 6-12 27A. B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake ........... 6-12 27B. Randleman Lake, N. C. .................... 6-13 28. Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N. C..........6-13 29. Deep Creek, Edgecombe County, N. C................. 6-14 30. Goldsboro, Neuse River, N. C.............. 6-14 31. Joyce Creek, Camden County, N. C.........6-14 32. Leesville, Va.-Roanoke River, Sec. 32, Demo. Project. .................... 6-15 33. Neuse River Basin, N. C. .................. 6-15 33A. Falls Lake, N. C.......... ........... 6-15 34. Scuppernong River, N. C................6-16 35. Wrightsville Beach, N. C....................6-16 36. Yadkin River Basin, N.C. and S.C...........6-16 36A. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, N. C............ .......... 6-17 37. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ........... ....... 6-17 38. Food Control Work Under Special Authorization....................6-17 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 39. Roanoke River Basin, Va. and N. C.........6-17 39A. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, Va. and N. C ............................ 6-17 39B. Philpott Lake, Va. .......... ........... 6-18 40. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations....................... 6-18 *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. Other tables referenced in the text also appear at the end of this chapter. 6-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 General Investigations Page 41. Surveys ............... . ............... 6-19 42. Collection and Study of Basic Data........... 6-19 43. Advance Engineering and Design............ 6-19 Tables Table 6-A Cost and Financial Statement........... 6-20 Table 6-B Authorization Legislation...........6-25 Table 6-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects......................... 6-27 Table 6-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects .................... 6-28 Tables (continued) Page Table 6-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ....................... 6-29 Table 6-F Not Applicable Table 6-G Deauthorized Projects. .............. 6-30 Table 6-H Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ............... .......... 6-30 Table 6-I Navigation Work Under Special Authorization................. 6-31 Table 6-J Dams and Reservoirs................. 6-32 Table 6-K Special Authorization................ 6-33 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (RIVER AND HARBOR ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Wilmington District. Existing project. The existing project provides for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with the report of the Chief of Engineers, House Document 251, 89th Congress, 1st session. The project was authorized by Section 302, 1965 River and Harbor Act (H.D. 25, 89th Cong., 1st sess.). The Act provides that research and planning costs shall be borne fully by the United States. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project, and participate to the extent of 30 percent of the cost of the program. Requirements are being met. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: No control work was performed during the year since problems were not sufficient to warrant treatment. Planning was accomplished at a federal cost of $22,261 to address the recent discovery of hydrilla. Contributed funds of $2,369 were refunded to the State. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Because of the discovery of hydrilla in Wake County, the State General Design Memorandum was supplemented to add hydrilla to the approved program in N. C. The supplement was approved by OCE on October 4, 1982 and proposes control work for selected sites when federal funds become available. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (WILMINGTON DISTRICT) Location. The project is located on the east coast of the United States, between Norfolk, Va., and St. Johns River, Florida. The section within Wilmington District begins at the Virginia-North Carolina State line and extends generally southerly and southwestwardly to Little River, S. C., a total of 308 statute miles. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 830 to 842, inclusive.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1926, 1932, and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a waterway, 12 feet deep, with widths varying from 90 feet in land cuts to 300 feet in open waters; the construction, operation and maintenance of suitable bridges; saltwaterintrusion preventive measures in the vicinity of Fairfield, N. C.; a channel in Peltier Creek, 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from the Intracoastal Waterway in Bogue Sound to and including a basin in Peltier Creek, 6 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and 600 feet long; a channel, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide between the Intracoastal Waterway and the gorge in Bogue Inlet; a channel,. 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to a turning basin, 200 feet wide and 350 feet long, at Swansboro; a channel, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide in New River Inlet, and a connecting channel of the same dimensions to the Intracoastal Waterway near the mouth of New River; a channel, 10 feet deep, and 90 feet wide in New River, between the Intracoastal Waterway and the Seaboard Coastline Railroad bridge at Jacksonville, N. C.; a channel through New Topsail Inlet, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide and a channel from New Topsail Inlet to the Intracoastal Waterway by way of Old Topsail Creek, 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide; a channel, 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide, in Banks Channel, from New Topsail Inlet, paralleling the barrier beach, to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; a channel, 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide, across the ocean bar at Masonboro Inlet, with suitable jetties at the entrance, thence 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to the channel of the Intracoastal Waterway at Wrightsville by way of Banks and Motte Channels; a turning basin, 15 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 700 feet 6-2 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT long, on the east side of Banks Channel near Masonboro Inlet, with three 15-pile dolphins therein; a channel, 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 8,000 feet long, to and including a turning basin of the same depth, 130 feet wide and 180 feet long, at Carolina Beach; a yacht basin, 230 feet wide, 450 feet long, and 12 feet deep, at the town of Southport, connected to the waterway by a suitable channel of the same depth; and maintenance of the general navigation features of the North Carolina State Ports Authority Small-Boat Harbor at Southport, consisting of an entrance channel, 150 feet wide and 400 feet long, an eastern harbor-access channel, 70 feet wide and 430 feet long, a western harbor-access channel, 60 feet wide and 185 feet long, to a turning basin, 180 feet wide and 550 feet long, all to a depth of 6 feet. Length of channels and basins total 347.1 miles. A modification providing for the replacement of five Federally owned and operated highway bridges was authorized in December 1970. A modification providing for 100 percent Federal funding for Walter B. Jones (formerly Wilkerson Creek) and Coinjock bridges was authorized in October 1976. Estimated Federal Cost is $50,100,000 (1982). The six mooring basins along the AIWW were deauthorized 5 August 1977 under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251.The south jetty at Masonboro Inlet has an estimated Federal cost of $8,810,000 (1982) and is complete except for the training wall. A Section 111 project to mitigate damages caused by the north jetty was authorized in October 1980 and was completed in April 1981. A modification to provide for a channel 150 feet wide and 8 feet deep extending from the seaward side of the ocean bar at Carolina Beach Inlet to the intersection of the inlet with the AIWW channel. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers on February 18, 1982, under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. The estimated Federal construction cost is $153,000 (1982). Plane of reference is mean low water. In the waterway north of Neuse River, variations in water surface due to winds seldom exceed 2 feet above or below mean stage. Between Beaufort and the Cape Fear River, normal tidal range varies from 3.5 feet at the inlets to 1 foot at points between. Average range of tide is 4 feet on the ocean side of Bogue Inlet and 2.5 feet just inside the inlet. At New River, tidal range varies from 3.5 feet at the inlet to 1 foot at the head of the marshes and zero at Tar Landing, 31 miles above. From Cape Fear River, N. C., to Little River, S. C., mean tidal range varies between 4.7 feet in Cape Fear River and 4 feet at the intermediate inlets, and 2 feet at points midway between the inlets. On October 15, 1954 (Hurricane Hazel), the tide at Holden Beach reached an elevation of 17.6 feet. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date except for the modifications. The State of North Carolina has agreed to keep the bridges toll free and upon completion of each bridge, accept maintenance, replacement, and ownership responsibilities thereof. They have withdrawn their offer to contribute 25 percent of the first cost. The Water Resources Act of 1976 modified the terms of local cooperation to delete the non-Federal cost-sharing requirement for the Walter B. Jones (formerly Wilkerson Creek) and Coinjock bridges. The three remaining bridges were not included in this modification and are awaiting reauthorization to reflect 100 percent Federal funding. For the Carolina Beach Inlet modification local interest must: (a) pay one-half of the first cost of construction (including engineering, supervision and administration costs) allocated to recreational boating, an amount presently estimated at $57,800; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to initial channel excavation and subsequent maintenance, except in the case of fault or negligence on the part of the United States or its contractors; and (c) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the initial excavation and subsequent maintenance of the inlet channel project and for aids to navigation, upon the request of the Chief of Engineers. Fully complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Government costs in connection with replacement of two highway bridges cost $394,221. Litigation on Walter B. Jones Bridge (formerly Wilkerson Creek) cost $74,384. Preauthorization studies for Carolina Beach Inlet cost $755. Preconstruction planning for the Carolina Beach Inlet modification cost $23,563. Between September 20 and 30, 1982, the U. S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 11,200 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $38,633. This is the first report since authorization. Cost in connection with mitigation of erosion at Wrightsville Beach caused by Masonboro Inlet was $501. This work was accomplished in connection with restoration of the Wrightsville Beach project and maintenance dredging on the AIWW. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 66,631 cubic yards from shoals in New River Inlet at a cost of $103,902 and 49,357 cubic yards from shoals in New Topsail Inlet at a cost of $93,397. The Merritt incurred cost of $1,672 at Bogue Inlet. During intermittent periods the U. S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 18,755 cubic yards from shoals in New River Inlet at a cost of $26,391. The Currituck incurred cost of $235 at Bogue Inlet. During intermittent periods the U. S. snagboat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations and maintained dredging and mooring ranges at a cost of $183,451. Between October 1 and 29, 1981, the contract dredges Marion and Clarendon removed 475,920 cubic yards from shoals in the through channel between the Neuse River and the South Carolina state line at a cost of $810,858. Between April 20 and June 3, 1982, the contract dredges Enterprise, Northwood and Buxton removed 176,248 cubic yards from shoals in the Topsail channels and at Masons Inlet at a cost of $529,536. Adjustments to prior year dredging costs caused an increase of $9,529. Engineering and design for pipeline dredging between the Neuse River and South Carolina state line cost $19,686. Marking of easements along the AIWW cost $13,121. Mosquito control in disposal areas cost $24,796. Masonboro Inlet monitoring program cost $4,898. Structural repairs to Hobucken, Core Creek, Fairfield and Coinjock bridges cost $189,241. Between April 27 and May 27, 1981 the contract dredge Talcott removed 6-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 61,352 cubic yards from shoals at the Carolina Beach Inlet crossing. This work was accomplished in connection with emergency work at Carolina Beach. This contract was modified in FY82 to include the maintenance dredging at a cost of $99,390. Bridge repairs due to accidents cost $55,106. Inspection of highway bridges cost $2,745. Condition and operation studies cost $362,330. Four highway bridges and utilities were operated and maintained at a cost of $605,814. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in April 1981 except for the training wall and three tie-up dolphins at Masonboro Inlet, the bridge replacement program and the Carolina Beach Inlet modification. The new Walter B. Jones bridge (formerly Wilkerson Creek) was opened to traffic on July 31, 1981. Construction of the Carolina Beach Inlet modification was initiated September 20, 1982. Total cost for existing project to September 1982 was $76,309,664, of which $25,502,464 was for new work and $50,807,200 was for maintenance. 3. BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is just inside Beaufort Inlet, adjacent to Morehead City Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for stopping erosion at Beaufort Inlet by jetties and sand fences at Fort Macon and Shackleford points and other shore protection; channels 15 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide in Bulkhead and Gallants Channels, except for a depth of 12 feet in the upper 5,000 feet of Gallants Channel; a harbor of refuge in Town Creek 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long connected to Gallants Channel by a channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 1,400 feet long; a basin 12 feet deep, 600 feet wide in front of the town of Beaufort except for a channel 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide through the basin; a stone bulkhead from Town Marsh across Bird Shoal to the west end of Carrot Island; and a channel in Taylors Creek 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide, extending about 2.6 miles easterly from about opposite Marsh Street in Beaufort to Lennoxville Point at North River, except for an 800-foot-long section at the east end which is 12 feet deep. Total length of channels is 6.9 miles. Average tidal range is 2.5 feet at Beaufort and 3.5 feet at the inlet. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are fifty waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 2,000 feet. These facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between March 12 and 27, 1982, the contract dredge Enterprise removed 87,776 cubic yards from shoals in Bulkhead and Gallants Channels at a cost of $269,789. Condition and operation studies cost $27,808. Contributed funds of $58,755 were expended for diking. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in October 1965. (For further details see Annual Report 1962.) Costs under existing project to September 30, 1982, were $573,389 for new work and $2,809,390 for maintenance, including $168,833 contributed funds, a total of $3,382,779. 4. BELHAVEN, N. C. Location. The town of Belhaven is at the junction of Pantego Creek and Pungo River, about 11 miles above the mouth of the latter. The harbor consists of the lower reaches of Pantego Creek and is about 6,000 feet long. Pungo River forms part of the Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk and the St. Johns River. Norfolk is 130 miles north of Belhaven and Beaufort 66 miles south. (See U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 123.) Existing project. This provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide, extending from deep water in Pungo River to a point about 800 feet east of the highway bridge, with a turning basin 800 feet long and 300 feet wide at the upper end; and for the construction of timber breakwaters at the mouth of Pantego Creek. Pungo River is a nontidal stream with little slope. Variations in the water surface, due to winds, seldom exceed 2 feet above to below mean stage. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930 and June 20, 1938. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 12 wharves along the town waterfront, all of timber construction; one is owned by the town and is open to all without charge; four have rail connections. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Real estate utilization inspections cost $400. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in September 1940. 5. CAPE FEAR RIVER, N. C. ABOVE WILMINGTON Location. The river is formed by confluence of the Deep and Haw Rivers at Moncure, Chatham County, N. C., and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Cape Fear, near the southern extremity of the State. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 426.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing projects. The authorized project provides for a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Wilmington to a turning basin 400 feet wide and 550 feet long at Navassa (2.9 miles); a channel 12 feet deep and 140 feet wide from Navassa to mileboard 30 at Acme, with five channel cutoffs, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide to eliminate sharp bends; a channel 8 feet deep from mileboard 30 to Fayetteville by constructing three locks and dams and by dredging river shoals; and recreational 6-4 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT facilities at the locks and dams. Total length of the project channels is 113.9 miles. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 25,1910; June 26, 1934; August 30, 1935; August 26, 1937; October 27, 1965; and Section 4, Flood Control Act of 1944. For further details see Annual Reports for 1962 and 1970. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are twelve waterfront facilities on the river, with a total frontage of 1,190 feet. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U. S. snagboat Snell snagged and cleared at a cost of $9,600. Periodic inspections and evaluation of three locks and dams cost $45,331. Repairs to lock gate sealing systems cost $14,542. Design for deferred pipeline dredging cost $441. Condition and operation studies cost $39,041. Operation and maintenance of three locks and dams cost $202,524. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in June 1970. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1982, were $14,358,993 of which $3,610,454 (including $1,226,385 public works) was for new work and $10,748,539 for maintenance. 6. CHANNEL FROM BACK SOUND TO LOOKOUT BIGHT, N. C. Location. The project is located on the coast of North Carolina, 8 miles east of Beaufort Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 7 feet deep from Back Sound, through Shackleford Banks to Lookout Bight. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 26, 1937, and March 2, 1945. For details see Annual Report for 1959. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Not required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U. S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 94,520 cubic yards from shoals in Bardens Inlet at a cost of $167,930. The U. S. sidecasting dredge Merritt incurred cost of $2,261. Condition and operation studies cost $20,257. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in May 1965. 7. FAR CREEK, N. C. Location. Flows easterly from Englehard into Pamlico Sound, about 95 miles south of Norfolk, Va. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1232). Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep and 80 to 100 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to highway bridge at Engelhard, with a turning basin 12 feet deep, 200 feet wide and 900 feet long at the head. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930, and May 17, 1950. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Project is served by 12 waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 2,300 feet, all privately owned. Existing facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Real estate utilization inspection cost $260. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed June 1957. 8. LOCKWOODS FOLLY RIVER, N. C. Location. The project is located on the south coast of North Carolina about 12 miles west of Cape Fear River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1236 and Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep at low water from the ocean to the bridge at Supply 12.5 miles above, to be obtained by dredging through oyster rocks and mudflats. The completed river portion of the project above the waterway was reclassified to the active category in 1971. Lunar tidal ranges in Lockwoods Folly River are 4.5 feet at the inlet and 2 feet at the head of navigation at Supply. The existing project was authorized by the 1890 River and Harbor Act. (See Annual Report for 1887, page 1099.) A modification to enlarge the channel from 6 to 12 feet deep and from 100 to 150 feet wide across the ocean bar for distance of 4,700 feet was approved by the Chief of Engineers on June 3, 1980, under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. The estimated Federal construction cost is $361,000 (1982). Local cooperation. For the new modification local interest must: (a) pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest, one-half of the first costs of construction allocated to recreational boating, an amount presently estimated at $93,000; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages resulting from changes in groundwater levels, saltwater intrusion, or wave action due to the construction works, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractor; (c) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rightsof- way necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers and (d) provide depths in berthing areas commensurate with the project depths, and provide service facilities. Terminal facilities. Thirty-one piers and wharves on the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway at Holden Beach, about 1.25 miles west of Lockwoods Folly Inlet, with a total frontage of about 1,980 feet available. At Dixons Landing, about 2 iniles upstream of the inlet, there are five wharves with a total frontage of 240 feet. Numerous natural landings are used for loading and unloading small boats. Berthing space in the vicinity of Lockwoods Folly Inlet totals about 2,220 feet. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning cost $40,096. Between 6-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 September 23 and 30, 1982, the U. S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 42,025 cubic yards from Lockwoods Folly Inlet at a cost of $17,559. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U. S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 135,581 cubic yards from shoals in the inlet at a cost of $305,392. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 110,152 cubic yards from shoals in the inlet at a cost of $184,131. The U. S. snagboat Snell removed the wreckage of the trawler King David at a cost of $5,926. Condition and operation studies cost $7,041. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the project was completed in June 1965 except for the latest modification. Work was initiated on the latest modification on September 23, 1982. 9. MANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, N. C. Location. The project is located on the northeastern side of Roanoke Island, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1229.) Existing project. The authorizedproject provides for a channel 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the Atlantic Ocean through Oregon Inlet with connecting 12-foot channels, 100 feet wide, to Pamlico Sound, Manteo, and Wanchese; and a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide connecting the Manteo-Oregon Inlet Channel with Roanoke Sound. Length of channels is 25.4 miles. A newly authorized modification provides for stabilization of Oregon Inlet with a dual rubble-mound jetty system, including means for sand transfer to the downdrift beach and bottom protection for the highway bridge over Oregon Inlet; a channel, 20 feet deep and 400 feet wide, through the ocean bar at Oregon Inlet; a channel, 14 feet deep and 120 feet wide, from the gorge in Oregon Inlet to and through Roanoke Sound to and including a 15-acre basin of the same depth at Wanchese. The estimated Federal cost for the modification is $110,000,000 (1982). The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 25, 1910; October 17, 1940; May 17, 1950; and December 31, 1970; and under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. For the new modification, local interests must: (a) provide all lands, easements, and rightsof- way for construction and subsequent maintenance of the, project, including suitable areas required for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil and also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent maintenance; (c) continue to pro vide and maintain adequate terminal and transfer facilities, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; (d) provide and maintain necessary mooring and berthing facilities in any enlarged basin, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; (e) provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with depths provided in the related projects areas; (f) provide and maintain necessary bottom protection along the bridge over Oregon Inlet or the cost of such protection works; (g) accomplish such alterations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage, electrical powerlines, telephone lines, or other utility facilties as well as their maintenance; (h) establish a competent and properly constituted public body empowered to regulate the use, growth, and free development of the harbor facilities, with the understanding that said facilities will be open to all on equal terms; (i) and establish regulations prohibiting the discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the water of the harbor by the users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control. Reasonable assurances have been received. The State of N. C. has constructed the Wanchese Harbor portion and was reimbursed under Sec. 215, PL 90-483. Terminal facilities. The project is served by 33 waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 3,320 feet. Additional wharves and facilities will be provided with the enlarged basin at Wanchese. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Environmental and archeological studies cost $41,036. Engineering and design cost $1,025,872. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Schweizer removed 665,080 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $1,200,107. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 279,265 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $515,565. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 36,872 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet. Cost for the Fry will be billed in FY 1983. Between August 24 and September 23, 1982, the contract dredge Richmond removed 77,420 cubic yards from shoals in Old House Channel at a cost of $345,157. Cost in connection with. prior year pipeline dredging were $22,234. During intermittent periods the U. S. snagboat Snell repaired dredging ranges and moorings at a cost of $28,612. Oregon Inlet model study cost $9,483. Condition and operation studies cost $83,318. Contributed funds of $41,800 were expended for diking. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for the latest modification. (For further details, see Annual Report of 1962.) 10. MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located on the northern shore of Bogue Sound, adjacent to Beaufort Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Previousproject. For details see page 470 of Annual Report for 1935. Existing project. The authorized project provides for deepening of the channel, from the 42-foot-depth contour in the Atlantic Ocean through the ocean bar to the gorge in Beaufort Inlet, to 42 feet over a bottom width of 450 6-6 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT feet, thence to a depth of 40 feet in the east leg of the turning basin including the 1,200 foot diameter turning area, with widths of 600 feet in the cutoff channel, and 400 feet wide to the turning basin and connecting shallow-draft channels. Project deepening was completed on 2 August 1978. Jetties at Beaufort Inlet were reclassified to the "active" category on March 8, 1972. The estimated Federal cost is $49,500,000 (1982) for the jetties. In general the project as it now exists was authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor Act (S.D. 54, 84th Cong., 1st sess.) and the River and Harbor Act of December 31, 1970. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for construction of the jetties which requires that all lands needed for construction be provided without cost to the United States. Terminal facilities. Twenty-six waterfront facilities serve the port, with a total frontage of 1,250 feet. Marine terminals provide 5,300 feet of berthing space, with a depth alongside of 35 feet, and facilities for transfer of cargoes between rail and water carriers. Improvements to facilities were completed in 1969. For further details see Port Series No. 12, revised 1980, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U. S. snagboat Snell repaired dredging ranges at a cost of $49,157. Between May 14 and June 12, 1982, the contract dredge Manhattan Island removed 977,040 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $3,034,167. Between October 1 and 5, 1982, the contract dredge Hampton Roads removed 22,865 cubic yards from shoals in the inner harbor and state ports at a federal cost of $78,146 and non-federal cost of $221,540. Monitoring of Bogue Inlet cost $5,527. Monitoring of Bogue Banks and Shackleford Banks cost $214. Maintenance and installation of tide gages cost $15,338. Condition and operation studies cost $124,866. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete except for the jetties. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1962.) Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1982 was $32,202,378 of which $6,501,569 was for new work (including $553,477 public works funds) and $25,700,809 for maintenance, including $639,427 contributed funds. 11. NEUSE RIVER, N. C. Location. Neuse River rises in the north central part of North Carolina near Raleigh, flows generally southeasterly to a point 30 miles below New Bern where it empties into Pamlico Sound. Total length about 350 MIiles. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 538 and 1231.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 300 feet wide and 12 feet deep at mean low water from a point 10 miles below, up to, and in front of New Bern; thence 120 feet wide and 10 feet deep, from the railroad bridge at New Bern to a point about 3 miles upstream; a channel 4 feet deep at dead low water to Kinston; and, during 9 months of the year, 3 feet deep at dead low water to Smithfield, to be obtained by dredging and snagging. The section included in the project is about 160 miles long. Estimated cost of new work is $488,200 (1964). The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 18, 1878; June 13, 1902; January 21, 1927; and two modifications, one providing for a channel 120 feet wide and 10 feet deep was authorized October 15, 1965 and the other providing for a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the highway bridge across the mouth of Dawson Creek to deep water in the Neuse River was authorized August 4, 1969, both under authority of Section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960. The 300-foot wide channel in front of New Bern was deauthorized August 5, 1977. Local cooperation. For the Section 107 modification, local interests must provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable spoil disposal areas and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance of the project; continue to provide and maintain, without cost to the United States, necessary mooring facilities and utilities, including a public landing, with suitable supply facilities, open to all on equal terms; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the waters of the creek by users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws and regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control. Terminal facilities. There are thirty wharves on this stream, of which two are below New Bern, sixteen at or near New Bern, three at Bridgeton, and nine above New Bern. Total frontage is 2,900 feet. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A report to determine the economic justification of the project cost $1,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in October 1971. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1950.) 12. OCRACOKE INLET, N. C. Location. The inlet connects Pamlico Sound with the Atlantic Ocean, about 30 miles southwest of Cape Hatteras and 43 miles northeast of Cape Lookout. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1232.) Existing project. Thie authorized project provides for a channel across the ocean bar 18 feet deep and 400 feet wide, and construction of a jetty extending from Ocracoke Island to the Atlantic Ocean. Construction of the jetty has been deferred for restudy. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of July 14, 1960. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962. 6-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $11,356. The U. S. sidecasting dredge Schweizer incurred cost of $2,384. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in August 1971. 13. PAMLICO AND TAR RIVERS, N. C. Location: The two names .apply to the same river, known as the Tar above and as the Pamlico below Washington, N. C. This stream rises in Person County, flows southeasterly 180 miles to Washington, thence 38 miles to Pamlico Sound. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 537.) Previous project. For details see page 502 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 200 feet wide from 12-foot contour in the river below Washington to Atlantic Coastline Railroad bridge at Washington; thence 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide to a turning basin of same depth, 200 feet wide, 300 feet long, in Hardee Creek, 1,500 feet above its mouth; thence 6 feet deep, 75 feet wide to Greenville; thence 20 inches deep, 60 feet wide to Tarboro; and thence to clear the natural channel to Little Falls. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 14, 1876; March 3, 1879; August 11, 1888; March 2, 1907; July 25, 1912; July 3, 1930; and August 26, 1937. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 54 wharves on the portion of this river under improvement, of which 34 are along the waterfront at Washington, 19 between Washington and the mouth, and only 1 in usable condition above Washington. They have a frontage of 3,570 feet. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A report to determine the economic justification of the project cost $1,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. (For details see Annual Report for 1962.) 14. ROANOKE RIVER, N. C. Location. Rises in Blue Ridge Mountains, west of Roanoke, Va., flows southeasterly about 398 miles, and empties into westerly end of Albemarle Sound, N. C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1228 and Post Route Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Albemarle Sound to 1 mile above Plymouth, N. C.; thence a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide to Hamilton; and thence a channel 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide to Palmyra Landing. Project authorized by River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1871; July 3, 1930; and June 20, 1938. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Thirty-two waterfront facilities serve the waterway. Facilities appear adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A report to determine the economic justification of the project cost $1,456. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. 15. ROLLINSON CHANNEL, N. C. Location. The project is located about 3.5 miles northeast of Hatteras Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 5.1 miles long from deep water in Pamlico Sound to and including a basin of the same depth, 80 to 150 feet wide, and 1,450 feet long at Hatteras; a rubble-mound breakwater on each side of the channel at the entrance to the basin; and a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from that depth in Hatteras Inlet gorge to Rollinson Channel, in the vicinity of the basin at Hatteras. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of August 30, 1935; March 2, 1945; September 3, 1954; and October 23, 1962. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Six waterfront facilities serve the channel, with a total frontage of 926 feet. Existing facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A report to determine the economic justification of the project cost $13. Project condition surveys cost $5,585. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed August 22, 1966. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1961.) 16. SHALLOTTE RIVER, N. C. Location. A small stream in Brunswick County, N. C., rising in the large swamp country between Cape Fear and Waccamaw Rivers, known as Green Swamp. Stream is about 30 miles long and flows southerly into Atlantic Ocean and 20 miles west of mouth of Cape Fear River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 835.) Previous project. For details see page 1806 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. A channel 4 feet deep at mean low water and 36 feet wide from the mouth to town of Shallotte. Section under improvement is 9 miles long. River is tidal, range varying from 5 feet at mouth to 3 feet at Shallotte. Hurricane Hazel in 1954 caused a tide about 16 feet above mean sea level in the river at Shallotte Point. Project authorized by River and Harbor Acts of March 4, 1913, and January 21, 1917. Local cooperation. None required. 6-8 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT Terminal facilities. A marine railway and shop at Shallotte Point and another in town of Shallotte with facilities for building and repairing boats up to about 60 feet long. On Shallotte River, there are 17 docks varying from 16 to 321 feet of frontage, providing 1,334 feet of wharf and docking space. Operation and results during period. Maintenance: Project condition surveys cost $2,633. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in 1929. 17. SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located at the southwest end of Ocracoke Island, a portion of the Outer Banks on the southeast coast of North Carolina, separating Pamlico Sound from the Atlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for basin depths of 12 feet in Silver Lake Harbor; an entrance channel 12 feet deep and 60 feet wide, from the basin to Teaches Hole Channel; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from the entrance channel through Big Foot Slough Bar to the 12-foot contour in Pamlico Sound; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from the entrance channel through Teaches Hole Channel to the gorge in Ocracoke Inlet; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, across Bluff Shoal; and for rubble-mound training walls on the north and south sides of the entrance channel, 300 feet and 400 feet long, respectively. Mean tidal ranges are 1.9 feet in the throat of Ocracoke Inlet and 1 foot at Ocracoke. Variations in the water surface of Pamlico Sound are generally due to winds and seldom exceed 1 or 2 feet above or below mean stage. Severe storms have raised the water surface as much as 7 feet above normal water level at Ocracoke. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Twelve waterfront facilities serve the harbor. These facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between December 17, 1981 and January 21, 1982, the contract dredge Marion removed 104,011 cubic yards from shoals in Big Foot Slough Channel at a cost of $369,470. Between September 24 and 30, 1982, the contract dredge Richmond removed 4,300 cubic yards from shoals in Big Foot Slough Channel at a cost of $45,977. Condition and operation studies cost $17,838. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed July 28, 1970. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) 18. SMITHS CREEK (PAMLICO COUNTY), N. C. Location. Smiths Creek rises in Pamlico County, flows generally southerly, and empties into Neuse River at the town of Oriental, 25 miles southeast of New Bern, N. C. It is about 5 miles long but navigable for only 2 or 3 miles above its mouth. (See U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 538.) Existing project. This project provides for a rubblemound breakwater starting at a point on the mainland in Oriental and extending 800 feet southwesterly; and an entrance channel in Smiths Creek, 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from that depth in Neuse River to and including a basin, generally parallel to the breakwater 10 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 800 feet long at Oriental. The total length of the channel and basin is about 5,000 feet. Variations in water level due to winds seldom exceed 2 feet above or below mean stage. Observations of 4 years duration show that the extreme range of wind tides is 8.3 feet. The existing project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of June 25, 1910 and September 3, 1954. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 16 wharves in this harbor, all of timber construction with pile foundations. They have a frontage varying from 6 to 40 feet, the total frontage being about 400 feet. None have rail connections. One wharf was built by the town and is to be maintained in perpetuity as a public wharf. The remaining wharves are all privately owned but are generally open to the public when not required by their owners. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Real estate utilization inspections cost $339. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in March 1956. 19. STUMPY POINT BAY, N. C. Location. On southeastern side of the mainland, Dare County, N. C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1229.) Existing project. A charnel 75 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in Pamlico Sound to a basin in the harbor at Lake Worth, 75 to 100 feet wide, 550 feet long and 10 feet deep, plus an irregularly shaped area providing access to the public wharf, together with protective breakwaters at entrance to the harbor. Project was authorized by 1948 River and Harbor Act and under Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Bulkheads in existing basin provide about 550 linear feet of berthing space, and a wholesale fishhouse provides about 250 feet. Part of the space along the bulkheads is publicly owned.Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce, but any appreciable increase will require additional facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A report to determine the economic justification of continuing maintenance cost $1,352. Real estate utilization inspections cost $262. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed on September 20, 1967. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1966.) 6-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 20. WATERWAY CONNECTING PAMLICO SOUND AND BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located in Core Sound, west of the outer banks of eastern North Carolina (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 420 and 1233.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a through channel to Core Sound 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to Beaufort Harbor; an alternative route of the same dimensions through Back Sound by way of channels at the east and west ends of Harkers Island; a channel 7 feet deep and 70 feet wide from the through channel to the local harbor at Cedar Island, including the authorized passage and future maintenance of a channel through the existing private basin, and an access channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide and about 400 feet long to a basin the same depth, 60 feet by 100 feet; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide from the through channel to Atlantic; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide, with a basin 200 feet by 500 feet, the same depth, at Sealevel; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide, with basin 150 feet by 130 feet, the same depth, at Davis; a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide with a basin 100 feet by 600 feet, the same depth, at Marshallberg; an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide, from Back Sound to harbor of refuge 120 feet by 250 feet, the same depth in Brooks Creek at the west end of Harkers Island; and a channel 7 feet deep and 70 feet wide, from the existing side channel at Atlantic, N.C., to the mouth of Little Port Brook; thence 7 feet deep and 50 feet wide, along the Brook to a basin 600 feet long, 180 feet wide, and 7 feet deep, with a breakwater, beginning at a point between the mouth of Little Port Brook and White Point, running along the channel approximately 2,000 feet. The project is complete except for 7-foot modification to Davis, N. C. which was deauthorized April 6, 1982 by the Chief of Engineers due to the inability of local interest to provide the terms of local cooperation. Plane of reference is mean low water. The length of the authorized channels is about 50.6 miles (See Table 6-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date for completed portion. Terminal facilities. Sixteen small wharves serve the waterway. Additional facilities are needed along Core Sound. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Real estate utilization inspections cost $760. Construction of dikes for pipeline dredging cost $56,129. Project condition surveys cost $15,921. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in September 1972 except for the modification to Davis, N. C. which has been deauthorized. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1961.) 21. WATERWAY CONNECTING SWANQUARTER BAY WITH DEEP BAY, N. C. Location. On north side of Pamlico Sound, about 10 miles east of mouth of Pamlico River. (See U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1231.) Existing project. A channel 60 feet wide and 8 feet deep from Deep Bay through present waterway to Swanquarter Bay, and thence through Swanquarter Canal to a basin of the same depth, about 500 feet long and 60 to 300 feet wide, at head of canal. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 25, 1910, and March 2, 1945. For further details see Annual Report for 1950. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Six waterway facilities serve the waterway, with a total frontage of 355 feet. Existing facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Real estate utilization inspections cost $275. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed January 24, 1964. 22. WILMINGTON HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located on the Cape Fear River, on southeast coast of North Carolina, between the Atlantic Ocean and Wilmington, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 426.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1804 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 533 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide from the Atlantic Ocean through the ocean bar and entrance channels to Southport, thence 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the upper end of the anchorage basin (foot of Castle Street) at Wilmington, thence 32 feet deep and 400 feet wide, to Hilton Bridge over Northeast (Cape Fear) River; a 38-foot-deep anchorage basin at Wilmington; a 32-footdeep turning basin opposite the principal terminals; a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide, about 3 miles long, in Cape Fear River; and a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Hilton Bridge over Northeast (Cape Fear) River to a point 1.66 miles above, including a turning basin of the same depth, 700 feet wide and 500 feet long, at a point 1.25 miles above the bridge. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930; March 2, 1945; May 17, 1950; October 23, 1962; and March 10, 1964; under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. A modification to widen the existing anchorage basin by 100 feet was authorized on July 13, 1982, under Sec. 5 of the Cong. Appro. Act of March 4, 1915. (For further details of authorization, see 1962 Annual Report.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Forty-three principal wharves, piers, and docks at port of Wilmington, with a berthing space of about 20,000 linear feet serve the harbor. These facilities handle general cargo and petroleum products. For further details, see Port Series No. 12, revised 1980, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Between September 17 and 30, 1982, the contract dredge Dauntless removed 140,200 cubic yards to widen the anchorage basin and state ports at a federal cost of $159,176 and non-federal cost of $25,531. This work was ac- 6-10 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT complished with maintenance funds. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U. S. snagboat Snell repaired survey and dredging ranges at a cost of $11,103. Between December 11, 1981 and January 6, 1982, the contract dredge Padre Island removed 687,286 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $1,060,225. Between November 27, 1981 and February 3, 1982, the contract dredge Enterprise removed 780,597 cubic yards from shoals in the anchorage basin and state ports at a federal cost of $538,877 and non-federal cost of $102,921. Between October 1 and 11, 1981, the contract dredge Clarendon removed 80,692 cubic yards from shoals in the 25 foot project at a cost of $300,614. Cost for prior year dredging was $1,496. The feasibility study for enlargement of turning basin cost $22,402. Installation of tide gages cost $3,494. Mosquito control on Eagle Island cost $7,912. Condition and operation studies cost $241,093. Contributed funds of $301,120 were expended for diking. A refund to the State Ports Authority was made for $2,823. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed July 1973. except for latest modification. Construction on latest modification was initiated September 17, 1982 with maintenance funds. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1962.) Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1982, was $51,993,528 of which $14,089,612 was for new work and $37,903,916 was for maintenance, including $2,210,330 contributed funds. 23. WRIGHTS CREEK, N. C. Location. About 10 miles south of Belhaven, N. C., and is a small creek tributary to Pungo River. Creek flows generally east to Pungo River, is about 900 feet wide at mouth, and gradually narrows to 200 feet at head of navigation. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1231 and 1232.) Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide from Pungo River to and including a basin 8 feet deep and 150 by 400 feet in north prong of Wrights Creek. Length of channel and basin is about 1.3 miles. Existing project was authorized July 12, 1962, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands, rights-of-way, and suitable spoil-disposal areas for initial work and maintenance; provide adequate terminal facilities; and hold the United States free from damages. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 17 commercial piers along the waterfront with a frontage of 1,400 feet, and a number of private piers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Real estate utilization inspections cost $396. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed April 1965. Beach Erosion Control 24. FORT FISHER AND VICINITY, N.C. Location. The project is located in New Hanover County about 20 miles south of Wilmington, North Carolina, on the peninsula which separates the lower Cape Fear River from the Atlantic Ocean. (See U. S. Geological Survey quadrangle sheet for Kure Beach, N. C.) Existing Project. The project involves construction of a stone revetment along the seaward face of the eroding upland bluff fronting the Fort Fisher Historic Site. The total length of the revetment is 3,200 feet. The revetment structure will be comprised of natural stone units. The crest of the revetment will be rimmed with a safety zone consisting of a pedestrian path, rails, and appropriate landscaping to prevent access to the sloping face of the structure. Three overlook, gazebo-type platforms will permit visitors to view the beach below the revetment, and three stairways integrated in the face of the structure will allow controlled access to the beach. Estimated Federal cost of construction is $4,030,000 (1982). The project was authorized under Section 201 of Public Law 89-298 on November 22, 1976. Local cooperation. The State of North Carolina is the project sponsor and prior to commencement of construction would: a. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable beach fill material borrow areas, as determined by the Chief of Engineers, necessary for the construction of the project. b. Provide a cash contribution for the shore protection project equal to the appropriate percentage of the final construction cost exclusive of lands, easements, rights-ofway, and alterations, the percentage to be in accordance with existing law, which contribution is presently estimated at $1,730,000, or 30 percent of project first costs. c. Enter into a written agreement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army concerning accomplishment of the above preconstruction requirements and that the State will: (1) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works. (2) Maintain the revetment structure, walkway, overlooks, and stairways after completion of construction 'i accordan e with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of he Army. (3) Provide without cost to the United States appropriate access and facilities, including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based, and administer and maintain the site for continued public use during the life of the project. (4) Control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers. (5) Adopt appropriate ordinances or provide other means to insure preservation of the beach areas and the dunes. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Advance engineering and design cost $118,661. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is in the preconstruction planning stage with completion indefinite due to higher priority work by the State of N. C. 6-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 Flood Control 25. ADKIN BRANCH, LENOIR COUNTY, N. C. Location. Adkin Branch is a tributary of the Neuse River and is located in central Lenoir County and the Coastal Plain Region of North Carolina. The stream flows in a southeasterly direction for about 6 miles to the Neuse River. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheet, Kinston, N. C.). Existing project. Provides for deepening and widening the channel to a 30-foot bottom width from the mouth of Adkin Branch to Lincoln Street, 0.5 mile; thence 26 feet wide to Seaboard Coast Line RR Crossing, 1.8 miles; thence 21 feet wide to Highland Drive, 0.4 mile; thence 17 feet wide to Queen Street, 0.5 mile; constructing drop structures at stations 52+00, 110 + 62, 143 + 08, and 165+ 78; modifying the existing bridges at Caswell Street, Gordon Street and Washington Avenue to 30-foot clear spans; and installing safety fence around structures, 0.3 mile. Total length of project is 3.2 miles. Project was approved by the Chief of Engineers, April 1, 1971, under Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended and was deauthorized September 8, 1981, due to the inability of local interest to provide the terms of local cooperation. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations and alterations, and highway or highway-bridge construction and alterations necessary for project construction; hold the United States free from damages, and adjust claims concerning water rights; maintain and operate the project after its completion; control land use in the flood plain to prevent development which would be subject to flood damage; contribute 16.75 percent of construction costs, and prevent future encroachment. Formal request has been imade. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Detailed engineering and design cost $242. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project has been deauthorized. 4 26. BLACK RIVER, HARNETT COUNTY, N. C. Location. The river rises near Angier in Harnett County, N. C., and flows in a southerly direction about 25 miles to its confluence with South River. (See Army Map Service quadrangle sheet 5254, Fayetteville, N. C.) Existing project. The project provides for 5.5 miles of channel excavation on Black River, beginning at a point 8,000 feet below County Road 1780, with a 35-foot bottom width to the Durham and Southern Railroad. The project was authorized by the Chief of Engineers on February 9, 1968, under Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Project monitoring cost $548. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in December 1979. 27. CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN, N. C. Location. Work covered by this project consists of a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of the Cape Fear River in North Carolina within a radius of 100 miles from Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. Public Law 88-253, approved December 30, 1963, authorized three principal dams and reservoirs and a series of smaller reservoirs on tributaries of the Cape Fear River in accordance with the comprehensive plans in House Document 508, 87th Congress, 2d session. The act also provides that the appropriate agencies of the Departments of the Army and Agriculture shall conduct joint investigations and surveys and prepare a report on the upper tributaries of the Cape Fear River in the interest of watershed protection and flood prevention, and the conservation, development, utilization, and disposal of water. The report is to be prepared and submitted in compliance with provisions of Public Law 87-639. A list of the dams and reservoirs included in the comprehensive plan follows. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs). Estimates of cost as given are based on 1960 price levels, except the ones for B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, and Randleman Lake, which were revised in 1982, and Howards Mills Lake in 1980. These three projects have been authorized for construction in accordance with the above authorization. Howards Mill Lake was reclassified to the "deferred" category in October 1980 due to the current lack of economic justification. The joint study, accomplished by the Departments of the Army and Agriculture was unfavorable and has been submitted to Congress. Local cooperation. Requirements are given in the individual project reports. 27A. B. EVERETT JORDAN DAM AND LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is located on the Haw River, N. C., 4.3 miles above its mouth, and 2.5 miles north of Moncure, N. C. Existing project. The project provides for an earth dam 1,330 feet long with a maximum height of 112 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled, unpaved chute spillway, and a controlled 19-foot-diameter outlet structure. Some saddle dikes are required beyond the spillway. The reservoir will have a gross storage capacity of 778,000 acre-feet, of which 543,000 acre-feet will be for flood control and a conservation pool of 235,000 acre-feet for water-quality control, water supply, and sedimentation. The reservoir will be operated as a unit of a coordinated system for control of floods in the Cape Fear River Basin and for water supply, water-quality control, 6-12 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT and other purposes. Estimated cost for new work is $129,000,000 (1982), consisting of $70,655,200 for construction, and $58,344,800 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations. The existing project was authorized by Public Law 88-253 approved December 30, 1963 (H.D. 508, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) Local cooperation. Local interests must protect downstream channels from encroachments and obstructions which would adversely affect operation of the project; reimburse the Federal Government for all costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, presently estimated at $3,800,000 and bear all annual costs for operation, maintenance, and major replacements allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, an amount presently estimated at $35,000 annually. Assurances that these obligations for water storage would be assumed have been received from the Departiment of Natural and Economic Resources, State of North Carolina. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Relocation of N. C. Roads 1715 and 1941 were completed at a cost of $38,545. Relocation of N. C. Road 1900 was initiated at a cost of $33,500. O&M support facilities were continued at a cost of $228,051. Miscellaneous dam facilities cost $47,974. Recreation facilities cost $329,613. Status of plans and specs: All relocations, 100 percent; Parkers Creek rec area sanitary disposal system, 90 percent; Dam toe riprap, 85 percent; Ebenezer Church interim rec facilities, 50 percent; Vista Point and Poe's Ridge interim rec facilities, 65 percent; and Parkers Creek rec area, 88 percent. Total Federal expenditures were $2,087,925. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance on completed features cost $561,223. Condition at end of fiscal year. Relocations complete except for one road relocation and Public Service Gas Co. Recreation facilities are underway. Impoundment was completed in February 1982 with dedication on May 1, 1982. 27B. RANDLEMAN LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is located on Deep River, N. C., about 15 miles south of Greensboro and about 2 miles upstream from the town of Randleman. The damsite and about two-thirds of the reservoir would lie in Randolph County. The upper one-third of the reservoir would lie in Guilford County. Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of an earth dam 2,400 feet long with a maximum height of 110 feet above the streambed to create a reservoir with gross storage of 108,000 acre-feet, consisting of 46,000 acre-feet for flood control and a conservation pool of 62,000 acre-feet for water supply, waterquality control and sedimentation. Randleman Lake is the second project of the comprehensive plan of development for the Cape Fear River Basin, providing reservoir storage for flood control, water supply, and recreation. Estimated cost of new work is $118,000,000 (1982), consisting of $62,945,000 for construction and $55,055,000 for lands and damages, including relocations. The existing project was authorized by the 1968 Flood Control Act (H.D. 343, 90th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests must: (1) In accordance with the Federal Water Project Recreation Act (P.L. 89-72): (a) Administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife and to assure access to such development to all on equal terms; (b) pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost allocated to recreation presently estimated at $16,400,000; and (c) bear all the costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities, presently estimated at $489,000 annually; (2) In accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, assure payment to the United States of all costs allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $46,300,000 for construction and $351,000 annually for operation, maintenance, and major replacement; (3) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to water-rights claims resulting from construction and operation of the project; (4) Prevent encroachment on downstream channels to the extent needed to provide effective reservoir operation; and (5) Exercise to the full extent of their legal capability control against removal of stream-flow made available for preservation of downstream fishery habitat. These assurances are subject to the provision that Federal participation in measures required to safeguard the quality of water in Randleman Reservoir shall not be provided as a substitute for the responsiblity of local interests to provide adequate treatment in accordance with water quality standards established pursuant to the Water Quality Amendments of 1972 (P.L. 92-500). Reasonable assurances that the requirements will be fulfilled have been received. With the advent of innovative financing under the current administration, the terms of local cooperation may change. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Advance engineering and design cost $147,365. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was completed in FY 1982. Currently awaiting a new construction start. 28. CAROLINA BEACH AND VICINITY, N. C. Location. The project is in New Hanover County, about 15 miles southeast of Wilmington, N. C., on the peninsula which separates lower Cape Fear River from the Atlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Map 834.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of a dune with a base generally bordering at or near the building line, with a crown width of 25 feet at an elevation of 15 feet above mean low water, together with integral construction of a beach berm with a crown width of 50 feet at elevation 12, extending about 25,800 feet from the northern limits of Carolina Beach to the southern limits of Kure Beach; initial deposition of sufficient material north of Carolina Beach to serve as a 6-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 feeder beach; and Federal participation in the cost of beach nourishment for a period not to exceed 10 years from the year of completion of initial placement. The area south of Carolina Beach was reclassified to the inactive category, February 1975. Approved estimated Federal cost for new work is $9,800,000 (1982). The project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H.D. 418, 87th Cong. 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) Provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction; (b) make required relocations and alterations of streets, utilities, or structures; (c) contribute 37.9 percent of the total first cost, with credit allowed for (a) and (b); (d) hold the United States free from damages; (e) maintain all works after completion; (f) maintain continued public ownership of the shore; (g) adopt and enforce appropriate ordinances to provide for preservation of improvement and its protective vegetation; (h) control water pollution to extent necessary to safeguard health of bathers; and (i) at least annually inform interests affected that project will not provide any substantial protection from ocean surges higher in elevation than that of Hurricane Hazel, October 15, 1954. Requirements have been fulfilled to date for the town of Carolina Beach portion of the project only. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Between December 28, 1981 and August 12, 1982, the contract dredge California placed 3,662,181 cubic yards of beach fill on Carolina Beach at a federal cost of $5,247,893 and non-federal cost of $3,136,513. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction was completed August 12, 1982, except for grassing which will be accomplished in FY 1983. 29. DEEP CREEK, EDGECOMBE COUNTY, N. C. Location. The stream rises in Halifax County and flows southerly to its confluence with Fishing Creek, about 0.5 mile upstream of the Fishing Creek and Tar River confluence, which is about 8.0 miles above Tarboro. All of the project is in Edgecombe County, N. C. (See U.S. Geological Survey quadrangle sheets, Parmele and Tarboro, N. C.) Existing project. The project provides for channel improvement and dike construction in the Deep Creek basin, consisting of the construction of a dike and drainage appurtenances on the north, west, and south sides of the town of Speed, for a distance of about 7,400 feet, to a maximum height of 9.5 feet, with a 10-foot-topwidth; relocation and channel excavation of 3,100 feet of Knight Swamp along the northern dike segment and 1,800 feet of Longs Branch along the southern dike segment, to 20-foot and 15-foot-bottom widths, respectively, and enlarging 3,200 feet of Deep Creek to a 65-foot maximum bottom width along the western dike segment, utilizing excavated material for dike fill; and channel excavation of an additional 500 feet of both Knight Swamp and Longs Branch upstream of the dike to bottom widths of 10 feet; at an estimated Federal construction cost of $388,000 (1982). The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers on February 18, 1977, under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide, without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way utility relocations or alterations, and road and bridge construction and alterations necessary for project provision (the acquisition of all lands or interest in lands necessary for the project shall be accomplished in accordance with provisions of P.L. 91-646, Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970); hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works when not caused by the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractor; maintain and operate the project after completion, without cost to the United States, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent obstruction or encroachment on channels which would reduce their flood carrying capacity or hinder maintenance and operation and regulate land use in the 100-year improved flood plain within the diked area to prevent any development which would be subject to flood damage in accordance with acceptable flood plain management practices; bear all project costs in excess of $2 million; and notify interests affected, at least annually, that the improvements will provide protection against the 100-year flood within the diked area and about the 5-year flood along the cleared and snagged reach, but complete flood protection is not provided. Formal assurances have been received. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Detailed engineering and design cost $17,252. Condition at end of fiscal year. A contract for project construction was awarded September 13, 1982, with completion scheduled for September 1983. 30. GOLDSBORO, NEUSE RIVER, N. C. Location. On that portion of the Neuse River near Goldsboro, Wayne County, N. C., between points 94.8 and 102.5 miles above New Bern, N. C. Existing project. Provides for cutoff channel, 12 feet deep, 20 feet wide, about 6,400 feet long, across the bend in the Neuse River located about 95 miles above New Bern, N. C. Project authorized by Flood Control Act of 1941. (See H. Doc. 327, 77th Cong. 1st sess., which contains the latest published map.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Real estate utilization inspection cost $273. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. 31. JOYCE CREEK, CAMDEN COUNTY, N. C. Location. Joyce Creek rises in the northeastern part of Camden County, N. C., and flows generally southward for 6-14 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT about 10 miles to Turners Cut near South Mills, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1227 and Army Map Service quadrangle sheet, South Mills, N. C.) Existing project. The project provides for excavating a channel 40 feet wide, from the confluence with Turners Cut to County Road 1235 , 3.2 miles; thence a channel, 30 feet wide, to the uppermost crossing of SR 1224, 0.8 miles; thence a 20 foot bottom width channel to the confluence with Mill Run and Cypress Run, 1.7 miles; thence on Cypress Run, a channel, 10 feet wide, to County Road 1233, 1.6 miles; and on Mill Run, a 10-foot-wide channel from confluence with Joyce Creek to County Road 1232, 2.2 miles; a total of 9.5 miles. Estimated Federal construction cost is $505,000 (1982). The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers on March 29, 1967, under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations and alterations, and highway or highway-bridge construction and alterations necessary for construction; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate the project after completion; prevent future encroachment; provide a cash contribution of 21.5 percent of construction costs, now estimated at $106,300; and accomplish associated drainage works necessary to realize the benefits from the Federal improvement. Camden County is project sponsor based on favorable referendum in 1974. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Detailed engineering and design cost $25,766. Project reanalysis cost $5,223. Condition at end of fiscal year. A contract for project construction was awarded September 23, 1982, with completion scheduled for April 1984. 32. LEESVILLE, VA., ROANOKE RIVER, SEC. 32, DEMO. PROJECT Location. The project is located on the Roanoke (Staunton) River in southwest Virginia near the Town of Leesville in Campbell and Pittsylvania counties. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Leesville, Va.) Existing project. The project provides for a total of about 2,200 linear feet of streambank protection on two separate sites along a 3-mile segment of the river between Leesville Dam and the town of Leesville. Three methods of erosion control were used, they were: stone rubble with vegetation, rubber tire mattress and rock windrow. The project was funded for construction by the Chief of Engineers in February 1978, under Section 32, P.L. 93-251. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; hold and save the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate project after completion. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Monitoring of Leesville and Little Rockfish Creek cost $1,382. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in March 1981. The project is functioning as designed. 33. NEUSE RIVER BASIN, N. C. Location. Works covered by this project consist of a series of dams and reservoirs in the Neuse River Basin in North Carolina within a radius of 50 miles from Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1965 authorized construction of the Falls project as the key project in the recommended general plan of development of the Neuse River Basin. The plan will serve as a guide for immediate and future development of the basin's water resources as set forth in House Document 175, 89th Congress, 1st Session. A list of projects included in the general plan of development follows. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) Estimated costs as given are based on 1963 price levels, except for Falls Lake which was revised in 1982. 33A. FALLS LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is on the Neuse River about 10 miles north of the city of Raleigh, North Carolina. Existing project. The authorized project provides for an earth dam 1,900 feet long with a maximum height of 92 feet above streambed. The dam will have a 30-foot top width. An uncontrolled chute spillway, 100-feet wide, will be located in the east abutment. The reservoir will have a gross storage capacity of 397,000 acre-feet, of which 243,000 acre-feet will be for flood control, 45,000 acre-feet for water supply for the city of Raleigh, 71,000 acre-feet for water-quality control, and 38,000 acre-feet for sediment storage. The reservoir will be operated as the initial unit of a coordinated system for control of floods in the Neuse River Basin for water supply, water quality control, recreation, and other purposes. Project items may be modified in detailed planning. Estimated cost of new work is $160,000,000, consisting of $70,115,000 for construction and $89,885,000 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations. The project was authorized by the 1965 Flood Control Act (H.D. 175, 89th Cong., 1st sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests must prevent encroachment on downstream channels that would interfere with the operation of the reservoir; pay the United States in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, the entire amount of construction cost allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $13,000,000 and entire amount of operation, maintenance, and replacement costs allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $83,000 annually, the final amounts to be determined after actual costs are known; administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees), with interest, one-half of the separable cost of the project allocated to recreation and one-fourth of the separable cost allocated to fish and wildlife enhancement, the amount involved currently being estimated at $23,000,000, and, bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife lands and facilities, the amount involved 6-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 currently being estimated at $1,149,000 on an average annual basis. Formal assurances have been received. The N.C. Department of Natural and Economic Resources has been authorized by an act of legislation to assure payment of all non-Federal costs allocable to water supply in all Federal projects as required by law. The State will require repayment of water supply costs, by the users. A contract between the city of Raleigh and the United States for water-supply storage space was approved by the Secretary of the Army on September 11, 1972. A contract agreement for cost sharing of recreational lands and facilities in accordance with P.L. 89-72 was approved by the Secretary of the Army on September 11, 1972. A contract agreement in accordance with Section 221 of P.L. 91-611 was executed on October 10, 1972. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Land acquisition continued at a cost of $4,121,264. Slope repairs on SR 1005 were initiated at a cost of $34,566. Rip-rapping of 1-85 and construction of the utility fill continued at a cost of $1,856,661. Relocation of Southern Railway was completed at a cost of $1,653,294. Cemetery relocations continued at a cost of $93,726. Installation of Public Service Gas line continued at a cost of $884,769. Utility relocations continued at a cost of $790,195. Reservoir clearing was completed at a cost of $602,562. Removal of Seaboard Coastline Railroad was accomplished at a cost of $73,500. Dam intake tower modifications were accomplished at a cost of $66,000. Recreation facilities continued at a cost of $628,162. Status of plans and specs: Sanderling Beach rec. area 95 percent; Hwy. 50 rec area, 90 percent; Rolling View interim rec facilities, 50 percent; Ledge Creek, Hickory Hill, Upper Barton Creek and Eno River access areas, 100 percent; and SR 2000 spillway bridge, 100 percent. Total federal expenditures for construction were $12,317,839. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance cost $385,530. Condition at end of fiscal year. Reservoir filling scheduled to commence January 1983. Interim recreation facilities are underway. The spillway bridge, fish and wildlife facilities and permanent recreation facilities remain to be constructed. 34. SCUPPERNONG RIVER, N.C. Location. The stream rises in the east-central portion of Washington County, N. C., flows east into Tyrrell County, and thence north into Albemarle Sound, a total distance of about 22 miles. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheet, Creswell, N. C.) Existing project. The project provides for excavating a 70-foot-bottom-width channel, with depths ranging from 9 feet to 12 feet, along Scuppernong River from Spruills Bridge to the confluence with Mauls Creek, a distance of 2.0 miles, and excavating a 45-foot-bottom-width channel, with depths ranging from 6 feet to 8 feet, along Mauls Creek from Scuppernong River to County Road 1163, a distance of 1.8 miles. Total project length is 3.8 miles. Estimated Federal cost of construction is $590,000 (1982). Project was approved by the Chief of Engineers, October 31, 1966 (with modification adding Mauls Creek approved June 16, 1967), under Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations and alterations, and highway or highway-bridge construction and alterations necessary for construction; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate project after completion; contribute, in cash, 19.4 percent of construction costs, currently estimated at $82,000; and prevent future encroachment. Formal request has not been made. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Project reanalysis cost $16,845. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project reanalysis and environmental studies are underway with completion scheduled in 1983. A smaller channel on Scuppernong River and deletion of Mauls Creek are anticipated. 35. WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, N. C. Location. A small island about 10 miles east of Wilmington, N. C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Map p. 834) Existing project. Construct a dune with a base bordering at or near the building line, with a crown width of 25 feet at elevation 15 feet. above mean low water, together with integral construction of a beach berm with a crown width of 50 feet at elevation 12, extending about 14,000 feet from Moores Inlet on the north to Masonboro Inlet on the south. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H.D. 511, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A cost adjustment caused a decrease in federal cost of - $15,941 and an increase in non-federal cost of $15,941. Dune grassing was accomplished at a non-federal cost of $57,023. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project restoration was completed April 10, 1981 except for grassing which is scheduled for completion in October 1982. 36. YADKIN RIVER BASIN, N. C. AND S. C. Location. The river rises on the eastern slope of the Blue Ridge Mountains in western North Carolina, flows generally easterly about 100 miles to the vicinity of Donnaha, North Carolina, thence southeasterly 104 miles to its confluence with Uwharrie River near Badin, North Carolina, where its name changes to Great Pee Dee River. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of July 24, 1946, authorized construction of four flood control dams in the Upper Yadkin River Basin, two on the Yadkin River above Wilkesboro, North Carolina, and two on Reddies River, a tributary stream. Studies made subsequent to authorization established the economic advantage of providing needed flood-control storage in only two reservoirs, one on the Reddies and one on the Yadkin. Present 6-16 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT planning considers only the two-reservoir plan, W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir constructed 1962 and Reddies River Lake. W. Kerr Scott was transferred to the Wilmington District from Charleston in fiscal year 1980 while Reddies River remains under Charleston District. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) 36A. W. KERR SCOTT DAM AND RESERVOIR, N. C. Location. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir is on Yadkin River, North Carolina, about 6 miles upstream from Wilkesboro. At full flood-control pool elevation (1,075 feet mean sea level), the reservoir extends 15.7 miles upstream to the Wilkes-Caldwell County line. Existing project. The project consists of a rolled earthfill dam 1,740 feet long, with top of dam at elevation 1,107.5 feet mean sea level or about 148 feet above streambed elevation; a spillway near the north abutment of the dam in a rock cut with crest elevation 1,075; and outlet works consisting of an intake structure, control tower, and a circular concrete conduit 12.25 feet in diameter through the base of the dam near the south abutment. The reservoir has a gross capacity of 153,000 acre-feet of which 112,000 acre-feet are reserved for flood control, 33,000 acre-feet will be used as required for water supply, and 8,000 acre-feet being contained in the minimum pool. Estimated cost is $9,104,000 (1982) for new work. The existing project was authorized by the 1946 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. For details, see page 413 of Annual Report for 1963. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: General operation and maintenance cost $798,047. Recreation use fees of $9,727 were expended for operation, maintenance, and construction of recreation facilities. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was commenced in August 1960 and placed in operation for flood control and water storage purposes in February 1963. 37. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation, inspections were made for the following projects during fiscal year 1981: Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N. C.; Gapway Swamp, Columbus County, N. C.; Old Field Swamp, Robeson County, N. C.; Gardners Creek, Martin County, N. C.; New River, Onslow County, N. C.; Pungo Creek, Beaufort County, N.C.; South Creek, Beaufort County, N.C.; Pungo River, Beaufort County, N. C.; and Filberts Creek, Edenton, N. C.; Pantego and Cucklers Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N. C.; Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N.C.; Pasquotank Dike, Pasquotank County, N.C.; Perquimans River, Perquimans County, N. C.; Core Creek, Craven County, N.C.; Princeville Dike, Edgecombe County, N. C.; Swift Creek, Pitt County, N.C.; Carolina Beach, New Hanover County, N. C.; Wrightsvilip Beach, New Hanover County, N. C.; Goldsboro, Neuse River, Wayne County, N. C.; Broad Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N. C.; Black River, Harnett County, N. C.; and Lick Run, Roanoke, Va. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation on local flood protection works where appropriate. Cost for the period was $25,289. Total cost to September 30, 1982, was $218,559, charged to operations. 38. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization. (See Table 6-K.) Emergency flood control activities and hurricane flood and shore-protection activities at Federally authorized projects (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). National Emergency Preparedness Planning cost $43,717. Advance Measures were $74,796. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 39. ROANOKE RIVER BASIN, VA. AND N. C. Location. The project is on the Roanoke River and its tributaries in Virginia and North Carolina within a radius of 100 miles from Danville, Virginia. Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1944 approved a general plan for the comprehensive development of the Roanoke River Basin for flood control and other purposes, and authorized construction of John H. Kerr and Philpott Reservoirs. (See Tables 6-J for a list of dams and reservoirs included in the comprehensiva plan.) Local cooperation. None required. John H. Kerr and Philpott Reservoirs are the only projects in the comprehensive plan that have been authorized for construction. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) 39A. JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA. AND N. C. Location. The project is on Roanoke River, about 178.7 river miles above its mouth, in Mecklenburg County, Virginia, and 20.3 miles downstream from Clarksville, Virginia. The reservoir extends upstream on Roanoke River 56 miles and on Dan River 34 miles. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete gravity dam with wing and saddle dikes on the right and left banks, with a total length of about 22,285 feet. The reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated system of reservoirs in the Roanoke River Basin for control of floods, generation of hydroelectric power, regulation of low-water flow, and for other purposes. The power installation is 204,000 kilowatts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Estimated cost is $67,643,000 (1982) for construction and 6-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 $24,521,000 for land and damages, including relocation of highways, railroads, and utilities, a total of $92,164,000 for new work. The existing project was authorized by the 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of four comfort stations and one utility building at Northbend, Buffalo Public Use Area, Tailrace Area and Rudds Creek was completed at a cost of $620. Construction of two comfort stations at Palmer Point and Rudds Creek was initiated at a cost of $125, 321. Design was continued on a washhouse and dump station at Northbend and comfort station at Longwood at a cost of $28. Cost-sharing at various sites cost $264,536. Maintenance: General operation and maintenance was performed at a cost of $3,098,050. Recreation user fees of $67,160 were expended for operation, maintenance and construction of recreation facilities. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for additional recreational facilities. Production of power and protection from floods are provided by project. 39B. PHILPOTT LAKE, VA. Location. On Smith River, Virginia, 44.3 miles above its junction with Dan River, and 35 miles upstream from Virginia-North Carolina State line in Franklin and Henry Counties. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete gravity dam 892 feet long and with a maximum height of 220 feet. Reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for flood control in the Roanoke River Basin, generation of hydroelectric power, regulation of low-water flow, and for other purposes. The powerhouse has a total installation of 14,000 kilowatts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Federal cost estimate is $13,730,000 (1982) for construction and $1,157,000 for lands and damages, a total of $14,887,000. Existing project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of a washhouse at Goose Point and a comfort station at Salthouse was initiated at a costs of $156,313. Maintenance: General operation and maintenance of the project was performed at a cost of $1,281,944. Recreation user fees of $20,240 were expended for operation, maintenance and construction of recreation facilities. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for additional recreational facilities, and is providing power and flood protection. 40. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake project, located in the Cape Fear River Basin, North Carolina, was in the initial filling phase and was at elevation 193.80 feet, MSL at the beginning of fiscal year 1982. The lake level was held near elevation 195.00 feet, MSL until the end of December to allow for construction activities to be finalized. Rainfall in the last week of December produced a rise in lake levels to elevation 199.70 feet, MSL on December 28. Additional rainfall on December 28, 1981 and January 3-5, 1982 caused a lake rise to elevation 210.2 feet, MSL on January 7. The lake level was maintained at elevation 210 feet, MSL for five days in accordance with the Initial Filling Plan. Jordan Lake was officially considered to be full at 10 a.m. on February 4, when the lake rose to elevation 216.0 feet, MSL marking the end of the filling period. Jordan Lake remained near this elevation until late May and early June when three separate rainfall events caused lake level peaks of 220.10 and 223.80 feet, MSL, on May 30 and June 6, respectively. The third rainfall period produced a lake elevation of 225.00 feet, MSL on June 12 which was the maximum elevation for fiscal year 1982 and since construction of B. E. Jordan Dam began. The lake was gradually drawn down to elevation 216.00 feet, MSL on June 27. Jordan Lake remained at or near this level until early September when declining inflows produced a gradual drawdown. Jordan Lake was at elevation 214.00 feet, MSL on September 30, 1982. Flood damages prevented during the fiscal year were equal to $570,000. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $62,800. The B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake was officially dedicated on May 1, 1982. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, located in the Roanoke River Basin, Virginia and North Carolina, began fiscal year 1982 at 4.40 feet below rule curve or at elevation 295.10 feet, MSL. The reservoir surface was drawn down gradually to the minimum elevation of the fiscal year at 293.71 or 4.20 feet below rule curve on October 24, 1981. Heavy rainfall caused the reservoir to rise steadily to 296.48 on November 7, 1981 or 0.6 feet below rule curve. During December 1981 to June 1982, periods of rainfall caused several lake rises above 300 feet, MSL, with the maximum elevation of the fiscal year at 305.56 feet, MSL, or 6.10 feet above rule curve occurring on June 18, 1982. The reservoir surface was drawn down gradually to end the fiscal year at elevation 297.72 feet, MSL, or 1.8 feet below rule curve. The 13-foot minimum stage required in the lower Roanoke River at Weldon, for striped bass fish spawning, was maintained during the entire period through the supplementation of augmentation flows from Kerr. All inflows to Kerr Reservoir were controlled without having to spill water over the spillway, or through the sluices. Gross generation amounted to 375,568,400 kilowatt hours and power revenue was $4,100,000, making an accumulative total since inception of $100,500,000. Flood damages prevented during the fiscal year amounted to $1,900,000 and the cumulative flood damages prevented since the project began amount to $60,000,000. Total cost of. functional operations for the period was $127,097. 6-18 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT Philpott Lake, located on the Smith River, Dan River Basin, Virginia, was 9.80 feet below rule curve or at elevation 961.69 feet, MSL at the beginning of the fiscal year. The lake gradually fell to the minimum elevation of the fiscal year at 957.44 feet, MSL or 14.10 feet below rule curve on December 11, 1982. Periods of rainfall caused a gradual rise in the lake levels to rule curve at elevation 973.50 on April 11, 1982. With minor fluctuations, Philpott Lake remained above rule curve until July 20, 1982. The maximum elevation of the fiscal year was 976.43 on June 15, 1982. During August and September the lake was drawn down to end the fiscal year at 968.56 or 2.90 feet below rule curve. There were no flood control benefits during the fiscal year, therefore, the cumulative amount of flood damages prevented was the same as last year or $17,000,000. Gross generation amounted to 17,459,770 kilowatt-hours and power revenue was $700,000, making a total of $11,300,000 since inception. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $47,090. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, located on the Yadkin River, in the Pee Dee River Basin, North Carolina, began fiscal year 1982 in a drought condition at elevation 1,020.00 feet, MSL. The reservoir level declined to elevation 1,019.95 feet, MSL on October 4, 1981, the minimum reservoir level for fiscal year 1982. Below normal rainfall in October 1981 and a record low rainfall of 0.81 inches in November 1981 perpetuated drought conditions through mid-December 1981. Above normal rainfall during late December 1981 and early January 1982 caused the lake to rise, reaching normal pool elevation of 1,030.00 feet, MSL on January 4, 1981. Reservoir levels continued near normal until heavy rainfall during late January and early February 1982 caused a rapid rise in the reservoir levels to elevation 1,038.70 feet, MSL on February 4, 1982, the maximum reservoir level for fiscal year 1982. The reservoir remained near the normal pool elevation, with some slight fluctuations, until early September 1982 when it began a gradual decline. W. Kerr Scott Reservoir ended the fiscal year at elevation 1,021.70 feet, MSL on September 30, 1982. Flood damages prevented in FY 82 were $350,000, which makes the cumulative total equal to $44,200,000. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $43,173. General Investigations 41. SURVEYS Cost for the period was $1,071,983, of which $120,310 was for navigation studies, $466,378 was for flood control studies, $149,535 was for beach erosion studies, $245,456 for review of completed projects, $247 for project deauthorization review, $3,786 for soil conservation service, $999 for water quality management, $5,147 for coastal zone management, $11,087 for hydrologic studies, $60,696 for cooperation with states, and $8,342 for dam inspection and inventory. 42. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain information studies, as authorized by Section 206, 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended, comprise compilation and dissemination, upon the request of a State or a political subdivision thereof, of information on floods and flood damages, including identification of areas subject to inundation by floods of various magnitudes and frequencies, and general criteria for guidance of Federal and non-Federal interests and agencies in the use of flood plain areas; and provide advice to other Federal agencies and local interests for their use in planning to ameliorate the flood hazard. Total costs for the period were $180,702. Total costs to September 30, 1982, were $2,934,376. 43. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Advance engineering and design for Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N. C. cost $55,240. Fiscal year 1982 was the first year of funding under the G. I. program. For additional information see the detailed write-up for Fort Fisher and Vicinity. 6-19 TABLE 6-A S S, in ee ection Text Project 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. & St. Johns River, Fla. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Beaufort Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Belhaven Harbor, N. C. 5. Cape Fear River, N. C. above Wilmington 6. Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N. C. 7. Far Creek, N. C. 8. Lockwoods Folly River, N. C. 9. Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost Total Cost to FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept 30, 1982 15,000 3,080,000 4,852,500 3,977,694 4,059,147 312,374 269,441 335,589 366,905 112,997 110,922 103,620 103,620 285,000 284,885 871,910 831,929 3,398,775 3,874,024 3,380,400 3,468,592 110,585 153,518 4,500 4,500 1,153,460 972,028 445,034 445,670 93,545 84,231 201,302 201,302 1,387,000 977,550 1,180,672 1,230,064 54,000 54,000 2,564,000 2,558,817 5,501,525 4,669,699 13,327 13,327 471,611 652,010 12,235 10,633 3,607 3,607 21,000 3,151 197,857 196,407 1,529,000 1,543,013 1,850,445 1,847,785 7,000 22,261 2,369 725,000 532,057 3,025,300 3,136,098 11,560 340,000 297,597 58,755 58,755 400 400 331,000 311,479 195,000 190,448 400 260 327,000 57,655 507,000 502,490. 820,000 1,066,908 2,723,000 2,204,476 44,000 41,800 6-20 119,400 118,355 31,809 31,809' 26,062,4162 25,701,1713 51,557,412' 50,807,200^ 11,560 598,389 598,3898 2,695,8148 2,653,4118 168,833 168,833 126,687 126,687 39,500 39,500 3,759,573' 3,759,573' 10,779,413 10,756,717� 88,328 88,328 1,966,571 1,958,863 164,642 164,642 545,904 545,764 491,2948 194,786' 1,680,046 1,674,086 5,925,945"' 5,751,156"1 16,850,507 16,313,390 98,000 95,800 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept 30, 1982 10. Morehead City Harbor, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 11. Neuse River, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 12. Ocracoke Inlet, N. C. 13. Pamlico and Tar Rivers, N. C. 14. Roanoke River, N. C. 15. Rollinson Channel, N. C. 16. Shallotte River, N. C. 17. Silver Lake Harbor, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 18. Smiths Creek, Pamlico County, N. C. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 1,587 18,689 105,200 84,466 1,714 1,714 109,502 109,502 34,506 34,506 29,882 37,483 148 148 310,940 310,940 - 4,411 1,777,561 1,794,868 6,931 6,931 54,832 54,500 3,548,007 3,335,094 490,112 329,534 45 45 29,000 25,457 5,030 5,030 4,782 4,782 6,542 6,542 616 616 144,300 124,210 75,000 1,645 1,645 3,097,000 3,307,415 60,962 221,540 1,700 1,700 16,000 13,740 1,700 1,700 1,600 1,456 5,023 5,023 804 804 345,526 364,956 75,000 11,985 5,598 18,633 2,633 645,000 433,285 400 339 6,546,053 '2 6,546,05312 25,370,262"s 25,345,939's 656,631 656,631 465,223 465,223 326,673 326,673 12,000" 12,0001" 346,240 346,240 860,044 853,909 674,651 674,651 770,678 770,678 404,584 404,584 550,508 550,364 589,105 589,105 761,467 755,080 18,181 18,181 153,269 137,269 184,284 184,284 2,742,218 2,529,843 75,000 75,000 113,273 113,273 36,448 36,387 6-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 6-A (Continued) See Section in Text Project 19. Stumpy Point Bay, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 20. Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 21. Waterway Connecting Swanquarter Bay with Deep Bay, N. C. 22. Wilmington Harbor, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 23. Wrights Creek, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 24. Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N. C. 25. Adkin Branch, N. C. 26. Black River, N. C. 27A. B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 27B. Randleman Lake, N. C. COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept 30, 1982 New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib: Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp.. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 5,083 5,083 18,216 16,696 1,900 1,614 10,826 12,346 -/ 287,921 72,810 351,391 351,391 124,000 124,000 -1,766 -1,766 7,879 7,879 290,000 305,645 1,347,000 1,333,031 143,720 137,713 - 963 4,016,800 4,048,204 514,347 489,834 - - 260,000 - 213,399 40,000 9,000 32,777 5,478 51,000 - 23,000 220,255 73,256 5,925,000 3,548,000 8,507,742 3,425,461 284,800 214,028 251,986 238,554 540,000 800,000 549,830 830,789 3,074,000 2,814,849 475,232 109,970 230,000 155,712 - 9,000 3,019 - 5,000 3,784 3,562,000 3,849,535 409,828 370,046 200,000 199,508 2,661,000 2,346,392 210,535 429,572 400 369 118,661 0 242 0 548 3,384,941 2,087,925 559,000 561,223 27,000 147,365 268,381 268,381 613,101 612,815 124,000 124,000 502,567 502,567 1,898,889 1,683,778 2,452 2,452 110,799 110,799 182,850 182,725 18,715,226'" 18,715,226"15 36,879,470" 36,296,200'" 2,395,334 2,210,33017 64,825 64,825 144,745 144,714 3,500 3,500 21,888 21,888 490,000 487,772 219,477 219,477 476,290 471,283 91,707,641 89,274,052 1,721,389 1,721,389 1,467,656 1,421,809 3,465,588 3,455,929 6-22 400 275 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project 28. Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 29. Deep Creek, N. C. 30. Goldsboro, Neuse River, N. C. ,31. Joyce Creek, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 32. Leesville, Va. - Roanoke River, Sec. 32, Demo Project 33A. Falls Lake, N. C. 34. Scuppernong River, N.C. 35. Wrightsville Beach, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 36A. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, N. C. 39A. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir 39B. Philpott Lake, Va. Funding New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept 30, 1982 - 1,586 275,000 - 184,248 13,000'" 19,000 12,977 IS 17,997 530,761 236,332 285,000 272,399 6,000 3,578 63,00021 63,954 21 10,000 316,424 16,057,000 19,276,211 29,000 26 21,739 26 850,239 850,239 1,092,800 986,282 500 500 690,206 736,119 34,100 203,322 2,945,520 2,998,266 62,400 48,038 1,098,531 994,694 5,128,000 5,247,893 3,951,800 3,136,513 211,000 17,252 1,400 273 251,000 22 30,98922 106,300 0 1,382 12,420,000 12,317,839 404,000 385,530 35,00027 16,84527 -15,941 -15,941 0 72,964 813,040 807,774 393,000 390,505 3,314,160 3,165,210 315,000 156,313 1,289,240 1,302,184 7,390,533 7,125,245 5,027,788 4,188,584 387,555 190,002 50,430 50,430 237,187 236,060 505,149 277,352 106,300 367,7552 3 361,14723 117,970,996 115,156,346 404,000 385,530 157,906 127,695 1,547,100 1,547,100 1,441,300 1,407,74626 8,841,326 8,841,326 7,907,53229 7,858,068 30 89,613,527 89,416,130 41,198,99231 40,745,086 32 14,587,784 14,400,634 13,213,906"3 13,086,017" 23,0001 19,7841" 124,355 9,305 18,100,000 19,009,130 36,000 20 31,348 20 113,400 20,556 24,033,000 19,557,763 10,000 24 10,000 25 10,000 24 5,206 25 85 733,900 692,071 361,000 366,931 2,779,254 3,012,183 71,000. 70,359 747,700 760,478 643,575 642,344 - 18,000 92,731 3,003,740 2,861,728 - 50,000 5,616 826,616 836,790 6-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1. Includes $2,369 refund to local interests in FY 82. 2. Includes $198,707 for previous projects and preauthorization study funds: FY 80, $47,763; FY 81, $4,275; and preconstruction and construction funds: FY 81, $2,725; FY 82, $133,000. 3. Includes $198,707 for previous projects and preauthorization study costs: FY 80, $44,377; FY 81, $6,906; FY 82, $755; and preconstruction and construction costs: FY 82, $62,196. 4. Includes $107,634 for previous projects. 5. Includes $25,000 for previous projects. 6. Includes $12,854 for previous projects. 7. Includes $149,119 for previous projects. 8. Includes $8,178 for previous projects. 9. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 64, $3,000; FY 65, -$2,755; FY 71, $8,000; FY 72, $2,000; FY 74, $9,000; FY 75, $25,000; FY 76 & 76T, $20,000; FY 77, $2,500; FY 78, $8,800; FY 79, $3,000; FY 81, $1,680; and preconstruction planning funds: FY 80, $15,000 and FY 81, $19,320. 10. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 64, $219; FY 65, $26; FY 71, $8,000; FY 72, $1,448; FY 73, $552; FY 74, $9,000; FY 75, $11,925; FY 76 & 76T, $27,977; FY 77, $7,598; FY 78, $7,449; FY 79, $4,351; FY 81, $1,680; and preconstruction planning costs: FY 80, $5,686 and FY 81, $1,471. 11. Adjusted by $6,361 to reflect actual cost. 12. Includes $44,484 for previous projects. 13. Includes $284,557 for previous projects. 14. Includes $1,959 refund to local interests on Dawson Creek, N. C. 15. Includes $4,625,614 for new work on previous projects. 16. Includes $602,614 for previous projects. 17. Includes refunds to local interests: FY 78, $92,374; FY 79, $8,000; FY 80, $14,007; FY 81, $1,847; FY 82, $2,823. 18. Includes $1,492 preauthorization cost. 19. Includes $11,474 preauthorization cost. 20. Includes $22,556 preauthorization cost. 21. Includes $9,706 preauthorization cost. 22. Includes $5,223 preauthorization cost. 23. Includes monitoring costs: FY 80, $7,414; FY 81, $10,842; FY 82, $1,382. 24. Preauthorization cost. 25. Includes $5,206 preauthorization cost. 26. Includes $21,739 preauthorization cost. 27. Includes $16,845 preauthorization cost. 28. Includes $3,081 refund to local interests. - 29. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 74, $4,000; FY 75, $5,500; FY 76 & 76T, $3,600; FY 77, $5,800; FY 78, $7,200; FY 79, $8,000; FY 80, $10,000; FY 81, $10,000; FY 82, $11,040. 30. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 74, $4,000; FY 75, $4,400; FY 76 & 76T, $4,666; FY 77, $5,193; FY 78, $6,824; FY 79, $7,506; FY 80, $11,312; FY 81, $9,688; FY 82, $9,727. 31. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 74, $35,000; FY 76 & 76T, $48,000; FY 77, $51,400; FY 78, $115,100; FY 79, $63,000; FY 80, $60,000; FY 81, $80,000; FY 82, $67,160; and maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 79, $167,646. 32. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 75, $35,000; FY 76 & 76T, $13,606; FY 77, $85,692; FY 78, $114,604; FY 79, $1,120; FY 80, $118,718; FY 81, $83,760; FY 82, $67,160; and maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 79, $167,350; FY 80, $296. 33. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 75, $47,000; FY 78, $40,400; FY 79, $22,000; FY 80, $25,000; FY 81, $20,000; FY 82, $20,240. 34. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 75, $13,741; FY 76 & 76T, $31,666; FY 77, $1,593; FY 78, $39,771; FY 79, $22,629; FY 80, $24,619; FY 81, $20,381; FY 82, $20,240. 6-24 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., and ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (See Section 2 of text) July 25, 1912 July 25, 1912 August 8, 1917 July 18, 1918 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 March 4, 19332 June 26, 1934 August 26, 1937 August 26, 1937 June 20, 1938 June 20, 1938 March 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 Nov. 29, 1963, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 April 7, 1966, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 Nov. 7, 1966 Nov. 7, 1966 Dec. 31, 1970 Original route of the Norfolk-Beaufort Inlet section. Purchase of canal. Change in route; following changes approved by Secretary of War, April 14, 1919: Albemarle Sound-Pamlico Sound section: Changed from "Alligator River-Rose Bay route" to "Alligator River- Pungo River route." Pamlico Sound-Neuse River Section: Changed from "Pamlico Sound-Brant Shoal Neuse River route" to "Goose Creek-Bay River route." Alligator River-Pungo route (proposed land cut connecting the rivers): Changed from a straight line to a bent line approaching nearer town of Fairfield, N. C. A 12-foot channel 90 feet wide from Beaufort to Cape Fear River, N. C., including highway bridge and tidal lock.' An 8-foot channel 75 feet wide from Cape Fear River to Winyah Bay, S. C. Construct a suitable bridge near Fairfield, N. C. Operating and care of works of improvements provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Increasing dimensions of waterway to 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide. A 12-foot side channel 90 feet wide to Swansboro. A yacht basin near Southport, 12 feet deep, 230 feet wide, and 450 feet long, with connecting channel. A 6-foot channel 90 feet wide from New River Inlet to Inland Waterway. Six mooring basins. A 12-foot channel in New River.5 Vicinity of Fairfield, drainage. Masonboro Inlet and connecting channels, including jetties at the inlet." A 12-foot channel and basin in Peltier Creek.7 A 6-foot channel 90 feet wide from Intracoastal Waterway to Bogue Inlet gorge. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide through New Topsail Inlet, thence a 7-foot channel 80 ft. wide to Intracoastal Waterway by way of Old Topsail Creek; and a 7-foot channel 80 feet wide in Banks Channel from New Topsail Inlet, paralleling barrier beach, to Intracoastal Waterway. Maintenance of a channel, 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 8,000 feet long, from the through channel of the waterway to and including a basin of the same depth, 130 feet wide and 180 feet long at Carolina Beach. Maintenance of general navigation features of N. C. State Ports Authority Small Boat Harbor at Southport. Replacement of Federally-owned and operated highway bridges at Coinjock, Fairfield, Wilkerson Creek, Hobucken, and Core Creek. H. D. 391, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. D. 589, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. D. 1478, 63d Cong., 3d sess. and H. D. 1136, 64th Cong., 1st sess.' Approved by Secretary of War, May 15, 1919. H. D. 450, 69th Cong., 1st sess. H. D. 41, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 6, 75th Cong., 1st sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 75th Cong., 1st sess.' H. D. 549, 75th Cong., 3d sess.' H. D. 691, 75th Cong., 3d sess.' H. D. 660, 76th Cong., 3d sess.' H. D. 421, 80th Cong., 1st sess.' H. D. 723, 80th Cong., 2d sess.' H. D. 341, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' H. D. 379, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' Detailed Project Report April 1963. Detailed Project Report. July 1965 H. D. 515, 89th Cong., 2d sess.' H.D. 514, 89th Cong., 2d sess.' H. D. 142, 92nd Cong., 1st sess. 6-25 TABLE 6-B Acts Documents REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 6-B (Continued) Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized October 22, 1976 August 13, 1968 February 18, 1982 Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 March 3, 1881 March 2, 1907 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 May 21, 1965 sec. 107 July 14, 1960 July 3, 1930 Oct. 17, 1940 Feb. 7, 1967 sec. 107 July 14, 1960 Modification of terms of local cooperation to allow for full Federal funding of Wilkerson Creek and Coinjock Bridges. Mitigation of damages caused by north jetty at Masonboro Inlet. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide through Carolina Beach Inlet to the Intracoastal Waterway. BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 3 of text) A 9-foot channel 200 feet wide through Bulkhead Channel to Beaufort; a 6-foot channel 100 feet wide to North River and Core Sound; and construct jetties on Shackleford Point. Repairs to Fort Macon jetties and additional jetties and shore protection. Bulkhead across Bird Shoal. Increase in depth to 12 feet in Bulkhead Channel, Gallants Channel, and in front of Beaufort. Increase in width and length of basin in front of Beaufort, all to 12 feet deep. Increase in depth to 12 feet and in width to 100 feet in Taylors Creek; transfer to Beaufort Harbor project. Channels 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide in Bulkhead, Gallants and Taylors Creek channels, and through turning basin in front of Beaufort; and harbor of refuge in Town Creek, 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long connected to Gallants Channel by channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 1,400 feet long. SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 17 of text) Entrance channel, 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide, from Pamlico Sound to the 3-foot contour in the lake, and training wall at entrance. Channel, 10 feet deep, and anchorage basin of same depth, 100 feet wide across Big Foot Slough and 60 feet wide in entrance. Basin depth of 12 feet in Silver Lake Harbor; channels 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, in Teaches Hole and Big Foot Slough Channels and across Bluff Shoal; entrance channel, same depth, 60 feet wide; and training wall on south side of entrance channel. H. D. 597, 94th Cong., 2d sess. Approved by OCE Oct. 2, 1980 Detailed Project Report. June 1980 Annual Report, 1881, p. 1013 Specified in act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 68th Cong., 2d sess.' H. D. 776, 69th Cong., 2d sess.' H. D. 334, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' H. D. 111, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' Detailed Project Report April 1965 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. No. 3, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. D. 325, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' Detailed Project Report July 9, 1965 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Public Law No. 443, 72d Cong. 3. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 4. Tidal lock in land cut between Myrtle Sound and Cape Fear River. 5. A 12-foot by 90-foot channel in New River from Intracoastal Waterway to and including a basin at Jacksonville, N. C. 6. Jetties on each side of Masonboro Inlet. 7. A 6- by 50-foot channel provided under Section 3, River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945; 12 by 90-foot project classified as inactive. 6-26 Documents WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Full September 30, 1982 Report See Annual Operation and Project Report for Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Controls' (R & H Act of 1958 and 1962) 1969 70,664 - Atlantic Beach Channels, N. C. 1976 29,1014 66,630 Avon Harbor, N. C.' 1975 74,096 89,735 Bay River, N. C.' 1950 44,382 49,627 Black River, N. C. 1969 12,358 124,846 Cashie River, N. C. 1950 40,403 15,905 Channel Connecting Thoroughfare Bay with Cedar Bay, N. C.' 1975 69,610 25,615 Channel from Pamlico Sound to Rodanthe, N. C.' 1975 42,029 5,685 Chowan River, N. C. 1950 - Contentnea Creek, N. C.' 1941 64,395 32,247 Drum Inlet, N. C.' 1979 166,119 1,050,579 Edenton Harbor, N. C.' 1960 73,750 47,642 Fishing Creek, N. C.' 1922 22,715 8,633 Harbor of Refuge, N. C. 1934 1,363,799 32,854 Knobb's Creek, N. C.', 2 19613 80,500 47,664 Mackay Creek, N. C.' 19383 13,375 6,273 Newbegun Creek, N. C. 19283 4,802 247 Northeast (Cape Fear) River, N. C.' 1950 10,688 61,139 Pembroke Creek, N. C. 1976 60,000 - Perquimans River, N. C.' 19103 13,750 414 Scuppernong River, N. C.' 1950 81,164 80,682 Smiths Creek (Wilmington), N. C.' 1950 8,507 18 South River, N. C.' 1936 12,452 23,686 Swift Creek, N. C.' 1940 1,600 5,422 Trent River, N. C.1 , s 1968 115,199 143,579 Wallace Channel, Pamlico Sound, N. C. 1965 132,834 85,221 Waterway - Norfolk, Va. to Sounds of N. C. 1976 751,196 2,893,812 1. Completed. 4. Includes $2,055 refund to local interests. 2. Transferred from Norfolk District (FY 1970); Meherrin 5. 8-foot modification deauthorized August 5, 1977 under River, N. C., Transferred to Norfolk District. authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 3. Report of Norfolk District. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 6-D For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1982 See Annual Project Report for Operation and Construction Maintenance Fort Macon State Park, N. C. 1973 620,000 6-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 6-E For Last Cost to September 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Broad Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.1 Brunswick County Beaches, N. C. (Cape Fear to North Carolina - South Carolina State Line)" Conetoe Creek, N. C.' Contentnea Creek, N. C.' Core Creek, N. C.' Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N. C.' Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N. C.' Filberts Creek, N. C.' Gapway Swamp, N. C. & S. C.', 1' Gardners Creek, N. C.1 Howards Mill Lake, N. C.12 Lick Run, Roanoke, Va.' Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N. C. Little Sugar Creek, Charlotte, N. C.', 0 New River, N. C.' New River, Onslow County, N. C.' Northeast (Cape Fear) River, N. C.' Ocracoke Island, N. C.13 Old Field Swamp, N. C.', 10 Pantego Creek and Cucklers Creek, N. C. Pasquotank River, N. C. Perquimans River, N. C.1 Pungo Creek, N. C.' Pungo River, N. C.', 2 Simmons Bay, N. C.1' South Creek, N. C.' Swift Creek, Pitt and Craven Counties, N. C.' Tar River, N. C Tar River, N. C.' Tar River and tributaries, N. C.' Tar River, Princeville, N. C. Tranters Creek, N. C.' Trent River, N. C.' Waccamaw River & Seven Creeks, N.C. & S.C. 1,10 White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N. C.1 1972 1976 1960 1939-1943 & 1958 1965 1963 1971 1970 1969 1972 1980 1974 1978 1979 1950 & 1956 1972 1961 1975 1969 1963 1960 1961 1972 1971 1963 1971 1966 1964 1947 1943 1967 1974 1953 1961 1963 1. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under special continuing authority. 2. Includes $17,356 refund to local interests. 3. Adjusted to reflect actual cost. 4. Includes $3,081 refund to local interests. 5. Includes $116,508 refund to local interests. 6. Includes $1,519 refund to local interests. 7. Includes $387 refund to local interests. 8. Includes $338 refund to local interests. 9. Adjusted $3,000 to include preauthorization cost prior to FY 1960. 10. Transferred from Charleston District, FY 1980. 11. Reclassified to inactive category February 3, 1976. 12. Reclassified to deferred category October 2, 1980. 13. Reclassified to inactive category November 25, 1974. 6-28 283,846 572,114' 29,867 50,889 236,223' 223,413 138,117' 37,7773 339,197 54,597' 698,400 1,280,317 113,657 763,022 51,896 580,977 95,873 129,592 86,600 517,948 80,931 6,366 582,270 296,6023 186,435 194,367' 611,096 81,266 18,624 22,660 390,249 139,339 64,769 67,821 61,473 - - - - - - - - - - - - -147 214,286 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS TABLE 6-G For Last Full Report See Annual Report Project For Adkin Branch, N. C. AIWW - Mooring Basins Bodie Island, N. C. Cape Lookout, N. C. Conoho Creek, N. C. Contentnea Creek, N. C. Davis, N. C. Harbor of Refuge, N. C. Hominy Swamp, N. C. Hyde County Dike, N. C. MacKay Creek, N. C. Mann's Harbor, N. C. Mill Creek, N. C. Mocassin Swamp, N. C. Moyock Creek, N. C. Nahunta Swamp, N. C. Neuse River, N. C. Neuse River Barrier, N. C. Neuse River, 300 ft.-wide channel in front of New Bern North River Dike, N. C. Rockfish Creek, N. C. Six Runs Creek, N. C. Sweetwater Creek, N. C. Thoroughfare Swamp, N. C. Topsail Beach and Surf City, N. C. Trent River, Basins and Access Channels at New Bern, N. C. 1. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 2. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 205 of the 1948 FC Act, as amended. 3. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority pro. TABLE 6-H vided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. 4. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 107 of the R&H Act of 1960 as amended. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Project Date Survey Conducted Rollinson Channel, N. C. Shallotte River, N. C. Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N. C. Waterway - Norfolk, Va. to Sounds of N. C. August 1982 July 1982 September 1982 November 1981 6-29 Federal Funds Exadd Contributed Funds E dd~ 1982 None None None 1974 1972 1982 1934 1973 None 1976 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 None None None None 1976 1971 1973 1976 None None Date tnruimui 8 Sep. 812 5 Aug. 77' 5 Aug. 77' 5 Aug. 77' 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 783 31 Mar. 82' 1 Nov. 81' 31 Mar. 782 5 Aug. 771 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 78' 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 78' 5 Aug. 77' 5 Aug. 77' 5 Aug. 77' 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 5 Aug. 77' 5 Aug. 77' 219,477 79,782 4,250 25,419 1,396,653 107,472 130,900 7,265 116,395 36,680 64,416 65,673 30,911 157,721 64,977 64,584 132,767 - -J -- - - - --- - - - ,11,, u a.euueu eI1 r Iela'e REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 6-I Study Identification Atlantic Beach Channels Belhaven Harbor, N. C. Bogue Inlet, N. C.' Calico Creek, N. C. Morgan Creek, N. C.2 Swanquarter Bay, N. C. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization) Fiscal Period Cost 61,829 3,508 7,174 18,884 8,790 13,411 1. Includes $1,473 reimbursement to revolving fund. 2. Includes $4,024 reimbursement to revolving fund. 6-30 TABLE 6-J DAMS AND RESERVOIRS See Miles Height Reservoir Power Estimated Section Project Name Nearest City River Above of Type Capacity Development Construc Cost Lands Total in Text Mouth Dam (ftl (acre-feet (kilowatts) tion and Damagesl 27. Cape Fear B. Everett Jordan 2 Moncure, N.C. Haw 4.3 112 E 778,000 - 70,655,200 58,344,800 129,000,000 3 River Basin, Howards Mill 2 , 14 Carthage, N.C. Deep 55.0 106 E 233,000 - 18,874,000 14,726,000 33,600,00012 N.C. Randleman 2 Randleman, N.C. Deep 85.0 110 E 108,000 - 62,945,000 55,055,000 118,000,00013 Small reservoirs - Various 20 to 70 + E 923,000 - - - 38,454,000 33. Neuse River Falls 2 Falls, N.C. Neuse - 92 E 397,000 - 70,115,000 89,885,000 160,000,0004 Basin, N.C. Wilson Mills Wilson Mills, N.C. Neuse - 81 CG,E 201,000 - - - 13,000,000 Beulahtown Kenly, N.C. Little - 50 E 81,000 - - - 9,300,000 Bakers Mills Princeton, N.C. Little - 53 E 36,000 - - - 6,600,000 Little Buffalo Kenly, N.C. Little Buffalo Creek - 51 E 13,000 - - - 1,100,000 Buckhorn Wilson, N.C. Contentnea Creek - 63 E 119,000. - - - 17,300,000 Wiggins Mill Wilson, N.C. . Contentnea Creek - 42 E 35,000 - - - 6,700,000 Stantonsburg Stantonsburg, N.C. Tisnot Swamp - 36 E 48,000 - - - 5,100,000 Great Swamp Fremont, N.C. Great Swamp - 39 E 18,000 - - - 1,800,000 Black Creek Wilson, N.C. Black Creek - 33 E 17,000 - - - 1,500,000 Aycock Swamp Fremont, N.C. Aycock Swamp - 37 E 7,000 - - - 550,000 Hillsboro Durham, N.C. Eno - 136 E 123,000 - - - 8,100,000 Orange Durham, N.C. Little - 107 E 57,000 - - - 3,500.000 36. Yadkin River W. Kerr Scott, N.C. Wilkesboro, N.C. Yadkin-Pee Dee 404.0 148 E 153,000 - 5,743,343 3,360,657 9,104.000 Basin, N.C.&S.C. 39. Roanoke River John H. Kerr, Va., and Boydton, Va. Roanoke 178.7 144 CG,E 2,808,000 204,000 67,643,000 24,521,000 92,164,0005 Basin, Va. and N.C. 2 N.C. Philpott, Va. 2 Bassett, Va. Roanoke 336.2 220 CG 1 1 249,800 14,000 13,730,000 1,157,000 14,887,000 Gaston, Va. and N.C. 6 Roanoke Rapids, N.C. Roanoke 144.9 108 CG,E 432,000 54,000 27,000,000 3,500,000 30,500,000 Roanoke Rapids, N.C.7 Roanoke Rapids, N.C. Roanoke 137.0 75 CG 59,300 83,000 31,300,000 800,000 32,100,000 Smith Mountain, Va. 8 Altavista, Va. Roanoke 314.2 244 CG 825,000 41,000 28,000,000 3.800,000 31,800,000 Leesville, Va. 9 Altavista, Va. Roanoke 293.7 95 CGE 76,900 20,000 9,100,000 1,000,000 10,100,000 Taber, Va. Altavista, Va. Roanoke 275.0 54 CG 34.000 12,000 8,000,000 1,700,000 9,700,000 Melrose, Va. Brookneal, Va. Roanoke 262.9 110 CG,E 120,000 43,000 17,700,000 6,000,000 23,700,00010 Randolph, Va. Chase City, Va. Roanoke 227.8 147 CG,E 350,000 48,000 22,100,000 4,700,000 26,800,000 Stuart, Va. and N.C. Spray, N.C. Roanoke 297.2 138 E 163,000 15,000 9,000,000 1,100,000 10,100,000 Schoolfield, Va. and N.C. Danville, Va. Roanoke 265.9 126 CG,E 248,000 80,000 27,800,000 6,400,000 36,000,000 1. Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2. For details, see individual report. 3. Includes $3,800,000 presently allocated to water supply to be reimbursed in the future by local interests. 4. Includes $13,000,000 presently allocated to water supply and $23,000,000 recreation and fish and wildlife. 5. Exclusive of transmission lines. 6. Construction completed in 1963 by Virginia Electric and Power Co. 7. Based on modified plan developed in fiscal year 1949. Construction completed June 1955 by Virginia Electric and Power Co. 8. Construction completed in February 1966 by Appalachian Power Co. 9. Construction completed in June 1963 by Appalachian Power Co. 10. Includes cost of earth dam on Whipping Creek. 11. Authorizing legislation provided for earth dam; concrete gravity dam constructed. 12. Includes $1,600,000 presently allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife. 13. Includes $46,300,000 presently allocated to water supply and $16,400,000 allocated to recreation. 14. Reclassified to the deferred category 2 October 1980. Key E - Earth CG - Concrete Gravity rMai z y - - OzG z A dd REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 6-K FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization) Study Identification Fiscal Period Cost Ararat River, Surry County, N. C. 162,793 Genoa Sewer Facility, Wayne County, N. C.' 15,784 Great Coharie Creek, N. C.2 4,828 Roanoke Island, N. C.3 813 1. Includes $12,500 reimbursement to revolving fund. 2. Includes $4,288 reimbursement to revolving fund. 3. Accomplished pursuant to Section 54. 6-32 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT* This district comprises all of South Carolina (except local watersheds draining into the Savannah River). Due to a recent realignment, work underway in western-central North Carolina, formerly in our district, will be carried through its current phase before being turned over to Wilmington. It embraces the drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean between Little River and Port Royal Sound, except watersheds of Mackay and Skull Creeks, and excluding Hilton Head Island. IMPROVEMENTS Beach Erosion Control Aquatic Plant Control, S.C.................. 7-2 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns River, Fla............7-2 Charleston Harrbor, S.C.......................7-2 Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, S.C..........7-3 Folly River, S.C. ............................. 7-3 Georgetown Harbor, S.C.......................7-4 Jeremy Creek, S.C. ........................ 7-4 Little River Inlet, N.C. and S.C................ 7-4 Lynches River & Clark Creek, S.C. ............. 7-5 Murrells Inlet, S.C ......................... 7-5 Port Royal Harbor, SC.........................7-5 Shipyard River, S.C...........................7-6 Town Creek, S.C...........................7-6 Village Creek, S.C..............................7-6 Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys.......... 7-6 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........... 7-6 Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ................................ 7-6 18. 19. Hunting Island Beach, S.C .................. 7-7 Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization ......................... 7-7 Flood Control 20. Leith Creek, S.C............................... 7-7 21. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ........................... 7-7 22. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects.............................. 7-7 23. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............................. 7-7 General Investigations 24. Active Investigations .......................... 7-7 *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 7-1 Navigation Page 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, S.C. Location. The project areas include navigable water, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in the State of South Carolina. Existing Projects. The project provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligator weed, Eurasian watermilfoil, and other noxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers. The act provides that research and planning cost shall be borne fully by the United States. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local Cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and contribute 30 percent of the cost of field operations. The South Carolina Water Resources Commission (WRC) is designated as the State's lead agency for aquatic plant management and meets the local interest requirement of paying 30 percent of the cost of field operations. The project provides for a comprehensive plan of chemical, biological, and integrated control measures for managing noxious aquatic plants within the state waters of South Carolina. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. Target species were increased during FY 82 to include Brazilian elodea, alligator weed, water primrose, water hyacinth, water smartweed, and hydrilla. The target species currently infest approximately 40,000 acres. Two hundred and fifty acres of water hyacinth and water smartweed were treated and eliminated in the Goose Creek reservoir. Approximately 275 acres of Brazilian elodea, hydrilla and water primrose were treated in upper Lake Marion during FY 82. In addition approximately 60,000 alligator weed flea beetles (biological control agents) were released on alligator weed infestations in Black Creek, Black River, Little Pee Dee River, Big Pee Dee River and upper Cooper River. The flea beetles established a population which provided seasonal control of alligator weed. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Field operation costs incurred during FY 82 were $13,500 for control operations in Goose Creek Reservoir and $30,000 for control operations in upper Lake Marion. $34,622 was spent for planning and reconnaissance surveys. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOSTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (CHARLESTON DISTRICT) Location. The project starts at Little River at the North Carolina-South Carolina state line and extends generally south along the coast of South Carolina 62 miles to Winyah Bay; thence 63.5 miles to Charleston; thence 84.5 miles to and including Port Royal Sound; a total of 210 miles. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11513, 11521, 11531, 11534, and 11535.) Previous projects. For further details see page 613 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. The project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep and not less than 90 feet wide with a branch channel of the same dimensions to McClellanville and construction of three bridges crossing the waterway in Horry County, South Carolina. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. There are rail-water terminals at Georgetown, Charleston, Johns Island and Port Royal and numerous-open-pile wharves mostly for shipping agricultural products, fish, oysters, _pulpwood, wood products, and petroleum products. Marinas are located at convenient intervals along the waterway where limited supplies and repair facilities are available for both commercial vessels and pleasure craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and recreation requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract maintenance dredging was performed by the pipeline dredge Cherokee during February - July 1982 from Winyah Bay to Charleston, removing 1,542,076 cubic yards of material at a cost of $870,721. Additional contract maintenance dredging was performed by the pipeline dredgeArlington during May - June 1982 from Charleston to Port Royal removing 550,374 cubic yards of material at a cost of $343,034. Mosquito abatement control contracts costs were $57,776. Clearing and Snagging by the U. S. maintenance vessel Snell was performed at a cost of $66,716. Costs of $163,578 were incurred for contract dike management. Condition surveys, shoaling studies, reestablishment of rightsof- way, engineering and design, and supervision and administration costs were $471,838. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1940; three bridges were completed in 1936. Federal costs of existing project to date have been $7,345,898 for new work and $34,444,800 for maintenance, for a total of $41,790,698. 3. CHARLESTON HARBOR, S.C. Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina about 15 miles south of the midpoint of the coastline, 50 miles southwest of Winyah Bay, S. C., and 80 miles northeast of the mouth of Savannah River. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) Previous projects. For further details see page 1808 of Annual Report for 1915; page 579 of Annual Report for 1926; and page 562 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 35 feet deep with varying widths from the Atlantic Ocean to the,mouth of Goose Creek, a total of 26.3 miles, together with a 35-foot depth by 500-foot width channel via Town Creek. Also, a 10-foot depth by 110-foot width channel on the Mount Pleasant side fo the harbor into Shem Creek to U. S. Highway 17 Bridge, and a 30-foot anchorage basin in the lower harbor between Castle Pinckney and Fort Moultrie. A 40-foot channel estimated to cost $6,060,000 (1960) was authorized to be executed when found necessary in the interests of national defense from the 40-foot contour in Atlantic Ocean to U. S. Naval Base. For further details see page 7-2 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT 425 of Annual Report for 1962. The Phase I Design Memorandum stage of Advance Engineering and Design for deepening of the 35-foot channel to 40 feet (42 feet in the ocean bar and entrance channel) from the 42-foot ocean contour to Goose Creek, a total distance of 26.9 miles, construction of one turning basin, modification of existing turning basins, deepening and modification of the anchorage basin, and deepening Shipyard River to 38 feet have been authorized. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with their responsibility to date but are experiencing difficulty in securing disposal areas for dredged material for continued future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Piers and slips extend for about one mile along the eastern waterfront of the City of Charleston with an additional mile of marginal wharves. The South Carolina State Ports Authority operates eight piers for fruit, wood, cold storage facilities and general cargo, a grain elevator and a beltline railway which serves the entire Cooper River waterfront. Modern facilities are also at wharves of seven major petroleum companies including storage tank farms. Modern facilities for marine repairs and servicing are available at Detvens Shipyard, located approximatley 10 miles northeast of Charleston on the Wando River. The U. S. Navy Department has modern facilities for construction and maintenance of naval vessels including nuclear-powered submarines. Loading docks and storage areas foi missile-carrying type vessels have also been constructed and are being operated by the U. S. Navy. For further details see Port Series No. 13, 1970, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The pipeline dredge McFarland performed maintenance dreding in the Harbor during January removing 315,385 cubic yards of material at a cost of $948,522. Contract maintenance dredging was performed in the Upper and Lower Harbor by the Florida during July - September removing 1,129,258 cubic yards of material at a cost of $794,910. Contract maintenance dredging was performed by the pipeline dredge Clinton in the Anchorage Basin during November 81 - January 82 removing 716, 188 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,366,875. Government furnished materials for the dike management cost $13,051. Contract dike management costs were $498,086. Costs of Riverine Utility Craft operations were $7,275. Engineering and design, surveys, and supervision and administration costs were $586,404. Condition at end of fiscal year. Jetties protecting the entrance channel across the bar were completed in 1895. The existing project was completed in October 1962 except for the national defense portion. Federal costs under the existing project to date have been $3,328,349 for new work and $71,232,414 for maintenance, a total cost of $74,560,763. 4. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, S.C. Location. Cooper River is located in Charleston and Berkeley Counties, S.C., and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Charleston (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 11524.) Existing project. The major cause of the shoaling problem in Charelston Harbor is the diversion of fresh water from the Santee River through Pinopolis Dam into the salt water of Charleston Harbor, causing density currents which trap sediments resulting in a phenomenal rate of deposition. The most practical solution of the shoaling problem is to redivert most of the Santee River waters above Pinopolis Dam back into the lower Santee River through a canal beginning at Lake Moultrie and extending to the Santee River in the vicinity of St. Stephen, South Carolina. The project for Cooper River as authorized by the 1968 River and Harbor Act provides that the discharge through the existing Pinopolis Hydro Plant be reduced to a weekly average of 3,000 cubic feet per second. This flow will not establish a density current in the harbor. The excess water then impounded in Lake Moultrie will be directed through a new canal above St. Stephen, South Carolina, to enter the Santee River at a point well below the Lake Marion Spillway (Wilson Dam). A new hydroeletric facility will be constructed on the new canal where the ground elevations decrease to become swampland and adjacent to the Santee River. This plant will replace those features made less effective at Pinopolis through curtailment of flows. The average flow of 12,600 cfs at the new powerplant, plus the proposed 3,000 cfs average release planned for Pinopolis, will approximate the existing average Pinopolis flow. The three generators at the new plant will be rated at 28,000 kilowatts each, for a total of 84,000 kilowatts. In the interest of fish and wildlife resources of the area, the plan provides for construction of a herring lift at the new powerhouse site and a relocated fish hatchery. Estimated cost of the project (1981) is $161,000,000, all Federal. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Funds were received for initiation of construction during FY 75. Costs during FY 82 were $229,530 for lands and damages, $5,557,034 for relocations, $9,677,964 for power plant, $798,711 for turbines, $730,822 for generators, $88,484 for governors, $29,069 for transformers, -$971 for oil circuit breakers, -$5,629 for main control switchboards, $84,751 for microwave facilities, $7,971 for 480 KV switchgear, $18,401 for 15 KV switchgear, $9,514 for disconnect switches and busswork, $1,624,210 for cooling water facilities - towers, $207,512 for cooling water facilities - 84" and 96" valves, $35,200 for cooling water facilities - pumps and motors, $105,999 for cooling water facilities - general construction, $150,092 for intake gantry crane contract, $1,025,423 for entrance channel, $724 for intake canal, $6,616,588 for tailrace canal, $14,721 for cultural resources preservation, $7,131 for permanent operating equipment, an d $957,094 for the fish lift, engineering and design and supervision and administrative costs were $3,617,838. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was completed at the end of FY 74. The General Design Memorandum was completed in January 1974 and work is proceeding on schedule on other phases of the project. Construction was initiated March 1977. The project is 75% complete. 5. FOLLY RIVER, S.C. Location. Folly River project begins in Folly River and Folly 7-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Creek north of the Town of Folly Beach and follows a southwesterly course into the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11521.) Existing project. The project provides: an entrance channel, 11 feet deep by 110 feet wide extending from the Stono River one mile through the ocean bar, a channel within Folly River nine feet deep and 80 feet wide, extending three miles downstream from U. S. Highway 171 to the confluence of Folly and Stono Rivers; and a channel within Folly Creek nine feet deep by 80 feet wide extending three miles downstream from Highway 171 to theconfluence with Folly River. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed by the sidecaster dredge Currituck during May removing 37,222 cubic yards of material at a cost of 475,268. Further dredging by the Currituck was performed in June - July removing 35,490 cubic yards of material at a cost of $104,153. Dredging by the pipeline dredge Arlington was performed removing 31,583 cubic yards of material at a cost of $54,000. Condition and operations, water control management, and engineering and design costs were $28,947. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in FY 1979. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $337,736 for new work and $316,380 for maintenance, a total of $654,116. 6. GEORGETOWN HARBOR, S. C. Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina 50 miles northeast of Charleston Harbor and 90 miles southwest of the entrance to Cape Fear River, North Carolina. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11532.) Previous projects. For further details see page 1806 of Annual Report for 1915; page 549 of Annual Report of 1938; and page 442 of Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorizations provide for a channel 27 feet deep with varying widths of 600 feet to 400 feet from the Atlantic Ocean to and including a turning basin at the upper end of the built-up portion of the city waterfront, a total of 17.9 miles. The project also provides for the continued maintenance to a depth of 18 feet and a width of 400 feet for the bypassed portion of Sampit River opposite the City of Georgetown. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Location cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities at the Port of Georgetown, suitable for oceangoing vessels, consist of one marginal concrete pier and one of creosoted-timber construction. For intracoastal waterway traffic there are a number of smaller wharves and landings along the Georgetown waterfront on the old channel. For further details, see Port Series No. 13, 1970, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Disposal area dike management was performed by contracts at a cost of $369,529. Government furnished materials for the dike management cost $5,730. Costs of Riverine Utility Craft operation were $42,030. The pipeline dredge Arlington performed maintenance dredging on the inner channel from August - September and November 1981 to January 1982 removing 1,346,352 cubic yards of material at a cost of $2,076,973. The contract hopper dredge Padre Island removed 380,579 cubic yards of material during July - August at a cost of $1,071,505. Engineering and design surveys, and supervision and administration costs were $303,009. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1951. The jetties were completed in 1903 - 04. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $4,615,903 for new work and $33,767,304 for maintenance, a total of $38,383,207. 7. JEREMY CREEK, S.C. Location. Jeremy Creek is located at McClellanville, S. C. approximately 40 miles northeast of Charleston and 20 miles southwest of Georgetown. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11531 and 11518). Existing project. The dredging of Jeremy Creek or "Side Channel to McClellanville" was authorized as a part of the channel from Charleston to McClellanville ( or part of what is now the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway) by the River and Harbor Act of 2 March 1907. The project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep at mean low water and a width of not less than 90 feet Local cooperation. Local requirements have been met by the S. C. Coastal Council. Terminal Facilities. There are three shrimping facilities, one oyster packing shed, a crabbing operation, an icehouse, a fuel dock, and a public launching ramp located on Jeremy Creek. The commercial facilities are privately owned, but are open to all on an equal basis. The existing facilities are considered adequate for present and near future commerce. There are areas along the east bluff shore available for the expansion of existing facilities or the construction of new ones. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A turning basin was constructed at the upper end of Jeremy Creek at McClellanville at a cost of $22,332. Engineering and design costs were $5,613. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Federal costs of existing project to date have been $49,297 for new work. 8. LITTLE RIVER INLET, N. C. AND S. C. Location. The project is located near the North Carolina- South Carolina state line. Little River enters the Atlantic Ocean at Little River Inlet at the state line and affords the only connection between the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway and the ocean along 68 miles of coastline from Shalotte, N. C. to Georgetown, S. C. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11535.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel 12 by 300 feet across the ocean bar; thence a 10 hv 90- foot inner channel to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. The entrance channel will be stabilized by jetties extending seaward 3,200 feet and 3,000 feet long on the north and south sides of the inlet, respectively. Emergency dredging on an annual basis was authorized by the Water Resources Act of 1974. Previous work was done 7-4 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT under the authority of the River and Harbor Act of 1945, Section 3, P.L. 79-14. Estimated costs of the project (1981) are $18,300,000 Federal cost and $2,790,000 non-Federal cost ($1,640,000 contributed funds and $1,150,000 for lands). (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. In a letter dated 28 December 1976, the Horry County (South Carolina) Planning and Promotion Commission gave assurances of cooperation. Since certain lands to be furnished by non-Federal interests lie in North Carolina, a letter dated 18 April 1977 has been supplied by the Brunswick County (North Carolina) Commissioners, agreeing to provide to the United States the necessary project lands lying in North Carolina. Local interests have met their responsibilities to date. Terminal facilities. There are eight marinas, numerous private docks, and several public boat ramps located in or near Little River. It is expected that existing facilities will expand and new ones will be added as demands for services exceed current capacity. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Cost for appraisal contract was -$500. Channels and canals were $1,297,161, breakwaters and seawalls were $6,325,943, special studies were $155,548, engineering and design costs were $15,238, construction engineering costs were $22,213, and supervision and administration costs were $146,939. Maintenance: Dredging was performed in the Inlet in October by the sidecaster dredge Merritt removing 14,304 cubic yards of material at a cost of $41,500. Further dredging was performed by the sidecaster dredge Fry during May- June removing 7,311 cubic yards of material at a cost of $105,525. Condition and operations studies, engineering and design, and supervision and administration costs were $1,773. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Emergency dredging operations are being performed annual until the project is constructed. The initial construction contract was awarded 14 January 1981. The project is 50% complete. 9. LYNCHES RIVER AND CLARK CREEK, S. C. Location. Lynches River is a tributary of the Great Pee Dee River into which it flows at a point about 65 miles above the mouth of the Great Pee Dee River. Shortly above this point, a branch of Lynches River, known as Clark Creek, leaves it and flowing about 7 miles, empties into the Great Pee Dee River about 10'/2 miles below the mouth of Lynches River. Existing project. The project provides for a clear 4-foot navigation channel through Clark Creek, the principal mouth of Lynches River. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Funds of $1,162 were transferred to other projects. Condition at end of fiscal year. Snagging operations were carried on from 1888 to 1892 and from 1907 to 1910.Channel is currently clogged with debris and silt. 10. MURRELLS INLET, S.C. Location. The project is located on the coast of South Carolina, in Georgetown County, about 13 miles southwest of the City of Myrtle Beach. The inlet is the ocean entrance through a barrier beach to several tidal streams in the Murrells Inlet-Garden City estuarine area. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11535.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel 12 by 300 feet across the seabar thence a 10 by 90- foot inner channel to a turning basin at the old Army crashboat dock. The entrance channel will be stabilized by ocean jetties extending seaward 3,445 feet and 3,319 feet on the north and south sides of the inlet, respectively. The recreational project includes a walkway on the south jetty with access road and parking area. Emergency dredging on an annual basis was authorized by the Water Resources Act of 1974. Previous work was done under the authority of the River and Harbor Act of 1945, Section 3, P.L 79-14. Estimated cost of the project (1979) is $12,700,000 Federal cost and $2,380,000 non-Federal cost ($1,380,000 contributed funds and $1,000,000 for lands). (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A letter of intent to provide local cooperation dated 4 November 1975 has been received for the Georgetown County Board of Commissioners. Local interests have met their responsibilities to date. Terminal facilities. There are five marinas and numerous private docks located about the Murrells Inlet Harbor. There are several public boat ramps in the area. Facilities are expected to be expanded and new ones added as demands for services outstrip capacity. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Expenditures for monitoring system contracts were $13,634. Engineering and design, and supervision and administration costs were $13,712. Maintenance: Condition and operating costs were $117,473, water control management costs were $6,845, diking costs were $12, and engineering and design costs were $4,263. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The jetty construction contract was awarded 2 September 1977. The recreational facilities (comfort station and parking lot) contract was awarded 25 July 1980 and physically completed 7 August 1981. 11. PORT ROYAL HARBOR, S. C. Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina 57 miles southwest of Charleston Harbor and 23 miles northeast of entrance to Savannah River, Georgia. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11516.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel from the ocean through Port Royal Sound to Port Royal, South Carolina, 27 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar and in Port Royal Sound for approximately 12.7 miles, thence 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Beaufort River and Battery Creek for approximately 8.3 miles to and including a turning basin 27 feet deep and 600 feet wide opposite the wharf of the South Carolina State Ports Authority. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. The South Carolina State Ports Authority constructed a marginal concrete wharf and operates 7-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 modern terminal facilities which are considered adequate for present commerce of the port. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design, surveys and supervision and administration costs were $917. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1959. 12. SHIPYARD RIVER, S. C. Location. This waterway is a tidal tributary of Charleston Harbor, South Carolina. It has its source about one-half miles below the U.S. Naval Base, whence it flows southerly about three miles and empties into the Cooper River about threefourths miles above Drum Island. (See National Ocean Survey Chart NO. 11524.) Previous projects. For details, see page 610 of Annual Report for 1932 and page 463 of Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 30 feet deep from Cooper River to Macalloy, Inc.'s plant, including the two turning basins, one opposite Gulf Oil Corporation Terminal and another at the upper end of the project.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. In the lower three-quarters of a mile of the channel are large marginal wharves of the Gulf Oil Corporation and Shipyard River Terminal Company. These wharves accommodate deep-draft, oceangoing vessels for handling petroleum products and fertilizer materials. In the upper channel is Macalloy, Inc.'s wharf for handling ores. For further details see Port Series No. 13, 1970, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract maintenance dredging was performed by the pipeline dredge Florida during August - September removing 475,604 cubic yards of material at a cost of $225,000. Condition and operations studies, water control management, supervision and administration, and engineering and design costs were $29,613. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1951. Federal costs under the existing project to date have been $487,824 for new work and $7,585,875 for maintenance, a total of $8,073,699. 13. TOWN CREEK, S. C. Location. Town Creek Channel begins at the AIWW directly south of the Town of McClellanville in Charleston County, S. C. The channel follows Five Fathom Creek in a southerly direction to the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11531.) Existing project. The project provides a channel 10 feet deep by 80 feet wide from the AIWW to the mouth of Five Fathom Creek, a distance of 6.2 miles. The project includes an entrance channel 12 feet deep by 100 feet wide across the ocean bar, a distance of 4.0 miles. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing projects.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed by the sidecaster dredge Fry during June - July removing 40,245 cubic yards of material at a cost of $116,724. Further dredging by the sidecaster dredge Currituck occurred during July - August removing 21,016 cubic yards of material at a cost of $36,570. Engineering and design, condition and operation studies, and water control management costs were $13,149. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1975. Federal costs under the existing project to date have been $219,521 for new work and $1,027,034 for maintenance, a total of $1,246,555. 14. VILLAGE CREEK, S. C. Location. Village Creek is located on the northeastern end of St. Helena in Beaufort County, approximately 12 miles from the Town of Beaufort. This creek, which is about 600 feet wide at its confluence with Morgan River and St. Helena Sound at a point 7 miles from the Altantic Ocean, extends in a southwestelry direction a distance of 6.8 miles to its headwaters. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11513.) Existing project. The authorized project provided for a channel 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide from the mouth of Village Creek upstream to the Porpoise Fish Company Terminal for a distance of 2.2 miles. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. All items of local cooperation have been complied with except the present requirement that a diked disposal area be furnished. In the past, a deep water disposal area has been used and may be used in the future. An environmental assessment of these areas is being prepared. If this assessment supports a negative determination for both areas, all items of cooperation will be fully satisfied. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $1. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in April 1966. Federal costs under the existing project to date have been $26,500 for new work and $96,512 for maintenance, a total of $123,012. 15. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Costs of $5,045 were incurred for condition surveys on Waccamaw River, North Carolina and South Carolina. 16. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION REPORTS (See Table 7-C.) 17. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATIONS (See Table 7-G.) Snagging and clearing for navigation (Sec. 3 of 1934 River and Habor Act, Public Law 14, 79th (Cong.)) Engineering and design, surveys, and supervision and administration costs were $797 for Calabash Creek. 7-6 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT 18. HUNTING ISLAND BEACH, S. C. Location. Hunting Island is a state park comprising about 1,850 acres of wooded land located along the southeastern shore of South Carolina in Beaufort County, 16 miles east of the Town of Beaufort, nine miles southwest of Edisto Beach, and 35 miles northeast of Tybee Roads at the mouth of Savannah River. (See National Ocean Survey Chart Nos. 11513 and 11517.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for periodic nourishment of about 10,000 feet of beach on the northern part of the island with initial placement of 750,000 cubic yards of sand for advance nourishment, and construction of one pre-stressed concrete groin at the north end of the island. Federal participation in periodic nourishment is limited to a period of 15 years. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. All requirements of local cooperation have been met by the State of South Carolina and accepted by the Chief of Engineers. The State has contributed 30 percent of construction costs. The initial construction was completed in June 1969, and two additional periodic nourishments (construction was completed in June 1969, and two additional periodic nourishments (construction) were completed in August 1971 and June 1975. Operations and resilts during fiscal year. Engineering and design costs were $5,999. Condition at end of fiscal year. The first three nourishments were designed to restore the feeder beach to the condition prevailing after the initial beach nourishment. The third nourishment was completed 30 April 1980. 19. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization). North Myrtle Beach, S. C. - $446. 20. LEITH CREEK, N. C. Location. Leith Creek is located entirely within the limits of Scotland County, North Carolina. The creek flows through the City of Laurinburg and forms a political boundary between the cities of Laurinburg and East Laurinburg. Existing project. The authorized project consists of 1.97 miles of channel conveyance improvement including replacement of two highway bridges, and relocation of three utility crossings. The project was authorized under general authority contained in section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interest must provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations and alterations and highway bridge alterations necessary for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages; maintain and operate the project after completion; prevent future encroachments; notify affected interests annually that improvement will not provide complete flood protection; and prevent unwise future flood plan development. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Total costs for fiscal year 1982 were $263,263 which included $223,678 for channels and canals, $3,642 for engineering and design, and $35,942 for supervision and administration. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed 30 May 1982 at a total Federal cost of $Lt 0,806. 21. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To determine the extend of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation, inspections were made of the following projects during the period: Cowpen Swamp, S.C. and N.C., Crab Tree Swamp, S.C., Gapway Swamp, S.C., Simpson Creek, S.C., Saluda River, S.C., Todd Swamp, S.C., Buck Creek, S.C. and N.C., Edisto River, S.C., Sawmill Branch, S.C., Shot Pouch Creek, S.C., Turkey Creek, S.C., Kingstree Branch, S.C. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation in local flood protection works when appropriate. Cost for the period was $12,275. 22. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 7-E.) 23. FLOOD CONTROL UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Sect. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (Section 208 of 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 708, 83rd Congress, Preauthorization). (See Table 7-D) Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and Antecedent Legislation. Federal costs for FY 1982 were $45,328 for the Disaster Preparedness Program and $31,862 for the National Emergency Preparedness Program. General Investigation 24. ACTIVE INVESTIGATIONS See Table 7-F which covers: Surveys, Collections, and Study of Basic Data, and Research and Development activities. 7-7 TABLE 7-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT DURING PERIOD See Sect. Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 1 Aauatic Plant New Work: Control, S.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds). 2 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. and the St. Johns River, Fla. 3 Charleston Harbor, S.C. 4 Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, S.C. 5 Folly River, S.C. 6 Georgetown Harbor, S.C. 7 Jeremy Creek, McClellanville, S.C. 8 Little River Inlet, N.C. and S.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 9 Lynches River and Clark Creek, S.C. Approp. Cost Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 35,000 17,272 45,000 49,174 3,435 101,900 128,391 80,605 78,122 489,605 484,597 52,028 52,028 - - - 7,455,3781 S- - - 7,455,378' 2,100,000 2,035,000 2,320,000 2,316,000 35,046,3042 1,663,475 2,435,663 2,261,584 1,973,663 34,514,2222 127,734 17 - - 10,165,5643 - 10,165,564 3 2,672,000 7,375,299 4,236,000 4,498,000 72,720,8874 2,635,886 7,673,599 3,479,697 4,215,123 71,634,4034 15,775,000 32,370,000 40,242,000 33,780,000 136,039,583 15,234,132 32,382,778 38,213,576 31,588,183 130,700,472 265,000 -18,000 -1,191 - 337,736 215,922 54,685 - - 337,736 - - 176,000 157,000 333,000 - 0 54,012 262,368 316,380 -- - - 7,061,7555 -- - - 7,061,7555 1,600,000 2,375,000 2,596,000 4,577,805 34,694,8806 1,098,931 2,851,550 2,573,534 3,868,776 33,881,8606 26,000 21,352 23,987 27,945 49,987 49,297 150,000 124,000 2,480,000 7,120,000 10,939,428 124,837 160,367 2,473,240 7,112,543 10,902,223 199,000 188,000 200,000 115,000 1,655,124 225,031 299,050 184,217 148,798 1,632,843 - 450,000 400,000 - 0 849,999 20,000 18,571 53,000 53,267 -1,162 0 950,000 849,999 9,500 9,500 84,170 84,170 7-8 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT TABLE 7-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT DURING PERIOD See Sect. Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 10 Murrells Inlet, S.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 11 Port Royal Harbor, S.C. 12 Shipyard River, S.C. 13 Town Creek, S.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 14 Village Creek, S.C. 18 Hunting Island Beach, S.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 20 Leith Creek, S.C. New Work: Approp. Cost Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 4,193,000 3,814,593 260,000 9,000 17,631 3,075,000 2,778,842 660,000 660,000 107 403,000 594,000 402,675 594,330 370,000 1,308,457 154,923 154,923 -175,000 27,346 0 0 13,419,240 13,357,810 1,380,000 1,274,923 - 279,000 980,5697 - 128,593 830,1627 - - 1,786,100 - - 1,786,100 32,000 30,465 -642 5,891,927 917 5,891,927 S- - - 491,9748 - - - - 491,9748 290,000 405,000 442,000 430,000 7,764,192 362,841 398,634 446,475 254,613 7,585,875 - - - - 219,521 - - - 219,521 - - - - 8,600 S- - - 8,600 145,000 110\000 253,000 218,000 1,093,000 43,151 212,909 235,056 166,443 1,027,034 19,420 512,000 8,000 6,178 200,000 1,293,280 100,000 612,000 1,745 16,000 5,738 12,660 2-- 0 1 26,5009 26,5009 106,773 96,512 0 2,881,117 5,999 2,866,712 - 1,249,336 0 1,249,336 22,000 241,280 430,951 5,398 263,263 430,806 'Includes $109,490 for new work for previous project. 2Includes $69,422 for maintenance of previous projects. 3Includes $6,586,455 for previous projects, $3,328,349 for the existing project, and $250,760 for Phase I to deepen harbor. 4Includes $401,989 for maintenance of previous projects. In addition, $600 for maintenance expended from contributed funds. Slncludes $2,445,852 for new work for previous projects. 6Includes $114,556 for maintenance of previous projects. 7Includes $67,000 accomplished under authority of Section 3, P.L. 79-14 incurred through FY 73. "Includes $4,150 for new work on previous projects. 9Excludes $3,000 in FY 69 for reconnaissance study to determine economic feasibility of modifying the existing project. 7-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized R&H Act of Oct. 27, 1965 R&H Act of Sept. 19, 1890 R&H Act of June 13, 1902 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1907 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1919 R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act of July 3, 1930 R&H Act of Aug. 30, 1935' R&H Act of Aug. 30, 19352 R&H Act of Aug. 30, 19352 R&H Act of Aug. 26, 1937 R&H Act of June 18, 1878 R&H Act of Aug. 8, 1917 R&H Act of July 18, 1918 R&H Act of Jan. 21, 1927 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of text) Provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the U.S., in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and state agencies. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (See Section 2 of text) Channel from Minim Creek to Winyah Bay. Channel from Charleston to a point opposite McClellanville. Branch channel to McClellanville. Extending the channel to Minim Creek, thence through the Estherville-Minim Canal to Winyah Bay. Cut across the Santee Delta at Four Mile Creek. Widening and deepening the waterway from Charleston to Beaufort. A waterway 8 feet deep and 75 feet wide from Cape Fear River to Winyah Bay. Construction of bridges across the waterway in Horry County, S.C. Cutoff between Ashepoo and Coosaw Rivers. Enlarging the channelf rom Winyah Bay to Charleston including the branch channel to McClellanville, to depth of 10 feet and bottom width of 90 feet. Increasing dimensions of waterway to 12 feet 12 feet deep, near Myrtle Beach, S.C. 4 CHARLESTON HARBOR, S.C. (See Secion 3 of text) 2 jetties. 5 Increase in depth to 30 feet width of 500 feet between the jetties and 1,000 feet seaward thereof. The 40-foot channel to the Naval Base. Act provided that the 40-foot channel should not be undertaken "until the proposed new drydocks at this navy yard, carrying a depth of 40 feet of water over the blocks, has been authorized." This dock was authorized in the Naval Appropriations Act approved July 1, 1918 (40 Stat. L 723). A 30-foot channel from the sea to Goose Creek via Cooper River, together with a 30-foot channel through Town Creek, for commercial purposes. The act also provided that the 40-foot channel be prosecuted only as found necessary for national defense. Sec. 302, 1965 River & Harbor Act (H.D. 251, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) Annual Report, 1889, p. 11$4. H.D. 84, 56th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report, 1900, p. 1908 Annual Report 1903, p. 1133. H.D. 178, 63d Cong., 1 sess. H.D. 237, 68th Cong., 1st sess. S.D. 178, 68th Cong., 2d sess. H.D. 41, 71st Cong. 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 14, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 129,, 72d cong. 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 11, 72d Cong. 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Annual Report 1878, pp. 553-572. H.D. 288, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H.D. 1946, 64th Cong., 2d sess., pt. 1, pp. 21-29, 57, 58 and 61-63. H.D. 249, 69th Cong. 1st sess. 7-10 Documents CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT TABLE 7-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents R&H Act of Oct. 17, 1940 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act of Sept. 3, 1954 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act of Sept. 3, 1954 R&H Act of July 14, 1960 Water Resources Development Act of Oct. 22, 1976 R&H Act of Aug. 13, 1968 Authorized by Chief of Engrs. on Dec. 23, 1977 under authority of Section 107 R&H Act of 1960, as amended. R&H Act of Aug. 5, 1886 R&H Act of June 25, 1910 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act of June 30, 1948 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1907 The 35-foot channel depth from the sea to the head of the project via Cooper River and Town Creek, also a channel in Shem Creek to Mount Pleasant, 110 feet wide and 10 feet deep, including a turning basin at the upper end. An anchorage area 30 feet deep in the water area between Castle Pinckney and Fort Moultrie.6 Deepen the 30-foot channel north and east of Drum Island to 35 feet. An anchorage area 30 feet deep in the water area between Castle Pinckney and Fort Moultrie.6 Deepen the 30-foot channel north and east of Drum island to 35 feet. Shem Creek Channel modified by extending 1,150 feet upstream and downstream from mouth to Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Project is authorized for the Phase I design memorandum stage of Advance Engineering and Design. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON, S.C. (ST. STEPHEN PROJECT) (See Section 4 of text) Redivert most of the Santee River waters above Pinopolis Dam into the lower Santee River through a canal beginning at Lake Moultrie and extending to the Santee River in the vicinity of St. Stephen, South Carolina. FOLLY RIVER, S.C. (See Section 5 of text.) Consists of stable all-tide channel 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide in Folly River and an entrance channel at Stono Inlet 100 feet wide and 11 feet deep. GEORGETOWN HARBOR, S.C. (See Section 6 of text) Jetties and earthen dike to protect south jetty. Previous project channel dimensions and training wall. 27-foot channel from ocean, including a turning basin in Sampit River. Cutoff and side channel in Sampit River. JEREMY CREEK, McCLELLANVILLE, S.C. (See Section 7 of text.) To provide a waterway 12 feet deep at mean low water and a width of not less than 90 feet. H.D. 259, 76th Cong., 1st seas. H.D. 156, 77th Cong., 1st seas. S.D. 136, 83d Cong., 2d sess. 7 H.D. 156, 77th Cong., 1st seas. S.D. 136, 83d Cong., 2d seas.' H.D. 35, 86th Cong., 1st seas. H.D. 436, 94th Cong. 2d sess. River & Harbor Act of 1968 S.D. 88, 90th Cong. Detailed Project Report H. Ex. Doc. 258 48th Cong., 2nd seas., and Annual Report 1885, pp. 1154-1170, and H Ex. Doc. 117, 50th Cong. 2d seas., and Annual Report 1889, pp. 1110-1111. H.D. 395, 58th Cong., 2d seas. and Annual Report 1904, pp. 1591-1605. H.D. 211, 76th Cong., 1st seas. S.D. 21, 81st Cong., 1st seas. Detailed Project Report 7-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 7-B (Continued) Acts R&H Act of 1945, Sec. 3 Autho. by Senate Public Works Comm. and the House Public Works Comm. on Oct. 12, 1972, under autho. of Sec. 201, PL 89-298, 1965 FC Act. Water Resources Development Act of 1974 R&H Act of Aug. 11, 1888 R&H Act of 1945, Sec. 3 Auth. by the House Committee on Public Works on Nov. 10, 1971 and the Senate Committee on Public Works on Nov. 18, 1971, under auth. or Sec. 201, PL 89-298, 1965 FC Act. Water Resources Development Act of 1974. R&H Act of Sept. 3, 1954 R&H Act of July 25, 1912 R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act of July 3, 1930 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized LITTLE RIVER INLET, N.C. and S.C. (See Section 8 of text.) Provides for an entrance channel 12 feet by 300 feet across the ocean bar, thence 10 Feet by 90 foot inner channel to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Authorized emergency dredging operations as the Chief of Engineers determines necessary to maintain channel depths sufficient to permit free and safe movement of vessels until such time as the authorized project is constructed. LYNCHES RIVER and CLARK CREEK, S.C. (See Section 9 of text.) Provides for a clear 4-foot navigation channel through Clark Creek, the principal mouth of Lynches River. MURRELLS INLET, S.C. (See Section 10 of text.) Provides for an entrance channel 12 feet by 300 feet across the seaward bar, thence 10 foot by 90 foot inner channel to a turning basin at the old Army crash boat dock. Authorized emergency dredging operations as the Chief of Engineers determines necessary to maintain channel depths sufficient to permit free and safe movement of vessels until such time as the authorized project is constructed. PORT ROYAL HARBOR, S.C. (See Section 11 of text.) A channel from the ocean through Port Royal Sound to Port Royal, S.C.; 27 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar and in Port Royal Sound for approximately 12.7 miles, thence 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Beaufort River and Battery Creek for approximately 8.3 miles to and including a turning basin 27 feet deep and 600 feet wide opposite wharf of the S.C. State Ports Authority. SHIPYARD RIVER, S.C. (See Section 12 of text.) Channel depth of 15 feet and width of 100 feet Deepening of channel to 18 feet from deep water in Cooper River upstream 1-1/16 miles. Channel depths of 12 and 20 feet. Documents P.L. 79-14 H.D. 362-2, 92d Cong. H.D. 10203, 93d Cong. 2d sess. River & Harbor Act of 1888 and Annual Report 1888 p.128. P.L. 79-14 H.D. 137, 92d Cong. H.D. 10203, 93d Cong. 2d sess. River & Harbor Act H.D. 469 81st Cong. 2d sess. S.D. 350, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H.D. 288, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 71st Cong., 2d sess. 7-12 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT TABLE 7-B (Continued) Acts R&H Act of Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act of Aug. 26, 19378 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 Auth. by Chief of Engrs. on Feb. 12, 1974 under Auth. of Sec. 107 of R&H Act of 1960, as amended. Auth. on Nov. 24, 1965, by Chief of Engrs. under the Auth. of Sec. 107 of R&H Act of 1960, as amended. R&H Act of Oct. 27, 1965 Water Resources Development Act of Oct. 22, 1976 Auth. by Chief of Engrs. on 8 December 1977 under auth. of Sec. 205 F.C. Act of 1948, as amended. AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized 28-foot channel from Cooper River to Gulf Oil Corp.'s terminal, and the deepening of the channel above that point to 20 feet from the depth of 12 above that point to 20 feet from the depth of 12 feet previously authorized without local cooperation. Enlargement of the channel to a depth of 30 feet and a width of 200 feet up to the Gulf Oil Corp.'s terminal, with a turning basin 30 feet deep at the latter point. Extension of the existing 30-foot channel to vicinity of the Pittsburgh Metallurgical Co. plant, with a turning basin at the upper end. TOWN CREEK, S.C. (See Section 13 of text.) An entrance channel 12 feet deep by 100 feet wide across the ocean bar a distance of 4.0 miles and a channel 10 feet deep by 80 feet wide from the mouth of Five Fathom Creek to the AIWW, a distance of 6.2 miles. VILLAGE CREEK, S.C. (See Section 14 of text.) A channel 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide from the mouth of Village Creek upstream to Porpoise Fish Company terminal for a distance of 2.2 miles. HUNTING ISLAND BEACH, S.C. (See Section 18 of text.) Provides for periodic nourishment for about 10,000 feet of beach on the northern part of the island with initial placement of 75,000 c.y. of sand for advance nourishment, and construction of one prestressed concrete groin at the north end of the island. Extended length of periodic nourishment from 10 to 15 years. LEITH CREEK, N.C. (See Section 20 of text.) Channel conveyance improvements extending a distance of 1.97 miles with bottom widths varying from 35 to 30 feet. Documents Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 75th Cong., 1sst sess. H.D. 93, 79th Cong., 1st sess. Detailed Project Report. Detailed Project Report. H.D. 323, 88th Cong., 2d sess.9 P.L. 94-587 Detailed Project Report. 'Included in Public Works Administration program, September 6, 1933. 2Included in Emergency Relief Administration program, May 28, 1935. 3Contains latest published maps. 4Inactive. 5Completed under previous projects. 6For national defense. 7Contains latest published maps. SIncluded in Emergency Relief Administration Program May 28, 1935. 9Contains latest published maps. 7-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 7-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY FY 1982 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Report For Construction Maintenance Adams Creek, S.C. L 1978 $125,697 $ 13,908 Aquatic Plant Control, N.C. and S.C. '1 1968 379,680 - Archers Creek, S.C. 1914 20,646 - Ashley River, S.C.' 1955 260,996 525,142 Edisto River, S.C.'1 2 1938 33,103 900 Great Pee Dee River, S.C. '3 1950 183,712 269,673 Mingo Creek, S.C. 12 1950 29,050 7,150 Salkahatchie River, S.C. 124 1896 15,841 - Santee River, N.C. & S.C. ' 1950 99,750 178,544 Waccamaw River, N.C. & S.C. ' 1978 262,814 277,700 Wateree River, S.C.' . 1940 60,000 151,784 'Completed. 4Abaondanment recommended in 1926 (H.D. 467, 69th Cong., 2No commerce reported. 1st Session). 3Curtailment recommended in 1926 (H.D. 467, 69th Cong., 1st SPilot Program. Session). TABLE 7-D FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Preauthorization studies (See Section 23 of Text) STUDY IDENTIFICATION SECTION FISCAL YEAR COSTS Brushy Creek, Greenville, S.C. 208 $ 3,419 Congaree River, Cayce, S.C. 205 8,337 Cramerton, S. Fork, Catawba, N.C. 205 82,905 Eagle Creek, Dorchester County, S.C. 205 64,846 Free Nancy Branch & Forth Creek, N.C. 205 358 Gills Creek, Lancaster, S.C. 205 2,618 Goose Creek, Berkeley County, S.C. 205 10,179 Langston Creek, S.C. 205 137,092 Socastee Creek, Horry County, S.C. 205 2,642 Wilson Branch, Cheraw, S.C. 205 73,614 Cow Castle Creek, S.C. 208 26,568 7-14 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT TABLE 7-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Project Buck Creek, N.C. & S.C.", 2 Cowpens Swamp, S.C., 2 Crabtree Swamp, S.C.1, 2 Edisto River, S.C., 3 Edisto River, North Fork, S.C. 1 2 Edisto River, Vicinity Canadays Landing, S.C.", 2 Gapway Swamp, N.C. & S.C.," , 2 Kingstree Branch, Williamsburg County, S.C.' Reddies River Lake Reedy River, S.C.", 3 Roaring River, Wilkes County, N.C.. 4 Saluda River, S.C." 2 Sawmill Branch, S.C., 2 Shot Pouch Creek, Sumter Co., S.C.", 2 Simpson Creek, S.C." 2 Todd Swamp, S.C.1 2 Turkey Creek, Sumter Conty, S.C." 2 Waccamaw River & Seven Creeks, N.C. and S.C." 2 'Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 2Completed. For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1970 1960 1969 1947 1969 1958 1969 1978 1980 1974 1978 1963 1971 1971 1957 1964 1974 1961 Federal Cost to Sep 30, 1982 Operation & Construction Maintenance $298,167 18,679 - 97,000 6,379 - 127,660 - 3,160 339,197 247,242 985,800 - 4,500 - 370,000 99,000 - 248,605 77,400 - 81,000 - 29,000 - 319,669 67,821 - 3Discontinued due to lack of interest. 4Phase I only. 7-15 --- CHARLESTON, S.C., DIST ICT TABLE 7-F ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS ITEM FISCAL YEAR COSTS NAVIGATION (110) Charleston Harbor, S.C. $ 95,330 Georgetown Harbor, S.C. 10,020 FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION STUDIES (CATEGORY 120) Gills Creek, S.C. $115,145 Little Pee Dee & Pee Dee Rivers, N.C. & S.C. 2,613 Lumber River, N.C. & S.C. 81,508 Lynches River, S.C. 194 Sugar Creek Basin, N.C. & S.C. 20,058 Waccamaw River Basin, N.C. & S.C. 2,762 SHORELINE PROTECTION STUDIES (CATEGORY 130) Myrtle Beach, S.C. $ 45,615 COORDINATION STUDIES WITH OTHER AGENCIES (CATEGORY 180) Department of Agriculture, SCS $ 4,023 Water Quality Management 635 Coastal Zone Management 891 Planning Assistance to States 22,599 National Wildlife & Scenic Rivers System 91 Tech and Eng Asst on Shore and Streambank 135 SUPPLEMENTAL PRE-AUTHORIZATION STUDIES (CATEGORY 190) Nay. Channel & Harbors -$ 232 TOTAL (CATEGORY 100) $401,387 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (CATEGORY 200) Inspection of Dams (Category 230) $ 33,028 FLOOD PLAIN MGMT SERVICES (CATEGORY 250) $162,694 HYDROLOGIC STUDIES (CATEGORY 260) Hydrologic Studies $ 5,243 Streamflow and Rainfall Data 514 TOTAL (CATEGORY 200) $201,479 TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $602.866 TABLE 7-G NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATIONS STUDY IDENTIFICATIONS SECTION FISCAL YEAR COSTS Calabash Creek, N.C. 107 $61,657 Jeremy Creek, S.C. 107 27,945 Charleston Harbor, S.C. 111 10,000 7-16 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT* The District comprises drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean between Port Royal Sound, SC, and Cumberland Sound, GA. and FL, including the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between these points. This area covers the headwaters of the Savannah River in southwestern North Carolina, a considerable portion of western South Carolina, eastern Georgia, and a small portion of northeastern Florida. IMPROVEMENTS Page 1. Altamaha, Oconee, and Ocmulgee Rivers, GA ..................................... 2. Aquatic Plant Control ....................... 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA, and St. Johns River, FL (Savannah District) ........... 4. Brunswick Harbor, GA ..................... 5. Savannah Harbor, GA ...................... 6. Savannah River Below Augusta, GA ................................... 7. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ......................................... 8. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ......................................... 9. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ................................. Beach Erosion Control 10. Tybee Island, GA ............................ Flood Control 11. Broadway Lake, Anderson County, SC ................................................ 12. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .............................. 13. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ......................................... 14. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ................................ 8-2 8-2 8-3 8-3 8-4 8-5 8-6 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 15. Savannah River Basin, GA and SC ........................................... 15A. Clarks Hill Lake, GA and SC ................ 15B. Hartwell Lake, GA and SC ................ 15C. Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, GA and SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake, GA and SC) .................. 16. West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, GA and AL ................... 8-8 8-8 8-8 8-9 8-9 8-6 General Investigations 8-6 1187.. 18. 19. 20. 8-6 Tables Surveys ....................................... Collection and Study of Basic Data ............................................ Research and Development ............. Continuation of Planning and Engineering ............................ Table 8-A Cost and Financial Statement ....... 8-7 Table 8-B Authorizing Legislation ............... Table 8-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects 8-7 Table 8-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .................................. 8-7 Table 8-H Savannah River Basin, GA and SC 88--77 Dams and Lakes ...............".... 8-10 8-10 8-10 8-10 8-11 8-12 8-16 8-16 8-17 *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. Other tables referenced in the text also appear at the end of this chapter. 8-1 Navigation Page REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Navigation 1. ALTAMAHA, OCONEE, AND OCMULGEE RIVERS, GA Location. These Rivers are entirely within the State of Georgia. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Survey Map of Georgia, formerly U.S. Geological Survey map of Georgia.) For full description of these rivers, see page 636, Annual Report for 1932. Previous projects. Prior projects for the Altamaha River have been adopted, and expenditures made under them, by River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1881, and September 19, 1890; for the Oconee River by River and Harbor Acts of June 18, 1878, September 19, 1890, and March 3, 1905; for the Ocmulgee River, by River and Harbor Acts of August 14, 1876, and September 19, 1890. For further details, see page 1815, Annual Report for 1915, and page 589, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for an appropriation of $40,000 annually for the Altamaha, Oconee, and Ocmulgee Rivers, to maintain a 3-foot depth during ordinary summer low water and to gradually increase channel depth, so far as practicable without sacrificing the maintenance work. This project covers the entire Altamaha River (including a channel between the river and Darien, GA), a length of 137 miles, the lower 139 miles of the Oconee River, and the lower 199 miles of the Ocmulgee River. The Altamaha River has a mean tidal range of 6.4 feet at its mouth which gradually decreases to mile 33 above, where there is no perceptible tidal effect. At Doctortown, mile 59, ordinary floods attain a height of about 10 feet above low water, and extreme floods, a height of about 15 feet above low water. On the Oconee River at Dublin the ordinary fluctuations attain a height of 22 feet, and the extreme fluctuations a height of 32 feet, above low water. On the Ocmulgee River at Macon the ordinary fluctuations attain a height of 15 feet, and the extreme fluctuations a height of 25 feet, above low water. There is no approved estimated cost for improvement or for maintenance. Published maps of these rivers are in the following documents: Altamaha River, House Executive Document 283, Fifty-first Congress, second session; Oconee River, House Executive Document 211, Fifty-first Congress, first session; Ocmulgee River, House Executive Document 215, Fifty-first Congress, first session; and Lower Altamaha River and Darien Harbor, GA, House Document 610, Seventy-seventh Congress, second session. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Along these rivers there are numerous natural shore landings which are considered ample for existing commerce. Facilities for recreational boats have been constructed in recent years at several points. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: No maintenance was performed during the fiscal year. The Toxic Substance Study was performed during the FY and tnte otal cost amounted to $5.821. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is such that the percentage of completion cannot be stated. Channel depths have been increased by excavating rock shoals and sandbars, by constructing contraction and bank-protection works, and by closing cutoffs. Navigation has been rendered safer by removing obstructions. Many of the closing dams and contractions and bank-protection works need repairs. The notice of availability on the Final Environmental Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 21, 1977. To September 30, 1982, costs under the existing project were $60,847 for new work and $1,871,172 for maintenance, of which $69,356 were contributed funds, a total of $1,932,019. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 2. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Savannah District. Existing project. The project provides for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water milfoil, and other noxious aquatic plants from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interests of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for developing the most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers, House Document 251, 89th Congress, 1st session. The authorizing act provides that research and planning costs shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and participate to the extent of 30 percent of the cost of the program. Requirements are being met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Georgia Game and Fish Division, Department of Natural Resources, who maintain surveillance of potential aquatic plant problem areas, reported aquatic plant infestation in the Satilla River and in other river basins in the State of Georgia. Actual control work under the Aquatic Plant Control Cost Sharing Program with the Georgia Game and Fish Division was not accomplished in FY 81. Certain parts of a proposed new contract were not acceptable to the State. After much work to resolve the differences, the State indicated they would be unable to cost share in either FY 82 or 83. Savannah District began pursuing the possibility of contracting with counties under the program. Cost during the fiscal year was $64,801. The notice of availability on the Final Environmental Statementap.- peared in the Federal Register August 17, 1979. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 8-2 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT 3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA, AND THE ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (SAVANNAH DISTRICT) Location. This 161-mile section of waterway connects Port Royal Sound, SC, with Cumberland Sound, GA and FL (See NOAA charts 11489 - 11507, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 838-841, inclusive.) Previous project. (Between Savannah, GA, and Fernandina, FL) For details see pages 1814, 1821-1823 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 585 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep at mean low water and not less than 90 feet wide between Port Royal Sound, SC, and Savannah, GA; 12 feet deep at mean low water, with widths of 90 feet in land cuts and narrow streams and 150 feet in open waters, between Savannah, GA, and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL; and a suitable anchorage basin at Thunderbolt, GA Mean tidal range between Port Royal, SC, and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL, is from 6 to 8 feet, with fluctuations from 1.5 to 2.5 feet, due to winds and lunar phases. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Exclusive of adequate terminal facilities at ports of entry, this improvement serves numerous wharves, some of which are open to the public on equal terms. Facilities are considered ample for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract for maintenance dredging of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway was awarded June 18, 1982. The contract dredges Dauntless and Cherokee removed 548,095 cubic yards of material from Hell Gate and Umbrella Cut during the period of July 31, 1982, thru September 30, 1982, at a total cost of $385,651, including inspection, administration, and other government cost. The government cost for surveys and inspection reports, and condition and operation studies amounted to $66,212. Real estate inspection cost and administration activities cost amounted to $4,213. Distribution of Engineer Yard cost amounted to $7,111. The 50-year long-range Maintenance Study was completed during the FY at a cost of $30,734. The total cost of the study, including previous fiscal years, was $61,060. Total cost for the FY amounted to $493,921. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The main channel of the existing project, completed in 1941, is maintained at 12 feet. The former main channel, now an alternate route through the westerly end of the South Channel and northerly end of Wilmington River, will be maintained to a depth of 7 feet mean low water for traffic points north and south of Savannah Harbor. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 29, 1976. Costs of the existing completed project to September 30, 1982, were $763,599 for new work and $13,298,699 for maintenance, a total of $14,062,298. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 8-3 4. BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA Location. The Harbor entrance is 70 statute miles south of the entrance to Savannah Harbor, GA, and 25 statute niiles north of the entrance to Fernandina Harbor, FL (See NOAA Chart 11215, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 447.) Previous projects. For details see page 1818 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 591 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a stone jetty 4,350 feet long at the entrance to East River and the following channels: 32 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the bar; 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide through St. Simons Sound, Brunswick River, and East River to the foot of Second Avenue; 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Turtle River to the Allied Chemical Co. wharf, formerly the Atlantic Refining Co.; 27 feet deep and 350 feet wide in East River from Second Avenue to its confluence with Academy Creek; 24 feet deep and 150 feet wide in Academy Creek; a channel in Back River 20 feet deep and 150 feet wide from St. Simons Sound to the mouth of Mill Creek; and a channel in Terry Creek 10 feet deep and 80 feet wide from its mouth to a point immediately above the wharf of Glynn Canning Company. All depths refer to mean low water. Mean tidal range on the bar is 6.5 feet, at the city of Brunswick 7.3, and 7.6 feet at the upper end of the harbor. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Eighteen wharves and piers, almost all privately owned, have a berthing space of 7,530 feet. The Port of Brunswick and the State of Georgia have a transit shed and modern docks with 1,640 feet of berthing space on East River. For further details see Port Series No. 14, Corps of Engineers (revised 1982). Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract for maintenance dredging of the bar channel and St. Simons Sound was awarded November 13, 1981. The contract dredge Manhattan Island removed 754,503 cubic yards of material from the sound and bar channel during the period January 2, 1982, thru January 25, 1982, at a total cost of $2,455,867 including inspection, administration and other government costs. The maintenance dredging contract for East River was awarded August 18, 1981. The contract dredge Dauntless removed 319,049 cubic yards of material from East River (sta 70 + 50 to 126 + 00) during November 19, 1981, to December 20, 1981, at a total cost of $486,121, including inspection, administration and other government costs. A contract for rock dredging in the inner harbor was awarded August 20, 1982. The cost during the FY amounted to $1,117, although dredging will not begin until FY 83. A contract to raise and repair St. Andrews Island spoil dikes and pipeline ramp and install weirs was awarded late in FY 81 with work commencing August 10, 1981, and completed October 16, 1981. The FY cost amounted to $73,826. The contract to raise the dikes in the Terry Creek disposal area was awarded March 9, 1982. The work began April 19, 1982, and was completed September 14, 1982, at a total cost of $114,987. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Routine condition surveys, water, air, and environmental studies, inspection and reports, and other essential activities amounted to $173,031. Mosquito control in disposal areas cost amounted to $54,325. Distribution of Engineer Yard and other year end adjustments amounted to $23,620. Credits received for dredging berthing spaces of Georgia Ports Authority, Brunswick Ports Authority, and the city of Brunswick amounted to $43,113. Total operation and maintenance cost amounted to $3,339,781. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in December 1960. General condition of the harbor works is satisfactory, providing maintenance dredging continues. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 3, 1975. Costs for existing completed project to September 30, 1982, were $33,976,567, of which $3,929,968 was for new work and $30,046,599 for maintenance. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 5. SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA Location. Harbor entrance is 75 statute miles south of Charleston Harbor, SC, and 70 statute miles north of Brunswick Harbor, GA (See NOAA Chart 11512, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 440.) Previous projects. For details see page 1810 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 578 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide across the ocean bar about 7.0 miles; 38 feet deep and 500 feet wide to the Seaboard Coast Line terminal; 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the vicinity of Garden City (Georgia Ports Authority terminal); and 36 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the vicinity of Savannah Sugar Refinery of Savannah Foods and Industries, Inc. about 22.6 miles; and 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide to a point 1,500 feet below the Atlantic Coastal Highway bridge, about 1.5 miles, a total length of 31.1 miles; Fig Island and Marsh Island Turning Basins 34 feet deep by 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long in the vicinity of the Seaboard Coast Line terminal, and American Oil Company terminal; Kings Island Turning basin 38 feet deep by 1,500 feet wide by 1,600 feet long in the vicinity of Garden City terminal of the Georgia Ports Authority; Argyle Island and Port Wentworth Turning Basins 30 feet deep by 600 feet wide by 600 feet long near Savannah Sugar Refinery terminal and at the extreme upper limit of the project near Continental Can Company terminal; and Oyster Bed Island Turning Basin in the vicinity of Georgia Ports Authority LASH facility. The project also provides for sediment control works consisting of a tide gate structure across Back River; a sediment basin 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide, about 2 miles long, with an entrance channel 38 to 40 feet deep and 300 feet wide; a drainage canal across Argyle Island 15 feet deep and 300 feet wide; control works and canals for supplying fresh water to the Savannah National Wildlife Refuge; and facilities to mitigate damages to presently improved areas other than refuge lands. Mean range of tide is 7.9 feet at the upper end of the harbor and 6.9 feet at the lower end. Extreme ranges are about 11.1 and 10.7 feet, respectively. Latest (FY 82) estimate of total Federal cost for new work modification is $34,219,000 ($11,932,000 for Sediment Basin and Appurtenant Works, $8,660,000 for LASH and Kings Island Turning Basins, $13,400,000 for the Widening and Deepening of Channels and Turning Basin and $227,000 U.S. Coast Guard costs). Estimated local cost for LASH and Kings Island Turning Basins is $2,102,000 and $367,000 for Widening and Deepening of Channels and Turning Basin, and $455,000 for Sediment Basin and Appurtenant Works. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide suitable spoil areas and retaining dikes for construction and future maintenance of the project. The Chatham County Commissioners, as local assurers, have met all requirements to date. Terminal facilities. Sixty-one piers and wharves adequately serve existing waterborne commerce of the port. These facilities, with use of dolphins, have a combined berthing space of 39,493 feet with water depths alongside ranging up to 38 feet at mean low water. Included in the berthing space are six container berths with 271 acres of handling area. All have railway and highway connections. LASH facilities are located at the entrance to the harbor and have depths ranging up to 38 feet mean low water. The berthing space of LASH facilities is included in the above combined berthing space. For further details, see Port Series No. 14, Corps of Engineers (revised 1982) and Annual Report for 1962. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Under Savannah Harbor Extension, a construction contract for Kings Island Turning Basin was awarded August 28, 1980. The pipeline dredge Stuart, under this contract, dredged 2,559,361 cubic yards of material (sta 97 + 500 - 103 + 250) during the period from October 1, 1981 thru July 23, 1982, at a total cost of $1,938,034. The total cost for new work during the FY amounted to $1,938,034. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement). Maintenance: The U.S. hopper dredge McFarland moved 188,266 cubic yards of shoal material from the bar channel (sta 8 + 00B - 104 + 500B), Sta 14 + 200B - 20 +000B, and sta 38 +000B - 44 + 000B) during the period of November 28, 1981 thru December 31, 1981, at a total cost of $1,332,444, including inspection, overhead, and other government cost. A contract for removal of material from the sediment basin was awarded August 7, 1981, with work beginning September 10, 1981, and continuing into FY 82. Under this contract, the pipeline dredge Enterprise removed 623,372 cubic yards of material (sta 0 + 500 - 8 + 000) during the period of October 1, 1981, and November 7, 1981, at a total cost of $772,492, including inspection, overhead, and other government cost. A new contract for removal of material from the sediment basin was awarded June 11, 1982. Contractpipeline dredges Cherokee and Clinton removed 3,706,821 cubic yards of material from the sediment basin (sta 0 +500 - 13 + 300) during the period from June 30, 1982, to September 30, 1982, at a total cost of $907,934, including inspection, overhead and other government cost. A con- 8-4 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT tract was awarded February 4, 1982, to dredge the inner harbor. The pipeline dredge Clinton removed 1,128,927 cubic yards between April 22, 1982, and September 30, 1982, from sta 35 + 000 - 112 + 500 and 137,525 cubic yards (sta 71 + 025 - 76 + 825) during the period June 23 to September 21, 1982, at a total cost of $1,071,147, including inspection, overhead, and other government cost. A contract for maintenance dredging in the Kings Island Turning Basin was awarded August 28, 1980. Dredging under this contract was continued into FY 82. The pipeline dredge Stuart removed 58,137 cubic yards of material during the period from March 16, 1982, to March 24, 1982, at a total cost of $71,591, including inspection, overhead and other government cost. This work was accomplished during the same period of time that the new work was being done under the same contract. A contract for bank protection for Oyster Bed Island was completed December 13, 1981. The total cost for the work in this FY amounted to $510,561. The Condederate gunboat Georgia, which is submerged opposite Fort Jackson, is being studied under a contract with Texas A&M University. The cost for the FY amounted to $2,857 (total cost to date is $161,649). Mosquito. control in disposal areas cost $120,215. Operation and maintenance of the tide gate system cost $153,794. (Credits received from agitation dredging of private shipping interest slips amounted to $106,433.) Distribution of Engineer Yard cost amounted to $89,868. The cost for dragging and sweeping for the FY amounted to $18,284. Condition surveys, water quality monitoring, water and air pollution studies, environmental studies, testing, inspection and reports, and government supervision and administration costs were $421,378. Miscellaneous operation and maintenance cost amounted to $276,721. Total operation and maintenance costs for the FY amount to $5,642,853. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is incomplete. Training walls, jetties, and other structures are in fair condition. Authorized channels are maintained by a planned dredging program with work at critical areas when necessary. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register June 25, 1976. Notices of availability on two Final Supplements to the Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register September 25, 1978, and January 8, 1980. Cost of existing project to September 30, 1982 were $39,037,839 Federal cost and $1,886,413 contributed funds for new work and $113,787,774 Federal cost and $852,858 contributed funds for maintenance, a total of $155,564,884. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 6. SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA Location. Savannah River is formed by the confluence of the Tugaloo and Seneca Rivers on the boundary line between South Carolina and Georgia. It flows southeast 314 miles, forming the boundary line between the two states, and empties into the Atlantic Ocean 16.6 miles below Savannah, GA (See NOAA Charts 11514 and 11515, formerly Geological Survey maps of South Carolina and Georgia.) Previous project. For details see page 1813 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 581 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 9 feet deep and 90 feet wide (at ordinary summer flow of 5,800 second-feet at Augusta, GA) from the upper end of Savannah Harbor to the head of navigation at Augusta, 3 miles above Fifth Street Bridge, a total distance of about 181 miles. A lock and dam is located approximately 15 miles below the upper limit of the project at New Savannah Bluff. Improvement is to be obtained by construction of contraction works, closure of cutoffs, bank protection, dredging, removal of snags, overhanging trees and wrecks, and open-river regulation. Mean tidal variation at the mouth of the river is 7 feet. Freshet variation above the normal pool level (elevation 114.5 mean sea level) of New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam at miles 187 is ordinarily about 13 feet with an extreme of 34 feet. Latest approved project cost estimate for providing a 9- foot channel (September 1963) is $6,576,000 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Recreation facilities at New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam cost $17,000. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Complied with to date. The City Council of Augusta, GA, and the Georgia and South Carolina Ports Authorities have agreed to act as local assurer. Terminal facilities. The only water terminals served by this improvement are at Augusta, Sylvania, and at or near Savannah. Augusta provided a municipal dock valued at $50,000 and Georgia Ports Authority constructed a State port at Augusta, GA, costing about $418,000. These facilities were expanded in 1965 at an additional cost of about $250,000. In addition, Koch Refining Company maintains a terminal below Augusta and Allied Chemical Co. maintains a terminal at Sylvania. These are .supplemented by natural landings along the river and extensive facilities at Savannah. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance and operation of the New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam and its recreational area, which accommodated 264,337 visitors, amounted to $79,618. Routine condition surveys, water pollution and environmental studies, inspection and reports and other administrative costs amounted to $29,895. Distribution of Engineer Yard cost amounted to $4,983. Miscellaneous cost including service facilities and radio system microwave equipment amounted to $253,828. Credits received for housing of lock employees amounted to $2,825. A credit of $2,774 was received for the removal of a 1977 Chevrolet van and boat trailer from the Savannah River near Blue Springs Landing. Total operation and maintenance cost for the FY amounted to $362,725. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of fiscal year. In general, openchannel works are in good condition. The notice on the 8-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register February 18, 1977. Costs of existing project to September 30, 1982, were $20,310,255 of which $6,646,551 was for new work and $13,663,704 for maintenance. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 7. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS No reconnaissance and condition surveys were conducted during the FY. (See Table 8-C.) 8. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 8-C.) 9. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Pub- 1ic Law 86-645, as amended (Preauthorization Studies.) FY costs for preauthorization studies were $771,680. The Cedar Point, GA, project was completed and constructed at a cost of $656,233. The notice of availability on the Final Environmental Impact Statement on the Cedar Point Project appeared in the Federal Register May 15, 1981. A detailed project study was continued on Bellville Point, GA, at a cost of $47,673. A draft Environmental Impact Statement on the Bellville Point Project was released on July 16, 1982. The Valona, GA, detailed project study was also continued and the FY cost was $8,379. A negative report was completed on Meridian, .GA, for $51,968 and a negative reconnaissance report was completed on Jekyll Island Marina, GA, for $7,427. The Torras Causeway, Brunswick, GA project was approved in early FY 82. It provides for the main channel of the AIWW, in the vicinity of Torras Causeway, to be relocated from Frederica River to Mackay River. This relocation to take place when the new Torras Causeway bridges are constructed. Beach Erosion Control 10. TYBEE ISLAND, GA Location. Tybee Island is located directly south of Savannah River entrance, about 17 miles east of the city of Savannah, GA (See NOAA Charts 11512, 11513 and 11509, formerly U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 440, 1240, and 1241, and on maps included in H.D. 92-105, 92d Cong.) The only portion of the island that has been developed is bounded on the north by the south channel of the Savannah River, on the east by the Atlantic ocean, and on the south and west by Tybee Creek and other small tidal streams. This area, hereinafter referred to as "Tybee Island," is occupied by the city of Tybee Island. The ocean face of this area has had a wide sandy beach. Tybee Island is about 3.5 miles long from its northerly tip to the mouth of Tybee Creek with an average width of about 0.5 mile. Behind the beach lies a line of sand dunes, a number of which have been removed during the years to make room for improvements and for various other reasons. Those that remain are from 10 to 20 feet high. The ground elevation west of the dunes is from 10 to 18 feet and slopes westward to the salt marsh. Existing project. The approved project plan of improvement provides for an 800-foot rock groin at the north end of the island, with a 225-foot tie-in to high ground. An additional 1,200-foot extension of this groin is deferred, as are two additional, intermediate groins (480 feet long); these will be added at a later date, if needed. Plans now call for the addition of a groin at the south end and modification and rehabilitation of the north rock groin. The plan also provides for the initial restoration of approximately 13,300 feet of beach, from the vicinity of 18th Street to the new terminal groin located at the northern end of the island. Periodic nourishment will be provided as needed to maintain suitable beach dimensions. Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) contribute in cash the required percentage of the first cost, including costs for construction, engineering, and design, and administration; and excluding the cost of lands, easements, rights-of-way; and relocations; of all items of work to be provided by the Corps of Engineers, presently estimated at 51.0 percent or $6,070;000 (FY 82 estimate) to be paid in a lump sum prior to start of construction or in installments prior to the start of pertinent work items in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers, the final apportionment of cost to be made after the actual costs have been determined; (b) provide maintenance and repair of the groins, and provide, after the first 15 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the restored beach as may be required to serve the intended purpose during the life of the project; (c) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations required for construction and subsequent nourishment of the project; (d) hold and save the United States free from claims for damages that may result from construction, maintenance, and nourishment of the project; (e) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (f) provide without cost to the United States access and facilities necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based, and maintain continued public use of the beach and administer it for public use during the life of the project; and provided further, that construction on the project shall not be started until local interests furnish lands for beach access and parking, satisfactory to the Chief of Engineers, for the reach from 1st Street to the terminal groin. To date, local cooperation is being provided as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. There were no Federal expenditures during FY and no funds were expended from non-Federal contributions. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The Final Environ- 8-6 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT mental Impact Statement was filed with CEQ on November 13, 1973. The initial construction contract for the terminal groin was awarded September 13, 1974 in the amount of $980,642. The groin was completed and formally accepted on June 17, 1975. The second contract, for initial beach fill and advance nourishment, was awarded June 18, 1975 in the amount of $2, 175,000. This resulted in the placement of 2.3 million cubic yards of sandfill along most of the entire length (13,300 feet) of ocean beach front. The sand was removed by hydraulic pipeline dredge from a massive sandbar borrow area off the south end of Tybee Island. Completed in March 1976, the project provides approximately 124 feet of beach seaward of the seawall (accessible at average high tide), doubling the public beach area. Erosion has occurred along the beach front. Results of prior years beach monitoring indicate a decreasing or stabilizing erosion rate. The southernmost section south of 13th Street has experienced the most critical erosion. However, the available beach surface for recreation purposes has increased since project completion. Total project cost is estimated to be $11,900,000, which includes $6,070,000 in non-Federal, contributed funds. Costs to date of existing project were $2,522,553 (Federal funds) and $2,024,856 (contributed funds). (See Table 8-A Cost and Financial Statement.) Flood Control 11. BROADWAY LAKE, ANDERSON COUNTY, SC Location. The Broadway Lake is located about 4 miles southeast of Anderson, South Carolina. It is formed at the junction of Broadway Creek and Neals Creek in the headwaters of Rocky River, a tributary of the Savannah River. Existing project. The authorization provides for the Corps of Engineers to undertake a demonstration project for the removal of silt and aquatic growth from an existing lake known as Broadway Lake, owned by Anderson County, South Carolina. This lake has a surface area of about 1 square mile and a tributary area of about 44 square miles with an existing dam and concrete spillway. The spillway is 50 feet wide, about 19 feet high, and flanked by an earth embankment on the west side. The total length of the dam is about 610 feet. The National Dam Safety Inspection Program determined that the dam did not meet the safety criteria. Since the repairs of the dam, spillway, and low-level outlet are not within the authority of the demonstration project, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will withhold implementation of the project pending repairs to the dam by State or local authorities. Local cooperation. The local interests are now making the necessary repairs to the dam. Local interests have expressed a willingness to provide necessary easements, and rights-of-way for removal of silt and aquatic weeds, as well as provide lands for disposal areas. They will be required to hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works other than damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors. The United States should be relieved of any liability due to dam failure from construction activity in the lake. The local assurer is Anderson County. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project is inactive, pending completion of repairs to the dam by local interest. The Office of the Chief of Engineers is preparing a Significant Post Authorization Change Report for submittal to Congress. Draft Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register August 29, 1977. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 12. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Physical inspections of the Augusta and Macon levees were conducted April 28 and 29, 1982, at a cost of $1,826. Inspections were made of Dunn Branch and Peacock Creek December 9 and 10, 1981, at a cost of $1,012. The total cost of the FY amounted to $2,838. (See Table 8-A Cost and Financial Statement.) 13. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 8-E.) 14. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization Studies). A preauthorization study on Casey Canal, GA continued through FY 82 at a cost of $68,878. Studies on Conley Creek, GA ($133,683) and Pettit Creek, GA ($19,910) were terminated. Positive reconnaissance reports were completed and detailed project reports were initiated on Federal Prison Creek, GA ($50,875), Placentia Canal, GA ($23,324), and Springfield Canal, GA ($29,915). Negative reconnaissance reports were completed on Baxter, FL ($5,609), Big Indian Creek, GA ($4,286), Cobbs Creek, GA ($7,614), Henderson Mill Creek, GA ($6,559), Horse Creek, SC ($6,928), Indian Creek, GA ($7,421), Rocky Creek, GA ($819), Shoal Creek, GA ($6,259), and Silver Lake, GA ($4,311). The total cost for the FY was $376,391. Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work, (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation). Revisions to emergency manuals, emergency planning, inspection, supplies, emergency operations, and other expenditures costs for coastal emergencies were $153,960. National emergency preparedness cost amounted to $139,338. 8-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 15. SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA AND SC Location. Works covered by this project consist of a series of 11 dams and lakes on Savannah River and its tributaries in Georgia and South Carolina. (See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1944 approved the general plan for comprehensive development of the Savannah River Basin for flood control and other purposes (H. D. 657, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and authorized construction of the Clarks Hill Project on the Savannah River in Georgia and South Carolina as the initial step of this development. The Flood Control Act of 1950 authorized construction of Hartwell Lake under the general plan. Trotters Shoals which will replace Goat Island and Middleton Shoals was authorized for construction by the Flood Control Act of 1966 at an estimated cost of $84,900,000. Clarks Hill and Hartwell Lakes are the only projects in the comprehensive plan that have been constructed. (See Table 8-H on Dams and Lakes at end of chapter.) Duke Power Company has completed constructed on the Keowee-Toxaway power complex on the Keowee River in the headwaters of Hartwell Lake and construction of the Jocassee pump-storage power project in the headwaters of the Keowee-Toxaway project. The Keowee-Toxaway power complex is located on the Newry - Old Pickens site identified in the approved comprehensive plan. Individual reports on Clarks Hill, Hartwell, and Richard B. Russell (formerly Trotters Shoals) Lakes follow. Local cooperation. None required. 15A. CLARKS HILL LAKE, GA AND SC Location. Clarks Hill Lake is located at mile 237.7 on Savannah River about 22 miles upstream from Augusta, GA (See Geological Survey maps of Georgia and. South Carolina.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of Clarks Hill Dam and Lake, the final cost of which was $79,156,300. The dam has a concrete section 2,282 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet, and a controlled spillway 1,096 feet long. The concrete section is flanked on the west side by a rolled-earth embankment of 2,069 feet, and on the east side by a similar embankment of 1,329 feet. Total length of the dam is 5,680 feet. At maximum power pool elevation 330, the lake covers 70,000 acres. It provides a total storage capacity of 2,900,000 acre-feet allocated as follows: flood control 390,000 acre-feet; hydroelectric power 1,045,000 acrefeet; and dead storage 1,465,000 acre-feet. Seven 40,000- kilowatt generators have a combined generating capacity of 280,000 kilowatts, with an average annual output of 700 million kilowatt-hours of electrical energy. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Cost of recreational activities during the period from Construction General funds (Code 710) amounted to $332,011. Gross generations of electric energy for the period was 484,194,500 kilowatt-hours, most of which was delivered to the Southeastern Power Administration. Flood damages prevented amounted to $1,156,900. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance costs during the FY amounted to $5,397,853. The notice of availability on the Final Environment Impact Statement on Clarks Hill Lake Operation and Maintenance appeared in the December 18, 1981, Federal Register. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is complete except for providing additional recreational development. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 15B. HARTWELL LAKE, GA AND SC Location. Hartwell Lake is on the Savannah River 305 miles above its mouth and 89 miles upstream from Augusta, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The dam is a concrete gravity-type structure, 1,900 feet long with a maximum height of 204 feet and a controlled spillway 568 feet in length. The concrete section is flanked on the east and west abutments by earth embankments totaling 13,390 feet in length and by a saddle dike 2,590 feet long also on the west side. Total length of the dam is 17,880 feet. At maximum power pool elevation of 660 feet the lake covers 55,950 acres. Total capacity of the lake is 2,843,000 acre-feet of storage allocated as follows: flood control 293,000 acre-feet; hydroelectric power 1,416,000 acre-feet; and dead storage 1,134,000 acre-feet. Four 66,000-kilowatt generators having generating capacity of 264,000 kilowatts were installed initially with provisions for a future unit. A-fifth 80,000 kilowatt generating unit presently being installed which will increase the rated capacity to 344,000 kilowatts. All major supply contracts have been awarded. The general construction contract was awarded April 30, 1981. The scheduled completion of the fifth unit is-August 1983 at a total estirhated cost of $18,100,000. The notice of availability on the Final Environmental Statement covering this aspect of Hartwell appeared in the Federal Register June 15, 1979. Latest approved project estimate (August 1968) is $88,300,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Cost of activities during the FY amounted to $10,207,054. Of this amount $164,558 was expended from Construction General funds (Code 710) for the construction of miscellaneous recreational facilities, and $8,067,887 was expended for construction for the additional fifth unit to the power dam. Major rehabilitation of the diversion dams at Clemson University was begun with the lower dam work to be completed in FY 83, and the upper dam rehabilitation completion date to follow. The FY rehabilitation cost amounted to $1,974,609. Gross generation of electrical energy for the period amounted to 279,351,000 kilowatt-hours, most of which was delivered to the Southeastern Power Administration. Flood dam- 8-8 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT ages prevented during the FY amounted to $794,500. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance costs during the FY amounted to $4,471,416. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement on the operation and maintenance of Hartwell Dam and Lake appeared in the Federal Register August 21, 1978. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is complete except for providing additional recreational development. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 15C. RICHARD B. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA AND SC, (FORMERLY TROTTERS SHOALS LAKE, GA AND SC) Location. Richard B. Russell Dam is on the Savannah River 275.1 miles above its mouth, 29.9 miles below Hartwell Dam and about 37.4 miles above Clarks Hill Dam. (See NOAA Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake substantially in accordance with the recommendations of the Chief of Engineers at an estimated cost of $84,900,000. The latest approved (FY 81) cost estimate for the project is $520,000,000, of which $424,635,000 is for construction, $29,107,000 for lands and damages, and $66,258,000 for engineering and design and supervision and administration. Approval was received January 1977 to include minimum provisions for pumped storage. A notice of availability of a Final Environmental Impact Statement covering pumped storage was published in the Federal Register February 18, 1977, and October 26, 1979. A notice of availability on the Final Supplement to the Environmen-. tal Impact Statement on Fish and Wildlife Mitigation for the Russell project appeared in the Federal Register on December 11, 1981. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Contracts were awarded during the FY as follows: Group I reservoir clearing awarded June 14, 1981; group II cemeteries awarded December 1, 1981; CO2 equipment awarded December 24, 1981; Georgia Power Company awarded December 17, 1981; microwave equip- 'ment awarded February 18, 1982; oil circuit breakers and disconnect awarded February 22, 1982; Western Carolina Rural Telephone Company awarded March 4, 1982; 480 kv station service switchgear and transformer awarded March 5, 1982; Little River Electric Corporation awarded March 31, 1982; Municipal Electric authority of Georgia awarded, April 15, 1982; main central switchboard awarded April 26, 1982; Hart County Electric Membership Corporation awarded May 4, 1982; group II reservoir clearing awarded May 7, 1982; Duke Power Company awarded May 20, 1982; operational boat ramp awarded May 20, 1982; Southern Bell Telephone awarded June 14, 1982; auxiliary power disconnect awarded September 1, 1982; and initial recreation facilities SC awarded September 29, 1982. Fiscal year cost for land acquisition and associated cost amounted to $1,855,800. Relocation of Georgia Route 72 cost amounted to $259,700. Relocation of Georgia State roads amounted to $3,731,800. South Carolina State roads relocations cost $3,002,000. Relocation of Elbert County roads amounted to $5,208,000. Abbeville/ Anderson County roads relocation cost $646,300. Relocation of Seaboard Coast Line Railroad (R-1) amounted to $2,305,400, (R-2) cost was $218,800, and the service contract amounted to $570,600. Group II cemeteries relocation cost $62,200. Duke Power Company relocation cost amounted to $45,000. Georgia Power Company relocation cost was $233,700. Little River Electric Company cost amounted to $46,500. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph cost was $71,900. Carolina Pipeline relocations amounted to $420,800. Other relocation costs were $405,000. Cost of group I reservoir clearing amounted to $4,576,000 and group II was $2,042,000. Concrete dam cost was $6,357,300. Earth embankment amounted to $7,534,200. Instrumentation cost was $48,600. Powerhouse cost amounted to $12,350,100 and turbines cost was $4,250,000. Generator cost amounted to $9,350,000 and governors were $40,000. Switchgear and phase bus amounted to $260,000. Main control switchboard cost was $210,000. Microwave equipment amounted to $79,600 and 480 kv station service switchgear cost was $100,000. Powerhouse crane cost amounted to $362,500 and the draft tube gantry crane was $243,000. CO2 equipment cost $50,000. Oil circuit breakers and discount amounted to $50,000. All other powerplant equipment amounted to $54,600. Bobby Brown State Park road amounted to $25,200. Cultural resources cost amounted to $999,500 and operational boat ramp cost was $120,000. Permanent operating equipment amounted to $186,553. The cost for engineering and design and supervision and administration was $6,444,700. Undistributed construction cost for the FY amounted to $231,000. Design memorandums submitted during FY were: Initial Reservoir Filling Plan, South Carolina Initial Recreation Facilities, Oxygen Distribution and Diffusing System, Analysis of Design, Pump/Turbines Generator/Motors and Governors. Total cost for the FY amounts to $75,048,353. Maintenance: The operation and maintenance cost for the FY amounted to $298,132. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is 54 percent complete. Costs of project to September 30, 1982 were $281,158,583 of which $280,860,451 is for new work and $298,132 for maintenance. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 16. WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA AND AL The West Point Lake located on the Chattahoochee River, 2.8 miles upstream from West Point, GA, was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1962 (H. D. 570, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). The project was designed and constructed for flood control, power, recreation, fish and wildlife development and streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. Design and construction was 8-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 accomplished by Savannah District for Mobile Distriet. For complete information see Mobile District. General Investigation 17. SURVEYS Fiscalyear cost was $1,137,566, of which $547,180 was for navigation studies; $556,121 for flood control studies; and $34,227 for special studies; and $38 for supplemental preauthorization studies. 18. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Work was continued under the Flood Plain Management Services on the compilation of information on floods, potential flood damages, and identification of those areas subject to inundation. FY expenditures for these activities were as follows: Guides, Pamphlets, and Supporting Studies; $22,609; Flood Plain Management Services, $88,123, and Technical Services, $74,527. Flood Plain Management Services included responses to other Federal agencies to aide them in fulfilling the requirements of Executive Order 11988 (Management of Base Flood Area). Through the Technical Sevices Program, flood problems in several areas were analyzed and possible improvements were identified. During FY 82 the Flood Plain Management Services Branch conducted several Flood Insurance Studies. Study effort conducted directly for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) cost $6,236. In addition to this work, the District did three flood insurance studies for Huntington District as a part of their commitment to FEMA. Funds made available to Savannah District for this work amounted to $215,425. The national program for inspection of non-Federal dams cost $23,569. The cost for hydrologic studies was $14,500. The total FY cost for collection and study of basic data was $223,355. 19. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT No funds were expended for research and development during the FY. 20. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING The Savannah Harbor Widening Study under Continuation of Planning and Engineering was initiated during the FY and the cost amounted to $156,065. The recommended plan provides for modification of the harbor by widening the navigation channel between the present upstream limit of the 500-foot channel (Fig Island Turning Basin) and the Kings Island Turning Basin from 400 to 500 feet. This will decrease the hazard of handling large vessels and reduce shipping transit time. 8-10 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 1. Altamaha, Oconee and Ocmulgee Rivers, GA 2. Aquatic Plant Control (1965 R&H ACT) 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, VA, and the St. Johns River, FL 4. Brunswick Harbor, GA 5. Savannah Harbor, GA 6. Savannah River below Augusta, GA 10. Tybee Island, GA 11. Broadway Lake, SC 12. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Works 15A. Clarks Hill Lake, GA and SC New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 50,000 47,777 35,000 14,619 1,145,000 1,149,907 68,000 152,549 2,520,000 2,598,924 86,000 229,272 11,835,000 11,969,503 1,418,400 1,449,937 310,000 203,497 185 22,000 22,393 167,000 398,531 3,002,854 2,507,638 85,000 30,004 863,000 905,951 142,000 184,067 3,612,200 3,588,806 450,000 130,732 6,454,000 5,997,994 1,286,200 1,156,639 95,885 10,000 9,623 374,900 146,287 4,641,000 4,346,877 1 2, 1, 8, 8 - - 821,4571 - - 821,4571 - 6,000 1,916,1822,8 - 5,821 1,913,7662,8 43,000 18,800 212,159 69,207 64,801 208,905 - - 958,0964 - - 958,0964 207,200 894,000 13,851,9215 203,626 493,921 13,433,4975 - - 4,573,6086 849 - 4,573,4336 ,261,000 5,691,000 33,008,101 7 731,353 3,339,781 30,101,0137 ,748,000 1,100,000 46,506,7218 ,963,949 1,938,034 46,298,2238 ,107,000 6,636,000 115,592,9409 ,108,330 5,642,853 114,086,668 9 - - 6,740,03110 - - 6,740,03110 542,000 404,000 13,753,492 677,332 362,725 13,663,704 15,000 - 2,530,30018 85,433 - 2,522,55318 - - 99,000 - - 99,000 15,000 1,000 82,518 13,414 1,838 82,192 200,000 727,000 83,791,29011 350,856 332,011 83,308,60811 ,841,500 4,885,360 41,879,45415 ,573,710 5,397,853 41,064,38815 8-11 .4, 4, REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 8-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 15B. Hartwell Lake, GA New Work: and SC Approp. 488,000 2,043,300 3,865,000 8,950,000 105,230,30712,14 Cost 609,505 1,223,614 4,448,634 8,232,445 103,861,39112,14 Maint. Approp. 3,566,000 4,875,000 4,826,500 4,768,760 39,320,76716 Cost 2,664,683 4,709,332 5,267,740 4,471,416 38,160,76816 Major Rehab. Approp. - - - 3,500,000 3,500,000 Cost - - - 1,974,609 1,974,609 15C. Richard B. Russell New Work: Dam and Lake, GA Approp. 29,390,000 67,191,000 67,717,000 75,030,000 281,320,509 and SC (Formerly Cost 32,532,450 66,838,820 68,346,895 75,048,353 280,860,451 Trotters Shoals) Maint. Approp. - - - 328,000 328,000 Cost - - - 298,132 298,132 1. Includes $760,610 for previous projects. 10. Includes $93,480 for previous projects. Includes 2. Includes $111,950 for previous projects. $1,634,562 from Public Works Fund. 3. Does not include $69,356 contributed funds. 11. Does not include $395,634 accelerated Public Works 4. Includes $194,497 for previous projects. Funds. Includes $4,508,613 appropriated under Code 710 of which 5. Includes $134,798 forprevious projects. $4,025,301 has been expended. 6. Includes $643,465 for previous projects and includes $97,521 12. Does not include $276,200 accelerated Public Works expended from Public Works Funds for existing project. Does not in- Funds. Includes $4,080,000 appropriated under Code 710 of which clude $10,000 contributed funds. $3,380,340 has been expended. 7. Includes $54,414 for previous projects. Includes $4,995 ex- 13. Does not include $2,024,856 contributed funds. pended from Public Works Funds for existing project. Excludes 14. Includes $210,000 appropriated for AE&D for 5th unit of $252,557 contributed by Brunswick and Ga. Port Authorities. which $210,000 has been expended and $8,200,000 appropriated for 8. Includes $7,260,384 for previous projects. Does not include construction of 5th Unit of which $8,067,887 has been expended. $46,847 for removal of sunken vessels and $1,886,413 contributed 15. Includes $30,360 appropriated and $51,020 expended funds. under special recreation use fees. 9. Includes $298,894 for previous projects. Does not include 16. Includes $71,760 appropriated and $70,712 expended $852,858 contributed funds. under special recreation use fees. TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZED LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. July25, 1912 and March 2, 1945 2. Oct. 27, 1965 Section 302 ALTAMAHA, OCONEE AND OCMULGEE RIVERS, GA. Channel 3 feet deep and 60 to 100 feet wide. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Provides for control and progressive eradication of noxious aquatic plant growths. H.D. 443,62d Cong., 2d sess. H.D. 610,77th Cong., 2d sess. H.D. 251, 89th Cong., lst sess. 8-12 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-B (continued) AUTHORIZED LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 3. June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 July 13, 1892 Mar. 3, 1905 July25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 2,1919 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar3., 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 26, 1937 June 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 15, 1981 4. Mar. 3,1879 Mar 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1919 July3, 1930 July3, 1930 June 20,1938 May 17, 1950 Oct. 22,1976 ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA., (SAVANNAH DISTRICT) Section from Beaufort, S.C. to Savannah, Ga. Route No. 2 adopted. Route No. 1 adopted. Section from Savannah, Ga. to Fernandina, Fla. Original 7-foot channel. Provided for Skidaway Narrows. Incorporated alternative routes previously improved as separate projects and the auxiliary channels. Section from Cumberland Sound, Ga. and Fla. to St. Johns River, Fla. Consolidation of the 3 sections shown above, into "Waterway between Beaufort, S.C. and St. Johns River, Fla." Section from Beaufort, S.C. to Cumberland Sound, Ga. and Fla. Removing logs and snags from Generals Cut. Improving Back River to provide a channel 7 feet deep and 150 feet wide. Channel 75 feet wide between Beaufort, S.C., and Savannah, Ga. Channel from Baileys Cut to Dover Creek. A 7-foot protected channel around St. Andrews Sound. A 12-foot channel between Beaufort, S.C., and Savannah, Ga. via Beaufort River and Port Royal Sound. A 12-foot channel between Savannah, Ga., and Fernandina, Fla., various cutoffs; and anchorage basin at Thunderbolt, Ga. An alternate route 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide in that part of Frederica River, Ga., not now traversed by the main route, at no additional cost to the United States. Main channel relocated from Frederica River to Mackay River in the vicinity of Torras Causeway. BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA Construction of East River jetty. Channels in the inner and outer harbors of 30-foot depth at mean high water, with widths varying from 150 feet in Academy Creek to 400 feet across the outer bar, extension of training wall in East River and construction of 2 spur dikes. Channels 27 feet deep at mean low water over the bar and at Brunswick point; and 24 feet deep at mean low water in the inner harbor and provides fora cut from Academy Creek to Turtle River, if deemed advisable. A channel in Back River 20 feet deep and 150 feet wide.. Increased Channel dimensions of the bar, Brunswick Point, East River, and Turtle River, as given in the then existing project. A 10-foot channel in Terry Creek. Increased channel dimensions of the bar, St. Simons Sound, Brunswick River, East River, and Turtle River, as given in the existing project. Provides for Phase I AE&D studies for deepening portions of existing harbor (East River and Entrance Channel) and for provision of a navigation channel to Colonels Island. H.D. 295, 53d Cong., 3d sess. H.D. 295, 53d Cong., 3d sess. H.D. 41, 52d Cong., lst sess. H.D. 450, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H.D. 1236, 60th Cong., 2d sess. H.D. 581, 63d Cong., 2d sess. H.D. 1391, 62d Cong., 3d sess.' S.D. 178, 68th Cong., 2d sess. S.D. 43, 71st Cong., 2d sess.' Senate committee print, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 75th Cong., 1st seas. H.D. 618, 75th Cong., 3d seas. H.D. 114, 77th Cong., 1st seas. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under the Small Navigation Project Authority, Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645 as amended. Annual Report, 1880, p. 959 H.D. 407, 59th Cong., lst sess. H.D. 393, 64th Cong., lst sess. S.D. 57, 71st Cong., 2d sess. S.D. 132, 71st Cong., 2d sesas. H.D. 690, 75th Cong., 3d sess.' H.D. 110, 81st Cong., lst sess.' Report of Chief of Engineers dated Aug. 18, 1976. 8-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 8-B (continued) AUTHORIZED LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 5. Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Jan. 21, 1927 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 7,1945 July24, 1946 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA. Tentative provisions for a 26-foot channel from the Quarantine Station to the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge. Definite provision for the 26-foot channel. A 21-foot channel from the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge to the foot of Kings Island. A 30-foot depth from the sea to the Quarantine Station. A 21-foot channel above Kings Island. Channel 30 feet deep, with general width 50 feet, from the ocean to the Quarantine Station, thence 26 feet deep, general width 400 feet, to the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge, thence 21 feet deep and 300 feet wide to Kings Island. Widening at West Broad and Barnard Streets; anchorage basin; mooring dolphins; regulating dam across South Channel;.relocation of the Inland Waterway; dredging Drakies Cut to 13 feet; widening to 525 ft. at Kings Island; extension of training walls, revetments, and jetties. Consolidation of projects relating to Savannah Harbor. Channel 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge to the foot of Kings Island. Authorized the 30-foot project and eliminated from the project (a) the relating dam across South Channel; (b) the relocation of the Inland Waterway; and (c) the further extension of training walls, revetments, and jetties. Deepening the channel and turning basin above the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge from 26 to 30 feet and widening the channel opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals to a maximum of 550 feet for a length of 5,000 feet. Deepening the channels to 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar; 34 feet deep and generally 400 feet wide, increased to 550 feet opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals, with a turning basin 34 feet deep at the Mexican Petroleum Corp. Refinery; and with such modifications thereof as the Secretary of War and the Chief of Engineers may consider desirable. Extending channel 30 feet deep, 200 feet wide, upstream from Atlantic Creosoting Terminal to a point 1,500 feet below the Atlantic Coastal Highway Bridge, with turning basin 30 feet deep at upper end. Deepening the channel to 34 feet and widening to 400 feet from the upper end of the presently authorized 34-foot channel in the vicinity of the American Oil Company Refinery wharf, to the Savannah Sugar Refining Corp. with a turning basin at the upper end of the proposed improvement, made by widening the channel to 600 feet for a length of 700 feet and providing approaches. Enlargement of turning basin near Kings Island to a width of 900 feet and a length of 1,000 feet, with suitable approaches, at a depth of 34 feet. Deepening the bar channel from 36 feet to 40 feet, the channel between the bar channel and Garden City Terminal from 34 feet to 38 feet, and the channel from the Garden City Terminal to the vicinity of the Savannah Sugar Refining Corp., from 30 feet to 36 feet; widening the bar channel from 500 feet to 600 feet, the channel between Fort Pulaski and Atlantic Coast Line Terminal from 400 feet to 500 feet, and the channel between Garden City Terminal and the Savannah Sugar Refining Corp. from 200 feet to 400 feet; providing necessary wideners of the bends; constructing a new turning basin 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long by 34 feet deep opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals; and enlargement of existing turning basin at the American Oil Company Terminal from 600 feet wide by 600 feet long to 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long. 8-14 H.D. 181, 59th Cong., lst sess. H.D. 563, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H.D. 1471, 64th Cong., 2d sess. H.D. 261, 69th Cong., lst sess. H.D. 262,69th Cong., lst sess. S.D. 39, 71st Cong., lst sess. H.D. 276, 73d Cong., 2d sess. H.D. 283, 76th Cong., lst sess. 1 H.D. 227, 79th Cong., lst sess.1 H.D. 678, 79th Cong., 2d seas. 1 H.D. 110, 83d Cong., lst sess.1 S.D. 115, 87th Cong., 2d seas. H.D.226,89th Cong.,lst sess. SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-B (continued) AUTHORIZED LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 SPWC Resolution June 15, 1976 and HPWTC ofJune 9, 1976 under authority of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 6. Sep. 19,1890 June 25, 1910 July3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 10. SPWC Resolution of June 22, 1971 and HPWC ofJune 23, 1972 under authority of Sec. 201 of FC Act of 1965. 11. Water Resources Development Act of March 7, 1974. 15A. Flood Control Act of Dec. 22, 1944 15B. Flood Control Act of May 17, 1950. Flood Control Act ofJuly 3,1958. Water Resources Development Act of 1976. 15C. Flood Control Act of Nov. 7, 1966. Providing sediment control works consisting of tide gate structure across Back River; sediment basin 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide about 2 miles long, with entrance channel 38 to 40 feet deep and 300 feet wide; drainage canal across Argyle Island 15 feet deep and 300 feet wide; control works and canals for supplying fresh water to Savannah National Wildlife Refuge; and facilities to mitigate damages to presently improved areas other than refuge lands. Provided for modification ofthe existing project to include (1) incorporation of the LASH Turning Basin as ani element of the existing Federal navigation project for maintenance purposes, (2) enlargement of Kings Island Turning Basin to 1,500 feet by 1,600 feet by 38 feet. SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA. For a 5-foot channel. Special improvement by bank protection work of 20 or 25 miles of the river immediately below Augusta. The present 6-foot channel project and Lock and Dam. Provision made for locating the lock and dam at New Savannah Bluff. Conditions of local cooperation modified. Provides for a 9-foot channel TYBEE ISLAND, GA. Project will provide for beach erosion control, consisting of beach restoration, groin system, and periodic beach nourishment. BROADWAY LAKE, S.C. Provided for undertaking a demonstration project for the removal of silt and aquatic growth from Broadway Lake. CLARKS HILL LAKE, GA. AND S.C. Approved the general plan for the comprehensive development of the Savannah River Basin and provided for construction of the Clarks Hill Project. HARTWELL LAKE, GA. AND S.C. Provided for construction of Hartwell Project. Provided for the completion of the Harwell Project. Provides for installation of 5th unit. RICHARD B. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA. Provided for construction of the Trotters Shoals Project. H.D. 223, 89th Cong., 1st seas. H.D. 94-520, 94th Cong. dated June 8, 1976. H.D. 255, 51st Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report, 1890; p. 1328 H.D. 962, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 101, 70th Cong., 1st seas. Senate Committee Print, 7d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 39, 75th Cong., 1st sess. S.D. 6, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 105, 92d Cong. P.L. 93-251, 93rd Cong. H.D. 657, 78th Cong., 2d seas. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H.D. 657, 78th Cong., 2d seas. P.L. 516, 81st Cong., 2d seas. P.L. 85-500, 85th Cong., 2d seas. P.L. 94-587, Sec. 182b. 85th Cong. S.D. 52, 89th Cong., 1st seas. 1. Contains latest published maps. 8-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 8-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 8 in text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project. Status Report for Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act 1962) Completed 1968 25,700 Darien Harbor, GA Completed 1975 199,723 185,433 Fancy Bluff Creek, GA1 Completed 1935 8,000 7,200 St. Marys River, GA and FL, and North Completed 1951 15,688 69,926 River, GA Sapelo Harbor, GA2 ,5 Completed 1929 17,906 19,594 Satilla River, GA1 Completed 1951 9,452 57,164 Savannah River above Augusta, GA2 , ,4 See Notes 1929 69,600 5,870 Savannah River at Augusta, GA2 ,8,5' See Notes 1929 200,556 17,444 1. Channel adequate forcommerce. power dams which submerged much of the work under the present 2. Project recommended for abandonment in H.D. 467, 69th and former projects, this improvement cannot be completed as origi- Cong., 1st seas. nally planned. 3. No commerce reported. 5. Excludes $185,000 contributed funds ($172,151 for con- 4. About 84 percent completed. Owing to construction of 2 struction and $12,849 for operation and maintenance). TABLE 8-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 13 in text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Augusta, Savannah River, GA Completed 1941 643,016 38,242 Curry Creek Dam and Lake, GA1 See Note 1974 - - Dunn Branch, Woodbine, Camden County, GA Completed 1977 132,640 2,854 Macon, GA Completed 1955 380,043 38,243 Peacock Creek, Liberty County, GA Completed 1976 582,163 2,853 1. Feasibility report completed. Project not authorized for construction. 8-16 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-H SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA. AND S.C. DAMS AND LAKES (See Section 15 of text) Estimated Cost Name River Federal Non-Federal Total Clarks Hill, GA and S.C. Savannah $79,156,000' $79,156,0001,4 Hartwell, GA and S.C. Savannah 89,240,000 89,240,0002 Goat Island, GA and S.C.5 Savannah 36,400,000 36,400,000$ Middleton Shoals, GA and S.C.S Savannah 16,500,000 16,500,0002 Chattooga Units (4), GA and S.C. , Chattooga 41,700,000 41,700,0002 Tallow Hill, GA Broad 39,000,000 39,000,0002 Anthony Shoals, GA Broad 18,100,000 18,100,0002 Newry-Old Pickens, S.C.6 Keowee 29,500,000 29,500,0002 1. Final cost. (Excludes $127,000 for preauthorization study.) 2. Approved Aug. 1963. (Excludes $73,000 for preauthorization study.) 3. Approved July 1954. 4. Excludes Code 710 funds. 5 Replaced by Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake (formerly Trotters Shoals Lake). 6. Site of Duke Power Co. Keowee-Toxaway Project. 8-17 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT* With the exception of a small area in the northeastern section of Florida, this district comprises a portion of south-central Georgia and all of peninsular Florida, embracing the watersheds tributary to the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of IMPROVE Navigation Page 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) ............................ 9-2 2. Arecibo Harbor, P.R. ................. 9-2 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns River, Fla. ................... .. 9-2 4. Canaveral Harbor, Fla. ............... 9-3 5. Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, Fla. ............................... 9-3 6. Charlotte Harbor, Fla ............... 9-4 7. Clearwater Pass, Fla ............... 9-4 8. Cross Florida Barge Canal ............. 9-5 9. Fernandina Harbor, Fla. ............. 9-5 10. Fort Myers Beach, Fla................ 9-5 11. Fort Pierce Harbor, Fla .............. 9-6 12. Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, Fla.................9-6 13. Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, Fla ..................... 9-7 14. Jacksonville Harbor, Fla ............. 9-8 15. John's Pass, Fla ..................... 9-8 16. Longboat Pass, Fla................. 9-9 17. Mayaguez Harbor, P.R.............. 9-9 18. Miami Harbor, Fla. . ................. 9-9 19. New Pass, Sarasota, Fla. ............ 9-10 20. Okeechobee Waterway, Fla............ 9-11 21. Oklawaha River, Fla....... ........... 9-11 22. Palm Beach Harbor, Fla. ............. 9-12 23. Ponce de Leon Inlet, Fla .............. 9-12 24. Ponce Harbor, P.R................... 9-13 25. Port Everglades Harbor, Fla........... 9-13 26. Removal of Aquatic Growth From Navigable Waters in the State of Florida ...................... 9-14 27. St. Augustine Harbor, Fla........... 9-14 28. St. Johns River, Jacksonville to Lake Harney, Fla .................. 9-15 29. St. Lucie Inlet, Fla. ................... 9-15 30. St. Petersburg Harbor, Fla............. 9-16 31. San Juan Harbor, P.R. ............... 9-17 32. Tampa Harbor, Fla ................. 9-17 33. Navigation Projects on which Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys only were Conducted during Period .................. 9-19 Mexico from, and including the harbor at Fernandina, Florida, to and including the Aucilla River. It also includes Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. MENTS Navigation (cont.) Page 34. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........................... 9-19 35. Navigation Work under Special Authorization .................... . 9-19 Beach Erosion Control 36. Brevard County, Fla............... 9-19 37. Broward County, Fla. Beach Erosion Control and Hillsboro Inlet, Fla., Navigation Project ......... 9-19 38. Dade County, Fla.................. 9-20 39. Duval County, Fla. .................. 9-21 40. El Tuque Beach, P.R. ................ 9-21 41. Fort Pierce, Fla. ..................... 9-22 42. Manatee County, Fla............... 9-22 43. Palm Beach County, Fla. from Martin County line to Lake Worth Inlet and from South Lake Worth Inlet to Broward County line .......... 9-23 44. Pinellas County, Fla. ................. 9-23 45. Punta Salinas, P.R .................. 9-24 46. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects .................... 9-24 47. Beach Erosion Control Activities under Special Authorization ........... 9-24 Flood Control 48. Central and Southern Florida ....... 9-25 49. Four River Basins, Fla. ............ 9-26 50. Portugues and Bucana Rivers, P.R ..... 9-27 51. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............. ..... . 9-28 52. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............................ 9-28 53. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ....................... 9-28 General Investigations 54. Surveys ......................... 9-28 55. Collection and Study of Basic Data ..... 9-28 *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 9-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (R&H ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economical control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers, House Document 251, 89th Congress, 1st session. The authorizing act provides that research and planning costs shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and contribute 30 percent of cost of operations. Compliance with requirements of local cooperation is on schedule. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: There were 11,761 acres of hyacinth, 6,039 acres of hydrilla, 2,143 acres of minor plant and 2,894 acres of hyacinth and waterlettuce mix controlled during the period. Costs incurred were - $14,171 for engineering and $1,343,591 for operations. Condition at end of fiscal year. Operations by the Corps and the State of Florida are in progress, water hyacinths within Florida are under maintenance control. Hydrilla is continuing to spread throughout the state and is causing major problems in some areas. 2. ARECIBO HARBOR, P. R. Location. The harbor is located on the north shore of Puerto Rico about 40 miles west of San Juan Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 903.) Previous project. For details see page 504 of 1956 Annual Report. Existing project. The project provides for a channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with flare at entrance and widening at inner end to form a maneuvering area, and a stone breakwater 1,200 feet long. Place of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non Federal contribution for new work was $288,000. Terminal facilities. A bulkhead wharf 688 by 220 feet providing a deep water berthing space of approximately 500 feet, and a 300 by 100 foot transit shed. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies for the year cost $1,216. Dredging by contract amounted to $561,481. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $1,581 and $22,507 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1944. Breakwater was repaired in 1952. Wave action has since caused minor damage. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1982 were $1,128,075 for new work and $1,727,593 for maintenance, a total of $2,855,668. 3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT) Location. That part of Intracostal Waterway between southerly limit of Fernandina Harbor, Florida, at junction of Lanceford Creek and Amelia River, and St. Johns River, Fla. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 841-SC.) Previous project. For Details see page 605 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. Channel 12, 90 to 150 feet widefrom Fernandina Harbor to St. Johns River about 22 miles long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 6 feet at Fernandina and 3.8 feet at St. Johns River. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Existing project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of 1913 (HD 898/62/2) and 1938 (HD 618/75/3). Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There is a commercial marina located at Sisters Creek. No other facilities exist along this section of the waterway and none are currently required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies for the year cost $59,635. Engineering and design and supervision and administrative costs were $3,676 and $596, respectively. 9-2 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1941. Total costs under the existing project to September 30, 1982, have been $263,659 for new work and $1,710,551 for maintenance, a total of $1,974,210. 4. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FLA. Location. The harbor is located on the east coast of Florida in Canaveral Bight, about 146 miles south of the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor and 69 miles north of the entrance to Fort Pierce Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 456 and 1245.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for maintenance of the 37-foot and 36-footdepth entrance channel and 35-foot-depth turning basin; construction and operation of a sand transfer plant; relocation of the perimeter dike about 4,000 feet westward and extension of the harbor westward; two entrance jetties 100 feet long (constructed of native stone core and granite sides and cap); a lock; a channel and turning basin 31 feet deep near the relocated dike; and a barge canal 12 by 125 feet from the turning basin to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Plane of reference is mean low water (ocean) for harbor dike and lock, and mean low water (Banana River) for barge canal. The project is about 11.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 3.5 feet at the entrance and practically non-tidal in Banana and Indian Rivers. (See Table 9-C for Data Relative to Lock.) Estimated cost (Oct. 1981 price levels) of the 1962 modification to the project is $23,000,000 Federal cost and $1,198,000 non-Federal cost ($289,000 contributed funds and $909,000 other costs); $700,000 costs to NASA and $43,000 costs to U.S. Coast Guard. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must: provide all lands, rights-of-way, spoil-disposal areas, retaining dikes, and embankments; hold United States free from damages; provide and maintain four-lane bridge and roadway subject to Federal contribution of 65.3 percent of cost of constructing bridge and 51.2 percent of constructing roadway; provide public terminal and transfer facilities; and make alterations as required in berthing facilities. For further details see Senate Document 140, 87th Congress, 2d session. Non- Federal contribution for new work is $289,000. Terminal facilities. On the south side of the port, there is a 1,060-foot marginal wharf supported by 108,000 square feet of general cargo warehouse space and 100,000 square feet of freezer warehouse space. Drafts along the vharf are 35 feet at the east end and 31 feet at the west end. Two tanker berths on the south side are utilized for bunkers, petroleum products offloading and bulk cement. Draft is 35 feet at both piers. Two berths are under construction for cruise ships. A 41-footdraft liquid and dry bulk facility is also located on the south side. The north side has three general cargo wharves totalling 1,240 linear feet, with 35-foot draft at all three. These facilities are used for general cargo, fresh citrus, scrap, visiting passenger vessels and lay berths for military vessels. One berth is dedicated to a home-ported cruise line offering daily service. Another bulk cement facility is located on the north side. Existing facilities are becoming saturated and rapid commercial expansion in the area will soon require the construction of additional facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $74,099 and $5,856, respectively, for the harbor extension. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation of locks amounted to $227,056 for the fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of district communications network cost $19,547. Condition and operation studies for the year cost $72,967. Dredging by contract of the Canaveral Harbor turning basin and the U.S. Navy Trident Areas Channel amounted to $147. Dredging of the Canaveral Harbor Entrance Channel by hopper dredge amounted to $27,796. Costs for the Sea Turtle task force were $19,770. Cost for operation of service facilities amounted to $17,454. Operations of buildings and ground by contract cost $5,791. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were - $8,082 and $62,839 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is about 80 percent completed. The perimeter dike and jetties are in good condition. Work remaining to complete the project is completion of the harbor extension and construction of the sand transfer plant. 5. CHANNEL FROM NAPLES TO BIG MARCO PASS, FLA. Location. Naples Bay' is on the southwestern side of the Florida peninsula about 35 miles south of the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River and approximately 1 mile inland and parallel to the Gulf of Mexico coastline. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1254.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an interior channel 6 by 70 feet from Naples to Big Marco Pass; a channel 12 by 150 9-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to Gordon Pass, thence 10 by 100-70 feet to a 10-foot-depth turning basin in the upper Naples Bay; and an 8-footdepth turning basin at the municipal yacht basin. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 2.1 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see Annual Report of 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Contributed funds for new work were $159,975. Terminal facilities. Four seafood packing houses, 4 marine repair yards; a municipal pier and basin for use by recreational boats; and numerous private piers and slips for both commercial and recreational craft are available. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging cost $13,219. Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports cost $1,837. Supervision and administration costs were -$11,910. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. 6. CHARLOTTE HARBOR, FLA. Location. The Harbor is located on the west coast of Florida about 68 miles south of the entrance to Tampa Bay and 150 miles north of Key West. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1255.) Previous projects. For details, see page 457 of 1959 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 32 by 300 feet, increased to 700 feet at the bend, from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Boca Grande, thence 10 by 100 feet from deep water at Port Boca Grande to and including a turning basin 200 feet square at the municipal terminal at Punta Gorda. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 29.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is one foot at Port Boca Grande and 1.4 feet at Punta Gorda. Extreme range is about 3 feet at Port Boca Grande and 3.8 feet at Punta Gorda. Strong southwesterly winds raise water level about 1.5 feet; strong northerly and easterly winds lower it about one foot. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation is fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $15,563. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities consist of a phosphate wharf at Port Boca Grande and a municipal earthfill pier about 850 feet long at Punta Gorda, both open to the public. Railway connections are available at Port Boca Grande, and highway and railway connections are available at Punta Gorda. There is a tank farm at Port Boca Grande for storage and rehandling of bunker fuel oil and numerous facilities are available in the area for docking and servicing small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging amounted to $2,578,004. Operation and maintenance of district communications network cost $4,230. Condition and operation studies cost $1,065. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $3,300 and $56,203 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1959. Total costs under existing project through September 30, 1982, have been $533,169 for new work and $8,527,061 for maintenance, a total of $9,060,230. In addition, $15,563 was expended from contributed funds for new work in Boca Grande entrance channel. 7. CLEARWATER PASS, FLA. Location. Clearwater Pass is a natural inlet connecting Clearwater Bay with the Gulf of Mexico. The pass is located about 25 miles north of the entrance to Tampa Harbor and 14 miles south of the mouth of Anclote River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 858 and 1257.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 10 by 150 feet in the Gulf of Mexico through Clearwater Pass, thence 8 by 100 feet eastward to the Intracoastal Waterway; a side channel 8 by 100 feet; and a turning basin 8 feet deep by 100 feet to 450 feet wide by 850 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The mean range of tide is 1.8 feet at Clearwater Marina. Length of the project is 3 miles. For further details see 1961 Annual Report. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation is fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work amounted to $42,783. Terminal facilities. The city of Clearwater operates a recreational pier. There are several marinas providing service for charter boats and small recreational craft and one marine railway. All facilities are accessible by highway connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design costs were -$177. 9-4 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1961. 8. CROSS FLORIDA BARGE CANAL Location. The proposed canal extends up the St. Johns River, past Palatka, thence up the valley of the Oklawaha River across the divide south of Ocala, and down the valley of the Withlacoochee River to the Gulf of Mexico, about 95 miles north of Tampa, Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a lock canal with project depth of 12 feet and a minimum bottom width of 150 feet, with five locks and two earth dams. Project including the section in the St. Johns River is 184 miles long. (See Table 9-D for Locks and Dams.) Operation and maintenance of the locks and dams is a Federal responsibility. Estimated cost of new work (1970) is $179,000,000 Federal, and $19,500,000 non-Federal for lands, rights-of-way, and other costs. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction of canal; hold the United States free from damages; and operate and maintain all highway bridges and roadways built in connection with project. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9-E for work accomplished.) Regulation. a. Lake Ocklawaha. During the period the lake continued to be regulated at 18.0 feet, NGVD by discharging through the Rodman spillway. The only exception was a winter drawdown of the lake from 18 ft. to 14 ft. to reduce the volume of noxious aquatic vegetation in the lake. b. Lake Rousseau. During the .period, the lake continued to be regulated at 27.5 ft., NGVD by discharging through the Inglis Main and Bypass Spillways. However, since July the lake has been drawn down to alleviate flooding along the Withlacoochee River. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project commenced February 25, 1964, and is 36 percent completed. Inglis Lock, Dam, and Spillway; Rodman Dam and Spillway, Eureka Lock, Dam, and Spillway; Henry H. Buckman Lock; and canal from Palatka to Lake Ocklawaha and from Withlacoochee River to Gulf of Mexico, including Inglis Bypass Channel, are completed. Construction work on the project was terminated in FY 1971 by order of the President. A restudy report and environmental impact statement were completed in February 1977. 9. FERNANDINA HARBOR, FLA. Location. Entrance to the harbor is located on the northeast coast of Florida about 95 miles south of the entrance to Savannah Harbor, Georgia, and 22 miles north of the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 453.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 32-foot-depth channel (maximum channel in active status: 28 feet) generally 300-400 feet wide from deep water in the ocean to the junction of Lanceford Creek with Amelia River; an 800-foot-wide turning basin at the first bend below Lanceford Creek; and two jetties, 19,150 and 11,200 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is 7 miles long. Mean tidal range is 5.8 feet on the bar and 6 feet in the inner harbor. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are two large wharves operated by industrial plants; twelve wharves serving fishing boats, recreational craft, and other vessels; three oil handling wharves with pipelines; and a Municipal Marina and Sportsman's Wharf with public facilities for small craft. Total berthing space is approximately 4,065 feet. Most terminals are served by rail, and all have highway access. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16 (Part 2), 1964.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Supervision and administration of recreational facilities at Fort Clinch incurred costs of $7,441. Maintenance: Dredging cost $1,361,372. Condition and operation studies cost $81,803. Operation and maintenance of district communications net work cost $5,355. Real estate management costs were $389. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $13,371 and $11,970, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the existing project is complete. Jetties are in poor condition and are badly in need of repair. Remaining work is to deepen the inner harbor channel and turning basin to 32 feet when and if the presently inactive 1950 authorization is reactivated. The outer harbor channel has been deepened to 34 feet in development of a military project. 10. FORT MYERS BEACH, FLA. Location. Fort Myers Beach is on Estero Island near the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River, about 20 miles below Fort Myers and 110 miles 9-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 south of Tampa, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 855-SC and 1255.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 by 150 feet from that depth in San Carlos Bay into Matanzas Pass, thence 11 by 125 feet in Matanzas Pass to and including a turning basin 2,000 feet upstream from the upper shrimp terminals. Plane of reference is mean low water. Project is 2.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 1.7 feet. Spring range is about 2.3 feet. Strong northerly winds lower the water surface 1 to 2 feet; strong southerly winds have an opposite effect. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $1,095. Terminal facilities. There are three shrimppacking houses and several fish-packing houses, two marine railways, a fuel terminal and an ice manufacturing plant in the area. There are several commercial facilities for servicing shrimp boats. Recreational-craft facilities include nine marinas, a boat and motor testing laboratory, and numerous privately owned piers and wharves. All terminals have highway access. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging surveys and inspection were performed at a cost of $229 Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. 11. FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FLA. Location. On east coast of Florida, about 218 miles south of entrance to St. Johns River and about 124 miles north of entrance to Miami Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 582.) Existing project. A channel 350 feet wide at the 27-foot contour in the ocean, tapering to a width of 200 feet at Sta. 100 + 00, thence 200 feet wide to Sta. 30 + 00, and thence flaring to a turning basin 900 feet wide. Entrance channel is 27 feet deep to Sta. 130 + 00 and thence 25 feet deep to and including the turning basin. Project includes the maintenance of two jetties and shore revetments at the inlet. Length of project is about 3.5 miles. Mean tidal range is 2.6 feet at the entrance and 0.7 foot at terminals. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see 1961 Annual Report. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $18,574. Terminal facilities. Two earth-filled piers forming a slip 200 feet by 300 feet, with bulkhead wharf at inner end, affording berthing space of about 1,653 feet. The south pier and bulkhead wharf are municipally owned. Facilities also include a cooling plant, a warehouse and a fruit packing house. The north pier is served by railway and both piers by highway connnections. North of the turning basin local interests have provided deep-draft berthing and pier facilities. Also available is a bulkhead wharf with a depth of 20 feet with ample room for open storage and with tank storage for petroleum in the rear. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintnenace: Condition and operation studies cost $39,733. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $14,995 and $3,297 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1938 except for the fishing walkway atop the south jetty which was completed by local interest in 1968. Local interests installed lighting atop the jetty in 1969. Jetties and revetments are in good condition. 12. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FLA. Location. The Waterway extends from the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River at Punta Rassa, Florida, to the mouth of Anclote River, Florida, following in general an almost continuous series of protected inside waterways along the gulf coast of Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 856-SC, 857-SC, and 858.) Previous projects. For details see page 767 of 1945 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 9 by 100 feet from Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River; deepening the existing channel at Caseys Pass to 9 feet; a channel 6 by 80 feet (Cats Point Channel) along the southeastern side of Boca Ciega Bay past Frenchman Creek and Gulfport; maintenance of bulkheads, revetments, and two jetties built at Caseys Pass under previous project; and improvement and maintenance of Sunshine Skyway Channel. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project includes about 160 miles of channels. Mean ranges of tide are 1.7 feet at Punta Rassa, 1 foot at Port Boca Grande, 1.4 feet in Tampa Bay at Anna Maria, and 2 feet at entrance to Anclote River. Extreme ranges are about 4.5 feet at Punta Rassa, about 3 to 4 feet between Port Boca Grande and Corey Causeway over Boca Ciega 9-6 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT Bay, and about 5.5 feet at entrance to Anclote River. Southerly winds over the area generally raise water level by 1 to 1.5 feet; northerly winds lower water level by 1 to 2 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for constructing Cats Point and Sunshine Skyway Channels was $9,707 and $4,766, respectively. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities include one municipal concrete pier, one railway pier, one freight wharf, one marginal wharf 500 feet long on terminal island, and eleven privately owned landings, all at Sarasota. Municipal pier and freight wharf are open to the public. All piers have highway connections. There are six wharves along Boca Ciega Bay and a number of small privately owned piers and wharves at various points along waterway for use of commercial fishing boats and recreational craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance of channel slopes and berms was performed by hired labor for $11,187. Operation and maintenance of district communications network cost $5,670. Purchase in installation of manatee warning signs cost $19,275. Condition and operation studies cost $15,001. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $4,450 and $4,556, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Jetties at Caseys Pass were maintained in F.Y. 80. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1982 were $7,597,078 for new work and $4,263,389 for maintenance, a total of $11,860,467. In addition, $14,473 contributed funds were expended for Sunshine Skyway and Boca Ciega Bay channels. 13. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FLA. Location. The waterway extends from Jacksonville to Miami, Florida, following the St. Johns River to the mouth of Pablo Creek and thence following in general an almost continuous series of protected inside waterways along the Atlantic coast of Florida to Miami. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 841-SC, 843-SC, 845-SC, and 847-SC.) Previous projects. For details, see pages 618-619 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 by 125 feet from Jacksonville to Miami, modified to 10-foot-depth from Fort Pierce to Miami by Chief of Engineer's report of July 22, 1960; side channels at Sebastian and Daytona Beach and turning basins at Sebastian and Vero Beach, all to an 8-foot-depth; and operation and maintenance of the Palm Valley highway bridge. Project is 370 miles long, including 21 miles in Jacksonville Harbor. Mean range of the tide is 3.8 feet at St. Johns River, 0.7 foot in the Indian River at Fort Pierce, 1.8 feet in Lake Worth at Port of Palm Beach terminals, 2.3 feet at the Port Everglades terminals, and 2 feet in Biscayne Bay. The extreme range is about 7 feet at St. Johns River, 1.5 feet at Fort Pierce, and 3 feet in Biscayne Bay. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal effect is imperceptible at points along waterway distant from inlets. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are a number of privately owned piers, wharves, and landings at various points along waterway. Terminals with railway connections are available at Jacksonville, Fort Pierce, West Palm Beach, Port Everglades, and Miami. Municipal piers or wharves have been constructed at Titusville, Cocoa, Melbourne, and Vero Beach for handling general freight and at St. Augustine, Daytona Beach, New Smyrna Beach, Eau Gallie, West Palm Beach, Delray Beach, Fort Lauderdale, and Miami for use of recreational craft. Yacht basins, open to the public, have been provided at Jacksonville Beach, Daytona Beach, Titusville, Eau Gallie, Vero Beach, Fort Pierce, West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale, Hollywood, and Miami. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details on facilities at Jacksonville, see Port Series No. 15, 1969, and at Palm Beach, Port Everglades, and Miami, see Port Series No. 16, Revised 1972.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The cost of dredging was $39. Operation and maintenance of the district communications network cost $8,820. Condition and operation studies cost $120,028. Real estate management cost $13,782. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $199,108 and $121,008, respectively. Purchase and installation of manatee warning signs cost $126,940. Operation and care: The highway bridge near Palm Valley was operated and maintained at a cost of $78,854. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project as modified by the Chief of Engineers is complete except for construction of the channel and turning basin at Sebastian, Florida, which is in an inactive status. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1982, were $16,956,271 for 9-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 new work: $20,901,544 for maintenance and $1,729,467 for operation and care, a total of $39,587,282, regular funds. In addition, $2,199,842 has been expended from public works funds for new work. 14. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FLA. Location. The authorized project comprises the lower 24.9 miles of St. Johns River which empties into the Atlantic Ocean near the northeasterly corner of the Florida peninsula. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 636-SC.) Previous projects. For details, see page 607 of Annual Report, 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 38 by 400-1,200 feet from the ocean to mile 20 via Dame Point - Fulton Cutoff, thence 34 feet to Commodore Point, and thence 30 feet deep to the F.E.C. Railway bridge at Jacksonville, including a 30-foot channel in Arlington Cut and in the Old Dame Point - Fulton Channel; maintenance of the existing 42 and 40-foot-depth entrance channel; maintenance of jetties at channel entrance; and construction of training walls and revetments. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 26.8 miles long. Mean tidal range is 5.3 feet on the bar, 4.9 feet at Mayport, 2.6 feet at Dame Point, and 1.1 feet at Jacksonville. The extreme range varies from about 9 feet on the bar to about 1.5 feet at Jacksonville. Strong northeasterly winds raise the water level about 2 feet at Mayport and Jacksonville. Strong southwesterly winds lower the water about 1.5 feet at Mayport and 1 foot at Jacksonville. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with requirements of local cooperation for work performed to date. For work authorized by the 1965 River and Harbor Act, local interests were required to contribute 2.6 percent of the contract price plus supervision and administration for work provided by the Corps; provide all lands and rights-of-way; save the United States free from damages; and provide and maintain public terminal and transfer facilities. Assurances of local cooperation for this work were accepted February 11, 1966. Terminal facilities. There are approximately 100 waterfront facilities serving the port, including 29 commercially operated, four of which are open to the public. There are 12 commercial oil terminals and four oil docks operated by the Navy. Rail connections are available to all but one of the oil terminals and to most commercial facilities. A superphosphoric acid storage and handling facilitiy is located at Jacksonville Bulk Terminal. Jacksonville Shipyards have facilities for building and repairing large vessels, and numerous facilities are available for repairing and servicing small craft. Jacksonville Port Authority operates municipal docks at two locations, Talleyrand and Blount Island. Available at Talleyrand are over 500,000 square feet of warehousing, 4,700 feet of marginal wharf, 85 acres of paved open storage, two container cranes, a container straddle carrier, and a 50-ton gantry crane. The facility has extensive rail and highway connections. At Blount Island Terminal there are a total of 3,550 feet of marginal wharf, over 220 acres of paved open storage, 25 acres of container storage area, an automobile processing plant, three transit sheds, four cranes and a 900-ton capacity gantry crane. There are also two 900-foot container berths, a concrete and steel roll on/roll off platform, and two mobile roll on/roll off ramps for servicing container vessels. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 15, Rev. 1978, Corps of Engineers.) Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of district communications network cost $5,670. Real estate management costs amounted to $189. Condition and operation studies cost $169,833. Maintenance dredging costs were $2,493,603. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $25,333 and $59,633, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the modification to the project, authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act, is completed. The north jetty is in fair condition and partially submerged at high tide. The south jetty is in good condition; revetments and restraining walls are in poor condition. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1982, were $43,786,128 for new work, $38,425,041 for maintenance, a total of $82,211,169, regular funds. In addition $290,013 has been expended from public works funds for new work. 15. JOHNS PASS, FLA. Location. A natural inlet on the west coast of Florida connecting Boca Ciega Bay with Gulf of Mexico. The pass is located about 8 miles northwest of lower Tampa Bay directly across Boca Ciega Bay from St. Petersburg, Fla. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1257.) Existing project. Channel 10 by 150 feet in the gulf, thence 8 by 100 feet inside pass, and 6 by 100 9-8 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, and suitable protective measures over a frontage of approximately one thousand linear feet of shore along the north end of Treasure Island. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 1.5 feet. Project is about 2.6 miles long. Project was authorized December 2, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act and by Section 110 of the 1966 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $53,732. Terminal facilities. Only small marinas and repair yards for recreational craft in the general vicinity. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Conditions and operation studies amounted to $902. Dredging costs were $279,130. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were - $42 and $62,631 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1968. As of June 1968 authorized depths were available throughout the project. 16. LONGBOAT PASS, FLA. Location. Longboat Pass is located on the west coast of Florida about 11 miles northwest of Sarasota and 23 miles south of St. Petersburg. Located in Manatee County, it is one of several natural inlets connecting Sarasota Bay, a tidal estuary, with the Gulf of Mexico. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1256.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 12 by 150 feet from the Gulf to Longboat Pass Bridge, thence a channel 10 by 100 feet from Longboat Pass Bridge along a north to northeasterly alinement to the Intracoastal Waterway and extending along Intracoastal Waterway to Cortez Bridge. The mean tidal range is 2.2 feet and the maximum tidal range is about 5 feet. Currents are predominantly tidal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See 1978 Annual Report for detailed local cooperation requirements. Contribued funds for new work were $172,324. Terminal facilities. From Sarasota north to Tampa Bay there are about 28 small craft facilities including marinas, boat repair yards, and boat basins along the Intracoastal Waterway. Nine of them are located within 2 miles of Longboat Pass. Numerous private mooring piers and wharves also exist in the area. The marina and repair facilities appear adequate for the general boating needs of the area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies amounted to $52. Dredging by contract cost $714,293. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were - $1,801 and $8,962, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. 17. MAYAGUEZ HARBOR, P.R. Location. The project is on the west cost of Puerto Rico, about 110 miles by water from San Juan Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 931.). Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 30-by 1,000 foot approach channel to the deep water terminal, decreasing to a 500 foot width opposite westerly end of terminal, thence the same width to easterly end of terminal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. A modern deep water terminal is located in the northeast section of the harbor consisting of a bulkhead wharf about 1,270 feet long with a storage transit shed 800 by 60 feet immediately shoreward. The Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company, an agency of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, owns a bulk-head wharf of about 200 feet in line with the existing deep water terminal plant located within the industrial harbor area. In addition, Bumble Bee Packing Company, Inc., owns and operates a dock of about 200 feet for docking tuna fish boats. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $2,826. Dredging by contract cost $279,959. Supervision and administration costs were $12,036. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1934. 18 MIAMI HARBOR, FLA. Location. Miami is near the northern end of Biscayne Bay, about 71 miles south of the entrance to Palm Beach Harbor. Miami River has its source in th Everglades and flows southeasterly to enter Biscayne Bay at Miami. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 547 and 1248.) Existing project. The authorized project pro- 9-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 vides for a 38 by 500-foot channel from the ocean to the outer end of the north jetty, thence 36 by 400 feet through the entrance and across Biscayne Bay to and including a turning basin at the municipal terminals; a 36-foot depth turning basin at Fisher Island; two rubblestone jetties at the entrance; a channel 15 by 200 feet from the mouth of Miami River to the turning basin at the municipal terminals; a channel 8 by 200 feet from the mouth of Miami River to the Intracoastal Waterway and thence 100 feet wide to Government Cut; a channel 15 deep in Miami River varying in width from 250 feet at mouth to 90 feet inland; and a channel 12 by 100 feet from Miami to a harbor of refuge in Palmer Lake. Plane of reference is mean low water, except for 15-foot channel in Miami River where depths are basedon flood conditions. Total length of the project is about 15.3 miles. Mean tidal variation is 2.5 feet at entrance and 2 feet in the bay. Extreme variation is about 4.5 feet at entrance and 3 feet in Biscayne Bay. Strong easterly winds raise the water level about 1.5 feet at entrance and 1 foot in the bay. Strong westerly winds lower water level about 1 foot at entrance and about 0.5 foot in the bay. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See 1978 Annual Report for detailed local cooperation requirments. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1968 modification to the project were accepted December 18, 1968. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities consist of 82 piers and wharves, of which two are on Fisher Island, 12 at Miami Beach, four along the south side of MacArthur Causeway, one along the west side of Biscayne Bay at Miami, and 43 on Miami River. Nineteen facilities are open to the public for handling general cargo, eleven of which accommodate deep-draft vessels. All general cargo wharves have highway and railway connections except the causeway terminal which has highway connections only. A municipal yacht anchorage basin and wharf are open to the public for recreational craft. Of the remaining piers and wharves, five are used for handling petroleum products, 22 are used in connection with ship repair activities, and 19 are used for mooring vessels or handling private freight. In addition, numerous landing facilities in and around Miami are designed for and used exclusively by recreational craft. Metropolitan Dade County is actively engaged in developing port facilities on Dodge Island in Biscayne Bay. Completed and in use are approximately 3.44 miles of lineal berthing space. Nine passenger terminals can each accommodate and process 1,000 persons daily through customs. There are 7 transit cargo sheds with a total of 823,558 square feet (635,742f2 net). There are presently in use ten berths for roll-on trailer ships. A slip of 800 feet by 400 feet on the south side of the island is being utilized for oceanographic research vessels. An additional 70 acres of open storage has been added to space already available, and two 40 long ton gantry cranes, with 20 acres of backup area, will be operational by the end of 1982. Current expansion program will add 210 more acres for cargo use, and four passenger terminals. Upon completion, facilities are expected to be adequate for current commerce. (See Port Series No. 16, Revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs preparatory to constuction of recreation facilities at Bay Front Park were $117,500 and $6,413, respectively. Maintenance: Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports cost $32,663 for the fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the modification to the project, authorized by River and Harbor Acto of 1968, is complete. South and north jetties are in good condition. Maintnenance dredging is required in the turning basin at the municipal terminals. 19. NEW PASS, SARASOTA, FLA. Location. Sarasota Bay is a tidal lagoon along the west coast of Florida immediately south of Tampa Bay. New Pass is a gulf inlet across the bay from Sarasota, Fla. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 857-SC.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide in the Gulf of Mexico diminishing to 8 by 100 feet through New Pass and extending across Sarasota Bay to the Intracoastal Waterway with side channels to, and turning basins at, Payne Terminal and city pier. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet in Sarasota Bay; mean spring range is 1.7 feet. Project is about 4 miles long. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work amounted to $45,811. Terminal facilities. Consist of Payne Terminal, a slip 200 by 650 feet, and city pier, 400 feet long with two finger piers equipped with adequate facilities at each location. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and condition surveys 9-10 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT cost $499 for the fiscal year. Dredging by contract costs were $743,995. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $2,385 and $8,695, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1964. 20. OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FLA. Location. The waterway traverses the southern part of the Florida peninsula via the Caloosahatchee River, Lake Okeechobee, and St. Lucie Canal, connecting coastal waterways along the Gulf and Atlantic Shores. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 11428 and 11427.) Previous projects. For details, see page 785 of 1949 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for replacing the old locks on the St. Lucie Canal by a single new lock; a channel 10 by 100 feet from Ft. Myers for about 5 miles upstream, thence 8 by 80 to 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami; near Stuart; an 8-foot depth basin at Stuart; a side channel at Ft. Myers; operation and care of St. Lucie Lock; and maintenance of features completed under previous projects as follows: a 12 by 200-foot channel from the Gulf to Punta Rassa, thence 10 by 100 feet to Fort Myers with a 10-foot depth basin at Fort Myers; a 6 by 80-foot channel along the south shore of Lake Okeechobee from Clewiston to St. Lucie Canal; a 6 by 60-foot channel in Taylor Creek from the town of Okeechobee to the Lake; and operation and care of Moore Haven and Ortona Locks. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Non-Federal contribution amounted to $502,407. Terminal facilities. There are 3 freight piers, 1 municipal recreation pier, 4 privately owned piers, and a municipal yacht basin on the Caloosahatchee River near Fort Myers. The Corps has provided a boat basin, launching ramp, and a 120-foot wharf on the Caloosahatchee River about one-quarter mile below Ortona Lock. There are tie-up dolphins above and below all 5 locks. Commercial yacht basins are provided on the south side of the Caloosahatchee River about halfway between Ortona and Moore Haven Locks and about 3 miles east of LaBelle. A commercial/ municipal yacht basin is provided on the north side of the St. Lucie Canal at Indiantown. There are numerous small wooden-pile landings along the Caloosahatchee River on St. Lucie Canal, and on the St. Lucie River, including one railroad terminal pier, a municipal pier, and a pier for handling petroleum products at Stuart. Also, 550 feet of wharves have been provided on the west side of Taylor Creek immediately landward of Hurricane Gate No. 6 and 150 feet on the east side of the creek. A yacht basin has been provided on the west side of the creek immediately landward of the hurricane gate. The installations of Taylor Creek are privately owned, but are open to the public. A breakwater protected harbor is available at Pahokee. There is a 440-foot marginal wharf on the Industrial Canal at Clewiston; a 125-foot wharf at LaBelle; a 150-foot wharf at Belle Glade; a 125-foot wharf at Moore Haven; a 50-foot wharf at Alva; and a 30-foot wharf on Taylor Creek at the town of Okeechobee. A docking facility for loading raw sugar was constructed in 1967 on Herbert Hoover Dike near Belle Glade. All have highway and/or railway connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9-F for work accomplished.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for providing the 8-foot depth basin at Stuart, which is inactive. Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1982, were $5,098,037 for new work, $9,565,869 for maintenance, and $7,101,544 ($67,558 excluded which represents services rendered without reimbursement) for operation and care, a total of $21,765,450. 21. OKLAWAHA RIVER, FLA. Location. The river has its source in a system of large lakes in the central part of the Florida peninsula and flows generally northerly, then easterly, emptying into St. Johns River 22 miles above Palatka. The extreme head of the system is considered to be Lake Apopka, 120 miles above the river's mouth. Previous projects. For details, see page 613 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 6 feet deep from the river mouth to the head of Silver Springs Run; clearing a channel to Lake Griffin; maintaining dikes to obtain a navigable depth of about 4 feet to Leesburg and construction of a lock and dam at Moss Bluff. The project length is about 85.7 miles in the river and 5.4 miles in Silver Springs Run. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Numerous private and public landings and boat-launching ramps are 9-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 located along the river. Public recreation-craft basins and boat launching ramps are near Silver Springs and State Road 40 and 316 bridges. There is a municipal wharf on Lake Griffin at Leesburg. A dam has created Lake Ocklawaha (13,000 acres) with egress to the St. Johns River through Buckman Lock. Along the lake are 4 launching ramps; Payne's Landing, Orange Springs, Kenwood Landing, and Rodman Recreation Area. Access below the dam is at the Oklawaha Boat launch ramp and at State Road 19. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $592. Snagging and clearing cost $27,804. Real estate management costs were $387. Supervision and administration costs were $4,129. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for providing a 6-foot depth channel from the mouth of the river to the head of Silver Springs run, which is in an inactive status. The Moss Bluff lock and dam structure was replaced under the Four River Basins, Fla., flood control project. Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1982 have been $311,352 for new work and $1,927,862 for maintenance (excluding $11,414 under provisions of the permanent indefinite appropriation), a total of $2,239,214. 22. PALM BEACH HARBOR, FLA. Location. The authorized project is located on the east coast of Florida about 71 miles north of the entrance to Miami Harbor and about 264 miles southeasterly from the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 291 and 1248). Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 35 by 400 feet merging with an inner channel 33 by 300 feet to and including a turning basin; tank revetment; and restoring jetties. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 1.6 miles long. Mean range of tide in the ocean at the entrance is 2.8 feet and at the turning basin, 2.2 feet. Extreme range of tide is about 4.5 feet at the inlet and 3 feet at the terminals. Seven-foot tidal ranges have occurred during storms. For details, see 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. For requirements, see 1961 Annual Report. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $509,506. Terminal facilities. The port has two slips, four marginal wharves containing 25 berths along 5,165 feet of bulkheading, six roll-on/roll-off ramps, nearly 183,775 square feet of transit shed space and 40 acres of open storage space, with an additional 17 acres of container marshalling yard. There are seven petroleum storage tanks connected by pipeline to terminals, a bulk sugar facility and terminal and cement storage warehouse. A new five-story Port Authority office building has been completed. Demolition of the old facility will provide additional operating space. All facilities are owned by the Port of Palm Beach District. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenar*e: Dredging cost $322,087. Condition and operation studies for the project totaled $42,786. Operation and maintenance of the district communications network cost $5,670. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $53,444 and $7,151, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The Project was completed in 1967. Jetties and revetment are in good condition. 23. PONCE DE LEON INLET, FLA. Location. Ponce de Leon Inlet is on the Atlantic coast of Florida about 65 miles south of St. Augustine Harbor and 57 miles north of Canaveral Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1245.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 15 by 200 feet across the ocean bar, thence 12 by 200 feet and 12 by 100 feet through the inlet; thence southward in Indian River North, 12 by 100 feet, and northward in Halifax River, 7 by 100 feet, each leg continuing to the Intracoastal Waterway; ocean jetties on the north and south of the inlet 4,200 and 2,700 feet long, respectively, and a weir in the north jetty with an impoundment basin inside the jetty. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 4.1 feet in the ocean and 2.3 feet inside the inlet. The project is about 5 miles long. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $2,377,884. Terminal facilities. None in the immediate area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance of breakwaters and seawalls cost $15,624. Condition and operation studies cost $94,252. Jetty repair by contract cost $31,009. Engineering and design and supervision 9-12 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT and administration costs were $1,606 and $12,219, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. Ocean jetties and weir are in good condition. 24. PONCE HARBOR, P. R. Location. Ponce Harbor is an open bay about midway on the south coast of Puerto Rico. From the center of the city of Ponce, the harbor is about 3 miles south. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart Nos. 927 and 902.) Previous project. For details, see page 12 of Annual Report for 1975. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a seawall 362 feet long extending northwesterly across the rock reef from near the landward end of the municipal pier; dredging an area off the municipal pier, 30 feet deep and containing about 18 acres; a breakwater 2400 feet long extending southwesterly from Punta Carenero; a channel 36 feet deep by 600 feet wide extending from the Caribbean Sea approximately 2.8 miles up to the port, thence a channel 400 feet wide by 36 feet deep into the harbor, and a 36-foot-deep, irregularly shaped turning basin with a diameter of 950 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 0.6 foot, extreme varies between about 1 foot below and 2 feet above mean low water. Estimated Federal cost of new work (Oct. 1980 price levels) is $7,070,000 with no local contribution required. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Should provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide and maintain at local expense depths in berthing areas and local access channels; hold United States free from any damages resulting from construction and maintenance of the project; relocate without cost to the United States all cables, sewer mains, water supply, drainage and other utility installations as required; provide adequate public terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms. A letter has been received from local interests, assuring compliance with local requirements. Further assurances are not required until completion of Phase I GDM. No contribution is required from locals. Terminal facilities. The municipality of Ponce owns and operates the only deep-draft terminal facilities in Ponce Harbor, which consist of a municipal pier 515 feet long and 108 feet wide, and a bulkhead wharf 3,811 feet long. Both are equipped for transfer and storage of freight. A 72.5 ton container lift shore crane is available for the handling of loaded containers. The municipal pier has a steel transit shed 386 by 85 feet. The bulkhead wharf has four steel transit sheds totaling over 103,000 square feet. Three concrete and steel warehouses are available providing 800,000 square feet for general storage. Open storage areas for structural steel, lumber, and other bulk and package commodities are also provided. Bulk cement is handled and loaded into cement cargo ships by the use of a private pipeline loading facility. A tuna fish processing and canning factory is located on the premises, with direct access to the bulkhead wharf. Existing facilities are open to the public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $15,842 and $186, respectively. Maintenance: Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports cost $770. Dredging by contract cost $268,365. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $22 and $12,497, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 1976 modification of the project has not commenced. South and north jetties are in fair condition. Maintenance dredging is required in the turning basin at the municipal terminals. 25. PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FLA. Location. The harbor is on the east coast of Florida about 23 miles north of Miami and about 48 miles south of Palm Beach Harbor, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 546.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an ocean entrance channel 45 by 500 feet through an ocean bar tapering to 40 by 450 feet between rubblestone entrance jetties, and continuing at that depth to an irregularly flared entrance and turning basin of same depth; enlarging Pier 7 channel to 36 by 400 feet for distance of about 1,600 feet; maintenance of the locally dredged channel opposite Berth 18 to 36 feet deep over a length of 700 feet with varying widths of 200 to 150 feet; planning for a south jetty fishing walkway with construction contingent upon need as developed by detailed postauthorization studies; and, maintenance of the jetties. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 1.9 miles long. Mean range of tide is 2.5 feet at the entrance and 2.3 feet at the terminals; extreme range is about 4.5 feet with storm tides of about 6.5 feet. Estimated cost of new work (Oct. 1980 price levels) of the 1974 authorization is $33,800,000 Federal (Corps of Engineers) cost and $7,062,000 9-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 non-Federal cost, $160,000 contributed funds and $6,902,000 other costs). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local Cooperation has been fully complied with for work completed to date. For work under House Document 144/93/1, local interest must: provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; save United States free from damages; accomplish utility and other relocations or alterations; provide depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with depths provided in the related project areas; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into waters of the channel by users thereof; prohibit erection of any structure within 100 feet of project channel as authorized at time of construction; provide and maintain public terminal and transfer facilities; contribute 50 percent of total first costs of recreational jetty fishing facility; and operate and maintain jetty fishing facility. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1974 authorization have been furnished by the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. All public port facilities are owned and operated by Port Everglades Authority. There are 27 commercial ship berths providing a total berthing space of over 16,000 linear feet. Ten berths are in three slips ranging from 900 to 1200 feet long and about 300 feet wide. Depth is 44 feet mean low water at two of the 900-foot berths and 33-37 feet mean low water at the remaining berths. There are eight transit warehouses with a capacity of 497,000 square feet, and over 100 acres of open storage. Private companies maintain over 200 storage tanks for petroleum products, and operate piping facilities extending from the port south to Miami. A 30-ton container crane has been in service at the port since 1979. A second 30-ton container crane will go into service in September 1982. All wharves are served by railway and highway connections. Marine repair and drydocking facilities are available for small and medium size vessels. A large passenger pier and modern cruise terminal facilities can accommodate five large cruise ships simultaneously. A Foreign Trade Zone, containing 140,000 square feet of warehouse space, is located less than 1/2 mile from dockside. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16, Revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Dredging for section 2 was performed by contract at a cost of $10,340,090. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $45,279 and $347,809, respectively. Maintenance: Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports cost $11. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work required to complete the project is construction authorized in House Document 144/93/1. 26. REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA. Location. Waterhyacinth, hydrilla and water lettuce are found in freshwater streams and lakes in various parts of the district. Existing project. The authorized project provides for destruction or removal of aquatic growth in navigable waters of the State so far as they constitute an obstruction to navigation and commerce, using any mechanical, chemical or other means not injurious to cattle, and use of log booms to close sloughs and backwaters as an auxiliary means. No estimate of the final cost of work has been made. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details, see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations continued during the year. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) (See Table 9-G for spraying operations.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is for maintenance of navigable waterways. During the year 12,759 acres of hyacinths, 4,265 acres of hydrilla, 318 acres of minor plant and 6,737 acres of waterlettuce and hyacinth mix were controlled in approximately 2,200 miles of waterways. Hyacinths in Lake Okeechobee and in St. Johns River Watershed are under maintenance control. 27. ST. AUGUSTINE HARBOR FLA. Location. The harbor is on the east coast of Florida, about 35 miles south of the entrance to St. Johns River and about 180 miles north of Fort Pierce Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1243 and 1244.) Previous project. For details see page 412 of Annual Report for 1958. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 16 feet by 200 feet along the best natural alinement as may exist from time to time across the new inlet bar, thence 12 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; a sandtrap groin on the north side of the inlet extending seaward from the shore of Vilano Beach, and a sand-tight jetty on the south side of the channel extending seaward from the shore of Conch Island parallel to and coexstensive with the groin, future landward extension of the groin and jetty; and a channel 10 by 100 feet in San Sebastian River from the 9-14 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT Intracoastal Waterway to King Street Bridge, with a turning basin near the upper end. Length of the inlet channel is about 1.5 miles, and length of the San Sebastian River channel is about 2.6 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. The mean tidal range is 4.5 feet in the ocean at St. Augustine Inlet and 4.2 feet at the city waterfront. Strong northerly winds, mostly in the winter, lower the water surface about 1 foot. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work amounted to $137,500. Terminal facilities. There are several timber docks on the Matanzas waterfront of St. Augustine. In this area of the harbor is a concrete dock which serves as a municipal yacht pier. It has fuel facilities, 19 slips and accommodates boats up to 60 ft. in length. A large public boat ramp is also available. The principal terminals are the numerous shrimp docks in the San Sebastian River which flows southward through the city into the Matanzas River south of the bridge; these consist of timber wharves, with frame and corrugated iron warehouses thereon, and 9 marine railways for small boats. There is also a marine supply facility and several boat yards. The present terminals have highway connections and several of the shrimp docks have rail connections. They are considered adequate for existing commerce and recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract surveys, inspections and reports cost $24,431. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is completed except for the North Jetty which is in a deferred status. The groin is in good condition except for the 300 feet which has subsided to about elevation 3.0 feet, mean low water. The jetty is in good condition, but is submerged at high tide. Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1982 were $1,405,131 for new work and $4,168,930 for maintenance, a total of $5,574,061. 28. ST. JOHN'S RIVER, FLA., JACKSONVILLE TO LAKE HARNEY Location. Rises in marshes of Brevard County, Fla., near east coast, and flows northwesterly to Jacksonville, thence easterly into the Atlantic Ocean, 122 miles south of Savannah River. River is about 285 miles long, of which 161.5 miles are included in project. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 685-688.) Previous projects. Adopted by River and Harbor Acts of June 14, 1880 and July 5, 1884. For further details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. Channel 13 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Florida East Coast Railway bridge at Jacksonville to Palatka, thence 12 by 100 feet to Sanford, and thence 5 by 100 feet to Lake Harney, with side channel to Enterprise and maintenance of two jetties. Existing project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of March 2, 1945 (H. Doc. 445, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and July 24, 1946 (S. Doc. 208, 79th Cong., 2d sess.). For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for active portions of project (see Annual Report for 1962.) Terminal facilities. There are 36 piers and wharves along project, including municipal piers and wharves at Green Cove Springs and Palatka, 12 Navy piers at Green Cove Springs, a municipal recreational pier at Sanford, and 19 privately owned piers, 5 of which have nearby tank storage facilities for petroleum projects. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies costs were $17,371. Condition at end of fiscal year. Active portion is complete. Condition of project as a whole is adequate for present needs of navigation. (For more detailed information refer to Annual Report for F.Y. 1963). 29. ST. LUCIE INLET, FLA. Location. The inlet is on the east coast of Florida about 19 miles south of the entrance to Fort Pierce Harbor, Florida, and 100 miles north of the entrance to Miami Harbor, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1247.) Previous project. For details see page 764 of Annual Report for 1949. Existing project. The authorized project provides for extending the north jetty about 500 feet and modifying existing jetty to provide a sand bypass weir section about 500 feet long; excavation of a sand impoundment basin adjacent to the bypass weir in the north jetty; construction of a south jetty consisting of a rubblemound structure about 2,400 feet long with a walkway for recreational fishing; channel between existing bar cut and the Intracoastal Waterway 10 by 500 feet through the bar cut, tapering to 150 feet through the inlet, and 100 feet wide and 7 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; and transfer of 380,000 cubic yards of material to the south beach during 9-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 each two year maintenance period. Plane of reference is mean low water. Total project length is about 1.9 miles. Mean tidal range is 2.6 feet on the ocean side and about 1 foot on the land side of the inlet. The estimated cost of the 1974 modification (Oct. 1979 price levels) to the project is $6,290,000 Federal cost and $2,525,000 non-Federal cost ($2,260,000 contributed funds and $265,000 other costs). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must: contribute 19.9 percent of construction cost allocated to navigation in the combined project, 23.2 percent allocated to beach erosion, and 50 percent of construction cost of jetty fishing walkway; provide 39.8 percent of the annual maintenance cost allocated to navigation and 23.2 percent of the annual costs for maintenance dredging allocated to beach erosion control for periodic beach nourishment and 100 percent of the annual jetty maintenance costs allocated to beach erosion control; maintain jetty fishing walkway; agree that each five years the amount of local cost sharing for maintenance is to be adjusted; provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold United States free from damages; provide marina with mooring facilities and utilities; provide and maintain depths in berthing area and local access and feeder channels commensurate with the depths provided in the project; accomplish such alterations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utility facilities, and take action to place in effect statutes and/or regulations which will protect the water quality for the authorized uses of the project. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1974 modification have not yet been requested from the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. A municipal pier provides facilities for docking and servicing charter fishing and small recreational craft. At Stuart there is a dock for handling bulk petroleum products and several marinas which provide facilities for mooring, servicing and minor repair of small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A dredging and jetty construction contract underway at a cost of $1,082,902. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $2,161 and $165,927, respectively. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $46,187. Supervision and administration costs were $417. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work required to complete the project is construction authorized in House Document 294/93/1. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1982 were $8,729,063 for new work (including $2,201,512 contributed funds) and $2,222,507 for maintenance, a total of $10,951,570. 30. ST. PETERSBURG HARBOR, FLA. Location. St. Petersburg is on west shore of Tampa Bay 8.75 miles southwest of Port Tampa City. Entrance from Gulf of Mexico to Tampa Bay is about midway of west coast of Florida, about 330 miles southeast of Pensacola, Fla., and 65 miles north of Charlotte Harbor, Fla. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 586 and 1257.) Previous projects. For details, see Annual Report of 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel 24 by 300 feet from Tampa Bay southwesterly and thence westerly along south side of Port of St. Petersburg basin to Bayboro Harbor: a 24-foot depth in the port basin and in the area between the entrance channel and the Maritime Service south bulkhead; a channel 15 by 100 feet in Bayboro Harbor along southwesterly 300 feet of the Maritime Service bulkhead; a basin 12 by 800 by 700 feet -1,400 feet in Bayboro Harbor, a channel 12 by 75 by 300 feet in the mouth of Salt Creek; an entrance channel 20 by 200 feet extending northerly about 5.5 miles from deep water in lower Tampa Bay; and thence a channel 19 by 250 feet leading westward to the 24-foot depth entrance channel, and a channel 16 by 200 by 6,200 feet on the easterly side of the Point Pinellas lighted beacon. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands, rights-of-way, and spoil-disposal areas; hold United States free from damages; and strengthen or move structures necessary to safeguard the channels and adjacent lands and structures. Requirements for active part fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A 1,500-foot-long municipal wharf and two warehouses at the Port of St. Petersburg turning basin. From turning basin to Bayboro Harbor the U.S. Maritime training station has 1,360 feet of wharfage space. On Bayboro Harbor, there are 5 oil company wharves, 2 marine repair and supply plants, a sand and shell wharf, 6 marine railways, steam-electric plant and fuel wharf of the Florida Power Corp., and 4 privately owned marginal wharves. Two oil companies have terminals on Salt Creek and there are three municipal yacht basins north of Port of St. Petersburg. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce and are open to all equally. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Cost for contract dredging amounted to - $134,316. Condition and operation studies cost $4,769. Engineering and design and 9-16 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT supervision and administration costs were $7,513 and - $15,372, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for 24-foot-depth channel and basin from Tampa Bay to Bayboro Harbor which is considered inactive. Controlling depths: 20.5 feet in 20-foot channel leading northward from Tampa Bay in April 1966; 19 feet in 19-foot entrance channel and 17 feet throughout Port of St. Petersburg basin in March 1963; 14.5 feet in Point Pinellas Channel in May 1938; and 12 feet in Bayboro Harbor and in mouth of Salt Creek in August 1957. Total Federal costs for existing project through September 30, 1982 were $255,608 for new work and $1,522,913 for maintenance, a total of $1,778,521. 31. SAN JUAN HARBOR, P. R. Location. San Juan Harbor is on the north coast of Puerto Rico about 35 miles from the island's east end and 1100 miles southeast of Miami, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 908.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1916, 1938. Existing project. Provides for a bar channel 48 by 800 feet, shifting the centerline 350 feet west; deepening Anegado Channel in steps from 46 to 40 feet while reducing its width to 800 feet; deepening Army Terminal Channel and turning basin to 40 feet while widening the channel to 450 feet; deepening Puerto Nuevo Channel to 40 feet and widening it to 400 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel to 40 feet at existing 400 foot width; an advance maintenance area 500 feet wide, 1,200 feet long and 44 feet deep at the mouth of Cano de Martin Pena.; deepening San Antonio Channel to 38 feet at varying widths, minimum of 500 feet; deepening cruise ship basin to 36 feet at an irregular width; maintaining Sabana Approach Channel at 30 by 250 feet; provide a 38-foot depth in Anchorage Area "E" with irregular width and six mooring dolphins for vessels using the area. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Should provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from any damages; provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access and feeder channels; provide alterations as required in sewer water supply, and other utility facilities. It is further recommended that local interests be reimbursed for work performed by them on the project subsequent to project authorization. Local interests have complied with authorization requirements to date. There is no non-Federal contribution required. Terminal facilities. There are 28 piers and bulkhead wharves in the harbor capable of docking deep-draft vessels, which have an aggregate berthing length of about 23,700 feet. Eleven piers and bulkhead wharves are on the north shore, two piers and a three-level ramp facility for rollon/ roll-off operations at Front Graving Dock turning basin and channel, nine at the eastern side and three at the western side of the Army Terminal basin and channel, and three on the south shore of San Antonio Channel. One pier and bulkhead wharf are privately owned, seven are U.S. Government property, and 24 owned by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Twenty piers and wharves are equipped with mechanical crane transfer facilities. Five wharves are equipped with a special crane for the handling of loaded containers. Twenty-four are open to general public. There is an aggregate length of about 1,339 feet of berthing space at Catano Point used principally by small vessels within the 18-foot draft range. This space is also open to the public. In addition, there are 10 piers and bulkhead wharves with approximately 6,910 feet of berthing space owned and operated by different agencies of the Federal Government. This space is not open to the public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $7,165. Dredging by contract cost $1,041,801. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $7,882 and $72,454 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Remaining work to complete project is modification authorized in 1976. Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1982 were $13,027,284 for new work and $11,595,359 for maintenance, a total of $24,622,638 regular funds. In addition, $427,068 was expended for new work and $24,737 for maintenance from public works funds and $100,000 for new work from contributed funds. Existing project includes the entrance channel and turning basin to Army Terminal which cost $1,543,712; this expenditure was made from military' appropriations and is not included in above costs. 32. TAMPA HARBOR, FLA. Location. Tampa Harbor is in a large natural indentation of the Gulf of Mexico about midway of the west coast of Florida. The entrance is about 220 miles north of Key West and about 330 miles 9-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 southeast of Pensacola. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 586, 587, and 1257.) Previous projects. For details see page 665 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Sutton and Tampa; 46 by 700 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to Mullet Key; 44 by 600 feet in Mullet Key Cut Channel; 44 by 500 feet in Tampa Bay from Mullet Key Cut to Hillsborough Bay and Port Tampa Channels; 44 by 500 feet in Hillsborough Bay from junction with Tampa Bay and Port Tampa Channels to the junction with Port Sutton entrance channel, thence 42 by 400 feet to the junction with Seddon and Garrison Channels; 44 by 400 feet in Port Sutton entrance channel; 42 by 400 feet in Sparkman Channel; 40 by 300 feet in Ybor Channel; 42 by 400 feet in Port Tampa Channel; 44 by 400-500 feet in East Bay entrance channel; 44 by 300 feet in East Bay approach channel; 30 by 300 feet in Seddon and Garrison Channels; 30 by 200 feet in Alfia River; 9 by 100 feet in Hillsborough River to a point 2,000 feet above Columbus River bridge; a breakwater; turning basins at Port Sutton, Ybor Channel, Port Tampa, East Bay, mouth of Hillsborough River, and in Alafia River; and maintenance of a channel 12 by 200 feet in Hillsborough River, and 44 by 200 feet in Port Sutton terminal channel. (The 46-foot and 44-foot depth portions of the project include a 5-foot underkeel clearance. Special studies on the project concluded that a 4-foot underkeel is sufficient. Therefore, a 1-foot overdepth has been placed in an inactive status, resulting in active project depths of 45 and 43 feet, respectively.) Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 67 miles long, including 10 miles in Hillsborough River and 3.6 miles in Alafia River. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet at the lower end of the bay, 1.6 feet at Port Tampa, and 1.8 feet at Tampa. Extreme range is about 3.8 feet at the lower end of the bay and 4.8 feet at Tampa. Strong southwesterly winds raise the water level about 1.5 feet. Strong northerly winds, which usually occur in the winter, lower the water level about 2 feet. Estimated cost of new work (Oct. 1981 price levels) of the 1970 modification to the project is $229,759,000. Federal ($228,000,000 Corps and $1,759,000 U.S. Coast Guard) cost and $5,028,000 non-Federal cost ($1,400,000 contributed funds and $3,628,000 other costs). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details, see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Local cooperation has been fully complied with for work completed to date. See 1978 Annual Report for requirements for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970, HD 401/91/2 and HD 150/91/1. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1970 authorization were approved by the Secretary of the Army on January 10, 1973. Terminal facilities. There are 93 commercial piers and wharves at Tampa, including those on Hillsborough River and Old Tampa Bay at Rattlesnake, Florida. Most facilities have railway connections. Municipal terminals (called Metroport) on Ybor Channel consist of a slip 750 by 350 feet with a total of 2,255 feet of berthing space and a steel-framed transit shed. The Tampa Port Authority operates an 800-head capacity cattle-loading wharf on the east side of Sparkman Channel. Ship repair facilities including a 900-foot drydock are available. There are 19 commercial oil terminals, 11 dry bulk terminals, 16 terminals for handling phosphate and phosphate related products, two privately owned cement storage facilities and a dockside cold storage facility. At Holland terminal there are four general cargo berths, a 600-foot roll-on/roll-off dock and two facilities specifically tailored for the importation and processing of pickup trucks. Also under construction at Holland Terminal is a combined transit warehouse and cruise passenger facility which will be operational in November 1982. A liquid bulk facility is in operation at Hookers Point. Also at Hookers Point are ammonia storage tank facilities which are connected by pipeline to fertilizer plants in Polk and Hillsborough counties. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 17 revised 1979, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of the 43-foot dredging project Mangrove Point to Alafia River, Section 4 continue at a cost of $8,536,943. Construction of the 43-foot dredging project Section 2C (portion) and Section 4 remainder continue at a cost of $6,969,127. Contract of planting of emergent disposal area continue at a cost of $19,012. Construction of the 43-foot project Mariposa Key to Piney Point Section 2C remainder and Piney Point to Mangrove Point Section 3A continue at a cost of $5,393,699. Construction of the 43-foot dredging project Gulf of Mexico, Egmont Channel Cut 1, Section iB, remainder continue at a cost of $6,552,792. Construction of the 43-foot dredging project PineyPoint to Mangrove Point Section 3C was awarded August 10, 1982 with a cost of $2,581,148. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $793,754 and $1,096,670, respectively. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of district communications network cost $7,560. 9-18 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT Condition and operation studies cost $111,583. Contract dredging costs amounted to $4,657,335. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $130,011 and $207,119, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970 (HD 401/91/2 is 57 percent complete.) Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1982 were: Main project: $145,218,600 for new work and $17,273,121 for maintenance, a total of $162,491,721 regular funds. In addition, $1,329,300 was expended for new work from public works funds, $1,463,000 from emergency relief funds, and $667,502 from contributed funds. On Hillsborough River $270,466 was expended for new work. 33. NAVIGATION PROJECTS ON WHICH RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS ONLY WERE CONDUCTED DURING PERIOD. (See Table 9-H.) 34. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 9-I.) 35. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation'Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) Fiscal year costs for Benner Bay - Mangrove Lagoon, V.I.; Cedar Island Keaton Beach Channel, Florida; Dunedin Pass, Florida; Pahokee Harbor, Florida; Willoughby Creek, Florida were $412, $18,505, $54, $43,838 and $2,000, respectively. Snagging and clearing for navigation (Sec. 3 of 1945 River and Harbor Act, Public Law 14, 79th Congress.) No costs incurred. Beach Erosion Control 36. BREVARD COUNTY, FLA. Location. The project is on the east coast of Florida at approximately the midpoint of the peninsula. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1245 and 1246.) Existing project. The authorization provides for a protective and recreational beach with a berm 50 feet wide at elevation 10 feet above mean low water and a natural seaward slope as would be shaped by wave action, along 14,600 feet of beach at the city of Cape Canaveral and 10,600 feet of beach at Indialantic and Melbourne beach, and for periodic nourishment of the restored beach at Indialantic and Melbourne Beach limited initially to a period of 10 years. Nourishment of the restored beach at the city of Cape Canaveral would be provided by the authorized sandtransfer plant for construction at Canaveral Harbor. The project also provides for improvement of the Federally owned shores for beach erosion control or hurricane protection to be accomplished by the Federal agencies involved, subject to their own determination of economic justification. The areas involved include 4.9 miles of shore at Kennedy Space Center, 4.0 miles at Cape Kennedy Air Force Station, and 2.3 miles at Patrick Air Force Base. Mean tidal range in the area is 3.5 feet. Estimated cost of the project (Oct. 1981 price levels) is $7,550,000 Federal costs and $7,632,000 non-Federal cost ($7,550,000 cash contribution and $82,000 for lands). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 50 percent of all first costs of the work and 50 percent of the nourishment cost at Indialantic and Melbourne Beach for the first 10 years of the project life; provide lands and rightsof- way; provide, after the first 10 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the restored beach at Indialantic and Melbourne Beach during project life; maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; control water pollution; and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances of local cooperation were approved by the Secretary of the Army on July 9, 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration for the fiscal year cost $21,689 and $1,410, respectively. Maintenance: Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports cost $308. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial beach fill has been provided at Indialantic and Melbourne beaches. 37. BROWARD COUNTY, FLA. BEACH EROSION CONTROL AND HILLSBORO INLET, FLA., NAVIGATION PROJECT Location. Broward County is on lower east coast of Florida, 300 miles south of Jacksonville and about 30 miles north of Miami. Hillsboro Inlet 9-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 is in northern part of Broward County. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1248.) Existing project. The authorization provides for Federal participation toward cost of a shore restoration and protection project and a project to provide and maintain a channel adequate for small craft navigation. Plan provides for restoration of a protective and recreational beach at four locations generally 100 feet wide with berm elevation of 10 feet above mean low water, a navigation channel 8 by 100 feet from the Intracoastal Waterway to a point 1,500 feet oceanward in Hillsboro Inlet, thence 10 by 150 feet in the ocean; jetties on north and south sides of ocean entrance; a permanently based floating dredge; and on a deferred basis, a trestle-mounted sand-transfer plant, if needed. Navigation portion of the project is in an inactive status. Mean range of tide in areas is 2.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Cost estimate for new work (Oct. 1981 price levels) is $9,500,000 Federal and $16,200,000 non-Federal contribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 90.5 percent of the first cost of beach restoration in the reach between north county line and Hillsboro Inlet, 90 percent of first cost allocated to beach restoration, and 50 percent of first cost allocated to navigation for reach between Hillsboro Inlet and Port Everglades and 72.4 percent of beach restoration in reach between Port Everglades and south county line; provide all lands and rights-of-way; obtain approval of Chief of Engineers of plans and specifications if local interests construct beach erosion features; and furnish assurances that they will hold the United States free from damages, provide and maintain adequate public landing or wharf at Hillsboro Inlet, establish a public body to cooperate financially and to provide and operate local facilities for navigation, control water pollution, maintain ownership of publicly owned shores, and maintain all project works except the jetties (maintenance of the channel to revert to the United States if sand-transfer plant is constructed). Assurances of local cooperation were accepted November 22, 1968. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract adjustment for beach replenishment amounted to $4,722. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs for the fiscal year were $7,374 and $1,251, respectively. Maintenance: Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports cost $7,974. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was constructed by local interests and is complete. 38. DADE COUNTY, FLA. Location. Dade County is on the southeast coast of Florida. Project area consists of that part of the Atlantic shoreline of the county from Government Cut north to Bakers Haulover Inlet and at Haulover Beach Park. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey chart No. 1248.) Existing project. Project provides for a protective and recreational beach having a dune at elevation 11.5 feet and a level berm 50 feet wide at elevation 9 feet, mean low water, for beach erosion control and hurricane protection between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet; a protective and recreational beach with a berm elevation of 9 feet for beach erosion control at Haulover Beach Park; and Federal participation in the initial construction and in periodic nourishment of both the above reaches for the first 10 years of project life. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide in the area is 2.5 feet. Estimated cost of the project (Oct. 1981 price levels) is $44,900,000 Federal cost and $37,705,000 non-Federal cost $36,100,000 cash contribution and $1,605,000 other costs). Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1968 (HD 335/90/2). Local cooperation. Local interests must (a) contribute for the first cost of the work: between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet amounts ranging from 60.2 percent of the cost of the fill within the project limit with existing shorefront ownership, and 100 percent of the cost of fill required landward of the project limit; and for the work at Haulover Beach Park, contribute 21.3 percent of the entire first cost excluding costs for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and preproject work, but including credit for preproject work; (b) contribute in cost for the first 10 years of project life, amounts ranging from 88.9 percent of the nourishment cost for the beach, with existing ownership, to 60.7 percent with public ownership, and the entire maintenance cost for the dune, all between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet; (c) provide all lands and rights-of-way; (d) hold United States free from damages; (e) assure continued public ownership and use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based: (f) assure maintenance of the groin, and after the first 10 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the protective beach and maintenance of the dune during the economic life of the project; (g) assure that water pollution will not be permitted; (h) prevent removal or relocation by man of fill from.the beach berm and dune; (i) prevent the erection of barriers to the littoral movement of 9-20 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT material that would interfere with the nourishment of the beach; (j) maintain at the parks qualifying for 70 percent Federal participation a zone that excludes permanent human habitation; (k) at least annually inform interests affected that the project will not provide complete protection from a hurricane tide level equal to or higher in elevation than that of the hurricane of September 1926; and (1) establish in public ownership for public use the beaches within project limits as a requirement for Federal participation in the allocated beach erosion control costs of improvement of shores presently in private ownership. Assurances of local cooperation have been requested from the local sponsor. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: The fifth contract was completed February 1982 for work from North Jetty and Lincoln Road to Government Cut, costs incurred on the fifth contract for the fiscal year amounted to $12,019,859. Engineering and design and superivision and administration costs were $73,019 and $123,649, respectively. 39. DUVAL COUNTY, FLA. Location. On upper east coast of Florida, within 20 miles of Florida-Georgia line. Ocean shoreline is about 16 miles long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1243.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation toward cost of constructing with artificial fill, a beach 60 feet wide at elevation 11 feet above mean low water with a natural slope seaward, and for periodic nourishment for 10 years. Federal participation to be 100 percent of the first cost of construction applicable to the Federal shore and 50 percent applicable to the other publicly owned shore and 55.5 percent of periodic nourishment cost for first 10 years of project life. Men tidal range at south jetty in St. Johns River is 4.9 feet. Estimated cost of new work (Oct. 1981 price levels) $10,500,000 Federal and $9,399,000 non- Federal ($7,400,000 contributed funds and $1,999,000 for other costs). Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1965 (HD 273/89/1). Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 50 percent of first cost of constructing non-Federal publicly owned shores; contribute 44.5 percent of periodic nourishment costs for first 10 years of project life; provide all lands, rights-of-way, and relocations; hold the United States free from damages; control water pollution; and furnish assurances that they will maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based during economic life of project. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted on November 29, 1973. Estimated contributed funds for new work is $7,200,000 Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $17,913 and $3,889, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial beach fill and four year advance nourishment has been completed. 40. EL TUQUE BEACH, P.R. Location. The project area is located at El Tuque Beach on the south coast of Puerto Rico about 5 miles west of the city of Ponce. Existing project. The authorization provides for a protective and recreational beach by the placement of about 60,000 cubic yards of fill material along the eroded shoreline of El Tuque Beach. The new fill will be stabilized by the construction of a shore-connected rubble breakwater at the south end of the beach fill and by an offshore breakwater parallel to the northerly section of shore under consideration. The shoreconnected breakwater would extend seaward a distance of about 900 feet from a point on the shore 300 feet north of the south-west corner of the park. The offshore breakwater would be located about 500 feet offshore, be 1,000 feet in length, and run generally parallel to the northwestern shore. Estimated cost of the project (Jul. 1981 price level) is $968,800 Federal costs and $415,200 non-Federal constribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must (a) provide without cost to the United States all necessary lands, easements, rights of way, and relocations required for construction and subsequent mainenance of the project. (b) Hold and save the United States free from all claims for damanges which may result from construction and subsequent mainenance of the project, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors. (c) Provide without cost to the United States appropriate access and facilities including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based, and administer and maintain the beach for continued public use during the economic life of the project. (d) Assume maintenance and repair during the economic life of the project as required to serve the intended purpose. (e) Provide a cash contribution for beach erosion control equal to the appropriate percentage of the final construction cost allocated. This function exclusive of 9-21 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT lands, easements, rights-of-way, alterations, and relocations. The percentage to be in accordance with existing law and based on shore ownership and existing at the time of construction, which contribution is presently estimated at $415,200 (30 percent). (f) Assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitations of $1,000,000 for the Corps of Engineers portion of the work. (g) Comply with the provisons of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646). Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for beach restoration, groin and breakwater was awarded August 1982. No costs were incurred during the year. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs for the year were $18,440 and $2,678, respectively. 41. FORT PIERCE, FLA. Location. Fort Pierce Beach erosion project fronts the Atlantic Ocean and is on coastal barrier island in St. Lucie County which separates Indian River from the ocean. Area is 120 miles north of Miami and about 225 miles south of Jacksonville. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 582.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in the cost of a shore restoration and protection project which involves construction and periodic nourishment for 10 years. Federal participation amounts to one-half such costs for that part of the ocean shoreline extending 1.2 miles southward of Fort Pierce navigation inlet, and 70 percent of such costs.for the adjacent 0.1 mile shoreline known as Lions Club Beach Park. Mean range of tide in area is 2.6 feet. Cost estimate (Oct. 1980 price levels) is $3,100,000 Federal and $2,890,000 non-Federal. Project was authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (HD 84/89/1) as modified by section 102 of 1968 River and Harbor Act. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute one-half the costs of protecting and periodically nourishing for 10 years the reach of shoreline starting at and extending 1.2 miles south of Fort Pierce Inlet and 30 percent of cost of protecting and periodically nourishing 0.1 mile of shoreline known as Lions Club Beach Park; obtain approval by Chief of Engineers of detailed plans and specifications for the project; establish in public ownership and beach within project limits prior to reimbursement; furnish all lands and rights-of-way; furnish assurances that they will maintain continued public ownership of the publicly owned shores; exclude permanent human habitation and provide full park facilities at the Lions Club Beach Park; provide periodic nourishment of the beach; control water pollution; hold United States free from damages; and execute such further assurances and agreements as may be necessary to carry out the intent of Congress expressed in the acts authorizing or modifying the project. River and Harbor Act of 1965 authorized construction of the project by local interests. Section 102 of 1968 River and Harbor Act modified the project to provide for construction by Secretary of Army and section 215 of the same act permitted construction by local interests. Local interests have elected to construct the project. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted January 2, 1969. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $5,640 and $39 respectively. Maintenance: Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports cost $850. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial beach nourishment has been completed. 42. MANATEE COUNTY FLA. Location. Manatee County is on the west coast of Florida just south of the entrance to Tampa Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1256.) Existing project. The authorization provides for Federal participation toward cost of a shore restoration and protection project. The plan provides for the entire 7.5 mile shoreline of Anna Maria Key and will consist of 3.2 miles of gulf shore beach to elevation 6 feet above mean low water with a 50 foot berm width and a natural slope seaward as would be shaped by wave action. Also, the project consists of periodic nourishment of the restored beach and such adjacent shoreline as may be needed and justified for the 50-year project life. Plane of reference is mean low water. Cost estimate for new work (Oct. 1981 price levels) is $8,100,000 Federal and $8,444,000 non- Federal ($8,100,000 contributed funds and $344,000 for other costs). If public ownership of the private beaches is established before construction of the improvements the local share of the estimated first cost of construction and periodic nourishment would be reduced from 85.8 percent to 48.9 percent. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interest must: (a) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas, and relocations necessary for construction of the improvements; (b) provide a cash contri- 9-22 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT bution equal to 85.8 percent of the first cost of construction, subject to any credit for eligible construction costs incurred by local interests, and exclusive of costs for lands, easements, rights-ofway, relocations and alterations, the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (c) provide a cash contribution for periodic beach nourishment equal to 85.8 percent of the annual nourishment cost, such contribution to be made prior to each nourishment operation, and the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (d) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction; (e) assure continued public ownership and administration of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; (f) provide without cost to the United States appropriate access and facilities, including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based; (g) adopt appropriate ordinances, or provide other means, to insure the intended use of the beach fill areas; and (h) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design costs for the year were $9. 43. PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLA., FROM MARTIN COUNTY LINE OF LAKE WORTH INLET AND FROM SOUTH LAKE WORTH INLET TO BROWARD COUNTY LINE. Location. Palm Beach County is on east coast of Florida about 300 miles south of Jacksonville and 70 miles north of Miami. Northerly reach of the project is separated from the southerly reach by Palm Beach Island. Project consists of about 12.2 miles of ocean coastline. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1247 and 1248.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation toward the cost of local shore project for restoration of beaches to a general width of 100 feet with a berm elevation of 10 feet above mean low water, and periodic nourishment for 10 years from the year of initial nourishment, as follows: 4.8 percent of the cost for the Martin County line - Jupiter Inlet segment; 11.6 percent of cost for Jupiter Inlet -- Lake Worth Inlet segment; and 5.1 percent for South Lake Worth Inlet - Boca Raton Inlet segment. Mean range of tide is 2.8 feet in the Atlantic Ocean at Palm Beach and 2.3 feet at Boca Raton Inlet. Estimated cost (Oct. 1981 price levels) is $4,810,000 Federal and $21,100,000 cash contribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must obtain approval by Chief of Engineers of plans and specifications prior to commencement of work and furnish assurances that they will maintain public ownership of publicly owned shores, maintain protective measures and provide periodic nourishment of protective beaches, and control water pollution. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $14,405 and $2,544, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Local interests provided initial beach fill at Delray Beach which was completed in August 1973. A periodic nourishment contract at Delray Beach was awarded in FY1978 by local interests and the contract has been completed. 44. PINELLAS COUNTY, FLA. Location. Pinellas County is on the Gulf coast of Florida, about midway of the peninsula. It extends northerly about 39 miles from the main entrance to Tampa Bay to the vicinity of the mouth of Anclote river. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts Nos. 858 and 1257.) Previous project. For details see page 429 of Annual Report for 1965. Existing project. The authorized project provides for Federal participation in preserving arrd protecting the shores of Pinellas County, Florida, by: restoration of 5,000 feet of beach at Clearwater Beach Island; restoration of 49,000 feet of beach at Sand Key; restoration of 9,200 feet of beach at Treasure Island; construction of 600 feet of revetment at Long Key; and advance nourishment of Long Key and periodic nourishment of each island. Estimated cost (Oct. 1981 price levels) is $27,500,000 Federal funds and $28,769,000 non- Federal funds. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) contribute in cash the required percentages of the first costs of work provided by the Corps of Engineers, the percentages varying with the type of beach ownership; 94.1 to 50 percent of the beach restoration at Clearwater Beach; 98.1 to 50 percent of the improvement at Sand Key; 94.3 to 50 percent of the improvement at Treasure Island; and 50 percent of the first cost of the revetment at Long Key; (b) contribute in cash an amount computed in accordance with the cost sharing provision contained in P.L. 826, 84th Congress as amended by P.L. 87-874, for beach nourishment cost for the first 10 years of the project life; (c) provide lands, easements, and rightsof- way; (d) assure maintenance and repair of the 9-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 stone revetment of Long Key; (e) assure periodic nourishment of the restored beaches; (f) assure public ownership of beaches; (g) assure against water pollution; (h) hold the United States free from damages; and (i) provide beach for public use. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted March 22, 1967. Operations and results furing fiscal year. New work: Contract for Treasure Island 4th periodic beach nourishment and groin extension was awarded September 1982, no costs were incurred during the year. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs for the fiscal year were $47,806 and $7,144, respectively. Maintenance: Hired labor surveys, inspections and reports cost $69. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project commenced in 1969 and is 15 percent completed. Total costs under existing project through September 30, 1982 were $1,521,931 Federal funds and $1,424,563 contributed funds for new work and $5,625 for maintenance. 45. PUNTA SALINAS, P.R. Location. The project is located on the north coast of Puerto Rico on the Punta Salinas Peninsula about five miles west of San Juan, Puerto Rico. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 903.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in the cost of shore restoration of the east and west shores of the Punta Salinas Recreation Area. The selected plan consists of beach fill (about 58,000 cubic yards) which will provide an average 140,foot protective and recreational beach at MHW for the west peninsula shoreline; two anchor groins 225-feet long and both consisting of 10,500 tons of stone at each-end of the west shore to anchor and retard the movement of the fill material and; a stone revetment for 2,500 feet of the east peninsula shore consisting of 5,500 tons of stone and 25,000 square feet of filter cloth to eliminate shoreline recession along this sector. The Federal share for initial construction cost is 70%/. The project cost is $1,008,000, including engineering and design and supervision and administration. (See Table 9-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must (a) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights of way necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance and nourishment of the project. (b) accomplish without cost to the United States all alterations and locations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities, and other structures, and improvements made necessary by the contruction. (c) Hold and save the United States free from all claims for damages due to constuction and subsequent maintenance of the project, except damages due to the fault of negligence of the United States or its contractors. (d) Provide a cash contribution for beach erosion control equal to the appropriate percentage of the final construction cost allocated to this function exclusive of. lands, easements, rights of way, alterations, and relocations. The percentage to be in accordance with shore ownership. The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico has contributed $300,000 which represents 30 percent of the project cost. (e) Provide an additional cash contribution for the cost of periodic beach nourishment every 5 years, presently estimated at $11,900. (30.0 percent) annually, until the $1,000,000 limitation of the Section 103A Small Projects Authority is reached. These percentages also to be revised in accordance with shore ownership and use at the time of construction. (f) Provide without cost to the United States appropriate access and facilities, including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based, and administer and maintain the beach for continued public use during the life of the project. (g) Adopt appropriate ordinances or provide other means to insure preservation of the beach fill areas, control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers, maintain and operate all structures after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army and comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646). Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A contract for beach nourishment was awarded 15 April 1981 and incurred costs of $559,051 for the fiscal year. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $5,497 and $68,636 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was completed in March 1982. 46. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 9-J.) 47. BEACH EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section 103, Public Law 87-874 (preauthorization) Reports incurring costs during the fiscal year were Dunedin Shores, Fla., $12,497, Ft. Clinch 9-24 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT State Park, Fla., $219, and North Shore Beach, St. Petersburg, Fla., $10,417. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section III, Public Law 90-483 Mitigation of Shore Damages Attributable to Navigation Projects No costs were incurred under the above authorization. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Shoreline Erosion Control Act of 1974, Public Law 93-251. The Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration Program included costs of $636 for Key West, Fla. and $108 for demonstration. Flood Control 48. CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA Location. The project is located generally within the southeastern eighteen counties of Florida covering an area of about 15,200 square miles. It is comprised of the Upper St. Johns River basin in the northeastern section of project, Kissimmee River basin in central section above the Lake Okeechobee-Everglades area in the central and southwestern section, and the east coast Everglades area in southeastern section. Previous projects. Completed works for control of Lake Okeechobee were included in and constructed under the navigation project for Okeechobee Waterway, Fla. (formerly Caloosahatchee River and Lake Okeechobee drainage area, Fla.) and under provisions of River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930, and August 30, 1935. For further information, see Annual Reports, 1948 and 1949. Existing project. The authorized project is for flood relief and water conservation and provides principally for: an east coast protective levee extending from the Homestead area north to the eastern shore of Lake Okeechobee near the St. Lucie Canal; three conservation areas for water impoundment in the Everglades area west of the east coast protective levee with control structures to effect transfer of water as necessary; local protective works along the lower east coast; encirclement of the Lake Okeechobee agricultural area by levees and canals; enlargment of portions of Miami, North New River, Hillsboro, and West Palm Beach Canals; enlargement of the existing Lake Okeechobee levees and construction of new levees on the northeast and northwest shore of the lake; increased outlet capacity for improved control of Lake Okeechobee; floodway channels in the Kissimmee River basin, with suitable control structures to prevent overdrainage; an interrelated system of canals, levees, pumping stations, and structures in southwest Dade County to control water levels; and facilities for regulating floods in the Upper St. Johns River basin; a system of canals and control structures for gravity drainage of Martin County and distribution of available water supplies to portions of Martin and St. Lucie Counties; and works to improve the supply, distribution, and conservation of water resources in central and southern Florida, including the Lake Okeechobee agricultural area, Everglades National Park, and other related areas. The project will provide water control and protection from recurrence of the devastating floodwaters from the Everglades and local sources, for the highly developed urban area along the lower east coast of Florida and for the productive agricultural areas around Lake Okeechobee (including towns around lake), in the Upper St. Johns and Kissimmee River basins, and in South Dade County. Project also provides for navigation improvements suitable for recreational craft, consisting of locks and channel dredging in the upper Kissimmee and St. Johns basins. The project includes a total of 897 miles of levees, 954 miles of canals, 30 pumping plants, 194 floodway control and diversion structures, 55 railroad bridge relocations, and 2 highway bridge relocations. The project also provides that upon completion, local interests assume operation and maintenance of all completed works except levees, channels, locks, and control works for regulation of Lake Okeechobee and the main control structures of conservation areas, which will be operated and maintained by the United States. The principal features of the hurricane gates, constructed under previous projects for Okeechobee Waterway and maintained under existing project since July 1, 1950, are set forth in Table 9-K. See also Table 9-L for principal features of locks and dams. Estimate of cost for new work (Oct. 1981 price levels) is $741,882,000 Federal funds ($740,000,000 Corps and $1,882,000 U.S. Coast Guard) and $185,000,000 contributed funds, exclusive of river and harbor funds expended on previous projects. Local interests' costs in reviewing plans and specifications are expected to be $625,000. In addition, estimated cost to local interests of lands, rights-of-way, and relocations is $173,583,000. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. (See Table 9-M for local cash contribution.) Local interests must also: provide lands, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas; hold the United States free from damages; bear the 9-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 cost of maintenance and operation of all works except those having to do with regulation of Lake Okeechobee and the main control structures of conservation areas; construct and maintain lateral drainage facilities; prohibit encroachment on flood-carrying capacity of the improved channels; and assume cost of all new highway bridges, relocations of existing bridges and alterations to utilities incident to construction of the project. In addition, for small boat navigation channels, local interests must provide, maintain, and operate adequate public landings, sanitary and access facilities, and establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the locks and channels by users thereof. Assurances of local cooperation have been accepted by the District Engineer for all items of work authorized to date except those for the Small Boat Navigation feature added in 1970 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965. Total estimated contributed funds amount to $163,000,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9-N for work accomplished.) Operations and care. a. Features completed under previous navigation project for Okeechobee Waterway and being maintained under this project are: a levee about 70 miles long following in general the south shore of Lake Okeechobee and a north shore levee 15.8 miles long; spillways at Ortona and St. Lucie locks; 5 hurricane gates; 20 gated drainage culverts through the levee; and 16 spillways along St. Lucie Canal. b. Features completed under existing project that are to be maintained with operation and maintenance funds are: (1) Levees 47, 48, 49 and 50 - total length 63 miles and enlargement of existing levees L-D1, L-D2, L-D3, L-D4, and L-D9, (2) spillway structures S-10, S-11, S-12, S-18C, S-77, and S-78 (3) C-43, Sec. 4 (Caloosahatchee River), and (4) W. P. Franklin Lock and Dam. In addition to the actual facilities listed above it is necessary under operation and maintenance to continue meteorological studies, water level records, stream gaging stations, etc., for proper regulation of the level of Lake Okeechobee and storage of water in Conservation Areas 1, 2 and 3. REGULATION Corps of Engineers - The Corps of Engineers operates and maintains the major outlets to Lake Okeechobee and Water Conservation Area Nos. 1, 2A and 3A in central and southern Florida. The severe 1981 drought in South Florida continued through the beginning of 1982. However, frequent summer rainfall commencing in late May brought the lake and water conservation areas up to their respective regulation schedules. During the period, Lake Okeechobee continued to be regulated under a regulation schedule ranging from 15.5 feet to 17.5 feet, NGVD. Regulatory discharges were made through the Caloosahatchee River from 26-30 August 1982. The Conservation Areas were regulated under the following regulation schedules: a. WCA #1: from 14.0 to 17.0 feet, NGVD., b. WCA #2A: from 9.5 to 12.5 feet, NGVD., c. WCA #3A: from 9.5 to 10.5 feet, NGVD. Water Conservation Area 2A was in the second year of a three-year drawdown. South Florida Water Management District - SFWMD is responsible for operation and maintenance of the remainder of the project facilities, including major pumping stations, spillways, locks (except on Okeechobee Waterway), levees and culverts. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was about 45 percent complete. Planning for the entire project began in November 1948 and has been continued. For construction completed prior to Fiscal Year 1980 see Annual Reports for 1960-1979. Construction completed under existing project during the fiscal year is set forth in Table 9-0. All Federally maintained features of the project were generally in good condition at the end of the fiscal year. (For status of work under contract at end of fiscal year see Table 9-P.) Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1982 were $257,587,963 for new work, $33,504,917 for maintenance, a total of $291,092,880. In addition, $48,308,801 has been expended from contributed funds for new work. 49. FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLA. Location. The Four River Basins area covers about 6,000 square miles within 14 counties in central and southwest peninsular Florida. Project includes all or part of the four main stream basins - the Hillsborough, Oklawaha, Withlacoochee, and Peace Rivers--and all of three smaller coastal basins north of Tampa, Florida, drained by the Pithlachascotee and Anclote Rivers and Lake Tarpon. Existing project. The authorized project provides for improvements for control of floods and drainage, and for water conservation through construction of necessary canals, levees, reservoirs, and control structures. More specifically, the project provides for: Green Swamp Area-a conservation area and three storage reservoirs with necessary canals and control structures; Hillsborough River--four flood-storage reser- 9-26 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT voirs, with necessary channels, control structures, and levees; Oklawaha River-a levee on the north shore of Lake Apopka, improvement of part of the river channel and a west bank levee below Moss Bluff lock and dam, and replacement of the lock and dam; Withlacoochee River-one flood-storage reservoir with outlet canals and control structures; Peace River-Peace Creek canal and control structures and improvements to the existing water control and drainage features; Gulf Coastal Areas -Lake Tarpon: outlet canal and control structure; Anclote River: control structure and channel improvement; Pithlachascotee River: reservoir with outlet canals and control structures. (See Table 9-Q on Moss Bluff Lock.) Estimated cost for new work (Oct. 1981 price levels) is $187,000,000 Federal funds and $114,100,000 non-Federal cost. $38,500,000 contributed funds; $44,576,000 for lands and damages; and $31,024,000 for relocations. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish all lands, and rights-of-way; provide all alterations or replacements of public and private utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), etc.; hold the United States free from damages; operate and maintain all project works after completion; construct and maintain such associated works as are necessary to realize benefits made available by the project works; and contribute in cash 17 percent of the first cost of construction ($38,500,000). Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for construction of C-135, S-155 bypass closure and S-159 (upper) wingwall stabilization was awarded September 23, 1981. Contract costs for the year were $452,980. Contract for construction of recreation area, Moss Bluff lock and dam was awarded December 7, 1981. Contract costs for the year were $237,565. Hired labor operation cost $12,142. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $562,808 and $258,493, respectively. (Included recreation at Moss Bluff.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project commenced April 18, 1966 and is 38 percent complete. See Table 9-R for construction of major features of the project completed to date. 50. PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS P.R. (This project authorized as Lago de Cerrillos, Lago de Portugues, and Channel Improvement at Ponce.) Location. Portugues and Bucana Rivers originate on the southern slopes of Cordillera Central divide of Puerto Rico and flow from this central ridge of the island to the Carribean Sea. Their drainage areas are 22.6 and 31.4 square miles, respectively. Ponce, the second largest city in Puerto Rico, is located in the lower coastal area along Portugues River and is the only urban community in the two basins. Existing project. The authorized project provides for two multiple-purpose reservoirs for flood control, water supply, general recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement-one on Portugues River and the other on Cerrillos River, a tributary to the Bucana River; enlargement of about 5.7 miles of the Bucana River, with an additional 0.2-mile tieback levee at the upstream terminus of the improvement; enlargement of 2.1 miles of the Portugues River, with an additional 0.5 mile of tieback levee at the upstream terminus of the improvement; and a 1.3 mile diversion channel connecting Portugues River to lower Bucana River. Estimated cost of the project (Oct. 1981 price levels) is $241,000,000 Federal cost and $71,500,000 non-Federal cost ($49,080,000 for lands and damages; $13,018,000 for relocations; and $9,402,000 for highway bridges). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from damages; operate and maintain all project works after completion; repay construction cost allocated to water supply in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958; pay one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; prohibit discharge of inadequately treated sewage and other pollutants into the reservoir; and prevent encroachment on downstream channels. Assurances of local cooperation have not been accepted. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract work for improvement on the Upper Bucana Channel, Section 3, Section 5B, Section 5C and Section 6A continue with costs for the year of $293,223, $203,729, $1,465,723 and $4,178,615. A contract for improvement on the Upper Bucana Channel, Section 4 was completed in August 1982 at a cost of - $180,967. Contract for landscape development and fencing of lower channel improvements continued with costs for the year of $711,896. A contract for improvement on the Upper Bucana Channel, Section 5A was completed in September 1981, with costs for this year of $31,772. Contract for Portugues Channel improvements Section 6B was awarded August 24, 1982. No costs were incurred during year. Contract for Upper Bucana Channel improvement Bucana debris basin control structure was 9-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 awarded September 20, 1982. No costs were incurred during the fiscal year. Contract for Cerrillos Dam River Divertion and foundation preparation was awarded September 22, 1982. No costs were incurred during the fiscal year. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $5,368,963 and $1,462,498, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project commenced in September 1975 and is 24 percent complete. 51. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Features transferred to the Central and Southern Florida Flood Control District and Southwest Florida Water Management District were inspected quarterly during the fiscal year at a total cost of $16,740. 52. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 9-S.) 53. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 685, 84th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 9-T.) Emergency flood control activities--repa r, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $177,402 for the Disaster Preparedness Program, $49,408 for national emergency preparedness program, and $516,845 for a rehabilitation report for Central and Southern Florida project for a total of $743,655. General Investigations 54. SURVEYS Hired labor costs during the fiscal year (all Federal funds) were: navigation studies, $458,085, flood damage prevention studies $1,768,421, shoreline protection studies, $134,282 and special studies $278,534 for a total of $2,639,322. 55. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for Inspection of Dams amounted to $6,845. The requirement for preparation of regular flood plain information studies has been rescinded. FPI studies that deal with land use changes will continue to be prepared. FPMS Unit Jacksonville, Fla., $28,652. Gold coast hurricane evacuation study, $129,360. Technical services, $59,746. 9-28 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 1. 2. (Contrib. Funds) 10. Fort Myers Beach, Fla. (Federal Funds) Aquatic Plant Control (R& H Act of 1965) (Federal Funds) Arecibo Harbor, P.R. (Federal Funds) Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. and St. John's River, Fla. (Federal Funds) Canaveral Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Charlotte Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) Clearwater Pass, Fla. (Federal Funds) Cross-Florida Barge Canal (Federal Funds) Fernandina Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) 2,549,000 2,225,000 2,028,100 1,415,400 12,771,670 2,317,673 2,339,816 2,077,761 1,329,420 12,591,757 81 899 New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 571,742 31,172 141,000 148,660 5,061,000 4,342,280 525,255 561,201 770,800 771,152 48,153 586,784 126,784 2,642,645 126,804 63,907 1,447,700 3,468,328 7,131 5,631 80,000 79,956 554,990 445,286 1,837 3,146 788,200 2,613,000 757,998 2,642,802 116,200 108,496 2,320,000 1,017,033 85,805 49,790 - 67,947 -67,411 12,254 12,254 467 932,568 921,118 700,000 88,092 1,719,600 1,750,655 700,000 199,751 70,000 33,978 1,365,800 1,324,473 - 254,000 554,528 2,343,300 2,343,679 105,000 524,765 371,700 407,661 - 177 1,262,308 1,313,848 20,494 4,040,000 4,037,075 72,130 5,365 5,293 20,000 1,655 1,655,000 1,407,447 325 2,323,000 1,474,260 7,116 229 229 3. 9-29 68,700 68,639 1,128,0753" 1,128,0753" 1,729,532 1,727,593 361,2252 361,2252 4,289,313 1,710,551 7,421,910 7,421,866: 20,953,821 20,834,359 305,290 305,290 912,635 912,375 159,975 159,975 533,169 533,169 8,527,526 8,527,061 46,3494� 46,34942 1,166,718 1,166,480 62,862,473 62,840,126 12,517,116 12,254,528 4,149,816 4,087,941' 15,410,439 14,558,761 805,000 803,762 158,140" 158,140 648,900 648,767 6. 7. 8. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project 11. Fort Pierce Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 12. Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, Fla. (Federal Funds) 13. Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, Fla. (Federal Funds) 14. Jacksonville Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 15. Johns Pass, Fla. (Federal Funds) 16. Longboat Pass, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 17. Mayaguez Harbor, P.R. (Federal Funds) 18. Miami Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 19. New Pass Sarasota, Fla. (Federal Funds) FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 578 4,500 442 4,431 214,607 185,000 371,683 186,330 92,262 58,026 69,127 60,139 Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 173,015 169,816 52,500 55,625 688,908 759,084 2,441,000 3,471,235 43,986 41,184 35,128 85,726 47,595 3,000 2,004 2,770,000 2,764,574 - 97,500 393,720 440,110 443,550 103,406 1,500 1,157 70,000 37,340 13,763 13,763 287 798,000 828,885 - 63,613 - 63,404 4,711,635 2,819,143 11,728 268,800 301,415 41,887 41,869 5,327 5,038 5,190 - 146,035 - 146,030 5,789 5,789 85,464 156,501 4,502 4,502 94,300 93,935 266,900 24,865 150,000 24,282 25,047 25,047 95,000 33,911 54,205 294,822 150,000 123,913 32,663 32,663 695,000 755,574 9-30 TABLE 9-A 356,056 356,056 2,496,134 2,458,630 18,574 18,574 8,112,5578 8,112,5578 4,723,238 4,714,138k 172,324 172,324 168,187 168,187 985,187 985,295 24,566,0665 24,414,2615 2,178,975 2,178,975 2,262,7109* 2,262,71039 45,81116 45,811 2,130,172 2,129,292 - 19,251,598"' - 19,250,889"' 761,000 22,957,803" 668,579 22,847,413" - 47,596,27812 - 47,596,27812 1,923,000 39,002,586'13 2,754,261 38,968,440'13 - 102,813 - 102,813 - 927,654 - 927,654' - 82,098'5 - 81,755 338,000 752,900 342,621 751,420 - 1,020,233 - 1,020,233 687,000 828,376 721,506 824,733 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 20. Okeechobee Waterway, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 21. Oklawaha River, Fla. (Federal Funds) 22. Palm Beach Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) 23. Ponce de Leon Inlet, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 24. Ponce Harbor, P. R. (Federal Funds) 25. Port Everglades Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) 26. Removal of Aquatic Growth (Federal Funds) 27. St. Augustine Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) 28. St. Johns River, Fla. Jacksonville to Lake Harney (Federal Funds) 29. St. Lucie Inlet, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Total Cost to FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 510,000 39,768 1,813,114 1,037,318 28,843 1,206,000 1,968,713 Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 19,918 27,368 10,788 11,191 1,010,000 1,136,384 469,409 98,000 96,404 3,602 3,602 530,000 76,296 1,176 1,588 23,600 23,588 366,700 367,465 161,400 164,883 37,887 - 72,000 398,921 1,469,000 1,318,044 22,000 20,690 256,900 256,842 253,700 214,089 20,629 125,000 61,803 1,325 1,325 13,058,000 9,025,007 165 183 - 20,000 19,850 261,300 19,636 6,245,000 7,863,324 35,906 35,906 18,805 1,953,000 1,792,820 41,000 32,912 447,000 431,138 110,084 139,086 15,624 - 8,000 16,029 62,000 281,654 13,982,000 10,733,178 11 11 21,320,590'7 21,320,31217 24,644,66618 24,248,56318 503,700 503,700 315,264'" 315,264'" 1,948,68620 1,939,27620 6,904,02121 6,904,02121 3,879,20922 3,863,25222 1,953,277 1,953,277 5,739,548 5,728,912 2,415,600 2,415,600 1,379,000 612,662 382,88223 381,96823 1,287,621 1,265,611 40,755,77324 34,622,19724 1,040,569 1.040.569 2,500,000 2,400,000 2,646,000 2,022,000 18,358,370 2,415,309 2,312,103 2,569,449 1,981,456 18,053,319 696,000 83,499 1,350,000 305,918 183,070 186,845 540,000 126,739 402,200 1,014,901 48,100 48,122 21,000 20,949 1,400,000 3,110,000 1,083,350 3,897,422 63,700 66,400 63,629 42,425 - 1,200,000 346,935 1,266,817 24,431 24,431 17,329 17,371 700,000 864,477 62,262 46,604 507,000 386,512 1,476,43425 1,476,43425 4,168,946 4,168,930 1,171,24340 1,171,24340 915,6864' 915,6774' 6,963,60228 6,554,24026 2,262,211 2,222,507 2,322,000 2,201,512 9-31 1,293 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 9-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding 30. St. Petersburg New Work: Harbor, Fla. Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost Maint: Approp Cost 31. San Juan New Work; Harbor, P. R. Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 32. Tampa Harbor, New Work: Fla. (Main Approp. Project) Cost (Federal Funds) Maint: Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost 36. Brevard County, New Work: Fla. Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost Maint: Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost 37. Broward County. New Work: Fla. Beach Erosion Approp. Control and Hills- Cost boro Inlet, Fla., Maint: Navigation Project Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost 38. Dade County, New Work: Fla. Approp (Federal Funds) Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost 39. Duval County. New Work: Fla. Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost 40. El Tuque Beach New Work: Ponce, Approp. Puerto Rico Cost (Federal Funds) Maint: Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost 41. Ft. Pierce, Fla. New Work: (Federal Funds) Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 66,500 1,375,000 95,000 - 137,358 68,076 53,753 1,416,793 - 137,406 82,128 2,208,000 1,457,000 - 200,000 79,696 2,210,323 24,139 1,129,302 32,895,000 11,293,100 14,171,000 29,899,000 33,030,922 10,203,797 13,377,011 31,755,233 974,956 337,100 2,818,200 2,656,000 1,028,633 334,640 356,616 5,113,608 152,460 150,000 - 165,000 198,480 58,746 84,224 187,912 1,400,000 425,000 - 23,518 204,992 1,521,026 15,519 12,833 184 15,519 12,833 184 - 1,701,000 - 65,000 18,860 19,204 1,697,918 - 2,850,000 22,372 2,857,832 211 12,951 211 12,951 - - - - 550,000 495,094 66 3,109 308 308 19,990 13,347 7,974 7,974 3,900,000 2,720,000 9,300,000 8,195,000 4,473,050 3,097,753 9,323,362 7,509,369 1,450,000 2,201,600 7,661,454 5,050,000 3,702,699 2,276,480 7,094,928 4,707,158 1,974,650 - 400,750 1,596,786 1,275,084 1,108,286 844,575 1,108,286 844,575 41,000 45,112 68,000 29,748 90,000 107,293 - 300,000 152,123 -7,000 27,110 25,000 773,000 55,200 749,324 - 3,469 27,980 295 850 27,980 295 850 - 908,000 - 135,000 - 732,098 23,780 200,000 - 1,331 23,132 360,000 - 19,246 520,000 40,364 - 333 6,012 9-32 255,95727 255,60827 1,522,99028 1,522,91328 13,774,9682" 13,774,968"2 11,743,7843s 11,640,08930 146,117,64331 146,071,65031' 17,296,82232 17,290,22832 734,962 726,248 2,346,492 2,255,197 29,001 29,001 2,262,000 2,254,667 6,253,100 6,204,883 26,270 26,270 1,758,841' 1,758,841' 32,133,95633 31,400,65733 22,194,08534 21,188,27434 5,968,900 5,749,646 4,142,400 4,085,270 511,5607 132,0707 520,000 40,364 1,175,44835 1,146,39935 31,734 31,734 773,000 761,890 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section In Text Project Funding 42. Manatee County, New Work: Fla. Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost 43. Palm Beach New Work: County, Fla. from Approp. Martin County line Cost to Lake Worth Maint: Inlet to Broward Approp. County line Cost (Federal Funds) 44. Pinellas County, New Work: Fla. Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost Maint: Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost 45. Punta Salinas New Work: Puerto Rico Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost Maint: Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost 48. Central and New Work: Southern Florida Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost Maint: Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost 49. Four River New Work: Basins, Fla. Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost 50. Portugues and New Work: Bucana Rivers, Approp. P. R. Cost (Federal Funds) FY 79 2,000 51,189 900,000 729,296 FY 80 25,000 21,066 112,621 13,115 13,115 380,000 93,081 306,710 386 1,761 386 1,761 432,000 112,765 290,803 37,000 590,000 21,732 61,596 6,105,000 6,070,000 7,145,663 5,891,260 2,696,000 4,681,500 2,602,459 4,372,350 1,215,000 1,402,144 1,222,330 3,010,350 7,476,000 5,423,550 7,395,814 598,789 1,007,225 826,279 1,295,292 6,060,000 9,940,000 8,547,368 9,973,955 FY 81 67 36,252 32,235 - 77,428 19,221 150,000 250,376 330,000 111,391 6,040,000 5,721,682 2,910,600 3,353,047 900,500 992,533 6,015,000 6,037,006 1,182,970 1,148,446 Total Cost to FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 - 4,400 9 16,950 1,000,000 54,950 69 69 900,000 420,520 212,663 6,780,000 4,859,723 3,774,000 3,213,709 200,000 622,179 1,300,000 1,332,526 115,000 191,461 217,600 217,585 1,830,834 1,825,930 13,621 13,621 2,539,693 1,521,931 5,625 5,625 2,325,755 1,424,563 842,0007 819,3127 330,000 324,054 260,056,39736 257,587,96336 34,155,961 33,504,917 48,829,575 48,308,801 68,312,095 68,121,39137 11,052,300 10,939,381 11,600,000 14,600,000 60,135,568 10,694,703 13,535,452 58,074,477 9-33 -a _ REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 1. Excludes work-in-kind. 2. Includes $97,566 for previous project. 3. Excludes $700,000 contributed by NASA in connection with construction of lock and $1,003,000 contributed funds for new work. 4. Includes $113,000 for new work on previous project; excludes $15,563 expended for new work on existing project from contributed funds. 5. Includes $2,202,126 expended from public work funds for new work. Includes costs of $452,500 for recreation facilities. 6. Includes $135,686 expended for recreation facilities. 7. Includes $10,128 cost for reconnaissance and detailed project report prepared under Sec. 107 modification to the project. Excludes $1,095 contributed funds for new work. 8. Includes $515,479 for new work for previous projects: $8,472 for new work on Sunshine Skyway Channel; and $9,707 for new work for Cats Point Channel. Excludes $14,473 contributed funds for new work. 9. Includes $450,749 for maintenance for previous project. 10. Includes $94,776 for work for previous projects. 11. Includes $213,222 for maintenance on previous projects and $3,179 operating and care under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation. 12. Includes $3,520,137 new work on previous project and $290,013 for new work expended from public works funds. 13. Includes $543,399 maintenance on previous projects. 14. Includes unused contributed funds of $64,136 returned to local interests. 15. Project authorized December 2, 1964, by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 R&H Act and by Section 110 of the 1966 R& H Act. Cost of new work excludes $53,732 contributed funds. 16. Excludes $45,811 contributed funds for new work. 17. Includes $16,222,275 for new work under previous project, $549,348 for recreational facilities (Code 710), and $27,574 for reconnaissance and detailed project report prepared under Section 107 modification to the project. 18. Includes $7,581,150 for maintenance for previous projects. Excludes $1,000 for maintenance from contributed funds on previous projects and $67,558 which represents services rendered without reimbursement. 19. Includes $3,912 for new work for previous projects. 20. Includes $11,414 for operating and care under provisions for the permanent indefinite appropriation. 21. Includes $80,000 new work from public works funds. Excludes $509,5016 contributed funds. 22. Includes $30,000 for maintenance from public works' funds. 23. Includes $11,588 expended for restudy, but excludes $21,960 expended for new work from contributed funds. 24. Excludes $323,456 contributed funds. 25. Includes $71,303 for new work on previous project. Excludes $137,500 contributed funds. 26. Includes $26,689 for new work under previous project. 27. Includes $32,689 under previous project. 28. Includes $20,532 under previous project. 29. Includes $747,684 for new work under previous project. Excludes $100,000 expended for new work from contributed funds. 30. Includes $44,730 in maintenance under previous project. 31. Includes $853,050 for new work under previous project. Excludes $270,466 for new work for Hillsborough River and $13,939 for new work from contributed funds. 32. Includes $17,107 for maintenance under previous project. 33. Includes $2,299,526 for reimbursement costs to Bal Harbor. 34. Excludes unused contributed funds of $17,969 returned to local interests. 35. Excludes $300,083 in property for services furnished by local interests in lieu of cash contribution. 36. Excludes $15,543 for property received without reimbursement and R&H Funds, expended on previous projects (see cost and financial statement for Okeechobee Waterway, Fla., project for these costs). Excludes $100,000 advanced by local interests toward federal costs. 37. Includes costs of $67,127 for recreation facilities at Moss Bluff and $2,638,272 at Lake Tarpon. 38. Excludes $288,000 contributed funds for new work. 39. Includes $343,479 work-in-kind and $160,429 in costs for north jetty recreation facility. 40. Baresford cutoff and completion of cutoffs and easing of bends in Putnam Lake and Volusia Counties in inactive status. Includes $29,566 for new work under previous project. 41. Includes $25,838 under previous project. 42. Excludes $42,783 contributed funds for new work. 9-34 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents October 27, 1965 August 26, 1937 March 4, 1913 June 20, 1939 March 2, 1945 October 23, 1962 June 20, 1938 July 14, 1960 July 25, 1912 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 August 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 P.L. 675/77 July 23, 1942 June 14, 1880 July 13, 1892 March 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 March 3, 1925 June 20, 1938 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious aquatic plants, and continued research to develop best method of control ARECIBO HARBOR, P.R. (See Section 2 of Text) Construction of breakwater 1,200 feet long and dredging channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide with flare at entrance and widening at inner end to form a maneuvering area. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA. AND THE ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 7 x 100 feet Channel 12 feet deep and 90-150 feet wide with cut-offs CANAVERAL HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 4 of Text) Entrance channel jetties, a turning basin enclosed by a dike, and a barge canal with a lock Maintain improved channel, turning basin, enlarge barge channel and lock, relocate dike, provide channel and turning basin west of 35-foot turning basin, construct and operate sand-transfer plant CHANNEL FROM NAPLES TO BIG MARCO PASS, FLA. (See Section 5 of Text) Interior channel 6 x 70 feet Channel 12 x 150 feet from the Gulf to Gordon Pass, thence 10 x 100 feet to a point 400 feet south of U.S. Highway 41 Bridge, thence 10 x 70 feet to bridge and two turning basins CHARLOTTE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 6 of Text) Channel 24 x 300 feet through Gulf through Boca Grande entrance Depth of 27 feet at entrance and width of 500 feet at the bend Channel 10 x 100 feet to Punta Gorda and a turning basin Depth of 30 feet at entrance and width of 700 feet at bend Depth of 32 feet in entrance channel CLEARWATER PASS, FLA. (See Section 7 of Text) Entrance channel 10 x 150 feet, inside channel 8 x 100 feet, and a turning basin CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL (See Section 8 of Text) Barge Canal 12 x 150 feet FERNANDINA HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 9 of Text) Entrance jetties Raising and extending jetties to provide 19-foot depth Improvement of inner harbor to obtain 20- to 24-foot depth and 400- to 600-foot channel width Combining improvement of Fernandina Harbor and Cumberland Sound under the general heading of Fernandina Harbor Provided for a 26-foot channel Provided for the 28-foot channel and turning basin H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 898, 62nd Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 618, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 367, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 140, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 596, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 183, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 699, 62nd Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 113, 66th Cong. 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 95, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 186, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 293, 86th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 109, 79th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report 1879 Annual Report 1891 & 1896 H.Doc. 388, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 227, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 284, 87th Cong., 1st sess. 9-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 9-B (Contined) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 Auth. by Chief of Engineers December 6, 1968, under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act. Def. Act of March 4, 1931 War Dept. Approp. Act, March 4, 1933 August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 May 10-16, 1957 Auth. March 1, 1962 By Senate and House Public Works Committee Auth. by Chief of Engineers March 1, 1963, under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act Provided for reducing the maximum width of turning basin from 1,000 to 800 feet, for shifting channel line in this vicinity 50 feet northwesterly and for including in authorized project small area dredged by Rayonier, Inc. Provided for 32-foot channel and turning basin FORT MYERS BEACH, FLA. (See Section 10 of Text) 12- x 150 foot channel in San Carlos Bay, thence 11 x 125 feet in Matanzas Pass to upper shrimp terminals Extension of 11- x 125-foot channel easterly about 2,000 feet to and including a turning basin adjacent to natural deep water in Matanzas Pass FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 11 of Text) Expenditure of $20,000 for dredging channel, maintenance by local interests Expenditure of up to $30,000 for dredging channel Maintaining channels, jetties, and revetments, and enlarging channels and turning basin to existing project dimensions INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FLA. (See Section 12 of Text) 9- x 100-foot channel; deepening channel at Caseys Pass to 9 feet and construction of highway bridge at Venice Original route may be modified at no excess cost to U. S. Any route in Venice-Lemon Bay area may be used Use of alternate Route C-i in Venice-Lemon Bay area Local interests to bear costs of Venice Avenue highway bridge and any other necessary crossing over Route C-I Sunshine Skyway Channel to be improved and maintained to 9 x 100 feet H.Doc. 284, 87th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 662, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 183, 86th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act Specified in Act H. Doc. 252, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21,, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 371, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 109, 85th Cong., 1st sess. 6- x 80-foot channel in Boca Ciega Bay January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 PARA June 26, 1934 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 Do. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FLA. (See Section 13 of Text) Channel 8 x 75 feet from Jacksonville to Miami Channel width of 100 feet Operation and care of Palm Valley Bridge Turning basin at Jacksonville Beach Channel 12 x 125 feet Side channel and turning basin at Sebastian H.Doc. 586, 69th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 71, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 180, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 740, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 336, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 9-36 TABLE 9-B (Contined) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Do. July 3, 1958 Chief of Engineers Report of July 22, 1960, Mod. 12-foot channel March 2, 1907 June 14, 1880 June 3, 1896 June 25, 1910 June 5, 1920 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 Do. Do. October 27, 1965 Auth. by Chief of Engineers December 2, 1964 Under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act and Sec. 110 of 1966 R&H Act. Auth. by Chief of Engineers April 20, 1976 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act, as amended August 30, 1935 Turning basin at Vero Beach Maintenance of side channel at Daytona Beach Channel 10 x 125 feet from Ft. Pierce to Miami JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 14 of Text) ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. OPPOSITE THE CITY OF JACKSONVILLE The 24-foot area from Hogan Creek to Florida East Coast Railroad bridge ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. Jetties at entrance (maintenance only) Extension of jetties, etc. (maintenance only) Main channel 30 by 300-600 feet; anchorage basin at Mayport; and training walls and revetments ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA., JACKSONVILLE TO THE OCEAN Consolidation of above projects Widening bend at Dame Point to 900 feet Widening Drummond, Trout, and Six Mile (now Long Branch) Creeks Cut to 400 feet; and Terminal Channel 30 by 400 feet Maintenance of existing channel widths; widening Terminal Channel to 590 feet; the 28-foot area between Laura St. and St. Elmo W. Acosta Bridge; channel along south side of Commodore Point; and basin at Naval Reserve Armory Main channel 34 feet deep via Terminal Channel Dame Point-Fulton Cutoff 34 by 500 feet Maintain existing entrance channel depths of 40 and 42 feet; deepen main ship channel to 38 feet to Mile 20 and widen channel near Mile 5 and near Mile 7 JOHN'S PASS, FLA. (See Section 15 of Text) Channel 10 x 150 feet in the gulf, 8 x 100 feet inside pass, 6 x 100 feet to IWW-2.6 miles long LONGBOAT PASS, FLA. (See Section 16 of Text) 12- x 150-foot entrance channel from Gulf of Mekico to Longboat Bridge; 10- x 100-foot channel from Longboat Bridge northeasterly to IWW; channel from north channel to Cortez Bridge MAYAGUEZ HARBOR P.R. (See Section 17 of Text) Approach channel 30 feet deep to and along deep water terminal H.Doc. 261, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 222, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 663, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report 1879, p. 767 H.Ex.Doc. 346, 53rd Cong., 3d sess., and Annual Report 1895, p. 1586 H.Doc. 611, 61st Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 483, 70th Cong. 2d sess. S.Comm. print, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 322, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 230, 78th Cong. 2d sess. S.Doc. 179, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 214, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 215, 72nd Cong. 1st sess. & River and Harbor Committee Doc. 1, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. 9-37 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 9-B (Contined) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1930 PWA Program September 6, 1933 June 13, 1902 March 2, 1907 March 4, 1913 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 August 13, 1968 Auth. by Chief of Engineers April 20, 1964 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act PARA June 26, 1934 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 Do. March 2, 1945 Do. MIAMI HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 18 of Text) MIAMI RIVER The 15-foot channel in Miami River, 150 feet wide at the mouth The channel at the Dinner Key Airport An 18-foot channel in a landcut across the peninsula and construction of the north jetty Construction of the south jetty and increase of channel width to 100 feet Modification of local cooperation requirements imposed by the Act of July 25, 1912 A channel 25 feet deep with present widths from the ocean to Biscayne Bay, thence 200 feet wide across the bay to but not including the municipal turning basin, and extension of both jetties A channel width of 300 feet across the bay and enlarging the municipal turning basin, with expenditures thereon limited to $200,000 A depth of 30 feet from the ocean to and in the turning basin, with the existing authorized project widths, including the 300-foot width in the channel across the bay Extending the turning basin 200 feet to the southward The Virginia Key improvement For incorporation of the project for Miami River in that for Miami Harbor, the widening at the mouth of Miami River to existing project widths; the channels from the mouth of Miami River to the turning basin and to Government Cut; and the channel from Miami River to the harbor of refuge, provided that local interest contribute one-third of the cost Deletion of Virginia Key development and the Dinner Key approach channel, widening the existing ship channel by easing the ocean bend and increasing the width of the 300-foot-wide section to 400 feet, enlarging the existing turning basin 300 feet along both the south and northeasterly sides, and dredging a turning basin along the north side of Fisher Island about 39 acres in extent and 30 feet in depth Enlarging existing entrance channel to 38 x 500 feet, deepening existing 400-foot-wide channel across Biscayne Bay to 36 feet; deepening existing turning basins at Biscayne Blvd. terminal and Fisher Island to 36 feet NEW PASS, SARASOTA, FLA. (See Section 19 of Text) 10- x 150-foot entrance channel; 8- x 100-foot inner channels; and 8-footdeep turning basins at Payne Terminal and City Pier OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FLA. (See Section 20 of Text) Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from R&H appropriations New lock and weir structure in St. Lucie Canal Deepening to 8 feet from Ft. Myers to Jacksonville-Miami waterway near Stuart via channel across lake from Clewiston Channel to yacht basin at Ft. Myers and a basin at Stuart Deepening to 8 feet from Ft. Myers to Jacksonville-Miami waterway near Stuart via channel across lake from Clewiston Channel to yacht basin at Ft. Myers and a basin at Stuart Specified in Act S.Doc. 95, 72d Cong., 1st sess. and specified in Act H.Doc. 622, 56th Cong., 1st sess. (Annual Report 1900, p. 1987) Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 516, 67th Cong., 4th sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Sen. Comm. Print. 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 86, 74th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 251, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 91, 79th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 71, 85th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 93, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 696, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 76, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 696, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 76, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 9-38 TABLE 9-B IContined) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Auth. by Chief of Engineers November 5, 1968, under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act September 19, 1890 March 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 July 27, 1916 PARA June 26, 1934 March 13, 1934 December 10, 1934 August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 October 27, 1965 March 3, 1925 August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 H.R. September 23, 1976 S.R. October 1, 1976 Enlarge existing 8- x 90-foot section of Okeechobee Waterway for about 5 miles upstream from Ft. Myers to 10 x 100 feet OKLAWAHA RIVER, FLA. (See Section 21 of Text) Clearing obstructions for channel 4 feet deep from mouth to Leesburg Channel 6 feet deep from mouth to head of Silver Springs Run Maintenance of levels in the lakes at head of river Acceptance of certain artificial waterways in lieu of portions of natural river bed Operation and care of lock and dam provided for with funds from appropriations for rivers and harbors PALM BEACH HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 22 of Text) Maintenance of improvement previously constructed by local interests Deepening the channels and turning basin, as constructed by local interests, to 20 feet Authorized the work previously approved by Public Works Administration, and widening the channels to existing project dimensions, enlarging the 700-foot-square turning basin eastward removing the obstructive point on south side of the inlet, revetting the banks of the inlet, and restoring existing jetties Deepening the channels and turning basin to 25 feet Extending the turning basin 550 feet southward over a 900-foot width, with a flare to the east; provided that local interests may be reimbursed not to exceed $305,000 for work done by them on this modification subsequent to July 1, 1949 An entrance channel 35 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 0.8 mile long, merging with an inner channel 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 0.3 mile long, thence flaring into a turning basin, 1,400 feet north-south by a minimum of 1,200 feet east-west PONCE DE LEON INLET, FLA. (See Section 23 of Text) Widening and deepening channels; jetties on north and south side of inlet; a weir in the north jetty and an impoundment basin inside the weir PONCE HARBOR, P.R. (See Section 24 of Text) Dredging 3 continuous areas, aggregating 153 acres, to depths of 30, 18, and 9 feet, and construction of a seawall, costs to be shared by U.S. and local interests Modified conditions of local cooperation to provide that U.S. undertake all dredging at Federal expense and return local funds previously contributed for dredging, all other portions of the improvement hereafter to be at the expense of local interests Eliminate previously authorized 9-foot dredging area, and provided for dredging 30-foot-depth area and 18 acres off the municipal pier and for construction of the breakwater off Punta Carenero Eliminate previously authorized 18-foot and a portion of the 30-foot project outside the proposed 36-foot and a portion of the adjacent to the municipal bulkhead. Channel 36 x 600 feet from Caribbean Sea to harbor; channel 36 x 400 feet into harbor; and a 36-foot turning basin. Annual Report 1889, p. 1360 H.Doc. 782, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Acts Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 185, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Recommended by Chief of Engineers to Public Works Administration October 17, 1934 H.Doc. 185. 73d Cong., 2d sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 42, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 530, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 705, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 283, 86th Cong., 1st sess. (contains latest published map) H.Doc. 74, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 532, 67th Cong., 4th sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 18, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 745, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 532, 94th Cong., 2d sess. 9-39 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 9-B (Contined) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 H.R. May 9, 1974 S.R. May 31, 1974 March 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 March 3, 1905 June 20, 1938 May 17, 1950 March 3, 1899 March 2, 1919 June 14, 1880 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 March 2, 1945 November 7, 1966 PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 25 of Text) Maintenance of harbor constructed by local interests Enlarge entrance channel and complete turning basin to 1,200 feet square Widen turning basin 350 feet on north side Widen turning basin 200 feet on north side, 500 feet on south side and enlarge flare at entrance channel Deepen and widen entrance channel on a new alinement and increase turning basin in size and depth Deepen and widen entrance channel, enlarge turning basin, widen Pier 7 channel, maintenance of Berth 18 channel, and planning for a south jetty fishing walkway with construction contingent upon need as developed by detailed postauthorization studies REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA (See Section 26 of Text) Construction and operation of a suitable vessel and use of log booms for removal of water hyacinths in the navigable waters of the State Extermination and removal of water hyacinths by any mechanical, chemical, or other means Prohibits use of any chemical process injurious to cattle ST. AUGUSTINE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 27 of Text) Channel 27 x 200 feet protected by a groin Channel 16 x 200 feet across bar, and thence 12 feet deep to Intracoastal Waterway; jetty on south side of inlet; future landward extension of groin and jetty; and channel 10 x 100 feet in San Sebastian River ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA., JACKSONVILLE TO LAKE HARNEY (See Section 28 of Text) A channel 13 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Jacksonville to Palatka The improvement of Deep Creek Two jetties at Volusia Bar (Maintenance only; new work completed under previous project.) A channel 100 feet wide, 8 feet deep from Palatka to Sanford with a side channel to Enterprise, and thence 5 feet deep to Lake Harney Cutoffs at Butcher Bend, Shake Creek, and Starks Landing, and easing bends at other points A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Palatka to Sanford, with a side channel to Enterprise and with cutoffs and easing of bends Combining the two projects above into a single project for St. Johns River, Fla., Jacksonville to Lake Harney, and for a cutoff 5 feet deep and 75 feet wide between Lake Monroe and the vicinity of Osteen Bridge (Woodruff Creek Cutoff) A channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Palatka to Sanford, and in the branch to Enterprise ST. LUCIE INLET, FLA. (See Section 29 of Text) Channel 10 x 200 feet Modification to maintain existing channel 6 x 100 feet H.Doc. 357, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 545, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 768, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 346, 85th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 144, 93d. Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report 1899 Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 555, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 133, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 523, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report for 1989, p. 1343 H.Doc. 699, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report for 1879, pp. 795-798 H.Doc. 1111, 60th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 691, 69th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 603, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 445, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 208, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 391, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 508, 89th Cong., 2d sess. 9-40 TABLE 9-B (Contined) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents H.R. May 9, 1974 S.R. May 31, 1974 Def. Act of March 4, 1929 July 3, 1930 August 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 August 8, 1917 September 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 October 17, 1940 March 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 August 4, 1976 March 3, 1899 March 3, 1905 Extending north jetty and modifying existing jetty to provide a sand bypass weir section; excavation of sand impoundment basin; construction of south jetty with walkway for recreational fishing; channel 10 x 500 feet thru bar cut, tapering to 150 feet thru the inlet, and 100 feet and 7 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway:; and transfer of 380,000 cubic yards of material to the south beach during each two-year maintenance period ST. PETERSBURG HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 30 of Text) Dredging Point Pinellas Channel 16 x 200 feet Channel 19 x 250 feet westward from Tampa Bay into and including the basin at the port of St. Petersburg Channel 20 x 200 feet leading southward from previous authorization to Tampa Bay Entrance channel 24 x 300 feet from Tampa Bay to and including a 12-foot basin in Bayboro Harbor; Maritime Service channel 15 x 100 x 300 feet; channel 12 x 75 x 300 feet in mouth of Salt Creek SAN JUAN HARBOR, P.R. (See Section 31 of Text) Anchorage (inner harbor) area of 206 acres and San Antonio Channel to 30-foot depth Substitution of a 68-acre area 30 feet deep along southeasterly side of anchorage area, for one 25 acres in extent and of same depth extending easterly from eastern end of the San Antonio project channel Modified condition of local cooperation Entrance channel across outer bar 38 feet deep and 800 feet wide, and thence across bay to anchorage area (Anegado Reach Channel) 30 feet deep and 700 feet wide and increasing anchorage area to 239 acres to 30-foot depth Widening Anegado Reach Channel and increasing anchorage area to 329 acres Removal to 8-foot depth of Anegado, Largo, and Capitanejo Shoals, and dredging to 30-foot depth the entrance channel and turning basin to the Graving Dock Maintenance of the 30-foot depth entrance channel and turning basin to the Army Terminal Deepening portions of entrance and approach channels and basins to Army Terminal and San Antonio Pier areas to 35-45 feet; new 32-foot depth Puerto Nuevo Channel; new 36-foot depth anchorage A bar channel 48 by 800 feet, shifting the centerline 350 feet west; deepening Anegado Channel in steps from 46 to 40 feet while reducing width to 800 feet; deepening Army Terminal Channel and turning basin to 40 feet while widening the channel to 450 feet; deepening Puerto Nuevo Channel to 40 feet and widening it to 400 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel to 40 feet at existing 400-foot width; deepening San Antonio Channel to 38 feet at varying widths, minimum of 500 feet; deepening cruise ship basin to 36 feet at an irregular width; maintaining Sabana Approach Channel at 30 by 250 feet; provide a 38-foot depth in Anchorage Area "E" with irregular width; six mooring dolphins for vessels using the area. TAMPA HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 32 of Text) TAMPA BAY For a channel 27 feet deep from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Tampa, 500 feet wide across the bar and 300 feet wide in the bay For a channel depth of 26 feet with sufficient width from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Tampa H.Doc. 294, 93rd Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act S.Doc. 229, 70th Cong., 2d sess. R.& H. Committee Doc. 71, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 70, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 865, 63d Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 45, 71st Cong., 2d sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 38, 74th Cong., 1st sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 42, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 364, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 38, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 574, 94th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 52, 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Also printed in Annual Report 1899, p. 1640) Channel dimensions specified in Act Specified in Act 9-41 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 9-B (Contined) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 25, 1910 August 8, 1917 March 3, 1899 September 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 Do. March 2, 1945 Do. Do. May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 October 23, 1962 December 31, 1970 Do. Do. TAMPA AND HILLSBOROUGH BAYS For a depth of 24 feet in Hillsborough Bay For a 27-foot depth from Gulf of Mexico up to and in the several channels of Hillsborough Bay, the widths to be 500 feet on the bar, 300 feet in Tampa Bay, Ybor, and Garrison Channels, and 200 feet in Hillsborough Bay, Sparkman, and Seddon Channels, with turning basins at the mouth of Hillsborough and at Ybor Estuary HILLSBOROUGH RIVER For a 12-foot channel to within 100 feet of the Lafayette St. highway bridge (maintenance only; new work completed under a previous project under the title Improving Hillsborough Bay, Fla.) TAMPA HARBOR Consolidation of the above projects to form a single project for Tampa Harbor Increasing the depth of Egmont Channel to 29 feet and the width of Sparkman Channel to 300 feet For a depth of 32 feet and a width of 600 feet on Egmont Bar, a depth of 30 feet and a width of 400 feet in Mullet Key Cut, and a depth of 30 feet and a width of 300 feet in all other project channels in Tampa Harbor (except in Hillsborough River and in the channel leading to Alafia River); and for a turning basin 2,000 feet long and 500 feet in maximum width at the entrance to the Port Tampa terminals For widening the bend between Sparkman Channel and Cut D of Hillsborough Bay Channel by 250 feet; widening Ybor Channel to 400 feet and extending the turning basin at the west end of Garrison Channel (mouth of Hillsborough River) easterly for 300 feet For construction of a breakwater at Peter 0. Knight Field, Davis Islands, its maintenance to be assumed by local interest For widening Sparkman Channel to 400 feet and Ybor Channel to 500 feet; widening the bend between Sparkman and Garrison Channels an additional 250 feet to extend the turning basin westerly; and widening the bend between Seddon and Garrison Channels by 150 feet (in lieu of 300 feet previously authorized) to extend the turning basin easterly For a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide in the Hillsborough River for about 2.4 miles above the upper end of the existing 12-foot channel, and for the removal of obstructions thence to the Florida Avenue Bridge For a channel 25 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Hillsborough Bay channel to and including a turning basin in,the Alafia River (Revoked by Act of May 17, 1950) For deepening Egmont Channel to 36 feet; enlarging Mullet Key Cut, Tampa Bay Channel, Hillsborough Bay Channel, Port Tampa Channel and Port Tampa turning basin to present project dimensions; deepening Sparkman Channel and Ybor turning basin to 34 feet; a channel 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Hillsborough Bay Channel to and including a turning basin in Alafia River, 700 feet wide and 1,200 feet long (in lieu of the improvement previously authorized); and substantial widening at entrance,, bends, and turns Extended removal of obstructions in Hillsborough River to City Water Works Dam. Maintenance of cleared channel to be assumed by local interests Channel and turning basin at Port Sutton 30 feet deep, Ybor Channel 34 x 400 feet For federal maintenance of Port Sutton Channel, 280 feet wide and an irregularly shaped turning basin both to a depth of 34 feet Enlarge entrance channel across Egmnont Bar to 46 x 700 feet from the Gulf to Mullet Key Enlarge Mullet IKey Cut Channel to 44 x 600 feet H.Doc. 634, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 634, 61st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 545, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1898, pp. 1357-1360 Specified in Act H.Doc. 100, 70th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 22, 72d Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 164, 75th Cong., 3d sess. Sen. Comm. Print. 76th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 183, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 119, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 16, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 258, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 567, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 529, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 150, 91st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 401, 91st Cong., 2d sess. Do. 9-42 TABLE 9-B (Contined) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS August 13, 1968 October 27, 1965 August 13, 1968 October 27, 1965 December 19, 1979 By Chief of Engineers under section 103 of the 1962 River and Harbor Act October 27, 1965 BREVARD COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 36 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection project BROWARD COUNTY, FLA., BEACH EROSION CONTROL AND HILLSBORO INLET, FLA., NAVIGATION PROJECT (See Section 37 of Text) Improvement for beach erosion control in Broward County, Fla. and a combined beach erosion and navigation improvement to Hillsborough Inlet and the shore south thereof to Port Everglades DADE COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 38 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection and hurricane-flood control project DUVAL COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 39 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection project EL TUQUE BEACH, PONCE, P. R. (See Section 40 of Text) Placement of about 60,000 cubic yards of fill material along eroded shoreline. Build a shore connected rubble breakwater and offshore breakwater to stabilize the fill material FORT PIERCE, FLA. (See Section 41 of Text) Federal participation in cost of local shore protection projects H.Doc. 352, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 91, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 335, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 273, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 84, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 9-43 Enlarge Tampa Bay Channel to 44 x 500 feet from Mullet Key Cut through Tampa Bay to the junction of Hillsborough Bay and Port Tampa Channels Enlarge Hillsborough Bay Channel to 44 x 500 feet from the junction with Tampa Bay and Port Tampa Channels to the junction with Port Sutton entrance channel, and thence deepening to a depth of 42 feet at the existing width of 400 feet to the junction with Seddon and Sparkman Channels Enlarge Port Sutton entrance channel to 44 x 400 feet Enlarge Port Sutton turning basin to a depth of 44 feet and a turning diameter of 1,200 feet Deepening Sparkman Channel to 42 x 400 feet Deepening Ybor Channel to 40 x 300 feet Enlarge turning basin at the entrance to Ybor Channel to a depth of 42 feet and an additional width of 200 feet on the southwest edge of the present basin Deepening Port Tampa Channel to 42 feet at its existing width from the junction with Hillsborough and Tampa Bay Channels to the turning basin. Deepening the Port Tampa turning basin to 42 feet over its existing length of 2,000 feet and width of 900 feet An entrance channel in East Bay 44 x 400 feet and 500 feet north from the Port Sutton turning basin for a distance of about 2,000 feet A turning basin in East Bay at a depth of 44 feet and with a turning diameter of 1,200 feet An approach channel in East Bay 44 x 300 feet north from the East Bay turning basin for a distance of about 2,500 feet Maintenance of Port Sutton Terminal channel to 44 x 200 feet for a distance of 4,000 feet Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. TABLE 9-B (Contined) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents S.R. May 31, 1974 H.R. November 20, 1975 October 23, 1962 November 7, 1966 September 4, 1979 By Chief of Engineers under Section 103 of the 1962 River and Harbor Act FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS June 30, 1948 September 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 October 23, 1962 Do. Do. Do. Do. October 27, 1965 Do. August 13, 1968 Do. Approved December 17, 1970 under the provisions of Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 MANATEE COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 42 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection project PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLA., FROM MARTIN COUNTY LINE TO LAKE WORTH INLET AND FROM SOUTH LAKE WORTH INLET TO BRO WARD COUNTY LINE (See Section 43 of Text) Federal participation in cost of local shore protection project and sand-transfer plant PINELLAS COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 44 of Text) Fe.deral participation in cost of shore protection project PUNTA SALINAS RECREATION AREA, P.R. (See Section 45 of Text) Shore restoration of the east and west shores of the Punta Salinas Recreation Area CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA (See Section 48 of Text) First phase of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes Modification and expansion of authorization to include entire comprehensive plan of improvement Canals, levees, and water-control and drainage structures in the Nicodemus Slough area, Glades County Flood protection on Boggy Creek, near Orlando Flood protection in the Cutler Drain area, near Miami Flood control and drainage works for South Dade County Project for Shingle Creek between Clear Lake and Lake Tohopekaliga for flood control and major drainage, including development of Reedy Creek Swamp Improvement of easterly section of West Palm Beach Canal for flood control and major drainage Primary works for flood control and major drainage in southwest Dade County Primary works for flood control and major drainage in Hendry County Gravity drainage in Martin County and distribution of available water supplies to portions of Martin and St. Lucie Counties Improvement of supply, distribution, and conservation of water resources in Central and Southern Florida, including Lake Okeechobee agricultural area, Everglades National Park and other related areas. Navigation improvements suitable for recreational craft S.Doc. 93, 37th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 164, 87th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 519, 89th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 643, 80th Cong., 2d sess. (Contains latest published map) H.Doc. 643, 80th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 53, 86th Cong. 1st sess. S.Doc. 125, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 123, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 138, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 139, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 146, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 20, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 102, 88th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 101, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 369, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 394, 91st Cong., 2d sess. 9-44 TABLE 9-B (Contin Acts October 23, 1962 December 31, 1970 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT ed) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLA. (See Section 49 of Text) Control of floods and improvement of drainage, and for water conservation through construction of necessary canals, levees, reservoirs, and control structures PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, P.R. (See Section 50 of Text) LAGO de CERRILLOS, P.R. Multiple purpose dam and lake for flood control, water supply, and recreation LAGO de PORTUGUES, P.R. Multiple purpose dam and lake for flood control, water supply and recreation PONCE, P.R. Diversion and enlargement of existing channels through Ponce for flood control Documents H.Doc. 585, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 422, 91st Cong., 2d sess. 9-45 TABLE 9-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 CANAVERAL HARBOR, FLA. PROJECT DATA RELATIVE TO LOCK (See Section 3 of Text) Distance to nearest town 9.9 miles via 12-foot barge canal and Intracoastal Waterway Name of nearest town Cocoa, Fla. Distance from Intracoastal Waterway 6.5 miles Lock Dimensions 90' wide; 600' long' Lift Varies with tide Depth of sills (mlw, ocean) 14 feet Character of foundation Piles in sand Year completed and opened to navigation 1965 Contract cost $2,966,539 56 x 400 feet authorized. At request of NASA lock was increased width. Operation and maintenance of lock is a Federal constructed 90 feet wide with NASA bearing additional cost responsibility. ($700,000). Length increased to 600 feet to be compatible with TABLE 9-D CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL PROJECT LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 7 of Text) R. N. Henry H. Buckman Eureka Lock Bert Dosh Dunnellon Inglis Lock Lock and Dam Lock Lock and Dam Nearest town Palatka, Sparr, Ocala, Dunnellon, Inglis, (miles) 11.2 15.8 8.9 2.5 3.2 Miles from Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway 90.4 111.4 127.7 156.5 168.6 Lock dimensions (ft.)' 84 x 600 84 x 600 84 x 600 84 x 600 84 x 600 Normal lift (ft.) 20 20 0-154 12-274 28 Depth over sills at normal pool levels: Upper (ft.) 14 17 16-312 16-312 18 Lower (ft.) 15 14 16 18 15 Character of Piles in Piles in Piles in Rock Rock foundation sand sand sand Kind of dam Movable Movable None None Movable Type const. Earth3 Earth3 - - Earth' Percent complete 100 100 0 0 100 Estimated contract cost $6,094,000 $7,975,000 $7,430,000 $9,500,000 $7,800,000 'Clear width and greatest available length. 2Pool level varies with natural ground water profile from minimum elevation of 40 feet to maximum elevation of 55 feet. 3With concrete spillway and movable gates. 9-46 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-E CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 8 of Text) Work Performed Cost New Work: Engineering and Design $ 1,655 Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of communications network 17,640 Removal of debris, mosquitoes, and aquatic plant life from reservoirs 95,620 Analysis of hydrologic and meteorologic data for scheduling releases from Lake Ocklawaha and Inglis Bypass 16,989 Reimbursement to USGS for cooperative stream gauging 19,740 Water quality surveillance 62,585 Maintenance of tools and permanent equipment 62,379 Maintenance of canal and dam slopes and berms 187,203 Maintenance of dams 10,198 Collection for quarters - 2,353 Income from recreation fees - 2,005 Clearing and snagging, Lake Ocklawaha 27,516 Real Estate 10,811 Condition and operation studies 54,796 Engineering and design 59,788 Supervision and Administration 75,475 Maintenance of roads 8,673 Trash removal 58 Sub-Total 705,113 Operation and care: Inglis Eureka and Buckman Locks, Rodman Dam Inglis Dam and Spillway, Inglis Bypass and Spillway, and buildings and grounds, and recreational facilities maintained by hired labor 671,643 Buildings and grounds maintained by contract 16,709 Sanitary facilities at recreation areas 13,982 Sub-Total 702,334 Total 1,407,447 9-47 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 9-F OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 20 of Text) Work Performed Cost New Work: Contract for recreation facilities @ W.P. Franklin and Moore Haven Locks $ 8,949 Supervision and administration 9,857 Total applied cost 18,805 Maintenance: District communications network 33,705 Repair and replacement of project signs 11,243 Snagging and clearing 148,285 Operation and maintenance of recreation facilities 145,330 Natural resource facilities 7,109 Collection for Quarters - 11,684 Service and maintain traffic counters 9,821 Repair electical system, St. Lucie Lock 471,920 Real Estate 73,271 Reevaluate and update master plan 5,356 Condition and operation studies 52,828 Contract Maintenance of Locks 74,329 Dredging, St. Lucie Inlet 57,644 Engineering and design 27,746 Supervision and administration 94,635 Hired labor surveys, inspections, and reports 7,892 Total applied cost 1,209,430 Operation and care: Hired labor cost of operating Moore Haven, Ortona and St. Lucie Locks and maintenance of structures and grounds 583,390 9-48 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-G REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA CONTROL OPERATIONS (See Section 26 of Text) Locality Acres Controlled Cost St. John's River and tributaries and Withlacoohee, Kissimmee and Crystal Rivers 18,579 $1,711,508 Okeechobee Waterway and tributaries 3,448 284,466 White Amur study 325,000 Acquisition and maintenance of airboats, engines, and work tools 19,373 Misc. Hired Labor Surveys and Equipment 49,704 Operation of communications network 11,606 Engineering design 110,079 Supervision and Administration 57,713 Total 22,027 2,569,449 TABLE 9-H NAVIGATION PROJECTS ON WHICH RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS ONLY WERE CONDUCTED DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 33 of Text) Date Cost Incurred Survey During Project Conducted Period' Anclote River. Fla. March 1981 $ 997 Arecibo Harbor, P.R. March 1981 153' Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns River, Fla. June 1982 59,635' Cedar Keys Harbor, Fla. April 1981 2,016 Christiansted Harbor, V.I. June 1978 1150 Clearwater Pass, Fla. May 1982 12,827 Crystal River, Fla. May 1982 1,452 Eau Gallie Harbor, Fla. October 1981 3,860 Everglades Harbor, Fla. October 1981 2,063' Fort Myers Beach, Fla. August 1981 229' Fort Pierce Harbor February 1982 7,262' Homosassa River, Fla. June 1982 811 Horseshoe Cove, Fla. September 1981 115 Intracoastal Waterway, Miami to Key West May 1981 376' Key West Harbor, Fla. August 1981 2,134 Kissimmee River, Fla. March 1981 10,222 Largo Sound Channel, Fla. June 1982 1,586 Manatee River May 1982 5,061 Mayaguez Harbor, P.R. August 1982 2,205' Melbourne Harbor, Fla. March 1981 157 Miami Harbor, Fla July 1982 32,663' Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, Fla. November 1980 1,837' New River, Fla. August 1981 2,131 Orange River April 1982 830 Ozona, Fla. May 1982 133 Pass-A-Grille Pass, Fla. July 1982 5,154 Pithlachascotee River, Fla. May 1982 428 Ponce de Leon Inlet, Fla. November 1981 47,084' Port Everglades Harbor, Fla. November 1981 11' Rice Creek, Fla. May 1982 2,625 St. Augustine Harbor, Fla. June 1982 24.431' St. Lucie Inlet, Fla. April 1982 7,262' St. Johns River, Jacksonville to Lake Harvey, Fla. October 1981 17,329' St. Petersburg Harbor, Fla. June 1982 4,769' Steinhatchee River, Fla. July 1982 1,671 Suwannee River, Fla. March 1980 208 Withlacoochee River, Fla. March 1981 214 Architect - Engineer Contracts 105,205 Supervision and Administration 211 'Costs of surveys included with maintenance costs under Section "Other authorized Navigation Projects." 9-49 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 34 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1982 Full Report See annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Anclote River, Fla. 1974 267,427 591,161 Aquatic Plant Control, Fla. (R&H Acts of 1958 & 1962) 1968 2,619,7002 Atlantic Gulf Ship Canal, Fla. 1939 5,099,153 Bakers Haulover Inlet. Fla.' 1965 243,2353 31,182 Bayport, Fla' 1972 58,495- Cedar Keys Harbor, Fla 1977 168,5696 49,327 Christiansted Harbor. St. Croix. V.I., 7 1964 303,317 38,891 Clearwater Pass, Fla.21 1980 46,349 1,179,484 Courtenay Channel, Fla.' 1940 22,846 18,254 Crystal River, Fla.' 1941 25,000 90,899 Eau Gallie Harbor, Fla.' 1970 9,627 67,530 Everglades Harbor, Fla.' 1964 221,5098 49,106 Fajardo Harbor, P.R.4 1945 Guayanes Harbor, P.R.4 1945 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway St. Marks to Tampa Bay, Fla. 1974 38,850 Homosassa River, Fla.' 1937 3,9999 10,590 Horseshoe Cove, Fla. 1977 347,521 122,847 Hudson River, Fla.3 1974 9,889 Intracoastal Waterway, Miami to Key West, Fla.3 1963 243,079 15,122 Key West Harbor, Fla.' 1972 1,548,892" 471,492 Kissimmee River, Fla.' 1931 23,479 49,294 Lake Crescent and Dunns Creek, Fla.9 , " 1931 10,276 8,166 Largo Sound Channel, Fla. 1, 12, 16 1966 117,44313 41,340 Little Manatee River, Fla. 4, 1 1949 11,903 - Manatee River, Fla." 1970 123,350 181,871 Melbourne Harbor, Fla.' 1970 17,696 60,832 New River Fla.' 1956 36,518 22,810 Orange River, Fla.' 1962 2,000 23,567 Ozona, Fla., channel and turning basin' 1963 105,527 14,783 Palm Beach, Fla., side channel and basin4 1946 Pass-A-Grille Pass, Fla.1, '1 1966 41,2971' 50,530 Pithlachascotee River, Fla. 1973 400,000"7 253,516 Rice Creek, Fla.' 1957 85,208's 17,777 St. Thomas Harbor. V.I.4 1949 1,989 Steinhatchee River, Fla.' 1940 135,053 40,456 Suwannee River, Fla." 1977 76,41819 195,959 Withlacoochee River, Fla." 1969 614,91220 365,858 1. Complete. 2. Excludes $918,205 contributed funds. 3. Excludes $243,235 for contributed funds. 4. Inactive. 5. Includes $41,222 for reconnaissance and detailed project reports under Section 107 of the R&H'Act of 1960. 6. Includes $82,500 expended under previous project. Excludes $1,473 contributed funds. 7. Project as modified by Chief of Engineers in report of June 30, 1961, is complete. Previously authorized depth of 25 feet in inactive status. 8. Excludes $36,000 contributed funds. 9. In addition, $1,000 expended from contributed funds. 10. Includes $27,500 for new work under previous project. Excludes $35,371 contributed funds. 11. Deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. 12. Authorized April 20, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 R&H Act. 13. Includes $25,008 for detailed project report but excludes $86,716 expended from contributed funds. 14. Expended on restudy. 15. Authorized November 19, 1964 by Chef of Engineers under Sections 107 of R&H Act of 1960. 16. Excludes $41,296 contributed funds. 17. Excludes $215,728 contributed funds. 18. Excludes $93,000 contributed funds. 19. Includes $10,154 expended under previous project. 20. Includes $30,000 expended under previous project. 21. Balance of $61 from prior year and transfer has been made during FY 1981. 9-50 TABLE 9-I JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS (See Section 46 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1982 Full Report See annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Cape Florida State Park 1969 34,862' Key West, Fla. 1963 96,3402 3,794 Lee County, Fla. 1971 - - Lido Key, Fla. 1971 - Mullet Key, Fla. 1973 436,2013 1,656 Palm Beach County, Fla., from Lake Worth Inlet to South Lake Worth Inlet 1970 195,140' 6,257 San Juan, Puerto Rico 1965 - - Virginia Key and Key Biscayne, Fla. 1978 1,667,2205 1,022 1. Includes $2,462 cost of reconnaissance and detailed project 4. Excludes $781,188 in property or services furnished by reports but excludes $13,818 contributed funds. local interests in lieu of cash contribution. 2. Excludes $192,168 contributed funds. 5. Excludes $714,522 contributed funds. 3. Excludes $187,133 contributed funds. TABLE 9-K CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF HURRICANE GATES (See Section 48 of Text) Depth Character Over of Year Gate' Nearest Town Distance Sills Founda- Cornm- Actual No. Name Imiles) (ft.) tion pleted Cost 2. Clewiston, Fla. 0.5 10 Pile 1935 $309,748 3. Lake Harbor, Fla. 0.5 10 Rock 1935 316,938 4. Belle Glade, Fla. 4.0 10 Rock 1935 350,025 5. Canal Point, Fla. 0.0 10 Rock 1935 262,465 6. Okeechobee, Fla. 0.5 7 Pile 1936 373,273 'All are 50 feet wide with available length unlimited. They are constructed of concrete with steel sector gates and have no lift. Gate No. 6 has an auxiliary culvert spillway with automatic control. Moore Haven Lock serves as Hurricane Gate Structure 1. 9-51 TABLE 9-J TABLE 9-L CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 48 of Text) Miles Elevation From Lock Normal of Normal Character Kind Kind Nearest Nearest Dimensions lift Pool Depth of of of of Percent Contract Town Town (ft.) (ft.) surface (ft.) sills (ft.) foundation Dam Construction Complete Cost W.P. Franklin Lock and Dam' S-65 Lock S-65A Lock S-65B Lock S-65C Lock S-65D Lock S-65E Lock eo a Moore Haven Lock (HGS-1 Mod.) S-310 HGS-2 Mod.) S-193 HGS-6 Mod. S-308B S-57 S-58 S-59 S-60 S-61 S-62 S-63 S-63A S-96 S-96A S-53 S-55 S-157 S-158 At Olga Frostproof Avon Park Sebring Sebring Okeechobee Okeechobee Hoore Haven Clewiston Okeechobee Pahokee Ashton Ashton Kissimmee Ashton St. Cloud Ashton Ashton Ashton Sebastian Sebastian Eau Gallie Christmas Sebastian Titusville 0 56 x 400 2.5 23 30 x 90 4.2 26 30 x 90 6.3 20 30 x 90 6.0 25 30 x 90 7.2 14 30 x 90 5.8 10 30 x 90 4.6 0.5 50 x 250 9.4 0.5 50 x 60 5.0 0.5 50 x 60 7.5 11 56 x 400 4.0 9 20 x 90 1.0 5 20 x 90 2.0 6 20 x 90 3.0 6 20 x 90 2.0 6 30 x 90 2.0 10 20 x 90 3.0 12 20 x 90 5.0 14 20 x 90 4.5 14 20 x 60 4.0 16 20 x 60 7.5 8 20 x 60 3.5 12 20 x 60 10.0 4 20 x 60 20.0 15 20 x 60 4.5 3.0 14 Piles in clay 48.5-52.33 6 Earth foundation, sand 46.3 6 Earth foundation, sand 40.0 6 Earth foundation, sand 34.0 6 Earth foundation, sand 26.8 6 Earth foundation, sand 21.0 6 Earth foundation, sand 15.5-17.53 11 Piles in sand 15.5-17.53 12.9 Slab on sand 15.5-17.53 7.5 Piles in sand and slab on sand 15.5-17.53 18 Slab on sand 62.0 6 Earth foundation, sand 64.0 6 Do. 58.0 6 Do. 64.0 6 Do. 55.0 6 Do. 61.0 6 Do. 62.0 6 Do. 57.0 6 Do. 24.0 6 Do. 25.0 6 Do. 17.5 6 Do. 14.0 6 Do. 20.0 6 Do. 4.0 6 Do. Movable Reinforced concrete None Reinforced concrete rigid frame None Reinforced concrete rigid frame None Reinforced concrete rigid frame None Reinforced concrete rigid frame None Reinforced concrete rigid frame None Reinforced concrete None Steel sheet pile lockwalls None Reinforced concrete None Reinforced concrete Fixed Reinforced concrete None Concrete and steel sheet pile None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. 'Operation and care of W.P. Franklin Lock and Dam (S-79) is a Federal responsibility. 3The normal pool level varies seasonally between the two elevations. 2Estimated. 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 0 100 0 100 0 000 100 00 0 0 00000 $3,803,655 $1,191,574.70 $1,513,693.91 $1,050,600.69 $1,326,073.12 $1,213,248.51 $1,320,039.84 $301,0002 $3,448,406 $427,3002 $8,308,700 $1,632,0002 $1,632,0002 $1,632,0002 $1,632,0002 $689,217 $1,632,0002 $1,632,0002 $1,598,0002 $1,431,0002 $1,362,0002 $1,322,0002 $1,355,0002 $1,723,0002 $1,558,0002 0 0 O A tE 0 ztFl C .c, zC N JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-M CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT LOCAL COOPERATION (See Section 48 of Text) Flood Control Act Work Authorized �/o Cash Contributions' June 30, 1948 First phase of comprehensive plan 15.0 Sept. 3, 1954 Second phase of comprehensive plan 20.0 July 14, 1960 Nicodemus Slough area 31.5 Oct. 23, 1962 West Palm Beach Canal 12.8 Boggy Creek Basin 29.7 Shingle Creek Basin 25.9 South Dade County area 19.2 Reedy Creek Swamp 50.0 Oct. 27, 1965 Southwest Dade County 46.0 Hendry County area 19.5 Aug. 13, 1968 Martin County Flood Control Features 34.0 Irrigation Features 49.0 Recreation Features 42.0 Water Resources 20.0 Approved Dec. 17, 1970 Navigation improvements suitable for 50.0 under Provisions of recreational craft Section 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act 'Computed on total contract cost and supervision and administration except for Reedy Creek Swamp which is computed on all costs, including engineering and design and land. 9-53 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 9-N CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 48 of Text) Work Performed Cost New Work: Construction of: Locks $ 1,553 Channels and canals 302,340 Levees 1,879,793 Floodway control and diversion structures 57,241 Building, Grounds and Utilities 717,411 Engineering and design 1,811,875 Supervision and administration 711,690 Total applied cost 5,481,902 Maintenance: Operation of district communications network 55,193 Repair or replacement of project signs 56,309 Patrol, inspections, and maintenance of Herbert Hoover Dike 536,577 Repair and stabilize crown road, Herbert Hoover Dike 74,980 Remove weed growth and replant grass on levee slopes, Herbert Hoover Dike 38,541 Rebuild and regrade levee slopes, Herbert Hoover Dike 67,630 Clean out landslide toe ditches and berms on Herbert Hoover Dike 50,601 Repair or replace culverts, Herbert Hoover Dike 24,415 Repair fences, Herbert Hoover Dike, LD-3 54,695 Recreation area, W.P. Franklin Lock 48,643 Berms, fences and shrubs on C-43 86,461 Clear debris from landslide entrance channel to all culverts, approach channels at HGS and floodway channels 6,669 Repair and riprap eroded berms, Herbert Hoover Dike 66,248 Remove trees and riprap slopes, Herbert Hoover Dike 57,549 Operations W.P. Franklin Lock and Spillway (S-79) 208,097 Operations and maintenance of spillways: St. Lucie (S-80); Moore Haven (S-77); Ortona (S-78); S-10, 11, & 12 92,646 Sandblast and paint S-77, Moore Haven Spillway 100,720 Operation of four hurricane gate structures 60,557 Operation and maintenance of 20 drainage culverts, thru levees and 16 spillways along St. Lucie Canal 6,444 Mowing grass on levee slopes Herbert Hoover Dike 195,556 Collection for quarters and damages - 6,361 Operation of Port Mayaca Lock and Spillway 203,870 Reimbursement to U.S.G.S. for cooperative stream gaging 42,920 Analysis of data for scheduling releases 211,992 Water quality studies 206,363 Real Estate Management 107 Dam Safety Studies 206,862 Service and maintain traffic counters 858 Reconnaissance Reports, Major Rehab. 202 Survey Water Data Gauges -0- Dewater, repair, sandblast and paint S-12, HGS-3 1,778 Periodic Surveys 59,621 Reevaluate and update master plan - 7,884 Performance monitoring 10,803 Maintenance of Airboat 450 Study by Waterway Experiment Station 16,257 Review of South Florida Water Management District permit applications 308 Regulatory of Lake Okeechobee and 3 construction areas Collection of data by CAO 137,991 Maintenance of hydrometeorological network 33,944 Engineering and design 34,516 Supervision and administration 170,581 Total applied cost 3,213,709 9-54 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-0 CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED UNDER EXISTING PROJECT DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 48 of Text) Date transferred to Flood Control District Construction for Operation and Feature Period Maintenance Channels and Canal: C-304 January 1980 - May 1981 Structures S-151 January 1980 - May 1981 S-339 February 1979 - December 1980 S-340 February 1979 - December 1980 Operator's Quarters (Port Mayaca) July 1981 - May 1982 TABLE 9-P CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT STATUS OF WORK UNDER CONTRACT AT END OF FISCAL YEAR (See Section 48 of Text) Construction Approx. 0/0 Feature Started Complete Channels and Canals: C-103 March 1979 99 C-51 May 1982 13 Levees: L-18 & 19 April 1980 99 L-24 & 25 January 1980 97 L-65 January 1980 99 Pumping Plants: S-331 March 1979 99 Structures: S-135 January 1980 99 S-153 January 1980 99 S-341 September 1981 86 S-155 May 1982 13 9-55 Nearest town Name of nearest town Distance above mouth of River Lock dimensions Normal lift Elevation of normal pool surface Depth of sills Character of foundation Kind of dam Type of construction Percent complete Estimated Cost (including dam and spillway) 20 miles Ocala, Fla. 65.5 miles 30 x 125 feet 18.0 feet 58 feet 12 feet Piles in sand None Reinforced concrete 100 $1,990,138 TABLE 9-R FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLORIDA PROJECT CONDITION AT END OF FISCAL YEAR (See Section 49 of Text) Date transferred to Construction Southwest Florida Feature Period for Operation and Maintenance Bridges: B-194 July 1968 - Mar. 1970 Not transferred Alteration of Facilities B-195 May 1971 - Jan. 1973 Do. B-594 Jan. 1973 - Jan. 1974 Do. Alteration of Facilities B-196 Oct. 1972 - Jan. 1975 Do. SCL RR Br., B-196 Dec. 1972 - July 1975 July 1975 Channels and Canals: C-135 May 1967 - Dec. 1968 Dec. 1968 C-135, Sec. 1A July 1966 - Aug. 1967 Oct. 1967 C-135, Sec. 1B May 1968 - Sep. 1972 Not transferred C-135, Sec. 1C & 2 Jan. 1971 - Dec. 1973 Not transferred C-135, Sec. 3A Dec. 1972 - Apr. 1975 Oct. 1977 C-135, Sec. 3B Feb. 1975 - Aug. 1977 Not transferred C-135, Sec. 4A Apr. 1976 - Jan. 1979 Not transferred C-136 Aug. 1975 - May 1977 Nov. 1977 C-231, Phase I July 1973 - Apr. 1975 Dec. 1975 C-231, Phase II July 1973 - Jan. 1974 Dec. 1975 C-331 July 1967 - Sep. 1968 Sep. 1968 C-531 Apr. 1966 - Jan. 1969 Apr. 1969 C-534 June 1970 - July 1971 Nov. 1971 C-135 March 1977 - Oct. 1980 Structures: S-160 May 1967 - Dec. 1968 Dec. 1968 S-161 Aug. 1975 - May 1977 Nov. 1977 S-162 Apr. 1975 - June 1977 Apr. 1977 S-353 July 1967 - Sep. 1968 Nov. 1968 Moss Bluff Lock and Spillway Apr. 1967 - Mar. 1969 Dec. 1975 S-551 July 1970 - Feb. 1972 Not transferred Levees: L-212, Sec. 1 June 1968 - July 1970 Dec. 1975 L-212, Sec. 2 July 1970 - Sep. 1971 Dec. 1975 L-112 March 1977 - Oct. 1980 L-112 & Floodway May 1978 - July 1981 S-155 May 1978 - July 1981 S-163 May 1978 - July 1981 S-159 Middle& Lower April 1979 - Aug. 1981 S-159 Upper June 1979 - Sep. 1981 9-56 TABLE 9-Q REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLORIDA PROJECT MOSS BLUFF LOCK (See Section 49 of Text) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-S OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 52 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Arch Creek, Dade County, Fla. 1960 $66,485' Biscayne Bay, Fla., Hurricane Protection 1966 Hilisborough Bay, Fla.2 1969 Phillippi Creek Basin, Fla.2 1966 1. Excludes $11,734 cost of preauthorization studies. Project 2. Inactive. was authorized February 20, 1959, by Chief of Engineers under 3. Includes $44,282 for reconnaissance and detailed project Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as Modified by P.L. 685, reports. 84th Congress. TABLE 9-T FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 685, (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Section 53 of Text) Study Identification Period Costs Detailed Project Report: Alligator Creek Basin, CL Fla. $ 7,500 Estate Mon Bijou, V.I. $34,769 Live Oak, Fla. 7,500 Malaria Canal, Catano, P.R. 7,500 Naguabo River, P.R. 6,382 Rio Cibuco, Vega Baja, PR. 8,649 Rio Tallaboa, P.R. 39,795 Sabana Grande, P.R. 23,418 Savan Gut-St. Thomas, V.I. 132,805 Seminole Basin, Fla. 15,805 9-57 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT* This district comprises a small portion of southeastern Tennessee, western Georgia, western Florida, all of Alabama south of Tennessee River Basin, eastern Mississippi, and a small portion of southeastern Luisiana embraced in drainage basins tributary to the Gulf of Mexico, west of Aucilla River basin, to and including the Pascagoula River Basin. The Pearl River Basin, Mississippi was included as part of the Mobile District until 1 October 1981, when responsibilities were transferred to Vicksburg District, Lower Mississippi Valley Division. A section of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from St. Marks, Florida, to lake Borgne Light No. 29, Louisiana is also within Mobile District. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Apalachicola Bay, Fla............. 10-2 2. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) ........................ 10-3 3. Bayou Coden, Ala................. 10-3 4. Bayou La Batre, Ala ............ 10-3 5. Biloxi Harbor, Miss ............. 10-4 6. Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, Ala. ...................... 10-4 7. Bon Secour, Ala. ................ 10-5 8. Cadet Bayou, Miss. .............. 10-6 9. Dauphin Island Bay, Ala. ....... 10-6 10. Dog and Fowl Rivers, Ala. ...... 10-7 11. East Pass Channel from Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, Fla. ....................... 10-7 12. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Flat and Mexican Border (Mobile District) ....................... 10-7 13. Gulfport Harbor, Miss............ 10-8 14. Mobile Harbor, Ala. .............. 10-9 15. Panama City Harbor, Fla. ......... 10-9 16. Pascagoula Harbor, Miss ......... 10-10 17. Pensacola Harbor, Fla. .......... 10-10 18. Perdido Pass Channel, Ala. ....... 10-11 19. Port St. Joe Harbor, Fla. ........ 10-11 20. Removing Water Hyacinths, Mobile District .................. 10-12 21. Waterway Connecting Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers, Ala., and Miss ......................... 10-12 22. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ......................... 10-13 23. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......................... 10-13 24. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ................... 10-13 Beach Erosion Control 25. Authorized Beach Erosion Control Project ......................... 10-13 Deauthorized Projects 26. Deauthorized Projects ........... 10-13 Flood Control 27. Okatibbee Lake, Miss ........... 10-13 28. Tallahala Creek Lake, Pascagoula River, Miss. .................. 10-13 29. Burketts Creek, Amory, Miss...................... 10-14 30. Gordons Creek, Hattiesburg, Miss. .............. 10-14 31. Houlka Creek, Chickasaw and Clay Counties, Miss........... 10-14 32. Murder Creek, East Brewton, Ala .............. 10-15 33. Tombigbee River, Miss. and Ala. ............................ 10-15 34. Tombigbee River Tributaries, Miss. and Ala ..................... 10-15 35. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................ 10-15 36. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........................ 10-16 37. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ................... 10-16 10-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 38. Alabama-Coosa Rivers, Ala., and Ga. ............................ 10-16 38A. Carters Lake, Ga. ................. 10-17 38B. Claiborne Lock and Dam, Ala. ............................ 10-17 38C. Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam, Ala .............. 10-17 38D. Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, Ala ... ......................... 10-18 38E. Coosa River Navigation .......... 10-18 39. Allatoona Lake, Coosa River Basin, Ga ........................ 10-19 40. Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, Ala., Ga., and Fla. .............. 10-19 40A. Buford Dam, Ga............... 10-20 Navigation 1. APALACHICOLA BAY, FLA. Location. The project is on the coast" of northwest Florida 160 miles east of Pensacola Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11401.) Previous project. For details, see page 1833, Annual Report for 1915, and page 689, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 10-foot depth in Apalachicola Bay, across St. George Island, to within 300 feet of the gulf shore, thence increasing uniformly in width to 200 feet at the shore and continuing with that width to the 10-foot depth in the Gulf of Mexico, with twin jetties extending from the dune line to the outer end of the channel; (b) an inner bar with a connecting channel nine feet deep and 80 feet wide through Scipio Creek to Apalachicola River; (d) a channel known as Link Channel, 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, in Apalachicola Bay; (e) a channel generally parallel to the shore at Eastpoint, Florida, six feet deep, 100 feet wide, 40B. George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, Ala. and Ga. .............. 10-21 40C. Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, Ga. and Fla. ....................... 10-21 40D. Spewrell Bluff Lake, Ga. ......... 10-22 40E. Walter F. George Lock and Dam, Ala. and Ga. ...................... 10-22 40F. West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, Ga. and Ala. ......... 10-22 41. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ............ 10-23 42. 43. General Investigations Surveys ......................... 10-23 Collection and Study of Basic Data ............................ 10-23 and about 6,000 feet long, with a connecting channel six feet deep and 100 feet wide to water at the same depth in St. George Sound; (f) a channel ten feet deep and 100 feet wide through Bulkhead Shoals, connecting Apalachicola Bay with St. George Sound; and (g) a 6-foot by 100-foot channel about one mile long, generally parallel to the shore at Two Mile, Florida, with a 6-foot by 100- foot connecting channel to water of the same depth in Apalachicola Bay. (See Table 10-B for authorized modifications of Two Mile project.) Mean range of tide throughout this harbor is 1.6 feet. Extreme range, except during storms, is about three feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of pileand- timber wharves which are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance cost amounted to $48,810. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, authorized by the 1954 River and Harbor Act, was completed in 1959, including reimbursement to local interests for approved work, as 10-2 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor Act. Improvements at Two Mile except for modifications authorized in 1975 were completed in September 1964. Construction of the breakwater and channel improvements authorized in 1975 at Two Mile were completed in September 1977. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1982 were $1,898,848 for new work and $2,139,514 for maintenance, a total of $4,038,362. 2. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (RIVER AND HARBOR ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable water, tributary streams, connecting channels and other allied waters in Mobile District. Existing project. The authorized project provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable water, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economical control measures to be administered by the Chief of Engineers, under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies. Research and planning cost prior to construction shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests shall agree to hold and save the United States free from claims that may occur from control operations and to participate to the extent of 30 percent of such operations. Requirements are being met in Alabama, Georgia, Florida and Louisiana. Operations and results duringfiscal year. Planning, engineering, design, supervision with the States of Alabama, Georgia, Florida, Louisiana and Mississippi cost $26,938. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total Federal costs under the existing project as of September 30, 1982 were $413,442. Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $21,225. 3. BAYOU CODEN, ALA. Location. The project is located in a small tidal stream on the southern coast of Mobile County, Alabama, emptying into Mississippi Sound about 7.6 miles northwest of Cedar Point, the southern tip of western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1945, page 843. Existing project. The project provides for a channel eight feet deep by 60 feet wide extending from La Belle Avenue bridge south for about 3,000 feet through the bayou to Portersville Bay, thence eight feet deep by 100 feet wide extending about 2.3 miles westward across Portersville Bay to connect with the Bayou La Batre channel, and a turning basin eight feet deep by 60 feet wide by 100 feet long on the west side of the bayou channel about 500 feet south of the La Belle Avenue bridge. Mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Small privately-owned pile-and-timber piers used in connection with fishing industry in this locality are adequate for existing commerce. A marina which will accommodate about 12 small recreational craft, and a slip with facilities for loading oyster shells are located near the mouth of the bayou, and are maintained by the Alabama Department of Conservation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Work on channels and canals cost $149,999. Surveys and miscellaneous costs amounted to $55,112. Condition at end of fiscal year. That portion of the project authorized prior to the 1969 modification was completed in 1956. Construction authorized in 1969 was initiated 31 March 1975 and completed 26 March 1976. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1982 were $325,051 for new work and $269,489 for maintenance, a total of $594,540. Contributed funds expended for new work amount to $100,000, and, $49,999 for maintenance. 4. BAYOU LA BATRE, ALA. Location. Bayou La Batre is a tidal stream about 10 miles long, emptying into Mississippi Sound on the southern coast of Mobile County, Ala., about 10 miles northwest of Cedar Point, the southern tip of the western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1945, page 844. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 12-foot by 100-foot channel from the 12-foot depth in Mississippi Sound to a point about 2,800 feet south of the highway bridge, thence a channel 12 feet deep by 75 feet wide to the bridge, an overall distance of about 33,500 feet, with the channel widened at a point 0.6 mile below the bridge to provide a turning basin 12 feet deep and about 2.6 acres in area. Mean tidal 10-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 range is 1.75 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.75 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Wooden wharves have been provided at seafood processing plants and public launching ramps are available. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed $174,772 (net) cubic yards of material from the Mississippi Sound Channel at a cost of $207,500. Condition surveys, contract adminstration, water control management and other costs amounted to $242,646. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was modified December 30, 1966 under the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers to include a turning basin. The project was completed in March 1967. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1982 were $311,095 for new work and $1,688,148 for maintenance, a total of $1,999,243. Contributed funds from local interests for new work amount to $10,500. 5. BILOXI HARBOR, MISS. Location. The project is located on Mississippi Sound in southeastern Mississippi, 32 miles by water west of Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi, and 14 miles east of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 584, Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a continuous channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 23 miles long from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Mississippi Sound east of Deer Island, Biloxi Bay, Back Bay, Cranes Neck, and a land cut to Gulfport Lake, including a 500-foot by 2,600-foot basin in the lake, thence a 12-foot deep by 100-foot wide channel for about two miles westward from the west end of the lake, terminating in a 300-foot by 500-foot basin; a 12- foot by 100-foot channel from the main channel in Big Lake to and up Bayou Bernard to the Air Force oil terminal at about mile 2.6; a 12-foot by 150-foot spur channel from the main channel in Biloxi Bay for about one mile, terminating in a 400-foot by 600-foot lateral channel westward about 2.2 miles to Biloxi's south waterfront; a 10- foot by 150-foot channel from Mississippi Sound, passing west of Deer Island to a point where it connects to the 12-foot by 150-foot lateral channel at Biloxi's south waterfront. Construction for the modifications authorized by River and Harbor Act of Nov. 7, 1966 was commenced in FY 1974 and completed in Feb. 1975. Further modifications to the project were authorized by the Chief of Engineers on 28 March 1979, which provided,for a channel 10 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 300 feet long extending northward from the Biloxi Lateral Channel, and into a rectangular basin, approximately 300 by 370 feet. Cost of modification as authorized by the 1966 River and Harbor Act was $664,390. That portion of the project providing for an entrance channel six feet deep, 50 feet wide, and about 1,800 feet long into Old Fort Bayou, as authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act, is inactive. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion was $6,000. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of wooden piling-and-timber piers for small craft and fishing boats, a bulk gasoline terminal, several boat ways, and concrete products plant are available. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies amounted to $57,265. Engineering and design and other miscellaneous costs amounted to $23,877. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, prior to the modification authorized in 1966, was commenced in 1931 and completed in 1962. This 1966 authorized modification was completed in FY 1975. The 1979 modification was completed in FY 1980. Total Federal costs under existing project as of 30 September 1982 were $1,171,054 for new work and $4,862,075 for maintenance, a total of $6,033,129. Contributed funds for new work amount to $102,600. 6. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, ALA. Location. Black Warrior River rises in northern Alabama above Birmingham and flows generally southwesterly to unite with the Tombigbee River at Demopolis, Alabama. Thence, the Tombigbee flows south, uniting with the Alabama River to form the Mobile River 45 miles above the head of Mobile Bay. Distance by water from Mobile to the vicinity of Birmingham is about 415 miles. Previous project. For details see page 732, Annual Report for 1938. Expsting project. The authorized project provides essentially for a canalized channel nine feet deep and 200 feet wide from the mouth of the Tombigbee River, 45 miles above Mobile, to the vicinity of Birmingham, via the Tombigbee and Black Warrior Rivers, to mile 430.4 on Sipsey Fork, mile 429.6 on Mulberry Fork and mile 407.8 on Locust Fork, and for maintenance by 10-4 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT snagging of Mobile River above the mouth of Chickasaw Creek, a total waterway distance of about 408 miles. The total lift of 255 feet is accomplished by six locks and dams. The original construction program, consisting of 17 dams with 18 lifts, was completed in 1915. Replacement of the original structures with new locks and dams, under the modernization program is as follows: William Bacon Oliver replaced locks 10, 11, and 12; Demopolis replaced locks 4, 5, 6, and 7; Warrior replaced locks 8 and 9; Coffeeville (Jackson) replaced locks 1, 2, and 3; and Holt replaced locks 13, 14, 15. and 16. Thus, 16 of the original locks have been replaced by five new locks. Bankhead Lock and Dam (Lock 17) is under rehabilitation to replace the original double lift lock with a single lift lock. The Jackson Lock and Dam wildlife refuge, authorized in 1960, includes 4,250 acres within the reservoir area and along its boundaries. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Tidal influence extends upstream from Mobile 101.6 miles to the old lock 1, where tidal effect is apparent only at low stages of the river. At Mobile the mean and extreme tidal ranges are 1.5 and 3.6 feet, respectively. These are at times slightly increased by the effect of winds. The greatest fluctuation of river stages is at Demopolis, Ala., the maximum being 59.7 feet. Maximum fluctuations at other points are 40 feet at lock 1,100.6 miles from Mobile; 57.8 feet at Tuscaloosa, 346.1 miles from Mobile; 13 feet at Birmingport, 404.9 miles from Mobile; and 27 feet at Cordova, 424.3 miles from Mobile. Ordinary fluctuations at these points are at old lock 1, 20 feet; at Demopolis, 35 feet; at Tuscaloosa, 40 feet; at Birmingport, four feet; and at Cordova, seven feet. Works of improvement reduced the amount of fluctuations at different points by three to 10 feet. Estimated costs (1981) of major rehabilitations at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam is $49,800,000, and cost of providing recreation facilities at completed projects (Code 710) is $1,510,000. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Docks, storage facilities, and handling equipment have been provided as required at most loading and unloading points along the waterway. These include facilities for handling petroleum and petroleum products, coal, ores, sand and gravel, pulpwood, manufactures, and various other commodities. While most terminal facilities are privately owned, many are available for use by the general public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Table 10-C for existing locks and dams.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam: Rehabilitation of lock and dam: Buildings, grounds and utilities and miscellaneous costs amounted to $26,270. Recreational facilities cost $112,032 at Demopolis Lock and Dam and $14,320 at Holt Lock and Dam. Maintenance: Contractors' dredges, T.L. James and Arkansas Valley removed 2,110,205 cubic yards of material from the river system at a cost of $2,746,312. Other general charges for the overall river project totaled $2,316,101. Other maintenance costs for the system include: Jackson Lock and Dam, $652,571; Demopolis Lock and Dam, $356,663; Warrior Lock and Dam, $405,763; Oliver Lock and Dam, $1,015,088; Bankhead Lock and Dam, $453,057; Holt Lock and Dam, $581,864; and reservoir operation, $972,606. Condition at end offiscal year. Work on the project, commenced in 1887, was essentially completed in 1915. Since then three of the original locks and dams (10, 11, and 12) were replaced by William Bacon Oliver (Tuscaloosa) Iock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1939; four original locks and dams (4, 5, 6 and 7) were replaced by Demopolis Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1954; two original locks and dams (8 and 9) were replaced by Warrior Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in October 1957; three original locks and dams (1, 2, and 3) were replaced by Coffeeville Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1960; and four original locks and dams (13, 14, 15, and 16) were replaced by Holt Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in June 1966. Rehabilitation of the spillway at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam commenced in 1966, and physically completed 6 February 1970. Replacement of the double lift lock with a single lift lock at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam commenced in April 1970 and was essentially completed in 1980. The cost to September 30, 1982 for replacement of the lock was $49,828,429. The power plant at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam was built and is operated by the Alabama Power Co. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1982 were $152,928,580 for new work and $124,200,595 for maintenance, a total of $277,129,175. 7. BON SECOUR RIVER, ALA. Location. Rises 2 miles south of Foley, Ala., and flows southerly about 8 miles, emptying into Bon Secour Bay, an arm of Mobile Bay in southwest Alabama. Existing project. A 10- by 80-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Bon Secour Bay to mouth of Bon Secour River and extending up river to vicinity of Swifts Landing, thence 6 by 80 feetup river to a point about 600 feet above Oak Landing with two turning and maneuvering areas 150 feet wide and 1,100 to 1,200 feet long op- 10-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 posite Swifts Landing and ice loading dock. Plane of reference is mean low water. Overall length of improvement is about 4.7 miles. Mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet and extreme,, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Existing project was authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 16, 1963, under authority in Section 187, River and Harbor Act of 1960. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of pile-andtimber marginal, wharves used by seafood industry and a marine ways located along existing project. These, together with numerous privately owned piers, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation studies, surveys and, supervision and administration cost $16,837. Condition at end offiscal year. Project was commenced in July and completed in October 1964. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1982 were $118,615 for new work and $114,063 for maintenance, a total of $232,678. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $9,700. 8. CADET BAYOU, MISS. Location. Cadet Bayou (also known as Bayou Caddy), is a small tidal stream in southwest Hancock County, Mississippi, which flows easterly through marshland and empties into Mississippi Sound about 10 miles southwest of Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11371). Existing project. The existing project provides for an 8- by 100-foot channel from the 8-foot depth in Mississippi Sound for about 7,800 feet to the mouth of Cadet Bayou, thence an 8- by 80-foot channel extending 700 feet into the bayou to a 6- by 60-foot turning basin (in addition to the 80-foot channel width) 130 feet long, thence a 6- by 60- foot channel continuing upstream for 8,800 feet to a second turning basin 110 feet wide (in addition to the 60-foot channel width) and 100 feet long thence a 6- by 60-foot channel approximately 870 feet to the end of the project. The total length of improved channel is about 18,400 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 1.6 feet in the vicinity of Cadet Bayou. Extreme range, except during storms is about 3.5 feet. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several privately-owned pile-and-timber wharves, a boatyard, marine ways near the mouth, and several natural landings are located along the bayou. A fishing camp at mile 2 provides necessary facilities for recreational boating needs, including about 250 feet of marginal wharf. Local interests will be required to provide, maintain, and operate a public wharf for commercial boating interests near the mouth of the bayou, and another for recreational boating interests in the upper reaches. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The contractors' dredge, McWilliams, removed 76,672 cubic yards of material from the entrance channel at a cost of $130,000. Surveys and miscellaneous costs amounted to $45,872. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was commenced and completed in December 1970. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1982 were $87,921 for new work and $672,279 for maintenance, a total of $760,200. Contributed funds for new work amount to $31,000. 9. DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, ALA. Location. The project is located between Dauphin and Little Dauphin Island on the west side of the entrance to Mobile Bay, about 30 miles south of Mobile, Alabama and 55 miles west of Pensacola, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) A channel seven feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay to an anchorage basin of the same depth, and about seven acres in area, in the marsh just north of Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island; a channel four feet deep and 40 feet wide from the anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay; and a jetty and revetment to protect the entrance channel; and (b) an anchorage basin seven feet deep and 500 feet square at Dauphin Island Village, with an entrance channel of like depth, 100 feet wide and about 8,300 feet long, extending to the 7-foot hydrographic contour in Mississippi Sound. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet, and extreme, except during storms is about four feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Several privately-owned wharves for handling seafood, a public dock and mooring slip, and a pier for recreational craft are located on the village basin. A marina, public launching ramp, and a number of private piers are located on the bay. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Hired labor costs included $26,852 for operation studies, engineering, design, supervision and administration and other costs. 10-6 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in July 1959. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1982 were $292,864 for new work and $949,390 for maintenance, a total of $1,242,254. 10. DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, ALA. Location. Dog and Fowl Rivers are primarily tidal streams emptying into the west side of Mobile Bay, 8.5 and 17 miles, respectively, south of central Mobile. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376). Existing project. The Dog River project provides for an 8-foot deep by 150-foot wide channel from about 3,000 feet east of the Mobile Bay ship channel to and up Dog River, a total distance of 26,200 feet, thence six feet by 100 feet for 12,300 feet to a point about 2,400 feet above the mouth of Halls Mill Creek, and a 6-foot by 100- foot spur channel from the main channel to the mouths of Perch and Halls Mill Creeks. Overall length of the proposed improvement is about 7.8 miles. This portion of the project has not been constructed due to local interest's inability to comply with cost-sharing responsibilities. The Fowl River project provides for a channel eight feet deep and 100 feet wide from Mobile Bay into and up Fowl River to deep water about 6,700 feet above its mouth. Total length of the channel is about 2.6 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 1.5 feet in Dog River. Extreme range during storms is about 3.6 feet. This segment of the project was completed in November, 1973. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for the Fowl River portion. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities consist of a boatyard for fabricating steel vessel hulls, nine marinas, four marine ways, a yacht basin on Dog River; two marinas on Fowl River, and numerous timber piers and docks on both rivers. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous costs amounted to $1,385. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was commenced in August 1973 and completed in November 1973. Total Federal costs on the existing project as of September 30, 1982 were $863,507; $190,695 for new work and $672,812 for maintenance. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $114,100. 11. EAST PASS CHANNEL FROM GULF OF MEXICO INTO CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY, FLA. Location. East Pass Channel is located in the entrance from the Gulf into Choctawhatchee Bay at eastern end of Santa Rosa Island, 48 miles east of the entrance into Pensacola Bay and 49 miles west of the new entrance to St. Andrews Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11388.) Previous project. For details see page 672 of Annual Report for 1937. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 12-foot by 180-foot channel from the Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, and a 6-foot by 100-foot channel from East Pass Channel into Old Pass Lagoon. The project consists also of two converging jetties spaced 1,000 feet apart at the seaward end. The west jetty is provided with a low weir section 1,000 feet long to permit passage of littoral drift into a dredged deposition basin 500 feet by 1,500 feet located between the west jetty and the navigation channel. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet; extreme range, except during storms, is 2.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Responsibilities of local cooperation have been complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Small privately-owned pile-and-timber piers used in connection with the fishing industry in this locality are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contractors dredges operating in the entrance channel to Old Pass Lagoon and East Pass removed 76,209 cubic yards of material at a cost of $339,665. Hired labor costs for condition studies, water control management, contract administration, engineering, design, supervision, administration and other costs amounted to $515,178. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 1965 modification was commenced October 1967 and completed January 1969. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1982 were $916,715 for new work and $4,355,888 for maintenance, a total of $5,271,603. Contributed funds for new work from local interests amount to $398,000. 12. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FLA., AND MEXICAN BORDER (MOBILE DISTRICT) Location. The project extends westward from Apalachee Bay, Florida, along the Gulf coast to the Rigolets, Louisiana, via a series of coastal lakes, bays, sounds, and land cuts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Previous project. For details see page 906, Annual Report for 1930. 10-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Existing project. The authorized project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide at mean low water from Apalachee Bay, Florida, to Mobile Bay, Alabama, and 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay, Alabama, to Rigolets, Louisiana (Lake Borgne Light No. 29), and for a tributary channel (Gulf County Canal), 12 feet deep, 125 feet wide and about six miles long connecting Intracoastal Waterway at White City, Florida, with St. Joseph Bay. The waterway between the 12-foot depth contours in Apalachee Bay and Lake Borgne Light No. 29 at the Rigolets is 379 miles long. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Responsibilities of local cooperation have been fully complied with for the work authorized prior to 1966. For modification of the Gulf County Canal which was authorized by the 1966 River and Harbor Act, local interests must provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required in connection with disposal of spoil, or the costs of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from all damages due to construction and maintenance of the project including damages to wharves, piers, bridges, and other structures; provide and maintain at local expense adequate terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms; provide and maintain without cost to the United States depths in berthing areas commensurate with depths provided in related project area; and accomplish without cost to the United States such alterations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage, and other facilities as well as their maintenance. Terminal facilities. Facilities are available for public use at Carrabelle, Apalachicola, Panama City, and Pensacola, Florida; Mobile and Bayou La Batre, Alabama; and Pascagoula, Biloxi, Gulfport, Pass Christian, and Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Carrabelle - Apalachicola Bay section, Miscellaneous hired labor costs amounted to $20,965. Apalachicola Bay - St. Andrew Bay section: Hired labor costs included $41,407 for condition studies and $24,119 for miscellaneous work. St. Andrew Bay - Choctawhatchee Bay section: Hired labor cost for the year included: bank stabilization $184,544; permanent operating equipment $165,419; canals and channels, $109,719; and, $34,642 for miscellaneous work. Choctawhatchee Bay - Pensacola Bay section: Costs for the year include condition and operation studies, and miscellaneous work of $11,090. Pensacola Bay - Mobile Bay section: Costs for the year included condition and operation studies, $170,753; bank stabilization, $514,647; channels and canals, $163,000; and miscellaneous, $60.725. Mobile Bay - Rigolets section: Hired labor costs included $135,382 for condition and operation studies and $5,427 for engineering, design, supervision, and administration. In addition, compliance inspections cost $241,757; direct charges to Mobile Area Office cost $62,996: and, direct charges to Panama City Area Office were $1,640. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete except for the portion between Apalachicola Bay and St. Marks, Florida, which is deferred for restudy. Modification of the Gulf County Canal to provide a 12-foot by 125-foot channel was commenced July 1968 and completed June 1969. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1982, were $36,960,656, of which $6,434,694 was for new work and $30,525,962 for maintenance. 13. GULFPORT HARBOR, MISS. Location. The project is located on Mississippi Sound in southeastern Mississippi, about 44 and 90 miles by water west of Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi, and Mobile Harbor, Alabama, respectively, and 78 miles east of New Orleans (via Gulf Intracoastal Waterway). (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Prvious project. For details see page 747, Annual Report for 1938, and page 995, Annual Report for 1948. Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) A channel 32 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and about eight miles long across Ship Island Bar, a channel 30 feet deep, 220 feet wide, and about 11 miles long through Mississippi Sound, and an anchorage basin at Gulfport 30 feet deep, 1,320 feet wide, and 2,640 feet long; and (b) maintenance of the existing commerical smallboat harbor about 26 acres in area, and a straightapproach channel, 100 feet wide and about 4,300 feet long, from deep water in Mississippi Sound to a small-boat basin, all at a depth of eight feet. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.75 feet, and extreme range, except during storms, is about 3.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Conditions of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Existing modern railconnected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The contractors' pipeline dredge, Mike Hooks removed a total of 1,333,527 cubic yards of material from the harbor channel at a cost of $629,940. Hired labor included condition 10-8 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT and operation studies, and engineering, design, supervision and administration, all at a cost of $496,579. Condition at end of fiscal year. The main harbor was commenced 1932 and completed April 1950. Maintenance for small boat harbor and approach channel, constructed by local interests in 1950, was authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1982 were $635,758 for new work and $22,562,237 for maintenance, a total of $23,197,895. 14. MOBILE HARBOR, ALA. Location. The project is located along the lower five miles of Mobile River, in southwestern Alabama, 91 miles by water west of Pensacola Harbor, Florida, 90 miles east of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi, and 144 miles by water northeast of mouth of Mississippi River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Previous project. For details see page 503, Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) A 42-foot by 600-foot channel about 1.5 miles long across Mobile Bar; (b) a 40- foot by 400-foot channel in Mobile Bay to mouth of Mobile River; (c) a 40-foot channel in Mobile River to highway bridge, varying from 500 to 775 feet wide; (d) a 25-foot channel from highway bridge to and up Chickasaw Creek to a point 400 feet south of mouth of Shell Bayou, widths being 500 feet in Mobile River and 250 feet in Chickasaw Creek; (e) a turning basin 40 feet deep, 2,500 feet long, and 800 to 1,000 feet wide, opposite Alabama State Docks; (f) a turning basin 40 feet deep, 1000 feet wide, and 1,600 feet long opposite Magazine Point; (g) a 27-foot by 150-foot channel from Mobile Bay Channel along Arlington pier to a turning basin 800 feet long and 600 feet wide opposite Brookley Air Force Base ocean terminal, and continuing thence to a turning basin 250 feet wide and 800 feet long in Garrows Bend, thence a 22-foot by 150-foot channel to the causeway linking McDuffie Island to the mainland; (h) a channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the main ship channel in Mobile Bay and extending northwesterly for about 5.3 miles to the shore of Mobile Bay, including an anchorage and turning basin near the shoreline, thence a land cut 40 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 1.9 miles long to and including a 42 acre trapezoid turning basin 40 feet deep, and a barge channel 12-by 100-feet, extending 6500 feet and terminating in a 300-by 300-foot turning basin; and (i) maintenance of Three Mile Creek by snagging, from its intersection with Industrial Canal to Mobile River. The project provides also for an anchorage area 32 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 2,000 feet long opposite site formerly occupied by the U.S. Quarantine Station at McDuffie (Sand) Island. Prior to widening the Mobile Bay Channel as authorized in 1954, the Quarantine Station anchorage area was maintained to a project width of 200 feet. Construction by local interests of a solid-fill causeway across Garrows Bend Channel between McDuffie Island and the mainland is also provided for under existing project. Total length of the bay and river channels is about 41.7 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range at the lower end of the improvement is 1.2 feet and at the upper end 1.5 feet. Extreme tidal range is 3.4 feet at the lower end and 3.6 feet at the upper end. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminalfacilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 18, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Continuing work on Theodore Channel cost $843,794. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 512,662 cubic yards of material from Mobile River Channel and 2,888,842 cubic yards of material from Upper Bay Channel, all at a cost of $5,102,239. Hired labor cost for surveys, engineering, design, supervision and administration and miscellaneous work amounted to $1,319,985. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was commenced in 1931 and completed in July 1965 except for the Theodore Channel portion, presently under construction. For details see Annual Report for 1965. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1982 were $60,643,694 for new work and $56,641,029 for maintenance, a total of $117,284,723. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $2,844,422. 15. PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FLA. Location. The project is located on the northwest coast of Florida, 102 miles east of entrance to Pensacola Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11389.) Previous project. For details see page 710, Annual Report for 1938. Existing prject. The authorized project (as modified) provides for a channel about 3.7 miles long extending from deep water in the bay (intersection of Bay Harbor and Dyers Point Channel) across Lands End to the Gulf of Mexico, 300 feet wide and 40 feet deep in the bay and across Lands End, and 450 feet wide, 42 feet deep 10-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 and about 1.1 miles long in the approach channel in the Gulf, protected by two jetties, each about 700 feet long; branch channels 38 feet deep and 300 feet wide, leading from the inner end of the main entrance channel westward to the Port Authority terminal at Dyers Point and eastward to the Bay Harbor terminal, about 3.4 and 3.6 miles in length, respectively; turning and maneuvering areas comprising about 55 acres opposite Dyers Point, and 42 acres opposite Bay Harbor, both at a depth of 38 feet; and an anchoring and loading basin for LASH type intermodal carriers, 40 feet deep and containing about 177 acres in St. Andrew Bay near the inner end of the main entrance channel; a channel in Watson Bayou, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in St. Andrew Bay to the highway bridge, about 1.75 miles; channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep in Grand Lagoon to a point about 2,400 feet east of State Highway 392 Bridge, with branched to serve terminal facilities. The east and west jetties have been reworked and are presently about 2,075 and 2,896 feet long, respectively. Mean tidal range 1.3 feet and extreme 3.0 feet. (See Table 10- B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Available terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 282;126 cubic yards of material from the main channel at a cost of $711,180. Condition and operation studies; supervision and administration; and, other miscellaneous costs amounted to $267,919. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project (prior to modifications) was completed in November 1949. Repairs to jetties were commenced in June 1961 and completed October 1968. Modifications to the project at Grand Lagoon were completed in January 1972. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1982 were $1,434,485 for new work and $4,415,539 for maintenance, a total of $5,850,024. Contributed funds expended for new work amount to $80,000. 16. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MISS. Location. The project is located along lower 6.8 miles of Pascagoula River, the lower six miles of Dog River, and in Bayou Casotte (about four miles east of the mouth of Pascagoula River), in southeastern Mississippi, about 61 miles by water west of Mobile Harbor, Alabama, and about 44 miles by water east of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 741, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for (a) An entrance channel 40 feet deep and 350 feet wide from the Gulf of Mexico through Horn Island Pass, including an impounding area for littoral drift, 40 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 1,500 feet long adjacent to the channel at the west end of Petit Bois Island; (b) a channel 38 feet deep and 350 feet wide in Mississippi Sound and Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge at Pascagoula, including a turning basin 2,000 feet long and 950 feet wide (including channel area) on the west side of the river below the railroad bridge; (c) a channel 38 feet deep and 225 feet wide from the ship channel in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of Bayou Casotte, thence 38 feet deep and 300 feet wide for about one mile to a turning basin 38 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and 1,750 feet long; (d) a 22-foot deep by 150-foot wide channel up Pascagoula River from the railroad bridge to the mouth of Dog River, thence up Dog River to Highway 63 bridge; and (e) a 12-foot by 125-foot channel from the highway bridge, via Robertson and Bounds Lakes, to mile 6 on Dog River. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme range is 3.75 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 2,515,530 cubic yards of material from the channel at a cost of $2,004,200. Hired labor costs for surveys, supervision and administration and other miscellaneous work amounted to $551,203. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in August 1965. Total Federal costs of existing project to September 30, 1982 were $5,668,543 for new work and $23,032,798 for maintenance, a total of $28,701,341. Contributed funds expended for maintenance amounted to $448,550. 17. PENSACOLA HARBOR, FLA. Location. The project is located in a landlocked bay on the coast of northwest Florida about 50 miles east of the entrance to Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 490 and 11382.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1938. 10-10 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) A 35-foot by 500-foot entrance channel about five miles long, from the Gulf of Mexico to lower Pensacola Bay; (b) a 33-foot by 300-foot bay channel; (c) two 33-foot by 300-foot parallel approach channels to opposite ends of the inner-harbor channel; (d) an inner-harbor channel 500 feet wide, 33 feet deep, and 3,950 feet long; (e) a 30-foot by 250-foot approach channelto the pierhead line south of Muscogee wharf; and (f) a 15-foot by 100-foot entrance channel into Bayou Chico, thence a channel 14 feet deep, 75 feet wide, and about 4,400 feet long to a turning basin 14 feet deep and 500 feet square. Mean range of tide throughout the harbor is about 1.1 feet near the entrance and about 1.6 feet at the head of bay. Extreme tidal range, except during storms, is about three feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Modification of the Bayou Chico project to provide for enlarging the entrance channel to 21 by 100 feet, the bayou channel to 20 by 100 feet, and deepening the turning basin to 20 feet has been deferred for restudy. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Surveys and ordinary maintenance amounted to $33,226. Condition at end of fiscal year. New work is completed except those features which are deferred for restudy. The modification authorized in 1962 was commenced in March and completed in May 1965. Total Federal costs of the existing project to September 30, 1982 were $875,005 for new work and $3,873,658 for maintenance, a total of $4,748,663. 18. PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, ALA. Location. The project is located about midway between Pensacola, Florida and Mobile, Alabama. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart 11378.) Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide for about 1,300 feet from the Gulf of Mexico into the inlet, thence nine feet deep and 100 feet wide for about 2,200 feet to the highway bridge, where the channel branches into two arms, each having dimensions of 9 by 100 feet, one of which extends about 3,400 feet into Terry Cove and the other about 3,200 feet into the southern arm of Perdido Bay. The project also provides for two jetties spaced 600 feet apart at the seaward end. The east jetty has a low weir section, 1,000 feet long to permit passage of littoral drift into a dredged deposition basin 800 feet by 1,200 feet located between the east jetty and the navigation channel. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet and extreme is 2.8 feet. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Six marinas, numerous timber piers, docks, and several launching ramps are available. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The contractors dredge, T.L. James, operating north of the highway, removed 97,494 cubic yards of material at a cost of $229,028. Cost of surveys, supervision and administration and miscellaneous work amounted to $184,876. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was commenced in May 1968 and completed in March 1969. Total Federal costs of the existing project to September 30, 1982 were $629,860 for new work and $3,723,193 for maintenance, a total of $4,353,053. Contributions from local interest amount to $510,000 for new work and $10,325 for maintenance. 19. PORT ST. JOE Location. The project is located on the northwest coast of Florida, 115 miles east of Pensacola Harbor. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 11389.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) An entrance channel 37 feet deep, 500 feet wide at its outer end and diminishing progressively in width to 400 feet at the first bend, a distance of 3.6 miles, thence continuing at a depth 37 feet and a width of 400 feet, through the second and third bend for 3.3 miles, thence continuing at a depth of 35 feet and a width of 300 feet 2.4 miles to a point in St. Joseph Bay where the entrance channel joins the north channel, a total overall distance of 9.3 miles, thence continuing in the north channel at a depth of 35 feet and a width of 300 feet to the north end of the turning basin at Port St. Joe, a distance of about 4.7 miles; (b) a turning basin 32 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and 2,000 feet long, and a harbor channel therein 35 feet deep, 250 feet wide, and 2,000 feet long, adjacent to the waterfront at Port St. Joe; and (c) a channel 27 feet deep, 200 feet wide and about 1 mile long leading from the south end of the turning basin to deep water in St. Joseph Bay. Average tidal variation is 1.4 feet and extreme, except during storms, is about 4 feet. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Rail and highwayconnected terminal facilities available at this port are considered adequate for existing com- 10-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 merce. (See Port Series No. 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary maintenance and care amounted to $22,315. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in July 1962. Total Federal costs for the project as of September 30, 1982 were $1,960,862 for new work and $2,173,695 for maintenance, a total of $4,134,557. Contributed funds for new work amount to $20,000. 20. REMOVING WATER HYACINTHS, MOBILE DISTRICT Location. The project is for all streams tributary to the Gulf Coast in Mobile District. Existing project. The authorized project provides for extermination or removal of plants from navigable waters of Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas, so far as they are or may become an obstruction to commerce, by any mechanical, chemical, or other means whatsoever; for construction and operation of boats equipped with suitable machinery for such removal, and construction and operation of log booms to prevent plants drifting from one stream to another. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, which is for maintenance, was commenced about 1899, and work has been carried on since that time. Total Federal costs for the project through September 30, 1982 amount to $1,099,266. 21. WATERWAY CONNECTING TOMBIGBEE AND TENNESSEE RIVERS, ALA. AND MISS. Location. The waterway extends from mile 215 in Pickwick pool on the Tennessee River, southerly through northeastern Mississippi and western Alabama, a total of 232 miles, to the confluence of the Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers at Demopolis, Alabama. Location. For details see Annual Report for 1953. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a waterway 234 miles long, connecting the Tennessee and Tombigbee Rivers via the East Fork of Tombigbee River and Mackeys and Yellow Creeks. The plan of improvement consists of three sections: (1) the river section, a 9-foot by 300-foot channel for 149 miles between Demopolis and Amory, Mississippi; (2) the lateral canal section, 12 feet by 300 feet for 46 miles from Amory to Bay Springs; and (3) the divide section, a 12-foot by 300-foot channel (except in the 27 mile-long divide cut in which the bottom width would be 280 feet) for 39 miles from Bay Springs through the dividing ridge to the Tennessee River; the total lift of 341 feet to be accomplished by 10 locks. Estimated (1982) Federal cost for new work is $1,839,000,000, including $9,600,000 for work by the U.S. Coast Guard, and $9,400,000 for National Park Service; plus, $159,000,000 non-Federal cost for relocations. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must make and maintain alterations in highways and highway bridges and in sewer, water-supply, and drainage facilities and provide and maintain suitable and adequate river and canal terminals. Officials of the State of Mississippi were notified of these requirements on December 13, 1949, and officials of the State of Alabama were notified on December 20, 1949. Legislation enabling boards of supervisors of the various counties concerned to enter into agreements with the United States relative to navigation projects was adopted by the State of Mississippi in 1950. A compact between the States of Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky, and Florida has been formed for the purpose of promoting the project. The name of this organization is the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway Development Authority. During its 1962 session the Mississippi Legislature authorized the formation of the Tombigbee River Valley Water Management District. The District was organized in accordance with the enabling legislation and is empowered to fulfill the requirements of local cooperation for the portion of the project in Mississippi. A satisfactory resolution has been furnished. During its 1967 session the Alabama Legislature authorized formation of a public corporation to be named the Tombigbee Valley Development Authority for the purpose of further development of the Tombigbee River and tributary streams. The organization was formed in accordance with the enabling legislation and in a referendum held 5 December 1967 the voters of Alabama authorized a bond issue not to exceed $10,000,000 to finance participation in this project and the Tombigbee River and Tributaries project. A satisfactory resolution has been furnished. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Total cost of new work during the fiscal year was $118,990,981, of which $2,721,596 was for work on Demopolis Lake; $3,708,937 for Gainesville Lock and Dam; $13,023,302 for Aliceville Lock and Dam; $27,433,881 for Columbus Lock and Dam; $9,372,672 for Aberdeen Lock and Dam. Canal section cost included: Lock A, $2,868,592; Lock B, $8,191,494; Lock C, $8,496,217; oInck D, $16,869,491; Lock E, 10-12 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT $21,990,930. Engineering, design, supervision, administration and other costs associated with the overall project amounted to $4,313,869. Maintenance: Cost for operation of the completed portion of the project during the year amounted to $3,598,169, which included general charges of $1,370,880; Gainesville Lock and Dam, $337.718; Aliceville Lock and Dam, $335,304; Columbus Lock and Dam, $372,073; Aberdeen Lock and Dam, $90,570; Lock "A", $91,351; Lock "B", $14,697; Lock "C", $481; Lock "D", $137; Bay Springs, $3,500; Lake charges of $864,279 and navigation charges of $117,179. Recreation attendance for CY 1981 totaled 306,000 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total Federal costs under the existing project as of September 30, 1982 were $713,625,565 for new work, and $9,843,595 for maintenance for a total of $723,469,160. Construction formally began December 12, 1972 and overall project is about 73 percent complete, including work being performed by Nashville District, which costs are not reported on by Mobile District. 22. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 10-D.) 23. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 10-E.) 24. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (Preauthorization). Studies conducted under this authority amounted to $169,297. (See Table 10-F.) Studies conducted under Section 103, 1962 River and Harbor Act, as amended, amounted to $11,247. (See Table 10-F.) Studies conducted under Section 54, Shoreline Erosion Control Evaluation and Demonstration Act of 1974, Public Law 93-251, amounted to $1,011. Studies conducted under Section 55 WRD Act of 1974 Public Law 93-251, for providing technical and engineering assistance to non- Federal public interests for developing methods for the prevention of shore and stream bank erosion control cost $48. Beach Erosion Control 25. AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT (See Table 10-G.) 26. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS) Projects deauthorized under Section 12, Public Law 251, 93rd Congress, as amended. (See Table 10-H.) 27. OKATIBBEE LAKE, MISS. Location. The project is located on Okatibbee Creek 37.7 miles above its mouth, in Lauderdale County, Mississippi, seven miles northwest of Meridian. Existing project. The project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, fish and wildlife, and recreation. The dam consists of a compacted earth fill 6,540 feet long with the top elevation 369.8 feet above national geodetic datum, with top width of 18 feet. The spillway, which is located 1,500 feet east of the east end of the dam, is an unpaved free overflow type 1,500 feet long with a fixed crest at elevation 359. A sluice intake structure near the center of the dam serves a 9.0-foot diameter concrete conduit. Storage allocated for water supply and water quality control varies seasonally from 21,400 acre-feet to 34,300 acrefeet between a minimum elevation of 328 and topof- conservation-pool elevation varying from 339 to 343. Storage varying from 46,500 acre-feet to 59,500 feet between the top of the conservation pool and elevation 352 has been reserved exclusively for storage of flood waters. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design of public use facilities cost $39,926. Maintenance: Costs for the year for ordinary maintenance and recreational management amount to $573,918. No flood control benefits were attributed to the project during FY 1982. Recreation attendance at the reservoir during CY 1981 totaled 917,000 recreational user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1965, and was completed in November 1968. Total Federal costs of the existing project as of September 30, 1982 were $9,088,574 for new work and $4,571,799 for maintenance, a total of $13,660,373. 28. TALLAHALA CREEK LAKE, PASCAGOULA RIVER, MISS. Location. The project is on Tallahala Creek, 81.1 miles above its mouth, in Jasper County, Mississippi, 13 miles north of Laurel. Existing project. The project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement. The dam will consist of a 10-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 compacted earth fill 8,000 feet long, with top elevation 343.5 feet above national geodetic datum, or a maximum 71.5 feet above streambed elevation, with a top width of 18 feet, and a 300- foot long saddle dike with maximum height of 15 feet in the left abutment. The spillway which is 6,000 feet northeast of the left abutment, will consist of an unpaved, free-overflow type, 500 feet long, with fixed crest at elevation 335.0. A sluice intake structure near the center of the dam will serve an 8-foot diameter, horseshoe-shaped concrete conduit. The reservoir at maximum pool elevation 306.5 will have an area of 4,000 acres and a total capacity of 63,000 acre-feet of which 35,900 acre-feet between elevations 288.5 and 302.0 will be used for water supply, 20,000 acrefeet between elevations 302.0 and 306.5 will be used for water quality improvement, and 7,100 acre-feet below elevation 288.5 will consist of dead storage. A volume varying seasonally from 50,000 to 70,000 acre-feet between elevations 306.5 and 315.0 will be reserved for flood storage. Estimated Federal cost (1982) is $113,000,000. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests will be required to reimburse the United States for all costs allocated to water supply Act of 1958, as amended; and one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to general recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. In addition, local interests are required to reimburse the United States for the annual operation, maintenance and replacement cost allocated to water supply, and bear all cost of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife areas and facilities for initial development. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost, $100,318. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction has not been initiated. 29. BURKETTS CREEK, AMORY, MISS. Location. The project is located in the northeast rtion of the city of Amory and lies between Burketts Creek and the Tennessee-Tombigbee Canal Section near Iock "A". Existing project. The project provides for an earthfilled diversion structure and a 60 foot wide bottom width diversion canal to intercept Burketts Creek at station 100+55 and direct flow in a northerly direction for about 4,000 feet to enter Inck "A" pool at canal station 2+00. Side slopes will be one vertical on three horizontal. In addition, provisions are made for a concrete baffled chute as an energey dissipator and a riprap blanket at the toe. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering, design and contract administration amounted to $98,578. Condition at end of fiscal year: Contract for construction of project was awarded in August 1982. Estimated completion date is August 1983. Total costs to date for this project have amounted to $265,140. 30. GORDONS CREEK, HATTIESBURG, MISS. Location. The project is located along the lower 12,320 feet of Gordons Creek between its mouth at Leaf River and Broad Street Bridge, within the city limits of Hattiesburg, Miss. Existing project. The authorized project provides for flood damage reduction along and upstream of the project limits by clearing, snagging, widening and the removal of debris. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Project has been turned over to local interest to maintain. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Miscellaneous costs amounted to $670. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in June 1979 and was essentially completed in June 1980. Total Federal costs for the project as of September 30, 1982 were $773,925, all for new work. 31. HOULKA CREEK, CHICKASAW AND CLAY COUNTIES, MISS. Location. The project is located along the lowermost 34.1 miles of Houlka Creek in Chickasaw and Clay Counties, Mississippi. The upper limits of the project extend to Mississippi State Highway 32. Existing project. The authorized project provides for improvement by clearing, snagging and the removal of debris at selective locations along the 34.1 mile project length between top banks. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Unexpended funds amounting to $11,781 were revoked during the year. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in July 1979 and was completed in November 1980. Total Federal costs for the project as of September 30, 1982 were $238,219, all for new work. 32. MURDER CREEK, EAST BREWTON, ALA. Location. The project is located in the city of East Brewton along the left bank of Murder Creek in the vicinity of Forrest and Snowden Avenues. Existing project. The project consists of nonstructural measures of flood plain evacuation and flood proofing of selected buildings for the reduction of flood damages. 10-14 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Land acquisition and incidental costs amounted to $207,920. Condition at end of fiscal year. Acquisition of land commenced in August 1982 and three parcels were obtained in September. Completion of this non-structural plan is scheduled for September 1983. Total costs to date have amounted to $393,894. 33. TOMBIGBEE RIVER, MISS. AND ALA. Location. The project is located on the Tombigbee River and its tributaries between the junction of Browns and Mackeys Creeks in Itawamba County, Mississippi, for a distance of 53 miles along the East Fork of the Tombigbee River, from Walkers Bridge at the junction of Browns and Mackeys Creeks to the Monroe County line, by clearing the banks of trees and underbrush to flood stage, the removal of drift jams and the excavation of 13 cutoff channels; and for additional channel improvements and related works for flood control of the Tombigbee River and tributaries above the mouth of and including the Noxubee River in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers, to protect people and valuable agricultural property from overflow waters of the Tombigbee River. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with on work done under the 1936 Flood Control Act. Work to be done under authority of the 1941 Flood Control Act requires local interest to provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction of the project; and maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary maintenance cost $7,063. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project for Itawamba County, as authorized in the 1936 Flood Control Act, was completed during fiscal year 1940. No work has been done on the extension of the project authorized in the 1941 Flood Control Act. The over-all project, as modified, is about 47 percent completed. Total Federal costs of the existing project as of September 30, 1982 were $134,801 for new work and $1,226,086 for maintenance, a total of $1,360,887. 34. TOMBIGBEE RIVER TRIBUTARIES, MISS. AND ALA. Location. The Tombigbee River rises in extreme northeast Mississippi and flows southerly through eastern Mississippi and western Alabama, emptying into the Mobile River about 45 miles above its mouth at Mobile, Alabama. Tributaries to be improved for flood control are all in northeast Mississippi and northwest Alabama. Existing project. The authorized project provides for improvement of 22 tributaries of the Tombigbee River by means of channel clearing and snagging. Approved estimate of cost (1982) for new work is $160,516,600; consisting of $148,000,000 Federal funds, and $12,516,600 non-Federal funds. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction; make all roads, highway bridge, and utility changes, alterations, additions, and relocations necessary for the project; hold the United States free from damages; prevent future encroachments along the improved channels; maintain all works after completion; and contribute $12,146,600 in cash or equivalent work. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $1,669,031. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in June 1965, and the overall project is about five percent complete. Federal cost of existing project as of September 30, 1982 were $10,157,138 for new work. Contributed cost for new work has amounted to $49,752. 35. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Local flood-protection works for which inspection is performed under this heading consist of levee projects at West Point, Georgia, on the Chattahoochee River; Montezuma, Georgia, in the Flint River Basin; Elba and Geneva, Alabama, in the Choctawhatchee River Basin; Rome, Georgia, and Collinsville, Alabama; in the Alabama-Coosa River Basin; and channel rectification projects on Black Creek, Gadsden, Alabama, in the Alabama-Coosa River Basin; Old Town Creek, Tupelo, Mississippi; Big Brown Creek, Donovan Creek, Twenty Mile Creek, and Mantachie Creek, Fulton, Mississippi; Houlka Creek, Chickasaw and Clay Counties; and Luxapalila Creek, Alabama, in the Tombigbee River Basin; Gordons Creek, Hattiesburg, Mississippi, Pascagoula River Basin; Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, Alabama, Conecuh River Basin; Sowashee Creek, Meridian, Mississippi, in Chickasawhay River Basin; Jackson and East Jackson, Mississippi, in the Pearl River Basin; Clanton, Alabama; Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, Alabama; Autauga Creek, Prattville, Alabama; Armuchee Creek, Armuchee, Georgia; Town Creek, Americus, Georgia; and Lake Douglas at Bainbridge, Georgia, in the Apalachicola- Chattahoochee-Flint Rivers Basin; and a 10-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 drainage project in Jackson County, Florida. Projects at Rome and Montezuma, Georgia, and Collinsville, Alabama, include pumping stations. Inspections were made during FY 1982 to determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation of the projects. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation of the local flood protection works under their jurisdiction where appropriate. Follow-up for compliance of the deficient projects continued during the year. Fiscal year costs were $20,720. Total cost to September 30, 1982 was $266,114 charged to maintenance. 36. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 10-I) 37. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Snagging and Clearing for flood control pursuant to Section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. Emergency streambank and shoreline protection pursuant to Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. (See Table 10-J) Emergency flood control activities--repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Lau. 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation, and disaster relief activites under Public Law 8750. (See Table 10-J) Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Powers 38. ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, ALA. AND GA. Location. Alabama River is formed 18 miles above Montgomery, Alabama, by the junction of the Coosa and Tallapoosa Rivers. It then flows southwesterly through Alabama 318 miles and unites with the Tombigbee River about 45 miles north of Mobile, in southwestern Alabama, to form the Mobile River. (See Geological Survey maps for central and southwest Alabama.) The Coosa River is formed at Rome, Georgia, in northwest Georgia, by the junction of the Oostanaula and Etowah Rivers, which have their sources in southeastern Tennessee and northern Georgia. From Rome the Coosa River flows southwesterly through Georgia and Alabama 286 miles and unites with the Tallapoosa River near Montgomery, Alabama, at about the center of the State, to form the Alabama River. (See Geological Survey maps for northeast Alabama, southeast Tennessee, and northwest Georgia.) Previous project. Projects for Alabama River: for details see page 1837, Annual Report for 1915; page 725, Annual Report for 1938; and page 592, Annual Report for 1944. Projects for Coosa River: for details see page 1837, Annual Report for 1915; page 728, Annual Report for 1938; and page 594, Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorized project provides for full development of the Alabama- Coosa Rivers and tributaries for navigation, flood control, power, recreation, and other purposes, in accordance with plans under preparation by Chief of Engineers, subject to modifications thereof which may be advisable for increasing development of hydroelectric power. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Public Law 436, 83rd Congress, suspended authorization of the comprehensive plan, insofar as it provides for development of hydroelectric power for Coosa River, to permit non-Federal interests to develop the Coosa River by construction of a series of dams in accordance with conditions of a license issued pursuant to Federal Power Act and in accordance with certain other provisions and requirements of the aforementioned public law. The present phase of improvement, now under construction, provides for construction of Robert F. Henry and Millers Ferry multiple-purpose improvements, Claiborne Lock and Dam, and supplemental channel work providing for a ninefoot deep navigation channel from the mouth of the Alabama River to Montgomery, Alabama, and for construction of Carters Dam, a multiplepurpose, improvement on Coosawattee River, Georgia. The total cost (1982) for new work on the present phase of Alabama-Coosa Rivers (exclusive of Coosa River navigation) is $289,876,400, consisting of $286,491,600 for structures, and $3,385,400 for supplemental channel improvements, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and $34,789,168 for Allatoona Lake. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation will be determined as formulation of plans for development of projects progress. No action in the matter of local cooperation has been initiated. Terminal facilities. On the east bank of the river a natural landing connects with city streets at Montgomery. Wofford Oil Company has a small wharf about 10 miles below Montgomery equipped for handling petroleum products. There are also various natural landings along the river. Facilities and natural landings on Alabama River are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results duringfiscal year. New work: Expenditures for work at Robert F. Henry amounted to $2,703,377, Millers Ferry $4,422, 10-16 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT and Carters $37,053. Engineering and design for Coosa River navigation segment amounted to $2,516,811. Total cost of new work amounted to $5,261,664. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 1,337,754 cubic yards of material from the river system at a cost of $1,857,051. General charges for recreation, supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs amounted to $765,679. Coosa River Reservoir operations cost $29,416 and lock operations $596,273. In addition, operation of Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam cost $1,693,988; Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, $2,615,655; Carters Lake, $1,991,853; all for a total maintenance cost of $9,549,915. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated on Carters Dam in April 1962 on Millers Ferry Lock and Dam in April 1963, Claiborne Lock and Dam in May 1965, and Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam in March 1966. Carters Dam was essentially completed in FY 1980. The authorized nine-foot navigation channel to Montgomery, Alabama was opened to traffic in January 1972. Overall construction is essentially complete at Millers Ferry Lock and Dam. Construction of Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam is about 99 percent complete with completion scheduled for 1983. Total Federal costs of the existing project as of September 30, 1982 are $368,803,842, including $304,539,688 for new work and $64,264,154 for maintenance. (See Table 10-K) 38A.CARTERS LAKE, GA. Location. The damsite is in Murray County, Georgia, on the Coosawattee River 26.8 miles above its junction with Conasauga River, one of the headwater tributaries of the Alabama- Coosa system. It is 60 miles north of Atlanta near the town of Carters, Georgia. The reservoir is in both Murray and Gilmer Counties. Existing project. The authorized project consists of a 1,950-foot long rockfill dam across the river, three saddle dikes on the left bank, a 258- foot long high-level, gated spillway on the left bank, a power house on the right bank having two conventional units with a generating capacity of 125,000 kilowatts each and two pump-generating units of the same size, and a regulating dam 2;855 feet long with a gated spillway 208 feet long 1.5 miles downstream from the main dam. The lake has an area of 3,220 acres, at maximum power pool elevation 1,072, total capacity of 472,800 acre-feet, of which 134,900 acre-feet is usable for power and 95,700 acre-feet reserved for flood control and 242,200 acre-feet dead storage. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Total cost of new work amounted to $37,053 for recreation facilities and engineering, design, supervision, and administration. Maintenance: Operation and ordinary maintenance of the dam, reservoir, powerhouse, service and recreational activities, and administration incidental thereto cost $1,991,853. Gross power generation amounted to 541,840,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1982, of which 480,565,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance during CY 1981 totaled 633,000 recreational user days. Reduced flood damages attributed to the Carters project and to the joint operation with Allatoona were $6,574,100 during FY 1982. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction which commenced in April 1962 was essentially completed in September 1980. Total Federal costs of the existing project as of September 30, 1982 are $122,818,083, including $111,096,079 for new work and $11,722,004 for maintenance. 38B.CLAIBORNE LOCK AND DAM, ALA. Location. The site is in Monroe County at mile 81.8 on the Alabama River, 15 miles northwest of Monroeville and 5.7 miles upstream from the U.S. Highway 84 bridge. Existing project. The authorized project consists of a short earth dike on the right bank, a combination of a fixed-crest and gatea spillway extending across the river channel and into the left bank, a navigation lock and mound on the left bank, and an earth dike extending across the left overbank to high ground. Normal upper pool is at elevation 35 and the minimum pool will be elevation 32 to provide storage for reregulation of Millers Ferry powerplant releases. The 60-mile long reservoir has an area of 5,850 acres and a volume of 96,360 acre-feet. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa projects. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: none. Maintenance: none. Recreation attendance during CY 1981 totaled 1,198,000 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1965 and was completed in FY 1976 at a total cost of $28,151,450. 38C.ROBERT F. HENRY LOCK AND DAM, ALA. Location. The site is in Lowndes and Autauga Counties at mile 245.4 on the Alabama River, 26 miles west of Montgomery. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a navigation lock, a gated spillway, and a power plant located at mile 245.4. The normal upper pool is at elevation 125.0 and the minimum lower pool due to the Millers Ferry 10-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Lock and Dam is at elevation 80.0. The structures consist of earth dikes and a power plant on the right bank, a gated spillway in the river channel, a lock and mound on the left bank, and an earth dike extending upstream parallel to the Western Railway of Alabama. The total length of the structures is about 14,962 feet with maximum height above the foundation at the power plant intake about 101 feet. The power plant contains four 17,000-kw. units. The 88-mile long reservoir has an area of 12,300 acres at normal pool level and a total capacity of 234,200 acre-feet. The lock has a chamber 84 feet wide and 600 feet long and provides a 12-foot depth over the lower miter sill. The approved estimated (1982) cost is $84,100,000. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Total cost of new work amounted to $2,703,377 for recreation facilities and engineering, design, supervision and administration. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost amounted to $1,693,988. Gross power generation amounted to 321,218,000 kilowatt-hours during FY 1982, of which 320,679,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance at R. E. "Bob" Woodruff Lake during CY 1981 totaled 2,270,000 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in March 1966 is 99 percent complete, and is scheduled for completion in FY 1983. The first powerhouse unit was placed in operation in June 1975, with the last unit on line in November 1975. Total Federal costs of the project as of September 30, 1982 were $92,301,283, including $82,944,140 for new work and $9,357,143 for maintenance. 38D.MILLERS FERRY LOCK AND DAM, ALA. Location. The site is in Wilcox County at mile 142.2 on the Alabama River, 10 miles northwest of Camden, Alabama, and 30 miles southwest of Selma. Existing project. The project consists of an earth dike on the right bank, a concrete, gravitygated spillway in the river channel, a lock and mound on the left bank, an earth dike extending downstream paralleling, the lock, to the powerhouse intake structure; a powerhouse, and an earth dike extending to high ground on the left bank. Normal upper pool is at elevation 80. The powerplant contains three 25,000 kilowatt units. The 103-mile long reservoir has an area of 17,200 acres at normal pool level and a total capacity of 331,800 acre-feet. The lock chamber is 84 by 600 feet with a 13-foot depth over the miter sills. For other information see description of Alabama- Coosa project. Operations and results duringfiscal year. Total cost of new work amounted to $4,422 for public use facilities. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of lock, dam, powerhouse, reservoir, and administration incidental thereto cost $2,615,655. Gross power generation amounted to 370,224,000 kilowatt-hours during FY 1982, of which 364,458,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance at William "Bill" Dannelly Reservoir during CY 1981 totaled 2,946,000 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1963. The lock was placed in temporary operation in June 1968 and opened to full use in November 1969. The powerhouse units were placed on line during April and May 1970. The project was essentially completed in 1980. Total Federal costs of the project as of September 30, 1982 were $62,702,800 for new work and $17,751,107 for maintenance, a total of $80,453,907. The remaining work to be done consists mainly of construction of recreational facilities. 38E.COOSA RIVER NAVIGATION Location. The Coosa River is one of the two major tributaries forming the Alabama River approximately 18 miles northeast of Montgomery, Alabama. From its source at the juncture of the Etowah and Oostanaula Rivers in northwest Georgia it flows southwesterly about 286 miles to join with the Tallapoosa River in forming the Alabama River. Existing project. The improvement of the Alabama-Coosa River for navigation to Rome, Georgia was authorized by Congress in the River and Harbor Act of 1945. A report in House Document 320, transmitted to Congress on 27 January 1960, recommended that the navigation project for the Coosa River from Montgomery to Gadsden be accomplished after the waterway to Montgomery was assured. The plan of improvement identified in House Document 320 provided for a waterway 9 feet deep with widths of 200 feet to Montgomery, Alabama, and 150 feet to Rome, Georgia. The waterway to Montgomery has essentially been completed. The estimated 1982 cost is $1,303,320,000 of which $1,252,320,000 is Federal and $51,000,000 non-Federal. Operations and results duringfiscal year. Funding was initiated in FY 1978 for preconstruction planning. FY 1982 costs were $2,516,812 for engineering, design, supervision and administration. In addition, general investigations funds expended amounted to $2,875,150 for advanced engineering and design. 39. ALLATOONA LAKE, COOSA RIVER BASIN, GA. 10-18 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT Location. The project is on Etowah River in Bartow County, Georgia, about 48 miles upstream from Rome, Georgia, about five miles due east of Cartersville, Georgia, and about 2,000 feet downstream from mouth of Allatoona Creek. The reservoir extends about 28 miles up the Etowah River at maximum power-pool elevation of 840 feet above mean sea level. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, regulation of streamflow for navigation, and development of hydroelectric power. Height above the river bottom of the concrete, gravitytype dam is about 190 feet from elevation, 690 feet to 880 feet national geodetic datum. The spillway, with crest at elevation 835, is controlled by nine tainter gates, 40 feet wide by twenty-six feet high, and two tainter gates, 20 feet wide by twenty-six feet high; having a combined discharge capacity of 321,000 cubic feet per second with the water surface at elevation 870.3. One 48-inch diameter sluicing conduit with a free discharge valve and four sluices, 5 feet-8 inches wide by 10 feet high, are included in dam. Installed generating capacity consists of two 36,000 kilowatt units and one 2,000 kilowatt unit, or a total of 74,000 kilowatts. Ultimate installed capacity will be 110,000 kilowatts. The reservoir, covering 19,200 acres at elevation 860, has a storage capacity of 670,000 acre-feet. The initial construction cost was $31,424,738, excluding the addition of recreation facilities at the completed project. (See Table 10- B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required (Sec. 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies). Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Additional recreational facilities cost $836,857. Maintenance: Operation and ordinary maintenance of the dam, reservoir, powerhouse, service and recreational activities, and administration incidental thereto cost $3,070,212. Gross power generation at Allatoona Reservoir amounted to 164,180,600 kilowatt-hours during FY 1982, of which 161,183,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Allatoona Lake during CY 1981 totaled 8,315,000 recreational user days. Benefits attributed to flood control storage and regulation amounted to $269,800. In addition, joint flood control operation with Carters Dams resulted in reduced damages of $6,574,100 in the vicinity of Rome, Georgia. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction of the existing project began in March 1944 and was completed in October 1955. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1982 were $34,798,168 for new work and $32,608,799 for maintenance, a total of $67,406,967. 40. APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, ALA., GA., AND FLA. Location. The Apalachicola River is formed at the southwest corner of the State of Georgia by the junction of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers and flows south 108 miles emptying into Apalachicola Bay. Florida River enters the Apalachicola River from the east at mile 45.4 and the River Styx also enters from the east at mile 36.7 and Chipola River enters from the west at mile 28.2. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11401.) The Chattahoochee River, 418 miles long, rises in northeast Georgia and flows southwesterly to West Point, and thence southerly to join the Flint River at the southwest corner of Georgia, forming the Apalachicola River. (See Geological Survey maps for northwest Georgia.) The Flint River, 330 miles long, rises in west central Georgia, flows generally southeasterly to Albany, and thence southwest to the southwest corner of the State, where it joins the Chattahoochee River to form the Apalachicola River. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Previous project. For details see page 484 for Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. The authorized project provides for development of the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers for navigation, flood control, hydropower, and recreation. Navigation features of the existing project consist of a continuous 9-foot by 100-foot channel in the Apalachicola River from the intersection of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to the confluence of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, 104 miles, thence to Columbus, Georgia, on the Chattahoochee River, 164 miles, and to Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, 29 miles, and a 3-foot by 100-foot channel on the Flint River from Bainbridge to Albany, Georgia, 74 miles, thence a channel suitable for light draft vessels at moderate stage to Montezuma, Georgia, 79 miles, to be accomplished by dredging, contraction works, and construction of three locks and dams (Jim Woodruff, George W. Andrews, and Walter F. George) along the 9-foot depth channel, two multipurpose dams (West Point and Buford) on the Chattahoochee River, three multipurpose dams (Lower Auchumpkee Creek, Lazer Creek, and Spewrell Bluff) on the Flint River, and minor improvements of certain streams tributary to the Apalachicola River, including a nine by 100-foot side channel, approximately 2,000 feet long, from Apalachicola River to Apalachicola River Industrial Park at Blountstown, Fla. Plane of reference is mean low water. Hydropower and flood control storage is provided at Sidney Lanier, Walter F. George, and West Point, and hydropower is provided at Jim Woodruff. The authorized but unconstructed projects of Lazer 10-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Creek, Lower Auchumpkee Creek and Spewrell Bluff would have storage for hydropower and flood control. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Mean range of tide at the mouth of Apalachicola River is 1.6 feet. At the point where the river is formed the variation between low and high water is about 37 feet. On the Chattahoochee River, variation between average low and high water is about 20 feet, and extreme fluctuation is 65.3 feet at Eufaula. On the Flint River the extreme fluctuation of stage due to flood is 40 feet, while average variation between low and high water is about 21.5 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. About 200 feet of public docks, in addition to private wharves, are available at Apalachicola, Florida. There are numerous constructed and natural landings along the entire system for launching small craft. For details of other terminal facilities, which are considered adequate for existing commerce, see individual project descriptions. See also Table 10- L on tocks and dams and multiple-purpose development included in existing project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A modification to the project consisting of about 2,000 feet of dredging from the Apalachicola River to Apalachicola River Industrial Park cost $19,381. Work continued on West Point Dam at a cost of $51,922. Recreation facilities for various reservoirs cost $1,030,190. Maintenance: The contractor's dredge, T.L. James, removed 372,306 cubic yards (net) of material from the river system at a cost of $953,350. Other costs incidential to the overall project amounted to $1,860,558. Operation of George W. Andrews Lock and Dam cost $340,750. Operations and -maintenance locks and dams: Buford Dam cost $4,685,414; Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, $2,707,678; Walter F. George Lock and Dam, $7,440,475; and West Point Lake, $2,452,152. Total FY 1982 cost for entire project was $21,522,190, of which $1,082,112 was for new work and $20,440,078 was for operation and maintenance. Detailed information on operations and costs applicable to the individual dam projects is presented under their respective project titles elsewhere in this report. Condition at end offiscal year. Improvementof Apalachicola River channel by dredging to provide project dimensions throughout is complete. All major construction on Lake Sidney Lanier Dam, George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, and Walter F. George Lock and Dam, is complete. West Point is essentially complete with the exception of adding recreation facilities. Channel rectification in Apalachicola River was completed December 1970. More detailed information concerning condition at the end of fiscal year for individual locks and dams and multiple-purpose developments comprising the system is presented under their respective project titles elsewhere in this report. Work remaining to complete the project consists of completion of recreational facilities at Lake Sidney Lanier, George W. Andrews Lack and Dam, Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, and Walter F. George Lock and Dam; design and construction of Lazer Creek, Spewrell Bluff and Lower Auchumpkee Creek Dam; and completion of construction of West Point Dam. (See Tables 10-A and 10-L for fiscal year costs and summaries of overall project.) 40A.BUFORD DAM, GA. Location. Buford Dam is on the Chattahoochee River about 348.9 miles above its mouth, 50 miles above Atlanta and five miles northwest of Buford, Georgia. The reservoir, Lake Sidney Lanier, extends about 47 miles upstream along the Chattahoochee River, and about 21 miles up the Chestatee River, which enters the Chattahoochee River 14.5 miles above the dam. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a rolled-earth dam 1,630 feet long with crest at elevation 1,106 feet national geodetic datum, or about 192 feet above streambed elevation; three earth saddle dikes with a total length of 5,406 feet; a chute spillway with crest at elevation 1,085; a powerhouse in a deep cut with steel penstocks in tunnels, and concrete intake structure at the upstream end of the tunnels; and a flood control sluice tunnel paralleling the power funnels. The Lake Sidney Lanier reservoir has a gross capacity of 2,554,000 acre-feet of which 637,000 acre-feet of storage is reserved for flood control storage. The power installations consist of one generating unit of 6,000 kilowatts and two units of 40,000 kilowatts each, or a total of 86,000 kilowatts. The project provides for maintenance, including operation and care. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of recreational facilities at the completed project cost $503,277, including engineering, design, supervision, and administration. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost $4,685,414. Gross power generation amounted to 116,394,000 kilowatt-hours during FY 1982, of which 113,648,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Lake Sidney Lanier during CY 1981 totaled 15,375,000 recreational user days. Flood control benefits attributed to the project for FY 1982 were negligible. 10-20 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in March 1950 and was completed in June 1960. The reservoir was in useful operation for flood control in February 1956. The first power generating unit was placed on the line June 19, 1957; the second on July 26,1957; and the third on October 10,1957. The project is essentially complete except for adding additional recreational facilities. 40B.GEORGE W. ANDREWS LOCK AND DAM, ALA. AND GA. Location. The project is on the Chattahoochee River about 46.5 miles above its mouth and about one mile below the town of Columbia, Alabama, near the head of Jim Woodruff Reservoir. (See Geological Survey maps for southeast Alabama.) The pool extends up the navigation channel about 28 miles upstream to Walter F. George Lock and Dam. Existing project. This single-purpose project provides for a concrete fixed-crest spillway 340 feet long extending into the right bank with a crest at elevation 102 feet national geodetic datum, a concrete gate spillway adjacent to the lock 280 feet long with crest at elevation 82 feet national geodetic datum, a single-lift lock with usable chamber dimensions of 82 feet by 450 feet, and a maximum lift of 25 feet. Depths are 13 feet over the lower sill and 19 feet over the upper sill at normal pool elevation. The underlying foundation is limestone. The project provides for maintenance including operation and care. The House Committee on Public Works, by resolution adopted May 19, 1953, approved the plan as proposed by the Chief of Engineers for a high dam at Walter F. George site and a low dam at the Fort Benning site and a high dam at the upper Columbia site, construction of which was authorized by the 1946 River and Harbor Act as the initiation and partial accomplishment of the plan for full development of the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint .River system. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must operate all movable span bridges, provide suitable public terminals, and hold the United States free from damages. These conditions are being complied with. Terminal facilities. At Columbia, Alabama, there is a public wharf with concrete deck for handling general cargo and a bulk petroleum terminal with an unloading dock. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Recreational attendance at George W. Andrews Lock and Dam during CY 1981 totaled 271,000 recreational user days. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost included under overall Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint project. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the lock and dam began in March 1959 and was completed in November 1963. Work remaining consists of construction of recreational facilities. 40C.JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, GA. AND FLA. Location. The project is located on the Apalachicola River 107.6 miles above its mouth, about 1,000 feet below confluence of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, and 1.5 miles northwest of Chattahoochee, Florida. Reservoir extends about 46.5 miles upstream along the Chattahoochee River to the vicinity of Columbia, Alabama, and about 47 miles upstream along Flint River, or 17 miles above Bainbridge, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete open-crest spillway 1,634 feet long on the right bank, with a crest at elevation 79 feet national geodetic datum; a single-lift lock with usable chamber dimensions of 82 by 450 feet, a maximum lift of 33 feet, and depth over the sills of 14 feet; a gated spillway 766 feet long with the bridge at elevation 107 feet national geodetic datum, or about 67 feet above the streambed elevation; a powerhouse with an intake section constituting a portion of the dam; an earth section 506 feet long to accommodate the switchyard and substation; and an overflow dike section 2,130 feet long on the left bank, with a crest at elevation 85. The underlying foundation is limestone. At the normal pool elevation of 77, the reservoir has a total capacity of 406,160 acre-feet. The power installation consists of three units of 10,000 kilowatts each, or a total of 30,000 kilowatts. Project provides for maintenance, including operation and care. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Required cooperation is being fulfilled. Easements for rights-of-way and spoil-disposal areas were provided as required along the Apalachicola River. Adequate public terminals were constructed by local interests at Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River; and at Columbia, Alabama, on the Chattahoochee River. Facilities are being planned for other localities on the project. Terminal facilities. A public wharf with concrete deck for handling general cargo, a bulk storage terminal for petroleum, a grain elevator, and private riverside facilities at Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Recreational facilities provided at completed project amounted to $19,902. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost $2,707,678. Gross power generation amounted to 10-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 237,818,000 kilowatt-hours during FY 1982, of which 233,007,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Lake Seminole during CY 1981 totaled 3,370,000 recreational user days. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction of the lock was commenced in 1947, and completed in 1957. The lock was opened to navigation in May 1954, and the pool was raised to project level in January 1957. The first power-generating unit was placed on-the-line on February 1, the second on March 1, and the third on April 26, 1957. 40D.SPEWRELL BLUFF LAKE, GA. Location. The dam site is on the Flint River in Talbot and Upson Counties, Georgia, about nine miles west of Thomaston. The lake will extend into Meriwether, Pike, and Spalding Counties. Existing project. The authorized project provides for: a dam 2,475 feet long with maximum height of 211.0 feet, a 326-foot long gated spillway with six tainter gates 38 feet high and 45 feet wide, concrete non-overflow abutments 1,149 feet across the main channel including 268 feet for the power intake, with an earth-rock fill dike 580 feet long to high ground on the left bank, a 420-foot saddle dike on the left bank, and a power plant with three 50,000-kw units located in the left bank. The reservoir would have an area of 13,330 acres at maximum power pool elevation of 695 national geodetic datum. Usable storage of 241,510 acre-feet would be provided for power generation between elevations 665 and 695 and 195,010 acre-feet would be reserved between elevations 695 and 706.5 for flood storage. Approved estimated (1982) cost is $393,000,000, of which $275,470,000 is for construction and design, and $114,530,000 for lands, damages, and relocations. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interest must maintain and operate all utility and highway facilities which may be relocated or otherwise altered as part of the improvement, provide suitable public terminal facilities, and hold the United States free from damages. Local agencies and organizations have indicated their willingness and ability to comply. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction has not been initiated. 40E.WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, ALA. AND GA. Location. The project is on the Chattahoochee River about 75.2 miles above its mouth and about 1.5 miles above Fort Gaines, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete dam, gated spillway, and single-lift lock, with earth embankments at either side. The non-overflow section of the dam includes a powerhouse and an intake structure. The gated spillway is 708 feet long with a fixed crest at elevation 163 feet national geodetic datum. The two earth embankments, of almost equal lengths, have a total length of 12,128 feet, with a crest elevation at 215, and a maximum height of about 68 feet. The non-overflow section of the concrete dam is 200 feet long, with the deck of the powerhouse section at elevation 208. The lock, with usable chamber dimensions of 82 feet by 450 feet, has a lift of 88 feet with the normal upper pool elevation at 190. Depths are 13 feet over the lower sill and 18 feet over the upper sill at normal pool elevation. The underlying foundation is limestone. Total reservoir capacity is 934,400 acre-feet, with 244,400 acre-feet reserved for power. The power installation consists of four units of 32,500 kilowatts each, or a total of 130,000 kilowatts. The project provides for maintenance, including operation and care. The approved (1982) cost of rehabilitation work to control seepage is estimated to be $29,300,000. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must maintain and operate all utility and highway facilities which may be relocated or otherwise altered as part of the improvement, provide suitable public terminal facilities, and hold the United States free from damages. Local agencies and other organizations have indicated their willingness and ability to comply. Terminalfacilities. Public wharves at Eufaula and Phenix City, Alabama, and Columbus, Georgia, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Recreation facilities cost $508,510. Maintenance of the project for operation and care was $7,440,475. Gross power generation amounted to 380,817,000 during FY 1982, of which 381,148,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance during CY 1981 totaled 4,904,000 recreational user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in 1963. The lock was opened to navigation in June 1963. The first power generating unit was placed on-the-line in March, the second in May, the third in September, and the fourth in November 1963. 40F.WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA. AND ALA. 10-22 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT Location. The damsite is on the Chattahoochee River 2.8 miles upstream from West Point, Georgia, 201.4 miles above the mouth of the Chattahoochee River, and 309.2 miles above the mouth of the Apalachicola River. At the full power pool elevation of 635 feet above national geodetic datum, the reservoir would lie in Troup and Heard Counties, Georgia, and in Chambers and Randolph Counties, Alabama (See Geological Survey maps of Georgia and Alabama.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for flood control, power, recreation, fish and wildlife development, and streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. The project provides for a gravity-type concrete dam 896 feet long with earth embankments at either end 1,111 feet long on the east end and 5,243 feet long on the west end. The total length of the dam and spillway is 7,250 feet. The main dam consists of a concrete non-overflow section, 185 feet long on the west side and an earth embankment retaining wall on the east side; a gravity concrete spillway 390 feet long, including piers and abutments, with six tainter gates, each 50 feet by 41 feet. A monolith intake-powerhouse section and erection bay 321 feet long is constructed directly west and adjacent to the spillway. At the full power-pool elevation of 635 the reservoir provides a total storage of 605,000 acre-feet of which 307,000 acre-feet is usable. During the critical flood season the reservoir is operated with maximum power pool elevation at 625 feet to provide flood storage between elevations 625 and 635. The initial power installation of 73,375 kilowatts consisting of units 1, 2 and 3 which were placed in operation in March and April, 1975. The ultimate installation is 108,375 kilowatts. Approved estimated cost of new work (1982) is $132,600,000, of which $90,455,000 is for construction and design; $19,420,000 for lands and damages; and $22,725,000 for relocations. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Miscellaneous costs amounted to $51,922. Maintenance: Operation and care of the project cost $2,452,152. Gross power generation amounted to 163,847,000 kilowatt-hours during FY 1982, of which 158,068,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance during CY 1981 totaled 3,737,000 recreational user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project, which was initiated in June 1966, was about 98 percent complete at the end of the fiscal year. 41. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Mobile District monitors flood control operations of Alabama Power Company's Weiss, H. Neely Henry, and Logan Martin Dams on Coosa River, Alabama, and their Lewis Smith Dam on Sipsey Fork (headwaters of Black Warrior River, Alabama), for compliance with regulation plans prepared in accordance with Public Law 436, 83rd Congress, and Federal Power Commission licenses. Fiscal year cost for these activities on the Weiss, H. Neely Henry, and Logan Martin Dams are included under operation and maintenance costs for the Alabama- Coosa Rivers. Fiscal year cost for the Lewis Smith Dam is included under the overall operation and maintenance costs for the Black Warrior- Tombigbee Rivers System. General Investigations 42. SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $4,109,594 of which $1,888,718 was for navigation studies, $986,094 for flood control studies, $1,481,172 for special studies; $202 for review of authorized projects; $428 for coordination with the Soil Conservation Service; $7,979 for water quality management; $10,484 for coastal zone management; $28,129 for planning assistance to states; $2,613, for National Wild and Scenic Rivers System; $48 for technical assisstance on shore and streambank erosion; $208,777 for supplemental pre-authorization studies. Continuation of planning and engineering for Mobile Harbor cost $486,046, and, advanced engineering and design for Coosa River Channel project cost $2,875,150. 43. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Collection and study of basic data continued during the fiscal year with the completion of Flood Insurance studies, the cost of which was reimbursable by HUD. In addition, Flood Plain Management were performed at a cost of $169,036. (See Table 10-M for listings of studies completed during FY 1982.) For listing of previous reports see page 10-50 Annual Report for 1974, page 10-44 of FY 1975 Annual Report, page 10-46 of FY 1977 Annual Report, and page 10-48 of FY 1978 Annual Report. The National Program for inspection of non- Federal dams cost $9,891. 10-23 TABLE 10-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding FY79 FY80 FY81 1. Apalachicola Bay New Work: Fla. Approp. - - Cost - - 2. Aquatic Plant Control (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Bayou Coden, Ala. (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Bayou La Batre, Ala. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Biloxi Harbor, Miss. (Contributed Funds) 6. Black Warrior & Tombigbee Rivers, Ala. 7. Bon Secour River, Ala. (Contributed Funds) 8. Cadet Bayou, Miss. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost -24,000 56,800 26,000 21,992 53,698 7,436 16,000 17,000 17,000 5,864 18,295 14,217 6,121 3,966 11,832 13,000 12,899 8,088 309 45,000 13,400 41,577 6,456 146, 35, 877, 861, 197, 755, ,000 115,281 ,433 225,848 ,441 247,000 ,328 250,984 - 24,000 - 24,000 ,000 -11,000 ,719 549,453 2,000 1,: 12,690 987,577 994,121 84,171 124,729 Total Cost to FY82 Sept. 30, 1982 - 2,033.461 - 2,033,461 51,000 2,332,8072 48,810 2,308,280 20,400 423,687 26,938 413,442 - 21,225 - 21,225 - 330,7012 - 330,701 214,155 284,533 205,111 269,489 - 100,000 - 100,000 50,000 50,000 49,999 49,999 - 311,095 - 311,095 300,466 2,442,852 550,156 1,688,148 - 10,5004 - 10,500 - 1,215,4365 - 1,215,436 84,000 4,971,1066 81,142 4,958,584 - 102,600 - 102,600 265,000 153,811,737; 152,622 153,535,511 Maint: Approp. 10,716,400 11,426,000 13,014,800 10,277,901 Cost 9,652,581 12,149,695 13,113,823 9,534,333 New Work: Approp. - - - Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 6,075 - 28,048 39,000 6,754 - 18,796 16,837 1,712 1,700 21,000 182,101 3,898 2,108 6,400 175,872 125,473,0248 124,250,895 118,615 118,615 145,478 114,063 6,700 6,700 87,921 87,921 693,118 672,279 31,000 31,000 10-24 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 9. Dauphin Island Bay, Ala. 10. Dog and Fowl Rivers, Ala. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 11. East Pass Channel From Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, Fla. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 12. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla. and Mexican Border 13. Gulfport Harbor, Miss. 14. Mobile Harbor, Ala. (Contributed Funds) (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 16. Panama City Harbor, Fla. (Contributed Funds) 17. Pascagoula Harbor, Miss. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) _ _ Funding FY79 FY80 FY81 New Work: Approp. - - Cost - - Maint: Approp. 30,152 231,018 60,000 Cost 39,688 244,234 56,245 New Work: Approp. - - Cost - - Maint: Approp. 111,254 256,800 12,000 Cost 114,632 257,593 2,914 New Work: Contrib. - - - Cost - - - New Work: Approp. - -- Cost Maint: Approp. 17,000 576,000 363,000 Cost 24,291 569,269 362,586 New Work: Approp. - - Cost - - -. New Work: Approp. - - Cost - - Maint: Approp. 1,656,100 8,040,200 1,268,000 Cost 1,913,733 8,002,607 1,320,430 New Work: Approp. - - Cost - - - Maint: Approp. 1,280,000 1,707,000 2,981,000 Cost 1,259,169 1,734,630 2,661,941 New Work: Approp. 5,700,000 22,700,000 23,600,000 Cost 5,085,558 21,967,612 23,730,997 New Work: Approp. 517,500 1,050,000 1,150,000 Cost 459,860 1,037,345 1,161,761 Maint: Approp. 2,018,000 10,228,000 2,053,000 Cost 1,999,508 8,521,963 3,088,041 Maint: Approp. - - Cost - - New Work: Approp. - - Cost - - Maint: Approp. 48,071 30,577 118,717 Cost 44,704 34,518 110,334 New Work: Contrib. - - Cost - - New Work: Approp. Cost - - Maint: Approp. 1,141,000 4,268,500 2,186,000 Cost 1,173,849 4,246,186 1,451,652 Maint: Contrib. - 191,000 25,000 Cost 20,500 175,000 - 1,673,000 1,663,687 1,465,000 1,126,519 230,000 843,794 850,000 235,456 6,294,000 6,422,224 30,662,72210 30,591,099 904,77511 904,775 25,549,50814 24,874,534 68,018,93719 67,326,798 3,567,500 2,894,422 61,373,483" 60,737,700 12,000 12,000 - 1,638,045"'s - 1,638,045, 1,323,000 5,282,3341: 979,049 4,929,143 - 80,000 - 80,000 - 6,572,98517,, - 6,572,986 2,203,174 23,651,4201: 2,555,403 23,245,422 469,350 25,000 448,550 10-25 Total Cost to FY82 Sept. 30, 1982 - 292,864 - 292,864 54,000 982,026 26,862 949,390 - 190,965 - 190,965 44,000 724,593 1,386 672,812 - 114,100 - 114,100 - 916,715 - 916,715 926,000 4,435,160 854,843 4,355,888 - 398,000 - 398,000 - 6,480,299' - 6,480,299 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 18. Pensacola Harbor, Fla. 19. Perdido Pass Channel, Ala. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 20. Port St. Joe Harbor, Fla. (Contributing Funds) (Regular Funds) 21. Removing Water Hyacinths (Mobile District) 22. Waterway Connecting Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers, Ala. and Miss. Funding FY79 FY80 FY81 FY82 New Work: Approp. - - - - Cost Maint: Approp. 41,184 51,200 338,268 67,000 Cost 43,107 53,248 315,114 33,226 New Work: Aprop. Cost - - Maint: Approp. 287,000 261,800 192,000 427,000 Cost 285,809 159,447 300,028 413,904 New Work: Contrib. - - - Cost - - Maint: Contrib. - - - - Cost - - - - New Work: Approp. - - - - New Work: Contrib. - - - - Const. - - - - Maint: Approp. 44,670 672,794 53,994 50,253 Cost 44,473 664,782 51,795 22,315 Maint: Approp. 21,000 21,800 7,000 49,000 Cost 37,284 22,859 972 - New Work: Approp. 80,321,000 124,348,000 108,185,000 118,490,000 Cost 86,293,989 112,719,590 117,448,766 118,990,981 Maint: Approp. 424,000 2,477,000 3,228,000 4,624,000 Cost 410,092 2,183,192 3,368,455 3,598,169 27. Okatibbee Lake, Miss. 28. Tallahala Creek Lake, Pascagoula River, Miss. 29. Burketts Creek, Amory, Miss. 30. Gordon's Creek, Miss. 31. Houlka Creek, Miss. 32. Murder Creek, East Brewton, Ala. 33. Tombigbee River, Miss. and Ala. New Work: Approp. - 3,000 Cost Maint: Approp. 484,000 546,800 Cost 513,940 522,072 New Work: Approp. -1,186,000 -190,000 Cost 191,967 51,263 New Work: Approp. 56,000 64,000 Cost 60,106 60,630 New Work: Approp. 575,000 - Cost 480,281 79,594 New Work: Approp. 34,000 Cost 35,500 121,036 New Work: Approp. 150,000 5,974 Cost 57,981 99,038 New Work: Approp. - - Cost Maint: Approp. -1,000 150,000 Cost 839 28,121 65,000 1 31,020 3 602,000 69 570,387 57 190,000 147,694 100,3 17,533 650,0 19,117 9 -15,000 10,836 - -1 723 - 215,0 - 207,9 -40,000 67,321 L4,000 9,099,628 39,926 9,088,574 31,000 4,753,892 73,918 4,571,799 - 3,945,757 113 3,859,326 00 822,553 )8,578 265,140 - 775,623 670 773,925 11,781 238,219 - 238,219 00 400,974 20 393,894 - 134,801 - 134,801 1,234,100 7,063 1,226,086 10-26 11,302,331, 10,077,906 Total Cost to Sept. 30, 1982 1,469,69319 1,469,693, 4,058,238m 4,000,307 629,860 629,860 3,743,217 3,723,193 510,000 510,000 10,325 10,325 1,960,862 1,960,862 20,000 20,000 2,212,090 2,173,695 1,154,471 1,099,266 4 s 717,741,200,, 713,625,565 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project 34. Tombigbee River Tributaries Miss. and Ala. (Regular Funds) Contributed Funds) 38. Alabama-Coosa Rivers, Ala. and Ga. 38A. Carters Dam and Reservoir, Ga. 38B. Claiborne Lock and Dam, Ala. 38C. Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam, Ala. 38D. Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, Ala. 38E. Coosa River, Montgomery to Gadsden, Ala. 39. Allatoona Lake, Coosa River Basin, Ga. 40. Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, Ala, and Ga. 40A. Lake Sidney Lanier, Ga. 40B. George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, Ala. and Ga. 40C. Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, Ga. and Fla. Funding FY79 FY80 FY81 New Work: Approp. - 450,000 2,350,000 Cost 394.648 295,201 649,352 New Work: Contrib. - - Cost 1,052 New Work: Approp. 2,525,000 3,835,000 12,190,000 Cost 5,731,313 5,939,040 10,209,325 Maint: Approp. 8,020,000 7,872,700 10,003,100 Cost 8,369,084 7,737,239 9,565,378 New Work: Approp. - -1,100,000 1,050,000 Cost 1,126,304 150,720 1,201,528 Maint: Approp. 1,636,000 1,462,800 1,860,600 Cost 1,881,118 1,485,797 1,735,269 New Work: Approp. - - - Cost - - New Work: Approp. -675,000 2,799,000 1,900,000 Cost 1,844,048 3,533,201 2,127,375 Maint: Approp. 1,054,000 1,390,800 1,835,000 Cost 1,124,435 1,319,160 1,828,692 New Work: Approp. -14,000 40,000 Cost 1,625 3,160 18,130 Maint: Approp. 2,278,000 1,866,300 2,453,000 Cost 2,265,592 1,903,222 2,024,013 New Work: Approp. 3,200,000 2,150,000 9,200,000 Cost 2,759,336 2,251,959 6,862,288 New Work: Approp. -358,000 164,700 582,931 Cost 416,831 149,422 175,420 Maint: Approp. 3,245,000 3,220,800 4,006,000 Cost 3,271,631 3,231,770 3,881,048 New Work: Approp. 3,473,000 2,922,000 1,677,899 Cost 3,555,113 3,598,176 1,471,173 FY82 Sept. 30, 1982 800,000 11,414,225 1,669,031 10,157,138 - 80,700 - 49,752 i1,400 3 0 9 ,1 7 6 ,1 0 8n 1,664 308 ,23 2,171 8,480 6 8 ,55 7 ,4 5 4n 9,915 67,242,204 - 111,330,340 7,053 111,096,079 0,000 11,950,800 1,853 11,722,004 - 27,997,450 - 27,997,450 0,000 83,247,800 3,377 82,944,140 6,000 9,674,778 3,988 9,357,143 6,000 62,726,778 4,422 62,702,800 7,480 18,349,965 5,655 17,751,107 4,600 15,035,400 6,812 14,653,362 2,000 35,445,085 6,857 34,798,168 3,480 33,588,523 0,212 32,608,799 7,000 337,184,620, 1,493 336,081,478 179,684,364, 176,887,264 52,872,7566 52,389,296 38,323,407 37,552,119 13,038,4270 13,038,427 o13,038,427 so as 48,020,358,1 47,933,909 34,493,081 33,791,071 2,65 5,26 9,89 9,54 3 2,01 1,99 2,66 2,70 1,87 1,69 2,68 2,61 -1 2,51 97 83 3,81 3,07 91 1,10 Maint: Approp. 17,048,000 16,231,700 20,918,300 20,870,960 Cost 15,839,945 17,203,131 20,154,974 20,440,078 New Work: Approp. 877,000 2,208,000 337,000 386,000 Cost 468,186 2,458,356 452,439 502,277 Maint: Approp. 4,429,000 3,441,800 4,956,000 5,009,480 Cost 4,182,496 4,013,988 4,560,430 4,685,414 New Work: Approp. - - - - Cost Maint: so so so so Approp. s so so so New Work: Approp. 55,000 12,000 81,348 -3,000 Cost 87,795 -13,246 48,661 19,902 Maint: Approp. 3,347,000 3,152,400 3,099,000 3,049,000 Cost 2,838,434 3,320,360 3,210,277 2,707,678 10-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY79 FY80 FY81 FY82 Sept.30, 1982 40D. Sprewell Bluff Lake, New Work: Ga. Approp. 2,169,600 Cost 177 - 2,158,652 44E. Walter F. George New Work: Lock and Dam, Approp. 85,000 -7,000 532,551 527,000 88,241,088k Ala. and Ga. Cost 98,781 7,563 216,672 508,510 87,870,922 Maint: Approp. 2,538,000 2,906,300 5,407,700 6,825,440 41.124.564 Cost 2,337,818 3,006,667 4,445,259 7,440,475 40,566,460 40F. West Point Lake, New Work: Chattahoochee River Approp. 2,456,000 659,000 500,000 129,846,411 Basin, Ga. and Ala. Cost 2,900,352 1,095,949 541,721 51.922 129,706,275 Maint: Approp. 2,716,000 1,887,700 2,620,000 2,573,000 14,287,800 Cost 2,224,328 2,332,469 2,596,982 2,452,152 14,037,335 1. Includes $134,613 for previous projects and $28,500 for DPR on Two-Mile. 2. Includes $168,766 for previous projects. 3. Includes $5,650 for previous projects. 4. Cost for providing spoil dikes for work authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act. 5. Includes $44,382 for previous projects of which $5,000 was contributed funds. 6. Includes $96,509 for previous projects of which $10,200 was contributed funds. 7. Includes $606,931 for previous projects and $725,430 for recreational facilities on completed projects. 8. Includes $50,000 for previous projects. 9. Includes $45,605 for previous projects. 10. Includes $66,137 for previous projects. 11. Includes $269,017 for previous projects. 12. Includes $2,312,297 for previous projects and $442,836 Special O and M funds. 13. Includes $6,683,104 for previous projects $14,000 Public Work funds and $41,242 Emergency Relief funds. 14. Includes *4,096,681 for previous projects and $494,136 Special 0 and M funds. 15. Includes $203,560 for previous projects, $581,959 Public Works funds, $457,467 rehabilitation of jetties under existing project and $48,001 for Grand Lagoon modification. 16. Includes $513,604 for previous projects. 17. Includes $904,442 for previous projects. 18. Includes $412,624 for previous projects, $124 565 Special 0 and M funds, and $829,472 Emergency Work Funds. 19. Includes $594,688 for previous projects. 20. Includes $126,649 for previous projects. 21. Includes $2 100,000 transferred to National Park Service; $210249 GI funds expended during FY 1957 thru FY 1961. Previous project cost amounted to $197,651. 22. Includes $234,331 for previous projects. 23. Includes ,692,483 for previous projects. 24. Includes 2,978,050 for previous projects. 25. Includes $2,436,573 for recreational facilities. 26. Includes $1,883,193 Federal funds, $1,924 contributed funds for previous projects; and, $809,553 for Lazer Creek design and 301,310 for Rysco Channel. 27. Includes $2,246,233 for previous projects. 28. Includes $7,585,202 for recreational facilities. 29. Includes $84,014 for recreational facilities. 30. Included under maintenance for overall Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers project. 31. Includes $1,470,982 for recreational facilities. 32. Includes $2,016,172 for recreational facilities. 10-28 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT TABLE 10-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1907 Jan. 21, 1927 Sept. 3, 1954 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 Nov. 21, 19631 Feb. 5, 19751 APALACHICOLA BAY, FLA. (See Section 1 of Text) Channel 18 feet deep through West Pass and Link Channels, 10 feet deep across the inner bar, and 9 feet deep through Bulkhead Shoals. Modify project to provide for channel 10 feet deep from mouth of inner bar channel to Gulf via Link and West Pass Channels, and 10-foot depth in Bulkhead Shoals Channel At Eastpoint, Fla., a channel 6 feet deep 100 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long, parallel to shore, with connecting channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to St. George Sound, and at Apalachicola, Fla., a small-boat basin 200 feet and 9 feet deep, with a connecting channel 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide through Sclpio Creek to the Apalachicola River. Modify project to provide for a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 10-foot depth in Apalachicola Bay across St. George Island to within 300 feet of the Gulf shore, thence increasing uniformly in width to 200 feet at shore and continuing at this width to the 10-foot depth in the Gulf with two jetties extending from the dune line on St. George Island to the outer end of channel, and for abandonment of West Pass Channel upon completion of channel through St. George Island. Modify improvement of Apalachicola Bay Fla., authorized by River and Harbor Act of Sept. 3, 1954 to provide that the Secretary of the Army shall reimburse local interests for such approved work as they may have done based upon the reduction in the amount of material which will have to be removed to provide project dimensions at such time as Federal dredging of the channels is undertaken. A channel 6 feet deep 100 feet wide and about 1 mile long, parallel to shore at 1 wo Mile, Fla., with a 6-by 100-foot connecting channel to water of the same depth in Apalachicola Bay. A channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from the eastern end of the existing Two Mile channel and generally paralleling the shoreline for a distance of about 9,000 feet to intersect with the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway about 1,650 feet south of Gorrie Bridge at Apalachicola, and a breakwater built to elevation 4.0 feet above mean low water along the seaward side of the existing channel parallel to the shore at Two Mile. The total length of the breakwater would be about 6,150 including two 860-foot legs paralleling the existing entrance channel. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 2 of Text) Aquatic plant control for N.C., S.C., Ga., Fla., Ala., Miss., and La. Research and planning costs to be borne by U.S. Provided for continued research. BAYOU CODEN, ALA. (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 4 by 40 feet. Channel 8 by 60 feet to connect with Bayou La Batre channel. BAYOU LA BATRE, ALA. (See Section 4 of Text) A 12- by 100-foot channel from that depth in Mississippi Sound to a point about 2,800 feet south of the highway bridge, thence a channel 12 by 75 feet to the bridge, an overall distance of about 33,500 feet. BILOXI HARBOR, MISS.'(See Section 5 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mississippi Sound west and north of Deer Island to deep water in Back Bay of Biloxi. H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 87-874 87th Cong. H. Doec. 251, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 824, 77th Cong., 2d Sees. DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doec. 327, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. . H. Doec. 754, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. 10-29 H. Doc. 422, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doec. 106, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doec. 156, 82d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 557, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) DPR (Sec. 107) July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 June 2, 19691 Oct. 27, 1965 July 3, 1930 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts June 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 Nov. 7, 1966 Mar. 28, 19791 July 5, 1884 Mar. 3, 1899 Sept. 19, 1890 Sept. 19, 1890 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1909 Aug. 22, 1911 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Work Authorized Relocation of channel. Entrance channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide into Old Fort Bayou Entrance channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide through Cranes Neck into Bayou Bernard. Maintain channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide from Biloxi Harbor to Ott Bayou. Continuous channel 12 feet deep from Mississippi Sound the Air Force terminal on Bayou Bernard via Back Bay and Cranes Neck. A 23-mile-long through channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through: Mississippi Sound, Biloxi Bay (east of Deer Island), Back Bay, Big Lake, and via land cut to Gulfport Lake, including a 500- by 2 600-foot turning basin in the lake thence, a channel 12 by 00 feet from the western end of Gulfport Lake for about 2 miles to a 300- by 500-foot turning basin; adoption for maintenance of a 12- by 150- foot spur channel from the main channel in Biloxi Bay, westward about 1 mile to a 400- by 600-foot turning basin opposite Ott Bayou, and abandonment of the existing 6- by 40-foot channel into Ott Bayou; continuation of maintenance of the 12- by 150-foot lateral channel westward about 2.2 miles from the main channel in Biloxi Bay to a point opposite Oak Street; continuation of maintenance of the channel west of Deer Island. A channel 10 feet deep; 100 feet wide and 300 feet long extending northward from the Biloxi Lateral Channel, and, into a rectangular basin approximately 300 feet by 370 feet. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, ALA. (See Section 6 of Text) Original appropriation for improving Black Warrior River. Original project for slack-water improvement authorized by Secretary of War, Apr. 19, 1887. Construction of the first locks between Tuscaloosa and Demopolis. (Maintenance of the section of Tombigbee River below lock 1 to its mouth (66 miles) included in the existing project.) / Construction of locks and dams 1, 2, and 3. Merging of the individual project for the Black Warrior and Warrior Rivers and the Tombigbee River below Demopoli" Construction of locks and dams 14, 15, 16, and 17. Provides for reconstruction of obsolete structures, modified in plan and location, to provide efficient and economical maintenance and operation. Lift of lock 17 changed to 63 feet and construction of locks and dams 18 and 19 eliminated from the project. Extension of slack-water improvement to Sanders Ferry on Mulberry Fork and Nichols Shoal on Locust Fork. Raising of various dams 2 feet and raising the lock walls 2 feet at lock 1 to provide a minimum depth of 8 feet at low water, widening the channel to 150 feet where practicable. For snagging Mobile River from the mouth of Chickasaw Creek to the junction of the Alabama and Tombigbee Rivers. Increase channel dimensions to 9 by 200 feet; construct crest gates at lock and dam 17; add flashboards at all dams; Sunflower Bend Cutoff. Construction of a lock and dam below Tuscaloosa to replace original locks and dams 10, 11, and 12. 10-30 Documents H. Doc. 639, 75th Cong.. 3d Sess. H. Doc. 258, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 326, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doec. 256, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 271, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 513, 89th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) Annual Report, 1887, pt. 2, p. 1302. H. Doc. 178, 56th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1901, pt. 3, p. 1858. H. Doc. 165, 57th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report, 1902, p. 1293. Public Law 317. H. Doc. 72, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1918, p. 876. H. Doc. 728, 71st Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 56, 73d Cong., 1st Sess and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doec. 45, 73d Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Dec. 26, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 26, 1934 Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 May 16, 19631 May 20, 19691 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 May 19, 19691 July 3, 1930 Oct. 24, 1951 Oct. 27, 1965 Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Recreation facilities. Construction of a lock and dam near Demopolis to replace existing dams 4, 5, 6, and 7. Provide increased spillway capacity at dam 1. Coffeeville Lock and Dam Wildlife Refuge. BON SECOUR RIVER, ALA. (See Section 7 of Text) A 10- by 100-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Bon Secour Bay to mouth of Bon Secour River and extending up river to vicinity of Swift's Landing, thence 6 by 80 feet up river to a point 600 feet above Oak Landing, with two turning and maneuvering areas 150 feet wide and 1,100 to 1,200 feet long opposite Swift's Landing and ice loading dock. Overall length of improvement is about 4.7 miles CADET BAYOU, MISS.(See Section 8 of Text) An 8- by 100-foot entrance channel extending from the 8-foot depth contour in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of the bayou, thence an 8- by 80-foot channel for a distance of about 1,900 feet into the bayou to a turning basin 8 feet deep, and a channel continuing therefrom 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide upstream for 8,750 feet with a second turning basin 6 feet deep located 900 feet downstream from the upper limit of the improvement. DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, ALA. (See Section 9 of Text) A channel 7 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay to an anchorage basin of same depth, about 7 acres in area, in marsh just north of Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island; a channel 4 feet deep and 40 feet wide from anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay; and a jetty and revetment to protect entrance channel; and (b)an anchorage basin 7 feet deep and 500 feet square at Dauphin Island Village with an entrance channel of like depth, 100 feet wide and about 8,300 feet long, extending to 7-foot hydrographic contour in Mississippi Sound DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, ALA. (See Section 10 of Text) To provide small craft navigation on west side of Mobile Bay. EAST PASS CHANNEL FROM GULF OF MEXICO INTO CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY, FLA. (See Section 11 of Text) Maintenance of 6-foot channel by 100-foot channel from Choctawhatchee Bay into Gulf. Maintenance of 12-foot channel from Choctawhatchee Bay into Gulf, and maintenance of 6-foot channel into Old Pass Lagoon. Construction of twin jetties. (Present project dimensions.) GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FLA., AND MEXICAN BORDER (Mobile District) (See Section 12 of Text) APALACHICOLA BAY TO ST. MARKS RIVER, FLA. A channel 9 feet and 100 feet wide at mean low water from Apalachicola Bay, Fla. via St. George Sound, Carrabelle, Crooked, and Ochlockonee Rivers and Ochlockonee and Apalachee Bays to St. Marks River, Fla. APALACHICOLA RIVER TO ST. ANDREW BAY, FLA. A channel 5 feet deep at mean low water and 65 feet wide at the bottom. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. H. Doc. 291, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doec. 670, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 52, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. 10-31 H. Doc. 276, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 382, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 50, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doec. 333, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doec. 394, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) H.Doc. 209, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 470, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doec. 194, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. Aug. 26, 1937 June 25, 1910 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 July 3, 1930 July 3, 1930 July 3, 1930 July 23, 1942 June 17, 1943 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Nov. 7, 1966 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Jan. 21, 1927 July 23, 1930 June 30, 1948 July 3, 1958 Aug. 26 1937 CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY TO WEST BAY, FLA. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water, with no reference to width. CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY TO PENSACOLA BAY, FLA. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. PENSACOLA BAY, FLA., TO MOBILE BAY, ALA. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. MOBILE BAY, ALA., TO NEW ORLEANS, LA. A channel 300 feet wide and 10 feet from the 10 foot contour in Mobile Bay to the 10-foot contour in Mississippi Sound. A channel 100 feet wide and 9 feet deep from Lake Pontchartrain to Mississippi Sound. APALACHEE BAY, FLA., TO NEW ORLEANS, LA. A channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide at mean low water except in the section between Mobile, Ala., and N'ew Orleans, La., where the width is to be 150 feet. Conditional acquisition of Gulf County Canal, Fla., and enlargement of the canal to 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide. Construction of a movable span in the Georgia, Florida & Alabama R.R. bridge crossing the Ochlockonee River Abandonment and closure of original channel between Big Lagoon and Pensacola Bay and construction of a new channel to enter the bay north of original entrance. Authorized enlargement of Gulf County Canal to 12 by 125 feet. GULFPORT HARBOR, MISS. (See Section 13 of Text) A channel 19 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the anchorage basin at Ship Island to Gulfport, Miss., and an anchorage basin next to the shore end 19 feet deep and not less than 2,640 feet by 1,320 feet in area. Combined Ship Island Pass with Gulfport Harbor project. Increased depth to 26 feet and width to 300 feet across Ship Island Bar and depth to 19 feet in channel from anchorage basin at Ship Island to anchorage basin at Gulfport. Authorized relocation of channel across Ship Island Bar. Increased depth to 27 feet and width to 300 feet across Ship Island Bar 26 feet deep and 220 feet wide through Miss. Sound and depth of 26 feet in the anchorage basin at Gulfport. Increased depth of 32 feet and width to 300 feet across Ship Island Bar, 30 feet deep and 220 feet wide through Miss. Sound, and a depth of 30 feet in the anchorage basin at Gulfport. Maintenance of the existing commercial small-boat harbor and an approach channel 100 feet wide and 4,300 feet long, from deep water in Miss. Sound to the small-boat basin, all at a depth of 8 feet. MOBILE HARBOR, ALA. (See Section 14 of Text) For improvement of Threemile Creek by snagging from Mobile River to the Industrial Canal. 10-32 H. Doc. 259, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 565, 61st Cong., 2d Seas. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 42, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 42, 71st Cong., 1st Sees. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 341, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Public Law 675, 77th Cong., 2d Sees. and H. Doc. 96, 79th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 257, 76th Cong., 1st Sess., and Public Law 75, 78th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 442, 76th Cong., 1st Sees. H. Doc. 325, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 89-789, 89th Cong., 2d Seas. H. Doc. 120, 55th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 2, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 692, 69th Cong., 2d Sees. H. Doc. 112, 81st Cong., S. Doc. 123, 84th Cong., 2d Sees. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 69, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 Sept. 3, 1954 July 26, 1970 (SR) Dec. 15, 1970 (HR) Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 Mar. 23, 1967 June 14, 1972 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 4, 1915 May 17, 1950 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 Adoption of existing channel through Garrows Bend from Choctaw Point to Arlington pier, 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide, with 2 turning basins. Adoption of the existing channel alongside Arlington pier from the MobileBay Channel to turning basin at the inner end of Garrows Bend Channel, 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide. A channel 25 feet deep and generally 500 feet wide in Mobile River from the highway bridge to the mouth of Chickasaw Creek, then 25 feet deep and 250 feet wide in Chickasaw Creek to a point about 400 feet below Shell Bayou. Enlarging Mobile Bar Channel to 42 by 600 feet. Enlarging Mobile Bay Channel to 40 by 400 feet. Deepening Mobile River Channel below highway bridgeto 40 feet over present widths, including existing turning basins and anchorage areas. Widening river channel opposite Magazine Point to provide a 40- by 800- by 1,400-foot turning basin. The turning basin was further modified for maintenance by SAD letter of 27 November 1973 under authority contained in ER-1130-2-307, to increase the turning basin's dimensions to 1000' x 1600'. Closure of Garrows Bend Channel by construction and operation of an earth-filled causeway across said channel (work to be done by local interests). To provide a channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the main ship channel in Mobile Bay and extending northwesterly for about 5.3 miles to the shore of Mobile Bay including an anchorage and turning basin near the shoreline, thence a land-cut 40 feet deep, 300 feet wide and about 1.9 miles long to and including a trapezoidal turning basin 40 feet deep and approximately 42 acres, 40 feet deep; a barge channel 12- by 100-feet extending f00-eet and terminating in a 300-foot by 300-foot terminal basin. PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 15 of Text) Channels 27 and 29 feet deep. Abandonment of project adopted by act of June 25, 1910. Maintenance of a channel in Watson Bayou 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in St. Andrew Bay to the highway bridge. Channels 32 and 34 feet deep. A channel 8 by 100 feet in Grand Lagoon from St. Andrew Bay to a point about 2,400 feet east of State Highway 392. Bridge with branches to serve shore facilities which terminate at the bridge. Channels 38, 40, 42 feet deep. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MISS. (See Section 16 of Text) Provides for through channel from the Gulf to mile 4 on Dog River 25 by 300 feet through Horn Island Pass, thence 22 by 225 feet across Mississippi Sound and up Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge, thence 22 by 150 feet in Pascagoula River above bridge, and up Dog River to mile 4, all subject to financial participation by local interests. Waived requirement for financial participation by local interests Cutoff channel 12 by 125 feet, from State Highway 63 bridge to mile 4 on Dog River, via Robertson and Bounds Lakes. Modification to provide for channel dimensions of 35 by 325 feet through Horn Island Pass, thence 30 by 275 feet across Mississippi Sound and up Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge, and a turning basin just below the bridge. Reimbursement of local interests for work done on Dog River cutoff ($44,000). H. Doc. 739, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doec. 74, 83d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 74, 83d Cong., 2d Ses. (Under provision of Section 201 of the 1966 Flood Control Act) H. Dec. 33, 73d Cong., 1st Seas. H. Doc. 66555, 76th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 559, 80th Cong., 2d Seas. DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 196, 92d Cong., 2d Seas. H. Doc. 682, 62d Cong., 2d Seas. River and Harbor Committee Doc. 12, 63d Cong., 2d Seas. H. Doec. 188, 81st Cong., 1st Seas. H. Doc. 98, 86th Cong., 1st Seas. 10-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 14, 1960 July 14, 1967 Oct. 28, 1962 June 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 27, 1962 Oct. 27, 1966 July 25, 1912 Aug. 26, 1987 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 Modification to provide for maintenance of 12- by 125-foot channel to mile 6 on Dog River, and maintenance of 30- by 225-foot side channel from main ship channel in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of Bayou Casotte, thence 30 by 300 feet in Bayou Cassotte to a turning basin of the same depth 1 mile above the mouth. Deepening the Ho' n Island Pass channel to 38 feet and deepening the main ship channel in Missiasippi Sound, the river channel to the railroad bridge, and the turning basin all to 33 feet. Enlarging Horn Island Pass Channel to 40 by 350 feet, provision of an impounding area adjacent to and east of channel 40 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 1,500 feet long, enlarging main channel in Missisippi Sound and river channel to railroad bridge to 38 by 350 feet, and deepening turning basin in river and Bayou Casotte channels and basin to 38 feet. PENSACOLA HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 17 of Text) A channel 30 feet deep at mean low water and 500 feet wide from the Gulf of Mexico to the dock line at the east end of the city of Pensacola, and also provided that $150,000 may be used in constructing or purchasing a seagoing suction dredge. Modified the existing project for the present inner channels and the deepening of the entrance channel to 32 feet. Improvement of Bayou Chico. Modified improvement of Bayou Chico, Fla. Maintenance of the entrance channel from the Gulf of Mexico to lower Pensacola Bay a distance of about 5 miles to dimensions of 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide; maintenance of a channel along the south side of the aircraft carrier mooring basin, a distance of about 2.5 miles, to dimensions of 33 feet deep and 300 feet wide; a bay channel 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and about 2.1 miles long; parallel approach channels to opposite ends of the inner-harbor channel about 1.3 and 1.4 miles in length, each 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and flared at the junctions with the inner-harbor channel; and deepening the existing 500-foot wide inner-harbor channel to a depth of 33 feet and lengthening it to 3,950 feet. PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, ALA. (Section 18 of Text) A 12- by 150-foot channel stabilized by twin rubblemound jetties, from the Gulf of Mexico into Perdido Pass, thence 9 by 100 feet into Perdido Bay with a spur channel of the same dimensions into Terry Cove. PORT ST. JOE, FLA. (See Section 19 of Text) A channel 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide across the bar at the entrance to the bay. An entrance channel 300 feet wide and 29 feet deep, and a bay channel 200 feet wide and 27 feet deep, with a turning basin at the proposed municipal pier at Port St. Joe. Adoption of south channel 27 feet deep and 200 feet wide from bay to turning basin, provision of a 32- by 300-foot entrance channel a 32- by 200-foot north bay (inner) channel, and a 32- by 1,000-by 2,000-foot turning basin. Enlargement of the channel to provide for a depth of 37 feet and a width of 500 feet at the Gulf end, diminishing in width to 400 feet over a distance of 3.6 miles, thence 37 by 400 feet for a distance of 3.3 miles, thence 35 by 300 feet in St. Joseph Bay to the turning basum, a distance of 7.1 miles, and a harbor channel in the basin 35 feet deep, 250 feet wide, and 2,000 feet long. 10-34 H. Doc. 98, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Chief of Engineers Report dated Nov. 3, 1960. H. Doc. 560, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 253, 72d Cong., Ist Seas. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 96, 74th Cong., 2d Seas. H. Doc. 743, 79th Cong., 2d Seas. H. Doe. 528, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 94th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 660, 62d Cong., 2d Ses. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe. 10, 6th Cong., 1st Seas. S . Doc. 17, 77th Cong., 1st Sees., and report of Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 595, 81st Cong., 2d Seas. MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 July 27, 1916 July 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 June 7, 1968 Nov. 6, 1981 2 Feb. 20, 19772 Mar. 1, 1977k 2 Feb. 17, 1982 Aug. 18, 1941 REMOVING WATER HYACINTHS, MOBILE DISTRICT (See Section 20 of Text) Appropriations made for the States of Florida and Louisiana and provided for the extermination or removal of plants, the building of boats, and the establishment of booms. Appropriation made for Florida, provided that no chemical process injurious to cattle shall be used. And also made available for use in that State the operating plan pertaining to the work of Louisiana. Appropriation made available for the State of Alabama. WATERWAY CONNECTING TOMBIGBEE AND TENNESSEE RIVERS, ALA. AND MISS. (See Section 21 of Text) A waterway connecting Tennessee and Tombigbee Rivers via East Fork of Tombigbee River, Mackeys and Yellow Creeks. Plan of improvement consists of three sections: river section, 9- by 300-foot channel for 149 miles between Demopolis and Amory, Miss,; canal section, 12 by 300 feet for 46 miles from Amory to Bay Springs; divide section, 12 by 300 feet (except in the 27 mile-long divide cut in which bottom width would be 280 feet) for 39 miles from Bay Springs through dividing ridge to Tennessee. Total lift of 341 feet to be accomplished by 10 locks. Total length of project is 234 miles. OKATIBBEE LAKE, MISS. (See Section 27 of Text) Provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, and recreation. TALLAHALA CREEK LAKE, PASCAGOULA RIVER, MISS. (See Section 28 of Text) Provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement. BURKETTS CREEK, AMORY, MISS. (See Section 29 of Text) Provides for an earth filled diversion structure with side slopes of one vertical on three horizontal, and, a'60 foot bottom width canal about 4,000 feet long to connect Burketts Creek to Lock A pool of the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway. In addition, provisions were made for a concrete baffled chute with a rip rap blanket along its toe. GORDON'S CREEK, HATTIESBURG, MISS. (See Section 30 of Text) Flood control improvements along Gordon's Creek consisting of channel enlargement by excavation to a bottom width of 40 feet for a distance of 6,489 feet, and, clearing and snagging of an additional 5,831 feet for a total project length of 12,320 feet. HOULKA CREEK CHICKASAW AND CLAY COUNTIES, MISS. (See Section 31 of Text) Selective clearning and snagging between tops of banks of the lowermost 34.1 miles of Houlka Creek. Removal of snags and debris. MURDER CREEK EAST BREWTON, ALA. (See Section 32 of Text) Provides for nonstructural measures for the reduction of flood damages by flood plain evacuation and flood proofing of selected buildings along the left bank of Murder Creek. TOMBIGBEE RIVER, MISS. AND ALA. (See Section 33 of Text) Provides for alleviation of floods from the Tombigbee River by clearing, snaggng, and excavation of 13 cut-off channels, and other related channel improvements. H. Doc. 91, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 486, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 549, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 143, 90th Cong., 1st Sess. DPR (205) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 208) DPR (205) Special Report on Record in OCE. (Public Law 222, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. 10-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 198Z TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents TOMBIGBEE RIVER TRIBUTARIES, MISS. AND ALA. (See Section 34 of Text) Provides for improvement of 22 tributaries of Tombigbee River. Extends project limits on Twenty Mile Creek and eliminates local cooperation for this remedial work. MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, ALA. AND GA. (See Section 38 of Text) Provides for full development of Alabama-Coosa Rivers and tributaries for navigation, flood control power, recreation, and other purposes. Authorized construction of Carters Lake Ga. Claiborne Lock and Dam, Ala., Jones Bluff Lock and Dam, Ala., and Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, Ala. Suspended comprehensive plan to permit non-Federal interests to develop Coosa River by constructing series of dams. Designated change of name from Jones Bluff to Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam. ALLATOONA LAKE, COOSA RIVER BASIN, GA. (See Section 39 of Text) Provides for dam and reservoir for flood control regulation of stream flow for navigation, development of iydroelectric power and recreation Mar. 2, 1945 June 28, 1954 May 25, 1982 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 Dec. 22, 1944 Jan. 27, 1981 July 24, 1944 July 24, 1946 Dec. 22, 1944 Dec. 22, 1944 Dec. 30, 1965 H. Doc. 167, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. PL (96-304) H. Doec. 414, 77th Cong., 1st Seas. Public Law 486, 88rd Cong. 5.2034 97th Cong., 2d ess. Public Law 228, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Dec. 674, 76th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doe. 324, 7th Cong., 1st Seam. H. Dec. 00, 80th Cong., DPR (Sec. 107) H. Dec. 300, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Dec. 567, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 10-36 July 23, 1958 July 8, 1980 APALACHICOLA CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, ALA., GA. AND FLA. (See Section 40 of Text) Development of Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers for navigation, flood control, hydropower, and recreation. Modified general plan for full development of Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint River System and authorized construction of Lake Sidney Lanier multipurpose reservoir. Authorized recreation facilities. Modified the existing project to provide for nine foot deep by 100-foot wide side channel into the Apalachicola River Industrial Park, Blountstown, Fla. LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA. (See Section 40A of Text) Provision of recreation facilities. GEORGE W. ANDREWS LOCK AND DAM, ALA. AND GA. (See Section 40B of Text) Construction of high dam at Walter F. George site and low dam at George W. Andrews site. Provided recreation facilities. JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, GA. AND FLA. (See Section 40C of Text) Provided recreation facilities. SPEWRELL BLUFF LAKE, GA. (See Section 40D of Text) Authorized construction MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, ALA, AND GA. (See Section 40Eof Text) May 19, 1953 Authorized construction of high dam at Walter F. George H. Comm. on Public Works. site and low dam at Columbia site. WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA. AND ALA. (See Section 40F of Text) Oct. 23, 1962 Authorized construction for flood control, power, H. Doc. 570, 87th Cong., recreation, fish and wildlife development, and 2d Sess. streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of Flood Control Act of 1948. of 1960 River and Harbor Act. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 208 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 205 of Flood Control Act of 1954. TABLE 10-C BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, ALA. (See Section 6 of Text) William John Hollis Coffeeville Demopolis Warrior Bacon Oliver Holt Bankhead Lock Lock and Lock Lock Lock Lock Dam and Dam and Dam and Dam and Dam and Dam Miles above Mobile2 116.7 213.2 261.1 338.2 347.0 365.5 Nearest town (Alabama) Coffeeville Demopolis Eutaw Tuscaloosa Tuscaloosa Oak Grove Distance (miles) 3)within city) 6 15 Lock: Greatest length available for full width (feet) 600.0 600.0 600.0 450.0 600.0 600.0 Width of chamber (feet) 110 110 110 95 110 110 Maximum lift (feet) 34 40 22 28 64 68 Depth over sills at low water (feet) 13.0 13.0 13.2 12.0 13.0 14.0 Character of foundation Rock Rock Sand, clay Hard shale Shale, Sandstone sandstone Kind of spillway Fixed-Gated Fixed Gated Fixed Gated Gated TyCn construction ock Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Dam Concrete Concrete Earth- Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Year completed 1965 1962 1962 1940 1969 Under const. Year opened to navigation 1960 1954 1957 1939 1966 1975 Actual cost of lock and dam $21,597,2643 $19,774,5833 $13,295,553 $4,450,874 $28,100,0003 $49,828,672 1. Single lift lock 2. Navigation mileage from foot of Government Street, Mobile, Ala. 3. Excludes cost of adding recreation facilities. 4. Cost to date (FY 82) for replacement of single lift lock which was essentially completed in FY 80. Excludes $1,435,636 cost of land submerged, damage to structures, and cost of spillway. Also excludes $3,824,859 cost of original double lift lock. 10-37 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 10-D RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 22 of Text) Cost During Project Date of Survey Fiscal Year Blackwater River, Fla. March 1982 $6,830 Ca rabelle Harbor, Fla. April 1982 5,292 mbia-Conecuh Rivers, FIl. and Ala. November 1981 9,073 Fly Creek, Ala. March 1982 1,529 LaGrange Bayou, Fla. May 1982 1,601 Panacea Harbor, Fla. September 1982 1,271 Pascagoula River, Miss. July 1982 156 Pass Christian, Miss. July 1982 3,756 St. Marks River, Fla. September 1982 6,218 Wolf and Jordan Rivers, Miss. January 1982 2,560 Total $37,2851 1. Other cost of surveys, included under 0 & M for Batre, Ala.,$466; Cadet Bayou, Miss., $2,101; and Port St. Joe respective projects are: Bayou Coden, Ala., $1556; Bayou La Harbor, Fla., $253. TABLE 10-E OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 23 of Text) For Last Cost to September 80, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Report For Construction Maintenance Blackwater River, Fla. 1981 $ 41,650 $266,368 Bluff Creek Miss.' 1963 $ 1,000 $ 6,883 Bon Secour River, Ala. 1979 118,615 91,194 Cahaba River, Ala. 1894 45,000 Carrabelle Bar and Harbor, Fla. 1979 481,627 379,413 Choctawhatchee River, Fla. and Ala. 1973 171,885 291,694 Escambia-Conecuh Rivers, Ala. and Fla. 1981 208,499 1,092,223 Fly Creek, Ala. 1981 29,000 200,250 Holmes Creek, Fla. 1931 8,562 36,800 LaGrange Bayou, Fla. 1972. 289,496 78,974 Leaf and Chickasawhay River, Miss.2 1919 23,090 42,676 Noxubee River, Miss.' 1902 47,528 14,472 Ocholockonee (Ochlockney) River, Ga. and Fla.' 2 1900 5,000 Old Town Creek, Miss.' 2 1887 3,000 Oostanaula and Coosawatee River, Ga.' 2 1907 32,656 Panacea Harbor, Fla. 1979 122,383 92,352 Pascagoula River, Miss. 1956 15,000 179,535 Pass Christian Harbor, Miss. 1976 59,313 139,653 St. Marks River, Fla. 1965 1,710,809 84,115 Tllapoosa River, Ala.2 1893 43,972 Upper Chipola River, Fla., from Mariana to its mouth' 1941 36,781 63,193 Wolf and Jordan Rivers, Miss. 1979 29,195 461,515 1. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467. 69th 2. Uncompleted portion of project deauthorized hv H Conn. Doc. 96-157, 1st Session. 10-38 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT TABLE 10-F NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 24 of Text) Study Authority Fiscal Year 1982 Costs Bi!oxi Harbor, Harrison County, MS 107 $ 7,511 Blackwater River, FL 107 6,539 Blakeley Bar, Baldwin County, AL 107 6,977 Carrabelle Harbor, FL 107 13,011 Dog River Channel, AL 107 13,109 East Point Breakwater, FL 107 32,516 Epes Harbor, Tombigbee River, AL 107 7,946 GIWW to Port Bienville, MS 107 * 39,192 Lake Krebs, MS 107 4,150 Old Pass Lagoon, FL 107 7,903 Shell Point, Waukulla County, FL 107 10,995 Liza Jackson State Park, Ft. Walton, FL 103 13,247 Total $163,0961 1. Excludes $19,381 for Rysco Shipyard Channel construction. TABLE 10-I OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 36 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Report For Construction Maintenances Alabama River at Montgomery, Ala.' 1965 $144,194 Armuchee Creek, Ga. 1966 115,547 Beaver Creek, Montezuma, Ga. 1958 149,815 Black Creek, Gadsden, Ala. 1953 125,389 Clanton, Ala. 1964 274,024 Collinsville, Ala. 1940 71,119 Jackson and East Jackson, Miss. 1979 7,190,200 Lake Douglas, Decatur County, Ga. 1970 164,998 Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, Ala. 1965 113,849 Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, Ala. 1980 190,974 Prattville, Autauga Creek, Ala. 1946 649,280 Rome, Coosa River, Ga. 1955 384,550 Sowashee Creek, Meridian, Miss. 1956 142,637 Town Creek, Americus, Ga. 1965 340,409 Trussville, Ala. 1965 141,334 West Point, Chattahoochee River, Ga. 1955 599,637 Yellow Jacket Creek, Hogansville, Ga. 1966 330,734 1. Engineering,' design, supervision, and administration (no construction work has been done. Includes $17,000 for preauthorilation studies. 2. Operation and maintenance is the responsibility of local interests. 10-39 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 10-G OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT (See Section 25 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Report For Construction Maintenance! Harrison County, Miss., shore protection' 1953 $1,133,000 1. Completed. 2. Operation and maintenance is the responsibility of local interests. TABLE 10-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 87 of Text) Study Authority Fiscal Year Costs Bishop Creek, Pelham, AL 206 -$ 9,359 Chattahoochee River, Helen, GA 206 11,296 Cribbs Mill Creek, Tuscaloosa, AL 205 8,988 Greens Creek, Petal, MS 206 4,055 Mill Creek, Dalton, GA 206 46,938 Norton Creek, Saraland, AL 206 76,078 Orange Grove Community, MS 205 7,367 Sandy Creek, Laurel, MS 205 72,738 Sellers Creek, Mendenhall, MS 205 30,384 Silver Creek, Rome, GA 205 7,574 Sope Creek, Marietta, GA 206 8,516 Streams in Vicinity of Rome, GA 205 28,970 Three Mile Creek, Mobile, AL 205 109,661 Town Creek, Gadsden, AL 206 3,497 Upper Gordons Cr., Hattiesburg, MS 206 28,246 Hwy 182 Bridge, Perdido Pass, AL 14 11,131 Hwy 84 Bridge, Monticello, MS 14 7,499 Hwy 43 Bridge, Chickasawbogue Cr., AL 14 -266 I-20 Bridges, Pearl River, Jackson, MS 14 1,528 Lorraine Rd., Biloxi River, MS 14 8,726 Osborne Creek, Prentiss County, MS 14 3,196 US Hwy 35 Bridge, Columbia, MS 14 6,860 Wolf Creek, Prentiss Co., MS 14 8,022 Big Escambia Creek, Flomaton, AL 208 7,422 Trim Cane & Sun Creeks, MS 208 15,095 Total $503,1611 1. Excludes construction costs of $98,578 for Burketts Gordons Creek, MS; all under Sec. 205 authority and, Creek, Amory, MS; $207,920 for East Brewton, AL; $670 for $216,397 for Valpariso, FL under Sec. 14 authority. 10-40 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT TABLE 10-H DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Section 26 of Text) Year of Last Deauthorization Date Project Type Full Report Document' Deauthorised Bayou Galere, Miss. Navigation 1946 H. Doc. 192, 94th Cong., 5 Aug. 1977 1st Sess., as amended. 1. H. Doc. 96-157 deauthorized uncompleted portions of certain projects as shown in Table 10-E. TABLE 10-K ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, ALA. AND GA. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED UNDER EXISTING PROJECT (See Sections 38 and 39 of Text) Claiborne Millers Ferry Robert F. Henry Carters Allatoona Proposed Structures Lock and Dam Lock and Dam Lock and Dam Lake Dams Dam Miles above mouth of river 81.11 42.2' 245.41 26.8' 47.8' Nearest town Claiborne, Ala. Camden, Ala. Benton, Ala. Carters, Ga. Cartersville, Ga. Distance (miles) 7 10 3 2 4 Greatest lock length available for full width (feet) 600 600 600 - - Width of lock chamber (feet) 84 84 84 - - Maximum lift (feet) 30 48 47 - - Elevation of normal pool surface (mean sea level) 35 80 125 1072 Varies seasonally Depth over sills at low water 13 Upper 15 Upper 15 - - (feet) Lower 13 Lower 12 Character of foundation Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Kind of spillway Gated and Gated Gated Gated Gated Fixed Crest Height of dam (feet) 95.5 99.5 94 451 190 Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Rock-fill Concrete Earth Core Total reservoir capacity (acre-feet) 96,360 331,800 234,200 472,800 670,050 Power development (kw) - 75,000 68,000 500,000 74,000 Percent complete 100 100 99 100 100 Cost to date: $27,997,450 $62,702,800 $82,944,140 $111,096,079 $34,798,168 1. Above mouth of Alabama River (river miles). 2. Above mouth of Coosawattee River (river miles). 3. Reregulation dam (Carters) 25.3 (river miles). 4. Above mouth of Etowah River (river miles). 5. Includes cost of added recreation facilities as shown in Table 10-A. 10-41 TABLE 10-L APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, ALA., GA., AND FLA., LOCKS AND DAMS AND MULTIPLE-PURPOSE DEVELOPMENT INCLUDED IN EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 40 of Text) Existing Projects Jim George W. Walter F. Buford Dam Woodruff Andrews George Lake Lock Lock Lock West Point Sidney and Dam and Dam and Dam Lake Lanier t4 Z N O A W W z c 0 0 W Ht 107.61 Chattahoochee, Fla. 1 450 82 33 77 14 Limestone Fixed-gated 67 Concrete and Earth 367,300 30,000 Miles above mouth Nearest town Distance (miles) Greatest lock length available for full width (feet) Width of chamber (feet) Maximum lift (feet) Elevation of normal pool surface (msl) Depth over sills at low water (feet) Character of foundation Kind of spillway Height of dam (feet) Type of construction Total reservoir capacity (acre-feet) Power development (kilowatts) Percent complete Year opened to navigation Estimated cost: Cost to date:' 46.52 Columbia, Ala. 1 450 82 25 102 13 Limestone Fixed-gated 62 Concrete 18,180 75.0s Ft. Gaines, Ga. 2 450 82 88 190 (Summer) 185 (Winter) 13 Limestone Gated 114 Concrete and Earth 934,400 201.42 West Point, Ga. 2.8 Authorized Projects Lower Auchumpkee Lazer Spewrell Creek Creek Bluff Lake Lake Lake 348.32 233.4' Buford, Ga. Roberta, Ga. 5 7 635 (Summer) 1070 625 (Winter) Rock Gated 95 Concrete and Earth 604,500 130,000 73,875 100 1962 100 1963 98 Rock Fixed 192 Earth 2,554,000 417 Rock Gated 130 Concrete and Earth 548,000 86,000 81,000 100 $47,933,909 $13,038,427 $87,870,9226 $129,706,275 $52,380,296 $222,000,000 255.8' Thomaston, Ga. 8 543 Rock Gated 142 Concrete and Earth 342,000 87,000 $258,000,000 263.8 Manchester, Ga. 8 700 Rock Gated 180 Concrete and Earth 486,200 150.000 $360,000,000 $2,158,652 1. Above mouth of Apalachicola River (river miles). 2. Above mouth of Chattahoochee River (river miles). 3. Above mouth of Flint River (river miles). 4. Includes cost of added recreational facilities as shown in Table 10-A. 5. Includes $333,198 cost of land for wildlife refuge. 100 1954 MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT COMPLETED FLOOD INSURANCE STUDIES AND FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION REPORTS FOR FY 1979 THRU FY 1981' (See Section 43 of Text) Study Flood Insurance Studies Ft. Payne, Alabama Geneva, Alabama Picayune, Mississippi Kennesaw, Georgia Powder Springs, Georiga Montgomery, Alabama Fulton Co., Georiga Montgomery Co., Alabama Roanoke, Alabama Wedowee, Alabama Heflin, Alabama Randolph County, Alabama Hobson City, Alabama Oxford, Alabama Weaver, Alabama Flood Insurance Studies Anniston, Alabama Calhoun County, Alabama Special Flood Hazard Information Date Federal Requesting Agency Completed Cost (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal lu rance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) FEMA FEMA Oct 78 Oct 78 Oct 78 Jan 79 Jan 79 Feb 79 Sep 79 Apr 80 Feb 81 Feb 81 Mar 81 Mar 81 Sep 81 Sep 81 Sep 81 Apr 82 Apr 82 $40,200 32,800 46,000' 4,100 5,500 186,500 209,000 104,600 19,400 21,900 20,700 34,400 14,200 30,000 6,400 80,900 61,200 Chattahoochee River, Walter Lower Chattahoochee Area Planning Apr 79 133,000 F. George to West Pt. Dam, Ga. and Development Commission Mulberry Fork and Cane Creek, Ala. Birmingham Regional Planning Commission July 79 50,000 Coldwater Creek, Ala. Coldwater United Methodist Church July 79 10,000 Yellowjacket Creek & City of Hogansville, Ga. July 79 10,000 Hogansville Branch, Ga. Dowling Branch, Ala. City of Hartford, Ala. Jan 80 10,000 Gum Creek, Ga. Housing Authority, Cordele, Ga. Sep 80 10,000 Choctawhatchee River, Fla. Board of County Commissioners Jan 81 10,000 Holmes County, Fla. Chattahoochee River, Supple- Atlanta Reg. Planning Mar 82 5,000 for Buford to Whitesburg Report Commission Oothcalooga Creek Gordon Co., GA Board of Jun 82 10,000 Commissioners 1. For list of reports completed by Mobile District for FY and, for reports completed in FY 1976 and FY 1977, see FY 1965 thru FY 1974 Annual Report, page 10-50; reports com- 1977 Annual Report, page 10-46. See page 10-48 FY 1978 Anpleted in FY 1975 see FY 1975 Annual Report, page -10-44; nual Report for FY 1978 reports. 10-43 TABLE 10-M - NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT * District comprises a portion of Louisiana, including drainage area of Red River south of Fulton, AR, embraced in drainage basins tributary to Mississippi River and Gulf of Mexico, except Mississippi River above mile 325.5 above Head of Passes, drainage area of Ouachita-Black River Basin, and small eastern and western portions of Louisiana tributary to Pearl River and Sabine River and Lake. It includes sections of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from Lake Borgne Light 29 at the mouth of Pearl River to Sabine River, and the Passes of the Mississippi River. It exercises jurisdiction over flood control work on Mississippi River from mile 325.5 AHP to Gulf of Mexico; on Red River including its south bank levees and tributaries from Index, AR, to its junction with Old River and Atchafalaya River; Atchafalaya River; and in Atchafalaya Basin; and maintenance of project navigation channel of Mississippi River below mile 325.5 AHP, under supervision of President, Mississippi River Commission (MRC), and Division Engineer, Lower Mississippi Valley Division. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Aquatic Plant Control Program, LA ...... 11-2 2. Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, LA ............. 11-3 3. Barataria Bay Waterway, LA ........... 11-3 4. Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche- Jump Waterway, LA .................. 11-4 5. Bayou Teche and Vermilion River, LA .... 11-5 6. Bayou Teche, LA ........................ 11-5 7. Calcasieu River and Pass, LA ............ 11-6 8. Freshwater Bayou, LA ................ 11-7 9. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla., and Mexican Border (New Orleans Dist.) ............ 11-7 10. Houma Navigation Canal, LA .......... 11-10 11. Leland Bowman Lock, LA (Replacement of Lock) (Formerly Vermilion Lock, LA ........... 11-10 12. Mermentau River, LA ................. 11-10 13. Mississippi River, Baton Rouge toGulfof Mexico, LA ..................... 11-11 14. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, LA ........ 11-13 15. Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, LA ............................. 11-13 16. Overton-Red River Waterway, LA ........ 11-14 17. Red River emergency bank protection .... 11-14 18. Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA ................ 11-14 19. Removing water-hyacinth, LA ........... 11-15 20. Tangipahoa River, LA ................. 11-15 21. Waterway from Intracoastal Waterway to Bayou Dulac, LA (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, LA) ....................... 11-16 22. Navigation work under special authorization .................. 11-16 Flood Control Page 23. Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR and LA ........................... 11-16 24. Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA ............ 11-17 25. Bayou Pierre, LA ...................... 11-17 26. Brush Bayou, LA ........................ 11-17 27. Caddo Lake, LA ....................... 11-18 28. Grand Isle & Vicinity, LA ............... 11-18 29. Lake Pontchartrain and vicinity, LA, (hurricane protection) .............. 11-19 30. Larose to Golden Meadow, LA (hurricane protection) ................. 11-20 31. McKinney Bayou, AR and TX .. ......... 11-20 32. New Orleans to Venice, LA, (hurricane protection) ................. 11-21 33. Red River below Denison Dam (New Orleans Dist.) ................... 11-22 34. Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabilization (New Orleans Dist.) .... 11-22 35. Red River Waterway-Shreveport, LA, to Index, AR ....................... 11-22 36. Wallace Lake, LA ..................... 11-23 37. West Agurs, LA ......................... 11-24 38. Inspection of completed flood control projects ......................... 11-24 39. Flood control work under special authorization .......................... 11-24 General Investivations 40. Active Investigations .................. 11-24 Tables Table 11-A Cost and Financial Statement .... Table 11-B Authorizing Legislation .......... Table 11-C Bayou Teche, LA, Locks .......... 11-25 11-29 11-35 11-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Tables (cont.) Table 11-D Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Between Apalachee Bay, FL and Mexican Border (New Orleans Dist.)-Locks ................. Table 11-E Other Authorized Navigation Projects ....................... Table 11-F Reservoir Operations Fiscal Year 1982 .............. Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL PROGRAM, LA Location. Lakes and streams in State of Louisiana. Existing project. Provides for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growth from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas, in combined interests of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economic control measures. The modification of the 1965 Act provides for comprehensive program for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water milfoil, and other obnoxious plant growths from navigable waterways, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economic control measures. Research and planning costs undertaken pursuant to 1965 Act shall be borne fully by the United States and shall not be included in costs to be shared by local interests. Local cooperation. Local interests must hold and save the United States free from claims and participate in project to extent of 30 percent of cost of operations. State of Louisiana, Office of Public Works, and Louisiana Department of Wild Life and Fisheries furnished a joint assurance of local cooperation, which was approved Apr. 29 and accepted May 4, 1959. Under provisions of continuing contract, local agencies are performing work in kind, exceeding 30 percent of cost of program. Operations and results during fiscal year. Combined efforts by Corps of Engineers crews and crews of the State of Louisiana, Department of Wild Life and Fisheries, continued against aquatic vegetation prob- Page Tables (cont.) Page Table 11-G Red River Below Denison Dam (New Orleans Dist.): New Projects .................. 11-40 11-36 Table 11-H Red River Below Denison Dam (New Orleans Dist.): 11-38 Incorporated Projects ............ 11-41 Table 11-I Other Authorized Flood 11-39 Control Projects ................ 11-42 Table 11-J Active General Investigations .... 11-44 lems throughout the State. Water-hyacinth control requires maintenance work in all areas, and waterhyacinth persists as the most serious aquatic pest. Control maintenance by the Corps of cleared areas continued in the Mermentau River, Bayou Lacassine, Bayou Queue de Tortue, in the Bayou Teche Basin south of U.S. Highway 190, including the lakes west of the Atchafalaya Floodway, in the feeder areas of the Port Allen-Morgan City Route of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, and in the feeder areas to the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway in Coastal Louisiana. Louisiana Department of Wild Life and Fisheries crews continued maintenance efforts in the major lakes and streams of north Louisiana, in the Atchafalaya Floodway, in the Louisiana portion of the Toledo Bend Reservoir, and the Pearl River Basin within Louisiana. During the fiscal year, 29,056 acres of water-hyacinths were destroyed in the State of Louisiana under this funding. Louisiana Department of Wild Life and Fisheries crews destroyed 15,156 acres and Corps of Engineers crews destroyed 13,900 acres primarily by herbicide treatment. The alligatorweed flea beetle (Agasicles hygrophila) population has increased to the point that they are again exercising significant control of this plant in many areas of the state. In addition, the stem boring moth (Vogtia malloi) has spread to such an extent that it is found associated with alligatorweed in all locations. The water-hyacinth weevils (Neochetina eichhorniae and Neochetina bruchi) have been spread throughout all areas of the state that water-hyacinth infest and adult feeding scars are more prevalent everywhere. Submersed weed problems in Toledo Bend Reservoir have reached serious proportions and Caddo Lake is also experiencing interference with boating and fishing. Hydrilla verticillata, an introduced exotic submersed weed species, continues to spread along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and poses a threat to water-related activities. Condition as of Sep. 30. Operations under 1958 River and Harbor Act, initiated May 1959, are complete. Operations under 1965 Act were initiated in FY 1968. Waterways are being cleared, then maintained as required. 11-2 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT 2. ATC'HAFALAYA RIVER AND BAYOUS CHENE, BOEUF, AND BLACK, LA Location. The improvement is located in the parishes of Assumption, Terrebonne, and St. Mary, LA, in the vicinity of Morgan City, along Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, and the Lower Atchafalaya River to the Gulf of Mexico. (Refer to MRC alluvial maps, Morgan City, Belle Isle, and Point au Fer quadrangles, NOAA Coast Charts Nos. 11351 and 11355 of Intracoastal Waterway, and Coast Chart No. 11354 for the Atchafalaya River system.) Existing project. Provides for enlargement and extension of project, Atchafalaya River, Morgan City to the Gulf of Mexico, LA, to obtain navigation channels 20 feet deep over a bottom width of 400 feet from vicinity of U.S. Highway 90 crossing over Bayou Boeuf to the Gulf of Mexico via Bayou Boeuf, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Bayou Chene, Avoca Island Cutoff, the lower Atchafalaya River, Atchafalaya Bay to the Gulf of Mexico, and from near U.S. Highway 90 to Bayou Chene via Bayou Black and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. The 400-foot channel extends into the Gulf of Mexico to the 20-foot contour, and the width in Bayou Boeuf would be reduced to 300 feet where necessary because of industrial development on both sides of the bayou. Estimated cost for new work (October 1982) is $33,600,000 Federal and $2,270,000 non-Federal, including $1,000,000 contributed funds. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $220,000. Local cooperation. For details see page 11-3, Annual Report for FY 1980. Assuring Agency: Morgan City Harbor and Terminal District. Basic assurance was approved on behalf of United States on Dec. 10, 1973, and amended assurance containing the applicable provisions of Public Law 91-646 and Public Law 91-611 was approved on behalf of United States on Feb. 25, 1974. In an effort to expedite the project, local interests have accomplished the surveys, soil borings, testing, and the basic mapping at an estimated cost of $250,000, for which they will not be reimbursed. As a convenience to local interests and to avoid confusion in 25 percent and 75 percent acquisition cost, the New Orleans District agreed to acquire all lands, with local interests reimbursing the Government for their 25 percent portion. An escrow agreement has been executed between the local interests and the Government, whereby, they will advance funds in a sufficient amount to provide for their portion of the acquisition and diking cost. To date original advance of $518,000 has been withdrawn; however, local interests will be required to deposit in escrow an additional $456,000. Local interests have asked that the Government invoke the navigation servitude under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, thereby requiring pipeline owners to relocate their pipeline at no expense to local interests or the Government. Terminal facilities. Two large and three small public wharves at Morgan City are open for use by all without charge. In addition, there are numerous privately owned facilities on both banks of the lower Atchafalaya River in Morgan City and Berwick, LA, and along Bayou Boeuf and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Fabrication and repair facilities are located on Bayous Boeuf and Black. Adequate acreage is available for expansion of existing terminals and construction of new terminals along Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Public and private terminals in the project area are adequately connected with rail, water, and highway transportation facilities. No additional public wharves are required. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated on the Atchafalaya Bay and gulf reach in April 1974. The project is 100 percent complete. 3. BARATARIA BAY WATERWAY, LA Location. In Jefferson Parish, LA, and extends about 37 miles southerly from junction of Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and Bayou Barataria near Lafitte Post Office. From its origin it extends southerly through Bay Barataria, Bayou Dupont, a land cut (known as Dupre Cut) through marsh area, Bayou Cutler, Bayou St. Denis, and Barataria Bay to east end of Bayou Rigaud. At its southerly terminus it also connects with Barataria Pass and through that pass with the Gulf of Mexico. (Refer to NOAA Coast Charts Nos. 11352, 11340, and 11535 and Geological Survey quadrangles, Barataria, Bay Dogris, Wilkinson Bay, and Barataria Pass.) Previous project. For details see page 562 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. A channel about 37 miles long with a 12-footdepth and 125-foot width from its beginning at Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to Grand Isle, LA, following route of previous project to mile 15.5 in Bayou St. Denis; thence by a relocated channel along western shore of Barataria Bay and through Barataria Pass to 12-foot-depth contour in the gulf, with an extension of project to include westerly 4.3 miles of Bayou Rigaud. Normal range of tide is 30 inches at mouth and 6 inches at head. Elevation of water surface near mouth, due to hurricanes, has been over 6 feet. Existing project was completed at a cost of $1,499,648. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 563, Annual Report FY 1963. Terminal facilities. Six privately-owned wharves at Lafitte; three privately owned facilities at Grand Isle; and wharfage in Bayou Rigaud at Grand Isle constructed by shrimping industry are available to all boats without charge. About 7 miles below Lafitte there is a large oil terminal for transferring production of Lafitte field to barges. Adjacent to Bayou Barataria and along Bayou Rigaud adequate sites are available for future use. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor continued condition and operation studies, stream gaging, and water quality studies. 11-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in May 1960 and completed in November 1963. 4. BAYOU LAFOURCHE AND LAFOURCHE-JUMP WATERWAY, LA Location. Prior to 1902, Bayou Lafourche was an outlet of Mississippi River, its head being at Donaldsonville, LA, 80 miles above New Orleans. It flows southerly 107 miles to Gulf of Mexico. (Refer to NOAA Coast Charts Nos. 11340 and 11357; MRC alluvial valley maps; Donaldsonville, White Castle, Napoleonville, Thibodaux, and Lac des Allemands quadrangles; and Geological Survey maps, Houma, Cutoff, Lake Felicity, Mink Bayou, Leeville, and Belle Pass quadrangles.) Previous projects. For details see page 564 of 1963 Annual Report. Existing project. Provides for permanent closure of head of bayou without a lock, a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from Canal Boulevard in Thibodaux to Lockport, and from Larose to Gulf of Mexico with a jettied entrance at Belle Pass, and the closure of Pass Fourchon. These improvements are about 50.5 miles long, and the modification of Jul. 14, 1960, provides for an additional 66 miles of improvement as follows: a 12- by 125-foot channel, extending from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway at mile 37.2 west of Harvey Lock to enter Bayou Lafourche below highway bridge at Leeville at about mile 12; a 12- by 125-foot channel in Bayou Lafourche from point of junction with proposed 12- by 125-foot channel to 12-foot-depth contour in gulf; modification and extension of existing jetties from 6-by 12-foot contour, if found advisable to reduce maintenance dredging in the gulf; and a channel 9 by 100 feet in Bayou Lafourche from Leeville to vicinity of lower limits of Golden Meadow; and a 12- by 125-foot channel from Bayou Lafourche at Leeville from point where auxiliary channel connects with Bayou Lafourche through Southwestern Louisiana Canal to and through Bayou Rigaud to connect with enlargement of Bayou Rigaud recommended under project "Barataria Bay Waterway, LA." Normal range of tide is 10 inches at mouth and 3 inches at head; from severe rains, 3 to 10 feet at head; from hurricanes, up to 10 feet at mouth. Estimated cost for new work (October 1980) is $10,500,000 Federal and $6,050,000 non-Federal. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $43,000. Excavation of a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from Thibodaux to Gulf Intracoastal Waterway at Lockport is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost of tlis portion (July 1974) is $733,000. Local cooperation. Original assurances received and accepted on all items of work in the project. Provisions of Public Law 91-611 are not applicable; however, provisions of Public Law 91-646 are applicable. Supplemental assurances covering Public Law 91-646 have been executed by the Jefferson Parish Council and Lafourche Parish Police Jury; however, the Louisiana Office of Public Works has not executed supplemental assurances. Golden Meadow to gulf: Local agency has acquired all rights-of-way and furnished rights-of-entry. Leeville to Grand Isle: No action is apparent on this stretch by either the Lafourche Parish Police Jury, the Jefferson Parish Council, the local assurers, or the State of Louisiana, Office of Public Works. Rights-ofway are not available due to multiplicity and other complications of ownership. The "Jump" portion of the project was classified as inactive on May 4, 1977. The Jefferson Parish Council and the Lafourche Parish Police Jury were requested to provide information as to whether they still favor construction on this part. If reactivation is favored, it should be with the understanding that they would have to provide required rights-of-way when requested. The Greater Lafourche Port Commission stated that they may provide assurances for that portion of the project located in Lafourche Parish. These assurances were forwarded to the Greater Lafourche Port Commission on Jan. 22, 1979. On Mar. 9, 1979, we requested information as to the status of their execution of the assurances. The Greater Lafourche Port Commission appears to be reluctant to execute the required assurances. Terminal facilities. There are numerous private warehouses, wharves, and stiff-leg derricks for handling cane along bayou. At Lockport, Barker Barge Line has a barge wharf with covered shed, and Southern Pacific Railroad maintains a large wharf with covered shed. At Golden Meadow each of the seafood canneries has docking facilities suitable for its needs. Four oil companies have docks at Leeville for transferring production of Leeville oil fields to barges. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor consisted of engineering studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of existing projects was initiated in FY 1939 and is 21 percent complete. Dredging between Larose, LA, and Gulf of Mexico was completed in 1939, and that segment between Lockport and Napoleonville, LA, is in an inactive status due to lack of right-of-way and spoil area. Jetties at mouth of Belle Pass were completed in 1939, and later damaged by storm action, which required placement of additional stone adjacent to both sides of steel sheet pile jetties in 1940, and repair and extension of jetties in 1941. During FY 1948, stone jetties were repaired and extended inland about 700 feet from shoreline; and steel sheet pile section was strengthened for about 250 feet gulfward of stone jetties, by placement of stone on both gulf and bayou sides. On May 31, 1949, an automatic tide gage for recording hurricane and storm tides was installed. Modification of Jul. 14, 1960, was initiated in February 1963 and is 21 percent complete, with 12- by 125-foot channel completed in September 1963 from Leeville to 12-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico, the 9- by 100-foot channel completed in August 1966 from Golden Meadow to Leeville, and the 9- by 100-foot channel from Golden Meadow to Leeville completed in August 1966. The Greater Lafourche Port Commission requested, 11-4 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT and was granted, a permit to dredge a new channel 20 by 300 feet wide west of the existing channel from mile 0.76 in Bayou Lafourche to the 20-foot depth in the gulf, and to close the existing jettied channel after completion of the new channel. This work was completed in March 1968 and the Port Commission must maintain the channel at no less than 12 by 125 feet. 5. BAYOU TECHE AND VERMILION RIVER, LA Location. Bayou Teche has its source in Bayou Courtableau, in St. Landry Parish, and flows southeasterly 125 miles to its confluence with lower Atchafalaya River, about 10.5 miles above Morgan City, LA Vermilion River, also called Bayou Vermilion, is formed by junction of Bayous Fusilier and Bourbeau, west of Arnaudville, LA, and flows southwesterly 72 miles to western end of Vermilion Bay. Bayou Teche is connected with Vermilion River by Bayou Fusilier at Arnaudville; and by Ruth Canal, an artificial, privately-owned, nonnavigable waterway, constructed for diversion of water from Bayou Teche to Vermilion River for rice irrigation. (Refer to NOAA Coast Charts No. 11340 and 11349; MRC alluvial valley maps; and Geological Survey maps.) Existing project. A navigable channel 51 miles long and 8 by 80 feet from 8-foot-depth contour in Vermilion Bay to Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, thence 9 by 100 feet to head of navigation (mile 52) at Lafayette, LA (fixed bridge at Louisiana State Highway 729, formerly State Highway 1092), with additional enlargement below Abbeville necessary to provide adequate capacity for floodflows; improvement of Vermilion River from Lafayette, LA, mile 52, to its junction with lower end of Ruth Canal, mile 57.2, by both widening and deepening to provide a channel 6 by 60 feet, mean gulf level, in order to provide adequate capacity for flood discharges from upper Vermilion River Basin, and also serve irrigation interests by conducting flow of Ruth Canal to lower Vermilion River during rice season. Clearing and enlargement of channel from Ruth Canal to Bayou Fusilier by both widening and deepening to provide a cross section about 50 percent larger than that of existing channel. This improvement is required in interest of flood control in upper Vermilion Basin. Enlargement of channel of Bayou Teche from its head in Bayou Courtableau to a point about 21 miles downstream thereof, by widening and deepening to provide a channel of 35-foot bottom width at minus 2 and minus 3, mean gulf level. Increasing height of Keystone Dam by 3 feet (later revised to 1.5 feet) by installation of a fixed crest spillway. (See individual report for Bayou Teche, LA.) In connection with these improvements, the project also provides for replacement of an existing pontoon bridge at Woodlawn over Vermilion River with a vertical-lift structure and lengthening and strengthening approaches to five existing movable bridges over Vermilion River below Lafayette, LA, located at Louisiana State Highway 43 at Perry, LA; Southern Pacific Railroad at Abbeville, LA; Louisiana State Highway 25 at Abbevile, LA; Milton, LA; and U.S. Highway 90 (Pinhook Bridge) just below Lafayette, LA. Similar work on existing fixed spans over nonnavigable streams is provided for on 11 bridges over Bayou Vermilion above Lafayette, LA, and three over upper Bayou Teche. New work completed in 1957 cost $2,891,922. Project was reclassified "Operation and Maintenance, General" under category, "Navigation (Locks, Dams, Reservoirs, and Canals)" by authority of Chief of Engineers, Apr. 23, 1956. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 687, Annual Report FY 1944. Terminal facilities. Privately-owned, publiclyoperated terminals are located on Bayou Teche at Franklin, Jeanerette, New Iberia, and Arnaudville. Other privately-owned boat landings are located at frequent intervals throughout the bayou and public/ landing is permitted without charge. Facilities on they Vermilion River include a public wharf and two privately-owned barge landing piers at Abbeville equipped for barge truck transfers of general commodities, seven landings for the transfer of petroleum products, and several private landings all along the waterway suitable for small craft. The Vermilion Sugar Company maintains a barge slip at its mill. Present facilities are adequate for existing commerce and there is ample space available for construction of more wharfage. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces continued condition and operation studies, stream gaging, and snagging and clearing above Lafayette, LA. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction commenced March 1944 and was completed March 1957, when Keystone Dam was raised to provide an increase of 1.5 feet in pool elevation, in order to increase flow through Ruth Canal into Vermilion River. This work was accomplished under navigation improvement "Bayou Teche, LA." 6. BAYOU TECHE, LA. Location. Has its source in Bayou Courtableau, in St. Landry Parish, flow southeasterly for 125 miles, and joins lower Atchafalaya River about 10.5 miles above Morgan City, LA (Refer to NOAA Sailing Chart No. 11340, and MRC alluvial valley maps, and Palmetto, Opelousas, Carencro, Arnaudville, St. Martinville, Loreauville, Derouen, Jeanerette, Foster, and Belle Isle quadrangles.) Previous projects. For details see page 569, 1963 Annual Report. Existing project. Provides for a channel 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide on the bottom from mouth of stream to New Iberia, LA, mile 54.5, thence 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide on the bottom to Keystone Lock, 18 miles, and thence 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide on the bottom from Keystone Lock to Arnaudville, LA, 34 miles, to be secured by dredging, removing snags and overhanging trees, and construction of a lock and dam and regulating works. (See Table 11-C on Keystone Lock.) 11-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Raising pool level by 1.5 feet above Keystone Dam by installation of a fixed crest spillway on dam is provided for in flood control project for Bayou Teche and Vermilion River, LA. Under project, flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries, East and West Calumet floodgates, with a width of 45 feet and sill elevation of minus 9.02 feet, mean low gulf level, were constructed in Bayou Teche at east and west approaches to Wax Lake Outlet from February 1949 to September 1950, and a lock was constructed in lower Atchafalaya River in vicinity of Berwick, LA, from November 1948 to September 1951. (See Table 11-C on Berwick Lock.) Normal range of tide is 10 inches at mouth; 4 inches just below Keystone Lock; extreme, 12 inches at mouth; 6 inches just below Keystone Lock; and zero above lock; due to freshets 4 to 5 feet at mouth; 12 to 15 feet just below Keystone Lock, and 2 to 7 feet above Keystone Lock. Estimated cost for new work (1954) is $1,080,000, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects and estimated cost (1954), $371,400 for widening and deepening channel between miles 50.06 and 72, Keystone Lock and Dam, which is inactive. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 687, Annual Report FY 1944. Terminal facilities. Small, privately-owned wharves are available at all towns along bayou; public landing is permitted without charge. There are privatelyowned terminals for transferring crude oil to barges near towns of Charenton, Jeanerette, Oliver, and St. Martinville. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor continued operation and maintenance of Keystone Lock and facilities, condition and operation studies, and stream gaging. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in 1891 and completed July 1928, except widening channel to bottom width of 80 feet from mile 50.06 to New Iberia, and to bottom width of 60 feet from New Iberia to Keystone Lock, which is inactive. For further details see Annual Report for 1966. 7. CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA Location. Calcasieu River has its source in southwestern Louisiana, and flows southerly to the gulf. About 25 miles from the gulf it debouches into Calcasieu Lake, which is about 18 miles long. Connection between lake and gulf, about 7 miles long, is known as Calcasieu Pass. (See Geological Survey maps, Edna, Thompson Bluff, Hecker, Moss Bluff, Lake Charles, West Lake, Moss Lake, Hackberry, Sweet Lake, Brown's Lake, Holly Beach, Grand Bayou, and Cameron quadrangles; and NOAA Small-Craft Charts Nos. 11341 and 11348 of Intracoastal Waterway and NOAA Small-Craft Chart No. 11347 of Calcasieu River and Lake.) Previous project. For details see 1936 and 1938 Annual Reports, pages 719 and 819, respectively. Existing project. Provides for a channel 40 by 400 feet (35.9 miles long) from Lake Charles to sea end of jetties in Gulf of Mexico; an approach channel 42 by 800 feet from sea end of jetties to 42 feet deep in the gulf; extension of 35- by 250-foot channel from its present upsteam limit at mile 34 to vicinity of U.S. Highway 90 Bridge (mile 36.2); a 750- by 1,000-foot turning basin at upper end with a 35-foot depth; improvement of river from Lake Charles to Phillips Bluff (52.6 miles) by removing logs, snags, overhanging trees, and by dredging; maintenance of existing 12- by 200-foot channel in old channel of Calcasieu River at Cameron, LA, which connects with project at mile 2.25; and reconstruction and extension of existing jetties initially to seaward end of east jetty, and further extension to 15-foot-depth contour if found advisable to reduce maintenance dredging costs. Improvement is 113.6 miles long. Normal range of tide is 10 inches at mouth, diminishing to zero at Phillips Bluff; extremes range from 14 inches to zero. Estimated cost for new work (July 1975) is $19,518,000 Federal, and $1,409,000 non-Federal. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $404,700. Local cooperation. Local interest furnished all rights-of-way and spoil-disposal areas for completed features. For construction and future maintenance of modification authorized by 1960 River and Harbor Act, local interests must furnish lands, rights-of-ways, and spoil-disposal areas; alter pipelines, cables, wharves, oil wells, and any other facilities and hold and save the United States free from damages. Assurances were accepted and right-of-entry was furnished for the modification. The local agency is presently finalizing transfer to the United States of the few remaining tracts with acceptable title evidence. Assurance Agency: Lake Charles Harbor and Terminal District. Terminal facilities. Facilities at Port of Lake Charles are owned by Lake Charles Harbor and Terminal District and operated by a board of commissioners. In addition to municipally-owned terminals, there are several privately-owned and operated wharf structures on existing ship channel. (For further details, see Port Series No. 19, vol. 1, "Port St. Joe, FL, Pensacola, FL, Baton Rouge, LA, Panama City, FL, Pascagoula, MS, Lake Charles, LA, Gulfport, MS," revised 1957, and Folio of Navigation Maps Intracoastal Waterway, New Orleans to Port Arthur, 1968, 13th edition, published by the MRC.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor continued operation and maintenance of the saltwater barrier, stream gaging, and condition and operation studies. Maintenance by contract: Dredging at stations 1165+00 to 1200+00 and Devil's Elbow stations 2+72 to 151+67 was completed Oct. 1, 1981, with a total of 184 stations of dredging (100 linear feet each) completed. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction under the existing project was initiated in FY 1939 and completed 11-6 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT October 1968, except extension of the jetties to 15-footdepth contour, which has been deferred until found advisable to accomplish same. Construction of modifications, described in Table 11-B, was as follows: Work authorized by Mar. 2, 1945, R&H Act was initiated in September 1948 and completed in June 1949; Work authorized by Jul. 24, 1946, FC Act was initiated in September 1948 and completed in April 1953; and Work authorized by Jul. 14, 1960, R&H Act was initiated in April 1962 and completed in October 1968. A turning basin or ship anchorage for vessels using waterway was constructed from April to June 1952, between St. Johns Island and vicinity of Cameron, LA, about 1.1 miles. Calcasieu Pass jetties, initiated under previous project and completed in May 1942, extended to 10-foot-depth contour. East jetty about 8,620 feet long, was built to about 6 feet above mean low gulf and extends seaward from existing gulf shoreline for 6,820 feet. West jetty, 8,050 feet long was built to about 4 feet above mean low gulf and extends seaward from existing gulf shoreline for 6,795 feet. 8. FRESHWATER BAYOU, LA Location. In Vermilion Parish, LA, between Atchafalaya and Calcasieu Rivers, from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, mile 161.2 west of Harvey Lock, to 12-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico near Freshwater Bayou. Waterway is routed 22.6 miles along Schooner Bayou Cutoff, Schooner Bayou, Six Mile Canal, Belle Isle Canal, and Freshwater Bayou. (Refer to NOAA Small- Craft Chart No. 11350of Intracoastal Waterway.) Existing project. Provides for dredging a new 12- by 125-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, mile 161.2 west of Harvey Lock, to 12-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico near Freshwater Bayou, construction of an 84- by 600-foot lock with a depth of 16 feet over sill near Gulf of Mexico; and construction of jetties from shoreline to 6-foot-depth contour in Gulf of Mexico, if maintenance dredging of channel without jetties proves to be more expensive than construction and maintenance of jetties. Until such determination has been made, offshore channel should be dredged and maintained to provide a 12- by 250-foot channel. In event jetties are provided, offshore section should then be maintained to 12- by 125-foot project in jettied reach, and 250 feet beyond. Existing project was completed in 1968, except for construction of jetties at a later date, if necessary. Estimated cost of construction of jetties (July 1971) is $3,118,100. Estimated total Federal cost is $10,400,000 (1971) and the total non-Federal cost for the existing project is $171,000. In addition, the Coast Guard is to provide navigational aids at an estimated cost of $19,100. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 649, Annual Report FY 1962. Terminal facilities. Extensive public and private terminal and transfer facilities do not exist in area, and none would be required for improved channel. Private terminals exist at site of oil and gas operations in area and sufficient private and public wharf facilties are along Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and its connecting waterways. Sites are available along proposed improvement for construction of any additional private and public terminals that might be required for utilization of channel. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of operation and ordinary repairs to lock, condition and operation studies, reconnaissance surveys, water quality studies, and channel patrol. Maintenance dredging under one contract was completed Apr. 10, 1982, with the removal of 1,266,452 cubic yards of material from the channel between Freshwater Bayou Lock and the Gulf of Mexico Intracoastal Waterway. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated April 1963 and completed August 1968, except for construction of jetties at a later date, if required to reduce the cost of maintenance dredging. 9. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL, AND MEXICAN BORDER (NEW ORLEANS DIST.) Location. Section of Gulf Intracoastal Waterway within New Orleans District extends from Lake Borgne Light 29 near mouth of Rigolets, to Sabine River, LA, and TX. Section from Lake Borgne Light 29 to Mississippi River follows Rigolets and Lake Pontchartrain to lake end of State-owned Inner Harbor Navigation Canal, thence via this canal to Mississippi River, a distance of 40.5 miles. Public Law 675, 77th Cong., modified project to provide for a land cut through marsh from Rigolets to a point on Inner Harbor Navigation Canal about 22.5 miles from Mississippi River, eliminating passage through Lake Pontchartrain and five drawbridges, a distance of 30.8 miles to Mississippi River by this route. From Inner Harbor Navigation Canal to entrance of Harvey Lock, route follows Mississippi River for 5.5 miles. Section from Mississippi River to Atchafalaya River, LA, leaves Mississippi River through Harvey Lock about 3.3 miles above Canal Street and follows Harvey Canal No. 1 and Bayou Barataria to Bayou Villars, a land cut south of Lake Salvador to Harvey Canal No. 2, Harvey Canal No. 2 to Larose, LA, and a land cut to Houma, LA, thence over a land cut south of Bayous Black and Cocodrie, thence through Bayou Cocodrie and a land cut to Bayou Black; thence through Bayous Black, Chene, and Boeuf to Atchafalaya River, about 0.5 mile south of Morgan City, LA, a total of 95.5 miles. Alternative connectibn with Mississippi River near Algiers, LA, about 10.3 miles below Harvey Lock, consisting of a lock and land cut about 9 miles long intersecting Intracoastal Waterway at about mile 6 is complete. An alternative route from Mississippi River follows Bayou Plaquemine passing Indian Village, LA, and continuing on through lower Grand River to and through a lock at Bayou Sorrel in East Atchafalaya Basin protection levee, thence through levee borrow pit to Berwick Bay; and thence through Berwick Bay to Morgan City, LA, 11-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 a total of 56 miles. This alternative route was enlarged from vicinity of Morgan City to Indian Village, LA, and extended from Indian Village, LA, through Bayou Grosse Tete and a new land cut to and through a new terminal lock and entrance channel to Mississippi River near Port Allen, LA, a total of 65 miles. Section from Atchafalaya River to Vermilion River, LA, begins at western end of Mississippi-Atchafalaya section and follows Atchafalaya River about 2.5 miles, portions of Little Wax Bayou, Possum Bayou, cutoffs, a land cut passing through North Bend Plantation to Bayou Bartholomew, Bayou Bartholomew to Little Bay, a land cut skirting north edge of Cote Blanche Island and west edge of Weeks Island to Vermilion River, about 24 miles below Abbeville, LA, a total of about 63.6 miles. Franklin Canal, St. Mary Parish, LA, extends southwesterly from Franklin, LA, on Bayou Teche, for 5.5 miles to Bayou Portage, a section of "The Inland Waterway from Franklin to the Mermentau River, LA," and through bayou for 0.75 mile to Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, 121 miles west of Harvey Lock. Section from Vermilion River to Mermentau River, LA, begins at western end of Atchafalaya-Vermilion section and follows Vermilion River 1.3 miles, a part of Schooner Bayou Cutoff canal, and a land cut running generally northwesterly to Mermentau River at a point about 0.5 mile above its entrance into Grand Lake and about 16 miles below town of Lake Arthur, LA, a total of about 42.7 miles. Vermilion Lock was constructed about 1.75 miles west of Vermilion River to prevent ingress of saltwater from Vermilion Bay. Section from Mermentau River to Calcasieu River, LA, begins at western end of Vermilion-Mermentau section and follows Mermentau River upstream for about 1.5 miles, a land cut running west-southwesterly to Lake Misere, passing north of lake and Bayou Misere, westerly to Sweet Lake, south and west of Sweet Lake, northwesterly to Bayou Tete Bois, through Bayou Tete Bois, Black Bayou, and cutoffs to a point on Calcasieu River about 16.6 miles below city of Lake Charles, LA, a total of about 37.1 miles. Calcasieu Lock was constructed near intersection of Calcasieu River and Intracoastal Waterway, mile 238 west of Harvey Lock, Calcasieu Parish, about 16.6 miles below Lake Charles, LA. Section from Calcasieu River to Sabine River, LA and TX, begins at western end of Mermentau-Calcasieu section, and follows Calcasieu River upstream about 1.6 miles, a land cut running southwesterly 2.8,miles, thence west 22 miles to Sabine River at a point about 3 miles below Orange, TX, a total of about 27.1 miles. (Refer to MRC alluvial valley map and Rigolets, Chef Menteur, St. Bernard, New Orleans, Barataria, Baton Rouge, Grosse Tete, Chicot Lake, Foster, Napoleonville, Morgan City, Belle Isle, Bayou Sale, Jeanerette, and Derouen quadrangles; Geological Survey maps, Cutoff, Houma, Gibson, Abbeville, Forked Island, Grand Lake East, Grand Lake West, Lake Charles, Sulphur, and Orange quadrangles; and NOAA Small-Craft Charts of Intracoastal Waterway, gulf section, Galveston Bay, TX, to Waveland, MS) Previous projects. For details see page 544 of 1963 Annual Report. Existing project. Provides for a waterway, within the district, from Lake Borgne to Sabine River by the following improvements; a channel 16 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from Mississippi River to Atchafalaya River, except in vicinity of Houma, miles 50.5 to 63.5, which is to be maintained at 12 by 125 feet; a channel 16 by 150 feet through bypass route around Houma, LA, miles 50.5 to 63.5, and through alternative connection in Mississippi River below Algiers, LA, about 9 miles long, a channel 16 by 200 feet from Atchafalaya River to Sabine River; a channel 12 by 150 feet in section between Lake Borgne Light 29 and New Orleans (via land cut through marsh and Inner Harbor Navigation Canal), 33.1 miles long; an alternative route 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide between Lake Borgne Light 29 and New Orleans (via Rigolets, Lake Pontchartrain, and Inner Harbor Navigation Canal), 40.5 miles long; a channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide for Plaquemine- Morgan City alternative route from Mississippi- Atchafalaya section of waterway, in vicinity of Morgan City, through lower Atchafalaya River (Berwick Bay) and borrow pit of East Atchafalaya protection levee to and through Bayou Sorrel Lock which was constructed under existing project "Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries," thence through Lower Grand River to Indian Village, and thence by way of Bayou Grosse Tete and a new land cut to and through a new terminal lock and entrance channel to Mississippi River near Port Allen, LA, opposite lower limit of Port Baton Rouge; a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Indian Village on Plaquemine-Morgan City alternative route through Bayou Plaquemine and Plaquemine Lock to Mississippi River at Plaquemine, LA, improvement of Franklin Canal as a connecting channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (mile 121) to Franklin, LA, to afford a channel 8 feet deep and generally 60 feet wide with a width of 100 feet in its upper .300 feet; and a saltwater guard lock (Calcasieu Lock) in waterway at mile 238 west of Harvey Lock. Project also provides for: widening at bends; passing places, mooring basins; locks or guard locks; such railroad bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary; purchase of pipeline dredge; construction and operation of new drainage canals and pumping facilities to restore parish drainage systems where intercepted; construction of movable bridges at Missouri Pacific Railroad and State Highways 31 and 996 (in lieu of State Highway Bridge 31, a tunnel was constructed, and additional cost over estimated cost of bridge was borne by local interest); fixedtrestle bridges for crossing proposed landside drainage canals; lift bridges at Louisiana Highway 168, Port Allen, LA, at Texas & Pacific Railway, Port Allen, LA, and at Texas & Pacific Railway, Morley, LA; and for annual payments to Board of Commissioners of Port of New Orleans for use of a portion of Inner Harbor Navigation Canal. Length of waterway within district is 384.1 miles via northerly or Port Allen route, and 299.4 miles via southerly or Harvey Canal route. Normal range of tide, 10 inches; extreme range, 14 inches. A severe storm may cause a high tide of from 6 to 9 feet. Estimated cost for new work, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects, is $157,833,827 Federal 11-8 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT and $27,535,000 non-Federal, divided as follows; Algiers Lock and canal, completed June 1961, $15,895,924 Federal and $2,185,000 non-Federal; Plaquemine- Morgan City route, completed October 1963, $26,869,372 Federal and $2,250,000 non-Federal; and remainder of waterway (October 1980), $115,068,531 Federal and $23,100,000 non-Federal, including $73,700,000 Federal and $21,500,000 non-Federal for modification (authorized by Public Law 87-874), October 1962. In addition, the Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $32,000. Construction of bulkheads and jetties at Lake Borgne and Chef Menteur, LA, is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (1956) of this item is $440,000. Construction of a doubleleaf bascule, four-lane highway bridge provided for under this project has become unnecessary because portion of project over which bridge was to be constructed was incorporated in project "Mississippi River- Gulf Outlet" which provides for a larger bridge. Bayou Sorrel and Bayou Boeuf Locks were constructed and are being maintained and operated with "Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries" funds. Therefore, construction, maintenance, and operation costs are not included in approved estimates referred to heretofore. (See Table 11-D for locks on Gulf Intracoastal Waterway in New Orleans District.) Local cooperation. Algiers Lock and Canal: All assurances required for construction were furnished. Local agency has failed to convey all fee and easement tracts with acceptable title evidence to the United States. However, authority has been received to accept the interests conveyed as best available from local agency with the understanding that the United States rely upon assurances of local cooperation should any claims against the United States occur as a result of failure of local agency to complete transfer of title. Plaquemine-Morgan City alternative route: All assurances required for construction were furnished. Title by United States has been acquired to all but 35 tracts, for which local agency failed to comply fully with curative requirements in title certificate. Authority was given to accept the tracts conveyed as best available from local interests and to rely upon assurances of local cooperation furnished by local agency should any claims against the United States occur as a result of failure of local agency to complete transfer of title. Louisiana Office of Public Works has furnished assurances for maintenance and improvement. Modification authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1962: Local interests must furnish lands, rights-of-way, and spoil-disposal areas for enlargement and future maintenance of project, make alterations to utilities; construct, maintain, and operate all bridges desired in connection with bypass channel around Houma, LA, and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances were requested in April 1963; however, none of the 11 local agencies involved has furnished assurances requested. Main objection to participation is requirement that local interests be responsible for alteration of utilities. Replacement of Vermilion Lock: The Vermilion Parish Police Jury was requested to execute an Agreement of Local Cooperation on Oct. 26, 1972, agreeing to provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the replacement lock and approach channels thereto, and hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance of the project, including erosion of the channel beyond the rights-of-way furnished for the replacement lock and the approach channels thereto and comply with the provisions of Public Law 91-646 and Sec. 221 of Public Law 91-611. They furnished formal assurances covering all requirements of local cooperation, including Public Law 91-611 and Public Law 91-646, on Mar. 19, 1975. These assurances were in the process of being accepted by the United States, when the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 was enacted authorizing the 110-foot-wide lock. The assurances were executed by the Police Jury on Dec. 6, 1976, and were accepted by the District Engineer on behalf of the United States on Feb. 8, 1977. The Acting Director of Real Estate for the Secretary of the Army approved the assurances on Jul. 5, 1977. The project was renamed "Leland Bowman Lock (Replacement)" by House Resolution 4284 dated Sep. 21, 1981 (House Report 97-234). Terminal facilities. Large terminal and transfer facilities, suitable for receiving and shipping commodities by barge, are available at principal cities in Louisiana; namely, New Orleans, Baton Rouge, Harvey, Morgan City, and Lake Charles. Facilities at New Orleans are on Inner Harbor Navigation Canal. Canal and facilities were leased from Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans, Apr. 1, 1944, and are now operated by the United States, toll free, 24 hours per day. At Morgan City, on Atchafalaya River, there are two large and three small wharves open to all without charge. Otherwise, facilities are nsidered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor: Real estate activities, condition and operation studies, condition surveys, stream gaging, and channel patrol. Locks, bridges, and waterways were operated and maintained. Fender systems were repaired at Algiers, Calcasieu, Harvey, Port Allen, and Vermilion Locks. Work by hired labor consisted of major repairs to the Algiers Lock. Miscellaneous repairs were made to the Florida Avenue Bridge, Vermilion, Harvey, and Port Allen Locks. Maintenance by contract: Dredging under two contracts included removing 379,845 cubic yards from below Bayou Sorrel Lock and 360,250 cubic yards from Mermentau Calcasieu River Section. Dredge operations in the New Orleans Harbor included removing 2,620,870 cubic yards of material. Construction was initiated on Oct. 15, 1981 for replacement of Leland Bowman Lock (Vermilion) and is 20 percent complete. 11-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated July 1929 and project, as modified, is 55 percent complete. For information on completion of segments of waterway, see 1965 Annual Report, pages 523 and 524. Work remaining to complete the project consists of enlarging waterway as provided by 1962 River and Harbor Act. Construction of bulkheads at Lake Borgne and Chef Menteur are inactive features as this work has not been necessary. President Carter, as a result of his review of water resource projects in April 1977, changed the site of the proposed new shiplock to the Industrial Canal in Orleans Parish and recommended that the existing lock be replaced and expanded at the existing site. This is a new concept and requires reinstitution of General Design planning with attendant slips in the schedule components. 10. HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL, LA. Location. Extends from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway at mile 59.5 west of Harvey Lock southerly about 16 miles, thence southeasterly 10.5 miles to Terrebonne Bay, and 9.5 miles across bay to deep water in Cat Island Pass. At mile 11.3 above Cat Island Pass, Houma Navigation Canal crosses Bayou Petit Caillou, and 20 miles above Cat Island Pass it crosses Bayou Grand Caillou. No other major waterways are crossed by Houma Navigation Canal. (See Army Engineer and Geological Survey quadrangle maps, NOAA Nos. 11352 and 11340 Sailing Charts; and NOAA Nos. 11357 and 11356 Small-Craft Charts on the Intracoastal Waterway. Existing project. Provides that United States assume maintenance and operation of Houma Navigation Canal, constructed by Parish of Terrebonne, to dimensions of 15 by 150 feet. Normal range of tide is 10 inches at mouth and 4 inches at Houma; extreme range is 14 inches at mouth and 6 inches at Houma; wind and tide, 1 to 3 feet at mouth; flood, 3 to 4 feet in upper section. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 11-13, Annual Report FY 1980. Terminal facilities. Privately-owned and operated facilities are adequate for existing commerce which is mainly seafood plants; oil companies and oil company supplies; sugar refining; and marine repair shops and towing. Southern Pacific Lines has dock facilities in Houma, LA. Ample space exists for expansion of existing facilities, or for the construction of new wharves and appurtenances. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor work consisted of reconnaissance surveys, stream gaging, and condition and operation studies. Maintenance dredging under contract, stations, 19+99 to 1310+00, was initiated Sep. 30, 1982 with 2,320,000 cubic yards of dike construction. Condition as of Sep. 30. Maintenance by the United States commenced in November 1964. 11. LELAND BOWMAN LOCK, LA (REPLACEMENT OF LOCK) (FORMERLY VERMILION LOCK, LA) Location. In the Louisiana section of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway near Abbeville, Vermilion Parish, LA, about 163 miles west of Harvey Lock. Existing project. The present Leland Bowman Lock, located in the most heavily utilized section of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, is the controlling structure in both width and depth. The lock is used for navigation and flood control (prevention of salt water intrusion). The tumbler-type gates are unsatisfactory for the dual purpose. (Flood Control-Navigation) operation required, since once the gates are lowered to pass flood flows, they cannot be safely raised until the differential stage across the lock is reduced to about 0.5 foot. The replacement lock also will provide a larger and more efficient outlet for floodwaters. Estimated cost for new work (October 1982) is $32,200,000 Federal and $240,000 non-Federal. The project was renamed "Leland Bowman Lock (Replacement)" by House Resolution 4284 dated Sep. 21, 1981 (House Report 97-234.) Local cooperation. Provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way for construction of the project and hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance works. The Vermilion Parish Police Jury furnished assurances covering all requirements of local cooperation, including PL 91-611 and PL 91-646, on Mar. 19, 1975. These assurances were in the process of being accepted' by the United States, when the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 was enacted authorizing the 110-foot-wide lock. Amended assurances of local cooperation were accepted on behalf of the United States by the Secretary of the Army on Jul. 5, 1977. The Vermilion Parish Police Jury on May 26, 1981, granted right of entry for construction of project. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction was initiated Oct. 15, 1981. Condition as of Sep. 30. The project is 20 percent complete. 12. MERMENTAU RIVER, LA Location. Work covered by this project is 35 to 70 miles southeast of Lake Charles, LA, along lower Mermentau River below Grand Lake, mile 25, to Gulf of Mexico; Inland Waterway from Vermilion Bay to White Lake, White Lake to Grand Lake, and from Schooner Bayou to Intracoastal Waterway-Gulf section (Schooner Bayou Cutoff); North Prong of Schooner Bayou; and waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, LA, and artificial canal, extending from 5-foot-depth contour in White Lake, almost due south for about 1.8 miles to Pecan Island. (Refer to Coast Charts Nos. 11344 and 11349, NOAA Small-Craft Chart No. 11348 on the Intracoastal Waterway, Geological Survey maps, Sweet Lake, Hog Bayou, Grand Lake West, Grand 11-10 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT Lake East, Constance Bayou, Forked Island, Pecan Island, and Abbeville quadrangles.) Existing project. Flood control, navigation, irrigation, and salinity control in coastal marsh of lower Mermentau River Basin and channel enlargement of lower Mermentau River below Grand Lake, mile 25, to a minimum section of 3,000 square feet below mean low gulf level for discharge of flood flows; construction of a sector-gated control structure at Catfish Point, mile 24 above mouth of Mermentau River, for discharge of flood flows and control of tidal flows and saltwater intrusion in Mermentau River; channel enlargement and realinement of Inland Waterway from Vermilion Bay to White Lake, 12.04 miles, and from White Lake to Grand Lake, 6.14 miles, to a minimum section of 3,000 square feet below mean low gulf level or interflow between lakes and discharge of flood flows; construction of a sector-gated control structure in enlarged channel immediately north of abandoned Schooner Bayou Lock reservation for discharge of flood flows and control of tidal flows and saltwater intrusion; channel enlargement of North Prong of Schooner Bayou and Schooner Bayou Cutoff, 6.69 miles, to 6 by 60 feet, mean low gulf level, for navigation purposes; and maintenance of existing 5- by 40-foot, mean low gulf level, waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, LA, 1.8 miles long, for navigation. In addition, project provides for incorporation of that section of project, "Inland Waterway from Franklin, LA, to Mermentau River," west of Vermilion Bay, a waterway that includes Schooner Bayou Lock. Project was reclassified as an "Operation and Maintenance, General" project under category, "Navigation (Locks, Dams, Reservoirs, and Canals)" by authority of Chief of Engineers, Apr. 23, 1956. Because of failure of both east and west gates, Schooner Bayou Lock was closed by a dike across east approach channel and traffic routed through new control structure. Under ordinary conditions mean range of tide on Mermentau River near mouth is 1.6 feet and near head about 3 inches. Variation of water surface near the mouth may be as much as 7 or 8 feet, due to hurricanes on the gulf, and near head from 8 to 12 feet, due to freshets. New work was completed in 1956. Estimated cost for new work (October 1982) is $6,570,000 Federal and $840,000 non-Federal, including $250,000 contributed funds. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 1022, Annual Report FY 1948. Terminal facilities. Privately-owned and operated facilities are adequate along the Mermentau River and Bayous Nezpique and des Cannes for the principal commodities transported, whichare petroleum and its products. A public wharf is located at Lake Arthur, LA, but due to insufficient use it has not been maintained and in its present condition is not usable. Sites for future expansion of these facilities are available and will be provided by non-Federal interests as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor continued operation and maintenance of Schooner Bayou and Catfish Point Control Structures, condition and operation studies, reconnaissance surveys, channel patrol, and water quality studies. Other work by hired labor forces during the fiscal year: Catfish Point Control Structures; construction of a new boat landing, placement of 2,400 tons of stone in needed areas, and maintenance repairs to the guidewalls. Dredging under one contract in the Gulf of Mexico Navigation Channel was initiated Jan. 6, 1982, and completed Feb. 21,1982, with the removal of 17,900 linear feet of material. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of project began April 1947 and completed July 1952. New work dredging was accomplished from April 1947 to June 1952. Catfish Point Control Structure was constructed from November 1948 to August 1951. Reservation comprises 9.7 acres. Schooner Bayou Lock and Control Structures: Schooner Bayou Lock and Dam were completed in 1913 and 1914, respectively, and the Lockmaster's house in 1917. Lock was closed to navigation May 7, 1951, and abandoned by authority of Chief of Engineers on Oct. 9, 1951. Permanent closure of lock channel and tie-in dikes was completed September 1951. Construction of control structures was accomplished from August 1949 to May 1951. Reservation comprises 6.9 acres. 13. MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO GULF OF MEXICO, LA Location. This reach of the river flows southeasterly through southeastern portion of Louisiana. At Head of Passes, approximately 233.1 miles below Louisiana Highway Commission bridge at Baton Rouge, river branches into three main passes: Southwest Pass, South Pass, and Pass a Loutre, two of which, Southwest Pass and South Pass, are improved under existing project. Head of Passes to mouths of Southwest and South Passes are 20.1 and 13.5 miles, respectively. Mouth of Southwest Pass is 141 miles west of Mobile, AL, and 349 miles east of Galveston, TX. Mouth of South Pass is 18.5 miles northeast of mouth of Southwest Pass. (Refer to NOAA Coast Charts Nos. 11361, 11364, and 11369; MRC alluvial valley map, and Zachary, Baton Rouge, White Castle, Donaldsonville, Thibodaux, Mount Airy, Bonnet Carr6, Hahnville, New Orleans, St. Bernard, Barataria, Pointe a la Hache, Black Bay, Empire, Forts, West Delta, East Delta, and Southwest Pass quadrangles and 1980 (48th edition) folio of flood control and navigation maps, Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Gulf of Mexico, LA, published by the MRC.) Previous projects. For details see page 552 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions as follows: Between a line one-tenth mile below Louisiana Highway Commission bridge at Baton Rouge 129.3 miles to upper port limits of New Orleans, 40 by 500 feet mean low water; within limits of port of New Orleans, where that authority has jurisdiction over both banks of river, a distance of 17.8 miles, 35 by 1,500 feet, measured from a line generally 100 feet from face of left bank wharves, but not closer than 100 feet to wharves on right bank; within 35- by 1,500-foot channel 11-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 in port limits of New Orleans, 40 by 500 feet; from lower limits of port of New Orleans 86.7 miles to Head of Passes, 40 by 1,000 feet; Southwest Pass, 17.5 miles from Head of Passes to jetty channel, 40 by 800 feet; 4.1 miles in the Southwest Pass bar and jetty channel, 40 by 600 feet; South Pass from Head of Passes to outer ends of jetties, 13.5 miles, 30 by 450 feet; and 1.2 miles in the South Pass bar channel, 30 by 600 feet. Plane of reference through New Orleans and below is mean low gulf. Plane of reference above New Orleans is low water reference plane. General plan of improvement of Southwest Pass provides for constructing pass to uniform cross section with about 1,420-foot surface width by means of jetties, spur dikes, and bulkheads; for channel maintenance by dredging from Cubits Gap, mile 3.5 AHP through the gulf entrance channel, mile 21.5 BHP; for construction of small revetted openings through narrow portions of banks of pass for purpose of strengthening and nourishment of banks; for closure of minor outlets not required for maintenance of banks; for construction of sills to prevent enlargement of the Venice Jump and Cubits Gap; for repairs to sill across Pass a Loutre and bank revetment at Head of Passes; for construction of dikes with a view to reducing width of river above Head of Passes; for construction of a submerged deflecting dike above Head of Passes; and for other minor work. East jetty is about 24,950 feet long and west jetty 19,699 feet. Jetties are composed of a substructure of brush mattresses, orginally built to about elevation of mean low gulf, surmounted with a superstructure of concrete blocks and large riprap and/or stone rubble mound of core and cover stone. Spur dikes are composed of cribwork of round piling filled with willows and stone, or with a curtain of round piles along upstream face. General plan of improvement of South Pass provides for construction and maintenance of jetties and spur dikes; for channel maintenance by dredging from Head of Passes through the Gulf Entrance Channel beyond mile 13.5 BHP; maintenance of a sill across Pass a Loutre, and for seaward extension of east jetty at mouth of pass; removal of west dike and construction of spur dikes and bank revetment at Head of Passes; removal of false point at head of South Pass. to bottom elevation of minus 45 feet and revetment of new bank line and construction and maintenance of east and west headland structure at Head of Passes. East jetty foundation is 12,070 feet long; inner east jetty is 11,170 feet long; west jetty is 7,820 feet long; and inner west jetty is 4,710 feet long. Jetties are composed of a substructure of brush mattresses surmounted by a superstructure of stone and/or concrete blocks and large riprap. Spur dikes are composed of cribwork of round piling filled with willows and stone. Plane of reference is mean low gulf. Variation of water surface is 16 inches at mouths and 10 inches at head of the passes, due to tides. Extreme range of tides at mouths of passes due to hurricanes in about 10 feet. At New Orleans extreme range of water surface is about 20 feet due to floods. At Baton Rouge extreme range is about 45 feet due to floods. Estimated cost of existing project (October 1982) is $198,000,000 Federal. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $29,000. Local cooperation. None required, except for modification of project in connection with Mississippi River- Gulf Outlet, which is reported separately. Terminal facilities. Piers, wharves, or docks serve the Port of New Orleans. Most wharves on east or left bank parallel riverbank forming nearly a continuous covered quay about 10 miles long. Public wharves controlled by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans (the Dock Board), cover 62 percent of improved waterfront. These facilities include a shipside grain elevator, general cargo and cotton wharves, fruit landings, bunkering facilities, terminal warehouses, railroad terminals, marine railways, and drydocks. (For further details see Port Series No. 20, "The Port of New Orleans, LA" revised 1977.) A foreign trade zone is located in Port of New Orleans. City of Baton Rouge has a reinforced concrete dock for deep-sea vessels with mechanical-handling facility. Attached to downstream end of wharf is a floating wharf boat 231 by 40.5 feet, of 2,000-ton capacity. Facilities are served by a transfer boat and municipal terminal having a capacity of 40 cars per day. Private terminals for handling oil, grain, bauxite ore, and other products are at points on both sides of river between New Orleans and Baton Rouge. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details, see "Port Facilities" included in "Flood Control and Navigation Maps of the Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to the Gulf of Mexico, LA," published annually by the MRC, and Port Series No. 19, vol. 1, "Port St. Joe, FL, Pensacola, FL, Baton Rouge, LA, and Lake Charles, LA," revised 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor continued on preparation of a supplement to the GDM. It is tentatively scheduled for completion in July 1983. Maintenance: (a) Baton Rouge to New Orleans: The U.S. dustpan dredge Jaduwin and hopper dredge Langfitt removed 6,071,658 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $4,000,000. (b) New Orleans Harbor: One leased dredge contract removed 2,627,760 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,577,000. (c) Head of Passes and Southwest Pass: The U.S. Hopper dredges Langfitt, removed 2,434,098 cubic yards of material from the lower jetty and bar channels and head of passes at a cost of $6,611,623. Two cutterhead dredges, under two unit price contracts, removed 7,641,148 cubic yards between mile 1.0 AHP and mile 18.8 BHP at a cost of $6,000,000. (d) Southwest Pass: Work under three contracts was completed as follows: One contract for east jetty repairs from Sta. 108+25 to Sta. 250+00 (NC) was completed May 19, 1982, at a cost of $781,054; one contract for repairs to foreshore protection from mile 1.95R to mile 16.13R was completed Oct. 12, 1981, at a cost of $3,690,603; one dredging contract was completed Dec. 16, 1981, with removal of 7,824,293 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $7,894,240. (e) Southwest Pass: Hired labor repairs were made 11-12 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT to pile dike structures at a cost of $264,500. (f) Langfitt wharf: Repairs made to wharf at a cost of $611,706. Construction: One contract for extension of pile dikes in Southwest Pass, mile 19.27-R to 20.00 BHP was initiated Apr. 28, 1982, and completed Jul. 29, 1982, at a cost of $900,558. Condition as of Sep. 30. The existing project is 38 percent complete. Deepening Southwest Pass to 40 feet mean low gulf, as authorized by the modification of Mar. 2, 1945, was completed in September 1963. Deepening the channel to 40 feet mean low water from Baton Rouge to New Orleans and to 40 feet mean low gulf in New Orleans Harbor, as authorized by the modifications of Oct. 23, 1962, was completed in August 1963. 14. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, LA Location. In State of Louisiana and extends from existing Inner Harbor Navigation Canal at a point 7,500 feet north of existing lock and about 11,000 feet from Mississippi River, to a turning basin south of Michoud, LA, and then as a land and water cut from turning basin south of Michoud, LA, southeasterly to and along south shore of Lake Borgne and through marshes to and through Chandeleur Sound to 38-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico. (Refer to NOAA Coast Charts Nos. 11340, 11360, 11363, 11369, 11371, and 11373. Also see MRC 1980 (48th edition) folio of maps, Mississippi River-Cairo, IL, to Gulf of Mexico, LA.) Existing project. Provides for a seaway canal, 36 by 500 feet, extending 76 miles as a land and water cut from Michoud southeasterly to and along south shore of Lake Borgne, and across Chandeleur Sound to Chandeleur Island and increasing gradually to 38 by 600 feet in Gulf of Mexico, with protective jetties at entrance, a permanent retention dike through Chandeleur Sound, and a wing dike along islands as required. It also provides for an inner tidewater harbor consisting of 1,000- by 2,000-foot turning basin 36 feet deep at landward end of seaway canal, and a connecting channel 36 by 500 feet wide extending westerly along Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from turning basin to Inner Harbor Navigation Canal, including construction of a suitable highway bridge with approaches to carry Louisiana State Highway 47 (formerly 61) over channel. Plan further provides for future construction of a channel and lock in the vicinity of Meraux to furnish an additional connection between tidewater harbor and Mississippi River. Estimated cost for new work (October 1982) is $483,000,000 Federal and $208,000,000 non-Federal, including cash contribution of $94,500,000. This does not include modification for Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Michoud Canal, which is reported separately. The Federal cost excludes $45,000 for aids to navigation by U.S. Coast Guard. Local cooperation. Original assurances furnished and accepted. Local agency has furnished Supplemental Assurance covering Public Law 91-646. Rights-of-entry for entire project were furnished by local agency which is in process of actively conveying to the United States title to remaining tracts. Supplemental assurances reflecting the changes made necessary by enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 were requested on Jan. 12, 1977. The Board of Commissioners of the Port of New Orleans, by letter dated Sep. 18, 1978, stated that they are unable to provide the required supplemental assurances at this time. They are concerned about the possible effects of the proposed new Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock on this project and pending legislation concerning local assurances for the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal project. Local interests have provided right of entry for construction for the Baptiste Collette Bayou portion of this project. Terminal facilities. The only facility on the waterway is the Public Bulk Terminal of New Orleans constructed by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans, on left descending bank at mile 63. Two new-container ship berths have begun operation at the Industrial Canal end of the seaway. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor: Engineering environmental and economic studies, stream gaging, surveys, and field investigations continued. One contract for foreshore protection test section, south bank, Chalmette Area, station 475 to 501 was initiated Aug. 2, 1982. Maintenance by hired labor: The hopper dredge Langfitt removed intermittently a total of 1,220,450 cubic yards of material from the Gulf Entrance Channel during the period Oct. 1, 1981, through Aug. 3, 1982. Maintenance dredging under one contract removed 7,786,390 cubic yards. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated March 1958 and entire project is 75 percent complete. The channel was opened to navigation Jul. 25, 1963, and completed Jan. 20, 1968. Paris Road Bridge was opened to traffic Jul. 21, and completed Nov. 14, 1967. Approximately 3 miles of first- and second-lift stone dikes have been constructed on north side of channel and approximately 8.27 miles of first-lift and 7.34 miles of second-lift stone dikes have been constructed on south side of channel in Breton Sound. Principal work required to complete project is construction of new ship lock, raising and extending dikes, and construction of foreshore protection. The site for the lock remained the major problem. President Carter, as a result of his review of water resource projects in April 1977, changed the site for the proposed shiplock to the Industrial Canal in Orleans Parish and recommended that, if justified, the existing lock should be replaced and expanded in place and that care should be taken to minimize dislocation of residents living adjacent to the site. These recommendations are being addressed in an Evaluation Report scheduled for completion in FY 1983. 15. MISSISSIPPI RIVER OUTLETS, VENICE, LA Location. In the coastal marsh area and in the vicinity of the Mississippi River at about miles 10 to 11 11-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 above the Head of Passes. (Refer to NOAA Coast Chart No. 1361.) Existing project. Provides for additional navigation outlets in the vicinity of Venice, LA, by enlargement of the existing channels of Baptiste Collette Bayou and Grand-Tiger Passes to 14 by 150 feet with entrance channels in open water 16 by 250 feet and jetties to the 6-foot-depth contour, if and when justified, to reduce cost of maintenance dredging. Existing project was completed at a cost of $10,008,400. Local cooperation. For details see page 11-17, Annual Report, FY 1980. Assuring Agency: Plaquemines Parish Commission Council. Basic assurances for the project have been furnished. Amended assurances covering Public Laws 91-646 and 91-611 were received on Aug. 5, 1977. Terminal facilities. In the Venice area, each operator of a construction, repair, or supply facility provides dock and transfer facilities to meet his own needs or arranges to use those of another. These facilities are considered adequate for the anticipated traffic. If new industry or supply facilities are established, they would provide any needed terminal facilities for their use. Ample areas for future expansion are available. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor work consisted of reconnaisance surveys, condition and operation, stream gaging and engineering studies. Contract work for maintenance dredging at Baptiste Collette Bar Channel, began Nov.2,1981, and completed Dec. 6, 1981, with a total of 798,040 cubic yards of material removed. Condition as of Sep. 30. The project is 87 percent complete. 16. OVERTON-RED RIVER WATERWAY, LA Location. In the State of Louisiana between junction of the Old and Mississippi Rivers and Shreveport, LA, along the Old and Red Rivers, through land cuts and natural channels on the south bank of Red River. (Refer to Geological Survey State maps and the MRC alluvial valley quadrangle maps.) Existing project. Provides for a navigation route from the Mississippi River at its junction with Old River, through Old River to mile 31 of the Red River; developing a channel about 31 miles long, 200 feet wide, and 9 feet deep. Improvements consist of revetments, dikes, and dredging designed to preserve favorable and correct unfavorable channel alinement and depth. In addition to the existing project, the authorized work included a navigation route from mile 31 of the Red River to Shreveport, LA, via a lateral canal excavated along the south bank of the Red River. However, the portion of the authorized project above mile 31 was reclassified to inactive status as approved by Office of the Chief of Engineers, letter dated Oct. 18, 1971. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 11-18, Annual Report FY 1980. Terminal facilities. None. Will be furnished if necessary. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor work consisted of investigations, and surveys. Contract work for stone bank paving, initiated Nov. 20, 1981 and completed Feb. 11, 1982, with placement of 28,013 tons of stone at Moreau Lake revetment and 46,069 tons at Pump Bayou. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of the lower 31 miles was initiated Nov. 12, 1968, and is 100 percent complete with 68,923 linear feet of bank protected. 17. RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION Location. In northwest Louisiana, southwest Arkansas, and northeast Texas, along the Red and Old Rivers between the Mississippi River and the head of the levee system above Index, TX. Existing project. Provides for realining the banks by means of cutoffs and training works and for stabilizing banks by means of revetments, dikes, and other methods as emergency conditions may require in advance of developing the design for the entire Red River Waterway project. Estimated cost for new work (October 1982) is $58,500,000 Federal and $2,530,000 non-Federal, including cash contribution of $25,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see pages 11-19 to 11-20, Annual Report FY 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work by hired labor consisted of preparing plans and specifications, surveys, and general engineering. Work continued from last fiscal year and was completed on four contracts: Bank stabilization at Spring Bank, AR, mile 335.5-L, completed Oct. 6, 1981; Young AR, mile 411.6, completed Jun. 9, 1982; Dukedale, completed Apr. 29, 1982 and Clear Lake, AR, mile 386-L, completed Sep. 10, 1982. Contract work was initiated at Little River, AR, mile 405.5-L, on Apr. 27, 1982. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in October 1972 and is 85 percent complete. 18. RED RIVER WATERWAYMISSISSIPPI RIVER TO SHREVEPORT, LA Location. From east central to northwest Louisiana along the Red and Old Rivers between the Mississippi River and Shreveport, LA. Existing project. Provide a navigation route from the Mississippi River at the junction with Old River via Old and Red River to Shreveport, LA, developing a channel approximately 210 miles long, 9 feet deep, and 200 feet wide. The development will include five locks and dams, realinement and contraction of the river as necessary to develop an efficient channel, and bank stabilization as necessary to hold the newly developed channel in position. Facilities to provide opportunities for recreation and for fish and wildlife development 11-14 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT are an integral part of the project. Estimated cost for new work (October 1982) is $1,497,000,000 Federal and $71,400,000 non-Federal, including $34,000,000 contributed funds. The Federal cost excludes $274,000 for aids to navigation by U.S. Coast Guard. Local cooperation. For details see page 11-21, Annual Report FY 1980. The Red River Waterway Commission, governing body of the Red River Waterway District, executed an act of assurance for all project features in Louisiana on Feb. 26, 1969, supported by resolution dated Jan. 30, 1969. The assurances were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Apr. 15, 1969. The Commission furnished amended assurances covering the provisions of PL 91-646 on May 23, 1973, for the portion of the project within Louisiana which were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Nov. 14, 1973. Terminal facilities. Adequate facilities are to be provided and maintained by local interest. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work by hired labor consisted of planning and preparing design memorandum, preparing plans and specifications, surveys, general engineering and model studies. Bank stabilization was completed at Larto, LA, mile 40.5L. Construction continued on Phase Three of the Lock and Dam at Marksville, LA, which is 68 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in July 1973, and project is 20 percent complete. 19. REMOVING WATERHYACINTH, LA Location. Lakes and streams tributary to the gulf coast. Existing project. Removal of plants from navigable waters of Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas, so far as they are or may become an obstruction to navigation, by any mechanical, chemical, or other means whatsoever; for construction and operation of boats equipped with suitable machinery for such removal; and construction and operation of booms to prevent plants drifting from one stream to another. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maximum use of funds available was made by using chemical methods of destruction. Maintenance continued in main waterways and principal tributaries to prevent waterhyacinth obstructions and damage to navigation. Preventive maintenance work was carried out in secondary streams and feeder areas whenever possible. In some cases where alligatorweed has previously kept waterhyacinth fringes confined along the banks, attack of the alligatorweed flea beetles (Agasicles) has reduced its competitiveness and water-hyacinths are multiplying and spreading in the waterways. A total of 28,626 acres of water-hyacinth were treated by chemical in Bayou Black, Lake Cataouatche and feeder streams, Lake des Allemands area, the Port Allen-Morgan City Route and Alternate Route of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Lake Dauterive and Grand Lake areas, Bayou Penchant- Bayou Copasaw area, the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Bayou Lafourche, Bayou Lacassine, and Bayou Teche. Aerial spraying by helicopter controlled 2,002 acres. A mild winter, excessive rainfall, and extreme summer temperatures prevented additional areas from being placed in a maintenance status. The introduction of the water-hyacinth weevil (Neachetina eichhorniae) has been made and populations are increasing. A large scale operations management test using the waterhyacinth weevil and the most promising plant pathogen (Cercospora rodmanii) has begun and will be monitored for effectiveness of control. A moth (Samoedes albiguttalis) has recently been introduced to assist in the control of water-hyacinth. Condition as of Sep. 30. From 1900 to 1902 a boat with suitable machinery for destroying hyacinth by crushing was operated. From that time until 1937 hyacinths were destroyed through use of a solution of arsenic and caustic soda which was sprayed on vegetation. The vegetation was removed by hand crews, and vegetation movement was controlled by booms and barricades. Use of arsenic was discontinued and hand removal supplanted by use of mechanical equipment in conjunction with chemical spray (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid). Use of booms and barricades has been discontinued. Use of the quarterboat Tambour was discontinued in September 1981. Present methods of control are by means of chemical spraying supplemented by the use of insects and pathogens for biological control. Waterways Experiment Station is conducting a large-scale operations management test of insects and pathogens for control of water-hyacinth in Louisiana. 20. TANGIPAHOA RIVER, LA Location. The river originates in the State of Mississippi and flows southerly to Lake Pontchartrain, LA, about 119 miles. (Refer to NOAA Coast Chart No. 11369 and MRC alluvial valley map, Ponchatoula quadrangle.) Existing project. Improvement by removing overhanging trees, snags, and obstructions to navigation for 53.5 miles above mouth, and provide an 8- by 100- foot entrance channel from the 8-foot depth contour in the lake to the 8-foot depth in the river. Variation in water surface is from 3 to 20 feet in the upper reaches due to freshets and from 2 to 5 feet in the lower reach due to winds and tides. The cost of existing project was $61,211, Federal (including $11,500 for previously completed portion and $49,711 for preauthorization studies and modification adopted under Sec. 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended) and $29,346 contributed funds for the modification. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces conducted reconnaissance surveys and prepared plans and specifications. 11-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 21. WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO BAYOU DULAC, LA (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, LA) Location. Bayou LeCarpe is a tidal stream which rises about 1.5 miles southeast of Houma in 'terrebonne Parish and flows southerly into Bayou Pelton, thence into Bayou Grand Caillou, which flows southwesterly into Caillou Bay, a total distance of about 40 miles. (Refer to Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart, No. 1116 and Geological Survey maps of Houma, Dulac, Bayou DuLarge, and Dog Lake quadrangles.) Existing project. As modified, provides for a 10- by 45-foot channel in Bayou LeCarpe from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway 2.6 miles to Houma navigation canal; a 5- by 40-foot channel through Bayou Pelton and Bayou Grand Caillou to Bayou Dulac, a distance of about 13.7 miles. Between miles 2.6 and 5, this project coincides with or is adjacent to 15- by 150-foot Houma navigation canal. Normal range of tide is 3 to 10 inches; from winds, 1 to 3 feet. Cost of new work, completed in August 1964, was $129,662. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for enlargement and subsequent maintenance of Bayou LeCarpe and of aids to navigation, and provide alterations to facilities, and hold the United States free from damage. Assurances were furnished and accepted. Local agency made available spoil areas for maintenance dredging of Bayou LeCarpe. None of these areas will be transferred to the United States. Meeting are continuing with local interests to resolve problems with their required cash contribution on total project cost. Terminal facilities. Many terminal and transfer facilities are in Houma and along waterways which flow through area between Houma and Gulf of Mexico. All facilities are privately owned and operated. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce and for reasonably prospective commerce. Ample space exists for expansion of existing facilities or for construction of new wharves and appurtenances. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor consisted of real estate activities, reconnaissance surveys, water quality studies and maintenance dredging. Maintenance contract dredge Cape Fear removed 70,900 cubic yards from Bayou LeCarpe. Condition as of Sep. 30. The 5- by 40-foot channel was constructed from January 1938 to August 1938, and modification of October 23, 1962, for enlargement of 2.54 miles of Bayou LeCarpe to 10 feet by 45 feet was initiated in May and completed August 1964. 22. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization.) Preauthorization studies costs as of Sep. 30, 1982, were $39,780 for Simmesport Harbor and $123,583 for Bayou Grand Caillou. Flood Control 23. BAYOU BODCAU AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA Location. In left bank flood plain of Red River. Bayou Bodcau rises in vicinity of Hope, AR, and flows southerly through Bayou Bodcau Reservoir and Bodcau Lake to join Cypress Bayou and form Red Chute Bayou, continues through Red Chute Bayou, Flat Lake, and Loggy Bayou to Red River, about 40 miles below Shreveport, LA. Existing project. Cypress Bayou-Red Chute Bayou levee: Extend existing levee from about 8 miles southeast of Benton, LA, proceeding southerly to junction of Cross and Red Chute Bayous, and then parallel to Red Chute Bayou on the right descending bank to its junction with Cutoff Bayou for a total distance of approximately 25 miles; construct landside drainage channel and several culverts with flap gates to Red Chute Bayou; construct cutoff on Red Chute Bayou just south of Louisiana Highway 527; construct approximately 5 miles of levee on left descending bank of Red Chute Bayou extending south from Louisiana Highway 612, and relocate utility lines as needed. Flat River-Loggy Bayou levee: Extend from lower end of existing Red River levee in vicinity of Ninock, LA, along high (left descending) bank of Red River to a point on right descending bank of Loggy Bayou, about 1 mile above its mouth, thence generally along right descending bank of Loggy Bayou, Red Chute, Cutoff Bayou, and Flat River to Taylortown to tie into existing Red River levee; close Flat River near its junction with Cutoff Bayou and install one 36-inch round corrugated metal pipe with automatic flap gate to drain isolated pockets and provide uninterrupted drainage; construct drainage structures on Flat River near its junction with Red Chute Bayou and along alinement of the Loggy Bayou in the vicinity of Grassy Lake; and make necessary utility relocations. Flat River channel improvement: Enlarge to average bottom width of 50 feet with flat side slopes and deepen by 2 to 6 feet from the confluence with Cutoff Bayou to junction with Cooper Bayou, 11.6 miles, including required relocations and modifications of utilities. Estimated cost for new work (October 1982) is $34,700,000 Federal and $7,600,000 non-Federal. The subject project was one of the Water Resofrces projects reviewed in March 1977 in accordance with the President's request. As a result of this review, the President recommended to deauthorize this project. Congress subsequently directed the Corps to take the following two actions: Construct levees on Red Chute Bayou below Cutoff Bayou that are required to prevent induced flood damage that would otherwise result from the abandonment of partly completed project. 11-16 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT Initiate studies to determine if modifications to the authorized project would permit its completion in a form consistent with the current executive policy. Engineering and design work for the induced flood prevention plan below Cutoff Bayou and project modification studies were being conducted when President Reagan signed, on Dec. 4, 1981, the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Bill of 1982, which contained language that "reconfirmed without further study and analysis" the plan for flood control for the project as approved by the Flood Control Act of 1965. Additional documents concerning environmental and socioeconomic impacts are currently being prepared and will be available to the public prior to further construction. There is clear evidence of a marked shift in land use within the project area over the past several years, from rural to urban-suburban. Because of this shift, we now find it necessary to expand our studies beyond those initially envisioned. The expanded studies will cover the areas of alternatives and economics, in addition to the natural environment. We are presently assessing the impacts of the expanded studies on the scheduled date for resuming construction on the project. Local cooperation. For details see pages 11-24 and 25, Annual Report for FY 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor forces consisted of preparation of plans and specifications, for design deficiency, and engineering studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in October 1974 and is 17 percent complete. 24. BAYOU BODCAU RESERVOIR, LA Location. In Red River Basin on Bayou Bodcau in Bossier Parish, LA, 72 miles above mouth of Loggy Bayou and 35 miles northeast of Shreveport, LA. (Refer to Geological Survey State map, scale 1:500,000.) Existing project. An earth-fill dam rising 76 feet above streambed with a reservoir providing a flood damage prevention storage capacity of 357,000 acrefeet. Outlet works are in south abutment, and an uncontrolled spillway is on north abutment. Reservoir controls 656 square miles, or 53 percent, of entire drainage area of Bayou Bodcau. Construction of a floodway for diversion of Bayou Bodcau and Cypress Bayou to improve flood protection was authorized by 1936 Flood Damage Prevention Act. This authorization was modified by 1938 Flood Control Act, which authorized construction of a reservoir and other flood damage prevention works in lieu of construction of a floodway for diversion of Bayou Bodcau and Cypress Bayou, LA to improve protection, and further modified by War Department Civil Appropriation Act of 1939 which provided that reservoir and other flood control works on Bayou Bodcau and Cypress Bayou, LA, authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938 shall be constructed in accordance with revised plans and cost estimates in Office, Chief of Engineers. New work was completed in 1961. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces continued operation and ordinary maintenance of the dam and reservoir, real estate activities, stream gaging, surveys and economic studies. Number of visitor-days of recreational use, 285,000 (Calendar Year 1980). (See Table 11-F for reservoir operations.) Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated April 1947 and completed April 1961. 25. BAYOU PIERRE, LA Location. In Red River Basin below Shreveport, LA, along channel of Bayou Pierre from its mouth at Grand Ecore, La., upstream 30 miles to its confluence with Bayou Wincy. (Refer to Geological Survey State map, scale 1:500,000.) Existing project. Provides for widening channel at intervals, totaling 12.9 miles, and snagging of 29.7 miles, to reduce flood damage and improve sanitary and living conditions over a wide area. Cost of new work, completed in 1939, was $299,529. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces continued condition and operations studies as required. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in FY 1938 and completed in FY 1939. 26. BRUSH BAYOU, LA Location. Rises in the southwestern portion of Shreveport, LA, in Caddo Parish. The stream flows in a generally southerly direction approximately 9 miles to a junction with Boggy Bayou. Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of the enlargement and realinement of the channel between miles 1.20 and 7.42. Between miles 1.20 and 2.18 the channel would be radically realined, and above the point, the enlarged channel would generally follow the existing alinement. Bottom widths for the improved channel vary from 100 feet at mile 1.20 to 20 feet at mile 7.42. Construction of the project would require modification of two highway bridges, one railway bridge, and numerous pipelines and power lines. Estimated cost of new work (October 1977) is $1,000,000 Federal and $2,480,000 non-Federal, including $1,120,000 contributed funds. Includes $80,500 preauthorization study cost. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from claim for damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all works, including measures for beautification, after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; bear all cost for the project in excess of the Federal limitation of $1,000,000; provide without cost to the United States all relocations and alterations of all drains, bridges (except railroad bridges) and roads, pipelines, sewers, utility lines, and 11-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 other facilities made necessary by the project; prevent encroachment on improved channels, and adopt and enforce flood plain regulations to restrict development of areas lying below the elevation of the 100-yearfrequency flood under project conditions; comply with the provisions of Public Laws 91-611 and 91-646. Caddo Parish Police Jury is assuring agency. Assurances have been received and accepted. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor consisted of real estate activities and advance engineering work. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was completed in FY 1982. 27. CADDO LAKE, LA Location. In Caddo Parish, about 19 miles northwest of Shreveport, LA, at the foot of Caddo Lake and at head of Twelve Mile Bayou. Existing project. Replacement of the original dam was completed in Jun. 1971, having same flow characteristics and located as near as practicable downstream of the old dam, built under navigation project "Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA." New dam will be capable of being raised in the future if desirable and justified. Estimated cost of new work (October 1976) was $3,587,800 Federal and $28,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Public Law 94-587, Section 174, amended the Flood Control Act of 1965 (PL 89-298) to provide that operation and maintenance of Caddo Lake Dam be the responsibility of the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers. Conveyance of title to the United States from the Caddo Levee District is being reviewed. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of condition and operation studies, stream gaging, and water quality studies. 28. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA Location. In south Jefferson Parish, LA, along the Gulf of Mexico, about 50 miles south of New Orleans and 45 miles northwest of southwest pass (Mississippi River). Existing project. The project provides protection from waves driven by hurricanes that have a frequency of recurrence of up to once in every 50 years. The plan consists of a berm and vegetated dune extending the length of Grand Isle's gulf shore and a jetty to stabilize the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. The dune would have a 10-foot-wide crown at an elevation of 11.5 feet mean sea level, 1 on 5 side slopes, and protective vegetation. The sandfill berm would slope from an elevation of 8.5 feet mean sea level at the toe of the dune 180 feet gulfward to an elevation of 3 feet mean sea level and, from this point, would assume its natural slope to the offshore bottom. The jetty provided by the plan has a top width of 6 feet at an elevation of 4 feet mean sea level, 1 on 2 side slopes, and extends approximately 2,600 feet along the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. Estimated cost of project (October 1981) is $8,650,000 Federal and $5,080,000 non-Federal, including $2,110,000 contributed funds. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction of the project, currently estimated to cost $2,380,000; accomplish without cost to the United States all relocations and alterations of buildings, streets, utilities, and other structures and improvements made necessary by the construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from claims for damages due to the construction works; assure maintenance, repairs, and periodic beach nourishment of the project after completion as may be required to serve the intended purposes in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, except that the Federal Government will contribute, for an initial period of 15 years, a sum currently estimated at $33,000 annually toward the cost of beach nourishment associated with beach erosion prevention, subject to a final determination on the basis of conditions of public use and ownership at the time of construction; provide a cash contribution for the hurricane protection function in an amount sufficient to insure that local investment in cash, equivalent work, and fair market value of lands and relocations are at least equal to 30 percent of all first costs allocated to that function, which cash contribution is presently estimated at $860,000; contribute cash or equivalent work an amount sufficient to pay the non-Federal share of construction costs allocated to beach erosion control, that amount presently estimated at $2,250,000 less $1,000,000 credit for completed work, west end jetty, or $1,250,000, the final amount to be determined at the time of project construction in accordance with cost-sharing procedures for beach erosion control as defined in the report; obtain approval by the Chief of Engineers, prior to commencement of any work on shore and beach protection phases of the project if undertaken separately from the recommended combined project, of detailed plans and specifications for the work contemplated and also the arrangements of prosecuting such work, excluding the preauthorization jetty construction; assure continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation in the beach protection phase is based, and its administration for public use during the life of the project, and assure continued availability for public use of privately owned shores; assure that water pollution which would endanger the health of bathers will not be permitted; adopt and enforce appropriate ordinances to provide for the preservation of the improvement and its protective vegetation; at least annually, inform interests affected that the project will not provide any substantial protection from hurricane flooding on the bay side, or from hurricane surges higher in elevation than those of Hurricane Betsy of Sep. 9, 1965; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies of 1970, Public Law 91-646; agree to the requirements of Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 11-18 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT 1970, Public Law 91-611. Comply with section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) that no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of or subjected to discrimination in connection with the project on the grounds of race, creed, or national origin. Formal assurances requested of Jefferson Parish Council, and the Mayor, Town of Grand Isle, LA, on Aug. 12, 1981. The Town of Grand Isle is not financially capable to be the sole local assurer. The Louisiana Office of Public Works is coordinating discussions among the potential non- Federal sponsors in an effort to determine whether adequate local support can be arranged. Operations and results during the fiscal year. Work by hired labor consisted of engineering studies to complete plans and specifications. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was not initiated. 29. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In southeastern Louisiana, vicinity of New Orleans, in St. Charles, Jefferson, Orleans, St. Bernard, and St. Tammany Parishes, comprising lower land and water area between Mississippi River alluvial ridge and the Pleistocene escarpment to north and west. The dominant topographic feature is Lake Pontchartrain, a shallow landlocked tidal basin, about 640 square miles in area and averaging 12 feet deep, connecting with lesser Lake Maurepas to the west and through Lake Borgne and Mississippi Sound to the gulf to the east. The lake drains about 4,700 square miles of tributary area. (Refer to Geological Survey quadrangles Yscloskey and Malheureaux Point, Drum Bay, Door Point, Lake Eugenie, Oak Mound Bayou, Mitchell Keys, Lake Eloi, and Morgan Harbor; Engineer quadrangles Slidell, Covington, Ponchatoula, Springfield, Denham Springs, Donaldsonville, Mt. Airy, Bonnet Carr4, Spanish Fort, Chef Menteur, Rigolets, St. Bernard, New Orleans, and Hahnville; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts No. 1115 and 1116. Existing project. Provides for control of hurricane tides by construction of two independent units; the Lake Pontchartrain barrier plan involves construction of a barrier levee along eastern boundary of the lake with navigation and hurricane flood control structures in Chef Menteur Pass, the Rigolets, and at Seabrook. These protective works, together with strengthening and extension of existing protective works and the construction of the Seabrook Lock, will afford full protection to the south shore of Lake Pontchartrain from Bonnet Carre Spillway to the eastern limit of Orleans Parish levee along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal. The Chalmette area plan consists of improving existing protection along east bank Inner Harbor Navigation Canal from the lock to Florida Avenue, then constructing a new levee to Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, thence along south bank of gulf outlet to Bayou Lawler, then turning south and tieing into Mississippi River levee at Violet, LA. The approved Chalmette area plan was modified, under the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers, to provide for enlargement of the protected area by construction of a levee from the Mississippi River levee near Caernarvon, LA, to the vicinity of Verret, LA, thence to and along the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet to a junction with the approved levee at the Bayou Lawler crossingof the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, and elimination of the levee in the approved plan from the Bayou Lawler and Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet to Violet, LA. Navigable drainage structures will be provided at Bayous Bienvenue and Dupre. Strengthening existing seawall at Mandeville on the north shore will insure that future hurricanes will not seriously damage this resort community. Estimated cost for new work (October 1982) is $439,000,000 Federal and $206,000,000 non-Federal, including cash contribution of $134,029,000 which includes $18,400,000 estimated to be capitalized value of operation and maintenance of Rigolets navigation lock and appurtenant channel. Local cooperation. Provide all rights-of-way; bear 30 percent of the first cost, consisting of fair market value of providing all lands, easements, and rights-ofway, including borrow and spoil disposal areas for construction, accomplish alteration and relocation of roads, railroads, pipelines, cables, wharves, drainage structures, and other facilities; maintain and operate all works after completion; and hold and save the United States free from damages. See H. Doc. No. 231, 89th Cong., 1st sess. for more detailed requirements of local cooperation. Assuring Agency: The Orleans Levee District, Lake Borgne Basin Levee District, St. Bernard Parish Police Jury, Louisiana Office of Public Works, and Pontchartrain Levee District. Basic assurances were received from the following: Orleans Levee District for the entire barrier plan and that portion of the Chalmette area plan in Orleans Parish; Pontchartrain Levee District for the barrier plan; Lake Borgne Levee District and St. Bernard Parish Police Jury for the Chalmette area plan in St. Bernard Parish. Supplemental assurances covering Public Law 91-646 have been received from the Orleans Levee District and the Pontchartrain Levee District. Lake Borgne Basin Levee District and St. Bernard Parish Police Jury have executed the supplemental assurance. The Governor of Louisiana executed an assurance containing all required provisions of local cooperation, including Public Law 91-646, for and on behalf of St. Tammany Parish. Approval of this assurance is being delayed pending receipt of supporting documents. Louisiana Office of Public Works is assisting in obtaining the required documents. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preparation of design memorandums and plans and specifications continued by hired labor. One design memorandum in the Chalmette Unit was submitted for review to LMVD and preparation of three- continued. 11-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 One is scheduled for completion in FY 83 and two are scheduled for FY 84. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction started May 1967 and is 49 percent complete, with 13.3 miles reinforced concrete floodwalls, 31.1 miles of first-lift levees and 5.5 miles of second-lift levees completed in the New Orleans east area, 1.3 miles of floodwall and 27.9 miles of first-lift levees, 9.1 miles of second-lift levees, 10.4 miles of first-lift levee enlargement, and two control structures completed in the Chalmette area. Contract work continued on six contracts. Construction of 4.4 miles of second lift levee in the New Orleans East area, Citrus Back Levee, 0.5 miles of floodwall capping, New Orleans East Lakefront, gap closures from Paris Road to South Point, New Orleans East area, and Inner Harbor Navigation Canal east and north of Florida Ave., 1.1 miles of floodwall, in the vicinity of Paris Road Bridge, 0.2 miles, and 8.5 miles of levee shaping and Creedmore Drainage Structure, Chalmette area, were accomplished. 30. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In coastal section of Louisiana, along Bayou Lafourche, and includes lands on both banks of the bayou from Larose to 2 miles south of Golden Meadow. (Refer to Geological survey quadrangles Cut-off, Lake Felicity, Bay Dosgris, Golden Meadow Farms, Bay Tambour, Mink Bayou, Caminada Pass, Leeville, Belle Pass, Pelican Pass, and Calumet Island; Engineer quadrangles New Orleans, Hahnville, Point-a-la-Hache, Barataria, and Fort Livingston; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1115 and 1116 Existing project. Provides a loop levee about 40 miles long along both banks of Bayou Lafourche from Larose to South Golden Meadow; enlargement of 3 miles of existing levee at Golden Meadow; floodgates for navigation and hurricane protection in Bayou Lafourche at upper and lower bayou crossings; about 8 miles of low interior levees to regulate intercepted drainage and seven multibarreled culverts controlled by flapgates. Estimated cost for new work (October 1982) is $65,500,000 Federal and $28,000,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas and spoil disposal areas, and accomplish alterations to roads, pipelines, cables, wharves, oil wells, and any other facilities necessary for the construction of the project; all at an estimated cost of $12,400,000; bear 30 percent of the total project cost, a sum presently estimated at $28,000,000 consisting of the items listed above, and a cash contribution presently estimated at $15,600,000 or equivalent work specifically undertaken as an integral part of the project after authorization and in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; and prevent any encroachment on ponding areas unless substitute storage capacity or equivalent pumping capacity is provided promptly without cost to the United States; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocations Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646) and with the provisions of Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-611) in acquiring real property. The Board of Commissioners of the South Louisiana Tidal Water Control Levee District executed the required Agreement of Local Cooperation on Nov. 13, 1972, which was executed by the United States on Jul. 10, 1973, and approved on behalf of the Secretary of the Army on Aug. 29, 1973. Section 38, Paragraph 1051 et seq., Louisiana Revised Statutes created the South Lafourche Levee District. The South Lafourche Levee District assumed the rights and obligations of the South Louisiana Tidal Water Control Levee District with respect to this project. Operations and results during fiscal year. One design memorandum was submitted to LMVD for review during the year. Three sets of plans and specifications were initiated, levee first lift, Section E, South, levee, first lift, Section F, and Larose floodwall. Two construction items were initiated, levee first lift, Section A, East and Golden Meadow floodgate. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction commenced in February 1975 and is 31 percent complete. 31. MCKINNEY BAYOU, AR AND TX Location. The McKinney Bayou watershed covers approximately 360 square miles and is located in southwestern Arkansas and northeastern Texas in the vicinity of the city of Texarkana, AR and TX, within the flood plain of the Red River. Existing project. Provides improvements for three major elements; improvement of the McKinney Bayou channel, construction of a diversion channel into Red River and control structure at Buzzard Bluff, and construction of a diversion channel into Red River and control structure about one-half mile west of the Arkansas-Texas state line. Mitigation of project-induced wildlife losses are included in the project. Estimated cost of new work (October 1982) is $7,440,000 Federal and $2,120,000 non-Federal, including cash contribution of $655,000. Local cooperation. For details see pages 11-29 and 30, Annual Report for FY 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work by hired labor consisted of planning for the project, investigations, environmental studies, and surveys. Condition as of Sep. 30. CQnstruction has not been initiated. 11-20 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT 32. NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION Location. Includes land subject to inundation by hurricane tides extending along both banks of the Mississippi River below New Orleans from vicinity of Phoenix to Venice, LA. Existing project. Provides for improvements along Mississippi River below New Orleans, LA, for prevention of hurricane tidal flood damages by increasing heights of existing back levees and modifying existing drainage facilities where necessary in three separate reaches: Reach A, on the west bank from City Price to Empire, 15 miles, 4,340 acres protected; Reach B, on the west bank from Empire to Venice, 21 miles, 4,900 acres protected; and Reach C, on the east bank from Phoenix to Bohemia (construction recently completed by local agency with credit given as equivalent work), 16 miles, 5,470 acres protected, and construction of a barrier levee on the east bank of the Mississippi River from Bohemia to mile 10 AHP with enlargement of the west bank Mississippi River levee from Fort Jackson to Venice, generally called the East Bank Barrier Levee plan. Reach B was later divided into two units, Reach B-1 from Empire to Fort Jackson and Reach B-2 from Fort Jackson to Venice, LA, as a result of a request made by the local agency. Estimated cost of new work (October 1982) is $138,700,000 Federal and $59,400,000 non-Federal, including $48,030,000 cash contributions or equivalent work. Local cooperation. Provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way including borrow areas and spoil disposal areas necessary for the construction of the project, at costs presently estimated at $4,563,000; accomplish all necessary alterations and relocations to roads, pipelines, cables, wharves and other facilities required by the construction of the project at costs presently estimated at $6,807,000; bear 30 percent of the first cost, a sum presently estimated at $59,400,000, and cash contribution presently estimated at $48,030,000 to be paid either in a lump sum prior to initiation of construction or in installments prior to start of pertinent work items, in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers, or as a substitute for any part of the cash contribution, accomplish in accordance with approved construction schedules items of work of equivalent value as determined by the Chief of Engineers, the final apportionment of costs to be made after actual costs and values have been determined; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; prevent any encroachment on ponding areas unless substitute storage capacity or equivalent pumping is provided promptly; and at least annually, notify those affected that the project will not provide complete protection from tidal flooding and that further local actions must be taken during hurricane emergencies. Local interests are also required to comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (PL 91- 646), in acquiring real property. PL 91-611. Not applicable. Construction started prior to Jan. 1, 1972. PL 91-646. A constitutional amendment was provided by the Louisiana legislature on Feb. 1, 1972 allowing local interests to comply. The estimated cost to local interests is $48,000. Assurances of local cooperation for Reaches A, B-1, B-2 and C, requested on Jan. 7, 1963, were furnished by the Plaquemines Parish Commission Council on Mar. 6, 1964. Required supporting papers were furnished on Mar. 16, 1965 and accepted. Supplemental assurances covering the requirements of PL 91-646 were received from Plaquemines Parish Commission Council on May 23, 1973 and accepted on Jun. 20, 1973. Assurances for the entire project have been furnished and accepted, although they do not specifically mention the East Bank Barrier Levee Plan. The scope of the project has not changed; however, local interests were requested to furnish separate assurances for the East Bank Barrier Levee. These assurances have not yet been received. There was a delay of approximately 26 months in the furnishing of assurances by local interests primarily because they desired that agreement on levee alinement be consummated as fully as possible before giving their assurance. Problems of assurance of local cooperation have been resolved and rights-of-way were furnished for the first two Reach B-1 items of work on Aug. 23, 1968 and May 20, 1970, respectively. All negotiations for relocations are the responsibility of local interests. These mainly consist of raising several petroleum and natural gas pipelines to the levee configuration and relocation of privately owned frame structures used as fishing and boating camps. To assure that there will be no delay in construction of levees, local interests are notified well in advance so that the owners of the pipelines can be advised. Assuring Agency: Plaquemines Parish Commission Council. Assurances for all reaches of the project, except the East Bank Barrier levee, have been furnished. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor: Planning for this project and engineering studies continued. A contract for Reach B-1, Hurricane Protection Levee, first enlargement, was completed Oct. 13, 1981. Reach B-1, final enlargement, was completed Jun. 1, 1982. Reach B-2, second enlargement, was awarded Jul. 29, 1982. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began on the project in September 1968 and the total project is approximately 30 percent complete. First lift construction is complete on Reaches B-1 and B-2 and the first enlargement is completed for a portion of Reach B-1. Second lift construction is complete on Reach C. Initial construction on Reach A is scheduled to begin in FY 1985. Initial construction on the East Bank Barrier is 11-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 not scheduled, pending the furnishing of assurances by local interest. 33. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (NEW ORLEANS DIST.) Location. On Red River and its tributaries below Denison Dam, in Oklahoma, Arkansas, Texas, and Louisiana. (Refer to Geological Survey State maps and folio "Maps of Red River"-1958 edition.) Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1946 approved general plan for flood control on Red River below Denison Dam, TX and OK, which provides for construction of six flood control reservoirs in combination with existing or authorized Federal and non-Federal levee improvements, modified as required, and channel stabilization at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. This act further authorized incorporation of several separate existing projects for flood damage prevention along Red River below Denison, above jurisdiction of the MRC, into this project. By Public Law 780, 83d Cong., 2d sess., as amended by Public Law 218, 84th Cong. 1st sess., and Public Law 645, 86th Cong., 1st sess., plan of improvement was amended to include additional projects as indicated in following lists of reservoirs and local protection works considered in general flood control plan for the Red River below Denison Dam, and existing flood control projects incorporated into project in New Orleans District. (See Table 11-G for new projects and Table 11-H for incorporated projects.) Local cooperation. See individual reports herein. 34. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM, LEVEES AND BANK STABILIZATION (NEW ORLEANS DIST.) Location. Along the main stem of the Red River from the head of the levee system immediately above Index, AR, through the southwest corner of Arkansas to the vicinity of Boyce, LA, on the right bank, and Pineville, LA, on the left bank. Existing project. Raising and strengthening existing and authorized Red River levees to provide protection against flooding and bank protection works at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. The plan consists of raising and strengthening existing and authorized Red River levees to provide against a flood approximately 20 percent greater than the flood of 1945, the flood of record, as modified by authorized reservoirs. Bank protection works are to be constructed at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. Estimated cost for new work (October 1980) is $55,100,000 Federal and $1,310,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands, easements, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas necessary for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate works after completion. Local interests have been prompt in furnishing levee rights-of-way upon request, except for the following three items of low priority: McKinney Bayou Drainage District, enlargement of approximately 4 miles of intermittently low levee; Garland Levee District, enlargement of approximately 1.3 miles of levee; and Red River Levee District No. 1, enlargement of approximately 4.3 miles of levee. The local agencies are convinced that the flow line lowering produced by completed reservoirs has made this work unnecessary. Assuring Agencies: Red River Levee and Drainage District, North Bossier Levee District, Red River Water Commission, Bossier Levee District, Caddo Levee District, Cane River Levee and Drainage District, Garland Levee District, Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, Miller County Levee District No. 2, Red River Levee District No. 1, Nineteenth Louisiana Levee District, and Long Prairie Levee District. All basic assurances received. Supplemental assurances covering Public Law 91-646 have been received from all agencies except the North Bossier Levee District. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces continued investigations, surveys, and preparation of plans and specifications. Bank stabilization was completed at Dukedale, LA, mile 290-L, Apr. 29, 1982, and below Garland City, AR, Phase 2, mile 371.5-R, Sep. 10, 1982. One construction contract was initiated on Apr. 26, 1982, at First Old River Lake, AR, mile 393-R. One construction contract at Tobe, mile 408-R, was awarded Sep. 30, 1982, but not initiated. Contract administration for Tobe Revetment was transferred to Vicksburg District. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in February 1948 and the project is 90 percent complete. 35. RED RIVER WATERWAYSHREVEPORT, LA, TO INDEX, AR Location. In northwest Louisiana, southwest Arkansas, and northeast Texas, along the Red River between Shreveport, LA, and Index, AR. Existing project. To provide for realining the channels of Red River from Shreveport, LA, to the levee system near Index, AR, by means of dredging, cutoffs, and training works and for stabilizing its banks by means of revetments, dikes, and other methods. Facilities to provide opportunities for recreation and for fish and wildlife development are an integral part of the project. Estimated cost for new work (October 1982) is $186,000,000 Federal and $24,000,000 non- Federal, including $2,780,000 contributed funds. Local cooperation. Provide prior to construction and without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for disposal of spoil, and provide necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments, therefor, or the cost of such retaining works and also including all additional lands, 11-22 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT or rights in land, required to insure public control of the recreational development; and hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, maintain all the project works upstream of the navigation improvement at Shreveport, LA, after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Provide without cost to the United States all relocations of utilities, bridges (except railroads), sewers, pipelines, and any other alterations of existing improvements which may be required for construction of the project; where the appraised value of the land provided for recreation development amounts to less than 50 percent of the total first cost of recreational development, make additional contributions sufficient to bring the non-Federal share to at least that level; which additional contribution may consist of the actual cost of carrying out an agreed-upon portion of the development, or a cash contribution, or a combination of both; operate and maintain for the life of the Federal project the recreational areas and all facilities installed pursuant to the agreement, except that facilities which are integral parts of a structure operated and maintained by the Federal Government shall be operated and maintained under whatever cost-sharing arrangement applies to the operation and maintenance of the basic structure; and assure access to recreational developments to all on equal terms. Local interests are required to comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646) and with the provisions of Sec. 221 of the Flood "Control" Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-611), in acquiring real property. Section 187 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (Public Law 94-587) modifies the requirement of local cooperation to provide that non-Federal interests shall contribute 25 percent of the construction costs of retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments required for initial and subsequent disposal of dredged material. Assuring Agencies: Louisiana: Formal assurances for the project in Louisiana were executed by the Red River Waterway Commission on Feb. 26, 1969, and accepted on behalf of the United States on Apr. 15, 1969. Amended assurances covering the provisions of Public Law 91-646 and Public Law 91-611 were executed by the commission on May 23, 1973, and accepted on behalf of the United States on Nov. 14, 1973. The Red River Waterway Commission was formed expressly to provide the local cooperation for the project and has an adequate tax base to fulfill its objectives. Arkansas: On Oct. 16, 1969, the Arkansas Soil and Water Conservation Commission furnished a statement of willingness to provide local cooperation on the proposed plan. In July 1976, the Soil and Water Resources Division of the Arkansas Department of Commerce stated that they would approach the Arkansas Legislature to obtain funds on a recurring yearly basis sufficient to insure its portion of the project funds by start of construction in Arkansas. By letter dated Jun. 20, 1977, the Director of the Soil and Water Resources Division advised that the Arkansas General Assembly appropriated $750,000 in the 1977 session to be held as a trust fund for payment of local cost sharing on this project. Further, they anticipated that additional funding will be added in future years to enable them to have on hand the required funds at the time construction begins. Texas: On Dec. 17, 1969, the Governor of Texas furnished a statement of willingness to provide local cooperation for bank stabilization. A meeting was held in Austin, TX, on Mar. 1, 1977, concerning sponsors of the Texas portion of the project. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the status of the waterway project and the type of organization needed to accomplish project assurances, the powers required by such an organization may be established. The Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) stated that they would take the lead in obtaining an organization with the ability to provide the local cooperation requirements. In the third quarter of 1980 the State of Texas moved closer to achieving that goal by action taken by the three Texas counties of Bowie, Lamar, and Red River, who have petitioned the State to enact legislation permitting them to join the Red River Authority of Texas. By this action, the Red River Authority of Texas will become legally empowered to act as sponsor for the Waterway. Terminal facilities. Adequate facilities are to be provided and maintained by local interests. Operations and results during fiscal year. Advanced engineering and design work was accomplished by hired labor forces. Preparation of Phase 1 of the GDM is approximately 52 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction has not been initiated. 36. WALLACE LAKE, LA Location. In Red River Basin on Cypress Bayou, Caddo and De Soto Parishes, LA, 66 miles above mouth of Bayou Pierre and about 14 miles southeast of Shreveport, LA. (Refer to Geological Survey map, scale 1:500,000.) Existing project. An earth-fill dam 4,940 feet long at top, including 644 feet of spillway and outlet works, rising 48 feet above streambed, with a reservoir providing storage of 96,100 acre-feet, including a conservation pool of 7,800 acre-feet. Outlet works and uncontrolled spillway are centered about 1,250 feet north of south abutment. Reservoir controls 260 square miles, or about 20 percent of total drainage area of Bayou Pierre, Cypress Bayou, and tributaries combined, and affords protection against floods for an area of about 90,000 acres of valley below; dam. Cost for new work completed in 1946 was $1,219,371, including $17,164 for Code 711. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 1024, Annual Report Fiscal Year 1946. 11-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor work consisted of condition and operation studies, stream gaging, and operation and maintenance of the dam as required. (See Table 11-F for reservoir operations.) Condition as of Sep. 30. All construction work on project was completed in December 1946. Main portion of dam was constructed during Fiscal Year 1943; stabilization of railroad embankment was accomplished from June to November 1946; and placing of fill in closure section of dam was accomplished from November to December 1946. Recreational facilities at the lake were closed in May 1972. 37. WEST AGURS, LA Location. The project area is located in Caddo Parish in northwest Louisiana, immediately adjacent to the northern corporate limits of the City of Shreveport, LA. Existing project. Provides for the installation of 232 relief wells excavated on centers 50 feet apart along the bottom for the entire length of the existing drainage canal on the landside of West Agurs Levee. The wells would extend from the thalweg of the borrow pit about 22 feet into the pervious sand stratum underlying the area. The wells would be 2 feet in diameter and backfilled with clean gravel. Disposal from the well excavation will be spread on the landside of the levee. No relocations will be required. Estimated cost of new work (October 1982) is $840,000 Federal. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including all borrow areas, and the relocation of buildings, roads, pipelines and utilities necessary for construction of the project, such as relocations to be made in accordance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646; hold and save the United States free from any claims for damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all works, including the well system, after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; and provide and operate and maintain all interior drainage works, including pumping stations, which may be required for the development of the protected area. Formal assurances have not been requested. The provisions of PL 91-611 and PL 91-646 will be included as a requirement when formal acts of assurances are requested. By letter dated Nov. 19, 1971 and Mar. 20, 1972, the Board of Commissioners of the Caddo Levee District indicated its ability and willingness to comply with the terms of local cooperation. On Feb. 16, 1979, the Board of Commissioners of the Caddo Levee District reaffirmed their willingness to furnish the items of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design studies were continued during fiscal year 1982. The District Commander submitted a draft general reevaluation report (formerly Phase I GDM) in June, and recommended that the existing project be modified. The modified project would provide for temporary ponding of water in the landside borrow pit and related improvements in lieu of the system of relief wells. Local interests expressed support for the modified project, and proposed that they construct it at their own expense. Action to implement the non-Federal proposal was initiated. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction has not begun. 38. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Various hurricane protection projects, as well as small flood control projects, were inspected during FY 1982. Additionally, inspection of completed flood control projects along the Red River from the northern boundary of the District to Alexandria, LA, was included in the joint annual inspection with local interests in 1982. Flood-fight sectors included in this area are the Arkansas, Shreveport, and Middle Red which contain a total of 438 miles of levee. Also, periodic inspection and continuing evaluation of completed civil works structures was conducted in accordance with ER 1110- 2-100, at various times during the year on an as-needed basis. Fiscal year costs for the period were $166,670. Total costs to Sep. 30, 1982, were $1,039,062. 39. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Disaster preparedness, FY costs for the period were $124,761. Emergency Operations: Advance measures, Lower Urania, $1,235; Raven Camp, $131,246. Total costs to Sep. 30, 1982 were $257,242. General Investigations 40. ACTIVE INVESTIGATIONS See Table 11-J which covers: Surveys, Collection and Study of basic data, and Research and Development activities. 11-24 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep. 30, 1982 1. Aquatic Plant Control Program, LA 2. Atchafalaya River Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, LA (Contrib. Funds) 3. Barataria Bay 4. Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche- Jump Waterway, LA 5. Bayou Teche & Vermilion River, LA 6. Bayou Teche, LA 7. Calcasieu River and Pass, LA (Contrib. Funds) 8. Freshwater Bayou, LA 9. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL & Mexican Border (New Orleans Dist.) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost $ 350,000 251,882 -148,000 557,845 4,399,847 3,285,162 140,000 53,756 3,745,000 3,728,252 1,416 75,000 56,227 80,000 79,905 $ 445,000 $ 450,000 $ 300,000 549,853 424,684 312,947 550,000 15,500,000 1,150,000 351,901 15,644,334 704,955 1,202,100 3,565,000 2,299,847 3,576,990 - 628,000 138,866 630,835 184,220 182,149 -30,600 199 125,970 131,865 116,910 123,167 7,133,700 10,552,980 6,000,937 8,699,203 - 282,774 535,750 2,665,265 516,166 1,825,010 2,053,000 1,994,623 148,750 150.540 305,000 2,320,000 307,580 224,389 2,817 40,000 55,498 137,000 128,135 8,285,000 11,262,008 155,000 437,774 39,000 39,291 202,000 110,272 1,885,000 914,539 $ 8,882,460 8,867,727 30,850,000 30,278,4841 24,274,9812 24,209,4432 1,483,8123 1,483,8124 1,572,6855 1,572,6855 13,346,8566 11,204,0046 1,624,4247 1,624,4247 829,7568 829,7568 2,891,822 2,891,822 1,627,724 1,627,725 754,3309 754,33010 3,599,585 3,492,969 27,807,31011 27,807,31011 65,446,74912 64,405,64612 437,774 437,774 814,000 1,670,000 1,392,685 1,693,519 7,116,22413 7,116,22413 12,193,765 11,915,406 63,654,53514, 15, 16 63,284,47014, 15, 16 11-25 TABLE 11-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 10. Houma Navigation Canal, LA 11. Leland Bowman Lock, LA (Replacement of lock) 12. Mermentau River, LA 13. Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico, LA 14. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, LA (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 15. Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, LA 16. Overton-Red River Waterway, LA 17. Red River Emergency Bank Protection (Contrib. Funds) 18. Red River Waterway- Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA (Contrib. Funds) Total Funds to Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep. 30, 1982 Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 9,125,000 7,932,967 187,000 198,625 800,000 108,708 -70,000 7,699 568,000 577,079 600,000 1,824,884 24,220,000 23,982,648 1,235,000 1,810,701 7,090,000 7,142,983 1,071,000 4,317,998 185,000 69,814 1,320,000 2,061,382 1,600,000 2,972,625 325 325 51,000,000 51,787,486 629,350 62,595 71,854 70,631 7,660,000 7,122,203 1,350,000 1,344,029 50,000 389,709 29,204 501,250 623,433 910,000 658,241 27,363,000 27,449,447 1,300,000 901,609 1,572,500 1,522,856 -;4,000 36,320 892,800 1,004,548 5,600,000 5,763,945 5,000,000 5,037,194 - 66,700,000 88,500,000 66,088,853 74,633,085 36,497 1,015,000 210,986 1,382,191 216,720 - 217,943 - 4,875,000 6,837,829 2,540,000 2,505,334 495,200 544,814 3,766 700,000 743,669 884,800 977,150 24,122,100 24,581,150 1,780,000 1,758,067 7,109,200 7,134,791 16,900 196,000 190,910 3,419,000 3,283,472 5,890,000 5,917,017 15,876,100 13,242,263 2,888,000 284,901 6,029,800 6,058,840 1,050,900 1,013,415 30,268,000 29,826,943 1,235,200 1,472,670 8,754,000 4,349,480 -578 926,000 863,216 4,974,500 5,129,335 6,000,000 4,101,980 36,500,000 50,445,943 1,327,800 1,355,419 11-26 137,538,246171, 9 134,814,11518 19 13,721,734 11,072,198 7,875,01020 7,832,01620 4,561,91021 4,672,57921 11,779,31222 11,730,97922 39,211,79723 38,986,28923 309,885,06424, 26 309,272,68325, 26 76,635,200 76,404,132 70,468,580 66,028,626 1,118,97727 1,118,97727 10,010,993 10,007,760 2,199,800 2,128,488 27,427,022 27,417,724 46,948,000 44,892,204 6,825 6,825 332,188,000 330,150,486 4,700,947 4,700,866 483,461 483,461 TABLE 11-A (Continued) NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section T in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 19. Removing Water- Maint. Hyancinth, LA Approp. 1,200,000 1,163,000 976,000 1,158,000 20. Tangipahoa River, LA 21. Waterway from Intracoastal Waterways to Bayou Dulac, LA (Bayou Grand Caillou & LeCarpe, LA) 23. Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR & LA 24. Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA 25. Bayou Pierre, LA 26. Brush Bayou, LA (Contrib. Funds) 27. Caddo Lake, LA 28. Grand Isle and Vicinity, LA 29. Lake Pontchartrain and vicinity, LA (Hurricane Protection) (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 30. Larose to Golden Meadow, LA Hurricane Protection) (Contrib. Funds) Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 1,237,031 190,103 191,547 34,250 22,639 -1,000,000 91,593 205,600 195,945 15,000 10,858 -65,000 35,853 80,000 69,662 200,000 186,352 230,000 7,363,786 165,710 385,710 1,570,000 1,464,274 984,300 20,840 20,833 190,000 39,613 300,000 129,196 275,050 265,025 9,370 14,142 -120,000 20,177 49,424 91,860 115,636 182,000 174,535 13,320,000 12,672,174 209,400 122,400 2,885,000 2,931,867 1,177,002 159,000 158,404 35,000 37,242 135,000 295,526 120,000 274,326 370,000 365,191 21,000 20,768 182,000 194,071 460,000 496,062 127,000 119,642 100,000 111,558 8,800,000 8,811,248 140,950 205,564 815,000 1,075,688 298,721 1,101,000 218,191 1,146,938 1,084,984 130,000 86,341 200,000 201,472 500,000 459,713 184,000 211,580 12,600 12,832 34,315 304,000 306,913 104,200 114,316 105,000 41,937 13,000,000 13,720,371 166,000 186,400 2,100,000 1,407,390 6,139 'otal Funds to Sep. 30, 1982 17,735,608 17,661,082 568,154 567,551 294,622 253,205 888,762 888,762 4,407,000 4,265,063 4,208,417 4,208,417 2,841,807 2,839,707 299,52928 299,52928 552,680 552,680 966,660 974,28329 1,134,200 1,134,199 3,587,143 3,587,143 520,060 516,243 749,500 675,859 127,564,000 127,070,051 2,977,060 2,975,074 16,532,000 15,802,24430 2,089,721 2,061,268 11-27 TABLE 11-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep. 30, 1982 31. McKinney Bayou, New Work AR, and TX Approp. 100,000 155,000 255.000 - 1,622,263 Cost 101,081 118,085 284,162 13,482 1,631,263 32. Mississippi New Work River Delta at Approp. 200,000 638,000 1,830,000 1,535,000 45,189,000 and below New Cost 334,797 534,233 1,994,914 1,864,215 45,142,660 Orleans, LA (New Orleans to Venice, LA, Hurricane Protection) (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. - - - - 366,430 Cost - 86,569 - - 366,430 34. Red River below New Work Denison Dam, Approp. 2,000,000 4,365,000 2,000,000 2,379,300 50,389,30031 Levees and Bank Cost .1,026,898 5,568,162 1,067,597 2,576,517 49,593,05831 Stabilization (New Orleans Dist.) 35. Red River Water- New Work way, Shreveport, Approp. 220,000 150,000 23,000 - 688,000 LA, to Index, AR Cost 212,351 112,393 94,340 5,057 688,999 36. Wallace Lake, LA New Work Approp. - - - - 1,219,371 Cost - - - - 1,219,371 Maint. Approp. 80,000 160,740 133,000 277,800 1,717,240 Cost 82,129 162,454 132,832 285,901 1,713,279 37. West Agurs, LA New Work Approp. - 50,000 137,000 - 187,000 Cost - 48,939 101,334 - 150,273 1. Includes $37,348 for advance engineering and design. 2. Includes any maintenance costs on Atchafalaya River, Morgan City to Gulf of Mexico, LA. 3. Includes allotment of $340,000 for Code 300. 4. Includes expenditures of $335,375 for Code 300. 5. Includes $73,037 for previous project. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds expended. 6. Includes $47,551 for previous project. 7. Includes $252,935 for previous projects; excludes $75,563 expended for rehabilitation (Code 820) in Fiscal Year 1961. 8. Includes $15,445 for previous projects. 9. Includes $45,704 for previous projects. 10. Includes $91,389 permanent indefinite appropriation. 11. Includes $495,914 for previous project; excludes $107,837 expended for minor rehabilitation in Fiscal Year 1963. 12. Includes $194,851 for previous project. 13. Excludes $16,060 contributed funds. 14. Includes $4,320,698 for new work on previous project. Included in these totals are $353,541 N.I.R.A. funds (new work); and $1,070,433 permanent indefinite appropriation. Included is repayment of advance funds for construction of Franklin Canal in the amount of $35,103. In addition, $1,413,133 was expended for transfer to drainage district of ownership of Plaquemines Parish pumping station, and drainage canals and all drainage responsibility and obligations vested in the United States by Public Law 14, 79th Cong., 1st sess. 15. Excludes contributed funds of $340,159. 16. Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock was constructed at a cost of $8,648,492 (non-Federal). 17. Does not include allotment of $60,000 (9613123). 18. Does not include expenditures of $36,630 (9613123). 19. Includes $454,259 for maintenance and $548,948 for operation and care for previous project, including $75,000 from appropriation for maintenance and operation of dam and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes $7,005 contributed funds. 20. Includes AE&D funds for replacement of Vermilion Lock. 21. Excludes $10,904 for new work on White Lake to Pecan Island section of existing project. 22. Excludes $10,742 for maintenance on White Lake to Pecan Island section of existing project. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds. Includes $13,163 of R&H funds and $109,714 accelerated Public Works Act funds. 23. Includes $1,729,989 for previous project. 24. Does not include allotment of $40,000 (9613123). 25. Does not include expenditures of $63,370 (9613123). 26. Includes $169,055 for previous projects and $3,379,676 from permanent indefinite appropriation. 27. Contributed by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans, for providing fill for future industrial sites adjacent to turningbasin and for dredging cable and pipeline crossings. 28. Includes $38,529 from emergency relief funds. 29. Includes $80,500 for preauthorized studies. 30. Includes $67,823 for advance engineering and design. 31. Includes $212,105 expended by Tulsa District for cost of Index, AR, TX unit. Excludes $100,000 contributed funds expended. 11-28 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 13, 1968 Water Resources Development Act, Mar. 7, 1974 Jul. 3, 1958 Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 14, 1960 Nov. 22, 1967 Aug. 18, 1941 Sep. 19, 1890 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1919 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL PROGRAM, LA (See Sec. 1 of Text) Control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth alligatorweed, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growth from navigable waters in tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in southeastern United States. Research and planning costs prior to construction to be borne fully by the United States and not included in costs shared by local interests. Provides for comprehensive program for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water milfoil, and other obnoxious plant growths from navigable waterways, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States. ATCHAFALAYA RIVER, BAYOUS CHENE, BOEUF, AND BLACK, LA (See Sec. 2 of Text) 20- by 400-foot navigation channels connecting Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Gulf of Mexico, and Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black. The non-Federal interests shall contribute 25 percentum of the costs of areas required for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil, and of necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor. This requirement shall be waived if applicable waste treatment facilities are constructed and water quality standards are not being violated. BARATARIA BAY WATERWAY, LA (See Sec. 3 of Text) A channel about 37 miles long with a 12-foot depth and 125-foot width from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to Grand Isle, LA, to mile 15.5 in Bayou St. Denis; a channel along western shore of Barataria Bay and through Barataria Pass to 12-foot depth contour in the gulf, with an extension of project to include westerly 4.3 miles of Bayou Rigaud. BAYOU LAFOURCHE AND LAFOURCHE-JUMP WATERWAY, LA (See Sec. 4 of Text) Permanent closure of head of bayou, without a lock; a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway at Larose to Gulf of Mexico by Belle Pass; closure of Pass Fourchon; and a jettied entrance at mouth of Bell Pass. Auxiliary channel 12 by 125 feet from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (mile 37.2) to Bayou Lafourche vicinity Leeville 12- by 125-foot channel improvement in Bayou Lafourche from Leeville to 12-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico; 9- by 100-foot channel improvement in Bayou Lafourche from Leeville to Golden Meadow; 12- by 125-foot channel from Leeville through Southwestern Louisiana Canal to and through Bayou Rigaud; and restore and extend jetties from 6- by 12-foot contour when justified to effect reduction in maintenance dredging. Bayou Lafourche, between Canal Boulevard in Thibodaux, Lafourche Parish, LA, and the head of the bayou' at its junction with the Mississippi River levee and Donaldsonville, Ascension Parish, LA, is declared nonnavigable. BAYOU TECHE AND VERMILION RIVER, LA (See Sec. 5 of Text) A navigable channel 51 miles long arid 8 by 80 feet from 8-footdepth contour in Vermilion Bay to Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, thence 9 by 100 feet to head of navigation (mile 52) at Lafayette, LA, with additional enlargement below Abbeville necessary to provide adequate capacity for flood flows. BAYOU TECHE, LA (See Sec. 6 of Text) Improve stream from its mouth to St. Martinville by removing obstructions and dredging. Construct lock and dam and extend improvement to Arnaudville, LA. Increase channel dimensions from mouth to Keystone Lock. H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 874, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 298, 89th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 155, 90th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 93-251. Sec. 58, 93rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 82, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 45, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 112, 8th Cong. 1st sess.' Public Law 90-149. S. Doc 93, 77th Cong., 1st sess.' Anriual Report, 1889, p. 1532. H. Doc. 527, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1329, 62d Cong., 3d sess.2 11-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 11-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 26, 19343 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 14, 1960 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Jun. 26, 19348 Jul. 23, 1942 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Operation and care of lock and dam provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA (See Sec. 7 of Text) Channel 30 by 250 feet from Lake Charles docks to gulf, repair and extend existing jetties to about 10-foot-depth contour, with a channel 30 by 250 feet between jetties; dredging approach channel 32 by 400 feet in gulf from sea ends of jetties to 32-footdepth contour; and provision for extension of jetties to 15-footdepth contour, if such action would be more economical than maintenance of approach channel by dredging. Channel 30 by 250 feet around Clooney Island. Channel depth of 35 feet from wharves of Lake Charles Harbor and terminal district, including Clooney Island Loop, to jetty channel, a uniformly increasing depth of 35 to 37 feet in jetty channel, and a depth of 37 feet in approach channel in Gulf of Mexico. An approach channel 42 by 800 feet from end of jetty to 42-foot contour in gulf; a jetty channel 400 feet wide, varying from 40 feet deep at shoreline to 42 feet deep at seaward end of jetty; a channel 40 by 400 feet from shoreline (mile 0) to Port of Lake Charles (mile 34.4); enlarge existing turning basin at mile 29.6 to 40 feet deep; a mooring basin (mile 3) 350 by 2,000 by 40 feet; a 35- by 250-foot extension of existing ship channel from Port of Lake Charles (mile 34.4) to vicinity of U.S. Highway 90 Bridge; a turning basin at upper terminus, 750 by 1,000 by 35 feet; and maintenance of 12- by 200-foot channel from ship channel to Cameron, LA. FRESHWATER BAYOU, LA (See Sec. 8 of Text) A new 12- by 125-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, mile 161.2 west of Harvey Lock to 12-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico near Freshwater Bayou; construction of an 84- by 600- foot lock with a depth of 16 feet over sill near Gulf of Mexico; and construction of jetties from shoreline to 6-foot-depth contour in Gulf of Mexico, if maintenance dredging of channel without jetties proves to be more expensive than construction and maintenance of jetties. Until such determination has been made, offshore channel should be dredged and maintained to provide a 12- by 250-foot channel. In event jetties are provided, offshore section should then be maintained to 12- by 125-foot project in jettied reach, and 250 feet beyond. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL, AND MEXICAN BORDER (NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT) (See Sec. 9 of Text) Construct waterway from New Orleans, LA, to Galveston Bay, TX Extension of waterway to Corpus Christi, TX A channel 9 by 100 feet from Lake Pontchartrain to Mississippi Sound. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Enlarge waterway from 9 by 100 feet to 12 by 125 feet from Apalachee Bay, FL, to Corpus Christi, TX, and its extension to vicinity of Mexican border, except between Mobile Bay, AL, and New Orleans, LA, where width shall be 150 feet; and rental of Inner Harbor Navigation Canal facilities. Alternative connection with Mississippi River in vicinity of Algiers at New Orleans. Enlarge and extend Plaquemine-Morgan City route from Mississippi-Atchafalaya section of waterway, in vicinity of Morgan City, to and through a new terminal lock and entrance channel to Mississippi River in vicinity of Port Allen, opposite lower limit of Port of Baton Rouge. H. Doc. 299, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 465, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 190, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 436, 86th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 435, 86th Cong., 2d sess.i H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 341, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 96, 79th Cong., 1st sess.; H. Doc 230, 76th Cong., 1st sess.6 S. Doc. 188, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 242, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 11-30 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 22, 1976 Oct. 23, 1962 WRD Act of 1976, dated Oct. 22, 1976 (PL 94-587) Aug. 18, 1941 Jul. 24, 1946 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Restore, improve, and maintain Franklin Canal as a terminal branch channel, 8 by 60 feet, from its confluence with Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to Franklin, LA. A salt-water guard lock in waterway at mile 238 west of Harvey Lock. Enlarge waterway to 16 by 150 feet from Mississippi River to Atchafalaya River, except in vicinity of Houma (mile 50.5 to 63.5); of Houma bypass (mile 50.5 to 63.5) and of Algiers alternative canal; and enlarge waterway from Atchafalaya River to Sabine River to 16 by 200 feet. Replacement of Vermilion Lock, in accordance with the recommendations of the Chief of Engineers in the report dated Aug. 3, 1976, recommending a lock size of 110 feet wide by 1,200 feet long by 15 feet deep. HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL, LA (See Sec. 10 of Text) Assumption of maintenance and operation of Houma Navigation Canal, constructed by Terrebonne Parish, to dimensions of 15 by 150 feet. LELAND BOWMAN LOCK, LA (REPLACEMENT OF LOCK) (FORMERLY VERMILION LOCK) (See Sec. 11 of Text) A replacement lock, 110 feet wide and 1,200 feet long, to accommodate present and projected marine traffic. MERMENTAU RIVER, LA (See Sec. 12 of Text) Channel enlargement, lower Mermentau River, from mile 15 to Gulf of Mexico, and construction of a lock and control spillway at Catfish Point, mile 24. Channel enlargement; lower Mermentau River below Grand Lake, mile 25; construct a gated-control structure at or near Grand Cheniere, mile 7; enlarge and realine Inland Waterway from Franklin, LA, to Mermentau River, LA, from Vermilion Bay to White Lake, via new channel, and from White Lake to Grand Lake; enlarge channel of North Prong of Schooner Bayou; construct a gated-control structure in new channel near Schooner Bayou lock; and include project "Waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, LA," and portion of project "Inland Waterway from Franklin, LA, to Mermentau River," west of Vermilion Bay in modified project "Mermentau River, LA." MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO GULF OF MEXICO, LA (See Sec. 13 of Text) Combines projects of Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to New Orleans, Mississippi River, South Pass, and Southwest Pass, adding thereto project for Mississippi River from New Orleans to Head of Passes, to provide a single project, "Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico," with channel dimensions as follows: Baton Rouge to New Orleans, 35 by 500 feet; port limits of New Orleans, 35 by 1,500 feet; New Orleans to Head of Passes, 40 by 1,000 feet, Southwest Pass, 40 by 800 feet; Southwest Pass Bar Channel, 40 by 600 feet; South Pass, 30 by 450 feet; South Pass Bar Channel 30 by 600 feet. Deepen existing channel from 35 to 40 feet by 500 feet wide from one-tenth mile below Louisiana Highway Commission bridge at Baton Rouge to upper limits of Port of New Orleans, and also 40 by 500 feet within presently authorized 35- by 1,500-foot channel in port limits of New Orleans. 11-31 S. Doc. 189, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 231, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 556, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 114 Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (PL 94-587) 2d sess. H. Doc. 583, 87th Cong., 2d sess;. Approved by Secretary of the Army, May 1967, under authority of the R&H Act of 1909. S. Doc. 94, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 231, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 215, 76th Cong., 1st sess.1 S. Doc. 36, 87th Cong., 1st sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 11-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 29, 1956 Oct. 22, 1976 Aug. 13, 1968 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 13, 1902 Jul. 25, 1912 Jun. 10, 1872 Jun. 14, 1880 Jun. 14, 1960 Aug. 30, 1935 MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, LA (See Sec. 14 of Text) Construct a seaway canal 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide from Michoud to 38-foot contour in gulf and an inner tidewater harbor consisting of a 1,000- by 2,000-foot turning basin 36 feet deep and a connecting channel 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide to Inner Harbor Navigation Canal and provides, when economically justified, for construction of a lock to Mississippi River in the vicinity of Meraux, LA. Amends above Act making the construction of bridge relocations a Federal responsibility when required by the construction of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet channel. MISSISSIPPI RIVER OUTLETS, VENICE, LA (See Sec. 15 of Text) Enlargement of existing channels of Baptiste Collette Bayou and Grand-Tiger Passes to 14 by 150 feet with 16 by 250-foot entrance channels in open water and jetties, if justified. OVERTON-RED RIVER WATERWAY, LA (See Sec. 16 of Text) Construct 9- by 100-foot channel for 206 miles from Mississippi River, mile 301 AHP, through Old and Red Rivers to mile 31, thence by lateral canal through land cuts and existing waterways across Mississippi-Red River backwater area along south bank of Red River floodplain to Shreveport, and construct nine locks and pumping plant on Red River near Shreveport. Extend Overton-Red River Waterway 9- by 100-foot channel from Mississippi River to north bank of Black River, mile 35.5. Provides for the navigation channel to be 200 feet wide. RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION (See Sec. 17 of Text) Realining the banks by dredging cut-offs and training works and stabilizing banks by means of revetments and dikes. RED RIVER WATERWAY-MISSISSIPPI RIVER TO SHREVEPORT, jA (See Sec. 18 of Text) Develop a 9 by 200 feet, approximately 210 miles long from Mississippi River at junction of Old River via Old River and Red River to Shreveport, LA, consisting of realinement, bank stabilization, and construction of five locks and dams. REMOVING WATER-HYACINTH, LA (See Sec. 19 of Text) Appropriations for Florida and Louisiana for extermination or removal of plants, building of boats, and establishment of booms. Authorized use of mechanical, chemical, or other means whatsoever. Made appropriation available for State of Mississippi and also made available for use in that State operating plant pertaining to work in Louisiana. TANGIPAHOA RIVER, LA (See Sec. 20 of Text) Improvement, without dredging, by removing overhanging trees, snags, and obstructions to navigation from Wells to mouth. Present project above entrance channel. 8- by 100-foot entrance channel from 8-foot depth contour in Lake Pontchartrain to 8-foot depth in River. WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO BAYOU DULAC, LA (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, LA) (See Sec. 21 of Text) Channel 5 by 40 feet from Intracoastal Waterway at Houma through Bayou LeCarpe, Bayou Pelton, and Bayou Grand Caillou to Bayou Dulac, about 16.3 miles. H. Doc. 245, 82d Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 186, Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (PL 94-587) 2d sess. H. Doc. 361, 90th Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 320, 80th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess.6 H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 91, 55th Cong., 3d sess. H. Ex. Doc. 54, 46th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1871, p. 553. Annual Report, 1879, p.946. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Jul. 28, 1967, under Sec. 107 of 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. H. Doc. 206, 72d Cong., 1st sess. 11-32 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 28, 1938 Jun. 22, 1936 Jun. 30, 1948 Oct. 27, 1965 Adopted by Committee Resolutions Sep. 23, 1976, and Oct. 1, 19764 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 22, 1976 Oct. 23, 1962 Channel 10 by 45 feet in Bayou LeCarpe from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to Houma navigation canal. BAYOU BODCAU AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA (See Sec. 23 of Text) Extend Cypress Bayou-Red Chute Bayou levee, construct stream closure landside drainage channel and three culverts on Red Chute Bayou, and clearing and snagging channel; extend Flat River-Loggy Bayou levee, close Flat River near junction with Cutoff Bayou, and construct control structures on Flat River near junction with Red Chute Bayou; and enlarge Flat River channel to 20 to 35 feet, a distance of 11.6 miles. BAYOU BODCAU RESERVOIR, LA (See Sec. 24 of Text) Provides for construction of a reservoir and other flood control works. BAYOU PIERRE, LA (See Sec. 25 of Text) Widening channel at intervals totaling 12.9 miles, and snagging of 29.7 miles. BRUSH BAYOU, LA (See Sec. 26 of Text) Enlargement and alinement of existing channel between (mile 1.20) and (mile 7.42), a distance of 6.22 miles. Bottom widths for the improved channel vary from 100 feet at mile 1.20 to 20 feet at mile 7.42. CADDO LAKE, LA (See Sec. 27 of Text) Maintenance Work. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA (See Sec. 28 of Text) To provide hurricane protection by placement of a berm and vegetated dune extending the length of Grand Isle's gulf shore and a jetty to stabilize the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) (See. Sec. 29 of Text) Control of hurricane tides by construction of two independent units, the Lake Pontchartrain Barrier plan and the Chalmette Area plan. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) (See Sec. 30 of Text) A loop levee about 36 miles long along both banks of Bayou Lafourche from Golden Meadow to Larose; enlargement of 3 miles of existing levee at Golden Meadow; floodgates for navigation and hurricane protection in Bayou Lafourche at upper and lower bayou crossings; about 8 miles of low interior levees to regulate intercepted drainage; and seven multibarreled culverts controlled by flapgates. MCKINNEY BAYOU, AR AND TX (See Sec. 31 of Text) Provides channel enlargement of McKinney Bayou; outlet channels to Red River; interior drainage channels; and four flood flow structures by USDA. NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION (See Sec. 32 of Text) Improvements along Mississippi River below New Orleans, LA, for prevention of hurricane tidal flood damages by increasing heights of existing back levees and modifying existing drainage facilities where necessary in five separate reaches. H. Doc. 583, 87th Cong., 2d sess.1 H. Doc. 203, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 378, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 378, 74th Cong., 2d sess. Approved Sep. 6, 1973, under authority of Sec. 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. S. Doc 39, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 639, 94th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 231, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 184, 89th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 647, 94th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 550, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 11-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 11-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM LEVEES AND BANK STABILIZATION (NEW ORLEANS DIST.) (See Sec. 34 of Text) Jul. 24, 1946 Levee and bank stabilization. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Aug. 13, 1968 Deauthorization of Morringsport Dam and Reservoir on Cypress H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d Creek; realining and stabilizing the banks of the Red River; and sess. recreational facilities from the Mississippi River to Denison Dam, OK and TX. RED RIVER WATERWAY-SHREVEPORT, LA, TO INDEX, AR (See Sec. 35 of Text) Aug. 13, 1968 Provides for realinement of the channels of the Red River from H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d Shreveport, LA, to Index, AR. sess. WALLACE LAKE, LA (See Sec. 36 of Text) Jun. 22, 1936 Construction of an earth-fill dam and a reservoir. H. Doc. 378, 74th Cong. 2d sess. WEST AGURS, LA (See Sec. 37 of Text) Oct. 18, 1976 Provides for the installation of 232 relief wells excavated on H. Doc. 647, 94th Cong. 2d centers 50 feet apart along the bottom for the entire length of the sess. existing drainage canal on the landside of West Agurs Levee. 1. Contains latest published map. Control Act of 1965. 2. For latest published map, see H. Doc. 288, 66th Cong., 5. Not mentioned in authorizing act. 1st sess. 6. Portion of existing project above mile 31 was reclassi- 3. Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act. fied to inactive status as approved by Office, Chief of 4. Authorized under provision of Sec. 201 of Flood Engineers, letter dated Oct. 18, 1971. 11-34 TABLE 11-C NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT BAYOU TECHE, LA, LOCKS (See Sec. 6 of Text) Pertinent Data Miles from Miles fron Width of chamber Length available for full width Lift Depth on miter sill at mean low gulf level Character of foundation Kind of dam Type of construction Completed Open to navigation Cost Keystone Lock 18 (New Iberia) 82.5 (Intracoastal Waterway) 36 feet 160 feet 8 feet 8 feet Timber piles Timber, rockfill Concrete 1913 $257,720 Berwick Lock 1.7 (Berwick, LA) 9 (Below mouth of Bayou Teche) 45 feet 300 feet 0-14.5 feet 9 Timber piles Reinforced concrete September 1951 November 1950 $2,100,000 11-35 TABLE 11-D GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL, AND MEXICAN BORDER (NEW ORLEANS DIST.)-LOCKS (See Sec. 9 of Text) Pertinent Data Pertinent Data Inner Bayou Bayou Harbor Plaque- Algiers Boeuf Sorrel Calcasieu Harvey Navigation mine Port Allen Vermilion Lock Lock Lock Lock Lock Canal Lock Lock Lock Lock Miles from New Orleans, LA (Canal St.) Miles below Lake Charles, LA Miles from Abbeville, LA Miles from Mississippi River Miles from Calcasieu Rivet' 96.6 (via Har- 135 (via Harvey Lock) vey Lock) - 16.6 26 0.38 56.7 (via Plaquemine Lock) 18 (via Plaquemine Lock) 0.5 Miles from Vermilion River Width of chamber Width between abutments Length available for full width Lift 75 feet 56 feet 75 feet 800 feet 1,156 feet 797 feet 75 feet 75 feet - 84 feet - 75 feet 56 feet 1,206 feet 425 feet 0-18 feet 0-11.3 feet 0-21 feet 0-4 feet Depth on sill at 13 feet mean low gulf level Character of foundation 13 feet Timber Concrete slab piles on medium of stiff clay 14 feet Timber piles 13 feet Concrete slab on preconstructed stiff clay 640 feet 0-19.6 feet 0-17.4 feet 12 feet 13.5 feet (miter sill) (miter sill) Timber piles Timber piles 1,202 feet 1,182 feet 0-45 feet 0-5 feet (either direction) 13.75 feet (miter sill) Concrete slab on clay 11.3 feet Timber piles 3.3 2.9 132.5 0.13 0.6 0.23 M 0 C) O O y C1 v 1.75 Type of construction Kind of dam Opened to April navigation 1956 Cost Completed Reinforced Reinforced concrete concrete gate bays and earth chamber Reinforced concrete gate bays and earth chamber September June 1954 1951 Reinforced concrete gate bays and earth chamber December 1950 Reinforced Reinforced concrete concrete 1934 $5,215,700 $2,754,000 $4,700,948 $2,133,527 $1,775,132 (Flood Control (Flood Control MR&T Funds) MR&T Funds) October 1952 February 1923 $8,648,492 (non- Federal) 1935 - Reinforced Reinforced - concrete concrete 19091 July 1961 $1,302,006 $13,902,222 1909 July 1961 Reinforced concrete spillway dam, vertical cast steel gates, timber pile foundation 1933 $330,7652 19343 1. Closed permanently September 29, 1961. 2. Replacement of lock approved by the Secretary of Army, May 16, 1967; estimated Federal cost $25,900,000. 3. Transferred to project status. Contruction of replacement lock, scheduled for January 1980. I-s N NE rz r ny zd TABLE 11-E REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1982 For Last Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Completed See Annual and Deauthorized Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance or Reclassified Alteration of Berwick Bay Bridge' Amite River and Bayou Manchac, LA Atchafalaya River, Morgan City to Gulf of Mexico, LA Baton Rouge Harbor, Segment between Mi. 2.5 and 5.02 Bayou Bonfouca, LA Bayou Dorcheat, Loggy Bayou and Lake Bisteneau, LA3 ' 4' 5' 6 Bayou Dupre, LA7 Bayou Grosse Tete, LA8 Bayou Lacombe, LA Bayou La Lautre, St. Malo, and Yscolskey, LA Bayou Plaquemine Brule, LA Bayou Queue de Tortue, LA Bayou Segnette Waterway, LA Bayou Terrebonne, LA4, 9 Bayou Vermilion, LA4 Big Pigeon and Little Pigeon Bayous, LAS Calcasieu River at Coon Island, LA'o Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, LA Cascasieu River Salt Water Barrier, LA" Cane River, LA3' 6 Chefuncte River and Bogue Falia, LA Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA' 2 Grand Bayou Pass, LA Inland Waterway from Franklin to Mermentau River, LA"' 13 Intracoastal Waterway from the Mississippi River to Bayou Teche, LA' 4 Lake Borgne and Chef Menteur- Bulkheads and Jetties Lake Charles Deep Water Channel, LA15 Little Caillou Bayou, LA Mermentau River, Bayou Nezpique, and Bay Des Cannes, LA Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Michoud Canal, LA Navigation work under special authorization (Calcasieu Pass channel in Old River Bend at Cameron, LA)' 7 Pass Manchac, LA Petite Anse, Tigre, and Carlin Bayous, LA Red River below Fulton, AR s '' 19, 20 Red River Waterway, LA, AR, OK, and TX 19, 20 Red River Waterway, Shreveport, LA to Daingerfield, TX Sulphur River, AR and TX3' 6 Complete Complete Deauthorized Complete Complete Deauthorized Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Deauthorized Complete Complete Complete Complete Inactive 1981 19462 1974 1887 1968 1969 1967 1970 1950 1970 1958 1961 1947 1936 1976 1981 1973 1910 1967 1971 1950 1960 1956 19422 1950 1973 1977 1976 1957 1950 1981 1978 1969 1976 1919 28,234 501,963 30,997 5,000 38,915 4,716 96,916 33,410 33,355 238,828 120,089 34,900 1,015,81410 5,856,200 4,197,262 2,500 58,342 202,817 7,676 249,052 77,761 5,197,97516 2,499,555 1,374 1967 1978 1,963,80618 2,147,890 69,087 290,192 104,1877 123,454 92,276 223,616 36,780 28,315 213,455 251,691 200,169 37,169 2,000 192,011 452,611 14,48012 552,780 11,699 241,896 751,485 114,519 139,755 10,039 811,172 1928 1914 Nov. 1979 1931 1939 May 1981 1938 May 1956 1915 March 1923 - - 1916 1896 3 April 1974 Sep. 1978 Jan. 1968 1959 Dec. 1914 1939 3 Nov. 1979 1929 Nov. 1974 1912 Nov. 1980 70,000 45,989 11-38 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1982 For Last Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Completed See Annual and Deauthorized Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance or Reclassified Tickfaw, Natalbany, Ponchatoula, and Blood Rivers, LA4 Complete 1973 8,115 92,163 1921 Vinton Waterway, LA 21 Deauthorized 1950 - - Nov. 1979 Waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, LA 3 - 1948 10,904 10,742 Waterway from Empire, LA, to Gulf of Mexico Complete 1981 1,068,142 835,252 Jun. 1950 1. Transferred to Department of Transportation. Authorized 13. Not completed; incorporated in navigation project under Truman-Hobbs Act. "Mermentau River, LA." 2. Date authorized. 14. Not completed; superseded for most of its length by 3. Completed. Date will be furnished when available, present 12- by 125-foot Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, which 4. Includes previous project costs. coincides with or parallels it. 5. No commerce reported. 15. Maintenance project; no future work schedules. 6. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th 16. Includes $57,555 ($29,974 of which was from Public Cong., 1st sess. Works funds) for new work on previous project. Includes 7. Includes $56 cost incurred in 1969. $114,519 for maintenance of previous project. 8. Completed except that portion above mile 10.3 17. Work is under continuing authority. providing for widening from 40 feet to 60 feet, which is 18. Includes $1,553,878 for previous projects. inactive. 19. Incorporated in the project "Red River Waterway- 9. By Public Law 88-404, that portion of Bayou Terre- Mississippi River Shreveport, LA" Sept. 30, 1976. bonne between point where Barrow Street crosses said stream 20. Emergency bank protection on this project is reand a line determined by prolonging and extending eastern ported separately as "Red River Emergency Bank Protection." right-of-way line of New Orleans Boulevard southerly to Two reaches, "Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to south bank of said stream was declared nonnavigable. Shreveport, LA" and "Red River Waterway-Shreveport, LA, 10. Includes $66,000 contributed funds. Daingerfield, TX," are also reported separately. 11. Operation and maintenance of the structure reported 21. No work performed; local interests have not provided under project "Calcasieu River and Pass, LA." rights-of-way and dumping privileges. 12. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds. TABLE 11-F RESERVOIR OPERATIONS FISCAL YEAR 1982 See Section Storage in Text Project (acre feet) Inflow' Outflow' 24. Bayou Bodcau2 Oct. 1, 1981 249 - - Reservoir, LA Sep. 30, 1982 310 - - Jul. 2, 1982 (Max) 11,340 - - Jun. 29, 1982 (Max) - 1,664 - Jul. 2, 1982 (Max) - - 1,125 36. Wallace Lake, LA Oct. 1, 1981 7,655 - - Sep. 30, 1982 7,319 - - Apr. 24, 1982 (Max) 11,739 - - Apr. 23, 1982 (Max) - 1,013 - Apr. 24, 1982 (Max) - 634 1. Cubic feet per second. 2. Project transferred to Vicksburg District FY 1982. 11-39 TABLE 11-G REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT): NEW PROJECTS (See Sec. 33 of Text) Drainage Conserva- Flood Area tion Control Estimated (square Storage (acre- Federal Project Stream miles) (acre-feet) feet) Cost Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR' 2 - 1,158 - - $ 20,400,0003 Bayou Nicholas-Coushatta, LA - - - - 70,7174 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA5 - - - - 243,3368 Caddo Lake, LA' Caddo Lake - - - 3,587,8002 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA Red River - - - 1,950,0003 Garland City, AR' 6 - - - - 1,336,0003 Maniece Bayou, AR - - - - 970,0323 McKinney Bayou, AR 7' 8 - - - - 5,700,0003 Posten Bayou, AR and LA2' 6, 9 - - - - 560,000 Red River below Denison Dam levees and bank stabilization, TX, AR, and LA 3New Orleans District)" - - - 52,600,0003 Total 87,417,885 1. Details presented in individual report herein. 2. Construction on this project not started. 3. In addition, non-Federal funds are: Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR and LA ....................................................... $4,100,000 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA (cash contribution) ..................................... 89,047 Caddo Lake, LA ............................................................................... 28,000 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA ................................................ 480,000 East Point ................................................................... 67,000 Garland City, A rk .............................................................................. 6,000 Maniece Bayou, AR (cash contribution) ................................................... :...... 39,293 McKinney Bayou, AR (cash contribution) ........................................................ 500,000 Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabilization, TX, AR, and LA ..................... 1,270,000 4. For last full report, see Annual Report for 1964. 5. For last full report, see Annual Report for 1951. 6. Inactive. 7. Includes $4,330,200, Code 711, and $399,739 accelerated Public Work funds. 8. Joint-use pool (sediment). 9. Deauthorized by resolution Dec. 17, 1970, which also authorized new project "Posten Bayou, AR," under provision of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965. 11-40 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-H RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT): INCORPORATED PROJECTS (See Sec. 33 of Text) For Last Flood Estimated Full Report Control Federal See Annual Project Type of Work Act Cost Report For Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA Levee and appurtenances 1941 $ 1,653,2371 1956 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA2 Flood-control reservoir 1938 5,120,7401, 3 4 Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA Channel improvement 1941 319,2001 1948 Bayou Pierre, LA Channel enlargement 1936 299,5291 4 Black Bayou Lake, LA5', Flood-control reservoir 1936 714,000 1945 Colfax, Grant Parish, LA Cutoff 1938 70,3481 7 1938 Grant Parish, below Colfax, LA Levees 1938 38,8091 1941 Hempstead County levee district No. 1, AR Levee enlargement 1938 88,0061 1941 Natchitoches Parish, LA Levee and appurtenances 1936 1,529,9271, 8 1956 Pineville, Red River, LA Levee and appurtenances 1941 232,4261 1953 Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, LA Bank protection 1944 3,908,0001 1953 Red River Parish, LA Levee enlargement 1936 149,4351 1939 Saline Point, LA Cutoff 1936 124,1111 1945 Wallace Lake, LA Flood-control reservoir 1936 1,219,3711, a 4 Total $15,467,134 1. Actual cost. 2. Project transferred to Vicksburg District August, 1982. 3. Includes amounts indicated for recreational facilities under Code 711, Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA, $1,027,000; Wallace Lake, LA, $17,164. 4. Included in this report. 5. Work not started. 6. Inactive. 7. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7 of Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended by Sec. 9 of Flood Control Act of 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 8. In addition, $250,000 was expended from contributed funds. 11-41 TABLE 11-I REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1982 Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA1 Amite River and Tributaries, LA Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA' Bayou Choupique, LAs Bayou Nicholas, Coushatta, LAs Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA"' 2 Bayou Rapides, LAs Black Bayou Reservoir, LA ' 4' 5 Black Bayou-Pine Island Area, LAs Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, LA"' 7 Colfax, Grant Parishes, LA"' Cooper Lake and Channels, TX8 East Point, LA Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake 0' the Pines, TX9 Garland City, AR. Grant Parish below Colfax, LA"1 9 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, AR.,9 Maniece Bayou, AR."' 2 McKinney Bayou, Finn Bayou Segment, AR. �o Morgan City and vicinity, LA Natchitoches Parish, LA"' 2 Pineville, Red River, LA"3 Posten Bayou, AR." Red River Parish, LA"1 9 Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, LA' Saline Point, LA"' 9 1956 1964 1948 1954 1964 1951 1952 1945 1963 1978 1977 1938 1979 1969 1979 1976 1941 1979 1941 1970 Aug. 1977 196310 1976 1956 1953 1973 1939 1953 1945 $ 1,653,189 3,034,2552 319,200 129,930 70,717 243,3362 95,179 336,063 1,655,700 741,892 70,348 20,839,300 486,069 14,175,197 1,335,842 38,809 1,018,005 88,006 970,9322 760,3142 1,529,478 232,426 149,435 3,908,000 124,111 8,301,021 11-42 Apr. 1955 Feb. 1964 Jan. 1948 Mar. 1954 Jun. 1964 Jun. 1939 Dec. 1951 May 1963 Jul. 1978 Apr. 1976 Aug. 1968 Jul. 1974 Aug. 1969 Aug. 1955 Dec. 1951 Mar. 1953 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-I (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1982 Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Twelvemile Bayou, LA3 - 1966 335,433 - May 1965 Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX - 1979 35,659,176 11,195,021 - 1. Authorized under project "Red River Below Denison Dam." 2. In addition, the following was expended from contributed funds: Amite River and tributaries ............ $ 430 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA .................... 89,047 Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, LA ...... 170,799 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA .............................. 425,209 Maniece Bayou, AR .................... 39,293 Natchitoches Parish, LA ................ 250,000 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended.) 4. Construction not initiated. 5. Inactive. 6. Includes $92,000 for preauthorization studies. 7. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7, Flood Control Act 1928, as amended by Sec. 9, Flood Control Act 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 8. These projects transferred to the Fort Worth District, Southwestern Division, during FY 1979. 9. Completed. Date will be furnished when available. 10. Date authorized. 11. Posten Bayou Project, authorized by Senate and House Resolutions, Dec. 17 and 15, 1970, deleted the plan authorized by the Flood Control Act dated Aug. 3, 1955. 11-43 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 11-J ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 82 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Navigation (110) Barataria Bay Waterway-Dupre Cut Section, LA -100021 $ 2,158 GIWW LA & TX Section -10032 262,890 Miss. River-Gulf Outlet Enlargement, LA -552702 6,770 271,818 Flood Control Studies (120) Aloha-Rigolette Area, LA -12123 117,122 Louisiana Coastal Area, LA -61610 167,340 Mermentau, Vermilion & Calcasieu Rivers & Bayou Teche, LA -34014 245,599 New Orleans, Baton Rouge Metro Area, LA -120353 3,742 West Bank of Miss. River in vicinity of New Orleans, LA -59360 0 533,803 Comprehensive Basin Studies (150) Red River Authorization Report -81129 68,950 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Water Quality Management (184) -51860 5 Coastal Zone Management (185) -51880 0 Planning Assistance to States (186) -51850 38,855 Tech. & Engr. Assist. Shore & Streambank Erosion (188) -51731 1,043 39,903 TOTAL (Category 100) $ 914,474 Collection and Study of Basic Data (Category 200) Inspection and Inventory of Dams (236) -53843 and -53842 0 Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Services 148,939 Hydrologic Studies (260) Hydrologic Studies -53820 1,788 TOTAL (Category 200) $150,727 Research and Development (Category 300) 0 None Continuation of Planning and Engineering (Category 400) Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet Enlargement, LA (55270) 439,917 TOTAL (Category 400) 439,917 Advance Engineering and Design (Category 600) McKinney Bayou, AR and TX (75353) 160,772 Red River Waterway, Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA (75023) 14,500 West Agurs Levee, LA (75345) 69,985 TOTAL (Category 600) 245,257 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $1,750,375 1. Negative report submitted in August 1981. 3. Negative report submitted to BERH in Dec. 81. 2. Feasibility report submitted to BERH in Oct. 81. 11-44 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT * This district comprises western Mississippi, southern Arkansas, northern Louisiana, and a very small portion of southwestern Tennessee, embraced in drainage basins of eastern tributaries of Mississippi River south of Horn Lake Creek to and including Buffalo River; Pearl River Basin in Mississippi; independent tributaries of the Gulf of Mexico south of the Buffalo River Basin to the Mississippi-Louisiana state line; western tributaries of Mississippi River between White and Atchafalaya Rivers including Arkansas River Basin below a point 3 miles upstream from Pine Bluff and Arkansas River below mile 36.1 near Pendleton, Arkansas; Ouachita and Black Rivers in Arkansas and Louisiana; and Red River in Louisiana and Arkansas to the Texas-Louisiana state line. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Lake Providence Harbor, LA ....... 2. Madison Parish Port, LA ........... 3. Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR .................... 4. Pearl River, MS and LA ........... 5. Rosedale Harbor, MS .............. 6. Yazoo River, MS ................. 7. Navigation work under special authorization .................... Flood Control 8. Lead Bayou, MS ................. 9. Ouachita River and Tributaries, AR and LA ...................... 9A. Blakely Mountain Dam-Lake Ouachita, Ouachita River, AR ....... 9B. DeGray Lake, Caddo River, AR ...... 9C. Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Little Missouri River, AR ................ 9D. Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, AR and LA ............ 9E. Monroe Floodwall, LA ............. 9F. Ouachita River Levees, LA .......... Page 12-1 12-2 12-2 12-3 12-3 Flood Control (cont) 10. Porter Bayou, MS ................ 11. Inspection of completed Flood Control ......................... 12. Flood control work under special authorization .............. 12-4 Tables Table 12-A 12-4 Table 12-B Table 12-C 12-4 12-4 Table 12-D 12-5 12-5 12-5 12-6 12-6 12-6 Table 12-E Table 12-F Table 12-G Table 12-H Cost and Financial Statement ................. Authorizing Legislation ...... Ouachita and Black Rivers, AR and LA (9-Foot Project), Locks and Dams ............ Locks in Pearl River Project ................... Other Authorized Navigation Projects .................. Ouachita River and Tributaries Existing Project ........... Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............ Active General Investigations ............. Page 12-6 12-6 12-7 12-8 12-10 12-12 12-13 12-14 12-15 12-15 12-16 Navigation 1. LAKE PROVIDENCE HARBOR, LA Location. In Hagaman Chute, a secondary channel of the Mississippi River at mile 483.4 above Head of Passes, and about 3 miles south of Lake Providence, LA. Existing project. A dredged harbor channel about 0.7 mile long and 150 feet wide with a project depth of 9 feet in Hagaman Chute from the Mississippi River. Channel was widened to 400 feet in front of and upstream from port area, a distance of 800 feet, to provide a turning basin. Local interests constructed retaining dikes to provide the disposal area for material excavated from channel and turning basin. Resulting hydraulic fill provides a raised port area. Federal cost of completed work was $198,859, excluding preauthorization study costs of $9,678. Total non-Federal cost was 12-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 $233,400, including cost of retaining dikes, and a cash contribution of $35,000. In addition, local interests have spent $1,022,000 for port facilities. Restudy of port for expansion, completed under continuing authority program. No further expansion is recommended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Local interests provided port facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Leased dredge, Butcher, dredged 212,000 cubic yards of material for maintenance in harbor channel and turning basin in November 1981 and 92,000 cubic yards in September 1982. Local interests have provided a diked disposal area for maintenance dredging in the harbor. Condition as of September 30. No major navigation problems exist at the present time. 2. MADISON PARISH PORT, LA Location. A "fast-water" dredged channel located near the right descending bank of the Mississippi River at mile 457.2 above Head of Passes, and about 6 miles north of Tallulah, Louisiana. Existing project. A dredged harbor channel about 0.5 mile long and 150 feet wide with a project depth of 9 feet. A turning basin within this channel was constructed by widening the harbor channel to 350 feet for a distance of 1,000 feet. Dredged material was used in construction of two hydraulic fills on property owned by the Madison Parish Port Commission for future development. Channel construction was completed in October 1980. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Madison Parish Port Commission has constructed a multipurpose loading dock, rail facilities, and storage building on hydraulic fill. Two private interests are engaged in grain handling facilities on adjacent properties. Operations and results during fiscal year. Leased dredge, Butcher, performed channel maintenance in November 1981. A total of 23,000 cubic yards were removed. Condition as of September 30. No major navigation problems exist at the present time. 3. OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS BELOW CAMDEN, AR Location. Ouachita River rises in Polk County, AR, and flows southeasterly and southerly about 600 miles. Below its confluence with the Tensas and Little Rivers at Jonesville, LA, it is called Black River, which enters Red River 35.5 miles from the Mississippi River. Previous projects. See page 683 of Annual Report for 1962 for details. Existing project. See page 684 of Annual Report for 1962 for details of existing 6.5-foot navigation project. New work for completed project costs $4,574,551, exclusive of amounts expended under previous projects. Modified project and project for Red River below Fulton, AR, provide for a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide in Red River between Old River and mouth of Black River, and in Black and Ouachita Rivers from mouth of Black River to Camden, AR. This is being accomplished by construction of four new locks, 84 feet by 600 feet; new dams; channel realinement; and measures to preserve Catahoula Lake for migratory waterfowl. Jonesville Lock and Dam replaced existing Lock and Dam No. 2; Columbia Lock and Dam replaced existing Lock and Dams Nos. 3, 4, and 5; Felsenthal Lock and Dam will replace existing Lock and Dam No. 6; and Calion Lock and Dam will replace existing Lock and Dam No. 8. The Felsenthal Canal was deauthorized as of Aug. 5, 1977, in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974. The River and Harbor Act of 1970 authorized establishment of wildlife refuges along Bayou D'Arbonne (14,700 acres) in connection with Columbia Lock and Dam and at Felsenthal Lock and Dam (65,000 acres). The Bayou D'Arbonne refuge was increased to 18,000 acres at the request of the Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. Approved (1982) estimated cost for new work for 9-foot navigation project is $290,852,000 including $278,000,000 Federal and $12,852,000 non-Federal for lands, damages, and relocations. Local cooperation. Local cooperation for all completed work in Louisiana has been furnished in a timely manner. It is anticipated that local interests in Louisiana will be able to supply the necessary rights-of-way for construction of the cutoffs and bend widenings. Local interests in Arkansas have furnished the rightsof- way for the Felsenthal and Calion Locks and Dams and it is anticipated that the remaining rights-of-way will be furnished when needed. The city of Camden, AR, has furnished land for the Sandy Beach recreation area. All assurances from local interests in Arkansas including supplemental assurances (Public Law 91-646) have been accepted. The State of Louisiana has not furnished supplemental assurances; however, they are anticipated in the near future. Terminal facilities. Public loading docks are at Columbia, LA, and Camden, AR. Privately owned docks and loading and unloading facilities are at Columbia, Monroe, and Sterlington, LA, and El Dorado, Calion, and Camden, AR. Two grain-handling facilities and a petroleum-loading facility are in the vicinity of Jonesville, LA, and a grain-handling facility is in the vicinity of Acme, LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction of Felsenthal Lock and Dam is complete. Construction of Calion Lock and Dam is scheduled for completion in early FY 83. Contracts were awarded for construction of both the Felsenthal and Calion Access Channels and Closure Dams in FY 82 with completion scheduled in late FY 83. A construction contract was also awarded for Crossett Harbor, AR, on Sep. 30, 1982, and construction is scheduled for completion in late FY 83. During FY 81 a channel alignment 12-2 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT review was conducted in response to public opposition to the channel realignment features of the project. As a result of the alignment review, an amendment was included in 1982 Appropriations Act directing the Chief of Engineers to restudy the navigation options above Crossett, AR, with a view of reducing the realignment features. The restudy is complete and scheduled for submission to the Appropriations Committees of Congress in early FY 83. The leased dredge, Butcher, removed 811,000 cubic yards of material from the Ouachita-Black waterway between October 1981 and September 1982. This included construction dredging in the amount of 227,000 cubic yards in connection with extending the 9-foot project to Camden, AR. Condition as of Sep. 30. The 6.5-foot project is complete and is being maintained. Planning and design for the 9-foot navigation project started in FY 1962 are continuing. Construction at Columbia Lock and Dam started in February 1964. The dam was completed in November 1968, and the lock was completed in January 1970 and was placed in service in May 1972. Construction at Jonesville Lock and Dam started in May 1967. The lock and dam were completed in January 1972 and were placed in service in March 1972. A 9-foot navigation channel to Lock and Dam No. 5 at Sterlington, LA, was established in June 1972. (See Table 12-C on locks and dams, Ouachita and Black Rivers, AR and LA.) The contract for removal of four abandoned locks and dams which proved hazardous to navigation in the Columbia and Jonesville pools is completed. Construction of Felsenthal Lock and Dam is complete and construction of Calion Lock and Dam is nearing completion. There have been 17,421 acres acquired for the Bayou D'Arbonne Wildlife Refuge and 64,976 acres acquired for the Felsenthal Wildlife Refuge. Acquisition of the lands for both refuges is complete. Acquisition of mineral interest and relocations assistance in the Felsenthal Wildlife Refuge is continuing. 4. PEARL RIVER, MS AND LA Location. Pearl River rises in east central Mississippi and flows southwest about 172 miles to Jackson, MS, thence southeast about 269 miles to the head of its delta, where it divides into West Pearl and East Pearl Rivers. West Pearl River flows about 34 miles to the Rigolets, a tidal pass connecting Lake Pontchartrain with Lake Borgne, an arm of the Gulf of Mexico. Previous project. For details see page 750, Annual Report for 1938 and page 463, Annual Report for 1965. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel from the mouth of West Pearl River for 58 miles to the mouth of Bogalusa Creek at Bogalusa, LA, 7 feet deep at low water with a bottom width of 100 feet in the river sections and 80 feet in the canal section, with locks 65 by 310 feet clear inside dimensions. The plan of improvement may be divided into three sections as follows: the river section from the mouth of West Pearl River to mile 28.5 at Holmes Bayou with a channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide to be obtained by dredging, snagging, and construction of cutoffs and easement of critical bends at eight locations below lock one along Pearl River in its reach from its mouth to mile 26, all at a depth of 7 feet; the canal section from mile 28.5 to 48.7 at Pools Bluff with a channel 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide to be obtained by construction of three locks in the canal with sills across Bogue Chitto at mile 44 and across the river at mile 48.7; the river section from mile 48.7 to 58 at the mouth of Bogalusa Creek to be obtained by dredging, snagging, and easing of bends. At Bogalusa the mean variation of water surface is 10 feet and extreme, 23 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Estimated cost of the project (1980) is $8,429,100 including $8,274,494 for improvements completed prior to 1966, and $154,800 cost for providing recreational facilities (Code 710). (See Table 12-D for features of locks included in existing projects.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The city of Bogalusa provides a barge terminal consisting of a wharf, transit shed, and access road at Richardson's Landing at the head of the project. A privately owned wharf at the Pearl River Highway Bridge near Pearl River Station, LA, is used for unloading logs. Only natural landings exist at various locations on the river. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. General Operation Locks-$24,895.59; Lock #1 Operation- $13,842.64; Lock #2 Operation and Maintenance- $17,347.91; Lock #3 Operation and Maintenance- $41,401.80; Reservoir Operation Non Fee Area- $10,469.18; Collection for Quarters-$2,301.96. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, prior to adoption of modifications authorized by the 1966 River and Harbor Act, was commenced in October 1938 and completed in January 1956. All locks were opened to navigation in November 1953. No work has been initiated on modifications (cutoffs and easements of bends below Lock 1) authorized by the 1966 Act. Total Federal costs under existing project as of Sep. 30, 1981, were $8,418,465 for new work and $4,514,449 for maintenance, a total of $12,932,914. Contributed funds for new work amount to $65,000. The responsibility of this project was transferred to Vicksburg District, Lower Mississippi Valley Division, on Oct. 1, 1981. Routine maintenance was performed at each of the three lock sites during the year. 5. ROSEDALE HARBOR, MS Location. In Log Loader Chute, a secondary channel of the Mississippi River at mile 584.5 above Head of Passes, and about 2 miles south of Rosedale, MS. Existing project. A dredged harbor channel about 2.4 miles long and 150 feet wide with a project depth of 9 feet. A turning basin consists of a dredged channel 1,000 feet long and 400 feet wide. Local interests constructed retaining dikes to provide the disposal area for material excavated from the channel and turning 12-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 basin. Resulting hydraulic fill provides a 20-acre port area. Channel construction was completed in February 1978 at a cost of $2 million. Local interests are continuing construction on port terminal, dock facilities, and additional dredging. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Local interests provided port facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. The dredge, Ockerson, removed 180,000 cubic yards of material during August 1982. Condition as of September 30. No major problems were experienced with navigation. 6. YAZOO RIVER, MS Location. Formed by junction of Tallahatchie and Yalobusha Rivers in Leflore County, MS, flows about 169 miles southerly and southwesterly, and enters Mississippi River at Vicksburg, MS. (See Mississippi River alluvial valley quadrangle maps.) Previous projects. See page 681 of Annual Report for 1961 for details. Authorized project. The Yazoo River Navigation project consists of a 9-foot channel from its mouth to Greenwood, MS, mile 164.9 (present mileage), with a minimum width of 150 feet. The project includes a single lock (84 feet by 600 feet) and a dam located near Vicksburg, dredging and channel realinement; 600,000 acre-feet of additional storage in Sardis Lake to augment low flows in the Yazoo River, and recreation features. Total estimated (1982) Federal cost of 9-foot project is $198,373,000 which includes $373,000 for the U.S. Coast Guard. Total estimated non-Federal cost is $2,533,000. These figures do not include the total estimated (1982) Federal cost of Belzoni Bridge relocation which is $8,570,000 and the total estimated non- Federal cost which is $252,000. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-3 of FY 80 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At Greenwood there is a privately owned dock and a grain-loading facility. There are privately owned facilities for loading grain at Belzoni and Satartia. At Yazoo City there is a privately owned grain-loading facility, a private log-loading facility, a private dock to handle dry and liquid fertilizer, and a public terminal. Operations and results during fiscal year. The construction of Belzoni Bridge was about 94 percent complete at the end of the fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Entire river is navigable. No work done on new authorization, except for construction work connected with the relocation of State Highway No. 12 Bridge at Belzoni, MS. Phase I studies are continuing on the 9-foot project. 7. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 87-645, as amended (preauthorization). Detailed studies were initiated for Port Gibson Port, MS, in January 1979. A public meeting was held in December 1980 with the Final Report submitted in September 1981. A construction contract was awarded on Sep. 30, 1982. The project will consist of constructing an access channel 800 feet long and 150 feet wide, a 400-foot by 800-foot turning basin, and an adjacent 10-acre landfill for industrial development. Expenditures in FY 1982 were $33,297. During FY 1982, $7,500 was expended on Two Bayou Port, AR, Reconnaissance studies. Detailed studies were terminated on Mayersville Port, MS, in September 1982; expended for the FY was $90,722. Detailed studies continued on Bastrop Port, LA, at a cost of $75,356 for FY 1982 and on Yellow Bend Port, AR, at a cost of $90,591. Flood Control 8. LEAD BAYOU, MS Location. Lead Bayou is a tributary of the Sunflower River in Bolivar and Sunflower Counties, MS, approximately 30 miles from the Mississippi River near Cleveland, MS. Existing project. The plan of improvement calls for enlarging the existing Lead Bayou channel to provide a 1.5-year degree of protection to agricultural areas and a 10-year degree of protection to the small developed area near Cleveland, MS. Total estimated Federal cost is $1,526,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Condition as of Sep. 30. A construcion contract was awarded Mar. 10, 1982 and as of Sep. 30, 1982, the project was 29 percent complete. Construction is scheduled for completion in July 1983. 9. OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA Location. Improvements comprising comprehensive projects are on main stem Ouachita River, AR and LA, on its tributaries, Caddo and Little Missouri Rivers, and in Pine Bluff, AR. Description of Ouachita River Basin is presented in greater detail on page 690 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The authorized general plan for flood control and other purposes in the Ouachita River Basin includes the projects listed in Table 12-F. The 1966 Flood Control Act modified the Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, AR and LA, project to include ten water-retention lakes in the western 12-4 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT tributaries of Bayou Bartholomew in Arkansas and six local levee units along the main stem of the bayou in Louisiana. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed features of comprehensive project. (See individual statements for further details.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations for Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, DeGray Lake, Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, Monroe Floodwall, and Ouachita River Levees are shown in individual reports herein. Condition as of Sep. 30. Pertinent data on those features which are complete or not started are in Table 12-F. Conditions of Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, DeGray Lake, and Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson are given in the following individual reports. An overall basin study including interim studies of the Monroe-West Monroe area, the Ouachita River Levees, the Arkansas Lakes, and extension of navigation to Arkadelphia is ongoing. 9A. BLAKELY MOUNTAIN DAMLAKE OUACHITA, OUACHITA RIVER, AR Location. This project is on Ouachita River, AR, at head of Lake Hamilton (pool of Carpenter Dam), 486 miles above mouth of Black River, and approximately 10 miles northwest of Hot Springs, AR. Previous project. See page 693 of Annual Report for 1962 for details. Existing project. A lake of 2,768,500 acre-feet storage capacity. for flood control and other purposes with an installed power capacity of 75,000 kilowatts. Remaining work consists of completion of public-use facilities. Latest approved (1982) estimated project cost is $44,700,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Power production totaled $152,975,000 kilowatt-hours of which 151,312,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Arkansas Power and Light Co., under contract between that company and Southwestern Power Administration. The maximum pool elevation of 578.56 feet above NGVD, or 0.56 feet above the maximum power pool, occurred on March 16, 1982. Storage in the flood control pool at this time amounted to 20,100 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow of 24,438 cubic feet per second occurred on April 2, 1982. On Sep. 30, 1982, the pool elevation was 573.95 feet above NGVD and storage in the power pool was 1,993,500 acre-feet. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was started in August 1947 and was completed for beneficial use in October 1955, except for public-use facilities. Power generation, operation, and maintenance activities are continuing. Remote control equipment has been installed to operate the power plants at DeGray Lake and Narrows Dam- Lake Greeson. 9B. DEGRAY LAKE, CADDO RIVER, AR Location. On Caddo River (mile 8), a tributary of Ouachita River, in a narrow, rocky gorge in Clark and Hot Springs Counties, approximately 7 miles north of Arkadelphia, AR. Existing project. Provides for a lake of 881,900 acrefeet storage capacity for flood control, water supply, pollution abatement, and power with an installed power capacity of 68,000 kilowatts (one conventional 40,000- kilowatt generating unit and one 28,000-kilowatt generating unit with reversible pump-type turbine). Latest approved (1980) estimated first cost is $72,034,000, including $5,800,000 for water supply, to be reimbursed by local interests, exclusive of interest. Local cooperation. None required for flood control and power features. Fully complied with for water supply feature. Operations and results during fiscal year. Power production totaled 55,490,000 kilowatt-hours, of which 54,196,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Arkansas Power and Light Co., under contract between that company and Southwestern Power Administration. The maximum pool elevation of 406.67 feet above NGVD, or 1.33 feet below the maximum power pool, occurred on Apr. 3, 1982. Storage in the power pool at this time amounted to 637,000 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow of 9,462 cubic feet per second occurred on Jan. 31, 1982. On Sep. 30, 1982, the pool elevation was 399.53 feet above NGVD and storage in the power pool was 548,800 acre-feet. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction started in June 1962 and was essentially complete in December 1971. All major construction is complete including the remote control for the power plant from Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita. Power generation, operation, and maintenance are continuing. 9C. NARROWS DAM-LAKE GREESON, LITTLE MISSOURI RIVER, AR Location. Narrows Dam is on the Little Missouri River, AR, 105 miles above the mouth and 5 miles northwest of Murfreesboro, AR. Existing project. Provides a lake of 407,900 acre-feet storage capacity for flood control and other purposes with power installation of 25,500 kilowatts in three units of 8,500 kilowatts each. Remaining work consists of completion of public-use facilities. Latest approved (1982) estimated cost is $20,900,000, excluding $1,738,700 for third generating unit and remote control equipment. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Power production totaled 28,643,900 kilowatt-hours, of which 27,716,850 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Texas- Louisiana Electric Cooperative, Inc., under contract between that company and Southwestern Power Administration. The maximum pool elevation of 548.15 feet above NGVD, or 0.15 feet above the maximum power 12-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 pool, occurred on Jun. 16, 1982. Storage in the flood control pool at this time amounted to 1,100 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow of 5,281 cubic feet per second occurred on Apr. 2, 1982. On Sep. 1982, the pool elevation was 540.26 feet above NGVD and storage in the power pool was 227,900 acre-feet. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was started in May 1947 and was completed for beneficial use in May 1950. The third power generating unit was completed in January 1970. Installation of remote control equipment was was completed in June 1972. Power generation, operation, and maintenance are continuing. Remote control equipment has been installed for operation of the power plant from Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita. 9D. BAYOU BARTHOLOMEW AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA Location. Bayou Bartholomew rises in Jefferson County, AR, about 10 miles northwest of Pine Bluff and flows southerly about 370 miles to join the Ouachita River upstream from Sterlington, LA. Authorized project. Project includes ten waterretention lakes in the western tributaries of Bayou Bartholomew in Arkansas and six local levee units along the main stem of Bayou Bartholomew in Louisiana. However, because of public opposition to construction of the loop levees, preconstruction planning of the six loop levees has been deferred until such time as there is sufficient support for such levees by local interests. Channel improvements previously authorized are deferred until it is determined that the quality and quantity of water downstream will not be adversely affected. Latest approved (1979) estimated cost of new work is $46,913,000 including $44,800,000 Federal and $2,113,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-5 of Fiscal Year 80 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning and design have been deferred pending favorable benefit-cost ratios. Condition as of Sep. 30. Preparation of general design memorandum has been deferred due to lack of economic justification. 9E. MONROE FLOODWALL, LA Location. Monroe, LA, lies within the alluvial valley of the Mississippi River and on the east bank of the Ouachita River. The city is located in the north-central part of Louisiana, in Ouachita Parish. Existing project. Provides for construction of floodwall to close the 1,750-foot opening extending from Bry Avenue to Grammont Street. Floodwall will provide complete flood protection to the city of Monroe. Total Federal cost of new work was $2,561,000. Non- Federal cost was $206,000. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-6 of Fiscal Year 80 Annual Report. Condition as of Sep. 30. Work on the floodwall is complete. 9F. OUACHITA RIVER LEVEES, LA Location. East bank of Ouachita River between Bastrop, LA, and Sandy Bayou. Loop levees on the west bank at West Monroe, Columbia, and Bawcomville. Existing project. There are 105.9 miles of levee on the east bank and 11.6 miles of levee in the three loops on the west bank. A letter report, approved by the Chief of Engineers, authorized gravel surfacing 37.8 miles of levee, enlargement of 40.4 miles of levee, and a 5.7-mile southward extension of the east bank levee. Approved (1979) estimated Federal cost is $9,400,000. Estimated non-Federal cost is $25,000. Local cooperation. Requirements and assurances of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-6 of FY 80 Annual Report. Condition as of Sep. 30. Completion of the authorized work would not correct all project deficiencies. Enlargement of the Bawcomville levee, enlargement of the east bank levee above Monroe, and replacement of numerous drainage structures are not authorized. Therefore the construction of the present Ouachita River levee project has been deferred. A complete study of the Ouachita River levee system is being accomplished as an interim study of the ongoing comprehensive Ouachita River Basin study. Item I of the Monroe to Sandy Bayou Levee enlargement project was completed Jul. 7, 1978; additional work is being deferred. 10. PORTER BAYOU, MS Location. Porter Bayou is located in Bolivar and Sunflower Counties, MS. It lies approximately 25 miles east of the Mississippi River, is approximately 5 miles south of Cleveland, MS, and travels through the town of Shaw, MS. Existing project. The plan of improvement calls for selective snagging and clearing of Porter Bayou from mile 12.5 to mile 32.3. This plan provides a 0.5-year frequency protection for the Porter Bayou area. All construction is being performed from one side of the stream, leaving the other side undisturbed. The total estimated Federal cost of the project is $1,214,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Condition as of Sep. 30. A construction contract was awarded Sep. 22, 1982. Construction is scheduled for completion in October 1983. 11. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed work was accomplished at a cost of $2,071 for the fiscal year. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1982, is $959,428. 12-6 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT 12. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) No activity during the period. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in the interest of flood control (Sec. 208 of 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780,83d Cong.). No activity during the period. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1956 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.). The Conference Report on the FY 1981 Energy and Water Development appropriations contains authority for the Corps to correct bank stability problems for a Coahoma County road at mile 175.8 on the Big Sunflower River. This work was completed in FY 82. Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). During FY 1982, reconnaissance studies were completed on Bledsoe Creek, Grenada, MS, at a cost of $7,500; Calion Lake, AR, at a cost of $7,500; Foster Creek, MS, at a cost of $7,500; Lee Branch, MS, at a cost of $7,500; Mt. Ida, AR, at a cost of $6,300; Parks Bayou, MS, at a cost of $5,000; Smackover, AR, at a cost of $7,500; and Trammel Lake, AR, at a cost of $7,500. Detailed studies continued on Little Mound Bayou, Bolivar County, MS, at a cost of $93,643; New Albany, MS, at a cost of $40,868; Canal 43, AR, at a cost of $24,591; and Dowling Bayou, MS, at a cost of $74,156 in FY 1982. Detailed studies were terminated on: 1) Brumps Bayou, Pine Bluff, AR, in July 1982. Expenditures for FY 82 were $45,879. 2) McNutt Lake Area, Leflore County, MS, in March 1982. Expenditures for FY 82 were $1,999. 3) Whiting Bayou, Issaquena County, MS, in November 1981. Expenditures were $3,868 for FY 82. 12-7 TABLE 12-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep. 30, 1982 1. Lake Providence Harbor, LA 2. Madison Parish Port, LA 3. Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR (6.5-foot navigation project) Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR (9-foot navigation project) 4. Pearl River MS 5. Rosedale Harbor, MS 6. Yazoo River, MS 8. Lead Bayou, MS 9A. Blakely Mt. Dam- Lake Ouachita, Ouachita River, AK Code 713 Funds 9B. DeGray Lake Caddo River, AK New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 225,000 224,985 115,000 105,752 163,600 65,190 520,000 478,276 250,000 17,900 268,800 154,377 -24,000 36,372 250,000 208,977 160,000 252,518 -29,000 66,247 14,400,000 19,900,000 19,200,000 18,211,000 18,588,719 17,157,320 21,665,779 13,939,425 4,065,581 3,494,400 3,362,700' 2,849,000 3,972,063 3,110,838 3,217,854 3,211,608 400,000 399,773 590,000 580,667 50,000 50,000 254,000 420,474 2,715,300 2,276,653 7,500 13,318 1,624,000 2,212,130 2,656,600 2,470,718 90;200 296,900 - 164,589 164,000 317,050 54,500 52,996 186,919 3,983,000 3,231,158 7,920 835,000 1,164,447 2,506,400 2,470,062 2,760,000 3,073,265 34,000 32,967 145,000 49,017 2,828,000 3,806,951 1,725 25,256 87,524 2,210,000 2,316,783 97,000 101,815 3,900,000 4,000,402 50,000 26,624 1,237,000 668,000 870,000 890,722 2,958,000 3,188,349 470 1,798 56,955 2,254,000 2,351,889 $ 208,5371 208,5371 1,731,500 1,611,170 656,000 655,999 471,000 293,124 5,248,6192 5,248,6192 173,418,000 168,276,247 52,082,407 51,715,726 161,0003 182,196 2,000,000 2,000,000 884,100 666,177 8,673,6614 8,656,0784 1,146,315 1,120,402 1,237,000 668,000 34,044,944 33,918,231 30,681,092 30,561,821 474,095 474,046 72,033,992 72,021,381 17,472,683 17,366,461 12-8 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep. 30, 1982 9C. Narrows Dam-Lake New Work Greeson, Little Mis- Approp. 234,000 - 145,000 625,000 16,533,229 souri River, AK Cost 325,107 76,029 32,741 579,042 16,368,700 Maint. Approp. 2,357,100 1,941,300 2,128,000 1,660,000 22,223,737 Cost 2,170,495 1,813,572 2,145,519 1,986,615 22,172,838 Code 713 Funds New Work Approp. 12,500 - -1,725 -470 331,505 Cost 62,200 77,783 - - 304,180 9D. Bayou Bartholomew New Work and Tributaries Approp. - - - - 974,000 AK and LA Cost 974,000 9E. Monroe Floodwall, New Work LA Approp. - - - - 2,560,500 Cost 1,189 10,272 - - 2,560,500 9F. Ouachita River New Work Levees, LA Approp. 10,000 - - 54,000 2,688,000 Cost 26,287 999 - - 2,634,000 10. Porter Bayou, New Work MS Approp. - - - 550,000 550,000 Cost - - - 247,000 247,000 1. Actual costs include $198,859 Public Works Acceleration Act funds and $9,678 expended for planning and design; excludes $35,000 contributed funds, $198,400 cost of retaining dikes, and $1,022,000 local interests' costs for port facilities. 2. Includes $674,068 for new work on previous projects. 3. Excludes $21,884 carryover from Mobile District. 4. Includes $359,661 for previous projects. Present appropriations include funds for Advance Participation on Belzoni Bridge. 12-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 12-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 14, 1960, as amended Jul. 14, 1960, as amended May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Dec. 31, 1970 Jun. 14, 1880 Apr. 21, 1900 Aug. 30, 1935 Nov. 7, 1966 Jul. 14, 1960, as amended Mar. 3, 1875 Aug. 13, 1968 Jun. 30, 1948, as amended LAKE PROVIDENCE HARBOR, LA (See Section 1 of Text) Dredging 0.7-mile channel and turning basin in an old chute of the Mississippi River, with the dredged material used to fill in a port area provided by local interests. MADISON PARISH PORT, LA (See Section 2 of Text) The project consists of constructing a navigation channel 150 feet wide and 1,000 feet long, transitioning into a 200-foot-wide channel 400 feet long with a 350- by 1,100-foot turning basin adjacent to the port area. Dredged material will be disposed into lands furnished by local interests. OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS BELOW CAMDEN, AR (See Section 3 of Text) Modification of existing project to provide for 9-foot channel and deepening canal to Felsenthal, AR. Modification of 9-foot project to provide four new locks and dams and channel improvements. Migratory waterfowl refuges on Bayou D'Arbonne in connection with the pool of the Columbia Lock and Dam and in the pool of the Felsenthal Lock and Dam. PEARL RIVER, MS AND LA (See Section 4 of Text) Provided for a 5-foot channel. Legalized construction of a fixed highway bridge at Rockport. A channel from the mouth of West Pearl River for 58 miles to the mouth of Bogalusa Creek at Bogalusa, LA, 7 feet deep at low water with a bottom width of 100 feet in the river sections and 80 feet in the canal section; with locks 65 by 310 feet clear inside dimensions. Construction of cut-offs and easement of critical bends at eight locations below lock 1 with no increase in project depth. ROSEDALE HARBOR, MISS. (See Section 5 of Text) The harbor channel is 150 feet wide and 2.7 miles long with a turning basin 1,000 feet long and 400 feet wide. A minimum operating depth of 9 feet below the lowest water of record (102.5 feet, NGVD) was maintained in both the channel and turning basin and provided a 20-acre landfill to a net elevation of 162.9, NGVD. The landfill is 1,250 feet long and 700 feet wide. An access roadfill was constructed from Mississippi Highway 1 to the port site. YAZOO RIVER, MS (See Section 6 of Text) Removal of obstructions to navigation from mouth to Greenwood, MS, 189 miles. Nine-foot channel from mouth to Greenwood, mile 154.9 (present mileage), with a lock and dam near Vicksburg, channel improvements, alteration of bridges, additional storage space in Sardis Lake to augment low river flows, and recreation features. LEAD BAYOU, MS (See Section 8 of Text) Channel enlargement. Approved Sep. 12, 1962, under authority of Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended Approved Sep. 12, 1962, under authority of Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 112, 86th Cong., 2d sess. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Nov. 25, 1970, and H. Doc. 92-109, 92d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 98, 45th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 145, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 408, 75th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 482, 89th Cong., 2d sess. Approved Sep. 12, 1962, under authority of Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended H. Doc. 342, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Jun. 10, 1980. 12-10 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA (See Section 9 of Text) May 17, 1950 Authorized DeGray Lake; Murfreesboro Lake; extension of S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st floodwall at Monroe to partially close the existing gap; local sess. protection at Bawcomville, LA (subsequently constructed under Sec. 6, Act of May 15, 1928, with local interests contributing one third of cost); Bayou Bartholomew channel improvement, including Deep Bayou and Overflow Creek; Pine Bluff local protection; local protection at Calion, AR; and incorporation, into the Ouachita River and Tributaries project, of all existing projects and portions thereof in the basin above the lower end of the levees on the east bank of the Ouachita River. In addition, the Chief of Engineers authorized on Nov. 14, 1966, additional work on the levees. BAYOU BARTHOLOMEW, AR AND LA (See Section 9D of Text) May 17, 1950 Authorized channel improvements on Bayou and Tributaries (see S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st above). sess. Nov. 7, 1966 Modified 1950 authorization to include 10 lakes in the west H. Doc. 506, 89th Cong., 2d escarpment in Arkansas and 6 local levees in Louisiana, and sess. acquisition of lands for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses. The previously authorized channel improvement was deferred until it is determined that the quality and quantity of water downstream will not be adversely affected. MONROE FLOODWALL, LA (See Section 9E of Text) May 17, 1950 Partial closure of gap in floodwall. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Oct. 27, 1965 Closure of gap in floodwall (Plan C). H. Doc. 328, 88th Cong., 2d sess. Nov. 7, 1966 Closure of gap in floodwall (Plan B). H. Doc. 328, 88th Cong., 2d sess. PORTER BAYOU, MS (See Section 10 of Text) Jun. 30, 1948, as Selective snagging and clearing of Porter Bayou, MS, from mile Sec. 205 of the Flood Control amended 12.5 to mile 32.3. Act of 1948, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 18, 1982. 12-11 TABLE 12-C OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, AR AND LA (9-FOOT PROJECT), LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 3 of Text) Min. Depth Greatest on Available Lower Miles Length Max. Elev. Miter Above Width for Full Lift Normal Sill at Miles Mouth of Width at Pool Normal Perfrom of Lock of Lock Low Surface Pool Character cent Nearest Black Chamber Chamber Water (feet Level or Kind of Type of Com- Estimated Location Town River (feet) (feet) (feet) msl) (feet) Foundation Dam Construction plete Cost Jonesville, LA 10 25 84 600 30 34 14 Piling Movable Tainter gated dam; 100 $ 55,500,000 bascule gated navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates Columbia, LA 5 117 84 600 18 52 13 do do Tainter gated dam; 99 51,000,000 fixed crest navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates Felsenthal, 1 227 84 600 13 65 13 Earth do Tainter gated dam; 97 98,300,000 AR navigation pass with fiberdam on crest; steel mitering lock gates Calion, AR 7 283 84 600 12 77 13 do do Tainter gated dam; 91 $ 73,200,000 hinged crest gated navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates Total $278,000,000 1. Includes $6,113,700 for Catahoula Lake diversion channel and control structure. O O tti CI) vd w A w'w w VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-D LOCKS IN PEARL RIVER PROJECT (See Section 4 of Text) Lock Miles above mouth Nearest town Miles to nearest town Width of Chamber Greatest length available for full width (feet) Lift (feet) Depth over sills at low water (feet) Character of foundation Type of construction Year completed Date opened for navigation Actual cost of lock Pearl River Lock No. 1 29.7 Pearl River, LA 65 310 26.7 10 Sand, gravel, silt, clay Concrete and steel 1949 November 1958 $2,119,100 Pearl River Lock No. 2 40.8 Bush, LA 3 65 310 14 10 Sand, gravel, silt, clay Concrete and steel 1950 November 1958 $1,967,537 Pearl River Lock No. 3 44.0 Sun, LA 2 65 310 11 10 Sand, gravel, silt, clay Concrete and steel 1950 November 1958 $1,497,539 Note: The responsibility of maintaining this project was Valley Division on Oct. 1, 1981. District boundaries transferred to the Vicksburg District, Lower Mississippi have been changed. 12-13 i TABLE 12-E REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1982 Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Bayou Bartholomew, LA and AR1' 2' 3' 4 - 1931 $ 45,874 $ 42,857 1 Bayous D'Arbonne and Corney, LA1, 2, 4 - 1941 19,000 37,804 1 Big Black River, MS ' 4,5 - 1895 15,000 - 1 Big Sunflower River, MS 1' 4' 6 7 - 1942 560,027 459,328 1 Boeuf River, LA13' 3, 4, 7 8,9 - 1949 30,000 103,737 1 Homochitto River, MS 4 - 1910 15,482 8,518 1 Little Missouri River, AR 1, 4'5 - 1873 19,992 - 1 Little River, LA 1' 45'' to - 1890 1,500 - 1 Little Tallahatchie River, MS" ' - 1913 19,000 - 1 Mouth of Xazoo River, MS' 7v. - 1953 1,179,211 145,217 1 Ouachita and Black Rivers, AR and LA, Felsenthal Canal - 193712 - -1 Removing snags and wrecks from - 1948 - 272,500 1 Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers" Saline River, AR 1 3, 4 5 - 1931 26,900 12,792 1 Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers, MS', 4.5 - 1939 43,481 173,066 1 Tensas River and Bayou Macon, LA1 8 12 - 1949 38,367 85,352 1 Yalobusha River, MS' 4, 5 13 - 1937 7,000 15,936 1 1. Completion Date unavailable. 2. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 1962, 64th Cong., 2d sess., and H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 3. Channels adequate for existing commerce. 4. Inactive project. No commerce. 5. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 6. Project curtailment recommended by elimination of work between Pentecost and mouth of Hushpuckena River. Abandonment of entire project erroneously recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 7. See report of Mississippi River Commission for operations in connection with Yazoo Basin. 8. Report of New Orleans District, pp. 919-920 for Fiscal Year 1949. 9. Project curtailment recommended by elimination of work above Girard, LA (Abandonment of entire project recommended errolieously in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 10. Due to decline of traffic, local interests not sufficiently interested to provide rights-of-way and dumping privileges. 11. No additional funds available under this project. Work is being carried on under appropriation flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries. 12. Year authorized. 13. Inactive. Channel adequate for commerce. 14. See report of Mississippi River Commission for operations in connection with Yazoo Basin flood control project including channel clearing and rectification and Grenada Lake on Yalobusha River. 12-14 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-F OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 9 of Text) For Last Estimated Full Report Federal See Annual New Work Project Report for: Cost Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, AR (1) $ 44,700,000 DeGray Lake, AR (1) 72,034,0002 Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, AR (1) 20,900,000 Calion, AR 1960 970,9968 Columbia, LA 1941 204,7408 Existing levees and extensions thereto from Bastrop, LA, to mouth of Boeuf River and at West Monroe, LA 1961 3,025,1813 Little Missouri River below Murfreesboro, AR 1957 354,8023 Ozan Creek, AR 1957 57,7428 Terre Noire Creek, AR 1948 123,7003 Pine Bluff, AR, local protection 1954 172,5828 Monroe, LA, floodwall extension (Plan B) (1) 2,561,0008 Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, AR and LA (1) 44,800,000 Ouachita River Levees (additional work) (1) 9,400,000 Total $199,304,7434 1. See individual reports herein. 4. Excludes the authorized Murfreesboro Lake, AR, 2. Includes $5,800,000 for water supply, to be reimbursed project, which is inactive. The latest estimated cost (1954) by local interests. was $4,190,000. 3. Actual cost of completed project. TABLE 12-G OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1982 Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. If See Annual and If Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Big Black River, MS1 1956 $910,185 $670,750 1 Big Choctaw Bayou, LA"1 2 1966 248,823 - 1 Buffalo River, MS 3 1940 - Homochitto River, MS 1 1956 205,000 144,650 1 Natchez Port Area, MS1 2 1969 538,000 - 1 Murfreesboro Dam and Lake3 - 1951 - 1. Completion Date Unavailable. 3. Deferred indefinitely because of insufficient justifica- 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of tion under present conditions. Sec. 205. Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 12-15 TABLE 12-H REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 82 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Control Studies (120) Ouachita River Basin, AR & LA -12046 $962,384 Pine Bluff Metro Area, AR -12015 32,676 995,060 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Dept. Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (181) -51840 0 Water Quality Management (181) -51860 0 Planning Assistance to States (186) -51850 32,216 32,216 TOTAL (Category 100) $1,027,276 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Collection and Study of Basic Data (200) Inspection and Inventory of Dams (230) -53843 and -53842 2,071 Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Services 221,602 Hydrologic Studies (260) Hydrologic Studies (260) -53820 5,955 229,628 TOTAL (Category 200) $229,628 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (Category 300) 0 0 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $1,256,904 12-16 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT * This district comprises a portion of southeastern Missouri and southern Illinois, western portions of Kentucky and Tennessee, a small portion of northern Mississippi, and the northeastern portion of Arkansas; includes area embraced in drainage basins of eastern tributaries of the Mississippi River south of Ohio River Basin to Nonconnah and Horn Lake Creeks, inclusive, and those of western tributaries south of Little River diversion channel and Commerce, MO, including St. Francis River Basin and White River and tributaries below Peach Orchard Bluff, AR, on the right bank and below Augusta, AR, on the left bank; also includes left bank Mississippi River levee from vicinity of Memphis south to about mile 620, and right bank levees from Cape Girardeau, MO, to about mile 605. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Caruthersville Harbor, MO ........... 2. Helena Harbor, AR ................. 3. Hickman Harbor, KY ............... 4. New Madrid Harbor, MO ............ 5. Osceola Harbor, AR ................ 6. White River, AR (below Newport) ......................... 7. Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN ..... 8. Navigation work under special authorization ...................... Flood Control 9. West Hickman area, Hickman, KY .... 10. Long Lake area, Helena, AR .......... 11. Huntington, TN ................... 12. Drinkwater Sewer, MO ............. 13. Nonconnah Blvd., Nonconnah Creek, TN. Navigation 1. CARUTHERSVILLE HARBOR, M Location. In Pemiscot, MO, in an old river ch miles north of the town of Caruthersville, MO, .o right bank of the Mississippi River, 349.5 miles Head of Passes, LA. Existing project. Authorized by the Chief of neers Nov. 4, 1980, under the authority of Sec. 107 River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. H. channel construction consisted of removal of 60 cubic yards of material from a 300- by 300-foot tui basin and provision of a 9- by 150-foot navigation nel, 4,680 feet long. The excavated material was p on top bank, between retainer dikes and the mai Page Flood Control (cont.) 13-1 14. North Second Street, Memphis, TN 13-2 (Wolf River Bridge) ................ 13-2 15. US Hwy 51, Nonconnah Creek, TN .... 13-2 16. Inspection of completed flood control 13-2 projects ....................... 17. Flood work under special 13-3 authorization ................... 13-3 Tables 13-3 Table 13-A Cost & Financial Statement .................. Table 13-B Authorizing Legislation ....... 13-3 Table 13-C Other Authorized 13-4 Navigation Projects ......... 13-4 Table 13-D Other Authorized Flood 13-4 Control Projects ............. 13-4 Table 13-E Active General Investigations .. . Page 13-4 13-4 13-5 13-5 13-6 13-8 13-10 13-10 13-11 Mississippi River levee to form a flood-free fill to be developed as an industrial park by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities are being provided by the Pemiscot County Port Authority. Operations and results during fiscal year. Leased dredge, Natchez, removed 142,478 cubic yards of material at a cost of $229,758 in July 1982 in maintaining project channel. Condition as of Sep. 30. Federal participation in the project is complete except for expected future maintenance dredging. 13-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 2. HELENA HARBOR, AR Location. In Phillips County, AR, on right bank of Mississippi River about 663 miles above Head of Passes, LA. (AHP). Existing project. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Sep. 20, 1962, under authority of Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Provides for maintenance of access channel with a depth of 9 feet below low water, between miles 659 and 663 APH, by dredging, and for enlarging the upstream 0.6 mile to dimensions of 9 feet deep by approximatly 450 feet wide. Remainder of channel conforms to project width of the main channel of Mississippi River. River stages recorded at Helena gage (zero is 141.70 feet msl) since 1871 have ranged between minus 3.0 and plus 60.21 feet with an average annual fluctuation of 40.6 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are ten terminals within the harbor, two of which are publicly-owned. Others are a rail incline, a small boat dock, grain terminals, a petroleum products terminal, a midstream grocery and refueling service, a fuel unloading facility, and a fertilizer-loading facility. Operations and results during fiscal year. Leased dredge, Natchez, removed 263,578 cubic yards of material in maintaining project channel. Expenditure was $360,391. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project is complete and is being maintained to dimensions. 3. HICKMAN HARBOR, KY Location. In Fulton County, KY, on left bank of Mississippi River about 922 miles APH. Existing project. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Jul. 12, 1962, under authority of Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Provides for dredging and maintaining harbor channel 250 feet wide with depth of 9 feet below low water, from main channel of Mississippi River at mile 922 AHP along former city waterfront about 1.1 miles, with the upper 600 feet forming a turning basin 500 feet wide. New work was completed in Fiscal Year 1963. River stages recorded since 1929 at Hickman gage (zero is 264.73 feet msl) have ranged between minus 0.4 and plus 51.5 feet with average annual fluctuation of 38 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Within harbor are terminals for handling petroleum products, sand and gravel, and timber and grain, which are publicly and privately owned; there is about 0.2 mile of surfaced, public mooring and launching area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Leased dredge, Natchez, removed 179,581 cubic yards of material in June 1982 in maintaining project channel. Expenditure was $249,585. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was completed Jan. 20, 1961, and is being maintained to project dimensions. 4. NEW MADRID HARBOR, MO Location. New Madrid County, MO, on right bank of the Mississippi River about 889 miles AHP. Existing project. Construction and subsequent maintenance of a harbor channel 150 feet wide with a depth of 9 feet below low water from the head of New Madrid Bar, about mile 889 AHP, along the city waterfront downstream for a distance of about 9,400 feet, with a 250-foot-radius turning basin at the downstream end. The project was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, Feb. 21, 1968, under Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Within the harbor are privately owned terminals for handling petroleum products, logs and lumber, and soybeans and grain. Terminal facilities are considered adequate for present and immediately foreseeable commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Expended $1,366 for Construction and Operation studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was completed Oct. 2, 1970, and is being maintained to project dimensions. 5. OSCEOLA HARBOR, AR Location. Mississippi County, AR, on the right bank of the Mississippi River at about 784 miles AHP. Existing project. The project was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, Sep. 30, 1971, under Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Harbor channel construction consisted of removal of 689,705 cubic yards of material from the harbor channel,to provide a navigation channel 250 feet wide and 9 feet deep from the Mississippi River navigation channel at the downstream end of the old chute of Island 30, upstream along the old bendway channel for a line distance of 6,500 feet. A 250-foot-radius turning basin is provided, at the upstream end of the harbor channel. The excavated material removed from the channel was placed on the top bank between the old bendway channel and the main line Mississippi River levee to form a flood-free industrial park to be developed by local interests. Latest published map is in 1980/48th edition, Flood Control and Navigation Maps of the Mississippi River, prepared under the direction of President, Mississippi River Commission. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilties. Public terminal facilities have been provided by Osceola Riverport Authority. Operations and results during fiscal year. Leased dredge, Natchez, removed 466,170 cubic yards of material for channel maintenance. Total expenditure was $554,773. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project, begun Sep. 30, 1970, was completed Nov. 13, 1974, and is being maintained to project dimensions. 13-2 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT 6. WHITE RIVER, AR (BELOW NEWPORT) Location. Rises in northwestern Arkansas and flows 686 miles first north into Missouri; thence southeasterly through Arkansas to the Mississippi River 64 miles below Helena, AR. (See Mississippi River Commission alluvial valley maps, scales 1:62,500 and 1:500,000 and map folio, May 1973, of White River, vicinity of Batesville, AR, to Mississippi River, scale 1:24,000.) White River enters Memphis District at foot of Peach Orchard Bluff, AR, 165 miles above its mouth; but Memphis District is responsible for maintenance of navigation channel from mile 10.0 to mile 254.0, Newport, AR. Previous projects. For details, see page 1874, Annual Report for 1915, and page 938, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Maintenance of a channel 4.5 feet deep by 100 feet wide between mouth of river and Batesville, 296 miles, by snagging, dredging, and contraction works. Maintenance discontinued after Fiscal Year 1951 due to negligible traffic; dredging and snagging resumed in 1962. White River channel from mouth to mile 10 has been improved and is being maintained as part of the Arkansas River Project. The existing project was modified by OCE, Mar. 11, 1968, under authority of Sec. 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended, to provide a 125-foot-wide channel with minimum depth of 5 feet and a depth of 8 feet at a stage of 12 feet on the Clarendon gage. This modification has been completed and increased dimensions extend from the mouth to Augusta, at mile 199. In February 1971, OCE authorized resumption of maintenance from Augusta to Newport. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Consist of terminals for handling riprap stone, sand and gravel, logs, soybeans, wheat, and rice at Augusta (mile 198); logs, soybeans, wheat, and rice at Des Arc (mile 143); logs, lumber, soybeans, and rice at Clarendon (mile 99); soybeans at Crocketts Bluff (mile 68); soybeans, rice, sand, gravel, and crushed stone at St. Charles (mile 57); riprap stone at Benzal (mile 7.5); and public launching ramp at I-40 bridge. Operations and results during fiscal year. Dredging was performed at various locations between mile 10 and mile 255 to provide project width and depth. Leasdd dredge, Tulsa, moved 2,360,086 cubic yards of material in maintaining project 'channel. Snagging operations were resumed April 1971 by hired labor. Total project Fiscal Year 1982 cost was $1,871,546. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project is complete and is being maintained to project dimensions. 7. WOLF RIVER (MEMPHIS HARBOR), TN Location. Rises near western edge of Tippah County, MS, and flows generally northwesterly through Shelby County, TN, entering the Mississippi River above Memphis, TN (mile 738.7 AHP). The lower 3.5 miles of channel, parallel to the Mississippi River along the Memphis waterfront, became a slack-water harbor when Wolf River was diverted through Mud Island to the Mississippi River by a flood control project, Wolf River and tributaries, under the Flood Control Act of 1958. (See Mississippi River Commission alluvial valley maps, scales 1:62,500 and 1:500,000, and folio of Flood Control and Navigation Maps of the Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Gulf of Mexico, scale 1:62,500, revised annually.) Previous projects. For details see pages 701 and 702, Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The project provides a channel 9 feet deep at low water from mouth to mile 3, with bottom widths of 250 feet from mouth to Keel Avenue (mile 1.75) and 200 feet from Keel Avenue to mile 3. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Twenty terminals along project channel. One terminal is operated by Coast Guard, two by contract carriers, and 17 are operated privately. Operations and results during fiscal year. Leased dredged, Natchez, removed 388,095 cubic yards of material in August 1982, in maintaining the channel. Total Fiscal Year 1982 expenditure was $410,893. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project began May 15, 1928, and is maintained to project dimensions. 8. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). During the period $59,150 was expended for a study of Lake County Harbor, TN, and $51,976 on Coahoma County Harbor, MS. Flood Control 9. WEST HICKMAN AREA, HICHMAN, KY Location. This project is located in the western section of the city of Hickman, Fulton County, KY. The area is protected from flooding by the Mississippi River by a levee and floodwall on the west. Existing project. Authorized Nov. 9, 1973, under authority of Sec. 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. The plan of improvement consists of installing a flap gate on the existing box culvert through the old levee to prevent backwater flooding from Bayou du Chien, excavation of a 3.8-acre sump area, and construction of a 190-cfs pumping plant to reduce flooding from interior runoff. About 800 feet of interior channel will be reshaped through the excavated sump area, 190 feet of new outlet ditch will be built from the pump 13-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 discharge to the existing outlet ditch, and 300 feet of the existing ditch is to be cleaned out and/or enlarged. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details, see Page 13-5, Annual Report for FY 1980. Condition as of Sep. 30. Completed Oct. 15, 1976. 10. LONG LAKE AREA, HELENA, AR Location. The project is located immediately south of Helena, Phillips County, AR. The area is protected from flooding by the Mississippi River by the project levee, and primary drainage of the area through Long Lake Bayou. Existing project. Authorized Dec. 16, 1975, under authority of Sec. 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. The authorized improvements consist of enlargement and cleanout of Long Lake Bayou, extending from the culvert upstream 5.6 miles to a point about 3/4 mile below Rabb Lake or some 10 miles below Helena. The plan also provides for revegetation of rights-of-way (about 100 acres) not required to remain open for channel maintenance purposes; and the project sponsor will be required to maintain the revegetated area after project construction. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details, see Page 13-5, Annual Report for FY 1980. Condition as of Sep. 30. Implementation of this project has been delayed pending further notification from project sponsors on rights-of-way. 11. HUNTINGDON, TN Location. In Carroll County, TN. Existing project. Authorized Aug. 11, 1976, under authority of Sec. 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. The plan consists of 1,110 feet of channel enlargement, 1,870 feet of vertical wall concrete channel and 3,320 feet of grouted riprap channel. First cost is $1,837,000. Protection to approximately 90 acres of highly developed urban lands will be provided and no significant adverse environmental effects will result. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details, see Page 13-5, Annual Report for FY 1980. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was completed Sep. 11, 1981. 12. DRINKWATER SEWER, MO Location. The Big Lake Basin is located immediately north of Charleston in Scott and Mississippi Counties, MO, and approximately 4.5 miles west of Cairo, IL. Existing project. Authorized under authority of Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Construction of a 150-cubic-feet-per-second pumping plant just north of the existing gravity outlet, with an 855-foot inlet channel to connect the pumping plant with the existing Big Lake Ditch, and an energy dissipator (baffled outlet) at the pumping plant outfall. This will provide relief during the Mississippi River flood stages, for 8.5 square miles of agricultural land from a watershed totaling 27.6 square miles. Local cooperation. Local interests have furnished the required assurances. Operations and results during fiscal year. The design of the vacuum breaker valve was modified to allow pump operation at low tailwater conditions. Construction on this modification is 75 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. Complete June 30, 1980. 13. NONCONNAH BLVD., NONCONNAH CREEK, TN Location. The project site is on the left bank of Nonconnah Creek in a reach extending from about 550 feet upstream to 150 feet downstream of the Nonconnah Blvd. Bridge in Shelby County, Memphis, TN. Existing project. Authorized under the authority of Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946. This project provides protection for the Nonconnah Blvd. Bridge from streambank caving. The improvements consist of grading and placing riprap on about 700 feet of eroding streambank. Local cooperation. Local interests have furnished the required assurances. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began in Sep. 1981 and was completed in November 1981. 14. NORTH SECOND STREET, MEMPHIS, TN (WOLF RIVER BRIDGE) Location. The project site is on the left bank of the Wolf River approximately one mile above its confluence with the Mississippi River at the North Second Street Bridge in Shelby County, Memphis, TN. Existing project.,Authorized under the authority of Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946. This project provides protection for the North Second Street Bridge from streambank caving. The improvements consist of grading and placing riprap on the eroding river bank, approximately 250 feet downstream and 800 feet upstream from the bridge. Local cooperation. Local interests have furnished the required assurances. Condition as of Sep. 30. Complete. 15. US HWY 51, NONCONNAH CREEK, TN Location. The project site is on the left bank of Nonconnah Creek in a reach extending from the US Hwy 51 bridge upstream about 500 feet, in Shelby County, Memphis, TN. Existing project. Authorized under the authority of Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946. This project provides protection for the US Hwy 51 bridge from streambank caving. The improvements consist of filling 13-4 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT and grading the bank and providing protection for the bank via rock-filled gabions. Local cooperation. Local interests have furnished the required assurances. Condition as of Sep. 30. A contract for construction of the project was awarded on Sep. 30, 1982. Work not initiated. 16. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspected completed projects at a cost of $129,157 in the period. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1982, was $765,257. This included in-depth inspection of projects. 17. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). During the period $80,432 was expended for detailed studies on Little Hatchie and Kise Creeks, TN; $100,512 on Humboldt, TN; $81,774 on Caney Creek, AR; and $23,637 on Beech Creek, Wickliffe, KY. Expended $14,903 to complete construction of the Huntingdon, TN, project. Emergency flood control activities--repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal cost was $140,000 for disaster preparedness. 13-5 TABLE 13-A See Section in REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT ._._ I 13-6 Text Project 1. Caruthersville Harbor, MO 2. Helena Harbor, AR 3. Hickman Harbor, KY 4. New Madrid Harbor, MO 5. Osceola Harbor AR 6. White River, AR (below Newport) 7. Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN 9. West Hickman area, Hickman, KY 10. Long Lake area, Helena, Ark. 11. Huntingdon, TN 12. Drinkwater Sewer, MO 13. Nonconnah Blvd.; Nonconnah Creek, TN Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost FY 79 $ 25,000 25,682 303,000 164,409 407,000 261,392 445 1,182,000 728,340 1,330,000 882,348 527,000 520,408 20,000 62,545 47,000 4,455 370,000 104,863 1,022,000 905,296 FY 80 $ 70,000 53,017 66,400 199,782 200,900 347,859 1,000 451 274,900 570,780 917,000 674,208 213,000 59,473 42,000 24,410 -39,000 3,629 1,395,000 1,651,613 35,000 535 FY 81 $ 618,500 636,305 280,000 278,311 303,000 283,522 282,000 277,569 513 555,000 694,079 878,200 1,258,457 630,000 783,129 33,194 1,032,000 1,030,028 37,000 60,581 55,000 21,237 Total Funds to FY 82 Sep. 30, 1982 - $ 748,500 - 768,992 252,000 532,000 229,758 508,069 - 90,847 - 90,847 362,000 2,031,400 360,390 2,003,974 - 149,827 - 149,827 252,000 1,778,748 249,585 1,771,688 - 196,373 - 196,373 11,000 377,500 1,366 365,821 - 269,115 - 269,115 541,000 2,971,000 554,773 2,964,391 - 169,9941 - 169,9942 ,933,000 11,289,603 ,871,545 10,912,690 - 586,500 - 586,500 441,000 6,002,488 410,893 5,960,809 - 1,656,6922 8,131 1,674,2808 - 62,000 - 61,281 2,500 2,899,500 14,903 2,900,281 47,000 1,991,000 39,975 1,468,073 195,000 250,000 228,762 249,999 11 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 13-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep. 30, 1982 14. North Second New Work Street, Approp. 31,000 219,000 - - 250,000 Memphis, TN Cost 19,180 220,105 10,714 - 249,999 (Wolf River Bridge) 15. Hwy 51, New Work Nonconnah Approp. - - 17,000 233,000 250,000 Creek, TN Cost - - 17,000 171,600 188,600 1. Excludes $25,000 expenditures for early construction; includes $20,245 for preauthorization studies on Sec. 107 Project. 2. Excludes $17,500 contributed funds expended. 3. Includes $40,992 for preauthorization studies on Sec. 205 Project. 13-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 13-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 14, 1960, as amended Jul. 14, 1960, as amended Jul. 14, 1960, as amended Jul. 14, 1960, as amended Jul. 14, 1960, as amended Jul. 13, 1892 Jul. 14, 1960, as amended Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 3, 1958 Jun. 30, 1948, as amended Jun. 30, 1948, as amended Jun. 30, 1948, as amended Jun. 30, 1948, as amended Jul. 24, 1946, as amended Jul. 24, 1946, as amended CARUTHERSVILLE HARBOR, MO (See Sec. 1 of Text) Channel 9 feet deep at low water and 150 feet wide, 4,680 feet long in a right bank chute at mile 849.5 AHP HELENA HARBOR, AR (See Sec. 2 of Text). Channel 9 feet deep at low water between miles 659 and 663 AHP. HICKMAN HARBOR, KY (See Sec. 3 of Text) Channel 9 feet deep at low water and 250 feet wide at mile 922 AHP along former city waterfront 1.1 miles, with upper 600 feet forming turning basin 500 feet wide. NEW MADRID HARBOR, MO (See Sec. 4 of Text) Channel 9 feet deep at low water and 150 feet wide at mile 889 AHP, along city waterfront 9,400 feet with a turning basin 250 feet wide. OSCEOLA HARBOR, AR (See Sec. 5 of Text) Channel 9 feet deep at low water and 250 feet wide, 6,500 feet upstream along the old bendway channel. WHITE RIVER, AR (below Newport) (See Sec. 6 of Text) Open channel work, mouth to Batesville. Channel enlargement, mile 10 to Augusta. WOLF RIVER (Memphis Harbor), TN (See Sec. 7 of Text) Channel 9 feet deep at low water and 250 feet wide to mile 1.75; 200 feet wide to mile 3.5; thence 125 feet wide to mile 5.5. Flood control work in lieu of navigation improvements above mile 3. WEST HICKMAN AREA, HICKMAN, KY (See Sec. 9 of Text) Installation of flap gate on existing culvert; 190-cfs pumping station; and minor channel work. LONG LAKE AREA, HELENA, AR (See Sec. 10 of Text) Approximately 5 miles of channel improvement on Long- Lake Bayou. HUNTINGDON, TN (See Sec. 11 of Text) Channel improvement within the city of Huntingdon. DRINKWATER SEWER, MO (See Sec. 12 of Text) Pumping station. NONCONNAH BLVD., NONCONNAH CREEK, TN (See Sec. 13 of Text) Stabilization of stream bank caving. NO. SECOND ST, MEMPHIS, TN (WOLF RIVER BRIDGE). (See Sec. 14 of Text) Stabilization-Stream bank caving. Approved Nov. 4, 19801 Approved Sep. 20, 1962.1 Approved Jul. 12, 1962.' Approved Feb. 21, 1968.1 Approved Sep. 30, 1971.1 Annual Report, 1893, page 2112. Approved Mar. 11, 1968.1 H. Does. 26, 72d Cong., 1st sess., and 45, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 76, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Approved Nov. 9, 1973.2 Approved Dec. 16, 1975.2 Approved Aug. 11, 1976.2 Approved Jan. 5, 1977.2 Approved Dec. 24, 19804 Approved Jul. 23, 19794 13-8 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 13-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents U.S. HWY 51 NONCONNAH CREEK, TN (See Sec. 15 of Text) Jul. 24, 1946 Stabilization of stream bank caving. Appoved Nov. 10, 1980 as amended 1. Authorized under authority of Sec. 107 of the River 3. Contains latest published map. and Harbor Act, as amended. 4. Authorized under authority of Sec. 14 of the 1946 2. Authorized under authority of Sec. 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. Flood Control Act, as amended. 13-9 TABLE 13-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1982 Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Forked Deer River, TN, including South Fork , 2 1912 $25,000 $ 12,818 - Obion River, Tenn. ' 3 - 1911 28,716 - - Removing snags and wrecks from Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers 4' 5 - 1948 - 318,833 St. Francis and L'Anguille Rivers and Blackfish Bayou, AR' 2 - 1942 92,000 300,449 1. No commerce. 4. Completion date not available. 2. Existing project is for maintenance only. 5. No funds available under this project. Work being 3. Recommended for abandonment in H. Doc. 467, 69th carried on under "Appropriation, Flood Control, Mississippi Cong., 1st sess. River and tributaries. TABLE 13-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1982 Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Big Creek Canal, Millington, TN - 1977 $ 70,363 $ - Big Creek and L'Anguille River, White River Basin, AR' 6 May 81 1937 Clarendon to Laconia Circle, White River Basin, AR' 6 May 81 - - - Cottonwood Slough pumping plant, IL2 - 1964 147,000 - Feb 1964 Dyersburg, TN2 - 1962 229,6493 - Jun 1962 Dyersburg, TN (SW) - 1981 1,820,869 - Oct 1976 Memphis, Wolf River, and Nonconnah Creek, TN - 1960 11,141,199 - May 1959 Mounds and Mound City, Ohio River Basin, IL4 1955 1,132,704 - Oct 19595 Nixon Creek, TN 2 - 1952 62,821 - Dec 1951 Treasure Island, MO - 1981 861,528 - Mar 1978 1. Inactive, awaiting local cooperation. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Sec. 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 3. Includes $21,863 contributed funds. 4. Work being completed under Mississippi River and Tributaries project. 5. Exclusive of Cache River Pumping Station. 13-10 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 13-E ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 82 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Navigation (110) St. Francis River Navigation, AR -10036 $ 22,629 White River Navigation to Batesville, AR -60740 1,867 24,496 Flood Control Studies (120) Memphis Metropolitan Area, AR, TN, & MS -12135 12,583 12,583 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Tech. & Engr. Assist. Shore & Streambank Erosion (188)-51731 327 327 $37,406 COLLECTIONS AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Services 148,848 TOTAL (Category 200) $148,848 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $186,254 13-11 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT * This district comprises those portions of southwestern Illinois and eastern Missouri embraced in drainage basin of Mississippi River and its western tributaries, exclusive of the Missouri River, from the mouth of the Ohio River to mile 300, and of its eastern tributaries to Hamburg Bay at mile 261 on left bank, exclusive of tributary basin of Illinois Waterway upstream of new La Grange Lock and Dam at mile 80.15 above confluence of the Illinois and Mississippi Rivers. District also includes drainage basin in Missouri tributary to the Little River diversion channel. Report on the Mississippi River between the Missouri River and mile 300 is included in separate report on the Mississippi River between the Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN. Report on the portion of the Illinois River downstream of new La Grange Lock and Dam is included in report of the Chicago District on the Illinois Waterway, Illinois and Indiana. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Illinois Waterway, IL (St. Louis Dist.) .................. 2. Kaskaskia River, IL .............. 3. Mississippi River between Missouri and Minneapolis, MN (St. Louis Dist.) (Includes L&D 26 Replacement) ..... 4. Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers, MO, and IL .... Flood Control 5. East St. Louis and vicinity, IL ....... 6. Eldred and Spankey Drainage and Levee District, IL ................ 7. Hartwell Drainage and Levee District, IL . .................... 8. Hillview Drainage and Levee District, IL ..................... 9. Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, IL ................ 10. Meramec River Basin, MO ......... 10A. Meramec Park Lake, MO .......... 10B. Pine Ford Lake, MO .............. 11. McGee Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL .................... 12. Meredosia, IL, and Meredosia, Willow Creek, and Coon Run Drainage and Levee District, IL ..... 13. Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL ..... 14. Mississippi River Agricultural Area 8, MO .................... 15. Nutwood Drainage and Levee District, IL ..................... Page Flood Control (cont.) 16. Perry County Drainage and Creek 14-2 Districts Nos. 1, 2, and 3, MO ....... 14-2 17. Rend Lake, Big Muddy River, IL .... 18. Wood River Drainage and Levee District, IL ................ 14-2 19. Inspection of completed flood control projects .................. 14-2 20. Navigation work under special authorization .............. 21. Flood control work under 14-3 special authorization .............. 14-3 Multiple-Purpose Project Including Power 14-3 22. Clarence Cannon Dam and Mark Twain Salt River, MO .................. 14-4 14-4 14-4 14-4 14-5 General Investigations 23. Active investigations ................ Tables Table 14-A 14-5 Table 14-B Table 14-C 14-5 14-5 14-6 14-6 Table 14-D Table 14-E Table 14-F Cost and Financial Statement ................. Authorizing Legislation ...... Other Authorized Navigation Projects ......... Lakes, Levees, and Recreational Facilities ....... Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............ Active General Investigations (96X3121) ..... Page 14-6 14-6 14-7 14-7 14-7 14-7 14-7 14-8 14-9 14-11 14-13 14-13 14-14 14-16 14-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Navigation 1. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL (ST. LOUIS DIST.) See report on Illinois Waterway, IL and IN, under Chicago District. 2. KASKASKIA RIVER, IL Location. The river rises in Champaign County, IL, about 5 miles northwest of Urbana, in east-central part of State. It flows southwesterly about 325 miles and empties into Mississippi River about 8 miles above Chester, IL, or about 118 miles above mouth of Ohio River. (See Cincinnati sheet of maps of United States published by Army Map Service, scale 1:500,000.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1896, page 171. Existing project. Improvement for navigation provides a channel 9 feet deep and 225 feet wide from mouth to Fayetteville, IL. Improvement consists of enlarging present channel where required, making overbank cutoffs to eliminate sharp bends, and construction of a dam at mile 0.8 with a single lock 84 feet wide and 600 feet long, at an estimated total Federal project cost (1982) of $163,100,000. Non-Federal project cost is $7,665,000, of which $1,500,000 is local contribution. Local cooperation. State of Illinois passed legislation authorizing Illinois Department of Public Works and Buildings to enter into assurances of local cooperation with the United States. These assurances have been furnished and were accepted Nov. 23, 1965. Work was completed on the grade control structure and the railroad relocations. Engineering and design was continued on remaining construction items. Project is about 78 percent complete. Maintenance. Hired labor performed operation and maintenance of the project. 3. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN. (ST. LOUIS DIST.) (INCLUDES L&D 26 REPLACEMENT) See separate section entitled "Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN," printed in the Annual Report of the Chief of Engineers. 4. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS, MO AND IL Location. Mississippi River rises in Lake Itasca, MN, and from that lake flows southerly about 2,340 miles and empties into the Gulf of Mexico. Portion included in this report embraces the 195-mile section known as middle Mississippi, between tributary Ohio and Missouri Rivers about 974 to 1,169 miles from the gulf. See folder by Corps of Engineers of Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Minneapolis, MN. Previous projects. For details see page 1879 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1014 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for obtaining and maintaining a minimum channel depth of not less than 9 feet, a minimum width of not less than 300 feet at low water, with additional widths in bends from mouth of Ohio River (about 974 miles from gulf) to northern boundary of city of St. Louis, mile 191, thence 200 feet wide, with additional width in bends to mouth of Missouri River, mile 195; to be obtained: (1) by regulating works, for closing secondary channels, contracting river by building new banks where river width is excessive and protecting new and old banks from erosion where necessary to secure permanency at an estimated total Federal cost (1982) of $164,000,000; (2) by dredging to maintain project channels; (3) by construction of works authorized for Chain of Rocks reach in 1945 River and Harbor Act, which approved a comprehensive plan for development of the river at Chain of Rocks to provide for construction of a lateral canal at a cost of $59,720,600; and (4) by construction of a fixed-crest rock-fill dam about 900 feet below Chain of Rocks Bridge, authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act, at cost of $4,353,000, excluding $7,000 costs to Coast Guard for aids to navigation. Estimated total Federal project cost (1982) is $228,073,600. A small boat harbor opposite Chester, IL, was deauthorized and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. See H. Doc. 669 (76th Cong., 3d sess.) for report of Chief of Engineers dated Feb. 27, 1940, containing a general plan for improvement of Mississippi River between Coon Rapids Dam and mouth of Ohio River for purposes of navigation, power development, flood control, and needs of irrigation. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regulating Works: Contract was continued on stone dike and revetment construction as was engineering and design and supervision and administration. Construction on existing project began in 1881 and project has been in beneficial use practically from its inception. Projects on Dam 27 and Chain of Rocks are complete. Work on the project is about 71 percent complete. Channel as a whole has been greatly improved by the work completed to date. Dredging is required at low stages to remove temporary shoals and maintain required channel depths. River is generally above 10-foot stage, St. Louis gage, from latter part of February to the latter part of August, during which time project channel depths generally prevail without dredging. Mean stage of river, St. Louis gage, was 9.54 feet for FY 1981 and 15.19 feet for FY 1982. Maintenance. Work consisted of 1,450 feet of dike and 8,300 feet of revetment repair. U.S. plant and hired labor performed channel dredging at 29 locations, 14-2 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT removing 5,352,000 cubic yards of material from main channel. Channels dredged had a combined length of 17.6 miles, an average width of 290 feet, and an average gain in depth of 5.4 feet. Condition and operation studies, recreation planning, engineering and design, and operation and maintenance of Lock and Dam 27 continued. Flood Control 5. EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL Location. Project is in St. Clair and Madison Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Mississippi River between river miles 175 and 195 above the Ohio River. Project includes all bottomlands between bluffs on the east and Mississippi River and Chain of Rocks Canal on the west, and extends from Cahokia diversion channel on the north to Prairie du Pont Creek on the'south. (See Corps of Engineers Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Minneapolis, MN.) Existing project. The 1936 Flood Control Act authorized raising and enlarging existing levee systems by construction or reconstruction of 19.8 miles of levee, including 3.1 miles of floodwall, together with necessary appurtenant works consisting of gravity drainage structures, highway and railroad closure structures, alterations and reconstruction of existing pumping plants, alterations to railroad bridges and approaches at levee crossings, service roads on levee crown, and seepage control measures. Work under this authorization provides the area protection against a flood of about 200-year frequency. The completed 10 miles of levee along Chain of Rocks Canal and Lock 27 provide flood protection on the landward side integral with and to the same degree as the East St. Louis levee. Final cost of work under this authorization is $22,550,100. The Flood Control Act of 1965 modified existing project to provide for channel improvements, diversion ditches, flood plain detention areas, a reservoir on Little Canteen Creek, and a pumping plant to considerably reduce damages resulting from interior flooding. This act also authorized reconstruction of a channel stabilization dam in Cahokia Creek diversion channel to provide protection to adjacent levees and bridges from scour and eventual loss. Estimated total Federal project cost of work under this authorization is $58,400,000 (1981), $29,390,000 for Cahokia Creek Dam, and $35,010,000 for Interior Flood Control. Non-Federal cost is $18,230,000. Local cooperation. Local intei-ests have fully complied with the requirements of local cooperation for work under the 1936 authorization. For work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965 requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-4 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Formal assurances were accepted on the Blue Waters Ditch area on Jun. 25, 1981. Formal assurances for the Cahokia-Harding Areas will be requested upon approval of the plan of improvement currently scheduled after FY 88, due to lack of funding for FY 84 through FY 88. Operations and results during fiscal year. Planning was continued on project modifications authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965 and construction was initiated on first ditching contract. Work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1936 is complete. 6. ELDRED AND SPANKEY DRAINAGE, AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The levee district is in Greene County, II, on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 23.8 and 32.3 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, ILMO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for raising and enlarging 15.9 miles of levees, altering discharge line of pumping station, and construction of two highway closure structures and seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to 10,470 acres of land, 9,735 of which are highly productive agricultural lands, against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1982) is $6,000,000. Non-Federal cost is $940,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2nd sess.). Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-4 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued under the general investigation appropriation. Construction has not begun. 7. HARTWELL DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The levee district is in Greene County on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 38.2 and 43.1 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, IL-MO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for construction of 12.3 miles of new or enlarged levees, altering discharge line of pumping station and construction of seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to 9,630 acres of land, 8,955 of which are highly productive agricultural lands against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1982) is $11,600,000. Non-Federal cost is $1,120,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-5 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued under the general investigation appropriation. Construction has not begun. 14-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 8. HILLVIEW DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The levee district is in Greene and Scott Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 43.2 and 50.0 above the Mississippi River. (See Qunicy, IL-MO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for construction of 14.3 miles of levee, alteration of discharge lines for three existing pumping stations, construction of a railroad closure structure, and seepage control measures. Project will provide protection the the Village of Hillview and to 13,070 acres of agricultural land against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1981) is $10,700,000. Non-Federal cost is $1,105,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-6 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued under the general investigation appropriation. Construction has not begun. 9. KASKASKIA ISLAND DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. In Randolph County, IL, on the right bank of the Mississippi River between miles 111 and 116 above the mouth of the Ohio River. (See Paducah, KY, IL, MO, IN, map published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Previous project. For details, see page 1375 of Annual Report for 1950. Existing project. Project area contains about 9,460 acres only partially protected against flood stage of 38.5 feet on the Chester, IL, gage. Flooding occurs about once in every 7.3 years with an average duration of 26 days, causing substantial damage. The 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 519, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) provides for enlarging and raising the existing levee about 8 feet to provide protection against a flood having a frequency of once in 50 years. Estimated total Federal project cost (1981) is $14,000,000. Non-Federal cost is $2,045,000. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-6 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Formal assurances from the Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District were accepted on behalf of the United States on Jan. 23, 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is complete and work is proceeding on plans and specifications. Construction was continued on the gravity drains. 10. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, MO Location. The basin lies within the State of Missouri and comprises 3,980 square miles. The river is a west bank tributary of the Mississippi River at mile 161 above mouth of Ohio River. Major streams in the basin include the Meramec, Big, and Bourbeuse Rivers. The basin extends about 100 miles southwesterly from St. Louis into the Ozark Highlands. (See St. Louis, MO, and Rolla sheets of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. The project provides for the construction of Meramec Park and Union Lakes, authorized by the 1938 Flood Control Act; and Pine Ford, Irondale, and I-38 Lake projects, and 19 angler-use sites, authorized by the 1966 Flood Control Act. Under the plan, Irondale and I-38 Lakes will reduce flood damages in the upper Big and Bourbeuse Rivers. Meramec Park, Union, and Pine Ford Lakes will substantially reduce flooding in the lower basin area and will lower flood crests on the Mississippi River. Project will also provide water supply, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife conservation. (See Table 14-D for additional data on this comprehensive project.) 10A. MERAMEC PARK LAKE, MO Location. Dam will be at mile 108.7 on Meramec River in Franklin County near Sullivan, MO. Reservoir will be mainly in Crawford, Franklin, and Washington counties, MO. (See St. Louis, MO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project as authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act provides for construction of an earth dam about 167 feet high with a crest length of 3,000 feet. Reservoir will provide 1 million acre-feet of storage and provide flood protection for 11,862 acres of flood plain in the Meramec River valley above the mouth of Bourbeuse River, and partial protection for 20,209 acres of land below the Bourbeuse. Project will also provide water supply, water quality control, storage, and recreation, and fish and wildlife benefits. Estimated total project cost (1981) is $220,000,000, including $22,506,000 local reimbursement for water supply. Local cooperation. Local interest must contribute toward cost of project for storage allocated to water supply in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958. State of Missouri, acting through its State Water Resources Board and under authority of the General Assembly of State of Missouri, executed assurances for water supply on Aug 23, 1967. The assurances were reviewed by the Office of the Attorney General, State of Missouri, and it is his opinion that the State of Missouri has the legal authority and financial capability to execute said assurances. These assurances have been approved by the Chief of Engineers. A water-supply contract will be entered into with the sponsor before any use of the water-supply storage provided under this contract. 14-4 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Project was deauthorized by Public Law 97-128. Maintenance. Hired labor forces performed operations and maintenance of existing facilities. 10B. PINE FORD LAKE, MO Location. Dam is on Big River at mile 43.8, about 45 miles southwest of St. Louis. The Big River is a tributary of the Meramec. Lake will extend about 34 miles up Big River. (See St. Louis, MO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for construction of a compacted earth-fill dam with a concrete chute spillway. Dam will be 141 feet high and 2,070 feet long. Construction of new roads, improvements of existing roads, alterations to pipeline, power and telephone lines, and construction of recreational facilities are included. Maximum storage capacity will be 285,000 acre-feet. Estimated total project cost (1981) is $133,000,000, of which $7,394,800 and $20,801,200 are local reimbursements for water supply and recreation and fish and wildlife respectively. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute toward cost of project for storage allocation to water supply in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958. The State of Missouri demonstrated sufficient interest and approval of the basin plan to warrant the assumption at this time that necessary local cooperation will be forthcoming. Operations and results during fiscal year.. Preconstruction planning continued. The project is being reformulated. Construction has not begun. 11. MCGEE CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The levee district is in Brown and Pike Counties, IL, on the right bank of Illinois River between miles 67.2 and 75.1 above the Mississippi River. (See Kansas City sheet of maps of United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:500,000.) Existing project. Project provides for reconstruction of 14.7 miles of levee, construction of a new pumping plant, closure structure, and seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to about 12,080 acres of agricultural land against a flood of about 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1982) is $24,000,000. Non-Federal cost is $930,000. Project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-9 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have executed assurances in compliance with Public Law 91-611 and Public Law 91-646. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is complete. The pumping station, the riverfront levee and the lower part of the lower flank levee are under construction. Construction is complete on the upper flank levee. 12. MEREDOSIA, IL, AND MEREDOSIA, WILLOW CREEK, AND COON RUN DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICTS, IL Location. The levee district is in Morgan and Scott Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 67.0 and 72.2 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, IL-MO sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for construction of 11.0 miles of new or enlarged levee, a pumping plant, closure structure, and seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to 8,215 acres of land, 7,640 of which are highly productive agricultural lands, and 575 acres of noncrop and farmsteads against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1982) is $11,200,000. Non-Federal cost is $1,030,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-9 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued under the general investigation appropriation. Construction has not begun. 13. MEREDOSIA LAKE AND WILLOW CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The project is in Cass and Morgan Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 72.2 and 79.0 above the Mississippi River. (See Qunicy, IL-MO sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Maps Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for construction of 15.9 miles of new or enlarged levee, closure structure, drainage facilities, and seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to 7,510 acres of land, 6,980 of which are highly productive agricultural lands, and 530 acres of noncrop and farmsteads against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1982) is $9,300,000. Non-Federal cost is $560,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-10 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued under the general investigation appropriation. Construction has not begun. 14-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 14. MISSISSIPPI RIVER AGRICULTURAL AREA 8, MO Location. Area 8 is in Lincoln and Pike Counties, MO, on west bank of Mississippi River between river miles 249 and 261 above the Ohio River. Small community of Elsberry lies within the area. (See Quincy sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. The 1966 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 510, 89th Cong., 2d sess.) authorized the raising and enlarging of existing levees to provide 24.4 miles of riverfront, flank, and back levees and construction of appurtenant works consisting of drainage structure, highway and railroad closure structures, and alterations to existing pumping plants. The project has been reduced in scope to consist of replacing one existing drainage structure, replacing an obsolete stream driven pump unit with a new one of 150 cubic feet per second capacity, and rehabilitation of the pump station. Project will afford protection to the area against a flood of 50-year.frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1980) is $2,400,000. Non-Federal cost is $20,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See page 14-10 of FY 1980 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Local interests have been reimbursed under Sec. 215, PL 90- 483, for cost they incurred for pumping plant improvement. Construction of gravity drain and pumping station rehabilitation is complete. 15. NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The levee district is in Greene and Jersey Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 15.2 and 23.7 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, IL-MO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for raising and enlarging 11.4 miles of levee, construction of 1.0 mile of new levee, altering discharge line of pumping station, and construction of seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to 10,360 acres of land, 9,635 of which are highly productive agricultural lands against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1982) is $9,000,000. Non-Federal cost is $840,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-11 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued under the general investigation appropriation. Construction has not begun. 16. PERRY COUNTY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, & 3, MO Location. Districts are in Perry County, MO, and Randolph County, IL, on the right bank of the Mississippi River between river miles 95 and 111 above the mouth of the Ohio River. (See Paducah, KY, IL, MO, IN, map published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Previous project. For details, see page 475 of Annual Report for 1968. Existing project. Project area contains about 26,881 acres protected from floods of the Mississippi River by levees. However, when Mississippi River stage exceeds 13 feet on the Chester, IL, gage, substantial damage results from impoundment of precipitation or seepage, or a combination thereof. Authorized project provides for construction of four pumping stations to reduce interior flooding. Estimated total Federal project cost (1982) is $8,812,000. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-11 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Assurances were furnished by local interests (presently, Boil Brule Levee District, MO). on Nov. 16, 1978, and were accepted Nov. 27, 1978, by the District Engineer under delegated authority. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction was continued on Missouri Chute and Bois Brule pumping stations and was completed on the Cinque Hommes and Jones Cutoff stations. 17. REND LAKE, BIG MUDDY RIVER, IL Location. The lake is in Franklin and Jefferson Counties in southern Illinois. The dam is on Big Muddy River, 103.7 miles upstream from its confluence with the Mississippi River, and about 3 miles northwest of Benton, IL. (See Belleville sheet of maps of United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000, and Geological Survey quadrangle maps, 1:62,500.) Existing project. The project provides for construction of an earth dam, ungated concrete spillway, relocation of roads and utilities, recreational facilities, access roads, and service facilities. In addition, two subimpoundment dams were constructed on upper arms of reservoir to enhance fish and wildlife value of project. Reservoir has an area of 24,800 acres, and a storage capacity of 294,000 acre-feet. Project provides flood control, water supply, low-flow regulations, conservation of fish and wildlife, recreation, and area development. Estimated total Federal project cost (1982) is $43,700,000, of which $12,197,700 is for lands and damages. Non-Federal local contribution for water supply is $9,941,300. Estimated actual Federal cost for code 711 recreation facilities is $1,060,900. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-12 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Assurance of local cooperation 14-6 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT and water supply contract have been executed and approved by the Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. Real estate activities in connection with project completion were performed. Lands acquired to date are 39,819 acres in fee and 906 acres in easements. Project is essentially complete. Maintenance. Hired labor forces performed operation and maintenance of Rend Lake Reservoir. 18. WOOD RIVER DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. In Madison County, IL, on left bank of Mississippi River between river miles 195 and 203 above Ohio River. District includes bottom lands between river and bluffs and extends from Cahokia diversion channel on the south to opposite lock and dam No. 26 at Alton, IL, on the north. Small industrial cities of Hartford, Wood River, Roxana, and East Alton and part of Alton riverfront, lie within the district. (See Corps of Engineers Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Minneapolis, MN.) Existing project. The 1938 Flood Control Act authorized raising, enlarging, and extending existing levee system to provide 20.8 miles of levees and construction of appurtenant works consisting of gravity drainage structures, highway and railroad closure structures, alterations to existing or construction of new pumping plants; surfacing service road on levee crown, making necessary alterations to railroad tracks and bridges at levee crossings, seepage corrective measures and construction of a low-water dam at mouth of Wood River. Project will afford protection to this district against a flood of about 200-year frequency. Estimated total construction cost (1982) is $18,600,000 (excluding $23,000 contributed funds). Flood Control Act of 1965 modified 1938 Flood Control Act to provide for construction of a pumping station with collector ditches and necessary appurtenant facilities for removal of water impounded by existing levee. This portion of the project has been declared inactive. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work authorized by the 1938 Flood Control Act is complete except for 1200 feet of levee and two closure structures. Design of these items is progressing. Construction has not begun. 19. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD PROJECTS CONTROL Inspection of completed work was accomplished at a cost of $404,649 for the fiscal year. Total cost as of end of fiscal period is $4,172,125. 20. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). Preauthorization studies cost for fiscal year were $88,926 for Southeast Missouri Port study. 21. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). Preauthorization studies costs for fiscal year were $6,300 for Town Branch, Mexico, MO. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $119,225 for disaster preparedness, and $4,687 for rehabilitation. Multiple-Purpose Project Including Power 22. CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND RESERVOIR, SALT RIVER, MO Location. Salt River rises in Schuyler County, about 12 miles south of Missouri-Iowa State line. It flows southeasterly about 192 miles and empties into Mississippi River about 2 miles above Louisiana, MO, or about 284 miles above mouth of Ohio River. (See Kansas City and Quincy sheets of maps of United States published by Army Map Service, scale 1:500,000, and Geological Survey quadrangle maps, 1:250,000.) Previous project. For details, see page 645 of Annual Report for 1968. Existing project. Project provides for construction of a multiple-purpose reservoir, including power, flood control, water supply, navigation storage, pollution abatement, fish and wildlife conservation, and recreation. Dam consists of a compacted earth embankment with a concrete spillway controlled by tainter gates. Dam and spillway are about 1,700 feet long. Spillway structure consists of an ogee overflow section surmounted by four 50- by 30-foot tainter gates. Reservoir will have a storage capacity of 1,428,000 acre-feet for use of flood control, future domestic and industrial water supply, sediment storage, and power generation. Project document plan provides for installation of two 27,000 kilowatt units, one conventional and one reversible, to be used for pumped storage operations. Total Federal project cost estimate (1982) is $308,100,000 of which $20,830,000 is for lands and damages, and $13,400,000 is for water supply. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-13 of Fiscal Year 14-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 1980 Annual Report. Assurances have been received 55,277 acres in fee and 10,032 acres in easements. from the State of Missouri and approved by the Chief of Project is 91 percent complete. Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work remaining to be accomplished consists of minor clearing, some county road relocations, construction of administration-maintenance building complex, and completion of earthen portion of the dam. In addition, final hydropower equipment needs to be acquired and testing of the two hydropower turbines and generators remains to be accomplished. Lands acquired to date are General Investigations 23. ACTIVE INVESTIGATIONS See Table 14-F which covers: Surveys, Collection and study of basic data, and Research and development activities. 14-8 TABLE 14-A See Section in Text Project 2. Kaskaskia River IL (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 4. Mississippi River Between Ohio and Missouri Rivers (Includes Chain of Rocks) 5. East St. Louis and Vicinity, IL 6. Eldred & Spankey Drainage and Levee District, IL 7. Hartwell Drainage & Levee District, IL 8. Hillview Drainage & Levee District IL 9. Kaskaskia Island Drainage & Levee District, IL 10A. Meramec Park Lake, MO 10B. Pine Ford Lake, MO 11. McGee Creek Drainage & Levee District, IL 12. Meredosia, IL, and Meredosia, Willow Creek and Coon Run Drainage & Levee Districts, IL 13. Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage & Levee District, IL ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Funds to Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep. 30, 1982 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost $7,600,000 8,289,750 975,400 941,353 0 12,535 2,940,000 3,640,376 7,221,300 5,381,847 520,000 892,564 120,000 132,191 67,000 76,528 60,000 32,709 130,000 257,533 0 93,743 123,000 147,429 600,000 662,744 500,000 496,207 40,000 22,456 50,000 32,508 $5,000,000 5,009,434 779,400 710,908 00 3,450,000 3,838,008 9,017,900 9,675,719 580,000 699,638 105,000 100,453 230,000 156,347 190,000 193,215 400,000 366,150 0 63,716 185,000 178,516 550,000 447,699 975,000 746,149 150,000 124,026 170,000 122,351 $3,635,000 3,478,872 929,000 1,025,322 00 3,075,000 3,051,785 9,121,000 8,919,608 725,000 432,485 400,000 369,419 250,000 190,624 183,000 147,733 1,363,000 1,160,083 0 63,796 287,000 271,948 545,000 521,842 5,600,000 5,110,855 180,000 151,945 140,000 67,865 $1,800,000 1,883,090 1,200,000 973,968 0 42,000 2,000,000 1,759,811 9,269,000 8,443,093 275,000 515,776 0 64,620 0 137,251 0 58,771 725,000 797,320 0 28,285 567,000 415,026 15,000 120,033 2,285,000 1,134,848 0 70,166 -15,000 121,430 14-9 $122,191,000' 122,091,9601 7,270,400 7,014,740 1,244,078 1,118,160 161,719,6002 161,264,9042 177,646,4773 175,123,2533 30,622,3884 30,472,0005 875,000 875,000 622,000 611,979 433,000 432,428 3,443,000 3,186,623 30,568,0006 30,504,9896 1,789,600 1,601,879 3,680,001 3,648,387 9,707,400 7,835,458 370,000 368,592 345,000 344,155 TABLE 14-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep. 30, 1982 14. Mississippi River New Work Agricultural Area Approp. 424,000 106,000 760,000 172,000 2,137,000 No. 8, IL Cost 413,636 95,295 763,571 173,441 2,120,944 15. Nutwood Drain- New Work ale & Levee Approp. 85,000 180,000 295,000 0 670,000 District, IL Cost 86,592 159,354 267,610 50,079 660,887 16. Perry County New Work Drainage & Levee Approp. 841,000 1,347,000 1,944,000 1,558,000 6,720,0007 District Nos. 1, Cost 613,596 1,551,162 1,845,151 943,491 5,846,9337 2, & 3, MO 17. Rend Lake, Big New Work Muddy, IL Approp. $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 0 43,700,9008 (Regular Funds) Cost -179,896 -18,714 2,104 19,141 43,512,0138 Maint. Approp. 1,959,200 1,861,000 1,500,000 2,203,000 15,458,800 Cost 1,672,800 1,904,092 1,656,264 2,107,010 15,235,847 Code 711 Funds New Work Approp. 366,000 318,000 0 0 1,060,900 Cost 292,546 412,636 16,375 0 1,060,900 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. 0 0 0 0 9,941,2789 Cost 5,998 2 0 0 9,941,2789 Maint. Contrib. 350,000 .400,000 4Q0,000 0 2,581,955 Cost 351,410 385,879 416,656 140 2,581,955 18. Wood River New Work Drainage & Levee Approp. 0 0 225,000 285,000 15,139,82110 District, IL Cost 0 0 93,322 354,171 15,077,31410 22. Clarence Cannon New Work 18,450,000 23,123,000 20,950,000 23,500,000 263,487,02811 Dam and Reservoir, Approp. 30,932,991 23,758,152 19,196,644 24,029,076 261,533,36411 Salt River, MO Cost Maint. Approp. 655,000 1,228,500 917,000 1,426,000 4,925,460 Cost 633,023 1,032,809 1,080,977 1,285,921 4,699,419 Wappapello Lake, New Work MO Approp. 0 0 0 178,000 178,000 Code 711 Funds Cost 0 0 0 3,295 3,295 1. Excludes $10,461 expended on previous project. 2. Excludes previous project cost of $1,416,620. 3. In addition $3,109 was expended for rehabilitation. 4. Includes $8,072,326 for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. 5. Includes $7,921,939 for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. 6. Includes $200,000 for definite project under 1938 Flood Control Act. 7. Excludes $6,800,700 for previous project. 8. Excludes $550,000 Area Development Administration Funds allotted to the State of Illinois for increased construction costs of Interstate Highway 57 to meet project requirements, and excludes $449,093 Area Redevelopment Administration Funds allotted to the Corps. 9. Includes $6,103,711 credit to State of Illinois for work in kind. 10. Funds are for work authorized by'Flood Control Act of 1938. 11. Includes $216,628 for definite project study under 1938 Flood Control Act. 14-10 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 19071 Mar. 3, 19051 Jun. 25, 1910 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 19543 Jul. 3, 19584 Jun. 22, 1936 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 28, 1938 Nov. 7, 1966 Oct. 23, 1962 KASKASKIA RIVER, IL (See Section 2 of Text) Construct canal, lock, and dam to provide a 9-foot navigation channel from mouth to Fayetteville, IL. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS (See Section 4 of Text) Project for regulating works in 1881. (To obtain a minimum depth of 8 feet.) Dredging introduced as part of the project. These acts practically abrogated that part of project for middle Mississippi which proposed regulating works. Regulating works restored to project and appropriations begun with a view to completion of improvement between Ohio and Missouri Rivers within 12 years at an estimated cost of $21 million, exclusive of amounts previously expended. For 9 feet deep and 300 feet wide from Ohio River to northern Rivers and Harbors boundary of city of St. Louis. Project between northern boundary of St. Louis and Grafton (mouth of Illinois River) modified to provide a channel 9 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide with additional width around bends. Modified to provide construction of a lateral canal with lock at Chain of Rocks. Modified to provide construction of a small-boat harbor opposite Chester, IL. Modified to provide construction of a fixed crest rockfill dam 900 feet below Chain of Rocks Bridge. EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL (See Section 5 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee. Construct pumping plant and other modifications to reduce interior flooding. ELDRED AND SPANKEY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 6 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. HARTWELL DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 7 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. HILLVIEW DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 8 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. KASKASKIA ISLAND DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 9 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, MO (See Section 10 of Text) Construct reservoirs and local protection project. Construct Pine Ford, Irondale, and 1-38 dams and 19 Angler-use sites. MCGEE CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTICT, IL (See Section 11 of Text) Reconstruct existing levee and construct pumping plant to reduce flooding. S. Doc. 44, 87th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1881, p. 1536. Committee Doc. 9, 69th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 231, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 230, 83d Cong., 1st sess. Special report on record in OCE. H. Doc. 329, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc..472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 519, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 525, 89th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 14-11 TABLE 14-B (Continued) Acts Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 1966 Oct. 23, 1962 Adopted by Senate and House Committee resolutions, Oct. 12, 19725 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 28, 1938 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized MEREDOSIA, IL, AND MEREDOSIA, WILLOW CREEK AND COON RUN DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICTS, IL (See Section 12 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. MEREDOSIA LAKE AND WILLOW CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 13 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. MISSISSIPPI RIVER AGRICULTURAL AREA 8, MO (See Section 14 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and alter pumping plant to reduce flooding. NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 15 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. PERRY COUNTY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, & 3, MO (See Section 16 of Text) Construct pumping plants and other modifications to reduce interior flooding. REND LAKE, BIG MUDDY RIVER, IL (See Section 17 of Text) Construct dam at Benton, Ill., and subimpoundment dams on upper arms of reservoir. WOOD RIVER DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 18 of Text) Construct reservoirs and local protection projects. CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND RESERVOIR, SALT RIVER, MO (See Section 22 of Text) Modified act of 28 Jun. 1938 by deleting the reservoir therefrom and reauthorizing it as a separate multiple-purpose project. Changes name of project from Joanna Dam to present designation. 1. Also joint resolution, Jun. 29, 1906. 2. Contains latest published map. 3. Inactive. 4. All work completed. 5. Authorized under provision of Sec. 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965. 14-12 Documents H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 360, 92nd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 541, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 507, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 89-298, 89th Cong. ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1982 Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Cuivre River, MO' - 1883 $ 12,000 $ - Grafton Small Boat Harbor, IL Nov. 1977 19622 - Mississippi River at Alton, IL Small Boat Harbor Nov. 1977 19582 Moccasin Springs, MO - 1969 76,4363 Small Boat Harbor opposite Chester, IL Nov. 1977 19542 Small Boat Harbor opposite Hamburg, IL Nov. 1977 19502 Wabash Railroad Bridges, Illinois River, Meredosia, and Valley City, IL - 1961 2,653,194 1961 1. Inactive. River declared nonnavigable by act of Mar. 2. Year authorized. 23, 1900. 3. Excludes $56,605 contributed funds. TABLE 14-D LAKES, LEVEES, AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES Estimated See Required Total Estimated Section Estimated Non-Federal Cost (Date to in Text Project Name Federal Cost Cost Revision) 10. Meramec River Basin, MO Lakes: Meramec Park' 197,494,000 22,506,000 220,000,000(1981) Union' 95,029,000 10,971,000 106,000,000 (1981) Pine Ford' 112,198,800 20,801,200 133,000,000 (1981) Irondale2 53,958,690 8,141,310 62,100,000 (1981) I-382 25,450,000 2,150,000 27,600,000 (1981) Recreation facilities: Angler-use sites2 2,040,000 2,040,000 4,080,000 (1981) 1. Separate reports are included herein. 2. See 1967 Annual Report for details. 14-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 14-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1982 For Last Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Angler-use sites, Meramec Basin, MO Big Swan Drainage and Levee District, Illinois River, IL' Cache River Diversion, IL Cape Girardeau, MO, reaches Nos. 1, 3, and 4 Cape Girardeau, MO, No. 2 Carlyle Lake, IL Chouteau, Nameoki, and Venice Drainage and Levee District, IL Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL2 Columbia Drainage and Levee District No. 3, IL Degonia and Fountain Bluff Levee and Drainage District, IL Dively Drainage & Levee District, IL East Cape Girardeau and Clear Creek Drainage District, IL Eldrid, IL Emergency bank protection for certain highway and railroad facilities at Price Landing, MO (see Flood Control Act of 1944) 4 Emergency repairs to levees on Mississippi, Illinois, and Kaskaskia Rivers and flood fighting and rescue work (Sec. 5, Flood Control Act of 1941, as amended)4 Emergency protection for certain highway and railroad facilities at Chester, IL, bridge (Sec. 12, Flood Control Act of 1944) Emergency protection for Illinois approach, Chain of Rocks Bridge (Sec. 12, Flood Control Act of 1944) Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5, IL Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5 and Stringtown Drainage and Levee District No. 4, IL Grand Tower Drainage and Levee District, IL Harrisonville Levee and Drainage District IL Indian Creek Area, Illinois River, IL' Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, IL Keach Drainage and Levee District, IL' Lake Shelbyville, IL Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, IL, Nos. 2, 5, 6, and 7 Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, IL, Nos. 3, 4, 8, 10, and 13 Levee Districts between Cowden and Vandalia, IL Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1967 $ - 1953 2,837,114 Oct. 1978 Nov. 1979 Nov. 1979 Nov. 1979 Oct. 1978 1959 1965 1981 1955 1964 1981 1959 1976 1963 19623 1950 1953 1952 1946 1970 1971 1959 1981 1959 1981 1979 1979 1978 1944 22,000 5,157,805 42,819,400 185,700 4,984,500 2,818,000 5,889,500 1,720,000 1,920,600 25,685,169 55,415 1,033,279 50,000 25,000 1,154,800 4,677,900 5,829,000 297,460 44,000,000 1953 1964 Oct. 1976 1955 1963 Aug. 1981 1959 1976 1963 Oct. 1949 1951 Jan. 1952 Aug. 1945 1958 1959 Mar. 1981 - 1949 23,344,787 Sep. 1978 496,000 249,738 14-14 1944 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1982 For Last Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Miller Pond Drainage District, IL - 1955 164,183 - 1955 Mississippi River at St. Louis, MO - 1980 79,265,166 - Jan. 1980 Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 10, MO Nov. 1979 1967 Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 12,MO - 1967 Mississippi River, Alton to Gale, IL, underseepage measures - - 85,422 - Oct. 1962 North Alexander Drainage and Levee District, IL - 1957 939,569 - 1957 Prairie du Pont Levee and Sanitary District, IL5 - 1970 6,005,127 - 1970 Prairie du Rocher and vicinity, IL - 1959 3,882,600 - 1959 Preston Drainage and Levee District, IL - 1959 1,866,910 - 1959 Richland Creek, IL - 1969 401,000 - Riverland Levee District, MO Aug. 1977 19363 - - Scott County Drainage and Levee District, Illinois River, IL Ste. Genevieve County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO Nov. 1977 19363 St. Louis County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO Nov. 1977 19363 - - Strington, Ft. Chartres and Ivy Landing, IL - 1957 2,123,700 - Aug. 1956 Union Lake, MO6 - 1979 4,917,359 - Urban areas at Alton, IL - 1960 192,000 - Village of New Athens, IL - 1981 1,983,000 - Sep. 1981 Valley City Drainage & Levee District, IL7 - 1967 91,952 - 1967 Wiedmer Chemical Drainage and Levee District, MO Nov. 1977 19363 1. frojects authorized or modified by Flood Control Act of Oct. 23, 1962 (see H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess., for details). 2. Completed except for seepage control measures, which are inactive. 3. Year authorized. 4. Work complete, now performed under Public Law 99. 5. Includes $5,235,927 for previous project. 6. Includes $183,638 for definite project study under 1938 Flood Control Act. Includes Highway 185 funds. 7. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended). 14-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 14-F ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 82 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Navigation (110) St. Louis Harbor, MO & IL -58330 $ 272,050 Miss. R. Mooring Facilities -81181 288,803 Sub-Total 560,853 Flood Control Studies (120) Alexander and Pulaski Counties, IL -12217 59,601 Cape Girardeau-Jackson Metropolitan Area, MO -12053 276,443 Degognia & Fountain Bluff D&LD & Grand Tower D&LD, IL -52140 1,030 East Cape Giradeau, Clear Creek, etc. (Big Five) -35035 161 Plattin Creek, MO -12137 -340 St. Louis Metropolitan Area, MO & IL -550401 2 1,358,893 Ste. Genevieve, MO -80061 228,140 Richland Creek, IL -12174 207,232 Sub-total 2,131,160 Special Studies (140) Great River Resource Mgmt Study -14028 700,591 Carlyle Lake - Shelbyville Lake, IL-12160 153,667 Sub-total 854,258 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Planning Assistance to States (186) -51850 10,000 TOTAL (Category 100) $3,556,271 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Inspection and Inventory of Dams (236) -53843 and 53842 105,925 Flood Plain Management Services (250) 136,842 TOTAL (Category 200) $ 242,767 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (Category 300) None ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (Category 600) Eldred & Spankey D&LD, IL -00071 307,388 Hartwell D&LD, IL -00073 204,945 Hillview D&LD, IL - 00075 194,221 Meredosia Lake & Willow Creek D&LD, IL -00079 56,796 Meredosia, IL, and Meredosia, Willow Creek & Coon Run D&LD, IL -00069 57,003 Nutwood D&LD, IL -00623 240,926 Pine Ford Lake, MO -00091 255,973 TOTAL (Category 600) $1,317,252 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $5,116,290 1. St. Louis Metropolitan "Overview Report" was for- to Congress Jun. 9, 80. warded to Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors on 2. St, Louis Metropolitan Maline Creek interim report to Mar. 3, 1978, to OMB Apr. 8, 80, to Sec'y of Army May 29, 80, BERH Mar. 13, 1981. 14-16 GALVESTON, TX DISTRICT * Galveston District comprises drainage basins of all short streams arising in coastal plain of Texas and flowing into the Gulf of Mexico, including the entire basin of Buffalo Bayou, San Jacinto, San Bernard, Lavaca, Navidad, Mission, and Aransas Rivers. It embraces Agua Dulce, San Fernando, and Olmos Creek Basins draining into Baffin Bay, and coastal area south thereof to the Rio Grande and east of western Boundary of Starr County, Texas. It includes lower basins of major streams flowing into the Gulf of Mexico: Sabine River, Texas and Louisiana, downstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas; Neches River downstream from Town Bluff gaging station; Trinity River downstream from Texas State Highway 19 crossing at Riverside, Texas; Brazos River downstream from confluence with Navasota River; Colorado River downstream from northern boundary of Fayette County; Guadalupe River downstream from confluence with San Marcos River; San Antonio River downstream from confluence with Escondido Creek; Nueces River downstream from confluence with Frio and Atascosa Rivers. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Aquatic Plant Control (Southwestern Division) ............... 15-2 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX ............ 15-2 3. Cedar Bayou, TX .................... 15-2 4. Clear Creek and Clear Lake, TX ..... 15-3 5. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX .... 15-3 6. Double Bayou, TX . ................. . 15-4 7. Freeport Harbor, TX ................ . 15-4 8. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX .. 15-5 9. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL, and the Mexican Border ............................... 15-5 10. Houston Ship Channel, TX ........... 15-7 11. Matagorda Ship Channel, TX ........ 15-7 12. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX ......... 15-7 13. Texas City Channel, TX ............. 15-8 14. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX .... 15-8 14A. Anahuac Channel, TX ................ 15-9 14B. Channel to Liberty, TX ............... 15-9 14C. Wallisville Lake, TX ................. 15-9 15. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys 15-10 16. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ...................... 15-10 Beach Erosion Control 17. Corpus Christi Beach, TX ............ Flood Control (cont) Page 20. Highland Bayou, TX ................ 15-11 21. Port Arthur and Vicinity, TX, Hurricane-Flood Protection ........... 15-11 22. Taylors Bayou, TX ................... 15-12 23. Texas City and Vicinity, TX, Hurricane-Flood Protection ............ 15-12 24. Vince and Little Vince Bayous, TX .. 15-12 25. Inspection of Completed Flood Control W orks ................................ 15-12 26. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ...................... 15-13 General Investigations 27. Surveys ............................... 28. Advance Engineering and Design .... 29. Planning and Engineering ............ 30. Collection and Study of Basic Data .. Tables Table 15-A Table 15-B Table 15-C Table 15-D 15-10 Table 15-E Flood Control 18. Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX ... 15-10 19. Freeport and Vicinity, TX, Hurricane-Flood Protection ............ 15-11 Table 15-F Table 15-G Table 15-H 15-13 15-13 15-13 15-13 Cost and Financial Statement. 15-14 Authorizing Legislation ....... 15-18 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ....................... 15-29 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ...................... 15-29 Total Cost of Existing Projects ..................... 15-30 Channel Dimensions .......... 15-31 Channel Dimensions, GIWW Tributary Channels ........... 15-34 Dredging Operations .......... 15-36 15-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION) 1965 ACT Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Texas and the Sabine River Watershed of Louisiana. Previous project. For details see page 699 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. A comprehensive project to provide for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths, from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Texas in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures. Eradication work continues in the Nueces River Basin, North Coastal Area, Guadalupe River Basin, Sabine River Basin, Trinity River Basin, Cypress Creek Basin, Neches River Basin, South Coastal Area, San Jacinto River Basin and Rio Grande Basin. Planning, to include hydrilla control in the existing program, is underway. Estimated cost for new work is $2,019,000 Federal (Corps) and $693,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Sec. 302, 1965 River and Harbor Act, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Reimbursement to State of Texas for Government's share of cost was $77,431. In addition, the State performed $31,756 of eradication work for which credit as work-in-kind was given.. 2. BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX Location. At extreme south end of coast of Texas, about 7 miles north of mouth of Rio Grande and about 5 miles east of Brownsville, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11301.) Previous project. For details see page 1017 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in various sections of the waterway as shown in Table 15F. Project also provides for dual jetties at the gulf entrance, a north jetty 6,330 feet long, a south jetty 5,092 feet long, and 1,000-foot extension to existing north jetty and for maintenance of 3rd fishing harbor constructed by local interests. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet, and extreme range is about 2 feet. All depths refer to mean low tide. To some extent, height of tides is dependent on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season, water surface in southern end of Laguna Madre may be raised 4 feet or more above mean low tide in the gulf. Widening Brownsville Channel from Goose Island to Brownsville turning basin and deepening southeast corner of Brownsville turning basin to 36 feet was completed in April 1980. The 1,000-foot extension to existing north jetty was placed in the inactive category in 1980. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1982.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. Numerous terminal facilities for bulk and liquid cargo are available. (See Port Series No. 26, revised 1980.) Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 3. CEDAR BAYOU, TX Location. The bayou is about 30 miles long. It flows to the south and empties into northwest corner of upper Galveston Bay, about 1.5 miles below mouth of San Jacinto River and about 28.5 miles north of Galveston, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11326.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Project provides for a channel 10 feet by 100 feet from Houston Ship Channel to Bayou Mile 11.0. Channel was completed from Houston Ship Channel to first bend in Cedar Bayou above the mouth in 1931. Channel from Mile -0.1 to Mile 3.0 was completed in March 1975. Channel from Mile 3.0 to Mile 11.0 is in the inactive category. Project also includes jetties at mouth of bayou provided for under previous project. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range is about 0.6 foot and extreme range 1.2 feet. Height of tides is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season, water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is $643,000 Federal (Corps) and $135,000 non-Federal, consisting of $25,000 cash contribution and $110,000 lands and damages. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1982.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for the inactive portion. Terminal facilities. U. S. Steel Company has a barge dock at bayou mile 2.8, afid there are a few small wharves, privately owned, for local use at various places along Cedar Bayou. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 15-2 GALVESTON TEXAS DISTRICT 4. CLEAR CREEK AND CLEAR LAKE, TX Location. Clear Creek has its source about 18 miles south of Houston, Texas, and flows southeast for about 25 miles, emptying into west side of upper Galveston Bay at a point 24 miles northwest of Galveston, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11326.) Existing project. Project provides for 1.5 miles of channel 7 feet by 75 feet from Galveston Bay to mouth of Clear Creek; 0.7 miles of channel 7 feet by 60 feet, known as North Fork Channel; and 7.7 miles of channel 7 feet by 60 feet through Clear Creek and Clear Lake. The project was completed in June 1950. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 0.8 foot and extreme range is 1.4 feet. Height of tides is dependent largely on the wind and during strong "northers" in winter season, water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Consist of small privately owned wharves, several ship repair yards and marinas which accommodate light commercial vessels and pleasure yachts. These are along lake shore and at towns of Seabrook and Kemah at mouth of creek. A commercial shell loading dock is located near League City at the head of the project, and NASA-Manned Spacecraft Center has a barge dock along lake shore near their property. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Construction of tide gage platform and installation of water-level recorder and staff tide gage cost $19,900. 5. CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. This project, formerly known as the Port Aransas-Corpus Christi Waterway, Texas, was changed to Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Texas, by 1968 River and Harbor Act. This is a consolidation of old improvements of Port Aransas, Texas, and channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi, Texas. Aransas Pass is on southern portion of Texas Coast, 180 miles southwest of Galveston and 132 miles north of mouth of Rio Grande. Aransas Pass connects Corpus Christi Bay and Aransas Bay with the gulf. Waterway extends from deep water in the gulf through Aransas Pass jettied entrance, thence westerly 20.75 miles to and including a turning basin at Corpus Christi, thence westerly 1.75 miles through Industrial Canal to and including turning basin at Avery Point, thence westerly 4.25 niiles to and including a turning basin near Tule Lake, thence northwesterly 1.8 miles to and including a turning basin at Viola, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11308, 11309, 11311, and 11314.) Previous project. For details see page 1861 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. (See Table 15-F for existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins comprising this waterway.) Project also provides for two rubblestone jetties at Aransas Pass entrance, extending into the gulf from St. Joseph and Mustang Islands, project lengths of which are 11,190 and 8,610 feet, respectively. Project further provides for a stone dike on St. Joseph Island about 20,991 feet long, connecting with north jetty and extending pp this island to prevent a channel being cut around jetty. Project also provides for a breakwater at the entrance to the harbor area at Port Aransas, and for the realignment of the existing 12-foot by 100-foot project channel to Port Aransas. The breakwater consists of two overlapping sections. The one on the east side of the realigned entrance channel has a length of 830 feet and the second, located on the west side of the entrance channel, has a length of 1,290 feet. The channel to Port Aransas was relocated in the 300- foot clear distance between the overlapping sections. The portion of the channel remaining inside the breakwaters was widened to 150 feet. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range at Aransas Pass is about 1.1 feet and extreme range about 2 feet, and at Corpus Christi mean range about 1 foot and extreme about 1.5 feet. Heights of tides are dependent largely on strength and directions of winds, and during strong "northers" in the winter season water surface may be depressed as much as 3 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: Federal (Corps) $91,024,515, including $456,515 for Port Aransas Breakwaters and exclusive of amount expended on previous projects; and non-Federal $20,606,068 (includes $768 for Port Aransas Breakwaters) including $8,413,840 contributed funds and value of useful work performed, $3,320,228 lands, $6,887,000 relocations and $1,985,000 other cost. The Port Aransas-Corpus Christi 40-foot project was completed in 1966. The Jewel Fulton Canal was completed in 1963. The Port Aransas Breakwaters were completed in July 1973. Work remaining consists of deepening deep-draft channels to 45 feet from Beacon 82 through Viola Turning Basin; widening of channels and basins; and constructing a mooring area at Port Ingleside with dolphins. Entrance and jetty channels have been dredged to project depth and width, and dredging of channel from Harbor Island to Beacon 82 at 45-foot depth has been completed. Initial mooring dolphins were completed in May 1979. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1982.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for provisions of Sec. 101 of 1968 River and Harbor Act and Sec. 124 of Water Resources Development Act of 1976. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities on Harbor Island at head of Aransas Pass, Ingleside, Corpus Christi, La Quinta, Avery Point, and Viola, 15-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series, No. 25, revised 1979, Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of mooring anchors for existing mooring dolphins was initiated at a cost of $242,260. Relocation of the entrance to the Port Ingleside Barge Mooring Basin cost $82,015. Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 15- H for dredging operations.) 6. DOUBLE BAYOU, TX Location. Enters upper Galveston Bay on the east side about 30 miles north of Galveston and about 8.25 miles south of Anahuac, Texas. Existing project. Project provides for a channel 7 feet by 125 feet from the mouth of Double Bayou to the 7-foot contour in Trinity Bay, a length of 3.9 miles; and a channel, known as West Fork, 7 feet by 100 feet for a length of 2.0 miles. The project was completed in 1971. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 0.5 feet and extreme range is about 1.2 feet. Height of tides is dependent largely on winds, and during strong north winds in the winter season, water surface may be depressed 1.5 feet below mean low tide. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11326.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities are privately owned. At the mouth of the bayou is a timber wharf for loading oil barges. Between miles 1 and 1.5 above the mouth are timber wharf, a boat slip, and a marine railway owned by the Brown and Root Corporation. At mile 3 above the mouth is a small depot for handling oystershell. The facility consists of a timber bulkhead and hoppers for loading trucks. One half mile above the mouth are several fishing vessel docks. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. Fiscal year cost for dredging Double Bayou Channel was $5,000. 7. FREEPORT HARBOR, TX Location. Formed by improvement of Brazos River, Texas, from mouth to about 6 miles upstream to Freeport, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11321 and 11322.) Previous projects. For details see page 1860 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 872 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Existing project dimensions for various channels and basins are shown in Table 15- F on channel dimensions at end of chapter. Existing project also provides for: Dual jetties and a diversion canal for the Brazos River, including a dam, a lock in the dam and necessary auxiliary equipment. Also provides for rehabilitation of southwest jetty and the relocation of the northeast jetty (about 640 feet to the northeast); realignment of the channel between the Jetty Channel and Brazosport Turning Basin; realignment of the channel between Brazosport Turning Basin and Upper Turning Basin; relocation of Upper Turning Basin; and public use facilities adjacent to the Freeport Jetties. The 30-foot channel from Upper Turning Basin to Stauffer Chemical Plant, including the turning basin, was deauthorized by Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. Construction of lock in diversion dam at local expense is considered inactive. The 38-36 foot project was completed in 1962. Work remaining consists of realigning, deepening and widening the Outer Bar and Jetty Channels; relocating the northeast jetty; rehabilitating the southwest jetty; realigning and deepening the harbor channel between the jetty channel and the Upper Turning Basin; relocating and enlarging the Upper Turning Basin; constructing a turning point near the northwesterly end of the jetty channel; enlarging Brazosport Turning Basin; deepening Brazos Harbor Channel; and enlarging and deepening Brazos Harbor Turning Basin. Preconstruction planning on this remaining work is complete. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1982.) Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet and extreme range is about 2.5 feet. Except under extreme conditions, rises on river and in diversion channel do not cause greater variations in water surface than those caused by tidal action. Estimated cost of new work is: $77,227,000 Federal (Corps); and $10,253,000 non-Federal, including $1,092,303 contributed funds, $360,249 contributed work, $5,827,448 lands, $2,478,000 levees and spillways, and $495,000 relocations. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for Section 101 of River and Harbor Act of 1970. River and Harbor Act of 1970 requires local interests provide necessary lands, easements, and rights-ofway required for public use facilities; and when the appraised value of land, easements, and rights-ofway amounts to less than 50 percent of the total first cost of the development, make additional contributions sufficient to bring the non-Federal share to at least that level. The cash contribution is presently estimated at $334,000 which combined with land, estimated $646,000 is 50 percent of the cost of public use facilities. Cash contribution at time of authorization estimated at $95,000 in addition to providing land estimated at $70,000. Terminal facilities. Small privately owned wharves, two oil docks, one acid dock, two shell unloading docks and one caustic dock. Brazos River Navigation District has one large dock with four transit sheds over rail facilities permitting allweather work. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 26, revised 1980, for additional facilities.) 15-4 GALVESTON TEXAS DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning continued on the 45-foot project. Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 15- H for dredging operations.) 8. GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX Location. A consolidation of authorized improvements at Galveston, Texas, which includes projects formerly identified as Galveston Harbor, Texas; Galveston Channel, Texas; and Galveston seawall extension. Entrance to Galveston Harbor is on Gulf of Mexico on the northern portion of the Texas Coast. Galveston Channel extends from a point in Galveston Harbor between Bolivar Peninsula and Fort Point to and along wharf front of Galveston, Texas, and is about 5 miles long and 1,200 feet wide. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11324/5.) Previous projects. For details see page 1854 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in sections of the waterway shown in Table 15-F. Also provided are: two rubble-mound jetties, the south one extending from Galveston Island and the north one extending from Bolivar Peninsula, for distances of 35,900 feet and 25,907 feet, respectively, into the Gulf of Mexico; a concrete seawall from the angle at Sixth Street and Broadway, in the city of Galveston, to the south jetty, and a 16,300-foot extension of the concrete seawall in a southwesterly direction from 61st Street; for 11 groins along the gulf shore between 12th Street and 61st Street; and for maintenance of seawall from the angle at 6th Street and Broadway to the south jetty. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range in Galveston Harbor is 1.6 feet on outer bar and 1.4 feet on inner bar with extreme ranges of 2.3 and 2.1 feet, respectively. Mean tidal range in Galveston channel is about 1.3 feet and extreme range about 2 feet under ordinary conditions. Height of tides in both Galveston harbor and channel is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Existing project is complete. Dredging of Galveston channel to 36 foot depth was completed in November 1966. Dredging of the realigned entrance and Outer Bar Channel was completed in October 1967. Rehabilitation of the Beach Front Groins was completed June 1970. Dredging of Galveston channel to'40 feet was completed in March 1976. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1982.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. None on Galveston Harbor, which is entrance channel leading to terminal facilities on Galveston, Texas City, and Houston Ship Channels. Galveston Channel terminal facilities are mostly on south side of channel. Principal wharves, owned by the city of Galveston, extend from 10th to 41st Street (see Port Series No. 23, revised 1979). A containership terminal equipped with a crane capable of stacking containers three units high on the deck of any normal containership has been completed and placed into operation by the city of Galveston at Piers 10 and 11, on the south side of Galveston Channel. The city of Galveston has also placed into operation a barge terminal equipped with two 35-ton and one 5-ton cranes for loading and unloading barges on Lash and Seabee ships at Pier 35 and a docking and holding area for Lash and Seabee barges on Pelican Island, directly across the channel from Piers 35 and 36. Present facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 9. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL, AND MEXICAN BORDER (GALVESTON DIST.) Location. Extends from a point on Sabine River about 3 miles below Orange, Texas, to Brownsville, Texas, about 421 miles; a navigation channel, about 7 miles long, in Colorado River, extending from Matagorda, Texas, to Gulf of Mexico; a tributary channel in San Bernard River, extending from Intracoastal Waterway crossing to State highway bridge some 30 miles above crossing; a tributary channel in Colorado River extending from Intracoastal Waterway upstream 15.5 miles; a tributary channel extending about 14 miles from Intracoastal Waterway to Palacios, Texas; a tributary channel extending about 2 miles from Intracoastal Waterway to Rockport, Texas; a tributary channel extending about 6 miles from Intracoastal Waterway near Port Aransas, Texas, to town of Aransas Pass, Texas; a tributary channel about one-fourth mile long extending from Intracoastal Waterway near Port O'Connor, Texas, into Barroom Bay; a tributary channel extending about 38.8 miles from Intracoastal Waterway via Seadrift to a point in Guadalupe River 5.5 miles below Victoria, Texas; a harbor of refuge for small craft at Seadrift; a channel extending from gulf to Port Mansfield, Texas, about 11 miles; and a tributary channel in Arroyo Colorado extending from Intracoastal Waterway to a point near Harlingen, Texas, about 31 miles; side channels in vicinity of Port Isabel, Texas, and a small boat basin at Port Isabel, Texas, and a tributary channel extending from Intracoastal Waterway main channel at a point in West Galveston Bay into Offatts Bayou about 2.2 miles with a west turnout 15-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 (wye connection) 12 feet deep and 125 feet between Offatts Bayou Channel and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11302, 11303, 11305, 11306, 11308, 11309, 11314, 11315, 11317, 11319, 11322, 11326, and 11331.) Previous project. For details see page 1859 of Annual Report for 1915. (West Galveston Bay and Brazos River Canal, Texas.) Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in main channel of waterway: A channel 12 feet deep (below mean low tide) and 125 feet wide from the Sabine River to Brownsville, Texas. Relocation of channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide in Matagorda Bay, miles 454.3 to 471.3, relocation of channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide in Corpus Christi Bay, miles 539.4 to 549.7 (mileage is west of Harvey Lock, Louisiana); and alternate channel, 12 feet deep (below mean low tide) and 125 feet wide via Galveston Channel and Galveston Bay to the Galveston causeway; maintenance of existing channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide through Lydia Ann Channel, between Aransas Bay and Aransas Pass; provisions of such passing places, widening of bends, locks and guard locks, railway bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary, and the tributary channels shown in tabulation. The authorized channel 16 feet deep and 125 feet wide from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel and the 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide channel from mile 8.2 to mile 13.2 in Chocolate Bayou are inactive. (See Table 15-G on existing project dimensions provided for in tributary channels.) Removal of the railroad bridge across the canal at Mud Bayou was completed and operation and care of the facility was discontinued on April 14, 1969. Deepening the existing 6 foot by 60 foot side channels at Port Isabel to 12 feet was completed February 22, 1972, Offatts Bayou channel was completed January 1974. Relocation of main channel across Corpus Christi Bay was completed in September 1976. The 14 foot by 175 foot Channel to Aransas Pass was completed in April 1979. Dredging Chocolate Bayou Channel was completed in January 1981. Construction of a saltwater barrier in Chocolate Bayou was completed in February 1981. The 12 foot by 125 foot channel relocation route in Matagorda Bay has been placed in the inactive category. The Harbor of Refuge at Seadrift, Texas, has been placed in the inactive category. Active authorized work remaining consists of the following: construction of jetties at mouth of Colorado River; dredging a navigation channel from gulf to the GIWW; constructing a turning basin at Matagorda, Texas; construction of a diversion dam and channel; construction of an oyster cultch; and recreation facilities. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1982.) Mean tidal variation is 0.5 foot at Orange, 1 foot at Port Arthur, 1.3 feet in Galveston Bay, 1.5 feet at Freeport, 1 foot in Matagorda Bay, 1 foot in San Antonio Bay, 1 foot at Corpus Christi, 1.5 feet at Port Isabel, and 1.5 feet at Brownsville. Extreme ranges of tide under ordinary conditions are 1 foot at Orange, 1.5 feet at Port Arthur, 2 feet in Galveston Bay, 2 feet at Freeport, 1.5 feet in Matagorda and San Antonio Bays, 1.5 feet at Corpus Christi, 2 feet at Port Isabel, and 1.5 feet at Brownsville. Height of tides is dependent largely on wind. Strong north winds have depressed water surface as much as 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: $72,664,000, Federal (Corps), including $8,414 for Port Isabel Side Channel, $46,559 for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin, $356,466 for Offatts Bayou, and $658,573 for Channel to Aransas Pass and excluding expenditures on previous projects; non- Federal $17,148,174 ($395,000 voluntarily expended on Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $46,559 contributed funds for Port Isabel, $49,665 contributed funds for Offatts Bayou, $347,950 contributed funds for channel to Aransas Pass, $2,870,000 contributed funds for Mouth of Colorado River, $5,972,000 lands for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $11,000 lands for Port Isabel, $4,242,000 relocations for Gulf Irntracoastal Waterway and $3,214,000 other costs Gulf Intracoastal Waterway). Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for inactive portions, and provisions of Section 101, 1968 River and Harbor Act. Non-Federal contributions are $395,000 for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $46,559 for Port Isabel, Texas, $49,665 for Offatts Bayou, Texas, $347,950 for Channel to Aransas Pass, Texas, and $2,870,000 for Mouth of Colorado River, Texas. Terminal facilities. There are terminal facilities at Aransas Pass, Port Arthur, Galveston, Port Isabel, and Brownsville. See Port Series No. 22 (revised 1981), Port Series No. 23 (revised 1979), Port Series No. 25 (revised 1979) and Port Series No. 26 (revised 1980), Corps of Engineers. Local interests constructed terminal facilities at Port Mansfield and Port Harlingen. There are numerous privately owned piers and wharves along the waterway. A 330-foot navigation district owned general cargo dock, a 770-foot private dock and a 760-foot private timber trestle have recently been completed at the upper end of the Channel to Victoria. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Planning continued on Mouth of Colorado River. Maintenance: The Brazos River Floodgates were operated and maintained at a cost of $712,925, including engineering and design, supervision and administration, and real estate activities. In addition, repairs to mooring facilities cost $151,802 and rehabilitation of control house cost $55,700. The Colorado River Locks were operated and maintained at a cost of $585,004, including engineering and design and supervision and administration. Work on the main channel included erosion repairs at critical areas on Channel to Victoria cost $95,972. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 15-6 GALVESTON TEXAS DISTRICT 10. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. Connects Galveston Harbor, at a point opposite Port Bolivar, with city of Houston, Texas, extending 50 miles northwesterly across Galveston Bay through San Jacinto River and Buffalo Bayou to a turning basin at head of Long Reach with lightdraft channel 7 miles long from turning basin to Main Street, Houston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11324/5, 11327, 11328, and 11329.) Previous project. For details see page 1856 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in sections of the waterway shown in Table 15-F. Also provides for certain cut-offs, for easing sharp bends, an earthen dam across the upper end of Turkey Bend, and for off-channel silting basins as deemed necessary by the Chief of Engineers. Construction of 26,000 linear feet of pile dike to protect the channel in upper Galveston Bay was deauthorized by Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. The 40-foot project was completed in March 1966. Dredging a channel in Greens Bayou to Mile 1.57 was completed in 1970. Only work remaining is dredging Greens Bayou, Mile 1.57 to Mile 2.73, which is in the inactive category. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1982.) Mean tidal range under ordinary conditions is 0.6 foot to 1.3 feet in lower part of Galveston Bay; 0.6 foot to 1.3 feet in upper bay; and 0.5 to 1 foot in San Jacinto River and Buffalo Bayou. Extreme ranges under ordinary conditions are about 2 feet, 1.2 feet and 1 foot, respectively. Freshets caused rises of over 12 feet in Buffalo Bayou; however, this condition has not occurred since completion of Addicks and Barker Dams for flood control on upper watershed of Buffalo Bayou. Height of tides is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season the water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Local cooperation. Complied with except for inactive portions of Greens Bayou. Terminal facilities. City of Houston and Port of Houston Authority operate modern terminals which supplement privately owned wharves, piers, and docks, as described in Port Series No. 24 (revised 1980), Corps of Engineers. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. Disposal areas were sprayed for mosquito control at a cost of $36,688. Rehabilitation of disposal area levees at Spilmans Island cost $423,960. Fiscal year cost for dredging Greens Bayou to Sims Bayou was $8,754. 11. MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. This is a consolidation of shallow draft channel improvements of "Channel from Pass Cavallo to Port Lavaca, Texas," and deep draft channel improvements authorized under "Matagorda Ship Channel, Texas." Bar at Pass Cavallo is 125 miles southwest of Galveston entrance and 54 miles north of Aransas Pass. It connects Matagorda Bay with the gulf. Project extends across Matagorda Bay and Lavaca Bay to towns of Port Lavaca and Point Comfort. These two towns are on opposite sides of Lavaca Bay and both are about 26 miles northwest from Pass Cavallo. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11316.) Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins are listed in Table 15-F on channel dimensions. Project also provides for dual jetties at entrance, south jetty extending 6,000 feet to 24-foot depth in the gulf and north jetty extending 5,900 feet to 24- foot depth. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1 foot and extreme range about 2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season the water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: $18,058,777 Federal (Corps), and $12,859,000 non-Federal, including $12,259,619 contributed funds, $182,000 for lands, $220,000 for relocations, and $196,581 other costs. The project was completed in March 1967. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Privately owned facilities at Port Lavaca, municipally owned facilities at mouth of Lynn bayou, privately owned and publicly owned facilities at Point Comfort, Texas. These facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Facilities at Point Comfort consist of a channel, turning basin with wharfs, oil dock and loading equipment, all owned by Aluminum Company of America; and a wharf built by local interest at Point Comfort turning basin. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. Fiscal year cost for dredging Channel to Red Bluff was $2,734. (See Table 15-H for other dredging operations.) 12. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX Location. This is a consolidation of old improvements of "Harbor at Sabine Pass and Port Arthur Canal" and "Sabine-Neches Canal, including Sabine River to Orange and Neches River to Beaumont, Texas." Sabine Pass is on Gulf of Mexico about 58 miles east of Galveston and 280 miles west of Southwest Pass, Mississippi River. It connects Sabine Lake with gulf. Port Arthur canal extends 7 miles from near upper end of Sabine Pass to Port Arthur docks at mouth of Taylors Bayou. Near its upper end, Sabine-Neches canal joins and extends to mouths of Neches and Sabine Rivers. Waterway next extends up Neches River to Beaumont and up Sabine River to Orange. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11341, 11342, and 11343.) 15-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Previous projects. For details see page 1863 of Annual Report for 1915, page 985 of Annual Report for 1916, and page 873 of Annual Report for 1926. Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins are set forth in Table 15-F on channel dimensions. Project also provides for two stone jetties at Sabine Pass entrance from the gulf, western jetty to be 21,905 feet long and eastern jetty 25,310 feet long. Project further provides for removal of guard lock in Sabine- Neches Canal, construction of suitable permanent protective works along Sabine Lake frontage owned by city of Port Arthur to prevent dredged material from entering Sabine Lake and to prevent erosion of material deposited, reconstruction of Port Arthur Bridge, and relocation of Port Arthur field office. Mean tidal variation at entrance is about 1.5 feet, at Port Arthur about 1 foot, and at Orange and Beaumont about 0.5 foot. Prolonged north winds during winter season have depressed water surface as much as 3.4 feet below mean low tide while tropical disturbances have caused heights as much as 8 feet above mean low tide. Existing project is complete except for inactive portions. Removal of obstructive bridge' at Port Arthur was completed May 1969. The high level fixed bridge across Sabine-Neches Canal was completed October 1970. Deepening project to 40 feet was completed April 1972. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1982.) Local cooperation. Complied with except for inactive portions. Terminal facilities. See volume 2, Port Series No. 22 (revised 1981), Corps of Engineers. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 13. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX Location. Texas City is on the mainland of Texas on west side of Galveston Bay, about 10 miles northwest of city of Galveston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11324/5.) Previous projects. For details see page 1856 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel 40 feet deep, 400 feet wide and about 6.75 miles long, from Bolivar Roads to a turning basin at Texas City, 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet to 1,200 feet wide and 4,253 feet long; and an Industrial Canal, 40 feet deep and 300- 400 feet wide extending a distance of 1.7 miles southwestward from the south end of Texas City Turning Basin, and a turning basin, 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 1,150 feet long. Project also provides for easing the approach to the turning basin; a pile dike 28,200 feet long, parallel to and north of the channel; and a rubblemound dike, 27,600 feet long, along the southerly side of the pile dike. The 40-foot channel was completed in June 1967. Widening the Texas City Turning Basin; yealigning the Texas City Turning Basin to a location 85 feet easterly from its present position; and enlargement through widening and deepening of the Industrial Canal and basins was initiated in July 1980 and completed in June 1982. The only work remaining is deferred construction consisting of widening the Industrial Canal from 250 feet to 300 feet at 40 foot depth. (See Talbe 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1982.) Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.3 feet and extreme range is about 2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on the wind and during strong "northers" water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is $14,300,000 Federal (Corps), excluding expenditures on previous projects, and $1,793,700 non-Federal, including $127,741 contributed funds, $248,000 work contribution, $427,959 lands, $984,000 levees and spillways and $6,000 for removal of barge mooring facilities from Snake Island. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Privately owned terminal facilities are on the mainland at inner end of this channel and are considered adequate for existing commerce. A deep-draft channel and turning basin extend about 1.9 miles southwestward from south end of Texas City Turning Basin have been constructed by local interests. See Port Series No. 23 (revised 1979), Corps of Engineers. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Contract for dredging Texas City Industrial Canal and turning basin, and construction of levees cost $490,841. Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 15- H for dredging operations.) 14. TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Location. The main stem of the Trinity River is formed at Dallas by the confluence of the West Fork and the Elm Fork at river mile 505.5. The mouth of the Trinity is about one-half mile west of Anahuac, Texas. (See Geological Survey base map, Texas, scale 1:500,000.) Previous project. For details of abandoned locks and dam construction see page 986 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. See individual detailed reports on Anahuac Channel, Channel to Liberty and Wallisville Lake. Project includes the existing Federal project designated as "Mouth of Trinity River, Texas," which was completed in 1907 at a cost of $80,000 (no cost to local interest). Project is not being maintained. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1982.) Local cooperation. See individual detailed reports on Channel to Liberty and Wallisville Lake. 15-8 GALVESTON TEXAS DISTRICT There is no local cooperation required for Anahuac Channel. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and piers at Anahuac, Moss Bluff, Wallisville, and Liberty, Texas, are adequate for existing commerce. 14A. ANAHUAC CHANNEL, TX Location. Extends from 6-foot depth in Galveston Bay to Anahuac, Texas, opposite mouth of Trinity River 38 miles north of Galveston, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11323.) Existing project. No project dimensions authorized by 1905 River and Harbor Act. A 6- by 80- foot channel, 16,000 feet long was dredged in 1905. At present a 6- by 100-foot channel is maintained. Under ordinary conditions tidal range is 0.6 to 1.2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on wind. Strong north winds depress water surface 1.5 feet below mean sea level. Latest published map is in House Document 440, 56th, Congress, 1st Session. Project was completed in 1911. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and piers are the only terminal facilities at Anahuac. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 14B. CHANNEL TO LIBERTY, TX Location. Improvement is located in Galveston Bay and tidal reach of lower Trinity River. (See Geological Survey Maps for Anahuac, Cove, Moss Bluff, and Liberty, Texas.) Previous projects. For details see page 986 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Provides for a 6-foot channel from Anahuac to Liberty which was completed in 1925. A navigable channel from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston Bay to Liberty, Texas, with depth of 9 feet and width of 150 feet, extending along the east shore of Trinity Bay to the mouth of the Trinity River at Anahuac, thence in the river channel to a turning basin at Liberty, Texas, and a protective embankment along the west side of the channel in Trinity Bay. The 6-foot Channel to Liberty was completed in 1925. The 9-foot Channel to Liberty has been dredged from junction with Houston Ship Channel to a point one mile below Anahuac, Texas. Work remaining consists of dredging a 9- by 150-foot channel from one mile below Anahuac, Texas to Liberty, Texas. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for portion of "Channel to Liberty" between Houston Ship Channel and 1 mile below Anahuac, Texas, as required by 1946 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 634, 79th Cong., 2nd sess.), but not complied with for remaining portion of "Channel to Liberty" as required by River and Harbor Act of 1945 (H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st sess.) at an estimated total cost of $550,000, of which $460,000 is for lands and rights-of-way and $90,000 for pipeline relocations for 9- by 150-foot channel. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and docks at Anahuac, Wallisville, Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.'s slip, Moss Bluff and Liberty, Texas, are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 14C. WALLISVILLE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is at river mile 3.9, about 4 miles northwest of Anahuac, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11323.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a 39,200-foot dam to store water to elevation 4 feet above mean sea level, with an 84- by 600-foot navigation lock in a cutoff channel; and extension of authorized channel to Liberty from its present terminus at channel mile 23.2 to Texas Gulf Sulphur channel at channel mile 33.6. Dam is composed of a nonoverflow section 16,820 feet long with a crest elevation varying from 13.0 to 10.0 feet above mean sea level, and an overflow section 22,400 feet long. All but 1,500 feet of overflow section has a crest elevation of 5.5 feet above mean sea level. The' two remaining portions of overflow section have crest elevations of 4.0 feet above mean sea level. Both the overflow and nonoverflow sections basically are earthen levees with full or partially riprapped side slopes and paved roadways on their crest. Lock is at channel mile 28.3, has a sill depth of minus 16.17 feet below mean sea level, a normal lift of 4 feet and is founded in piles of clay. Dam controls a drainage area of 1,262 square miles below Livingston Dam (non-Federal project at channel mile 99.2) and has a storage capacity of 58,000 acre-feet. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range in bay is from 0.6 foot to 1.2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on wind. Strong northerly winds depress water surface 1.5 feet below mean sea level. Total estimated cost of authorized project is $28,800,000 Federal (Corps) and $18,000 non-Federal for lands for construction of portion of channel to Liberty. A contract for construction of access road, Big Hog intake structure, intake canal and access bridge was completed in October 1968. Work started in July 1970 on construction of the lock and dam, roads, diversion channel, and navigation channel. Work was suspended in February 1973 because of an injunction halting construction. Protective work on the lock and dam was permitted and was completed in April 1973. An exception to the injunction was granted for plugging oil wells which was completed in August 1973. Notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit was filed in April 1973. In August 1974, the Court of Appeals reversed the 15-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 judgment and remanded the case with directions that a revised or supplemental statement be prepared and judged anew. Studies undertaken to supplement the Environmental Impact Statement showed that modifications to the project were warranted. The modified project would create a 5,600 acre lake with a maximum pool elevation of 4 feet above mean sea level, a 11,420 acre-foot capacity, and a 140 million gallons per day yield. A report recommending project modification and the resumption of construction is currently being reviewed in the Office of the Chief of Engineers. The schedule for the completion of construction for the modified project is dependent on the authority required to approve the modified project, the time required to coordinate with the courts to lift the injunction, and the availability of construction funds. Local cooperation. Under the authorized project, local interest must contribute an amount equal to cost allocated to water supply, one-half of cost allocated to salinity control and cost allocated to recreation less cost of basic facilities and less 15 percent of total project cost. Local interest contribution is estimated at $4,956,000. For improvement of the navigation channel, exclusive of reservoir features, local interests must provide lands, disposal areas, and adequate terminal and transfer facilities, make necessary relocations of utilities crossing natural river channel and give assurances that they will hold and save the United States free from claims for damages, including but not limited to damages due to salt water intrusions, that may result from construction and operation of the navigation improvements. Operations during fiscal year. The Post Authorization Change Report was completed. 15. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys were conducted on the following projects: Fiscal Year Project Date of Survey Cost Cedar Bayou Channel to Port Bolivar Chocolate Bayou Clear Creek and Clear Lake Dickinson Bayou Double Bayou Freeport Harbor Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Texas City Channel Total Jun 1982 Jul and Aug 1982 Oct and Apr 1982 Dec 1981 and May 1982 Nov 1981 and May 1982 Jun 1982 Oct 1981 Mar 1982 Jul 1982 $ 472 10,401 9,334 5,666 2,008 4,712 128 507 1,203 $34,431 16. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Preparation of the detailed project report for investigating the feasibility of, and Federal interest in, a harbor of refuge at the East Fork, Double Bayou, Texas, cost $30,102. Beach Erosion 17. CORPUS CHRISTI BEACH, TX (RESTORATION PROJECT) Location. Corpus Christi Beach, a shore area having a length of about 2 miles, is located on the west side of Corpus Christi Bay in Nueces County at Corpus Christi, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11309 and 11311.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provided for initial restoration of eroded areas of Corpus Christi Beach, over a shore length of 1.4 miles, located on the easterly side of Rincon Peninsula, with periodic nourishment as required. Construction was completed in March 1978; however, erosion and/or littoral movement of the beach will be monitored during ten years following completion to determine periodic nourishment requirements. Estimated cost of new work is $2,460,000 Federal (Corps) and $2,575,000 non- Federal consisting of $2,460,000 contributed funds, $43,000 relocations, and $72,000 lands. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for periodic nourishment. Operations during fiscal year. No costs were incurred during FY 1982. Flood Control 18. BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Location. Improvements are on Buffalo Bayou watershed, a part of San Jacinto River watershed, in Harris County, west and northwest of city of Houston, Texas. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheets for Harris County.) Existing project. Provides for improvement of Buffalo Bayou and its tributaries above turning basin of Houston Ship Channel to control floods for protection of city of Houston, and prevent deposition of silt in turning basin of ship channel by construction of detention reservoirs, enlargement and rectification of channels and construction of control works. Estimated cost for new work is $133,000,000 Federal (Corps) including $11,000,000 for recreational facilities at completed projects (Code 713 funds), and $93,693,000 non-Federal, consisting of $82,693,000 for lands and relocations, and $11,000,000 contributions for recreational facilities. Construction of Barker Dam was completed in February 1945. Construction of Addicks Dam and 7.4 miles of channel rectification downstream from Addicks and Barker Dams was completed in October 1948. Modification of Barker and Addicks Dams 15-10 GALVESTON TEXAS DISTRICT consisting of gating of two uncontrolled conduits in each dam, was completed in 1969. Channel rectification on White Oak Bayou was completed in 1976. Major rehabilitation of Addicks and Barker Dams to prevent seepage through the embankment was completed in 1982. Work remaining consists of rectification of approximately 22 miles of main stem of Buffalo Bayou. Negotiations are in progress with the city of Houston for construction of the recreation facilities. Local cooperation. Section 203, 1954 Flood Control Act applies. Local interests have accomplished all required local cooperation on Brays Bayou and White Oak Bayou. On Buffalo Bayou, local interests purchased interests that the United States had in 7 miles of rectified channel below Barker and Addicks Dams for $256,651. Of the remaining required rights-of-way on Buffalo Bayou, local interests have acquired about 40 percent. About 53 percent of required bridge relocations and 3 percent of the required utility relocations have been accomplished. Advance of $4,400,000 by the Harris County Flood Control District was refunded in September 1956. Public Law 86-53 authorized reimbursement of $38,726 to Galveston, Houston and Henderson Railroad Co. for bridge alterations at Brays Bayou. Non-Federal contributions totaled $63,661 for project betterments. Recreation development is subject to conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. A cost sharing contract covering the work proposed was approved by the Secretary of the Army in 1982. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance at Addicks and Barker Dams. 19. FREEPORT AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Location. Freeport is in southern part of Brazoria County on Gulf of Mexico at mouth of Brazos River, about 43 miles southwest of Galveston, Texas. Existing project. Authorized project provides for hurricane-flood protection for a highly industrialized area and community of about 39,000 persons. Major features of project consist of improvements to 42.8 miles of existing levees, two interior drainage pumping plants and 2.1 miles of new levee. The project was completed in February 1982. Estimated cost for new work is $29,311,000 Federal (Corps) and non-Federal $12,562,000 consisting of $8,709,000 cash, $1,127,000 lands, and $2,726,000 relocations. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Final segment of work was turned over to local interest and operating manuals are being prepared. 20. HIGHLAND BAYOU, TX Location. Rises near Arcadia, in Galveston County, Texas, and flows into Jones Bay, an arm of West Bay. The watershed, with an area of about 38 square miles lies entirely within Galveston County and is about 14 miles long and varies in width from about 0.3 miles at its lower end to a maximum of about 5 miles near its midpoint. Exidting project. Plan of improvement provides for enlargement and rectification of Highland Bayou Channel and construction of a diversion dam in Highland Bayou, with a diversion channel extending southerly from the diversion dam and emptying into Jones Bay, which lies on the north side of West Bay. Initial construction contract was awarded in June 1974. Work completed consists of a diversion dam, 8.2 miles of diversion channel, a railroad bridge crossing the diversion channel, and 3.1 miles of upper Highland Bayou Channel. Estimated cost of new work is $20,200,000 Federal (Corps) and $6,000,000 non-Federal consisting of $2,967,000 lands and $3,033,000 for relocations. Local cooperation. Section 204, 1965 Flood Control Act applies. Operations during fiscal year. A contract for channel rectification, Highland Bayou, Mile 9.2 to 11.68 was completed at a fiscal year cost of $339,629. A contract for repair of eroded areas was initiated at a fiscal year cost of $167,490 21. PORT ARTHUR AND VICINITY, TX, (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Location. Port Arthur is on west shore of Sabine Lake in extreme southeast part of Texas, about 14 miles from the gulf. Area under consideration is comprised of about 38,500 acres, and includes cities of Port Arthur and Groves, towns of Griffing Park, Pearl Ridge, and Lakeview, and adjacent industrial areas. Existing project. Authorized plan provides for raising and reconstructing 6.3 miles of existing concrete and steel sheet-pile seawall; constructing 0.3 mile of new concrete and sheet-pile seawall; raising and improving 3.0 miles of existing earth levees; constructing 20.3 miles of new earth levees and constructing five interior drainage pumping plants.Raising and strengthening of levees surrpunding Gulf Oil Company's fresh water reservoir was placed in the "inactive" category in December 1980. The project was initiated in March 1966 and the active portion of the project is 99 percent complete. Estimated cost for new work, excluding "inactive" portion, is $59,979,000 Federal (Corps) and $26,154,000 non-Federal consisting of $16,134,000 cash contributions, $3,403,000 for lands, $6,168,000 for relocations, and $449,000 for pumping 15-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 station betterments and levee realignment betterments. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation during fiscal year. Contract for construction of levees, final stage, Sabine Tank Farm and Taylors Bayou Area was continued at a fiscal year cost of $2,398,299. Repairs to floodwalls and sealing of joints cost $81,500. Construction of levees, Pleasure Island Barrier, was completed at a fiscal year cost of $10,773. 22. TAYLORS BAYOU, TX Location. Watershed of Taylors Bayou is in extreme southeast corner of Texas adjoining basins of Neches River and Sabine Lake on the east. City of Port Arthur is about 8 miles from the main stream of Taylors Bayou. Existing project. Improvement consists of enlarging and rectifying approximately 53 miles of natural and artificial channels on Taylors Bayou and tributary water courses. Phase I consists of constructing a gated structure to prevent saltwater intrusion and 2.9 miles of new diversion channel and enlarging 1.8 miles of Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and a 1.9 mile section of the Outfall Canal. Phase II consists of enlarging 6.0 miles of Taylors Bayou, 14.3 miles of Hillebrandt Bayou, 1.5 miles of Pivotot Bayou, 2.3 miles of Bayou Din, and 3.5 miles of Willow Marsh Bayou. Phase III consists of enlarging 7.0 miles of North Fork Taylors Bayou, 7.8 miles of South Fork Taylors Bayou and 4.4 miles of Mayhaw Bayou. The Phase III portion of the project was placed in the "inactive" category in November 1980. Initial contract on the "active" portion of the project was awarded in August 1982. Estimated cost for new work, excluding inactive portion, is $52,900,000 Federal (Corps) and $25,635,000 non-Federal, including $18,032,000 cash contribution, $4,137,000 lands, and $3,466,000 for relocations. Local cooperation. Section 204, 1965 Flood Control Act, applies. Operation during fiscal year. The Outfall Canal was initiated at t fiscal year cost of $186,240. 23. TEXAS CITY AND VICINITY, TX, (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Location. On the west and southwest shore of Galveston Bay, about 9 miles northwest of Galveston, Texas. Project fronts on the west side of Galveston Bay and protects a land area of about 36 square miles. Existing project. Plan provides for construction of improvements for control of storm tides. Improvements consist of 15.9 miles of new levees, 1.3 miles of concrete floodwall, related drainage and stoplog structures, one tide control structure, and two pumping plants. The project was initiated in 1962. All work is complete except for the La Marque Pumping plant and drainage structures. Construction of the La Marque Pumping plant was initiated in September 1982. Estimated cost for new work is $37,560,000 Federal (Corps) and $16,354,000 non-Federal, including $13,678,000 cash contribution, $1,071,000 work contribution, and $1,349,000 for lands, and $256,000 for ramps in lieu of closure structures and increased low flow pumpimg capacity for La Marque Pumping plant. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Contract for construction of levee and closure structures, Southwest Leg, was continued at a fiscal year cost of $1,039,920. Supply contract for the La Marque Pumping plant cost $245,212. Contract for drainage structure west of Galveston County Reservoir cost $166,600. 24. VINCE AND LITTLE VINCE BAYOUS, TX Location. Watershed of Vince Bayou and tributary, Little Vince Bayou, has an area of about 17 square miles and lies entirely within Harris County. Vince Bayou is a minor tributary of Buffalo Bayou in San Jacinto River Basin on upper gulf coast of Texas. Existing project. Project provides for enlarging and rectifying channel of Vince Bayou from mouth to a point about 7.3 miles upstream and Little Vince Bayou from mouth to a point about 4.2 miles upstream, a total distance in both streams of about 11.5 miles. The project was initiated in 1968. All work on Vince Bayou is complete. Planning is in progress on Little Vince Bayou. Estimated cost for new work is $19,400,000 Federal (Corps) and $16,600,000 non-Federal, consisting of $4,940,000 for lands and $11,660,000 for relocations. Local cooperation. Sec. 203, 1962 Flood Control Act, applies. Local interests have acquired all real estate and accomplished all required relocations on Vince Bayou. On Little Vince Bayou, local interests have acquired 80 percent of the real estate and accomplished 10 percent of the required relocations. Operations during fiscal year. Contract for erosion control on Vince Bayou cost $67,630. 25. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL WORKS Inspections of completed projects operated and maintained by local interests were made on Big Hog Bayou Intake Structure (September 1982); Hurricane Flood Protection at Port Arthur and Vicinity, Texas (April 1982); Hurricane Flood Protection at Freeport and Vicinity, Texas (June 1982); Little Cypress Bayou Levee (September 1982); and Hurricane Flood Protection at Texas City and Vicinity, Texas (September 1982) at a total cost of $42,618. 15-12 GALVESTON TEXAS DISTRICT 26. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency bank protection pursuant to Section 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress. Reconnaissance study of bank erosion problems at Fort Brown Resaca, Brownsville, Texas cost $1,148. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of 1970 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. Preparation of detailed project report for flood problems at Kirbyville, Texas was continued at a fiscal year cost of $80,614. Preparation of detailed project reports for flood problems at East and West Edinburg, Texas, were initiated at fiscal year costs of $10,159 and $9,056, respectively. Reconnaissance study of flood problems on Chocolate Bayou, Calhoun and Victoria Counties, cost $5,875. Reconnaissance study of flood problems at Whispering Oaks Subdivision, Montgomery County, cost $3,742. Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation). Costs were $108,025 for disaster preparedness and $60,580 for emergency operations. General Investigations 27. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,796,912 of which $566,288 was for navigation studies, $1,158,978 was for flood damage prevention studies, $49,556 was for shoreline protection studies, $6,466 was for coordination with other agencies, and $15,684 was for preauthorization studies Phase I (Lower Rio Grande Basin). 28. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Neches River and Tributaries, Salt Water Barrier at Beaumont, Texas - The project will provide for an overflow dam in the Neches River; a gated salt water barrier consisting of five 56 feet by 24.5 feet tainter gates; a gated navigation bypass channel with a clear opening of 56 feet and a depth of 16 feet; an access road and levee; and an au'xiliary dam across a canal which drains an adjacent bayou. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $1,655,000. Preconstruction planning was initiated in 1978. The Phase I General Design Memorandum was completed in 1982. Fiscal year costs were $186,443. Clear Creek, Texas - The project will provide for enlargement and rectification of the existing Clear Creek channel from the upper end of Clear Lake at Mile 3.8 to improved channel Mile 26.05, a distance of approximately 22 miles; and an additional outlet with a gated structure from Clear Lake to Galveston Bay. A number of bridges, pipelines and other structures which now obstruct flood flows will require relocation or alteration. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $2,830,000. Preconstruction planning was initiated in 1972. The" Combined General Design Memorandum and the Final Environmental Impact Statement were completed in 1982. Total costs during fiscal year were $217,092. 29. PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Upper White Oak Bayou and Tributaries, vicinity of Houston, Texas - The project will provide for channel improvements on White Oak Bayou from Mile 10.7 to Mile 19.9; on Cole Creek from Mile 0 to Mile 4.9; and on Vogel Creek from Mile 0 to Mile 4.5, for a total of 18.6 miles. Project also provides for flood plain zoning and regulation on the residual 100-year flood plains on White Oak Bayou from Mile 19.9 to near Mile 25.5; on Cole Creek from Mile 4.9 to near Mile 6.9; and on Vogel Creek from Mile 4.5 to near Mile 6.5; and includes recreational development along White Oak Bayou from near Mile 14.6 to near Mile 18.3. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $3,225,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in 1982. Total costs during fiscal year were $306,341. 30. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management and technical services were performed at a cost of $79,497 and $81,335, respectively. Hydrologic studies cost $4,054. 15-13 TABLE 15-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 1. Aquatic Plant Control (Southwestern Division) 1965 Act 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX 3. Cedar Bayou, TX 4. Clear Creek and Clear Lake, TX 5. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 6. Double Bayou, TX 7. Freeport Harbor, TX 8. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 86,000 59,793 504,950 884,900 445,589 944,261 4,391,000 3,970,800 4,382,009 3,979,481 5,154 5,154 10,000 60,000 15,705 97,972 - (-)3,877 - (-)3,877 1,017,1001 1,014,134 11,857,5022 3 11,857,5022 3 2,017,038 1,518,000 29,720,385 2,013,558 1,510,837 29,708,586 - - 2,170,080 - - 2,170,080 - - 681,2634 - - 681,2634 3,000 1,145,000 2,095,6166 2,565 1,080,913 2,031,0946 20,000 19,900 66,934 66,934 537,239 537,139 1,380,000 285,000 1,100,000 2,191,491 43,872,3596 1,521,314 271,749 1,099,502 1,441,665 43,103,6416 3,316,000 7,658,074 9,084,000 7,300,000 67,212,7287 1,957,255 8,400,775 9,666,964 7,372,185 67,187,3677 S- - - 3,576,684 S- - - 3,576,684 90,000 86,437 - (-)127,433 - (-)152,346 18,750 357,000 18,537 350,279 85,000 25,000 39,710 44,816 - 1,492,088 6,735 1,473,910 - 226,558 - 226,558 - 1,094,9788 6,413 1,094,4578 - 2,767,1529 19,853 2,757,7759 581,000 4,258,500 2,528,000 2,080,000 29,562,26510 379,065 4,451,698 2,539,513 2,070,483 29,552,24510 S- - - 8,935 - - - 8,935" - - - 29,096,39211 - - - 29,096,39211 7,346,206 4,141,100 695,000 6,165,000 59,068,00312 7,304,349 3,407,144 921,444 6,708,009 59,061,56312 15-14 125,000 14 143,181 14 GALVESTON TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 15-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding Major rehab. Approp. Cost 9. Gulf Intracoastal New Work: Waterway between Approp. Apalachee Bay, FL Cost and the Mexican Maint. Border Approp. (Galveston Dist.) Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost 10. Houston Ship New Work: Channel, TX Approp. (Regular Funds) Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 11. Matagorda Ship New Work: Channel, TX Approp. (Regular Funds) Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 12. Sabine-Neches New Work: Waterway, TX Approp. (Regular Funds) Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 13. Texas City Channel, New Work: TX Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost 14. Trinity River and New Work: Tributaries, TX Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 17. Corpus Christi Beach, New Work: TX (Restoration Project) Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost 18. Buffalo Bayou and New Work: Tributaries, TX Approp. Cost FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 547,050 468,261 8,567,900 7,954,204 3,860,000 2,917,824 2,367,000 1,838,831 7,466,000 7,390,897 275,000 36,051 1,384,000 1,339,545 630,000 390,980 17,157 17,058 4,117 23,345 4,117 315,000 294,851 2,103,500 2,156,246 7,522,800 7,444,379 3,683,747 3,970,774 3,336,300 3,853,102 635,625 735,933 111,100 382,394 293,000 336,870 284,297 386,550 385,934 4,648 4,648 150,000 177,806 1,530,000 1,327,915 13,853,956 14,378,786 6,701,900 7,335,604 4,465,000 2,282,888 8,590,000 8,326,011 6,875,000 6,313,649 1,834,000 1,182,621 210,000 185,244 95,460 88,068 2,921 2,921 200,000 203,409 - 7,969,329 - 7,969,329 (-)1,491 49,988,303'3 125,098 49,885,88613 12,081,000 143,956,43014 9,693,675 141,310,01414 - 434,638 - 434,638 - 835,873 - 835,873 - 35,760,38215 - 35,760,38215 1,150,000 77,374,14316 1,100,243 77,287,62516 - 18,058,77717 - 18,058,77717 1,770,000 28,502,243 3,958,543 28,497,302 - 56,136,81518 - 56,136,81518 5,873,000 101,032,22019 6,191,822 101,015,93219 282,000 13,325,47220 843,251 13,317,73920 3,260,000 17,315,66121 3,867,333 17,271,03021 - 726,158 - 726,158 255,000 27,899,67622 212,946 27,825,67322 903,000 6,837,30323 902,018 6,828,14523 - 1,555,641 - 1,555,030 - 1,573,345 - 1,555,031 - 57,206,32424 - 57,206,32424 15-15 TABLE 15-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 19. Freeport and Vicinity, TX Hurricane Flood Protection (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 20. Highland Bayou, TX 21. Port Arthur and Vicinity, TX Hurricane Flood Protection (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 22. Taylors Bayou, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 23. Texas City and Vicinity, TX Hurricane- Flood Protection (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 24. Vince and Little Vince Bayous, TX Recreation Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 1,100,000 2,225 66 22 (-)610,000 (-)785,000 - 2,326 115,600 413 127,600 11,248 716,000 433,700 981,000 1,461,000 11,121,513 643,150 483,948 907,545 1,304,922 10,838,714 ,300,000 825,000 50,000 - 12,475,000 ,199,598 851,116 388,262 17,137 12,474,964 ,525,000 1,458,000 180,000 - 29,310,042 ,471,688 1,823,689 268,718. 13,912 29,274,039 875,000 600,000 1,040,160 391,679 79,052 - 9,045,00026 4,080 8,690,784w 525,000 460,000 3,300,000 703,877 11,838,390 224,482 819,590 3,304,700 637,183 11,757,077 4,830,000 985,000 2,230,000 1,600,000 59,978,509 3,991,728 1,847,566 1,645,839 1,937,833 59,531,317 1,150,000 999,300 100,000 50,389 - 450,000 430,000 467,340 494,712 668,456 11,500 215,000 1,175,000 93,786 210,011 400,587 - - 400,000 - - 55,872 16,061,97526 16,038,80826 2,843,198 2,060,126 400,000 55,872 1,305,000 2,050,000 4,183,000 2,960,000 34,690,400 1,226,295 2,094,828 4,073,009 1,703,584 33,251,922 600,000 400,000 1,250,000 700,000 12,235,10027 432,810 (-)53,782 1,620,725 729,981 12,003,05527 1,305,000 712,000 117,000 450,000 6,868,100 1,429,401 1,005,641 143,669 274,907 6,688,176 'Excludes $243,266 credit for contributed work. 2Includes $675,855 for previous projects. 3In addition, $1,806,619 expended from contributed funds, of which $123,361 was for previous projects 4Includes $39,087 for previous projects. In addition, $25,000 expended from contributed funds. 5Includes $69,784 for previous projects. 6Includes $1,372,534 for previous projects. Includes $456,515 for Sec. 107 project for Port Aransas Breakwaters. In addition $768 expended from contributed funds for Port Aransas Breakwaters. 7Includes $62,452 for previous projects. In addition, $434,611 expended from contributed funds. 8In addition $5,211 expended from contributed funds. 9Includes $147,098 for previous projects. In addition, $758,303 expended from contributed funds. 10In addition, $229,311 expended from contributed funds. 1Includes $8,421,996 for previous projects. In addition, $3,648,932 expended from contributed funds. 12Includes $86,126 for previous projects. In addition, $1,959,849 expended from contributed funds. 13Includes $706,709 for previous projects. Includes Sec. 107 projects for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin ($46,559); Port Isabel Side Channel ($8,414); Offatts Bayou ($356,466); and Channel to Aransas Pass ($658,573). In addition contributed funds expended for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin ($46,559); Offatts Bayou ($49,665); Channel to Aransas Pass ($347,950); and Chocolate Bayou ($658,310). 14Includes $1,526,564 for previous projects. In addition, $22,672 expended from contributed funds. 15-16 -- GALVESTON TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 15-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 15Includes $4,105,157 for previous projects. In addition, $2,591,939 expended from contributed funds, of which $1,209,179 was for previous projects. 16Includes $1,213,142 for previous projects. In addition, $363,360 expended from contributed funds, of which $200,000 was for previous projects. '7In addition $12,259,619 expended from contributed funds and $182,800 for contributed lands. 18Includes $5,180,832 for previous projects. In addition, $2,680,942 expended from contributed funds, of which $577,507 was for previous projects. g9 Includes $2,379,677 for previous projects. In addition, $1,762,511 expended from contributed funds. 20Includes $366,823 for previous projects. In addition, $1,023,819 expended from contributed funds, of which $99,000 was for mitigation measures. 21Includes $195,083 for previous projects. 22Includes $1,966,306 for previous projects. In addition, $66,000 expended from contributed funds. 23Includes $543,662 for previous projects. 24 Includes $4,400,000 of advanced funds repaid to Harris County Flood Control District. In addition, $63,661 contributed funds expended for Brays Bayou and $12 900 Federal funds and $19,104 contributed funds expended for enlargement of Clodine Ditch. 25Excludes $1,126,905 estimated value of contributed lands and $2,726,446 for relocations. 26 Excludes $3,402,588 estimated value of contributed lands, $6,168,360 for relocations, and $217,000 credit given local sponsor for work-in-kind. 2 7 Excludes $1,349,069 estimated value of contributed lands and $1,070,959 credit given local sponsor for workin- kind. 15-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. Oct. 27, 1965 2. Jul. 3, 1930 May 24, 1934 (PWA) Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 3. Jul. 3, 1930 4. Jun. 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 5. Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Provides for control of progressive eradication of aquatic plant growth from the navigable waters and streams in the U.S. BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX Jetties and jetty channel, inside channels and basins. Local cooperation requirement modified to provide contribution of funds to cover cost of original dredging of all inside channels and basins. Deepen jetty channel to 31 feet and inner channels and Brownsville and Port Isabel turning basins to 28 feet. Enlarge Port Isabel turning basin. Deepen entrance channel to 35 feet; deepen to 33 feet channel across Laguna Madre; deepen to 32 feet channels from Laguna Madre to turning basins at Brownsville and Port Isabel; widen turning basins; and dredging present shallow-draft channel south of Port Isabel from railroad bridge to Laguna Madre and connecting channel to Port Isabel turning basin. Additional connecting channel between Port Isabel and Brownsville channels; and transfer shallow-draft channels at Port Isabel to GIWW. Deepen to 38 feet in outer bar channels and 36 feet in all other authorized channels and basins; extend existing turning basins at Brownsville and Port Isabel; and construct small-boat basin with a connecting channel next to Brownsville ship channel. Widen Brownsville Channel to 300 feet at a depth of 36 feet from former Goose Island passing basin to turning basin extension, thence at a width of 500 feet and same depth to turning basin proper, deepen to 36 feet in area in southeast corner of turning basin, maintain two existing basins of fishing harbor, and a connecting channel, and construct a third basin, with necessary connecting channel and extend Brazos Island Harbor north jetty seaward 1,000 feet.27 CEDAR BAYOU, TX Channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Houston Ship Channel to a point on bayou 11 miles above mouth. CLEAR CREEK AND CLEAR LAKE, TX A channel 4 feet deep and 50 feet wide. Enlargement of channel to 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide. Realinement, enlargement, and extension of channel to highway bridge near League City. CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX Acquisition of old curved portion of north jetty previously constructed by private parties. Complete north jetty in accordance with builder's plans. Complete north jetty in accordance with builder's plans. Connect old curve to St. Joseph Island, and construct south jetty. Dredge roadstead in Harbor Island Basin to 20 feet deep and construct 10,000 linear feet of stone dike on St. Joseph Island. H. Doc 251, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 71st Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and 'Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 32 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 347, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 627, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 192, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 428, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess.x S. Doc 107, 71st Cong., 2nd Sess. 1 H. Doc. 449, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 264, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 319, 77th Cong., 1st Sess.' Specified in Act. Specified in Acts. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1094, 61st Cong., 3rd Sess. 15-18 GALVESTON TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 4, 19132 Sep. 23, 1922 Jul. 3, 1930s Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19354 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 19546 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Channel between jetties and Harbor Island Basin to 25 feet deep, extend jetties seaward, extend dike on St. Joseph Island 9,100 feet, and dredge approach channel 12 feet deep to town of Port Aransas. Dredging channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi, 25 feet deep, 200 feet bottom width. Deepen entrance channel from gulf to Harbor Island and provide an inner basin at Harbor Island of reduced area but greater depth. Channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi Channel with depth 30 feet. Enlarge all channels from gulf to western end of basin dredged by Humble Oil and Refining Co., at its docks on Harbor Island. Maintain channel and maneuvering basin between breakwater and western shoreline of Corpus Christi Bay. Maintain 30-foot depth of approach channel, turning basin at Corpus Christi, Industrial Canal and turning basin at Avery Point. Maintain and deepen to 32 feet channel from deep water at Port Aransas to and including turning basin at Corpus Christi. Extend main turning basin at Corpus Christi westward 2,500 feet at its present width and depth, deepen existing Industrial Canal and turning basin to 32 feet and extend this canal at a depth of 32 feet and general width of 150 feet, westward along Nueces Bay shore to a turning basin 32 feet by 900 feet, and 1,000 feet long near Tule Lake. Provide depth of 34 feet in all project channels and basins from Port Aransas to and including Tule Lake turning basin, for a width of 250 feet from Port Aransas to breakwater at Corpus Christi, for a width of 200 feet in Industrial Canal and in channel between Avery Point and Tule Lake turning basins, and widen Avery Point turning basin to 1,000 feet. Deepen entrance channel to 38 feet from gulf to outer end of jetty; 38 feet decreasing to 36 feet thence to station 90 north jetty; and 36 feet in all other deep water channels and basins except 2,000-foot undredged part of inner basin at Harbor Island, and a width of 400 feet in channel from Port Aransas to Maneuvering basin at Corpus Christi. An anchorage basin 12 feet deep, from 300 to 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long in Turtle Cove at Port Aransas, Texas. Branch channel 32 feet by 150 feet, extending northerly from main channel in vicinity of Port Ingleside, along north shore of Corpus Christi Bay to Reynolds Metals Co. plant and turning basin 32 feet deep and 800 feet square near plant in general vicinity of LaQuinta, Texas. An entrance channel 36 by 400 feet on a tangent alignment from 400-foot channel in Corpus Christi Bay, near Corpus Christi breakwater, to flared approach channel to Corpus Christi turning basin. Deepen and widen LaQuinta Channel to 36 by 200 feet; enlarge LaQuinta turning basin to 36 by 800 by 1,000 feet; a flared entrance to channel; and widening at curves. Deepen entrance channel to 42 feet from gulf to outer end of jetty; 40 feet in all other deep-water channels and basins except undredged northward extension to inner basin at Harbor Island and branch channel to LaQuinta; H. Doc. 1125, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 321, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 214, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Does. 35, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess., and 40, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. ljoc. 130, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 63, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 574, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 544, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 560, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 654, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 89, 83rd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 487, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 33, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. 15-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended by Dec. 31, 1970) Aug. 13, 1968 Oct. 22, 1976 6. Mar. 3, 1899 Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended by Oct. 25, 1965) 7. Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Mar. 4, 1913 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 19256 Jlil. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19357 Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 Jul. 3, 1958 and widen Industrial Canal to 400 feet with flared entrances to Corpus Christi and Avery Point turning basins. Channel 40 by 200 feet extending 2.2 miles from Tule Lake turning basin to a turning basin 40 feet deep, 700 to 900 feet wide, 1,000 feet long at Viola, Texas. Depth of 12 feet and a width of 100 feet in locally dredged Jewel Fulton Canal from LaQuinta Channel to a turning basin 12 by 200 by 400 feet, and assumption of maintenance by United States. Construction of a breakwater at entrance to harbor area at Port Aransas, and realignment of existing 12-foot by 100-foot project channel. Provides for a project depth of 45 feet in the existing deep-draft channels and basins, for construction of a new deep-draft turning point, for construction of a deepdraft mooring area and mooring facilities and for widening of the channels and basins at certain locations. The Act also deauthorized the undredged northward extension of Inner Basin at Harbor Island and the undredged west turnout (Wye connection) between the LaQuinta Channel and the main channel of the waterway. Modified local cooperation requirements for 1968 Act. Shifted responsibility for cost of disposal areas and confinement works from sponsor to joint 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal responsibility. DOUBLE BAYOU, TX A channel 6-foot deep and 100-feet wide through the bar at mouth of Double Bayou. 7-foot by 125-foot channel from the 7-foot depth in Trinity Bay to the intersection of Double Bayou Channel with the channel to Liberty; and thence a 7- by 100-foot channel upstream for 2.0 miles. FREEPORT HARBOR, TX Dredging and other work necessary in judgment of Secretary of War for improving harbor; for taking over jetties and privately built works at mouth of river. Examination authorized. Work later confined to maintenance" of jetties. Repairs to jetties and dredging. Construct seagoing hopper dredge. Purchase of one 15-inch pipeline dredge and equipment, its operation of 3 years, operation of seagoing dredge one-half time for 3 years, and repairs to jetties. Diversion dam, diversion channel, and necessary auxiliary works. Maintenance of diversion channel at expense of local interest. Deepening channels and basins. Maintenance of present project dimensions of channels and basins at Federal expense. Deepen outer bar channel to 38 feet from gulf to a point within jetties, thence 36 feet in authorized channels to and including upper turning basin. Relocate outer bar channel on straight alignment with jetty channel and maintain Brazos Harbor entrance channel and turning basin (constructed by local interests). H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 S. Doc. 99, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess.' Sec. 124, PL 94-587 H. Doc. 387, 55th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 Specified in Act. H. Doc. 1087, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 68th Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 18, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Docs. 15, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess., and 29, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 195, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 433, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. 15-20 GALVESTON TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 5, 1961 Dec. 31, 1970 8. Aug. 5, 1886 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 19109 Jul. 27, 1916 Jul. 18, 1918 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Apr. 4, 1938 Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Jul. 3, 1958 Modification of HD 1469. Revoking certain provisions of local cooperation. Relocation of entrance channel and deepen to 47 feet; enlargement to a depth of 45 feet and relocation of jetty channel and inside main channel; deepening to 45 feet of channel to Brazosport; enlargement of the widened area of Quintana Point to provide a depth of 45 feet with a 750-foot diameter turning area; Brazosport turning basin to 45 feet deep with a 1,000 foot turning area; a new turning basin with a 1,200 foot diameter turning area and 45 feet deep; deepening Brazosport channel to 36 by 750 feet diameter; flared approaches from Brazos Harbor Channel; relocation of north jetty and rehabilitation of south jetty. GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX Construct 2 rubblestone jetties at entrance to Galveston Harbor. A channel 1,200 by 30 feet from Bolivar Roads (outer end of old inner bar near Fort Point) at 51st Street.8 Purchase or construct hydraulic pipeline dredge. Extension of jetties to present project length and construction and operation of a dredge. Extension of Galveston Channel from 51st to 57th Sts., with depth of 30 feet and width of 700 feet. Conditional extension of Galveston Channel between 51st and 57th Sts., 30 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide. Extend seawall at Galveston from angle at 6th St. and Broadway to vicinity of Fort San Jacinto. Deepen harbor channel to 35 feet and widen to 800 feet. Further extension of seawall at Galveston to a junction with south jetty; and repairing seawall in front of Fort Crockett reservation. Deepen Galveston Channel to 32 feet; and maintain Galveston Harbor channels to dimensions of 800 feet wide, 35 feet deep on outer bar and 34 feet deep on inner bar.10 Maintain State Highway Ferry Landing Channels to dimensions of 12 by 100 feet. Construct 13 groins along gulf shore from 12th to 61st Sts. in city of Galveston at a limited cost of $234,000 (10 groins constructed). Deepen Galveston Channel to 34 feet (Bolivar Roads to 43rd St.). Deepen Galveston entrance channel to 36 feet. Completion of project for construction of 13 groins. Deepen Galveston Harbor to 38 feet from gulf to a point 2 miles west of seaward end of north jetty; thence 36 feet to Bolivar Roads; revoking authority for maintenance of ferry channels; and Galveston channel to 36 feet deep from Bolivar Roads to 43rd Street. Construct extension of Galveston Seawall from 61st Street, southwesterly 16,300 feet along gulf shore. Deepen Galveston Harbor to 42 feet from gulf to point 2 miles west of seaward end of north jetty and 40 feet thence to Bolivar Roads. PL 394, 87th Cong. H. Doc. 289, 93rd Cong., 2nd Sess.1 H. Doc. 85, 49th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report, 1886, p. 1311. H. Doc. 264, 56th Cong., 2nd Sess. Specified in Act. H. Doc. 340, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 768, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 328, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1390, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 758, 65th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 693, 66th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 307, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 31, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 400, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 61, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 57, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. PL 463, 75th Cong. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 173, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 350, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. 15-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun. 23, 1971 (House Res.) Nov. 18 1971 (Sen. Res.) 9. Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 193813 Jun. 20, 1938 Jun. 20, 1938 Jun. 20, 1938 Jun. 20, 1938 Mar. 23, 1939 Jul. 23, 1942 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 19459 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2. 194514 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Jul. 12, 1952 Sep. 3, 195415 Deepen Galveston Channel to 40 feet from Bolivar Roads to 43rd Street. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL AND MEXICAN BORDER 12 Channel 4 by 100 feet from West Galveston Bay across Chocolate Bay to 4 feet of water in Chocolate Bay. Channel 9 by 100 feet, Sabine River to Galveston Bay, and a 20-inch pipeline dredge. Such passing places, widening at bends, locks or guard locks and railway bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary. Channel 9 by 100 feet, Galveston Bay to Corpus Christi. Maintenance of a flood-discharge channel in Colorado River. Channel 9 by 100 feet in San Bernard River, Texas. Channel in Colorado River, 9 by 100 feet, with basin. Channel 9 by 100 feet from Palacios through Trepalacios and Matagorda Bays. Channel 9 by 200 feet from main channel to harbor at Rockport and improve harbor to 9-foot depth. Channel 6 by 100 feet from main channel to Aransas Pass, Texas. Enlarge waterway to depth of 12 feet and a width of 125 feet from Sabine River to Corpus Christi. Enlarge waterway from Corpus Christi to vicinity of Mexican border to provide a depth of 12 feet and width of 125 feet throughout. Channel 6 by 60 feet from GIWW to a point in Chocolate Bayou near Liverpool. Channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from main channel near Port O'Connor, Texas, into Barroom Bay. Enlarge channel from main channel to Aransas Pass, Texas, providing a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet. Channel 12 by 125 feet from main channel to Red Fish Landing, Texas, with basin. Channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide from main channel to vicinity of Harlingen, Texas, via Arroyo Colorado with basin. Fill a portion of shallow-draft channel adjacent to Port Isabel Turning Basin, construct a channel to connect shallow-draft channel with main channel near shoreline of Laguna Madre, and enlarge shallow-draft channel west of this connection, all to 12-foot depth and bottom width of 125 feet. Reroute main channel to north shore of Red Fish Bay between Aransas Bay and Corpus Christi Bay; deepen tributary channel from Port Aransas to Aransas Pass, Texas, 12 feet and extended basin at same depth. Deauthorized 6 by 60 foot channel in Chocolate Bayou and reauthorized the 4 by 100-foot channel. Alternate channel across South Galveston Bay between Port Bolivar and Galveston causeway. "Red Fish Landing" changed to "Port Mansfield, Texas." Incorporate as part of Intracoastal Waterway a channel 9 by 100 feet from main channel via Seadrift to point on Guadalupe River 3 miles above Victoria, Texas, authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1945. Small craft harbor 9 by 200 by 1,000 feet at Seadrift with an entrance channel 9 by 100 feet. H. Doc. 121, 92nd Cong., 1st Sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) H. Doc. 445, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Committee print, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 640, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 642, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 564, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 641, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 643, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 230, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. PL 675, 77th Cong. H. Doc. 337, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 428, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 383, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 248, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 402, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. (See Public Law 14, 79th Cong.) H. Doc. 627, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 700, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 768, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 196, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. PL 516, 81st Cong. PL 527, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 478, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. 15-22 GALVESTON TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 9, 1959 Jul. 14, 1960 Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Oct. 23, 196216 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 196517 Aug. 13, 1968 Widen tributary channel between Port Aransas and Aransas Pass, Texas, to 125 feet; straighten and widen to 125 feet connecting channel to Conn Brown Harbor, and maintain Conn Brown Harbor at Federal expense, all to 12 feet deep. Improve channels and basins comprising channel to Port Mansfield constructed in part by Federal Government and in part by local interest; constructing turnout curves at Gulf Intracoastal Waterway intersection and bend easing at entrance to turning basin; construct parallel jetties at gulf entrance; maintenance of locally dredged jetty channel 16 by 250 feet; and maintenance of small craft basin. Entrance channel 7 feet deep by 75 feet wide from main channel to Gulf of Mexico to inside shoreline at Port Isabel, Texas, an inner channel 6 feet deep by 50 feet wide from entrance channel to East Harbor Basin, and an irregular-shaped harbor basin 6 feet deep having a surface area of about 7 acres. Deepen the existing 6-foot channel at Port Isabel to 12 feet and removing the submerged bars at each end of the island to a depth of -12 feet MLT. Deepening the existing channel to 12 by 125 feet, and extend southeasterly from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway main channel in West Galveston Bay, into Offatts Bayou, a distance of 2.2 miles, and a west turnout 12 by 125 feet between the proposed Offatts Bayou Channel and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Deepening Aransas Pass tributary channel to 14 feet from mile 0 at Harbor Island to mile 6.1 at the city of Aransas Pass; widening to 175 feet between miles 3.5 and 4.6; and deepening Conn Brown Harbor, turning basin and connecting channel between Conn Brown Harbor and turning basin. Improve main channel 16 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel; with two relocations; relocate main channel in Matagorda Bay and Corpus Christi Bay; and maintaining existing Lydia Ann Channel. Deepen and widen channel to Palacios; construct two protective breakwaters; maintain and deepen existing basins; and deepen, enlarge and maintain existing approach channel to basin No. 2. Eliminates requirement of local interest to construct bridge at mile 29.2 turning basin at Victoria, and maintain turning basins at Victoria and Seadrift; provide: Federal construction of vertical-lift railroad bridge at Missouri- Pacific Railroad mainline crossing, mile 29.2; construction and future maintenance of basin near Victoria, Texas, and maintenance of basin constructed by local interests at Seadrift, Texas. Modify existing Federal navigation project to provide a channel extending from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Chocolate Bay and Chocolate Bayou to project channel mile 8.2, thence to a turning basin near channel mile 13.2 and for salt water barrier in Chocolate Bayou about 3.7 miles upstream from basin (channel mile 16.9). Entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide at the mouth of Colorado River Channel protected by an east jetty 3,500 feet long extending to 12-foot depth and a west jetty 2,900 feet long extending to 5-foot contour; make channel 12 feet by 100 feet from gulf shore to Matagorda, including recreation facility, a turning basin 12 feet by 300 feet wide and 1,450 feet long, and a new diversion channel 250 feet wide and varying in depth from 20 to 23 feet including a closure dam across the present river channel. 15-23 H. Doc. 376, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 11, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 107, PL 645, 86th Cong. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 Sec. 107, PL 86-645 Sec. 107, PL 86-645 H. Doc. 556, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 504, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 288, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 217, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 102, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 10. Mar. 5, 1905 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 3, 195820 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 1965 11. Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 12. Jul. 25, 1912 HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX Easing or cutting off sharp bends and construction of a pile dike.s8 A channel 30 feet deep, widen bend at Manchester and enlarge turning basin. A light-draft extension of channel to mouth of White Oak Bayou. 19 Widen channel through Morgan Point and to a point 4,000 feet above Baytown and widen certain bends. Deepen to 32 feet in main channel and turning basin, and a 400-foot width through Galveston Bay. Deepen to 34 feet in main channel and widen from Morgan Point to turning basin. Branch channel 10 by 60 feet behind Brady Island. Widen channel from Morgan Point to lower end of Fidelity Island with turning points at mouth of Hunting Bayou and lower end of Brady Island. Widen channel from lower end of Fidelity Island to Houston turning basin and dredge off-channel silting basins. Deepen to 36 feet from Bolivar Roads to and including main turning basin at Houston, Texas, including turning points at Hunting Bayou and Brady Island. Deepen to 40 feet from Bolivar Roads to Brady Island, construct Clinton Island turning basin, a channel 8 by 125 feet at Five Mile Cut, and improve shallow-draft channel at Turkey Bend. Barbour Terminal at Morgan Point. Restoring existing locally dredged channel from mile 0 to 0.34 to 36 feet deep and dredging a 15-12 ft. channel from mile 0.34 to 2.81, in Greens Bayou.21 MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX Channel to Port Lavaca, Texas 7 feet deep and 89 feet bottom width. Extend 7-foot channel to shoreline of Lavaca Bay at mouth of Lynns Bayou. Deepen and widen channel to present project dimensions. Extend channel 6 by 100 feet from Port Lavaca via Lavaca Bay, Lavaca and Navidad Rivers to Red Bluff, a distance of 20 miles. A harbor of refuge 9 feet deep near Port Lavaca and an approach channel 100 feet wide and equal depth. Deepen to 12 feet and widen to 125 feet Port Lavaca Channel and approach channel to harbor of refuge; deepen to 12feet Port Lavaca turning basin and basins at harbor of refuge. An entrance channel 38 by 300 feet, a channel 36 by 200 feet, 22 miles long across Matagorda and Lavaca Bays to Point Comfort, Texas, a turning basin 36 feet deep and 1,000 feet square at Point Comfort, and dual jetties at entrance from gulf. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX Existing project dimensions of jetties, a 26-foot channel through Sabine Pass, Port Arthur Canal and Port Arthur turning basin; and a 26-foot turning basin at Port Arthur. A depth of 25-feet in Sabine-Neches Canal, Neches River to Beaumont and Sabine River to Orange, including cutoffs and widening channels. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 35, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1632, 65th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 93, 67th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 13, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 58, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 226, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 256, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 737, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 350, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess.' Sec. 107, PL 86-645 R. Doc. 257, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 1082, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 37, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 314, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 731, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 131, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 388, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 773, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. 15-24 GALVESTON TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Sep. 22, 1922 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 193822 Oct. 17, 1940 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, Jul. 24, 1945 194623 Jul. 24, 194624 Deepen channels to 30 feet from gulf to Beaumont, with increased widths and an anchorage basin in Sabine Pass. Deepen Port Arthur east and west turning basins and approach channel to 30 feet. Take over and deepen to 30 feet channel connecting west turning basin with Taylors Bayou turning basin. For a 30-foot depth in channel from mouth of Neches River to cutoff in Sabine River near Orange. Removal of guard lock in Sabine-Neches Canal. Widen Sabine Pass and jetty channel, Port Arthur Canal, and Sabine-Neches Canal. For dredging 2 passing places in Sabine-Neches Canal, easing of bends, removal and reconstructing Port Arthur field office, extending Beaumont turning basin upstream 200 feet above new city wharves, and an anchorage basin ip Sabine Pass. A depth of 32 feet in channels from gulf to Beaumont turning basin, including all turning basins at Port Arthur. Deepen channels to 34 feet with increased widths from gulf to Beaumont turning basin. Construct suitable permanent protective works along Sabine Lake. Maintain Taylors Bayou turning basin. Maintain channel from Sabine River to Orange Municipal wharf. Dredging 500 feet from eastern end of Harbor Island and abandonment of channel south and west of Harbor Island. Increased widths of channels from gulf to Beaumont turning basin and channel connecting Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin, deepen Beaumont turning basin and Beaumont turning extension to 34 feet; and dredge a new cutoff from Smith's Bluff cutoff to McFadden Bend. Abandon Orange turning basin; dredge a channel 25 by 150 feet, suitably widened on bends to highway bridge, and dredge a cutoff channel opposite Orange. Extend Beaumont turning basin upstream 300 feet. Widen Port Arthur west turning basin to 600 feet. Dredge a channel from Beaumont turning basin to vicinity of Pennsylvania Shipyard. Deepen Sabine Pass outer bar channel to 37 feet, Sabine Pass jetty channel to 36 feet at inner end, deepen to 36 feet Sabine Pass Channel, Port Arthur Canal, Port Arthur east and west turning basins, Taylors Bayou turning basin and channel from Port Arthur west turning basin to Taylors Bayou turning basin, deepen to 36 feet and widen to 400 feet Sabine-Neches Canal from Port Arthur Canal to mouth of Neches River except through Port Arthur Bridge; deepen Neches River channel from mouth to Beaumont turning basin to 36 feet widening to 350 feet from Smith's Bluff to Beaumont turning basin; deepen junction area on Neches River at Beaumont turning basin to 36 feet; and widen Sabine-Neches Canal between Neches and Sabine Rivers to 150 feet. Improve Cow Bayou, Texas, by construction of a channel 100 feet wide and 13 feet deep extending from navigation channel in Sabine River to a point 0.5 mile above county bridge at Orangefield, Texas, with a turning basin. H. Doc. 975, 66th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc. 152, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 234, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 287, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 27, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 581, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc. 14, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 685, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc. 60, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 158, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 571, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 702, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. 15-25 i REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 195425 Oct. 23, 196226 13. Mar. 4, 1913 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun 30, 1948 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 12, 1972 (Sen. Res.) Oct. 12, 1972 (House Res.) 14. Mar. 3, 1905 Improve Adams Bayou, Texas, to provide a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from 12-foot depth in Sabine River to first county highway bridge across bayou. Deepen to 36 feet and widen to 400 feet the Sabine- Neches Canal near Port Arthur bridge; reconstruct Port Arthur Bridge and relocate Port Arthur field office. Rectification of certain reaches of existing Sabine Pass Channel, Sabine-Neches Canal, and Neches River and Sabine River Channel; widen to 350 feet entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basins; widen curve at junction of Port Arthur and Sabine-Neches Canals; relocate and enlarge Sabine Pass anchorage basin to 34 by 1,500 by 3,000 feet; widen to 200 feet Sabine-Neches Canal from mouth of Neches River to mouth of Sabine River and Sabine River Channel to upper end of existing project at Orange, except for channel around Harbor Island at Orange; deepen to 30 feet Sabine River Channel from cutoff near Orange municipal slip to upper end of project, except around Harbor Islane; and enlarge area at entrance to Orange municipal slip to provide a maneuvering basin. Improve outer bar channel to 42 and 40 feet for all inland channels to Port Arthur and Beaumont; width of 500 feet in Port Arthur Canal and 400 feet in Neches River Channel to Beaumont with three turning points in Neches River; a channel, 12 by 125 feet, extending in Sabine River to Echo; and replace an obstructive bridge at Port Arthur, Texas. Deauthorization of uncompleted portion of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin and enlargement of entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basins. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX A channel 300 by 30 feet and construct a pile dike 28,200 feet long north to channel. A harbor 800 by 30 feet at Texas City, and construct a rubblemound dike. Extension of rubblemound dike to shoreline. Deepen channel and harbor to 32 feet. Deepen channel and harbor to 34 feet. Extend harbor 1,000 feet southward, 800 by 34 feet. Deepen channel and harbor to 36 feet, widen channel to 400 feet and harbor to 1,000 feet and changing name of project to "TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TEXAS." Deepen channel and turning basin to 40 feet and construct 16-foot Industrial Barge Canal. Widen the existing main turning basin to 1,200 feet including relocation of the basin 85 feet to the east; providing a 40-foot deep channel in the Industrial Canal at widths of 300-400 feet, with a turning basin at the head of the canal 40 feet deep, 1,150 feet long, and 1,000 feet wide, and easing of the bend at the entrance to the canal, and desuthorization of shallow-draft Industrial Barge Canal not incorporated in the plan of improvement above. TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Anahuac Channel. H. Doc. 626, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 174, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 80, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 553, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 1390, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 107, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 46, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 62, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 47, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 427, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 199, 92nd Cong., 2nd Sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) 15-26 GALVESTON TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 25, 1912 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 17. Dec. 15, 1970 (House Res.) Dec. 17, 1970 (Sen. Res.) 18. Jun. 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 19. Oct. 23, 1962 20. Oct. 27, 1965 21. Oct. 23, 1962 22. Oct. 27, 1965 23. Jul. 3, 1958 Six-foot channel to Liberty. Abandon improvements above Liberty and terminate all improvements by lock and dam, leaving a 6-foot channel from Liberty to mouth. Provides for a navigable channel from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston and Trinity Bays to the mouth of Trinity River and 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide in the river section, with a turning basin at Liberty. Modification of the project to provide for a channel 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston Bay extending along the east shore of Trinity Bay to the mouth of the Trinity River at Anahuac, including protective spoil embankment on the bay side of the channel in lieu of the 9 by 200-foot channel in Galveston and Trinity Bays. Provides for the multiple-purpose Wallisville Reservoir, including a navigation lock in the Wallisville Dam at Channel Mile 28.30 and advancement of the Channel to Liberty from one mile below Anahuac (Mile 23.2) to the Texas Gulf Sulphur Company's slip at Channel Mile 35.8, and incorporation into existing project Anahuac Channel and mouth of Trinity River projects. Reevaluation of navigation benefits. CORPUS CHRISTI BEACH, TX (RESTORATION PROJECT) Restoration and periodic nourishment of 1.4 miles of beach. BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Barker & Addicks Reservoirs, Texas. Clearing, straightening, enlarging and lining of Buffalo Bayou, Brays, and White Oak Bayous. Extend upper limits of White Oak Bayou upstream about 2.1 miles from BRI RR bridge to mouth of Cole Creek. FREEPORT AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Improvements to 42.8 miles of existing levees, 2.1 miles of new levees and 2 interior drainage pumping plants. HIGHLAND BAYOU, TX Enlargement and rectification of Highland Bayou Channel, construction of diversion dam, and diversion channel. PORT ARTHUR AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Raising and reconstructing 6.3 miles of existing seawall; constructing 0.3 mile of new seawall, 20.3 miles new levees and five pumping plants; and raising and improving 7.5 miles of existing levees. 28 TAYLORS BAYOU, TX Enlarging and rectifying channels; construction of diversion channel; a salt water gate; enlargement of GIWW 1.3 miles and alteration of State Highway 87 bridge.29 TEXAS CITY AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Construction of improvements for control of storm tides, consisting of new and enlarged levees and floodwalls approximately 14.1 and 2.1 miles in length; related drainage and stoplog structures; a navigation opening and pumping plants. H. Doc. 989, 66th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 634, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 215, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 415, 91st Cong., 2nd Sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) H. Doc. 456, 75th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 250, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 169, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 495, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 168, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 505, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 206, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 347, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess.' 15-27 i i TABLE 15-B REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents VINCE AND LITTLE VINCE BAYOUS, TX 24. Oct. 23, 1962 Enlarging and rectifying channel of Vince Bayou and H. Doc. 441, 87th Cong., Little Vince Bayou upstream for a total of 11.5 miles 2nd Sess.' for both streams. 'Contains latest published maps. 2Extension of north jetty 1,950 feet and south jetty 1,265 feet considered inactive. 3Dredging 2,000 by 650-foot northerly extension of inner basin deauthorized. 4Included in Public Works Administration program Sept. 6, 1933 and Feb. 16, 1935. 5West leg of Wye junction with main channel deauthorized. 6Construction of lock in diversion dam at local expense considered inactive. 7Dredging upper .5 mile of channel to vicinity of Stauffer Chemical plant was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. Included in Public Works Administration program Sept. 6, 1933. 8Dredging 43rd to 51st Streets was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 9Deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. '�Deepening 43rd to 57th Streets was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. "Previously authorized Sept. 6, 1933 by Public Works Administration. 12H.Doc. 230, 76th Cong., 1st sess. and project documents contain latest published maps. 13Dredging upper 3.5 miles was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. "4Dredging upper 5 miles is inactive. '5Inactive. 16Portion of 16-foot by 150-foot channel from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel and relocation of channel in Matagorda Bay are in inactive category. 1 7The 9 feet by 100 feet channel from Mile 8.2 to Mile 13.2 in Chocolate Bayou is inactive. "sConstruction of pile dike was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 19Hill Street Bridge to mouth of White Oak Bayou was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 20Deepening channel to 40 feet from Southern Pacific Slip to Brady Island was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 21The 12-foot channel from mile 1.65 to mile 2.81 is inactive. 22 Complete widening of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin authorized by 1962 R&H Act. 23Complete deepening of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 24Channel extension above Cow Bayou turning basin near Orangefield was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93- 251. 25Widening to 350 feet entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 26The 12-foot channel in Sabine River from Orange to Echo, Texas is inactive. 27Jetty extension inactive. 28Raising and strengthening of levees surrounding Gulf Oil Company's fresh water reservoir is inactive. 29Enlarging 7.0 miles of North Fork Taylors Bayou, 7.8 miles of South Fork Taylors Bayou and 4.4 miles of Mayhaw Bayou-are inactive. 15-28 GALVESTON TEXAS DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS TABLE 15-C For Last Cost To September 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control (1958 and 1962 River and Harbor Acts)6 1967 38,2521 - Bastrop Bayou, TX2 3 1931 9,920 27,129 Brazos River, TX, Velasco to Old Washington 3 1924 216,9895 223,010 Channel to Port Bolivar, TX 1980 133,9254 1,030,6287 Corpus Christi, TX, Channel to Navy Seaplane Base, Encinal Peninsula 6 1968 1,194,344 26,467 Dickinson Bayou, TX6 1954 33,942 57,553 East Bay (Hanna Reef), TX8 1922 2,476 847 Johnson Bayou, LA6 9 1933 2,261 54,042 Little Bay, TX' o 1979 - 252,728 Oyster Creek, TX6 1 1922 6,942 7,556 Sabine River and Tributaries, TX (Echo to Morgan Bluff)3 1971 - - 1Excludes $1,672 work contributions. 2Widening from 60 feet to 100 feet at 4-foot depth was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 3Inactive. 4Includes $48,711 for previous projects. 'Includes $123,676 for previous projects. 6Completed. 7Includes $46,101 for previous projects. 8In inactive category for maintenance. 9Channel adequate for existing commerce. 'oAransas County Navigation District, Rockport, TX, constructed project as authorized by 1950 River and Harbor Act (H.D. 114, 81st Cong., 1st sess.) in 1955 under Department of Army permit. "No commerce reported. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 15-D For Last Cost To September 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Baytown, Texas' 1980 245,400 - Colorado River, Matagorda, Texas2 1963 273,757 - Guadalupe River (Remove Log Jams), Texas2 1978 505,749 Lavaca-Navidad River, Texas: Hallettsville Project 1961 256,043 - General channel project 1952 21,086 - Liberty Local Protection Project, Texas' 1971 98,517 - Mill Creek, Texas' 1952 24,753 - Peyton Creek, Texas' 1975 66,377 - San Diego Creek, Alice, Texas2 1963 135,175 - Tranquitas Creek, Kingsville, Texas2 1956 130,239 - 'Inactive. 2Completed. 15-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECTS TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 TABLE 15-E See Section in Text Project Funds New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Total 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX 3. Cedar Bayou, TX 5. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX 7. Freeport Harbor, TX 8. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX 9. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and the Mexican Border (Galveston District) 10. Houston Ship Channel, TX 12. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX 13. Texas City Channel, TX 14. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Total cost of project Regular Channel Seawall Public works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Contributed Total cost of project $ 8,333,087 2,848,560 1,683,258 12,864,905 642,176 25,000 667,176 41,406,820 324,287 1,474,678 43,205,785 1,716,695 276,720 45,199,200 2,494,102 116,575 758,303 3,368,980 360,249 3,729,229 11,920,187 8,754,209 3,648,932 24,323,328 48,712,700 466,477 1,102,484 50,281,661 395,000 139,776 50,816,437 29,042,293 2,612,932 1,382,760 33,037,985 49,592,331 1,363,652 2,103,435 53,059,418 32,000 116,760 53,208,178 12,814,620 136,296 1,023,819 13,974,735 25,859,367 66,000 25,925,367 $ 29,708,586 29,708,586 1,961,310 1,961,310 67,124,915 434,611 67,559,526 67,559,526 29,552,245 229,311 29,781,556 29,781,556 58,795,929 166,387 13,121 1,959,849 60,935,286 139,783,450 22,672 139,806,122 139,806,122 76,074,483 163,360 76,237,843 98,636,255 1,762,511 100,398,766 100,398,766 17,075,947 17,075,947 6,284,483 6,284,483 $ 2,170,080 2,170,080 3,576,684 3,576,684 3,576,684 8,935 8,935 8,935 7,373,356 595,973 7,969,329 1,270,511 1,270,511 1,270,511 726,158 726,158 $ 40,211,753 2,848,560 1,683,258 44,743,571 2,603,486 25,000 2,628,486 112,108,419 324,287 1,909,289 114,341,995 1,716,695 276,720 116,335,410 32,055,282 116,575 987,614 33,159,471 360,249 33,519,720 78,089,472 9,516,569 13,121 5,608,781 93,227,943 189,766,661 466,477 1,125,156 191,358,294 395,000 139,776 191,893,070 105,116,776 2,612,932 1,546,120 -109,275, 828 148,228,586 1,363,652 3,865,946 153,458,184 32,000 116,760 153,606,944 30,616, 725 136,296 1,023,819 31,776,840 32,143,850 66,000 32,209,850 15-30 TABLE 15-F GALVESTON TEXAS DISTRICT CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Ai See Section in Text Project Section of Waterway 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX 5. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX 7. Freeport Harbor, TX 8. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX Outer Bar and Jetty Channel Padre Island to Long Island Long Island to Goose Island Goose Island to Turning Basin Extension Turning Basin Extension Brownsville Turning Basin Port Isabel Channel via East Turnout West Wye, from Brownsville Channel Port Isabel Turning Basin Fishing Boat Harbor: West Basin Middle Basin East Basin Connecting Channel Entrance Channel Aransas Pass Outer Bar Channel Aransas Pass Jetty Channel Inner Basin at Harbor Island Channel to Port Aransas Port Aransas Turning Basin Anchorage Basin at Port Aransas Inner Basin to Mile 8.5 Mile 8.5 to LaQuinta Junction LaQuinta Junction to Corpus Christi Turning Basin Corpus Christi Turning Basin Industrial Canal Avery Point Turning Basin Channel to Chemical Turning Basin Chemical Turning Basin Tule Lake Channel Tule Lake Turning Basin Viola Channel Viola Turning Basin Channel to LaQuinta LaQuinta Turning Basin Turning Point at LaQuinta Channel Junction Jewell Fulton Canal Jewel Fulton Turning Basin Mooring Area at Ingleside: Mooring Area (a) Mooring Area (b)" Outer Bar Channel Jetty Channel Quintana Turning Basin Channel to Brazosport Turning Basin Brazosport Turning Basin Channel to Upper Turning Basin Upper Turning Basin Channel to Stauffer Chemical Plant Stauffer Turning Basin Brazos Harbor Channel Brazos Harbor Turning Basin Entrance Channel Outer Bar Channel Inner Bar Channel Anchorage Basin Bolivar Roads Channel Galveston Channel: Bolivar Roads Channel To 43rd St. dopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Feet (Below Mean Low Tide) 38-36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 15 15 15 15 15 47 45 45 12 12 12 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 12 12 45 45 47 45 45 45 4 45 45 45 30 30 36 36 42 42 40 36 40 40 Bottom Width (Feet) 300 200 200 300 500 1,000 200 200 1,000 370-305 370-305 370 270 100 700 600-730 730-1,720 100-150 200-4002 300-400 600-500 500 400 800 400 975 400 1,200w 300 1,200 300-350 1,200 300-400 1,200 1,250 a 100 200 150 150 400 400 750 4 400 1,000' 375 1,200 4 200 500 200 750 4 800 800 800 2,8751 800 1,125 15-31 - 3.9 Depth in Feet (Below Mean Low Tide) 38-36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 15 15 15 15 15 47 45 45 12 12 12 45 45 40-45 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 45 45 45 12 12 45 38 36 36 36 36 36 30 25 30 30 42 42 40 36 40 Bottom Width (Feet) 300 200 200 200 500 1,000 200 200 1,000 370-305 370-305 370 265 100 700 600 Irregular 100 2002 300-400 600-500 500 400 1,000 400 1,000 350 1,0506 200 900 200-250 700-900 300-400 1,200 1,250 s 100 200 150 300 200 200-350 744-800 350-375 600 200 500 200 525-675 800 800 800 2,875 800 Length Feet Miles 2.5 2.1 9.6 3.2 1.3 2,670 0.5 1.4 0.8 1,300 0.2 1,470 0.3 1,200 0.2 1,470 0.3 1,230 0.2 770 0.1 1.8 1.0 1,550 - 0.1 200 - 900 0.2 8.5 3.6 8.6 5,423 1.0 1.1 1,150 0.2 0.6 1,690 0.3 3.1 1,000 0.2 1.8 1,000 0.2 5.6 800 0.1 1,250 0.2 - 0.8 400 0.1 - - 0.8- - 3.0 - 0.8 - 1.2 667 0.1 - 1.4 600 0.1 - 1.1 500 0.1 - 0.5 675 0.1 - 4.7 - 1.7 - 3.2 - 1.81 - 1.0 40 1,125 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 15-F (cont) CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions See Depth in Feet Bottom Depth in Feet Bottom Section (Below Mean Width (Below Mean Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Low Tide) (Feet) Low Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 10. Houston Ship Channel, Texas 11. Matagorda Ship Channel, TX 12. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX Bolivar Roads to Morgan Point Morgan Point to Boggy Bayou Boggy Bayou to Greens Bayou Greens Bayou to Sims Bayou Hunting Bayou Turning Point Clinton Island Turning Basin Sims Bayou to Southern Pacific Slip Southern Pacific Slip to Houston Turning Basin Houston Turning Basin Upper Turning Basin Brady Island Channel Barbour Terminal Channel Turning Basin Five-Mile Cut Channel Light-Draft Channel: Upper Turning Basin to ensen Drive Turkey Bend Channel Greens Bayou Channel: Mile 0 to Mile 0.36 Mile 0.36 to Mile 1.57 Outer Bar and Jetty Channel Channel to Point Comfort Approach Channel to Turning asin Turning Basin Channel to Port Lavaca Lynn Bayou Turning Basin Channel to Harbor of Refuge North-South Basin East-West Basin Channel to Red Bluff Sabine Bank Channel Sabine Pass Outer Bar Channel Sabine Pass Jetty Channel Sabine Pass Anchorage Basin Sabine Pass Channel Port Arthur Canal Entrance to Port Arthur Turning Basins Port Arthur East Turning Basin Port Arthur West Turning Basin Channel connecting Port Arthur West Turning Basin and Taylors Bayou Turning Basin Taylors Bayou Turning Basin Sabine-Neches Canal, Port Arthur Canal to Neches River Turning Point at Mile 19.5 Neches River, Mouth to Maneuvering Area at Beaumont Turning Basin Turning Point, Mile 31.1 Turning Point, Mile 36.6 Turning Point, Mile 40.3 Channel Extension, Mile 40.3 Maneuvering Area at Beaumont Turning Basin Beaumont Turning Basin Beaumont Turning Basin Extension Beaumont Turning Basin Extension to End of Project Channel Vicinity Bethlehem Steel Company Sabine-Neches Canal, Neches River to Sabine River 40 400 40 400 40 300 40 300 40 900-1,000* 40 800e 40 300 36 300 36 400-1,000 36 150 10 60 16 100 16 1,100 8 125 10 10 36 15 38 36 36 36 12 12 12 12 12 6 42 42 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 40 34 34 30 30 60 60 175 100 300 300-2006 200-300 1,000 125 27-340 125 300 250 100 800 800 800-500 1,500 500 500 275-678 420 600 200-250 150-1,000 400 900 4 400 1,000 4 1,000 4 1,000 4 350 Irregular 500 350 200 200 40 400 - 40 400 - 40 300 - 40 300 - 40 948-1,000 s 1,375 40 965-1,070a 1,592 40 300 - 36 300 - 36 400-1,000 3,100 36 150 1,000 10 60 - 16 100 - 16 1,100 1,000 8 125 - 10 10 36 15 38 36 36 36 12 12 12 12 12 6 42 42 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 40 34 34 30 30 60 60 175 100 300 300-200 6 200-300 1,000 125 27-340 125 300 250 100 800 800 800-500 1,500 500 500 275-678 370-547 350-550 200-250 90-1,233 400 900 4 400 1,000 1,000 1,300 350 Irregular 160-535 300 200 200 - 4.1 - 0.8 - 0.3 - 1.3 - 3.2 - 20.9 - 1.1 1,000 0.2 - 4.1 532 0.1 - 1.9 1,682 0.3 1,750 0.3 - 20.2 - 14.7 - 3.4 - 4.1 3,000 - - 5.6 - 6.2 - 0.3 1,765 0.3 1,610 0.3 - 0.6 3,470 0.7 - 11.2 - 18.3 700 930 1,530 1,265 0.2 1,300 0.2 1,500 0.3 - 0.4 - 0.7 - 4.4 15-32 26.2 12.8 2.4 5.3 0.6 2.9 0.6 0.2 0.9 1.5 0.2 1.9 TABLE 15-F (cont) GALVESTON TEXAS DISTRICT CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions See Depth in Feet Bottom Depth in Feet Bottom * Section (Below Mean Width (Below Mean Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Low Tide) (Feet) Low Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles Sabine-Neches Sabine River Channel, Mouth Waterway, to Foot of Green Ave. 30 200 30 200 - 9.5 TX (cont) Orange Turning Basin 30 Irregular 30 Irregular 1,550 0.3 Orange Municipal Slip 30 200 30 150-200 2,435 0.5 Old Channel Around Harbor Island 25 150-200 25 150-200 - 2.4 Channel to Echo7 12 125 - - - - Adams Bayou 12 100 12 10Q - 1.7 Cow Bayou 13 100 13 100 - 7.0 Orangefield Turning Basin 13 300 13 300 500 0.1 1Average. 2Includes 100-foot channel width. 3Includes 450-foot channel to Corpus Christi. 4Diameter. 5Includes 350-foot channel width. 6300-foot width through Matagorda Peninsula. 7Inactive Category. sIncluded in channel length. 9Includes 300-foot channel width. 15-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY APALACHEE BAY, FLORIDA TO MEXICAN BORDER EXISTING PROJECT DIMENSIONS, PROVIDED TABLE 15-G FOR IN TRIBUTARY CHANNELS (See Section 9 of Text) Authorized Improved Project Dimensions Project Dimensions Depth Depth Tributary Channel (Feet Below Bottom (Feet Below Bottom Mean Width Mean Width Length Low Tide) (Feet) Low Tide) (Feet) Miles Feet Offats Bayou Main Channel West Wye Chocolate Bayou Channel 12-Foot Channel via East Turnout West Turnout 9-Foot Channel Turning Basin San Bernard River Channel Colorado River Channel Turning Basin Silting Basin Mouth of Colorado River Navigation Channel, GIWW to Gulf Turning basin at Matagorda Channel to Palacios Turning Basin No. 1 Turning Basin No. 2 Connecting Channel Channel to Barroom Bay Channel to Victoria Main Channel via east Turnout Turning Basin West Turnout Channel Channel to Seadrift via South Turnout Turning Basin North Turnout from Channel to Victoria Harbor of Refuge at Seadrift Channel Basin Channel to Rockport Turning Basin Channel to Aransas Pass Turning Basin Channel to Conn Brown Harbor Conn Brown Harbor Channel to Port Mansfield Entrance Channel Approach Channel to Hopper Dredge Turning Basin Hopper Dredge Turning Basin Channel Across Padre Island and Laguna Madre 12 12 1 2 12 a 12 4 9 9 6 9 8 9 99 7 15-12 12 8 12 12 12 12 9 6 999 99 9 99 99 14 14 14 14 16 16 16 14 10 125 125 125 125 100 600 100 100 400 150 200-100 350 125 200 300 150-480 60 100 600(avg) 100 100 250 100 100 200 200 475 175 300 125 300 250 100 300 100 12 12 12 12 9 999 - 12 12 12 12 9 9 9 99 9 99 14 14 14 14 261 2613 26s 14 125 125 125 125 100 100 400 150 125 200 300 130-400 100 500(avg) 100 100 200 100 200 342(avg) 125-175 300 125 300 250 100 300 100 2.3 0.4 8.2 0.8 26.0 15.5 0.1 1.0 16.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 34.8 0.1 0.8 2.0 0.5 2.1 0.2 6.1 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.8 0.4 0.1 7.7 2,200 .=- 500 - 635 1,130 4 800(avg) 230 - 1,225 2,212 1,800 300 15-34 GALVESTON TEXAS DISTRICT GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY APALACHEE BAY, FLORIDA TO MEXICAN BORDER EXISTING PROJECT DIMENSIONS, PROVIDED TABLE 15-G FOR IN TRIBUTARY CHANNELS (See Section 9 of Text) Authorized Improved Project Dimensions Project Dimensions Depth Depth Tributary Channel (Feet Below Bottom (Feet Below Bottom Mean Width Mean Width Length Low Tide) (Feet) Low Tide) (Feet) Miles Feet Turnout Channels, East Side of Main Channel, GIWW North Turnout 12 100 12 100 0.6 - South Turnout 12 100 12 100 0.6 - Channel West Side of Main Channel, GIWW, to P.T. of Turnout Channels 14 100 14 100 0.3 Turnout Channels, West Side of Main Channel, GIWW North Turnout 12 200 12 200 0.6 - South Turnout 12 200 12 200 0.6 - Channel from P.T. of Turnout Channels to Approach Channel to Main Turning Basin 14 125 14 125 0.6 Approach Channel to Main Turning Basin 14 200 14 200 0.3 - Main Turning Basin 14 400 14 400 0.2 1,250 Turning Basin Extension 14 1,000 14 1,000 0.1 580 Small Craft Basin 8 160 8 160 0.2 860 Shrimp Basin 12 350 12 350 0.3 1,450 Channel to Harlingen via South Turnout From Main Channel, GIWW 12 125 12 12511 25.812 - Turning Basin Near Rio Hondo 12 400 12 400 0.1 500 North Turnout from Main Channel 12 200 12 200 0.7 - Port Isabel Side Channels Main Channel 12 125 12 125-90 0.6 - Main Channel 12 233-60 12 233-60 0.4 - South Leg 12 125 12 125 0.2 - Port Isabel Small Boat Harbor Entrance Channel 7 75 7 75 1.4 - Harbor Channel 6 50 6 50 0.3 - Boat Basin 6 Variable 6 72-501 0.2 1,308 1Includes the construction of a salt water barrier at mile 16.9. 2Constructed 10 feet deep by 100 feet wide by local interests. East turnout channel constructed 150 feet wide. 3Constructed by local interests. 4Authorized to mile 13.2. Mile 8.2 to mile 13.2 is in inactive category. 5Authorized to mile 31 above mouth (channel mile 29.41). Upper 3.4 miles was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 6Includes a discharge channel from Matagorda, Texas, to the gulf which was dredged by local interests in 1939. (Maintenance will be discontinued upon completion of improvements authorized by R&H Act of 1968.) 7Authorized by R&H Act of 1968. Also provides for a dam across the present discharge channel, a new 250-foot wide by 20 to 23-feet deep discharge channel into Matagorda Bay, and a 15-foot by 200-foot wide entrance channel with parallel jetties from the gulf shoreline into the Gulf of Mexico. East jetty to be 3,500 feet long and west jetty 2,900 feet long. I8ncludes two protective breakwaters at entrance to turning basins. 91In the inactive category for maintenance. '0Also provides for two stone jetties at the gulf entrance about 1,000 feet apart. (North jetty constructed 2,300 feet long and south jetty constructed 2,270 feet long.) "South turnout is 200 feet wide. 12Authorized to mile 31. Mile 25.8 to mile 31 is in inactive category. 13Dredged 26 feet deep to accommodate U.S. Hopper Dredge A. MACKENZIE. 15-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 15-H DREDGING OPERATIONS Brazos Island Harbor, TX (Maintenance) Entrance Channel (U.S. Hopper Dredge Langfitt) October 25, 1981 to November 15, 1981, January 23, 1982 to February 16, 1982 1,016,000 1,393,397 Cedar Bayou, TX (Maintenance) Cedar Bayou Channel November 20, 1981 to April 16, 1982 687,000 1,048,485 Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Inner Basin to La Quinta Junction and Port Ingleside Mooring Basin October 23, 1981 to April 30, 1982 2,939,742 2,260,240 La Quinta Junction to Beacon 82 July 12, 1982 to September 30, 1982 4,714,363 2,223,200 Entrance Channel August 10, 1982 to September 30, 1982 969,500 1,763,100 Freeport Harbor, TX (Maintenance) Outer Bar and Jetty Channel June 18, 1982 to August 5, 1982 1,388,226 1,427,168 Inside Channels and Basins July 29, 1982 to September 30, 1982 40,000 318,800 Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX (Maintenance) Bolivar Roads to Pier "B" October 13, 1981 to April 12, 1982 6,047,721 4,632,765 Bolivar Roads to Pier 9; July 7, 1982 to August 31, 1982 2,262,062 1,736,258 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL, and Mexican Border (Galveston District) (Maintenance) Main Channel across Corpus Christi Bay October 23, 1981 to April 30, 1982 268,079 318,035 North Deer Island to Bastrop Bayou February 11, 1982 to September 30, 1982 2,325,000 2,075,000 Texas City Junction to Galveston Causeway February 23, 1982 to May 8, 1982 1,426,684 848,243 Main Channel across Aransas Bay April 8, 1982 to June 11, 1982 2,085,915 1,146,791 Emergency dredging, Colorado River Channel February 22, 1982 to April 5, 1982 95,970 259,215 Port Isabel to Mud Flats, Channel to Harlingen, and Channel to Port Mansfield August 13, 1982 to September 30, 1982 206,900 365,170 Emergency dredging Brazos River Crossing August 10, 1982 to September 30, 1982 290,400 519,300 Channel to Victoria and Channel to Seadrift September 2, 1982 to September 30, 1982 40,000 224,630 Matagorda Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Matagorda Penninsula to Point Comfort October 21, 1981 to March 24, 1982 6,355,061 3,116,879 Port Lavaca Channel and Harbor of Refuge May 13, 1982 to July 8, 1982 1,494,077 662,912 Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX (Maintenance) Sabine Pass Channel April 2, 1982 to August 4, 1982 2,270,438 1,306,037 Port Arthur Canal October 1, 1981 to December 13, 1981 2,040,617 1,328,939 Outer Bar and Jetty Channel April 27, 1981 to May 20, 1982 1,693,264 1,745,036 GALVESTON TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 15-H cont. DREDGING OPERATIONS Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX (Maintenance) Sabine-Neches Canal and Lower Reach Neches River Channel June 11, 1982 to September 30, 1982 1,897,000 1,233,000 Texas City Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Texas City Turning Basin and Industrial Canal October 1, 1981 to June 17, 1982 880,538 1,779,087 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to Texas City Turning Basin October 1, 1981 to December 1, 1981 2,603,400 2,004,618 Trinity River and Tributaries, TX (Maintenance) Anahuac Channel and Channel to Liberty November 1, 1981 to April 16, 1982 687,000 706,865 15-37 FORT WORTH, TX DISTRICT * District includes that portion of Texas south of Red River drainage basin exclusive of drainage basin of Rio Grande and its tributaries above and including Pecos River; exclusive of drainage basins to all short streams arising in coastal plain of Texas and flowing into the Gulf of Mexico, including entire basins of Buffalo Bayou, San Jacinto, San Bernard, Lavaca, Navidad, Mission, and Arkansas Rivers; exclusive of lower basins of major streams flowing into the gulf as follows: Sabine River, Texas and Louisiana, downstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas; Neches River downstream from Town Bluff gaging station; Trinity River downstream from Texas State Highway 45 crossing at Riverside, Texas; Brazos River downstream from confluence with Navasota River; Colorado River downstream from gaging station at Austin; Guadalupe River downstream from confluence with San Marcos River; San Antonio River downstream from confluence with Escondido Creek; Nueces River downstream from confluence with Frio and Atascosa Rivers; and exclusive of Agua Dulce, San Fernando, and Olmos Creek basins draining into Baffins Bay and coastal area south thereof to Rio Grande and east of western boundary of Starr County, Texas. District also includes those portions of the Sulphur River and Cypress Creek Watershed located in the State of Texas; that portion of western Louisiana in Sabine River drainage basin upstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Trinity River Project, TX ............ 16-2 Flood Control 2. Aquilla Lake, TX ..................... 16-3 3. Bardwell Lake, TX ................... 16-3 4. Belton Lake, TX ..................... 16-3 5. Benbrook Lake, TX ................... 16-4 6. Big Sandy Lake, TX ................... 16-4 7. Boggy Creek, TX .................... 16-4 8. Canyon Lake, TX .................... 16-5 9. Cooper Lake and Channels, TX ....... 16-5 10. Duck Creek Channel Improvement, TX. 16-6 11. Elm Fork Floodway, TX .............. 16-6 12. Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O' The Pines, TX .................................. 16-6 13. Grapevine Lake, TX .................. 16-7 14. Greenville, TX .......................... 16-7 15. Hords Creek Lake, TX ............... 16-7 16. Lake Brownwood Modification, TX .... 16-8 17. Lakeview Lake, TX ................... 16-8 18. Lavon Lake TX ...................... 16-8 19. Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement, TX ............ 16-9 20. Lewisville Dam, TX ................. 16-9 21. Millican Lake, TX ...................... 16-10 22. Navarro Mills Lake, TX ............. 16-10 23. O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake, TX ....... 16-10 24. Proctor Lake, TX ....................... 16-10 25. Ray Roberts Lake, TX (Aubrey) ....... 16-11 26. San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX. 16-11 27. San Gabriel River, TX ............... 16-11 28. Somerville Lake, TX ................... 16-12 29. Stillhouse Hollow Dam, TX ............ 16-12 30. Three Rivers, TX ..................... 16-13 Flood Control (cont) Page 31. Waco Lake, TX ...................... 16-13 32. Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX ... 16-13 33. Zacate Creek, TX .................... 16-14 34. Inspection of completed flood control projects. ............................. 16-14 35. Scheduling flood control reservoir operations.. 16-14 36. Other authorized flood control projects. 16-14 37. Flood control work under special authorization ......................... 16-14 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 38. Belton Lake Modification, TX .......... 16-14 39. Dam "A" Lake, TX .................. 16-15 40. Rockland Lake, TX .................. 16-15 41. Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX . 16-15 42. Town Bluff Dam-B. A. Steinhagen Lake, TX ............................. 16-15 43. Whitney Lake, TX ................... 16-15 General Investigations 44. Surveys ............................... 16-16 45. Collection and study of basic data ..... 16-16 Tables Table 16-A Table 16-B Table 16-C Table 16-D Table 16-E Cost and Financial Statement. 16-17 Authorizing Legislation ....... 16-21 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................... 16-24 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ........ 16-24 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ........ 16-25 16-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Navigation 1. TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TX The project authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.) consists of five major components: Multiple-Purpose Channel, Tennessee Colony Lake, Dallas Floodway Extension, West Fork Floodway, and Water Conveyance Facilities. For the last full report on the project as authorized, see Annual Report of 1978. The project information present herein is based on the tentatively selected project plan presented in the Draft General Design Memorandum. The plan consists of three structural components: Dallas Floodway Extension, Tennessee Colony Lake, and a Multiple-Purpose Channel in the lower basin. The estimated cost of the improvements is $1,164,000,000 including $74,000,000 non-Federal cost for land acquisition and relocation required for the- local protection features. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning continued. MULTIPLE-PURPOSE CHANNEL: Location. The Multiple-Purpose Channel begins at the Houston ship channel, crosses the bay area in an easterly direction to intersect the existing Double Bayou channel turns northward along the coastline to Wallisville Lake and then continues northward through the lake area along the course of the Trinity River to 4-1/2 miles above Liberty, Texas. Existing project. The navigation portion of the channel will have a width of 200 feet with a depth of 12 feet and will extend from the Houston ship channel in Galveston Bay to the port of Liberty, Texas. The flood control portion of the channel will have a bottom width of 320 feet with a depth of 30 feet, and will extend from Wallisville Lake to 4-1/2 miles above Liberty, Texas. Estimated Federal cost of the improvements is $152;000,000. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to: (a) provide, without cost to the Federal Government, all lands, easements and rights-of-way required for construction, operation and maintenance of the project, (b) accomplish, without cost to the Federal Government, all relocations and alterations to existing improvements, other than highway bridges over new land cuts and railroad bridges required for the construction of the project, (c) maintain and operate the flood control portion of the channel upstream of Liberty, Texas, and (d) reimburse the Federal Government for one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $229,000, exclusive of interest. TENNESSEE COLONY LAKE: Location. The Tennessee Colony dam site is located at River Miles 341.7 on the Trinity River about 22 miles west of Palestine, Texas. The lake extends into Freestone, Anderson, Henderson, and Navarro Counties. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for the construction of an earthfilled dam with a maximum height of 123 feet above the streambed and a total embankment length of 42,350 feet with a gated concrete spillway. The lake will have a total controlled storage of 3,455,000 acre-feet and a water surface area of 114,400 acres at the top of the flood control pool and 68,100 acres at the top of the conservation pool. The total storage includes 2,269,500 acre-feet for flood control, 1,040,000 acrefeet for conservation, and 145,500 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated Federal cost of the improvement is $873,000,000. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage and one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $439,262,000 for water supply and $8,886,000 for recreation (excluding future recreation facilities), for a total cost of $448,148,000, exclusive of interest. DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION: Location. Dallas Floodway Extension is located on the Trinity River in the City of Dallas, Dallas County, Texas. Existing project. The plan of improvenient provides for enlargement and realignment of the Trinity River from the existing Dallas Floodway downstream approximately 9 miles to the confluence of the Trinity River and Five Mile Creek. The enlargement and realignment of three tributary channels for a total distance of about 10.5 miles through the leveed areas. Construction of a parallel levee system through the lower areas consisting of about 10.2 miles along the left bank, 14.6 miles along the right bank of the main and diversion channels with a minimum distance of 2,000 feet between levees along the main channel. The estimated Federal cost is $65,000,000 and estimated non-Federal cost is $58,000,000 for a total estimated cost of $123,000,000 for the improvement. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to: (a) provide, without cost to the Federal Government, all lands, easements and rights-of-way necessary for construction, maintenance and operation of the project, (b) accomplish, without cost to the Federal Government, all alterations to existing iinprovements, other than railroad bridges required for the construction of the project, (c) maintain and operate the project after completion, and (d) reimburse the Federal Government for onehalf of the separable costs allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $1,809,000 (excluding future recreation) exclusive of interest. 16-2 FORT WORTH TEXAS DISTRICT Flood Control 2. AQUILLA LAKE, TX Location. On Aquilla Creek in Hill County, Texas, with the dam at River Mile 23.3, about 6.8 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas, and about 24.0 miles north of Waco, Texas. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps, Aquilla and Peoria, Texas, quadrangle scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Plan of improvement provides for an earthfill dam 104.5 feet high and 11,800 feet long with an uncontrolled concrete spillway 1,200 feet long on the left abutment, creating a lake with a total storage capacity of 146,000 acre-feet, including 86,700 acre-feet for flood control, 33,600 acre-feet for water supply, and 25,700 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Drainage area above damsite is 294 square miles. Estimated cost is $46,100,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. A contract with the Brazos River Authority for water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army, June 29, 1976. Operations during fiscal year. Acquisition of real estate and construction continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started March 1977, with award of contract for relocation of FM Road 310. Contract for Initial Embankment, Partial Spillway Excavation, and Outlet Works was awarded June 5, 1978, and is continued. Contract for relocation of FM Road 1947 awarded September 11, 1980 continues. A contract for Completion of Embankment and Spillway and Construction of Services Bridge, Access Roads, Project Buildings, Visitors Center Overlook, FM-310 and other Appurtenances was awarded January 21, 1981. Contract for Boundary Fencing, Part 1, was awarded August 7, 1981, as was contract for Sanitary Facilities, Boat Ramp and Parking awarded June 24, 1981. Relocation of Hill County Road Contract, Part II, was awarded September 18, 1981, and continues. Sanitary Facilities, Boat Ramps, & Parking contract was awarded June 24, 1981, Contract for Reservoir Clearing was awarded March 12, 1982; Revegetation contract was awarded August 9, 1982; Sanitary and Safety Facilities contract was awarded July 23, 1982, and Boundary Fencing, Pt. II contract was awarded September 16, 1982. 3. BARDWELL LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Waxahachie Creek, 5 river miles upstream from its confluence with Chambers Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, and about 5 miles south of Ennis, Ellis County, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of project is $12,941,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to increased water supply storage under the terms of the Water Supply Act of 1958. In Contract approved by the Secretary of the Army on June 24, 1963 the Trinity River Authority, a State agency, agreed to fulfill all requirements of local cooperation. To date the authority has paid $187,067 toward principal and $273,737 toward annual cost of operation and maintenance of project, including cost of operating 10-foot conduit. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Bardwell project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1982 were $8,659,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was started August 1963 and completed for beneficial use in November 1965. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 4. BELTON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Leon River about 16.7 miles above confluence of Leon and Lampasas Rivers and about 3 miles north of Belton, Texas. (See Geological Survey base map, scale 1:500,000 and Geological Survey, Belton sheet, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of project is $18,410,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for remaining water supply storage in reservoir was approved by Secretary of the Army on January 15, 1958, at an estimated cost of $1,602,822. To date $888,004 has been paid. Under the contract Brazos River Authority must also pay annually 11.2 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date $758,392 has been paid. An interim contract with Brazos River Authority for emergency use of water supply storage in project was approved by Secretary of the Army on January 2, 1957. Amount of $152,435 paid by authority on March 21, 1957 for use of these facilities was credited to interest and principal payable under formal water supply contract. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 regular were constructed. Benefits accrued to Belton project: Accumulated damages prevented through FY 1982 were $105,983,100. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started June 1949 and project was ready for beneficial use in March 1954. Raising water s'upply pool: Construction started in July 1970 and the pool raise is complete. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 16-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 5. BENBROOK LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Tarrant County, Texas, on Clear Fork of Trinity River 15 river miles upstream from its confluence with West Fork of Trinity River about 10 miles southwest of downtown Fort Worth, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of project is $14,544,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. No water supply storage is included in project. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Construction of recreation facilities under Code 710 continued including recreation facilities under a cost-sharing contract with the City of Benbrook, Texas. Benefits accrued to system consisting of Benbrook Lake, Clear Fork and West Fork Floodways: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1982 are estimated at $48,303,500. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for beneficial use in September 1952. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 6. BIG SANDY LAKE, TX Location. The project is located on Big Sandy Creek, a tributary of the Sabine River, and is virtually contained in Wood County, with a small area extending into Upshur County. The damsite is located at River Mile 15.3 about 6 miles northwest of Big Sandy, Texas. Existing project. The project provides for construction of an earth and rock fill dam with a maximum height of 94.5 feet above streambed and a total length of 6,200 feet, including the concrete spillway. Big Sandy Lake would have a total controlled storage of 418,200 acre-feet and a water surface area of 16,580 acres at elevation 382.0, top of flood control pool. At elevation 367.5, top of conservation pool, the lake would have an area of 10,810 acres and a storage capacity of 221,200 acrefeet. Project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1970 (PL 91-611) and is a unit in the comprehensive basin-wide plan of water resource development. Estimated cost of project is $99,100,000. Local cooperation. Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 apply. The Sabine River Authority of Texas and the Texas Water Development Board are the local project sponsors. Operations during fiscal year. March 25, 1982, Ph. I GDM was recommended for termination due to lack of present Federal interest in the project. Condition at end of fiscal year. AE&D Studies terminated May 1982. 7. BOGGY CREEK, TX - COLORADO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES Location. In southeast portion of the city of Austin, Texas, which is about 160 miles north of Houston and approximately 200 miles south of Dallas-Fort Worth area. Existing Project. The recommended plan consists of concrete trapezoidal channel on Boggy Creek beginning just above Webberville Road and extending downstream about 2.2 miles to just below Jain Lane. From there, a grass lined channel would extend further downstream and transition into the natural channel at Ed Bluestein Boulevard, a distance of about 0.7 miles. New bridges would be required at four street crossings and two railroad crossings. Two small ponds, about one acre in size and a maximum depth of three feet, will be formed by weirs located between Ed Bluestein Boulevard and Jain Lane and also upstream of Webberville Road. The plan calls for acquisition of 54 acres of land adjacent to the lower end of the channel to mitigate habitat losses and also to provide for environmental quality enhancement. About 3.25 miles of trails along the channel and 0.95 miles in the EQ/mitigation area will also be provided. Estimated Federal cost is $19,400,000 including $5,000,000 non-Federal cost. The proposed flood control channel will provide capacities for the 100 year flood. Design will provide for containment of flows within the banks of the improved channels. Bottom widths for the concrete channel will vary from 80 feet to 120 feet, and top widths from 90 feet to 180 feet. Local Cooperation. In accordance with the President's,1978 Cost Sharing Policy and the recommendations contained in the reporting document, the State of Texas is required to make a cash contribution of 5 percent of construction costs associated nonvendible outputs. The city of Austin in required to provide a cash or in-kind contribution equal to 20 percent of the project first costs associated with flood control benefits and 20 percent of the associated mitigation lands. The city is also required to provide 50 percent of the recreational development cost and 25 percent of the EQ enhancement lands. The city will also be required to hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction work, operate and maintain all works after completion prevent any obstruction or encroachment that would reduce the flow capacity of the project, provide and maintain adequate lateral drains and channels, publicize flood plain information for all streams in the watershed and adopt and enforce regulations to minimize damages to future developments within the 100-year flood plain and administer and assure access to the recreational facilities and lands to all on an equasl basis. Operations during fiscal year. Affimation (letter report) submitted to Southwestern Division, May 5, 1982. Initiation of Ph. II GDM. 16-4 FORT WORTH TEXAS DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning continued. 8. CANYON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Guadalupe River, 303 miles above its mouth, and about 12 miles northwest of New Braunfels, Comal County, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of project is $21,732,000, including $1,400,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Local interests (Guadalupe- Blanco River Authority) will utilize water impounded for water supply and streamflow regulation for development of electric power. In a formal contract approved by Chief of Engineers on October 24, 1957, Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority agreed to fulfill all requirements of local cooperation. Required contribution of $1,400,000 was made in full by Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority. The estimated cost of the Water Storage contract is about $9,000,000. To date $793,082 has been paid. In addition, $22,848 was contributed for installation and operation of reservoir leakage gages. Under the contract the authority must pay 34.8 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date $730,191 has been paid. Operations during fiscal year. Regular funds: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Canyon project: Accumulated damages prevented through FY 1982 were $49,624,100. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started April 1958 and project completed for beneficial use June 1964. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 9. COOPER LAKE AND CHANNELS, TX Location. Cooper Dam and Reservoir is about 4 miles southeast of Cooper, 13 miles north of Sulphur Springs, Texas, and is at mile 23.2 on South Sulphur River, which rises in Fannin County, Texas, and flows generally east for about 80 miles to its confluence with North Sulphur River to form Sulphur River. Existing project. Provides for construction of an earth-fill dam with maximum height of about 73 feet, 15,882 feet long at its crest, one controlled (service) spillway, and an emergency uncontrolled spillway. Reservoir surface area will be 22,740 acres at top of flood control pool, 5,084 acres at top of sediment pool, and 19,305 acres at top of water supply pool. The reservoir will contain 131,400 acrefeet of flood control storage space, 273,000 acre-feet of municipal and industrial water supply space, and 37,000 acre-feet of sediment storage. Also provides for channel clearing, realignment, and enlargement; enlargement and extension of existing levees; and construction of appurtenant drainage works along main stem of Sulphur River above mile 126; channel clearing, realignment, and enlargement and levee enlargement and modification of appurtenant drainage works on Cuthand Creek below mile 24, on Sulphur River below mile 70, except in proposed Cooper Reservoir, mile 29 to 42, and on Middle Sulphur River below mile 8 channel clearing and realignment of Brushy Creek below mile 5; and levee enlargement on North Sulphur River between mile 1 and 5. Estimated Federal cost for (October 1980) is $166,000,000, which includes $54,258,000 to be reimbursed by water supply users over a 50-year period and $227,000 non-Federal cost for lands for the levees. Local cooperation. Except for Cooper Reservoir, local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way, and alter and relocate highways and related facilities and utilities, except railroads, for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages; maintain and operate all works after completion, and preserve channel capacities by preventing encroachment. Local agencies furnished rights-of-way for first two phases of work on levees and channels downstream from Cooper Dam. Rightof- way acquisition for part II, for channels and levees downstream from Cooper Dam is essentially complete, except for that required below mile 140.4, Sulphur River (Magnolia Pipeline Crossing). Rightof- way acquisition for this portion of project is inactive pending resolution of a controversy among local interests as to the responsibility for relocation of the pipeline. Assuring Agencies are the following counties in Texas: Delta, Hunt, Franklin, Lamar, Morris, Hopkins, Titus, and Red River. Basic assurances have been received. Supplemental assurances covering Public Law 91-646 have not been received from Delta, Lamar, Morris, or Hunt Counties. Operations during fiscal year. Preparation of a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, real estate administration within the reservoir, and negotiations with cooperating agencies were continued by hired labor. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project began July 1958, with 14.8 miles of South Sulphur River and 6.3 miles of Middle Sulphur River channels excavated; and 3.4 miles of levee embankment on South Sulphur River and 7.3 miles of levee embankment constructed on Middle Sulphur River, all upstream from Cooper Reservoir. About 10.5 miles of levee on North Sulphur River, 8.2 miles of levee on Sulphur River, 14 miles of levee on Cuthand Creek, and 4.2 miles of levee on Brushy Creek were strengthened; 0.5 mile of levee on Kickapoo Creek was enlarged; and 15.3 miles of new channel in Cuthand Creek, 0.8 mile of new channel in Brushy Creek, and 0.2 mile of cutoff channel in Kickapoo Creek were excavated; all downstream from Cooper Reservoir. Modification of Texas and New Orleans Railroad Company's trestle 93.77, Middle Sulphur River, was completed August 1959, 16-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 and modification of St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company's trestles 533.74 and 542.61, South Sulphur River, January 1960. Approximately 98 percent of the lands for the reservoir have been acquired, 64 percent of the levees and 85 percent of the channel work has been completed. Lack of funds and spending limitations prevented construction of the levees and channel between April 1964 and February 1971. On February 10, 1971, a contract was awarded for construction and rectification of approximately 23 miles of levee and 33 miles of channel improvement and realignment of the Sulphur River. In May 1971, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, acting on a motion for preliminary injunction halted further construction until an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was prepared. A Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) was filed on June 24, 1977. The plan recommended in the FEIS minimized further construction of the authorized channels, and provided for construction of the reservoir and downstream levees. In November 1977, a trial brief was filed in the United States District Court challenging the sufficiency of the FEIS. On December 8, 1978, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas cited 5 deficiencies in the FEIS and halted all further construction. A Supplemental EIS to comply with Court's decision was prepared. The final Supplemental' EIS was released by OCE on March 18, 1981. The assistant U.S. Attorney will initiate legal proceedings to have the Supplemental EIS reviewed by the court. Litigation has not been resolved. This project transferred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of the FY 1979. 10. DUCK CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Location. In Garland, Dallas County, Texas on Duck Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River between River Mile 10.4 and 17.5. Existing project. Provides for realignment and enlargement of 6.6 miles of channel improvement consisting of concrete walls, modification of drainage facilities, 2 railroad bridges, 9 street bridges and relocation of all utilities. Estimated Federal cost of these modifications is $9,000,000 and estimated cost to local interests is $6,500,000, a total of $15,500,000. Existing project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1965 in House Document 276, 89th Congress, 1st Session. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements and rights-of-way necessary for construction, and all alterations and relocations of existing buildings, utilities, bridges (except railroad bridges), sewers, pipelines, and any other existing improvements; hold the United States free from damages due to the construction work, operate and maintain all features after completion of the project. Operations during fiscal year. No construction was accomplished. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in June 1972, and the project is 4 percent complete. Construction has been suspended pending local interests providing items required for local cooperation. Action to reclassify the project to inactive status was initiated in March 1980. 11. ELM FORK FLOODWAY, TX Location. The project is located in Dallas and Denton Counties, Texas. A portion. of the improvement will be in and adjacent to the Cities of Dallas, Irving and Farmers Branch, Texas. Existing project. Improvement of the Elm Fork of the Trinity River from the mouth to Lewisville Dam and along Denton Creek, 'a tributary of the Elm Fork to Grapevine Dam. The plan of improvement provides for enlargement and realignment of about 22 miles of the Elm Fork, enlargement and realignment of about 20 miles of tributary channels, construction of about 39 miles of new levee, rehabilitation of about 2 miles of existing levees, modification of 14 street and highway bridges, 4 railroad bridges and alteration of utilities. Estimated Federal cost of these modifications is $57,100,000, and non-Federal estimated cost is $81,100,000, a total of $138,200,000. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide (without cost to the Federal Government) except for the main channel thereof, all lands, easements, utilities and bridge relocations (except railroad bridges) necessary for construction and operation of the project. Assurances were signed March 20, 1969 by the Trinity River Authority, a State agency, that they would provide items required of local interests. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was suspended in 1973. Further studies have been delayed until a definite plan has been accepted by local interests. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is suspended. 12. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM-LAKE O' THE PINES, TX Location. On Cypress Creek in Marion, Harrison, Upshur, Morris, Camp, and Titus Counties, Texas, 8 miles west of Jefferson, Texas. Existing project. An earth-fill dam 10,600 feet long and 77 feet high includes a 200-foot spillway with a capacity of 68,200 cubic feet per second. Reservoir controls runoff from 850 square miles of drainage area, and has a gross storage capacity of 842,100 acre-feet, including 587,200 acre-feet flood control storage, 3,800 acre-feet conservation storage, and 251,100 acre-feet for municipal and industrial water supply. Reservoir extends 28 miles upstream. Project affords substantial flood protection of 16-6 FORT WORTH TEXAS DISTRICT Cypress Creek Valley from damsite to confluence with Red River and, together with operation of other reservoirs proposed in Red River Basin, will provide flood protection along main stem of Red River below Denison Dam. Estimated cost of project is $17,231,700 Federal. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O' The Pines project: Accumulated damages prevented through FY 1982 were $6,139,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in January 1955 and was completed in June 1960. Recreation facilities under Code 710 regular remain. This project transferred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of FY 1979. 13. GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Tarrant County, Texas, on Denton Creek, 11.7 river miles upstream from its confluence with Elm Fork of Trinity River and about 20 miles northwest of City of Dallas, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of project is $18,896,000, including $2,040,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. A contract with Dallas County Park Cities Water Control and Improvement District No. 2 for 50,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on March 21, 1955. Park Cities paid the required $607,000. A contract with City of Dallas for 85,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on March 17, 1954. Dallas paid the required $1,433,026. A Contract with City of Grapevine, Texas, for 1,250 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on September 14, 1953, at an estimated cost of $22,654. A contract for Interim Use of Navigation Storage with city of Grapevine was approved by Secretary of the Army on February 27, 1981, at an estimated cost of $684,000. To date, $56,010 has been paid. To date Grapevine has paid $22,654. Above contracts include payment of operation and maintenance costs as follows: Dallas County Park Cities Water Control and Improvement District No. 2, a pro rata part of the actual annual cost, which part to be not less than $2,000 nor more than $3,000; Dallas, 9.2 percent of actual annual cost; and Grapevine, its pro rata part of actual annual cost (estimated at $79.55 annually and included in total annual payment). Following operation and maintenance payments have been made: Park Cities $90,394, Dallas $393,491, and Grapevine $18,251. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 regular were continued. Benefits accrued to system comprised of Lewisville Lake, Grapevine Lake and Dallas Floodway: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1982 were $801,008,400. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was started December 1947 and ready for benefical use in July 1952. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 14. GREENVILLE, TX Location. In Greenville, Hunt County, Texas on Long Branch of the Sabine River. Existing project. Provides for realignment and enlargement of 3.34 miles of improved channel along Long Branch. Estimated Federal cost is $910,000, and estimated cost to local interests was $320,000, a total of $1,230,000. Existing project was authorized by the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1970. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements and rights-of-way necessary for construction, and all alterations and relocations of existing buildings, utilities, bridges (except railroad), sewers, pipelines and any other existing improvements; hold the United States free from damages due to construction work; and operate and maintain all features after completion of the project. Operations during fiscal year. Local interests acquired necessary items of local cooperation. The construction of the improved channel was completed. A cost-sharing contract for Hike and Bike Trails was awarded to the City of Greenville. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the improved channel is complete. Recreation facilities remain. 15. HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX Location. On Hords Creek, a tributary of Pecan Bayou, about 13.5 miles west of Coleman, Texas, and about 27.8 miles upstream from mouth of Hords Creek. (See Geological Survey sheets, Grosvenor and Zephyr, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of project is $4,337,000 including $105,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Hords Creek project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1982 were $937,200. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was started January 1947 and completed for beneficial use in April 1948. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 16-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 16. LAKE BROWNWOOD MODIFICATION, TX Location. The dam will be located at River Mile 57 on Pecan Bayou, a tributary of the Colorado River, eight miles north of Brownwood, Texas. The lake will be located in Brown and Coleman counties. Existing project. The project will insure the safety of the existing non-Federal Lake Brownwood and preserve its flood control, water supply, and related values. Modification measures consist of a new embankment 130 feet high and 1,870 feet long, new outlet works, and erosion control measures in the spillway channel. The total controlled storage of the existing lake is 118,900 acre-feet including 85,900 acre-feet for water supply and 33,000 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Storage capacity will not be altered by this project. The modification project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1968 (P.L. 90- 483). Estimated cost of project is $29,480,000 including $20,000,000 non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. Water Supply Act of 1958 and Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Brown County Water Improvement No. 1 is the local sponsor. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning suspended pending proposed legislation prepared by the Department of the Army to deauthorize the project. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is complete. 17. LAKEVIEW LAKE, TX L cation. Dam site is located at River Mile 11.2 on MPountain Creek, a right bank tributary of the West Fork of the Trinity River, and is adjacent to the city limits of Grand Prairie, Dallas County, Texas, which is one of the rapidly growing cities in the Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan area. Existing project. The project provides for construction of an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 108.5 feet above the streambed and a total length of 24,200 feet, including a 50-foot uncontrolled ogee type spillway, which wil control 232 square miles of drainage area. The reservoir will have a total controlled storage of 304,000 acre-feet and a water surface area of 10,940 acres at th top of the flood control pool and 7,470 acres at the top of the conservation pool. The total storage in udes 123,100 acre-feet for flood control, 142,900 acre-feet for conservation and 38,000 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of the project is $205,442,000 including $9,442,000 non-Federal first cost. Project is a unit in the general comprehensive plan for development and control of the water resources of the Trinity River basin. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 apply. Contracts for water supply storage and recreation with the Trinity River Authority was approved by the Secretary of the Army, June 15, 1977. Reimbursement is currently estimated at $49,261,000 for supply and $9,810,000 for recreation (excluding future recreation facilities) for a total of $59,071,000 exclusive of interest. Operations during fiscal year. Real Estate acquisition and construction continue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Real Estate acquisition was initiated in August 1977. Construction was started in December 1978 with award of contract for relocation of FM Road 1382. A construction contract for Outlet Works and Initial Embankment was awarded November 19, 1979. A contract for Boundary Fencing, Part 1, was awarded June 2, 1981, and is complete. Award of contract for Completion of Embankment, Spillway and Outlet Works was made September 30, 1981, and notice to proceed issued May 18, 1982. Construction of FM Road 1382 is complete. Other contracts awarded during the FY are: Fencing, Pt. 1-A & Historical Site Fencing June 21, 1982; Removal of Sanitary Landfill February 19, 1982; Relocation of City Streets and County Roads, Road Relocation No 1, Pt. I, June 4, 1982; and Relocation of City Streets and County Roads, Road Relocation No. 1, Pt. II, September 8, 1982. Real Estate acquisition and engineering and design continued. 18. LAVON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Collin County, Texas, on East Fork of Trinity River 55.9 miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of project is $15,470,000. For information concerning Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement project, see individual project. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with North Texas Municipal Water District for water supply storage, including cost of intake structure, was approved by Secretary of the Army July 8, 1954, at an estimated cost of $1,405,753. Contract was revised in 1973 and final revised contract amount is $1,445,261.67. To date the district has paid $583,587. Under the contract North Texas Municipal Water District must pay annually 13.6 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the district has paid $448,948. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Lavon project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1982 were $81,704,300. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was started January 1948 and ready for beneficial use in September 1953. Project is complete. See following section for Lavon Lake 16-8 FORT WORTH TEXAS DISTRICT Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement authorized by Flood Control Act of 1962. 19. LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION AND EAST FORK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Location. Existing dam is in Collin County, Texas, on East Fork of Trinity River, 55.9 miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. Channel improvement of East Fork extends from its mouth to River Mile 31.8. Existing project. Reservoir modification provides for raising top of existing dam from elevation 502.0 to 514.0 and lengthening existing dam from about 9,499 feet to about 19,493 feet; modification of existing concrete spillway structure; enlargement of existing reservoir area, involving acquisition of additional rights-of-way; relocation and alteration of highways, county roads, railroads and utilities; and provision of recreational facilities. East Fork Channel and floodway improvements consist of 25 miles of channel enlargement and straightening of the East Fork between River Mile 0.0 and 31.8; replacement of inadequate levee-sluice structures; rehabilitation of existing levees; acquisition and clearing of land areas as required for rights-of-way along improved channel and existing levees; alteration of existing railroad, highway and county road bridges crossing the improved channel as well as relocation of existing utility lines; and strengthening and raising about 202,400 linear feet of levees of seven existing levee districts. Reservoir will provide a total storage capacity of 748,200 acre-feet (275,600 are for flood control, 380,000 for water supply storage, and 92,600 for sedimentation reserve.) Estimated Federal cost of the modification and improvement is $69,750,000 and estimated cost to local interests is $220,000 for lands and damages and relocations, a total of $69,970,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to increased water supply storage under the terms of the Water Supply Act of 1958. The North Texas Municipal Water District has contracted for 43 percent of the water supply (approved September 22, 1967 by the Secretary of the Army) and to date $880,738 has been paid. North Texas Municipal Water Supply District has submitted assurances to contract for the 57 percent for future water supply. Reimbursement is currently estimated at $33,518,000. Levee Districts 4 and 5, which comprise the lower 10 miles of the East Fork Channel, entered into agreements as required by Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 on January 28, 1972 and have furnished all necessary construction easements. Levee Districts 6, 8, 10, 13, and 15, which comprise the upper 15 miles of the East Fork Channel, have declined to provide the necessary assurances. On December 8, 1972, this portion of the project was reclassified from "active" to "inactive" category. Operations during fiscal year. A construction contract for improving the lower ten miles of the East Fork Channel was awarded March 30, 1979 and a contract for Levee Improvement, Increment I, East Fork was awarded May 1, 1981, and continues. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in May 1970 and ready for beneficial use in December 1975. Improvement of the lower ten miles of the East Fork Channel and Levees is 96 percent complete and total project is 99 percent complete. 20. LEWISVILLE DAM, TX Location. In Denton County, Texas, on Elm Fork of Trinity River 30 river miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northwest of City of Dallas, Texas at a site downstream from old Garza Dam. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of project is $27,527,000 including $3,677,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. A contract with City of Dallas for 415,000 acre-feet of water supply storage and rights and interests to Garza Dam and Reservoir was approved by the Secretary of the Army on July 16, 1953. Local contributions have been made in full. A contract with city of Denton, Texas, for remaining 21,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army on May 20, 1954, with an estimated cost of $250,064. To date Denton has paid $250,064. Under above contracts, cities of Dallas and Denton mustpay annually 21.9 and 1 percent, respectively, of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date Dallas has paid $1,767,612 and Denton $92,839. Operations during fiscal year. Major rehabilitation of the existing embankment continued. Rehabilitation consists of upstream and downstream stability berms. Estimated Federal cost is $6,580,000. A construction contract for the upstream berm was awarded June 12, 1979 and is complete. Contract for Modification of Embankment of Downstream Berms was awarded March 6, 1981, and is physically complete. Benefits accrued to system comprised of Lewiville Lake, Grapevine Lake, and Dallas Floodway: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1982 were $801,008,400. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was started November 1948 and ready for benefical use in November 1954. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. The construction contract for the upstream berm is complete and construction downstream is 99 percent complete. 16-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 21. MILLICAN LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on the Navasota River at mile 24.1, approximately 7 miles north of Navasota, Texas in Grimes and Brazos Counties, Texas. This project would be the first of a two-stage development consisting of Millican and Navasota Dams, both of which would be units in the overall plan of improvement for the Brazos River Basin. Existing Project. The project provides for construction of a concrete and earthfill dam 25,300 feet long including a 472-foot gate-controlled spillway. Without Navasota Lake in operation, the top of flood control pool (elevation 234.0) would provide 1,557,400 acre-feet of storage space and cover a surface area of 66,000 acres. There would be 784,800 acre-feet of flood control; 680,200 acre-feet for water supply (surface area 42,400 acres), and 92,400 acre-feet for sediment reserve. With Navasota Lake in operation, the top of flood control elevation and total storage would remain the same. The flood control pool would be 359,600 acrefeet, water supply storage would be 1,125,800 acrefeet (surface area 55,500 acres) and sediment reserve would be 72,000 acre-feet. Estimated Federal cost of the project is $318,000,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. By letter dated December 9, 1974, the Brazos River Authority stated that they would be the state agency to cost share for both water supply and recreation. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Overall preconstruction planning 63 percent complete, Ph. I, GDM and EIS 90 percent complete. 22. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Navarro County, Texas, at River Mile 63.9 on Richland Creek, a tributary of Trinity River, about 16 miles southwest of Corsicana, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorization acts see Annual Report for 1965. Estimated cost of project is $13,399,000 including $300,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended applies. A formal contract with the Trinity River Authority was approved March 3, 1966, by the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $2,260,800. To date the Authority has paid $502,020 for water supply and $520,448 for operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Navarro Mills project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1982 were $25,576,900. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started December 1959 and project completed for beneficial use March 1963. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 23. O. C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on North Concho River, a tributary of Concho River, about 6.6 miles above mouth of North Concho River near city of San Angelo, Texas. (See Geological Survey base map, Texas, scale 1:500,000, and sheet Wall, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Name was changed from San Angelo Dam and Reservoir January 3, 1975 by Public Law 93-634. Estimated cost of project is $17,111,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A water-supply contract with Upper Colorado River Authority for water-supply storage in reservoir was approved by Secretary of the Army on October 11, 1948. The Authority has contributed $860,444 toward cost of project and $64,324 toward operation and maintenance for a 50-year period. The Authority must pay additional consideration of $1 a year for useful life of project, beginning January 1, 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Regular funds: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to O. C. Fisher Dam and Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1982 were $2,375,600. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for beneficial use February 1952. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 24. PROCTOR LAKE, TX Location. Dam is at River Mile 238.9 on Leon River, a tributary of Brazos River, about 8 miles northeast of Comanche in Comanche County, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorization act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of project is $16,249,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 applies. A formal contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, was approved by Secretary of the Army, July 1, 1960, and was modified and was approved May 9, 1966, at an estimated cost of $1,707,900. To date the Authority has paid $249,991 for water supply and $196,693 for operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance were continued. 16-10 FORT WORTH TEXAS DISTRICT Benefits accrued to Proctor project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1982 were $5,166,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was started July 1960 and completed for beneficial use 1963. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 25. RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX (formerly Aubrey Lake) Location. Damsite is located at River Mile 60.0 on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River, Denton County, between Sanger and Aubrey, Texas ind 30 miles upstream from Lewisville Dam. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for construction of an earthfilled dam with a maximum height of 141 feet above the streambed, a length of 15,250 feet including an uncontrolled broadcrested spillway 100 feet long, controlling 682 square miles of drainage area. The lake will have a total controlled storage of 1,064,600 acre-feet, with a water surface area of 36,900 acres. The total storage includes 260,800 acre-feet for flood control, 749,200 acre-feet for water supply, and 54,600 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated Federal cost of the project is $292,000,000. Public Law 96-384, 96th Congress, H.R. 8024, effective January 4, 1981, changed the name of Aubrey Lake to Ray Roberts Lake. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Contracts with the cities of Dallas and Denton, Texas, for water supply storage and recreation were approved by the Secretary of the Army September 16, 1980. Operations during fiscal year. Acquisition of real estate continues.Construction contracts awarded during FY 1982 are: Boundary Fencing, Pt. 1, April 27, 1982; Boundary Fencing, Pt. II, June 24, 1982; Boundary Fencing, Pt. III, August 12, 1982; and Embankment, Spillway and Outlet Works, May 12, 1982. Condition at end of fiscal year. Real estate acquisition is approximately 12 percent complete, and engineering and design continues. 26. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Location. Floodway is in City of San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas, on San Antonio River and San Pedro, Apache, Alazan, and Martinez Creeks. Existing project. Provides for clearing, widening, deepening, and straightening about 31 miles of river and creek channels to carry standard project flood discharges, construction of channel walls, and paving, conduit, and construction and alteration of railroad bridges. Estimated Federal cost of these modifications is $74,200,000 and estimated cost to local interests is $92,600,000 which includes $2,000,000 cash contributions and $90,600,000 for lands, damages, and construction, a total of $166,800,000. Existing project was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act. Latest published map is in project document. The Water Resources Act of 1976 added authorization to the existing project for construction of flood control measures needed to preserve and protect the Espada Acequia Aqueduct located in the vicinity of Six Mile Creek. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction, including purchase and removal of buildings, relocation or reconstruction of bridges (exclusive of railway bridges), channel dams where applicable, and utility lines; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate all works after completion; and provide a cash contribution for enhancement benefits of 2.65 percent of actual Federal construction cost. San Antonio River Authority furnished assurances that it will comply with all requirements of local cooperation. These assurances were accepted by the District Engineer on April 15, 1957. To date $927,975 has been contributed by San Antonio River Authority. In addition, $30,000 has been contributed and accepted, under the authority of Civil Functions Appropriations Act of 1958, for vehicular crossings over the San Antonio channel. Operations during fiscal year. Contract for Espada Aqueduct Flood Protection Unit 9-1, Six Mile Creek, awarded July 10, 1979, is complete. Construction contract for Channel Improvement, Schedule I, Unit 8.3-2 was awarded September 14, 1981, and a contract for Channel Paving, Unit 8-3-1, Schedule II was awarded September 28, 1981. A contract for seepage and erosion control - 6 mi Creek diversion canal awarded July 28, 1982. Engineering and design studies continued. Benefits accrued to San Antonio project: Accumulated damages prevented through FY 1982 were $44,055,500. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in October 1957 and the project is about 46 percent complete. 27. SAN GABRIEL RIVER, TX Location. System of three reservoirs in Williamson County in the central portion of Brazos River Basin. Granger Dam at River Mile 31.9 on San Gabriel River, about 7 miles east of Granger, Texas; North San Gabriel Dam at River Mile 4.3 on North Fork of San Gabriel River, about 3.5 miles northwest of Georgetown, Texas; and South Fork Dam at River Mile 4.7 on South Fork of San Gabriel River, about 3 miles southwest of Georgetown, Texas. Existing project. Granger Lake was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act, and North (North San Gabriel Dam and Lake Georgetown) and South Fork Lakes were authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. 16-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Estimated total Federal cost of project is $149,000,000. Plan of improvement provides for the following: Granger: An earthfilled dam 16,320 feet long, with maximum height of 115 feet above streambed, which controls 709 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 244,200 acre-feet, of which 162,200 acrefeet are for flood control, 37,900 acre-feet for water supply storage, and 44,100 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of project is $60,400,000. North San Gabriel Dam: A rockfill dam 5,950 feet long with maximum height of 164 feet above streambed, which controls 246 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 130,800 acre-feet, of which 87,600 acrefeet are for flood control, 29,200 acre-feet for water supply storage, and 14,000 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of project is $38,800,000. South Fork: A rockfill dam 5,620 feet long with maximum height of 152 feet above streambed, which controls 123 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 82,600 acre-feet (45,700 for flood control, 28,900 for water supply storage, and 8,000 for sediment reserve). Estimated cost of project is $49,800,000. Public Law 96-575, 96th Congress, H. R. 4941 effective January 4, 1981, changed the name of North Fork Lake to North San Gabriel Dam and Lake Georgetown. Local cooperation. Construction is subject to condition that local interests reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply at Granger, Lake Georgetown, and South Fork Lakes. Reimbursement currently estimated at $12,862,000 for Granger, $6,312,000 for Lake Georgetown, and $14,638,000 for South Fork, for a total of $33,812,000 exclusive of interest. Brazos River Authority, a State agency, is the local interests' sponsor of project, and by letter dated April 18, 1966, indicated its acceptance of the proposed plan of development and its willingness to pay for the costs allocated to water supply in each reservoir in the ultimate plan. Such water supply assurances for Granger and Lake Georgetown Lakes were approved May 24, 1968 as satisfactory in accordance with requirements of the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended. Contract negotiations for South Fork Lake will be deferred until the need for water supply develops and the reservoir is scheduled for construction. Operations during fiscal year. Construction, real estate activities and engineering and design continued at Granger and Lake Georgetown. Deliberate impoundment of water commenced at Granger and Lake Georgetown Lakes on January 21, 1980 and March 3, 1980, respectively. In FY 1982, studies on South Fork Lake were resumed in preparation of a General Design Memorandum to provide reaffirmation prior to construction. Benefits accrued to project consisting of Granger and Lake Georgetown: Accumulated damages prevented through FY 1982 were $8,233,300. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in October 1972. Granger and Lake Georgetown Lakes are about 99 percent complete. Granger and Lake Georgetown Lakes were ready for beneficial use in January 1980 and March 1980, respectively. 28. SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Yegua Creek 20 miles upstream from its confluence with Brazos River and about 2 miles south of Somerville, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorization act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of project is $30,227,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage was approved May 10, 1962, by the Secretary of the Army, at an estimated cost of $4,871,815. Also under the contract, the authority must pay annually 28.655 percent of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Construction of recreation facilities under a contract with the State of Texas, under Code 710 cost-sharing continued. Benefits accrued to Somerville project: Accumulated damages prevented through FY 1982 were $30,354,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in June 1962 and project was ready for beneficial use in January 1967. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 29. STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX Location. Dam is on Lampasas River 16 miles upstream from its confluence with Little River, a tributary of the Brazos River, and about 5 miles southwest of Belton, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorization act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of project is $23,670,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage was approved April 13, 1962, by the Secretary of the Army, at an estimated cost of $6,912,430. To date the Authority has paid $581,691. Also under the contract the Authority must pay annually 27.748 percent of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the Authority has paid $268,582. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 regular were constructed. Benefits accrued to Stillhouse Hollow Project: Accumulated estimate of flood damages prevented through FY 1982 is $20,596,800. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in July 1962 and the project was ready for beneficial use in February 1968. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 16-12 FORT WORTH TEXAS DISTRICT 30. THREE RIVERS, TX Location. The project is located in and adjacent to the city of Three Rivers, Live Oak County, Texas, midway between San Antonio and Corpus Christi, Texas, on the left bank of the Frio River, two miles below the mouth of the Atascosa River and two miles above the confluence with the Nueces River. Existing project. The local flood protection project consists of an earthfill levee 5.1 miles in length and appurtenant water control measures. The project was authorized in 1971 under Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act in accordance with the recommendations of the Chief of Engineers as contained in House Document 92-153. Estimated cost of the project is $6,363,000 including $473,000 non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. The City of Three Rivers, Texas, gave assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-ofway, and borrow areas necessary for construction, maintenance, and operation of the project; (b) Provide without cost to the United States all bridge relocations, except railroad bridges, and all buildings, structures, and any other alterations of existing structures or improvements which may be required for construction of the project; (c) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction of the project; (d) Acquire without cost to the United States, easements on lands adjacent to the city to allow flooding on some lands not now in the flood plain, and hold and save the United States free from claims as a result of this additional flooding; (e) Provide assurances that encroachment on interior and exterior drainage and ponding areas will not be permitted without offsetting the encroachment by substitute storage or equivalent pumping capacity, without cost to the United States; (f) agree to publicize flood plain information in the area concerned and to provide this information to zoning and other regulatory agencies and public information media for their guidance and appropriate action, including adoption of such regulations as may be necessary to insure compatibility between future developments and protection levels provided by the project; and (g) Maintain and operate all works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. The assurances were accepted by the Federal Government July 26, 1979. Operations during fiscal year. A contract for construction of levees and floodwalls was awarded March 20, 1981, and continues. Engineering and design continued. * Condition at end of fiscal year. Land acquisition and relocations by local sponsor are complete. 31. WACO LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Bosque River, 4.6 river miles above its confluence with Brazos River, at City of Waco, McLennan County, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorization act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of project is $50,853,000 including $250,000 contributed by local interests and $2,500,000 other non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. Section G of the Flood Control Act of December 1944 applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage and the contract with the City of Waco transferring the existing Lake Waco to the Government for their water supply storage, was approved by the Secretary of the Army on April 15, 1958. To date the Authority for their portion of the water supply storage has paid $1,181,474. Also under the contract the Authority and the City must pay 14.607 and 2.087 percent respectively of the actual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the Authority has paid $471,520 and the City has paid $79,276. Operations during fiscal year. Regular funds: Routine operations and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Waco project: Accumulated damages prevented through FY 1982 were $58,731,900. Condition at end of fiscal year.Construction was started in July 1958, and project was ready for beneficial use in February 1965. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 32. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX Location. On Sulphur River in Cass and Bowie Counties, Texas. Dam is 45 miles above mouth of Sulphur River, and about 8 miles southwest of Texarkana, Texas. Existing project. An earth-fill dam 18,500 feet long and 100 feet high, including a spillway 200 feet wide and outlet works with a capacity of 27,600 cubic feet per second. Reservoir controls runoff from 3,400 square miles of drainage area, and has a storage capacity, of 2,654,300 acre-feet, of which 145,300 acre-feet are for conservation and remainder for flood control. Estimated cost for work (October 1978) is $51,945,000 which includes $5,449,100 Code 711, $399,939 accelerated public works funds, and $13,138,004 to be reimbursed by local interests, over a period not to exceed 50 years, for water supply storage, and including $2,060,076 for pro rata share of original reservoir cost. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Wright Patman project: Accumulated damages prevented through FY 1982 were $13,697,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in August 1948 and completed in March 1962, except real estate activities, 16-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 construction under Code 711, and conversion of 120,000 acre-feet to water supply storage after completion of Cooper Reservoir. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 regular continue. This project transferrred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of FY 1979. 33. ZACATE CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Location. The project is located on Zacate Creek in the Rio Grande River Basin at Laredo, Webb County, Texas, approximately 150 miles south of' San Antonio, Texas. Existing Project. Provides for realignment and. enlargement of approximately 3.9 miles of channel improvement from Corpus Christi-Washington, up to Canal Street. New bridges were constructed at Clark Park, Saunders-LaFayette and the Missouri- Pacific Railroad. Bridge modifications were made at Corpus Christi-Washington, Sanchez-Gustavus and the Texas-Mexican Railroad. Estimated Federal cost of this project is $2,882,000, and estimated cost to local interests is $1,300,000. The project was authorized under Section 205, Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress. Local Cooperation. Local interests must provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction of all alterations and relocations of existing buildings, utilities, bridges (exclusive of railroad bridges), sewers, pipelines, and any other existing improvements; hold the United States free from damages due to the construction work, operate and maintain all features after completion of the project. Operations during fiscal year.The construction contracts for both the Channel Improvement and the Railroad Bridge modification were physically completed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction initiated in August 1980, and the project is about 98 percent complete. 34. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed local flood protection projects is made periodically in compliance with section 208.10 of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, which contains regulations for operation and maintenance of local flood-protection works approved by Secretary of the Army in accordance with authority in section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936. See Table 16-D for inspections made this fiscal year. Inspection costs for FY from regular funds for maintenance were $7,118. Total costs to September 30, 1982 were $468,583. 35. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with Flood Control Act of 1944 expenditures were made for scheduling flood control reservoir operations and preparation of reservoir regulation manual for Marshall Ford Dam, on the Colorado River, near City of Austin, Texas, and for preparation of reservoir regulation manual for Twin Buttes Dam, on Middle and South Concho Rivers near City of San Angelo, Texas. Marshall Ford Dam was authorized by 1937 River and Harbor Act. Project was constructed jointly by Bureau of Reclamation and Lower Colorado River Authority and was completed during FY 1942. Twin Buttes Reservoir was authorized for construction by Department of Interior by Public Law 152, 85th Congress. Construction was initiated in June 1960; closure of dam started in June 1962; deliberate impoundment was started January 23, 1963. Accumulated damages prevented by Marshall Ford Reservoir through FY 1982 were $139,745,600. During filling stage Twin Buttes Reservoir will consist of two separate pools, one on South Concho River and the other on Middle Concho River and Spring Creek. Equalizing channel between these two pools is at elevation 1925.0. Costs for fiscal year from regular funds for maintenance were $144,996. 36. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 16-C.) 37. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Table 16-E.) Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Emergency flood control, hurricane-flood, and shore protection activities (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs were $152,795 for disaster preparedness, and $70,632 for advance measures. Multi-Purpose Projects Including Power 38. BELTON LAKE MODIFICATION, TX Location. For location of completed dam see Belton Lake, Texas in this chapter. Existing project. The modification of Belton Lake to provide installation of hydroelectric power generating facilities was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1954 (H.Doc. 535, 81 st Cong., 2nd Sess.). The plan of improvement provides for reallocation of the gross storage capacity in Belton 16-14 FORT WORTH TEXAS DISTRICT Lake to provide a power pool and the installation of hydroelectric power generating facilities. Condition at end of fiscal year. The modification is classified as deferred until the Chief of Engineers determines it is advisable. 39. DAM A LAKE, TX Location. The dam would be located approximately 18 miles west of Jasper and about 4 miles west of Horger, Texas. Existing project. The project is designed to be used as a run-of-river plant for the generation of power and to re-regulate power surges from the proposed Rockland Lake. The last estimate of project cost was $3,220,000 in 1954. For last full report see Annual Report of 1952. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is classified as deferred. The study was reactivated to determine if project is economically feasible. 40. ROCKLAND LAKE, TX Location. The dam would be located approximately 3 miles west of Rockland, Texas, on the Neches River. Existing project. The project would control floods, generate hydroelectric power, and provide water supply for various uses. The last estimate of project cost was $46,300,000 in 1954. For the last full report see Annual Report of 1952. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is classified as deferred. The study was reactivated to determine if project is economically feasible. 41. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX Location. Dam is on Angelina River 25.2 miles upstream from its confluence with Neches River and about 10 miles northwest of Jasper, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorization act see Annual Report 1969. Estimated cost of project is $68,683,000 including $3,000,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. A contract with the Lower Neches Valley Authority, a State agency, to contribute $3,000,000 toward the first cost and an additional $200,000 annually for 50 years after completion of the project was approved by the Secretary of the Army on January 22, 1957. Contribution of $3,000,000 was made in full and annual payments to date of $3,000,000 have been made by the Authority. A contract with the City of Lufkin for water supply storage was approved May 27, 1969 by the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $525,600. To date the City has paid $70,715. Also under the contract the City of Lufkin must pay annually 0.692 percent of the annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the City has paid $49,457. Operations during fiscal year. Continued routine operation and maintenance. Recreation facilities under Code 710 were constructed. Benefits accrued to Sam Rayburn project: Accumulated damages prevented through FY 1982 were $50,528,900. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started August 1956 and project was ready for beneficial use in March 1965. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 42. TOWN BLUFF DAM - B. A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Neches River about 12.4 miles below mouth of Angelina River, one-half mile north of Town Bluff, Texas, and 93 river miles north of Beaumont, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of project is $9,888,000, including $2 million contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations during fiscal year. Regular funds: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started March 1947 and project was ready for beneficial use in April 1951. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Studies began to determine the feasibility of modifying the existing project to incorporate hydropower, and continue. 43. WHITNEY LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Brazos River, about 442 miles above mouth of river, 5.5 miles southwest of Whitney, Texas, and about 38 miles upstream from City of Waco, Tex. (See Geological Survey sheets: Waco, Cleburne, and Granbury scale 1:125,000, and Whitney, Blum, and Morgan scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of project is $46,306,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Continued routine operation and maintenance. Benefits accrued to Whitney project: Accumulated damages prevented through FY 1982 were $131,516,200. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project was started June 1946 and ready for flood control use in December 1951. First power was placed on-the-line in June 1953. Raise power pool is complete. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 16-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 General Investigations 44. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $645 for navigation studies, $981,133 for flood damage prevention studies, $77,809 for coordination with other agencies, and $375,546 for preauthorization studies Phase I for a total of $1,435,133. 45. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Work was continued under the Flood Plain Management Services on the compilation of information on floods and potential flood damages, including identification of those areas subject to inundation. Fiscal year expenditures for these activities totaled $207,593. Fiscal year costs were $6,006 for hydrologic studies. The national program of inspection of dams, authorized by Public Law 92- 367, was continued in FY 1982. Expenditures under this program for inventory of dams were $467. 16-16 TABLE 16-A FORT WORTH TEXAS DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project 1. Trinity River Project, TX 2. Aquilla Lake, TX 3. Bardwell Lake, TX 4. Belton Lake, TX 5. Benbrook Lake, TX 6. Big Sandy Lake, TX 7. Boggy Creek, TX 8. Canyon Lake, TX (Federal Funds) 9. Cooper Lake and Channels, TX 10. Duck Creek Channel Improvement, TX 11. Elm Fork 'Floodway, TX 12. Ferrells Bridge Dam Lake O' The Pines, TX 13. Grapevine Lake, TX FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep. 30, 1982 840,000 516,712 6,242,000 5,731,069 1,000,000 1,016,390 4,875,000 5,418,361 -- ! Funding New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (-)2,192 13,014 1,230,000 857,672 17,410 18,968 1,176,204 959,222 (-)2,165 1,066,900 1,023,979 774,900 814,700 1,1 1,011,242 807,839 1,0 16-17 700,000 680,184 8,425,000 7,226,026 666,800 704,472 7,010 6,850 702,200 750,667 13,000 17,813 767,400 784,450 250,000 275,431 624,400 620,445 400,000 288,535 (-)29,600 (-)28,978 1,483,100 975,229 50 67 13,30 12,44 62 60 6 86 21 99 88 6 2i 2 968,200 515,900 927,136 515,502 162,000 2,563 193,499 3,345 .,244,600 686,700 .,048,737 828,738 239,300 1,531 131,436 147,789 ,,125,600 487,500 839,385 781,720 75,000 350,000 74,910 311,826 - (-)3,600 - (-)3,600 679,300 585,900 669,616 613,781 -)561,000 350,000 680,192 677,824 - (-)44,000 (-)17,073 (-)27,550 71 7( 2( (-)I (-)I 1 1 9F 1,7 )0,000 21,939,866 78,572 21,775,043 )0,000 42,457,300 1,014 39,838,337 - 10,934,505 - 10,934,505 X4,600 6,659,687 )0,648 6,593,731 30,000 16,891,645 9,765 16,841,2501 10,900 9,922,003 34,927 9,620,691 X3,256 13,080,542 L5,649 13,053,8872 )4,600 9,570,955 30,233 9,446,080 35,000 740,000 77,041 739,208 70,000 270,000 45,452 245,452 - 19,088,5243 - 19,088,524 32,800 7,459,484 16,764 7,435,943 00,000 22,653,000 05,401 22,011,060 30,095 506,600 30,095 506,600 - 662,400 - 662,400 - 14,175,1974 - 14,175,1976 K 50,400 12,207,767 56,338 12,056,567 - 9,967,790 - 9,967,7907 41,800 11,088,418 91,786 11,016,167 ( TABLE 16-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project 14. Greenville, TX 15. Hords Creek Lake, TX 16. Lake Brownwood Modification, TX 17. Lakeview Lake, TX 18. Lavon Lake, TX 19. Lavon Lake Modification & East Fork Channel Improvement, TX 20. Lewisville Dam, TX 21. Millican Lake, TX 22. Navarro Mills Lake, TX 23. O. C. Fisher Dam and Lake, TX 24. Proctor Lake, TX 25. Ray Roberts Lake, TX 40. Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep. 30, 1982 New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 42,202 109,250 108,407 443,900 430,224 13,667 18,145,000 18,178,789 936,900 969,655 1,165,500 1,401,220 724,900 732,522 1,374,150 1,082,487 1,581 (-)5,660 (-)5,660 754,500 678,118 (-)7,600 (-)7,079 664,600 618,743 616,500 568,837 (-)1,000,000 60,523 112,000 103,578 12,649 495,800 426,750 17,324,000 14,890,100 64,096 38,949 1,241,800 1,130,811 2,413,000 1,729,262 1,297 (-)528 315 376,300 388,095 8 19,785,000 19,460,419 904,800 902,713 6,900,000 6,729,155 2,300,000 2,059,628 1,017,000 1,187,391 300,000 294,536 24,000 23,947 577,100 630,573 617,300 617,011 507,600 578,781 (-)425,000 667,048 (-)5,813 2,608 49,000 50,774 328,300 347,437 19,689,000 18,677,800 309,000 276,544 962,900 883,200 2,601,000 2,716,402 1,775,000 1,989,569 991,100 1,171,036 490,000 418,158 53 621,500 659,377 420,800 469,500 7,000 7,000 514,700 518,437 5,500,000 5,363,835 3,000 2,557 896,900 867,592 2,711,0898 2,711,089 4,786,059 4,698,702 840,000 840,000 97,288,000 93,430,568 12,901,796 12,844,193 10,907,309 10,700,446 69,500,862 68,759,614 09,000 24,773,579 26,286 23,557,6439 35,600 13,488,841 95,291 13,231,78510 15,000 3,325,000 75,026; 3,307,718 5,904 9,845,992 5,891 9,845,97911 96,800 7,021,905 65,859 6,977,088 - 16,027,467 - 16,027,467 71,900 6,747,055 47,689 6,717,114 30,000 14,446,585 11,556 14,428,141 06,500 6,334,172 59,991 6,227,072 00,000 28,394,700 30,776 26,847,565 89,000 60,672,256 39,529 60,622,34212 1,4( 2 1,5 1,2 3] 3, 6! 6 16-18 4, 44 7( 6 18,6( 17,51 TABLE 16-A FORT WORTH TEXAS DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep. 30, 1982 26. San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 27. San Gabriel River, TX Granger North Fork 28. Somerville Lake, TX 29. Stillhouse Hollow Dam, TX 30. Three Rivers, TX 41. Town Bluff Dam- B. A. Steinhagen Lake, TX 31. Waco Lake, TX 42. Whitney Lake, TX 32. Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX Maint. Approp. 1,660,500 Cost 1,591,894 New Work: Approp. 920,000 Cost 1,080,730 New Work: Contrib. - Cost - New Work: Approp. 8,000,000 Cost 9,524,145 Maint. 4 Approp. 102,896 Cost - Maint. Approp. 89,596 Cost - New Work: Approp. 576,400 Cost 567,830 Maint. Approp. 1,746,100 Cost 1,310,493 New Work: Approp. (-)5,000 Cost 3,807 Maint. Approp. 871,600 Cost 734,091 New Work: Approp. 112,500 Cost 78,092 New Work: Approp. - Cost - Maint. Approp. 472,700 Cost 466%637 New Work: Approp. 16,000 Cost 20,176 Maint. Approp. 768,000 Cost 812,154 New Work: Approp. 110,000 Cost 15,193 Maint. Approp. 1,725,604 Cost 1,797,633 New Work: Approp. (-)1,094 Cost 250,168 Maint. Approp. 1,145,000 Cost 979,843 1,471,700 3,838,500 1,714,400 21,053,394 1,524,529 1,706,868 3,181,584 20,339,809 2,570,000 1,150,000 4,750,000 34,418,048 2,563,224 937,593 4,212,286 33,636,942 - 96,450 141,775 927,975 - 65,250 172,975 927,975 12,826,000 1,607,000 2,080,000 99,252,100 12,372,988 1,758,823 2,158,550 98,949,920 319,700 668,100 615,900 1,706,596 406,430 621,982 609,162 1,637,574 274,200 591,300 667,000 1,622,096 353,927 567,067 620,044 1,541,038 6,566 134,990 151,000 27,666,775 202,076 146,313 137,380 27,625,583 837,700 990,700 1,315,200 9,711,747 1,291,207 978,203 1,003,973 9,383,510 (-)220 - 20,000 20,524,04413 - - 12,319 20,516,363 650,300 768,800 993,100 6,944,826 718,939 742,189 789,229 6,629,105 115,000 2,000,000 3,169,000 5,890,500 - 1,878,478 3,197,970 5,648,415 - - - 6,602,737 - - - 6,602,73714 472,500 541,700 594,980 7,708,894 470,173 528,612 582,686 7,664,650 - - - 49,521,12115 - - - 49,521,121 820,400 778,200 1,074,300 9,011,726 817,001 782,059 1,010,122 8,939,189 14,813 128,000 - 42,971,349 108,737 103,337 7,723 42,953,52616 1,494,000 1,434,400 1,760,400 19,873,480 1,425,105 1,447,788 1,667,889 19,694,544 (-)1,146 - 41,000 35,731,626 31,450 - 41,000 35,731,626 884,700 808,000 1,466,000 14,633,790 988,791 854,738 1,328,404 14,367,095 16-19 TABLE 16-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep. 30, 1982 33. Zacate Creek, TX New Work: Approp. 110,000 552,000 1,705,000 405,000 2,772,000 Cost 107,946 221,342 1,623,719 728,216 2,681,223 'Excludes $47,309 receipts from reconveyance of land, deposited to miscellaneous receipts. 2Excludes $322 346 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts. 3Excludes $1,422,848 expended for new work from contributed funds, including $22,848 "Contributed Funds Other" for installation and operation of gages for leakage study. 4Includes $1,378,486 for Code 711, $52,808 for Code 713, and $399,739 accelerated Public Works Act funds. Excludes $1,711,200 contributed funds. 5Includes $1,376,322 for Code 711, $52,808 for Code 713, and $399,739 accelerated Public Works Act funds. Excludes $4,137 reimbursed in Fiscal Year 1973. 6Claim Northeast Texas Municipal Water District $16,546. Three payments of $12,410 less real estate charges of $1,325, making a total of $2 811 reimbursed in Fiscal Year 1972, Fiscal Year 1973, and Fiscal Year 1974. 7Excludes $146,795 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts, and $2,040,026 for new work expended from contributed funds. 8Excludes $105.079 expended from contributed funds. 9Excludes receipts from reconveyance of land of $426,606 which were deposited to miscellaneous receipts, and $3,676,661 for new work expended from contributed funds. 1�Includes $130,000 under appropriation 96X5125. "Excludes $300,000 expended from contributed funds. 12Excludes $3 million expended from contributed funds. 13Includes receipts from disposals and revocation of funds related thereto. 14Excludes $2,000,000 contributed funds expended. 15Excludes $2,750,000 expended for contributed funds. '6 Excludes $188,282 receipts from reconveyance of lands deposited to miscellaneous receipts. 16-20 TABLE 16-B FORT WORTH TEXAS DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section AuthorizingP in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Aug. 13, 1968 Mar. 31, 1960 Jul. 24, 1946 Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 31, 1970 Jun. 22, 1936 Mar. 2., 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 3, 1955 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1975 Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 24, 1946 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 31, 1970 AQUILLA LAKE TX Construction of a dam on Aquilla Creek, about 6.8 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas and about 24 miles north of Waco, Texas. BARDWELL LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Waxahachie Creek about 5 miles south of Ennis, Texas. BELTON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Leon River about 3 miles north of Belton, Texas. Modification (see Sec. 36 of Text) of the dam to provide for generation of hydroelectric power. BENBROOK LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Clear Fork of the Trinity River about 10 miles southwest of Fort Worth, Texas. BIG SANDY LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Big Sandy Creek about six miles northwest of Big Sandy, Texas. BOGGY CREEK, TX Interim Survey Report. CANYON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Guadalupe River about 12 miles northwest of New Braunfels, Texas. COOPER LAKE AND CHANNELS, TX Construction of earth-fill dam and reservoir area; channel clearing, realignment, and enlargement; enlargement and extension of existing levees; construction of appurtenant drainage works along main stem of Sulphur River above mile 126; channel clearing, realinement, and enlargement and levee enlargement and modification of appurtenant drainage works on Cuthand Creek below mile 24, on Sulphur River below mile 70, except in proposed Cooper Reservoir, miles 29 to 42, and on Middle Sulphur River below mile 8; channel clearing and realignment of Brushy Creek below mile 5; and levee enlargement on North Sulphur River between miles 1 and 5. DAM "A" LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Neches River about 18 miles west of Jasper, Texas. DUCK CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Realignment and enlargement of about 7 miles of Duck Creek in the urban area of Garland, Texas. ELM FORK FLOODWAY, TX Realignment and enlargement of the Elm Fork of the Trinity River and Denton Creek, and a parallel levee system from the existing Dallas levee system upstream to near the Dallas and Denton county lines. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM-LAKE O' THE PINES TX Provides for construction of an earth-fill dam and reservoir area. GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Denton Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, about 20 miles northwest of Dallas, Texas. GREENVILLE LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION Realignment and enlargement of Long Branch, a tributary of the Sabine River, in the city of Greenville, Texas. 16-21 S. Doc. 52, 90th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 424, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 88, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 429, 91st Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Act of 1936 (PL 738) H. Doc. 247, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 488, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 91-429, 91st Cong., 2nd Sess. 39. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 16-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 15. 16. 17. 18. 19.. in Text Act Aug. 18, 1941 Aug. 13, 1968 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 13, 1968 Sep. 3, 1954 Dec. 31, 1970 Aug. 18, 1941 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Jan. 3, 1975 16-22 See Date Section Authorizing Project and Work Authorized HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Hords Creek, a tributary of Pecan Bayou, near the city of Coleman, Texas. LAKE BROWNWOOD MODIFICATION, TX Modification of the existing Lake Brownwood located on Pecan Bayou about 8 miles north of Brownwood, Texas. LAKEVIEW LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Mountain Creek, adjacent to the city limits of Grand Prairie, Texas, about 3 miles above the existing Mountain Creek Dam. LAVON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the East Fork of the Trinity River about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION AND EAST FORK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Enlarge Lavon dam and enlargement and realignment of the lower 25 miles of the East Fork of the Trinity River, including rehabilitation of existing levees. Improvement of Collin County Road 115. LEWISVILLE DAM, TX Construction of a dam on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River near the City of Lewisville, Texas. MILLICAN LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Navasota River about seven miles north of Navasota, Texas. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX *Construction of a dam on Richland Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, about 16 miles southwest of Corsicana, Texas. Alteration of FM Highway 3164 in Wolf Creek Park. O. C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the North Concho River just above San Angelo, Texas. PROCTOR LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Leon River about 8 miles northeast of Comanche, Texas. RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River between Sanger and Aubrey, Texas, about 30 miles upstream from the existing Lewisville Dam. ROCKLAND LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Neches River approximately three miles west of Rockland. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX Construction of a dam on the Angelina River about 10 miles northwest of Jasper, Texas. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Channel improvement of the San Antonio River and tributaries in and near the City of San Antonio, Texas. SAN GABRIEL RIVER PROJECT, TX Construction of: (1) a dam (Granger Dam and Lake) on the San Gabriel River about 7 miles east of Granger, Texas, (2) a dam (North Fork Lake) on the North Fork of the San Gabriel River about 3.5 miles northwest of Georgetown, Texas and (3) a dam (South Fork Lake) on the South Fork of the San Gabriel River about 3 miles southwest of Georgetown, Texas. Documents H. Doc. 370, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 350, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 533, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 554, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 341, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 498, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 315, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 344, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess., and H. Doc. 591, 87st Cong., 2nd Sess. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25 40. 41. 26. 27. TABLE 16-B FORT WORTH TEXAS DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 28. 29. 30. 42. Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 29, 1971 Mar. 2,1945 Oct. 27, 1965 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 18, 1941 Jul. 24, 1946 Jun. 30, 1948 SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Yegua Creek about 2 miles south of Somerville, Texas. STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX Construction of a dam on the Lampasas River about 5 miles southwest of Belton, Texas. THREE RIVERS FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, TX Construction of a levee to provide flood protection to the City of Three Rivers, Texas, on the Frio River. TOWN BLUFF DAM-B.A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Neches River near Jasper, Texas. TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TX Construction of Tennessee Colony Dam located at river mile 339.2 on the Trinity River about 16 miles west of Palestine, Texas; a multiple purpose channel from the Houston, Texas ship channel to Fort Worth, Texas; a distance of approximately 363 miles, an extension of the existing Dallas, Texas, Floodway downstream approximately 9.0 miles; a realignment and enlargement of the West Fork of the Trinity River from the mouth of the West Fork to the existing Fort Worth, Texas, Floodway, a distance of approximately 31 miles; and water conveyance facilities involving construction of about 98 miles of pipeline from Tennessee Colony Lake to the existing Benbrook Lake. WACO LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the northwest edge of Waco, Texas, below the confluence of the North, South, and Middle Bosque Rivers. WHITNEY LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Brazos River, about 19 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas. Raise the power pool 13.0 feet. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX Construction of an earth-fill dam and reservoir. ZACATE CREEK CHANNEL, TX Construction of Channel Improvement. 16-23 H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 92-153, 92nd Cong. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess., and H. Doc. 364, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 390, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 6419, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. PL 858 1. 31. 43. 32. 33. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 16-C (See Section 36 of Text) For Last Cost To September 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Big Fossil Creek, Tex.3 1969 - - Big Spring, Tex. 2 1979 - Brownwood Channel Improvement, Tex.' - - Carl L. Estes Dam and Lake, Tex.2 1979 - Fort Worth Floodway (Clear Fork), Tex.3 1971 - - Fort Worth Floodway (West Fork), Tex.3 1971 - - Lake Fork Lake, Sabine River, Tex.2 - - Navasota Lake, Navasota River, Tex.' - - Pecan Bayou Lake, Pecan Bayou, Tex.' - - Plainview Local Flood Protection Project2 1979 - Roanoak Lake, Tex.2 1979 - - Rutledge Hollow Creek Channel Improvement, Poteet, Tex.3 1969 - - 'Awaiting availability of funds. 2Inactive. 3Completed. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 16-D (See Section 34 of Text) Location Dates of Inspection Munday Floodway Nov. 6, 1981 Fort Worth Floodway Dec. 3, 1981 Big Fossil Creek Floodway Jan. 18, 1982 Dallas Floodway Apr. 28, 1982 San Antonio Floodway Aug. 16, 1982 Pleasanton Floodway Aug. 18, 1982 Poteet Floodway Aug. 18, 1982 Greenville Floodway Aug. 25, 1982 16-24 FORT WORTH TEXAS DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 16-E (See Section 37 of Text) Project Cost Bonito-Lanana Creek, TX $ 116 Brushy Creek, Round Rock, TX 7,500 California Creek, Hamlin, TX 8,478 Chacon Creek, Round Rock, TX 7,500 Cibolo Creek, Shertz, TX 94,123 Dry Devils R&L Draw, Sonora, TX 42 Edgecliff Branch, Edgecliff Village, TX 81,603 Elm Fork - Gainsville, TX 7,665 Escondido Creek, Kenedy, TX 7,409 Hickory Creek, Balch Springs, TX 10,917 Lake Creek, Round Rock, TX 8,837 Lake Creek, Williamson County, TX 12,504 Nolan Creek, Belton, TX 7,500 Parker Creek, Marshall, TX 30 Pecan Creek, Gainesville, TX 8,549 Pecan and Cooper Creeks, Denton, TX 35,527 Playa Flooding, Roscoe, TX 89,366 Shoal Creek, Austin, TX 7,500 South Nolan Creek, Killeen, TX 149 Waco Creek, Beverly Hills, TX 67 Walnut Creek, Springtown, TX 7,491 Wheeler Creek, Gainesville, TX 7,502 16-25 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT* The district comprises watershed of Canadian River and tributaries and the watershed of Arkansas River and tributaries in Colorado and New Mexico; the watershed of Rio Grande and tributaries including Pecos River and its tributaries upstream of Amistad Lake; and watershed of Mimbres River and its tributaries in New Mexico. Note: The district watershed boundaries were revised to include all of New Mexico west of Texas state line and the southwest corner of Colorado west of the Kansas state line. IMPROVEMENTS Flood Control Page Flood Control (cont.) 1. Albuquerque Diversion Channels, NM ...... 2. Cibolo Creek, TX ................... 3. Conchas Lake, NM .................. 4. E1Paso, TX ........... ........... 5. Granada, CO ............... .............. 6. Highway 12, CO . ................... 7. Holly, CO .............. .......... 8. John Martin Reservoir, CO................. 9. Lamed, Pawnee River, KS ................ 10. Rio Grande Basin, NM.................... 10A. Abiquiu Dam, NM.................. 10B. Cochiti Lake, NM .................. 10C. Galisteo Dam, NM.................. 10D. Jemez Canyon Dam, NM .................. 10E. Rio Grande Floodway, NM................. 10F. Truth or Consequences (Hot Springs) Unit, NM ................... 11. Santa Fe River and Arroyo Mascaras, NM ..................... 17-1 17-2 17-2 17-2 17-3 17-3 17-3 17-3 17-4 17-4 17-4 17-4 17-5 ,17-5 17-5 12. Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, NM ............. 17-6 13. Smith Creek, CO ....................... 17-7 14. Trinidad Lake, CO ....................... 17-7 15. Two Rivers Dam, NM ....................... 17-8 16. Inspection of completed flood control projects ....................... 17-8 17. Scheduling flood control reservoir operations........................ 17-8 18. Other authorized flood control projects .......................... 17-9 19. Flood control work under special authorizations ..................... 17-9 General Investigations 17-6 20. 21. 17-6 22. Flood Control 1. ALBUQUERQUE DIVERSION CHANNELS, NM Location. In an area which comprises watersheds of ephemeral streams entering a 15-mile reach of Rio Grande from the east at Albuquerque, NM, and vicinity. Combined drainage area of tributaries is about 276 square miles. Sandia range of the Rocky Mountains, which is about 12 miles east of Rio Grande, forms eastern border of watersheds. Crest of mountain range rises more than a mile over river to elevation of 10,692 feet above mean sea level. (See Geological Survey Map, Albuquerque, NM, quadrangle, scale 1:62,500.). Existing project. Plans of improvement consists of north and south diversion channels on high ground east of and parallel to valley. Channels are designed to carry floods equal in magnitude to standard project flood from all tributaries. Surveys ........................ ......... 17-9 Collection and study of basic data ........... 17-9 Inspection of dams ....................... 17-9 For description of complete improvement and authorizing legislation see page 17-15 of Annual Report for FY 1973. Local cooperation. Section 2 Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. For details of local cooperation requirements see page 17-2 of Annual Report for FY 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. The North and South Diversion Channels prevented an estimated $456,600 annual flood damages during FY. The estimated total accumulated flood damages prevented were $36,768,300. Peak flood flows recorded during FY 1982 were North Diversion Channel near Alameda, 7,400 c.f.s. on July 31, 1982, and for South Diversion Channel 860 c.f.s. on August 1, 1982. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the north and south diversion channels began in March 1965, and was completed in March 1972. Channels are in good condition and well maintained by local interests. *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 17-1 Page REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 2. CIBOLO CREEK, TX Location. Presidio, TX, Presidio County, at the confluence with the Rio Grande in southwest Texas. Project. Consists of left bank levee 1.4 miles long to protect the town of Presidio TX and a right bank swing levee 0.7 miles long to protect a housing development area. The levee system is designed for a peak flow of 67,000 c.f.s. on Cibolo Creek with a coincident flow in the Rio Grande of 44,000 c.f.s. Appurtences consist of ramps for existing road and 18 inch rip-rap for both levees on Cibolo Creek. Local Cooperation. Section 3 Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. Local interests are in compliance with Section 221, 1970 FC Act and Public Law 91-646 Uniform Relocation Act of 1970. Operations and results. N/A Conditions at the end of the year. Construction was started in April 82 and will be completed in November 1982. 3. CONCHAS LAKE, NM Location. Dam is in San Miguel County, NM, on Canadian River, about one-fourth mile downstream from confluence of Canadian and Conchas Rivers. (See Geological Survey State map of New Mexico, scale 1:500,000, and Geological Survey topographic map. Thcumcari quadrangle, scale 1: 125,000). Existing project. A concrete gravity main dam section 1,250 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet above streambed located in Canadian River Canyon together with earth dikes on each side having an overall length of about 3.7 miles. Main section contains conduits in its base for release of water to maintain low flows and for drainage of reservoir, and an overflow, ungated spillway 300 feet long. Earth dikes vary in height up to 100 feet and north dike contains a concrete ogee-type emergency spillway 3,000 feet long. Reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 529,000 acrefeet (198,900 for flood control, 259,600 for water conservation and irrigation, and 70,500 dead storage). Dam controls 7,409 square miles of drainage area. (See page 17-16 of Annual Report of 1973 for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of reservoir continued. Reservoir was operated for storage of floodwaters and releases for irrigation purposes. $11,000 in flood damages were prevented during FY 1982; and $245,000 in sediment damages were prevented. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by project through FY 1982 were $1,945,400. Estimated irrigation benefits for FY 1982 were $245,000. Estimated total accumulated irrigation benefits through FY 1982 were $7,986,600. Pool elevation at start of FY 1982 was 4,176.55 feet with corresponding storage of 155,688 acre-feet. Total releases for reporting period were 71,644 acre-feet. Releases of 67,614 acre-feet were made to Arch Hurley Conservancy District and 2,389 acre-feet to Bell Ranch. Pool elevation on September 30, 1982, was 4,190.63 feet with corresponding storage of 241,753 acre-feet. Sediment deposition during the fiscal year was 2,194 acre-feet. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was essentially complete in 1940. Reservoir and appurtenances are in good condition and in operation. Irrigation of some lands under project was begun in November 1945. A cost sharing agreement between the Government and the State of New Mexico for additional Recreation Development at Conchas Lake was approved in August 1977. Costs of the facilities are 50 percent State of New Mexico and 50 percent Federal. Construction of these recreation facilities was initiated in FY 1978. The facilities are approximately 71 percent complete. 4. EL PASO, TX Location. At El Paso, El Paso County, TX, which is on left bank of Rio Grande in reach that forms part of international boundary between United States and Republic of Mexico. (Geological Survey map for El Paso, TX; New Mexico quadrangle, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Consists of a single-purpose flood control system of detention dams, diversion dikes, and channels to collect, regulate and discharge arroyo runoff into Rio Grande. Runoff from tributary arroyos on eastern, southern, and western slopes of adjacent Franklin Mountains often inundates sections of city and its outlying suburban developments. Project is divided into four independent elements: Northwest area, Central area, and two units (Copper System and Bluff Channel) in Southeast area. The project plan satisfies the 1933 U.S. and Mexico agreement on limited tributary discharge into the Rio Grande in El Paso, Texas. (See Table 17-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2 Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Flood control dams in operation during FY 1982 and dates of completion of construction are as follows: Northgate and Range Dams (February 1973); Sunrise and Mountain Park Dams (October 1974); and Pershing Dam (March 1977); Fort Bliss Diversion Channel (November 1978); Oxidation Pond and Buena Vista Diversion and Oxidation Pond Outlet Conduit (November 1980); Mulberry and Thorn Drive Dams (June 1982); Mesa Dam was completed in September 1982. During FY 1982 flood flows and flood control storage were minimal; however, damages which would have resulted from these flows were prevented. The estimated total flood damages prevented since completion of Northgate and Range Dams in 1973 through FY 1982 were $22,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction continued in the Central Area with all elements completed except for the McKelligon-Fillmore-Van Buren Darns System. The Central Area of the project is about 90 percent complete. In the Northwest Area construction has been initiated on Keystone Dam. The remaining Design Memorandum is a supplement to DM 12 addressing redesign of Borderland 17-2 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT and Highway Diversion. The NW Area of the project is about 50% complete. Preliminary Phase I planning on the Southeast Area has been initiated. 5. GRANADA, CO Location. Granada, CO, Prowers County on Wolf Creek, a right bank tributary of the Arkansas River at river mile 1,115. (See Geological Survey map Granada, CO quadrangle, scale 1:24,000). Existing project. Consists of improvement of Wolf Creek channel and levee to protect the town of Granada, CO for a design flow 41,000 c.f.s. from the Arkansas River. The construction of a 7,600 foot long outfall channel along the north edge of town to the Arkansas River will protect the adjacent farmland and town from design peak flows of 9,200 c.f.s. on Wolf Creek. A right bank levee about 0.9 mile in length would divert flood flows to the north and east around the town and existing sewage disposal system. The contributing drainage area of Wolf Creek is 122 square miles. Local Cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. Local interests are in compliance with Section 211 1970 FC Act and Public Law 91-646 Uniform Relocation Act of 1970. Operations and results. N/A Condition at the end of the year. Construction was started in April 1979 and completed in May 1980. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 6. HIGHWAY 12, CO Location. Highway 12, along the Purgatoire River, Las Animas County, CO approximately 7 miles above Trinidad, CO to Weston, CO. (See Geological Survey Map Madrid CO quadrangle scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Three locations on the left bank of the Purgatoire River are protected from bank erosion during flood flows by an approximate total of 1950 feet of Kelner jacks spaced at 12.5 feet on centers. Local cooperation. Section 3 of FC Act of June 22, 1936 applies. Local interests are in compliance with Section 221 1970 FC Act and PL 91-646 Uniform Relocation Act of 1970. Operation and results. N/A Condition of the end of the year. Construction started in September 1982 and is less than 10% complete. 7. HOLLY, CO Location. Holly, CO, Cheyenne County, is situated on the north bank of the Arkansas River at the confluence of Wild Horse Creek, a north bank tributary and Two Butte Creek a south bank tributary and the Arkansas River at river mile 1,105. (See Geological Survey map Holly East CO & KS quadrangle, scale 1:24,000). Existing project. A levee 4.3 miles in length begins at a high point north of Holly extending south along the left bank of Wild Horse Creek to its junction with the Arkansas River then east 4,300 feet below the confluence. Appurtences consist of 2 gravity flow drainage structures for interior ditches and ponding areas with closure structures at the railroad and highway crossings. Contributing drainage area is 5,508 square miles with design flows of 62,000 c.f.s. for Wild Horse Creek and a peak flow of 160,000 c.f.s. for the combined flows on the Arkansas River at Holly, CO. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. Local interests are in compliance with Section 221, 1970 FC Act and Public Law 91-646 Uniform Relocation Act of 1970. Operations and results. Operations by local interests. Condition at the end of the year. Construction was started in June 1979 and placed in operation in 1982. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 8. JOHN MARTIN RESERVOIR, CO Location. On Arkansas River 1,159 miles upstream from its mouth, 300 miles downstream from its source, in Bent County, about 18 miles upstream from city of Lamar, CO. (See Geological Survey maps for Lamar and Las Animas, CO quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. A concrete and earthfill structure about 2.6 miles long with a maximum height of 118 feet above streambed and an overflow, gated spillway 1,174 feet long. Total capacity of reservoir at spillway crest is 615,500 acrefeet (270,200 for flood control and 345,300 for conservation and recreation storage). Reservoir controls a contributing drainage area of 18,130 square miles and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system for flood control in Arkansas River Basin. Public Law 89-298 modified the act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1570) to authorize 10,000 acre-feet of reservoir flood control storage space for fish and wildlife and recreation purposes. For detail of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 17-16 of Annual Report for FY 1973. Local cooperation. Section 3 Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine maintenance and operation continued. Regulation of conservation storage continued under rules and regulations of Arkansas River Compact. No flood damages were prevented during FY 1982; however, $122,400 sediment damages were prevented. Estimated total flood and sediment damages prevented by project through FY 1982 were $74,553,500. Estimated irrigation benefits for FY 1982 were $280,600. Estimated total accumulative irrigation benefits were $20,603,000. Maximum pool elevation of 3,810.26 feet with corresponding storage of 53,248 acre-feet occurred on April 4, 1982. Total releases for FY 1982 were 206,819 acre-feet. Releases attributed to irrigation benefits amounted to 71,406 acre-feet. Sediment depositions was 1,093 acre-feet. 17-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Condition at end of fiscal year. Storage and operation of reservoir for irrigation began in March 1943. Resevoir and appurtenances are in good condition and in operation. 9. LARNED, KS Location. Lamed KS, Pawnee County at river mile 896 on the Arkansas River at the confluence of the Pawnee River, a major tributary that enters the Arkansas River from the west. (See Geological Survey Map, Lamed quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Consists of a levee about 1.9 miles long beginning on the left bank of the Pawnee River, extending east past the confluence of the Arkansas River to a point below the municipal sewage treatment plant, a sufficient distance to prevent backwater from entering the urban area behind the levee. Appurtenent works include an interior drainage system with 3 gravity drainage outlet structures. Stop-log structures are located where the levee intersects the US HIghway 56 and AT & SF Railroad and at Kansas Highway 19. The project design is to protect Lamed, KS from a peak flow of 46,000 c.f.s. in the Arkansas River. Contributing drainage area of the Arkansas River is 7,887 square miles, while the Pawnee River watershed contains 2,549 square miles. Local cooperation. Section 3 FC Act of June, 22, 1936 applies. Local interests are in compliance with Section 221, 1970 FC Act and Public Law 91-646. Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1970. Operations and results. Operations are by local interests. Condition at the end of the year. Construction was started in December 1980 and placed in operation in 1982. 10. RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM Location. Improvements are on Rio Grande and tributaries in New Mexico. More definite locations and descriptions of individual projects are in following paragraphs and individual reports by projects. Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1948 authorized flood control phase of comprehensive plan of development of water resources of Rio Grande basin in New Mexico (H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong., 1st sess.) with exception of Chiflo Dam and Reservoir and spillway gate structure at Chamita Dam. Although recommended Chiflo Dam and Reservoir was deleted from authorized plan, it was excluded without prejudice to future consideration by Congress. It was requested at that time, by States of Colorado and Texas, that project be deferred for restudy regarding required storage and methods of operation. By same act, Congress also authorized for construction irrigation phase of comprehensive plan as recommended by Bureau of Reclamation (H. Doc. 653, 81st Cong., 2nd sess.). The act also stipulated that work should be prosecuted in accordance with joint agreement approved by Secretary of the Army and Acting Secretary of the Interior on November 21, 1957. In addition, under that agreement Bureau of Reclamation was given responsibility for construction, operation, and maintenance of channel rectification, and drainage rehabilitation and extension phases of unified plan of improvement. Authority for Chamita Dam and Reservoir was abrogated when Cochiti Dam and Reservoir was authorized. (See Table 17-B for authorizing legislation and Table 17-C for existing projects.) All operations and costs for projects in authorized plan are in individual reports on the following pages. 10A. ABIQUIU DAM, NM Location. Project is one unit of flood control phase of comprehensive plan for Rio Grande and tributaries, New Mexico. Abiquiu Dam is on Rio Chama near town of Abiquiu, NM, about 32 miles upstream from confluence of Rio Chama and Rio Grande. (See Geological Survey Map for plan and profile of Rio Chama, NM, from mouth to mile 103, sheet 1, and Army Map Service, Aztec, NM; Colorado NJ 13-10, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. An earthfill dam 1,540 feet long, 325 feet high, with a 12-foot diameter controlled outlet, and an uncontrolled spillway in a natural saddle about one mile north of left abutment. Reservoir provides 565,000 acre-feet of flood control and sediment storage. Total capacity at spillway crest is 1,212,000 acre-feet. For detail description of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see Annual Report of 1973. A major rehabilitation project was completed in September, 1980 and the recreation facilities were completed in FY 1981. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine maintenance and operation continued. Storage and flows were regulated in accordance with regulations prescribed by Rio Grande Compact Commission. On October 1, 1982, the pool elevation was 6,161.73 feet. The maximum pool (6,185.79 feet) and storage (84,515 acre-feet) occurred on June 3, 1982. On September 30, 1982, the pool elevation was 6,151.29 feet with a corresponding storage of 32,316 acre-feet. There was 1,480 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1981. There were $89,300 in flood damages prevented during FY 1982. Sediment damages prevented were $165,800. Accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project since completion were $33,140,800 through FY 1982. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was placed in operation in February 1963. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 10B. COCHITI LAKE, NM Location. Dam is at river mile 340 on Rio Grande (river mile 0 being at intersection of New Mexico-Texas State line with international boundary at El Paso, TX), near Pueblo de Cochiti, which is about 50 miles upstream from Albuquerque, NM. (See Geological Survey Maps, Cochiti Dam, 17-4 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT NM, quadrangle and Santo Domingo Pueblo, NM, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Consists of an earthfill dam about 5.4 miles long with a maximum height of 251 feet above streambed. Project extends generally in an east-west line across Rio Grande to a point about 2 miles east of Rio Grande and then southward across Santa Fe River. An uncontrolled spillway with a 460-foot-long ogee-weir and a 160-foot notch 10.5 feet deep in the center is at the embankment on south side of Santa Fe River. Operational releases for flood control and irrigation are made through a 3-barrel gated conduit in left abutment on Rio Grande. Reservoir has a storage capacity of 492,500 acre-feet for flood control, 103,800 acre-feet for sediment and 41,900 acre-feet for recreation within the sediment space, for a total of 596,300 acre-feet. The project controls flood waters from a 11,695 square mile drainage area. For more improvements details see page 17-7 of Annual Report for 1980. See page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report for Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project was completed in June 1975. On October 1, 1981, the pool elevation was 5,321.51 feet with a corresponding storage of 40,852 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 5,328.70 feet with a storage of 48,690 acre-feet on June 3, 1982. There was 1,181 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1982. There were no flood damages prevented during FY 1982. Sediment damages prevented were $132,300. Accrued total damages prevented are $34,479,300. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The dam and appurtenances were placed in operation in 1975. The Cochiti Recreation area was completed in 1976, with the Visitors Center completion in 1977. The Tetilla Peak Recreation area was re-advertised and awarded in 1980 and completed in 1981. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 10C. GALISTEO DAM, NM Location. Dam is at river mile 12 on Galisteo Creek, a tributary of Rio Grande. Definite project site is about 8 miles upstream of project document site. Reservoir will extend upstream from dam for about 4 miles to near village of Waldo, NM. (See Geological Survey Map, San Pedro 1, NM quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Consists of an earthfill dam 2,820 feet long with a maximum height of 158 feet above streambed. The outlet works consist of a 10-foot diameter uncontrolled outlet with a discharge capacity of 4,980 cubic feet per second with pool at spillway crest elevation. The spillway is a broad crested weir 250 feet long in right abutment. The flood control storage is 89,000 acre-feet. For more details of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see page 17-17 of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Operation of the project began on October 11, 1970. The reservoir was empty on October 1, 1982. Outflow from the project ranged from zero to the maximum inflow and discharge of 1,666 c.f.s. on September 17, 1982. There was 177 acre-feet of sediment deposition during the year and the reservoir was empty on September 30, 1982. Sediment damages prevented during FY 1982 were $19,800 totaling $89,700 through FY 1982. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was placed in operation in October 1970. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 10D. JEMEZ CANYON DAM, NM Location. in Sandoval County, NM, on Jemez River about 2 miles upstream from confluence ofJemez River and Rio Grande, about 5 miles northwest of Bernalillo, NM (See Geological Survey map for Bernalillo quadrangle, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. An earthfill dam 780 feet long with a maximum height of 136 feet above streambed, and offchannel uncontrolled saddle spillway 400 feet wide, and a 13-foot diameter gated outlet in left abutment with discharge capacity of 8,340 cubic feet per second with pool at spillway crest elevation. Reservoir has a capacity of 106,100 acrefeet (73,000 acre-feet for flood control and 33,100 acre-feet for sediment control). For more detailed description of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see page 17-17 of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. On October 1, 1981, the pool elevation was 5,160.10 feet with a corresponding storage of 2,013 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 5,164.55 feet with a storage of 3,522 acre-feet on September 20, 1982. The reservoir was regulated for sediment control during Fiscal Year 1982. Sediment deposition during the year was 628 acre-feet. There were no flood damages prevented during FY 1982. Sediment benefits during FY 1981 were $70,300. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project through FY 1982 were $3,996,300. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was placed in operation in October 1953. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 10E. RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, NM Location. Project is one unit of flood control phase of comprehensive plan of improvement for Rio Grande Basin in New Mexico. It is on Rio Grande and covers section of river commencing near Truth or Consequences (formerly Hot Springs) at about river mile 123 and extends upstream from Espanola, NM, about river mile 394. (See Table 17-D on Rio Grande Floodway.) Existing project. Consists of flood protection and major drainage improvements by channel rectification, levee' enlargement and construction, and bank stabilization work where needed to protect levees. Construction of project is 17-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 a joint undertaking by Bureau of Reclamation and the Corps. Portions to be done by Corps will consist of levee enlargement, construction, and bank protection work, with channelrectification and drainage-rehabilitation work the responsibility of Bureau of Reclamation. Levees constructed by local interests exist through reach of river involved, but are not uniform as to grade, section, or standard of construction, and in many places are threatened by meandering river. (See Table 17-D on existing project and Table 17-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. In addition to usual requirements, local interests are responsible for all highway, bridge, and public utility relocations or replacements required in construction of project. Local interests will also be required to comply with requirements of Section 221, 1970 Flood Control Act and PL 91-646 Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1970. Total costs for all requirements for completed Albuquerque unit under terms of project authorization were $75,000. There were no non-Federal costs in connection with construction of Cochiti to Rio Puerco unit of floodway. Espanola Valley unit is in the deferred category. The city of Espanola or Santa Clara Pueblo has not given indication they plan positive action to solve the flooding problem. For more details see page 17-8 of Annual Report for 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. There were $2,526,300 in flood damages prevented by the completed floodway project during FY 1982. Estimated total accumulated flood damages prevented by the floodway project through FY 1981 amounted to $37,353,500. The peak flow of the Rio Grande through the middle valley was 5,460 c.f.s. at Albuquerque on June 2, 1982. The peak at San Acacia was 14,100 c.f.s. on September 21, 1982. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of Albuquerque unit and Cochiti to Rio Puerco units of Rio Grande Floodway project is complete. San Acacia to Bosque del Apache unit is deferred for restudy. The Truth or Consequences (Hot Springs) unit was reclassified to the active category on July 18, 1973, based on a letter of intent to cooperate from the city of Truth or Consequences dated May 31, 1973. The Espanola Valley unit was reclassified to deferred category on 17 October 1973. 10OF. TRUTH OR CONSEQUENCES UNIT, NM Location. Vicinity City of Truth or Consequences, New Mexico. Existing project. Plan of improvement will include 4 miles of 20-foot-high levees with positive seepage control, an interior drainage system, and 5 miles of diversion channels. The diversion channels would be required for control of floods on tributary arroyos at and in the vicinity of Truth or Consequences. Estimated Federal cost is not available pending project reformulation. (See Table 17-B for authorizing legislation.) Location cooperation. Section 2 Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Letters of intent have been received from the City of Truth or Consequences (dated July 7, 1977) and the County of Sierra (dated July 6, 1977). Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was initiated in FY 1979 and continued during FY 1981. 11. SANTA FE RIVER AND ARROYO MASCARAS, NM Location. Santa Fe, New Mexico, and Vicinity, within Santa Fe County, First Congressional District. (See Geological Survey map, Santa Fe South and McClure Reservoir quadrangles, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The recommended plan is located in Santa Fe, capital of New Mexico. The city of Santa Fe is experiencing new growth and development throughout the city. The confluence of Arroyo Mascaras with the Santa Fe River is near the downtown area of Santa Fe. Studies to date indicate that the Arroyo Mascaras segment of the project is not justifiable. Accordingly, a report recommending no Federal construction on the Arroyo Mascaras portion of the project was approved by the Division Engineer on 1 October 1979. The authorizing legislation for the project prohibits construction of any impoundment on the Santa Fe River above the existing Nichols Dam and therefore precluded further consideration of the originally recommended Granite Point Dam as a means of providing flood damage protection for the Santa Fe River. Accordingly, the project is being reformulated. The most likely plan of improvement for the Santa Fe River will provide 100-year flood protection by combination of channel modifications, within the existing channel, replacement and/or modification of 6 bridges; and construction of low architecturally treated walls, to preserve the unique river park setting. Estimated cost of the reformulated project is approximately $6,000,000. Local cooperation. Section 2 Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Further requirements include an agreement with the local interests to prevent encroachments in the existing Santa Fe River channel below any dam project and maintain a minimum channel capacity of 5,000 c.f.s.: and bear all costs of operation and maintenance of the flood control works presently estimated at $5,500 on an average annual basis. Requirements are described in full on page 17-8 of Fiscal Year 1981 Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Plan of action and hydrology design memorandum were completed in FY 1979. Studies continued during FY 1982. 12. SANTA ROSA DAM AND LAKE, NM Location. Lake is in Guadalupe County, on Pecos River, at river mile 766.4 approximately 7 miles north of Santa Rosa, NM (See U.S.-Geological Survey map, Corazon, NM, sheet, scale 1:125,000.) 17-6 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT Existing project. Project operation began in November 1979. Authorized plan of improvement consists of an earth and rock fill dam 1,950 feet long and 212 feet maximum height above the streambed. Project purposes are flood control, irrigation and sediment retention. An unlined, open rock cut about 1,000 feet back from the left abutment serves as an uncontrolled spillway. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consists of a control tower, intake structure with gates, and a 10-foot diameter concrete lined tunnel with a terminal flip bucket energy dissipater. Storage capacity at the spillway crest is 447,100 acre-feet which includes 80,100 acre-feet sediment reserve, 200,000 acre-feet irrigation and 167,000 acre-feet flood control storage. Surface area of the reservoir at the spillway crest is 10,685 acres. Contributing drainage area at the dam site is 2,434 square miles. For a more detailed report of the authorized project including the modification to existing Summer Lake see page 17-8 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. For authorizing legislation see page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperation. In addition to first costs, operation and maintenance of both reservoirs will be responsibility of Federal Government; however, Carlsbad Irrigation District will be required to contribute to operation and maintenance costs an annual amount equal to what they now pay toward Sumner Lake. Carlsbad Irrigation District also will be required to agree to use of Sumner Lake for flood-control purposes. Because they will realize equivalent benefits from storage capacity in Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, they will be required to continue to fulfill their repayment obligation. The New Mexico Division of Parks to manage Santa Rosa Dam and Lake. Activities include camping, picnicking, boating and hiking. For more requirements and details on final approval in 1974, for transfer of irrigation storage from Sumner Lake to Santa Rosa Dam and Lake (formerly Los Esteros Lake) see page 17-5 of Annual Report for 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project was completed in late 1979. Reservoir operation for irrigation was started in March 1980 and the reservoir was operated for irrigation purposes only during FY 1982. No flood damages were prevented during FY 1982. Pool elevation at start of fiscal year was 4,720.97 feet with storage of 36,515 acre-feet. Total releases for the fiscal year were 73,298 acrefeet. Pool elevation on September 30, 1982 Was 4,716.66 feet with a storage of 29,308 acre-feet. The maximum elevation was 4,729.48 feet with a storage of 54,545 acre-feet on June 24, 1982. There was 499 acre-feet of sediment deposition during the fiscal year. Sediment damages prevented during the fiscal year were $55,900. Releases attributed to irrigation benefits were 71,916 acre-feet. Irrigation benefits for the fiscal year were $251,700 with an accumulative total of $374,400 through FY 1982. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract for the recreation area was awarded in September 1979 and completed in October 1980. Design studies for spillway rriodification were initiated in FY 1979. 13. SMITH CREEK, CO Location. Smith Creek, Pleasant View Estates, El Paso County, CO is located 15 miles north of Colorado Springs, CO. (See Geological Survey Map, Monument CO quadrangle scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The construction of 8 gabion weirs in the channel on Smith Creek to protect existing sewage lagoons for the Pleasant View Estates during flood flows. The upper most gabion weir 35 feet in width, would act as a collection structure, the remaining 7 weirs, 15 feet in width would reduce flood flows to about 3 feet per second during flood design stage. Local cooperation. Section 3 FC Act of June 22, 1936 applies. Local Interests are in compliance with Section 221, 1970 FC Act and PL 91-646 Uniform Relocation Act of 1970. Operations and results. N/A Condition at the end of the year. Construction was started in June 1982 and is approximately 45% complete. 14. TRINIDAD LAKE, CO Location. On Purgatoire River about 161 miles above its junction with Arkansas River. Project is about 4 miles upstream from city of Trinidad, CO. (See Geological Survey map. Trinidad, CO, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Consists of an earthfill dam 6,610 feet long, with a maximum height of 200 feet above streambed, an uncontrolled spillway 1,000 feet wide in left abutment, and a 10-foot diameter, gate-controlled conduit in right abutment with discharge capacity of 5,870 c.f.s. with water surface at top of flood control pool. Reservoir provides for storage of 60,000 acre-feet for flood control, 39,000 acre-feet for sediment, 20,000 acre-feet irrigation, and 4,500 acre-feet for recreation, a total of 123,500 acre-feet. Reservoir controls a drainage area of 671 square miles and will be operated for flood and sediment control, irrigation, and recreation purposes. For authorizing legislation see page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation received from City of Trinidad and Purgatoire River Water Conservancy District were formally accepted May 11, 1967, after execution of irrigation repayment contract. For complete details of requirements and costs pertaining to the execution of the irrigation repayment contract and the addition of permanent storage for recreation facilities see page 17-9 of fiscal year 1980 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. The reservoir was operated for flood control and irrigation releases during the fiscal year. On October 1, 1981 the pool elevation was 6,209.04 feet with a corresponding storage of 45,784 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 6,215.94 feet with a corresponding storage of 53,512 acre-feet on April 6, 1982. On September 30, 1982, the pool elevation was 6,206.73 feet with a corresponding storage of 43,378 acrefeet. Sediment deposition during FY 1982 was 506 acre-feet. 17-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Sediment damages prevented during FY 1982 was $189,200. Accrued sediment benefits are $825,800. Irrigation benefits for FY 1982 were $68,800. Accrued irrigation benefits through FY 1982 were $577,700. Irrigation releases for the year were 17,508 acre-feet. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in 1977. The recreation facilities were completed in 1980. The Dam Safety Assurance Contract was awarded in September 1982 and no work accomplished during the fiscal year. Project features are in good condition and in operation. 15. TWO RIVERS DAM, NM Location. About 14 miles southwest of Roswell, NM, on Rio Hondo and Rocky Arroyo. Rio Hondo is formed at confluence of Rio Ruidoso and Rio Bonito, near village of Hondo, NM, in foothills region of Sierra Blanca in southeastern part of Lincoln County, NM, and flows generally easterly to its confluence with Pecos River near Roswell, NM (See Geological Survey map, Hondo Reservoir quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Diamond "A" Dam is an earthfill structure, 4,885 feet long and 98 feet high, with a gated outlet. Rocky Dam is an earthfill structure 2,940 feet long and 118 feet high with an uncontrolled outlet. No provision is made for storage except for flood control. Flood releases will be controlled, so that flows through Roswell will not exceed channel capacity Rio Hondo which is about 1,000 c.f.s. Capacity of Two Rivers Reservoir at spillway crest is 168,000 acre-feet, of which 18,000 acre-feet are provided for sediment reserve. Together these dams regulate runoff from 1,027 square miles of drainage area. For details of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 17-18 of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. Section 2 Flood Control Act of 1938 applies and compliance is satisfactory. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine maintenance and operation continued. The reservoir was empty on October 1, 1981. The maximum flow was 171 c.f.s. on September 30, 1982. There were $220,100 in flood damages prevented during 1982. Sediment damages prevented were $1,200. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented through FY 1982 were $3,567,600. There were 11 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1982. The accrued sediment benefits through FY 1982 are $422,500. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete and was placed in operation July 1963. Project features are in good condition and in operation. 16. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Included under this heading is inspection of completed flood control projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Projects in Kansas, Texas, Colorado, and New Mexico were inspected. Federal costs for the fiscal year were $16,770. 17. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Pursuant to Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, three projects are operated by others for flood control. These projects are Platoro, Pueblo, and Sumner. Platoro Dam on Conejos River above the town of Platoro, Conejos County, CO controls runoff from 40 square miles of high mountain area. Authorized purposes are irrigation storage and flood control. Total storage is 60,000 acre-feet with the top 6,000 acre-feet for flood control. The 54,000 acre-feet is dual purpose storage with flood-control on a forecast basis during spring runoff. Platoro Dam was authorized by Interior Appropriation Act of 1941, (see H Doc 693, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess.) Construction of project was completed by Water and Power Resources Service (Bureau of Reclamation) in FY 1952. On October 1, 1981, storage in Platoro reservoir was 19,690 acre-feet; elevation 9,982.4 feet. There was no flood control releases during FY 1982. Maximum storage of 19,980 acre-feet, elevation 9,982.9 feet occurred on January 23, 1982. On September 30, 1982, storage was 19,690 acre-feet, elevation 9,982.4 feet. Peak flow at Mogote gage was 2,490 c.f.s. on June 19, 1982. $37,700 in flood damages were prevented by the project during the FY 1982. Total flood damages prevented to date are at $2,714,400. Total cost for activity during FY 1982 was $12,491. Pueblo Dam is part of the Fryingpan-Arkansas project which was authorized under Public Law 87-590, 87th Congress, HR 2206 on August 16, 1962. The project was completed in August 1975. Pueblo is operated by the Water and Power Resources Services and is located at river mile 1,293.7 on the Arkansas River in Pueblo County Colorado. Pueblo reservoir has 27,000 acre-feet exclusive flood space and 66,000 acre-feet joint use space. Operation of Pueblo Reservoir began on February 10, 1974. Storage on October 1, 1981 was 32,906 acre-feet, elev. 4798.64 feet. Maximum storage during the year was 111,825 acre-feet, elev. 4837.96 feet on March 8, 1982. Storage on September 30, 1982 was 60,948 acre-feet, elev. 4816.01 feet. There were $111,000 in flood damages prevented in FY 1982. Total cost for FY 1982 activity was $11,756. Total flood damages prevented to date are $607,600. Sumner Dam is located on the Pecos River at river mile 710.8 in DeBaca County, New Mexico. Sumner Dam was authorized as Alamogordo Dam by the Secretary of the Interior under a Finding of Feasibility approved by the President of the USA on 6 November 1935, under the Federal Reclamation laws. The original project was completed in 1937. Modification work of raising the dam 16 feet, adding a spillway and limiting the service spillway floor to 56,000 c.f.s. was completed in 1957. A twenty-four inch bypass line was installed in 1977 to pass flows less than 100 c.f.s. Storage on October 1, 1981 was 16,099 acre-feet, elevation 4,243.4 17-8 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT feet. Maximum storage for FY 1982 was 48,357 acre-feet, elevation 4,259.9 feet on March 1, 1982. Storage on September 30, 1982 was 16,099 acre-feet, elevation 4,243.4 feet. Total cost for FY 1982 activity was $5,776. 18. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 17-E. 19. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Costs during FY 1982 were: Belen, NM, Rio Grande, $137,247; Crestone Creek, Crestone, CO, $7,500; Magdalena, NM, $7,337; Santa Ana Pueblo, NM, $7,437. Emergency flood control activities repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Federal costs for fiscal year 1982 were $165,699 for advance preparation, and $28,640 for flood emergency operations, and $92,559 for repair and restoration. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Federal costs for studies during the fiscal year were $72,527. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in the interests of flood control (Sec. 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act, PL 780, 83rd Congress.) Federal costs for studies during the fiscal year were $28,919. TABLE 17-A COST AND FINAN General Investigations 20. SURVEYS Costs for the fiscal year were $981,753 for flood damage prevention studies, $18,111 for special studies (coordination studies with other agencies), and $466,218 for pre-authorization studies, Phase I (Arkansas River and Tributaries above John Martin Dam, Colorado, $221,949 and Rio Grande and Tributaries (Rio Puerco/Rio Salado), New Mexico, $244,268). 21. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $148,841 for flood plain management and technical services, including $65,293 for water supply study. Two studies to update flood insurance studies for Las Cruces, New Mexico and the northwest portion of El Paso, Texas were completed. Hydrologic studies involving collection and study of basic data, such as stream flow data, collection of suspended sediment samples, recording rain gage data, hydrometeorological studies, and sedimentation studies continued. Costs during the fiscal year were $5,707. 22. INSPECTION OF DAMS Included under this heading is the program of inventory of dams enacted into law (HR 15951) August 9, 1972. The area of responsibility for the District is the state of New Mexico. Federal costs for the fiscal year were $18,528 for both programs. CIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Total Cost Section to to In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 1. Albuquerque New Work Diversion-Channels Project, NM (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) (Other Contributed Funds) 2. Cibolo. TX - 28,372 - 28,372 - 30,000 5,000 8,141 17-9 2,170 23,900 1,020,000 215 1,001,799 - 17,268,450 - 17,268,450 518,356 545,237 854,644 854,644 1,108,900 1,066,195 Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 17-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Total Cost Section to to In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 3. Conchas Lake, NM 4. El Paso, TX 5. Granada, CO 6. Highway 12, CO 7. Holly, CO 8. John Martin Reservoir, CO 9. Lamed Pawnee River, ks 10. Rio Grande Basin, NM 10A. Abiquiu Dam, NM 10B. . Cochiti Lake, NM 10C. Galisteo Dam, NM 10D. Jemez Canyon Dam, NM 10E. Rio Grande Floodway, T. or C. Unit, NM 11. Santa Fe River and Arroyo Mascaras 12. Santa Rosa Dam & Lake, NM New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5,000 123,980 506,000 397,494 2,853,094 3,184,758 674,000 683,698 453,000 212,952 192,000 119,424 1,084,000 965,929 35,000 11,302 2,737,000 2,808,747 1,456,200 1,386,693 69,000 542,208 1,123,000 797,977 105,000 58,738 24,175 695,000 180,980 218,500 212,090 7,041,000 7,619,618 15,000 2,742 68,130 68,571 532,000 545,723 3,931,000 3,315,190 813,000 742,801 1,359,900 1,406,623 29,610 92,398 1,187,000 964,294 65,000 54,040 2,453,000 2,168,642 534,000 481,865 2,380,000 739,072 1,035,800 1,259,753 87,000 119,943 4,730 4,770 445,000 921,243 260,000 238,817 4,772,000 4,522,362 278,000 226,714 5,000 32,976 579,000 628,895 5,563,000 4,447,994 6,900 74,872 15,000 8,960 103,583 21,368 37,001 726,700 1,090,652 1,600,000 964,616 13,629 228,015 434,000 596,559 1,971,819 988,000 916,827 100,000 112,607 246,000 293,304 150,000 167,964 140,000 112,864 1,570,000 2,249,340 323,000 369,106 14,589 691,000 602,238 6,878,000 5,542,583 15,000 9,102 68,454 859,000 793,550 297,000 943,111 28,162 593,000 508,427 84,000 94,303 925,000 883,462 40,000 12,027 136,000 106,041 35,000 4,059 374,000 206,379 92,000 100,886 111,000 127,383 2,300,000 1,898,670 416,000 386,535 17-10 13,828,3061 13,786,411' 8,759,972 8,592,645 37,879,294 34,690,513 1,662,100 1,662,100 30,000 18,062 1,977,400 1,944,238 15,446,3582 15,446,3582 11,072,200 10,957,189 2,104,800 2,082,233 26,756,128 26,549,525 6,818,106 6,713,877 96,984,259 96,615,763 5,414,300 5,182,119 14,260,053 14,232,080 1,047,477 1,015,469 4,248,147 4,217,206 4,355,351 4,184,208 5,141,8683 5,168,718- 829,5004 790,3784 40,993,562 40,481,046 1,032,000 985,097 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT TABLE 17-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Total Cost Section to to In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 13. Smith Creek, CO New Work Approp. - - 17,500 192,000 209,500 Cost - - 10,511 83,664 94,175 14. Trinidad Lake, CO New Work Approp. 1,700,000 1,447,000 - 1,516,000 52,122,758 Cost 1,619,304 1,789,677 119,274 298,985 50,133,923 Maint. Approp. 412,000 315,000 748,000 383,000 2,159,500 Cost 184,769 420,326 814,676 323,109 2,079,833 15. Two Rivers Dam, NM New Work Approp. - 2,000 - 70 - 20,000 4,852,869 Cost - 73 - 2,434 4,835,304 Maint. Approp. 102,000 167,000 146,000 160,000 1,460,912 Cost 86,372 140,381 163,806 148,098 1,422,465 'includes $3,492,696 maintenance and improvement costs and 3 Includes funds for completed Albuquerque and Cochiti to $869,978 for emergency relief, excludes $2,279,326 cost of initiat- Rio Puerco units and for preconstruction planning of Espanola Valing project under the authority of Emergency Refief Appropria- ley unit. Excludes $1,000,011 appropriated funds transferred to tion Act of 1935 and $222,669, the cost for work performed with Bureau of Reclamation under memorandum agreement between funds transferred to the Corps under Public Works acceleration that agency and the Corps. Act of 1962. 4 Starting in FY 1982, AE&D programs are funded through 2 Excludes $59,977 emergency relief funds for new work. In- GI appropriations. cludes $30,000 for Code 710. AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. 4. 6. 7. 9. June 30, 1948 as amended. Oct. 27, 1965 June 30, 1948 as amended. July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 as amended. June 30, 1948 as amended. CIBOLO, TX Consists of right bank levee 0.7 miles long left bank levee 1.4 miles long to protect the town of Presidio, TX from a peak flow of 67,000 c.f.s. on Cibolo Creek. EL PASO, TX A single-purpose flood control system of detention dams, diversion dikes and channels to collect, regulate and discharge arroyo runoff in the Rio Grande. Consists of four independent units (NW Area, Central Area, and two units, Copper System and Bluff Channel of the SE Area.) GRANADA, CO Consists of a right bank levee 0.9 miles long on Wolf Creek to protect Granada, CO from a peak flow of 41,000 c.f.s. on the Arkansas River and a 7,600 foot long outfall channel for Wolf Creek to the Arkansas River. HIGHWAY 12, CO Three locations on left bank of Purgatoire River are protected from peak flows by Kelner Jacks. HOLLY; CO Consists of a levee 4.3 miles in length along the left bank of Wild Horse Creek to its junction with the Arkansas River thence 4,300 feet below the confluence. Appurtences include interior drainage facilities, closure structures at RR and highway crossings. LARNED, PAWNEE RIVER, KS Consists of a levee 1.9 miles long on the left bank of the Pawnee River extending past the confluence of the Arkansas River to a point below the municipal sewage plant. Appurtences include interior drainage facilities and stop-log structures at Hwy. and RR crossings. Sec. 205, PL 858, 80th Cong. as amended. Authorized by C of E July 1, 1977 H. Doc. 207, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 205, PL 858, 80th Cong. as amended. Authorized by C of E Nov. 18, 1976 Sec. 14, PL 79-526 of 1946 FC Act. Authorized by C of E April 22, 1981. Sec. 205, PL 858, 80th Cong. as amended. Authorized by C of E Sept. 9, 1977. Sec. 205, PL 858, 80th Cong. as amended. Authorized by C of E January 4, 1979 17-11 Table 17-B REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Table 17-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM 10. June 30, 1948 Authorized to be appropriated $3,500,000 to be expended by the H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong., Dept. of the Army for partial accomplishment of approved general 1st sess. comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin in NM and Colorado. May 17, 1950 Authorized to be appropriated an additional $39,000,000 for Dept. Public Law 516, 81st of the Army for prosecution of comprehensive plan for the Rio Cong., 2nd sess. Grande Basin. July 14, 1960 Authorized Cochiti Dam on Rio Grande and Galisteo Dam on Galisteo S. Doc. 94, 86th Cong. Creek as additions to authorized comprehensive plan for Rio Grande Basin (Cochiti Dam was authorized in lieu of Low Chamita Dam of Chamita Reservoir Project on Rio Chama under "substitute plan"). Also authorized to be appropriated an additional $58,300,000 for Dept. of the Army for this addition to comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin. RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, NM 10. June 30, 1948 Channel rectification, levee enlargement and construction, and bank H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong., and stabilization on Rio Grande between river mile 123 and 394 1st sess.i and Public May 17, 1950 (See Table 17D.) Law 516, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. TRUTH OR CONSEQUENCES (HOT SPRINGS), NM 10. June 30, 1948 Approved comprehensive plan for Rio Grande Basin is set forth in H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong., the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated April 15, 1948, for flood 1st sess. control of Rio Grande Basin. May 17, 1950 In addition to previous authorizations, the completion of the plan H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong., approved in the Flood Control Act of 1948, for the Rio Grande 1st sess. Basin, at an estimated cost of $39,000,000. SANTA FE RIVER AND ARROYO MASCARAS, NM 11. Oct. 22, 1976 Consists of flood control improvements on the Santa Fe River, Public Law 94-587, 94th excluding any impoundment east of the existing Nichols Dam, Cong. and channel improvement on Arroyo Mascaras, and non-structural measures. SMITH CREEK, CO 13. July 24, 1946 Consists of 8 gabion weirs on Smith Creek to protect two sewage Sec. 14, PL 79-526 of lagoons from erosion during flood flows on Smith Creek. 1946 FC Act. Authorized by C of E April 22, 1981. iContains latest published maps. RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM TABLE 17-C RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 10 of Text) Drainage Miles Area Total Above Nearest (square Estimated Project River Mouth Town mile) Description Cost Abiquiu Dam Rio Chama 32 Espanola, 2,147 Earthfill 325 feet high, 1,212,000 26,797,0963 NM acre-feet capacity Jemez Canyon Jemez 2 Bernalillo, 1,034 Earthfill 136 feet high, 106,100 4,217,206 Dam NM acre-feet capacity Rio Grande Rio Grande 123 to 3941 - - Channel rectification, levee 25,744,0002 Floodway enlargement and construction Cochiti Lake Rio Grande 3401 Cochiti, 11,695 Earthfill 251 feet high, 596,300 96,900,000 NM acre-feet capacity Galisteo Dam Galisteo Creek 8 Waldo, 596 Earthfill 158 feet high, 89,000 14,340,280 NM acre-feet capacity 1River mile 0 is at intersection of New Mexico-Texas State Line with international boundary at El Paso, Texas. 2Does not include non-Federal costs. 3Includes $5,383,000 major rehabilitation, $138,900 for recreation facilities. 17-12 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT TABLE 17-D RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, NM: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 10E of Text) Location Estimated Reach (river miles)' Cost Truth or Consequences unit (formerly Hot Springs) 123 to 129 $14,200,000 San Acacia to Bosque del Apache unit 155 to 226 6,200,000 (1960)2 Cochiti to Rio Puerco unit (not including Albuquerque unit) 236 to 340 2,658,0004 Albuquerque unit 286 to 305 3,130,0004 Espanola Valley unit 366 to 394 (1970)s 456,0002 'River mile 0 being at intersection of New Mexico-Texas State line with international boundary at El Paso, Texas. 2Deferred for restudy. 31In addition, $1,650,000 incurred by the Bureau of Reclamation in this reach. 41n addition, $75,000 incurred by local interest in this reach. 5In addition, estimated cost to local interests is $69,000 (1970). TABLE 17-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Report For Construction Maintenance2 Alamogordo diversion channel, Tularosa (closed) Basin, New Mexico4 1966 189,356 - Alpine, Texas3 1977 130,488 - Colorado Springs, Fountain que Bouille River, CO (Templeton Gap Floodway)1 1959 881,262 - Creede, Willow Creek, CO (floodway)' 1952 219,789 - Dodge City, KS2 1980 6,323,420 - Great Bend, KS2 1977 883,972 - Las Animas, CO2 1980 4,956,000 - Las Cruces, NM2 1980 4,752,310 - Pecos, Texas3 1977 480,273 - Pinon Canyon Dam, Trinidad, CO (Sec. 212)1 - 130,678 - Pueblo Arkansas River, CO (floodway levee extension)' 1954 201,958 - Socorro diversion channel, tributaries of Rio Grande, New Mexico' 1965, 2,259,328 - 'Completed. 2Responsibility of local interests. 3Inactive. 4Deferred. 17-13 LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT* This District comprises northern, western, and southwestern portions of Arkansas and a portion of southern Missouri embraced in drainage basins of Arkansas River and tributaries above and exclusive of Pine Bluff, Ark., and below mouth of Poteau River, near Fort Smith, Ark., drainage basins of the Arkansas portion of Little River and tributaries above its mouth near Fulton, Ark., and drainage basins of White River and tributaries above Peach Orchard Bluff, Ark. In addition, Little Rock District has responsibility for planning, design, construction, and operation and maintenance of that portion of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System below Pine Bluff. Memphis District is responsible for navigation maintenance on White River below Newport, Ark., and mouth of Wild Goose Bayou. White River downstream from mouth of Wild Goose Bayou is a part of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Arkansas River Basin, Ark., Okla., and Kans. ............................... 18-2 2. Bank Stabilization & Channel Rectification Ark. .......................... 18-2 3. David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No. 6), Ark. .............................. 18-2 4. Lock and Dam No. 2, Ark. ................. 18-2 5. Lock and Dam No. 3, Ark. ....... .......... 18-3 6. Lock and Dam No. 4, Ark. ................. 18-3 7. Lock and Dam No. 5, Ark. ................. 18-3 8. Lock and Dam No. 9, Ark. ................. 18-3 9. Lock and Dam No. 13, Ark. ............... 18-3 10. Maintenance and Repair Fleet and Marine Terminals, Ark .................... 18-3 11. Murray Lock and Dam (No. 7), Ark ....... 18-3 12. Norrell Lock and Dam (No. 1) and Entrance Channel, Ark .................... 18-3 13. Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam (No. 8), Arki ................... ........... 18-3 14. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...... 18-4 15. 16. 17. Flood Control Little River Basin (Little Rock District) . . 18-4 White River Basin (Little Rock District) .... 18-4 Blue Mountain Lake, Ark. ................. 18-5 Flood Control (cont) 18. Clearwater Lake, Mo. ...................... 18-5 19. DeQueen Lake, Ark. ....................... 18-5 20. Dierks Lake, Ark. ......................... 18-5 21. Gillham Lake, Ark. ........................ 18-5 22. Millwood Lake, Ark. ........................ 18-6 23. Nimrod Lake, Ark. ........................ 18-6 24. Pine Mountain Lake, Ark ................ 18-6 25. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ........................... 18-6 26. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .... 18-6 27. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ...... ................ 18-7 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 28. Beaver Lake, Ark ......................... 18-7 29. Bull Shoals Lake, Ark ..................... 18-7 30. Dardanelle Lock and Dam (No. 10), Ark. ... 18-7 31. Greers Ferry Lake, Ark .................. 18-8 32. Norfork Lake, Ark. ........................ 18-8 33. Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No. 12), Ark. ............................. 18-8 34. Table Rock Lake, Mo. ...................... 18-8 35. 36. General Investigations Surveys ................................... 18-8 Collection and Study of Basic Data ........ 18-9 *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed in table 18-A at end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at end of this chapter. 18-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Navigation 1. ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, ARK., OKLA., AND KANS. Location. Arkansas River rises in Rocky Mountains near Leadville, Colo., and flows southeastward 1,396 miles through Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas to join Mississippi River 559 miles above Head of Passes, La. (See Geological Survey state maps, 1:24,000, and flood control and navigation maps of Mississippi River, Cairo, Ill., to Gulf of Mexico, 1970 edition scale 1:62,500.) Previous projects. For details see page 1066, Annual Report for 1932, and pages 744, 864, and 881, Annual Report for 1943. Existing project. Provides for improvement of Arkansas River Basin by construction of coordinated developments for navigation, hydroelectric power, flood control, water supply, sediment control, recreation, and fish and wildlife propagation. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System provides a channel of 9 feet deep and 445.3 miles long, beginning at mouth of White River, which enters Mississippi River 599 miles above Head of Passes, La., thence 9.8 miles upstream to mouth of Wild Goose Bayou; thence 9.2 miles by a land cut, designated as Arkansas Post Canal to mile 42 (1943 survey) on Arkansas River; thence 376.0 miles along channel of latter stream to mouth of Verdigris River at navigation mile 395.0; thence 50.3 miles up Verdigris River to head of navigation at Catoosa, Okla. Waterway is canalized throughout its length by 17 locks and dams with total lift of 420 feet. Dardanelle, Ozark-Jeta Taylor, Robert S. Kerr, and Webbers Falls are multiple-purpose projects including power. Lock chambers are 110 by 600 feet. A minimum channel width of 150 feet is provided for Verdigris River, 225 feet for San Bois Creek, 250 feet for Arkansas River, and 300 feet for Arkansas Post Canal and White River. Other coordinated developments consist of 15 lakes, of which 13 are in Thlsa District, Kansas and Oklahoma, and two in Little Rock District. Pertinent data and estimated Federal cost are summarized in Tables 18-C and 18-D, and Arkansas River Basin; Ark., Okla., and Kans.: Navigation Lakes. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. For McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, local interests must provide adequate terminal and transfer facilities and bear increased cost of maintenance and operation of all altered rail and highway routes, including bridges and appurtenances, utilities, and other existing improvements, other than federally owned. For lakes see requirements for each individual lake. Terminal facilities. Public port facilities were in operation at Pine Bluff-Jefferson County, Little Rock, and Fort Smith, Ark., and Muskogee and Catoosa (Tulsa- Rogers County), Okla. Port authorities have been organized to develop public facilities at North Little Rock, Dardanelle-Russellville, Morrilton, Clarksville, Ozark and Van Buren, Ark., and Sallisaw, Okla. Private and commercial port facilities are complete and in operation or being built at 32 locations in Arkansas and at 19 locations in Oklahoma along the improved waterways. Operations and results during fiscal year. Blue Mountain, Canton, Dardanelle Lock and Dam (No. 10), Dardanelle Marine Terminal, David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No. 6), Elk City, Eufaula, Fall River, Fort Gibson, Keystone, W. D. Mayo Lock and Dam (No. 14), Chouteau Lock and Dam (No. 17), Newt Graham Lock and Dam (No. 18), Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir (No. 15), Webbers Falls Lock and Dam (No. 16) and Oologah; Locks and Dams Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, and 13. Markham Ferry, Murray Lock and Dam (No. 7), Nimrod, Norrell Lock and Dam (No. 1), Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No. 12), Pensacola, Pine Bluff Marine Terminal, Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, Tenkiller Ferry, Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam (No. 8), Toronto, and Wister were in operation. Construction is complete on bank stabilization. For details of McClellan- Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System and lakes in Oklahoma and Kansas, see report of Tulsa District. Details of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System and lakes in Arkansas are shown on following pages. Condition at end of fiscal year. See Tables 18-C and 18-D, Arkansas River Basin; Ark., Okla., and Kans.: Navigation/Lakes for status for individual items, navigation project, lakes, and basin plan. 2. BANK STABILIZATION & CHANNEL RECTIFICATION, ARK. Location. Several bank stabilization and channel rectification projects are laid out in various reaches extending from fixed point to fixed point on Arkansas River from 33.7 to 362 miles above mouth and across the Arkansas-White cutoff, a 4- to 5-mile natural channel joining Arkansas and White Rivers about 18 and 12 miles above their respective mouths. Existing project. Bank stabilization and channel rectification is a part of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. For a complete description of reach and location of each bank stabilization and channel rectification project, see the Annual Report FY 81. Total Federal cost to date is $119,300,184 for existing project in Little Rock District. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. 3. DAVID D. TERRY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 6), ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in January 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in August 1968. 4. LOCK AND DAM NO. 2, ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation, and 18-2 LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963. Lock was placed in operation in April 1967 and dam was placed in operation in March 1968. 5. LOCK AND DAM NO. 3, ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963 and lock and dam was placed in operation in December 1968. 6. LOCK AND DAM NO. 4, ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. An addition to the resident office was completed 27 Apr. 1982 for $214,293. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1964 and lock and dam was placed in operation in December 1968. 7. LOCK AND DAM NO. 5, ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in November 1964 and lock and dam was placed in operation in December 1968. 8. LOCK AND DAM NO. 9, ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in July 1969. 9. LOCK AND DAM NO. 13, ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in October 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in April 1969. Bridge across dam was completed in July 1968. 10. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR FLEET AND MARINE TERMINALS, ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of Pine Bluff Marine Terminal began March 1968 and it was placed in operation in April 1969. Construction of Dardanelle Marine Terminal began June 1968 and it was placed in operation in November 1969. 11. MURRAY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 7), ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Recreation facilities are complete except for cost sharing items under the 710 program. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in November 1964 and lock and dam was placed in operation in October 1969. 12. NORRELL LOCK AND DAM (NO. 1) AND ENTRANCE CHANNEL, ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Recommended modification. A Supplement to the General Design Memorandum on the Entrance Channel presenting the results of design and planning studies to modify the existing entrance channel was submitted in June 1981 and approved in August 1981. The recommended modification would consist of construction of additional contraction works to relieve restrictions to navigation in this reach of the waterway during low-flow conditions on the White River and low stages on the Mississippi River. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963 and lock and dam was placed in operation in June 1967. 13. TOAD SUCK FERRY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 8), ARK. Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. A contract was awarded in June 1980 for construction of the dam spillway, and outlet works for a reservoir to provide a source of water supply for the city of Conway, Arkansas, which will 18-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 replace existing source adversely affected by construction of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Estimated cost of the reservoir is $32,944,000. The contract to relocate Arkansas Highway 92 (awarded in September 1979) out of the Conway Water Supply Lake area is 100 per cent complete. A construction contract to install 10.9 miles of 36-inch water transmission pipeline for the Conway Water Supply Project was awarded in February 1981 and is 96 percent complete. A clearing contract for the Conway Water Supply Lake area was awarded in August 1981 and is 68 percent complete. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in July 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in November 1969. 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 18-G, Other Authorized Navigation Projects. Flood Control 15. LITTLE RIVER BASIN (LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT) Location. Improvements are on Little River and tributaries, Arkansas. More definite location of individual items is shown in Table 18-I, Little River Basin. Existing project. Part of a six-lake system for flood control and other purposes in the Little River Basin. The system consists of four lakes in Arkansas: Millwood on the main stem, Dierks on the Saline River, DeQueen on the Rolling Fork River, and Gillham on the Cossatot River, and two lakes in Oklahoma: Broken Bow on the Mountain Fork River and Pine Creek on the Little River. Under a District boundary change, effective 1 October 1980, the four projects in this system in Arkansas were reassigned from the Tulsa District to the Little Rock District. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Tri-Lakes (DeQueen, Gillham, and Dierks) Water District furnished a resolution of intent to repay costs allocated to water supply storage. The Southwest Arkansas Water District is currently repaying costs allocated to water supply storage at Millwood Lake. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of projects continued. See individual projects for details. Condition at end of fiscal year. Millwood, DeQueen, Gillham, and Dierks Lakes are complete and in operation. 16. WHITE RIVER BASIN (LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT) Location. Improvements are on White River and tributaries, Arkansas and Missouri. More definite location of individual items is shown in Table 18-I, White River Basin. Existing project. A general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in White River Basin. Plan now includes seven lakes, of which two are flood control only projects and five are multiple-purpose projects. Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, Clearwater, Greers Ferry and Bell Foley Lakes were selected and approved for construction by Chief of Engineers, and individual reports on these seven lakes are presented on subsequent pages. Bell Foley Lake was reclassified to inactive in June 1977. Lakes in plan are listed in Table 18-I, White River Basin. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies to Beaver, Greers Ferry, and Norfork. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of projects continued. Estimated monetary flood control benefits for fiscal year attributed to Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, and Greers Ferry Lakes for prevention of flood damages were $1,401,000, $3,430,000, $4,584,000, $1,099,000, and $1,276,000 respectively, a total of $11,790,000. Total flood damages prevented by lakes through September 30, 1982 amounted to $92,545,000 of which $10,350,000 accrues to Beaver, $27,973,000 to Table Rock, $36,171,000 to Bull Shoals, $12,092,000 to Norfork and $5,959,000 to Greers Ferry. Delivered 384,001,900 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing, of which 130,556,500, 2,946,600, 400,866,000, 116,876,200, and 134,073,200 kilowatt-hours were generated at Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, and Greers Ferry powerplants, respectively. During the fiscal year 28,960 acre-feet of water were released from Norfork Lake for Fish and Wildlife Service trout hatchery; 14,480 acre-feet were released from Table Rock Lake for Missouri Conservation Commission trout hatchery; 14,480 acre-feet of water were released from Greers Ferry Lake for U.S.. Fish and Wildlife Service Service trout hatchery. Beaver Water District withdrew 25,369 acre-feet from Beaver Lake; and Water and Sewer Improvement District No. 3 of Mountain Home, Ark., withdrew 1,908 acre-feet from Norfork Lake; the Community Water System, Cleburne County, Ark., and the city of Clinton, Ark., withdrew 1,523 acre-feet from Greers Ferry Lake. Condition at end of fiscal year. Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, Clearwater, and Greers Ferry Lakes are complete and in operation. Preconstruction planning is discontinued on Bell Foley. Progress on these lakes is in individual reports. Water Valley and Lone Rock Lakes have been deauthorized. The White River Fish Hatchery authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 would be located on White River in Carroll County, Arkansas about 9 miles northwest of the city of Eureka Springs to provide a plan of improvement for construction of trout production facilities including a fish hatchery downstream from Beaver dam. Total estimated cost is $6,000,000. 18-4 LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT 17. BLUE MOUNTAIN LAKE, ARK. Location. See Table 18-D, Arkansas River Basin, Ark., Okla., and Kans.: Lakes. Existing project. Estimated cost is $5,069,974, of which $551,000 is Code 710 funds. For further information see pages 906 and 907 of 1962 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Flooding was prevented on an average of 4,430 acres of improved land during fiscal year. Estimated monetary benefits at end of fiscal year attributed to Blue Mountain Lake for prevention of flood damages were $2,395,000, a total of $13,495,000 to September 30, 1982. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for additional recreation sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in May 1940, and it was ready for beneficial use in March 1947. 18. CLEARWATER LAKE, MO. Location. See Table 18-1. White River Basin. Existing project. Estimated cost is $10,453,403, of which $1,719,000 is Code 710 funds. For further information see pages 897 and 898 of 1962 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Recommended modification. A reconnaissance report under the Dam Safety Assurance Program was submitted in August 1979 and approved subject to comment in April 1980. The report recommends further planning and design to lengthen the emergency spillway by 350 feet at an estimated cost of $21,460,000 and to continue studies to determine the extent of the underseepage problem and seismic stability. A Comprehensive Seepage Analysis and Report and a Seismic Analysis Report were submitted in August 1981. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Flooding was prevented on an average of 4,350 acres of cultivated land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Clearwater Lake for prevention of flood damages were $5,240,000, a total of $30,368,000 to September 30, 1982. Releases made from lake during low-water periods were sufficient to supply municipal water for Poplar Bluff and other usages. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing sanitary recreational facilities. Construction of project began in June 1940 and was ready for beneficial use in March 1948. 19. DEQUEEN LAKE, ARK. Location. On Rolling Fork River, river mile 22.8, a tributary of Little River, in Sevier County, about 6 miles northwest of DeQueen, Ark. (See Geological Survey map for Chapel Hill, Ark., quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. An earthfill dam, 2,360 feet long, constructed to 160 feet above streambed. An uncontrolled spillway, 200 feet wide, is about 1,400 feet east of main embankment. Outlet works consist of a gated conduit, 12 feet in diameter. The lake controls 169 square miles of drainage area and provides a total storage of 136,100 acre-feet (101,200 for flood control storage and 34,900 for conservation and sedimentation reserve.) Federal cost of project is $19,618,853 of which $90,999 is for Code 710 funds. (See table 18-B, Little River Basin (Little Rock District)-for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. The structure reduced downstream flooding on an average of 3,620 acres. Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $3,563,000 to September 30, 1982. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began April 1966 and project placed in useful operation iri August, 1977. 20. DIERKS LAKE, ARK. Location. On Saline River, river mile 56.6, a tributary of Little River, about 5 miles northwest of Dierks, Howard County, Ark. (See Geological Survey map for Dierks Dam, Ark., quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. An earthfill dam, 2,760 feet long, about 153 feet above streambed. An uncontrolled spillway 800 feet wide is in a saddle at west end of dam. Outlet works consisting of a gated 6- by 9-foot oblong conduit, one 24-inch low-flow pipe, and one 30-inch water supply pipe are provided. The lake controls a drainage area of 114 square miles and provides for storage of 67,100 acrefeet for flood control and 29,700 acre-feet for water supply, conservation, and sedimentation reserve, a total of 96,800 acre-feet. Federal cost of project is $16,014,904 of which $72,891 is Code 710 funds. (See table 18-B, Little River Basin (Little Rock District)-for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. A total of 218 acre-feet was made available for water supply for Tri- Lakes Water District. The structure in place reduced flooding on an average of 2,090 acres of land. Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $1,894,000 to September 30, 1982. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1968. The embankment closure was made on May 8, 1975 and the project placed in useful operation. 21. GILLHAM LAKE, ARK. Location. Damsite is on Cossatot River, river mile 49.0, in Howard County, about 5 miles northeast of Gillham, Sevier County, Ark. (See Geological Survey 18-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 map for Gillham Dam, quandrangle, Ark., quandrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement see Page 19-12 of Annual Report for 1977 (Tulsa District). Federal cost of project is $17,828,711 of which $4,000 is for Code 710 funds. (See Table 18-BLittle River Basin (Little Rock District)-for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Tri-Lakes Water District furnished a resolution of intent to repay costs allocated to water supply storage. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Flood damages were prevented on an average of 2,630 acres of land. Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $3,564,000 to September 30, 1982. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1963. The embankment closure was made on May 8, 1975 and the project placed in useful operation. 22. MILLWOOD LAKE, ARK. Location. On Little River, river mile 16.0, approximately 7 miles east of Ashdown, Little River County, Ark., and about 2 miles northeast of Millwood, Little River County, Ark. (See Geological Survey map for Red Bluff, Ark., quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1969 (Tulsa District). Federal cost of project is $46,100,082, of which $1,836,871 is Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. A total of 43,882 acre-feet of water was released from the lake for water supply to Southwest Arkansas Water District. Flooding was prevented on an average of 2,710 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Millwood Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $5,154,000 to September 30, 1982. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in September 1961 and the project was placed in full flood control operation in August 1966. Work required to complete project consists of additional recreation facilities under cost sharing program. 23. NIMROD LAKE, ARK. Location. See Table 18-D, Arkansas River Basin, Ark., Okla., and Kans.: Lakes. Existing project. Estimated cost is $4,005,627, of which $583,000 is Code 710 funds. For further information see pages 908 and 909 of 1962 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities were continued. Flooding was prevented on an average of 1,978 acres of improved land during fiscal year. Estimated monetary benefits at end of fiscal year attributed to Nimrod Lake for prevention of flood damages were $240,000 making a total of $6,857,000 to September 1982. Seventy-one acre-feet of water were withdrawn by the city of Plainview, Ark., from Nimrod Lake. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing sanitary recreation facilities. Construction of project began in January 1940 and was ready for ,beneficial use in January 1942. 24. PINE MOUNTAIN LAKE, ARK. Location. Damsite is at mile 35.7 on Lee Creek and 12 miles north of Van Buren, Ark. (See Geological Survey map Rudy NE, Ark., quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a lake for flood control, water supply, and recreation. The lake would control runoff from 168 square miles. Capacity would be 261,000 acre-feet, of which 93,100 would be for flood control, 168,000 for water supply, fish and wildlife mitigation and recreation. Estimated cost is $68,900,000, of which local interests will repay $49,300,000 for water supply storage. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and Federal Water Project Recreation Act apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was discontinued pending receipt of local assurance for cost sharing. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is 75 percent complete. Project is 2 percent complete. 25. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Approved regulations for operation and maintenance of flood control works, Part 208 of Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, provide for periodic inspection of completed projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Inspections of local flood protection projects, shown in Section 26 as completed projects, were made to determine extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation of these projects. Responsible officials of improvement districts concerned were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation of local flood protection works under their jurisdiction where appropriate. Cost for fiscal year was $66,000. Total cost to September 30, 1982, was $785,278. 26. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 18-H, Other Authorized Flood Control Projects. 18-6 LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT 27. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal cost of disaster preparedness for fiscal year 1982 was $105,500. Emergency bank protection, (Section 14, Flood Control Act of 1946, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Emergency bank protection, Rolling Fork River, Sevier County Road No. 12, Arkansas, construction contract for $64,500 awarded 27 February 1981. The work has been completed. A construction contract for White County Bridge Protection at Little Red River, Judsonia, Arkansas, was awarded in September 1982. Costs for the fiscal year was $6,307. Small navigation project (Section 107, River and Harbor and Flood Control Act of 1960). A study of the Little Rock Port was initiated during FY 82 under this authority. Small flood control projects (Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948). Five reconnaissance studies were initiated in FY 82: Shannon Hills, Bentonville, and Jacksonport, Arkansas; Poplar Bluff, and Ellington, Missouri. A detailed project report was begun on the Shannon Hills project in September, 1982. Flooding on Howell Creek and tributaries, West Plains, Missouri, study, initiated FY 81, was completed in August 1982. The study recommended that a detailed project report be prepared. Cost for fiscal year was $17,117 for a definite project report. Total costs for Section 205 studies during FY 82 were $58,354. Natural Disaster operations for FY 82 cost $55,000. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 28. BEAVER LAKE, ARK. Location. See Table 18-G, White River Basin. Existing project. Estimated cost is $50,903,000, of which $5,842,000 is Code 710 funds. For further information see pages 788 and 789 of 1966 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Results of operation of Beaver Lake are shown in Section 16. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in October 1959 and was placed in operation for flood control in December 1963, hydroelectric power generation with both units in May 1965, and water supply in January 1966. 29. BULL SHOALS LAKE, ARK. Location. See Table 18-G, White River Basin. Existing project. Estimated cost with eight generating units is $96,616,000, of which $10,886,000 is Code 710 funds. For further information see pages 725 and 726 of 1965 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Results of operation of Bull Shoals Lake are shown in Section 16. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in April 1946 and was ready for beneficial use for flood control in June 1951 and generation of electrical energy in September 1952. Units 1 through 8 were placed in operation September 1952, September 1952, December 1952, June 1953, January 1962, February 1962, August 1963, and September 1963, respectively. 30. DARDANELLE LOCK AND DAM (NO. 30), ARK. Location. See Table 18-C, Arkansas River Basin; Ark., Okla., and Kans.: Navigation. Existing project. Project is a unit of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Dam is 2,683 feet long and 68 feet high. It has a spillway with 20 tainter gates 50 feet.long and 39 feet high. Navigation lock is 110 by 600 feet with a lift of 54 feet. Powerhouse contains four 31,000 kilowatt generators. Lake has a storage capacity of 486,200 acre-feet. Estimated cost is $86,507,000, of which $1,708,000 is Code 710 funds. For authorization see Table 18-B. Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Pool fluctuated within 2-foot power pondage, elevation 336.00 to 338.00. Power generation continued. Installed capacity is 124,000 kilowatts. Delivered 704,995,800 kilowatt hours of electrical energy to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Major accomplishments with regular funds: Lock was unwatered, inspected, and repaired September 14-23, 1981. Operation and maintenance continued at cost of $2,775,065. A new visitor's center and resident office is planned; the estimated cost is $1,169,385. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Construction began June 1957. Power units were placed on line April, May, and September 1965, and January 1966. Lock was placed in operation in December 1969. 31. GREERS FERRY LAKE, ARK. Location. See Table 18-G, White River Basin. Existing project. Estimated cost is $55,202,000, of which $8,157,000 is Code 710 funds. For further informa- 18-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 tion see page 740 of 1964 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. A contract to construct the visitors center was awarded September 18, 1981 in the amount of $734,890. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in June 1957, was ready for beneficial use for flood control in January 1962, and power units 1 and 2 were placed in operation in March and May 1964, and water supply was placed in operation in April 1971. 32. NORFORK LAKE, ARK. Location. See Table 18-G, White River Basin. Existing project. Estimated cost is $111,624,000, of which $4,125,000 is Code 710 funds, $38,700,000 is for addition of power units 3 and 4, and $40,000,000 is for highway bridge construction. For further information see page 896 of 1962 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations arid results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Results of operation of Norfork Lake are shown in Section 16. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities, highway bridges, and addition of power units 3 and 4. Construction of project began in October 1940, ready for beneficial use for flood control in June 1943, and for generation of electrical energy with one unit in June 1944. Second unit was added in February 1950. Water supply was added as a purpose in December 1969. A contract was awarded in April 1979 for construction of two highway bridges over. N.orfork Lake to replace ferries. The work is scheduled for completion in June 1983. Preconstruction planning for addition of power units 3 and 4 was continued and the report is scheduled for completion in January 1983. 33. OZARK-JETA TAYLOR LOCK AND DAM (NO. 12), ARK. Location. See Table 18-C, Arkansas River Basin; Ark., Okla., and Kans.: Navigation. Existing project. Project'is a unit of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Dam is 2,480 feet long and 58 feet above streambed. It has a spillway with 15 tainter gates 50 feet long and 46 feet high. Navigation lock is 110 by 600 feet with a lift of 34 feet. Powerhouse contains five 20,000 kilowatt generators. Lake has a storage capacity of 148,400 acre-feet. In addition, 1 foot of power pondage is provided in Pool No. 13 between elevations 391.00 and 392.00. Estimated cost is $86,167,000 of which $400,000 is Code 710 funds. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Delivered -2,496,600 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Continued operation and maintenance. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in December 1964 and is complete. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Lock and dam was placed in operation in November 1969. Power units were placed on line as follows: Unit 1, November 1972; unit 2, August 1973; unit 3, October 1973; unit 4, December 1973, and unit 5, May 1974. Work remaining consists principally of modifications to powerplant. 34. TABLE ROCK LAKE, MO. Location. See Table 18-G, White River Basin. Existing project. Estimated cost is $67,263,388, of which $5,832,000 is Code 710 funds. For further information see page 893 of 1962 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Equipment for injection of oxygen in the power generation releases has been installed. Results of operation of Table Rock Lake are shown in Section 16. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in October 1954, was ready for beneficial use for flood control in November 1958, and for generation of electrical energy with units 1 and 2 in May 1959. Units 3 and 4 were added in April and June 1961. General Investigations 35. SURVEYS Cost for the fiscal year was $1,251,158, of which $349,857 was for navigation studies, $683,999 was for flood damage prevention studies, $171,243 was for review of authorized projects, $5,104 was for comprehensive studies and $40,955 was for coordination studies with other agencies. 36. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Technical services and guidance were furnished to other Federal, state and local agencies and individuals. Cost for the fiscal year was $170,333. During the fiscal year, 100 stream gaging stations were operated, of which 65 were operated cooperatively by Geological Survey and Corps, and the remaining 35 by the Corps. Suspended sediment samples were collected at 17 stations during the fiscal year in cooperation with 18-8 LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT Geological Survey, and suspended loads were determined at certain stations. One hundred and twelve rainfall and/or river reporting stations were operated in a cooperative program by National Weather Service and Corps for use in forecasting streamflow for flood warning and operation of lake projects. Records also were collected at certain hydroclimatic rainfall stations under a cooperative program of the two agencies. General hydrologic studies relating to streamflow frequency and distribution were continued. Cost for the fiscal year was $2,216. 18-9 TABLE 18-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 1. Arkansas River Basin, Ark., Okla., & Kans. 2. Bank Stabilization & Channel Rectification, Ark. 3-13. Navigation LocIks & Dams, Ark. 15. Little River Basin, (Little Rock Dist.) 16. White River Basin (Little Rock District) New Work Approp. Dams Navigation Cost Dams Navigation Maint. Approp. Dams Navigation Cost Dams Navigation Rehab. Approp. Cost. New Work Contrib. Cost Special Funds Cost Other Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost. Other Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost $ 3,977,900 562,800 3,415,100 3,699,197 423,158 3,276,039 36,165,433 7,828,820 28,336,613 32,667,064 6,915,709 25,715,355 $ 5,672,433 342,322 5,330,111 6,169,941 266,723 5,903,218 32,863,209 6,159,147 26,704,062 32,725,494 6,471,861 26,253,633 $11,261,061 -28,500 11,289,561 10,602,360 255,868 10,346,492 40,003,400 7,167,600 32,835,800 40,303,566 7,696,923 32,606,643 $ 9,614,000 253,000 9,361,000 7,508,211 121,201 7,387,010 38,403,821 9,036,800 29,367,021 35,266,411 7,967,122 27,299,289 $1,451,769,075 150,252,481 1,301,516,594 1,451,769,075 150,252,481 1,301,516,594 414,338,122 92,626,825 321,711,297 406,382,714 91,309,012 315,073,702 - 291,106 - 291,106 - 1,609,842 - 1,609,842 - 19,926,755 - 19,926,755 - 531,336 - 531,336 - 119,300,184 12,752 - 119,300,184 4,173,000 2,067,637 11,197,281 10,646,597 4,230,000 4,626,391 11,058,300 9,939,392 3,019,797 96,100 2,133,764 584,458 1,964,600 2,561,280 2,037,731 2,092,845 697,300 10,721,700 672,942 11,711,320 13,545,367 12,217,000 12,998,872 12,759,439 11,290,000 10,332,435 11,546,800 12,815,340 15,850 91,374 1,898,834 2,332,510 11,780,000 11,717,083 13,288,000 13,910,820 9,330,000 7,365,152 11,064,121 11,043,182 205,000 40,526 3,146,600 2,944,422 12,195,000 11,342,114 16,098,500 14,877,509 4,561,666 4,561,666 414,077,473 411,047,646 130,871,474 129,512,270 973,385 963,567 531,336 531,336 99,562,550 99,356,298 20,511,560 19,539,855 332,409,673 330,974,348 165,065,269 162,701,478 18-10 LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT TABLE 18-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 17. Blue Mountain Lake, Ark. 18. Clearwater Lake, Mo. 19. DeQueen Lake, Little River Basin, 20. Dierks Lake, Little River Basin, Ark. 21. Gillham Lake, Little River Basin, Ark. 22. Millwood Lake, Little River Basin, Ark. 23. Nimrod Lake, Ark. 24. Pine Mountain Lake, Ark. 28. Beaver Lake, Ark. 29. Bull Shoals Lake, Ark. Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New York Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Total to FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 2,200 959 560,400 527,727 16,400 86,581 1,692,667 1,246,855 60,000 338,827 409,900 406,168 717,500 663,505 26,000 232,920 322,000 279,230 10,100 12,711 1,111,880 743,942 -2,802 1,985 641,900 637,677 166,000 119,846 59,600 48,838 1,949,000 1,715,989 28,000 29,542 2,757,000 2,702,649 1,221 467,092 514,307 2,000 10,982 2,002,000 1,863,180 35,000 36,462 365,550 377,116 184 345,592 416,151 3,815 275,941 319,598 15,850 63 911,751 1,219,645 11,146 530,067 569,606 1 2 11 617,000 750,1 600,249 654, 60,000 53,( 59,749 3,9 ,886,000 1,425,E ,403,920 1,249,( - 85,( - 3, 568,000 667, 531,940 582,E - 71,( - 26,z 499,000 491,( 454,364 536,E -4,C 39 10,; 402,000 526, 404,694 419,1 - 32,3 14,606 ,341,000 1,462,( ,097,759 1,406,( - 25,C - 1,2 571,000 640,3 570,168 577,5 61,920 - - 62,399 191 1,397,000 1,661,000 1,702,171 1,644,640 - 30,000 - 31,845 2,803,000 2,487,000 2,448,917 3,053,396 43,0 9,8 1,609,8 1,589,2 1,1 3,6 4,218,6 3,556,9 18-11 - 5,069,974 - 5,069,954 300 7,269,800 769 7,149,279 )00 10,453,403 469 10,390,423 200 14,454,822 609 14,164,479 000 19,618,853 322 19,531,176 500 2,528,150 271 2,383,114 )00 16,014,904 115 15,968,428 )00 3,032,683 957 3,019,122 300 17,828,711 789 17,824,336 300 2,153,024 132 2,034,716 300 46,087,382 - 46,032,358 300 12,497,702 362 12,102,903 )00 4,005,627 228 3,981,855 300 8,202,142 373 8,125,479 - 1,432,331 - 1,432,331 )00 46,203,832 334 46,095,475 300 20,088,759 268 20,001,243 L00 88,860,511 330 88,858,322 300 37,263,673 )28 36,475,591 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 18-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 30. Dardanelle Lock New Work & Dam (No. 10), Ark. 31. Greers Ferry Lake, Ark. 32. Norfork Lake, Ark. 33. Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock & Dam (No. 12), Ark. 34. Table Rock Lake, Mo. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 61,000 6,110 2,447,681 2,312,381 115,000 135,809 2,560,500 2,352,224 200,206 263,349 2,382,800 2,231,832 26,100 976 2,611,281 2,225,256 97,300 108,823 3,203,400 2,749,323 1,127,000 1,173,061 2,470,000 2,549,462 -156,000 3,698 2,364,000 2,521,094 11,074,000 11,627,263 1,749,000 1,826,434 1,906,000 2,281,417 -197,400 '6,978 1,902,000 2,397,643 - - 84,270,124 - - 84,261,240 2,810,800 2,802,600 29,786,913 - 2,775,065 29,597,845 - 77,000 48,865,512 -2,021 1,290 48,787,678 2,628,000 3,412,500 28,201,218 2,528,971 3,164,279 27,720,629 11,690,000 11,959,000 67,333,628 11,627,319 11,226,676 66,113,547 2,190,000 2,432,300 29,951,628 1,911,510 2,582,827 28,982,752 - 2,000 85,629,412 - 1,523 85,622,488 5,249,000 3,100,500 23,930,342 3,527,631 4,197,864 23,081,837 - 39,000 67,077,875 - - 67,038,875 2,436,000 3,000,100 35,788,705 2,368,383 2,734,598 35,356,784 18-12 TABLE 18-B LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, ARK., OKLA., & KANS. (See Section 1 of Text) June 28, 1938 Flood Control Com. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 107 and 440, 76th Cong. 1st sess. Approved General comprehensive plan: Mannford Reservoir, Okla. Oologah Lake, Okla. Canton Lake, Okla. Tenkiller Ferry Lake, Okla. Wister Lake, Okla. Blue Mountain Lake, Ark. Nimrod Lake, Ark. Modified comprehensive plan to include reservoirs in Grand (Neosho) River Basin, Okla., and Mo., and in Verdigris River Basin: Markham Ferry Reservoir, Okla. Fort Gibson Lake, Okla. Pensacola Reservoir Lake O' The Cherokees, Okla. Fall River Lake, Kans. Elk City Lake, Kans. Toronto Lake, Kans. Neodosha Lake, Kans. Authorized Chief of Engineers to provide in the Canton Lake 69,000 acre-feet of irrigation storage, subject to certain conditions. Approved multiple-purpose plan: Oologah Lake, Okla. Markham Ferry Reservoir, Okla. Fort Gibson Lake, Okla. Blackburn Reservoir, Okla. Mannford Reservoir, Okla. Taft Reservoir, Okla. Bank stabilization Dardanelle Lock and Dam, Ark. Eufaula Lake, Okla. Navigation locks and dams Ozark Lock and Dam, Ark. Short Mountain Lock and Dam, Okla. Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, Okla. Tenkiller Ferry Lake, Okla. Modified Arkansas River navigation comprehensive plan to include bank protection works at Bradens Bend, Okla. Modified comprehensive plan authorized in 1938 Flood Control Act and multiple-purpose plan authorized in River and Harbor Act of 1946 to provide for substituting Keystone Lake for Mannford, Blackburn and Taft Reservoirs. Authorized incorporation of River and Harbor and Flood Control plans into a single plan of development and made all previous authorizations applicable to combined plan of development. Pine Mountain Dam and Lake authorized for construction. S. Doc. 107, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 270, 89th Cong., Flood Control Act of 1965 (Title II, Public Law 89-298) 18-13 H. Doc. 758, 79th Cong., 2d sess. August 18, 1941 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 1965 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGNEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 18-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents LITTLE ROCK LEVEE, ARK. (EAST END-FOURCHE BAYOU June 22, 1936 Levees to provide flood protection to people and city H. Doc. 308, 74th Cong., property. 1st sess. December 22, 1944 Modified local flood protection project to raise grade H. Doc. 447, 78th Cong., and protect additional areas. 2d sess. October 27, 1965 Authorized 45,000 g.p.m. pump station and excavated S. Doc. 55, 89th Cong., storage area of 164 acre-feet 1st sess. WHITE RIVER BASIN (LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT) (See Section 16 of Text) June 28, 1938 Approved comprehensive plan for White River Basin: Flood Control Com. Lone Rock Lake, Ark., Norfork Lake, Ark., Doc. 1, 75th Cong., Clearwater Lake, Mo., Water Valley Lake, Ark., 1st sess. Bell Foley Lake, Ark., Greers Ferry Lake., Ark., and White River emergency. August 18, 1941 Modified comprehensive plan to include Bull Shoals H. Doc. 917, 76th Cong., Lake, Ark., and Mo., Table Rock Lake, Mo., and 3d sess. Ark., and Norfork Lake, Ark., and Mo. (power). H. Doc. 290, 77th Cong., 1st sess. September 3, 1954 Authorized power in Greers Ferry Reservoir and added H. Doc. 499, 83d Cong. Beaver Lake to the plan. 2d sess. 1960 Jacksonport State Park in Jackson County, River and Harbor Act Arkansas. Improvements along the White River of 1960 as amended for recreation and navigation and the protection Section 107 of the park which is historically significant. October 23, 1962 Authorizing clearing and straightening of channel for H. Doc. 352, 87th Cong., Village Creek, Jackson and Lawrence Counties. 2d sess. March 1, 1974 Authorizing highway bridge construction across Flood Control Com. Norfork Lake. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. October 22, 1976 White River Fish Hatchery, Arkansas provides for Water Resources trout production facilities downstream from Development Act of Beaver Dam. 1976, P.L. 94-587, Sec. 105 VILLAGE CREEK, WHITE RIVER, AND MAYBERRY LEVEE DISTRICT, ARK. June 22, 1936 Approved levee protection. H. Doc. 102, 73d Cong., 1st sess. July 14, 1960 Modified existing project to add interior drainage in H. Doc. 225, 86th Cong., accordance with plan I, and directed study of plan III. 1st sess. October 23, 1962 Modified project to provide a pumping plant. H. Doc. 577, 87th Cong. 2d sess. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM INCLUDING LITTLE RIVER BASIN, OKLA. AND ARK. (See Section 15 of Text) July 24, 1946 Construct Boswell, Hugo, and Millwood Lakes, and Bank H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., Stabilization. 2d sess. July 3, 1958 Modified Millwood: Construct Pine Creek, Lukfata, H. Doc. 170, 85th Cong., Broken Bow, DeQueen, Gillham, Dierks Lakes 1st sess 18-14 TABLE 18-C ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; ARK., OKLA., AND KANS.: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Elevation Char- Year Up- Upper Depth on Miter acter Opened stream Lock Pool Sill of Kind to Total from Miles to Dimension Lift (feet, Upper Lower Founda- of Type of Navi- Estimated Feature Mouth - Nearest Town (feet) (feet) MSL) (feet) (feet) tion Dam Construction gation Cost LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT Norrell L&D No. 1 Lock No. 2 Dam No. 2 L&D No. 3 L&D No. 4 L&D No. 5 David D. Terry L&D No. 6 Murray L&D No. 7 Toad Suck Ferry L&D No. 8 L&D No. 9 10.3 13.3 40.5 50.2 66.0 86.3 108.1 125.4 155.9 176.9 8 east of Arkansas Post, Ark. 6 east of Arkansas Post, Ark. 3 southeast Arkansas Post, Ark. 5 north of Grady, Ark. 7 east of Pine Bluff, Ark. 4 southeast of Redfield, Ark. 12 southeast of Little Rock, Ark. 6 northwest of Little Rock, Ark. 6 west of Conway, Ark. 3 southwest of Morrilton, Ark. F-- 00 i 1-- 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 600 30 max. 20 nom. 28 max. 20 14 17 18 18 16 19 142 162 182 196 213 231 249 265 -287 16 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 15 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 Fixed overflow Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Piles in sand Piles in sand Piles in sand Piles in sand Piles in sand Clay Piles in sand Shale Shale Shale 1967 1967 1968 1968 1968 1968 1968 1969 1969 1969 Concrete Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends $33,450,000 40,318,000 33,840,000 40,862,000 29,625,000 62,093,000 33,083,000 63,776,000 33,205,000 r r 14 TABLE 18-C (Continued) Mil Up stre frol Feature Moutl Dardanelle 205 L&D No. 10 L&D No. 11 Ozark-Jeta Taylor L&D (No. 12) L&D No. 13 TULSA DISTRICTx L&D No. 13 (part) W. D. Mayo L&D No. 14 Robert S. Kerr L&D No. 15 Webbers Falls L&D No. 16 Chouteau L&D No. 17 Newt Graham L&D No. 18 ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; ARK., ORLA., AND KANS.: N. (See Section 1 of Text) es Elevation Char- -U per Depth on Miter acter am Lock Pool Sill of m Miles to Dimension Lift (feet, Upper Lower Foundah - Nearest Town (feet) (feet) MSL) (feet) (feet) tion .5 2 northwest of 110 by 600 54 338 18 14 Movable 256.8 292.8 319.6 336.2 366.6 401.4 421.6 Dardanelle, Ark. Deleted 1 east of Ozark, Ark. 7 east of Fort Smith, Ark. 4 east of Redland, Okla. 1 north of Cowlington, Okla. 1 northwest of Gore, Okla. 4 northwest of Okay, Okla. 8 southwest of Inola, Okla. 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 600() 110 by 600 110 by 600 34 20 20 48 30 21 21 370 392 412 460 490 511 532 18 18 14 18 19 15 15 15 14 15 14 16 14 14 Sandstone and shale Sandstone and shale Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock AVIGATION 1- N. Year Opened Kind to of Type of Navi- Dam Construction gation Sandstone Gated concrete 1969 spillway with embankment ends Movable Gated concrete 1969 spillway with embankment ends Movable Gated concrete 1969 spillway with embankment ends - - 1970 Movable Gated concrete 1970 spillway with embankment ends Movable Gated concrete 1970 spillway with embankment ends Movable Gated concrete 1970 spillway with embankment ends Movable Gated concrete 1970 spillway with embankment ends Movable Gated concrete 1970 spillway with embankment ends Total Estimated Cost $84,270,124 85,629,412 47,882,000 6,858,000 32,655,000 94,578,237 83,738,277 31,619,000 44,355,000 TABLE 18-C (Continued) ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; ARK., OKLA., AND KANS.: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Additional features entering into cost of project Little Rock District: Bank stabilization and channel rectification, mile 33.7 to 362 and Arkansas-White Cutoff, 100 per cent complete ............. $119,300,184 Maintenance and repair fleet and marine terminals, 99 per cent complete ................................... 7,529,000 Total, Little Rock District .............................. 713,862,720 Navigation aids (US Coast Guard) ........................ 2,268,000 Tulsa District: Bank stabilization and channel rectification, Short Mountain to Fort Smith, complete .................................... 12,700,038 Maintenance and repair fleet and marine terminals, complete .......................................... 2,750,000 Subtotal .............. ....................... $309,253,552 Upstream Lakes: Oologah, 90.2 miles upstream from mouth, Verdigris River complete ............................................... $ 46,689,329 Keystone, 638.8 miles upstream from mouth, Arkansas River, complete ................................................ 123,126,173 Eufaula, 27 miles upstream from mouth, Canadian River, complete ................................................. 121,819,344 Subtotal ..................... ................ 291,633,846 Total, Tulsa District ................................. 600,888,398 Total Project Cost 99.8 percent complete .............. $1,451,769,075 r r C CV l d n1 yd TABLE 18-D ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; ARK., OKLA., AND KANS.: LAKES (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Drainage Height Reservoir Power Year or Total Above Area of Dam Capacity Development Percent Estimated Lake and State River Mouth Nearest Town (sq mi) (feet) Type (acre-feet) (kilowatts) Complete Cost Blue Mountain, Ark. Petit Jean 74.4 Paris, Ark. 488 115 Earthfill 257,900 - 1947 $ 5,069,974 Canton, Okla. North Canadian 384.3 Canton, Okla. 12,483 68 Earthfill 383,300 - 1948 10,919,727 Elk City, Kans. Elk 8.7 Independence, Kans. 634 (Table Mound) 107 Earthfill 284,300 - 1966 19,057,990 Eufaula, Okla. 1 2 3 Canadian 27.0 Eufaula, Okla. 47,522 114 Earthfill 3,798,000 90,000 1964 121,819,344 Fall River, Kans. Fall 54.2 Fall River, Kans. 585 94 Earthfill 256,400 - 1949 10,551,393 Fort Gibson, Okla.' 7 Grand (Neosho) 7.7 Fort Gibson, Okla. 12,492 110 Concrete-gravity 1,284,400 45,000 1953 43,643,378 Keystone, Okla.' 2 3 Arkansas 538.8 Sand Springs, Okla. 74,506 121 Earthfill 1,836,500 70,000 1964 123,126,173 Markham Ferry, Okla.' 4 Grand (Neosho) 47.4 Pryor, Okla. 11,533 90 Earthfill 444,500 100,000 1968 6,908,756 Neodesha, Kans.5 Verdigris 222.8 Neodesha, Kans. 1,152 74 Earthfill 90,000 - 0 97,910 Nimrod, Ark. Fourche La Fave 62.6 Plainview, Ark. 680 103 Concrete-gravity 336,010 - 1942 1,432,331 Oologah, Okla.2 Verdigris 90.2 Claremore, Okla. 4,339 137 Earthfill 1,519,000 - 1974 46,689,329 Pensacola, Okla.' 6 Grand (Neosho) 77.0 Disney, Okla. 10,298 147 Concrete arch 2,197,000 86,400 1940 52,126 Tenkiller Ferry, Okla.' 3 Illinois 12.8 Gore, Okla. 1,610 197 Earthfill 1,230,800 34,000 1953 24,115,719 Toronto, Kans. Verdigris 271.5 Toronto, Kans. 730 90 Earthfill 199,700 - 1960 13,896,324 Wister, Okla. Poteau 60.9 Wister, Okla. 993 99 Earthfill 427,900 - 1949 10,501,226 Subtotal, exclusive of Eufaula, Keystone, and Oologah, 93 percent complete 148,820,150 Total, Arkansas River Basin, 98 percent complete 1,451,769,075 1. Project includes facilities for production of hydroelectric power. 2. Cost included in navigation project. 3. Estimate includes Code 710 funds. 4. Constructed by State of Oklahoma under the name of Robert S. Kerr Dam (Lake Hudson). Estimate shown is for Federal participation. 5. Inactive. Estimate is based on 1954 price levels. 6. Constructed by State of Oklahoma under the name Grand River Dam (Lake O' The Cherokees). Estimate shown is for Federal participation. 7. Estimate includes Code 710 funds and present estimate cost of power units. O c3 x 0 ci) ot LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT TABLE 18-E AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Black River, Ark., and Mo. 1 1950 $ 80,000 $ 930,324 Current River, Ark., and Mo. 1 1964 17,0002 132,178 Upper White River, Ark. 3 4 1952 813,197 1,788,374 White River, Ark., (above Peach Orchard Bluff)1 5 1950 - 785,666 1. Channel adequate for existing commerce. Completion Nos. 1, 2, and 3 disposed of in accordance with authority in not contemplated. Public Law 996, 84th Cong. 2. Includes $7,000 for previous project. 4. Completed. 3. Federal operation and maintenance terminated June 5. Responsibility for maintenance of project downstream 30, 1952, due to lack of commerce. Facilities at Locks and Dams from Newport, Ark., transferred to Memphis District in FY 62. TABLE 18-F LITTLE RIVER BASIN, ARKANSAS (See Section 15 of Text) Project River Site' Nearest Town DeQueen Lake' Rolling Fork River 22.8 DeQueen, Ark. Gillham Lake' Cossatot River 49.0 Gillham, Ark. Dierks Lake' Saline River 56.6 Dierks, Ark. Millwood Lake' Little River 16.0 Millwood, Ark. 1. Project is reported separately herein. 18-19 TABLE 18-G WHITE RIVER BASIN (See Section 16 of Text) Miles Drainage Reservoir Power Total Above Area Height of Dam Above Streambed Capacity Development Estimated Lake River Mouth Nearest Town (sq mi) and Type (acre-feet) (kilowatts) Cost - Beaver2 White 609.0 Eureka Springs, Ark. 1,186 228 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 1,952,000 112,000 $ 50,860,000 Bell Foley4 Strawberry 27.2 Poughkeepsie, Ark. 519 136 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 518,000 (3) 60,000,000 Bull Shoals2 White 418.6 Mountain Home, Ark. 6,036 258 feet concrete-gravity 5,408,000 340,000 96,612,000 Clearwater2 Black 257.4 Piedmont, Mo. 898 154 feet earthfill 413,000 (3) 11,404,000 Greers Ferry' Little Red 79.0 Heber Springs, Ark. 1,146 243 feet concrete-gravity 1,844,000 96,000 55,125,000 Norfork2 North Fork 4.8 Norfork, Ark. 1,806 216 feet concrete-gravity 1,983,000 80,550 111,624,000 Table Rock2 White 528.8 Branson, Mo. 4,020 252 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 3,462,000 200,000 71,233,000 Village Creek, (3) 9,580,000 Jackson and Village Creek, Lawrence Tributary of Counties, Ark.4 White River 0-61.2 Walnut Ridge, Ark. 283 White River Fish Hatchery White 608.3 Eureka Springs, Ark. - - (3) 6,000,000 Total - 16,580,000 828,550 471,561,000 1. Current FY price levels unless otherwise noted. 2. For details of this project, see individual report. 3. None. 4. Inactive-reclassilfied June 1977. 5. Based on October 1976 price levels including $4,960,000 Non-Federal cost. o 0 'Ti o o1 nI LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT TABLE 18-H OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Bell Foley Lake, White River, Ark.1 1975 $1,407,116 - Black River, Poplar Bluff, Mo., to Knobel, Ark.2 1958 584,315 - Carden's Bottom Drainage District No. 2, Arkansas River, Ark.2 1951 919,955 - Clarksville, Ark.2 1962 271,717 - Conway County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, Ark.2 1959 187,440 - Conway County Levee Districts Nos. 1, 2, and 8, Arkansas River, Ark.2 1952 1,018,840 - Conway County Levee District No. 6, Arkansas River, Ark.2 1952 390,952 - Crawford County Levee District, Arkansas River, Ark.2 1954 2,001,820 - Crooked Creek, Lake and Levee, Ark.3 1969 - - East Poplar Bluff and Poplar Bluff, MQ..2 1958 304,699 - Faulkner County Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, Ark.2 1941 99,511 - Fort Smith, Arkansas River, Ark.2 1951 1,077,546 - From North Little Rock to Gillett, Ark. (above Plum Bayou)2 1954 845,300 - Fourche Creek, Little Rock, Ark. 1973 22,890 - Little Rock Levee, Ark., East End Fourche Bayou 1975 1,901,899 - McLean Bottom Levee District No. 3, Arkansas River, Ark.2 1950 422,549 - Near Dardanelle, Arkansas River, Ark.2 1953 198,069 - Newport, White River, Ark.2 1941 314,276 - North Little Rock, Arkansas River, Ark.2 1958 512,001 - Petit Jean River, Ark.2 6 1966 84,350 - Roland Drainage District, Arkansas River, Ark.2 1950 269,907 - Skaggs Ferry, Black River, Ark.2 1941 81,023 - South Bank Arkansas River (Head Fourche Island to Pennington Bayou), Ark.2 1964 1,404,852 - South Bank, Arkansas River, Little Rock to Pine Bluff, Ark., Tucker Lakes2 1961 409,115 - Van Buren, Arkansas River, Ark.2 1952 438,222 - Village Creek, White River, and Mayberry Levee Districts, Ark.4 1972 1,567,156 - Village Creek, Jackson and Lawrence Counties, Ark. 1977 510,217 - West of Morrilton, Arkansas River, Ark.2 1962 1,269,959 - 1. Reclassified as inactive in June 1977. 4. See H Doc. 577, 87th Cong., 2d sess., for description of 2. Completed. project. 3. Recommended to continue in deferred category in 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. August 1977. 18-21 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT* The civil works portion of this District covers an area of approximately 160,000 square miles including Oklahoma and parts of Kansas and Texas within the Arkansas and Red River Watersheds. The District's responsibilities within the Arkansas River Watershed cover southern Kansas, northern Oklahoma, and the Texas Panhandle in northern Texas. These areas are embraced in the drainage basin of the Arkansas River and its tributaries above the mouth of the Poteau River, inclusive, and below the mouth of the Walnut Creek near Great Bend, KS, extending to the Kansas-Colorado state line, exclusive of that portion of the South Canadian Watershed and its tributaries west of the Texas-New Mexico state line. The District's responsibilities within the Red River Watershed cover the northern portion of Texas, and the southern portion of Oklahoma embraced in the Red River drainage basin and its tributaries above Fulton, AR. The District also has responsibility for the planning, design, construction, and operation and maintenance of the McClellan- Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System in Oklahoma. Effective July 1, 1982, the District assumed responsibility for all military construction in Oklahoma and Arkansas which includes nine active installations. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Big and Little Sallisaw Creeks Navigation Project, OK........... ................ 19-2 2. Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS .............................. 19-2 3. Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification, Arkansas River River, AR and OK ................................ 19-3 4. Maintenance and Repair Fleet and Marine Terminals, OK ...................... 19-3 5. Red River Waterway, LA, AR, OK, and TX, Index, AR to Denison Dam, TX ................ 19-3 6. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................ . .................... 19-4 7. Navigation Work under Special Authorization (Poteau River) .................... 19-4 Flood Control 8. Arcadia Lake, Deep Fork River Basin, OK...................................... 19-4 9. Ark-Red River Basins Chloride Control ........................... 19-4. 9 A. Ark-Red River Basins Chloride Control, Part I - Wichita River Basin, TX' ................ 19-5 9 B. Ark-Red River Basins Chloride Control, Part II - Remaining Red River Basin,. OK,andTX .............................. 19-5 9 C. Ark-Red River Basins Chloride Control, Part II - Arkansas River Basin, OK ............................................ 19-5 10. Big Pine Lake, Red River Basin, TX ......... ... ...... ........................ 19-6 11. Birch Lake, Verdigris River Basin, OK ................... ........................ 19-6 12. Candy Lake, Verdigris River Basin, OK ................. ............... 19-6 Flood Control (cont) Page 13. Canton Lake, Arkansas River Basin, OK................ ................ 19-6 14. Copan Lake, Verdigris River Basin, OK ................................... 19-6 15. Council Grove Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, KS ........................ 19-7 16. El Dorado Lake, Walnut River Basin, KS ............. .................. 19-7 17. Elk City Lake, Verdigris River Basin, KS ................................... 19-7 18. Fall River Lake, Verdigris River Basin, KS................................... 19-7 19. Fort Supply Lake, North Canadian River Basin, OK ................. ............ 19-8 20. Great Salt Plains Lake, Arkansas River Basin, OK .............................. 19-8 21. Heyburn Lake, Arkansas River Basin, OK .................................. 19-8 22. Hugo Lake, Kiamichi River Basin, OK........... ........................... 19-8 23. Hulah Lake, Vbrdigris River Basin, OK ................................... 19-8 24. John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, KS...............: ...................... 19-9 25. Kaw Lake, Arkansas River Basin, OK.................................... 19-9 26. Lake Kemp, Wichita River Basin, TX ..................................... 19-9 27. Lukfata Lake, Little River Basin, OK and AR .............................. 19-9 28. Marion, KS.................................. 19-9 29. Marion Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, KS ............................... 19-10 30. Oologah Lake, Verdigris River Basin, OK................................... 19-10 *All costs and financial statements (table 19-A) for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 19-i REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Flood Control (cont) Page 31. Optima Lake, North Canadian River Basin, OK.................................19-10 32. Pat Mayse Lake, Red River Basin, TX .................................... 19-10 33. Pearson - Skubitz Big Hill Lake, Verdigris River Basin, KS .................... 19-10 34. Pine Creek Lake, Little River Basin, TX................................... 19-11 35. Red River Below Denison Dam (Tulsa District) .............................. 19-11 36. Sardis Lake, Little River Basin, OK ............... 1911 37. Shidler Lake, Arkansas River Basin, OK .................................. 19-11 38. Skiatook Lake, Verdigris River Basin, OK..................................... 19-11 39. Toronto Lake, Verdigris River Basin, KS........................ ....... 19-12 40. Waurika Lake, Red River Basin, OK ................................. .. 19-12 41. Wister Lake, Poteau River Basin, OK ............................. ... 19-12 42. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects. ........................... 19-12 43. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations .......................... 19-13 43 A. Altus Reservoir, Red River Basin, OK.............................. . 19-13 43 B. Arbuckle Reservoir, Red River Basin, OK. ...................... 19-13 43 C. Cheney Reservoir, Ninnescah River Basin, KS. .......................... 19-13 43 D. Fort Cobb Reservoir, Washita River Basin, OK.... ....................... 1913 43 E. Foes Reservoir, Washita River Basin, OK............. ................. . 19-13 43 F. Mountain Park Reservoir (Tom Steed Lake), Red River Basin, OK ....................... ............. 19-13 43 G. Normaq Reservoir (Lake Thunderbird), Red River Basin, OK ................................... 19-13 Flood Control (cont) Page 43 H. Sanford Dam (Lake Meredith), Canadian River Basin, OK ..................................... 19-13 44. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ....................................... 19-13 45. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ............................ 19-13 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. Broken Bow Lake, Little River Basin, OK .................................. 19-14 Denison Dam--Lake Texoma, Red RiverBasin, TXand OK ......................... 19-14 Eufaula Lake, Canadian River Basin, OK..................................... 19-14 Fort Gibson Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, OK ...................... 19-14 Keystone Lake, Arkansas River Basin, OK .................................. 19-15 Markham Ferry Reservoir (Lake Hudson), Grand (Neosho) River Basin, OK ........................................ 19-15 Pensacola Reservoir (Grand Lake), Grand (Neosho) River Basin, OK ............................. 19-15 Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, Arkansas River Basin, OK ....................................... 19-15 Tenkiller Ferry Lake, Illinois River Basin, OK ........................... 19-16 Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, Arkansas River Basin, OK .................... 19-16 General Investigations 56. Surveys ....................................... 19-16 57. Collection and Study of Basic Data .................. 19-16 58. Continuation of Planning and Engineering. ........... 19-17 59. Advanced Engineering and Design. .............. 19-17 Navigation 1. BIG AND LITTLE SALLISAW CREEKS, OK Location. About 3 miles southwest of Sallisaw, Sequoyah County, OK, approximately 5 miles from the existing navigation sailing line upstream on Big Sallisaw Creek and Little Sallisw Creek (about navigation mile 341.6). Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of a 9-foot-deep, 100-foot-wide navigation channel extending from near Sallisaw, OK, to the existing McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System and of a 400-by 500-foot turning basin. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Estimated Federal cost is $5,400,000. Preconstruction Phase I General Design Memorandum at OCE for approval. Local cooperation. See section 2 of this rqport. Operations and results during fiscal year. Not applicable. 2. ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, AR, OK, AND KS Location. Arkansas River rises in the Rocky Mountains near Leadville, Colorado, and flows southeastward 1,396 miles through Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas to join the Mississippi River 599 miles above Head of Passes, LA. (See Geological Survey state maps, scale 1:500,000, and flood control and navigation maps of the Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to the Gulf of Mexico, 1980 edition, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. Provides for improvement of the Arkansas River Basin by construction of coordinated developments for navigation, hydroelectric power, flood control, water supply, water quality control, sediment control, recreation, and fish and wildlife propagation. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System provides a channel 9 feet deep and 445.2 miles long beginning at the mouth of the White River, which enters the Mississippi River 599.0 miles above Head of Passes, LA; 19-2 TULSA OKLAHOMA DISTRICT thence 9.8 miles upstream to mouth of the Wild Goose Bayou; thence 9.2 miles by a land cut, designated as Arkansas Post Canal, to mile 42.0 (1943 survey) on the Arkansas River; thence 376.0 miles along the channel of the latter stream to the mouth of the Verdigris River at navigation mile 395.0; thence 50.3 miles up the Verdigris River to the head of navigation at Catoosa, OK. The waterway is canalized throughout its length by 17 locks and dams with total lift of 420 feet. Dardanelle, Ozark-Jeta Taylor, Robert S. Kerr, and Webbers Falls are multiplepurpose projects including power. Lock chambers are 110 by 600 feet. A minimum channel width of 150 feet is provided for the Verdigris River, 225 feet for the Sans Bois, 250 feet for the Arkansas River, and 300 feet for the Arkansas Post Canal and White River. Other coordinated, developments consist of 15 lakes, of which 13 are in the Tulsa District, KS and OK, and two in the Little Rock District, AR. The authorized features of the multiplepurpose plan within the Tulsa District are listed in table 19-C. Federal costs for combined comprehensive and multiple-purpose plan total $1,317,607,935. Status of individual items are reported separately in this chapter. Local cooperation. For the navigation system, local interest must provide adequate terminal and transfer facilities and bear increased cost of maintenance and operation of all altered rail and highway routes, including bridges and appurtenances, utilities, and other existing improvements, other than federally owned. For lakes see requirements for each individual lake. Terminal facilities. Public port facilities were in operation at Pine Bluff, Little Rock, Dardanelle and Fort Smith, AR, and Muskogee and Catoosa (Tulsa), OK. Port authorities have been organized to develop public facilities at North Little Rock, Dardanelle-Russellville, Clarksville, Van Buren, Arkansas, and Sallisaw, OK. Private commercial port facilities are complete and in operation at seven locations in Arkansas and at eight locations in Oklahoma. Ten additional private port facilities are being developed along improved waterways in the State of Arkansas. Operations and results during fiscal year. Blue Mountain, Canton, Dardanelle Lock and Dam (No. 10), Dardanelle Marine Terminal, David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No. 6), Elk City, Eufaula, Fall River, Fort Gibson, Keystone, W. D. Mayo Lock and Dam (No. 14), Chouteau Lock and Dam (No. 17), Newt Graham Lock and Dam (No. 18), Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir (No. 15), Webbers Falls Lock and Dam (No. 16), and Oologah; Locks and Dams Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, and 13, Markham Ferry, Murray Lock and Dam (No. 7), Nimrod, Norrell Lock and Dam (No. 1), Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No. 12), Pensacola, Pine Bluff Marine Terminal, Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, Tenkiller Ferry, Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam (No. 8), Toronto, and Wister were in operation. For details of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, which includes Lock and Dam No. 13 Channel Improvement, W. D. Mayo Lock and Dam, Chouteau Lock and Dam, and Newt Graham Lock and Dam see appendix C. Lakes in Oklahoma and Kansas are shown on the following pages. BANK STABILIZATION AND CHANNEL RECTIFICATION, ARKANSAS RIVER, AR AND OK. Location. On the Arkansas River between Robert S. Kerr Damsite, OK and Fort Smith, AR, river miles 336.2 and 308.0, respectively. (See Geological Survey maps for Sans Bois, OK, Sallisaw, OK, and Fort Smith, AR-OK, quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. Bank stabilization and channel rectification is a part of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1970. Federal cost was $12,700,038 for existing project located in the Tulsa District. Construction began in May 1952 and was completed December 1969. Local cooperation. See section 2 of this report. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Operation and maintenance of project structures is reported, and under appropriate navigation locks and dams. 4. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR FLEET AND MARINE TERMINALS, OK. Includes two terminals in the Little Rock District, and one terminal in the Tulsa District located near Sallisaw, OK. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Information on this project follows: ROBERT S. KERR MARINE TERMINAL, OK. Location. Five miles south of Sallisaw, OK, on the left side of Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir. Existing project. Consists of wharf, office and storage building, storage space, and operating areas for servicing of floating plant and storage of machinery, equipment, and supplies to maintain the navigation facilities. Federal cost was $2,760,000 excluding the cost of facilities to be provided for the US Coast Guard on a reimbursable basis. Construction began in May 1967 and the terminal became operational in October 1970. Local cooperation. See section 2 of this report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. RED RIVER WATERWAY, LA, AR, OK, AND TX, INDEX, AR TO DENISON DAM, TX (Tulsa District). Location. On Red River in Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Texas, between Index, AR, and Denison Dam, TX. (See Geological Survey State maps and folio maps of Red River 1958 edition.) Existing Project. Plan of improvement provides for channel realignment and river bank stabilization by dredging, cutoffs, and training works, including revetments, dikes, and steel jetties. The overall length of the Red River channel in this reach would be reduced from about 250 river miles to 200 miles. In addition, the authorized project 19-3 3. 5. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 provides for public use recreational development at various river cutoffs formed by the realigned channel. Estimated Federal cost is $201,000,000. (See table 19-B for authorized legislation.) Preconstruction planning studies were initiated in December 1980. A review of the potential for extending navigation to Denison Dam showed that project costs would exceed project benefits and that further navigation studies are not warranted at this time. No funds are budgeted to continue preconstruction planning for the authorized bank stabilization project in fiscal year 1983. Preconstruction planning studies will resume when funds are appropriated. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. In addition, non-Federal interests are required to make a cash contribution for one-half of the cost of recreation development, and 26.1 percent of the total construction cost for bank stabilization and chapnel works. The total estimated non-Federal cost is $85,000,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. Not applicable. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS. Red River from Fulton, AR, to the mouth of the Washita River. For description of completed improvement and authorization see Annual Report for 1924. Cost for construction was $378,574 and operation and maintenance $182,157. Curtailment of project was recommended in H. Doc. 947, 64th Congress, 1st Session. 7. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION. Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645. Poteau River, AR and OK. Location. The Poteau River Small Navigation Project is located at Fort Smith, AR. Existing project. The project provides for a 130-footwide, 9-foot-deep channel on the Poteau River extending from its confluence with the Arkansas River 1.7 miles upstream to the Port of Fort Smith. A turning basin is provided a short distance upstream of the port. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Cost for the project was $536,952 Federal and $25,000 non-Federal. Project completed and placed in operation in November 1979. Local cooperation. Section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960 applies. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities are owned by the Fort Smith Port Authority. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contract was completed in October, 1979 in the amount of $434,740. Flood Control 8. ARCADIA LAKE, DEEP FORK RIVER BASIN, OK. Location. On Deep Fork River, mile 213.8 in the metropolitan area of Oklahoma City and Edmond, OK, about 1.5 miles west of Arcadia, in Oklahoma County, OK. (See Geological Survey map for Arcadia, OK, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Plan of improvement provides for flood control, water supply, and recreation by construction of an earthfill dam approximately 104 feet high and 5,200 feet long with a high-level uncontrolled spillway. Outlet works will consist of gate tower and conduit. The lake will have a total capacity of 92,000 acre-feet (27,380 for conservation, 64,430 for flood control, and 190 for sedimentation reserve), and will control a drainage area of 105 square miles. Estimated cost is $86,700,000. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Construction began in October 1980. The project is 39 percent complete. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965, and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operation and results during fiscal year. Major accomplishments with regular funds: land acquisition and damages $10,260,000; outlet works $2,289,000; relocations $2,027,000. 9. ARK-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL. Location. On certain tributary streams of Arkansas and Red Rivers in the western half of Tulsa District. Existing project. Provides for construction of proiect features to control the natural water pollution caused by the fifteen natural salt sources identified in 1957 by the US Public Health Service. The Arkansas and Red Rivers represent a major national and regional water resource which is severely limited because of poor water quality primarily caused by a natural pollutant, sodium chloride. The Arkansas River is polluted by five naturally occurring salt sources located in northwestern Oklahoma and southwestern Kansas. Those areas contribute an estimated 7,900 tons per day of dissolved salt to the river. The Red River is polluted by ten naturally occurring salt sources located in northwestern Texas and southwestern Oklahoma. Those sources contribute an estimated 3,600 tons per day of dissolved salt to the river. Preauthorization studies were completed in 1966 and 1970 and recommended construction of project features at thirteen of the fifteen sites. Area V, one of the areas in Texas, was constructed as an experimental project. It has been operational since 1964. Construction was authorized on the remaining twelve sites in two parts. Construction of the project for three salt areas in the Wichita River Basin (Part I) was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1966 (SD 110/89/2). During the early stages of the AE&D work performed after authorization, an administrative decision was made to separate further project development work on Part II by basin. Project features on Part I, Wichita River Basin, Part II, remaining Red River Basin and Part II, Arkansas River Basin are reported respectively under 9A, 9B, and 9C. Local cooperation. Prior to construction of chloride control projects, responsible non-Federal interests will furnish satisfactory assurances to the Secretary of the Army. These interests will continue and strengthen efforts 19-4 TULSA OKLAHOMA DISTRICT to reduce manmade salt pollution, to hold and save the United States free from damages due to water rights claims and to construction and operation of the project works, and to participate in the cost of recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement as a part of the Arkansas Basin project in accordance with the Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Both the states of Oklahoma and Texas have provided necessary assurances and have made significant progress toward reducing manmade pollution. 9A. ARK-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL, PART I WICHITA RIVER BASIN, TX. Location. The Wichita River Basin, a major sub-basin within the Red River Basin contains three salt source areas and one disposal area. Area VII is located on the North Fork of the Wichita River in Cottle County, TX. Area VIII is located on the South Fork of the Wichita River in King County, TX. Area X is located on the Middle Fork of the Wichita River in King County, TX. The disposal area, Truscott Brine Lake, is located on Bluff Creek, a tributary of the Wichita River in Knox County, TX. Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of low-flow dams with attendant pumping stations and pipeline facilities located at each salt source area. The collected brines will be discharged into two off-channel, total retention, brine storage reservoirs. Each low-flow dam will be equipped with an inflatable fabric-type weir located in the spillway section which would be deflated to pass relatively good quality high flows downstream. Estimated cost of the Wichita River Basin project is $140,450,000. Preconstruction planning for Area VII and X is essentially complete and construction is awaiting approval from the Secretary of the Army and subsequent funding from Congress. Construction was initiated at Area VIII and Truscott Brine Lake in 1976. Construction of Area VIII is 81 percent complete. Local cooperation. See Section 9 of this report. Operation and results during fiscal year. Major accomplishments with regular funds: Approximately $9,800,000 was expended in FY 82 for construction at Truscott Brine Lake. These funds were used to continue construction of the main dam and associated instrumentation and to initiate construction of the pumps and controls for Bateman Pump Station. 9B. ARK-RED RIVER BASIN CHLORIDE CONTROL, PART II - REMAINING RED RIVER BASIN, OK AND TX. Location. The remaining Red River Basin contains five salt source areas and two disposal areas. Area VI and its disposal area is located on the Elm Fork of the north fork of the Red River in Harmon Couity, OK. Area IX is located on the Middle Pease River in Cottle County, TX. Area XIII - XIV are located on tributaries of the Prairie Dog Town Fork of the Little Red River in Hall County, TX. The other disposal area, Crowell Brine Lake, is located in Canal Creek, a tributary of the Pease River in Foard County, TX. Existing project. Design efforts for Area XV have been deferred at this time due to economic conditions. The plan of improvement for Area IX consists of a low -flow weir and an attendant pumping station and pipeline facility to pump the collected brines to Crowell Brine Lake, a total retention brine storage reservoir. The collection facilities for Areas XIII and XIV will be shallow wells and accompanying collection pipelines to collect the brines in the subsurface aquifer. These collected brines will also be conveyed to Crowell Brine Lake by pipeline. The plan of improvement for Area VI consist of a system of dikes and channels for surface collection of the brines and attendant pumping facilities to transmit the brines to the total retention reservoir at the disposal site. Estimated cost of the remaining Red River Basin (Area VI, IX, XIII-XIV) is $89,900,000. Preconstruction planning for Area VI is essentially complete and construction is waiting approval from the Secretary of the Army and subsequent funding from Congress. The Phase II GDM for Areas IX, XIII-X1V is complete. Local cooperation. See Section 9 of this report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Major accomplishments with regular funds: Approximately $940,000 was expended in FY 82 in preparation of a Phase II GDM for Areas IX, XIII-XIV. 9C. ARK-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL, PART II ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OK. Location. Four salt areas on tributaries of the Arkansas River in Oklahoma: Area I, Great Salt Plains, located on the Salt fork of the Arkansas River in Alfalfa County, OK; Area II-II, Big and Little Salt Plains, located on the main stem of the Cimarron River and its tributary, Buffalo Creek, in Woods, Woodward, and Harper Counties, OK; and Area IV located on Salt Creek a tributary of the Cimarron River in Blaine County, OK. 7 Existing project. The selected chloride control plan consists of the freshwater diversion concept for Area I, with division of the existing Great Salt Plains Lake into a brine lake and a freshwater lake. The freshwater diversion concept uses a series of dams, dikes, and channels to divert the freshwater around the brine source. The freshwater diversion concept is also selected for Area II-III, with a multipurpose component, Englewood Lake. The selected plan for Area IV is based on the collect and dispose concept. Brine is collected behind an inflatable dam and pumped to a brine lake for storage. Estimated Federal cost is $663,800,000 for the control of the four areas. The final of the Phase I GDM No. 32 for Areas I, II-III and IV was submitted in September 1981. In GDM No. 32, it is recommended that further studies for the Arkansas River Basin portion of the Arkansas-Red River Basin Chloride Control Project be deferred until a significant change occurs in present or projected conditions that would clearly demonstrate a greater need and probable use of the improved water. Local cooperation. See Section 9 of this report. Operations and results during fiscal year. None 19-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 10. BIG PINE LAKE, RED RIVER BASIN, TX. Location. On Big Pine Creek (mile 16.5) approximately 22 miles northwest of Clarksville, Red River County, TX. (See Geological Survey maps for Woodland, Manchester, and Kiomatia, TX, quadrangles, scale 1:62,500 and Defense Mapping Agency map, Texarkana, TX scale 1:25.000.) Existing project. Plan of improvement provides for an earthfill dam 10.190 feet long, including an uncontrolled concrete chute spillway. Outlet works will consist of a 6-foot-diameter inlet conduit and a stilling basin. A 30-inch water supply pipe and a 24-inch low-flow pipe will be constructed through the dam. The lake will have a total capacity of 174,400 acre-feet, of which 73,400 acre-feet will be allocated for flood control and 101,000 acre-feet for conservation and sedimentation reserve. The lake will control a drainage area of 95 square miles. Estimated cost is $56,300,000. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Phase II of the General Design Memo is complete. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. 11. BIRCH LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, OK. Locaton. On Birch Creek, river mile 0.8, about 1.5 miles south of Barnsdall in Osage County, OK. (See Geological Survey map for Barnsdall, OK, quandrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Location. On Birch Creek, river mile 0.8, about 1.5 miles south of Barnsdall in Osage County, OK. (See Geological Survey map for Barnsdall, OK, quandrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1979. Federal cost is $13,548,848. Construction began in November 1973. Project placed in useful operation in March 1977. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. No noteworthy rise occurred above the lake. Operation of the lake prevented flooding on 1,600 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Birch Lake operations for the prevention of flood damages total $700,000 to September 30, 1982. 12. CANDY LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, OK. Location. On Candy Creek, river mile 1.9, a tributary of Bird Creek in Verdigris River Basin. Damsite is about 1 mile northeast of Avant, Osage County, OK. (See Geological Survey map for Avant, OK, quandrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Plan of improvement provides for an earthfill dam about 4,200 feet long, including an uncontrolled concrete spillway, with a maximum height of 103 feet above streambed. Outlet works will consist of a gated intake structure, a 10-foot by 11.25-foot conduit, and a stilling basin. An 18-inch by 24-inch low-flow pipe and an 18-inch water supply pipe will be provided. The lake will have a total capacity of 75,420 acre-feet (44,160 for conservation and sediment reserve and 31,260 for flood control). Drainage area above the damsite is 43 square miles. Candy Lake will be operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Estimated cost of project is $37,200,000, (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Construction began in September 1976. The project is about 15 percent complete. Construction has been delayed because of the US Justice Department decision to withdraw condemnation proceedings to acquire mineral rights. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, and Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. 13. CANTON LAKE, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OK. Location. On North Canadian River, about 394 miles above its mouth and about 2 miles north of Canton, Blaine County, OK. (See sectional aeronautical chart, Wichita sheet, scale 1:500,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 590 of Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost is $10,912,323, of which $533,682 is Code 710 funds. Construction began in December 1940 and project placed in useful operation in April 1948. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Canton Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $6,380,000 to September 30, 1982. Hydraulic studies were completed under the Dam Modernization Program to determine feasibility of modification of the project as a result of the Dam Safety Inspection Program. Final recommendations are being held in abeyance until other projects in the District and nationwide are analyzed for priorities. No water was released for water supply. 14. COPAN LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, OK. Location. On Little Caney River, river mile 7.4, a tributary of Caney River in Verdigris River watershed, about 2 miles west of Copan, Washington County, OK. (See Geological Survey maps of Nowata, OK, and Sedan and Independence, Kansas, quadrangles, scale 1:125,000 and Defense Mapping Agency maps, Tulsa, OK, Wichita, KS, and Joplin, MO, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. The earthfill dam is 7,730 feet long, including a gated spillway section; a levee 17,000 feet 19-6 TULSA OKLAHOMA DISTRICT long, for protection of Caney, KS. Maximum height of the dam above streambed is 73 feet. A concrete spillway, controlled by four 50-foot by 35.5-foot tainter gates, provides for operation of the lake for flood control. Outlet works include a 36-inch low-flow pipe and a 12-inch future water supply pipe. The lake will have a total capacity of 227,700 acre-feet (46,000 for conservation and sediment reserve, and 181,700 for flood control). Drainage area above damsite is 505 square miles. Copan Lake will be operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Relocated Oklahoma State Highway 10 crosses the top of the dam. Estimated cost is $79,400,000. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Construction began in November 1972. The project is 94 percent complete. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1933, Water Supply Act of 1953, and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Major accomplishments with regular funds: land acquisition and mineral deficiencies $4,919,000; railroad relocations $722,000; clearing $233,000; plugging oil and gas wells $172,000; recreational development $336,000; permanent operating equipment $341,000. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Copan Lake operations for the prevention of flood damages total $390,000 to September 30, 1982. 15. COUNCIL GROVE LAKE, GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN, KS. Location. On Grand (Neosho) River about 450 miles above mouth and about 1.5 miles northwest of Council Grove, Morris County, KS. (See Geological Survey maps for Parkerville and Eskridge, Kansas, quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 519 of Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost is $11,604,732, of which $163,829 is Code 710 funds. Construction began in July 1960 and project placed in useful operation in October 1964. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. No noteworthy rises occurred on Grand (Neosho) River above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Council Grove Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $8,990,000 to September 30, 1982. 16. EL DORADO LAKE, WALNUT RIVER BASIN, KS. Location. On Walnut River, river mile 100.2, a tributary of Arkansas River, about 2 miles northeast of El Dorado, Butler County, KS. (See Geological Survey maps for El Dorado and DeGraff, KS, quadrangles, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The earthfill dam is 21,000 feet long, including a 350 foot uncontrolled spillway. Dam is 99 feet above streambed. The lake will control 234 square miles of drainage area and provide a total storage of 236,200 acrefeet (79,200 for flood control storage, 154,100 for conservation, and 2,900 for sedimentation reserve). Outlet works consist of an 11.5-foot by 15.75-foot oblong conduit, a 24-inch by 36-inch low-flow sluice and a 36-inch water supply pipe. El Dorado Lake will be operated as a unit of a three-lake system for flood control in the Walnut River Basin. Estimated Federal cost of project is $89,900,000. Estimated non-Federal cost is $5,600,000. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Construction began in October 1973. The project is 91 percent complete. Remaining work consists of public-use facilities and boundary fencing. Impoundment began in June 1981. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, Federal Water Recreation Act of 1965, and Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Major accomplishments with regular funds: recreation facilities $1,692,000; railroad relocations $635,000. 17. ELK CITY LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, KS. Location. On Elk River, river mile 8.7, about 7 miles northwest of Independence, Montgomery County, KS. (See Geological Survey maps for Caney-NE, NW, and SW, and Benton, KS, quadrangles, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 593 of Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost is $19,042,990. Construction began in February 1962 and project placed in useful operation in March 1966. Studies to evaluate the feasibility of adding hydropower at the existing facility are in progress. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Elk City Lake for prevention of flood damages total $36,270,000 to September 30, 1982. 18. FALL RIVER LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, KS. Location. On Fall River about 54 miles above its confluence with the Verdigris River and about 4 miles northwest of Fall River, Greenwood County, KS. (See Geological Survey map for Eureka, KS, quadrangle, scale 1:125,000; and Severy, KS, quadrangle, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 953 of Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost is $10,512,382, of which $13,000 is Code 710 funds. Construction of the dam began in May 1946 and the project placed in full operation in April 1949. Studies to evaluate the feasibility of adding hydropower to the existing facility are in progress. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Fall River Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $27,410,000 to September 30, 1982. 19-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Hydraulic studies were completed under the Dam Modernization Program to determine feasibility of modification of the project as a result of the Dam Safety Inspection Program. Final recommendations are being held in abeyance until other projects in the District and nationwide are analyzed for priorities. 19. FORT SUPPLY LAKE, NORTH CANADIAN RIVER BASIN, OK. Location. On Wolf Creek, river mile 5.5, a tributary of North Canadian River, about 12 miles northwest of Woodward, Woodward County, OK. (See sectional aeronautical chart, Wichita sheet, scale 1:500,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 594 of Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost is $7,723,127, of which $132,941 is Code 710 funds. Construction began in October 1938 and the project was placed in full flood control operation in May 1942. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. A total of 203 acrefeet was withdrawn for water supply. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Fort Supply Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $3,060,000 to September 30, 1982. Hydraulic studies were completed under the Dam Modernization Program to determine feasibility of modification of the project as a result of the Dam Safety Inspection Program. Final recommendations are being held in abeyance until other projects in the District and nationwide are analyzed for priorities. 20. GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OK. Location. On Salt Fork of Arkansas River, mile 103.3, about 12 miles east of Cherokee, Alfalfa County, OK. (See sectional aeronautical chart, Wichita sheet, scale 1:500,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 594 of Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost was $4,626,270. Construction of dam was initiated September 1938 and completed July 1941. Project placed in full flood control operation in May 1941. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Great Salt Plains Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $13,240,000 to September 30, 1982. 21. HEYBURN LAKE, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OK. Location. On Polecat Creek, a minor tributary to Arkansas River near Sapulpa, Creek County, OK. (See Geological Survey maps for Nuyake, Hominy, and Claremore, OK, quadrangles, scale 1:250,000; and Bristow and Kiefer, OK, quadrangles, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 599 of Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost is $2,518,673 (including $135,300 for construction of channel improvement on Polecat and Rock Creeks and $151,500 Code 710 funds). Construction was started in March 1948 and the project was placed in useful operation in September 1950. Channel improvements below the lake were completed in September 1952. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation, maintenance, and repaired embankment slope protection continued. Rural Water District No. 1, Creek County, OK, used 1,225 acre-feet of water from the lake. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $4,140,000 to September 30, 1982. 22. HUGO LAKE, KIAMICHI RIVER BASIN, OK. Location. On Kiamichi River, river mile 17.6, about 7 miles east of Hugo, Choctaw County, OK. (See Geological Survey map for Alikchi, OK, quadrangle, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement see Annual Report for 1977. Federal cost is $37,659,102, of which $22,171 is code 710 funds. (See table 19-B--Red River below Denison Dam (Tulsa District)-for authorizing legislation.) Construction began in October 1967 and the project was placed in useful operation in January 1974. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. The State of Oklahoma, through its Water Resources Board, and local interests furnished resolutions of intent to repay costs allocated to water supply,storage. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. A total of 4,503 acre-feet of water was used from the lake for water supply. The highest lake level of record (elevation 425.09) occurred in May 1982. One noteworthy rise occurred on the Kiamichi River above the lake. The project reduced the damaging effects of floods on 500 acres of land below the damsite. Flood damages prevented total $5,400,000 to September 30, 1982. 23. HULAH LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, OK. Location. On Caney River, river mile 96.2, about 15 miles northwest of Bartlesville, near Hulah, Osage County, OK. (See Geological Survey maps for Pawhuska, OK, and Sedan, KS, quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost is $11,133,333, of which $264,727 is Code 710 funds. Construction began in May 1946 and completed in June 1950. Project placed in full flood control operation in September 1951. Local cooperation. Completed as required. 19-8 TULSA OKLAHOMA DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Hulah Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $59,990,000 to September 30, 1982. A total of 10,654 acre-feet of water was used by the city of Bartlesville, Oklahoma. 24. JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN, KS. Location. Dam is on Grand (Neosho) River, river mile 343.7, about 2 miles northwest of Burlington, Coffey County, KS. (See Geological Survey maps for Burlington and Emporia, KS, quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1970. Federal cost is $28,151,515, of which $170,651 is Code 710 funds. Construction was initiated in July 1959 and completed in December 1965. Project placed in flood control operation in July 1964. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. No water supply releases were made during the fiscal year. No noteworthy rises occurred above the reservoir. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to reservoir operations for prevention of flood damages total $51,840,000 to September 30, 1982. 25. KAW LAKE, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OK. Location. On Arkansas River, river mile 653.7, about 8 miles east of Ponca City, Kay County, OK. (See Geological Survey map for Charley Creek, OK, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1977. Federal cost is $108,672,964. Construction began in June 1966 and project placed in operation in May 1976. Studies to evaluate the feasibility of adding hydropower at the existing facilities are in progress. The proposed plan considers adding 95 megawatts of power and has a benefit-to-cost ratio of 3.5. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Water Supply Act of 1958 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. A record high lake level of elevation 1027.27 was attained in June 1982. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Kaw Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $9,330,000 to September 30, 1982. No water was released for water supply. 26. LAKE KEMP, WICHITA RIVER BASIN, TX. Location. On Wichita River, river mile 126.7, about 40 miles southwest of Wichita Falls, TX. (See aeronautical chart, Dallas, TX, scale 1:500,000 and Defense Mapping Agency map, Wichita Falls, TX, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1977. Cost of completed project was $7,637,702 Federal and $3,130,000 non-Federal. Construction began in April 1970 and the project placed in useful operation in October 1972. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. A total of 29,508 acre-feet of water was released for irrigation and water supply. One noteworthy rise occurred above the lake. The first flood control releases from the lake were made in June, 1982. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to reservoir operations for prevention of flood damages total $2,930,000 to September 30, 1982. 27. LUKFATA LAKE, LITTLE RIVER BASIN, OK AND AR. Location. On Glover Creek at mile 17.3 about 6 miles north of Glover, McCurtain County, OK. (See Geological Survey map for Lukfata, OK, quadrangle, scale 1:125,000; and Bethel, Smithville, Golden, and Broken Bow, OK, quadrangles, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. Plan provides for construction of a rockfill dam about 2,600 feet long, rising 176 feet above the original streambed. an uncontrolled 600-foot saddle spillway will be near the left end of the embankment. Outlet works will provide for a 12-foot conduit and a stilling basin. The lake will provide a total storage of 252,100 acre-feet (208,630 for flood control, 43,470 for conservation and sedimentation reserve), and will control a drainage area of 252 square miles. Lukfata Lake will be operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in Little River watershed, thereby reducing Red River floodflows. Estimated cost (1979 price levels) of project is $39,900,000. (See table 19-B--Red River below Denison Dam (Tulsa District)--for authorizing legislation.) Construction has not started. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. 28. MARION, KS. Location. On Mud Creek at Marion, the county seat of Marion County, KS. Existing project. Construction of a diversion channel 9,026 feet in length, an overflow protection levee 17,875 feet in length, and structures to control interior drainage and low streamflow. Railroad and highway bridges were altered or relocated as required. Estimated Federal cost is $5,466,394 and $900,000 non-Federal cost. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Construction started in June 1975 and was completed in April 1980. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate all works after completion; perform all relocations except railroads; acquire fee title to lands for borrow and ponding purposes and flowage easements over lands for ponding only; and pre- 19-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 vent encroachment on existing and improved channel. Operations and results during fiscal year. City of Marion, KS assumed project operation and maintenance responsibility. 29. MARION LAKE, GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN, KS. Location. On Cottonwood River, river mile 126.7, about 3 miles northwest of Marion, Marion County, KS. (See Geological Survey map for Newton, KS, quadrangle, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost of project is $13,335,317 of which $17,779 is Code 710 funds. Construction began in June 1964 and the project placed in flood control operation February 1968. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Marion Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $26,130,000 to September 30, 1982. 30. OOLOGAH LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, OK. Location. On Verdigris River about 10 miles northwest of Claremore, Rogers County, OK, and about 2 miles southeast of Oologah, Rogers County, OK. (See Geological Survey maps for Claremore and Nowata, OK, quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation, see Annual Report for 1972. Federal cost of project is $46,688,556 of which $13,994 is Code 710 funds. After construction of right abutment access road, project was placed in standby status in October 1951. Construction was resumed in December 1955 and completed in May 1963 for initial development. Construction for ultimate (second stage) development was initiated July 1967, and was completed in 1974. Studies to evaluate the feasibility of adding hydropower at the existing facility are in progress. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operatons and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. A total of 44,272 acre-feet of water was withdrawn from the lake for water supply. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Oologah Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $38,580,000 to September 30, 1982. 31. OPTIMA LAKE, NORTH CANADIAN RIVER BASIN, OK. Location. On North Canadian River, river mile 623.2, about 4.5 miles northeast of Hardesty, Texas County, OK. (See Geological Survey map for Optima Dam, Oklahoma, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of existing improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1979. Federal cost is $47,224,665. Construction began in March 1966. Impoundment began in October 1978. Project is complete. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance began. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Optima Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $7,000 to September 30, 1982. 32. PAT MAYSE LAKE, RED RIVER BASIN, TX. Location. On Sanders Creek, mile 4.6, a tributary of Red River, about 12 miles north of Paris, Lamar County, TX. (See Geological Survey map for Grant, TX, quadrangle, scale 1:62,500 and Defense Mapping Agency map, Texarkana, TX, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1970. Federal cost of project is $9,310,661, of which $819,404 is Code 710 funds. Construction began in March 1965 and was placed in full flood control operation in September 1967. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Two noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. The second highest lake level of record (elevation 462.41) occurred in May. Flooding was prevented on an average of 500 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Pat Mayse Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $3,270,000 to September 30, 1982. A total of 10,317 acre-feet of water was released for water supply to city of Paris, Texas. 33. PEARSON - SKUBITZ BIG HUILL LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, KS. Location. On Big Hill Creek, river mile 33.3, about 5 miles east of Cherryvale, KS. (See Geological Survey maps for Mound Valley and Parsons, KS, quadrangles, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. Consists of an earthfill dam about 3,900 feet long, 83 feet above streambed. The 400-foot uncontrolled spillway is located in the right abutment. Outlet works include a drop inlet intake structure, a 5-foot 8-inch-diameter conduit, and a stilling basin. A 30-inchdiameter pipe is provided for water supply releases along with a 2-foot by 5-foot low flow opening. The lake has a total capacity of 40,600 acre-feet, (13,100 for flood control and 27,500 for conservation and sedimentation reserve), and controls runoff from a drainage area of 37 square miles. Estimated cost is $17,120,000. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Construction began in April 1974. Impoundment began in March 1981. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. All major 19-10 TULSA OKLAHOMA DISTRICT items of construction are complete. The project was officially dedicated on July 24, 1982. Major accomplishments with regular funds: Public-use areas $2,972,200. 34. PINE CREEK LAKE, LITTLE RIVER BASIN, OK. Location. On Little River, river mile 145.3, about 5 miles northwest of Wright City, McCurtain County, OK. (See Geological Survey maps for Alikchi, OK, quadrangle, scale 1:125,000; and Wright City and Pickens, OK, quadrangles NE, NW, SE, and SW, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1970. Federal cost of project is $20,304,909 of which $3,500 is Code 710 funds. Construction began in February 1963 and the project was placed in useful operation in June 1969. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. A total of 33,667 acre-feet of water was released for water supply. Three noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Flooding was prevented on an average of 2,500 acres of land. The lake reached its second highest pool level of record (elevation 462.29). Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Pine Creek Lake operation for prevention of flood damages total $7,520,000 to September 30, 1982. 35. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (TULSA DISTRICT). Location. On Red River and its tributaries below Denison Dam, in Oklahoma, Arkansas, Texas, and Louisiana. (See Geological Survey State maps and folio maps of Red River - 1958 edition.) Existing project. Provides for construction of eleven flood control lakes in combination with existing or authorized Federal and non-Federal levee improvements, modified as required, and channel stabilization at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. (See table 19-F for water control projects included in general flood control plan for Red River below Denison Dam within Tulsa District.) (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Preconstruction planning completed. Local cooperation. See individual reports. 36. SARDIS LAKE, LITTLE RIVER BASIN, OK. Location. On Jackfork Creek, river mile 2.8, a tributary of Kiamichi River, about 2.5 miles north of Clayton, Pushmataba County, OK. (See Geological Survey map for Tuskahoma, OK, quadrangle, scale 1:125,000 and Defense Mapping Agency map, McAlester, OK, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. Consists of a rolled earthfill dam about 14,138 feet long, with a maximum height of 101 feet above the streambed. An uncontrolled spillway 215 feet wide is constructed near the right abutment. Outlet works consist of an oblong conduit, 9-foot by 12.25-foot, and a 2.5-foot by 5.25-foot sluice was installed for low-flow regulation. The lake will provide 128,200 acre-feet of storage for flood control and 302,400 acre-feet for conservation and sediment reserve, a total of 430,600 acre-feet, and controls a drainage area of 275 square miles. Sardis Lake will be operated as a unit of a three-lake system for flood control in the Kiamichi River Basin, including Hugo and Tuskahoma Lakes thereby reducing Red River floodflows. Estimated cost of project is $54,880,000. (See table 19-B - Red River below Denison Dam (Tulsa District)for authorizing legislation.) Construction began in August 1975 and the project is 93 percent complete, with completion scheduled for FY 83. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Major accomplishments with regular funds: land acquisition and damages $130,000; embankment and outlet works $839,000; relocations $1,913,000. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Sardis Lake operations for the prevention of flood damages total $990,000 to September 30, 1982. Sardis Lake operated as a detention lake and reduced peak flood flows downstream of the dam on several occasions. 37. SHIDLER LAKE, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OK. Location. On Salt Creek, mile 39.2, a tributary of Arkansas River, about 1 mile east of Shidler, Osage County, OK. (See Geological Survey map for Fairfax, OK, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Provides for an earthfill dam 6,050 feet long, with a maximum height of 117 feet above streambed. An uncontrolled spillway 200 feet wide will be east of the dam. Outlet works will include a gate tower with gated wet well inlet with a 10.5-foot by 11.5-foot controlled conduit. A 30-inch low-flow bypass and a 24-inch water supply line will be provided. A roadway will be located along crest of dam. The total lake capacity of 108,100 acre-feet will be allocated, 49,900 acre-feet for flood control and 58,200 acre-feet for conservation, and will control runoff from 99 square miles. Shidler Lake will be operated as a unit of the coordinated lake system for flood control in the Arkansas River Basin. Estimated cost of the project is $33,100,000. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Preconstruction planning has been completed. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. 38. SKIATOOK LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, OK. Location. On Hominy Creek, mile 14,3, a tributary of Bird Creek, in the Verdigris River Basin about 5 miles west of Skiatook, Osage County, OK. (See Geological Survey map for Avant, OK, quadrangle, SE, scale 1:24,000 and Defense Mapping Agency map, Enid, OK, scale 1:250,000.) 19-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Existing project. Provides for an earthfill dam 3,590 feet long, 143 feet high with a crown width of 32 feet. The uncontrolled 100-foot spillway will be located in the right abutment. Outlet works will consist of a controlled intake structure, 10.5-foot diameter tunnel, stilling basin, 2.5-foot by 5-foot low-flow sluice, and a 36-inch water supply pipe. The lake will provide a total storage of 513,500 acre-feet (319,400 for conservation storage, 182,300 for flood control, and 11,800 for sedimentation reserve), and will control a drainage area of 354 square miles. Skiatook Lake will be operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Estimated cost of project is $112,000,000. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Construction began in January 1974. The project is 74 percent complete. Studies to evaluate the feasibility of adding hydropower at the existing facility are in progress. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, Water Supply Act of 1958, and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Major accomplishments with regular funds: second stage embankment, spillway, and outlet works $5,045,000; mineral subordination $13,595,000. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Skiatook Lake operations for the prevention of flood damages total $1,140,000 to September 30,1982. 39. TORONTO LAKE, VERDIGRIS RIVER BASIN, KS. Location. On Verdigris River about 271.5 miles above its mouth and 4 miles south and east of Toronto, Woodson County, KS. (See Geological Survey map for Fredonia, KS, quadrangle, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost is $13,896,324 of which $922 is Code 710 funds. Construction began November 1954 and project placed in full operation March 1960. Studies to evaluate the feasibility of adding hydropower at the existing facility are in progress. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. The city of Toronto, Kansas, used 73 acre-feet of water from the lake. One noteworthy rise occurred above the lake. Flooding was prevented on 7,500 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to operation of Toronto Lake for prevention of flood damages total $23,630,000 to September 30, 1982. 40. WAURIKA LAKE, RED RIVER BASIN, OK. Location. Beaver Creek, mile 27.0, a tributary of the Red River, about 6 miles northwest of Waurika, Jefferson County, OK. (See Geological Survey map for Hastings, OKTX, quadrangle, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. An earthfill dam 16,600 feet long, including an uncontrolled spillway 300 feet wide, and 106 feet above streambed. Outlet works include a gated conduit 13.5 feet in diameter, a 14-inch water supply pipe, and a 12-inch low-flow pipe. The lake provides a total storage of 343,500 acre-feet (199,700 for conservation storage, 140,400 for flood control, and 3,400 for sedimentation reserve), and controls a drainage area of 562 square miles. Waurika Lake is operated as a unit of a coordinated lake system for flood control in Red River Basin. Estimated cost is $67,080,000. (See table 19-B for authorizing legislation.) Construction began in July 1971. Impoundment began in August, 1977. All major items of construction are complete. Project is 99 percent complete. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance continued. A total of 4,620 acre-feet was withdrawn for water supply. The conservation pool filled and flood control releases were made for the first time. Major accomplishments with regular funds: Land acquisition and damages $256,000; reservoir fencing $261,800. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Waurika Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $3,990,000 to September 30, 1982. 41. WISTER LAKE, POTEAU RIVER BASIN, OK. Location. On Poteau River, river mile 60.9, about 2 miles south of Wister, LeFlore County, OK. (See Geological Survey map for Winding Stair, OK, quadrangle, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 601 of Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost was $10,501,226. Construction began April 1946 and was completed May 1949. Project placed in full flood control operation in October 1949. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. One noteworthy rise'occurred above the lake. Flooding was prevented on 18,000 acres of land. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Wister Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $55,650,000 to September 30, 1982. A total of 2,671 acre-feet of water was withdrawn from the lake for water supply. 42. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS. Semiannual inspection of completed local flood protection projects operated and maintained by local interests are made to determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for operations and maintenance. The inspections assist the Corps of Engineers to determine if the project provides the flood protection for which it was constructed. (See table 19-G for inspection of local flood protection projects.) Fiscal year cost was $138,651. Total cost to September 30, 1982 was $908,743. 19-12 TULSA OKLAHOMA DISTRICT 43. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS. Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized the Secretary of War to prescribe regulations for use of storage allocated for flood control or navigation at all reservoirs constructed wholly or in part with Federal funds. Under the purview of this act, operation of the flood control storage included in reservoirs shown below in items 43A through 43H is prescribed by the Corps. Work accomplished consists of operating activities necessary in basin-wide coordination of functional scheduling of releases from reservoirs operated by other agencies and preparation of flood control operation and maintenance manuals for projects underway. Fiscal year cost from regular funds for maintenance was $390,876. 43A. ALTUS RESERVOIR, RED RIVER BASIN, OK. Located on the North Fork of the Red River, 16 miles north of Altus, OK, the project was completed in 1948 by the Bureau of Reclamation (now Water and Power Resource Service). Flood damages prevented total $3,260,000 through September 30, 1982. 43B. ARBUCKLE RESERVOIR, RED RIVER BASIN, OK. Located on Rock Creek, a Red River tributary 6 miles southwest of Sulphur, OK, the project was completed in 1967 by the Bureau of Reclamation (now Water and Power Resource Service). Flood damages prevented total $330,000 through September 30, 1982. 43C. CHENEY RESERVOIR, NINNESCAH RIVER BASIN, KS. Located on the Ninnescah River, about 23 miles west of Wichita, KS, the project was completed in 1965 by the Bureau of Reclamation (now Water and Power Resource Service). Flood damages prevented total $6,940,000 through September 30, 1982. 43D. FORT COBB RESERVOIR, WASHITA RIVER BASIN, OK. Located on Cobb (Pond) Creek, a tributary of the Washita River, in Caddo County, OK, the project was completed in 1959 by the Bureau of Reclamation (now Water and Power Resource Service). Flood damages prevented total $300,000 through September 30, 1982. 43E. FOSS RESERVOIR, WASHITA RIVER BASIN, OK. Located on the Washita River, about 7 miles north of Foss, OK, the project was completed in 1961 by the Bureau of Reclamation (now Water and Power Resource Service). Flood damages prevented through September 30, 1982 total $830,000. 43F. MOUNTAIN PARK RESERVOIR (TOM STEED LAKE), RED RIVER BASIN, OK. Located on Otter Creek, a tributary of the North fork of the Red River, about 6 miles north of Snyder, OK, the project was completed in 1977 by the Bureau of Reclamation (now Water and Power Resource Service). Flood damages prevented through September 30, 1982 total $390,000. 43G. NORMAN RESERVOIR (LAKE THUNDERBIRD), RED RIVER BASIN, OK. Located on the Little River, about 12 miles east of Norman, OK, the project was completed in 1965 by the Bureau of Reclamation (now Water and Power Resource Service). Flood damages prevented through September 30, 1982 total $2,630,000. 43H. SANFORD DAM (LAKE MEREDITH), CANADIAN RIVER BASIN, OK. Located on the Canadian River about 8 miles northwest of Borger, TX, the project was completed in 1965 by the Bureau of Reclamation (now Water and Power Resource Service). Flood damages prevented through September 30, 1982 total $6,000. 44. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS. See table 19-H. 45. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION. Small flood control projects not specifically authorized by Congress (Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended Public Law 858, 80th Congress), (preauthorization). See table 19-I. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Federal cost for fiscal year was $131,021, of which $100,934 was for advance preparation and $30,087 for repair and restoration. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, Flood Control Act of 1946, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Federal cost for fiscal year was $105,888 as follows: Wildhorse Creek, Carter County, Kansas, $773; Fall River, Neodesha, KS, $13,740; Neosho River, Erie, Kansas, $678; Salt Fork of Red River, Jackson County, Oklahoma, $42.00; Verdigris River, Coffeyville, Kansas, $8,471; and Walnut River, Cowley County, Kansas, $82,184. Flood insurance activities (Section 1301-1377, Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, Public Law 90-448, as amended.) 19-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 In coordination with flood control activities, eight flood insurance studies were in progress in accordance with various Interagaency Agreements at a fiscal year cost of $62,700 under Housing and Urban Development reimbursable orders. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 46. BROKEN BOW LAKE, LITTLE RIVER BASIN, OK. Location. On Mountain Fork River, river mile 20.3, about 9 miles northeast of Broken Bow, McCurtain county, OK. (See Geological Survey maps for Broken Bow and Smithville, OK, quandrangles, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1971. Federal cost was $41,222,692. Construction began in November 1961 and project placed in useful operation in October 1968. Power units 1 and 2 were placed in operation in January and June 1970, respectively. Generator 1 experienced a stator winding failure on June 15, 1982. Temporary repairs allowed the unit to be returned to service. Additional testing indicates both generators require replacement of the stator winding. Funding is being sought to accomplish this work. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Three noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Operation of the lake prevented downstream flooding on an average of 4,500 acres of land. Estimated monetary beneifts attributed to Broken Bow Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $9,020,000 to September 30, 1982. During low-flow water periods, releases totaling 4,344 acre-feet were made to supplement water for a State park. Other low flow requirements were met by power releases. These delivered 163,013,900 kilowatt-hours of electric energy to Southwestern Power Administration for distribution and sale, and released 932,960 acre-feet of water through turbines. 47. DENISON DAM - LAKE TEXOMA, RED RIVER BASIN, TX AND OK. Location. On Red River, river mile 725.9, about 5 miles northwest of Denison, TX. (See Geological Survey maps for Denison, TX, and Tishomingo, OK, quadrangles, scale 1:125,000; and Denison Dam and Gordonville, TX, quadrangles, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1969. Hydroelectric development consists of two units having an installed capacity of 70,000 kilowatts. Ultimate installation planned is for five units with a total of 175,000 kilowatts. Lake Texoma is operated as a unit of a coordinated lake system for flood control in the Red River Basin. Federal cost is $67,864,473 of which $3,394,828 are Code 710 funds. Non-Federal cost was $1,256,068. Construction was started in August 1939 and was completed for the dam, spillway, and outlet works in February 1944. Impoundment of the power pool began in January 1944 and commercial power generation was started in March 1945 with the first unit operating. Authorized work is complete except for installation of the third and fourth power units, and additional perimeter access roads. (Work discontinued on access roads, has been recommended for deferral.) Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Denison Dam-Lake Texoma operation for prevention of flood damages downstream to Fulton, AR, total $57,590,000 to September 30, 1982. A total of 5,660 acre-feet was withdrawn for water supply. 330,940,700 kilowatt-hours of electric energy were delivered to Southwestern Power Administration for distribution and sale, and 3,522,162 acre-feet of water were released through turbines. 48. EUFAULA LAKE, CANADIAN RIVER BASIN, OK. Location. On Canadian River, at river mile 27.0, about 12 miles east of Eufaula, McIntosh County, OK. (See Geological Survey maps for Okmulgee, Canadian, McAlester, and Sans Bois, OK, quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1970. Federal cost is $121,801,719, of which $551,900 is Code 710 funds. Construction began in December 1956 and project placed in full flood control operation in February 1964. Project is complete except for additional recreation facilities. Commercial power was generated on unit 1 July 1964, on unit 2 September 1964, and on unit 3 August 1964. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Eufaula Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $35,270,000 to September 30, 1982. A total of 2,030 acre-feet of water was withdrawn for water supply. 354,043,400 kilowatt-hours of electric energy were delivered to Southwestern Power Administration for distribution and sale, and 4,205,156 acre-feet of water were released through turbines. FORT GIBSON LAKE, GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN, OKLAHOMA. Location. On Grand (Neosho) River, river mile 7.7, about 5 miles north and east of Fort Gibson, Muskogee County, OK. (See Geological Survey map for Muskogee and Pryor, OK, quadrangles, scale 1:125,000; and Wagoner, OK, quadrangle, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost is $43,596,858, of which $1,140,596 is Code 710 funds. The estimated cost for the addition of power units 5 and 6 is $23,800,000. Construction began in 19-14 49. TULSA OKLAHOMA DISTRICT March 1942 with construction of temporary field office buildings, but further construction at project was held in abeyance during World War II. Construction of concrete dam and spillway, the largest single feature of the project, started in May 1946 and was completed in June 1950. Fourth generator installed and project placed in full operation in September 1953. Additional studies are being conducted to determine the feasibility of adding additional hydropower units. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Fort Gibson Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $27,950,000 to September 30, 1982. A total of 16,276 acre-feet were released to the city of Muskogee, Oklahoma, for water supply. 239,871,900 kilowatt-hours of electric energy were delivered to Southwestern Power Administration for distribution and sale, and 4,465,856 acre-feet of water were released through turbines. 50. KEYSTONE LAKE, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OK. Location. On Arkansas River, river mile 538.8, near Sand Springs, OK, and about 15 miles west of Tulsa, OK. (See Geological Survey map for Hominy, OK, quadrangle, scale 1:125,000; Skedee and Yale, OK, quadrangles, scale 1:62,500; and Keystone Dam, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1970. Federal cost is $123,126,175, of which $448,656 is Code 710 funds. Construction began in January 1957 and the project was placed in flood control operation in September 1964. No. 1 generating unit became operational on May 21, 1968 and No. 2 on May 2, 1968. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 80,118,100 kilowatt-hours of electric energy were delivered to Southwestern Power Administration for distribution and sale, and 1,131,269 acre-feet of water were released through turbines. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Water supply usage totaled 5,654 acre-feet. Low-flow release requirements were met by power releases. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to operation of Keystone Lake for prevention of flood damages total $84,660,000 to September 30, 1982. 51. MARKHAM FERRY RESERVOIR (LAKE HUDSON), GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN, OK. Location. On Grand (Neosho) River, river mile 47.4, about 8 miles southeast of city of Pryor, Mayes County, OK. (See Geological Survey map for Pryor and Vinita, OK., quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 605 of Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost was $6,908,756. Federal participation in the project is coxiplete. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Flood control storage in the project was operated by the Grand River Dam Authority (an agency of the State of Oklahoma) under the direction of the Corps of Engineers. No noteworthy rises occurred above the reservoir. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to the operation of Markham Ferry Reservoir for flood damage prevention total $5,490,000 to September 30, 1982. 52. PENSACOLA RESERVOIR (GRAND LAKE), GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN, OK. Location. On Grand (Neosho) River, river mile 77.0, next to town of Disney, Mayes County, OK. (See Geological Survey maps for Pryor, Wyandotte, and Vinita, OK, and Siloam Springs, AR, quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost was $52,126. Project is complete. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Flood control storage in project was operated by Grand River Dam Authority (an agency of State of Oklahoma) under direction of the Corps of Engineers. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Pensacola Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $37,050,000 to September 30, 1982. 53. ROBERT S. KERR LOCK AND DAM AND RESERVOIR, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OK. Location. On Arkansas River at navigation mile 336.2, about 8 miles south of Sallisaw, LeFlore County, OK. (See Geological Survey maps for Robert S. Kerr Dam, Keota, Vian, Sallisaw, Stigler NE, and Webbers Falls, OK, quadrangles, scale 1:24,000 and Defense Mapping Agency map, Fort Smith, AR, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1972. Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir is a unit of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Federal cost is $94,578,237 of which $24,004 is Code 710 funds. Construction began in April 1964 and closure was completed in October 1970. Lock and dam became operational for navigation in December 1970. Power units number 1, number 2, number 3, and number 4 were placed in operation in October, July, September, and November 1971, respectively. Local cooperation. See section 2 of this report. Terminal facilities. Seven sites have been developed for handling coal, grain, construction aggregrates, and miscellaneous cargo. The facilities are considered adequate for present traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine 19-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 operation and maihtenance continued. 614,602,500 kilowatt-hours of electric energy were delivered to Southwestern Power Administration for distribution and sale, and 16,592,266 acre-feet of water were releasedthrough turbines. 54. TENKILLER FERRY LAKE, ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN, OK. Location. On Illinois River, river mile 12.8, about 7 miles northwest of Vian and 7 miles northeast of Gore, Sequoyah County, OK. (See Geological Survey maps for Muskogee and Tahlequah, OK, and AR, quadrangles, scale 1:125,000; and Webbers Falls, OK, quadrangle, scale 1:62,500.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1969. Federal cost is $23,954,780, of which $1,295,322 is Code 710 funds. Construction began in June 1947 and completed in July 1953. Commercial sale of power started November 1953, with unit number 2. Unit number 1 was installed in December 1953. Work on repair and extension of spillway apron began in July 1960 and was completed in August 1961. Generator 1 experienced a stator winding failure on July 2, 1982. Temporary repairs allowed the generator to be returned to service. Generator 1 will have the stator winding replaced during the spring of 1983. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Additional recreation facilities were constructed. No noteworthy rises occurred above the lake. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Tenkiller Lake operations for prevention of flood damages total $10,690,000 to September 30, 1982. 109,685,400 kilowatt-hours of electric energy were generated for distribution and sale by Southwestern Power Administration, with 829,130 acre-feet of water released through turbines. A total of 5,937 acre-feet of water was released for water supply. 55. WEBBERS FALLS LOCK AND DAM, ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, OK. Location. On Arkansas river at navigation mile 366.6, about 5 miles northwest of Webbers Falls, Muskogee County, OK. (See Geological Survey maps for Webbers Falls, Keefeton, and Wagoner, OK, quadrangles, scale 1:62,500 and Defense Mapping Agency map, Fort Smith, AR, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1977. Project is a unit of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Federal cost is $83,736,701. Construction began in January 1965, and the project was placed in useful operation in November 1970. The lock and dam became operational for navigation in December 1970. Power units number 1, number 2, and number 3 were placed in operation in August, September, and November 1973, respectively. The project is complete. Studies to evaluate the feasibility of expanding hydropower at the facility are in progress. The selected plan has a benefit-tocost ratio of 1.4. Local cooperation. See section 2 of this report. Terminal facilities. Cargo pier, mooring dolphins, warehouse, terminal building, and fuel facility built by Muskogee City-County Port Authority; liquid cargo loading facility and steel unloading facility built by Frontier Steel Company serve existing traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Generating units were not in service because of cracked turbine shaft welds. The repaired turbine shafts will be returned for installation during FY 83. General Investigations 56. SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $2,546,241 of which $119,865 was for special navigation studies (Arkansas River and tributaries hydropower studies), $153,004 for coordination with other agencies, $13,792 for preauthorization studies (Prosperity Lake, MO), and $240,724 for the review of the completed Hugo and Pine Creek Lakes in Oklahoma. $1,972,250 was used for the following local protection flood control projects: Arkansas River, Great Bend, KS to Tulsa, OK ($510,744); Canadian River, OK, NM, TX ($315,184); Grand Neosho River Basin, KS and OK ($89.00); Lake Texoma, OK and TX ($10,527); Lake Texoma water supply facilities, TX and OK ($1,337); Poteau River, OK ($258,880); Red River above Denison, TX and OK ($60,751); Tenkiller Ferry Dam and Reservoir, OK ($219,453); Tulsa Urban Study, OK ($116,278); and Verdigris River Basin ($479,007). In addition, $46,606 was used for the deferred Lukfata Lake, OK project. The hydroelectric power studies reported in the General Design Memorandum of 1976 were reviewed and updated to current economic and technical criteria. The estimated cost (July 1982 price levels) of a project with a 65-MW hydroelectric power generator and turbine is $178,000,000. The study was authorized by House Document No. 97-177, 97th Congress, 1st Session, July 14, 1981. The results of the hydroelectric power study were submitted to higher authority, recommending that an expanded reconnaisance report on the Lukfata Project be prepared with emphasis on the evaluation of fish and wildlife resources. In addition to the normal Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act studies by the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation and the US Fish and Wildlife Service, the studies for the report would include formal consultations with the Fish and Wildlife Service to determine project effects on critical habitat of the leopard darter and whether any adverse effects can be mitigated. When the mitigation question is resolved, the Federal interest in the Lukfata Project can be determined. Studies for the expanded reconnaisance report have not been approved or started. 57. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year cost was $239,321 of which $26,723 was for inspection of dams, $205,939 for flood plain management services, and $6,659 for hydrologic studies. 19-16 TULSA OKLAHOMA DISTRICT 58. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Fiscal year cost was $136,353 for the two local protection flood control projects detailed below. ARKANSAS RIVER, GREAT BEND, KS TO TULSA, OK AT HALSTEAD, KS: The Halstead project is a local protection project for the city of Halstead, KS. The city is located in the Little Arkansas River Basin in the southcentral portion of Kansas. The basin covers an area of approximately 1,400 square miles of which about half is above the city of Halstead. The basin area is largely devoted to agricultural and related industries, light manufacturing, and oil and gas production and refining. Average annual flood damage in the area are $667,000 without the project and $25,000 with the project. The proposed plan of improvement includes construction of about 21,600 feet of levee and floodwall, clearing and snagging, and widening of the Little Arkansas River, two internal ponding areas, and pumping facilities to prevent internal flooding. Channel work will be restricted to one side of the river, where possible, and will not adversely affect the upstream and downstream reaches of the river or associated land resources. The channel will be constructed and maintained to carry the design flow capacity throughout the life of the project. Fiscal year funds totalling $78,527 were used to prepare a plan of study and to initiate studies on the General Design Memorandum, which is scheduled for completion in September 1983. Annual charges for economic analysis are estimated at $706,000. The total first cost of the project is estimated at $7,500,000 of which $6,130,000 would be Federal funds and $1,370,000 would be non-Federal funds. LAKE WICHITA, HOLLIDAY CREEK AT WICHITA FALLS, TX: Holliday Creek is a right bank tributary of the Wichita River at river mile 46.9 in Wichita County, TX. Lake Wichita is located at about river mile 9.6 of the Holliday Creek on the southwestern edge of the city of Wichita Falls, TX. Flood damages above and below the dam exceed $2.2 million annually. The recommended plan of improvement consists of raising and repairing the existing Lake Wichita Dam, constructing a new spillway, and channeling 9.3 miles along the Holliday Creek through Wichita Falls, TX. The project would provide a 100-year level of flood protection and would provide a safe dam in a highly urbanized area. Preparation of a combined General Design Memorandum was initiated during the fiscal year. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $1,300,000. Fiscal year cost for this project totalled $57,826. 59. ADVANCED ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Fiscal year cost was $687,978 for the Arkansas-Red River Chloride Control project in Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas. 19-17 TABLE 19-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep 30, 1982 1. Big and Little Sallisaw Creeks Navigation, Arkansas River Basin, OK 3. Bank Stabilization & Channel Rectification, Arkansas River, AR & OK 4. Maintenance & Repair Fleet & Marine Terminals, OK 5. Red River Waterway LA, AR, OK and TX, Index, AR to Denison Dam, TX 7. Poteau River Navigation, Arkansas River Basin, OK 8. Arcadia Lake, Deep Fork River Basin, OK 9. Ark-Red River Basins Chloride Control, 9A. (AREA VIII) 10. Big Pine Lake, Red River Basin, TX 11. Birch Lake, Verdigris River Basin, OK 12. Candy Lake Verdigris River Basin, OK 13. Canton Lake, Arkansas River Basin, OK 14. Copan Lake, Verdigris River Basin, OK 15. Council Grove Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, KS 16. El Dorado Lake, Walnut River Basin, KS New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Costp Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost p New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost $ 85,000 $ 75,000 67,816 89,746 171,400 175,149 552,000 428,999 872,900 816,218 6,012,000 5,738,506 17,000 8,293 3,426,000 4,537,974 316,500 252,742 59,000 1,070,200 526,200 1,315,346 1,785,000 1,315,347 46,000 21,846 833,600 630,011 7,796,000 7,746,100 11,894 732,000 413,812 9,185,000 12,542,560 128,214 132,218 76,000 50,451 3,122,000 2,317,627 2,140,000 1,826,999 124,692 123,494 9,310,000 9,425,096 25,000 101,778 154,507 467,396 112,962 -230,000 112,962 113,000 126,861 709,876 774,757 10,405,000 11,308,037 459,607 381,161 13,060,000 13,682,428 - - $ -159 $ 270,348 5,360 570 270,347 182,200 180,479 105,000 92,551 604 9,799,000 10,342,119 1,900,000 2,311,281 189,500 199,522 8,660,000 8,671,380 506 9,168 558,800 677,051 186,000 295,161 4,000 6,889 853,400 967,804 8,050,000 8,422,582 12,221 6,124 474,500 575,342 5,612,000 5,280,005 74,100 70,967 - 12,700,038 - 12,700,038 - 2,689,734 - 2,689,734 - 2,750,000 - 2,750,000 219,500 1,784,465 213,377 2,010,513 379 105,379 12,820 105,371 - 586,952 - 586,952 17,989,780 33,334,289 15,600,626 30,588,702 - 25,705,208 252,245 25,649,754 61,000 3,573,247 59,985 3,571,964 10,840,000 38,831,000 9,791,605 37,621,703 - 1,701,670 744 1,700,617 - 13,549,170 -735 13,548,113 591,900 2,508,1018 566,802 5,773,7568 - 4,949,922 6,905 4,831,970 - 10,919,727 5,776 10,918,099 832,600 10,729,2728 827,323 10,691,4698 - 291,106 - 291,106 11,900,000 76,771,999 7,832,339 75,501,568 202,500 11,813,329 196,999 11,801,731 541,200 5,687,476' 533,241 5,668,6928 2,550,000 75,909,149 3,075,030 75,611,787 253,500 327,600 245,029 315,996 19-18 TULSA OKLAHOMA DISTRICT TABLE 19-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 17. Elk City Lake, Verdigris River Basin, KS 18. Fall River Lake, Verdigris River Basin, KS 19. Fort Supply Lake, North Canadian River Basin, OK 20. Great Salt Plains Lake, Arkansas River Basin, OK 21. Heyburn Lake, Arkansas River Basin, OK 22. Hugo Lake, Kiamichi River Basin, Okla. 23. Hulah Lake, Verdigris River Basin, OK 24. John Redmond Dam & Reservoir, Grand (Neosho) River, KS 25. Kaw Lake, Arkansas River Basin, OK 26. Lake Kemp, Wichita River Basin, TX 27. Lukfata Lake, Little River Basin, OK 28. Marion, KS New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 1,000,120 891,053 2,000 1,969 775,800 427,977 85,000 8,193 428,000 328,263 257,100 211,640 16,000 1,342 591,000 279,557 -329 -38,262 659,100 641,770 31,000 1,300 583,000 514,466 -1,000 6,107 771,100 697,055 550,000 1,574,727 1,414,100 1,398,777 102,000 93,778 -180 1,475,000 2,526,815 528,000 633,308 31 321,158 441,332 43,000 114,676 371,984 438,546 215,828 246,614 12,369 384,411 673,450 232,000 296,684 716,000 681,381 -16,300 13,021 460,799 446,663 688 980,475 619,647 780,000 1,525,126 1,703,498 1,362,054 88,964 90,348 - -450,000 -370,778 531,900 543,923 11,000 5,989 416,100 668,571 -90 5,034 436,300 449,162 259,000 260,913 -22 2,268 382,800 394,637 20,000 15,930 753,300 815,829 581 960 595,300 672,020 712,700 1,126,866 -200,000 282,621 1,099,500 1,482,798 89,700 97,267 162 75,000 70,848 15,000 8,033 461,500 449,174 34,000 38,491 534,800 526,590 533,500 534,126 333,000 336,770 41,000 37,710 604,600 606,469 35,000 40,642 886,200 849,445 31,500 3,480 504,400 501,655 637,700 640,266 200,000 173,051 1,263,900 1,151,085 146,900 134,656 19,057,990 19,051,023 5,535,232' 5,520,070' 10,551,393 10,550,873 5,804,276 5,787,281 7,723,134 7,723,127 5,832,7748 5,807,4928 4,626,270 4,626,270 3,624,207 3,609,062 2,559,672 2,556,383 4,788,8058 4,771,411 37,739,742 37,699,744 5,467,725' 5,408,710' 11,164,833 11,136,813 6,714,893' 6,689,923' 135,718 135,718 28,151,515 28,151,515 7,806,453' 7,784,543' 109,012,650 108,846,015 7,065,008' 6,914,778' 7,637,702 7,637,702 1,001,634 987,906 - 1,424,685 - 1,424,685 - 5,600,200 11,474 5,477,868 19-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS. U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 19-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep 30, 1982 29. Marion Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, KS 30. Oologah Lake, Verdigris River Basin, OK 31. Optima Lake, North Canadian River Basin, OK 32. Pat Mayse Lake, Red River Basin, TX 33. Pearson - Skubitz Big Hill Lake, Verdigris River Basin, KS 34. Pine Creek Lake, Little River Basin, OK 36. Sardis Lake, Little River Basin, OK 37. Shidler Lake, Arkansas River Basin, OK 38. Skiatook Lake, Verdigris River Basin, OK 39. Toronto Lake, Verdigris River Basin, KS 40. Waurika Lake, Red River Basin, OK 41. Wister Lake, Poteau River Basin, OK 46. Broken Bow Lake, Little River Basin, OK New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost- New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5,000 4,335 974,700 453,167 2,000 1,360 864,300 829,451 2,759,000 2,640,755 219,000 168,155 20,500 19,121 538,000 459,415 3,170,000 3,089,379 3,500 3,107 493,300 493,851 8,535,000 8,970,795 10,000 3,032 7,944,000 8,303,830 6,400 409 237,400 205,501 3,439,000 5,063,042 264,900 248,562 384,700 336,423 712,000 671,990 665 440,064 528,212 6,000 552 961,983 989,024 210,000 754,067 243,054 268,568 618,000 599,608 3,900,000 3,837,763 393 463,918 455,755 14,132,000 13,900,317 25,000 20,526 15,187,000 14,715,818 -5,078 943 178,627 186,032 1,611,000 2,194,211 691,514 513,241 337,164 334,963 781,343 806,147 12,779 12,779 488,800 916,471 -93 5,222 796,600 875,917 3,000 259,501 427,500 438,420 -29 1,350 425,300 521,751 3,220,000 2,972,698 98,000 95,437 510,100 521,602 7,785,000 5,743,329 -10,896 17,873,000 13,014,349 104 291,000 308,472 920,000 945,501 586,600 776,517 391,400 432,384 855,400 872,268 20,000 13,355,317 10,644 13,345,961 636,000 6,161,1328 627,795 6,130,8458 - 46,689,3291 - 46,688,5561 928,600 10,816,8118 914,460 10,788,202 20,000 47,183,438 47,431 47,272,096 453,200 1,342,754 430,439 1,305,582 - 9,310,661 - 9,310,661 583,400 4,967,5838 521,601 4,885,829" 2,113,000 17,120,116 2,247,338 16,705,853 - 98,000 - 95,437 - 20,304,909 - 20,304,909 615,600 5,042,7588 614,109 5,015,9788 3,565,000 51,087,479 4,707,433 49,857,330 - 568,190 234 546,086 15,806,000 81,865,282 19,991,981 80,083,511 - 13,896,324 - 13,896,324 321,600 3,358,003 306,165 3,333,305 489,000 67,080,050 734,340 66,791,528 650,100 2,397,3148 644,391 2,373,3318 - 10,501,226 - 10,501,226 403,100 6,011,545 405,482 5,994,337 - 41,222,692 -r- 41,222,692 1,073,248 7,804,504 1,102,100 7,816,110 19-20 TABLE 19-A (Continued) TULSA OKLAHOMA DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 47. Denison Dam-Lake New Work Texoma, Red River Basin, TX & OK 48. Eufaula Lake, Canadian River Basin, OK 49. Fort Gibson Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, OK 50. Keystone Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Okla. 51. Pensacola Lake, Grand (Neosho) River Basin, OK 52. Robert S. Kerr Lock & Dam & Reservoir, Arkansas River Basin, OK 53. Tenkiller Ferry Lake, Illinois River Basin, OK 54. Webbers Falls Lock & Dan, Arkansas River Basin, OK Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 51,829 48,714 3,799,900 3,107,684 163,000 18,972 2,513,200 1,912,989 274,000 265,131 1,847,800 1,749,462 10,000 9,372 1,654,900 1,324,332 5,000 4,356 1,000,000 990,351 2,446,000 2,015,673 63,000 11,013 1,542,100 1,541,972 183 2,248,000 2,205,273 76,000 71,571 2,990,716 3,396,576 300 142,674 2,161,112 2,308,543 257,400 181,363 1,713,098 1,697,614 -. 1,797,605 2,027,357 4,950 5,593 -35,800 7,199 1,764,802 2,198,796 207,000 47,846 1,374,064 1,319,942 1,710,260 1,681,864 44,000 59,949 3,245,200 3,369,946 -301 1,325 2,079,800 2,477,739 -14,224 67,873 1,871,500 1,970,187 -32 596 1,864,200 1,899,774 6,900 6,952 -13 4,838 1,671,600 1,738,902 -29,276 174,926 1,617,400 1,678,213 4,515,700 3,356,093 -23,000 13,394 3,623,300 3,494,114 29,000 17,625 2,429,000 2,365,469 25,000 40,559 2,614,600 2,193,260 1,880,200 1,910,704 12,000 8,892 1,769,900 1,728,877 154,000 27,114 2,465,500 2,017,534 1,577 3,001,900 2,363,668 67,890,9012 67,877,8672 44,660,9878 44,327,1428 46,237 46,237 121,830,747$ 121,819,344$ 27,320,173' 24,129,4688 43,643,378' 43,637,417' 26,046,3858 25,567,5148 123,126,1736 123,126,1755 19,959,7878 19,883,7518 52,126 52,126 210,708 207,442 94,578,237 94,578,237 21,153,3238 22,083,4278 24,115,7198 23,981,8948 19,459,461 18,932,836 83,738,277 83,738,701 22,110,6418 20,177,2388 1. Excludes $81,460 contributed funds and $1,348,816 special funds. 2. Includes $433,539 Emergency Relief funds. Excludes $1,256,068 from special contributed funds. 3. Excludes $299,803 contributed funds and $13,211,728 special funds. 4. Excludes $134,919 contributed funds. Includes $49,581 Public Works acceleration funds. 5. Excludes $5,366,231 special funds. 6. Excludes $946 contributed funds. Includes $39,999 Public Works acceleration funds. 7. Excludes $4,470,000 contributed funds. 8. Excludes $2,643,900 special recreation use fees funds as follows: Birch Lake 9,200 Canton Lake 156,100 Chouteau Lock & Dam 2,760 Council Grove Lake 37,380 Elk City 10,000 Eufaula Lake 330,200 Fort Gibson Lake 292,900 Fort Supply Lake Heyburn Lake Hugo Lake Hulah Lake John Redmond Reservoir Kaw Lake Keystone Lake Lake Texoma Marion Lake Newt Graham Lock & Dam Oologah Lake Pat Mayse Lake Robert S. Kerr Res. Tenkiller Lake Pine Creek Lake Waurika Lake Webbers Falls 19-21 52,800 6,048 68,600 6,716 40,336 92,460 187,880 485,080 48,880 2,760 87,600 52,760 30,880 602,000 22,200 4,600 2,760 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 19-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents December 31, 1970 October 22, 1976 October 23, 1962 November 7, 1966 December 31, 1970 March 7, 1974 October 22, 1976 July 24, 1946 and October 22, 1976 October 23, 1962 October 23, 1962 October 23, 1962 October 27, 1965 December 12, 1970 July 24, 1946 October 23, 1962 July 4, 1960 (as amended Dec. 31, 1970) ARCADIA LAKE, OK (See Section 8 of Text) Construction of reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, and recreation purposes. Delete water quality benefits and include water supply benefits. ARK-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL (See Section 9 of Text) Construction of experimental water quality study projects near Estelline and Guthrie, Tex. Project for water quality control, designated as Part I. Project for water quality control, designated as Part II. Modify 1966 and 1970 Acts-Inititated construction of Area VIII features of the project consisting of low-flow dam pumping station, pipeline, and brine dam. Modify 1970 Act-Gave construction approval to the Secretary of the Army. BIG AND LITTLE SALLISAW CREEKS NAVIGATION, OK (See Section 1 of Text) Construction of navigation channel 9 feet deep with a minimum width of 100 feet from Robert S. Kerr Lock & Dam & Reservoir to near Sallisaw, OK, and a 400-foot by 500-foot turning basin. BIG PINE LAKE, OK (See Section 10 of Text) Construction of reservoir for flood control, water supply, recreation, and fish and wildlife purposes. CANDY LAKE, OK (See Section 12 of Text) Construction of reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife purposes. COPAN LAKE, OK (See Section 14 of Text) Construction of reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife purposes. EL DORADO LAKE, KS (See Section 16 of Text) Construction of reservoir to provide flood control, water supply, water quality control, and recreation. MARION, KS (See Section 28 of Text) Local protection works for flood control, diversion channel, levee, and appurtenant structures. MAINTENANCE & REPAIR FLEET & MARINE TERMINALS (See Section 4 of Text) Wharf, office and storage building, storage space, and operating areas for floating maintenance and repair fleet. PEARSON-SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE, KS (See Section 33 of Text) Construction of reservoir for flood control, water supply, and recreation purposes. POTEAU RIVER NAVIGATION, AR & OK (See Section 7 of Text) Construction of navigation channel 9 feet deep and 130 feet wide from the confluence of the Poteau River and the Arkansas River upstream on the Poteau 1.7 miles to Fort Smith, Ark., with a turning basin just upstream from Fort Smith. H. Doc. 229, 91st Cong., 2d sees. PL 94-587 S. Doc. 110, 89th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 110, 89th Cong., 2d sees. Chief of Engineers Report, May 6, 1970 PL 91-611 PL 93-251 PL 94-587 H. Doc. 6407, 79th Cong., 2d sees. PL 525, 79th Cong., as amended by PL 94-587 H. Doc. 71, 88th Cong., 1st sees. H. Doc. 563, 87th Cong., 2d sees. H. Doc. 563, 87th Cong., 2d sees. H. Doc. 232, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 256, 91st Cong., 2d sees. H. Doc. 758, 79th Cong., 2d sees. H. Doc. 572, 87th Cong., 2d sees. Section 107, PL 86-645. 19-22 TABLE 19-B (Continued) Acts July 24, 1946 August 3, 1955 July 3, 1958 October 23, 1962 August 13, 1968 October 27, 1965 October 23, 1962 December 30, 1963 TULSA OKLAHOMA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (TULSA DISTRICT) (See Section 35 of Text) Construct Boswell, Hugo, and Millwood Lakes, and Bank Stabilization. Walnut Bayou Channel Improvements. Modify Millwood; construct Pine Creek, Lukfata, Broken Bow, DeQueen, Gillham, and Dierks Lakes. Construct Sardis and Tuskahoma Lakes. Modify 1946 Act--onstruct bank stabilization, Index, AR, to Denison Dam, TX SHIDLER LAKE, OK (See Section 37 of Text) Construction of reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, and recreation purposes. SKIATOOK LAKE, OK (See Section 38 of Text) Construction of reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife purposes. WAURIKA LAKE, OK (See Section 40 of Text) Construction of reservoir for flood control, irrigation, and conservation purposes. Documents H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sees. H. Doc. 488, 83rd Cong., 2d sees. H. Doc. 170, 85th Cong., 1st sees. S. Doc. 145, 87th Cong., 2d sees. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sees. H. Doc. 242, 89th Cong., 1st sees. H. Doc. 563, 87th Cong., 2d sees. S. Doc. 33, 88th Cong., 1st sees. TABLE 19-C ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN: MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PLAN (See Section 2 of Text) Feature River River Mile Nearest Town Locks and Dams: W.D. Mayo No. 14 Arkansas 319.61 Redland, OK Robert S. Kerr, No. 18 Arkansas 336.21 Cowlington, OK Webbers Falls, No. 16 Arkansas 366.61 Gore, OK Chouteau, No. 17 Verdigris 401.51 Okay, OK Newt Graham, No. 18 Verdigris 421.6' Inola, OK Appurtenant Navigation Features: Channel cutoffs and enlargements Verdigris (2) Muskogee to Catoosa, OK tion and Arkansas (2) channel rectification Arkansas 295.4 to Fort Smith, AR to 336.2 Robert S. Kerr lock & Dam Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal Arkansas 339.0' Sallisaw, OK Lakes: Canton North Canadian 394.3 Canton, OK Elk City Elk River 8.7 .Elk City, KS Eufaula Canadian 27.0 Eufaula, OK Fall River Fall River 54.2 Fall River, KS Fort Gibson Grand (Neosho) 7.7 Fort Gibson, OK Keystone Arkansas 538.8 Sand Springs, OK Markham Ferry Grand (Neosho) 47.4 Locust Grove, OK Neodesha' Verdigris 222.8 Neodesha, KS Oologah Verdigris 90.2 Oologah, OK Pensacola Gra Neosho) 77.0 Disney OK Tenkiller Ferry Illinois 12.8 Gore, OK Toronto Verdigris 271.5 Toronto, KS Wister Poteau 60.9 Wister, OK 1. Navigation miles--McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation 2. As required for channel 9 feet deep. System. 3. See Table 19-H, "Other Authorized Flood Control Projects." 19-23 TABLE 19-D REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL, PART I - WICHITA RIVER CHLORIDE CONTROL PLAN, TX (See Section 9A of Text) PROJECT RIVER SITE1 NEAREST TOWN Area VII North Fork of the Wichita 213.0 Paducah, TX Area VIII South Fork of the Wichita 74.9 Guthrie, TX Truscott Brine Lake Bluff Creek 3.6 Truscott, TX Area X Middle Fork of the Wichita 19.7 Paducah, TX 1. Approximate River Mile Above Mouth TABLE 19-E ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL PART II - RED RIVER PLAN, OK, AND TX (See Section 9B of Text) PROJECT RIVER SITE' NEAREST TOWN Area VI Elm Fork River 54.0 Erick, OK Area VI, Brine Lake Fish Creek 1.6 Erick, OK Area IX Middle Pease River 5.0 Childress, TX' Area XIII Jonah Creek 2.2 Childress, TX Area XIV Salt Creek 1.0 Childress, TX Area XV Little Red River 14.0 Estelline, TX Crowell Brine Lake Fish Creek 1.6 Erick, TX 1. Approximate River Mile Above Mouth TABLE 19-E ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL (Continued) PART II - ARKANSAS RIVER PLAN, OK (See Section 9C of Text) PROJECT RIVER SITEI NEAREST TOWN Area I Salt Fork, Arkansas Riv. 103.3 Jet. OK Area II-III Cimarron, River 290.4 Freedom, OK Englewood Lake Cimarron River 346.5 Englewood, KS Area IV Salt Creek 25.3 Southard, OK 1.Approximate River Mile Above Mouth 19-24 TULSA OKLAHOMA DISTRICT TABLE 19-F RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM FLOOD CONTROL PLAN (TULSA DISTRICT) (See Section 35 of Text) Project River Site' Nearest Town Bank Stabilization' Red River 485.3 Index, AR Boewell Lake' Boggy Creek 18.9 Boswell OK Broken Bow Lake' Mountain Fork River 20.3 Broken Bow, OK Hugo Lake' Kiamichi River 17.6 Hugo, OK Lukfata Lake' Glover Creek 24.5 Glover, OK Pine Creek Lake' Little River 145.3 Wright City, OK Tuskahoma Lake' Kiamichi River 118.5 Tuskahoma, OK 1. River mile above mouth. 3. Project is reported separately herein. 2. See Table 19-H "Other Authorized Flood Control Projects." TABLE 19-G INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 42 of Text) Inspection Date Project 1981 1982 Carthage Levee, MO' April/October March/October Cherry and Red Fork Creeks, OK August March/October Deep Fork Channel Improvement, OK October April/October Dodge City, KS' - March/October Enid Diversion Canal and Levee, OK May/November May/November Flat Rock Creek, OK August March/November Florence Levee, KS April/September May/October Hutchinson Levee, KS April/November April/November Iola Levee, KS April/October April/October Jenks Levee, OK April/October March/October Joe Creek Channel Improvement, OK August March/October Lamed, KS' - March/October Marion Diversion Channel and Levee, KS April May/October Oklahoma City Floodway, OK November May/November Polecat Creek Channel Improvement, OK October March/October Sand Creek Channel Improvement, KS April/September MaylOctober South Deer Creek Levee, OK April/October April/October Springdale Levee, AR' January - Tulsa/West Tulsa Levees, OK July (Periodic) MarchlOctober Walnut Bayou Channel Improvement, AR' May - 1. Transferred to Little Rock District October 1, 1980. 2. Transferred to Tulsa District July 1, 1982. 19-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 19-H OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 44 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Opertion and Project Report For Construction Mintenance Ark-Red River Basins Chloride Control, Supplemental Studies' Augusta Levee, KS'' Bank Stabilization, Red River Below Denison' Boswell Lake, OK' Carthage Levee, MO' Cedar Point Lake, KS' Cherry & Red Fork Creeks Channel Improvement, OK' Cow Creek Channel Improvement, KS' Crutcho Creek Channel Improvement, OK' ' Douglass Lake, KS' El Dorado KS West Branch, Walnut Riv., Channel improvement.' ' Enid Levee Floodway, OK' Experimental Chloride Control Project, Red River Basin, Estelline & Guthrie, TX' Flat Rock Creek Channel Improvement, Tulsa, OK" Florence Levee, KS' Hutchinson Levee and Channel, KS' Iola Levee, KS' Jenks Levee, OK' Lost & Little Lost Cr., Channel Improvement, MO' " Mud Creek Channel Improvement, OK' Neodesha Lake, KS' Oklahoma City Floodway, OK' Sand Creek Channel Improvement, KS' Sand Lake, OK' Spring Creek Channel Improvement, Springdale, AR" Towanda Lake, Walnut River Basin, KS' ' Tulsa and West Tulsa Levee, OK' Turtle Creek Channel Improvement, Yukon, OK' 1o Tuskahoma Lake, OK' West Branch Chisholm Creek Channel Improvement, KS' Wichita and Valley Center Channel Improvement, KS' Winfield Levee, KS' Winfield Levee Modification, KS7 1. Reported by Memphis District in 1937; by Little Rock District 1938 and 1939. 2. Completed by Kansas Works Progress Administration. 3. Completed. 4. Inactive. 5. Awaiting appropriation of funds. 6. Placed in deferred status 8 Oct 1981. 7. Not economically justified at this time. 8. Local assurances received but not economically justified at this time. 9. Federal cost limited to $1,000,000. 10. Notice of expiration of authorization after 5 years issued 24 August 1976. 11. Notice of expiration of authorization after 5 years issued 20 July 1977. 19-26 - 84,217 14,599 131,794 1980 1938 1953 1952 1958 1980 1970 1971 1972 1966 1977 1963 1975 1975 1965 1956 1939 1950 1977 1952 1960 1968 1963 1975 1981 1954 1975 1963 1965 1960 1937 1977 9,791,805 222,105 346,416 261,448 363,720 213,016 92,319 743,612 300,028 1,741,000 369,782 3,497,718 22,290 344,797 158;406 173,020 97,910 8,047,512 545,996 1,371,000 78,700,000 2,785,070 144,853 364,200 12,247,379 98,897 98,897 TULSA OKLAHOMA DISTRICT TABLE 19-I FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Section 205, PL 858, 80th Cong., as amended (Preauthorization) (See Section 45 of Text) Study Identification Fiscal Year Cost $ Coody, Corta, and Sam Creeks, Muskogee, OK' 4,962 Fisher and Anderson Creeks, Sand Springs, OK' 50,808 Haikey Creek, Tulsa, OK� 190,103 Kingfisher and Uncle John's Creek, Kingfisher, OK1 10,151 Labette Creek, Parsons, KS' 80,800 Main Branch Chisholm Creek, Park City, KS' 18,605 McGrath Creek, Wichita Falls, TX' 3,123 North Canadian Wastewater Treatment Plant, Oklahoma City, OK' 82,562 Rock Creek, Burlington, KS' 7,456 Stinking Creek, Altus, OK' 7,500 (1) Reconnaisance Report and Detailed Project Report (2) Reconnaissance Report (3) Revolving Fund to be Reimbursed (4) Detailed Project Report (5) Plans and Specifications (6) Plans and Specifications and Construction 19-27 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT * The district comprises a portion of southwestern Iowa; northwestern, central, and western Missouri; northern Kansas; southern Nebraska; and a portion of northeastern Colorado embraced in drainage basin of the Missouri River and tributaries from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth. Report on navigation project for section of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to Rulo, Nebraska, is in report of Omaha District. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa, to Mouth (Rulo, Nebraska, to Mouth) ......... 20-2 2. Blue River Basin Plan, Vicinity of Kansas City (Kansas City District) .. .... 20-2 Flood Control 3. Blue River Channel, Kansas City, MO ....... 20-2 4. Clinton Lake, Wakarusa River, KS ... ..... 20-3 5. Gypsum, Gypsum Creek, KS .............. 20-3 6. Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE .............................. 20-3 7. Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS ......... 20-3 8. Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS ...... 20-4 9. Little Blue River Channel, MO ............. 20-4 10. Little Blue River Lakes, MO .............. 20-4 11. Long Branch Lake, Little Chariton River, M O ............................. 20-5 12. Melvern Lake, Marais 'des Cygnes (Osage) River, KS ....................... 20-5 13. Milford Lake, Republican River, KS ........ 20-5 14. Missouri River Levee System, Iowa., NE, 1 KS, and MO (Rulo, NE to Mouth) .......... 20-5 15. Onaga Lake, Vermillion Creek, KS .......... 20-6 16. Perry Lake Area (Road Improvements), KS .. 20-6 17. Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS ........... 20-6 18. Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Kansas City Dist.) ....................... 20-6 19. Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO ....................... 20-7 20. Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, KS ......................... 20-7 21. Rathbun Lake, Chariton River, Iowa ......... 20-7 22. Smithville Lake, Little Platte River, MO ..... 20-8 23. Tuttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, KS ...... 20-8 24. Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS ............. 20-8 Flood Control (cont.) 25. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ..................... 26. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ....................... Page ... 20-8 ... 20-8 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 27. Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO ............... 20-9 28. Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO ............. 20-9 General Investigations 29. General Investigations . ................. 20-10 Tables Table 20-A Cost & Financial Statement ........ 20-11 Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation .......... 20-14 Table 20-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................... .. 20-18 Table 20-D Not Applicable Table 20-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........................ 20-18 Table 20-F Not Applicable Table 20-G Deauthorized Projects ............ 20-19 Table 20-H Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa, to Mouth (Rulo, NE to Mouth) Total Cost of Existing Project ..... .20-20 Table 20-I Missouri River Sioux City to Mouth: Terminal Facilities ........ 20-20 Table 20-J Missouri River Levee System ...... 20-22 Table 20-K Kansas City District Projects Included in Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program ................. .20-23 Table 20-L Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................ .20-23 Table 20-M Active General Investigations ...... 20-24 20-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Navigation 1. MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IOWA, TO MOUTH (RULO, NE, TO MOUTH) Location. Jefferson, Madison, and Gallatin Rivers conjoin at Three Forks, Mont., to form the Missouri River, which flows southeasterly 2,315 miles (1960 mileage) across or along seven states to the Mississippi River, 17 miles above St. Louis. For description see page 1149, Annual Report for 1932. The river is commercially navigable from Sioux City, Iowa to the mouth, a distance of 732 miles. The portion of project in Kansas City District extends from Rulo, Nebraska to the mouth, a distance of 498 miles. Previous projects. For details see page 1891 of Annual Report for 1915, and pages 1153 and 1175 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A channel of 9-foot depth and width not less than 300 feet, obtained by revetment of banks, construction of permeable dikes to contract and stabilize waterway, cutoffs to eliminate long bends, closing minor channels, removal of snags, and dredging as required. Improved section (mouth to upper end of Rulo Bend) is 498.4 miles (1960 mileage) long. Bank stabilization work on this section of the project (Rulo, NE, to mouth) is essentially complete. River access sites have been completed at 11 locations. Ordinary and extreme fluctuations of stage are 16 and 38 feet, respectively. Local cooperation. Cooperation from benefited localities may be required where any improvement may confer special benefit. The receipt of contributions from private parties are to be expended along with Government funds upon authorized work where such work would be in the interest of navigation, as authorized by 1915 Rivers and Harbors Act. Secretary of the Army approved general principle of cooperative construction on Missouri River below Kansas City on basis that 25 percent of cost of any special installation shall be paid by the United States and 75 percent by local interests. Total contributed by local interests in cooperation with the United States from 1918 to June 30, 1964, was $675,663, of which $8,647 was returned to contributors. Local interests must share in cost of recreation facilities in accordance with provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Local interests have contributed $164,185 for cost sharing on construction of recreation in addition to constructing portions of the facilities. Terminal facilities. Facilities for transferring, agricultural, petroleum, and other commodities are maintained by private interests at various locations on this section of the river. Present facilities, listed in Table 20-H, are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. The 1974 Base Line Study of the reach of the Missouri River in the Kansas City District estimated recreation use on the river at 1,250,000 recreation days annually. The projected tonnage on the river for FY 1982 is approximately 2.5 million. Maintenance: Repair of dikes and revetments by contract. In addition, following work was accomplished by hired labor: Construction of environmental gaps and dike and revetment repair, maintenance of U.S. Government dredges in standby status, real estate management, channel reconnaissance, condition studies, surveys and mapping, stream gaging, environmental studies and special working data, engineering and design, surveys and layout of construction, and supervision and administration. There was no dredging because no significant bars or shoals developed. 2. BLUE RIVER BASIN PLAN, VICINITY OF KANSAS CITY (KANSAS CITY DIST.) Location. The Blue River is a right-bank tributary of the Missouri River which drains a 272 square-mile basin within the Kansas City Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area. Approximately 60 percent of the basin is in Johnson County, Kansas, and 40 percent is divided between Jackson and Cass Counties, Missouri. The authorized plan is for four multiple-purpose lakes on tributaries to the Blue River and channel modification on approximately 12 miles of the main stem from 63rd Street in Kansas City, Missouri, to the mouth. Existing project. The four lakes form a system which would provide flood control, low streamflow supplementation and recreation and fish and wildlife. In addition, each of the lakes was recognized as a potential source of municipal and industrial water supply. The channel modification would provide improved flood protection to a highly developed segment of the floodplain downstream of the lakes. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning of the channel modification is essentially complete and the project has received a construction appropriation in each of the last four fiscal years. However, the local sponsor, Kansas City, Missouri, has experienced difficulty in implementing the local sponsorship requirements. These difficulties have now been largely overcome and the channel project is expected to be under construction this fiscal year. Because of a lack of local support the three lakes in Kansas, Indian, Tomahawk, and Wolf-Coffee, were placed in the inactive category. Indian and Tomahawk were reclassified in 1976 and Wolf-Coffee was reclassified in 1978 after all potential non-Federal sponsors indicated no further interest in sponsoring either water supply or recreation development. Mill Lake in Missouri is in the deferred category pending the availability of funds for restudy. Flood Control 3. BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO Location. Along the Blue River and tributaries in Jackson County, Missouri. Existing project. Preliminary plans consist of 12.5 miles of improved channel along the Blue River within Kansas City, Missouri. Estimated Federal cost through construction of the project (1982) is $173,000,000 and estimated non-Federal cost of lands, damages and relocations is $20,000,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 20-2 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT June 22, 1936, applies. The city of Kansas City, Missouri, passed a resolution of intent on 9 December 1975 to provide the required assurances of local cooperation when requested. A Section 221 agreement was signed by the city October 8, 1979, but review by the Corps was delayed until the city's sources of funding could be established. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is complete and plans and specs are underway. The second contract plans and specifications advanced to 90 percent complete and plans and specifications for the third contract were initiated. Problems with a major landowner prevented right-of-way acquisition by the end of fiscal year. This problem has now been resolved and the 221 Agreement will be finalized in January 1983. 4. CLINTON LAKE, WAKARUSA RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Wakarusa River about 4 miles southwest of Lawrence, Kansas, in Douglas County. Lake extends into Shawnee and Osage Counties, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 9,250 feet long constructed to a maximum height of about 114 feet above riverbed, with an uncontrolled spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity 397,200 acre-feet (258,300 for flood control, 28,500 for sediment reserve, and 110,400 of multipurpose storage for municipal and industrial water supply and recreation). The estimated Federal cost (1982) is $57,521,533. Construction was initiated in January 1972 and the project was placed in operation in November 1977. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Reimbursement in the estimated amount of $7,249,000 is required for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. A contract was signed by the State on September 6, 1978 and was approved by the Secretary of the Army on October 30, 1978. Utilization of storage was initiated in December 1979. Repayment also began at that time. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1982 was 1,085,400 visitor days. Project is 99 percent complete. Work remaining consists of completing cultural resources mitigative work, administrative buildings and interpretive program. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 5. GYPSUM, GYPSUM CREEK, KS Location. At Gypsum, Saline County, Kansas, on the left bank of Gypsum Creek, 10 miles south of its confluence with Smoky Hill River, 15 miles southeast of Salina, Kansas. Existing project. A levee around the city, a diversion channel, and channel improvement work. Total Federal cost to essentially complete the project in May 1980 was approximately $2,690,000, and estimated non-Federal cost of lands, damages, and relocations was $278,000. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. A Section 2~1 agreement was signed by the City of Gypsum on June 14, 1976 and by the Secretary of the Army on August 31, 1976. Operations during fiscal year. Minor deficiencies remain, consisting of a drainage problem created by the project and a need for reseeding of a portion of the project. The City could not resolve the drainage problem due to right-of-way problems. Seeding should be completed by September 1983. 6. HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, NE Location. Dam is on main stem of Republican River about 235 miles above confluence of stream with Smoky Hill River. Site is in Harlan County, about 3 miles east of Republican City and 13 miles west of Franklin, Nebraska. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 107 feet above streambed with a total length of 11,827 feet, including a gate-controlled, concrete, gravity-type spillway section near center of dam. Reservoir provides storage capacity of 850,000 acre-feet (500,000 for flood control and 350,000 for irrigation and sedimentation allowance). Initial cost of constructing the project was $45,279,532. Total estimated Federal cost of project (1982), including $1,017,623 for major rehabilitation work and $3,143,000 supplemental recreation development (Code 710), is $49,440,155. Construction of the project was initiated in August 1946. Project was placed in operation in December 1952. Major rehabilitation work was completed in FY 1968. Construction of supplemental recreation facilities .is underway. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1982 was 751,300 visitor days. Supplemental- recreational development activity during the year consisted of construction by hired labor of two vault toilets in the Methodist Cove area. Also, award of the Patterson Harbor sewage treatment facility contract in September 1982. Maintenance: Activities included forestation by contract, repair of irrigation pipeline, dredging, construction of retention dikes in recreation areas, and ordinary operation and maintenance. 7. HILLSDALE LAKE, BIG BULL CREEK, KS Location. The project is located approximately 12 miles above the mouth of Big Bull Creek, a tributary of the Marais des Cygnes River and about 15 miles southwest of the Kansas City -metropolitan area in Miami County, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill embankment about 11,600 feet long (including approximately 3,300 feet of dike section) about 75 feet above rising valley flood plain. The spillway is gravity type uncontrolled and the outlet works are controlled. The total reservoir storage capacity is 160,000 acre-feet (81,000 for flood control, 11,000 for sediment reserve, and 68,000 for multipur- 20-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 pose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Construction was initiated in December 1974 and was completed in October 1982 except for recreational facilities. Estimated Federal cost (1982) through construction of the project is $63,800,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act 1938, applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $20,260,000 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958 and share in separable cost allocated to recreation in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. The Kansas Water Resources Board signed a contract in January 1974, approved by the Secretary of the Army in April 1974, for the entire 53,000 acre-feet of water supply storage. Local interests have shown no interest in sponsoring recreational development at this time. Therefore, only minimum recreational facilities have been built. Operations during fiscal year. Land acquisition, relocations and construction of project features were completed. 8. KANOPOLIS LAKE, SMOKY HILL RIVER, KS Location. Dam is on Smoky Hill River about 19 miles west and 16 miles south of Salina, Kansas, and about 205 river miles above mouth of stream. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 131 feet above streambed, having a total length of 15,360 feet, including 4,070 feet of dike section on left abutment and 2,550 feet of dike section on right abutment. The reservoir provides storage capacity of 450,000 acre-feet, (400,000 for flood control and 50,000 for recreation and streamflow regulation). Outlet works and spillway are in right abutment. Initial cost of constructing the project was $12,327,735. Total Federal cost of project (1982), including $805,000, supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $13,132,735. Construction was initiated in June 1940 and project was placed in operation in May 1948. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1982 was 662,900 visitor days. Future supplemental recreation facilities remain to be designed and constructed. Maintenance: Activities consisted of installation of seepage drains and ordinary operation and maintenance. 9. LITTLE BLUE RIVER CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, LITTLE BLUE RIVER, MO Location. The project is located along the Little Blue River and extends from the head of Missouri River Levee Unit R 351, 22 miles upstream to the vicinity of Wildwood Creek in Jackson County, Missouri. Existing project. The improvements consist of straightening and enlarging the Little Blue River channel from the head of Missouri River Levee Unit R 351, near Blue Mills Road, upstream to the vicinity of Wildwood Creek, reducing the length of this section from 20.4 to about 15 miles. Alteration of six highway bridges and construction of five new highway bridges and one railroad bridge were required. Improvements in the vicinity of Lake City Army Ammunition Plant consists of diversion of West Fire Prairie Creek into the Little Blue River and construction of a levee. Estimated Federal cost through construction of the project (1982) is $27,300,000 and estimated non-Federal cost is $3,390,000. Construction was initiated in December 1974. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies to the Little Blue River channel improvement works. Jackson County, Missouri, passed a bond issue for sponsorship of the project. Assurances of local cooperation were furnished July 31, 1973. Operations during fiscal year. Project is 60 percent complete. Stage 5, Phase II, Lake City, was awarded November 15, 1982. 10. LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO Location. This project consists of two lakes in Jackson County, Missouri, located in Kansas City, Missouri, and suburban communities. The Blue Springs Lake site is on the East Fork of the Little Blue River about one-half mile south of U.S. Highway 40 and the Longview Lake site is on the main stem at approximately 109th Street. Existing project. The Blue Springs dam will be an earthfill embankment about 2,500 feet long and rising about 78 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled service spillway and uncontrolled outlet conduit. The total reservoir storage capacity will be 26,600 acre-feet (15,700 for flood control, 10,600 for multipurpose storage for water quality and recreation, and 300 for sedimentation). The Longview dam will be an earthfill embankment about 1,900 feet long and rising about 120 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled service spillway and an uncontrolled outlet conduit. The total reservoir storage capacity will be 46,900 acre-feet (24,300 for flood control and 20,600 for multipurpose storag for water quality and recreation and 2,000 for sediimeitation). Estimated Federal cost (1982) through construction of the project is $143,000,000. Construction was initiated in September 1977. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Local interests must share in separable cost allocated to recreation in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. The Jackson County Legislature approved a recreation costsharing contract on July 5, 1974 which was approved by the Secretary of the Army on June 24, 1976. A supplemental agreement, signed by Jackson County officials on June 5, 1978, and approved by the Secretary of the Army January 10, 1979, revised the existing contract to include additional costs involved in raising the multipurpose pool elevation at the Blue Springs Lake. Estimated reimbursement for recreation is $15,796,000. Operations during fiscal year. Contracts were under- 20-4 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT way for Longview and Blue Springs Lakes for relocation of roads, utility, access roads, and dam contracts. Also, Longview recreation facilities were underway. Project is 57 percent complete. Land acquisition is complete. 11. LONG BRANCH LAKE, LITTLE CHARITON RIVER, MO Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Little Chariton River in north-central Missouri about 1 mile west of Macon in Macon County. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 3,800 feet long and about 71 feet high with an uncontrolled outlet conduit and an uncontrolled service spillway in right abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity will be 65,000 acre-feet (29,000 for flood control, 4,000 for sediment reserve, and 32,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, fish and wildlife, and recreation). Estimated Federal cost (1982) is $20,100,000, and estimated non-Federal cost is $3,400,000. Construction was initiated in March 1973. Project was placed in useful operation for flood control on September 1, 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $5,560,000 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958 and share in separable cost of $3,400,000 allocated to recreation in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. On September 15, 1972 the Secretary of the Army approved a contract signed by the city of Macon, Mo. for water supply and recreation development. Missouri State agencies indicated their intent to sponsor future water supply and signed a contract on June 17, 1977 to sponsor recreational development in lieu of city of Macon. After review by the Office of the Secretary of the Army, the state signed the contract in December 1979 and it was approved by the Secretary of the Army on April 18, 1980. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1982 was 433,000 visitor days. Contract for recreation facilities, Stage 1, was completed and Stage 2 recreation facilities was awarded and work initiated. Contract for Interpretive Exhibits was essentially completed. Design activities for remaining facilities continued. Project is 77 percent complete. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 12. MELVERN LAKE, MARAIS DES CYGNES (OSAGE) RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River in Osage County, Kansas, about 2 miles west of Melvern, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 9,700 feet long and about 98 feet high with an uncontrolled chutetype spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 363,000 acre-feet (200,000 for flood control, 26,000 for sediment reserve, and 137,000 of multipurpose storage for water quality control and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $37,436,530. Construction was initiated in July 1967 and the project was placed in operation in August 1972. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1982 was 994,100 visitor days. Maintenance: Activity consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 13. MILFORD LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Republican River near village of Alida and about 8 miles downstream from Milford, Geary County, Kansas, and about 10 miles above confluence of Republican and Smoky Hill Rivers which form Kansas River near Junction City, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 6,300 feet long and 126 feet high with an uncontrolled servicechute spillway in a saddle on right abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 1,160,000 acre-feet (700,000 for flood control, 160,000 for sediment reserve and 300,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Water supply storage is included in project at request of Governor of Kansas under provisions of Federal Water Supply Act of 1958. Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $48,268,843. Total estimated Federal cost of project (1982), including $1,298,000 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $49,566,843. Construction was initiated in July 1961. Project was placed in operation in June 1965. Construction of supplemental recreation facilities is underway. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $13,467,000 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. Utilization of storage has not been initiated. Reimbursement was initiated, at the option of the State, in September 1976. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1982 was 1,390,100 visitor days. Supplemental recreational development. Maintenance: Activities included continuation of seismic reevaluation and ordinary operation and maintenance. 14. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IA, NE, KS, AND MO (RULO, NE, TO MOUTH) . Location. On both banks of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, about 760 miles to mouth near St. Louis, Missouri. Portion of project in Kansas City District extends from Rulo, Nebraska, 498 miles to Iouth. Existing project. A series of levee units and appurtenant works along both sides of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to the mouth, for protection of agricultural lands and small communities against floods. Estimated Federal cost (1982) through construction for the active portion of the project from Rulo, Nebraska to mouth is $166,500,000. Costs of $17,400,000 for lands and damages to be borne by local interests. Remaining portion of project consists of units on which planning and construction are beiig delayed 20-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 pending completion of restudy to assure that additional levee construction is economically justified. Cost estimate for deferred and inactive portion of project Rulo, Nebraska, to mouth is $298,082,500 (1964 price level except Unit L 15 which is 1975 price level) of which $274,098,000 is Federal cost for construction and $23,984,500 for lands and damages to be borne by local interests. Construction of the project was initiated in June 1948. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936, applies. Fully complied with for all completed units and units under construction. Sponsor for Unit L 345-330 has optioned the major part of lands for rightsof- way. Because of anticipated changes as a result of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the District advised the sponsor to suspend condemnation proceedings for remaining requirements pending development of an alternate plan. Local sponsors provide all operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Status of individual units of active portion of project at end of fiscal year is shown in Table 20-J on Missouri River levee system. Contracts for levee work and pipeline relocation for Unit L 246 were completed. Remedial work on L 246 was initiated. Modification to provide the authorized degree of protection for Unit L 408 was completed. Planning on remaining active units continued. 15. ONAGA LAKE, VERMILLION CREEK, KS Location. The project is located on Vermillion Creek in Pottawatomie County, Kansas, about 35 miles northwest of Topeka, Kansas. Existing project. Preliminary plans provide for an earthfill dam about 8,600 feet long and about 90 feet high above valley floor with an uncontrolled service spillway. The total reservoir storage capacity would be 328,000 acre-feet (217,000 for flood control, 21,000 for sediment reserve, and 90,000 multipurpose storage for water supply and recreation). Estimated Federal cost of construction (1982) is $100,000,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Reimbursement of $27,200,000 would be required by local interests for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. Operations during fiscal year. The project was reclassified to inactive on June 1, 1982, following deletion from the State Water Plan. 16. PERRY LAKE AREA (ROAD IMPROVEMENTS), KS Location. The road improvements are in three segments at different locations in Jefferson County, Kansas, around the Perry Lake area. Segment A extends from U. S. Highway 24 at Perry, Kansas, 2.5 miles north and west to the east end of the Perry damsite access road. Segment B extends from the north side of the Jefferson Point Park north and west about 5.5 miles to highway K-92 about 2 miles west of Ozawakie, Kansas. Segment C extends from K-92, about 2 miles east of Ozawakie, north about 8.1 miles to highway K-4, K-16, about 2 miles east of Valley Falls, Kansas. Total improvement length is about 16.1 miles. Existing project. All segments were improved to then existing Kansas State Highway Commission secondary road standards. Additional rights-of-way required for this project were authorized to be acquired at Federal expense. Federal cost of construction (1982) is $5,315,168. Construction was initiated in March 1977 and is 100 percent complete. Local cooperation. County will maintain roads after completion. Operations during fiscal year. Final payment was made in FY 1982. 17. PERRY LAKE, DELAWARE RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Delaware River about 5 miles above mouth in Jefferson County, Kansas, and about 3 miles north of Perry, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 7,750 feet long constructed to an elevation about 95 feet above valley floor with gated-outlet works and an uncontrolled spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 770,000 acre-feet (480,000 for flood control, 140,000 for sediment reserve and 150,000 of multipurpose .storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Water supply storage is included in project plan at request of State of Kansas under provisions of Federal Water Supply Act of 1958. Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $48,371,706. Total Federal cost of project, including $1,058,000 (1982) supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $49,429,706. Construction was initiated in March 1964 and the project was placed in operation in January 1969. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $8,290,000 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. Utilization of storage has not been initiated. Reimbursement was initiated at the option of the State in September 1978. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1982 was 1,617,500 visitor days. Supplemental recreation development consisted this FY of financial completion of the contract for water supply for several recreation areas. Future supplemental recreation facilities remain to be designed and constructed. Maintenance: Activity included essential completion of maintenance building and ordinary operation and maintenance. 18. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (KANSAS CITY DIST.) Location. Flood control improvements included in this project are on and along the Missouri River and several of its principle tributaries, in States comprising the Missouri River Basin. Existing project. The Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin pro- 20-6 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT gram for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin provides for levees along Missouri River between Sioux City, Iowa, and the mouth, floodprotection works at certain municipalities, and reservoirs on main stem of Missouri River and on tributaries for control of flooding. (See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation and Table 20-K on Kansas City District projects included in Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program.) See individual project reports. Operations during fiscal year. Operations are shown in individual reports for those project expenditures on which plans were in preparation or construction was initiated. Under sections 7 and 9, 1944 Flood Control Act, the Corps is responsible for detailed scheduling of operations concerning storage capacity reserved for or assigned to flood control in reservoirs constructed by Bureau of Reclamation as well as those constructed by the Corps. 19. POMME DE TERRE LAKE, POMME DE TERRE RIVER, MO Location. Dam is on main stem of Pomme de Terre River, about 44 miles above mouth of stream in Hickory County, Missouri. The lake extending upstream into Polk County, Missouri. Site is about 3 miles south of Hermitage, Missouri, and 20 miles north of Bolivar, Missouri. Existing project. An earth and rockfill dam about 4,630 feet long constructed to about 155 feet above riverbed and a dike section on left abutment about 2,790 feet long, providing storage capacity of 650,000 acrefeet (407,000 for flood control and 243,000 for sedimentation and multi-purpose). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $14,946,784. Total estimated Federal cost of project (1982), including $329,140 area redevelopment and $3,338,000 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $18,613,924. Construction was initiated in January 1957 and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1961. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1982 was 1,313,200 visitor days. Supplemental recreation facilities. Future supplemental recreation facilities remain to be designed and constructed. Maintenance: Activities included ordinary operation and maintenance. 20. POMONA LAKE, ONE HUNDRED TEN MILE CREEK, KS Location. Dam is on One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, a tributary of Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, 7 miles above mouth of stream in Osage County, Kansas, about 7 miles northwest of Pomona, Kansas, and 34 miles upstream from Ottawa, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam 7,750 feet long constructed to an average height of about 85 feet above streambed, with gated-outlet works and an ungated chute-type spillway near left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 230,000 acre-feet (160,000 for flood control, 14,000 for sediment reserve, and 56,000 of multipurpose storage for water quality control and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $13,272,108. Total estimated Federal cost of project (1982), including supplemental recreational development $1,519,000 (Code 710), is $14,791,108. Construction began in July 1959 and the project was placed in operation in October 1963. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1982 was 737,900 visitor days. Future supplemental recreation development remain to be designed and constructed. Supplemental recreation facilities consisted of hired labor construction of additional water supply in four recreation areas. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 21. RATHBUN LAKE, CHARITON RIVER, IA Location. Damsite is on Chariton River about 7 miles north of Centerville and 1 mile north of- town of Rathbun, Appanoose County, Iowa. Existing project. An earthfill dam 10,600 feet long constructed to an elevation about 86 feet above valley floor, with gated-outlet works and an uncontrolled service chute with paved sill spillway about a mile upstream from left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 552,000 acre-feet (339,000 for flood control, 24,000 for sediment reserve and 189,000 of multipurpose storage for navigation, water quality control, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the project was $27,033,210. Total estimated Federal cost of project (1982), including $2,062,000 supplemental recreation development (Code 710), is $29,095,210. Construction of the project was initiated in September 1964 and completed in November 1969. The operating plan for this project was revised to reduce flood control releases during critical times of the year to allow local farmers better access during planting and harvesting and to facilitate field drainage and drying out. The revised plan has resulted in more frequent high pool elevations than anticipated, which has inundated roads and recreation facilities. A shoreline erosion study was accomplished and a supplement to the master plan has been approved recommending relocation of recreation facilities and bank stabilization affected by the higher lake levels. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1982 was 883,600 visitor days. Future recreation facilities remain to be designed and constructed. Supplemental recreation development this FY consisted of preparation of plans and specification for construction of the Bridgeview shower building. Maintenance: Activities included continuation of a cultural resource survey, downstream rock blanketing, essential completion of maintenance building, and ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 20-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 22. SMITHVILLE LAKE, LITTLE PLATTE RIVER, MO Location. Damsite is on Little Platte River about 1 mile northeast of Smithville and about 5 miles north of Kansas City, in Clay and Clinton Counties, Missouri. Existing project. Earthfill dam about 4,200 feet long and 95 feet high with an uncontrolled service spillway. A dike about 2,000 feet long crosses a saddle in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 246,500 acre-feet (92,000 for flood control, 52,300 for sediment reserve, and 102,200 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Estimated Federal cost (1982) through construction of the project is $86,092,000. Construction was initiated in November 1973 and the project was placed in operation in March 1982. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Reimbursement of $24,000,000 will be required for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958 and reimbursement of $7,500,000 will be required for recreation development in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Additional non-Federal contribution for recreation amounts to $600,000. All contracts for local cooperation were approved by the Secretary of the Army on November 27, 1972. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1982 was 1,698,700 visitor days. Project is 98 percent complete. Land acquisition, relocations and recreation facilities. Project is complete except for administrative facilities. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 23. TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, BIG BLUE RIVER, KS Location. Dam is on main stem of Big Blue River, about 12 miles above mouth of stream in Riley and Pottawatomie Counties, Kansas. Site is about 12 miles northwest of Manhattan, Kansas. Existing project. An earth and rock dam 7,500 feet long and 157 feet high. Total reservoir storage capacity is 2,346,000 acre-feet (1,933,000 for flood control, 228,000 for sediment reserve and 185,000 for multipurpose storage, for low flow regulation, navigation, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $80,051,031. Total estimated Federal cost of project (1982), including $533,048 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $80,584,079. Construction began in October 1952. Project was placed in operation in July 1962. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1982 was 1,003,100 visitor days. Supplemental recreation development. Maintenance: Activity included cultural resource survey, seismic reevaluation, and ordinary operation and maintenance. 24. WILSON LAKE, SALINE RIVER, KS Location. Dam is on Saline River about 130 miles above its mouth, near eastern edge of Russell County, Kansas, about 50 miles west of Salina, 10 miles north of Wilson, and 20 miles east of Russell, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 5,600 feet long and 160 feet high with a gated-outlet works, chute spillway, and structural provision for irrigation. Total reservoir storage capacity is 776,000 acre-feet (511,000 for flood control, 40,000 for sediment reserve and 225,000 multipurpose storage for irrigation, navigation, and low flow regulation). Initial cost of constructing the project was $20,015,023. Total estimated Federal cost of project (1982), including $864,000 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $20,879,023. Construction began in April 1961 and the project was placed in operation in December 1964. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1982 was 746,700 visitor days. Future recreation facilities to be designed and constructed. Supplemental recreation development and improved water system in the Lucas area. Maintenance: Activity consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 25. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1963, P.L. 738, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within boundaries of their respective district. (See table 20-L on inspection of completed flood control projects.) 26. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and Antecedent Legislation). Federal cost for period October 1, 1981 thru September 30, 1982 for operations under this heading were as follows: Disaster Preparedness Program, including planning, training, inspection, supplies and equipment and personnel cost: $494,400. Flood Fighting and Rescue Work, for three major flood events on the Missouri River and tributaries: $307,422. Rehabilitation of both non-federal farm levees, and federal authorized levees and control works damaged as a direct result of flooding: $1,685,873. Emergency Bank Protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., July 24, 1946) as amended. Operations during this period under this heading were as follows: 20-8 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT Big Blue River, Seward County, Nebraska-Design completed and plans and specifications prepared for protections of church' camp building, Methodist Church Nebraska Annual Conference. Costs for the period were $6,178. Chariton River, Appanoose County, Iowa-Construction was completed on a project to provide protection for a county road in Appanoose County, Iowa. Costs for the period were $55,210. Nemaha River, Elk Creek, Nebraska-Construction was completed on a project to provide protection for sewage lagoons in Johnson County, Nebraska near the village of Elk Creek. Costs for the period were $5,259. Snagging and Clearing (Sec. 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83d Cong.) 3 September 1954, as amended. No operations during this period. Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., June 30, 1948) as amended. See detailed report for operation at Gypsum, Kansas. Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 27. HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OSAGE RIVER, MO Location. Damsite is on main stem of Osage "River about 1.5 miles northwest of Warsaw, Benton County, Missouri. Reservoir extends into Bates, Henry, Hickory, St. Clair, and Vernon Counties, Missouri. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 5,000 feet long constructed to an average height of about 96 feet, including a gate-controlled overfall spillway section and a power installation consisting of six inclined pumpgenerating units with total capacity of 160,000 kilowatts. Total reservoir storage capacity is 5,202,000 acre-feet (3,918,000 for flood control, 244,000 for sediment reserve, and 1,040,000 multipurpose storage for power, low-flow regulation, and recreation). Public Law 91-267, approved May 26, 1970, authorized a change in project name from Kaysinger Bluff Dam and Reservoir, Osage River Basin, Missouri to the Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir. Estimated cost (1982) is $543 million. Construction of relocation of Missouri Highway M-13 was initiated September 1964 and completed May 1966. Construction of the dam and reservoir was initiated in October 1964. The embankment has been completed including paving the top of the dam roadway. The spillway was completed in October 1979. The Southwestern Power Admimistration powerline needed for final testing and commercial operation of the generators was completed in December 1979. The first power unit was placed on line on 22 December 1979. Subsequent problems with the turbine bearing required remedial design on the bearing. Restricted commercial power production began in April 1982. Through September 1982, power generation totaled 313,267,800 kilowatt hours. Of the gross income from thesale of power by Southwestern Power Administration, $501,093 was allocated to the Corps of Engineers for project power operating costs, interest, investment recovery. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operation during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1982 was 1,988,800 visitor days. Work was continqd .0n - quisition of land and rights-of-way; relocation of roads, cemeteries, utilities and municipal facilities; reservoir clearing; boundary surveying and marking; construction of the powerplant; and construction of public use facilities. Construction of measures to protect downstream areas from power operation were initiated: Project is 90 percent complete. During FY 1982 305,932,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power were generated. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 28. STOCKTON LAKE, SAC RIVER, MO Location. Damsite is on Sac River about 49.5 miles above its confluence with Osage River, and about 2 miles east of Stockton, Cedar County, Missouri, lake extending into Dade and Polk Counties. Existing project. A rock-shell dam with impervious core about 5,100 feet long constructed to an average height of about 128 feet, with a gated overfall spillway and a 45,200-kilowatt power installation. Total reservoir storage capacity is 1,674,000 acre-feet (774,000 for flood control, 25,000 for sediment reserve and 875,000 multipurpose storage for power and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $75,628,300. Estimated cost of the project, including $3,671,700 for downstream channel work and $1,132,000 for supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $80,432,000 (1982). Construction was initiated in October 1963 and the project was placed in operation in December 1969. Power operation problems were encountered with the initial operation in March 1973 because the downstream channel did not have the capacity which earlier observations and computations indicated. As a result, it has been necessary to restrict the power operation to about the 30,000 kilowatt level pending resolution of the downstream capacity problem. Remaining work consists of a proposed solution to protect downstream areas from power operation. It is proposed to acquire flowage easements on land and to construct a channel cutoff at Horseshoe Bend downstream from the dam to assure downstream channel capacity of 8,000 c.f.s. for powerplant operation. On March 22, 1978, the state of Missouri and ten landowners on the Sac River filed suit in United States District Court seeking to enjoin the Corps from implementing the proposed solution. On March 29, 1978, the Court denied plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order and the Corps agreed that it would not acquire any easements pending the Court's decision on the merits of the case. A trial was held April 14, 1980. Judgement was rendered in favor of the Corps on December 24, 1980. On February 17 and 20, 1981 the plaintiffs filed notices of appeal to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. In an opinion issued March 9, 1982, the Eighth Circuit Court resolved 20-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 all issues on the appeal in favor of the Government. Through September 1982 power generation totaled 468,645,800 kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from the sale of power by Southwestern Power Administration, $9,463,826 was allocated to the Corps of Engineers for project operating costs, interest, investment rec nrvr was 47,753,000 kilowatt-hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of installation of pressure cells, construction of maintenance building, and ordinary operation and maintenance. General Investigations Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control. Act of 29. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 1938, applies. Fiscal year 1982 costs totaled $1,449,70 Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1982 General Investigation activities. See Table 20 was 1,781,100 visitor days. The project is complete and covers Surveys, Collection and Study of Ba in operational status. No construction work is under- Research and Development, Continuation of way. Resumption to resolve downstream capacity prob- and Engineering, Planning and Engineering u lem is scheduled in FY 1983. The net amount of power posed Program Legislation, and Advance En marketed with Southwestern Power Administration and Design. )1 for all )-M which lsic Data, Planning under Proigineering 20-10 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 20-A See Section in Text Project 1. Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa to Mouth (Rulo, Nebr., to Mouth) (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 3. Blue River Channel Kansas City, Mo. 4. Clinton Lake, Wakarusa River, Kans. (Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 5. Gypsum, Gypsum Creek, Kans. (Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 6. Harlan County Lake, Republican River, Nebr. 7. Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, Kans. 8. Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, Kans. 9. Little Blue River Channel Improvement, Little Blue River, Mo. COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Total Cost to FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 2,350,000 3,538,664 4,641,000' 5,223,800' 1,348,000 1,909,672 5,841,500 5,897,687 1,334 6,401,400 6,401,102 32,253 2,350,000 3,538,646 4,641,0009 5,223,800' 500,000 437,637 2,350,000 3,945,287 336,700 333,194 -243 2,349,757 3,945,287 746,000 1,452,959 130,841 876,841 1,452,959 286,742 42,756 845,100' 847,331' 12,800,000 13,353,283 570,300' 612,027' 1,650,000 2,579,074 1,348,000 1,909,672 5,841,500 5,897,687 695,000 710,532 923,033 1,916,752 574,500 574,381 923,033 1,916,752 310,000 678,681 125,574 310,000 804,255 15,984 274,019 876,000 849,000 12,550,000 13,339,102 548,000 538,020 2,429,967 3,341,757 33,587 6,401,400 6,401,102 839,000 882,756 773,000 758,487 853,700 854,482 773,000 758,587 -54,000 67,801 -10,835 -54,000 56,966 900 10,174 1,431,300 1,376,607 7,891,000 6,850,206 39,000 38,996 732,200 730,683 1,522,000 1,647,911 - 237,942,1901 - 237,942,1901 5,157,500 245,592,2142, 9 4,797,635 245,203,7282, 9 - 816,190 - 816,190 - 22,642 - 22,642 - 238,758,3808 - 238,758,3808 5,157,500 245,614,8564 ' 4,797,635 245,226,370', 300,000 3,745,171 244,266 3,681,884 1,628,000 57,521,533 872,952 56,726,636 951,500 2,716,400 952,396 2,714,453 - 118,805 - 118,805 1,628,000 57,640,338 872,952 56,845,440 104,000 2,689,952 55,213 2,640,821 - 130,841 16,102 130,841 104,000 2,820,793 71,315 2,771,662 174,000 47,145,9266 41,942 47,013,868 1,000,400 12,044,961' 1,077,446 12,027,915' - 1,017,623 - 1,017,623 3,355,000 62,081,800 4,089,541 61,687,264 349,500 349,500 348,860 348,860 - 12,577,2276 4 12,577,2276 945,400 8,226,410' 958,933 8,221,377' 2,259,000 19,225,083 520,777 17,369,320 20-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 20-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 10. Little Blue River Lakes, Little Blue River, Mo. (Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 11. Long Branch Lake Little Chariton River, Mo. (Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 12. Melvern Lake, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, Kans. 13. Milford Lake, Republican River, Kans. 14. Missouri River Levee System, Iowa, Nebr., Kans., and Mo. 15. Onaga Lake, Kans. 16. Perry Lake Area (Road Improvements), Kans. 17. Perry Lake, Delaware River, Kans. 18. Pick-Sloan Mo. Basin Program 19. Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, Mo. 20. Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, Kans. Total Cost to Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 New Work Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 11,557,000 18,280,000 21,248,000 10,893,293 17,972,213 18,968,228 1,436,000 4,542,070 295,000 1,731,000 4,542,070 700,000 1,095,914 122,900 122,359 700,000 1,095,914 42,000 38 782,2009 742,1719 566,000 466,861 869,300' 985,9179 3,812,570 5,332,041 94,452 1,038,000 1,429,652 -10,688 386,995 992,8009 999,998' 150,000 148,070 415,000 227,092 1,008,700' 1,038,582' 59,571 798,9009 854,055', o10 225,000 11,557,000 11,118,293 -158,000 -141,460 255,500 253,633 321,014 321,014 163,014 179,554 -24,280 26,019 682,500 676,941 311,000 89,926 1,329,000 1,302,600 4,552,000 3,907,735 275,000 108,564 -16,000 114,473 75,408 944,000 938,548 140,500 142,302 -13,000 190,195 1,125,000 1,121,864 -2,984 705,000 705,797 35,000 18,280,000 18,007,213 -100,000 490,325 317,100 314,949 197,874 128,311 97,874 618,636 500 825,000 822,987 -111,900 278,876 1,473,300 1,488,610 1,747,000 1,873,014 181,547 -40,000 -33,350 -11,000 4,508 1,502,500 1,415,974 145,000 145,514 1,000 9,045 1,271,200 1,275,130 1,000 1,000 895,700 886,503 35,000 21,243,000 19,003,228 350,000 279,820 341,100 345,045 17,566 39,966 367,566 319,786 937,138 946,783 15,000 S28,014 1,067,700 1,077,854 656,000 955,769 8,000 9,650 -33,000 -30,569 -24,340 1,156,100 1,252,008 164,000 165,340 54,417 54,417 1,004,200 1,006,162 5,000 4,735 952,100 962,341 20-12 77,635,915 295,000 295,000 81,303,200 77,930,915 17,410,577 17,225,962 1,036,600 1,035,987 536,45412 489,29118 17,947,03118 17,715,25318 37,436,530 37,436,530 6,584,298' 6,577,888' 49,540,492 49,539,692 10,279,024' 10,263,641' 55,274,851 55,006,610 2,178,261 2,178,261 5,315,168 5,315,168 49,121,918 49,095,918 10,082,084' 10,078,994' 55,5697 55,5697 4,335,6238 4,333,876' 17,350,452 17,350,452 10,497,012' 10,494,781' 14,003,238 14,002,973 8,757,933' 8,751,555', 1o KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 20-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 21. Rathbun Lake, New Work: Chariton River, Approp. - - - 69,000 27,196,159 Iowa Cost - - - 56,439 27,183,598 Maint. Approp. 883,500' 830,000 1,119,900 1,074,800 8,369,118' Cost 994,0179 811,000 1,064,023 1,133,069 8,349,110' 22. Smithville Lake, New Work: Little Platte Approp. 8,850,000 8,965,000 3,580,000 2,963,000 86,100,438 River, Mo. Cost 15,337,162 9,649,068 3,356,263 1,437,562 84,066,606 Maint. Approp. 208,800 361,000 426,000 569,900 1,565,700 Cost 208,282 359,141 425,787 566,805 1,560,015 23. Tuttle Creek Lake, New Work: Big Blue Approp. - - 220,000 -13,389 80,584,079 River, Kans. Cost - - 52,215 154,395 80,584,079 Maint. Approp. 838,300' 862,500 774,300 673,500 10,148,279' Cost 937,131' 815,593 826,742 688,167 10,143,299' 24. Wilson Lake, New Work: Saline River, Approp. -1,622 - 381,000 -27,028 20,463,367 Kans. Cost 2,378 - 97,922 256,050 20,463,367 Maint. Approp. 686,500' 553,500 672,500 746,600 7,004,246' Cost 694,701' 555,558 658,408 758,161 6,998,019' 25. Inspection of Maint. Completed Flood Approp. 210,600 228,500 308,000 241,000 2,639,975 Control Projects Cost 212,033 228,456 308,158 241,170 2,639,975 27. Harry S.Truman New Work: Dam & Reservoir Approp. 38,000,000 34,048,000 28,970,000 14,500,000 484,941,900 Osage River, Mo. Cost 52,666,915 34,374,314 28,625,025 13,549,322 482,473,897 Maint. Approp. 681,900 1,785,500 2,587,800 2,928,600 7,983,800 Cost 678,919 1,761,331 2,571,700 2,935,717 7,947,667 28. Stockton Lake, New Work: Sac River, Mo. Approp. 1,757,880 -960,000 432,000 - 77,002,357 Cost 1,052,292 50,990 55,878 370,441 76,984,261 Maint. Approp. 1,422,300' 1,478,500 1,825,100 1,483,800 12,984,300' Cost 1,478,703' 1,478,509 1,768,669 1,542,330 12,968,747' 1. Includes $8,665,594 costs of new work for previous project. 2. Includes $738,109 for maintenance of previous project. 3. Includes $8,665,594 for new work for previous project and $816,190 from contributed funds. 4. Includes $738,190 for maintenance of previous project $22,642 from contributed funds and $200,000 Fiscal Year 1968 Supplemental Appropriation Funds. 5. Excludes cost of materials furnished without charge in the amount of $24,198. 6. Excludes cost of materials furnished without charge in the amount of $7,885. 7. Covers 96X3122 construction, general, funds allotted to the 'Republican River Basin Reservoirs (Medicine Creek Reservoir) CO, NE and KS.' 8. Covers 96X3123 operation and maintenance, general funds allotted to 'Scheduling of Flood Control Reservoir Operations.' 9. Includes funds from Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters appropriation for FY 1979. 10. Reflects $10 expenditure of undelivered order after close of 1978 cost records. 11. Includes $619,787 non-Federal contributions for work desired by local interests, but not required under the project. 12.Includes $31,664 for interest during construction and a duplication of $9,363. Correct total should be $495,427. Correction will be in FY 83. 13. Overstated by $22,811. Correction will be in FY 83. 20-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 12, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 31, 1970 Dec. 31, 1970 Oct. 23, 1962 June 30, 1948 June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Sep. 3, 1954 MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IOWA TO MOUTH (RULO, NE, TO MOUTH) Project adopted for securing a permanent navigable channel of 6-foot depth from Kansas City, MO to mouth. Fixed upstream limit of improvement at upper end of Quindaro Bend (374.8 miles from mouth) and provided for dredging. For a minimum width of 200 feet, with a reasonable additional width around bends. Appropriation of $12 million authorized for existing project. Appropriation of $15 million additional authorized; additional allotments totaling $29,153,108 were made by Public Works Administration under provisions of National Industrial Recovery Act of 1938, and $9,669,791 allotted under provisions of Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935. Completion of improvement from mouth to Sioux City, Iowa. Securing a navigable channel of 9-foot depth and a minimum width of 300 feet. BLUE RIVER BASIN (KANSAS CITY DISTRICT) Adopted plan for Blue River Basin and authorized $40,000,000 for initiation and partial accomplishment. BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO Adopted plan for Blue River Basin and authorized $40,000,000 for initiation and partial accomplishment. CLINTON LAKE, WAKARUSA RIVER, KS The project for the Kansas River, KS, NE, and CO is authorized at an estimated cost of $88,070,000. GYPSUM, GYPSUM CREEK, KS Authorized construction of small flood-control projects not specifically authorized by Congress. HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, NE Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. HILLSDALE LAKE, BIG BULL CREEK, KS The comprehensive plan for the Missouri River Basin, approved by the Act of June 28, 1938, and as amended and supplemented is further modified to include the project for flood protection on the Kansas River and tributaries. It is further modified to include the project for flood protection on the Osage River and tributaries. 20-14 H. Doc. 1287, 61st Cong., 3d sess. (contains latest published map). P.L. 241-62 H. Doc. 463, 64th Cong., 1st sess. (contains latest published map). P.L. 585-68 H. Doc. 1120, 60th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 560-70. H. Doc. 238, 73d Cong., 2d sess. (contains latest published map). H. Doc. 214, 76th Cong., 1st ses. (contains latest published map) P.L. 14-79. H. Doc. 91-332, 91st Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 91-611. H. Doc. 91-332, 91st Cong., 2d sess. 1962 Flood Control Act S. Doc 122, H. Doc. 578, 87th Cong., 2d sess., P.L. 87-874. Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, P.L. 858. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess., P.L. 761. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong., 3d sess., P.L. 228. H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., 2d sess., P.L. 534. P.L. 780, 83rd Cong., 2d sess. 2. 8. 4. 5. 6. KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 20-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 8. June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 Oct. 27, 1965 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 6, 1971 Sept. 3, 1954 20-15 KANOPOLIS LAKE, SMOKY HILL RIVER, KS Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. LITTLE BLUE RIVER CHANNEL Additional $38,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO Additional $38,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. LONG BRANCH LAKE, LITTLE CHARITON RIVER, MO The project for flood protection on the Chariton and Little Chariton Rivers and tributaries, Iowa and Missouri, is authorized at an estimated cost of $9,167,000. MELVERN LAKE, MARAIS DES CYGNES (OSAGE) RIVER, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. MILFORD LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IOWA, NE, KS, AND MO Levees along both sides of river from Sioux City to Kansas City. Extended project from Kansas City to the mouth provided for increased protection. ONAGA LAKE, VERMILLION CREEK, KS The project for the Kansas River, Kansas, Nebraska, and Colorado, is authorized at an estimated cost of $88,070,000. PERRY LAKE AREA (ROAD IMPROVEMENTS), KS In order to protect the environment, promote safety, and provide access to public use recreation area around Perry Reservoir, the Corps of Engineers is authorized to take action as may be necessary to improve specific roads in the vicinity of Perry Reservoir, Kansas. PERRY LAKE, DELAWARE RIVER, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess., P.L. 761. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong., 3d sess., P.L. 228. H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., 2d sess., P.L. 534. P.L. 90-483 (H. Doc. 169, 90th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 90-483 (H. Doc. 169, 90th Cong., 1st sess. 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298, (H. Doc. 238 & 262, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) H. Does. 642, 5491, and 561, 81st Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 780. H. Does. 642, 5491, and 561, 81st Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 780. H. Doc. 821, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 347, 78th Cong., 2d sess. 1962 Flood Control Act S. Doc. 122, 87th Cong. 2d sess., P.L. 87-874. River Basin Monetory Authorization Act of 1971 (P.L. 92-222) H. Does. 642, 549', and 561, 81st Cong., 2d sesas. P.L. 780. 14. 15. 16. 17. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 20-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 18. June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sept. 3, 1954 May 2, 1956 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Dec. 30, 1963 June 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Aug. 13, 1968 Dec. 24, 1970 Dec. 23, 1971 Mar. 7, 1974 PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (KANSAS CITY DIST.) Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Additional expenditure of $150 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional expenditure of $250 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. Modified general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin by deletion of construction of Red Willow Dam and Reservoir, NE, and addition of construction of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, KS. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Additional expenditure of $207 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional expenditure of $80 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and modified plan to include bank protection or rectification works below Garrison Dam. Additional $116 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional $20 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional $38,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Change comprehensive plan name to Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program. Additional $101,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program. Additional $72,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program. POMME DE TERRE LAKE, POMME DE TERRE RIVER, MO Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. POMONA LAKE, ONE HUNDRED TEN MILE CREEK, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. 20-16 Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Docs. 642 and 5491 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 409, 84th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 91-1100, 91st Cong., 2d seas. S. Doc. 92-222, 92nd Cong., 1st sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess., P.L. 761. H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., 2d seas., P.L. 534. H. Docs. 642, 5491, and 561, 81st Cong., 2d seas., P.L. 780. H. Docs. 642, 5491, and 561, 81st Cong., 2d seas., P.L. 780. 19. June 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 Sep. 3, 1954 20. Sept. 3, 1954 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 20-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 21. 22. 23. Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Dec. 22, 1944 July 14, 19602 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Sept. 3, 1954 1. Contains latest published maps of Missouri River. 2. Report of Chief of Engineers on justification of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, submitted in compliance with Public Law 505, 84th Congress, published as Senate Document 96, 86th Congress, was approved July 14, 1960 (Public Law 645). 20-17 RATHBUN LAKE, CHARITON RIVER, IA Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. SMITHVILLE LAKE, LITTLE PLATTE RIVER, MO The project for flood protection on the Platte River and tributaries, MO and IA is authorized at an estimated cost of $26,889,000. TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, BIG BLUE RIVER, KS Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. WILSON LAKE, SALINE RIVER, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Additional expenditure of $207 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for MissouriRiver Bas in HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OSAGE RIVER, MO Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. The Kaysinger Bluff Reservoir is hereby modified in accordance with recommendations of the Chief of Engineers in H. Doc. 578, 87th Cong., at an estimated additional cost of $43,245,000: provided, that nothing in this Act shall be construed as authorizing the acquisition of additional lands for the establishment of a national wildlife refuge at the reservoir. STOCKTON LAKE, SAC RIVER, MO Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. 24. H. Does. 642, 549', and 561, 81st Cong., 2d sess., P.L. 780. 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298 (H. Docs. 238 & 262, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 761. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong., 3d sess., P.L. 228 H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., 2d sess., P.L. 534 H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., 2d sess., P.L. 534 S. Doc. 96, 86th Cong. P.L. 645. H. Does. 642, 549', and 561, 81st Cong., 2d seas., P.L. 780. 1962Flood Control Act, H. Doc. 578, 87th Cong., 2d sess., P.L. 87-874. H. Does. 642, 549', and 561, 81st Cong., 2d sess., P.L. 780. 27. 28. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 20-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost To September 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Fort Leavenworth Bridge removal Complete 1965 270,393 - Gasconade River, MO', 4 Complete 1931 139,003 85,077 Kansas River Navigation Inactive 1980 259,900 - Osage River, MO, lock and dam' Complete 1952 658,076 850,495 1. Improvement adequate for existing needs. Project for 3. Operation of lock and dam placed in standby status. maintenance only. 2. Curtailment of project in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. TABLE 20-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost To September 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Abilene, KS. Completed 1965 1,099,350 - Atchison, KS. Completed 1973 4,099,590 - Barnard, KS' Completed - 127,860 - Bartley, NE Completed 1953 118,269 - Bedford, East Fork, 102 River, IA' Completed 1974 652,414 Big Blue River, Seward, NE' Completed - 126,887 - Big Stranger Creek, KS' Completed - 337,131 - Braymer Lake, Shoal Creek, MO Inactive 1966 - Brookfield Lake, Yellow Creek, MO. Inactive 1976 451,400 - Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, MO (1965 Act)1 1977 692,706 - Chariton River, MO (1944 Act) Completed 1973 8,052,990 - Dry Fork and East Fork Lakes, Fishing River, MO Deferred 1974 51,989 - East Muddy Creek, MO Inactive 1966 - - Elk Creek, Clyde, KS Completed 1975 881,415 - Fairbury, Little Blue River, NE Completed 1973 726,966 - Fort Scott Lake, Marmaton River, KS Deferred 1976 757,500 - Frankfort, Black Vermilfon River, KS Completed 1966 1,271,025 - Garnett Lake, Pottawatomie Creek, KS Inactive 1973 71,466 - Grove Lake, Soldier Creek, KS Inactive 1977 1,754,019 - Indian Lake, Blue River, KS Inactive 1976 127,297 - Indianola, NE Completed 1950 67,275 - Kansas City, Kansas River, KS (62 Mod) Active 1981 24,936,277 - Kansas Citys on MO and KS Rivers, MO and KS' 1980 42,434,197 - Kansas River Navigation Inactive 1980 259,900 - Lawrence, Kansas River, KS (62 Mod) Active 1981 8,709,064 - Lower Grand River, MO Active 1966 - - Manhattan, Kansas River, KS Completed 1967 2,488,585 - Mercer Lake, Weldon River, MO Inactive 1976 432,245 - Mill Lake, Blue River, MO Deferred 1971 - - Missouri River at New Haven, MO1 Completed - 139,883 - Osawatomie, Pottawatomie Creek, KS Completed 1973 2,036,624 - Ottawa, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS Completed 1966 4,462,661 - Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO Inactive 1976 - - Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO (Advance Highway Relocation) Inactive 1976 390,763 - Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO (Advance Town Relocation) Inactive 1976 91,929 - Platte River, MO, Channel Improvement Deferred 1973 222,193 - Rathbun Lake Fish Hatchery Completed 1975 700,000 - Salina, Smoky Hill River, KS Completed 1967 3,878,668 - Salt Creek, Barnard, KS' Completed - 127,860 - Seward, NE' Completed - 126,887 - Smithville Channel, Little Platte River, MO Deferred 1973 6,896 - 20-18 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 20-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost To September 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Stonehouse Creek, Jefferson Co., KS' Completed 1972 246,995 - Tomahawk Lake, Blue River, KS Inactive 1976 77,189 - Topeka, Kansas River, KS Completed 1974 21,174,593 - Trenton Lake, Thompson River, MO Inactive 1966 - - Upper Grand River, MO Inactive 1966 - - Wolf-Coffee Lake, Blue River, KS Inactive 1976 1,095,019 ' - 1. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers under section 205, 3. The project as a whole is complete except for Turkey Creek Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. facilities in Central Industrial District Unit. 2. Little Chariton River (East and Middle Fork) and Mussell Fork classified inactive. Construction cost includes $481,106 cost of completed Shoal Creek Unit and $211,600 cost for inactive units, Little Chariton River and Mussell Fork. TABLE 20-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federral Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Project Report For Date and Authority Expended Expended Arlington Lake, MO 1948 Flood Control Act approved $8,651 - June 28, 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act approved August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Control Act approved December 22, 1944 Beatrice, Big Blue River, NE 1965 Flood Control Act approved 16,317 - September 3, 1954 Hackleman Corners Lake, - Authorized by Flood Control Act - - Cedar Creek, MO approved September 3, 1954 Hays, Big Creek, KS' 1974 Flood Control Act of 1965 499,200 - approved October 27, 1965 Marysville, KS - Flood Control Act of 133,682 - September 3, 1954 Merriam, Turkey Creek, KS 1970 Flood Control Act approved 39,708 - September 3, 1954 Pioneer Lake, KS 1952 Flood Control Act approved 95,692 - June 28, 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Control Act approved December 22, 1944 Richland Lake, MO 1948 Flood Control Act approved 8,548 - June 28, 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act approved August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Control Act approved December 2, 1944 1. A study of water supply and flood problems at Hays, KS, is being studied under Kansas and Osage Rivers, KS, study. 20-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 20-H MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY IOWA, TO MOUTH (RULO, NEBR., TO MOUTH) TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 (See Section 1 of Text) Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular $209,732,851 $242,966,277 $452,699,128 Emergency 2,362,599 190,401 2,553,000 Public works 17,181,146 114,180 17,295,326 Accelerated public works - 393,261 393,261 Maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters 801,500 801,500 Total $229,276,596 $244,465,619 $473,742,215 TABLE 20-I MISSOURI RIVER SIOUX CITY TO MOUTH: TERMINAL FACILITIES (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Description of Facility' Above Bank Nearest Town Mouth2 Existing facilities: Grain loading dock Rock loading dock Rock loading dock Rock loading dock Ramp, gas, and restaurant (fee) Sand and gravel unloading dock Grain loading dock Grain and vegetable oil loading dock Chemical unloading Grain unloading Rock loading dock Fertilizer unloading dock Grain loading dock Loading dock Transfer of materials dock Grain loading dock Rock loading dock Municipal Dock Fertilizer unloading and grain loading dock Shipyard and dry dock Grain loading dock Molasses unloading dock Material transfer and rock loading dock Sand and gravel unloading dock Loading and unloading dock Grain loading dock Fertilizer unloading dock Grain loading dock Loading and unloading dock Loading and unloading dock Loading and unloading dock Scrap steel loading dock Sand and gravel unloading dock 488.0 478.0 474.6 468.9 452.0 447.6 446.6 446.2 445.4 444.4 432.8 423.3 423.1 422.9 421.1 420.9 403.0 396.1 396.0 395.7 386.5 386.4 385.0 378.3 378.2 375.6 375.6 373.0 372.4 368.2 367.7 367.7 367.1 367.1 366.9 365.8 Right Right Right Right Left Left Left Left Left Left Right Right Right Right Right Right Left Right Right Right Right Right Left Left Left Left Left Right Right Right Right Right Right Right Right Right White Cloud, KS White Cloud, KS White Cloud, KS St. Joseph, MO St. Joseph, MO St. Joseph, MO St. Joseph, MO St. Joseph, MO St. Joseph, MO St. Joseph, MO St. Joseph, MO Atchison, KS Atchison, KS Atchison, KS Atchison, KS Atchison, KS Weston, MO Leavenworth, KS Leavenworth, KS S. Leavenworth, KS Wolcott, KS Wolcott, KS Waldron, MO Parkville, MO Parkville, MO Parkville, MO Parkville, MO Kansas City, KS Kansas City, KS Kansas City, KS Kansas City, KS Kansas City, KS Kansas City, MO Kansas City, MO Kansas City, MO Kansas City, MO 20-20 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 20-I (Cont.) MISSOURI RIVER SIOUX CITY TO MOUTH: TERMINAL FACILITIES (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Description of Facility' Above Bank Nearest Town Mouth2 Excursion dock Grain loading dock Fuel loading dock Grain loading dock Grain loading dock Chemical loading and unloading dock Coke loading and unloading dock Haydite loading dock Sand and gravel unloading dock Steel unloading dock Oil unloading dock and barge refueling Fertilizer unloading dock Cement loading dock Rock loading dock Rock loading dock Dock Rock loading dock Grain loading dock Sand and gravel loading dock Sand and gravel loading dock Grain loading dock Grain loading dock Sand and gravel unloading dock Rock loading dock Grain loading dock Chemicals, dry bulk, salt, molasses, fertilizer, coal and steel Rock loading dock Grain loading dock Sand and gravel unloading dock Rock loading dock Rock loading dock Rock loading dock Sand, gravel & fertilizer unloading dock Fertilizer, salt & molasses unloading and grain loading dock Rock loading dock Sand and gravel unloading dock Rock loading dock Sand and gravel unloading dock Rock loading dock Rock loading dock Rock loading dock Rock loading dock Oil unloading dock Sand and gravel unloading dock Coal loading dock Rock loading dock Sand and gravel unloading dock Coal unloading dock Barge dock Rock loading dock Sand and gravel unloading dock Rock loading dock Unloading dock Sand and gravel unloading dock Rock loading dock Rock loading dock Sand and gravel unloading dock Rock loading dock & sand and gravel unloading dock Sand and gravel unloading dock Sand and gravel unloading dock Rock loading dock and gravel unloading dock Rock loading dock & sand and gravel unloading dock 365.6 364.2 364.1 361.6 361.0 360.6 360.4 360.1 360.1 357.6 356.7 355.8 354.8 350.2 345.7 345.3 335.5 318.2 317.9 317.1 293.3 293.0 286.9 263.0 262.7 256.3 245.3 226.4 226.2 219.1 215.0 207.0 197.0 196.4 193.2 186.3 185.5 181.6 181.6 177.2 164.2 157.5 148.7 143.3 143.2 126.2 124.5 117.1 115.5 109.7 96.9 85.3 81.7 68.1 56.1 47.4 43.9 31.4 28.1 27.8 16.7 8.4 Right Right Right Left Left Left Left Left Left Right Right Right Right Right Left Left Left Right Right Left Right Right Left Right Right Left Right Left Left Left Right Right Right Left Right Left Left Left Left Right Right Right Left Left Left Right Left Right Left Left Left Left Right Right Left Left Right Left Right Right Right Right Kansas City, MO Kansas City, MO Kansas City, MO Kansas City, MO Randolph, MO Randolph, MO Randolph, MO Randolph, MO Randolph, MO Sugar Creek, MO Sugar Creek, MO Sugar Creek, MO Sugar Creek, MO Sugar Creek, MO Missouri City, MO Missouri City, MO Sibley, MO Lexington, MO Lexington, MO Lexington, MO Waverly, MO Waverly, MO Carrollton, MO Miami, MO Miami, MO Brunswick, MO New Franklin, MO Glasgow, MO Glasgow, MO Glasgow, MO Arrow Rock, MO Arrow Rock, MO Boonville, MO Boonville, MO Boonville, MO Rocheport, MO Rocheport, MO Huntsdale, MO Huntsdale, MO Lupus, MO Sandy Hook, MO Marion, MO Jefferson City, MO Jefferson City, MO Jefferson City, MO St. Aubert, MO Mokane, MO Chamois, MO Portland, MO Portland, MO Hermann, MO New Haven, MO New Haven, MO Washington, MO Augusta, MO Monarch, MO ChesterfieM MO St. Charles,'MO St. Charles, MO St. Charles, MO Musicks Ferry, MO Ruegg, MO 1. Privately owned and operated unless indicated. 2. 1960 adjusted mileage. 20-21 TABLE 20-J REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM (See Section 14 of Text) Miles of Unit Levee Status R 513-512 Richardson Co. D. D. #7 19.1 Complete-1958 R 500 Iowa Point D. D. #4 4.1 Complete-1954 Kimsey Holly Creek 4.4 Complete-1970 L 497 Forest City L. D. 16.0 Complete-1962 L 488 Holt Co. D. D. #7 11.5 Complete-1955 R 482 Burr Oak D. D. #3 8.2 Complete-1954 L 476 Amazonia L. D. 10.8 Complete-1956 R 471-460 Elwood-Gladden L. D. 13.8 Complete-1968 L 455 S. St. Joseph L. D. 15.6 Complete-1967 L 448-443 Halls L. D. 17.3 Complete-1957 R 440 Atchison & Doniphan Co. D. D. 10.7 Complete-1959 L 408 Farley-Beverly D. D. 12.2 Complete (Levee raise modification)-1972 L 400 Waldron L. D. 7.6 Complete-1957 L 385 Riverside-Quindaro D. D. 6.5 Planning underway R 351 Atherton L. D. 15.9 Complete-1966 L 345-330 Orrick L. D. 43.4 Planning underway L 325-319 Henrietta-Crooked River D. D. 35.0 Planning underway L 246 Brunswick-Dalton D. D. 20.0 Under construction Remaining units Detailed planning not initiated 20-22 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 20-K KANSAS CITY DISTRICT PROJECTS INCLUDED IN PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (See Section 18 of Text) Estimated Estimated Project Federal Non-Federal Cost Cost Abilene, Smoky Hill River, Kansas $ 1,099,350 $ 287,000 Bartley, Republican River, Nebraska 118,269 9,500 Fort Scott Lake, Marmaton River, Kansas6 78,500,000 2,616,000 Garnett Lake, Pottawatomie Creek, Kansas2 38,600,000 - Harlan County Lake, Republican River, Nebraska 49,440,155 - Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, Missouri 535,000,000 120,455,000 Hilledale Lake, Big Bull Creek, Kansas 63,800,000 20,260,000 Indianola, Republican River, Nebraska 67,275 7,592 Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, Kansas 13,132,735 - Lawrence, Kansas River, Kansas' 8,626,111 2,130,000 Manhattan, Kansas River, Kansas 2,488,585 265,000 Melvern Lake, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, Kansas 37,436,530 - Melvern Lake and Pomona Lake (Road Improvement), Kansas (1974 Authorization) 500,000 214,300 Milford Lake, Republican.River, Kansas 49,566,843 - Missouri River Levee System, Rulo to the Mouth' 166,000,000 17,400,000 Osawatomie, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, Kansas 2,036,624 348,300 Ottawa, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, Kansas 4,462,661 876,000 Perry Lake, Delaware River, Kansas 49,429,706 - Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, Missouri3 18,613,924 - Pomona Lake, Osage River Basin, Kansas 14,791,108 - Salina, Smoky Hill River, Kansas 3,878,668 1,960,000 Stockton Lake, Sac River, Missouri 80,432,000 17,432,000 Topeka, Kansas River, Kansas 21,174,593 10,383,492 Tuttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, Kansas 80,584,079 - Tuttle Creek Lake, Kansas-Road and Bridge (1976 Act) 630,000 460,000 Tuttle Creek Lake (Road Improvement), Kansas (1974 Modification) 500,000 214,300 Wilson Lake, Saline River, Kansas 20,879,023 - 1. Active portion of project. Deferred portion of project 3. Active portion of project. Inactive portion of the is currently estimated to cost (.1964) $1,690,000 Federal and project for power modification is currently estimated to cost $122,000 non-Federal. Inactive portion of project is currently (1954) $7,300,000. estimated to cost (1964) $272,408,000 Federal and $23,862,500 4. 1976 estimate. non-Federal. 5. 1981 estimate. 2. 1969 Estimate. TABLE 20-L INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 25 of Text) Location Month Inspected Missouri River Main Stem Missouri River Levees: R 513-512, R 500, Kimsey Holly Creek, L 497, L 488, R 482, L 476, R 471-460, L 455, L 448-443, R 440, L 408, L 400 and R 351, L 246 Kansas Citys, Missouri and Kansas: Argentine, Armourdale, Birmingham, CID (Mo & Kans), East Bottoms, Fairfax-Jetsey Creek, North Kansas City Units, and GSA Federal Complex Osage River, Kansas and Missouri Ottawa, Kansas Osawatomie, Kansas Kansas River and Minor Tributaries Topeka, Kansas; Auburndale, North Topeka, Oakland, Soldier Creek, South Topeka, and Waterworks Units Republican River, Nebraska and Kansas Bartley, Nebraska Smoky Hill, Saline, and Solomon Rivers Abilene, Kansas Mar-Apr 82 Sep-Nov 82 Aug 82 Aug 82 Sep 82 Sep 82 Sep 82 20-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 20-M ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Section 29 of Text) Federal Cost Totals By Item and CWIS Number FY 82 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) Kansas and Osage Rivers, Kansas - 12204 $906,430 Metropolitan Region of Kansas City, Missouri and Kansas- 12018 519 Nemaha and Little Nemaha Rivers and Tributaries, Nebraska and Kansas - 12268 44,682 Stranger Creek Basin, Kansas - 12118 267 Subtotal $951,899 Review of Authorized Projects (160) Fort Scott Lake, Kansas - 06470 $133,471 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Soil Conservation Service, Dept. Agric. (181) - 51840 $ 5,051 Bureau of Reclamation, Dept. Interior (182) - 51820 50,877 Missouri River Basin Commission (183) - 50615 9,784 Planning Assistance to States (186) - 51850 20,607 Technical Assistance for Streambank Erosion (188) - 51731 390 Subtotal $ 86,709 TOTAL (Category 100) $1,172,079 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Inspection and Inventory of Dams (236) - 53842/3 $ 28,239 Flood Plain Management Services (250) - 82030/40/60 200,361 Hydrologic Studies (260) - 53820 41,022 TOTAL (Category 200) $ 269,622 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (Category 300) None CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING (Category 400) None PLANNING AND ENGINEERING UNDER PROPOSED LEGISLATION (Category 500) None ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (Category 600) Flood Control Projects (650) Onaga Lake, Kansas (652) -21610 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $1,449,701 20-24 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT * This district comprises portions of Montana, Wyo- basin of Missouri River along main stem and tributaries ming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Colorado, Ne- to Rulo, NE. braska, Iowa, and Minnesota, all embraced in drainage IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Fort Peck Lake, MT ....................... 21-2 2. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE .............................. 21-2 3. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .......................... 21-2 Flood Control 4. Bear Creek Lake, CO ..................... 21-2 5. Big Sioux River at Sioux City, IAand SD ............................ 21-3 6. Bowman-Haley Lake, ND .................. 21-3 7. Chatfield Lake, CO ........................ 21-3 8. Cherry Creek Lake, CO ....... ............ 21-3 9. East Nishnabotna River at Red Oak, IA ............................ 21-4 10. Fall River Basin, SD ...................... 21-4 11. Frazer-Wolf Point, MT . .................. 21-4 12. Great Falls, MT .......................... 21-4 13. Lost Creek at Columbus, NE ................ 21-5 14. Miles City, MT ......................... 21-5 15. Missouri National Recreational River, NE and SD ......................... 21-5 16. Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, ND.......................21-5 17. Missouri River, Kenslers Bend, NE to Sioux City, IA ..................... 21-5 18. Missouri River Levee System, Sioux City, IA to Mouth ................... 21-6 19. Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, NE ............................... 21-6 20. Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program (Omaha Dist) ................... .21-6 21. Pipestem Lake, ND ....................... 21-6 22. Salt Creek & Tributaries, NE ............... 21-6 23. South Platte River Basin, CO ............... 21-7 24. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Works ......................... 21-7 25. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations .................... 21-7 26. Flood Control Activities Under Special Authorization ..................... 21-7 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power Page 27. Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, SD ................. 21-7 28. Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, Missouri River Basin, SD ................ 21-8 29. Garrison Dam-Lake Sakakawea, Missouri River Basin, ND ................. 21-8 30. Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake, Missouri River Basin, NE and SD .......... 21-8 31. Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin, SD and ND ................. 21-8 Miscellaneous 32. Streambank Erosion Control Evaluation and Demonstration Project ... ... 21-9 General Investigations 33. Surveys...............................21-9 34. Collection & Study of Basic Data ........... 21-9 35. Research and Development ................ 21-9 36. Continuation of Planning and Engineering ... 21-9 37. Planning and Engineering Under Proposed Legislation ............... 21-9 38. Advanced Engineering and Design .......... 21-9 39. Transportation Systems .................. 21-9 Tables 21-A Cost and Financial Statement ........... 21-10 21-B Authorizing Legislation ................ 21-12 21-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .... 21-16 21-D Not Applicable 21-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .. 21-16 21-F Not Applicable 21-G Deauthorized Projects ................. 21-17 21-H Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE .......................... 21-18 21-I Missouri River Levee System ....... ... 21-18 21-J Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Rubl, NE Terminal Facilities ............ 21-19 21-K Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program ...... 21-19 21-L Inspection of Completed Local Protection Projects .................... 21-20 21-M Flood Control Activities - Under Special Authorization ....... :....21-22 21-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Navigation 1. FORT PECK LAKE, MT Location. Reservoir is in Missouri River Valley in Mc- Cone, Valley, Garfield, Phillips, Petroleum, and Fergus Counties, MT. Dam is approximately 1,771.5 miles above mouth of Missouri River. Nearest towns are Glasgow, 17 miles northwest, and Nashua, 9 miles north. Existing project. A hydraulic earthfill dam with a maximum height of 251 feet, with a crest length of 21,026 feet, and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 18,909,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. Work started on original project in October 1933 and on second power plant in August 1956. The project was completed in 1965. The power installations at the project were uprated in FY 1979. The 5 generators have a total output of 185,250 KW, 2 generators at 40,000 KW each, 2 generators at 43,500 KW each and 1 generator at 18,250 KW. See page 818 of 1965 Annual Report and page 905 of 1958 Annual Report for project details. Estimated cost of overall project (1982) is $158,487,000 including $1,936,000 Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Public use facilities were designed with Code 710 funds. Maintenance: Installation of a powerplant controller system for the six Missouri River dams continued. Contracts were initiated for rehabilitation of the townsite. Fort Peck Lake was operated in conjunction with the other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multi-purpose uses. Generating facilities produced 1,335,806,000 net kilowatt hours of electricity. Total cost of Operation and Maintenance during the period was $5,060,500, however, reimbursement from the Western Area Power Administration for the prorata share of Operation and Maintenance cost of the power plant, reimbursement for furnishing operator's village facilities, and property disposals reduced net cost to $2,995,670. Annual project visitation was estimated at 384,700. On September 30, 1982, the pool was at elevation 2236.6 and 16,213,000 acre-feet of water was impounded in the reservoir. 2. MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA TO MOUTH (SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE) Location. Channel of the Missouri River extending from Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE. Previous projects. For details see page 1893, Annual Report for 1915, and page 1175, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a navigation channel of 9-foot depth and width not less than 300 feet, obtained by revetment of banks, rock dikes to contract and stabilize waterway, cutoffs to eliminate long bends, closing minor channels, and removal of snags and dredging as required. Construction was initiated on this section of the project (Sioux City to Rulo) in fiscal year 1928, and the bank stabilization work was completed in April 1979. Work remaining to complete this section of the project consists of construction of fish and wildlife facilities. A reliable channel suitable for navigation is available through this section. Controlling depth at ordinary stages of the river is 9 feet, with additional depths available during high stages. Commercial navigation was inaugurated on this section in May 1939, and common carrier transportation service was inaugurated in October 1946. Seven riverside recreation sites are complete and in operation. Estimated cost of new work Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE is $190,500,000 (1982), through construction, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Local cooperation. Local interests must share in cost of recreation facilities in accordance with provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Local interests have contributed for cost sharing on construction of recreation by constructing portions of the facilities. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities for loading and unloading grain, liquids and dry bulk products are maintained by private interests at various locations on this section of the river. These terminals are listed in Table 21-J and are adequate for the current demands. Sites are available for construction of additional wharfage. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract maintenance work consisted of revetment and dike repair. Work by hired labor forces included removal of debris from environmental notches, repairing dikes and revetments. Local interests have assumed operation and maintenance' of the recreation sites. (See Table 21-H for total cost of work under existing project to September 1982). 3. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Small Navigation Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended, Public Law 645, 86th Congress). Operations during fiscal year. Additional studies on the Omaha Marina were terminated in February 1982. Costs for this activity thru 30 September 1982 were $202. Flood Control 4. BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO Location. Damsite is on Bear Creek in Jefferson County, CO about 8 miles above the confluence of Bear Creek with the South Platte River at Denver. Existing project. Earthfill dam 180 feet high, with a crest length of about 5,300 feet, and a supplementary earthfill dike with a height of 65 feet and a crest length of 2,100 feet, to the south of the main dam, and an uncontrolled earth and rock-cut emergency spillway. The lake provides storage capacity of 28,560 acre-feet for flood control and 2,000 acre-feet for sediment and rec- 21-2 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT reation. Construction of the project was initiated in October 1973 and was completed in September 1982, exclusive of recreation facilities. Estimated cost through construction is $61,503,600 (1982). Recreation facilities are proposed using Code 710 cost sharing funds at an additional cost of $500,000. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 21-3 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. A botanical maintenance contract was awarded and completed. Construction of relocations and project roads was completed. Maintenance: Routine operations and maintenance activities were performed. 5. BIG SIOUX RIVER AT SIOUX CITY, IA AND SD Location. Near mouth of the Big Sioux River in the vicinity of Sioux City, Woodbury County, IA and North Sioux City, Union County, SD. Existing project. Channel improvement by enlargement and minor realignment along the existing channel upstream from the Interstate Highway 29 bridge to a point approximately 1,300 feet upstream of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Bridge. Levees provide a high degree of protection to North Sioux City, SD and the Riverside Area of Sioux City, IA. Stone revetment has been placed along the improved channel at locations of potential erosion. Construction was initiated in September 1976 and was completed in September 1981. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act approved June 22, 1936 applies. Contracts required by Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 to provide local cooperation were executed July 13, 1976. Operations during fiscal year. Letters of completion and transfer of responsibility for future Operation & Maintenance of the completed project were sent to the local sponsors. 6. BOWMAN-HALEY LAKE, ND Location. Damsite is on North Fork of Grand River in southwestern North Dakota, about 6 miles above Haley, ND. Existing project. A dam 79 feet high, with a crest length of 5,730 feet, and reservoir with a storage capacity of about 19,780 acre-feet for sediment storage, fish and wildlife conservation, recreation, and future water supply for communities of Bowman, Reeder, Scranton, and Gascoyne, ND. Construction was initiated in July 1964, and the project was completed in 1970. Supplemental cost sharing recreational facilities are proposed using Code 710 funds at a cost of $353,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must prevent encroachment on capacity of North Fork channel below reservoir; obtain water rights for storage; pay the United States for costs allocated to water supply; and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances of local cooperation were approved June 19, 1964. With respect to water rights, requirements have been complied with. A contract with the Bowman County Water Management District for water storage space was signed November 10, 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance activities included sedimentation and reservoir regulation studies and intermittent inspections of the dam and structures. Project boundary fencing was completed. Annual project visitation was estimated at 29,600. 7. CHATFIELD LAKE, CO Location. On the South Platte River, just below the mouth of Plum Creek, about eight miles upstream from Denver, CO. Existing project. Consists of rolled earth-fill dam with a maximum height of 148 feet, a crest length of 12,500 feet, and a reservoir with flood control capacity of 215,000 acre-feet and sediment capacity of 20,000 acre-feet, which will be used for recreation, and an enlarged channel from the dam downstream to Denver to accommodate reservoir flood releases. The Corps is participating with local interests in acquisition of lands and development of recreation facilities immediately downstream of the Chatfield Dam in lidu of a portion of the channel improvement. Construction of the project was initiated in August 1967 and is 94 percent complete, with a scheduled completion date in FY 1987. Acquisition of land, relocations, construction of the spillway, and the final earthwork contract are complete. Construction of recreation facilities is 95 percent complete. Planning is underway for remaining dam facilities, downstream channel and public use facilities. Estimated cost through construction of the project is $102,825,000 (1982) of which $96,300,000 is the Federal cost for construction, $6,625,000 local cost in connection with the downstream channel improvement, and $2,900,000 is the local cost for acquisition of water for the recreation pool. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies to the downstream channel improvement. The Colorado Water Conservation Board provided assurances of local cooperation for the downstream improvement on December 13, 1967. Local interests must provide water for filling the sediment reserve pool for recreation use which the state agreed to on April 25, 1967. Operations during fiscal year. Continued design by hired labor. Continued construction on repairs to bridges, recreation facilities and rehabilitation of the outlet works. Initiated repair to visitor center floor, installation of spillway security fencing, and data collection platforms. Maintenance: continued routine operation and maintenance activities. Annual project visitation was estimated at 1,131,200. 8. CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO Location. Damsite is on Cherry Creek in Arapahoe County, CO, approximately 6 miles southeast of Denver, CO. just outside of city limits. Cherry Creek joins South Platte River within city limits of Denver. 21-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam with maximum height of 141 feet above streambed and 14,300 feet long. Project includes a reinforced concrete outlet works and an uncontrolled side channel spillway canal discharging into adjacent Toll Gate Creek. Cherry Creek project provides reservoir storage capacity of 93,920 acre-feet below spillway canal invert and, in addition, a surcharge storage of 134,470 acre-feet. Plan of operation in ultimate development for multiple-purpose uses includes 13,960 acre-feet for sediment storage and 79,960 acre-feet for conservation purposes. Construction began in fiscal year 1946 and was completed in June 1961, exclusive of recreation facilities. Estimated cost of project is $15,214,400 (1982) including $544,500 Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing under the Code 710 program. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance activities include administration of project area, continuation of sediment studies, stream gaging activities, embankment instrumentation and analysis, and miscellaneous items of ordinary repair and maintenance. Annual project visitation was estimated at 1,387,000. 9. EAST NISHNABOTNA RIVER AT RED OAK, IA Location. On the East Nishnabotna River on the western edge of Red Oak in Montgomery County, IA. Existing Project. The work on the original project was initiated in April 1962 and completed in October 1962. The work consisted of 10,500 feet of levee along the west edge of Red Oak. The cost when completed (1962) was $443,000, of which $400,000 was Federal and $43,000 non-Federal. Flooding subsequent to completion of the project raised concerns about the adequacy of the project. A study was made and the recommendation to raise the existing project to standard project flood protection was approved February 1981. Construction was initiated in April 1982 and is approximately 76% complete. The work is currently estimated at $1,800,000, of which $1,700,000 is the Federal cost for construction and $100,000 is the non-Federal cost for necessary rights of way and utility relocations. Local cooperation. A 221 contract to sponsor the project was furnished by the City of Red Oak and was approved on September 21, 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Construction contract was awarded for the new work in March 1982, and completion is scheduled during July 1983. 10. FALL RIVER BASIN, SD Location. In Custer and Fall River Counties, in and near the town of Hot Springs, SD. Hot Springs unit is in the town of Hot Springs, immediately south of the junction of Cold Brook and Hot Brook which combine to form the Fall River. Cold Brook Lake unit is approximately 1.25 miles north of the town of Hot Springs on Cold Brook; and Cottonwood Springs Lake unit is approximately 4.5 miles west of the town of Hot Springs on Cottonwood Springs Creek, one-half mile upstream from its confluence with Hot Brook. Existing project. The general plan of improvement provides flood protection for Hot Springs, SD. The Hot Springs channel improvement unit consisted of widening, deepening and straightening 6,000 feet of channel of Fall River. The Cold Brook Lake unit, an earth-fill dam with appurtenant structures, controls an area of 70.5 square miles. The Cottonwood Springs Lake unit consists of an earth-fill dam with appurtenant structures and controls an area of 26 square miles. Construction of Hot Springs unit was completed during fisoal year 1951. Construction of Cold Brook unit dam and appurtenances was completed in fiscal year 1953 with exception of a road and parking area which were completed in fiscal year 1955. Construction of the Cottonwood Springs unit dam was completed in fiscal year 1970, with the exception of the recreation facilities which were completed in fiscal year 1972. Local cooperation. Local cooperation requirements have been fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance activities were continued on the Cottonwood Springs and Cold Brook Dams and structures. Annual project visitation was estimated for Cold Brook Lake and Cottonwood Springs Lake at 52,700 and 13,100 respectively. 11. FRAZER-WOLF POINT, MT Location. Along the Missouri River approximately 4 miles southwest of Frazer, MT. Existing project. The project consists of stonefill dike construction on the right bank and stonefill revetment protection on the left bank upstream and downstream of the Frazer-Wolf Point Irrigation Unit intake structure. Construction was initiated in October 1980 and completed in December 1980. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act approved June 22, 1936 applies. Operations during fiscal year. O & M manuals were completed by hired labor. 12. GREAT FALLS, MT Location. In Great Falls, Cascade County, MT at confluence of the Sun and Missouri Rivers. Existing project. Provides for levees along the left bank of the Sun River and an interceptor ditch and closed conduit to collect and convey side-hill runoff to the Sun River. Estimated cost through construction of the project is $13,352,000 (1982) of which $11,300,000 is the Federal cost of construction and $2,052,000 is the local cost for lands, relocations and a cash contribution for replacement of a storm sewer conduit desired by local interests. Local cooperation. Section 3. Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. In addition local interests must zone the unleveed portion of the flood channel through the damage area to preserve its capacity and to prevent further encroachments and contribute in cash $179,000 21-4 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT representing the estimated cost of replaced storm drainage facilities which will be incorporated into the closed conduit of the Watson Coulee Interceptor. West Great Falls Flood Control and Drainage District provided assurances on January 17, 1968. State Supreme Court decision on assessments required a change in state law, which was enacted in 1973. The final court ruling on compliance was made April 1, 1981, and the local sponsor was instructed to proceed toward project construction. Operations during fiscal year. Work continued on the Watson Coulee Interceptor Conduit contract, and is 90% complete. A contract for construction of the Sun River left bank levees and channels was awarded in September 1982. Engineering and design continued by hired labor. 13. LOST CREEK AT COLUMBUS, NE Location. On Lost Creek just north of the City of Columbus in Platte County, NE. Existing project. This project provides levee and channel improvements on the north side of Columbus and provides protection to commercial and residential areas. The estimated cost of the construction is $4,217,000 (1982) of which $3,700,000 is the Federal cost of construction, and $517,000 is non-Federal contributed funds - other, that provides for all necessary right of way, utility, and bridge relocations. Local cooperation. A contract with the City of Columbus to sponsor the project was approved on February 18, 1982. Operations during fiscal year. Plans and specifications for Stage 1 were completed and a contract was awarded for construction on September 17, 1982. Plans and specifications for Stage 2 are currently underway for award in FY 1983. 14. MILES CITY, MT Location. On the right banks of the Tongue and Yellowstone Rivers at Miles City, MT. Existing project. The plan provides for construction of levees along the right banks of the Tongue and Yellowstone Rivers starting about 1,000 feet upstream from the Interstate 94 embankment and extending approximately five miles downstream. Estimated cost through construction of the project is $8,070,000 (1981) of which $5,880,000 is the Federal cost of construction, and $2,190,000 is the non-Federal cost for lands, easements, right of way and relocations. Project was placed in the Inactive category March 11, 1982 due to economic infeasibility. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act approved June 22, 1936 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Preparation of the Phase II General Design Memorandum was discontinued and placed in Inactive status. 15. MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER, NE, AND SD Location. NE and SD. The Missouri River between Gavins Point Dam and Ponca State Park, NE. This includes Cedar and Dixon Counties in Nebraska, and Yankton, Clay, and Union Counties in South Dakota. Existing project. The designation as a National Recreational River will preserve outstanding and important scenic values and will provide additional opportunities for river access and recreation use. Erosion control, consisting of bank stabilization and river management techniques designed to preserve the existing environment, will at the same time preserve high bank flood plain lands. Federal cost of the project is limited by the authorization to $21,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Continued coordination with the National Park Service. Surveys for cultural resources, visual resources, wildlife resource values, and mineral resources are continuing. 16. MISSOURI RIVER, GARRISON DAM TO LAKE OAHE, ND Location. Along the channel of Missouri River between Garrison Dam and headwaters of Oahe Reservoir in North Dakota. Existing project. Consists of bank stabilization and rectification works required to stabilize banks of Missouri River in specific areas and prevent further loss of agricultural lands through erosion. Construction was initiated January 1965 and project is 99 percent complete. Estimated total cost is $9,711,000 (1982) of which $9,441,000 is the Federal cost of construction and $270,000 is the non-Federal cost for all lands, easements, and rights of way. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations during fiscal year. The existing corrective construction contract was completed in November 1981. A new corrective construction contract was awarded in July 1982 and is scheduled for completion in early FY 1983. 17. MISSOURI RIVER, KENSLERS BEND, NE, TO SIOUX CITY, IA Location. Project is along Missouri River between Ponca Bend, NE, and combination bridge at Sioux City, IA. Existing project. Construction of dikes, revetments and channel improvement along Missouri River from Miners Bend and vicinity, SD and NE, to Sioux City, IA. Project was started in June 1946 and completed in June 1961. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance consisted of revetment repair and rehabilitation of environmental notches. 21-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 18. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IOWA, NEBRASKA, KANSAS AND MISSOURI (SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE) Location. On both banks of the Missouri River from Sioux City, IA to St. Louis, MO. Active portion of the project in Omaha District extends from Council Bluffs, IA to Rulo, NE. Existing project. A series of levee units and appurtenant works along both sides of Missouri River from Sioux City, IA, to mouth, for protection of agricultural lands and small communities against floods. Construction was initiated June 1948. (See Table 21-I for status of active units). Construction was initiated on Levee Unit L-611-614 in September 1980 and is 75 percent complete. Studies were completed on units L-627, L-624 and L-561-550. Construction of Unit R-616 is still being delayed by a temporary restraining order. A hearing was held during February 1982 and the judge's decision is pending. Cost estimate for active portion of project from Council Bluffs, IA to Rulo, NE is $41,100,000 (1982) of which $36,500,000 is Federal cost for construction and $4,600,000 local costs for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. Fully complied with for all completed units. Local interests have furnished assurances of their willingness and ability to fulfill local cooperation requirements for the remaining active units. Operations during fiscal year. Levee Unit L-611-614, Stage I, was essentially completed and a construction contract was initiated on Stage 3. Construction of Stage 2 continued. Remedial studies were completed on units L-627, L-624 and L-561-550. 19. PAPILLION CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES LAKES, NE Location. The Papillion Creek basin is located in Washington, Douglas, and Sarpy Counties, NE. Big Papillion Creek rises west of Blair, flows southeasterly through metropolitan Omaha area where it is joined by the Little Papillion Creek just above Offutt AFB, forming Papillion Creek. The combined creek flows along the side of Offutt AFB to its confluence with the Missouri River. Existing project. The active project consists of a series of four dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Papillion Creek. Construction of the project was initiated in FY 1972. Construction was completed on Standing Bear Lake (Site 16) in December 1978 and Glenn Cunningham Lake (Site 11) in December 1979. Construction at Site 20 is 32 percent complete. Estimated Federal appropriation requirement through construction of the project is $49,400,000 (1982). Estimated non-Federal cost sharing for recreation facilities is $3,209,000, which includes Federal reimbursement of $2,980,000. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 21-6 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Design for Sites 18 and 20 continued by hired labor. Construction continued at Site 20; land acquisition was initiated at Site 18. Maintenance: Routine operations and maintenance activities continued at Sites 11 and 16. Annual project visitation was estimated at 815,400. 20.. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (OMAHA DISTRICT) Location. Flood control improvements in this project are along Missouri River and several of its principal tributaries and in states comprising Missouri River Basin. Existing project. General comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin provides for levees along Missouri River between Sioux City, IA, and mouth and reservoirs on main stem of Missouri River and tributaries. See individual reports and Table 21-K for projects in the Omaha District included in the comprehensive plan. 21. PIPESTEM LAKE, ND Location. On Pipestem Creek in Stutsman County, ND, 3 miles upstream from where Pipestem Creek joins the James River at Jamestown, ND. Existing project. The project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam approximately 108 feet high with a crest length of 4,000 feet and outlet works of a gated reinforced concrete conduit. The reservoir provides 146,880 acre-feet of storage. The multipurpose pool provides space for silt storage and 885 acres of water surface for fish, wildlife and recreation needs. Construction of the project was initiated in FY 1970 and completed in FY 1977. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement and to bear the first cost of associated improvements in the wildlife management area; pay, contribute in kind, or repay, with interest, one-half of the separable cost of the project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife lands and facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance activities continued. Annual project visitation was estimated at 95,400. 22. SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE Location. Salt Creek Basin comprises an area of about 1,627 square miles in and around Lincoln in southeastern Nebraska. Existing project. The authorized project consists of a system of 10 dams and reservoirs, channel clearing, enlarging and realignment, levees and necessary bridge alterations. Pursuant to Senate Resolution adopted August 7, 1964, which authorized a review of Salt Creek survey report, remaining units were placed in "inactive" classification. Construction of the project began in the spring of 1962. All work under the active portion of the project, consisting of the 10 dams and reservoirs and the channel improvements and levees through 21-6 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT Lincoln, was completed in 1969. Funds were transferred to the project in FY 1980 with concurrence of Congressional Committees. These funds were used to determine an effective method of correction for the dispersive clay problem in the completed downstream levees through Lincoln. Initial corrective construction on the levee was completed in September 1980. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for the completed levee and channel improvement part of the project. For the dams, local interests are required to operate and maintain the permanent pools for fish and wildlife conservation and assume all costs related to utilization of the permanent pools for recreational purposes and insure public access to the pools. Operations during fiscal year. An interim report will be forwarded during FY 1983, to higher authorities and guidance requested prior to recommending any further repairs. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance activities included sedimentation and reservoir regulation studies, intermittent inspections of the dams and structures, and rehabilitation of the outlet works. Annual visitation to the system of dams was estimated at 2,683,400. 23. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, CO Location. Flood control improvements in this project are along the South Platte River and its tributaries in Colorado. Existing project. General plan for flood control and other purposes provides for construction of Chatfield Lake on the South Platte River, Bear Creek Lake on Bear Creek, and levee and channel improvements on the South Platte River. (See individual reports and Table 21-B for authorizing legislation. 24. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL WORKS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion, in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within the boundaries of their respective districts. Inspections of completed local protection projects which have been turned over to local interests for maintenance and operation during the fiscal year are set forth in Table 21-L, Inspections of Completed Local Protection Projects. Fiscal year costs were $283,453. 25. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Under sections 7 and 9, Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944, Corps of Engineers is responsible for detailed schedulingof operations involving storage capacity reserved for or assigned to flood control in reservoirs constructed by Bureau of Reclamation as well as those constructed by Corps of Engineers. Costs for FY 1982 were $212,738 and total costs to September 30, 1982 were $3,837,537. 26. FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for FY 1982 were $246,750 for disaster preparedness; $3,543 for emergency operations, and $5,494 for repair and restoration. Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act as amended, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., June 30, 1948). See Table 21-M for preauthorization studies on potential projects. Emergency Bank Protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., July 24, 1946). Operations under this heading were as follows: Two projects, E. Fork of the Boyer River at Vail, IA and Shoshone River at Byron, WY, were approved by OCE for construction; however, funds were not available during FY 1982. A negative reconnaissance report was submitted on the Middle Fork of the Powder River at Kaycee WY. Total cost to September 30, 1982 was $4,896. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 27. BIG BEND DAM-LAKE SHARPE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD Location. On Missouri River, 987.4 miles above mouth, near Fort Thompson, SD, and approximately 20 miles upstream from Chamberlain, SD. Dam is located in the upstream reach of Fort Randall Reservoir. Big Bend Reservoir extends upstream to Pierre, SD. Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam 95 feet high, with a crest length of 10,570 feet, a hydroelectric generating plant consisting of eight 58,500 kilowatt units, and a chute-type gated spillway. Reservoir provides gross storage of 1,883,000 acre-feet. Estimated cost is $107,379,000 (1982) including $258,000 Code 710 funds. Construction began in September 1959 and was completed in September 1977, except for Code 710 recreation facilities. On September 30, 1982, reservoir pool was at elevation 1420.0 feet mean sea level and a total volume of 1,703,000 acre-feet of water was impounded. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Public use facilities were constructed with Code 710 funds. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production and other multiple uses. During the period, 872,276,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity were produced. Installation of a power plant controller system for the Missouri River dams continued. Annual project visitation was estimated at 837,700. 21-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 28. FORT RANDALL DAM-LAKE FRANCIS CASE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD Location. On Missouri River in Charles Mix and Gregory Counties, SD, about 82 miles above Yankton, SD. Site is 880 miles above mouth of Missouri River and 148 miles above Sioux City, IA. Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam with a maximum height of 165 feet, a crest length of 10,700 feet, and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 5,603,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. The power installation consists of eight units rated at 40,000 kilowatts each. Construction began in May 1946 and was completed in 1969, except for Code 710 recreation facilities. On September 30, 1982, reservoir pool was at elevation 1356.1 feet mean sea level, and a total volume of 3,807,000 acre-feet of water was impounded. Estimated Federal cost of project is $198,979,000 (1982), of which $197,402,000 is the Federal cost for construction, and $1,577,000 is Code 710 funds. Non-Federal contribution for constructing approaches to the Platte-Winner Bridge was $720,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple uses. Generating facilities produced 1,588,083,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity. Installation of a power plant controller system for the Missouri River dams continued. A contract was awarded for sanitary sewers and a water distribution line in conjunction with rehabilitation of the government townsite at Pickstown. Annual project visitation was estimated at 1,388,000. 29. GARRISON DAM-LAKE SAKAKAWEA, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, ND Location. On Missouri River in McLean and Mercer Counties, ND, about 11 miles south of Garrison, ND, and 9 miles west of Coleharbor, ND. 1,389.9 miles above mouth of river and 75 miles above Bismarck, ND. Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam 11,300 feet long with a maximum height of 210 feet and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 24,137,000 acre-feet. It provides five power units, three units rated at 80,000 kilowatts each, and two units rated at 95,000 kilowatts each, three flood control tunnels and a gated spillway. Estimated Federal cost is $300,156,000 (1982) including $1,490,000 Code 710 funds and $4,208,000 for major rehabilitation. Non-Federal contribution in connection with widening Snake Creek Embankment was $687,000. Construction of the project was initiated in April 1946 and completed in 1966, except for recreational development using Code 710 funds. On September 30, 1982, pool elevation was 1845.0 and 20,804,000 acre-feet of water was impounded. Local cooperation. None required except cost sharing with the State of North Dakota for widening the Snake Creek Embankment. Operations during fiscal year. Public use facilities were constructed with Code 710 funds. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with the other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the fiscal year. Generating facilities produced 2,328,209,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity. Installation of a power plant controller system for the Missouri River dams continued. Contracts for rehabilitation of the townsite were initiated. Annual project visitation was estimated at 2,267,400. 30. GAVINS POINT DAM-LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, NE AND SD Location. On Missouri River in Yankton County, SD, and Knox County, NE, about 4 miles upstream from Yankton, SD, and 811.1 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. A concrete and rolled-earth-fill dam with a maximum height of 74 feet and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes with a gross storage capacity of 504,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. The power installation consists of three units rated at 33,333 kilowatts each. Cost estimate is $49,407,000 (1982), including $1,350,000 Code 710 funds. Construction of original project was initiated in March 1952 and was completed in 1964. Project is providing its multiple purpose benefits for flood control, navigation, power, and other uses. On.September 30, 1982, pool elevation was 1208.1 and a total volume of 447,000 acre-feet of water was impounded. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production and other multiple purpose uses. Generating units produced 711,998,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity during fiscal year. Installation of a power plant controller system for the Missouri River dams continued. Annual project visitation was estimated at 2,166,300. 31. OAHE DAM-LAKE OAHE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD AND ND Location. Dam is on Missouri River in Hughes and Stanley Counties, SD, about 6 miles northwest of Pierre, SD, and 1,072.3 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam with maximum height of 245 feet, a crest length of 9,300 feet, and reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 23,337,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. It contains seven power units rated at 85,000 kilowatts each. Estimated cost is $347;293,000 (1982) including $3,117,000 Code 710 funds. Construction was initiated August 1948 and project placed in operation June 1963. Land acquisition is 97 percent complete. On September 30, 1981, pool elevation was 1607.9 and a total volume of 19,166,000 acre-feet of water was impounded. Operations during fiscal year. Public use facilities were constructed with Code 710 funds. Maintenance: 21-8 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT Project was operated in conjunction with the other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production and other multiple purpose uses. Generating facilities produced 2,350,563,000 net kilowatthours of electricity. Installation of a power plant controller system on the Missouri River dams continued. Annual project visitation was estimated at 1,933,000. Miscellaneous 32. STREAMBANK EROSION CONTROL EVALUATION AND DEMONSTRATION PROJECT Location. Along the Missouri River between Garrison Dam and Lake Oahe, ND and between Fort Randall Dam and Sioux City, IA; along the Yellowstone River in Montana and North Dakota; and along undesignated rivers and streams in the Omaha District. Existing project. The project provides for development of new methods and techniques for bank protection. It consists of various experimental bank stabilization structures designed to stabilize the river banks and prevent further loss of land through erosion. Construction was initiated in November 1976 on the Missouri River between Garrison Dam and Lake Oahe and between Gavins Point Dam and Sioux City, IA. Construction was initiated in August 1978 on the Missouri River between Fort Randall Dam and Lewis & Clark Lake. Construction was initiated in October 1980 on the Yellowstone River between Intake, MT and the mouth. Except for the structure rehabilitation, construction is complete. Local cooperation. The sponsor is the North Dakota State Water Commission for the North Dakota portion of the Yellowstone River as well as the Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe portion. The sponsors for the Missouri River, Fort Randall Dam-Lewis & Clark Lake portion are the Lower Niobrara Natural Resources District, NE and the Charles Mix County Conservation District, SD. The sponsors for the Missouri River, Gavins Point Dam-Sioux City, IA portion are the Lewis and Clark Natural Resource District, NE, and Clay, Union, and Yankton Counties, SD. The sponsor for the Montana portion of the Yellowstone River are the Richland County Commissioners. The sponsor for the Powder River at Arvada, WY, is the Sheridan County Board of County Commissioners. The local sponsor is responsible for necessary lands, easements and rights of way and O&M after completion. Operations during fiscal year. Construction continued along the Missouri River in North Dakota in the Knife Point, Price, Fort Lincoln, Horseshoe Butte, Wildwood, Coal Lake Coulee, and Sandstone Bluff Areas. Structural rehabilitation was initiated on the Missouri River in North Dakota between Garrison Dam and Lake Oahe, in South Dakota and Nebraska between Fort Randall to Ponca, and on the Yellowstone River in North Dakota in the Cheney Creek Area. General Investigations 33. SURVEYS Costs for FY 1982 amounted to $1,582,277 of which $1,130,151 was for flood control studies, $119,636 review of authorized projects, and $157,421 for coordination studies with other agencies. 34. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Precipitation Studies) No work during the period. (Inspection of Dams) National Dam Safety Program Inspection of Dams - The inspection of all Non-Federal dams in the five state area of Colorado, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming is complete. Inventory of Dams - Work on the inventory of dams is complete. The total cost of this program since inception was $726,050. There are approximately 7,383 dams in the five state area assigned to the Omaha District. (Flood Plain Management Services) Flood Plain Information Reports - None. Work on the Cache la Poudre River Special Study was completed in FY 82. Cost during FY 82 was $4,853. Flood Plain Management Flood plain management service costs for the Omaha District were $69,347 and the costs for the Missouri River Division office were $45,790 during the fiscal year. Technical Services The costs for providing site investigations and flood hazard evaluations to military and non-military Federal agencies, state and local government agencies, and to individuals and businesses were $98,197. Hydrologic Studies Costs for hydrologic studies for the fiscal year were $23,563. 35. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT No work during the period. 36. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING No work during the period. 37. PLANNING AND ENGINEERING UNDER PROPOSED LEGISLATION No work during the period. 38. ADVANCED ENGINEERING AND DESIGN No work during the period. 39. TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS The Corps of Engineers is the lead agency in the ongoing National Waterways Study. This Study examines the characteristics of the National Waterways System, its past and present role in commerce and in meeting national needs, along with projections and recommendations for future development, and its relationship to other modes of transportation. In FY 1982 the Missouri River Waterway Study was completed. 21-9 TABLE 21-A See Section in Text Project Fort Peck, Lake MT 2. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE 4. Bear Creek Lake, CO 5. Big Sioux River at Sioux City, IA 6. Bowman-Haley Lake, ND 7. Chatfield Lake, CO 8. Cherry Creek Lake, CO 9. East Nishnabotna River at Red Oak, IA 10. Fall River Basin, SD 11. Frazer-Wolf Point, MT 12. Great Falls, MT 13. Lost Creek, Columbus,'NE 14. Miles City, MT REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1. Total Thru Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep 30, 1982 New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 78,000 73,757 772,000 1,678,085 155,000 180,579 238,000 255,230 22,000 22,863 1,000 1,500 127,000 117,287 111,000 9,360 -- 266,000 73,772 48,000 50,310 60,000 58,859 11,000 8,521 2,017,000 2,080,082 20,000 50,234 2,003,000 2,480,742 584,000 906,602 194,000 181,266 100,423 238,000 227,011 721,000 793,341 47,000 45,604 276,000 257,390 92,000 86,732 176,000 181,577 254,000 354,847 128,000 130,205 65,000 25,190 28,279 9F 7E 2,98 3,00f 1,69] 1,697 24 254 197 209 177 189 633 608 262 270 282 305 1,207 1,145 207 203 6 3,250 2,858 225 144 107,000 -4,344 459,670 -4,344 2,286,000 1,527,000 1,957,973 1,834,824 -15,000 218,000 119,709 193,201 2,315,000 2,645,000 2,320,798 2,426,596 4,442,000 1,158,000 4,522,765 791,523 - 107,000 - 96,470 2,335,000 -299,000 2,976,213 1,906,110 21-10 8,000 158,450,080 6,531 158,426,132 9,000 36,580,670 5,514 36,542,0445 - 189,225,9911 83 189,224,3011 1,000 95,212,4192 7,737 95,209,2522 2,000 61,533,600 4,530 61,452,818 7,000 498,000 ),971 487,707 - 7,458,934 - 7,458,934 - 4,372,174 - 4,372,174 7,000 1,126,043 ),624 1,122,143 ,000 86,534,700 3,748 86,429,087 2,000 929,800 ),880 926,365 - 15,053,364 - 15,053,364 2,000 3,074,511 i,660 3,073,600 1,000 1,799,016 i,430 1,791,700 - 5,538,432 - 5,538,432 1,000 1,914,141 ,571 1,899,817 - 435,000 3,343 435,000 ),000 4,042,1126 3,217 3,637,577 ,000 523,518 ,535 413,300 -800 282,2003 609 282,2003 60,500 63,448 1,385,000 399,622 174,000 173,474 246,000 225,347 20,000 48,221 18,000 17,500 429,000 455,479 -330,000 10,220 155,000 98,267 90,000 87,633 40,000 25,668 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Thru in Text Project 15. Missouri National Recreational River NE & SD 16. Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, ND 17. Missouri River, Kenslers Bend, NE, to Sioux City, IA 18. Missouri River, Levees, IA, NE, KS & MO 19. Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, NE 21. Pi~estem Lake, 22. Salt Creek and Tributaries, NE 27. Big Bend Dam- Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, SD 28. Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, Missouri River Basin, SD 29. Garrison Dam- Lake Sakakawea, Missouri River Basin, ND (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep 30, 1982 New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost Major Rehab Contrib. Cost 324,000. 507,543 -- 30,000 19,825 -481,000 130,628 100,000 115,903 139,000 143,547 189,000 206,678 - 574,000 529,665 243,000 254,198 2,954,000 2,918,494 13,000 69,348 4,016,000 3,951,419 729,000 615,762 4,535,500 4,577,923 500,000 391,189 60,000 268,994 33,000 38,533 286,000 279,727 -70,000 6,720 135,000 130,749 206,000 201,530 280,000 201,244 924,000 911,943 2,530,000 2,524,990 1,604 3,799,000 3,717,013 185,206 4,359,000 4,455,665 - _ 100,000 177,481 60,000 48,399 50,000 48,714 7,955,000 7,774,971 900,000 610,001 196,000 179,918 206,000 205,168 70,000 97,201 549,000 647,745 37,000 30,819 2,617,000 2,711,161 4,393,900 4,582,201 33,000 18,930 4,478,900 4,529,974 800 16,260 120,000 144,138 53,000 57,358 2,830,000 2,263,149 4,186,000 4,343,351 171,000 192,609 229,000 234,438 22,456 462,000 472,104 6,000 181 2,880,000 2,871,804 4,769,000 4,758,168 512,000 488,465 5,617,000 5,662,105 21-11 600,800 584,930 9,441,000 9,338,904 11,294,414 11,294,414 4,247,000 4,246,336 33,312,388 32,521,094 28,677,7627 29,561,433 763,000 762,915 9,277,545 9,277,545 1,385,000 1,384,133 12,197,6224 12,168,5224 4,827,475 4,823,729 107,187,597 107,187,597 28,676,974 28,638,0335 198,065,883 198,065,819 53,177,191 53,086,3805 295,442,613 295,403,771 60,796,020 60,727,1285 4,208,310 4,208,310 686,961 686,961 i i i REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Thru in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep 30, 1982 30. Gavins Point New Work: Dam-Lewis & Approp. 2,000 -1,000 - 8,000 49,239,239 Clark Lake, Cost 63,737 6 - 8,000 49,239,239 Missouri River Maint. Basin, SD Approp. 3,089,000 2,963,000 3,131,000 4,060,000 41,916,415 and NE Cost 3,338,313 2,929,868 3,196,104 4,126,591 41,947,8995 31. Oahe Dam-Lake New Work: Oahe, Missouri Approp. 128,000 - 9,000 - 344,590,603 River Basin, Cost 212,401 49,479 42,388 13,912 344,573,736 SD & ND Maint. Approp. 5,228,354 4,735,000 4,572,200 5,729,000 51,811,379 Cost 4,623,949 5,281,687 4,658,458 5,682,119 51,678,7725 32. Streambank New Work: Erosion Control Approp. 4,575,000 5,049,000 2,305,000 436,000 17,470,000 Evaluation and Cost 4,096,407 4,296,517 3,723,222 678,286 16,871,070 Demonstration Project 1. Includes $18,325,581 National Industrial Recovery 4. Includes $123,000 of government cost applicable Act funds, $8,625,718 Emergency Relief Funds, and to that portion of the project which is currenlty being $1,181,125 for previous project. carried in a deferred status. 2. Includes $325,122 for previous project and 5. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees, FY 82 only. $200,000 fiscal year 1968 supplemental appropriation 6. Includes $110,000 transferred to inactive portion funds. for planning cost. 3. Does not include $79,700 allocated for restudy of 7. Does not include $1,854,338 cost of inactive sites. the project. TABLE 21-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents 1. FORT PECK LAKE, MT Aug 30, 1935 Construction of earth dam. Included in Public H. Doc. 238, 73rd Cong., Works Administration program in 1933. 2nd Sess. May 18, 1938 Completion, maintenance, and operation of a hydroelectric powerplant, subject to certain provisions in act respecting transmission and sale of electric energy. Also authorizes installation of additional power-generating facilities by Secretary of War when deemed necessary in judgment of Bureau of Reclamation. Dec 22, 1944 Modified authorization to provide for full multiple H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 purpose operation. and 247, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. June 3, 1948 Payments to be made to school districts serving project as reimbursement for educational facilities (including transportation to and from school) to pupils who are dependents of persons engaged in construction, operation, and maintenance of projects. 2. MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE Jan 12, 1927 Appropriation of $12 million authorized for existing H. Doc. 1120, 60th Cong., project. 2nd Sess. July 3, 1930 Appropriation of $15 million additional allotments totaling $29,153,108 made by Public Works Administration under provisions of National Industrial Recovery Act of 1938, and $9,669,791 allotted under provisions of Emergency Relief Appropriations Act of 1935. Aug 30, 1935 For completion of project from mouth of Sioux H. Doc. 238, 73rd Cong., 2nd City, IA. Sess. Mar 2, 1945 For a channel of 9-foot depth and 300-foot width. H. Doc. 214, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. 21-12 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents 4. BEAR CREEK LAKE. CO Aug 13, 1968 Flood Control Act of 1968 Flood Control Act of 1962 Flood Control Act of 1950 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Dec 22, 1944 April 4, 1961 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 23, 1971 Flood Control Acts of 1955, 1965 Dec 21, 1981 Flood Control Act of 1950 National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 Flood Control Acts of 1963, 1968 Aug 18, 1941 June 30, 1948 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 A flood control reservoir for protection to metropolitan Denver, CO. BIG SIOUX RIVER AT SIOUX CITY, IA AND SD Local protection project consisting of levee & channel improvements. BOWMAN-HALEY LAKE, ND Flood control reservoir and water supply. CHATFIELD LAKE, CO Flood control reservoir and channel improvements to provide downstream protection at Denver, CO. CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO Initiation and partial accomplishment of project. Completion of plan approved in Act of Aug 18, 1941. General comprehensive plan, Missouri River Basin. EAST NISHNABOTNA RIVER AT RED OAK, IA Levee and appurtenant structures on left bank of the East Nishnabotna River at Red Oak, IA. FALL RIVER BASIN, SD Provide flood control to the town of Hot Springs, SD. FRAZER-WOLF POINT, MT Bank stabilization to protect existing water treatment plant. GREAT FALLS, MT Levees and channel improvement for local protection. LOST CREEK AT COLUMBUS, NE Levee and channel improvement for local protection. MILES CITY, MT Construction of levee to protect the city. . -- PL 92/222, 92nd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 343, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. PL 97/140 H. Doc. 216, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER, NE AND SD Preservation and enhancement of the Missouri PL 95/625 River between the reaches from Gavins Point Dam, NE & SD to Ponca State Park, NE. MISSOURI RIVER, GARRISON DAM TO LAKE OAHE, ND Bank stabilization and rectification. H. Doc. 343, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. MISSOURI RIVER, KENSLERS BEND, NE TO SIOUX CITY, IA Construction of dike, revetments. H. Doc. 821, 76th.Cong., 3rd Sess. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IA, NE, KS, AND MO. Levees along both sides of river from H. Doc. 821, 76th Cong., 3rd Sioux City, IA to Kansas City, MO. Sess. Extended project from Kansas City, MO to mouth H. Doc. 475, 78th Cong., 2nd and provided for increased protection. Sess. S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. 21-13 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. S. Doc. 87, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 94, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 574, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. PL 516, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 426, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 426, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 475, and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. PL 685, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 655, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents 19. Flood Control Act of 1968 20. June 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sep 3, 1954 Sep 3, 1954 May 2, 1956 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Dec 30, 1963 June 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Aug 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec 24, 1970 Dec 23, 1971 Mar 7, 1974 July 8, 1976 Nov 16, 1977 PAPILLION CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES LAKES, NE Series of flood control reservoirs, providing pro- H. Doc. 349, 90th Cong. tection to the metropolitan areas of Omaha, NE. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (OMAHA DIST.) Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri Flood Control Committee River Basin and authorized $9 million for Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong., 3rd Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Sess. Republican River, NE and authorized additional $7 million. Expanded general comprehensive plan for H. Doc. 475, and S Docs. 191 Missouri River Basin and authorized additional and 247, 78th Cong., 2nd Ses $200 million. Authorized additional $150 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $250 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri H. Docs. 549 and 642, 81st River Basin and authorized additional Cong., 2nd Sess. $217,710,000. Authorized $5,384,014 to compensate Sioux Indians for reservation lands required for Oahe, South Dakota project. Modified general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin by deletion of construction of Red Willow Dam and Reservoir, NE, and addition of construction of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, KS. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri H. Doc. 409, 84th Cong., 2nd River Basmin and authorized additional $200 Sess. million Authorized additional $207 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $80 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and modified the plan to include work protection and rectification works below Garrison Dam. Authorized additional $116 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $20 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $38 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Misosuri River Basin. Authorized additional $109 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Misosuri River Basin. Change comprehensive plan name to Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $101 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $72 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $85 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $59 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. S. H. Doc. 91-748 and S. Doc. 91-895. S. Doc. 91-1100, 91st Cong., 2nd Sess. 21-14 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents 21. 22. 23. Water Resource Development Acts of 1974 & 1976 Flood Control Act of 1965 July 3, 1958 May 17, 1950 May 12, 1967 Aug 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec 23, 1971 Mar 7, 1974 July 8, 1976 Nov 16, 1977 Dec 22, 1944 Dec 22, 1944 Dec 22, 1944 PWA 1968 Dec 22, 1944 Dec 22, 1944 PIPESTEM LAKE, ND Provide flood control for Jamestown and downstream areas. SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE Series of dams and channel improvements for flood control around Lincoln, NE. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, CO Adopted plan of improvement for South Platte River Basin and authorized $26.3 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Authorized additional $2 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $12 million for prosecution of plan and Bear Creek Lake. Authorized additional $21 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $37 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $15 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $22 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $3 million for prosecution of plan. BIG BEND DAM - LAKE SHARPE, SD Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. FORT RANDALL DAM - LAKE FRANCIS CASE, SD Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong., 3rd control and other purposes in the Missouri Sess. River Basin. GARRISON DAM - LAKE SAKAKAWEA, ND Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess. GAVINS POINT DAM - LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE, NE & SD Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong., 3rd control and other purposes in the Missouri Sess. River Basin. OAHE DAM - LAKE OAHE, SD & NE Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess. STREAMBANK EROSION CONTROL EVALUATION AND DEMONSTRATION PROJECT Experimental bank stabilization methods to PL 93/251 prevent losses due to erosion. 21-15 H. Doc. 266, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 396, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 669, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. TABLE 21-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1982 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Fort Benton, MT Complete 1948 3,123,141 644,863 Small Navigation Project at Sioux City, IA Complete 1970 43,582 TABLE 21-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1982 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Belle Fourche, Cheyenne River, SD 1 Blackbird Creek Near Macy, NE2 Boulder Creek, Boulder, CO Buffalo Creek, Meadow Grove, NE 2 Buffalo Creek, Scranton, ND 2 Buffalo, WY Castlewood Lake, Cherry Creek and Tributaries, CO City of Aurora, Westerly Creek, CO Clarkson, NE, Maple Creek Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1936) Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1944) Davids Creek Lake, IA (Act of 1968) Dry Creek, Hawarden, IA Eagle Bay and Fort Yates Highway Bridges, N.D. Floyd River, Sioux City, IA Forsyth, MT Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake Relocation of Niobrara, NE Gering Valley, NE Glasgow, MT Greybull, WY Havre, MT Herreid, Spring Creek, SD Hooper, NE2 Ida Grove, IA2 Jamestown Reservoir, ND Linton, ND2 Little Papillion Creek, NE Little Nemaha River, NE Little Sioux River and Tributaries, IA Loup River, Columbus, NE 2 Lower Big Sioux River, IA and SD Lower Heart River, ND McCook Lake, SD Madison, NE, Union and Taylor Creeks " Mandan, Heart River, ND Marmarth, ND Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Inactive Inactive Complete Complete Complete Complete Inactive Complete Inactive Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Inactive Complete Inactive Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete 1940 1970 1976 1974 1960 1961 1943 1955 1967 1939 1954 1972 1964 1978 1970 1950 1980 1971 1939 1960 1958 1954 1968 1972 1950' 1973 1976 1973 1970 1973 1966 1964 1958 1967 1960 1960 37,410 262,479 142,666 293,016 102,980 150,000 191,282 2,557,680 400,000 616,639 11,556,667 255,177 13,516,459 5,989,663 16,832 248,507 1,825,881 50,216 326,667 522,344 3,643,111 15,482,920 1,000,000 1,961,173 147,627 234,839 676,916 169,498 21-16 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT TABLE 21-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Full Report Cost to September 30, 1982 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Miles City, MT Inactive 1956 - - Missouri River, Aten, NE Complete 1951 578,791 - Missouri River, Niobrara, NE Complete 1945 99,370 5,633 Mott, ND Deferred - - - Mud Creek, Broken Bow, NE 2 Complete 1976 1,000,000 - Nishnabotna River at Hamburg, IA Complete 1948 236,000 - Norfolk, NE Complete 1971 3,400,504 - Omaha, NE Complete 1954 5,903,640 - Pierce, NE Complete 1967 296,597 - Platte River Near Schuyler, NE2 Complete 1948 74,940 - Platte River and Lost Creek, Schuyler, NE Complete 1971 257,398 - Platte River and Tributaries, NE Inactive - 1,538,269 - Cedar Canyon Dam, Rapid City, SD Complete 1960 120,482 - Saco, MT Complete 1958 67,793 - Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton, SD Complete 1978 184,380 - Sheridan, WY3 Complete 1976 1,966,809 - Shields River, Near Clyde Park, MT 2 Complete 1951 25,747 Shoshone River, Lovell, WY Complete 1963 14,350 - Sioux Falls, SD Complete 1966 5,288,707 - Vaughn, MT, Sun River 2 Complete 1971 457,582 - South Platte River Levees and Channel Improvements, Chatfield Lake to Ft. Morgan, CO Inactive 1957 - - Waterloo, NE Complete 1970 237,883 - West Point, NE Complete 1966 149,596 - Yellowstone River, W. Glendive, MT Complete 1960 230,294 1. Completed as a Public Works Administration project. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 3. Includes inactive segment. TABLE 21-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Sec. 201, FC Act 1950 Billings, MT 1976 23 Mar 81 75,000 - Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 Dayton, WY 1956 5 Aug 77 - - Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 Giles Creek, Elkhorn, NE 1952 6 Nov 77 - - Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 Indian Creek Lake, IA 1969 4 Jan 74 135,000 - Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA Of 1974 Morrison, Bear Creek, CO 1950 5 Aug 77 30,000 - Sec. 12, PL 93-251 Redwater River and WRDA of 1974 Hay Creek, Bell Fourche, SD 1966 4 Jan 74 1,000 - 21-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 21-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Federal Contributed Full Report Date Funds Funds See Annual and Expended Expended Project Report For Authority Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 Shell Creek, NE 1962 3 Oct 78 71,000 - Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 Vermillion River and Tribs, SD 1968 4 Jan 74 208,000 - TABLE 21-H MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 (See Section 2 of Text) Cost Funding New Work Maintenance Total Regular Funds 162,273,002 95,212,419 257,485,421 Public Works Funds 18,325,581 - 18,325,581 Emergency Relief Funds 8,625,718 - 8,625,718 Total Funds 189,224,301 95,212,419 284,436,720 TABLE 21-I MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM (See Section 18 of Text) Miles of Unit Levee Status L627-624 Mosquito Creek Levee 14.2 Complete 1950 L601 Watkins-Waubonsie Ditch Levees 15.0 Complete 1966 L594 Pleasant Valley Levee 11.4 Complete 1964 R580 Nebraska City Levee 0.2 Complete 1950 L575 Thurman-Hamburg Levee 45.8 Complete 1950 R573 Otto County Drainage District No. 2 5.9 Complete 1950 R562 Peru Dike 7.6 Complete 1950 L561-550 Atchison County Levee District No. 1 41.3 Complete 1952 R548 Brownville-Nemaha Levee 19.5 Complete 1952 L536 Mill Creek Levee 13.6 Complete 1952 R520 Richardson County Drainage Dist. No. 8 6.3 ' Complete 1960 R613 Papillion Creek-Platte River Levee 14.0 Complete 1971 R616 Bellevue-Papillion Creek Levees 4.5 Under Court Injunction L611-614 Mosquito-Keg Creek Levees 22.0 Under Construction L627, L624, L561-550 Remedial Studies on Completed Units Studies Complete 21-18 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE TERMINAL FACILITIES (See Section 2 of Text) As of September 30, 1982 Description of Facility Sioux City Municipal Dock Kay Dee Feed Co. (Nutra Flo) Big Soo Terminal Dock Jebro Inc. Sioux By-Products Terra Chemical International Farmland Industries Farmland Industries Blencoe (N.F.O.) Spencer Chemical (Gulf Oil Corp. Term) Consolidated Blenders Inc. Agrico Chemical Co. Ft. Calhoun Stone Co. Terminal Far-Mar-Co. Pentzien, Inc. Missouri Portland Cement Co. Heartland Terminal Greater Omaha Marina Cargill, Inc. Molasses Terminal Omaha Municipal Dock, Sioux City & New Orleans MacMillan Oil Co., Inc. Farmland Industries, Inc. Cargill Inc. Terminal Terminal Packaging Corp. Namalco, Inc. Allied Chemical Corp. Far-Mar-Co. Steinhart Bulk Plant Terminal Nebraska City Municipal Dock Bartlett Grain Co. Terminal Steinhart Terminal Dock Consolidated Blenders, Inc. Continental Grain Company Kentopp Grain Co. Terminal Quad State Terminal, Inc. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM TABLE 21-K (See Section 20 of Text) Estimated Estimated Project Federal Cost Non-Federal Cost Fort Pack Lake, MT1 ,2 158,487,426 - Garrison Dam, Lake Sakakawea, ND 1 300,155,651 687,000 Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS and MO (Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE)1 ,3 36,500,000 4,600,000 Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe SD and ND 1 347,293,203 - Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, SD1 ,2 107,378,597 - Fort Randall Dam, Lake Francis Case, SD1 ,2 198,979,000 720,000 Gavins Point Dam, Lewis & Clark Lake, SD & NE1,2 49,406,550 - Gavins Point Dam, Lewis & Clark Lake, SD & NE-Relocation of Niobrara, NE 2 13,516,459 - Omaha, NE2 5,903,640 362,000 Council Bluffs, IA 2 2,557,680 145,800 Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, ND 1 9,441,000 270,000 Cherry Creek Lake, CO1,2 15,214,364 - 1 Details presented on individual report. 2 Completed. 21-19 3 Active portion of project. TABLE 21-J Miles Above Mouth 731.3 731.2 727.8 727.5 727.0 718.7 717.0 716.6 680.6 648.5 648.2 647.7 640.4 624.8 624.5 624.2 624.0 617.9 616.3 616.3 614.55 614.45 614.4 614.1 612.2 595.3 584.5 562.6 562.4 562.4 562.3 561.8 535.5 535.25 503.0 Bank Left Left Left Left Left Left Left Left Left Right Right Right Right Right Right Right Right Right Right Right Left Left Left Left Right Right Right Right Right Right Right Right Right Right Left Nearest Town Sioux City, IA Sioux City, IA Sioux City, IA Sioux City, IA Sioux City, IA Sioux City, IA Sioux City, IA Sioux City, IA Blencoe, IA Blair, NE Blair, NE Blair, NE Ft. Calhoun, NE Omaha, NE Omaha, NE Omaha, NE Omaha, NE Omaha, NE Omaha, NE Omaha, NE Council Bluffs, IA Council Bluffs, IA Council Bluffs, IA Council Bluffs, IA Omaha, NE Omaha, NE Rock Bluff, NE Nebraska City, NE Nebraska City, NE Nebraska City, NE Nebraska City, NE Nebraska City, NE Brownville, NE Brownville, NE Mound City, MO REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 21-L (See Section 24 of Text) Location Month Inspected Montana Glasgow, Milk River Sep 82 Saco, Beaver Creek Sep 82 Havre, Milk River Sep 82 Havre, Scott Coulee-Bull Hook Dam Sep 82 Clyde Park, Shields River May 82 Three Forks, Lower Madison River May 82 Forsythe, Yellowstone River May 82 West Glendive, Yellowstone River May 82 Vaughn, Sun River Sep 82 *Yellowstone River, Water Plant, Livingston May 82 *Yellowstone River, Reedpoint Bridge Inactive *Yellowstone River, Greycliff Bridge May 82 *Yellowstone River, Springdale Bridge Inactive *Yellowstone River, Near Miles City Water Intake & Sewage Lagoon Inactive *Yellowstone River, Bank Protection, Billings Inactive *Yellowstone River, Yellowstone Co. Bridge, Near Billings May 82 *Yellowstone River, Voges Bridge, Near Big Timber May 82 *Jefferson River, Willow Creek Bridge, Near Three Forks May 82 *Jefferson River, Bank Protection, Near Waterloo May 82 *Big Hole River, Pennington Bridge, Near Twin Bridges May 82 *Ruby River, Wheatly Bridge, Near Twin Bridges May 82 *Big Horn River, Two Leggin Bridge, Near Hardin Inactive *Missouri River, Bank Stabilization, Fort Benton Sep 82 Wyoming Greybull, Big Horn River Jun 82 Sheridan, Big and Little Goose Creeks Jun 82 *Shoshone River, Bank Protection, Lovell Jun 82 North Dakota Mandan, Lower Heart River Jun 82 Marmarth, Little Missouri River Jun 82 Scranton, Buffalo Jun 82 South Dakota Sioux Falls, Big Sioux River Jul 82 Belle Fourche, Belle Fourche River Sep 82 Rapid City, Cedar Canyon Dam Sep 82 Hot Springs, Fall River Channel Sep 82 Herreid, Spring Creek Sep 82 *Missouri River, Bank Protection, Greenwood Jun 82 *Bad River, Bank Protection, Fort Pierre May 82 *Big Sioux River, Schofield Bridge, Near Flandreau Aug 82 *Big Sioux River, Fink Bridge, Near Flandreau Aug 82 Rapid Creek, Rapid City Sep 82 Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton May 82 21-20 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 21-L (Continued) (See Section 24 of Text) Location Month Inspected Colorado Aurora, Westerly Creek-Kelley Road Dam Aug 82 *Plum Creek, Bank Stabilization, Aurora Aug 82 *South Platte River, Bank Protection, Denver Aug 82 *Cache La Poudre River, Ft. Collins Aug 82 Nebraska Omaha, Missouri River Aug 82 Waterloo, Elkhorn River Aug 82 West Point, Elkhorn River Jul 82 Pierce, Elkhorn River Jun 82 Clarkson, Middle Fork, Maple Creek Jul 82 Hooper, Elkhorn River Aug 82 Norfolk, North Fork, Elkhorn River Jun 82 Madison, Union & Taylor Creeks Aug 82 *Platte River, M.U.D. Protection, Cedar Island Jul 82 *Platte River, Bank Protection, Louisville Aug 82 *Elkhorn River, Q Street Bridge, Near Gretna Aug 82 *Elkhorn River, Ray Bridge, Near Norfolk May 82 *North Platte River, Bank Stabilization, Minatare Mar 82 *Logan Creek, Bank Protection, Near Bancroft May 82 *Battle Creek, Bank Protection, Battle Creek May 82 Schuyler, Platte River Jul 82 Schuyler, Lost Creek & Platte River Jul 82 Little Papillion, Little Papillion Creek May 82 Gering Valley, Gering Drain & Tributaries Jul 82 Macy, Blackbird Creek Mar 82 Lincoln, Salt Creek & Tributaries Jul 82 Meadow Grove, Buffalo Creek May 82 Columbus, Loup River Jul 82 Broken Bow, Mud Creek Apr 82 *Tangeman, Little Nemaha River Aug 82 *Julian, Rock Creek Aug 82 Iowa Council Bluffs, Missouri River Ju182 Ida Grove, Maple River-Odebolt Creek Apr 82 Sioux City, Floyd River Jul 82 Hawarden, Dry Creek Apr 82 Hamburg L575, Nishnabotna River Jul 82 Intercounty D.D., Little Sioux River Sep 8 2 Nagel D.D., Little Sioux River Sep 82 Bennett-McDonald-Smithland D.D., Little Sioux River Sep 82 *West Nishnabotna River, Mills Co. Bridge, Near Malvern Mar 82 *West Nishnabotna River, Mills Co. Bridge, Near Hastings Mar 82 *East Nishnabotna River, Page Co. Bridge, Near Essex May 82 *Missouri River, Marina, Sioux City Sep 82 *West Nishnabotna River, Near Hancock Mar 82 *East Nishnabotna River, Near Griswold Mar 82 21-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 21-L (Continued) (See Section 24 of Text) Location Month Inspected Missouri River Levees L624 & L627, Mosquito Creek & Sieck Levees L601, Watkins Levee District L601, Miller-Sturgeon Levee District L601, Missouri River Levee District #1 L594, Waubansie Drainage District L594, Pleasant Valley Levee District L575, Benton-Washington Levee District L575, Northwest Atchison Levee District L575, McKissock Island Levee District L575, Buchannan Levee District L561, L550, L536, Atchison County Levee District R613, Sarpy Co. Soil & Water Cons. D. R562, Peru Levee District R548, Brownville-Nemaha Levee District R548, Little Nemaha Levee District R520, Richardson Co. Levee Dist. #8 R573, Otoe County Drainage Dist. #2 *Denotes Section 14 Projects FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 21-M (See Section 26 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Cost (Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as Amended) (Preauthorization) Beaverhead River, Dillon, MT Cache La Poudre River, Greeley, CO Lost Creek, Columbus, NE Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE Prairie-Silver Creeks, Grand Island, NE Rapid City, SD West Nishnabotna River, Red Oak, IA Lodgepole Creek, Sidney, NE Sun River, Ft. Shaw, MT TOTAL Sep 82 May 82 May 82 Sep 82 Sep 82 Sep 82 Aug 82 Jul 82 Jul82 Jul 82 Aug 82 Apr 82 Apr 82 Aug 82 Aug 82 Jun 82 Jul 82 $4,067 $7,416 $144,535 $107,252 $19,197 $32 $1,145,430 $71,961 $7,459 $1,507,349 21-22 OHIO RIVER * For actual construction of locks and dams, and operation and care of completed structures, river is divided into three sections under immediate supervision and direction of district engineers at Pittsburgh, Huntington and Louisville. Pittsburgh section extends 127 miles from head of river at Pittsburgh, Pa., to a point immediately upstream from New Martinsville, W. Va., and includes Emsworth, Dashields, Montgomery, New Cumberland, Pike Island and Hannibal locks and dams. Huntington section extends 311 miles from mile 127 to 438 immediately upstream from Foster, Ky., and includes Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Gallipolis, Greenup and Captain Anthony Meldahl locks and dams. Louisville section extends 543 miles from mile 438 to mouth of river, and includes Markland and McAlpine locks and dams (with Louisville and Portland Canal) Cannelton, Newburgh, Uniontown and Smithland locks and dams and locks and dams 52 and 53. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Construction of locks and dams on Ohio River ................................... 22-1 2. Open channel work, Ohio River .............. 22-3 Tables Table 22-A Cost & Financial Statement ............ 22-5 Table 22-B Authorizing Legislation .............. 22-5 Trable 22-C Not Applicable Table 22-D Not Applicable Table 22-E Not Applicable Navigation 1. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS ON OHIO RIVER Location. Ohio River is formed by junction of Allegheny and Monongahela Rivers at Pittsburgh, Pa., and flows generally southwesterly for 981 miles to join Mississippi River near Cairo, Ill. For description of river see page 1227, 1932 Annual Report. Previous projects. For details see page 1907 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for improvement of entire river by construction of locks and dams to provide a channel depth of 9 feet and for widening Louisville and Portland Canal at Louisville, Ky. Project provides for a lock with usable dimensions of 110 by 600 feet at each of the dams and, in addition, an auxiliary lock 56 by 360 feet is available at Emsworth, Dashields, Montgomery, and McAlpine locks and dams with an auxiliary lock at Gallipolis being 110 by 360 feet. Dashields is a fixed dam, while Emsworth, Montgomery, and Gallipolis are fixed dams with movable crests. Remaining dams are movable type, with navigable pass varying in width from 600 to 1,248 feet. In addition to navigable pass, movable-type 'Tlable 22-F Not Applicable Table 22-G Not Applicable Table 22-H Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River, Total Cost of Existing Project ................ 22-6 Table 22-I Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Licenses of Locks and Dams, Ohio River .......... .22-6 Table 22-J Ohio River Locks and Dams Statistics ......................... 22-7 dams are also provided with one or more regulating weirs. At McAlpine locks and dam a canal (Louisville, and Portland) extends along left bank for 2 miles, with locks at lower end. Modifications to existing project under purview of Section 6, March 3, 1909 Act, provide for fixed dams with movable crests with two locks (110 by 1,200 feet and 110 by 600 feet) at New Cumberland, Pike Island, Hannibal, Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Greenup, Captain Anthony Meldahl, Markland, Cannelton, Newburgh and Uniontown, two locks 110 by 1,200 feet at Smithland, 110 by 1,200 foot temporary locks in addition to the existing locks at locks and dams 52 and 53, and reconstruction to provide a 110 by 1,200 foot lock in addition to existing locks and a fixed dam with two sections of movable crest at McAlpine locks and dam, widening Louisville and Portland Canal to 500 feet. Rehabilitation of existing locks and dams 52 and 53 was started in September 1979 under the purview of Section 6, March 1909 Act. Mound City was also considered authorized under purview of 1909 Act, and preconstruction planning was performed in the period 1965 to 1972. The ruling of the U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, on September 6, 1974, with reference to Lock and Dam 26, Mississippi River, would also apply to this project. Consequently, it is no longer considered 22-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 authorized. Operation and care of locks and dams were included in project July 1, 1935, under provisions of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. Estimated Federal cost of new work (existing project)(1982), exclusive of Gallipolis locks and dam reported under Kanawha River project is $1,727,094,245, estimated non-Federal cost is $14,999,000. Foregoing estimate does not include expenditures on previous projects. Various items previously included in this project are considered inactive or unnecessary and are excluded from foregoing cost estimate. See page 693, Annual Report, 1968 for items and estimated cost. Under authority of 1910 River and Harbor Act. Louisville and Portland Canal was widened to 200 feet; locks and dams 40 and 42 eliminated; locks and dams 1 and 2 replaced by Emsworth locks and dam; lock and dam 3 replaced by Dashields locks and dam; and locks and dams 4, 5 and 6 replaced by Montgomery locks and dam. Locks and dams 24, 25 and 26 were replaced by Gallipolis locks and dam authorized by August 30, 1935 Act, and constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River. Locks and dams 7, 8 and 9 were replaced by New Cumberland locks and dam, locks and dams 10 and 11 were replaced by Pike Island locks and dam, locks and dams 12, 13 and 14 were replaced by Hannibal locks and dam, locks and dams 15, 16 and 17 were replaced by Willow Island locks and dam, locks and dams 18, 19 and 20 were replaced by Belleville locks and dam, locks and dams 21, 22 and 23 were replaced by Racine locks and dam, locks and dams 27, 28, 29 and 30 were replaced by Greenup locks and dam, locks and dams 31, 32, 33 and 34 were replaced by Captain Anthony Meldahl locks and dam, locks and dams 35, 36, 37, 38 and 39 were replaced by Markland locks and dam, the Louisville and Portland Canal at McAlpine locks and dam was widened to 500 feet. Locks and dams 43, 44 and 45 were replaced by Cannelton locks and dam, locks and dams 46 and 47 were replaced by Newburgh locks and dam, locks and dams .48 and 49 were replaced by Uniontown locks and dam presently under construction, and locks and dam 50 and 51 were replaced by Smithland locks and dam, presently under construction, as modifications to existing project under purview of Section 6, March 3, 1909 Act, reducing total number of structures to 20. The Water Resources Development Act of 1974 combined the Newburgh Bank Protection Works project with the Newburgh locks and dam project. Table 22-J contains data relative to various features of locks and dams included in existing project. For list of principal towns and cities along Ohio River with their mileage below Pittsburgh, PA, see page 1060, 1962 Annual Report. See Table 22-I for licenses. Navigation system of 21 locks and dams is in operation and 9-foot navigation throughout length of river is generally available at all times. At certain unstable bars project depth is maintained by dredging, supplemented by contraction works. (See "Open Channel Work, Ohio River.") Table 22-J shows cost and year completion of locks and dams now in operation. Existing project does not provide adequate facilities for present day navigation due to obsolescence of structures. Since repair and modernization of these facilities would be extremely costly, replacement and reconstruction is being accomplished as rapidly as funds are made available for the purpose. Construction of lock and dam replacement program was initiated in fiscal year 1955. New Cumberland, Pike Island, Hannibal, Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Greenup, Captain Anthony Meldahl, Markland, McAlpine, Cannelton, Newburgh, Uniontown and Smithland ,replacement locks and dams are inoperation, replacing 39 old low-lift locks and dams. For total cost of existing project, see Table 22-H. Terminal facilities. Modern public terminals, with warehouses, equipped with operating machinery for transferring materials, have been constructed by private interests at some of the larger cities and towns. A list of terminals on Ohio River is revised annually and can be obtained from Division Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer Division, Ohio River, Cincinnati, Ohio. Operations during fiscal year. New work by contract and hired labor: Emsworth locks and dams (rehabilitation): Upper lock miter gates, 110-foot chamber, were installed by hired labor in October 1981. Contract for Locks and Dams Rehabilitation, awarded Oct 15, 1981, progressed to 26 percent completion. Dam work included placing stone erosion protection downstream of both back channel and main channel, structurally rehabilitating seven of 14 dam gates and painting of the service bridge on main channel dam. Lock work included: rehabilitation of the river chamber, below pool, and upper and lower guard cells, and work on the machinery and lock walls. Expenditures during FY 1982 for real estate acquisition and coordination, construction, and engineering and design of remaining project was $10,081,417. Willow Island locks and dam: Construction initiated in January 1967 is complete except for recreation facilities and visitors center at the locks site. A total of $87,373 was expended during the fiscal year for channel dredging and engineering studies. Belleville locks and dam: Construction work complete except for additional recreation facilities under the completed projects program. During the period $117,726 was expended under recreation at completed projects. Racine locks and dam: Construction initiated in June 1964 is complete. Gallipolis locks and dam: The existing project, constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River, was placed in operation in August 1937. The dimensions of the existing lock chambers and poor approach conditions, particularly to downstream traffic, have created a higher than normal accident rate to the structure with corresponding hazards and delays to traffic. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 authorized Phase I studies for a single 1,200 foot lock in a bypass canal. These studies are underway. Greenup locks and dam: Construction work complete except for additional recreation facilites under the completed projects program. Captain Anthony Meldahl locks and dam: Construction work complete. Markland locks and dam: Project is complete including a public highway bridge across the navigation structure, as authorized by the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-606). For details of bridge see page 22-3 of Annual Report for 1978. 22-2 OHIO RIVER McAlpine locks and dam: Project is complete except for alteration of lift section of railroad bridge that spans the upper end of the Louisville and Portland canal which work is presently deferred. Cannelton locks and dams: Project was completed except final items on rehabilitation of one boat ramp and paving repairs at another boat ramp: $833,411. Newburgh locks and dams: Project was completed except engineering study of need for additional corrective work and extended warranty for the centralized remote control and surveillance system: $215,579. Uniontown locks and dams: Project remained at 99 percent complete. Land acquisition is complete except for continuing action on Declarations of Taking on several tracts. One contract for boat ramp, road and parking was completed and another contract for similar work at another recreation site was advanced to 99 percent completion. Contract for landscaping and miscellaneous items was completed. Electric service and security lights were advanced to 98 percent completion. Engineering and design for landscaping and miscellaneous items for the last two recreation sites was completed: $653,700. Smithland locks and dams: All major construction features are complete and the project was advanced to 95 percent completion. Land acquisition remained at 95 percent completion. Work on the dam was completed in November 1980; however, final payment has not been made pending settlement of all claims. Alterations to Millstone, IL Water District facilities and Rosiclare, IL drainage and water structures were advanced to 27 percent and 17 percent completion, respectively. Contract for fabrication of floating mooring bitt extensions was awarded in August 1982. Engineering and design of remaining project features was continued: $2,759,545. Lock and Dam No. 53 (Temporary Lock): Project was completed with final payment made on contract for temporary lock: $1,396,167. Locks and Dam No. 52 (Rehabilitation): Project is 57 percent complete. Hired labor repair of beartraps, leaves and installation of machinery was completed. Four supply contracts for wicket assemblies and hurters were advanced to 48 percent completion. Contract for fabrication of miter gates was advanced to 54 percent completion. Contract to restore dam pier No. 1 and lock structures was awarded in December 1981 and advanced to 51 percent completion. Contract for stone protection awarded in May 1982 was completed. Engineering and design of remaining project features was continued: $3,768,558. Locks and Dam No. 53 (Rehabilitation): Project is 41 percent complete. Restoration of lockwall rails was completed. Four supply contracts for wicket assemblies and hurters were advanced to 50 percent completion. Contract for fabrication of miter gates was advanced to 46 percent completion. Contract to restore machinery and equipment for 600-foot lode, awarded in August 1982, was advanced to 1 percent completion. Continued engineering and design for remaining project features: $1,209,315. Operation and maintenance, general. Locks and dams operated as required and necessary repairs and improvements made thereto and to operator's quarters, grounds and esplanades. Reconnaissance report for Major Rehabilitation of Montgomery Locks and Dam, Ohio River, was approved by OCE on Sep 8, 1982. Costs were $8,266,144 for Pittsburgh District, $9,297,958 for Huntington District and $10,084,703 for Louisville District. 2. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER Location. Under jurisdiction of district engineer in whose district the work is located. Portion of river included in project extends 974.7 miles from head of river at Pittsburgh, Pa., to mouth of Cache River (Mound City, Ill.). Open channel improvement from mouth of Cache River to mouth of Ohio River is under jurisdiction of Mississippi River Commission. Existing project. Before completion of canalization project, no project depth had been fixed by Congress under project for open channel work, but in order to properly aid packet and barge navigation it was necessary to secure a low-water channel with a minimum depth of from 4 to 6 feet, and a width, depending upon difficulty of running channel, of from 400-600 feet; also to permit movement of large coal tows, which movement occurred at stages of water exceeding 10 feet, it was necessary to remove points of projecting bars which formed at various locations along river. Accomplishment of this purpose involved concentration of current by closing back channels at islands with low dams, contraction and straightening wide open channels by low dikes, dredging bars and shoals, and removal of snags and wrecks. Incidental to direct improvement of Ohio River is construction and maintenance of ice piers as required for protection of river craft. Stage of extreme high water on Ohio River varies from 46 feet at Pittsburgh, Pa., to 80 feet at Cincinnati, Ohio, with 57.2 feetat Louisville, Ky. (head of falls), 53.8 feet at Evansville, Ind., and 59.5 feet at Cairo, Ill. (mouth of river). Estimated cost of new work (1960) is $16,160,000, exclusive of following items which are considered inactive: Ice piers authorized by 1927 River and Harbor Act; reforestation of sloughs on Kentucky Peninsula near Evansville, Ind., authorized by 1930 River and Harbor Act; dredging to widen channel at certain points; and placing revetment at various points. Estimated cost of these items (1954) is $6,565,000. Operation of snag boats on Ohio River below Pennsylvania State line was included in project July 1, 1935, under provisions of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. See Table 22-B for authorizing legislation. New Work under this project is substantially complete, since it is not anticipated that work on inactive portion of project will be accomplished. In addition to dredging, local stabilization of channel has been effected at various points by construction of dikes and revetment. Work which remains consists of dredging to widen channels at certain points to project depth. Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of January 21, 1927, authorizing construction of ice piers for general open channel work, imposes condition that before work is begun on any pier, local interests convey to the United States free of cost such riparian rights as may be deemed necessary in connection with the improvement at locality (H. Doc. 187, 67th Cong., 2nd sess.). Existing ice piers are 22-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 adequate for present purposes and local cooperation is not needed since no additional construction is under consideration. River and Harbor Act of July 3, 1930, provides for reforestation of sloughs of Kentucky Peninsula and bank protection and that no expense shall be incurred by the United States for acquiring lands required for purpose of this improvement (H. Doc. 409, 69th Cong., 1st sess.). However, since no serious overbank erosion has occurred since bank revetment in 1933-34, reforestation is not considered justifiable at this time and no local cooperation is required. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Dredging was done where required to provide an adequate and dependable channel of project depth at minimum pool condition. Dikes and revetments were maintained and routine work of maintaining navigation aids, removing snags, making channel studies, hydrographic surveys and mapping was performed as required. Channel soundings, hydrographic surveys, stream gaging operations, channel inspections and aids to navigation, and miscellaneous inspections and reports cost $822,634. There was no dredging by hired labor on the Ohio River in FY 82. Dredging by contract: Pittsburgh District: A contract for dredging lower approaches, Hannibal and Pike Island Locks and Dams, Ohio River, WV was awarded Sep 28, 1982 for $334,320. Huntington District 1,669,500 cubic yards at $2,970,000 and Louisville District 1,213,676 cubic yards at $1,840,841. 22-4 OHIO RIVER TABLE 22-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 1. Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River 2. Open Channel Work, Ohio River New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 1. Includes $17,003,761 for previous 6-foot canalization project. 2. Includes $36,943,217 expended from 1885 to 1937 on operation and care of work of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriations for such purposes. 3. Includes $215,812 public works acceleration, executive 1963. 4. Includes $38,766 public works acceleration, executive 1963. 5. Excludes $251,769 contributed funds for new work. 6. Excludes $250,102 contributed funds for new work. 7. Excludes $1,621,349 expended in operation of snag boats under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes, and $267 transferred to project without reimbursement. TABLE 22-B 16,796,138 12,511,848 12,298,533 7,457,298 1,377,793.503' '" 25,875,100 15,780,604 13,090,919 6,156,450 1,373,520.140' ' " 23,462,979 24,895,869 22,960,200 28,416,500 457,594,730 4 22,980,531 24,027,531 23,594,858 27,648,805 456,418,610 13 4 640,000 1,924,000 8,709,000 15,400,000 10,293 1,325,554 6,348,682 15,059,290 26,673,000 22,743,819 - - - - 15,962,260" - - - - 15,962,260" 4,790,351 4,252,076 4,345,200 5,378,100 89,373,363'" 4,217,049 4,654,642 3,776,592 5,759,040 88,662,259' y - - - - 944,649 - - - - 944,649 8. Includes $1,040,236 Public Works funds. 9. Includes $1,000 for removal of obstructions in Licking River under authority of Section 3, R&H Act of 1930. 10. Includes $100,000 placed in FY 1971 Budget Reserve. 11. Excludes $3,899 transferred from project without reimbursement. 12. Surplus property valued at $3,553 transferred to project without reimbursement. 13. Excludes $2,140 transferred to project without reimbursr ment. 14. Excludes surplus property valued at $73,832 transferred to project without reimbursement. 15. Includes $87,724,162 prior construction cost. 16. Excludes surplus property valued at $297,385 transferred to project without reimbursement. AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER March 3, 1827 Project adopted by this act originally covered entire length of Ohio River from its mouth near Cairo to Pittsburgh, a distance of 981 miles. It provided for removal of all obstructions which tend to endanger steamboat navigation. Jan. 21, 1927 Construct ice piers as a part of project, with funds allotted H. Doc. 187, 67th Cong., 2nd sess. from appropriations for general open channel work. July 3, 1930 Reforestation of sloughs on Kentucky Peninsula near Evans- H. Doc. 409, 69th Cong., 1st sess. ville, Ind., and a 200-foot strip along upstream bank and for bank protection, at an estimated cost of $200,000. July 3, 1958 Act of Mar, 3, 1827 modified to include maintenance of exist- H. Doc. 434, 84th Cong., 2nd sess. ing Licking River Channel within lower 3-mile limit of River slack water, at an estimated increase of $1,000 in cost of average annual maintenance. 22-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS ON OHIO RIVER TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 TABLE 22-H (See Section 1 of Text) Operations and Maintenance, Funds New Work General Rehabilitation Total Regular 1,281,122,961 416,013,225 22,743,819 1,719,880,005 Public Works 3,258,368 - - 3,258,368 Emergency Relief 1,198,837 19,000 - 1,217,837 Maintenance & Operation - 2,483,457 - 2,483,457 Public Works Acceleration 215,812 38,766 - 254,578 Executive 1963 Total 1,285,795,978 ' 5 7 418,554,448 2 4 6 22,743,819 1,727,094,245 1. Excludes surplus property valued at $297,385 5. Excludes $3,899 transferred from project without transferred to project without reimbursement. reimbursement. 2. Excludes surplus property valued at $73,832 transferred 6. Excludes $2,140 transferred to project without to project without reimbursement. reimbursement. 3. Excludes $250,118 contributed funds for new work. 7. Excludes $87,724,162 prior construction cost. 4. Excludes $36,943,217 expended from 1885 to 1937 under permanent indefinite appropriation. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSES TABLE 22-I AT LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER Markland Dam McAlpine Dam F.E.R.C. License 2,211 289:1,000 License Public Service Co. Louisville Gas and of Indiana Electric Co. Annual Charge $45,950.00 $95,000.00 Collections to end of Fiscal Year 1982 $687,361.64 $5,130,311.20 22-6 TABLE 22-J Lock Miles and Below Distance From Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, Miter Sills Actual Cost of For Full mean Character of Foundation Year to Date of Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Percent Opened to Each Lock (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Dam 1. - Replaced 6.2 Emsworth locks and dam, 110 Emsworth, PA 56 2. - Replaced 3. - Replaced - 13.3 Dashields locks and dam, 110 1.6 miles below 56 Sewickley, PA 4. - Replaced 5. - Replaced - 6. - Replaced - 31.7 Montgomery locks and dam, 110 1.4 miles above 56 Industry, PA 7. - Replaced 8. - Replaced 54.4 New Cumberland locks and 110 dam, Stratton, OH 110 9. - Replaced 10. - Replaced 11. - Replaced 84.3 Pike Island locks and dam, 110 2 miles upstream from 110 Warwood, WV 12. - Replaced 13. - Replaced 14. - Replaced 126.4 Hannibal locks and dam, 1.6 miles upstream from 110 New Martinsville, WV 110 15. - Replaced 16. - Replaced 161.7 Willow Island locks and dam, 2.7 miles above Waverly, WV 600 18.0 710.0 17.0'' 12.9' 360 15.5 ' ' 12.99 600 360 10.0 692.0 13.4' 17.5' Rock Rock and piles 100 1921 Rock Rock 100 1929 600 360 17.5 682.0 16.0' 14.6' Rock and piles Rock and piles 100 1,200 600 20.5 664.5 7.0' 14.8' 1,200 600 21.0 644.0 17.0' 18.0' Rock Rock Rock Rock 1936 $ 870,034 21,018,2392 4 976,767 1,144,588 3,533,076 1,071,472 1,080,132 1,123,442 5,737,611 1,075,000 1,167,456 100 1959 39,099,688 - 1,177,100 -- 1,138,000 -- 1,162,165 100 1968 56,623,946 1,166,104 1,222,389 1,133,371 1,200 600 21.0 623.0 38.0 17.0 110 1,200 110 Rock Rock 600 20.0 602.0 35.0 15.0 Rock and piles Rock 99 1972 87,574,561 - - 1,180,478 - - 1,275,532 98 1972 76,243,417 0 0 TABLE 22-J (Continued) OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, Miter Sills Actual Cost Lock Miles of For Full mean Character of Foundation Year to Date of and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Percent Opened to Each Lock Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Dam 17. - Replaced 18. - Replaced 19. - Replaced - 20. Replaced - 103.9 Belleville locks and dam, 110 0.3 mile below 110 Reedsville, OH 21. - Replaced 22. - Replaced 23. - Replaced - 237.5 Racine locks and dam, 110 1.5 miles below 110 Letart Falls, OH 24. - Replaced 25. - Replaced 26. - Replaced 279.2 Gallipolis locks and dam, 110 0.7 mile below 110 Hogsett, WV Gallipolis Modernization 27. - Replaced 28. - Replaced 29. - Replaced 30. - Replaced 341.0 Greenup locks and dam, 110 4.9 miles below Greenup, KY 110 31. - Replaced 32. - Replaced 33. - Replaced 34. - Replaced 436.2 Captain Anthony Meldahl 110 locks and dam, 2.2 miles 110 above Foster, KY S 1 362 591 1,200 600 22.0 582.0 37.0 15.09 Rock and piles Rock 100 1968 927,091 m 1,213,848 936,696 y 6 62,591,255 r 1,484,562 1,218,798 1,851,488 1,200 600 22.0 560.0 18.0 15.0 Rock and piles 600 360 26.0 538.0 18.0 12.0 1,200 600 30.0 515.0 18.0' 13.0 Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock 1,200 600 30.0 485.0 18.0' 15.0 Rock Rock 98 1971 64,922,680 100 1937 1,187,542 1,925,205 1,307,241 1,436,465 2,015,601 1,063,133 1,088,802 1,579,618 100 1959 56,447,191 - 1,359,231 - 2,951,216 - 1,937,166 - 3,437,057 100 1962 74,188,216 y 0 x / z z ct 00 q TABLE 22-J (Continued) IAck Miles and Below l)istance From I)am Pittsburgh Nearest Town OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) IAock l)imensions Upper Normal (Greatest Pool Length Elevation l)epth on Width Available (feet, Miter Sills Actual Cost of For Full - mean Character of Foundation Year to I)ate of Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Percent Opened to Each Lock (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and I)am Replaced - - - lReplaced - - - - - - I31.5 Markland locks and dam. I I() 1.200 1 mile above Markland. IN I10() 600 35.0 455.0 50.0 15.0 -ieplaced . - - l: liminated - - 604.0 McAlpine locks and dams 10) 1.2(M) 49.0 12.0 (Reconstruction of locks 1() 600() 37.0 420.0 19.0 1 1.0 and(l dam 4 1.) 56 360 19.0 11.0 $ 1,894.942 3.704.535 1,297.924 2.857.04() Rock Piles 100 1963 63.019.4):0 2,222.448 7.658.134 Rock Rock 100" 1961 45.726.189 12. - Eliminated 13. - Replaced - - - 11. - Replaced - 1I. - Replaced - - - 720.7 Cannelton locks and dam 110 1.2(X) 25.0 383.0 38.0 13.0 3 miles above Cannelton. IN 110 6(X) 16. - Replaced 776.1 Newburgh locks and dam. 1)10 1.200 16 miles above 1110 600 16.0 358.0 32.0 16.0 Evansville. IN 17. - Replaced 18. - Replaced - - 19. - Replaced - 846.0 Uniontown locks and dam. 110 1.2(00 3.5 miles below 11)0 600 22.0 342.0 34.0 12.0 Uniontown. KY 5). - Replaced - - I1. - Replaced - - 918.5 Smithland locks and dam. 110) 1.2(X) 2 miles above I 10 1.200 22.0 324.0 34.0 12.0 Smithland, KY 15.4 11.0 52. 938.9 1.4 miles below lBrookport. ii, 110() 600 12.0 302.0 15.4 11.0) 938.9 1.41m iles below Brookport. IL, 110 1,200 12.0 302.0 (New Lock) Rock Rock Rock 100 1972 Pile 100 1975 2.592.242 2.819.930 3.202.890 98.889.043'" 3,129.028 104.172,651 4,415,526 3.062,710 3.325.964 Rock Rock 99 1975 99.956,475 3,751.762 4.370,566 Rock Pile Pile Rock Pile Pile 95 1980 100 1928 100 1969 263,205,392 9.783.112" 10.197.518 1. 11I. 0x 06 c3 TABLE 22-J (Continued) OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimenelons Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, Miter Sills Actual Cost Lock Miles of For Full mean Character of Foundation Year to Date of and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Percent Opened Dam to Each Lock Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Dam 53. 962.6 10.8 miles above 110 600 13.4 290.0 15.4 9.6' Pile Pile 100 1929 $ 7,676,648" Mound City, IL 962.6 10.8 miles above 110 1,200 13.4 290.0 15.4 9.6 Pile 98 - 38,570,921 Mound City, IL (New Lock) 974.2 Mound City locks and dam, 1 mile below Mound City, IL - - - - - 1,539,470" 54. 974.2 Mound City, IL - - - - - - - - - TOTAL $1,389,269,724" 1. Depths are on emergency dam foundation and are controlling depths. 2. Change from fixed dam to lift-gate dam completed in 1938. 3. Depths are on poiree dam foundation and are controlling depths. 4. Land chamber. 5. River chamber. 6. Roller-gate dam. Cost not included in total. Constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River. 7. Lock and dam 41 completed with 110- by 600-foot lock in 1921. Completed with new dam and raised canal and lock wall in 1928. Auxiliary 56- by 360-foot lock constructed in 1929-30. Reconstruction and modernization began 1956, renamed McAlpine locks and dam in 1960. Operation of auxiliary lock suspended in 1971. 8. Completed except for deferred alteration of railroad bridge. 9. Dam below not yet constructed. Depth on lower miter sill at lower water. 10. Reflects reduction of $2,219,975 payment for settlement of damage to dam caused by barge accident in April 1978. 11. Includes $5,321,365 for major rehabilitation project initiated in FY 1979. 12. Includes $2,265,980 for major rehabilitation project initiated in FY 1979. 13. For preconstruction planning 1965 to 1972. No longer considered authorized. See Section 1 of text. 14. Includes $15,156,474 for major rehabilitation initiated in FY 1980. 15. Exclusive of $6,994,235 details below. Additional Features Entering into Cost of Project Louisvlle and Portland Canal and Indiana chute (under $ 5,359,203 previous project) Examinations, survey contingencies, plants and miscellaneous 966,232 Recreation facilities, pool area, Gallipolis locks and dams 668,800 TOTAL 6,994,235 GRAND TOTAL $1,396,263,959 F-+ 0"I 0 z z 1< Cl) N NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT* This district comprises portions of southern Ken- western portion, and embraces drainage basins of tucky, southwestern Virginia, western North Caro- Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers and their tribulina, northern Georgia and Alabama, northeastern taries. Mississippi and practically all of Tennessee except IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page General Investigations Page 1. 2. 3. Cumberland River, TN and KY ........ 23-2 Tennessee River, TN, AL and KY ...... 23-3 Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS ........................... 23-4 Alteration of Bridges 4. Authorized Alteration of Bridges ..... 23-4 Flood Control 5. Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, KY and TN .......... 23-4 6. Martins Fork Lake, KY .............. 23-5 7. Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, KY .......................... 23-5 8. Tug and Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, W VA, VA and KY ......................... 23-6 9. Ohio River Basin (Nashville Dist.) .... 23-6 10. Inspection of completed flood control projects .................... 23-6 11. Flood control work under special authorization ................... .. 23-6 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 12. Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN ........................ 23-6 13. Dale Hollow Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN and KY ....................... 23-6 14. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN ............... 23-7 15. Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY .......................... 23-7 16. Wolf Creek Dam-Lake Cumberland, Ohio River Basin, KY ................ 23-8 17. 18. Tables Table Table Table Surveys ............................ 23-8 Collection and study of basic data ...... 23-8 23-A 23-B 23-C Table 23-D Table 23-E Table 23-F Table 23-G Table 23-H Table 23-I Table 23-J Table 23-K Table 23-L Table 23-M Table 23-N Cost & Financial Statement ..... 23-9 Authorizing Legislation ........ 23-11 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...................... 23-13 Not Applicable Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ...................... 23-13 Other Authorized Multiple- Purpose Projects, Including Power ........................ 23-14 Deauthorized Projects .......... 23-14 Cumberland River, TN & KY, Principle Features ............ 23-15 Tennessee River Lock Dimensions ................... 23-17 Tennessee River Total Cost of Existing Project ....... . ...... 23-18 Ohio River Basin (Nashville District) Local Protection ...... 23-18 Reservoirs .................... 23-18 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............... 23-19 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .......... 23-19 *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 23-1 3 c c c REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Navigation 1. CUMBERLAND RIVER, TN AND KY Location. Formed by junction of Poor and Clover Forks in Harlan County, Ky., about 694.2 miles above its mouth, and flows west to Burnside, Ky., from whence it makes a locp southwestward into Tennessee, pa'ses Nashville, and returns northwestward to Kentucky, emptying into Ohio River near Smithland, Ky. (See Geological Survey base maps of Tennessee and Kentucky.) Previous projects. For details see pages 1898 and 1901 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1208 of Annual Report for 1938, and pages 1069 and 1070 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Below Nashville: Improvement of Cumberland River between mouth and Nashville was authorized for 9-foot navigation; increased project depth to be obtained by construction of three moderate height dams with lockage facilities, designated as Kuttawa (Eureka), Dover, and Cheatham, to replace existing locks A to F inclusive below Nashville and lock 1 above Nashville. (See table 23-B for authorizing legislation.) Subsequent authorities provided for construction of hydroelectric power-generating facilities at Cheatham Dam, river mile 148.7, and modification of project for navigation on Cumberland River, Tenn. and Ky., to provide, in lieu of previously authorized works at Kuttawa, mile 32.2, and Dover, mile 100.1, for construction of a multiple-purpose improvement consisting of a dam, lock, and powerplant near ' ile 30.6 on lower Cumberland River and a canal for navigation and other purposes connecting this reservoir with reservoir formed by Kentucky Dam on the Tennessee River. The project is known as Barkley Dam and Lake Barkley. Provision of interconnecting canal, involving excavation of a channel through narrow watershed divide about 2.5 miles upstream from damsite, permits alternative routes available for navigation between either Cumberland or Tennessee Rivers and Ohio River, and affords integrated operation of Barkley and Kentucky Reservoirs through diversion of flows in interests of flood control and power production. Estimated cost of modified project for 9-foot navigation and multiple-purpose development is $180,394,000 Federal funds and $102,966 non- Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program (October 1982). (See table 23-H for listing of principal features.) Under flood conditions as regulated by upstream reservoirs, extreme fluctuation in stage of river below Nashville, Tenn., varies at different localities from about 16 to 55 feet above minimum pool levels. Ordinary fluctuations vary with power flows from as much as the allowable 3-foot drawdown below normal pool elevation 385 at Cheatham Lock and Dam to a range of about 7 feet at Nashville. Seasonal variation in normal headwater levels at Lake Barkley is 5 feet, which in combination with power flows produces fluctuations up to 10 feet below Cheatham Lock and Dam. Above Nashville: See pages 1693 thru 1696 of Annual Report for 1950 for information including statistical data on locks and dams 1 to 17 and 21. Completion information is shown on pages 1454 of the report for 1951. See Table 23-B for Authorizing Legislation. Construction of Old Hickory, Carthage, and Celina Dams above Nashville was also authorized for navigation and power. The dam and reservoir authorized for construction on Cumberland River near Carthage, Tenn., has been redesignated as Cordell Hull Dam and Reservoir. Cost of Old Hickory and Cordell Hull projects, including locks, is estimated at $137,485,100 (October 1982). Estimated cost of Celina Dam (1982) is $200,000,000. (See table 23-H at end of chapter for listing of principal features.) Under flood conditions as presently regulated, including effect of surcharge operation of Old Hickory project, extreme fluctuations of stage in this section of river vary from a range of 35 feet at Nashville (mile 191) to a maximum of 46 feet immediately below Old Hickory Dam (mile 216.2), and from an 8-foot variation in headwater at dam to 36 feet in vicinity of Carthage, Tenn., (mile 313.5), present head of navigation; with variations up to 35 feet at Celina, Tenn. (mile 380.8) and 29 feet in tailwater at Wolf Creek Dam (mile 460.9). Maximum fluctuations under ordinary conditions from power flows vary from about 7 feet at Nashville to 14 and 3 feet, respectively, in tailwater and headwater of Old Hickory Dam, and at other key points as follows: 13 feet at Carthage; 18 feet at Celina; and 19 feet at Wolf Creek Dam. Further details on project authorization for river sections below and above Nashville are shown on Table 23-B. Local cooperation. Under modified project for 9- foot navigation and multiple-purpose development, recreation features of reservoir components are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Terminal facilities. There are 49 terminals on the Cumberland River (1 municipally owned and open for public use; 5 government owned facilities and 43 privately owned facilities). A total of 28 terminals have railroad connections. Principal commodities handled are petroleum products, stone, sand, gravel, coal, coke, 23-2 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT iron, steel, chemicals, and grain. Nineteen terminals are set up to handle various types of commodities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. For further information see page 695 of Annual Report for 1969. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Below Nashville: Recreation facilities provided at Barkley project under (Code 711) cost $21,019 and Cheatham (Code 713) cost $26,843. Above Nashville: Recreation facilities provided at Old Hickory under (Code 711) cost $17,780. Maintenance: Barkley, Cheatham, Cordell Hull, and Old Hickory locks and dams were operated as required. Operation and Maintenance improvements at Barkley included boundary line surveying and marking property lines, paving roads and parking areas, miscellaneous dredging and snagging, and maintenance of mooring facilities and safety harbors. Work at Cheatham included snagging and maintenance of mooring and safety harbors. Work at Cordell Hull included boundary surveying and marking property lines. Work at Old Hickory included aerial mapping, surveying and marking property lines, enlarged and paved parking lot, built power plant classroom, built resource manager's office and visitors center, awarded contracts for boundary line surveying and property line marking of right bank and left bank on Old Hickory reservoir. Total net energy generated at Barkley Dam (721,869,206 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to the Tennessee Valley Authority, Southern Illinois power Cooperative, Big Rivers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation, and Indiana Statewide Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc., Hoosier Energy. Division. Total net energy generated at Cheatham Dam (217,776,775 kw-hr), Cordell Hull (426,497,573 kw-hr), and Old Hickory (566,849,260 kw-hr) was made available for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program comprising malaria control, shoreline sanitation, land management and disposal, and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. Flood damages prevented at Barkley amounted to $85,000. 2. TENNESSEE RIVER, TN, AL AND KY Location. Formed by junction of French Broad and Holston Rivers in eastern Tennessee, 4.4 miles above Gay Street Bridge at Knoxville, flows southwest into northern Alabama, thence in a generally westerly course across north Alabama, to northeast boundary of Mississippi, thence nearly due north across Tennessee and Kentucky, entering Ohio River at Paducah, 652.1 miles from junction of French Broad and Holston Rivers. (See Geological survey base map of Tennessee River Basin.) Previous projects. For details see pages 1902-1906, Annual Report for 1915; pages 1190-1194, 1196-1216, and 1220-1222, Annual Report for 1929; and page 1216, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Originally provided for permanent improvement of river for a navigable depth of 9 feet at low water from mouth about 650 miles to Knoxville, Tenn. Only work performed by the Corps was construction of lock at General Joe Wheeler Dam and miscellaneous appurtenant improvements at a new work cost of $2,244,236. Tennessee Valley Authority program provided for obtaining authorized 9-foot project by construction of high dams and locks and utilization of certain locks and dams previously constructed under jurisdiction of the Corps. (See Table 23-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Subsequent construction by that agency of Melton Hill Dam extends navigable channel of Tennessee River system up the Clinch River about 38 miles above damsite (mile 23.1) to vicinity of Clinton, Tenn. (See table 23-I on Tennessee River.) In accordance with general navigation laws placing control and supervision over navigable waters under direction of Secretary of the Army, the Corps of Engineers operates and maintains all locks, and maintains navigation channels and safety harbors by performing all necessary maintenance dredging and snagging operations. For information concerning other functions of the Corps under division of responsibilities for Tennessee River since adoption of Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933, see page 1084 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Authorization requires no local cooperation in construction of alternate system of low dams. It does, however, provide that if high dams are built before the United States builds projected locks and low dams which are to be replaced, the United States shall contribute to cost of substituted structures an amount equal to estimated cost of works of navigation for which substitution is made. Terminal facilities. There are 166 terminals on the Tennessee River (7 municipally owned, 27 government owned facilities and 132 privately owned facilities). A total of 79 terminals have railroad connections. Principal commodities handled are petroleum products, stone, sand, gravel, coal, coke, grain, chemicals, iron, and steel. Seventy two terminals handle various types of commodities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. A list of terminals is revised annually and can be obtained from Division Engineer, 23-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Ohio River Division, Corps of Engineers, Cincinnati, Ohio. For further information see page 698 of Annual Report for 1969. Operations during fiscal year. Channel work by government plant and hired labor consisted of dredging and snagging at various locations, and maintenance of mooring facilities and safety harbors. Cost of channel maintenance was $292,721. Maintenance: All locks were operated and lock appurtenances and standby plant maintained as required. Major maintenance work items were dewatering and repair at Kentucky Lock and repairing Wilson Lock lower gates. See table 23-J for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1982. 3. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL AND MS Location. West Central Alabama and Northeastern Mississippi; in Marengo, Sumter, Greene and Pickens Counties, Alabama, and Noxubee, Lowndes, Clay, Monroe, Itawamba, Prentiss and Tishomingo Counties, Mississippi. Existing project. Provides for a waterway 234 miles in length, connecting the Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers by way of the East Fork of Tombigbee River, Mackeys and Yellow Creeks, affording a channel not less than 9 feet deep and 280 feet in bottom width, with 10 locks each having clear chamber dimensions of 110x600 feet. Construction of the divide section, including Bay Springs lock and dam, is assigned to the Nashville District; whereas, the prosecution of work on the river and canal sections is under the jurisdiction of the Mobile District. Only activities of the Nashville District are reported hereon. Estimated Federal cost of new work under jurisdiction of the Nashville District is $727,000,000. (See 23-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Authorization requires local interests to construct, maintain and operate all highway bridges, construct and maintain all highway relocations or alterations, make and maintain alterations as required to sewer, water supply and drainage facilities, assume cost of operation and maintenance of utility crossings, provide and maintain as required suitable and adequate river and canal terminals in accordance with plans approved by the Secretary of the Army and the Chief of Engineers. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and design continued. Work continued on Bay Springs Lock, Dam, and Access Road contract; and contracts for Southern Railway, DC4/2A/Plug and DC2. Bay Springs contracts were awarded for Clearing Area B, Clearing Area C, Emergency Stoplogs and Bulkheads, Crows Neck and Damsite Initial Recreation Facilities, and Archelogical Excavation of seven sites. Contracts were awarded at Divide Cut for Tishomingo County Road, Erosion Control and Stabilization, and Initial Paden Recreation Facilities. Bay Springs reservoir will start filling next year. Construction remains ahead of schedule. The project is 84% complete. Alteration of Bridges 4. AUTHORIZED ALTERATION OF BRIDGES Work on Woodland Street bridge, under Truman- Hobbs Act, was initiated in 1965 and completed in 1966. Costs were $987,632. For details see page 922 of Annual Report for 1967. Flood Control 5. BIG SOUTH FORK NATIONAL RIVER AND RECREATION AREA, KY AND TN Location. The proposed project is located in Northeastern Tennessee and Southeastern Kentucky along the Big South Fork River and its tributaries in Pickett, Scott, Fentress, and Morgan Counties, Tennessee, and McCreary County, Kentucky. Existing project. A National Recreation Area will be established in accordance with the concept included in the interagency report prepared pursuant to section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1968. Total acreage is not to exceed 125,000 acres. The act specifically establishes the National Area for the purpose of preserving and interpreting the scenic, biological, archaeological and historical resources of the river gorge area and developing the natural recreational potential of the area. The area is divided into two categories, gorge and adjacent areas, with no construction permitted except limited clearing for establishment of day-use facilities, historical sites, primitive campgrounds and access roads. Lodges and other facilities will be provided in the adjacent areas. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 as amended by Water Resources Development Act of 1976. (See table 23-B for authorizing legislation.) The present authorized cost (ceiling) for the project is $103,522,000. The National Park Service will operate and maintain the useable units of the area upon completion of land acquisition and construction of basic 23-4 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT facilities by the Corps of Engineers. The first construction contract was awarded in June 1981. The project is 50% complete. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and design continued. Acquired 8,991.41 acres fee. Construction continued on Leatherwood Ford Road and Bridge. Contract awarded for trails. 6. MARTINS FORK LAKE, KY Location. Dam located at mile 15.6 on Martins Fork of Clover Fork, Cumberland River, about 10 miles southeast of city of Harlan, with reservoir extending about 6 miles upstream within Harlan County, southeastern Kentucky. Existing project. Multiple-purpose improvement combining flood control with water quality control and recreation development adopted by 1965 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 244, 89th Cong.), in general accordance with recommendations. Dam will be concrete type, about 504 feet long and rising 97 feet above streambed. Outlet works provide for release of water from reservoir at varying levels. Drainage area above damsite is 55.7 square miles. At full pool level, spillway crest at elevation 1341 above mean sea level, reservoir will cover 578 acres and contain 21,120 acrefeet of storage capacity. Provision is made for 17,450 acre-feet of reservoir capacity between elevations 1341 and 1300 for control of floods in winter and spring season, and 14,360 acre-feet (El. 1341-1310) during summer and fall, in conjunction with which storage of 3,090 acre-feet would be available on a seasonal basis to meet streamflow requirements for water quality control and fish life below the dam. A minimum permanent pool of 3,670 acre-feet, 274 acres in extent, will thus be provided during potential flood seasons; and during late spring and summer when flood storage can be reduced, the lake is to be operated generally at a higher level (El. 1310) to maintain a larger surface area of 340 acres for recreation and to provide the required seasonal storage for releases of water during critical low-flow periods. Project will prevent major portion of average annual flood losses at Harlan and result in significant stage reductions with related benefits along rural reaches and at other urban areas downstream. Estimated cost of project including $803,400 code 710 funds is $21,195,076 (October 1982). First construction contract awarded in December 1972. Project completed for beneficial use in September 1978. Local cooperation. Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 (P.L. 89-72) applies in regard to non-Federal participation in recreation development, in addition to which local interests are to provide certain safeguards to ensure functioning of reservoir as intended. In May 1981 a final recreation cost-sharing contract with Harlan County was approved and certain recreation facilities have been jointly developed by the Corps and the County. These facilities, consisting of a swimming beach and a picnic area are now operated and maintained by Harlan County. Recreation investment to date (Corps and Local) is about $100,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Deficiency claim fee paid. Regular construction work for project finished in April 1982. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures operated as required. Recreation facilities under (Code 713) cost $30,502. 7. MIDDLESBORO, CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN, KY Location. At Middlesboro, Ky., on Yellow Creek, a tributary entering Cumberland River about 660 miles above its mouth. Existing project. A system of canals and levees around one side of town, arranged so as to divert most headwaters of Yellow Creek away from present channel through heart of city. Protection is thus afforded in large measure to life and property within business district and a large part of residential section. For project details, see page 1088 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work on levees, canals, and appurtenances was accomplished by hired labor. Flood damages prevented amounted to $4,000,000. 8. TUG AND LEVISA FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY RIVER AND UPPER CUMBERLAND, WV, VA AND KY Location. The proposed project is located in the State of West Virginia and the Commonwealths of Kentucky and Virginia. The Cumberland portion consists of the Upper Cumberland River Basin, above Cumberland Falls, Ky. The basin is approximately 100 miles in length, averaging 30 miles in width at the lower portion and 10 miles in width upstream at Harlan, Ky. The Big Sandy Basin is within the Huntington District and the Cumberland within the Nashville District. 23-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Existing project. Provides for flood control measures for communities in the Tug and Levisa Forks and Upper Cumberland River Basins. The Cumberland portion has been assigned to the Nashville District. Only activities of the Nashville District are reported hereon. Estimated Federal cost of new work under jurisdiction of the Nashville District is currentby being formulated. The project was authorized by the Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1981, Section 202 of PL 96-367. Local cooperation. Authorizing legislation requires that non-federal interests shall hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction works and maintain and operate all such works after their completion in accordance with regulations by the Secretary of the Army. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and design continued. 9. OHIO RIVER BASIN (NASHVILLE DISTRICT) Location. A series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs in Ohio River Basin within Nashville District. Existing project. The general comprehensive plans approved for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin is set forth in legislation listed in Table 23-B. Individual projects, local protection projects and lakes, considered in comprehensive plan within Nashville District are listed in Table 23-K. 10. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts, requires local interests furnish assurances they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within their respective districts. Maintenance inspections were made during fiscal year of completed protective works in localities transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation. Local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. Fiscal year cost was $23,624. Total cost to September 30, 1982 was $164,237. For project inspection data see table 23-M. 11. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control and coastal emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Actual Federal-costs for fiscal year were $154,974 for disaster preparedness. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 12. CENTER HILL LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TN Location. Dam is on Caney Fork River, 26.6 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 309.2) at Carthage, Tenn. It is in DeKalb County, Tenn., about 55 miles east of Nashville, and 14 miles southeast of Carthage, Tenn. Reservoir extends about 64 miles up main stream and about 10 miles up Falling Water River and lies within DeKalb, Putnam, White, and Warren Counties, Tenn. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production, with a permanent pool for public use and conservation purposes. In addition to main dam structure, provision was made for a rolled-earth dike to close a saddle in reservoir rim near damsite. For further details, see page 1099 of 1962 Annual Report. Estimated cost of project including $10,275,200 code 710 funds is $54,746,600 (October 1982). Local cooperation. None required on completed project. Recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Recreation facilities provided under (Code 711) cost $21,715. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structure and its appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Total net energy generated (343,257,600 kw-hr) was mnide available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management involved land management, public relations, and maintenance of public use facilities. Flood damages prevented amounted to $56,000. 13. DALE HOLLOW LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TN AND KY Location. Dam is on Obey River, 7.3 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 380.9) at Celina, Tenn. It is in Clay County, Tenn., and about 80 miles northeast of Nashville, Tenn., 28 miles north of Cookeville, Tenn., and 3 miles east of Celina, Tenn. Reservoir extends about 51 miles up main stream, 10 miles up East Fork, and 6 miles up West Fork of Obey 23-6 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT River, and lies within Cumberland and Clinton Counties, Ky., and Clay, Pickett, Overton, and Fentress Counties, Tenn. Existing project. A concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production with a permanent pool for public use and conservation purposes. See page 1096 of 1962 Annual Report for project details. Estimated cost of project including $14,989,300 code 710 funds and $150,000 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program is $41,111,700 (October 1982). Local cooperation. None required on completed project; future recreation developm nt subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cdst-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Total net energy generated (139,201,700 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved public relations, land management, and maintenance of public-use facilities. Contract for replacing turbine parts completed. Flood damages prevented amounted to $46,000. 14. J. PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TN Location. Damsite is on Stones River, 6.8 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 205.9); in Davidson County, Tenn.; and about 7 miles east of Nashville, Tenn. Reservoir extends southeasterly from dam about 32 miles along main stream, 10 miles up East Fork, 6.5 miles up West Fork, and for shorter distances up other tributaries of Stones River; and lies within Davidson, Rutherford, and Wilson Counties, Tenn. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control, power production and recreation. For further details see page 703 of 1969 Annual Report. Estimated cost of project including $4,336,600 under code 710 funds and $46,000 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program is $57,990,300 (October 1982). Local cooperation. Recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Recreation facilities provided under (Code 711) cost $62,642; and (Code 713) cost $8,965. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Total net energy generated (72,312,400 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved public relations, fish and wildlife management, and maintenance of publicuse facilities. Contracts consisted of boundary line surveying and marking. Flood damages prevented amounted to $10,000. 15. LAUREL RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. Damsite is at mile 2.3 on Laurel River, a tributary of Cumberland River, in southcentral Kentucky. The two streams meet about 9 miles below Cumberland Falls, a prominent physiographic feature at head of Lake Cumberland which is formed by Wolf Creek Dam. Reservoir extends 19.2 miles upstream to site of Corbin, Ky. water-supply dam and lies within Laurel and Whitley Counties. Existing project. Project approved in general accordance with recommendations of House Document 413, 86th Congress, by 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended by Public Law 88-253, was designed for purposes of flood control, power, and recreation as an integral unit of a coordinated plan for development of water resources of Cumberland River Basin. With the view of a net gain in power potential on a system basis, the plan of improvement incorporated appropriate flood control storage in the proposed project and corresponding adjustment in operations of Wolf Creek Dam-Lake Cumberland for flood control and power, which in effect constituted a transfer of reservoir capacity without entailing a change in flood control benefits. Further detailed study giving full consideration to power capabilities and marketing arrangements indicated the advantage of maintaining present storage allocation at Wolf Creek and use of all available storage capacity of Laurel River Lake for power. The power plant is complete. Recreation is under construction. Total estimated cost is $60,000,000 (October 1982). Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction on Grove Access Road and Recreation Area is 23-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 54% complete. Contract awarded and completed for Grove Recreation Structures. Forest Service continued work on recreation sites under agreement. The project is 99% complete. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Total net energy generated (52,840,000 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior for distribution. 16. WOLF CREEK DAM-LAKE CUMBERLAND, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. Wolf Creek Dam is on Cumberland River at mile 460.9 (above mouth) in Russell County, Ky., about 10 miles southwest of Jamestown and 12 miles north of Albany, Ky. Lake Cumberland extends 101 miles up main stream, 48 miles up South Fork of Cumberland River, in Russell, Clinton, Wayne, Pulaski, McCreary, Laurel, and Whitley Counties, Ky. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production, with a permanent pool for publicuse and conservation purposes. See page 1094 of 1962 Annual Report for project details. Estimated cost of project is $189,693,037 (October 1982). This estimate includes $4,171,900 code 710 funds, $880,000 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed program, and $105,034,237 for major rehabilitation. Local cooperation. None required on completed project; future recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Activity involving the integrity of the structure began in 1968 when a leak or seepage developed in the embankment. The major rehab embankment contract was physically completed in September 1982. Recreation facilities provided under (Code 711) cost $7,801 and facilities under (Code 713) cost $263,251. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Contract awarded to pave roads and parking areas. Total net energy generated (891,962,000 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved land management activities, public relations, and maintenance of public-use facilities. Flood damages prevented amounted to $144,000. General Investigations 17. SURVEYS Costs for this period were $869,841 for which $279,726 was for navigation, $503,316 for flood damage prevention studies, $32,240 for review of completed projects, and $54,559 for coordination studies with other agencies. 18. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for this period were $1,035 for flood plain management programs, $37,789 for technical services to others, $59,329 for flood plain management services, totalling $98,153. 23-8 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 23-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 1. Cumberland River, TN and KY " 2. Tennessee River, TN, AL and KY 3. Tenn.-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS 5. Big South Fork National River and Rec. Area, KY and TN 6. Martins Fork Lake, KY 7. Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, KY 8. Tug & Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy & Cumberland River, WV, VA and KY 11. Cumberland, KY 12. Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN 13. Dale Hollow Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN and KY 14. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN 15. Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY Total to Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep 30, 198 2 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work* Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. 420,000 Cost 397,297 506,000 750,582 8,823,997 9,346,673 4,263,000 4,197,111 117,579,000 123,161,567 19,200,000 19,043,168 550,000 436,809 241,000 231,237 150,000 211,875 154,000 639,254 1,762,000 1,777,065 111,000 208,110 1,681,000 1,696,333 189,000 533,979 1,593,000 1,598,694 1,450,000 2,408,671 430,500 705,904 9,900,000 9,708,780 4,750,000 4,755,596 133,300,000 133,493,093 4,440,900 4,438,717 537,851 355,000 343,729 41,000 26,488 88,805 142,642 2,235,000 2,116,901 - 3,923 2,335,000 1,827,710 140,618 213,969 1,390,000 1,376,104 2,140,000 2,231,740 640,000 605,855 4,016 185,052 11,962,325 11,878,926 5,255,000 5,276,536 121,765,000 119,325,924 15,770,131 10,093,287 10,000 109,146 355,000 352,256 130,000 123,929 2,500,000 1,408,093 - 93,000 - 1,714 2,137,000 2,192,593 1,963,000 2,424,393 40,000 52,874 1,993,000 1,937,975 2,094,000 2,349,517 615,000 390,000 65,642 12,715,140 11,954,181 - 7,027,000 6,958,972 104,390,000 105,650,243 8,958,124 15,036,650 26,876 100,729 357,000 354,482 __- 55,000 70,428 2,200,000 1,733,344 14,200 21,715 2,155,880 2,178,280 2,529,880 2,584,143 68,000 71,607 1,756,880 1,847,366 3,650,000 3,735,017 773,000 638,017 811,751 2,734,096 23-9 318,780,797 1.2 318,429,732 1.2.3 132,064,888 4 130,457,080 5 16,251,428 6 16,251,4286 77,631,4517 77,387,272 7.8 400,000 400,000 614,484,050 612,110,275 51,379,155 50,893,265 1o 20,436,676 20,422,178 11 1,308,000 1,281,704 12 817,830 13 817,830 13 1,569,844 1,563,207 '4 4,700,000 3,141,437 66,642 66,642 53,256,075 15 53,247,800 15.16 26,604,967 17 26,539,722 17.1s 27,940,004 19 27,940,004 19.20 27,302,807 21 27,262,097 21.22 56,920,947 23 56,905,856 23.24 15,934,086 25 15,899,162 21.26 53,968,231 53,478,812 27 2,749,000 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 23-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep 30, 1982 16. Wolf Creek Dam and New Work Lake Cumberland, Approp. 990,000 1,170,000 86,110 223,000 83,230,508 28 Ohio River Basin, KY Cost 592,105 1,727,245 280,850 271,052 83,163,158 8s.29 Maint. Approp. 2,135,000 2,103,000 2,2?5,000 2,403,880 38,186,441 s30 Cost 2,079,743 2,145,076 2,232,648 2,358,456 38,075,394 31 Rehab. Approp. 18,700,000 3,834,000 920,000 - 90,000 105,034,237 Cost 19,158,515 3,344,381 612,001 765,037 104,969,302 32 1. Includes $9,707,354 for abandoned and/or replaced works under the old Cumberland River system. (Amount includes $826,253 for new work and $3,266,706 for maintenance on previous projects.) 2. Includes $61,733 public works acceleration funds, and $102,966 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 3. Includes surplus property valued at $133,550 transferred from project without reimbursement. 4. Includes $711,940 for special recreation use fees, and $859,303. for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 5. Includes $708,692 for special recreations use fees and $859,303 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. In addition surplus property valued at $70,561 transferred to project without reimbursement. 6. Includes $14,007,193 for new work and $4,005,175 for maintenance on previous projects. 7. Includes $310,319 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 8. Includes surplus property valued at $54,336 transferred from project without reimbursement. 9. Surplus property valued at $21,127 transferred to project without reimbursement. 10. Surplus property valued at $13,170 transferred to project without reimbursement. 11. Surplus property valued at $2,877 transferred to project without reimbursement. 12. Surplus property valued at $13,415 transferred from project without reimbursement. 13. Includes $38,876 Emergency Relief Funds. 14. In addition, surplus property valued at $4 transferred to project without reimbursement. 15. Includes $35,896 public works acceleration funds. 16. Includes surplus property valued at $55,528 transferred to project without reimbursement. 17. Includes $214,286 funds for special recreation use fees. 18. Includes surplus property valued at $51,549 transferred from project without reimbursement. 19. Includes $51,789 public works acceleration funds, and $150,000 contributed by the State of Tennessee. 20. Includes surplus property valued at $28,223 transferred to project without reimbursement. 21. Includes $232,480 funds for special recreation use fees. 22. Includes surplus property valued at $28,455 transferred to project without reimbursement. 23. Includes $46,000 contributed by the Metropolitan Government, Nashville, TN. 24. Includes $41,719 contributed by the Metropolitan Government, Nashville, TN. In addition, surplus property valued at $386,000 transferred to project without reimbursement. 25. Includes $181,680 for special recreation use fees. 26. Includes surplus property valued at $384,777 transferred to project without reimbursement. 27. Includes surplus property valued at $8,994 transferred to project without reimbursement. 28. Includes $96,920 public works acceleration funds, and $880,000 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 29. Includes surplus property valued at $46,488 transferred to project without reimbursement. 30. Includes $82,048 public works acceleration funds and $194,780 fund, for special recreation use fees. 31. Includes $82,048 public works acceleration funds and $194,302 funds for special recreation use fees. In addition, surplus property valued at $44,783 transferred from project without reimbursement. 32. Includes surplus property valued at $16,851 transferred from the project without reimbursement. It also includes $203,757 for claim paid on initial construction of switchyard. 23-10 TABLE 23-E See Section in Text 1. Jun 5, 1920 Jul 3, 1930 Authorizes work to proceed in Tennessee without waiting for action of local interests in Kentucky. Raising dam 1, 3 feet. Jun 26, 1934 2 Operation and care bf locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Jul 24, 1946 Construction of Old Hickory, Cordell Hull (Carthage), and Celina Dams above Nashville for navigation and the development of power resources. Oct 1, 1980 Design and construct flood control measures for communities in the Upper Cumberland River basins. 2. TENNESSEE RIVER Jul 3, 1930 Authorized navigable depth of 9 feet from mouth about 650 miles to Knoxville, Tennessee to be obtained by construction of low dams. May 18, 1933 Authorized TVA to construct such dams in the Tennessee River as will provide a 9 foot channel. NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT 3 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorized Act Project and Work Authorized CUMBERLAND RIVER BELOW NASHVILLE Jul 13, 1892 Provision made for lock A Jun 25, 1910 Provision made for locks B to F, and for dredging below lock F. Aug 30, 1935 Repairing dams A to F, inclusive, and surmounting same with movable crests. Jul 24, 1946 Provision of 9-foot channel by the construction of 3 moderate height dams below Nashville; via, Kuttawa (Eureka), Dover, and Cheatham. Jun 19, 1952 Provision for hydroelectric power production as a function of Cheatham Dam. Sep 3, 1954 Construction of Barkley (Lower Cumberland) dam and reservoir project for navigation, flood control, hydroelectric power, and related purposes in lieu of Kuttawa and Dover navigation-only structures. Jul 14, 1960 Authorized change in alignment of Illinois Central Railroad. CUMBERLAND RIVER ABOVE NASHVILLE Aug 5, 1886 Provision made for locks and dams; the Secretary of War to determine the final plan of improvement. Dimensions of the locks fixed in accordance with reports of Mar. 30, 1887, and Nov. 25, 1890. Mar 2, 1907 Adoption of the report of the Board of Engineers, dated Feb. 26, 1906, limiting the lock and dam construction to locks and dams 1 to 7, and 21. Mar 2, 1919 Provision made for locks and dams 8 to 17. Annual Report 1884, p. 1663. Annual Report 1888, p. 1622, and Annual Report 1892, p. 1933. H. Doc. 699, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe. 10, 63d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 70th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 761, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 202, PL 96-367 H. Doc. 328, 71st Cong., 2d sess. 23-11 Documents Annual Report, 1890, p. 2151 H. Does. 758, 60th Cong., 1st sess.; and 1481, 60th Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 38, 73d Cong., 1st se8s. H. Doc. 761, 79th Cong., 2d seas.. S. Doc. 81, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 56, 86th Cong., 2d 8ess. 1. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Authorized Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 9. OHIO RIVER BASIN, NASHVILLE DISTRICT Aug 28, 1937 Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. Project to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction. Jun 28, 1938 Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable at discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50,300, for local flood protection works. Aug 18, 1941 Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Additional $45 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Dec 22, 1944 Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Jul 24, 1946 Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. May 17, 1950 H. Doc. 762, 77th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong., 1st sess. Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Dec 30, 1963 Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin. Jun 18, 1965 Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Aug 13, 1968 Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Jun 19, 1970 Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Mar 7, 1974 Authorized establishing Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, KY and TN. Total area not to exceed 125,000 acres. Mar 7, 1974 Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY Jul 24, 1946 Construction of waterway to connect above rivers and provide a 9 foot channel and minimum bottom width of 170 feet in river and canal sections and 150 feet in the divide cut, with locks 110 by 600 feet clear inside dimensions. Subsequent studies determined most practical plan consists of channel with bottom width of 300 feet (280 feet in divide cut), fewer locks with higher lifts resulted in reducing number of lifts from 18 to 10 and reduced length from 260 to 253 miles. 1. Contains latest published maps. Included in Public 2. Permanent Appropri Works Administration program Sept. 6, 1933. H. Doc. 6755, 89th Cong., 1st seas. S. 3710, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. R. 15166 91st Cong., 2d sess. H. R. 10203 93rd Cong. Water Resources Develop. Act of 1974 Amended by PL 94-587, 94th Cong. H. R. 10203 93rd Cong. River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974. H. Doc. 486, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Page 1343, Part I, FY 1968 House Hearings. ation Repeal Act. 23-12 TABLE 23-B (Continued) 3. NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 23-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (All Projects not Specifically Identified in Text) For last Full Cost to Sep 30, 1982 Report see Operation and Project Status Annual Report Construction Maintenance Caney Fork River, TN abandoned 1895 $ 27,828 - Clinch River, TN and VA abandoned 1923 53,949 $ 7,873 Duck River, TN abandoned 1887 13,000 - Elk River, AL and TN abandoned 1904 4,000 - French Broad and Little Pigeon Rivers, TN abandoned 1931 249,605 33,554 Hiwassee River, TN abandoned 1923 113,311 9,754 Holston River, TN abandoned 1911 5,714 Little Tennessee River, TN abandoned 1888 5,510 Obey River, TN abandoned 1887 11,500 Red River, TN abandoned 1884 5,000 South Fork of Cumberland River, KY abandoned 1892 11,967 - TABLE 23.E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (All Projects not Specifically Identified in Text) For last Full Cost to Sep 30, 1982 Report see Operation and Project Status Annual Report Construction Maintenance Barbourville, KY completed 1963 $2,088,147 - Chattanooga, TN and Rossville, GA completed 1949 180,997 - Coal Creek and Tributaries (Lake City), TN completed 1962 460,134 Corbin (Lynn Camp Creek), KY completed 1969 567,703 - Middlesboro (Yellow Creek), KY completed 1949 26,309 - Paint Rock River, AL completed 1967 544,173 - Pineville, KY completed 1963 1,679,126 - 1 Rossview Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN and KY completed - 6,779 - 1. Includes $9,950 contributed funds. 23-13 TABLE 23-F REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER Project Barkley Dam and Lake Barkley, KY and TN Celina Dam, KY Cheatham Lock and Dam, TN Cordell Hull Lock and Dam, TN Old Hickory Lock and Dam, TN 1. Details given under "Cumberland River, TN and KY." Status beneficial use deferred beneficial use beneficial use beneficial use For last Full Report see Annual Report ICost to Sep 30, 1982 Operation and Construction Maintenance $145,991,263 $37,604,230 1 222,575 - 30,738,211 26,386,505' 79,824,492 15,664,134 I 51,945,836 33,523,850 1 TABLE 23-G Project Three Islands Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For last Full Report see Annual Report for Date and Author 1970 Authorized: FC Act 1938, -ity PL 761, 75 Cong., 3rd sess.; FC Act 1946, PL 525, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Deauthorized: 5 Aug 1977. Federal Contributed Funds Funds Expended Expended $111,855 - 23-14 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 23-H CUMBERLAND RIVER, TN AND KY: PRINCIPLE FEATURES (See Section 1 of Text) Dam and Reservoir Barkley Cheatham Old Hickory Cordell Hull Celina Nearest town Miles above mouth of river Lock dimensions (feet) 1 Lift at normal pool levels (feet) Depths on guardsills at minimum pool levels (feet) Character of foundation Dam: Type Height Length, exclusive of lock section (feet) Spillway: Gross length (feet) Net length opening (feet) Crest gates: Type Number Size (feet) Operating levels at dam (feet, mean sea level) : Maximum regulated Normal operation: Full pool Minimum pool Minimum pool in advance of floods Reservoir area (acres) Reservoir capacity (acre-feet) : Flood control Power drawdown Dead storage Total Canal: Length (miles) Bottom width (feet) Depth at minimum pool level (feet) Power development: Number of units Generator rating (kilowatts) Total installation (kilowatts) Kuttawa, KY, 11 miles. 30.6 110 by 800 57 11, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 157 9,959 804 660 Tainter 12 55 by 50 Ashland City, TN, 9 miles. 148.7 110 by 800 26 14, upper; 17, lower Rock Concrete gravity 75 800 480 420 Tainter 7 60 by 27 375 359 354 346 93,430 1,213,000 8,4 259,000 610,000 2,082,000 385 382 7,450 19,800 7 84,200 104,000 Old Hickory, TN, 3 miles. 216.2 84 by 400 60 14, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 98 3,605 2 325 270 Tainter 6 45 by 41 450 a 442 27,450 125,000 * 63,000 357,000 545,000 Carthage, TN, 5 miles. 313.5 84 by 400 59 14, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 93 1,138 2 291 225 Tainter 5 45 by 41 508 3 508 501 499 13,920 85,600 5.6 20,500 204,800 310,900 1.75 400 11 4 32,500 130,000 3 12,000 36,000 4 25,000 100,000 3 33,333 100,000 23-15 Celina, TN, 5 miles. 385.4 Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 86 2,298 290 250 Tainter 5 50 by 37 564 a 560 559 559 16,960 55,950 5 14,700 287,300 357,950 3 36,000 108,000 TABLE 23-H (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 CUMBERLAND RIVER, TN AND KY: PRINCIPLE FEATURES (See Section 1 of Text) Dam and Reservoir Barkley Celina Cheatham Cordell Hull Old Hickory Percent of project completion 8 - 8 8 8 Year opened to navigation 1964 - 1952 1973 1954 Estimated cost 9 $147,007,600 $200,000,000 $33,386,400 $84,806,500 $52,678,600 1. Clear width and length available for full width. 2. Exclusive of lock section. 3. Surcharge. 4. Normal operation (elev. 375-359) during nonflood season; flood control allowance to be increased to 1,472,000 acrefeet (elev. 375-354) during season of major floodflows. 5. Surcharge storage. 6. During flood season (elev. 508-501); minimum 51,800 acre-feet (elev. 508-504) with normal operation during nonflood season. 7. Daily pondage allowance; run-of-river project. 8. Completed for full beneficial use. 9. Includes recreation facility costs. 23-16 TABLE 23-I TENNESSEE RIVER (See Section 2 of Text) Lock Dimensions Length Minimum Depth Width Avail. Lift on Guard Sills of able for Year Miles Cham- Full Nor- Maxi. Opened Cost of Above Miles from ber Width mal mum Lower Upper Character Navi- Kind Type of Each Lock Project ' Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) of Foundation gation of Dam Construction and Dam Kentucky 22.4 0.5 above Gilbertsville, 110 600 56 73.3 12.7 11.0 Limestone 1942 Fixed Concrete and 2 KY earthfill Pickwick Landing 206.7 4.4 above Hamburg, 110 600 55 63.0 12.8 10.0 Limestone 1937 Fixed Concrete and TN earthfill Wilson: Auxiliary lock 259.4 2.9 above Florence, 60 292 94 100.0 11.0 4 11.2 Limestone 1927 Fixed Concrete and $46,973,540 AL 300 earthfill Main lock 259.4 2.9 above Florence, 110 600 94 100.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone 1959 - - AL General Joe Wheeler: Auxiliary lock 274.9 18.4 above Florence 60 400 48 51.5 13.2 14.7 Limestone 1934 Fixed Concrete and 1,796,295 6 AL earthfill Main lock 274.9 18.4 above Florence, 110 600 48 51.5 13.0 13.0 Limestone 1963 Fixed Concrete and ' AL earthfill Guntersville: Auxiliary lock 349.0 9.1 below Guntersville, 60 360 39 45.0 11.8 13.0 Limestone 1937 Fixed 3 & 7 AL Main lock 349.0 9.1 below Guntersville, 110 600 39 45.0 12.7 13.0 Limestone 1965 Fixed Concrete and 7 AL earthfill Nickajack: Auxiliary lock 424.7 39.4 below Chatta- 110 600 39 41.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone 1967 Fixed Concrete nooga, TN Main lock 424.7 39.4 below Chatta- 110 800 39 41.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone Fixed Concrete nooga, TN Chickamauga 471.0 6.9 above Chatta- 60 360 49 53.0 13.0 10.0 Limestone 1939 Fixed - & 7 nooga, TN Watts Bar 529.9 6.8 above Breedenton, 60 360 58 70.0 11.8 12.0 Shale 1941 Fixed Concrete and TN earthfill Fort Loudon 602.3 1.3 above Lenoir City, 60 360 72 80.0 11.8 12.0 Limestone 1943 Fixed Concrete and 3 TN earthfill Melton Hill 23.1 22.1 above Kingston, 75 400 54 60.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone 1963 Fixed Concrete 2 (Clinch R.) TN 1. H. Doc. 328, 71st Cong., 2d sess., contains table, pp. 98 and 99, giving pertinent information concerning low dams contemplated under 1930 project. Annual Report for 1938, pp. 1218 and 1219, contains similar information pertaining to low dams in addition to existing locks and dams, including those constructed or under construction by Tennessee Valley Authority. 2. Lock and dam constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. 3. Lock and dam constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. Design for lock prepared with Corps forces and funds. 4. Tailwater in canal; flight of 2 locks. 5. Constructed by the Corps under authority of sec. 124, National Defense Act of June 3, 1916 (H. Doc. 1262, 64th Cong., 1st sess.). Actual cost of lock and dam. 6. Actual cost of lock only as constructed by the Corps; dams constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. 7. Constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. 1 No "a TABLE 23-J REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TENNESSEE RIVER, TN, AL, AND KY TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECTS TO SEP 30, 1982 (See Section 2 of Text) Channel Operation & Funds New Work Maintenance Maintenance Total Regular $2,244,236 $6,235,118 $67,135,309 $75,614,663 1.2 Maintenance - - 11,665 11,665 Increase of compensation, - 5 - 5 rivers and harbors, 1919 (certified claims) Total $2,244,236 $6,235,123 $67,146,974 $75,626,333 1.2 1. In addition, surplus property value at $54,336 was tion and care of works of improvement under provisions of transferred from the project without reimbursement. Excludes appropriation for such purposes. $4,005,175 expended between 1890 and June 30, 1935, on opera- 2. Excludes $14,007,192 previous construction cost. TABLE 23-K OHIO RIVER BASIN (NASHVILLE DISTRICT) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Estimated Cost Type of Location Protection Federal Non-Federal Total r Middlesboro Levees $581,000 $161,000 $742,000' (Yellow Creek, KY) Cumberland, KY Channel 520,000 240,000 760,000 1 Improvement 1. Deferred. TABLE 23-L RESERVOIRS Tributary Basin and Reservoir Center Hill Lake, TN Dale Hollow Lake, TN and KY J. Percy Priest Dam & Reservoir, TN Laurel River Lake, KY Martins Fork Lake, KY Rossview, TN & KY 1. Details of this project are in individual report. 2. Formerly Stewarts Ferry Reservoir. 3. See "Other authorized multiple-purpose projects." Total Estimated Stream Cost Caney Fork River $54,746,600 1 Obey River 40,961,700 1 Stones River 57,944,300 1.2 Laurel River 60,000,000 S Martins Fork 21,195,076 Red River 12,590,000 ' 4. See "Other authorized flood control projects." 5. Deferred. 23-18 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 23-M INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 10 of Text) Project Date of Inspection Barbourville, KY Oct. 1981 and Apr. 1982 Corbin, KY Oct. 1981 and Apr. 1982 Lake City, TN Oct. 1981 and Apr. 1982 Middlesboro, KY (Yellow Creek) Oct. 1981 and Apr. 1982 Middlesboro, KY (Diversion Canal) Oct. 1981 and Apr. 1982 Paint Rock River, KY Sep. 1981 and Apr. 1982 Pineville, KY Oct. 1981 and Apr. 1982 Spring City, TN Oct. 1981 and Apr. 1982 TABLE 23-N FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205 P.L. 858, 80th Congress, as amended Project FY 82 Cost Browns Creek, Nashville, TN $ 2,599 Dry Creek, Goodlettsville, TN 15,023 Erin Branch, Erin, TN 14,900 Little Harpeth River, Brentwood, TN 42,319 Middle Fork, Holston River, Marion, VA 7,466 Whiteoak Creek, Sunbright, TN 20,055 Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, P.L. 526, 79th Congress) Project FY 82 Cost Clifton, TN $ 2,066 Concord Park, Fort Loudoun, TN 2,349 Johnson Creek, Old Lock A Road Bridge, TN 9,042 Louisville Point Park, Fort Loudoun Lake, TN 14,821 Soddy Daisy, TN 123,325 Valley River, NC 978 Wheeler Lake, Tennessee River, Decatur, AL 18,634 23-19 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT * This district comprises a portion of southwestern Ohio, west central Kentucky, a small portion of north central Tennessee, Indiana except northern part, and southeastern Illinois except Cairo-Mounds-Mound City area, all included in drainage basin of Ohio River and its tributaries (exclusive of Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers) from mile 438 (below Pittsburgh) immediately upstream from Foster, KY, to mouth. All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation - Locks and Dams Page 1. Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio River ............................ 24-2 2. Green and Barren Rivers, KY .......... 24-2 3. Kentucky River, KY ..................... 24-2 4. Open-channel Work, Ohio River ......... 24-3 5. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............................... 24-3 6. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ......................... 24-3 Flood Control - Local Protection 7. Dayton, KY ........................... 24-3 8. Evansville, IN ........................ 24-3 9. Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN ...................... 24-4 10. Mason J. Niblack Levee, Wabash River, IN ..................... 24-4 11. Mill Creek, OH ........................ 24-4 12. Southwestern Jefferson County, KY ........................... 24-5 Flood Control - Reservoirs 13. Barren River Lake, KY ................. 24-5 14. Brookville Lake, IN ................... 24-5 15. Buckhorn Lake, KY ................... 24-6 16. Caesar Creek Lake, OH ............... 24-6 17. Cagles Mill Lake, IN ................... 24-7 18. Camp Ground Lake, KY ............... 24-7 19. Carr Fork Lake, KY .................... 24-7 20. Cave Run Lake, KY .................... 24-8 21. Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN .............. 24-8 22. Clarence J. Brown Dam & Reservoir, OH ......................... 24-8 23. Green River Lake, KY .................. 24-9 24. Huntington Lake, IN ................... 24-9 25. Louisville Lake, IL ................... 24-10 26. Mississinewa Lake, IN ................. 24-10 27. Monroe Lake, IN ..................... 24-10 28. Nolin Lake, KY ........................ 24-11 29. Ohio River Basin (Louisville Dist.) ...................... 24-11 30. Patoka Lake, IN ....................... 24-11 31. Rough River Lake and Channel Improvements, KY ................... 24-12 Page 32. Salamonie Lake, IN .................. 24-12 33. Taylorsville Lake, KY ................. 24-13 34. Wabash River Basin .................... 24-13 35. West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH ...... 24-13 36. William H. Harsha Lake, OH ........... 24-14 37. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ...................... 24-14 38. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .............................. 24-15 39. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................. 24-15 40. Streambank Erosion Control Evaluation and Demonstration Act of 1974 ............................ 24-15 General Investigations 41. Surveys ................................ 24-15 42. Collection and Study of Basic Data ...... 24-15 43. Advance Engineering and Design ....... 24-15 Tables Table 24-A Cost and Financial Statement ...................... 24-16 Table 24-B Authorizing Legislation ......... 24-20 Table 24-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ....................... 24-21 Table 24-D Not Applicable ................ Table 24-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................ 24-22 Table 24-F Not Applicable ................ Table 24-G Deauthorized Projects ........... 24-24 Table 24-H Principal Features of Green and Barren Rivers and Kentucky River Navigation Systems ...... 24-26 Table 24-I Ohio River Basin - Total Cost of Basin Plan .............. 24-27 Table 24-J Wabash River Basin - Total Cost of Basin Plan ............ 24-31 Table 24-K Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ........... 24-32 Table 24-L Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .......... 24-34 24-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 Navigation - Locks and Dams 1. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER For report on this improvement, see this heading under Ohio River. 2. GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY Location. Green River rises in Casey County, KY, flows northwesterly 370 miles, and empties into Ohio River about 8 miles above Evansville, IN. Barren River rises in Monroe County, KY, flows northwesterly 130 miles, and empties into Green River 1/2 mile above Lock 4 and 149.5 miles above mouth of Green River. Existing project. Six locks and dams on Green River and one on Barren River to give, with channel work in pools of dams, a navigable depth of 9 feet and width of 200 feet from Ohio River to mile 103 Green River, 3.2 miles upstream from Paradise, KY; a navigable depth of 5.5 feet from mile 103 Green River to Mammoth Cave, KY, mile 197.8 Green River, and from mouth of Barren River mile 149.5 Green River, to Bowling Green, KY, mile 30.1 Barren River. Fluctuations in stage vary considerably at different locks. At Lock 3, Green River, ordinary high stages are from 12 to 15 feet above pool level, and at Lock 1, Barren River, from 7 to 10 feet above pool. Maximum stages of record are 34 feet above normal pool stage at Lock 3, Green River, and 29 feet at Lock 1, Barren River, obtained during floods of 1937 and 1913, respectively. (See Table 24-B for authorizing legislation and Table 24-H for principal features of the locks and dams.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Coal handling facilities located on the Green River between miles 81.5 and 108.1 near South Carrollton, Rockport, Paradise and Rochester, Kentucky are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Consisted of operation and maintenance of Locks and Dams, 1 to 3, Green River, and removal of shoals, snags, and slides as required to maintain adequate channel for existing traffic between mouth of Green River and Dam 4 at mile 108.5 Green River. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Locks and Dams 1 and 2, Green River, and Lock and Dam 1, Barren River, are in good condition. Lock and Dam 3, Green River, is in fair condition and Lock 4, Green River is in poor condition. Dam 4, Green River, failed May 24, 1965, when 120 feet washed out. Breach later widened, and repairs are deferred pending completion of survey report for navigation on Green River. Pool of Dam 1, Barren River, is maintained for local small boat use, but navigation through lock is suspended because of loss of lower pool. Operation activity was discontinued at Lock 4 Green River and Lock and Dam 1 Barren River in January 1974 and at Lock 3, Green River in September 1981. The residences and associated buildings and certain real estate at both locations were disposed of in January 1975. Operation of Locks 5' and 6, Green River, was discontinued August 1951, as they were no longer used by river traffic. Controlling project depth in lower 103 miles of Green River is 9 feet; controlling depth from mile 103 to Bowling Green, KY, is 5.5 feet. Under permit issued by District Engineer on August 20, 1963, private interests dredged channel of Green River to extend 9-foot depth to coal loading terminal at mile 105.7. Channel of Green River from mouth of Barren River at mile 149.5 to Mammoth Cave, KY, at mile 197.8, is no longer maintained and is blocked by deactivated Locks and Dams 5 and 6. 3. KENTUCKY RIVER, KY Location. Formed by confluence of its North and Middle Forks about 4 miles east of Beattyville in east central Kentucky, (South Fork joins the main stream at that location), flows northwesterly and empties into Ohio River at Carrollton, KY, mile 545.8 below Pittsburgh, PA. Existing project. Provides for 14 locks and fixed dams to give, in connection with improvement of Ohio River, slack water navigation of 6 feet minimum depth from Ohio River to places on the three forks that are short distances above Beattyville, KY. Length of 6- foot-depth project on main stem of Kentucky River is 258.6 miles to confluence of Middle and North Forks. Cost of completed new work is $4,176,749. River frequently rises to 35 feet or higher. Extreme height at Lock 1 due to flood backwater from Ohio River is 60.3 feet, while extreme floods reach height of 47.6 feet at Lock 4, and 35.5 feet at Lock 14. At some intermediate locks extreme height of floods exceeds 40 feet. All flood heights refer to upper pool gages. Existing project was adopted by 1879 River and Harbor Act (H. Ex. Doc. 47, 45th Cong., 3d. Sess., and Annual Report, 1879, p. 1398). Operation and care of locks and dams were included in project July 1, 1935, under provision of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. (See Table 24-H for principal features of the locks and dams.) On December 19, 1976 the lock operation schedules for commercial traffic and recreational craft on the Kentucky River system were reduced from continuous 24-hour year-round operation to two shift year-round operation 'of Locks 1 through 4, intermittent daily operation of Locks 5 through 10 and intermittent operation five days weekly of Locks 11 through 14. Since that time the hours for operation of Locks 5 through 14 have been reduced in several increments. During the fiscal year Locks 1 through 4 continued with the two shift year-round operations, Locks 5 and 6 through 10 were operated three part weekend days from May 28 through September 6, 1982 and were closed to traffic the rest of the year, and Locks 7 and 11 through 14 were closed to traffic for the entire year. Licenses. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission License No. 539, to Kentucky Utilities Co., at Dam 7, Kentucky River, Annual charge, $4,708; total collec- 24-2 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT tions through September 30, 1981, $244,189. (Collection amount for fiscal year 1982 not available from Department of Energy.) Terminal facilities. Facilities for bulk commodities and gasoline are at various points and considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Consisted of operation and maintenance of the 14 locks and dams, and removal of shoals, snags, and slides as required to maintain an adequate channel for existing traffic between mouth of river and Beattyville, KY, in pool of Dam No. 14. Existing project was completed in 1917. Work accomplished was rehabilitation of the five old State locks and dams and construction of new Locks and Dams 6 to 14 inclusive. Repairs have been made to deteriorated locks and dams as required to keep locks in operation and maintain pool levels above dams except in extreme dry weather, when some pools fall below normal levels, details in Annual Reports for 1963, 1964 and 1965. Channel work was performed as required to provide for existing river traffic. Controlling navigable depth in length of river covered by existing project was 6 feet at end of fiscal year. 4. OPEN-CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER For report on this improvement, see this heading under Ohio River. 5. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 24-C. 6. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION None. Flood Control - Local Protection 7. DAYTON, KY Location. In Campbell County, Kentucky on left bank of Ohio River from mile 467.0 to mile 469.2 and across the river from Cincinnati, Ohio. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Newport, KY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of 8,170 feet of levee, two pumping stations with gravity drainage structures and major relocations of storm and sanitary sewers serving the community. Estimated cost of new work (1982) is $12,624,000 Federal and $2,043,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. Preliminary assurances of cooperation were received from City of Dayton, Kentucky on May 3, 1966. City has acquired all rightsof- way for the project. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and design studies continued. Contracts for construction of access roads and levees and floodwall, purchase of pumps and motors and pumping plant structures at Main and McKinney Streets were completed. Dedication ceremony was held September 25, 1982. Project is about 97 percent complete overall and operational for flood control purposes. Remaining work involves landscaping for the project. 8. EVANSVILLE, IN Location. In Vanderburgh County, IN, on right bank of Ohio River, 792.2 miles below Pittsburgh, PA. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Evansville-South, IN.) Existing project. Construction of a system of levees and concrete floodwalls, together with pumping plants for disposal of interior drainage, at Evansville. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1127. Project will provide protection for City of Evansville, IN, against Ohio River floods equal to 1937 flood (maximum of record), with a 3-foot freeboard. Estimated total cost of new work (1982) is $53,000,000 Federal, including $7,900,000 (Oct 1977) for Howell Section, Unit 2 that is in "inactive" category, and $7,982,000 non-Federal, including $352,000 (Oct 1977) for the said-Howell Section, Unit 2. Existing project selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1937 Flood Control Act. Howell Section, Unit .2 was reclassified from the "active" to the "inactive" category July 7, 1977 based on current studies that indicated this part of the project is not economically justified. Local cooperation. Section 3 of Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, as amended, applies. Fully complied with for Howell Unit 1 and Knight Township sections. Assurances for Pigeon Creek Section, Unit 1 were executed February 11, 1963. Authorizations-of-entry for Pigeon Creek Section, Unit 2, Parts 1 and 2 have been furnished. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and design studies continued. Design Memorandum for North 1st Avenue, Diamond Avenue, and Stringtown Road pumping plants was advanced to about 70 percent completion. Construction contract for Delaware Street pumping plant was completed. Contract for levee and flood wall Cedar Street to Stringtown Road was awarded in March 1982 and advanced to about 22 percent completion. Flood damages estimated at $82,000 were prevented during the 1982 flood season. Knight Township, Howell, Unit 1, and Pigeon Creek, Unit 1 Sections are complete. Howell Section, Unit 2, is in the "inactive" category. Construction of Pigeon Creek Section, Unit 2 was started in April 1974 and is about 32 percent complete. General Design Memorandum and Supplement on Pigeon Creek Unit 2, and Design Memorandum and plans and specifications for Delaware, Dresden and North 6th Avenue pumping plants are approved. Project is about 45 percent complete overall. 24-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 9. LEVEE UNIT NO. 5, WABASH RIVER IN Location. In Gibson and Posey Counties, IN, on left bank of Wabash River, from 58 to 94.5 miles above mouth. Existing project. Provides for construction of 41.9 miles of earth levee, drainage structures, pumping plants, together with alterations to three railroad bridges crossing Wabash River. Project provides protection for 44,000 acres of farm land and towis of Lyle, Skelton, and Griffin, IN, against a flood equal to that expected on an average of 7 times in each 100-year period. Estimated total cost of new work (1982) is $8,820,500 of which $905,500 is non-Federal cost for lands and damages and road utility relocations. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1946. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Assurances were executed by Superintendent of Levee District on January 8, 1962. Completed portions of project (levees) were transferred to the Levee District for operation and maintenance October 15, 1969. Emerson Ditch pumping plant was transferred to the Levee District for operation and maintenance November 24, 1975. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and design studies continued. Construction contract for Coffee Bayou pumping plant was awarded in June 1982 and advanced to 6 percent completion. Flood damages estimated at $734,000 were prevented during the 1982 flood season. All sections of levee, Emerson Ditch pumping plant, and required alterations of the Penn Central Railroad, Southern Railroad, and Illinois Central Railroad are complete. Construction is in progress on the Coffee Bayou pumping plant. Project is about 83 percent complete overall. 10. MASON J. NIBLACK LEVEE, WABASH RIVER, IN Location. In Knox and Sullivan Counties, IN, on left bank of Wabash River, between miles 134.8 and 151.8 above mouth. Existing project. Construction of two sections of earth levee totaling 18 miles in length, three pumping plants for disposal of interior drainage, and other necessary appurtenanes. Length of protection, including high ground between the two levee sections, is 18.9 miles long. Project protects 15,900 acres of agricultural land against a flood equal to that expected to occur 7 times in a 100-year period. Estimated Federal cost of the pumping plants (1982) is $2,784,000. Cost of the completed levee was $1,663,200, of which $109,200 was non-Federal cost and $1,554,000 was Federal cost. The levee project was authorized by the 1946 Flood Control Act; pumping facilities were authorized by the 1968 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, as amended, applies. Fully complied with for levees and pumping plants. Operations during fiscal year. Remedial work on the ventilation systems for the pumping plants was started. Operation by local interests for flood control prevented damages estimated at $1,739,000 during 1982 flood season. Construction of levees complete and transferred to Mason J. Niblack Levee District in January 1965 for operation and maintenance. Construction of the pumping plants and channel improvements complete and transferred to the local sponsor in May 1980. 11. MILL CREEK, OH Location. Proposed project is located along the 18- mile length of Mill Creek and three-fourths mile length of East Fork in Hamilton County, Ohio. Lower Mill Creek is in the commercial and industrial heart of the Cincinnati metropolitan area in the southwestern portion of the State. Existing project. Eighteen miles of channel improvement, 2 miles of levees, two pumping plants, modification of 29 bridges, and the addition of two pumping units at the present Mill Creek Barrier Dam, located near the Ohio River, are included in the project. Acquisition and development with appropriate landscaping of 620 acres along the creek will be provided for high-density urban oriented recreational use. Estimated cost of new work (1982) is $171,692,000, of which $37,191,000 is non-Federal. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 as amended, applies. In addition, local interests must provide without cost to the United States all modifications and relocations of buildings, utilities, street and foot bridges, sewers, and related and special facilities as necessary for construction of project; prevent encroachment on improved channels and on ponding areas which would impair capacities; at least annually inform interests affected as to degree of protection afforded by project, and provide guidance and leadership in preventing unwise and uneconomical development of flood plain areas by encouraging prudent use of floodproofing, land regulation planning, or other flood plain management techniques to reduce flood losses. Further, with respect to the recreational aspects of the project, local interests are required to furnish assurances that they will, if necessary, pay or contribute in kind, a portion of the cost of recreational facilities which, when added to the cost of recreation land, would amount to at least 50 percent of the total first cost of the recreation land and recreational facilities, and assure access to the recreation facilities to all on equal terms. An assurance agreement covering local cooperation requirements for the project consistent with Section 221 of the 1970 Flood Control Act and the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 was executed by the Millcreek Valley Conservancy District February 6, 1975, and for the Secretary of the Army March 28, 1975. A recreation cost sharing contract was executed by the Conservancy District February 25, 1975 and approved by the Secretary of the Army May 28, 1975. 24-4 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Engineering studies continued. Contract for construction of channel and levee Section 7A, Phase I was completed. Construction contract for channel and levee Section 3 awarded in February 1982 and advanced to 26 percent completion. Design Memoranda, Hydrology & Hydraulics, Concrete Aggregate and Stone Protection Sources, and Railroad Relocations, General Design Memoranda, Phase I and Phase II, Design of Channel - Sections 5 and 7 are complete. Channel and levee Section 7A, Phase I is complete. Project is about 4 percent complete overall. 12. SOUTHWESTERN JEFFERSON COUNTY, KY Location. In Jefferson County, KY, on left bank of Ohio River from mile 616 to 628.6. Existing project. Provides for the construction of 68,500 feet of levee, 1,550 feet of concrete wall, four pumping plants, and other necessary appurtenances. Project will provide protection to 24,100 acres against Ohio River floods equal to 1937 flood of record with 3- fo6t freeboard. Estimated cost of new work (1982) is $74,913,000, of which $64,996,000 is Federal, $9,917,000 is non-Federal. Project was authorized under Flood Control Act of August 1968. Recreation as a project purpose has been deferred until such time as a water quality problem on Pond Creek is corrected. Local cooperation. Section 3 Flood Control Act of 1936 as amended applies. In addition, local interests must agree to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and to pay, contribute in kind or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of lands and facilities for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. Jefferson County Fiscal Court expressed intent to fulfill requirement by resolution dated April 4, 1967. Formal assurances of local cooperation for the flood protection portion of the project were executed by resolution of Jefferson County Fiscal Court, adopted September 17, 1971, and assurances for the recreation portion of the project were executed by similar resolution, adopted September 14, .1971. Authorization-of-entry for levee and floodwall sections 1, 2, 3, 4 and 4A have been furnished. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering studies continued. Supply contract for pumps and motors for Riverport, Lower Mill Creek, and Upper Mill Creek pumping plants and contract for power service for Riverport and Lower Mill Creek pumping plants were completed. Contracts for relocation of Texas Gas pipeline and Louisville Gas and Electric pipeline .advanced to 99 percent and 57 percent complete, respectively. Contracts for construction of levee and floodwall Section 4A and Upper Mill Creek pumping plant were advanced to 99 percent and 50 percent complete, respectively. Preconstruction planning is complete and engineering studies are about 79 percent complete. Construction of levee and floodwall Sections 1, 2 and 3, electric service for gatewells, and Riverport and Lower Mill Creek pumping plants are complete. Project is 40 percent complete overall. Flood Control - Reservoirs 13. BARREN RIVER LAKE. KY Location. Dam is on Barren River, 79.5 miles above its confluence with Green River and 10 miles northeast of Scottsville, KY. At flood control pool, reservoir extends upstream about 40 miles in Barren and Allen Counties, KY. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Lucas, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earth and rockfill, 146 feet high and 3,970 feet long, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open-cut spillway. Total storage capacity is 815,200 acre-feet (768,600 for flood control and 46,600 for water supply storage). For further details, see page 1125 of Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of new work (1982) is $27,479,717 including $2,335,056 Federal funds and $108,418 non- Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Under provision of Water Supply Act of 1958, contract with City of Glasgow for water supply storage was approved by Secretary of Army on October 4, 1965. Terms require City to pay $23,433, which is project cost allocated to water storage plus capitalized prepayment of proportionate share of operation, maintenance, and major replacement costs. A contract with the Commonwealth of Kentucky for development of additional campsites, shoreline protection and breakwa'ter extension at Barren River Lake State Park under the cost-sharing category of the completed projects program was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 4, 1977. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1982 flood season prevented damages of $1,013,000. Construction started in March 1960 and all major construction and relocation items were completed in October 1964. Project was placed in operation in March 1964. Land acquisition complete. 14. BROOKVILLE LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Whitewater River, 2.4 miles above confluence with West Fork, and about 1-1/2 miles north of Brookville, Indiana. The reservoir lies in Franklin and Union Counties, Indiana. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Brookville, IN.) 24-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earthfill, 182 feet high and 3,004 feet long, with gate-controlled outlet works, and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 359,600 acre-feet (214,700 for flood control, 89,300 for water supply and 35,500 for conservation). A minimum pool of 20,100 acre-feet is maintained. Estimated cost of new work (1982) is $66,639,182 of which $37,937,182 is Federal cost and $7,592,000 is non- Federal contribution for water supply storage and $21,110,000 for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Contract with State of Indiana for water supply storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958 was approved by Secretary of Army, August 5, 1965. Under terms of contract, State paid initial costs allocated to water supply feature of project plus capitalized prepayment of proportionate share of operation and maintenance costs. Operation during fiscal year. New work: Engineering studies for pump modification and force main connection to regional sewer system continued. Maintenance: Contract for installation ofhydropower unit advanced to 99 percent completion. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1982 flood season prevented damages estimated at $26,000. Construction started in November 1965 is about 99 percent complete, overall. All major construction and relocation items are complete except connection of recreation facilities to a regional sewer system. Land acquisition is complete and the project was placed in operation January 1974. 15. BUCKHORN LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Middle Fork of Kentucky River, 43.4 miles above mouth, and 0.5 mile upstream from Buckhorn, Perry County, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 34 miles and lies in Leslie and Perry Counties, Kentucky. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Buckhorn, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam is earth and rockfill type, with gate controlled outlet works. Total storage capacity is 168,000 acre-feet, of which 157,600 acre-feet is for flood control. For further details, see page 1120 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of completed new work (1982) is $11,766,206 including $386,707 for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Department of Parks of Commonwealth of Kentucky has undertaken management of lands and recreationalfacilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on June 29, 1962. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contract for stabilization of rock wall in operations area completed. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1982 flood season prevented damages estimated at $96,000. Construction started in September 1956 and project was placed in operation in August 1960. All construction and land acquisition is complete. 16. CAESAR CREEK LAKE, OH Location. Damsite is on Caesar Creek, about 3.0 miles above its confluence with Little Miami River, in Warren County, Ohio, about 3.5 miles southeast of Waynesville, Ohio, and 10.5 miles northeast of Lebanon, Ohio. Reservoir lies in Warren, Clinton, and Green Counties, Ohio. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Oregonia, OH.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earth and rockfill dam, four saddle dams, outlet works and an uncontrolled saddle spillway. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 242,200 acre-feet, of which 148,500 acre-feet is reserved for flood control storage. Estimated cost of new work (1982) is $81,798,000 including $4,998,000 non-Federal reimbursement for water supply storage and $16,757,000 for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. However, the State of Ohio requested inclusion in the project of storage for future municipal and industrial water supply uses. Contract with State of Ohio for water supply storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, was approved by Secretary of the Army, May 20, 1970. Under terms of contract, State will reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated plus estimated annual amount for cost of operation, maintenance and major capital replacements required for the water supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design studies continued. Final condemnation action for land acquisition on one tract continued. Three contracts for construction of service/ maintenance center; power service to Wellman Meadows; and regional visitors center were completed. Contract for sewer connection charge with Warren County was modified to include enlargement of waste water treatment plant at Waynesville and advanced to 1 percent completion. Two contracts for picnic units in recreation areas and landscaping the regional visitors center were awarded and completed. Contract for tailwater comfort station was awarded and advanced to 98 percent completion. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1982 flood season prevented damages of $2,176,000. Construction of the project started in January 1968 and it is ndw complete except final condemnation 24-6 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT action on one real estate tract, corrective work on utility ducts at a relocated highway bridge, corrective work on the regional visitors center and several recreation buildings, and final utility connections to the recreation facilities. Project is about 92 percent complete overall. 17. CAGLES MILL LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Mill Creek, 2.8 miles above its confluence with Eel River, in Putnam County, IN, and about 25 miles east of Terre Haute, IN. Reservoir extends upstream about 11 miles and is in Putnam and Owen Counties, IN. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Poland, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam is earth and rockfill embankment. Total storage capacity is 228,100 acre-feet, of which 201,000 acre-feet are for flood control. For details see Annual Report for 1962, page 1136. Estimated cost of new work (1982) is $4,603,582 including $265,814 Federal funds and $230,000 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. State of Indiana has undertaken development and management of recreation facilities for use of the public in reservoir area in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on January 17, 1952. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources for expanding the boat ramp and parking area at Site 3, Lieber State Park under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program was signed by the State of Indiana on August 26, 1981 and approved by the Deputy Chief of Engineers on March 26, 1982. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Planning was completed for construction of ramp and parking area at Site 3, Lieber State Park under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1982 flood season prevented damages of $2,425,000. Construction started in July 1948 and completed in June 1953. 18. CAMP GROUND LAKE, KY Location. The damsite is in central Kentucky on Beech Fork, about 49.1 miles above its confluence with Rolling Fork, which stream is a tributary to Salt River, in Washington County about 11 miles northeast of Bardstown and about 34 miles southeast of Louisville, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Maud, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. The project consists of a rolled-earth dam with an uncontrolled open-cut spillway through. the left abutment, and a gate controlled outlet conduit. A detached dam is required in a saddle between the main dam and the spillway. Total storage capacity will be 360,740 acre-feet for flood control, water supply, water quality and recreation. Estimated cost of new work (1981) is $124,227,000 of which $113,047,000 would be reimbursed by non-Federal interests. Project was authorized for Phase I design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design by the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (Section 1). Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to administer project lands, facilities, and water areas for recreation, including fish and wildlife enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, no less than one-half of the separable first costs allocated to recreation; bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of fish and wildlife and recreation use lands and facilities; repay all cost allocated to water supply; effect proper measures for control of pollution at the source to assure the effectiveness of the water quality storage provided; exercise, to the full extent of their legal capability, control against removal of streamflow resulting from the reservoir storage provided for water quality control; prevent encroachment of flowcarrying capacities of stream channels below the reservoir to the extent needed to provide reasonably effective reservoir operations; and periodically (at least annually) notify interests affected that the project will not provide complete flood protection and that backwater floods from the Ohio River will not be substantially reduced by the project. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning studies were discontinued because the responsible agencies of the Commonwealth of Kentucky have indicated they do not anticipate the Commonwealth's participation in either the recreation aspects or the water supply aspects of the project and the project is not economically feasible without such participation. Report on Economics recommending continuation of Phase I studies was completed and approved May 29, 1979. This project is no longer funded under the Construction General appropriation category. The supplemental preauthorization study has been assigned to the General Investigation appropriation category. Construction has not started. 19. CARR FORK LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is 8.8 miles above mouth of Carr Fork, a tributary of North Fork of Kentucky River, 16 miles upstream from Hazard, Kentucky. The reservoir lies entirely within Knott County. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Carrie and Vicco, KY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rock and earth fill with impervious core, 720 feet long and 130 feet high, with uncontrolled open cut spillway thrgugh left abutment. Outlet works has two control gates and 8-foot diameter conduit to stilling basin. Total storage capacity is 47,700 acre-feet (31,600 for flood control and 4,300 for water quality control). A higher level seasonalpool for recreation is provided. Estimated Federal cost "of new work (1982) is $50,389,000 including $89,000 for recreation facilities 24-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for reservoir project. Division of Flood Control and Water Usage of Commonwealth of Kentucky gave assurance that encroachments on downstream channel capacity will be prevented. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Real estate administrative action required for condemnation of remaining tracts was continued. Multicomponent contract for relocation of Sassafras Bridge, Knott County Road 1089, construction of spillway access road and remedial work at recreation sites was completed. Construction, by hired labor, of sanitary dump station for boats, in conformance with EPA and State standards, at Irishman Creek site was advanced to 99 percent completion under the completed projects program. Maintenance: Contract for resurfacing road in operations area was completed. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1982 flood season prevented damages of $22,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was placed in operation January 1976. Construction started in January 1966 is complete. All land required for the project has been acquired; however, a number of condemnation actions remain unsettled. 20. CAVE RUN LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is on Licking River, about 4 miles upstream from U. S. Highway 60 near Farmers, Kentucky, and 7 miles southwest of Morehead, Kentucky. Reservoir will be in Rowan, Bath, Morgan, and Menifee Counties, Kentucky. (See U. S. Geological Survey maps of Salt Lick and Morehead, KY.) Existing project. Plan provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earthfill, with gate controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 614,100 acre-feet (438,500 for flood control and 28,300 for water quality control). Estimated Federal cost of new work (1982) is $114,704,000 of which $34,256,000 is U. S. Forest Service cost. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of June 22, 1936, and June 28, 1938. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design studies continued. Real estate administrative action required for acquisition of remaining tracts was continued. Three contracts for construction of Highway 801 recreation facilities, and paving in recreation areas and in Zilpo recreation area, Part I were completed. Contract for repair of relocated Morgan County Road 1009A was awarded in June 1982 and advanced to 27 percent completion and contract for remaining recreation facilities at the Twin Knobs site was awarded in September 1982. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1982 flood season prevented damages of $612,000. Project has been in operation since February 1974. Construction started in June 1965 and is about 86 percent complete overall. Land acquisition is complete except for outstanding condemnation actions. All relocation and construction features are complete except remedial work on control tower and recreation facilities. 21. CECIL M. HARDEN LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Raccoon Creek, 32.4 miles above its confluence with Wabash River, and 25 miles northeast of Terre Haute, IN. At flood control pool, reservoir extends upstream about 15 miles in Parke and Putnam Counties, Indiana. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Mansfield, IN.) Existing project. A rolled earth dam and reservoir, for flood control and allied purposes. Total storage capacity is 132,800 acre-feet of which 116,600 acre-feet are for flood control. For details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1132. Estimated Federal cost of new work (1982) is $7,037,794 including $398,672 Federal funds and $378,988 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from Mansfield Lake to Cecil M. Hardin Lake by Public Law 93-521, December 14, 1974. Local cooperation. State of Indiana has undertaken management of lands and recreational facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on April 19, 1961. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Cost shared recreation facilities being constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program were advanced to about 99 percent completion. Maintenance: Boundary monumentation continued. Routine maintenance was performed. Flood damages of $3,056,000 were prevented during the 1982 flood season. Construction started in October 1956 and all major items of work were completed December 1961. Land acquisition is complete. Project has been in operation since August 1960. 22. CLARENCE J. BROWN DAM & RESERVOIR, OH Location. Damsite is just east of Springfield, Clark County, Ohio, at mile 7.3 of Buck Creek, a tributary of Mad River. (See U. S. Geological Survey maps of New Moorefield and Springfield, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam, 6,620 feet 24-8 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT long and 72 feet high, with gated outlet works and open cut spillway with concrete chute through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 63,700 acre-feet (32,900 for flood control and 20,800 for water quality control). Federal cost of completed project (1981) is $22,083,700. Project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from Buck Creek Dam and Reservoir to Clarence J. Brown Dam and Reservoir by Public Law 90-46, July 4, 1967. Local cooperation. Assurances from City of Springfield, Springfield Conservancy District, and Clark County, Ohio, covering protection against detrimental channel encroachment below dam to mouth of Buck Creek, were accepted March 5, 1964. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contract for additional stone protection on the dam and spillway was awarded in March and completed in April 1982. Routine maintenance was performed. Flood damages of $152,000 were prevented during the 1982 flood season. Construction started in September 1966. Land acquisition and all major project features were completed in November 1973. The project was placed in operation in January 1974. 23. GREEN RIVER LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is 305.7 miles above mouth of Green River in Taylor County, KY, about 8 miles south of Campbellsville. Reservoir lies in Taylor and Adair Counties. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Cane Valley, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth and rock-fill, 141 feet high and 2,350 feet long. Outlet works is slide gatecontrolled and spillway open and uncontrolled. Total storage capacity is 723,200 acre-feet (560,600 for flood control and 64,500 for low-flow augmentation). Estimated cost of new work (1982) is $33,609,163, including $317,232 Federal funds and $186,747 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authorized under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Taylor County, by lease approved by Secretary of Army February 15, 1968, undertook operation and maintenance of Smith Ridge public access area. In May 1980, the lease was amended to turn back responsibility for maintenance and operation of 99 percent of the site to the Corps, with the County retaining responsibility for the marina area. Under provision of Water Supply Act of 1958, contractwith City of Campbellsville for water supply storage was approved by Secretary of Army April 23, 1969. Terms require city to repay, with interest and annual charges for operation, maintenance and major replacement, the investment cost of $85,765 allocated to its water supply storage space. Total payments received through fiscal year 1982, $17,920. The Department of Parks of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, by lease approved by Secretary of Army, October 4, 1971, has undertaken the management of the Lone Valley public access area. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Hired labor construction of sanitary dump station for boats at Dam Site in conformance with EPA and State standards and rehabilitation of sewage treatment facilities, washhouses and restrooms at Smith Ridge site were continued under the completed projects program. Maintenance: Contract for resurfacing recreation road at Dam Site completed and contract for repairs to stilling basin and retreat channel awarded in October 1981 was completed. Contract for security fence was awarded in September 1982. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages estimated at $929,000 during the 1982 flood season. Construction began in August 1965 and all major construction and relocation items were completed in 1972. Project has been in operation since February 1969. Project including all land acquisition complete in 1973. 24. HUNTINGTON LAKE, IN. Location. Damsite is on Wabash River, about 2 miles from Huntington, IN, and 411.4 miles above mouth. Reservoir is in Huntington and Wells Counties, IN. (See U. S. Geological Survey maps of Majenica and Mt. Etna, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam consists of a rolled earth embankment 4,700 feet long and 89 feet high, a concrete spillway and outlet section 155 feet long, and a concrete gravity section 310 feet long. Spillway is controlled by three gates, and outlet works by six sluices. Project also provides local flood protection for Markle, IN. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 153,100 acre-feet, of which 149,000 acre-feet is reserved for flood control storage. Estimated project cost for new work (1982) is $19,893,664 of which $19,490,813 is Federal cost and $402,851 non-Federal responsibility including recreation facilities under completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to one percent of project first cost. State of Indiana has met this obligation. Contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army May 17, 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreational facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost shared category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Planning for additional cost shared recreation development under the completed. projects program was completed. Construction of additional cost shared development by the State of Indiana under the same program at Little Turtle and Kil-So-Quah recreation areas was advanced to 99 percent completion. Maintenance: Contract for resurfacing in the operations area 24-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 was awarded in September 1982. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages estimated at $15,509,000 during the 1982 flood season. Land acquisition and all major construction complete. Project was placed in operation.January 9,1969. 25. LOUISVILLE LAKE, IL Location. Damsite is on the Little Wabash River 164.8 miles above the mouth and about 3.5 miles northwest of Louisville, and 23 miles south of Effingham, IL. The lake area lies in Clay and Effingham Counties. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Edgewood, IL.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. The project will consist of a gatecontrolled concrete overflow spillway section located at the face of the right abutment flanked by random rock and earth fill embankment with impervious center core extending across the valley to the left abutment. A small dike along the right abutment will parallel an existing railroad. Total length of dam is about 21,400 feet with a maximum height of 69 feet. Total storage capacity is 230,769 acre-feet, of which 168,531 acre-feet will be for flood control. Estimated Federal cost of new work (1981) is $108,694,000, including $2,347,000 for recreation facilities under the completed projects program, and $15,604,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and recreation. Project was authorized by 1968 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest (which may be through user fees) one-half the separable costs allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife lands and facilities; reimburse the allocated construction costs allocated to water supply storage; bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of water supply storage facilities; prevent channel encroachments tending to reduce present channel capacities; hold and save the United States free from damages from water rights claims resulting from construction and operation of the reservoir; exercise, to the full extent of their legal capability, control against removal from stream flow made available by reservoir storage for water quality control purposes; and contribute to the control of pollution of the stream subject to low-flow augmentation by adequate treatment or other methods of controlling wastes at their source. The State of Illinois will be the responsible cooperating agency for all required assurances. Operations during fiscal year. Regular preconstruction planning has been discontinued due to the State of Illinois' failure to provide up to date reaffirmation of state support for the project. Alternative water supply studies continued. Design Memoranda, Hydrology and Hydraulics, Draft and Final General Design Memorandum, Phase I, Plan Formulation and Appendices and Final Environmental Impact Statement are complete. Relocation of U. S. Route 45 (Advance Participation) is complete. 26. MISSISSINEWA LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is 7.1 miles above mouth of Mississinewa River, which flows into Wabash River about 2 miles upstream from Peru, IN. At flood control pool level, reservoir extends upstream about 28 miles, in Wabash, Grant, and Miami Counties, IN. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Peoria, IN.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam 137 feet high and 8,100 feet long, gate-controlled outlet works, and an uncontrolled open spillway through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 368,400 acre-feet, of which 345,100 acre-feet are reserved for flood control storage. Estimated project cost for new work (1982) is $24,614,943, of which $23,981,438 is Federal cost and $633,505 non-Federal responsibility including recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to 1 percent of project first cost. State of Indiana assumed this obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction of additional. cost shared recreation development by the State of Indiana at Miami and Frances Slocum sites under the completed projects program was advanced to 99 percent completion. Maintenance: Contract for repair of service bridge was completed and contract for resurfacing at the operations area was awarded in September 1982. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages of $19,136,000 during 1982 flood season. Construction and land acquisition is complete. Project was placed in operation in May 1968. 27. MONROE LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Salt Creek, a tributary of White River, 25.9 miles above mouth, and 2 miles each of Harrodsburg, Monroe County, IN. At flood control pool level, reservoir will extend upstream 44 miles in Monroe, Brown, and Jackson Counties. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Clear Creek, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth core and rock shell, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 441,000 acre-feet 24-10 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT (258,800 is for flood control and 159,900 for low flow augmentation). Estimated cost of new work (1982) is $16,619,473, of which $7,797,604 is non-Federal contribution for low-flow regulation storage and $895,285 Federal funds and $894,100 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act, modifying comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Local cooperation. Section 3, 1944 Flood Control Act applies. Local interests must contribute 54.1 percent of project cost, this being the proportion allocated to low-flow regulation feature, plus a capitalized amount representing that part of average annual maintenance and operation cost allocated to low-flow regulation. State of Indiana assumed this cost sharing obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Cost to the State of Indiana for low flow regulation storage was reduced $217,719 for recalculation of road relocation costs. Construction of additional cost shared recreation development by the State of Indiana at Fairfax, Paynetown, and Moores Creek sites under the completed projects program was completed. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages of $1,824,000 during 1982 flood season. Project is complete and was placed in operation in February 1965. 28. NOLIN LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Nolin River 7.8 miles above its confluence with Green River, about 70 air miles southwest of Louisville, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 57 miles and is in Edmonson, Grayson, Hart, and Hardin Counties, KY. (See U. S. Geological Survey maps of Nolin Reservoir and Dickeys Mill, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rockfill-earth core type, with gate-controlled outlet works, and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 609,400 acre-feet, of which 545,600 acre-feet is for flood control. For further details of project see Annual Report for 1962, page 1124. Estimated Federal cost of new work (1982) is $17,922,176 including $3,325,113 for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control,Act. Local cooperation. None required for authorized project. State of Kentucky contributed $18,195 for increased width of dam for public road. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction by hired labor on sanitary dump station for boats at Moutardier site in conformance with EPA and State standards, under the completed projects program, was advanced to 99 percent complete. Maintenance: Contracts for resurfacing roads in tailwater area and modification of control tower gate hoist equipment were completed. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1982 flood season prevented damages estimated at $836,000. Construction started in January 1959. Project was completed and placed in operation in March 1963. 29. OHIO RIVER BASIN (Louisville District) Location. Works covered by this project are a series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs in Ohio River Basin within Louisville District. Existing project. Individual projects considered in comprehensive plan within the Louisville District. (See Table 24-B for authorizing legislation, and Table 24-I for cost and listing of projects in the basin plan.) Operations during fiscal year. No costs were incurred except for those projects for which individual reports are given. 30. PATOKA LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is in Dubois County, IN, 118.3 miles above mouth of Patoka River, and 50 miles westnorthwest of New Albany, IN. Reservoir extends into Dubois, Orange and Crawford Counties. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Cuzco, IN.) Existing project. Reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth and rock fill, 1,550 feet long and 85 feet high, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 301,600 acre-feet (121,000 for flood control and 167,500 for water supply and water quality control). Estimated cost of new work (1982) is $80,362,000, of which $1,300,000 is Federal cost for emergency remedial measures and to clear and snag the Patoka River downstream of Patoka Lake, which work was directed by Congress in 1981, $53,077,000 is Federal cost for other construction including recreation facilities under completed projects program, and $25,985,000 is non-Federal contribution for water supply storage and recreation facilities. Project was authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act, and emergency measures and snagging and clearing the Patoka River downstream of Patoka Lake to insure effective operation of the project for flood control was directed by 1981 Appropriation Act for Energy and Water Development. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated, presently estimated at 29.316 percent of the joint-use facilities cost, exclusive of interests, plus $287,000 for the cost of 24-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 operating and maintaining water supply storage for a period of 50 years, plus $42,000 for the cost of major capital replacements required for water supply storage space for a period of 50 years. Local interests are also required to pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to recreation. Present laws of the State of Indiana require that agency to make cash contributions during construction of the project. Local interests must also agree to prevent encroachments on channel of Patoka River from dam to mouth, and to pay allocated initial and annual maintenance and operation costs for water supply storage. Formal assurances of local cooperation, executed by the Indiana Natural Resources Commission, were accepted August 27, 1970. Contracts with State of Indiana for water supply and recreation were approved by the Secretary of the Army November 2, 1970. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering studies and land acquisitions continued. Three utility relocation contracts for Orange County REMC, Indiana Telephone Corporation, and Public Service of Indiana continued. Emergency remedial measures and snagging and clearing the Patoka River, that is being accomplished with leased equipment and hired labor, was advanced to about 83 percent completion. Contract for repairs to the beach, awarded in October 1981 was completed. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1982 flood season prevented damage estimated at $2,780,000. Construction was started in July 1972. Engineering studies are about 99 percent complete. Land acquisition is about 98 percent complete. Construction of all relocations are complete, except minor repairs to a relocated road. All other major features with the exception of recreation facilities are also complete. Permanent impoundment was started in February 1978 and the project was placed in operation about August 1980. The project is about 98 percent complete overall. 31. ROUGH RIVER LAKE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, KY Location. Dam is on Rough River, 89.3 miles above its confluence with Green River 160.3 miles above Ohio River, and about 60 miles southwest of Louisville, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 30 miles and is in Breckinridge, Hardin, and Grayson Counties, KY. Channel improvement work is on Rough River, Barnett Creek, and West Fork of Barnett Creek. (See U. S. Geological Survey maps of McDaniels and Falls of Rough, KY.) Existing project. Reservoir is for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earthfill type, with gatecontrolled outlet works. Storage capacity is 334,380 acre-feet, of which 314,210 acre-feet is of flood control. Project also includes channel clearing of lower Rough River, and channel improvement on Barnett Creek, a tributary of Rough River. For further details see page 1126 of Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of new work (1982) is $11,265,009 including $1,512,016 Federal funds and $22,612 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Modification of previously approved plan to include channel improvement items was authorized by the 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for construction of reservoir unit. Provisions of Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936, are applicable to channel improvements. Assurances obtained from Ohio County for channel improvement. Department of Parks, Commonwealth of Kentucky, has undertaken management of certain lands and recreation facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on August 18, 1961. A contract with the Commonwealth of Kentucky to improve and pave road at the Below Dam Area - State Park under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 4, 1977. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction by hired labor on sanitary dump station for boats at North Fork site in conformance with EPA and State standards under the completed projects program was advanced to 99 percent complete. Maintenance: Two contracts for modification of lift station and repair to boat ramp at North Fork site were completed. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1982 flood season prevented damages estimated at $1,250,000. Construction started in November 1955 and reservoir was placed in operation in June 1959. Land acquisition and all major items of construction and relocation are complete. 32. SALAMONIE LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is 3.1 miles above mouth of Salamonie River which enters Wabash River about 6 miles upstream from Wabash, IN. Reservoir extends upstream about 27 miles at flood control pool and lies in Wabash and Huntington Counties, IN. (See U. S. Geological Survey maps of Lagro and Majenica, IN.) Existing projects Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 133 feet and a length of 6,100 feet, gate-controlled outlet works with a 16-foot diameter conduit and an uncontrolled open spillway through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 263,600 acre-feet, of which 250,500 acre-feet is for flood control storage. Estimated project cost for new work (1982) is $17,044,819, of which $16,559,216 is Federal cost and $485,603 is non-Federal responsibility including recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. - Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to one percent of project 24-12 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT first cost. State of Indiana assumed this obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe, and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction of additional cost shared recreation development by the State of Indiana at the Dora-New Holland and Lost Bridge sites under the completed projects program was advanced to 99 percent complete. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. During the 1982 flood season, operation for flood control prevented damages of $17,982,000. Land acquisition and all major construction and relocation contracts are complete. Reservoir was placed in operation in spring 1967. 33. TAYLORSVILLE LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is in Spencer County, KY, 60.0 miles above the confluence of Salt River and Ohio River, 4 river miles above Taylorsville and 36.9 river miles above Shepherdsville, KY. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Taylorsville, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam will be an earth and rock fill structure, 164 feet high and 1,280 feet long. Outlet works will be slide gate controlled and spillway will be uncontrolled open cut. Total storage capacity will be 291,670 acre-feet (211,230 for flood control, winter months), and 52,245 for water quality and fish and wildlife. Estimated Federal cost of new work (1982) is $100,441,000, of which $5,146,000 is for recreation facilities under the completed projects program, and $20,171,000 is non-Federal responsibility for recreation facilities. Project was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to administer project land and water areas for recreation; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be. through user fees) with interest one-half of the separable first costs of the project allocated to recreation; bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation lands and facilities. Local interests must also agree to prevent encroachments on flow-carrying capacities of stream channels below the reservoir to the extent needed to provide reasonably effective reservoir operation. Commonwealth of Kentucky has indicated intent to fulfill requirements for recreation cost sharing and has assumed responsibility for channel encroachments and pollution control. The Commonwealth furnished assurance agreements covering prevention of encroachment on capacity of stream channels in April and May 1973 and executed the recreation cost sharing contract in April 1973. On April 2, 1980 the U. S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky ruled that the 1973 recreation cost sharing contract between the Commonwealth and the United States that provided for repayment after completion was invalid under the Kentucky Constitution which prohibits one General Assembly from obligating future appropriations that would be binding on a subsequent legislature. In response to the Court's ruling, the Commonwealth and the United States entered into a new contract providing for cash contributions. Contract was approved by the Secretary of the Army June 11, 1980. The contract was found to be valid and enforceable by the Court July 14, 1980. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and design studies and land acquisition continued. Three road relocation contracts and two utility relocation contracts were advanced to 86 percent and 71 percent overall completions, respectively. Dam and spillway contract and Settlers Trace, Phase I recreation facilities contract were advanced to 91 percent and 82 percent complete, respectively. Three relocation contracts for Kentucky Highway 248, Site B-1, Kentucky Highway 1066, Site K-6, and South Central Bell telephone facilities were awarded and advanced to 36 percent, 14 percent, and 75 percent complete, respectively. Contract for final pool clearing was awarded in March 1982 and advanced to 94 percent complete, and contract for utilities to the operations area was awarded in May 1982 and advanced to 13 percent complete. During the 1982 flood season operation for flood control prevented damages of $149,000. Engineering and design studies are about 83 percent complete and land acquisition is about 89 percent complete. Construction was started in June 1974. The project was substantially complete and used for flood control purposes during the 1982 flood season. Two major highway relocation contracts are not awarded and major portions of the cost shared recreation construction are not yet started. Project is about 60 percent complete overall. 34. WABASH RIVER BASIN Location. Works covered by this project are located in the Wabash River Basin, a drainage area of 33,100 square miles, covering parts of Indiana, Illinois and Ohio. Existing project. One local protection project and five reservoir projects were authorized for this basin plan. (See Table 24-B for authorizing legislation and Table 24-J for project list and total cost of basin plan.) Operations during fiscal year. See individual listing for Louisville Lake, IL. 35. WEST FORK OF MILL CREEK LAKE, OH Location. Dam is on West Fork of Mill Creek 6.5 miles above its junction with Mill Creek and 2 miles northeast of Mount Healthy, Ohio, and 10 miles north of downtown Cincinnati. Reservoir extends upstream about 3 miles and is in Hamilton County, Ohio. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Glendale, OH.) Existing project. An earth embankment dam and 24-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 a reservoir for flood control, recreation, and reduction of pumping requirements at Mill Creek barrier dam in Cincinnati. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 11,300 acre-feet, of which 9,850 acre-feet is for flood control. For further details see page 1119 of Annual Report for 1962. Estimated cost of new work (1982) is $6,067,663, including non-Federal cost of $520,800 for sewer relocation and dam, $50,000 non-Federal contribution in fulfillment of project authorization and $1,201,961 Federal funds and $1,201,961 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project selected for construction under additional authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1946 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests were to release necessary land under their control and give assurance that future channel encroachment below damsite would be prevented. For enlargement of reservoir to include a conservation pool, local interests would contribute one-half additional cost of such pool, including one-half cost of relocation of sanitary sewer, and agree to hold the United States free from damages resulting from its provision. Board of County Commissioners of Hamilton County, Ohio, adopted a resolution October 8, 1947, signifying willingness to fulfill requirements including provision of conservation pool. Assurances were executed on same date. A contract with the United States for relocation of sanitary sewer outside reservoir area in order to include conservation pool in project was accepted by Hamilton County, in which the United States paid one-half cost of such relocation work. Hamilton County Commissioners furnished $50,000, required as a local contribution toward additional cost of providing conservation pool. Hamilton County Park District has undertaken development and management of recreation facilities in reservoir area for use of the public in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on October 31, 1951. Contract for cost shared recreation development under the completed works program was executed by the Board of Park Commissioners, Hamilton County Park District, Ohio, in September 1975 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1975. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction continued for additional cost shared recreation development under the completed projects program. Maintenance: Contract for repairs to the stilling basin was awarded in September 1982. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during 1982 flood season prevented damages estimated at $135,000. Construction started March 1949 and reservoir was placed in operation in December 1952. Project is complete. 36. WILLIAM H. HARSHA LAKE, OH Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Little Miami River between Batavia and Williamsburg, Ohio, about 6.0 miles above Batavia and 32.6 miles above mouth of the Little Miami River. Entire project lies in Clermont County, Ohio. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Batavia, OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam, outlet works, an uncontrolled saddle spillway and a dike to close a saddle north of spillway. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 294,800 acre-feet, of which 210,600 acrefeet is reserved for flood control storage. Estimated cost of new work (1982) is $77,510,000 including $3,494,000 non-Federal reimbursement for water supply storage and $22,928,000 for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from East Fork Lake to William H. Harsha Lake effective January 4, 1981 by Public Law 96-383, October 6, 1980. Local cooperation. None required. However, the State of Ohio requested inclusion in the project of storage for future municipal and industrial water supply uses. Contract with State of Ohio for water supply storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, was approved by Secretary of the Army, May 20, 1970. Under terms of contract, State will reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated plus estimated annual amount for cost of operation, maintenance and major capital replacements required for the water supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design studies continued. Three contracts for construction of Tunnel Mill Road, remaining work at North Shore boat ramp, and service maintenance center were completed. Two contracts for electric service and sewer service to recreation areas were advanced to 81 percent and 62 percent complete respectively. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during 1982 flood season prevented damages of $1,158,000. Construction was started in May 1970. Engineering studies are 88 percent complete. All land required for project has been acquired. Major relocation and construction features are complete, except several recreation items. Project is about 93 percent complete overall and was placed in operation in February 1978. 37. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to maintain and operate local protection projects in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. Inspections were made to determine extent of compliance and to advise interests as necessary to measures required to correct deficiencies. (See Table 24-K for local protection projects and channel improvements inspected.) Fiscal year costs were $158,394. Total costs to September 30, 1982 were $2,202,209. 24-14 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT 38. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 24-E. 39. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities pursuant to Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation. Costs for fiscal year were $152,986 for disaster preparedness, $12,123 for emergency operations, and $10,615 for repair work on Brevoort Levee, Indiana ($10,196), and Saint Marie Levee, Illinois ($419). Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Costs for fiscal year were $302,579 for preparation of reconnaissance reports and detailed project reports on nine projects. See Table 24-L. Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress). Costs for fiscal year were $20,020 for preparation of reconnaissance reports and detailed project reports on three projects. See Table 24-L. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Costs for fiscal year were $50,834 for preparation of reconnaissance reports on ten projects and $144,454 for completion of construction of two projects on Ohio River, Otter Creek Park, Kentucky ($33,297) and White River Brownstown, Indiana ($111,157). See Table 24-L. 40. STREAMBANK EROSION CONTROL EVALUATION AND DEMONSTRATION ACT OF 1974 Costs for the fiscal year were $24,820 for completion of the Moscow, Ohio, Ohio River mile 443 demonstration project. General Investigations 41. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,766,756, of which $80,243 was for one navigation study, $1,125,859 for five flood damage prevention studies, $242,983 for the Wabash River Basin Authorization Report, $78,814 for review of two authorized projects and review for deauthorization, $57 for coordination with the Soil Conservation Service, $15,341 for coordination with the Ohio River Basin Commission, $44 for Water Quality Management, $1,538 for technical and engineering assistance on shore and streambank erosion, $218,624 for planning assistance to states, and $3,253 for supplemental preauthorization studies (Phase I) on Camp Ground Lake, KY. 42. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $943,769 for inspection of dams, $187,183 for flood plain management services and $433 for general hydrology studies. 43. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Fiscal year costs were $96,643 for General Design Memorandum studies on Frankfort, Kentucky (South Frankfort Section) and $93,052 for alternative water supply studies on Louisville Lake, Illinois. 24-15 TABLE 24-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding Navigation - Locks and Dams 2 Green and Barren New Work Rivers, KY Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 3 Kentucky River, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Flood Control - Local Protection 7 Dayton, KY New Work Approp. Cost 8 Evansville, IN New Work Approp. Cost 9 Levee Unit No. 5 New Work Wabash River, IN Approp. Cost 10 Mason J. Niblack New Work Levee, IN Approp. Cost 11 Mill Creek, OH New Work Approp. Cost 12 Southwestern New Work Jefferson County, Approp. KY Cost Flood Control - Reservoirs 13 Barren River Lake, New Work KY Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost 14 Brookville Lake, New Work IN Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost 15 Buckhorn Lake, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 16 Caesar Creek Lake, New Work OH Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Total to 1979 1980 1981 1982 Sep 30, 1982 $ - $ - $ - $ - $13,808,2221 - - - - 13,808,2221 880,600 1,127,000 1,070,000 1,279,000 21,189,8482 778,726 1,212,991 1,014,016 1,106,928 20,944,2622 - - - - 4,176,749 - - - - 4,176,749 2,181,100 2,592,000 2,240,000 790,000 42,828,0893 2,446,462 2,194,532 2,640,907 772,727 42,778,8383 - - - - 556,956 - - - - 556,956 2,415,000 3,329,507 600,000 2,134,535 -326,600 26,718 55,000 16,093 -987,000 36,450 2,418,000 3,267,914 627,000 126,230 884,000 888,778 40,367 37,655 -177,000 251,050 265,200 264,246 16,782 12,868 12,868 512,700 491,286 5,344,000 7,097,079 228,700 224,968 4,885,000 3,972,216 1,925,000 1,384,776 -100 16,394 41,000 97,460 50,400 202,163 6,050,000 4,860,517 -173,712 603,710 655,000 635,202 68,051 70,763 -427,000 275,178 411,000 260,441 24,841 482,000 494,837 3,613,800 2,910,844 245,000 242,822 2,841,000 2,737,531 1,300,000 2,369,557 13,300 96,544 -4,000 13,032 2,103,000 1,842,086 5,000,000 4,914,329 14,768 188,838 838,000 853,504 235,683 325,000 405,958 26,862 655,000 552,706 3,574,700 2,893,288 302,000 291,592 350,000 1,542,969 3,500,000 2,113,939 600,000 175,535 3,080 8,112 6,536,000 2,839,732 2,995,000 4,348,890 12,790,2454 12,265,1844 23,568,8565 21,826,3915 6,889,587 6,459,099 4,327,792 4,320,492 10,848,242 6,881,156 27,982,473 26,837,626 - 27,371,2996 - 27,371,2996 895,800 8,852,4267 8 875,375 8,790,3457 9 - 108,41810 108,41810 12,100 37,807,792 5,208 37,752,229 321,000 2,303,189 358,813 2,267,674 - 7,578,738 166 7,578,738 - 11,766,20611 - 11,766,20611 586,840 6,203,01012 654,627 6,145,64113 1,436,000 62,188,282 1,585,052 59,859,401 362,000 1,542,463 354,471 1,514,876 24-16 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT See Section in Text Project Funding Flood Control - Reservoirs 17 Cagles Mill Lake, New Work IN Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 18 Camp Ground Lake, New Work KY Approp. Cost 19 Carr Fork Lake, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 20 Cave Run Lake, New Work KY Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 21 Cecil M. Harden New Work Lake, IN Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 22 Clarence J. Brown New Work Dam & Reservoir, Approp. OH Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 23 Green River Lake, New Work KY Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 24 Huntington Lake, New Work IN Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost 25 Louisville Lake, IL New Work Approp. Cost 26 Mississinewa Lake, New Work IN Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost 27 Monroe Lake, IN New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost Total to 1979 1980 1981 1982 Sep 30, 1982 $ 47,500 218,000 230,805 -15 7,563 81,600 383,054 534,300 538,066 2,006,000 2,978,279 252,600 252,320 700,000 689,561 -63,000 100,776 238,600 244,402 1,984 722,000 749,043 4 282,100 285,672 515,900 345,434 -5,500 3,728 261,000 257,310 -310,000 10,055 253,000 254,081 $ -10,200 942 262,000 243,482 885,500 773,220 541,000 522,064 2,826,300 3,607,628 305,000 290,995 98,000 8,400 472,000 387,396 2,000 17,159 243,000 238,878 129,300 1,908 744,000 706,572 5,405 293,000 285,290 -2,368 103,678 -40,000 20,471 288,000 283,060 -3 27,000 39,822 280,000 269,094 $ -28,398 $ - $ 4,152,48414 7,960 - 4,152,48414 250,000 320,000 3,504,506 264,505 288,677 3,463,243 - - 160,773 - - 160,773 438,000 267,600 46,987,75715 649,378 316,880 46,919,44116 623,000 719,040 3,634,78617 602,565 663,000 3,528,84518 4,181,361 3,026,000 70,100,982 4,197,084 2,990,290 69,311,578 360,000 405,000 2,300,546 361,481 375,755 2,252,113 -1,632 - 6,658,80619 175,081 636 6,633,81320 337,000 335,000 4,154,396 436,607 321,031 4,134,351 - -40 22,083,660 174 -40 22,083,660 292,000 386,000 2,172,347 287,019 364,421 2,138,524 -68 - 33,422,41621 61,645 63,915 33,416,77222 796,000 839,780 7,568,24923 728,675 886,496 7,497,92424 -1,032 -8,614 19,482,19925 101,784 2,730 19,428,60526 308,000 310,000 2,912,012 308,931 261,496 2,853,806 103 - 193,903 503 -92 193,811 -90,000 - 2,335,81227 -4,450 451 2,316,22928 -3,982 -8,987 23,972,45129 310,560 -7,458 23,967,53730 282,000 334,000 2,696,105 274,215 300,547 2,670,342 - - 239,200 -190 -3 237,871 - 217,150 7,927,20031 306,023 234,343 7,902,82732 320,000 352,000 3,427,365 303,880 340,491 3,383,849 - - 8,015,323 - -217,719 7,797,604 24-17 TABLE 24-A CONTINUED COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT TABLE 24-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT CONTINUED See Section Total to in Text Project Funding 1979 1980 1981 1982 Sep 30, 1982 Flood Control - Reservoirs 28 Nolin Lake, KY 29 Ohio River Basin, Louisville District 30 Patoka Lake, IN (Contributed Funds) 31 Rough River Lake & Channel Improvement, KY (Contributed Funds) 32 Salamonie Lake, IN (Contributed funds) 33 Talorsville Lake, (Contributed Funds) 35 West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH (Contributed Funds) 36 William H. Harsha Lake, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost $ 47,000 479,876 774,000 858,924 3,500,000 4,949,603 189,200 184,439 1,970,800 2,256,776 80,132 17,177 838,000 828,213 198 91,956 264,300 264,360 -. 7,200,000 7,983,660 43,000 92,587 171,200 168,836 2,775,000 2,862,249 222,600 210,722 $ -72,500 47,500 728,000 707,743 1,300,000 3,939,944 245,000 237,736 765,500 2,020,856 -39,888 33,201 877,000 857,706 26,604 928,000 876,364 2,800,000 2,073,045 227,000 231,368 833,400 445,820 2,570 19,228 1,017,000 966,177 $ 1 1,279 79 262 262 7,90 7,42 3i; 17 16~ - -26 1,908 61,925 2,000 258,000 2,015 260,106 - -103 - -268 5,998 17,390,000 7,796 13,684,349 - 518,000 - 168,013 - -5,039 7,139 214,077 5,000 230,000 2,642 233,748 - - - - 3,738,000 2,223,600 275,000 266,338 1,511,000 2,861,045 336,000 342,312 - $17,201,17733 338' 17,196,81034 920,920 10,427,41535 36 944,754 10,338,19436 37 - 1,526,142 - 1,526,142 383,270 52,989,190 ,340,798 52,562,198 330,000 1,148,131 294,910 1,105,184 - 19,903,500 433,719 19,662,436 10,620,39738 1,489 10,620,37139 996,240 10,614,81040 967,164 10,485,86241 - 22,87311 - 22,87311 896 16,560,11342 -1,079 16,557,94943 315,000 3,175,313 257,736 3,112,918 -46 14,282,000 16,510,393 437,000 381,940 55,786 380,000 218,997 1,330,485 673,045 378,000 361,394 163,870 69,111,998 66,253,455 955,000 549,953 3,758,90244 3,727,22445 2,635,889 2,462,191 50,000 50,000 52,000,65646 50,606,99846 1,467,366 1,434,561 24-18 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT TABLE 24-A CONTINUED COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1. Includes $85,000 public works funds. 2. Includes $2,000 emergency relief funds, $19,000 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters" and $3,842,667 expended from 1888 to June 30, 1936, for operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation. 3. Includes $203,127 under "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters," and $6,405,372 expended between July 5, 1885 and June 30, 1937 on operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation. 4. Includes $12,426 allotted to Bellevue-Dayton and used in study of that project. 5. Includes $11,812 emergency relief funds. 6. Includes $2,224,948 Code 711 funds and $110,107 Code 713 funds. 7. Includes $100,000 Supplemental funds. 8. Includes $231,900 Special Recreation Use Fees. 9. Includes $224,509 Special Recreation Use Fees. 10. Cost sharing for Code 713 recreation facilities. 11. Includes $61,451 public work acceleration executive 1963 funds, $143,088 Code 711 funds, and $243,619 Code 712 funds. 12. Includes $46,240 Special Recreation Use Fees. 13. Includes $46,079 Special Recreation Use Fees. 14. Includes $35,814 Code 711 funds and $8,902 Code 713 funds. 15. Includes $80,000 Code 711 funds. 16. Includes $73,912 Code 711 funds. 17. Includes $30,740 Special Recreation Use Fees. 18. Includes $30,507 Special Recreation Use Fees. 19. Includes $19,683 Code 711 funds and $378,989 Code 713 funds. 20. Includes $19,683 Code 711 funds and $353,995 Code 713 funds. 21. Includes $133,500 Code 711 funds and $183,732 Code 713 funds. 22. Includes $127,856 Code 711 funds and $183,732 Code 713 funds. 23. Includes $87,780 Special Recreation Use Fees. 24. Includes $82,813 Special Recreation Use Fees. 25. Includes $208,947 Code 713 funds. 26. Includes $155,354 Code 713 funds. 27. Includes $685,632 advance funding for Government participation in the construction of U. S. Route 45 relocation by the State of Illinois. 28. Includes $666 049 for Government participation in the construction of U'. S. Route 45 relocation by the State of Illinois. 29. Includes $394,300 Code 713 funds. 30. Includes $383,391 Code 713 funds. 31. Includes $1,185 Code 711 funds and $893,250 Code 713 funds. 32. Includes $1,185 Code 711 funds and $869,158 Code 713 funds. 33. Includes $21,897 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds, and $2,604,113 Code 711 funds. 34. Includes $21,897 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds, and $2,599,746 Code 711 funds. 35. Includes $143,420 Special Recreation Use Fees. 36. Includes $52,000 Supplemental Funds. 37. Includes $143,181 Special Recreation Use Fees. 38. Includes $196,306 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds, $867,404 Code 711 funds, and $22,612 Code 713 funds. 39. Includes $196,306 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds, $867,377 Code 711 funds, and $22,612 Code 713 funds. 40. Includes $166,640 Special Recreation Use Fees. 41. Includes $164,371 Special Recreation Use Fees. 42. Includes $315,756 Code 713 funds. 43. Includes $313,592 Code 713 funds. 44. Includes $615,961 Code 713 funds. 45. Includes $584,283 Code 713 funds. 46. Includes $58,571 for preconstruction planning engineering and design completed before FY 1953. 24-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 24-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Construction of Lock 2, Green River Construction of Lock 5, Green River Construction of Lock 6, Green River Appropriated $5,000 for continuing improvements of Green River above mouth of Big Barren River, with provision "That the Secretary of War may, in his discretion, expend such portion of said amount as may be necessary for removal of snags in Nolin River" Construct new Lock 1 and new Lock and Dam 2, Green River Construct new locks at Dam 5 Green River and Dam 1 Barren River; modification of Dam 5, Green River, widen bends in Bear Creek, KY June 26, 19343 Operation and care of locks and dams with War Department Appropriations for rivers and harbors Aug. 30, 19352 Improvement of Nolin River Sep. 3, 1954 Channel enlargement of lower 103 miles of Green River. Revocation of authorities for improvement of Bear Creek and Nolin River Aug..28, 1937 June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 30, 1963 June 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Aug. 13, 1968 GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY (See Section 2 of Text) Aug. 11, 1888 Purchase of original improvement OHIO RIVER BASIN (Louisville Dist.) (See Section 42 of Text) Construct levee, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection Flood Control Committee Docof cities and towns in Ohio River Basin, projects to be selected ument 1, 75th Cong., 1st by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War, at a cost Session not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other Flood Control Committee Docpurposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in discretion ument 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sesof Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation sion and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50.3 million for local protection works, individual projects to be selected and approved by Chief of Engineers subject to provision that authorization shall include diversion of Cache River above Cairo, Illinois, and protection of area north of Cairo drainage district by levees at an estimated cost of $2 million Additional $45 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive H. Doc. 504, 78th Cong., 2d plan for Ohio River Basin, including 'plan of improvement for Session flood control and other purposes in Kentucky River Basin Flood protection works at Taylorsville, Kentucky at an S. D. 105, 78th Cong., 1st estimated cost of $129,350 Session Channel improvement of lower Rough River and Barnett Creek H. D. 535, 78th Cong., 2d Sesat an estimated cost of $360,000 sion Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehen- H. D. 197, 80 Cong., 1st sive plan including plan of improvement for flood control in Session Wabash kiver Basin, Illinois and Indiana, at an estimated cost of $9 629,000 Also, West Fork of Mill Creek at an estimated cost of $1,527,000 H. D. 198, 80th Cong., 1st Ses- Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including necessary bank stabilization measures at New Harmony Bridge, Indiana, at an estimated cost of $500,000 Flood Control Act of 1958 modified comprehensive plan to provide for Monroe Reservoir on Salt Creek, White River Basin, Indiana, at an estimated cost to the United States of $4,350,000; cost to local interests, $5,141,000 Flood Control Act of 1962 delected Jessamine Creek Reservoir on Kentucky River, Kentucky, from comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Additional $38 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin sion H. D. 192, 85th Cong., 1st Session H. D. 423, 87th Cong., 2d session Public Law 88-253, 88th Cong., 1st Session Public Law 89-42, 89th Cong., 1st Session Public Law 90-17, 90th Cong., 1st Session Public Law 90-483, 90th Cong., 2d Session 24-20 H. Ex. Doc. 111, 49th Cong., 2d Sess., Annual Report 1887, p. 1903. Annual Report, 1891, p. 2439 Annual Report, 1891, p. 2478 S. Doc. 82, 83d Cong., 2d Session Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 71st Cong., 1st Session, and H. Doc. 685, 69th Congress, 2d Session H. D. 480, 72d Cong., 2d Session S. D. 82, 83d Cong., 2d Session Mar.3, 18931 July 13, 1892 July 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 19052 Mar. 3, 1909 July 3, 19302 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT TABLE 24-iB CONTINUED Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Documents June 19, 1970 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Aug. 13, 1968 Dec. 29, 1981 OHIO RIVER BASIN (Louisville Dist.) (Cont'd) Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin 54 local protection projects and 1 reservoir project in comprehensive plan for Ohio River .Basin were deauthorized August 5, 1977, under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 Two additional local protection projects in comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin were deauthorized November 6, 1977, under Section 12, Water }lesources Development Act of 1974 WABASH RIVER BASIN (See Section 46 of Text) Construction of five multiple purpose reservoirs and one local protection project in Wabash River Basin, IL & IN, with proviso that construction of Big Walnut Lake, IN project must be approved by the President. Authorization of $50 million for initiation and partial accomplishment of project Two multiple purpose reservoirs in Wabash River Basin were deauthorized Public Law 91-282, 91st Cong., 2d Session Public Law 93-251, 93rd Cong., 2d Session Public Law 93-251, 93rd Cong. 2d Session S. D. 96, 90th Cong., 2d Session Public Law 97-128, 97th Cong., 2d Session 1. Deficiency act. 2. Authorization for Nolin River and Bear Creek revoked by Act of Sep. 3, 1954. 3. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. TABLE 24-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 5 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Name of Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Licking River KY Rough River kY Tradewater Aiver, KY White River, IN Completed Completed Completed Completed 1901 1952 1958 1909 $ 13,045 105,500 18,568 119,312 101,196 33,331 24-21 TABLE 24-E REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project and Status 1 Report For Construction Maintenance Local Protection: Completed: Boone County, KY (Bank Protection & Repair Roads) Brookport, IL Cannelton, IN Cincinnati, OH Covington, KY Delphi, IN (Wabash River) England Pond Levee IL (Wabash River) English, IN (Little Blue River)2 Gill Township Levee Unit, IN (Wabash River) Golconda, IL Grassy Creek Jackson County, IN (Muscatatuci River)2 Harrisburg, IL Hawesville; KY Indianapohs, IN (Fall Creek Section) (White River) Indian Creek, Corydon, IN2 Jackson, KY (Kentucky River Basin) Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN Lawrenceburg, IN Lebanon Junction KY (Salt River Basin)2 Levee Unit 8 IN (White River) Louisville, K%' Lyford Levee Unit IN (Wabash River) Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN (Wabash'River) Mill Creek, Jefferson County KY2 Mount Carmel IL (Wabash 1iver) Muncie IN (White River) Neon-Fleming KY (Kentucky River) New Albany IN Newburgh, IN4 Newport, KY Paducah, KY Panther Creek KY (Green River Basin)2 Portland IN (Salamonie River)2 Reevesville IL (Cache River) Rochester & McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL (Wabash River) Rosiclare, IL Saline River & Tribs, IL Sturgis, KY Taylorsville KY (Salt River) Tell City, 114 Terre Haute (Conover Levee), IN (Wabash River) Town Creek, Harrodsburg, KY2 Triplett Creek, Morehead, KY (Licking River) 2 Uniontown, KY Vincennes, IN (Wabash River)5 West Terre Haute, IN (Wabash River) Active: Chaplin River, Perryville KY2 Clear Creek, Franklin, OHt2 Dicks Creek Amanda Station, OH2 Russell & Allison Levee, IL (Wabash River) 1977 1958 1959 1957 1965 1953 1972 1965 1948 1960 1953 1952 1955 1953 1964 1957 1959 1953 1967 1952 1975 1944 1965 1973 1972 1956 1963 1957 1974 1959 1959 1970 1962 1954 1972 1954 1981 1972 1952 1956 1965 1967 1972 1956 1964 1977 $ 392,443 597,493 2,068,391 10,150,935 7,862, 937 144,563 734,498 372,353 561,200 565,333 70,304 870,015 969,318 1,859,363 300,143 130,952 4,226,361 2,433,414 130,417 700,534 26,721,438 267,391 1,554,712 292,710 1,980,675 887,835 86,532 5,375,471 52,061 7,512,987 4,761,552 254,031 237,657 600,300 1,079,236 622,544 7,826,219 1,826,776 373,050 932,229 14,913 56,505 893,094 1,070,926 3,308,940 1,095,704 163,918 161,474 121,193 52,088 24-22 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT TABLE 24-E CONTINUED OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project and Status 1 Report For Construction Maintenance Inactive: Adams Levee, IN (Wabash River) $ - Anderson, IN (White River) 1940 5,724 Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River Basin) Brevoort Levee, IN (Wabash River) 1954 1,230,873 Caseyville, KY Cloverport, KY Concordia, KY Frankfort, KY (Kentucky River) (Benson Creek, North Frankfort and South Frankfort Sections)6 1979 2,960,970 Greenfield Bayou Levee, IN (Wabash River) 1979 157,935 Indianapolis, IN (Warfleigh Section) (White River) 1976 153,410 Island Levee, IN (Wabash River) 1979 355,963 Levee Unit 1, IL (Wabash River) 1973 60,000 Lewisport, K Y Marion, IN (Wabash River) 1979 209,975 Metropolis, IL 10,575 New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River)2 1959 297,624 Orleans, IN 1972 13,158 Owensboro, KY Salyersville, KY (Licking River) 1946 12,000 Shawneetown, IL 27,287 Shoals, IN (East Fork White River) 1938 Smithland, KY Tolu, KY Utica IN - - West Point, KY 4,490 Reservoirs: Active, no FY 1982 expenditure Downeyville Lake, IN (Wabash River Basin) Inactive: Big Pine Lake, IN (Wabash River Basin) 1977 1,270,590 Big Walnut Lake, IN (Wabash River Basin) 1980 1,009,188 Booneville Lake, KY (Kentucky River) 1976 1,038,595 Eagle Creek Lake KY 1975 702,471 Falmouth Lake, IY (Licking River) 1981 944,386 Lafayette Lake, IN (Wabash River Basin) 1977 1,200,920 Mining City Lake KY(Green River) 350,474 Red River Lake, ICY (Kentucky River) 1976 1,794,308- 1. All projects are on Ohio River unless otherwise noted. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. 3. Cost includes $1,716,301 cash contribution from City of Louisville. 4. The Water Resources Development Act of 1974 modified the Newburgh Locks & Dam project to include the bank protection works at Newburgh, IN. 5. Partially completed to form a useful unit. Remaining portion of project deferred. 6. Cost includes $161,098 contributed funds. 24-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 24-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Flood Control - Local Protection Alton, IN - 1977 $ - Aurora, IN - 1977 35,420, Bellevue, KY - 1977 12,853 - Bromley, KY - 1977 California (Cincinnati) OH 1977 16,465 - Carrollton, KY 1977 9,713 - Cave-in-Rock, IL - 1977 - - Cincinnati, OH (Unit 2) - 1977 - - Cincinnati OH (Unit 4) 1977 - Cleves, 01- 1977 6,343 Clinton, IN - 1977 6,848 - Deer Creek, Prairie, Levee, IN - 1977 - - Derby, IN 1977 - - Elizabethtown, IL - 1977 - - Fletcher & Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN - 1977 3,361 - Grandview, IN - 1977 8,497 - Honey Creek Levee, IN 1977 - - Leavenworth, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 1, Eel River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 2, Eel River, IN. - 1977 - - Levee Unit 2, East Fork White River, IN - 1977 Levee Unit 3, East Fork White River IN 1938 1977 275 Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River, IL - 1977 - - Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, IL - 1977 - - Levee Unit 2, Wabash River, IL - 1977 Levee Units, 3 and 4 Wabash River, IL 1938 1977 216 - Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, IL - 1977 9,922 - Levee Unit 17 Wabash River Basin, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 1, White River, IN - 1977 - - 24-24 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT TABLE 24-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS CONTINUED For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Levee Unit 7, White River, IN - 1977 $ - - Levee Unit 9, White River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 10, White River, IN - 1977 - - Ludlow, KY - 1977 14,503 - Madison, IN 1977 - - Mauckport, IN - 1977 - - McGinnis Levee, IN 1950 1977 71,049 - Milton, KY - 1977 - - Moscow, IN - 1977 - - New Amsterdam IN - 1977 - - New Harmony IN - 1977 - - New Richmond, IN - 1977 7,104 - Patriot, IN - 1977 - - Prestonville, KY - 1977 - - Raccoon Creek Levee, IN - 1977 - - Rising Sun IN - 1977 - - Rockport IN - 1977 - - Rome 114 - 1977 - Shufflebarger Levee IN 1950 1977 64,487 - Sugar Creek Levee, IN 1961 1977 28,061 - Tri Pond Levee, IL 1972 1977 65,510 - Troy, IN 1977 - - Vevay, IN - 1977 - - Westport, KY - 1977 - - Flood Control - Reservoirs Big Blue Lake, IN 1980 1981 1,079,867 - Clifty Creek Lake, IN 1979 1981 1,016,358 - Helm Lake IL 1976 1981 41,616 - Lincoln Lake, IL 1979 1981 1,331,844 - Metamora Lake, IN - 1977 - - 24-25 TABLE 24-H NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS PRINCIPAL FEATURES - GREEN & BARREN RIVERS AND KENTUCKY RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEMS Lock Dimensions Miles Lock above Greatest LU egth Available Upper Depth ofYear and Mouth of Distance from Width of For Full Normal Pool Miter Sill, Character of Percent Opened to Cost of Dam River Nearest Town Chamber Width Lift Elevation Upper Lower Foundation Complete Navigation Lock and Dam (feet) (feet) (Feet mal) (feet) (feet) CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER - For report on this improvement, see this heading under Ohio River. GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY (See Section 2 of Text) Green River New 1 9.1 Spottevile, KY 84.0 600.0 11.8' 349.1 12.1 11.3 ShaleandCoal 100 1956 $5,101,9783 New 2 63.1 0C.3a mlhioleusn ,b KelYow 84.0 600.0 14.3 363.4 15.0 11.7 Shale 100 1956' 4,799,271s 3 106.5 0.3 mile below 35.8 137.5 17.0 380.4 7.3 5.6 Rock 100 1836' 121,377 Rochester,KY 4 149.0 Woodbury,KY 35.8 138.0 16.4 396.8 7.1 6.5 Rock 100 1839' 125,718 5 168.1 0.3 mle below 56.0 360.0 15.2 4120' 120 9.3 Piles and Rock 100 1934' 1,020,868" 6 181.7 2.8 mileaove 36.0 145.0 9. 2 421.1 8.0 8.8 Gravel 100 190 168,415 Brownsville, KY Barren Barren River River 1 15.0" 0.3 miles above 6.0 360.0 15.2 4120 120 9.3 100 1934 871,565" Greemaste, KY Kntucky KENTUCKY RIVER, KY (See Section 8 of Text) River Kantucky River 1 4.0 3.8 miles above 38.0 148.0 8.2 430.0 8.2" 14.8 Rock and clay 100 1839" 2 31.0 i KY 38.0 145.0 13.9 443.9 7.6 6.1 Rock 100 1839" 3 42.0 Gest, 38.0 145.0 13.2 457.1 8.6 6.5 Rock 100 1844" 1,350,386s 4 65.0 1.0 mile below 38.0 145.0 13.2 470.3 6.4 7.4 Rock 100 1844" 5 82.2 2.8 mlesbo 38.0 145.0 15.0 486.3 10.0 6.5 Rock 100 1844" 6 96.2 21.6 milesbelow 52.0 147.0 14.0 499.3 9.4 6.4 Rock and piles 100 1894 314,847 High Bride,KY 8 139.9 4.7m leabove 52.0 146.0 18.7 533.6 10.6 6.0 Rock 100 1900 275,463 CamNesoKY 9 157.5 Va ViewKY 52.0 148.0 17.3 560.6 10.0 6.6 Rock 100 1907 237,646 10 176.4 1.0 mile below 52.0 148.0 17.0 667.6 9.0 6.0 Rock 100 1907 221,500 Ford, KY 11 201.0 17.2 miles below 52.0 145.0 18.0 585.6 10.0 6.0 Rock 100 10 9,9 Irvine, KY 12 220.0 Ravenna, KY 52.0 148.0 17.0 602.6 9.6 6.0 Rock 100 1910 425,693 13 239.9 2.2 miles below 52.0 148.0 18.0 620.6 9.6 6.0 Rock 100 1915 461,476 Willow, KY 14 249.0 Heidelberg, KY 520 148.0 17.0 637.6 8.6 6.0 Rock 100 1917 392,902 1. At normal pool Dam 48, Ohio River, Elev. 337.3 Green 9. Operation discontinued Aug. 1,1951. River datum (Elev. 338.0 Ohio River datum). 10. Does not include $179,434 cost of old Lock and Dam 5. 2. New Lock 1 placed inoperationMay25,1956;oldDam 1, 11. Distance frommouth of Green River is 164.5miles.Lock completed 183540, replaced with newellulacornncrsette mason- closed to navigation as the result of loss of pool at Green River ryc odnatrmu cted 197071 with O&M Generalfund atcostof Lock and Dam 4 on May 24, 1966. $6822000.12. Includes $729,269 for new large lock completed in 1934. . Does not include $179,110 cost of old Lock and Dam 1. 13. At normal pool McAlpine Dam, Ohio River elev. 421.8 4. New Lock and Dam placedin opeationJune18,1956. Kentucky River datum (Elev. 420 Ohio River datum). 5. Does not include 29,696 cost of old Lock and Dam 2 14. Reconstruction completed by United States in 1882. 6. Operation discontinued September 30,1981. 15. Built by State of K tucky. is for repairs by 7. Breaching of dam on May 24, 1965, stopped through United States to Locks and Dams 1 through5.r.a traffic to Bowling Green. KY. construction costs to State were: LAD 1 0,300,L 2, 8. With movable amecrest 3 feet high. $151,983; IAD 3, $135,857; LAD 4, $131,607; LAD 5, $137,436. 0 T~j x 0 tTJ. L!J t~j LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT TABLE 24-I OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (FLOOD CONTROL) (See Section 29 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Type of Estimated Cost2 Project and Status' Construction Federal Non-Federal Total Completed: Barnett Creek, KY (Rough River Basin)3 4 Brookport, IL5 6 Cannelton, IN5 7 Cincinnati, OH5 8 Covington, KY5 9 Delphi, IN (Wabash River)5 10 England Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River)" 1 Golconda, IL 5 12 Harrisburg, IL5 0 Hawesville, KY5 13 Jackson, KY (Kentucky River Basin)5 8 Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN 7 Lawrenceburg, IN5 Louisville, KYs 14 New Albany, IN5 8 Newport, KY5 7 Paducah KY5 7 Reevesville, IL (Cache River)5 15 Rochester and McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL (Wabash River)" Rough River, KY3 4 Sturgis, KY (Tradewater River)11 Taylorsville, KY (Salt River)5 16 Tell City IN5 14 Uniontown, KY5 '7 Vincennes, IN (Wabash River)5 West Terre Haute, IN (Wabash River) Active: Dayton, KY 4 5 Evansville, IN4 Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN (Wabash River)4 6 Russell & Allison Levee, IL (Wabash River)5 Inactive: Adams Levee, IN (Wabash River) Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River Basin)5 Caseyville, KY5 Cloverport, KY 5 Concordia, KY5 Frankfort, KY (Kentucky River)5 South Frankfort Area s Benson Creek Area s North Frankfort Area s Greenfield Bayou Levee, IN (Wabash River)5 Island Levee IN (Wabash River)5 Lewisport, KYS Metropolis, IL5 New Harmony Bridge, IL and IN (Wabash River)5 Owensboro, KY5 Shawneetown, IL5 Smithland, KY5 Tolu, KY5 Utica IN5 West Point KY5 Wilders, KfY Channel improvement $ - Wall and levee 597,493 Wall and levee 2,068,391 Wall and barrier dam 10,150,935 Wall and levee 7,866,300 Levee 144,563 Levee 734,498 Wall and levee 565,333 Wall and levee 870,015 Levee 969,318 Cutoff channel 130,952 Wall and levee 4,226,361 Wall and levee 2,433,414 Wall and levee 2,540,000 Wall and levee 5,375,471 Wall and levee 7,512,987 Wall and levee 4,761,532 Levee 600,300 Levee 1,079,236 Channel improvement Levee 1,826,778 Levee 373,050 Wall and levee 932,229 Levee 1,070,926 Wall and levee 6,426,000 Levee 1,095,704 Wall and levee 12,624,000 Wall and levee 53,000,000 Levee and pump plants 4,344,000 Levee 5,340,000 Levee 292,000 Channel improvement 1,080,000 Levee 396,000 Wall and levee 728,000 Levee 590,000 Wall and levee 5,200,000 Wall and levee 3,340,000 Wall and levee 2,961,000 Levee 4,600,000 Levee 4,630,000 Wall and levee 610,000 Wall and levee 3,070,000 Bank protection 962,000 Wall and levee 886,000 Wall and levee 1,810,000 Wall and levee 864,000 Levee 303,000 Levee 1,570,000 Wall and levee 3,283,000 Wall and levee 10,800,000 $ -8 8,500 29,105 1,309,146 1,051,102 17,164 107,000 10,900 20,000 42,593 3,000 590,888 284,725 745,000 740,000 298,506 232,000 40,000 100,000 93,000 63,309 32,707 72,153 285,000 150,000 2,043,000 7,982,000 109,200 2,025,000 14,000 630,000 35,000 193,000 55,000 187,000 1,150,000 272,100 1,087,000 528,000 243,000 431,000 99,000 195,000 361,000 414,000 35,000 120,000 400,000 959,000 $ - 605,993 2,097,496 11,460,081 8,917,402 161,727 841,498 576,233 890,015 1,011,911 133,952 4,817,249 2,718,139 3,285,000 6,115,471 7,811,493 4,993,532 640,300 1,179,236 1,919,778 436,359 964,936 1,143,079 6,711,000 1,245,704 14,667,00018 60,982,00018 4,453,20019 7,365,000 306,00020 1,710,00020 431,000 921,000 645,000 5,387,00018 21 4,490,00019 3,233,10022 5,687,00023 5,158,00023 853,00024 3,501,000 1,061,00025 1,081,000 2,171,000 1,278,000 338,000 1,690,000 3,683,00024 11,759,00026 24-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 24-I CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (FLOOD CONTROL) (See Section 29 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Tvue of Estimated Cost 2 Project and Status' Deauthorized August 5, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-251): Alton, IN Bellevue, KY Bromley, KY Carrollton, KY Cave-in-Rock, IL Cincinnati, OH (Unit 2) Cincinnati OH (Unit 4) Cleves, OiL Clinton, IN (Wabash River) Deer Creek Prairie Levee, IN (Wabash River) Derby, IN Elizabethtown, IL Fletcher and Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN (Wabash River Basin) Grandview, IN Honey Creek Levee, IN (Wabash River) Leavenworth, IN Levee Unit 1, Eel River, IN (Wabash River Basin) Levee Unit 2, Eel River, IN (Wabash kiver Basin) Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River, IL (Wabash River Basin) Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, IL (Wabash River Basin) Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, IL (Wabash River Basin) Levee Unit 17, IN (Wabash River Basin) Levee Unit 1, White River, IN (Wabash River Basin) Levee Unit 2, White River, IN (Wabash River Basin) Levee Unit 7, White River, IN (Wabash River Basin) Ludlow, KY Madison, IN Mauckport IN McGinnis Levee, IN (Wabash River Basin) Milton, KY Moscow, OH New Amsterdam IN New Harmony IN (Wabash River) New Richmond, OH Patriot, IN Prestonville, KY Raccoon Levee IN (Wabash River) Rising Sun IN' Rockport IN Rome IlN Shufflebarger Levee, IN (Wabash River Basin) Sugar Creek Levee, IN (Wabash River) Tri-Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) Troy, IN Vevay, IN Westport, KY Construction Federal Non-Federal Total Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Wall Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall $ 255,000 1,570,000 1,250,000 2,220,000 661,000 16,800,000 14,900,000 1,240,000 77,000 213,000 553,000 559,000 548,000 580,000 653,000 1,470,000 204,000 2,090,000 2,850,000 3,410,000 1,160,000 1,580,000 2,180,000 724,000 1,490,000 2,540,000 3,820,000 506,000 1,820,000 2,480,000 1,170,000 476,000 161,000 3,200,000 753,000 1,710,000 426,000 896,000 466,000 359,000 2,380,000 418,000 2,050,000 502,000 1,170,000 1,610,000 $ 40,000 400,000 925,000 97,000 125,000 2,900,000 621,000 67,000 9,000 10,000 67,000 153,000 26,000 133,000 32,000 266,000 40,000 715,000 164,000 136,000 56,000 118,000 116,000 73,000 88,000 745,000 360,000 105,000 104,000 41,000 372,000 13,000 25,000 720,000 372,000 55,000 37,000 280,000 133,000 67,000 90,000 29,000 191,000 133,000 146,000 41,000 $ 295,000 1,970,000 2,175,000 2,317,000 786,000 19,700,000 15,521,000 1,307,000 86,000 223,00024 620,000 712,000 574,00024 713,000 685,000 1,736,000 244,000 2,805,000 3,014,00027 3,546,00022 1,216,000 1,698,00022 2,296,00027 797,00027 1,578,00027 3,285,000 4,180,000 611,000 1,924,000 2,521,000 1,542,000 489,000 641,000 3,920,000 1,125,000 1,765,000 463,00024 1,176,000 599,000 426,000 2,470,000 447,00024 2,241,00020 635,000 1,316,000 1,651,000 24-28 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT TABLE 24-I CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (FLOOD CONTROL) (See Section 29 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Type of Estimated Cost2 Project and Status' Construction Federal Non-Federal Total Deauthorized November 6, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-251) Aurora, IN Wall and levee California (Cincinnati), OH Wall and levee 1. All projects are on an Ohio River unless otherwise noted. 2. Latest cost estimate revision 1954, unless otherwise noted. 3. Part of Rough River Reservoir and Channel Improvement Project, KY. 4. Details of this project are in individual report. 5. Also see "Other authorized flood control projects." 6. See Annual Report for 1958 for details. 7. See Annual Report for 1959 for details. 8. See Annual Report for 1957 for details. 9. See Annual Report for 1965 for details. 10. See Annual Report for 1953 for details. 11. See Annual Report for 1972 for details. 12. See Annual Report for 1960 for details. 13. See Annual Report for 1955 for details. 14. See Annual Report for 1962 for details. 15. Substitute project for Belknap, Karnak, and Ullin, IL, complete. See Annual Report for 1954 for details. 16. See Annual Report for 1952 for details. 17. See Annual Report for 1956 for details. 18. Latest cost estimate revision 1982. 19. Latest cost estimate revision 1976. 20. Latest cost estimate revision 1973. 21. Active. 22. Complete. 23. Latest cost estimate revision 1978. 24. Latest cost estimate revision 1960. 25. Latest cost estimate revision 1971. 26. Latest cost estimate revision 1977. 27. Latest cost estimate revision 1961. $4,300,000 $1,190,000 $5,490,000 1,750,000 720,000 2,470,000 24-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 24-I CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (FLOOD CONTROL) (See Section 29 of Text) RESERVOIRS Tributary Basin & Estimated Cost' Reservoirs Status Stream Federal Non-Federal Total Great Miami River: Brookville Lake, IN2 Active East Fork of Whitewater River $ 48,492,182 $18,147,0003 $ 66,639,182 Metamora Lake, IN Deauthorized West Fork of Whitewater River 35,300,000 - 35,300,004 Green River: Barren River Lake, KY2 Active Barren River 27,371,299 108,418 27,479,7175 Green River Lake, KY2 Active Green River 33,422,416 186,747 33,609,1635 Mining City Lake, KY Inactive Green River 69,100,000 - 69,100,0004 Nolin Lake, KY2 Active Nolin River 17,922,176 - 17,922,176 Rough River Lake, KY2 Active Rough River 11,242,397 22,612 11,265,0095 Kentucky River: Booneville Lake, KY2 Inactive South Fork of Kentucky River 60,700,000 - 60,700,0006 Buckhorn Lake, KY2 Active Middle Fork of Kentucky River 11,766,206 - 11,766,206 Carr Fork Lake, KY2 Active North Fork of Kentucky River 50,389,000 - 50,389,000 Licking River: Cave Run Lake, KY2 Active Licking River 114,704,000 - 114,704,0007 Falmouth Lake, KY Inactive Licking River 131,000,000 - 131,000,0008 Little Miami River: Caesar Creek Lake, OH2 Active Caesar Creek 68,422,500 13,375,5009 81,798,000 William H. Harsha Lake, OH2 Active East Fork of Little Miami River 62,552,000 14,958,00010 77,510,000 Mill Creek: West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH2 Active West Fork of Mill Creek 4,294,902 1,772,76111 6,067,663 Wabash River: Cagles Mill Lake IN 2 Active Mill Creek 4,373,582 230,000 4,603,5825 Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN2 Active Raccoon Creek 6,658,806 378,988 7,037,7945 Monroe Lake, IN2 Active Salt Creek 7,927,769 8,691,70414 16,619,473 Patoka Lake, IN2 Active Patoka River 54,377,000 25,985,00013 80,362,000 1. Latest cost estimate revision 1982 unless otherwise noted. 2. Details of this project given in individual report. 3. Includes $7,592,000 cash contribution for water supply storage and $10,555;000 for Code 713 recreation development; method of payment not determined. 4. Latest cost estimate revision 1954. 5. For Code 713 recreation development. 6. Latest cost estimate revision 1975. 7. Includes $34,256,000 United States Forest Service cost. 8. Latest cost estimate revision 1979. 9. Includes $4,998,000 reimbursement for water supply storage and $8,378,500 for Code 713 recreation development. 10. Includes $3,494,000 reimbursement for water supply storage and $11,464,000 for Code 713 recreation development. 11. Includes $520,800 for non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and dam, $50,000 for contributed funds in fulfillment of project authorization, and $1,201,961 for Code 713 recreation development. 12. Includes $7,797,604 cash contribution for storage for low-flow regulation and $894,100 for Code 713 recreation development. 13. Includes $13,350,000 cash contribution for water supply storage, $11,231,000 for initial recreation development, and $1,404,000 for Code 713 recreation development. 24-30 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT TABLE 24-J WABASH RIVER BASIN, TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN: (FLOOD CONTROL) (See Section 34 of Text) Type of Construction Estimated Cost' Project or Stream Status Federal Non-Federal Total LOCAL PROTECTION Marion, IN Wall and Levee Inactive $ 3,900,000 $ 854,000 $ 4,754,0002 RESERVOIRS Big Blue Lake, IN Big Blue River Deauthorized 87,200,000 53,846,0003 141,046,0004 Big Walnut Lake, IN Big Walnut Creek Inactive 81,800,000 45,069,0005 126,869,0004 Downeyville Lake, IN Flatrock and Little Flatrock Rivers Active 78,025,000 68,879,0006 146,904,000 Helm Lake, IL Skillet Fork Deauthorized 32,009,000 21,667,0007 53,676,0008 Louisville Lake, IL9 Little Wabash River Active 101,148,000 17,018,00010 118,166,000 1. Latest cost revision 1982 unless otherwise noted. 2. Latest cost estimate revision 1977. 3. Includes $38,190,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $15,656,000 reimbursable for recreation facilities. 4. Latest cost estimate revision 1979. 5. Includes $26,663 000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $18,406,000 reimbursable for recreation facilities. 6. Includes $51,973,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply, $8,581,000 reimbursable for initial recreation facilities and $8,325,000 for future recreation development. 7. Includes $12,696,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $8,971,000 reimbursable for recreation facilities. 8. Latest cost estimate revision 1975. 9. Details of this project given in individual report. 10. Includes $8,402,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and 6,033,000 reimbursable for initial recreation facilities and $2,583,000 for future recreation development. 24-31 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 24-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 37 of Text) Fall Spring Fall Local Protection Projects Inspection 1981 Inspection 1982 Inspection 1982 Brevoort Levee, IL Sep May Sep Brookport, IL Oct Jun Cannelton, IN Oct Jun Cincinnati, OH Sep Apr Sep Covington, KY Sep May Sep Delphi, IN Aug Apr Aug England Pond Levee, IL Sep May Sep Evansville, IN Oct May Sep Frankfort, KY Sep May Sep Gil Township Levee, IN Aug Apr Aug Golconda, IL Oct Jun Harrisburg, IL Oct Jun Hawesville, KY Oct Jun Indianapolis, IN Aug Apr Aug Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN Nov Jun Lawrenceburg, IN Sep Apr Sep Lebanon Junction KY Nov Jun Levee Unit No. 5, IN Oct May Levee Unit No. 8, IN Aug Apr Aug Louisville, KY Nov Jul Lyford Levee IN Sep Apr Sep Mt. Carmel, iL Oct May Muncie, IN Aug Apr Aug New Albany, IN Nov Jun Newport KY Sep May Sep Niblack Levee, IN Sep May Sep Paducah KY Oct Jun Reevesville-Cache River IL Oct Jun Rochester-McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL Oct May Rosiclare, IL Oct Jun Shawneetown, IL Oct Jun Sturgis, KY Sep May Sep Taylorsville KY Nov Jun Tell City, IR Oct Jun Terre Haute (Conover Levee), IN Sep Apr Aug Uniontown, KY Sep May Sep Vincennes, IN Sep May Sep West Terre Haute, IN Sep Apr Aug 24-32 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT TABLE 24-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED CONTINUED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 37 of Text) Dates of Channel Improvements Inspection Cypress Creek, McLean County KY Nov 1981 Eel River Brazil Waterworks, Il Aug 1982 English, IN (Little Blue River) Mar 1982 Grassy Creek, Jackson County IN Dec 1981 Harrodsburg, KY (Town Branch) Mar 1982 Indian Creek, Corydon, IN May 1981 Jackson, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) Mar 1982 Mill Creek, KY Mar 1982 Morehead, KY (Triplett Creek) Jul 1982 Muscatatuck River, Crothersville, IN Sep 1982 Neon-Fleming, KY Mar 1982 Nicholasville (Town Fork) Vicinity, KY Jul 1982 Panther Creek, Curdsville, KY Dec 1981 Plum Creek, Spencer County, KY Jul 1982 Portland, IN (Salamonie River) Aug 1982 Saline River and Tributaries, IL Nov 1982 Troublesome Creek, Hindman KY Mar 1982 Whitesburg, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) Mar 1982 Bank Revetments Boone County, KY (Ohio River) Apr 1982 Brandenburg, KY (Ohio River) Jun 1982 Brownstown, IN (White River) Apr 1982 Cloverport, KY (Ohio River) Oct 1982 Eighteen Mile Island, Oldham Co., KY Jul 1981 Evansville, IN (Ohio River) Oct 1981 Hawesville, KY (Ohio River) Oct 1982 Indian Hills, OH (Little Miami River) Apr 1982 Kentucky Peninsula, KY (Ohio River) May 1980 Madison IN (Ohio River) Mar 1982 Merom, fN (Wabash River) Sep 1982 Newburgh, IN (Ohio River) Sep 1982 New Harmony, IN (Wabash River) Oct 1981 North Middletown KY (Stoner Creek) Apr 1982 Otter Creek Park kY (Ohio River) Oct 1981 Patoka River at Jasper, IN Sep 1982 Rockport, IN (Ohio River) Jun 1982 South Bank White River, Petersburg, Pike County, IN Aug 1982 Troy, IN (Ohio River) May 1978 Upper River Rd., Jefferson Co., KY Mar 1982 24-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 24-L FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 39 of Text) Fiscal Year Cost Flood Control: Bonpas Creek, IL' $ 22,164 Canoe Creek, Henderson, KY' 57,811 Chaplin River at Perryville, KY' 3 22,369 Duck Creek, Elwood, IN' 72,115 Eagle Creek, Sanders KY2 7,500 Lancassange Creek, Clark Co., IN' 2 8,926 Lilly Creek, Montgomery Co., OH' 2 21,675 Triplett Creek, Farmers, KY' 6,851 Whitewater River, Hagerstown, IN' 83,160 Snagging and Clearing for Flood Control: Lick Creek, Hartford City, IN' 7,165 Salamonie River, Montpelier, IN' 5,133 White River, Rockford, IN 2 7,722 Emergency Bank Protection: East Fork White River Sparksville, IN 2 7,500 Great Miami River, Sidney, OH3 -612 Licking River Butler, KY3 1,274 Lusk Creek, dolconda, IL3 3,260 Ohio River, Carrollton, KY2 7,500 Ohio River, Elizabethtown, IL2 7,500 Ohio River, Fort Massac State Park, IL2 7,500 Ohio River, Hancock Co., KY3 529 Ohio River, Lewisport, KY2 7,494 Ohio River, Otter Creek Park, KY5 33,297 Ohio River, Owensboro, KY3 1,382 Ohio River, Rockport Landing, IN2 7,500 Patoka River Winslow, IN2 7,500 White River, Brownstown, IN5 111,157 Detailed Project Report 2 Reconnaissance Report 3 Plans and Specifications a Construction Funds Received 5 Construction Completed 24-34 HUNTINGTON, WV DISTRICT * All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in the text and also appear at the end of this chapter. The Huntington District includes central and southeastern Ohio, all of West Virginia except the northern panhandle and northeastern portion, the eastern portion of Kentucky, a portion of midwestern Virginia, a very small portion of midwestern Virginia, a very small portion of northwestern North Carolina, embraced in the drainage basin of the Ohio River and its tributaries from approximate river mile 127 (below Pittsburgh, Pa.) to approximate river mile 438, immediately upstream from Foster, KY. The drainage area of the Huntington District is approximately 44,914 square miles. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River ............ 25-2 2. Kanawha River, WV ............ 25-2 3. Open Channel Work, Ohio River ..... 25-2 4. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............. 25-2 Flood Control 5. Alum Creek Lake, OH ........... 25-2 6. Beech Fork Lake, WV ........... 25-2 7. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV .............. 25-3 8. Burnsville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ............ . . 25-3 9. Chillicothe, OH ............... 25-3 10. Deer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH ........... 25-3 11. Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH ............... 25-4 12. Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY ............... 25-4 13. Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH . .............. 25-4 14. East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ........... 25-4 15. Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY . . 25-5 16. Grayson Lake, KY ............. 25-5 17. John W. Flannagan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin,VA ...... 25-5 18. Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, KY, WV and VA .......... 25-5 19. Martin, KY ................. 25-6 20. Massillon, OH ................ 25-6 21. Muskingum River Lakes, OH ....... 25-6 22. Newark, OH ................ 25-7 23. North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH ..... .......... 25-7 24. 25. North Fork of Pound River Lake, VA . . Ohio River Basin (Huntington District) Page 25-7 25-7 26. Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio .. .. .......... 25-8 27. Paintsville Lake, KY ............ 25-8 28. R.D. Bailey Lake, WV ........... 25-8 29. Roseville, OH .................. 25-8 30. Summersville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV . ............. 25-9 31. Sutton Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV .................. 25-9 32. Tom Jenkins Dam, Ohio River Basin, OH .............. 25-9 33. Yatesville Lake, KY ............ 25-9 34. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............ .25-10 35. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............ .25-10 General Investigations 36. Surveys ................... .25-10 37. Collection and Study of Basic Data . . . . 25-10 Tables Table 2 Table 2 Table 2 :5-A 5-B :5-C Table 25-D Table 25-E Table Table Table 25-F 25-G 25-H Cost & Financial Statement . . . 25-11 Authorization Legislation . . . . 25-15 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ....... 25-18 Not Applicable Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ......... 25-19 Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects ..... . 25-20 Inspection of Flood Control Projects ......... . . 25-21 25-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Navigation 1. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS ON THE OHIO RIVER See this heading under Chapter 22 - Ohio River 2. KANAWHA RIVER, WV Location. The Kanawha River is approximately 97 miles in length and is formed by the junction of the New and Gauley Rivers, a short distance above Kanawha Falls, WV, and flows generally northwesterly to the confluence with the Ohio River at Point Pleasant, WV. Previous projects. For details of previous projects see the Annual Reports for 1875,1915 and 1938. Existing project. The existing project consists of three navigation structures on the Kanawha River. London Locks and Dam are located approximately 83 miles above the mouth of the Kanawha River and approximately two miles downstream from Montgomery, WV. Marmet Locks and Dam are located approximately 68 miles above the mouth of the Kanawha River at Marmet, WV. Winfield Locks and Dam are located approximately 31 miles above the mouth of the Kanawha River at Winfield, WV. Each structure has twin locks with usable dimensions of 56 feet by 360 feet. Another structure is located on the Ohio River at approximate river mile 279 and approximately nine miles below Gallipolis, OH. This structure has two parallel locks, the main lock is 110 feet by 360 feet. This system of locks and dams provides a navigable depth of nine feet from the mouth of the Kanawha River to a point approximately 91 miles upstream. The existing project was completed at a cost of $22,972,909. Construction was initiated in 1931 and completed in 1937. For further cost details see Table 25-B, see also, Appendix C. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are 79 terminals along the Kanawha River located from the mouth of the river to 30 miles east of Charleston, WV. These terminals are constructed principally of steel and wood mooring piles and steel pile mooring cells. Seventeen of these terminals have railroad connections. One terminal, a paved wharf, is owned by the City of Charleston, WV. The remaining terminals are privately owned. The principal commodities handled are coal, chemicals, acids, cement, gasoline and oil, and sand and gravel. For further details see the 1962 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. The Locks and Dams were operated as required and necessary repairs and improvements were made to the locks and dams as well as to the appurtenant structures and grounds. Channel inspections were conducted periodically. A contract was awarded for construction of Daniel Boone State Park, under the recreation at completed projects program, in August 1982. 3. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Chapter 22-Ohio River. 4. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 25-C. 5. ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH Location. The damsite is located in Delaware County, OH, on Alum Creek, a tributary of Big Walnut Creek, approximately 26 miles above the mouth of Alum Creek and 15 miles north of Columbus, OH, and approximately 157 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earthfill dam 93 feet in height and 10,000 feet in length with a gate controlled spillway located in the right abutment. The reservoir provides a total storage of 134,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 123 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1970 and completed in July 1974. The 405 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. The full funding estimate for new work is $57,430,000 which is to be appropriated and expended by the Federal Government. The Sponsor will reimburse the Government an estimated $27,910,000, exclusive of interest, for cost allocated to water supply. Local cooperation. For details of required local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: Engineering activities for the remaining work items continued. The project is essentially complete, except for minor work items such as landscaping and cleanup. Operations and Maintenance. The project was operated for the benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $974,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $35,542,000 in flood damages. 6. BEECH FORK LAKE , WV Location. The damsite is located in Wayne County, WV., on Beech Fork Creek, a tributary of Twelvepole Creek, approximately four miles above the mouth of Beech Fork Creek and 20 miles above the confluence of Twelvepole Creek and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam 86 feet in height and 1,080 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway landward of the left abutment of the dam with a contr6l structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides a total storage of 37,540 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 78 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in December 1972 and completed in February 1977. See also Appendix A. The 485 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. The full funding estimate for new work is $47,300,000. Local cooperation. None required. 25-2 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: Engineering activities for remaining work items continued. The project is essentially complete, except for remaining recreation facilities, landscaping and cleanup. Operations and maintenance. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated at $1,000. To date the project has prevented an estimated $2,467,000 in flood damages. 7. BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Location. The damsite is located on the New River in Summers County, WV., approximately three miles above Hinton, WV and one mile from the confluence of the New and Greenbrier Rivers. The reservoir is located in Summers County, WV and Giles County, VA. Existing project. The existing project consists of a concrete gravity dam 180 feet in height and 2,048 feet in length. Appurtenant structures consist of a gated spillway 790 feet in length located in the channel section of the dam. The stilling pool is formed by a 23 foot highweir located 364 feet downstream of 16 gated sluices through the spillway section and discharging into the stilling pool. Penstocks were installed at the time of construction to permit the future installation of hydropower. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 631,000 acre-feet. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam was initiated in January 1942 and completed in April 1952. A total of 338 tracts of land was acquired for the project. The Federal cost of the project was $29,457,603, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. For further details see the 1939 and 1962 Annual Reports. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. The entire project is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented flood damages estimated to be $177,000 during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $520,120,000 in flood damages. 8. BURNSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Location. The damsite is located in Braxton County WV, on the LIttle Kanawha River, approximately two miles above Burnsville, WV, and 124 miles above the confluence of the Little Kanawha River and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth embankment dam 80 feet in height and 1,000 feet in length with a gated spillway in the left abutment. The outlet works is an integral part of the spillway, consisting of five sluice gates and one low flow sluice. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 65,400 acrefeet and controls a drainage area of approximately 165 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in June 1973 and completed in February 1976. See also Appendix A. The 357 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. The full funding estimate for new work is $55,400,000. Local cooperation. None Required. Operations during the fiscal year. The project is essentially completed except for remaining recreation facilities, landscaping and cleanup. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented flood damages estimated to be $93,000 during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $16,605,000 in flood damage. 9. CHILLICOTHE, OH Location. The project is located in Ross County, OH, along the right bank of the Scioto River, approximately 69 miles above the confluence with the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project provides for the construction of 10,805 feet of earth levee, four gate openings and four pump stations. The full funding estimate for new Work is $22,100,000 of which $21,582,000 is to be allocated and expended by the Federal Government. The Sponsor, in addition to incurring $2,390,000 in estimated non-Federal costs will reimburse the Federal Government $518,000 for the non-Federal share of recreational development costs. Construction of the project was initiated in June 1975. The overall project is 91% complete. The contract for Local Protection Project (Part III), Pump Stations was awarded in September 1980 and is 96% complete. Local cooperation. All requirements for local cooperation are complete. For further details see the 1978 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design of the recreation facilities were initiated. 10. DEER CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. The damsite is located in Pickaway County, approximately seven miles south of Mount Sterling, OH on Deer Creek, a tributary of the Scioto River, approximately 21 miles above the mouth of Deer Creek and approximately 106 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-filled dam 93 feet in height and 3,880 feet in length, a 741 foot concrete gravity channel section controlled by .three tainter gates, an outlet works consisting of five gated sluices through a concrete spillway section discharging into a stilling basin and an earth dike 15 feet by 4,600 feet in a saddle located approximately four miles southwest of the damsite. The reservoir provides a total storage of 102,540 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 278 square miles. Construction of the dam was completed 25-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 in May 1968. The 138 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. For further project details see the 1965 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost of the project is $20,406,545, including expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. For details of required local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $637,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $14,858,000 in flood damages. 11. DELAWARE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. The damsite is located on the Olentangy River, approximately six miles above and north of Delaware, OH, and approximately 32 miles above the confluence of the Olentangy and Scioto Rivers at Columbus, OH. The reservoir is located in Delaware, Marion and Morrow Counties, OH. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam with a gate controlled ogee type spillway and five outlet conduits in the channel. The dam is 18,600 feet in length and 92 feet in height. The project provides for storage of 132,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 381 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in April 1946 and completed in July 1948. For further details see the 1962 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. Total real estate requirements of 7,703 acres of fee acquisition and 2,428 acres of flowage easements have been completed. The Federal cost for the project was $7,631,821. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $546,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $51,305,000 in flood damages. 12. DEWEY LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. The damsite is located on Johns Creek, approximately seven miles southeast of Paintsville, KY and approximately six miles above the confluence of Johns Creek and the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earthfill dam 118 feet in height and 913 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging through a channel excavated in the left abutment, and a rolled earth-fill dike blocking a low divide to Brandykeg Creek and the Levisa Fork. The reservoir provides a total storage of 93,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 207 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in March 1946 and completed in July 1949. For further project detail see the 1965 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. Total real estate requirements for the project were 12,458 acres in fee and 1,170 acres in flowage easements. The Federal cost of the project was $7,845,569, including expenditures for recreation under the completed project program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction activities are complete. The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $14,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $40,698,000 in flood damages. 13. DILLON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. The damsite is located on the Licking River, approximately six miles above the confluence of the Licking and Muskingum Rivers at Zanesville, Ohio. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam 118 feet in height and 1,400 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging through a 20-foot conduit in the right abutment, and an ungated 280-foot spillway adjacent to the left abutment of the dam, and two rolled earthfill dikes. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 261,110 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 748 square miles. Construction of the dam was completed in July 1959. For further project details see the 1962 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. Total real estate required for the project consists of 8,232 acre in fee and 5,380 acres of flowage easements. See also Appendix A. Federal cost of the project was $30,218,135, including expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated as required for flood control, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $2,197,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $85,051,000 in flood damages. 14. EAST LYNN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Location. The damsite is located in Wayne County, WV approximately six miles southeast of Wayne, WV, 10 miles above the mouth of East Fork and 42 miles above the confluence of Twelvepole Creek and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth-fill dam 113 feet in height and 638 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway near the left abutment of the 254 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT dam, and a 13-foot reinforced concrete tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 82,500 acrefeet and controls a drainage area of approximately 133 square miles. The required 552 tracts of land have been acquired. See also Appendix A. The estimated Federal costs of the project is $34,826,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All major construction work is complete. Remaining items include minor recreation, landscaping and cleanup. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $1,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $33,417,000 in flood damages. 15. FISHTRAP LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. The damsite is located in Pike County, KY, on the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River, approximately 15 miles upstream from Pikeville, KY, approximately three miles above the confluence of Levisa and Russell Forks and 103 miles above the mouth ofthe Levisa Fork. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rock-fill dam 195 feet in height and 1,100 feet in length, a controlled spillway containing four tainter gates located in the valley wall adjacent to the left abutment of the dam, the outlet works consists of an intake structure with three conduits controlled by slide gates and discharging into a horseshoe shaped tunnel. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 164,360 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 395 square miles. The dam was completed in February 1969. The 1,301 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. The Federal costs for new work, to date, has been $54,588,911, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required, and necessary repairs wer made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $15,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $179,361,000 in flood damages. 16. GRAYSON LAKE, KY Location. The damsite is located in Carter County, Kentucky on the Little Sandy River approximately 49 miles above the confluence with the Ohio River, and 11 miles upstream from Grayson, KY. Existing project. The existing project consists of a random earthfill dam 120 feet in height and 1,460 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging through a 14-foot spillway beyond the left abutment. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 119,000 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 196 square miles. The dam was completed in January 1968. The 484 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. Federal costs for the project to date have been $19,162,728, which includes expenditures for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $3,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $28,927,000 in flood damages. 17. JOHN W. FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, VA Location. The damsite is located in Dickenson County, VA, approximately four miles northwest of Haysi, VA, on the Pound River approximately two miles above the confluence of the Pound River and Russell Fork and approximately 150 miles above the mouth of the Big Sandy River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rock-fill dam 252 feet in height and 970 feet in length, an outlet tunnel located near the left abutment of the dam with a control structure at the upstream end, a spillway controlled by six tainter gates located in a saddle just upstream from the damsite. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 145,700 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 222 square miles. The project was modified to include water quality control by adding control gates to the previously uncontrolled spillway, which increased the total storage capacity by 39,000 acre-feet. The dam was completed in December 1963. The 382 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost for the project, to date has been $20,356,389, which includes expenditures for recreation under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. the project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented flood damages estimated to be $49,000 during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $108,320,000 in flood damages. 18. LEVISA AND TUG FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY RIVER AND CUMBERLAND RIVER, WV, VA, AND KY 25-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Location. The Levisa and Tug Forks form the Big Sandy River at Louisa, KY. The Cumberland portion is the Upper Cumberland River Basin above Cumberland Falls, KY. The basin is approximately 100 miles in length and averages approximately 30 miles in width in the lower portion and approximately 10 miles in width above harlan, KY. The Big Sandy Basin is within the Huntington District, and the Cumberland Basin is within the Nashville District. This report covers that portion of the project located in the Huntington District. Existing project. The authorization language directs the Corps of Engineers to design and construct, at full Federal expense, such flood control measures as are determined to be necesssary and advisable for the communities in the Tug and Levisa Forks and Upper Cumberland River basins. The authorization further states that such flood control measures would be located at or in the vicinity of Pikeville, KY; and Grundy, VA on the Levisa Fork; Pineville, KY, on the Cumberland River; and Williamson and Matewan on the Tug Fork, in order to afford the named communities and other flood damaged locations and their immediate environs a level of protection against flooding at least sufficient to prevent any future losses from the likelihood of flooding such as occurred in April 1977. The full funding estimate for that portion of the authorized areas consisting of the Williamson, WV area, Pineville, KY, Barboursville, KY and other detailed studies is $188,000,000. Which includes $10,000,000 non-Federal contributions. The Tug Fork Valley Flood Reduction Plan was submitted for review in April 1982. The design of the pump station at West Williamson, WV was submitted for review in June 1982. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Additional engineering studies are now underway to determine what is necessary and advisable to address the flooding problems in both the Levisa Fork Basin and in the Tug Fork tributary stream areas. 19. MARTIN, KY Location. The project is located in Floyd County, KY, approximately six miles above the mouth of Beaver Creek, a tributary of the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River. Existing project. The existing project provides for the construction of approximately 4.5 miles of channel improvement along Beaver Creek beginning at a point approximately 2.3 miles above the junction of the Right and Left forks. The improved channel will have a bottom width of 75 feet, riprap will be placed along the outside of all channel bends and on both sides and the channel bottom through three existing bridges. The total estimated cost of the project (1981) is $10,190,000. The Federal portion of the estimate is $9,850,000 and the non-Federal portion is $340,000 for lands and damages and utility adjustments. To date, the local sponsor has acquired approximately 67% of the real estate required for the project. Local cooperation. For details of required local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. All engineering studies are complete and no further activities are planned pending fulfillment of local cooperation requirements. 20. MASSILLON, OH Location. The project is located in Stark County, on the Tuscarawas River, approximately 200 miles above the mouth of the Muskingum River. Existing project. The existing project consists of channel improvement to the Tuscarawas River, combined with the construction of drainage facilities, levees and pump stations. For further details see the 1962 Annual Report. Construction was initiated in July 1940 and completed in October 1951. Local cooperation. None required. See the 1962 Annual Report for details of local contribution of work beyond the scope of the project. Operations during the fiscal year. Routine inspections were conducted to determine that the improved channel was maintained in satisfactory condition. 21. MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH Location. The Muskingum River lies in Southeast Ohio and including tributaries, drains approximately 8,000 square miles. The headwaters rise about 25 miles south of Lake Erie and flow into the Ohio River at Marietta, OH, 172 miles below Pittsburgh, PA. Existing project. The existing project consists of the construction and operations and maintenance of 14 reservoirs and appurtenant works in the Muskingum River Basin. The existing project originally authorized by the Public Works Administration in February 1934. Construction of the system was initiated in January 1935 and completed in November 1938. The system was initially operated and maintained by the Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District of Ohio, the sponsoring agency, from July 1938 to August 1939 when operation and maintenance became the responsibility of the Corps of Engineers in accordance with the provisions of the 1939 Flood Control Act. For further project details, see the 1962 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. The cost of new work to date is $41,247,815, which includes expenditures for recreation facilities under the completed project program. A significant Major Rehabilitation program was approved in December 1977 in order to assure the integrity of the existing 14 structures under the originally designed maximum pool conditions. Underseepage and abutment seepage problems are being corrected through the installation of downstream blankets and/or relief wells and grouting. The estimated full funding cost'of the rehabilitation program is $45,200,000. A related but separate program entitled Dam Safety Assurance has been initiated. Under current hydrologic design standards, deficiencies exist in the spillways at all the 14 projects in the system. 25-6 HUNTINGTON WEST.VIRGINIA DISTRICT Corrective measures include widening present spillways, constructing new spillways and installing parapet walls on top the dams. The full funding estimate for the Dam Safety Assurance Program is $98,000,000. Local cooperation. All requirements for local cooperation have been met. For further details see the 1942 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work. The Major Rehabilitation is continuing as scheduled. Thus far, twelve contracts have been awarded and the program is 30% complete. The Dam Safety Assurance program was initiated during FY 1982 when the initial construction contract was awarded. The Dam Safety Assurance program is 1% complete. Operations and Maintenance. The reservoirs were operated for flood control as required, and the necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. The system prevented an estimated $28,083,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the system has prevented an estimated $915,686,000 in flood damages. 22. NEWARK, OHIO Location. The project is located in Licking County at the junction of the North and South Forks of the Licking River, approximately 29 miles above the confluence with the Muskingum River at Zanesville, OH. Existing project. For details of the existing project see the 1981 Annual Report. Construction of the existing project was initiated in July 1940 and completed in November 1941. As a result of the 1968 Flood Control Act the existing project was modified to include improvement of the interior drainage facilities, construction of Log Pond Run diversion channel and modification of the North Fork Channel. Construction of the Log Pond Run diversion channel was awarded in September 1980 and completed in December 1981. The full funding estimate for the project is $11,100,000 Federal cost and $3,780,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. For details of required and completed local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: North Fork Channel - As a result of withdrawal of State support for the Utica Lake project (now inactive) and the interdependency of the operation of Utica with the North Fork Channel, the North Fork Channel portion of the project requires re-formulation. A reanalysis is currently underway. Interior Damage - considerable change has occurred in city storm drainage due to road construction and a newly constructed interceptor sewer. Current drainage patterns must be determined before feasibility of additional pumping can be analyzed. Operations and Maintenance: Routine inspections were conducted to determine that the improved channel was maintained in satisfactory condition. 23. NORTH BRANCH OF KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH Location. The damsite is located in Knox County, OH, on the North Branch of Kokosing River, .approximately nine miles above the confluence of the Kokosing and North Branch Rivers, and 2 miles northwest of Fredericktown, OH. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled-earth dam, 70 feet in height and 1,400 feet in length with an uncontrolled spillway adjacent to the right abutment, and an uncontrolled, reinforced concrete outlet work located in the right abutment of the dam. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 14,885 acrefeet and controls a drainage area of approximately 45 square miles. the 56 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction of the dam was completed in May 1972. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost for new work to date is $6,226,186, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. Necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. 24. NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA Location. The damsite is located in Wise County, VA, on the North Fork of Pound River, approximately one mile upstream from the confluence of the North and South Forks which form the Pound River and approximately three miles upstream from Pound, VA. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam, 130 feet in height and 600 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway in a saddle upstream from the dam, and an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides a total storage of 11,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 17 square miles. The 127 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction of the dam was completed in January 1966. See also Appendix A. The Federal costs for the project to date is $6,186,901, which includes expenditures for recreation under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction is complete. The project was operated as required for flood control and the necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented flood damage estimated to be $693,000 during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $2,293,000 in flood damages. 25. OHIO RIVER BASIN (HUNTINGTON DISTRICT) Location. The work covered by this project consists of a series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements and dams and lakes in the Ohio River Basin within the Huntington District. 25-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Existing project. The existing project consists of the individual projects considered in the Ohio River Basin comprehensive plan within the Huntington District. Operations during the fiscal year. The completed local protection porjects, which are operated and maintained by local interest, except for those local protection projects for which individual reports have been included, prevented flood damages of an estimated aggregate total of $834,608. 26. PAINT CREEK LAKE,OHIO RIVERBASIN,OH Location. The damsite is located in Ross County, Ohio, on Paint Creek, a tributary of the Scioto River, approximately 37 miles above the mouth of Paint Creek and 100 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River and approximately four miles east of New Parkersburg, OH. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rock and random earth fill dam, 118 feet in height and 700 feet in length, a gale controlled spillway located near the right abutment, an outlet tunnel located in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end, and a random rockfill dike located at the right abutment of the spillway. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 145,000 arcre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 576 square miles. Construction of the dam was completed in July 1973. The 257 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. Federal costs for the project to date have been $26,954,778, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. For details of required local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and the necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented an estimated $173,000 in flood damages. To date, the project has prevented flood damages estimated to be $33,086,000. 27. PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY Location. The damsite is located in Johnson County, KY, on Paint Creek, a tributary of the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River, approximately eight miles above the mouth of Paint Creek, and four miles west of Paintsville, KY. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam 153 feet in height and 1,560 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located southwest of the right abutment of the dam, and an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 76,642 acrefeet and controls a drainage area of approximately 93 square miles. The 635 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction of the dam was initiated in September 1976 and was completed in September 1980. The full funding estimate for new work is $60,300,000, which is to be appropriated and expended by the Federal Government. The local sponsor will reimburse the Government an estimated $3,275,000 for the cost sharing portion of recreation development. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: The project is well advanced in the construction phase. Remaining work items include completion of reservoir clearing, remaining highway relocations, recreation items, landscaping and cleanup. Pool impoundment is scheduled for initiation in the latter part of 1983. While the project is not complete, involuntary storage in FY 1982 prevented an estimated $19,000 in flood damages. To date, involuntary impoundments have prevented an estimated $3,913,000 in flood damages. 28. R.D. BAILEY LAKE, WV Existing project. The damsite is located in Wyoming County, WV, on the Guyandotte River approximately 108 miles above the confluence with the Ohio River and one mile east of Justice, WV. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled rockfill dam with a concrete face, 305 feet in height and 1,330 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located in a saddle in the right abutment of the dam, and an outlet tunnel in the left abutment with a control structure located at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 203,700 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 540 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in November 1973 and completed in December 1979. See also Appendix A. The full funding estimate for new work is $195,200,000. Local cooperation. None required. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the project is' well advanced. The remaining work items include remaining recreation, landscaping and cleanup. The project is approximately 95% complete. Operations and Maintenance. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented an estimated $214,000 in flood damages. To date, the project has prevented flood damages estimated to be $28,180,000. 29. ROSEVILLE, OH Location. The project is located in Muskingum and Perry Counties, on Moxahala Creek, approximately six miles the confluence with Jonathan Creek, a tributary of the Muskingum River. Existing project. The existing project consists of 7,291 feet of channel improvement; 6,400 feet of levee and railroad embankment enlargements; and the necessary appurtenances for interior drainage. Total Federal cost of the project was $910,785. Construction was initiated in August 1959 and completed in October 1960. Local cooperation. All requirements for local 25-8 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT cooperation have been completed. See also the 1962 Annual Report. Total costs of local requirement were $62,000. Operations during the fiscal year. Routine inspections of the improved portion of the project were conducted to determine that the project was maintained in satisfactory condition. 30. SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Location. The damsite is located at Ruckers Bend in Nicholas County on the Gauley River approximately 35 miles above the confluence of the Gauley and New River at Gauley Bridge, WV. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam having a height of 357 feet and a length of 2,280 feet, an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure located at the upstream and, an uncontrolled spillway located west of the right abutment and two earthfill dikes. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 413,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 803 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam was initiated in March 1960 and completed in March 1966. A total of 9,346 acres of land were acquired for the project. The Federal costs of the project, to date, have been $48,338,740, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. All construction work is complete, except for minor sanitary facilities under the recreation at completed projects program. The project was operated for flood control as required and necesssary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $7,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $217,321,000 in flood damages. 31. SUTTON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Location. The damsite is located on the Elk River in Braxton County approximately one mile above Sutton, WV and 101 miles above the mouth of the Elk River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a concrete gravity dam having a height of 220 feet and a length of 1,178 feet, a gated spillway in the channel section of the dam, comprised of six tainter gates supported by piers, an outlet works comprised of five gate sluices through the spillway section. The reservoir provides for a storage of 265,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 537 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam was initiated in September 1956 and completed in June 1960. A totalof 13,154 acres of land were acquired for the project. The Federal costs of the project, to date, have been $38,839,961, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. See the 1981 Annual Report for contributed funds. Operations during the fiscal year. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $7,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $135,224,000 in flood damages. 32. TOM JENKINS RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. The damsite is located in Athens County, on the East Branch of Sunday Creek, a tributary of the Hocking River, approximately three miles north of Glouster, Ohio and 57 miles above the mouth of the Hocking River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled-earth dam, 84 feet in height and 944 feet in length, a controlled works discharging through a tunnel in the left abutment, and an uncontrolled spillway in the ridge running south from the damsite. The reservoir, known as Burr Oak Lake, provides for a total storage of 26,900 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 33 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the project was initiated in March 1948 and completed in February 1950. A total of 100 acres of land were acquired for the project. The Federal costs of the project were $2,117,264. Local cooperation. All requirements of local cooperation have been met, see also the 1962 Annual Report. Contributed funds in the amount of $575,000 have been received from the State of Ohio. Operations during the fiscal year. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $8,559,000 in flood damages. 33. YATESVILLE LAKE, KY Location. The damsite is located in Lawrence County, on Blaine Creek, a tributary of the Big Sandy River, approximately five miles west of Louisa, KY and 18 miles above the mouth of Blaine Creek. Existing project. The existing project provides for the construction of an earthfill dam, 104 feet in height and 770 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located approximately one-half mile east of the right abutment of the dam, and an outlet tunnel through the left abutment of the dam with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir will provide a total storage of 86,951 acre-feet and control a drainage area of 208 square miles. The full funding estimate for new work is $96,700,000, which will be allocated and expended by the Federal Government. The sponsor will reimburse the Government an estimated $6,510,000 for the cost sharing portion of the required 499 real estate tracts have been acquired. A contract for construction of the dam was awarded in January 1977 and was terminated for the convenience of the Government in August 1977. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: Congress appropriated funds in fiscal year 1981 to 25-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 resume project construction, and work progressed until March 1981 when the administration directed a deferral action which resulted in a substantial reduction in project funds and the elimination of any recommendation for funding in fiscal year 1982. Congressional action provided fiscal year 1982 funding for the project and funds were made available to the district with guidance restricting the application of dollars. No funds are contained in the Administration's Budget Recommendation to Congress for fiscal year 1983. 34. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS The flood control act of June 22, 1936 and subsequent acts require local interest to furnish assurances that they will operate and maintain certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulationsprescribed by the Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for the administration of these regulations within their respective districts. Maintenance inspections were made during the fiscal year of those completed units transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain the projects in accordance with the standards prescribed by regulations. Total costs for fiscal year 1982 were $89,479. Total cost to September 30,1982 were $948,828. The flood control works inspected and the dates of inspection are tabulated in Table H. 35. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency bank protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress are tabulated as follows: Location FY 1982 Cost Guyandotte River, Huntington, WV Kanawha River, Chesapeake, WV Little Kanawha River, Burnsville, WV Manchester, OH Ohio River and Duck Creek, Marietta, OH Ohio River, Huntington, WV Parkersburg, WV $ 4,441 4,500 2,000 115,268 16,268 1,631 137,886 Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 853, 80th Congress are tabulated as follows: Location Apple Creek, Wooster, OH Blacklick Creek, Reynoldsburg, OH Laurel Fork, Matheny, WV Laurelville, OH Marsh Fork, Fairdale, WV Russell Fork, Haysi, VA Sandy Creek, Malvern, OH FY 1982 Cost $ 817 25,092 30,827 81 7,395 2,514 5,513 Stream erosion control, evaluation, demonstration pursuant to Section 32 of the 1974 Water Resources Development Act, Public Law 251, 93rd Congress are tabulated as follows: Evaluation of the extent of Stream Bank Erosion Ohio River Demonstration Projects $1 464 Flood control and coastal emergency activities pursuant to Public Law 99, 84th Congress were conducted as required during FY 1982 at a cost of $83,815. National emergency management activities were accomplished by the district as required. The costs for these activities during FY 1982 were 68,751. 36. SURVEYS Fiscal year 1982 costs were $3,925,222 itemized as follows: Navigation Studies $ 900,064 Flood Damage Prevention Studies 1,026,507 Comprehensive Basin Studies 612,332 Coordination Studies 291,928 Supplemental Pre-Authorization 30,287 Continuation of Planning and Engineering 1,064,104 37. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year cost were $183,152. 25-10 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT TABLE 25-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to InText Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept.30, 1982 2. Kanawha River, WV 5. Alum Creek Lake, OH 6. Beech Fork Lake, WV 7. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 8. Burnsville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 9. Chillicothe, OH 10. Deer Creek Lake Ohio River Basin, OH 11. Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - 45,000 619,317 27,831,6991 - - 36,203 63,936 27,267,521' 4,015,767 2,511,273 4,328,000 4,290,000 49,393,584' 3,639,967 2,551,386 4,195,100 3,945,120 48,361,928' - - - - 130,394' - - - - 130,394' 492,101 1,259,465 237,612 263,945 983,000 1,015,287 350,785 343,891 25,000 46,667 396,709 441,164 3,525,000 4,483,202 332,108 327,116 1,470,000 1,870,000 2,130,000 56,168,064 1,453,947 1,946,955 266,351 54,130,851 270,715 404,000 493,000 2,236,065 275,565 380,678 489,002 2,202,508 825,000 880,000 1,245,000 36,991,500 1,001,244 755,144 1,084,855 36,559,314 438,556 502,500 562,000 2,394,039 435,941 498,904 562,079 2,372,230 120,000 -803 -9,461 29,458,652' 72,194 6,851 - 29,457,6030 487,618 645,000 669,000 8,129,078 586,224 630,392 660,586 8,072,452 540,000 760,000 7,000,000 51,495,265 683,890 639,185 6,816,907 50,975,995 453,117 523,200 622,000 2,496,505 421,624 532,657 613,160 2,458,146 2,304,000 434,000 7,550,000 5,600,000 20,054,099 2,288,025 362,619 7,637,269 5,134,146 19,558,094 10,000 5,871 664 4,793 - 20,406,5457 - 20,406,545' 390,863 389,802 373,000 445,000 3,716,364 354,549 418,619 365,310 407,829 3,654,924 - - - - 7,631,821 - - - - 7,631,821 222,262 288,348 307,000 433,000 3,843,719 231,466 290,102 284,545 440,228 3,819,377 25-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 25-A (CONT'D) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 12. Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY 13. Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 14. East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 15. Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY 16. Grayson Lake, KY 17. John W. Flannagan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, VA 18. Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, KY, WV, and VA 19. Martin, KY 20. Massillon, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost -67,600 3,095 -2,020 637,573 586,916 634,470 596,546 - - 7,845.547' - - 7,845,5478 556,000 624,200 7,606,476' 550,024 646,564 7,581,55510 30,218,135 30,218,135 277,122 187,556 273,845 190,062 125,752 1,764,000 177,321 1,356,942 570,858 670,645 627,749 597,963 185,000 246,315 -2,384 6,409 783,488 1,045,198 720,341 1,020,942 -435,000 336,473 36,930 45,458 506,527 513,303 500,538 523,570 -10,000 - 499,752 472,167 493,701 483,082 209,000 228,000 2,723,843 214,476 225,591 2,716,638 700,000 852,489 - 34,825,968 201,205 34,593,750 705,000 809,920 5,508,80711 681,167 791,773 5,458,99812 - 106,000 54,672,0931" 4,652 22,818 54,588,911" 573,000 685,000 2,341,19816 574,633 658,909 2,296,4201" -125,924 249,041 604,500 568,937 7,143 19,162,7411" 75,556 19,162,72817 630,000 624,091 5,270,670 5,223,541 - 147,000 20,458,59818 - 44,791 20,356,38919 609,000 798,200 6,405,8520 579,537 712,410 6,281,71321 - 4,000,000 3,800,000 - 3,001,393 2,548,242 -24,000 3,547 10,000 -2,900 3,911 10,924 20,922 580 9,000 8,997 960 11,000 11,004 7,800,000 5,549,635 213,400 211,839 8,139,406" 8,139,406 " 233,508 233,507 25-12 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT TABLE 25-A (CONT'D) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 21. Muskingum River Dams and Lakes, OH 22. Newark,OH (Previous project) (Existing project) 23. North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH 24. North Fork of Pound River Lake, Ohio River Basin, VA 25. Ohio River Basin 28. R.D. Bailey Lake, WV 29. Roseville, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Dam Safety Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Maint. Maint. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost 10,000 9,770 5,384 10,639 8,413 2,186,361 3,263,068 3,321,000 2,103,898 3,024,326 3,245,321 2,075,000 2,200,000 3,730,000 1,697,422 2,204,626 3,611,151 -2,879 41,247,815" 1,501 41,247,815" 4,459,300 40,680,070 4,613,985 40,396,660 3,720,000 13,931,9452" 4,182,532 13,561,82224 - 1,430,000 1,430,000 - 1,293,342 1,293,342 - - 845,916 - - 845,916 10,000 191 9,516 19,475 14,000 14,000 -30,000 381,700 2,820,000 103,753 320,167 2,712,807 103,753 320,167 2,712,807 -101 143,173 164,303 49,000 17,470 16,000 15,997 760,000 785,454 785,454 -3,823 27,707 60,823 119,500 62,770 105,526 397,456 295,189 343,000 352,958 344,094 335,337 - -. - - - 143,000 - - 139,639 14,708,000 4,871,000 2,700,000 16,502,356 5,101,980 2,816,128 286,203 372,131 594,000 283,851 359,095 564,155 5,000 4,970 9,560 9,560 10,000 10,000 131,000 144,677 635,765 635,762 4,749,375 4,598,472 4,598,472 6,266,186" 6,266,18625 962,017 958,087 6,186,90126 6,186,9016 331,200 3,874,35927 329,040 3,860,776" 314,000 314,166 6,000,000 5,793,813 642,000 643,987 6,000 5,998 355,861" 355,861" 457,000 453,805 185,322,23332 184,555,45232 2,196,814 2,152,771 910,785 910,785 106,968 106,966 25-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 25-A (CONT'D) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept, 30, 1982 30. Summersville Lake, New Work Ohio River Basin, Approp. 290,000 -30,000 - 42,879 48,378,732" WV Cost 14,638 42,441 124,585 81,223 48,338,740" Maint. Approp. 761,609 545,409 951,000 1,789,920 8,364,914" Cost 718,451 580,337 852,417 1,667,124 8,121,356" 31. Sutton Lake, New Work Ohio River Basin, Approp. - - - - 38,839,961" WV Cost - - - - 38,839,96187 Maint. Approp. 1,215,920 2,514,929 870,000 969,920 12,257,787" Cost 1,166,664 2,532,998 830,473 921,281 12,127,822" 32. Tom Jenkins Dam, New Work OH Approp. - - - - 2,124,567" Cost - - - - 2,124,567" Maint. Approp. 145,645 172,506 295,200 231,000 2,530,475 Cost 142,663 178,076 184,738 293,149 2,517,569 33. Yatesville Lake, New Work KY Approp. -115,000 50,000 800,000 4,000,000 16,044,500 Cost 104,878 100,015 603,357 481,415 12,265,948 1 Includes $4,294,612 for new work for previous projects, $4,498,636 emergency relief funds, $9,004,800 public works funds, and $664,317 Code 713 funds. 2 Includes $4,294,612 for new work for previous projects, $4,498,636 emergency relief funds, $9,004,800 public works funds, and $100,139 Code 713 funds. Includes $3,883,513 for maintenance of previous projects and $167,646 Maintenance and Operation funds. SPublic works acceleration funds. a Includes $543,960 emergency relief funds, $9,698 public works acceleration funds, $211,850 Code 711 funds and $75,000 Code 713 funds. * Includes $543,960 emergency relief funds, $9,698 public works acceleration funds, $211,850 Code 711 funds and $73,951 Code 713 funds. ' Excludes $225,090 contributed funds. Includes $590,690 Code 711 funds. SIncludes $23,087 public works acceleration funds, $1,089,940 Code 711 funds and $231,105 Code 713 funds. * Includes $51,400 special recreation use fee funds. 10 Includes $51,396 special recreation use for funds. 1 Includes $164,418 special recreation use fee funds. 12 Includes $164,416 special recreation use fee funds. 18 Includes $364,616 Code 711 funds and $10,000 Code 712 fund1s." Includes $281,434 Code 711 funds and $10,000 Code 712 fund1s. 6 Includes $38,000 special recreation use fee funds. 18 Includes $406,919 Code 711 funds and $2,317 Code 713 funds. 17 Includes $406,906 Code 711 funds and $2,317 Code 713 funds. 18 Includes $437,198 Code 711 funds. 19 Includes $355,169 Code 711 funds. * Includes $71,200 special recreation use fee funds. 21 Includes $71,199 special recreation use fee funds. "Includes $477,813 contributed funds. "Includes $27,190,000 National Industrial Recovery Funds and $528,288 Code 711 funds. " Includes $61,945 Public Works Acceleration Funds. " Includes $45,177 Code 711 funds. 3 Includes $64,233 Code 711 funds. 9 Includes $68,200 special recreation use fee funds. 8 Includes $68,197 special recreation use fee funds. " Includes $10,920 Emergency Relief funds. 80 Includes $14,153 Code 711 funds. 81 Includes $31,496 special recreation use fee funds. " Includes $5,534 Consolidated Army funds. "Includes $302,879 Code 711 funds. " Includes $262,887 Code 711 funds. " Includes $164,412 special recreation use fee funds. " Includes $164,409 special recreation use fee funds. 8'Includes $1,647,713 Code 711 funds and $287,843 Accelerated Public Works funds. Excludes $62,800 contributed funds. " Includes $192,934 special recreation use fee funds. 8 Includes $192,931 special recreation use fee funds. ' Includes $8,064 Code 711 funds and $30,000 Public Works Acceleration funds, excludes $575,000 contributed funds. 25-14 TABLE 25-B HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing inText Act Proiectand Work Authorized Documents 2. Aug. 30, 1935 5. Oct. 23, 1962 6. Oct. 23, 1962 7. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22,1944 8. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 9. Oct. 23, 1962 10. Jun. 28, 1938 11. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 12. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22,1944 13. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 14. Jun. 28, 1938 KANAWHA RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV Construction of three locks and dam on the Kanawha River and one on the Ohio River. ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. BEECH FORK LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation Deleted Power BURNSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN,WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added recreation CHILLICOTHE, OH Construction of Levees and Pump Stations. DEER CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. DELAWARE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation DEWEY LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation DILLON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation EAST LYNN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation 25-15 H. Doc. 31, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 587, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 520, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 91, 74th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., lest Sess. P.L. 534 78th Cong., 2nd. Sess. H. Doc. 587, 8th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., Ist Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Dec. 22,1944 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY, 1982 TABLE 25-B (CONT'D) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Proiect and Work Authorized Documents 15. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 16. Jul. 14,1960 17. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 18. Oct. 1,1980 19. Oct. 27, 1965 20. Jun. 28, 1938 21. Feb. 20, 1934 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 11, 1939 22. Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 13,1968 23. Oct. 23, 1962 24. Jul. 14, 1960 FISHTRAP LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation GRAYSON LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. JOHN W. FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, VA Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation. TUG AND LEVISA FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY RIVER, AND CUMBERLAND RIVER, KY, WV Construction of such Flood Control Measures as Deemed Necessary and Advisable. MARTIN, KY Construction of Channel Improvement Project. MASSILLON, OH Construction of Channel Improvement Project. MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH Construction of 14 Flood Control Reservoirs. Reibursement to the Muskingum Conservancy District a sum not to exceed actual expenditures for project construction. Operations and Maintenance assigned to the Corps of Engineers NEWARK, OHIO Construction of Channel Improvement Project. Modification to Existing Project and Additional Channel Improvement and Drainage Facilities. NORTH BRANCH OF KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA Construction of Flood Control Reservoir Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 440, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sect. 202, P.L. 367, 96th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 246, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Works Admin. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 396, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 337, 90th Cong., 2nd Session H. Doc. 220, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 645, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. 25-16 TABLE 25-B (CONT'D) HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act 26. Jun. 28,1938 Dec. 22, 1944 27. Oct. 27, 1965 28. Oct. 23, 1962 29. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 31. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22,1944 32. Dec. 22, 1944 33. Oct. 27, 1965 34. Jun. 22, 1936 Project and Work Authorized PAINT CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. R.D. BAILEY LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. ROSEVILLE, OH Construction of Channel Improvement Project. Added Recreation SUTTON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation TOM JENKINS DAM, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. YATESVILLE LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. INSPECTIONS OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS. Inspection of Local maintenance of Federally Constructed Local Protection Projects. Documents Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 246, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 569, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 762, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 246, 89th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 738, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 25-17 TABLE 25-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY, 1982 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Big Sandy River WV and KY including Levisa and Tug Forks2 1952 1,586,236 1,569,8111 131,473 Elk River, WV8 1903 30,259 Gauley River, WV4 1903 14,761 Guyandotte River, WV5 1915 27,500 Little Kanawha River, WV6 1960 470,536 1,023,854 Muskingum River, OH' 1955 301,912 6,171,897 6,041 New River, WA and VA5 1899 109,691 Scioto River at Portsmouth, OH8 1953 10,951 16,593 1n addition, $140,068 expended from funds transferred from Department of Commerce, under accelerated public works program, for repairs of eroded bank at lock 3 on Big Sandy River, at Louisa, KY. 2Operation and Maintenance suspended June 30, 1952. 8Work closed September 1902. Property transferred to Kanawha River improvements. 4Work closed September 1902. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress. 5Work suspended. 6Operation and maintenance suspended June 30, 1951. 7 Collections from license non-Federal hydroelectric utilities for use of dams on Muskingum River for fiscal years 1923-1953 were $79,154. sPrivate Law 954, August 31, 1954, authorized Secretary of Treasury to pay Portsmouth sand and Gravel Co. $75,000 in full settlement of claims against Government for damages resulting from change in Scioto River Channel. Cost to September 30,1981 25-18 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT TABLE 25-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Completed Local Protection Projects Ashland, KY 1954 3,718,839 - - Athens, OH 1979 5,313,700 - - Cattletsburg, KY 1963 3,854,361 - - Ceredo-Kenova, WV 1955 2,753,551 - - East Rainelle, WV 1962 614,598 - - Galax, VA 1953 480,536 - - Huntington, WV 1956 7,172,840 - - Ironton, OH 1952 2,604,646 - - Maysville, KY 1959 6,493,747 - - Parkersburg, WV 1955 6,652,827 - - Pt. Pleasant, WV 1955 6,652,827 - - Portsmouth-New Boston, OH 1956 9,806,424 - - Princeton, WV 1962 808,750 - - Russell, KY 1953 237,193 - - Williamson, WV 1964 1,056,166 - - Inactive Local Protection Projects Augusta, KY - 11,577 Burlington, OH - - Chesapeake, OH - - - - Coal Grove, OH - 3,389 - - Coal River, WV 1979 472,229 - - Dover, KY - - - - Fullerton, KY - - - - Greenup, KY - 4,962 - - Lower Guyandotte River Basin, WV - 17,721 - - Miller, OH - - - - Normal, KY - - - - Proctorville, OH - - - - Ravenswood, WV - - - - South Point, OH - - - - South Portsmouth, KY - - - - Vanceburg, KY - - - - Inactive Reservoirs and Lakes Haysi, VA - 2,656 - - Leading Creek, WV 1974 272,880 - - Panther Creek, WV 1976 22,879 - - Salt Creek, OH 1975 1,089,943 - - Utica, OH 1975 757,550 - - West Fork, WV 1974 663,192 - - Deferred Reservoir and Lakes Birch, WV - Logan, OH - Moores Ferry, WV - Active Authorized Projects with no current year expenditures. Kehoe Kake, KY 1981 1,272,740 Oceana, WV 1981 610,602 25-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY, 1982 TABLE 25-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS All projects listed in this table have been deauthorized in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974, P.L. 251, 93rd Congress. For Last Full Report Federal Contributed Local Protection See Annual Funds Funds Projects Report For Date Expended Expended Aberdeen, OH - May 1981 1,334 - Athalia, OH - Aug 1977 - - Belpre, OH - Nov 1977 - - Brooklyn, WV - Nov 1979 - - Buena Vista, OH - Aug 1977 - - Chambersburg, OH - Aug 1977 - - Cheshire, OH - Nov 1977 - - Chilo, OH - Aug 1977 - - Clifton, WV - Aug 1977 11,237 - Columbus, OH - Aug 1977 - - Friendly, WV - Aug 1977 - - Gallipolis, OH - Aug 1977 - - Hanging Rock, OH - Aug 1977 - - Hartford, WV - Aug 1977 - - Henderson, WV - Aug 1977 - - Higginsport, OH - Oct 1978 - - Hockingport, OH - Aug 1977 - - Letart, WV - Aug 1977 - - Letart Falls, OH - Aug 1977 - - Manchester, OH - May 1981 - - Mapleshade, OH - Oct 1978 - - Marietta, OH - Nov 1981 - - Mason, WV - Aug 1977 - - Middleport, OH - May 1981 9,783 - Millwood, WV - Aug 1977 - - New Martinsville, WV - Nov 1979 - - New Matamoras, OH - Aug 1977 - - Newport, OH - Aug 1977 - - Pomeroy, OH - Aug 1977 - - Portland, OH - Aug 1977 - - Racine, OH - Aug 1977 - - Ripley, OH - Oct 1978 7,523 - Riverview, WV - Aug 1977 - - St. Mary's, WV - Aug 1977 - - Sardis, OH - Aug 1977 - - Sciotoville, OH - Aug 1977 - - Sistersville, OH - Aug 1977 - - Syracuse, OH - Aug 1977 - - Waverley, WV - Aug 1977 - - Williamstown, WV - Nov 1979 - - Zanesville, OH - May 1981 - - Reservoirs and Lakes Big Bend, WV - Aug 1977 - - BigDarby, OH 1969 Nov 1979 3,349,568 - Frazeysburg, OH - May 1981 5,000 - Millersburg, OH - May 1981 - - Mill Creek, OH 1981 Nov 1981 1,602,702 - Mud River, WV - Nov1979 - - Poca, WV - May 1981- - Rocy Fork, OH 1950 Aug 1977 91,321 - White Oak Creek, OH - Nov 1981 - - 26-0 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT TABLE 25-H INSPECTION OF FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS - See Section 34 ofText Flood Control Works Inspected Dates of Inspection Ashland, KY Athens, OH Bramwell, WV Cairo, WV Canton (Nimishillen), OH Cattletsburg, KY Ceredo-Kenova, WV East Rainelle, WV Fishing Creek, Pine Grove, WV Fourpole Creek, WV Galax, VA Grahn, KY Griffithsville-Yawkey, WV Hitchins, KY Huntington, WV Inez, KY Ironton, OH Jacksonsburg, Fishing Creek, WV Maysville, KY Montcalm, WV Newark, OH Olive Hill, KY Paint Creek at Chillicothe, OH Paint Creek at Washington Court House, OH Parkersburg, WV Pax, WV Point Pleasant, WV Portsmouth-New Boston, OH Prestonsburg, KY Princeton, WV Richwood and Fenwick, WV Right and Left Forks of Beaver Creek, KY Ripley, WV Roseville, OH Russel, KY Smithfield, WV South Wiliamson, KY Utica, OH West Union, Middle Island, WV Williamson, WV May 1982 Nov 1981 Aug 1982 Aug 1982 Nov 1981 May 1981 Sep 198 May 1982 July 1982 Aug 1982 Dec 1979 Aug 1981 Aug 1981 Dec 1982 Aug 1981 Apr 1982 Oct 1981 May 1982 Aug 1982 Apr 1982 Aug 82 Aug 1982 Aug 1982. Aug 1981 Nov 1981 Dec 1981 Jun 1982 Jul 1982 May 1982 Nov 1981 Apr 19[ Jul 1982 Aug 1982 Jul 1982 Jan 1982 Aug 1982 Jul 1982 Apr 1982 Aug 1982 Aug 1982 Aug 1981 Aug 1982 Apr 1982 82 25-21 81 PITTSBURGH, PA DISTRICT * This District comprises part of eastern Ohio, western age basin of Ohio River and tributaries above mile 127 Pennsylvania, southwestern New York, northern West (below Pittsburgh), immediately upstream from New Virginia, and northwestern Maryland embraced in drain- Martinsville, W. Va. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation - Locks and Dams Page 1. Allegheny River, PA ...................... 26-2 2. Construction of locks and dams, Ohio River .............................. 26-2 3. Monongahela River, PA and WV ............ 26-2 4. Open-channel work, Ohio River .............. 26-3 5. Tygart Lake, WV ........................ 26-3 6. Other authorized navigation projects ......... 26-3 Flood Control - Local Protection 7. Allegheny River, Oil City, PA ............... 26-3 8. Chartiers Creek, PA ...................... 26-3 9. Elkins, WV ............................. 26-4 10. Girty's Run, Millvale, PA .................. 26-4 11. Johnstown, PA .......................... 26-5 12. Punxsutawney, Ohio River Basin, PA .............................. 26-5 13. Root Creek, Bolivar, NY ................... 26-5 Flood Control - Reservoirs 14. Berlin Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH .............................. 26-5 15. Conemaugh River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA ..................... 26-6 16. Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA ..................... 26-6 17. East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA ..................... 26-6 18. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, PA and NY ............... 26-7 19. Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA ............................. 26-7 20. Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA ..................... 26-8 21. Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, OH ........................... 26-8 22. Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH ........................ 26-9 23. Ohio River Basin (Pittsburgh District) .............................. 26-9 Flood Control (Continued) Page 24. Shenango River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and OH ................... 26-9 25. Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV . .............. 26-9 26. Tionesta Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA ......................... 26-10 27. Union City Damrn, PA ..................... 26-11 28. Woodcock Creek Lake, PA ............... 26-11 29. Youghiogheny River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and MD ...................... 26-12 30. Inspection of completed flood control projects ............................. 26-12 31. Other authorized flood control projects ....... 26-12 32. Flood control work under special authorization ......................... 26-12 General Investigations 33. Surveys ............................. 26-13 34. Collection and study of basic data ........... 26-13 35. Research and development ................ 26-13 Tables Table 26-A Cost & Financial Statement .......... 26-14 Table 26-B Authorizing Legislation ............. 26-17 Table 26-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects . 26-21 Table 26-D Not Applicable...................... Table 26-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .............. .... :......26-22 Table 26-F Not Applicable ..................... Table 26-G Deauthorized Projects .............. 26-23 Table 26-H Allegheny River Statistics ........... 26-24 Table 26-I Monongahela River Statistics ........ 26-25 Table 26-J Monongahela River Total Costs ....... 26-26 Table 26-K Ohio River Basin Local Protection Projects ......................... 26-26 Table 26-L Ohio River Basin Reservoirs ......... 26-27 Table 26-M Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ......................... 26-28 Table 26-N Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................... 26-29 26-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Navigation - Locks and Dams 1. ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA Location. The Allegheny River is 325 miles long. It rises in northern Pennsylvania, flows northwestward into New York, thence generally southwestward to Pittsburgh, PA, where it joins with Monongahela River to form the Ohio. (See Geological Survey Charts for western Pennsylvania and southwestern New York.) Existing project. The project consists of eight locks and dams to afford slack-water navigation for a length of 72 miles from Pittsburgh, PA to above East Brady, PA. Controlling depth through canalized portion is 9 feet at normal pool level. Channel width varies from a minimum of 200 feet to full width of river at mouth. Existing project is complete, the last lock, No. 9, was placed in service in 1938. All locks and dams are in fair condition. Navigation channel has been widened at certain points and, in general, maintained to project depth, thus affording adequate depth for passage of commercial tows. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. City of Pittsburgh constructed a modern wharf for river freight. There are numerous privately maintained terminals and docks, consisting of tipples, various types of hoists, chutes, and pipelines for use in loading and unloading coal, stone, sand, gravel, petroleum products, steel products, and other commodities. Transshipment of freight between river and railroads is handled at privately owned river-to-rail terminals. Existing private terminals are adequate for shipments and receipt in Pittsburgh District of type of commerce now in existence. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Locks were operated as required and necessary repairs were made to structures to maintain them in a serviceable condition. 2. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Ohio River portion. 3. MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV Location. Formed by junction of Tygart and West Fork Rivers about 1 mile south of Fairmont, WV, and flows northerly for 128.7 miles to its junction with Allegheny River, forming Ohio River at Pittsburgh, PA (See Geological Survey Charts for southwestern Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1963, page 1070. Existing project. Provides for improvement of river by 9 locks and dams to afford slack-water navigation for its entire length from Pittsburgh to above Fairmont, WV. Original locks and dams 7, 8 and 9 were replaced by new locks and dams 7 and 8 in 1925. Increased traffic necessitated enlargement and improvement of locks and dams 1 to 6 between Pittsburgh and Rices Landing, PA, by building two parallel chambers and fixed concrete dams during 1905 and 1932. Locks and dam 1 were eliminated in 1938 by raising Emsworth Dam, Ohio River. Reconstruction of lock 2 was completed in 1953 to provide two modern navigation chambers. The existing locks and dam 2 were originally completed in 1907; major modifications were made in 1923 and 1924, and in 1926 the upper guard and guide walls were extended. Construction of Maxwell locks and dam and the reconstruction of dam 4 have allowed for removal of obsolete locks and dams 5 and 6. Small and antiquated original locks and dams 10 to 15, inclusive, have been replaced by three modern structures. Morgantown lock and dam, initial step in replacement program, was completed in 1950 replacing locks and dams 10 and 11. Hildebrand lock and dam, next upstream, was completed in 1959 replacing locks and dams 12 and 13. Raising crest of dam 8 was also completed in 1959 as part of upper river improvement and eliminates restricted depth in upper reach of pool. Opekiska lock and dam was completed in 1967 replacing locks and dams 14 and 15. Completion of this link in upper river replacement program provides for entire river length of minimum channel depth of 9 feet, varying in width from a minimum of 250 feet to practically full width at mouth. Locks and dam 3 showed advanced stages of deterioration and, because of its strategic location and its importance to industry throughout the Greater Pittsburgh area and the nation, emergency remedial work had to be done in 1977. Major rehabilitation of locks and dam 3 was completed on Oct. 27, 1980. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. City of Pittsburgh constructed a modern wharf for freight. Boat landings are maintained by some municipalities along the river. A large number of tipples at mines and various types of hoists at manufacturing plants and sand and gravel supply companies are maintained for private use in loading and unloading coal, coke, billets, steel products, sand, gravel, and other commodities. These terminals and docks are not available for general commerce. A number of docks and pipelines are also privately maintained for petroleum and acid products. Marine ways are maintained by some of the larger industries. There are also several terminals for rail-to-river and river-to-rail transfer. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Work on the locks and dam 3 major rehabilitation project was completed in October 1980 at an estimated final cost of $12,460,000. Study for replacement of locks and dams for middle and lower reach of river is being conducted as part of the continuing study of the entire Monongahela River Basin. The Reconnaissance Report on the Monongahela River Navigation System, Stage I Studies was submitted in Jan. 1981. A feasibility study draft report is scheduled for submission in Aug. 1983 with a final report scheduled for submission in Feb. 1984. Contract for Additional Armor Protection, Locks and Dam 3, was awarded in June 1982 for $76,900 and progressed to 67% completion with contract completion scheduled in Nov 1982. Operation and maintenance, general: Locks were operated as required and necessary repairs were made to structures maintain them in a serviceable condition. 26-2 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT 4. OPEN-CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Ohio River portion. 5. TYGART LAKE, WV Location. Tygart Lake is located on the Tygart River in Taylor and Barbour Counties, northcentral WV. The lake is approximately 26 road miles due east of Clarksburg, WV and 30 road miles south of Morgantown. The dam is situated 22.7 river miles above the mouth of the Tygart River at Fairmont, or 2.25 miles upstream from Grafton, WV, and about 78 miles south of Pittsburgh, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Fairmont, Thornton, and Belington, WV.) Existing project. A reservoir for low water regulation and flood control. Dam is concrete gravity type with an uncontrolled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides. Project was authorized by Public Works Administration January 11, 1934, and adopted by 1935 River and Harbor Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low water control in Monongahela River and for purpose of flood protection in Monongahela and Ohio Valleys. Construction of dam was started in 1935 and placed in operation in 1938. Land acquired for project consists of 2,662.9 acres in fee, flowage easements over 1,216.9 acres and 1,731.9 acres of other easements. Current estimate for construction of recreation facilities at completed project is $1,520,000 of which $635,000 are non-Federal costs. Local cooperation. The State of West Virginia has assumed responsibility for the development and operation of hunting and fishing areas as well as the Tygart Lake State Park. Controlled releases for downstream navigation and recreation are also coordinated with others to the extent feasible. No local cooperation is required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. A cost-sharing agreement was executed with the West Virginia Department of Recreation in May 1981. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Cost-sharing contract for Construction of Water Supply, Sewage Collection System and Sewage Treatment Plant, Right Bank Facilities awarded in Sep 1981 for $517,629.25 progressed to 71% completion. Contract for Construction of Restrooms, Day Use Area awarded in Mar 1982 for $149,845 progressed to 41% completion. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low water regulation, as required, and project structures were operated and maintained in a serviceable condition throughout the year. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $1,382,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1982 are $227,752,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as State of West Virginia has jurisdiction over recreation in reservoir area. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 26-C on other authorized navigation projects. Flood Control - Local Protection 7. ALLEGHENY RIVER, OIL CITY, BA Location. Oil City is located in Venango County, PA at the junction of Oil Creek and the Allegheny River (Allegheny river mile 132.1). (See Geological Survey Chart for Oil City, PA.) Existing project. To alleviate the long-standing ice jam flooding problems in Oil City, a floating ice control structure will be located on the Allegheny River about onehalf mile upstream from the mouth of Oil Creek. It will consist of a series of 20 floating steel pontoons (each 20' x 3' x 1.25') and five steel cylindrical floats connected together by 2-1/4 inch diameter corrosion resistant steel cables. The cables will be attached to a junction plate in the center of the Allegheny River and four anchors (two on each side) on the river banks. Concrete storage pads will be provided on the south bank of the river for storage during the non-winter months. To complete the project, a second ice control structure will be built in 1983 on Oil Creek. Preliminary plans provide for a single cable strung across the creek, using timber floats. Estimated first cost for project is $741,000 of which $720,000 is Federal cost and $21,000 is non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. The City of Oil City is responsible for the acquisition of required project land interests and the operation and maintenance of the ice control structures. By early Sep. 1982, the City had acquired all the necessary rights-of-way for the Allegheny River structure. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contract for the fabrication of the components (pontoons, floats, cables, chains and attachments) of the structure was awarded Aug 6, 1982 for $154,190 and about 65% complete at end of fiscal year. Contract for construction of the anchors, storage pads, and assembly and installation of the floating ice control structure was awarded Sep 7, 1982 for $195,430 with contract completion scheduled for Dec 22, 1982. Engineering and design continued on remaining project features. 8. CHARTIERS CREEK, PA Location. Within Washington and Allegheny Counties, southwestern Pennsylvania, a tributary of Ohio River. (See Geological Survey Chart for Carnegie, PA) Existing project. Provides for channel widening, deepening and realignment, construction of a major channel cutoff, and relocations in two separate and independent reaches. James G. Fulton project in Allegheny County 26-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 would be about 13.4 miles long and Canonsburg-Houston reach in Washington County about 4.7 miles long. Completed improvements would contain within banks, all floods up to the 1912 maximum of record, but with some residual damage, and would greatly reduce flood stages and damages resulting from higher floods. James G. Fulton Flood Control Project-Construction of Unit 1 was started in July 1968, completed in September 1970, and turned over to local interests for operation and maintenance on June 25, 1971. Construction of Unit 2 was started in April 1970, completed in April 1973, and turned over to local interests on November 22, 1974. Construction of Unit 3 was started in July 1971 and was completed in December 1974. Construction of Unit 5 was started in June 1972 and was Completed in December 1973. Construction of Unit 4 channel improvement was started in July 1978 and was completed in June 1981. A contract for Environmental Improvement, Unit 4, James G. Fulton, was awarded in Sep 1981 and completed in Dec 1981. Canonsburg-Houston Reach-Construction of Unit 1 was started in December of 1968, completed in March 1970, and turned over to local interests for operation and maintenance on August 10, 1970. Construction of Unit 2A was started January 17, 1976, completed December 16, 1976, and turned over to local interests on June 9, 1977. Construction plans and specifications for Unit 2B, the remaining unit of the reach, are 99% complete. Remaining work on project has been delayed due to the inability of local cooperating agency to provide the necessary rightsof- way. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. Estimated cost for new work (1982) is $41,400,000 of which $32,300,000 is Federal cost and $9,100,000 non- Federal cost. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperating agency (Washington County) has been unable to provide the necessary rights-of-way for the remaining Unit 2B. Direct non-Federal contributions have been made in the amount of $4,219,967. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contract for Environmental Improvement, Unit 4, James G. Fulton, awarded in Sep 1981 for $22,120.04, was completed in Dec 1981. Regular inspections were made at completed units. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by the Chartiers Creek project through September 30, 1982, totaled $12,163,000. 9. ELKINS, WV Location. On Tygart River in north-central Randolph County, WV, about 155 miles south of Pittsburgh, PA. It is at downstream end of a long, broad reach of upper Tygart Valley, about 75 miles above mouth of river. (See Geological Survey Chart for Elkins, WV) Existing project. Provides flood protection by diverting flood discharges from upstream arm of loop of natural river channel into an artificial cutoff channel, thereby bypassing City of Elkins. Improvement is designed to accommodate discharges equivalent to maximum flood of reasonable expectancy. Project construction was started May 1946 and completed May 1949. Completed works, except that portion of channel maintained by Federal Government, has been operated and maintained by City of Elkins since March 31, 1949. Land acquired for project consists of 32.04 acres in fee and 526.01 acres in easements. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1222. Federal cost of completed project was $1,772,627; estimated non-Federal cost for lands, easements, and rights-of-way was $40,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Routine inspections were made. Cumulative total flood damages prevented to September 30, 1982, $4,156,000. 10. GIRTY'S RUN, MILLVALE, PA Location. Girtys Run rises in the Fox Ridge area of the southern portion of McCandless Township, Allegheny County, and flows generally southeast through Ross and Shaler Townships and the Borough of Millvale to enter the Allegheny River from the right bank at River Mile 3.6 above the "Point" at Pittsburgh. (See U.S Geological Survey chart for Pittsburgh, PA, East.) Existing project. To decrease flooding conditions in the Borough of Millvale area, project consists of lowering the existing channel bottom within the limits of the existing walls. The lowering was accomplished by a 16-foot average bottom width of cut in rock or overburden averaging 4 feet in depth in the lower 2,750 feet of the project and 2 1/2 feet in depth for the remaining portion. Existing masonry walls of the channel were replaced and/or stabilized where required. Construction of project complete on June 26, 1980. Project was authorized for construction by the Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as amended. Federal cost is $2,000,000; estimated non-Federal cost of lands, easements and rights-of-way, utility adjustments, and amount in excess of $2 million limitation established by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as amended, is estimated at $1,361,722. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-4 of FY 1981 Annual Report. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the County of Allegheny, Pennsylvania, have each agreed to provide to the Borough of Millvale 50% of all estimated non-Federal costs, currently estimated at $1,361,722. To date, nonfederal contributions have totaled $701,722; a formal request for the additional $660,000 has been presented to the Borough of Millvale. Operations during fiscal year. Work on the project started July 11, 1976 with a scheduled completion date of November 22, 1977; however, by that date the contract work had progressed to only about 50% of completion and it was found necessary to terminate that contract for default due to unsatisfactory and untimely performance. Subsequently, a new contract for completion of the remaining work was made on May 4, 1978 and work was completed July 26, 1980 at a cost of $2,091,522.95. 26-4 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT Formal hearings were held on July 26, 1978 before the Division Engineer and July 8-15, 1980, inclusive, before the Engineer Board of Contract Appeals regarding the appeal of the defaulted contractor. In July 1982, an agreement was reached with the surety and default contractor regarding the liability resulting from the termination. Modification effecting settlement and release stipulation was finalized, resulting in payment to Government of $464,340.66. 11. JOHNSTOWN, PA Location. Project is located in southwestern Cambria County, PA, about 58 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. It is in a deep and comparatively narrow valley at junction of Stoney Creek and Little Conemaugh River, which unite to form Conemaugh River. (See Geological Survey Chart for Johnstown, PA.) Existing project. Provides for increased channel capacity by enlarging and realigning channels and protecting banks with concrete pavement. Improvement designed to accommodate discharges equivalent to those of March 1936 flood, maximum natural flow of record, minimum of overbank flow and to practically eliminate damages therefrom. Project construction began in August 1938 and was completed November 1943. Footer protection for Unit 4 was completed in November 1949. Land acquired for project consists of easements over 192 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1937. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1215. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Contract for Removal of Bar Deposits from Channel awarded in Jun 1982 for $45,150.90 was completed in Sep 1982. Operation activities and routine investigations and inspections were made. Flood damages prevented by project for fiscal year were estimated to be $60,000; cumulative total to September 30, 1982 was $414,792,000. 12. PUNXSUTAWNEY, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Borough of Punxsutawney is on Mahoning Creek in Jefferson County, PA, about 85 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. It is on a comparatively wide, alluvial flood plain about 52 miles above mouth of stream and 30 miles above Mahoning Creek flood control dam. (See Geological Survey Charts for Punxsutawney and Smicksburg, PA.) Existing project. Provides flood protection by channel enlargement, dikes, and walls. Improvement is designed to accommodate discharges 20% greater than that of maximum flood of record. Construction was accomplished by construction of four units. Construction started May 1946 and was completed June 1950. Land acquired for project consists of perpetual easements over 72.6 acres. Completed works, except that portion of channel maintained by the Federal Government, have been operated and maintained by Borough of Punxsutawney since July 31, 1950. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1209. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Operation activities and routine investigations and inspections were made. Cumulative total flood damages prevented by project were estimated to be $28,328,000 to end of September 1982. 13. ROOT CREEK, BOLIVAR, NY Location. The problem area is located in the southwestern portion of the State of New York in the Village of Bolivar, Allegany County, about 17 road miles east of Olean, New York. (See Geological Survey Chart of Olean, NY.) Existing project. Flooding of the Village of Bolivar from Root Creek causes estimated annual damages in the amount of about $53,000. The project will consist of 3,230 feet of Root Creek channel modification, including moderate widening, deepening and slope protection. The plan will provide Bolivar with protection against a flood having a frequency of once in 100 years. Total first cost of the plan is estimated to be $1,250,000. Project was authorized for construction by the Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as amended. Final EIS filed with CEQ on March 11, 1976. The Detailed Project Report was approved April 29, 1976. Plans and specifications are complete. Assurances were executed by the State of New York Department of Environmental Conservation and accepted by the Department of the Army on March 23, 1977. All interests in real estate required for project construction are available. Utility adjustments were completed by NYDEC. Land acquired for project consists of 7.809 acres. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-5 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Contract for construction of Bolivar Flood Protection Project was awarded Sep 17, 1979 for $945,077.71. Construction progressed to approximately 92% completion at end of fiscal year. Flood Control - Reservoirs 14. BERLIN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. Dam is on Mahoning River about 73 miles above its confluence with Shenango River. It is about 10 miles above existing Milton Reservoir Dam and 35 miles upstream from Warren, Ohio. Reservoir is in Portage, Mahoning and Stark Counties, OH. (See Geological Survey charts for Warren, Ravenna, and Alliance, OH.) 26-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and water supply. Dam consists of a partially controlled, concrete gravity, center spillway flanked by rolled-earthfill abutment sections joining valley sides. Authorized project is complete and in operation for flood control and low water regulation purposes in industrialized Mahoning Valley below. Construction of dam was started January 1942 and completed June 1943. Present project lands consists of 6,885.3 acres in fee and 1,098.7 acres in easements. For further project description, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1233. Current estimate for construction of recreational and sanitary facilities at completed project is $2,977,700 of which $100,000 were non-Federal costs. Local cooperation. None required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Contract for preparation of Master Plan Design Memorandum No. 1 progressed to 82% completion at end of fiscal year. Reservoir was operated as required and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $5,503,000; total benefits through September 30, 1982, $191,385,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 15. CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is on Conemaugh River in Indiana and Westmoreland Counties, PA, 7.5 miles above junction of Conemaugh River and Loyalhanna Creek, which form the head of the Kiskiminetas River. It is about 2 miles northeast of Tunnelton, PA, and about 42 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Westmoreland and Indiana Counties, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Latrobe, New Florence, and Elders Ridge, PA.) Existing Project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides and an earth embankment ending in right abutment. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Land acquired for dam, reservoir and railroad relocation consists of 7,635.1 acres in fee and 518.6 acres in easements. Project authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1217. Estimated cost of sanitary facilities required to upgrade area and comply with sanitary codes is $332,000. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contract for construction of Restrooms, Damsite Area, awarded in Apr 1983 progressed to 23% completion. Work is scheduled for completion in Feb 1983. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this fiscal year were $1,138,000; total flood control benefits through September 30, 1982 are $'524,328,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities were continued. 16. CROOKED CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is on Crooked Creek 6.7 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River near Ford City, PA, and about 32 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Freeport and Elders Ridge, PA.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earthfill type with separate uncontrolled saddle spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in March 1938 and completed October 1940. Present project lands consist of 2,563.6 acres in fee and 99.98 acres in easements. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1213. Current estimated cost of sanitary facilities, required to upgrade area and comply with state sanitary codes, is $3,175,000. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Master Plan Design Memorandum No. 2 was initiated in FY 82 and progressed to 15% completion. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $189,000; total benefits through September 30, 1982 are $118,516,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of certain public-use facilities continued. By letter dated Aug 14, 1981, the Commonwealth of PA relinquished their lease having jurisdiction over recreation in reservoir area effective Oct 1, 1981. 17. EAST BRANCH, CLARION RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is in Elk County, PA, on East Branch of Clarion River above Middle Fork, 7.3 miles above junction of East and West branches of Clarion River at Johnsonburg, PA, and about 105 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Elk County, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Mount Jewett, PA.) 26-6 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and lowwater regulation. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with gatecontrolled concrete tunnel under right abutment and a paved uncontrolled spillway on left abutment slope. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low-water regulation purposes in Clarion River Valley below and for flood control as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for protection of Pittsburgh and upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in June 1947 and completed in July 1952. Present project lands consist of 287.2 acres in fee and 1,296.7 acres in easements. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in Flood Control Acts of 1938 and 1944. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1206. Estimated cost of construction of additional sanitary facilities, required to upgrade area and comply with state sanitary codes, is $225,000; current total estimate of recreation facilities at completed project, $336,800. Local Cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for flood control and low-water regulation, as required; and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir during this fiscal year were $42,000, total benefits through September 30, 1982, $29,954,000. Some reservoir management activity was performed throughout the year comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation of public-use facilities. Work was limited in scope as bulk of reservoir lands are owned by Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 18. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND NY Location. Dam site is on Allegheny River 9 miles above Warren, PA, and 198 miles above mouth of river at Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Warren and McKean Counties, PA., and Cattaraugus County, NY. (See Geological Survey Charts for Warren and Kinzua, PA - NY, and Randolph and Salamanca, NY.) Existing project. Reservoir provides flood control, low water regulation, and recreation. Dam consists of a combination concrete gravity structure and rolled earth embankment with gate-controlled spillway and discharge conduits controlled by slide-gates in gravity section. Construction of project, initiated in February 1960, is complete. Construction of dam was started in September 1960 and completed in December 1965. Development of recreation area at Onoville under a cost-sharing agreement with Cattaraugus County was completed in June 1978. Land acquired for project consists of 2,646.6 acres in fee and easements over 22,420.4 acres. For further details see Annual Reports for 1962, page 1202. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936, 1938 and 1941. Current estimate for construction of recreation facilities at completed project is $1,002,000 of which $493,500 are non-Federal costs. A major rehabilitation plan was approved for repairs to the dam stilling basin. Current cost estimate for this work is: $6,000,000. Local cooperation. None required by law. Licenses. The Federal Power Commission granted a license to Pennsylvania Electric Company and Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company on December 28, 1965, for the joint construction, operation and maintenance of a 325-megawatt pumped-storage installation (FPC Project No. 2280). The project is complete. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: A major rehabilitation plan was approved for repairs to the dam stilling basin in fiscal year 1980. The feature design memorandum was initiated in fiscal year 1981 and was 80% complete at end of fiscal year. Plans and specifications will begin in fiscal year 1983 with a construction contract award scheduled for Jun 1983. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low water regulation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $1,377,000; total to end of this fiscal year, $302,178,000. Of 2,212 surface tracts authorized for acquisition, all have been acquired. Final judgments remain to be entered on 28 surface tracts acquired by condemnation. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities were continued. 19. LOYALHANNA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is on Loyalhanna Creek, 4.5 miles above junction of creek with Conemaugh River at Saltsburgh, PA, and about 29 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Westmoreland County, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Latrobe, PA) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides, and an earth embankment section ending in left abutment. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in October 1939 and completed in June 1942. Land acquired for project consists of 3,334.7 acres in fee and easements over 86.8 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1219. Current estimated cost of recreation and sanitary facilities at completed project is $2,896,000. Of this amount, $1,298,000 would be non-Federal costs. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Contract for Construction of Resource Manager's Office and Restrooms awarded in Jan 1982 progressed to 26% completion. Contract for Master Plan Design Memorandum No. 1 progressed to 77% com- 26-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 pletion. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this fiscal year were $214,000; total benefits to September 30, 1982, $158,188,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 20. MAHONING CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is on Mahoning Creek in Armstrong County, PA, 21.6 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River. It is about 6.50 miles southeast of New Bethlehem, PA, and about 51 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Armstrong, Indiana, apd Jefferson Counties, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Rural Valley and Smicksburg, PA.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in February 1939 and completed in June 1941. Land acquired for project consists of 2,532.6 acres in fee and easements over 83.5 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1210. Current estimated cost of recreation and sanitary facilities at completed project is $1,306,000. Of this amount, $479,000 would be non-Federal costs. Local cooperation. None required at completed project. On November 4, 1977 a contract for wildlife development at Mahoning Creek Lake was executed between the U.S. Government and the Pennsylvania Game Commission. Each party will pay or contribute in kind 50% of the first costs of initial wildlife development. On Jupe 7, 1979, a contract for fishing and boating development at Mahoning Creek Lake was executed between the U.S. Government and the Pennsylvania Fish Commission. Each party will pay or contribute in kind 50% of the first costs of initial fishing and boating development. On September 9, 1980, a contract for camping and day-use recreational development was executed between the U.S. Government and the County of Armstrong. Each party will pay or contribute in kind 50% of the first costs of initial camping and day-use recreational development and 50% of the costs for future development. Each cooperating authority is responsible for operation, maintenance and replacements without cost to the Government of all facilities developed with their support. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Cost-sharing for Construction of Fishing Access Area awarded in Sep 1980 was completed in Jul 1981 for $335,405.75. Cost-sharing contract for Construction of Hunting Access Areas awarded Jul 30, 1980 was completed on Nov 25, 1981 at a final cost of $44,540. Costsharing contract for Construction of Milton Loop Recreation Area awarded Jul 29, 1981 was completed on Sep 17, 1982. Estimated final cost for this work is $402,500. $404,724 has been contributed by local interests towards cost-sharing developments. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this fiscal year were $323,000; total to September 30, 1982, $147,328,000. Activities under reservoir management and maintenance for public-use facilities continued. 21. MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH Location. Dam site is on West Branch of Mahoning River which joins Mahoning River at Newton Falls, OH. It is 11 miles above mouth of branch and about 15 miles upstream from Warren, OH. Reservoir is in Portage County, OH. (See Geological Survey Charts for Ravenna, Garrettsville, Chagrin Falls, and Kent, OH.) Existing project. Reservoir provides flood control, lowwater regulation and recreation. Dam consists of a rolledearth embankment structure with gate-controlled outlet works and an uncontrolled side-hill spillway through left abutment. Authorized project is complete and in operation for flood control and low water regulation purposes. Construction of dam and access road was started in May 1963 and completed in November 1966. Land acquired for project consists of 6,298.9 acres in fee and easements over 27.9 acres. For further description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1231 (West Branch Reservoir, Mahoning River, Ohio). Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 191, 85th Cong. 1st sess.), with local contribution requirements modified by Flood Control Act of 1960. Federal cost of completed project was $17,370,000. Local interests contributed $3,230,000 during period of contruction bringing initial project cost to $20,600,000. Current estimate for construction of recreation facilities at completed project is $1,154,000, of which $275,000 are non-Federal costs. Local Cooperation. Local interests must contribute $5,200,000 for water pollution abatement and for municipal and industrial water supply purposes, of which $3,230,000 was paid in cash during construction. Unpaid balance at time project is placed in operation, $1,970,000, will be paid in cash at that time or on an annual basis. Of the unpaid balance of contributed funds due and payable, payment in full of Trumbull County's share in the amount of $663,040 has been received. Mahoning County elected to pay their share ($1,306,960) in 50 annual installments of $50,323.32, including interest, and has paid $392,088 toward principal to date. Local interests have now contributed $4,285,128 towards total of $5,200,000 non- Federal costs. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Contract for Master Plan Design 26-8 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT Memorandum No. 8 was 99% complete at end of fiscal year. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this dam for this fiscal year were $1,662,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1982 are $66,420,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 22. MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. Dam is on Mosquito Creek, 9 miles above junction of creek with Mahoning River at Niles, OH, and about 18 miles northwest of Youngstown, OH. (See Geological Survey Charts for Bristolville and Kinsman, OH, and Pennsylvania.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control, low-water regulation and water supply storage. Dam is rolledearthfill type with outlet facilities through dam, and an uncontrolled natural wasteway to discharge overflow from reservoir. Authorized project is complete and in operation for flood control and low-water regulation purposes in industrialized Mahoning and Beaver Valleys below. Construction of dam was started in July 1943 and was ready for beneficial use in January 1944. Land acquired for project consists of 11,180.4 acres in fee and easements over 276.0 acres. State of Ohio has a license from Secretary of the Army for development and operation of recreation facilities in reservoir area. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1228. Current estimate of total recreation and sanitary facilities required to upgrade areas and comply with sanitary codes is $2,134,000 of which $795,000 would be non-Federal costs. Local cooperation. None required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow regulation as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this dam for this fiscal year were $1,287,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1982 are $53,784,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of certain public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as State of Ohio has jurisdiction over recreation in reservoir area. 23. OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT) Location. A series of dikes, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs/lakes in Ohio River Basin within Pittsburgh District. Existing project. Individual projects considered in comprehensive plan within Pittsburgh District. (See Tables 26-B, 26-K and 26-L on Acts authorizing existing projects, local protection projects and reservoirs.) Operations during fiscal year. New work: None by the United States except as stated in individual projects. Completed local protection projects operated and maintained by local interests, including those projects for which individual reports have been included, prevented flood damages of an estimated $5,215,000 during this fiscal year. Total flood damages prevented through September 30, 1982 are $643,494,000. 24. SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND OH Location. Dam is on Shenango River about 0.8 mile above Sharpsville, PA, and about 33 miles above junction of river with Mahoning River, which unite near New Castle, PA, to form Beaver River. Reservoir is in Mercer County, PA, and Trumbull County, Ohio. (See Geological Survey Chart for Kinsman, Ohio, and Shenango, PA.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control, low-flow augmentation and recreation. Dam consists of a concrete gravity structure with gate-controlled outlet works and an uncontrolled center spillway section. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low-water regulation purposes in Shenango River valley below and for flood control as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for protection of Shenango River valley and the Beaver and upper Ohio River Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in March 1963 and completed May 1965. Land acquired for project consists of 14,632.2 acres in fee and easements over 197.7 acres. Future work consists of completion of project lands of any additional recreation facilities as required to serve the public needs. For further project description, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1230. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. Current estimate of recreation and sanitary facilities required to upgrade areas and comply with sanitary codes is $4,628,000. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $91,000. Total flood control benefits for this dam through September 30, 1982 are $14,215,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 25. STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV Location. In Lewis County, North Central West Virginia, on the West Fork River, which joins the Tygart 26-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 River at Fairmont, West Virginia to form the Monongahela River. Damsite is located at Brownsville, West Virginia, about 4 miles south of Weston and 72 miles above mouth of West Fork River at Fairmont, WV. (See Geological Survey Charts for Weston and Crawford, WV.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, area redevelopment and recreation. Dam would be of the concrete gravity type, 95 feet high and 620 feet long. Outlet works will consist of five multi-level sluices, spillway will be uncontrolled. Storage capacity will be 74,650 acre-feet controlling an area of 102 square miles. Project was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act. Estimated initial Federal cost for new work (1982) is $205,000,000 (includes $16,305,000 reimbursement by non-Federal interests.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to make arrangements for repayment, under the provisions of the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, of that part of the construction cost and annual operation, maintenance and replacement costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, an amount presently estimated at $4,300,000 for construction; and $12,300 annually for operations, maintenance and replacements. Also, in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act, local interests are required to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement, pay, contribute in kind or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost of the reservoir project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement, an amount presently estimated at $16,305,000; bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife land and facilities, the amount involved being currently estimated on an average annual basis to be $389,000, exercise to the full extent of their legal capability, control against removal of streamflow made available for water quality control; and contribute to the control of pollution of streams subject to low-flow augmentation by adequate treatment or other methods of controlling wastes at their source. The requirements of Section 221 were amended in 1971 to exempt assurances for future demands for water supply pursuant to the Water Supply Act of 1958 from the contractual requirements of the Act. Accordingly, the City of Weston, West Virginia, has provided assurances that it will enter into a water supply contract with the Department of the Army within a period of time which will permit paying out the costs allocated to the water supply storage within the life of the project. A recreation cost-sharing contract, in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act, P.L. 89-72, was executed by the State of West Virginia on March 27, 1977. Local cooperation assurances for recreation cost-sharing were executed by the Governor and Attorney General of West Virginia on May 29, 1973. In this connection, Section 8 of P.L. 92-222 deleted the requirement that the State of West Virginia "hold and save the United States free from damages resulting from water rights claims due to construction and operation of the project." Legislation relieving Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV, project of the requirements of Section 221, P.L. 96-611 was contained in Water Resources Development Act of 1974 signed by the President on March 7, 1974. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Costreimbursable contract for relocation, rearrangement and alteration of certain gas pipline facilities, Jarvis Farm Meter Station, Machine Shop and Warehouse, and telephone facilities awarded in Aug 1979 and essentially complete at end of fiscal year. Contract for construction of replacement compressor station awarded Nov. 26, 1979 was completed in May 1982 at a cost of $7,735,560. Two utility contracts were awarded in FY 81 and one in FY 82 for relocation of certain pipeline/power facilities to accommodate the Stonewall project - Rt. 19, Section 2, and all three contracts were physically completed in Apr 1982. A contract for Relocation of 2-16" Pipelines at Proposed New Compressor Station was awarded May 1, 1981 for $173,185 and completed Dec 31, 1981. Contract with Equitable Gas Co. for Gas Storage Replacement Wells awarded in Mar 1982 was 97% complete at end of fiscal year. Relocation of US Rt. 19, Section 1 contract awarded Jan 26, 1982 was 43% complete and Relocation of US Rt. 19, Section 2 contract awarded Mar 4, 1982 was 35% complete at end of fiscal year. A cost-reimbursable contract for relocation of power facilities to accommodate the Stonewall project - State Rt. 23 was awarded in Sep. 1982 and is scheduled for completion in Oct 1982. Cost-reimbursable contract for relocation of certain pipeline facilities awarded in Sep 1982 progressed to 10% completion with a Dec 1, 1982 scheduled completion date. Advertisement for bids for Relocation Rt. 19, Sec. 3, was issued Sep 1982, with a contract award anticipated in early FY 1983. Supply contract for Slide Gates, Hydraulic Cylinders, Sluice Liners and Deflector Plates awarded Sep 29, 1982 for $996,732. Construction of Dam Access Roads contract also awarded Sep 29, 1982 for $1,003,062.38. Scheduled completion dates for these two contracts had not been set at end of fiscal year. Both contracts are scheduled for completion 420 days from date of notice to proceed. Design Memorandum No. 7, Public-Use Plan was completed in Sep 1982 and submitted to ORD for approval. The WV Dept. of Natural Resources approved DM 7 by letter dated Jul 9, 1982. Design Memorandum No. 10, School Relocation was completed by Huntington District Real Estate and approved by OCE on Jan 8, 1982. An agreement has been executed with Lewis County School Board covering the new school site acquisition and the arrangements for the preparation of plans and specifications DM 10, Concrete Materials, was submitted to ORD on Sep 30 1982 for approval. 586 of an estimated 800 surface tracts have been acquired. Land acquisition, detailed engineering work and construction continued and all items of work were progressing on schedule. 26. TIONESTA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is on Tionesta Creek, 1.25 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River at Tionesta, PA, 26-10 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT and about 78 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA Reservoir is entirely in Forest County, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Tionesta, Tidioute and Sheffield, PA.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earthfill type with separate uncontrolled saddle spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in May 1938 and completed January 1941. Land acquired for project consists of 2,797.3 acres in fee and easements over 13.1 acres. Future work consists of provision on project lands of additional recreational facilities as required to serve public needs. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1203. Current estimate for construction of recreation and sanitary facilities required to upgrade areas and comply with sanitary codes is $2,773,700. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contract for Replacement of Water System at Dam awarded May 26, 1982 progressed to 35% completion. $455,055 has been obligated to aid in construction of a treatment plant and for connection charges to tie-in the camping area below the Proposed Tionesta Regional Sewage Treatment Plant. The Borough of Tionesta awarded their contract for construction of treatment plant in May 1982 and construction progressed to 25% completion with final completion scheduled for May 23, 1983. Operation and maintenance general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repiars were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $475,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1982 are $158,953,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 27. UNION CITY DAM, PA Location. In Erie County, northwestern Pennsylvania, on French Creek, a tributary of Allegheny River. Damsite is 24 miles upstream from Cambridge Springs, PA, and 41 miles upstream from Meadville, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Union City, PA - NY.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earth embankment nongated type with uncontrolled sidechannel spillway. Outlet works consist of a lower outlet located in valley floor constructed of reinforced concrete conduit 8 feet by 4.5 feet and an upper outlet consisting of an uncontrolled slot 9.5 feet wide through the north end of the ogee weir in the spillway. Dam is 1,420 feet long at top rising 88 feet above streambed and provides gross capacity of 47,640 acre-feet from a drainage area of 222 square miles. Project authorization was modified to provide for a conservation pool and addition of recreation. facilities. On November 5, 1974, a referendum proposal was defeate'd by the constituents of Erie County in regard to the cost-sharing for construction of recreation facilities. In view of the foregoing, all action toward implementation of the authorized project modification was discontinued. Reservoir is operated as one of a tworeservoir system for reduction of flood stages in French Creek Basin between damsite and mouth, Allegheny River from Franklin, PA, to Pittsburgh, PA, inclusive, and upper Ohio River Valley. Initial highway relocations were completed in October 1968 and remaining highway relocations were completed in May 1972. Construction of the dam was started in July 1968 and completed in September 1971. Land acquired for project consists of 465.2 acres in fee and easements over 2,154.6 acres. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Current cost estimate for sanitary facilities required to upgrade area and comply with sanitary code is $170,000. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to inform affected interests in French Creek Basin at least annually, that the system of reservoirs of which Union City Dam is a part, will not provide protection against maximum floods. November 10, 1964 the Department of Forests and Waters of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania furnished formal assurances of local cooperation in respect to notifying local interests at least annually that the system of reservoirs will not provide protection against maximum floods. A referendum on the ballot during the November 1974 election regarding the approval to cost-share the maintenance of a summer pool was defeated by the local voters. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Maintenance of the structure and appurtenances was performed as required. This dam acted as an uncontrolled detention type dam during the fiscal year. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $349,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1982 are $9,593,000. 28. WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA Location. In Crawford County, northwestern Pennsylvania, on Woodcock Creek, a tributary of French Creek. Damsite is about 4.1 miles above mouth of Woodcock Creek and about 5 miles northeast of Meadville, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Meadville, PA.) Existing project. A flood-control reservoir dam of rolledearth embankment type, gate-controlled outlet works with a 6 foot-wide by 7.75 foot-high conduit and uncontrolled saddle spillway on the left abutment. Dam is 4,650 feet long at top rising 90 feet above streambed and provides for gross capacity of 20,000 acre-feet from a drainage area of 46 square miles. Reservoir is operated as one of a tworeservoir system for reduction of flood stages in French Creek Basin between damsite and mouth, Allegheny River from Franklin, PA, to Pittsburgh, PA, inclusive, and upper Ohio River Valley. Authorized project is complete. Construction of dam was started in July 1970 and completed in July 1973. Land acquired for project consists of 1,733.2 acres in fee and easements over 1.2 acres. Project was authorized for flood control and recreation by 1962 Flood Control Act. Storage for water quality control was 26-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 added to the project during the preconstruction planning stage. Current estimate for construction of sanitary facilities, required to comply with state sanitary codes, at completed project is $1,652,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must inform affected interests in French Creek Basin at least annually, in a manner satisfactory to District Engineer, that a system of reservoirs of which Woodcock Creek Lake is a part, will not provide protection against maximum floods. Pennsylvania Department of Forests and Waters assumed responsibility of local cooperation for project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contract for Construction of Bossard Area Restrooms awarded Sep 30, 1982 for $157,776; work will be performed in FY 1983. $713,100 has been obligated to aid in the construction of Saegertown Treatment Plant and connection charges to tie-in recreation sanitary facilities. Borough of Saegertown awarded their contract for construction of Treatment plant in Feb 1982 with a scheduled completion of Oct 19, 1983. Construction of plant was 55% complete at end of fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Maintenance of the structure and appurtenances was performed as required. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $59,000, total through September 30, 1982 is $1,249,000. 29. YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND MD Location. Dam is on Youghiogheny River about 74.2 miles above its junction with Monongahela River at McKeesport, PA. It is 1.2 miles upstream form Confluence, PA, and about 57 miles southeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Fayette and Somerset Counties, PA, and Garrett County, MD. (See Geological Survey Charts for Confluence, PA, Accident, MD, West Virginia and Pennsylvania.) Existing project. Reservoir for flood control, low-flow augmentation, and pollution abatement purpdses. Darn is rolled-earthfill type with separate uncontrolled side channel spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for flood control, low-flow augmentation, and pollution abatement purposes. For flood control, reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in June 1940 anti completed May 1944. Land acquired for project consists of 3,914.9 acres in fee and easements over 0.48 acre. A license was isued Commonwealth of Pennsylvania covering fish conservation and management in Pennsylvania portion of reservoir. Future work consists of provision on project lands of additional recreational and sanitary facilities as required to serve public needs. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1223. Current estimate of recreation and sanitary facilities at completed project is $4,245,400. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Design Memorandum No. 1, Master Plan was completed in Aug 1981 and submitted to higher authority for approval on Sep 30, 1981. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances as required. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $661,000. Total flood control benefits for this dam through September 30, 1982 are $124,465,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities were continued. 30. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within boundaries of their respective districts. Inspections were made of completed units transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation and local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain these projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. (See Table 26-M for dates of inspections.) Costs for this fiscal year, $59,741. Total cost to September 30, 1982 was $681,669. 31. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 26-E on other authorized flood control projects. 32. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION For flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) See Table 26-N. For emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) See Table 26-N. For Streambank Erosion Control Evaluation and Demonstration Act of 1974 (Sec. 32, Public Law 251, 93rd Cong.) See Table 26-N. *For Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration Act of 1974 (Sec. 54, Public Law 251, 93rd Congress) See Table 26-N. 26-12 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT Flood control and coastal emergencies (Public Law 99, 34. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). BASIC DATA Advance preparation $132,453 Emergency operations 15,945 Costs this fiscal year were $165,464 for flood plain Rehabilitation work: management services and $5,100 for related hydrologic Brookville, PA 597 studies. Total cost for fiscal year: General Investigations 33. SURVEYS Flood control studies Review of authorized projects Coordination with other agencies Supplemental preauthorization studies: Clarion River Basin, Acid Mine Drainage, Phase I Total cost for fiscal year: $148,995 35. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT $133 was expended this fiscal year for a water resources planning study of Sewickley Creek Watershed. $1,188,787 30 7,575 256 $1,196,648 26-13 lTA L 2 9A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 'OQT AND N I AL STATTATEMEINTT I ttD4LEJLU tI.Fr Y Ji I ! 1J 1' I A L1 V 1t LJa�1t �IJ'AVA'J See Total Cost to Section Sep30, In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 1982 Navigation - Locks and Dams 1. Allegheny River New Work PA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 3. Monongahela New Work River, PA and Approp. WV Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost 5. Tygart Lake, New Work WV Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Flood Control- Local Protection 7. Allegheny River New Work Oil City, PA Approp. Cost 8. Chartiers New Work Creek, PA Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost New Work (Contributed Contrib. Funds) Cost 9. Elkins, WV New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 10. Girty's Run, New Work Millvale, PA Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost New Work (Contributed Contrib; Funds) Cost 11. Johnstown, PA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 12. Punxsutawney, New Work Ohio River Approp. Basin, PA Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 13. Root Creek, New Work Bolivar, NY Approp. Cost. Flood Control - Reservoirs 14. Berlin Lake Ohio River Basin, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 3,027,900 2,923,387 6,020,000 5,293,853 5,397,300 5,468,999 6,020,000 5,118,664 3,093,800 3,090,667 5,777,000 5,899,630 5,146,800 4,972,781 5,777,000 5,892,733 - 60,000 - 25,078 394,700 514,600 400,494 476,838 3,419,700 3,096,229 2,180,000 2,718,722 6,194,000 6,207,403 2,180,000 2,712,043 514,588 129,285 502,800 507,623 - - 55, - - 39, -1,135,000 2,299,000 1,602, 731,949 2,574,399 1,524, -123,610 119,906 8,600 8,612 73,900 32,188 -17, 25, 60, 28, 1,060,000 75,000 369,181 744,510 -156,435 231,451 400,400 400,339 32,700 32,951 460,000 27,058 25,000 4,133 955,390 948,498 7,000 7,064 13,400 13,412 661,035 727,192 35,000 32,764 948,800 900,415 - 18,157,860' - 18,157,860' 2,693,000 42,331,5622 3,100,425 42,276,8732 - 129,203,085' 2,657 129,087,824' 6,290,000 111,312,214' 5,968,529 110,730,732' - 15,977,000 115,139 15,744,104 489,000 19,495,432 s 584.004 19,170,2116 583,500 5,995,339 583,113 5,948,042 000 620,000 675,000 365 215,428 254,793 983 - 26,586,186 356 82,727 26,505,157 - 4,219,967 846 1,329 4,194.278 - 1,772,627 - 1,772,627 000 6,000 214,487 324 6,597 208,673 -470,000 2,665,000 ,586 -451,892 2,648,830 - 701,722 417 - 701,722 47,000 43,525 5,000 4,856 251,000 428,012 -2,889 15,827 1,015,300 984,740 83,000 74,974 6,000 5,081 100,000 157,472 2,708 902,600 897,342 8,865,388: 8,865,388: 3,352,796 3,341,264 3,586,107" 3,586,107" 710,900 709,824 1,602,385 1,468,004 8,742,4789 8,739,9221� 9,789,483 9,678,678 26-14 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section Sep930, In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 821982 15. Conemaugh River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 16. Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 17. East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 18. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, PA and NY 19. Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 20. Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 21. Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, OH 22. Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 23. Ohio River Basin, Pittsburgh, PA District Consolidated 24. Shenango River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 355,621 357,207 114,000 18,614 382,834 379,493 409,304 418,070 4,736 692,100 673,985 - -2,315 677,214 664,317 10,000 37,666 264,206 263,866 329,174 369,018 5,000 4,648 369,672 378,627 25,153 1,113,297 1,137,310 441,300 403,274 9,383 109,636 460,500 452,913 15,000 14,984 411,000 402,723 -30,378 10,904 737,100 760,141 -2,331 764,900 711,562 61,000 43,693 346,800 305,466 434,100 390,939 -1,271 294,300 290,850 2,995 1,244,700 1,201,999 52,000 51,566 514,600 508,659 -1,748 803 753,800 552,917 -16 409,700 455,494 -1,735 5,135 795,600 785,849 15,000 11,422 643,600 705,277 273,706 400,112 487,800 453,571 21,000 17,374 480,600 492,385 421,800 404,245 8,529 1,632,600 1,551,254 280,000 78,631 529,000 519,823 1,166,300 1,221,024 574,700 560,055 -50 958,600 951,570 185,000 104,826 175,000 52,647 1,031,500 809,831 -8,238 99,952 662,900 705,652 3,584 506,100 498,645 394,400 385,562 1,411,400 1,367,677 46,016,411" 45,814,60812 4,660,713 4,597,155 4,335,023" 4,335,023" 5,674,721 5,512,103 9,539,585" 9,539,585' 4,548,835 4,477,773 109,309,076" 109,293,867"1 10,014,778 9,934,690 185,000 104,826 5,752,531m 5,626,60117 6,420,174 6,174,569 7,304,813" 7,120,03119 4,832,816 4,790,536 47,033 47,033 17,376,09720 17,376,05521 4,324,889 4,280,249 4,253,02922 4,253,02922 4,188,364 4,149,498 985,1972" 985,19723 40,227,201"' 40,220,3222" 9,936,617 9,728,905 26-15 TABLE 26-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section Sep930, In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 1982 25. Stonewall New Work Jackson Lake Approp. 9,295,000 12,300,000 15,505,000 20,455,000 66,510,200 WV Cost 10,076,022 11,234,875 15,585,738 20,917,297 65,507,064 26. Tionesta Lake New Work Ohio River Approp. 240,000 7,000 18,701 350,000 7,546,706" Basin, PA Cost 51,291 187,586 25,377 106,733 7,092,48627 Maint. Approp. 669,700 708,600 647,600 729,120 7,469,953 Cost 683,159 721,146 676,637 698,626 7,422,324 27. Union City New Work Dam, PA Approp. - - - - 14,559,800 Cost - - - - 14,559,800 Maint. Approp. 205,062 209,200 204,200 215,000 1,502,668 Cost 205,308 211,746 197,002 209,590 1,485,618 28. Woodcock Creek New Work Lake, PA Approp. - 43,000 - 1,068,000 19,984,700 '" Cost - 36,588 6,061 583,988 19,500,33729 Maint. Approp. 335,924 364,900 383,700 454,100 2,715,871 Cost 330,031 368,436 377,938 435,069 2,682,301 29. Youghiogheny New Work River Lake, Approp. 461,000 -56,004 80,000 - 12,256,23830 Ohio River Cost -71,976 233,521 263,134 18,679 12,205,246" Basin, PA and Maint. MD Approp. 785,803 937,100 1,004,200 1,239,100 9,920,689 Cost 769,786 944,663 1,050,372 1,224,065 9,872,415 1. Includes $2,453,737 from emergency relief funds and $1,250,049 from public works funds. 2. Includes $64,354 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963). 3. Includes $5,420,541 for new work for previous projects. 4. Includes $22,549 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963) and $742 for maintenance for previous project. 5. Includes $1,999,995 emergency relief funds, $10,000,000 public works funds, $246,000 Code 711 funds and $817,588 Code 713 funds: excludes $319,500 contributed by local interest. 6. Includes $1,999,995 emergency relief funds, $10,000,000 public works funds, $151,010 Code 711 funds and $587,357 Code 713 funds. 7. Includes $33,423 from emergency relief funds. 8. Excludes $180,485 for new work expended from contributed funds. 9. Includes $1,545,000 Code 711 funds, $809,700 Code 712 funds and $99,111 Code 713 funds; excludes $100,000 contributed by local interest. 10. Includes $1,542,435 Code 711 funds, $809,700 Code 712 funds and $99,111 Code 713 funds; excludes $100,000 contributed by local interest. 11. Includes $5,351 from emergency relief funds and $332,000 Code 711 funds. 12. Includes $5,351 from emergency relief funds and $130,197 Code 711 funds. 13. Includes $63,788 from emergency relief funds and $130,134 Code 711 funds. 14. Includes $156,812 Code 711 funds, 15. Includes $2,791 from emergency relief funds, $14,622 Code 711 funds and $568,265 Code 713 funds; excludes $389,370 contributed by local interest. 16. Includes 87,339 from emergency relief funds and $299,669 Code 711 funds. 17. Includes $7,339 from emergency relief funds and $173,739 Code 711 funds. 18. Includes 825,671 emergency relief funds, $132,221 Code 711 funds and 8751,247 Code 713 funds; excludes $404,724 contributed by local interests. 19. Includes $25,671 emergency relief funds, $132,221 Code 711 funds and 8566,465 Code 713 funds; excludes 8226,379 contributed by local interests. 20. Includes $74,900 Code 711 funds; excludes $4,285,128. for new work contributed by local interest. / 21. Includes $74,858 Code 711 funds; excludes $4,285,128 for new work expended from contributed funds. 22. Includes $122,729 Code 711 funds and $94,900 Code 713 funds. 23. Includes 88,914 from emergency relief funds. 24. Includes 81,730,100 Code 711 funds and $1,618,300 Code 713 funds. 25. Includes 81,730,096 Code 711 funds and 81,618,300 Code 713 funds. 26. Includes $2,057,405 Code 711 funds, $275,900 Code 712 funds and $24,201 emergency relief funds. 27. Includes $1,603,184 Code 711 funds, $275,900 Code 712 funds and $24,201 emergency relief funds. 28. Includes $1,111,000 Code 711 funds. 29. Includes $626,637 Code 711 funds. 30. Includes $2,581,334 Code 711 funds. 31. Includes $2,530,343 Code 711 funds. " 26-16 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA Aug 5, 1886 For lock and dam 1. (Fixed dam contemplated. Sept. 29, 1891 Secretary of War authorized change to a movable dam.) Jun 3, 1896 For locks and dams 2 and 3. July 25, 1912 For locks and dams 4 to 8, inclusive. Jul 3, 1930 For a depth of 9 feet in the lower 61 miles. Aug 30, 1935' Aug 30, 1935' Jun 26, 19342 Mar 3, 1899 Jun 13, 1902 Mar 3, 1905 Mar 3, 1905 Mar 2, 1907 Mar 4, 1913 Sep 22, 1922 Jul 3, 1930 Jan 31, 19313 Jun 26, 19342 May 17, 1950 Replace lock and dam 1 by a dredged channel, 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide up to lock -2, and construct new locks and dams 2 and 3, to replace existing locks and dams 2 and 3. Construct lock and dam 9, raising crest of dam 8, and dredging a navigable channel to head of pool 8. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriation for rivers and harbors. MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV Enlarge and improve lock and dam 6; additional works at lock 3; new repair steamer and new dredge boat with equipment; all at an estimated cost of $185,556. Rebuild lock and dam 2 at estimated cost of $655,961. (Estimate increased in 1910 to $698,961.) Acquisition of land and additional improvements at 5 and 6 at a cost of'$7,850. Rebuild lock and dam 3 at estimated cost of $589,196. Reconstruct lock and dam 5 at estimated cost of $756,042. Reconstruct lock and dam 6 at estimated cost of $356,400. (Estimate increased in 1916 to $418,860.) Additional improvements at estimated cost as follows: Guide walls and guard walls, 1 to 6, $1,255,130; Lengthen land chamber of lock 3 to 720 feet, $787,722; New chamber (360 feet long), lock 4, $699,786; Lock and dam 7, $1,161,241; Lock and dam 8, $1,165,758; Lock and dam 7 (second chamber), $419,126; Lock and dam 8 (second chamber), $504,465; Reconstruct dam 4, $397,211; Marine ways, repair plant, office and warehouse, $250,000, for a total of $6,640,439. Construct new locks and dam 2.5 miles below existing ' structure, at estimated cost of $2,175,000 in lieu of work authorized at old lock and dam 4. Chief of Engineers authorized to locate new locks and dam 4 above existing structure and on such site as they may deem most desirable. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Modification of existing project as follows: Provide 2 new locks and dams similar to Morgantown lock and dam to replace existing locks and dams 12 to 15, inclusive. Provide a movable crest on existing dam 8 to raise existing pool-full elevation 4 feet. Provide a navigation channel of 300-foot minimum bottom width and a 9-foot project depth above lock and dam 8. Provide an extension of navigable channel of upper Monongahela River, into lower Tygart River for 2.1 miles at a maximum bottom width of 200 feet and a 9-foot project depth. Annual Report 1886, p. 1545, Annual Report 1891, p. 2366 H. Doc. 204, 54th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report 1896, p. 2212 H. Doc. 540, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 356, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 16, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 721, 71st Cong., 3d sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 27, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report 1897, p. 2423 Annual Report 1909, p. 1756 Annual Report 1904, p. 460 H. Doc. 209, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 209, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1217, 62d Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 288, 67th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc 22, 70th Corig., 2d sess. S. Doc. 100, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 26-17 3. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 9. 11. 12. 14. 5. Jan 11, 1934 Aug 30, 1935 Jun 28, 1938 Jun 28, 1938 Jun 28, 1938 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended 26-18 TABLE 26-B (Continued) TYGART RIVER LAKE, WV Construction of a dam and reservior for low water regulation and flood control ELKINS, WV For construction of local flood protection projects. JOHNSTOWN, PA For construction of local flood protection projects. PUNXSUTAWNEY, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA For construction of local flood protection projects. BERLIN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Construction, operation & maintenances of recreation facilities. CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. CROOKED CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. EAST BRANCH CLARION RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. H. Doc. 1792, 64th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 106, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act. of 1944 15. 16. 17. PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 modified by Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jul 3, 1958 Jul 14, 1960 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Aug 28, 1937 Jun 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Jul 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Dec 30, 1963 Jun 18, 1965 18. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND NY Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation and recreation. Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, pollution abatement, low water regulation and recreation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. LOYALHANNA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. MAHONING CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, low water, regulation and recreation. To define cost-sharing arrangement for municipal & industrial water supply & water for pollution abatement purposes. MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low water regulation and water supply storage. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. OHIO RIVER BASIN - Pittsburgh District Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection Flood Control Committee, of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. Projects to be selected by Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction. Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other Flood Control Committee, purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in discretion of Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50,300,000 for local flood protection works. Additional $45 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for H. Doc. 300, 76th Cong. Ohio River Basin. 1st Sess. Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive H. Doc. 762, 77th Cong., plan for Ohio River Basin, including additional projects in 2d sess. tributary basins. Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong., plan including additional projects m tributary basins. 1st sess. Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for S. Doc. 20, 81st Cong. Ohio River Basin. 1st Sess. Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive Public Law 88-253, plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin. 88th Cong., 1st sess. Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive H. Doc., 6755, 89th Cong., plan for Ohio River Basin. 1st sess. 26-19 TABLE 26-B (Continued) H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 300, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 191, 85th Cong. 1st Sess. Pub. Law 86-645 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents May 12, 1967 Aug 13, 1968 Jun 19, 1970 Mar 7, 1974 Oct 22, 1976 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Additional $38 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Authorized phase I design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design of the project for abatement of acid mine drainage in the Clarion River Basin, Pa. Public Law 90-17, 90th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 90-483, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 15166, 91st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 10203, 93rd Cong., River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974. Water Resources Development Act of 1976; Public Law 94-587, Sec. 101(a). SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low water H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. regulation and recreation. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV Nov 7, 1966 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, S. Doc. 109, 89th Cong. water quality control, area redevelopment and recreation. 2nd Sess. Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 TIONESTA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. as amended Oct 23, 1962 Oct 23, 1962 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended UNION CITY DAM, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, recreation and storage for water quality control. YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND MD Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low-flow augmentation, and pollution abatement purposes. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 S. Doc. 95, 87th Cong. 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 95, 87th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 1. Included in the Emergency Relief Administration program April 8, 1935. 2. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 3. Public Res. 117, 71st Cong., 3d Sess. .26-20 TABLE 26-B (Continued) 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 6 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allegheny River, PA, open-channel work Completed 1934 197,000 133,940 Beaver and Mahoning Rivers, PA and OH' Inactive 1938 - - Buckhannon River, WV2 3 Completed 1893 5,500 - Cheat River, WV2 3 Completed 1895 12,997 - Pittsburgh Harbor, PA Completed 1922 110,663 81,613 Youghiogheny River, PA and MD Inactive 1971 47,195' 185,6685 1. January 23, 1939, Chief of Engineers recommended constructing a waterway from Ohio River through Beaver, Mahoning, and Grand River Valleys to Lake Erie (H. Doc. 178, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.) 2. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 3. No Commerce reported. 4. Previous project data. 5. Includes $1,700 expended under previous project. 26-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 26-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (All Projects Not Specifically Identified in Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allegany, NY, unit I (Allegheny River) Deferred - 4,100 - Allegany, NY, unit II (Five Mile Creek Area) Deferred 1975 64,851 - Amsterdam, OH' Completed 1964 183,072 - Benwood, WV2 Deferred 1954 81,028 - Big Run, PA' Completed 1965 364,208 - Black Fork at Hendricks, WV' Completed 1972 6,800 - Brackenridge, Tarentum and Natrona, PA Inactive - - Bradford, PA Completed 1962 7,601,763 - Brookville, PA Completed 1963 964,976 - Buckhannon, WV Completed 1972 1,568,661 - Burgettstown, PA' Completed - 83,129 - Butler, PA Completed 1970 1,556,181 - Dubois, PA Completed 1979 4,465,107 - Eagle Creek Reservoir, OH' Inactive - 100,000 - Empire-Stratton, OH Inactive - 33,031 - Friendsville, MD' Completed - 41,529 - (Granville, PA' Completed - 75,908 - Johnsonburg, PA Completed 1958 674,664 - Kittanning, PA, part I Completed 1949 130,317 - ILatrobe, PA Completed 1951 207,659 - latrobe, PA Completed 1970 2,556,652 - Leetonia, OH' Completed - 89,299 - ILeetsdale, PA Inactive - - - Martins Ferry, OH2 Inactive 1941 25,164 - Moundsville, WV' Inactive - -- Muddy Creek Dam, PA' Active 1977 402,459 - Neville Island, PA Inactive - - - New Kensington and Parnassus, PA Inactive - - ()akdale, PA' Inactive - 14,127 - Oil City, PA' Completed - 43,595 - ()lean, NY Completed 1954 3,217,531 - Portage, PA4 Completed 1965 150,386 - PIortville, NY Completed 1954 2,070,484 - Powhatan Point, OH' Inactive - - - Proctor, WV2 Inactive - - - Reynoldsville, PA Completed 1959 385,494 - Ridgway, PA (Elk Creek) Completed 1964 628,888 - Ridgway and vicinity, PA (on Clarion River)' Active 1979 132,464 - Rochester, PA Inactive - - Rouseville, PA' Inactive - 1,642 - Rowlesburg Lake, WV' Inactive 1977 2,857,575 - Salamanca, NY Completed 1972 2,880,535 - Slovan, PA' Completed - 57,811 - Sykesville, PA' Completed - 184,246 - Tarentum, PA' Completed 1964 136,591 - Tenmile Creek at Marianna, PA' Completed 1981 1,554,428 - Turtle Creek, PA Completed 1972 15,350,552 - Wallace, WV' 3 Inactive - 11,035 - Warwood, WV' Inactive - - - Washington, PA Completed 1964 789,093 - Wellsville, OH, Sec. I Completed 1956 483,910 - Wellsville, OH, Sec. II Completed 1956 157,633 - Wheeling, WV (North Wheeling)2 Inactive - -- Wheeling, WV (Wheeling Island)" Inactive - 21,700 - Wheeling, WV2 Inactive 1954 189,067 - Wilmore, PA' Completed - 96,853 - Woodlands, WV2 Inactive - - - Youngstown, OH Completed 1976 3,621,134 - 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 3. Lacks local support. 2. Eligible for deauthorization. 4. No longer economically justified. 26-22 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Adena, OH (Short Creek) - Aug 5, 1977 13,452 - Bellaire, OH - May 6, 1981 76,487 - Brilliant, OH - Aug 5, 1977 - - Brockway, PA (Allegheny River Basin) - Aug 5, 1977 194 - Buckhannon, WV' - Feb 20, 1951 37,488 - Clarington, OH - Aug 5, 1977 - - Coraopolis, PA - Aug 5, 1977 - - Dillonvale, OH (Short Creek) - Aug 5, 1977 16,884 - Follansbee, WV - Aug 5, 1977 - - Freeport, PA (Allegheny River) - Aug 5, 1977 - - Industry, PA - Aug 5, 1977 - - Kittanning, PA, part II (Allegheny River) - Nov 6, 1977 - - Lake Chautaugua and Chadakoin River, NY2 1956 Mar 2, 1970 190,722 - Lake Erie-Ohio Canal, OH and PA 1972 May 6, 1981 1,342,000 - McKees Rocks, PA - Oct 3, 1978 - - Mingo Junction, OH - Aug 5, 1977 - - New Cumberland, WV - Aug 5, 1977 - - Pittsburgh, PA (Golden Triangle) - Oct 3, 1978 - - Pittsburgh, PA (North Side) - Oct 3, 1978 - - Pittsburgh, PA (The Strip) - Oct 3, 1978 - - Redbank Creek Lake, PA - Aug 5, 1977 156,337 - St. Marys, PA (Allegheny River Basin) - Aug 5, 1977 13,529 - Smith Ferry, PA - Aug 5, 1977 - - Uniontown, PA (Monongahela River Basin) 1956 Oct 3, 1978 - - Wellsburg, WV - Aug 5, 1977 6,387 - West Bridgewater, PA - Aug 5, 1977 - - Wilcox, PA3 - Mar 5, 1955 16,761 - 1. Local interests failed to meet requirements of cooperation, authority for project expired Feb 20, 1951. 2. Local interests failed to meet requirements of cooperation, authority for project expired Mar 2, 1970. 3. Local interests failed to meet requirements of cooperation, authority for project expired Mar 5, 1955. 26-23 TABLE 26-H ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA.: LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Dimensions Upper Avail- Normal Depths on Miter Width able Lift at Pool Sills at Normal Character of Type of Year of Length Normal Elevation Pool Level' Foundation Construction Per- Opened Miles Cham- to Full Pool (feet, cent to Above ber Width Level mean sea Lower Upper Kind of Com- Navi- No. Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Dam Lock Dam plete gation Actual Cost 2 6.7 Aspinwall, PA 56 360 11.0 721.0 12.0 10.9 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19342 $ 1,763,485 3 14.5 Cheswick, PA 56 360 13.5 734.5 10.8 11.8 Rock Pile-rock Fixed Concrete .Concrete 100 19342 1,875,665 4 24.2 Natrona, PA 56 360 10.5 745.0 10.0 8.5 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1927 1,707.690 5 30.4 Freeport, PA 56 360 11.8 756.8 10.5 10.3 Piling Crib-Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1927 1,940,537 6 36.3 Clinton, PA 56 360 12.2 769.0 10.6 10.8 Rock Crib-Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1928 1,523,959 7 45.7 Kittanning, PA 56 360 13.1 782.1 9.8 10.9 Piling Steel Sheet Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1930 1,460,008 Piling 8 52.6 Templeton, PA 56 360 17.9 800.0 10.4 13.8 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1931 2,848,920 9 62.2 Rimer, PA 56 360 22.0 822.0 10.5 11.3 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1938 2,510,373 Total $15,630,637 Abandoned lock and dam 1 591,187 Abandoned lock and dam 2 544,929 Abandoned lock and dam 3 310,1@3 Demolishing old dam 1 26,001 Dredging channel 1,055,003 Total $18,157,860 1. All depths as shown are on guard sills and 2. Dates shown represent replacement structures. are controlling depth. C 0 0 y x x .MC C z z6 vJ TABLE 26I MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. AND W. VA.: LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 3 of Text) Dimensions Upper Avail- Normal Depths on Miter Width able Lift at Pool Sills at Normal Character of Type of Year of Length Normal Elevation Pool Level' Foundation Conaruction Per Opened Miles Chain- to Full Pool (feet, cent to Above her Width Level mean sea Lower Upper Kind of Com- Navi Estimated or No. Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Dam Lock Dam plete gation Actual Cost 2 11.2 Braddock, PA 56 360 8.7 718.7 16.0 15.95 Rock Crib pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1953' $17,872,212' 110 720 3 23.8 Elizabeth, PA 56' 360 8.2 726.9 16.0 15.95 Rock Crib Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1953' 17,658,538 720 4 41.5 Monessen, PA 56' 360 16.6 743.5 10.7 20.0 Piles Piles Movable Concrete Concrete 100 1932' 17,254,071 720 61.2 Maxwell locks and dam. 84' 720 19.5 763.0 15.0 20.5 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 1964 30,110,889 Maxwell, PA 82.2 Grays Landing lock 84 720 15.0 778.0 15.0 26.0 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete - - 802,995' and dam, Grays Landing, PA 7 85.0 Greensboro, PA 56 360 15.0 778.0 10.0 10.5 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1925' 2,639,804' 8 90.8 Point Marion, PA 56 360 19.0 797.0 10.0 14.5 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 1925' 6,027,139' S 102.0 Morgantown lock and 84 600 17.0 814.0 14.5 17.8 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 1950 8,778,000' dam, Morgantown. WV - 108.0 Hildebrand lock and 84 600 21.0 835.0 15.0 14.0 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 1959 12,506,829' dam, 6 miles above Morgantown, WV - 115.4 Opekiska lock and dam, 84 600 22.0 857.0 14.0 17.75 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 1964 25,179,622 13.4 miles above Morgantown, WV Marine ways, etc. 250,000 Abandoned lock and dam 1 1,019,907 ' Abandoned lock and dam 4 780.816 ' Abandoned lock and dam 5 1,074,812' Abandoned lock and dam 6 770,449' Abandoned lock and dam 7 213,776 ' Abandoned lock and dam 8 245.900 ' Abandoned lock and dam 9 191,000 ' Abandoned lock and dam 10 210,445' Abandoned lock and dam 11 227,668' Abandoned lock and dam 12 200,550' Abandoned lock and dam 13 190,691 Abandoned lock and dam 14 210,127 Abandoned lock and dam 15 175,829' Dred)gg 587.899 Total 145.179.968' 1. All depths as shown are on guard sills and are controlling depths. 2. Dates shown for locks and dams No. 2 to 8. inclusive, represent reconstruction. 3. 2 Chambers 4. Includes $3,322,057 for raising crest of dam. (1958-9), $2,086,438 for original reconstruction (1923-1926) and $618,466 AE&D costs for replacement of lock. 5. Actual cost; may include estimated costs which have been footnoted as necessary. 6. Includes 12.173.767 for original reconstruction (1931-2), and $15,080,304 for reconstruction of dam (1977). 7. Includes $16,967.114 for reconstruction of locks. 8. Includes estimated $15,977,000 for major rehabilitation. 9. AE&I) costs for proposed lock. 0 xi REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 26-J MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV: TOTAL COSTS OF EXISTING PROJECT TO END OF FISCAL YEAR (See Section 3 of Text) Operation and Maintenance, Funds New Work General Total Regular $139,411,38713 $89,993,6752 $229,405,062' 2 3 Maintenance and operation - 267,179 267,179 Public Works acceleration, executive (1963) - 22,549 22,549 Total $139,411,387' 3 $90,283,403' $229,694,790' 2 3 1. Excludes $5,420,541 for new work for previous projects. TABLE 26-K OHIO RIVER BASIN (I 2. Excludes $20,446,587 expended between July 7, 1897 and June 30, 1937, on operation and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent appropriation for such purposes and excludes $742 for maintenance of previous projects. 3. Includes $15,744,104 for major rehabilitation. PITTSBURGH DISTRICT): LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 23 of Text) Estimated Cost 8 Type of Location' Protection Federal Non-Federal Total Allegany, NY, unit I (Allegheny River) ' Allegany, NY, unit II (Five Mile Creek area)l Benwood, W V2 '' ' Brackenridge, Tarentum and Natrona, PA (Allegheny (River)' Elkins, W V (Monongahela River Basin)4 * Empire-Stratton, OH' Johnsonburg, PA (Allegheny River Basin)2 "' Johnstown, PA (Allegheny River Basin)' " Kittanning, PA, part I (Allegheny River)" " Lake Chautauqua and Chadakoin River, NY (Allegheny River Basin)2 Latrobe, PA (Allegheny River Basin)2" Ieetsdale, PA2 Martins Ferry, OH' " '" Moundsville, WV " Neville Island, PA' New Kensington and Parnassus, PA (Allegheny River)2 Olean, NY (Allegheny River) ' "' Portville, NY (Allegheny River) " Powhatan Point, OH ' ' Proctor, WV 2 Punxsutawney, PA (Allegheny River Basin)4 ' Ridgway, PA (Allegheny River Basin) " Rochester, PA2 Warwood, WV2 '" Wellsville, OH, sec. I " Wellsville, OH, sec. 11 5" Wheeling, WV ' " Levee Channel and levee Wall Wall Channel diversion Internal drainage facilities Wall Channel Wall Channel Channel Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall Levee Levee Levee Levee Channel and levee Channel Wall Wall Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee 697,000 980,000 8,500,000 11,800,000 1,772,627" 933,000 674,664 8,865,388' 130,317 6,640,000 207,659 1,270,000 8,630,000 3,070,000 3,210,000 7,900,000 3,217,531" 2,070,484' 4,720,000 334,000 3,586,1073 628,8883 3,350,000 1,740,000 483,9103 157,6333 19,700,000 65,000 133,000 3,180,000 3,080,000 762,000 ' 1,113,000' 11,680,000"' 14,880,000 40,000 1,812,627 28,000 961,000's 130,000 804,664 - 8,865,388 2,000 132,317 1,310,000 7,950,000" 44,400 141,000 836,000 605,000 1,830,000 148,000 597,000 353,000 397,000 121,000 180,485 72,000 622,000 376,000 113,000 3,460,000 252,059 1,411,000 9,466,000 3,675,000 5,040,000 8,048,000 3,814,531 2,423,484 5,117,000 455,000 3,766,592 700,888 3,972,000 2,116,000 596,910 157,6333 23,160,000"' 26-26 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-K (Continued) OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT): LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 23 of Text) Estimated Cost' Type of Location' Protection Federal Non-Federal Total Wheeling, WV (North Wheeling)2 16 Wall 11,700,000 2,700,000 14,400,000 Wheeling, WV (Wheeling Island)2 16 Wall and levee 13,300,000 2,470,000 15,770,000 Woodlands, WV 2 16 Levee 206,000 28,000 234,000 1. All projects are on the Ohio River unless otherwise 9. Latest cost estimate revision 1959. noted. 10. Latest cost estimate revision 1960. 2. Also see "Other authorized flood control projects." 11. Latest cost estimate revision 1965. 3. Actual cost. 12. Latest cost estimate revision 1966. 4. Reported in detail in an individual report. 13. Latest cost estimate revision 1974. 5. Completed. 14. Latest cost estimate revision 1977. 6. Reported in detail in Annual Report for 1941. 15. Latest cost estimate revision 1978. 7. Reported in detail in Annual Report for 1954. 16. Eligible for deauthorization. 8. Latest cost estimate revision 1954 unless otherwise noted. TABLE 26-L OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT): RESERVOIRS (See Section 21 of Text) Total Estimated Tributary Basin and Reservoir Stream Cost Allegheny: Conemaugh River, PA' Conemaugh River $ 46,016,400 4 Crooked Creek, PA' Crooked Creek 7,379,900 4 East Branch Clarion River, PA' Clarion River 9,749,600 4 Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, PA and NY' Allegheny River 115,730,200 4 5 Loyalhanna, PA' Loyalhanna Creek 8,348,900 , Mahoning Creek, PA' Mahoning Creek 7,727,300 4 Tionesta, PA' Tionesta Creek 7,987,100 Union City, PA' French Creek 14,729,800 Woodcock Creek, PA' Woodcock Creek 20,525,700 ' Beaver: Berlin, OH' Mahoning River 9,266,400 Eagle Creek, OH2 Eagle Creek 12,700,000 3 Michael J. Kirwan, OH' Mahoning River 21,754,000 * Mosquito Creek, OH' Mosquito Creek 6,169,000 * Shenango River, PA and OH' Shenango River 41,528,000 * Monongahela: Youghiogheny River, PA and MD' Youghiogheny River 13,920,300 ' 1. Reported in detail in an individual report. 2. Also see "Other authorized flood control projects." 3. Latest cost estimate revision 1954. 4. Latest cost estimate revision 1982. 5. Includes $6,000,000 cost estimate for Dam Rehabilitation plus $2,535,000 for total recreational and sanitary facilities to upgrade area and comply with sanitary cbdes. 26-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 26-M INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 30 of Text) Project Dates of Inspection Project Dates of Inspection Amsterdam, OH October 1982 Leetonia, OH September 1982 Big Run, PA August 1978 Oil City, PA August 1981 Bradford, PA July 1982 Olean, NY September 1982 Brookville, PA August 1981 Portage, PA August 1982 Buckhannon, WV May 1979 Portville, NY September 1982 Burgettstown-Slovan, PA t March 1976 Reynoldsville, PA August 1977 Butler, PA September 1980 Ridgway, PA July 1982 Chartiers Creek, PA Salamanca, NY September 1982 Cannonsburg-Houston Reach March 1976 Stonewood-Nutter Fort, James G. Fulton Reach April 1982 WV October 1982 Colliers, WV October 1982 Sykesville, PA August 1978 Dubois, PA September 1977 Tarentum, PA November 1976 Eldred, PA June 1978 Turtle Creek, PA July 1980 Friendsville, MD May 1981 Washington, PA March 1976 Granville, PA March 1982 Wellsville, OH October 1979 Johnsonburg, PA May 1982 Weston, WV October 1982 Kittanning, PA None Wilmore, PA August 1982 Latrobe, PA May 1982 Youngstown, PA October 1982 26-28 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-N FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 32 of Text) Flood Control Activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Project/Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Allegheny River, Oil City, PA (detailed project report, plans, specifications and construction) $215,428 Catfish Creek, Washington Co., PA (preliminary project report) 8,624 Girty's Run, Millvale, PA (construction) -451,892 Root Creek, Bolivar, NY (construction) 157,472 Tenmile Creek, Marianna, PA (construction) 11,056 West Little Pine Creek, Etna, PA (detailed project report) 57.787 Total cost for current fiscal year: -$ 1,525 Emergency Bank Protection - Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress Project/Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Allegheny River, Wattersonville, PA (construction) $50,804 Craig Beach, OH (construction) 36 Dry Brook, NY (plans, specifications and construction) 190,081 Monongahela River, Newell Borough, PA (construction) 48,383 Ohio River, Chester, WV (reconnaissance report, plans and specifications) 3,903 Ohio River, McMechen, WV (plans and specifications) 7,737 Roberto Clemente Park, PA ( plans and specifications) 1,322 Thompson Run, PA (construction) 36,764 West Butler Creek, Lyndora, PA (construction) 54.159 Total cost for current fiscal year: $393,189 Streambank Erosion Control, Evaluation and Demonstration - Section 32, of the 1974 Water Resources Development Act, Public Law 251, 93rd Congress Project/Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Ohio River Main Stem Demonstration Projects $37,876 Demonstration Projects at Undesignated Sites 1,593 Total cost for current fiscal year: $39,469 Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration - Section 54, of the 1974 Water Resources Development Act, Public Law 251, 93rd Congress Activity Fiscal Year Costs Architect/Engineer Contract for Preparation of Three Reports for the Purpose of Disseminating Information on the Section 54 Program. $8,630 Three Guides to Low Cost Shore Protection for: 1. Engineers and Contractors 2. Local government officials 3. Property owners 26-29 ST. PAUL, MN DISTRICT * District comprises western Wisconsin, major portion of Minnesota, northern and eastern North Dakota, and small portions of northeastern South Dakota and northern and northeastern Iowa embracing drainage basins of Mississippi River and tributaries from its source to mile 614 above mouth of Ohio River; Red River of the North and tributaries; those streams north of Missouri River Basin in North Dakota; and U.S. waters of Lake of the Woods and its tributaries. That section of Mississippi River above mile 614 is included in report on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minnesota. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Minnesota River, MN ..................... 27-2 2. Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN .... 27-2 3. Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, MN ............... 27-2 4. St. Croix River, MN & WI...............27-2 5. Warroad Harbor and River, MN ......... 27-3 Flood Control 6. Bassett Creek, MN ..................... 27-3' 7. Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, MN and SD ...................... 27-4 8. Burlington Dam, Souris River, ND ...... 27-4 9. Chaska, MN ................ ....... 27-4 10. Eau Galle River, WI ................... 27-5 11. Enderlin, Maple River, ND ........... 27-5 12. Grafton, ND ............................ 27-6 13. Homme Lake and Dam, ND ............. 27-6 14. Lac qui Parle Lake, Minnesota River, MN ............................... 27-7 15. LaCrosse, WI ............................ 27-7 16. La Farge Lake and channel improvement, WI ........................ 27-7 17. Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, ND .................... 27-8 18. Lake Darling, Souris River, ND ......... 27-8 19. Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River, SD and MN ..................... 27-8 20. Mankato and North Mankato, MN ...... 27-8 21. Minot, ND .............................. 27-9 22. Pembina River, ND ..................... 27-10 23. Prairie du Chien, WI .................... 27-10 24. Red Lake River, MN, including Clearwater River, MN ................... 27-10 25. Red River of the North drainage basin, MN, SD & ND ................... 27-11 26. Red River of the North at Oslo, MN.....27-12 27. Rochester, MN ........................... 27-12 28. Roseau River, MN ....................... 27-12 29. Sheyenne River, ND ..................... 27-13 30. State Road and Ebner Coulees, WI ...... 27-13 31. Twin Valley Lake, Wild Rice River, MN .27-13 32. Wild Rice River-South Branch and Felton Ditch, MN ........................ 27-14 33. Winona, MN ............................. 27-14 34. Inspection of completed flood control projects ......................... 27-15 General Investigations 35. Surveys .................................. 27-15 36. Collection and study of basic data.......27-15 37. Advance engineering and design ...... 27-15 38. Other work under special authority ...... 27-15 Tables Table 27-A Cost & Financial Statement ...................... 27-16 Table 27-B Authorizing Legislation ......... 27-19 Table 27-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............ 27-20 Table 27-D Not Applicable Table 27-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ......... 27-21 Table 27-F Not Applicable Table 27-G Deauthorized Projects...........27-22 Table 27-H Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River.............27-23 Table 27-I Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .......... 27-24 Table 27-J Red River of the North Drainage Basin: Active Units in Comprehensive Basin Plan ............................ 27-24 Table 27-K Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .......... 27-24 Table 27-L Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ........... 27-25 27-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Navigation 1. MINNESOTA RIVER, MN Location. Rises in Big Stone Lake, MN and SD, and flows southeasterly about 224 miles to Mankato, MN, thence northeasterly about 106 miles to join the Mississippi River opposite St. Paul, MN. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Previous projects. For details see page 1890 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1105 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides 9-foot depth below flat pool level of Mississippi River lock and dam 2 from mouth to mile 14.7, one-half mile above the railway bridge at Savage, MN, and 4-foot depth from mile 14.7 to 25.6 at Shakopee, MN. For details see page 1018 of Annual Report for 1965. (See table 27-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See also page 1074 of Annual Report for 1967. Terminal facilities. There are privately owned terminals at miles 9, 13.1, 14.5, and two at mile 14.7. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys cost $12,423. Dredging by contract cost $355. Snagging and clearing by hired labor cost $16,215. Engineering and administrative costs amounted to $8,258. Condition at end of fiscal year: Work on project for 4-foot depth was completed in 1931. The United States owns 10 acres of land in fee 2 miles east of Savage, MN. Rights-of-entry have been obtained over 123.08 acres of land over which perpetual easements will be conveyed by local interests. 46.20 acres have been transferred from the Department of the Army and Department of the Air Force to the project. Navigation from mouth to Shakopee was practicable for drafts not in excess of 3 feet. A contract for work under 1958 authorization for a 9-foot channel started in May 1966 was terminated in January 1967 when 56 percent complete. A channel dredging contract awarded in June 1967 was completed in August 1968. Total costs for existing project to September 30, 1982 were $3,345,739, of which $1,940,180 was for new work and $1,405,559 for maintenance. In addition, cost from contributed funds was $139,671 for dredging to 9-foot depth under provisions of section 4, River and Harbor Act of 1915, and $219,531 for work done for the State of Minnesota relative to modification of the project. 2. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN For report on this improvement see chapter on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minnesota. 3. RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN Location. Reservoirs are on the Mississippi River and several of its tributaries in Itasca, Beltrami, Hubbard, Aitkin, Cass and Crow Wing Counties, MN. (See table 27-H on reservoirs.) Previous projects. For details see page 1888 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1098 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for reconstruction from timber to concrete at Winnibigoshish, Leech Lake, Pokegama, Sandy Lake and Pine River Dams, and construction of a concrete dam at Gull Lake. Pokegama was built on bedrock and the others on pile foundations. A portion of Leech Lake Dam from piers 26 to 39 was replaced with an earth fill. Constructed three dikes at Winnibigoshish, four at Pokegama, two at Sandy Lake, and 16 at Pine River. Sandy Lake Dam includes a lock 160 feet long, 30 feet wide, with a maximum lift of 9.5 feet and a depth of 2.5 feet on lower sill at low water which was converted to use as a spillway. (See table 27-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and administrative costs amounted to $218 at Winnibigoshish Lake. Payments to the contractor for the Pine River sewage treatment facility amounted to $4,000. Maintenance: Reservoirs were operated as required, recreation facilities were maintained, real estate managed and miscellaneous inspections, surveys, repairs, and reports were made by hired labor including administration at a cost of $953,091. Miscellaneous engineering and design cost $7,558. Contract work for dam operations, recreation and sanitation facilities, and archaeology cost $54,360. A recreation maintenance contract at Winnibigoshish cost $37,147. A stability study with the Waterways Experiment Station cost $3,467 and foundation testing with the Missouri River Division cost $3,896. Cooperative stream gaging with U.S. Geological Survey cost $14,200. Condition at end of fiscal year< Existing project was completed in 1937. Flowage rights were acquired on all lands affected by construction, maintenance, and operation of reservoirs. A total of 1,861 acres in fee and easements on 296,365 acres are owned by the United States. Structures are in fair condition. Recreation facilities for public use are being constructed intermittently at all reservoir areas. (See table 27-H for capacities and costs by reservoir.) 4. ST. CROIX RIVER, MN & WI Location. From source in northwestern Wisconsin, flows southwesterly and then southerly about 164 miles to Mississippi River at Prescott, WI, about 41.7 miles below lower Burlington Northern railway 27-2 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT bridge, Minneapolis, MN. For its greater part, forms boundary between Minnesota and Wisconsin. (See Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for maintenance of a channel, 9 feet in depth and of suitable width from mouth to Stillwater, MN, 24.5 miles, created by improvement of upper Mississippi River; a channel 3 feet deep at mean low water between Stillwater and Taylors Falls (27.3 miles); improvement of harbor and waterfront at Stillwater; and a small-boat harbor at Hudson, WI. Estimated (1981) Federal cost of new work is $820,400. Latest authorization (1954) for maintenance work on reach between Stillwater and Taylors Falls is limited to an expenditure not exceeding $5,000 per year. (See table 27-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion. For Hudson Harbor, see the annual report of 1970 for requirements. Terminal facilities. At Stillwater there is a concrete paved levee and a piling-and-timber trestle wharf on right bank. At other points along river, landing may be made on banks. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Sounding surveys cost $8,994 and a reconnaissance study cost $31. Condition at end of fiscal year: All new work was completed in 1930, except subsequently authorized harbor at Hudson. The United States owns 2.75 acres of land in fee at Taylors Falls and has easements over 7.57 acres of land at Bayport, MN. Extension to provide a 9-foot channel from mouth to Stillwater was completed August 12, 1938 when full pool at dam 3 of Mississippi River canalization project was reached. Minimum draft from Stillwater to Taylors Falls is about 1 foot at extreme low water, and from mouth to Stillwater, 9 feet. Maintenance of the 3 foot channel is limited to requests by the National Park Service which manages this reach under the Wild and Scenic Waterways classification. 5. WARROAD HARBOR AND RIVER, MN Location. At southwestern extremity of Lake of the Woods, 36 miles west of mouth of Rainy River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14999.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 8 feet deep from landing at Warroad to deep water in lake, channel being 9,200 feet long, 200 feet wide within harbor, and 300 feet wide out in lake; for a turning basin 500 by 900 feet to a depth of 8 feet; and for a pile-brush stone jetty on north side of channel extending from shore 700 feet into the lake. For additional details see page 1027 of Annual Report of 1965. Portion of dredging of entrance channel and turning basin to complete project width and depth was considered unnecessary to meet present navigation requirements, and classified inactive was deauthorized on August 5, 1977 under Section 12 of Public Law 93-251. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion was $355,200. (See table 27-B for authorization legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There is one publicly owned wharf. There are two commercial fish wharves, one of which is served by a spur track, and a number of minor wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Sounding surveys cost $17,278. Environmental review cost $17,299 by hired labor. Other engineering and administrative costs were $13,628. Condition at end of fiscal year: Project is complete. Prospective jetty completed in 1910 and reconstructed as a rubble mound in 1929 is in good condition. Turning basin at Warroad wharves was completed in 1911, and a channel 200 feet wide and 8 feet deep in 1915. Controlling depth in river channel and lake approach channel was 6 feet below low-water datum for a minimum width of 100 feet. A walkway on the jetty is provided for public use. A revetment wall, constructed under Section 2 of Public Law 269, 69th Congress, in accordance with Article VIII of the Lake of the Woods Treaty, has deteriorated and will require future maintenance. Flood Control 6. BASSETT CREEK, MN Location. In Hennepin County and Minneapolis, Minnesota, on Bassett Creek, a tributary of the Mississippi River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The selected plan consists of flood storage in the upper Bassett Creek watershed and a new tunnel in the outlet reach under a highly urbanized area of Minneapolis. Also, floodplain regulations, flood proofing of 24 homes, evacuation of one home, flood insurance, flood forecasting and warning, and recreation trails are included in the plan. The flood storage would generally consist of providing increased temporary inundation on existing golf courses, parks and open space throughout the watershed. The outlet tunnel would be a cooperative venture with the Minnesota Highway Department which has two major highway projects in the area. Estimated Federal cost (1982) for new work is $13,700,000 and $253,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. Local cooperation. See annual report for 1977 for requirements. A local assurance agreement will be required after completion of the Phase II General Design Memorandum. By resolutions approved September 12, 1974, October 31, 1975, and December 11, 1981, the city of Minneapolis has indicated its 27-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 willingness and intention to meet the requirements of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $415,765. Condition at end of fiscal year: Preconstruction planning is in progress. 7. BIG STONE LAKE AND WHETSTONE RIVER, MN AND SD Location. On Minnesota River near Ortonville and Odessa, MN, and Big Stone City, SD, at the outlet of Big Stone Lake and in Big Stone and Lac qui Parle Counties, MN, and Grant County, SD. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for a dam and reservoir on Minnesota River above U.S. Highway 75, modification of Big Stone Lake outlet dam and silt barrier, bank stabilization along lower reach of Whetstone River, channel improvement on Minnesota River for 3 miles below outlet control dam at Big Stone Lake along with necessary relocations and acquisition of lands. These improvements would be made for wildlife conservation and development, flood control, and recreation. For additional details see Annual Report for 1970. Estimated Federal cost (1982) for new work is $13,200,000 and $153,000 to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 579, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest map; and H. Doc. 193, 88th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1968 for requirements. The project requires sponsorship from both the States of Minnesota and South Dakota. Formal resolution of assurances adopted by the Upper Minnesota River Watershed District on June 10, 1969 and accepted by the District Engineer on November 3, 1969. Formal resolution of assurances adopted by the East Dakota Conservancy Sub- District for South' Dakota on October 23, 1969 was furnished on November 18, 1969 and accepted by the District Engineer on November 19, 1969. Supplemental assurances covering the requirements of Public Law 91-646 were provided by the Upper Minnesota Watershed District on August 13, 1974 and by the East Dakota Conservancy Sub-District on April 15, 1976. Rights-of way for construction on the Whetstone River and the entire cash contribution of $153,000 for the project were furnished by the local sponsors on December 21, 1981. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A contract for upstream works on the Whetstone River cost $260,000. Engineering and design cost $89,940, and supervision and administration cost $15,527. Maintenance: Structure was operated and maintained and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $103,889. Engineering and design cost $63,720. Supervision and administration cost $21,903. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of the new dam above Highway 75 and roads is completed. Surveys for land lines are complete, and the land acquisition program is complete. The first land payment was made on November 28, 1969 and 128 tracts have been purchased. A general plan betweeh the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Interior for administering the use of waters, land, or interests therein has been consummated, and a cooperative agreement between the Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was approved. On March 31, 1975 the Secretary of the Army transferred lands in the project not required for Corps of Engineers operation and maintenance to the Department of the Interior. The transfer of property was accepted by the Department of the Interior on May 21, 1975. Construction on the Whetstone River portion of the upstream works is in progress. 8. BURLINGTON DAM, SOURIS RIVER, ND Location. In Ward County in northwestern North Dakota above Burlington, ND, on the Souris River. The damsite is north of Burlington about 11/2 miles northwest of the confluence of the Souris and Des Lacs Rivers and about 10 miles above Minot, ND. (For general location see Geological Survey Map of North Dakota.) Existing project. Authorized plan of improvement as modified by the phase I design memorandum provides for a single-purpose flood control reservoir near Burlington on the Souris River; modification of nine fish and wildlife refuge dams including a 4-foot raise of Lake Darling Dam; a diversion tunnel adjoining the Des Lacs River to the Burlington reservoir; improvements at the community of Velva and improvements by local interests in seven subdivision areas between Burlington and Minot and at the community of Sawyer, and regulation of future floodplain land use downstream from the dam site. Estimated Federal cost (1981) for new work is $124,000,000. Project was authorized by 1970 Flood Control Act. (H. Doc. 321, 91st Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 27-4 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $17,508. Condition at end of fiscal year: Project has been deferred with authorization of Lake Darling project. Additional authorization required for implementation of recommended plan. 9. CHASKA, MN Location. In Carver County in south-central Minnesota on the Minnesota River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of a levee and interior drainage works along the 27-4 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT Minnesota River and flood diversion channels on Chaska Creek and East Creek at Chaska, together with appropriate floodplain regulation measures. Principal project features include approximately 1.1 miles of upgraded levee, 0.6 mile of new levee, one pumping station, 0.9 mile of diversion channel on Chaska Creek, and 1.1 miles of flood bypass channel and a 1,400-foot tunnel on East Creek. Approximately 1.6 miles of paved recreation trails on top of the levee and around Courthouse Lake are also included in the proposed plan. Estimated Federal cost (1982) for new work is $17,600,000 and $38,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. (H. Doc. 644, 94th Congress, 2d sess., contains latest published map.)* Local cooperation. See annual report for 1977 for requirements. A local assurance agreement will be required after completion of the design memorandum. By letter of May 7, 1981, the city of Chaska has indicated its willingness and intention to meet the requirements of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $183,115. Condition at end of fiscal year: Preconstruction planning is in progress. 10. EAU GALLE RIVER, WI Location. At and in vicinity of Spring Valley, WI, on Eau Galle River 30 miles above its mouth at Chippewa River, and its tributary, Mines Creek, which flows through the village. Spring Valley is about 45 miles east of St. Paul, MN; and 36 miles west of Eau Claire, WI. (See Geological Survey map for Wisconsin for general location.) Existing project. Authorized plan of improvement as modified by further studies includes a retarding dam and reservoir on Eau Galle River immediately upstream from Spring Valley, and remedial works on Mines Creek including channel enlargement, a low levee, and a drop structure. Project provides for earth and rock-fill dam, an uncontrolled outlet and an uncontrolled spillway emerging above Mines Creek. See page 1030 of Annual Report for 1965 for further details. Proposed improvements on Burghardt Creek were eliminated. Improvements provide complete protection near Spring Valley for standard project flood, and below that point in decreasing value in proportion to distance from reservoir. Permanent conservation pool will serve a local need for a recreational area. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 52, 84th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See page 1083 of Annual Report for 1967. Operations and rtsults during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structure and recreation facilities were operated and maintained, and inspection and evaluations were performed at a cost of $160,132. Master plan appendices and engineering and design for conduit repair cost $752 and $5,415 respectively. Contracts for cultural resource investigation, water quality, and miscellaneous conduit work cost $-2,503, $8,181 and $241,154 respectively. Cooperative stream gaging cost $13,500. Administrative and other miscellaneous engineering costs were $42,224. Condition at end of fiscal year: Mines Creek improvements were substantially completed in 1964; minor work was accomplished in 1966. A contract for dam, spillway, and discharge channel, started July 1, 1965, was completed in October 1968. Recreational facilities have been provided. Remedial work to repair eroded gutters and road ditches was completed in September 1973. 11. ENDERLIN, MAPLE RIVER, ND Location. In Ransom County in southeastern North Dakota on the Maple River about 45 miles southwest of Fargo, North Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey Map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The proposed project at Enderlin provides for a system of levees along the right bank of the main stem and the left bank of the South Branch of the Maple River. On the south branch the levee would be built contiguous with an existing emergency levee wherever possible. The total levee system would be about 1.2 miles long and would have an average height of about 8 feet. Other features of the project include channel improvements on the south branch extending about 2,000 feet upstream from the mouth, modification of the Soo Line Railroad tracks within about a 3,200-foot reach, and replacement of the railroad bridge, a new street bridge and a water control structure on the south branch, and interior drainage facilities consisting of three ponding areas with gated outlet conduits. To prevent failure of the channel and levee by erosion rip-rapping would be provided in selected reaches. Total Federal cost (1982) for the proposed project is estimated at $3,555,000. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction August 11, 1982 under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to hold and save the United States free from damages caused by the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow, ponding and disposal areas, as determined by the Chief of Engineers necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project; accomplish without cost to the United States all relocations of buildings, utilities, highways, and highway bridges necessary for the construction and maintenance of the project except relocation of utility 27-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 lines passing through or under the line of protection and considered to be integral parts of the improvement within the right-of-way of the project; provide the cost difference between the actual cost of the combined street bridge-water control (drop) structure and the estimated cost of the drop structure by itself; provide all costs in excess of the $4,000,000. Federal cost limitation as prescribed under the authority of Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; prevent encroachment on any of the flood protection structures, including ponding areas, and if ponding areas are impaired, provide substitute storage capacity or equivalent pumping capacity promptly without cost to the United States; upon completion of the project, adopt, enforce, and adhere to a modified comprehensive plan for floodplain management applying to residual floodplain areas along the Maple River and South Branch Maple River within the corporate limits of the City as prescribed by Federal and State floodplain law; periodically inform affected interests that the recommended flood control improvements will not provide complete flood protection; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971, in the acquisition of lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and advise affected persons of pertinent procedures, policies, and benefits in connection with said Act; comply with Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) apd Department of Defense Directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, in connection with the construction, operation and maintenance of the project. A local assurance agreement required by Public Law 91-611 was adopted by the City of Enderlin in July 1982. Operations and results during fiscal year: New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $33,900. Condition at end of fiscal year: A first feature construction contract involving riprap protection of the State Highway 46 bridge at Enderlin was awarded in September 1982 for $34,900. Work on the plans and specifications for the remaining features of the project was initiated in September 1982. 12. GRAFTON, ND Location. In Walsh County in northeastern North Dakota on the Park River, a tributary of the Red River of the North. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The plan of improvement proposed in the Draft Phase I GDM is designed to protect present and future development at Grafton from damages due to floods of magnitudes up to and including the standard project flood. The plan consists of a grass-lined flood bypass channel 3.75 miles long with a levee to the north of Grafton and a tieback levee and interceptor ditch to the west. There would be a diversion structure at the upstream end of the bypass channel and a gated control structure where the tieback levee crosses the Park River at the diversion structure, limiting the flow in the existing channel to 2,000 cfs. Estimated Federal cost (1982) for new work exclusive of Phase I costs is $15,200,000. The Phase I study was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. (H. Doc. 645, 94th Congress, 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for requirements. A local assurance agreement will be required after completion of the design memorandum. By Resolution No. 685, passed August 15, 1973 by the Grafton City Council, the city has indicated its willingness and intention to meet the necessary requirements of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Phase I design memorandum stage of advance engineering and design was continued under the General Investigations program. Condition at end of fiscal year: Phase I design memorandum stage of advance engineering and design is in progress under the General Investigations program. 13. HOMME LAKE AND DAM, ND Location. Dam is on South Branch of Park River about 4 miles upstream from Park River, ND, and 62.1 miles above mouth of Park River. South, Middle, and North Branches, headwater streams of Park River, rise in Cavalier County in northeastern North Dakota and flow easterly to an almost common confluence near Grafton, ND, forming main stream which flows easterly 35 miles to join Red River of the North about 35 miles south of the international boundary. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. See page 1285 of Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized as Park River Reservoir by 1944 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 194, .78th Cong., 2d sess.), and redesignated Homme Reservoir and Dam by Public Law 435, 80th Congress, 2d session. Latest published map is in project document. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Total costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization, including required non-Federal contributions, were $62,800. In addition, local interests contributed $16,220 for construction of a water supply outlet through dam and incurred other costs of $19,600. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structure was operated and maintained, and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $133,026. 27-6 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year: Project completed in June 1956 except for additional recreational facilities which have been done intermittently since that time. Construction began in April 1948 and major structures completed in May 1951. Structures are in good condition. Government has acquired 395 acres of land in fee and easements over 7.8 acres of land for project. An additional 6.3 acres of land have been donated for recreational development and 3.75 acres have been acquired due to bank erosion bordering the project. 14. LAC QUI PARLE LAKE, MINNESOTA RIVER, MN Location. Works covered by this project lie along Marsh Lake and Lac qui Parle and the Minnesota River between head of Marsh Lake and Granite Falls, MN. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 1291 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated and maintained, and inspections and evaluation performed at a cost of $176,117. Condition at end of fiscal year: Project has been operated by the Government since transfer from State of Minnesota to the United States in September 1950. The United States owns fee title to 517.62 acres of land and easements on 19,859.47 acres of land. In 1957, 60.1 acres were withdrawn from public lands for use by the Department of the Army. Land acquisition is complete. Construction under present plan of improvement was started in September 1941 and completed in December 1951 except for recreational facilities. All structures are in good condition. 15. LA CROSSE, WI Location. In La Crosse County in southwestern Wisconsin on the Mississippi River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of seven miles of levee and one mile of street raise, road and rail closure structures, necessary interior drainage collection facilities, floodplain regulation, permanent evacuation and relocation of 40 residential structures and flood proofing several businesses. Also, a paved hiking and bicycling trail would be provided on some portions of the levee system to meet identified recreation demands in the area. Estimated Federal cost (1982) for new work exclusive of Phase I costs is $24,700,000 and $60,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. (H. Doc. 598, 94th Congress, 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for requirements. A local assurance agreement will be required after completion of the design memorandum. By resolution adopted June 21, 1973 the county of La Crosse has indicated its willingness and intention to meet the requirements of local cooperation. The city provided their continued support for the study in a letter dated January 20, 1982. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year: Preconstruction planning has not started. 16. LA FARGE LAKE AND CHANNEL , IMPROVEMENT, WI Location. Rises in Monroe County in southwestern Wisconsin and flows south and southwest through Vernon, Richland, and Crawford Counties emptying into Wisconsin River about 16 miles above junction of latter stream with Mississippi River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. Provides for a dam and impoundment of the Kickapoo River about 1 mile upstream from village of La Farge, operated for flood control, fish and wildlife conservation, general recreation, and a reduction of aggradation downstream from the dam, and supplemental protection at Soldiers Grove and at Gays Mills by means of levees, supplementary channel improvement, and interior drainage facilities. See Annual Report for 1975 for details. Estimated Federal cost (1976) for new work is $55,400,000. Project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 557, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. None required for construction of La Farge Lake. See page 1087 of Annual Report for 1967 for requirements for local protection works. Local interests have not been requested to furnish assurances. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Land acquisition, engineering and design, relocation utility contracts, and operation and maintenance during construction cost $11,954. Supervision and administration cost $856. Maintenance: Project was operated and maintained at a cost of- $15,864. Condition at end of fiscal year: General and Real Estate design memorandums and detailed plans for the La Farge Dam and spillway and for relocations have been completed. Land acquisition negotiations began in December 1968. The first land payment was made on January 15, 1969 and the land acquisition program is 80 percent complete. Contracts for excavation of the left abutment, for test wells, and for construction of the outlet works and right abutment have been completed. A study of alternatives has been completed. Funds to complete the authorized project have been withheld and all further construc- 27-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 tion has been indefinitely suspended. Work has been accomplished to provide for completion of relocation work left partially completed when construction was suspended. Soldiers Grove has begun relocation out of the floodplain area after receiving funds from other agencies. 17. LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM, SHEYENNE RIVER, ND Location. Baldhill Dam is on the Sheyenne River, 16 miles upstream from Valley City, ND, and about 271 miles above mouth. Sheyenne River rises in central North Dakota and flows 500 miles generally southeast to enter Red River of the North about 10 miles north of Fargo, ND. (For general location see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. See page 1287 of Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1944 (S. Doc. 193, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Reservoir above Baldhill Dam was designated as Lake Ashtabula by Public Law 772, 81st Congress, 2d session. Local cooperation. See page 1288 of Annual Report for 1962. Complied with except for construction of Fargo diversion dam and ditch for which assurances furnished by city of Fargo were approved by the Secretary of War on June 26, 1947. Necessity for this feature will be reviewed. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Administrative and engineering costs were $1,551. Maintenance: Project was operated and maintained, and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $398,685. Bank protection and recreation maintenance contracts cost $469,926. Contract for cultural resource investigation cost $3,991. Contract for law enforcement cost $11,107. Administrative and other miscellaneous costs were $47,648. Condition at end of fiscal year: Project completed in March 1956 except construction of recreational facilities which is being accomplished intermittently. United States owns 7,816.5 acres of land in fee and easements on 666.2 acres. Construction initiated in July 1947 and major features completed in November 1950. Dam was placed in permanent operation in spring of 1951. Structures are in good condition. 18. LAKE DARLING, SOURIS RIVER, ND Location. On the Souris River in Ward, Renville, McHenry, and Bottineau Counties in northwestern North Dakota. The existing Lake Darling Dam, which is to be raised, is located about 20 miles northwest of Minot, North Dakota. The project also includes features at the communities of Sawyer and Velva and at various locations along the 358-mile U.S. portion of the Souris River. (For general location see Geological Survey Map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The Lake Darling project provides for raising Lake Darling dam by approximately 4 feet. The project also provides for other work on the Souris River such as levee improvements at Velva, Sawyer, and six subdivision areas between Burlington and Minot, floodproofing of rural residences, modification of refuge structures in the Upper Souris Refuge, and bridge relocations in the reservoir. The work is a portion of the Burlington Dam project which required post-authorization approval prior to construction. However, Congress has directed the Corps not to take further actions to construct the Burlington Dam until expressly directed to do so. Estimated Federal Cost (1982) for new work is $60,800,000. Project was authorized by 1982 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, Public Law 97-88 approved December 4, 1981. Local cooperation. Coordination has been initiated to establish a joint board representing the counties affected by the project to serve as the local sponsor. The Ward County Water Resource District has provided a letter of intent to accept responsibilities as the lead agency of a joint organization which would serve as the non-Federal sponsor for the project. The letter of intent indicated a willingness to work in good faith with the administration of the United States in the planning and funding process for the project. Items of local cooperation now being considered for the local protection portions of the Lake Darling project include providing without cost to the United States, all lands, easements and rights-of-way, including ponding areas, borrow areas and disposal sites, necessary for the construction, operation and maintenance of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation and maintenance of the project except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project without cost to the United States, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; provide, without cost to the United States, all relocations of buildings, utilities, highway bridges, roads, sewers, and any special facilities resulting in a local betterment, except as otherwise warranted for special reasons; pay a share of the construction cost of the project which is determined to be satisfactory to the President and the Congress; prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent obstructions or encroachments on channels, floodplain and floodway areas, and ponding areas which would reduce their floodcarrying capacity or hinder the operation and maintenance of the projects and/or compromise the level of protection provided by the projects; zone land currently in agricultural and/or recreational land use to continue in either of those land use categories after protection is provided by the project; at least annually, inform affected interests of the limitations of the protection afforded by the project; publicize floodplain information in the areas concerned and provide this information to zoning and other regula- 27-8 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT tory agencies for their guidance and leadership in preventing unwise future development in the floodplain and in adopting such regulations as may be necessary to insure compatibility between future development and protection levels provided by the projects; comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971, in acquiring lands, easements and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and inform affected persons of pertinent benefits, policies and procedures in connection with said Act; comply with Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) and Department of Defense Directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, in connection with the construction and subsequent maintenance and operation of the project. Certain items above apply only to local protection features of the project; however, an additional item of local cooperation which would apply to the entire project includes the regulation of drainage activities in the watershed to assure that flood frequencies and discharges are not increased or that the effectiveness of the projects is not adversely affected. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $660,376. Condition at end of fiscal year: Preconstruction planning is in progress. Construction start is scheduled for November 1984 with initiation of work on the Velva levees. 19. LAKE TRAVERSE AND BOIS DE SIOUX RIVER, SD AND MN Location. Works covered by this project lie along Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River between upper end of Lake Traverse at Browns Valley, MN, and the mouth of Bois de Sioux River at Breckenridge, MN. Lake drains through river to Red River of the North, and the two waters form a portion of bbundary between State of Minnesota and States of North and South Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 1289 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project was authorized by Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project and related facilities were operated and maintained, and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $143,241. Condition at end of fiscal year: Existing project was completed in June 1948, except for minor recreation facilities. Fee title to 1,144.13 acres and easements on 6,172.25 acres of land have been acquired. White Rock Dam and Reservation control structures are in operation, and structures and appurtenances are in good condition. Remedial work for repair of apron at White Rock Dam was completed in November 1968. Roadways across structures are open to public travel. 20. MANKATO AND NORTH MANKATO, MN Location. Along Minnesota River between miles 103.5 and 109.5 near Mankato, North Mankato, and Le Hillier, in south-central Minnesota. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.). Existing project. As modified as a result of severe 1965 flood, provides for protection of communities of Mankato, North Mankato, and Le Hillier by means of levees and floodwalls with pumping plants and interior drainage facilities. See page 1090 of Annual Report for 1967 for further details. Additional channel improvement, levees, pumping, and interior drainage features have been included in the Mankato unit of the project for protection from the high flows of Indian Creek. Expansion of Indian Creek improvements were made during detailed studies as a result of updated hydrologic data. Highway bridge relocations made necessary by the project have been authorized at Federal expense. Estimated Federal cost (1982) for new work is $95,000,000. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 437, 84th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Project was modified by 1965 Flood Control Act, and by the Water Resources Development Acts of 1974 and 1976. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work under contract. See Annual Report for 1973 for requirements. Resolutions agreeing to provide formal assurances of local cooperation, when requested, were passed by the city council of North Mankato, Mankato, and South Bend Township (Le Hillier), respectively, on November 12, 1968. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of stage 3B-2B (Mankato) was completed. Construction of Stage 3B-1 (Mankato) continued. Construction costs for improvements at Mankato were $4,358,291, at North Mankato were $194,391 and at Le Hillier were $7,367. Engineering and design by contract cost $686,583 and by hired labor cost $728,296. Supervision and administration cost $341,425. Condition at end of fiscal year: Contract work for construction of stage 1, 1-H.P., 4A and 4B (North Mankato), stage 2A (Mankato along the Blue Earth River), stage 2B (Le Hillier), stage 3A-1, 3A-2, 3B-2A and 3B-2B (Mankato) is complete. Construction of stage 3B-1 (Mankato) is underway. Detailed planning for remaining features to standard project flood design is in progress. 21. MINOT, ND Location. In Ward County in northwestern North Dakota on the Souris River, extending from Burling- 27-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 ton through Minot to the village of Logan. The river meanders through Minot, flowing generally from west to east and divides the community into two parts. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. Project provides for channel improvement within a 37.0-mile reach of the Souris River extending from Burlington to Logan. For details see Annual Report for 1973. Project was authorized in 1970 under section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965. (H. Doc. 321, 91st Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Resolutions were adopted by the Public Works Committees of the Senate on June 25, 1970 and the House on July 14, 1970. Project has been modified by the Water Resource Development Act of 1974 and 1976. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work under contract. See Annual Report for 1971 for requirements. On May 26, 1971 the Ward County Water Management Board approved the motion to provide assurances of local cooperation. The resolution was furnished by letter dated June 16, 1971 and accepted by the District Engineer on August 9, 1971. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction costs by contract for the year amounted to $13,420. Engineering and design cost $3,690. Supervision and administration costs were $7,616. Condition at end of fiscal year: The project was completed in September 1979 and was officially turned over to the local sponsor for operation and maintenance December 1981. 22. PEMBINA RIVER, ND Location. Near the Pembina-Cavalier County line in northeastern North Dakota on the Pembina River, two miles southwest of Walhalla, North Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. Plan of improvement proposed in the 1976 feasibility report provided for a multiplepurpose impoundment for flood control, water supply and recreation. The earth-filled dam would be about 1,960 feet long, and 150 feet high with a fixed crest concrete spillway and outlet channel. The impoundment would have a storage capacity of 147,000 acrefeet at design flood pool elevation. The conservation pool would have a surface area of 800 acres with public use facilities adjoining the pool for recreation and wildlife management. Estimated Federal cost (1982) for new work exclusive of Phase I study costs is $44,100,000. The Phase I study was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. (H. Doc. 116, 96th Congress, slet sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for requirements. A local assurance agreement will be required prior to the initiation of construction. A September 1975 resolution of intent to assume the allocated non-Federal water supply costs for a reservoir has been received from the North Dakota State Water Commission. The North Dakota State Park Service has agreed by letter dated August 13, 1976 to work closely with local recreation entities to develop arrangements to provide the local cooperation for recreation. Further support of the reservoir project by the State of North Dakota was provided in letters dated August 17, 1976, April 11, 1977, and July 11, 1977, and by the North Dakota State Legislature in a resolution signed by the Governor on March 17, 1981. Operations and results during fiscal year. Phase I design memorandum stage of advance engineering and design was continued under the General Investigations program. Preliminary evaluation of flood control alternatives was completed. Condition at end of fiscal year: Phase I design memorandum stage of advance engineering and design is in progress under the General Investigations program. 23. PRAIRIE DU CHIEN, WI Location. In Crawford County in southwestern Wisconsin on the left bank of the Mississippi River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. Combines total evacuation with flood proofing and land use control measures to provide the desired reduction of potential flood damages within design limits. Evacuation would be accomplished by purchase and relocation of structures in the lowest portions of the floodplain. Estimated cost (1982) to the United States for new work is $4,000,000. Project was authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1974. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1974 for requirements. A local assurance agreement in accordance with Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 was entered into with the city of Prairie du Chien on May 2, 1978 and signed by the Chief of Engineers on September 11, 1978. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Costs for property acquisition and relocation activities were $865,732. Contracts for floodproofing and site restoration cost $11,297 and $11,869, respectively. Engineering and design cost $55,398 by hired labor and $10,445 by contract, and supervision and administration cost $28,689. Contributions in lieu of cash were $-94,587. Condition at end of fiscal year: Property acquisitions and relocations are in progress. 24. RED LAKE RIVER, MN, INCLUDING CLEARWATER RIVER, MN Location. Works covered by this project lie along upper reach of Red Lake River and also along Clearwater River, a tributary of Red Lake River, between a 27-10 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT point near Plummer, MN, and a point just above the mouth of Ruffy Brook. Red Lake River, principal tributary of Red River of the North, has its source at the outlet of Lower Red Lake in northwestern portion of Minnesota and flows westerly about 196 miles to its junction with Red River of the North at East Grand Forks, MN. Clearwater River has a general westerly course from its source near Ebro, MN, about 205 miles to its junction with Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, MN. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 1281 of Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 345, 78th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structures were operated and maintained and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $41,747. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of major improvements on Red Lake River initiated in February and the Clearwater River initiated in October 1948 were completed in June 1956. Replacement of a rock and brush dam on Red Lake River at Indian boundary with a concrete structure and appurtenant work was completed in June 1959 to restore marshes in the area to better wildlife conditions. Construction of a bridge on Clearwater Road was completed by the Indian Service in July 1965. A contract for improvements on Red Lake River was completed in November 1966, and a contract for restoration of water levels in Red Lake River marshes was completed in July 1967. Increased slope protection downstream of the control structure was completed in November 1968. Operation of Red Lake Dam was assumed by the Corps on April 1, 1951. Channels are in good condition and indicate effectiveness of project as a flood control measure. 25. RED RIVER OF THE NORTH DRAINAGE BASIN, MN, SD & ND Location. Red River of the North basin, within the United States, includes northeastern corner of South Dakota and much of eastern North Dakota and northwestern Minnesota. Red River of the North, formed by confluence of Otter Tail and Bois de Sioux Rivers, flows northward through this region, forming boundary between North Dakota and Minnesota. (For general location of basin, see Geological Survey maps of Minnesota and South Dakota.) Previous project. See page 1278 of Annual Report for 1962 for navigation and flood control projects in the basin, not part of this project. Existing project. Project includes improvements for local protection in interests of flood control and major drainage accomplished by channel improvement, levees, etc., in addition to construction of a multiple purpose reservoir on Otter Tail River to control floods and, in conjunction with previously authorized Federal reservoir project at Baldhill site of Sheyenne River and at Red Lake, to increase low flows for water supply and pollution abatement. (See table 27-J for active units in comprehensive basin plan.) Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1948 and 1950. Public Works Authorization Act, 1957, authorized Chief of Engineers to acquire such lands as were beyond legal authority of city of Grand Forks to acquire. Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 provided for extension of the expiration date for the East Grand Forks project. Authorization of the Sheyenne River (Kindred Lake) project by the 1970 Flood Control Act provided for the deletion of channel improvement on the lower 48.8 miles of the Sheyenne River authorized under the Flood Control Acts of 1948 and 1950. Latest published map is in House Document 185, 81st Congress, 1st session. Local cooperation. See page 1039 of Annual Report for 1965. Following the flood of 1965, the city of East Grand Forks requested reactivation of the project and furnished a resolution adopted May 11, 1965, indicating its willingness to meet the requirements of local cooperation. Expiration date for the East Grand Forks project was extended to April 17, 1975 permitting local interests additional time to furnish assurances of local cooperation. A local assurance agreement was passed by the city on March 27, 1975 and accepted by the acting Director of Real Estate, OCE for the Secretary of the Army on April 9, 1975. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued for the East Grand Forks project at a cost of $121,593. Maintenance: Orwell Lake and Dam were operated as required and miscellaneous inspections, reports, and repairs were made at a cost of $125,354. Dam operations and maintenance contracts cost $300. Cultural resource investigation contract and a hydrology contract cost $2,981 and $16,309 respectively. Supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs were $15,094. Condition at end of fiscal year: Major construction for all active units except for East Grand Forks, MN, is complete. Preconstruction planning is underway at East Grand Forks. A total of 1,985 acres of land for Orwell Lake and Dam is owned in fee by the United States. See page 1281 of Annual Report for 1962 for periods of completion at active units of project other than Fargo. Work at Fargo, ND, started in May 1959, was completed in July 1963. (See table 27-J at end of chapter for total costs of new work to date.) Costs to date for operation and maintenance of Orwell Lake and Dam are $2,158,623. Total costs for active portion of project are $9,001,411. In addition, $350,034 was expended from contributed funds for work done for local interests. 27-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 26. RED RIVER OF THE NORTH AT OSLO, MN Location. In Marshall County in northwestern Minnesota on the Red River of the North about 20 miles north of Grand Forks, North Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for a levee encircling the village of Oslo and an agricultural tract north of the village. Wherever possible, the levee has been constructed contiguously with an existing emergency levee, and is about 10 feet high and 3.2 miles long with a top width of from 10 to 12 feet. The project also provides interior drainage facilities, including a pumping station, two ponding areas, interceptor and outfall sewers, and drainage ditches; highway and street ramps; temporary sandbag closures; and landscape measures. Total Federal costs (1982) for new work are estimated at $1,985,200. Project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction on August 2, 1972 under the authority contained in section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1973 for requirements. A local assurance agreement required by Public Law 91-611 was adopted by the village of Oslo on October 15, 1972. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $35,321. Condition at end of fiscal year: A construction contract was awarded in June 1974. Project is complete except for construction of bank stabilization measures. 27. ROCHESTER, MN Location. In Olmstead County in southeastern Minnesota on the South Fork of the Zumbro River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for channel modifications supplemented by levees at and in the vicinity of Rochester, together with appropriate flood warning and floodplain regulation measures. Principal project features include approximately 0.9 miles of concretelined channel, 7.3 miles of riprap or gabion lined channel, 1.1 miles of grass-sloped channels, 2.6 miles of levees, drop structures, bridge modifications, and interceptor sewers and ditches for interior drainage. A river corridor hiking and biking trail system, four new parks, and other environmental treatment measures are also included in the proposed plan. Estimated cost (1982) to the United States for new work is $65,200,000. Project was authorized, by the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (H. Doc. 156, 93rd Cong., slet sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1974 for requirements. By resolution approved on September 29, 1981 the city of Rochester, the local sponsor, indicated its willingness and intention to meet the requirements of local cooperation for flood control and recreation. Formal assurances will be requested after completion of the Phase II Design Memorandum. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $515,705. Condition at end of fiscal year: Phase I design memorandum stage of preconstruction planning was completed and forwarded to Congress on April 27, 1979 which was the basis for authority to proceed with the Phase II design memorandum stage of advance engineering and design. Phase II studies are in progress. 28. ROSEAU RIVER, MN Location. In Roseau County and northeastern Kittson County, in northwestern Minnesota, and in south-central Manitoba, Canada. (For general location of the works in United States see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for improvement of Roseau River for flood control consisting of 44.4 miles of channel improvement, two sections of earth levees with lengths of 1.9 and 5.9 miles, respectively, 76 side ditch inlet transitions; remedial works along 16.6 miles of channel in Canada or an acceptable alternative therefor; one new bridge; and alteration of the existing dam in Roseau Village. Remedial works will be constructed in Canada at the expense of the United States. Estimated cost (1982) to the United States for new work is $27,400,000, including $6,064,000 for cost of work in Canada to be accomplished with United States funds. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 282, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1968 for requirements. Local interests have formed a Roseau River Watershed District and have started proceedings to acquire rights-of-way. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Planning activities were continued relative to coordination of the project plan with Canadian interests. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $354,867. Condition at end of fiscal year: Planning is in progress and coordination with Canadian interests is underway. The general design memorandum was submitted in October 1971 and approved in March 1972. Design memorandum supplements which contain dimensions of environmental features added to the project were submitted in October 1975 and June 1980 and approved in November 1975 and July 1980, respectively. An EIS supplement was completed for filing with EPA. The local sponsor is in the process of acquiring the rights-of-way. 27-12 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT 29. SHEYENNE RIVER FLOOD CONTROL, ND (Formerly Kindred Lake) Location. The Sheyenne River basin is included in 16 counties in the southeastern portion of North Dakota and drains an area of 7,140 square miles into the Red River of the North near Fargo, North Dakota. The principal area of flood damages in the basin is located at the lower end within Cass County and the city of West Fargo. The authorized Kindred Lake project is in Richland County, ND, on the Sheyenne River, about 70 miles above its mouth and 5 miles above Kindred, ND. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a multiple-purpose impoundment for flood control, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife purposes to control the runoff from 3,014 square miles. The improvements would be coupled with a revised operating plan for the existing Baldhill Dam and with appropriate flood plain management measures at communities along the river. See Annual Report for 1973 for details. Project was authorized by 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 330, 91st Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) The General Reevaluation Report, completed in 1982, recommends implementation of a plan other than the authorized plan. The plan recommended in the General Reevaluation Report includes levees and diversions at West Fargo/Riverside, a flood diversion channel from Horace to West Fargo, and a five foot raise of the Baldhill Dam. The report also recommends deauthorization of the Kindred Lake project. The estimated Federal cost (1982) of the plan, based on traditional cost-sharing requirements, is $24,400,000. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1971 for requirements of the project as authorized. On January 23, 1976, the North Dakota State Water Commission passed a resolution expressing continued interest and support in evaluating flood control alternatives on the lower Sheyenne River basin. On July 7, 1982, the North Dakota State Water Commission indicated their support and willingness to sponsor a new flood damage reduction plan for the basin. Formal assurances of local cooperation will be requested after completion of the Phase II General Design Memorandum. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $142,475. Condition at end of fiscal year: Preconstruction planning is in progress. Due to local concerns, a changed set of planning criteria, and potential changed conditions, a complete reformulation and reevaluation of alternatives was undertaken during preconstruction planning. The reevaluation studies showed that another alternative plan is more favorable than the authorized project. This alternative plan consists of a raise of Baldhill Dam, levees and a flood diversion channel at West Fargo, and a flood diversion channel from Horace to West Fargo. Other actions are also identified that could be taken by non- Federal interests to enhance the degree of flood damage reduction provided by the overall plan. This new plan represents a significant change from the authorized project and should be ready for recommendation to Congress for authorization in FY 1983. 30. STATE ROAD AND EBNER COULEES, WI Location. In La Crosse County in west-central Wisconsin, on the east side of the city of La Crosse. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. The plan of improvement for State Road Coulee provides for channel deepening and enlarging downstream from Hagen Bridge to the mouth, and includes an 11,600-foot section of concrete-lined, trapezoidal-shaped channel, a 600- foot-long concrete flume, a drop structure, a stilling basin, three new street bridges, and a new railroad bridge. The city recently replaced a fourth bridge, previously included in the authorized plan. Estimated cost (1982) to the United States for new work, exclusive of the Ebner Coulee portion of the project which was deleted due to lack of economic feasibility, is $23,600,000. Project was authorized by 1968 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 360, 90th Cong., 2d sess., contains published map.) Local cooperation. See page 826 of Annual Report for 1969. The local sponsor withdrew support for the project in 1976 citing increased non-Federal costs and lack of agreement on local cost sharing between three local units of government located within the project area. The project was reclassified as inactive on April 7, 1977 but was reactivated on November 8, 1978 after the La Crosse County Board of Supervisors, the La Crosse City Council, and the Town of Shelby passed separate resolutions on September 17, 1978, July 13, 1978, and July 10, 1978, respectively, which requested continuance of the project. All three groups reaffirmed their support by letter in July 1981. On October 4, 1982 the city of LaCrosse furnished a letter in further support for the project and acknowledged that it would serve as the local sponsor. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $238,956. Condition at end of fiscal year: Preconstruction planning is in progress. Ebner Coulee will be recommended for reclassification to "inactive" due to lack of economic feasibility. 31. TWIN VALLEY LAKE, WILD RICE RIVER, MN Location. In Norman County in west-central Minnesota, northeast of the city of Moorhead, on the Wild Rice River about 2 miles east of Twin Valley, 27-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 MN. The Wild Rice River is a tributary of the Red River of the North. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The project authorization provides for reservoir development on the Wild Rice River near Twin Valley, Minnesota, for flood damage reduction, recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement. The principal features include an 84 foot high, 7,700 foot long, earthen dam, a gated concrete spillway with concrete chute and stilling basin, a 10 foot diameter gated circular conduit for low flow outlet works, and recreation development on the created 540 acre reservoir. Storage capacity would provide 7,500 acre-feet for recreation and sedimentation and 44,700 acre-feet for flood control. The proposed works include development of three recreation areas along the margin of the lake for public use. The Federal Government would acquire about 3,500 acres of land necessary for carrying out the purposes of the project. Approximately 2,200 additional acres will be acquired to offset fish and wildlife habitat losses associated with project construction. Estimated Federal cost (1982) for new work is $33,700,000. Project was authorized by 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 366, 90th Congress, 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1971 for requirements. Local interests have not been requested to furnish assurances. The Norman County Board of Commissioners, by resolutions dated November 7, 1974, September 19, 1978, and August 26, 1981, has declared its intention to provide local cooperation for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. Both the Norman County Board of Commissioners and the Wild Rice River Watershed District have indicated the capability to provide assurances of local cooperation relating to flood control improvements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $887. Condition at end of fiscal year: Preconstruction planning is in progress. Project requires further authorization for mitigation lands. 32. WILD RICE RIVER-SOUTH BRANCH AND FELTON DITCH, MN Location. In Clay and Norman Counties in westcentral Minnesota northeast of the city of Moorhead, MN. The South Branch of the Wild Rice River and Felton Ditch drain areas of 253 and 122 square miles and enter the Wild Rice River at points 29.5 and 20.5 miles, respectively, above its confluence with the Red River of the North. (For general locations, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for increasing the capacities of the South Branch and Felton Ditch channels by widening the existing channels through the floodplain. Debris removal would be accomplished in the lower reaches of both streams. In addition, short reaches of low dikes would be constructed on both banks of Felton Ditch near the upper limit of improvement. The plan also includes bridge and culvert structure alterations, new bridges, multiplate pipe arches, side ditch inlet and lateral ditch entry modifications, and a drop inlet structure. The project would provide flood protection in both watersheds for a 6-percent chance flood and outlets necessary for removal of crop-damaging surface waters from lateral and on-farm drainage systems. Estimated Federal cost (1982) for new work is $5,140,000. Project was authorized by 1968 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 98, 90th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See page 826 of Annual Report for 1969 for requirements. A local assurance agreement in accordance with Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 was executed by the Wild Rice Watershed District on October 18, 1978. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for channel modification cost $1,720,067. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $106,322. Condition at end of fiscal year: Approximately $500,000 worth of construction remains to be completed. 33. WINONA, MN Location. At Winona County in southeastern Minnesota on the right bank of the Mississippi River about 725 miles above mouth of Ohio River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 833 of Annual Report for 1968 for completed upstream improvement&s authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958 providing for a continuous flood barrier 'about 6.1 miles long with related pumping and interior drainage facilities. Federal costs amounted to $2,147,131 of which $111,500 was expended for the portion then deferred for restudy and $17,316 was contributed by local interests. Improvement authorized in 1971 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 152, 92d Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map) provides for levee and floodwall protection with necessary interior drainage works for the riverfront and the Lake Winona closure reaches, as well as a sound floodplain management program to prevent unwise development of the area bordered by U.S. Highway 61 and Burns Valley and Pleasant Valley Creeks. The plan would also provide the downstream flood barrier needed to prevent Mississippi River backup flows from entering Lake Winona and inundating the area now only partially protected by the completed segment of the project authorized by the 1958 Flood Control Act. The selected plan would also provide control of Burns Valley Creek by means of channel improvement, raising and extending the 27-14 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT existing levee system, a drop structure, an erosion control structure, alteration of two highway bridges, and a sewer line modification. Earth levees averaging 10 feet in height total approximately 3.1 miles in length. Concrete floodwalls, also averaging about 10 feet in height, total about 2,025 feet in length. Estimated Federal cost (1982) for new work is $30,500,000 and $580,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Resolutions authorizing the project were adopted by the Public Works Committees of the House on July 29, 1971, and the Senate on November 18, 1971. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. See page 833 of Annual Report for 1968 for requirements. For improvements authorized in 1971 see Annual Report for 1972 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement required under Section 221 of the 1970 Flood Control Act was executed by the city of Winona on 6 October 1978. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction contracts for Reaches A, B, C, D and E cost $3,675, $395,544, $2,518,057, $1,639,158, and $1,240,000 respectively. Pumping station contracts cost $1,096,486. Engineering and design cost $18,920 by contract and $626,075 by hired labor. Supervision and administration cost $320,958. Condition at end of fiscal year: The upstream improvement except for a portion of the project raising and extending the existing levee downstream from the Lake Winona outlet was completed in August 1967. At the request of local interests, the uncompleted portion of the project authorized in 1958 was not constructed in order that the scope of the project could be reconsidered to allow for the protection of additional lands needed by the city for industrial expansion. This work was deferred for restudy and now has been deauthorized by approval and authorization in 1971 of additional protection for Winona. Preconstruction planning for the improvement authorized in 1971 is complete. Construction on Reach A and E-1 is completed. Construction on Reaches B-1, C, D and E-2 is in progress. 34. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood control projects turned over to local interests were inspected to determine that project channels are kept clean and unobstructed, dikes and revetments are in good condition, and structures are in good repair and operable. Deficiencies, if any, were minor unless noted. (See table 27-K on inspection of completed flood control projects.) Cost for the period was $67,572. Total cost to September 30, 1982 was $566,667. General Investigations 35. SURVEYS Navigation studies continued at a cost of $124,298. Flood control studies continued at a cost of $1,543,012. Coordination studies with other agencies, review of the completed projects at Redwood River at Marshall, MN and at St. Paul, MN and Phase I preauthorization studies at Pembina River, ND and Grafton, ND were conducted at a cost of $890,213. See sections 12 and 22 in text for details of Grafton and Pembina River projects. Total cost of surveys for the period was $2,557,523. 3(. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs during the period were $60,357 for International Water Studies and $120,032 for Flood Plain Management Services. Costs were $54,014 for stream flow data obtained by Corps gaging beyond cooperative stream-gaging program, and for hydraulic laboratory work in measurement and analysis of sediment load in streams. Costs were $19,778 for inspection and inventory of dams in conjunction with the national program of inspection of non-Federal dams. Total cost for collection and study of basic data was $254,181. 37. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Costs during the period were $1,617,609 for advance engineering and design projects. For details of individual projects see sections 6, 9, 25, 27, 29, and 30 in text. 38. OTHER WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITY In the Aquatic Plant Control program (Section 302, Public Law 298, 89th Congress) a contract with the Waterways Experiment Station to evaluate mechanical plant control operations in Buffalo Lake, WI cost $27,910. 27-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 27-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30 In Text Project Funding FY79 FY80 FY81 FY82 1982 1. Minnesota River, MN 3. Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, MN 4. St. Croix River MN and WI 5. Warroad Harbor and River, MN 6. Bassett Creek, MN 7. Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, MN and SD 8. Burlington Dam Souris River, ND 9. Chaska, MN 10. Eau Galle River, WI 11. Enderlin, Maple River, ND 13. Homme Lake and Dam, ND New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maj. Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 20,000 20,000 55,000 183,442 1,447,300 1,302,119 23,400 23,391 6,482 6,482 178,000 125,680 -1,600,000 121,902 88,000 87,768 800,000 692,184 200,000 172,052 438,500 336,503 72,000 85,984 84,400 99,576 22,000 21,944 30,000 122,195 1,095,000 1,197,737 178,000 171,072 31,000 27,845 387,000 382,567 109,000 115,313 102,000 102,569 149,568 244,000 261,605 398,000 456,089 75,000 53,446 97,000 77,467 143,000 142,178 -14,200 7,649 1,146,000 1,134,443 1,000 7,938 15,000 17,249 250,000 300,621 125,000 108,599 100,500 97,295 25,000 53,971 240,000 248,430 773,800 545,148 40,000 68,804 268,000 267,360 1, 1, - $2,057,7221 - 2,057,7221 434,000 1,803,186 37,251 1,405,559 4,000 4,398,6282 4,218 4,398,6272 ,122,000 16,475,8583 073,719 16,359,4903 - 425,000 - 425,000 - 150,410 - 150,410 106,000 1,044,255 9,025 947,280 - 86,105 - 86,105 221,0004 1,001,280 48,2054 827,579 425,000 1,240,000 415,765 1,224,633 490,000 9,815,00010 365,467 9,670,83110 803,000 1,366,200 189,512 749,006 - 5,568,500 17,508 5,566,961 200,000 884,000 183,115 865,202 - 9,039,250 - 9,039,250 219,000 3,186,105 468,855 3,161,632 160,000 562,000 33,900 433,684 - 1,396,0975 - 1,396,0975 113,000 1,853,421 133,026 1,851,507 27-16 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 27-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 3Q In Text Project Funding FY79 FY80 FY81 FY82 1982 14. Lac qui Parle Lakes, MN 16. La Farge Lake and Channel Imp., WI 17. Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, ND 18. Lake Darling, Souris River, ND 19. Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River, SD and MN 20. Mankato and North Mankato, MN 21. Minot, ND 23. Prairie du Chien, WI 24. Red Lake River, MN, including Clearwater River, MN 25. Red River of the North Drainage Basin, MN, SD and ND 26. Red River of the North at Oslo, MN 27. Rochester,MN New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: (pprop. ost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost $964,873 964,873 169,000 320,000 203,000 169,754 318,827 187,895 - - 120,000 45,876 5,792 339,802 203,000 3,024,163 176,117 2,979,775 - 18,092,000 12,810 18,091,165 - 18,000 - 15,864 55,000 145,604 744 200 200 740,200 1,685,000 366,000 1,403,430 1,141,031 1,008,809 18,000 1,551 513,000 931,357 - 800,000 - 660,376 18,000 15,864 3,325,6386 3,309,1896 8,994,112 8,915,151 800,000 660,376 - 1,339,727 - 1,339,727 164,000 180,000 174,000 164,888 154,650 196,171 3,890,000 5,000,000 4,150,000 4,288,223 5,043,149 4,293,918 350,000 318,620 - 160,000 111,989 285,810 575,000 875,000 1,000,000 588,621 859,040 992,811 34,000 34,600 32,000 32,000 48,100 48,009 180,000 143,241 6,016,000 6,316,353 2,275,619 2,233,744 43,199,500 43,032,680 - 21,479,50011 24,726 21,465,18811 1,050,000 888,843 3,859,000 3,670,066 - 3,120,0797 - 3,120,0797 50,000 637,802 41,747 629,458 - 141,000 161,000 124,000 - 104,374 196,973 121,593 348,800 153,000 172,000 139,000 260,164 222,273 164,830 159,738 60,000 29,248 17,205 - 450,000 17,517 35,321 204,000 550,000 330,000 109,998 486,812 487,806 535,000 515,705 6,923,9848 6,920,9248 2,166,534 2,158,623 1,985,200 1,569,681 2,064,000 2,041,957 27-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 27-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30 In Text Project Funding FY79 FY80 FY81 FY82 1982 28. Roseau River, New Work: MN Approp. 189,000 145,000 100,000 500,000 $1,878,000 Cost 200,443 145,482 82,644 354,867 1,713,292 29. Sheyenne River, New Work: ND (formerly Approp. 638,000 387,000 250,000 178,000 2,275,000 Kindred Lake) Cost 623,552 394,317 271,488 142,475 2,239,015 30. State Road & New Work: Ebner Coulees, Approp. 25,000 150,000 254,000 195,000 905,000 WI Cost 24,929 139,641 220,423 238,956 904,949 31. Twin Valley Lake, New Work: Wild Rice River, Approp. 232,000 - - - 1,911,700 MN Cost 360,857 9,046 8,721 887 1,911,700 32. Wild Rice River, New Work: South Branch Approp. 85,000 150,000 1,815,000 1,859,000 4,309,700 and Felton Cost 84,844 149,510 1,331,793 1,826,389 3,792,235 Ditch, MN 33. Winona, MN New Work: Approp. 1,700,000 3,600,000 4,345,000 7,844,000 20,744,1319 Cost 838,617 4,405,217 4,368,053 7,858,873 20,715,6759 'Includes $117,542 for new work for previous project. Excludes $359,202 contributed funds. 2Includes $681,805 for new work for previous projects. 3Includes $100,857 for maintenance for previous projects. 4Excludes $20 for condition surveys. 5Excludes $56,220 contributed funds. 6Excludes $208,000 contributed funds. 7Excludes $30,020 contributed funds. sIncludes cost of the Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit, $11,239, which is classed as "inactive" and the units on which authorization has expired: Maple River, $1,241; Moorhead, $27,700; Sheyenne, $37,956. In addition, $203,874 special deposit funds and $146,160 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under Government contract paid for by local interests. 9Excludes $227,849 contributed funds. '�Excludes $32,335 contributed funds. "Excludes $2,052 contributed funds. 27-18 TABLE 27-B ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents MINNESOTA RIVER, MN 1. July 13, 1892 July 3, 1958 3. Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 27, 1916 June 26, 19342 4. June 18, 1878 June 3, 1896 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 5. Mar. 3, 1899 June 6, 1900 June 13, 19023 Mar. 3, 1905 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Open-channel improvement from mouth to Shakopee to obtain a channel of 4-foot depth to accommodate vessels with 3-foot draft. Dredging to provide channel of 9-foot depth from mouth to mile 14.7 RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN Reconstruct 4 of the 5 original dams and surveys to determine extent of lands overflowed by reservoirs. Reconstruct Sandy Lake Dam and construct Gull Lake Reservoir. Construct an equalizing canal between Winnibigoshish and Leech Lake Reservoirs (no work was done and this part of the project abandoned in Act of Mar. 4, 1915.) Abandonment of ditches connecting Long Lake, Round Lake, and Gull Lake. Operation and maintenance provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. ST. CROIX RIVER, MN AND WI Dredging, etc., for a 3-foot channel between mouth and Taylors Falls. Harbor and waterfront at Stillwater. A 6-foot channel to Stillwater. The 9-foot channel from mouth to Stillwater. Small-boat harbor at Hudson. WARROAD HARBOR AND RIVER, MN Dredging bar at mouth of Warroad River. Entrance channel 300 feet wide and 7 feet deep. Enlarging turning basin Annual Report 1891. p. 2209 S. Doc. 144. 84th Cong., 2d sess. 1 H. Doc. 363, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 413, 64th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Ex. Doc. 75, pt. 6, 43rd Cong., 2d Sess;4 Annual Report 1875, p. 372. H. Doc. 378, 69th Cong., 1st sess.4 H. Doc. 184, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. 4 H. Doc. 184, 81st Cong., 1st sess88. 4 Specified in Act. H. Doc. 92, 56th Cong., 2d se88. 5 H. Doc. 703, 61st Cong., 2d sess. 5 Deepening to 8 feet. 'Contains latest published map. 2Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 3Appropriation. 4See H. Doc. 462, 71st Congress, 2d sess., for latest published map. 5Latest published map is Report for 1911. opposite p. 1984 in Annual 27-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 27-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost To September 30,1982 Full Report See Annual Operation And Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Baudette Harbor, MN Completed 1961 $36,415 $46,4887 Black River, WI 1 1950 67,585 - Lake Traverse, MN and SD 3 4 1921 92 - Mississippi and Leech Rivers, MN Completed3 1929 277,615 40,251 Mississippi River between Brainerd and Grand Rapids, MN 5 1925 47,794 3,891 Pine Creek, Angle Inlet, MN Completed 1978 38,700 102,196 Red Lake and Red Lake River, MN Completed3 1923 9,070 Red River of the North, MN and ND 36 1921 293,344 76,209 Wisconsin River, WI 2 3 1888 Zippel Bay Harbor, MN Inactive5 1928 27,941 11,139 1Existing channel adequate for commerce (see table 27- G for deauthorized portion of project). 2Originally included in project 'Fox and Wisconsin Rivers, WI'. Abandonment of improvement of Wisconsin River by channel contraction works recommended in 1886 and 1887 (H. Ex. Doc. 65, 49th Cong., 2d sess.). Expenditures included under 'Fox and Wisconsin Rivers, WI'. No breakdown available. 3No commerce reported. 4Abandonment recommended in 1915 (H. Doc. 439, 64th Cong., Ist sess.) and June 24, 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.). 5Abandonment recommended June 24, 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.). 6Abandonment recommended in 1915 (H. Doc. 1666, 63d Cong., 3d sess.). 7Excludes $10,980 for project condition surveys. 27-20 TABLE 27-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost To September 30,1982 Full Report See Annual Operation And Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Dry Run, IA Completed 1966 $1,790,7598 - Elk River, MN Completed 1970 259,7002 Guttenberg, IA Completed 1974 2,361,915 - Lost River, MN Completed 1967 517,5193 - Lower Branch Rush River, ND' Completed 1974 1,000,0004 - Marshall, MN Completed 1964 1,802,866 - Minneota, MN' Completed 1963 161,545 - Mississippi River near Aitkin, MN Completed 1957 1,675,835 - Pembina River Lake, ND Inactive6 1950 50,000 Red River of the North at Pembina, ND' Completed 1979 2,000,000 - Redwood River below Marshall, MN' Completed 1960 202,400 Rushford, MN Completed 1980 3,192,333 - St. Paul and South St. Paul, MN Completed 1974 8,476,0127- Tongue River Lake, ND Inactive6 1950 23,695 Upper Iowa River, IA Completed 1964 888,445 - Velva, ND' Completed 1970 334,628 - Vermillion River, Hastings, MN' Completed 1980 999,900 - Warroad River and Bull Dog Creek, MN Inactive5 1974 182,000 - Zumbro River, MN Completed 1975 1,284,100 - 'Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. 2In addition $87,878 was expended from Public Law 99 funds in the spring of 1969 for emergency protection and incorporation into the permanent project. 3Excludes $46,034 for the Ruffy Brook unit for which authorization expired in April 1966 (see table 27-G). Excludes $246,911 contributed funds. 4Excludes $35,000 contributed funds. 5Preconstruction planning suspended. Local interests requested the project be reclassified to inactive due to a limitation of their funding capability. The project was classified inactive on April 5, 1974. 6Further work deferred pending review of project document (inactive). 7Excludes $545,637 contributed funds for new work and $38,000 expended by South St. Paul for work in lieu of required cash contribution. Excludes an additional $206,629 expended for work done at request of local interests. 8Excludes $42,766 contributed funds. 27-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 27-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Black River, WP 1950 Aug. 5, 1977 - - Black River, Lake, WI 1950 Aug. 5, 1977 - - Maple River, ND2 1981 Oct. 26, 1961 $1,241 - Moorhead, MN2 1981 Oct. 30, 1961 27,700 - Ruffy Brook, MN 1967 Apr. 1966 46,034 - Sheyenne River, ND2 1981 Dec. 31, 1970 37,956 - Warroad Harbor and River, MN3 1981 Aug. 5, 1977 - - 1Portion of project for removal of obstructions at Section 25 in text and table 27-J for costs for active units of various points outside the dredged area to clear channel to the project). full project width (see table 27-C for costs for completed 3Portion of dredging of entrance channel and turning portion of project). basin to complete project width and depth (see table 27-A for 2 Part of Red River of the North Drainage Basin (see costs for completed portion of project). 27-22 TABLE 27-H RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER (See Section 3 of Text) Outlet Watershed Area (square miles) Capacity Previous Projects Existing Projects at Minimum Above Watershed Maximum Stages St. Paul (square Original Stage Corn- Co- Total Reservoir (feet)' River (miles) miles) Lake Reservoir (acre-feet) pleted Cost pleted Cost Cost Winnibigoshish 6 Mississippi 408 1,442 117 179.4 967,930 1884 $214,000 1900 $173,470 $387,470 Leech Lake 0 Leech 410 1,163 173 250.9 743,320 1884 171,805 1902 84,380 256,185 Pokegama 6 Mississippi 344 6602 24 35.0 120,750 1884 85,000 1904 126,030 211,030 Sandy Lake 7 Sandy 267 421 8 16.6 72,500 1895 114,000 1909 117,020 231,020 Pine River 9 Pine 199 562 18 23.7 177,520 1886 97,000 1907 133,320 230,320 Gull Lake 5 Gull 168 287 20 20.5 70,820 - - 1913 86,826 86,826 Surveys and flowage rights - - - - 160,939 160,939 Recreational facilities - - - - 2,834,838 2,834,838 Total new work - - 681,805 - 3,716,823 4,398,628 Total operating and care - - 100,857 - 15,291,436 15,392,293 Permanent indefinite appropriation for operating and care ,Feb. 1, 1895 to end of fiscal year 1936 - - - - 967,197 967,197 Rehabilitation - - - - 425,000 425,000 Total 2,152,840 - $782,662 - $20,400,456 $21,183,118 'Lower operating limits by regulations approved February 4, 1936, as modified December 29, 1944. 2Exclusive of area controlled by Winnibigoshish and Leech Lake Dams. c Ct y r z z 0y dr y d REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 27-I NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107 Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization) Study identification Fiscal Year Costs Lake City Harbor, MN $34,813 Pike Island, MN 21,740 Trempealeau, WI 27,345 Warroad Harbor, MN 1,882 Zippel Bay, Lake of the Woods Co., MN 63,026 TABLE .27-J RED RIVER OF THE NORTH DRAINAGE BASIN: ACTIVE UNITS IN COMPREHENSIVE BASIN PLAN (See Section 25 of Text) Total Cost to Estimated Name of Unit September 30, 1982 Federal Cost Orwell Reservoir (Otter Tail River) Minnesota Reservoir $1,916,753 $1,916,7001 Wild Rice and Marsh Rivers Minnesota Channel improvement 405,056 405,100 Rush River North Dakota Channel improvement 287,686 287,000 Sand Hill River Minnesota Channel improvement 548,778 548,800 Mustinka River Minnesota Channel improvement 440,788 440,800 Otter Tail River Minnesota Channel improvement 174,768 174,800 Red River at Grand Forks North Dakota Levees and floodwall 948,895 948,900 Red River at East Grand Forks Minnesota Levees, floodwall, pumping plants 479,487 12,300,000 Red River at Fargo North Dakota Channel improvement, levees 1,639,924 1,639,9002 Total cost to date 6,842,1353 Total estimated cost 18,662,0004 'Includes $178,000 for lands and $25,000 for recreation cost of this unit, last revised in 1955, was estimated to be facilities. $996,000. The Flood Control Act approved December 31, 2Includes $67,900 for lands. 1970 (H. Doc. 330-91-2) provided for deletion of the 3Costs of $11,239 for the Wahpeton-Breckenridge Sheyenne River unit, and authorization of the Maple River inactive unit not included. Authorization of the Sheyenne and Moorhead units expired at the end of the 5-year period River, Moorhead, and Maple River units has expired. Cost within which local interests were required to furnish of these units also not included total $66,897. assurances of local cooperation. Authorization of these 4The Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit of the project is units, not included, expired on the dates indicated in table classed as 'inactive' and is excluded from the estimate. The 27-G. TABLE 27-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 34 of Text) Project Date Inspected Enderlin, ND ................................................... August 1982 Fargo, N D ............................................... ... ................. A ugust 1982 Grand Forks, ND ................. ........................................... August 1982 Pembina, ND ........................................ . ............. ....... August 1982 27-24 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 27-L FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Study Identification Argyle, MN, Middle River Cook, MN, Little Fork River Devils Lake, ND Enderlin, ND, Maple River English Coulee, Grand Forks, ND Farmstead Levees, Walsh County, ND McGregor, IA Red River of the North, Argusville, ND Red River of the North, Drayton, ND Red River of the North, Halstad, MN Sauk Rapids, MN, Benton County Ditch No. 3 Snake River, Alvarado, MN Snake River below Warren, MN Souris River, Velva, ND Fiscal Year Costs $22,149 25,543 54,547 33,900 3,776 7,500 45 54,880 7,500 67,370 5,055 7,500 1,109 207 Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Publi Law 526, 79th Congress). Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Clayton, IA $7,500 Irving Township, Jackson Co., WI 10,708 Mahnomen, MN, Wild Rice River 64,724 Red Lake River, Gentilly, MN 7,500 Red Lake, Crookston, MN 6,000 Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Project Fiscal Year Costs Disaster preparedness $177,367 27-25 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT* This district comprises most of the northern half of Illinois, portions of southern Wisconsin, southern and southwestern Minnesota, eastern and central Iowa, and northeastern Missouri, embraced in drainage basin of Mississippi River and its eastern and western tributaries between mile 300 (above mouth of Ohio River) and 614, and of its eastern tributaries only, between Hamburg Bay, at mile 261 and 300. This district also includes the Illinois Waterway above mile 80 with its tributaries and drainage basins, the Illinois and Mississippi Canal and drainage basin of Bureau Creek. The section of the Mississippi River between river miles 300 and 614 is included in the report on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Illinois Waterway, IL and IN .............. 28-2 2. Illinois and Mississippi Canal, IL .......... 28-3 3. Mill Creek and South Slough at Milan, IL... 28-3 4. Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN .................... 28-3 5. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...... 28-3 6. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ................ ....... 28-3 Flood Control 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. Ackerman Creek, Tazewell County, IL ...... 28-3 Bettendorf, IA ............................. 28-4 Burlington, IA ............................ 28-4 Coralville Lake, IA ........................ 28-4 Davenport, IA ........................... 28-4 East Moline, IL ............................ 28-4 Evansdale, IA ............................. 28-5 Farm Creek, IL ............................ 28-5 Fort Madison, IA ...................... 28-5 Fulton, IL .............................. 28-5 Hannibal, MO ............................ 28-5 Milan, IL .................................. 28-6 Moline, IL ................................. 28-6 Monroe County, IA, Highway Bridges ...... 28-6 Muscatine, Mad Creek, IA .................. 28-6 Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, IA......28-7 Rockford, IL ............................... 28-7 Rock River Agricultural Levees, IL ......... 28-7 Saylorville Lake, IA.........................28-7 South Fabius River, Knox County, MO ..... 28-8 Waterloo, IA .............................. 28-8 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ........................... 28-8 Flood Control (Cont'd) Page 29. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects.... 28-8 30. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .............................. 28-8 General Investigations 31. Surveys.................................... 28-9 32. Collection and Study of Basic Data ......... 28-9 33. Research and Development............... 28-9 Tables Table 28-A Cost and Financial Statement.....28-10 Table 28-B Authorizing Legislation ........... 28-12 Table 28-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...................... 28-15 Table 2SD Not applicable Table 28-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................ 28-16 Table 28-F Not applicable Table 28-G Deauthorized Projects ............ 28-18 Table 28-H Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .............. 28-18 Table 28-I Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization.....................28-20 Table 28-J Illinois Waterway: Existing and Proposed Locks and Dams ........ 28-21 Table 28-K Illinois Waterway: Lock and Dam Construction, Foundations, Cost .. 28-21 Table 28-L Illinois Waterway: Additional Features Entering into Cost ..... 28-23 Table 28-M Illinois Waterway: Existing Project ........................... 28-23 Table 28-N Illinois Waterway: Total Cost of Existing Project .................. 28-24 28-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Navigation 1. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN Location. Illinois River (entirely within State of Illinois), formed by confluence of Kankakee and Des Plaines River, flows southwesterly and enters Mississippi at Grafton, IL, about 38 miles above St. Louis. Illinois Waterway comprises Illinois River from its mouth to confluence of Kankakee and Des Plaines Rivers (273 miles); Des Plaines River to Lockport (18.1 miles) and Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal and South Branch of Chicago River to Lake Street, Chicago (34.5 miles). Also from a point 12.4 miles above Lockport, IL, waterway comprises Calumet-Sag Channel and Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers to turning basin 5, near entrance to Lake Calumet (23.8 miles); and Grand Calumet River from junction to 141st Street, deep (lake) draft navigation (9 miles) and to Clark Street, Gary, IN (4.2 miles). ,Previous Projects. For details, see page 1945 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1172 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. See table 28-K and page 1255 of Annual Report for 1963. Estimated cost of new work 1978 is $1,065,080,208 and includes $445,000 for Recreation Facilities under Code 711. Calumet-Sag Modification, Part II, placed in the inactive category in June 1973, cost of $132,000,000 (July 1972) Federal and $16,300,000 (July 1972) non-Federal; Calumet-Sag Modification, Part III, placed in the deferred-forrestudy category in March 1972, cost of $33,000,000 (July 1971) Federal and $20,700,000 (July 1971) non- Federal; widen Pekin Bend, a portion of work authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1935, placed in the inactive category, cost of $1,360,700 (July 1972) Federal; and, widen Marseilles Canal to 300 feet, a portion of work authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1935, placed in the deferred category, cost of $1,859,300 (July 1972) Federal, are all excluded from present cost estimate. (See also tables 28-J through 28-N on authorizing legislation; existing and proposed locks and dams; lock and dam construction, foundations, cost and additional features entering into cost of project.) Local cooperation. Complied with for completed modifications and Part I of Calumet-Sag Modification. Required cooperation under October 23, 1962 Act (Duplicate Locks) is that prior to construction local interests agree to assume title to and maintain and operate new bridge across lower approach to Brandon Road lock when bridge is placed in service. Initial assurances for the October 23, 1962 Act were received from the State of Illinois 19 December 1969. Formal assurances based on the project as reformulated in the GDM - Phase I studies were requested from the State of Illinois 7 March 1975. Reaffirmation of assurances has not been received from the State. For details see Pages 1412 to 1414, Annual Report of 1962. All pools above Alton Pool: Maintenance: Strike removal and snagging was accomplished at a cost of $147,300, and pre- and post-dredge disposal requirements cost $15,200. Study begun in FY 1981 by Argonne National Laboratory covering potential use of abandoned strip mines for dredged material and for sediment analysis in connection with dredged material disposal was completed at a cost of $12,000. Contract and S & I expenditures at the Lucas-Berg Disposal Area, a containment area for contaminated dredged material from the Calumet-Sag channel, were $2,480,700. This contract was awarded by and is being administered by the Chicago District and funded by Rock Island District. Structural repairs to dams, including the wicket dams at Peoria and La Grange, were performed at a cost of $514,100. Lock structural maintenance and repairs, including contract costs for lower guidewall repairs at Marseilles Lock and Dam and contract costs for installation of bubbler systems at Peoria and La Grange Locks were performed at a cost of $752,500. Repairs to lock structure damaged by a towboat at Peoria Lock were performed at a cost of $413,300, and repairs to other lock structures damaged by towboats were performed at a cost of $48,000. Contract cost for resurfacing of access road to Marseilles Lock and Dam was $181,000, and contractors earned $126,000 for erection of new maintenance and shop buildings at O'Brien and Starved Rock Locks. Contractors also earned $687,000 for cable and switchboard replacements at Peoria and La Grange Locks. Permanent operating equipment costs were $83,900, and water control data equipment was purchased at a cost of $62,200. Engineering and design work totaled $414,200. Supervision and administration and district overhead for the maintenance features totaled $442,500. Included in maintenance costs shown is the amount of $117,200 which was expended against separate appropriation 96x5125, Maintenance and Operation of Dams funds: Net credits to the project for miscellaneous receipts amounted to $74,100. Operation and care of locks and dams. Operation of the locks and dams and routine maintenance and minor repairs thereto were made at a cost of $4,005,100. The former Joliet Project Office was closed in early April 1982, and operation of all locks including the two locks under the former Peoria Project Office then came under the supervision of the Chief, Project Operations Branch. A new Illinois Waterway Project Office was at the same time established and consolidated at the site of the old Peoria Project Office, with some loss of personnel as a result of the consolidation and became responsible for all maintenance activities on the Illinois Waterway. Service facilities for the Joliet Structure Maintenance Unit under the supervision of the new Illinois Waterway Project Office were continued at the site of the former Joliet Project Office, and service facilities at both Peoria and Joliet were operated at a cost of $719,800. Real estate management services were provided at a cost of $79,600; Visitors' Center at Starved Rock Lock and Dam was operated at a cost of $108,700; surveys, studies, and structural inspections were performed at a cost of $112,400; channel inspection and hydrographic surveys were performed at a cost of $139,800; and 28-2 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT water control management costs were $392,500. Supervision and administration and district overhead for the operations features totaled $823,200. Total operation and maintenance costs were $12,686,905 for all pools above Alton Pool. Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation work at Dresden Island and Starved Rock Locks and Dams was in progress. Costs at Dresden Island Lock and Dam were $2,603,773 and at Starved Rock Lock and Dam were $2,490,472, a total of $5,094,245. Alton Pool Operation: Costs by hired labor for condition and operation studies were $145,575; water control management $100,524; water resources management $2,544; and supervision and administration $12,442. Alton Pool Maintenance: Costs for the year were $127,638 for dredging; $2,899 for engineering; and $4,452 for supervision and administration. Total cost for work in Alton Pool was $396,074. 2. ILLINOIS AND MISSISSIPPI CANAL, IL Location. This canal extends for 75 miles from the Illinois River near LaSalle, IL, to the Mississippi River at Rock Island, IL. A feeder canal, 29 miles in length, extends from the summit level of the canal to the Rock River at Rock Falls, IL. Existing project. See pages 1306-1308 of Annual Report for 1962 for details regarding project. The canal was constructed in the period 1892-1918. The canal has not been operated for navigation since June 1951 in accordance with Corps policy to discontinue operation of waterways affording little or no benefit to navigation. The River and Harbor Act of 1958 authorized the appropriation of $2,000,000 for the purpose of placing the canal in proper condition for public recreational use and to convey and transfer the canal to the State of Illinois as part of the State park system. The repair and modifipation program was initiated in 1961, and a number of canal features have been repaired or modified. In connection with this program, fee title to 1,062 acres and recreational flowage easements over 309 acres of land in Rock River at Rock Falls, formerly under navigation flowage easement, have been acquired. The State of Illinois accepted title to the canal as of August 1, 1970. The River and Harbor Act of 1970 authorized the additional appropriation of $6,528,000 to be expended for the repair, modification, and maintenance of bridges, title transfer, modification or rehabilitation of hydraulic structures, fencing, clearing auxiliary ditches, and for the repair and modification of other canal property appurtenances. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A judgment of the Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit, directed that a fund of $2,812,658 plus interest at 12 percent per annum computed from Feb. 23, 1979, be established by the United States in the District Court from which payments are to be made to plaintiffs for required repairs to Illinois and Mississippi Canal bridges. Actual payment for the judgment award was $3,722,572, which included interest at 12 percent through Nov. 4, 1981. Engineering and design work in connection with this matter cost $2,343. Total costs were $3,724,915. 3. MILL CREEK AND SOUTH SLOUGH AT MILAN, IL Location. Mill Creek and South Slough are small streams, tributary to the Rock River, at Milan, Rock Island County, IL. Existing project. The existing project provided for flood protection at the village of Milan necessitated by the construction of the Illinois and Mississippi Canal. The project consisted of diversion of Mill Creek into South Slough, flood gates in the walls of the Illinois and Mississippi Canal to carry Mill Creek flood waters across the canal right-of-way into Rock River, levees, and other works for flood protection. The project was constructed in 1931-1932. In 1962-1963, $73,366 was expended from Illinois and Mississippi Canal maintenance funds for restoration of the Mill Creek outlet into Rock River. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Minor channel maintenance was performed at a cost of $1,350. 4. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN For report on this improvement see chapter on "Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN. 5. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 28-C. 6. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (Preauthorization). Preauthorization study cost for fiscal year was $36,610 for small-boat harbor in Muscooten Bay, Illinois River, near Beardstown, IL. Flood Control 7. ACKERMAN CREEK, TAZEWELL COUNTY, IL Location. Ackerman Creek is a small stream tributary to Farm Creek, which, in turn, is tributary to the Illinois River, near East Peoria in Tazewell County, IL. Existing project. High flows on Ackerman Creek have eroded the creek's left bank and washed out a 28-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 reach of township road. The existing project consists of placing fill and riprap protection along a 1,600-foot reach of the creek bank. Construction has not been started. See Table 28-B for project authorization. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. In addition, Fondulac Township, the local sponsor, must comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970; must contribute any funds required in excess of the $250,000 Federal cost limitation; and grant the Federal Government the right to enter upon the project lands. The requirements of local cooperation have been complied with by the township. Operations during fiscal year. Planning and engineering for the project were completed at a cost of $10,867. ,8. BETTENDORF, IA Location. The city of Bettendorf is located on the right bank of the Mississippi River, 485.7 miles above the mouth of the Ohio River, in Scott County, IA. Existing project. Local flood protection from the Mississippi River to be provided by construction of 3 miles of earth levee, railroad raises, closure structures, and street raises and ramps. Construction was started in July 1982. Estimated project cost is $15,510,000, including $1,510,000 non-Federal cost for lands and relocations. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction initiated, the principal work item being the relocation of railroad bridges. Costs were $539,682. 9. BURLINGTON, IA Location. The project site is an industrial area at the confluence of Flint Creek with the Mississippi River at the city of Burlington, Des Moines County, IA, 405 miles above the mouth of the Ohio River. Existing project. Local protection from floods on the Mississippi River and Flint Creek to be provided the industrial area by construction of earth levees, a concrete floodwall, interior drainage facilities, and two railroad closure structures. Construction was started in July 1982. The estimated project cost is $2,687,000, including $477,000 non-Federal cost for lands and relocations. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction initiated, the principal work item being clearing of the construction site, preparatory to placing levee fill. Costs were $978,757. 10. CORALVILLE LAKE, IA Location. Coralville Lake is formed by the Coralville Dam on the Iowa River, several miles upstream from Iowa City, Johnson County, IA, about 83 miles above the confluence of the Iowa River with the Mississippi River. Existing project. See page 28-4, Annual Report for 1981, for project details. Construction began in July 1949 and project has been in operation since February 1958. About 24,112 acres of land were acquired in fee, and flowage easements obtained for 9,588 acres. The project was modified to provide for construction of a highway bridge crossing the lake at the Mehaffey site, which was begun in June 1964 and completed in October 1966. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None required, except in connection with the Mehaffey Bridge, which has been fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Additional land acquisition to provide for the present plan of reservoir operation and damage payments to Johnson County, IA, for past and future damages to certain flowage easement roads in the upper limits of the reservoir and construction of additional recreation facilities were performed at a cost of $2,056,279. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities continued at a cost of $1,579,421. Expenditures from return of recreation use fees: $39,560. 11. DAVENPORT, IA Location. The city of Davenport is located on the right bank of the Mississippi River, 482.4 miles above the mouth of the Ohio River, in Scott County, IA. Existing project. Local protection to the city from floods on the Mississippi River to be provided by construction of levees, floodwall, interior drainage facilities and pump plants, closure structures, and recreational facilities. The project also provides for the enhancement and preservation of Nahant Marsh at the downstream edge of the city as a wetland area with important contribution to environmental quality. Estimated project cost is $37,500,000, including $14,400,000 non-Federal cost for land and relocations. Construction has not been started. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests also to bear the cost of relocations, bear not less than one-half of the separable first cost for recreational development, obtain legal control to prevent encroachment on project features, and provide pressurized sewers at three locations. Negotiations are under way with the city of Davenport. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning and engineering were completed at a cost of $89,162. 12. EAST MOLINE, IL Location. East Moline is located on the left bank of the Mississippi River, 489.3 miles above the mouth of the Ohio River, in Rock Island County, IL. Existing project. Local protection from Mississippi River and Rock River floods to be provided by construction of 4.8 miles of levee, 960 linear feet of floodwall, a closure structure, a pumping station, two 28-4 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT railroad raises, and three street raises. Construction was initiated in July 1979. The estimated project cost is $11,170,000, including $1,490,000 non-Federal cost for lands, relocations, and alterations of buildings and utilities. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction was continued with the placing of levee fill, railroad track raises, and the pumping station at a cost of $3,283,610. The project is about 70 percent completed. 13. EVANSDALE, IA Location. Evansdale is located on the left bank of the Cedar River, about 194 miles above the confluence of that stream with the Iowa River, in Black Hawk County, IA. Existing project. Local protection from the Cedar River and Elk Run Creek to be provided the city of Evansdale and the adjoining community of Elk Run Heights by the construction of a 3.2-mile long system of levees with appurtenant closures, ramps, and interior drainage -facilities. About 1.1 miles of the embankment for the I-380 Highway through Evansdale will also serve as part of the levee system. Construction was initiated in January 1981. The estimated project cost is $5,140,000, including $1,070,000 non- Federal cost for lands and relocations. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction continued, with placement of remaining levee fill, grading and shaping the levee, and clean-up work, at a cost of $1,189,781. Only minor work remains to complete the project. 14. FARM CREEK, IL Location. Farm Creek watershed in Tazewell County, IL, is 60 square miles in extent. Stream empties into Illinois Waterway at Mile 162 above mouth. Existing project. Two compacted-earth flooddetention dams, Fondulac Dam on Fondulac Creek, Tazewell County, IL, about 1.5 miles easterly of East' Peoria, IL, and Farmdale Dam on Farm Creek, Tazewell County, IL, about 2.5 miles easterly of East Peoria, IL, and improvements to Farm Creek, Cole Creek, and Kerfoot Creek channels in East Peoria, IL. Fondulac Dam has a maximum height of 67 feet above riverbed and a reservoir capacity of 3,780 acre-feet. Farmdale Dam has a maximum height of 80 feet above riverbed and a reservoir capacity of 15,500 acrefeet. Linear feet of channel improvements are: Farm Creek, 12,000 feet; Cole Creek, 1,875 feet; Kerfoot Creek, 900 feet. Project provides complete protection to residential, business, and highly developed industrial areas in East Peoria against design flows in Farm, Cole, Kerfoot, and Dempsey Creeks of expected frequency once in about 100 years. The project is completed. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities were continued at a cost of $98,839. 15. FORT MADISON, IA Location. The city of Fort Madison, IA, is located on the left bank of the Mississippi River at river mile 383 above the mouth of the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of removing accumulated silt in Fork Creek, French Creek, and Dry Creek, three small tributaries of the Mississippi River, which flow through the city of Fort Madison and have caused extensive flood damage from creek overflow, storm-water ponding, and sewer backup. Construction was initiated in December 1981 and completed in June 1982. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. In addition, the city of Fort Madison must comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970; contribute any funds required in excess of the $250,000 Federal cost limitation; and grant the Federal Government the right to enter upon the project lands. The requirements of local cooperation have been complied with. Operations during fiscal year. The project was completed at a cost of $143,951. 16. FULTON, IL Location. The city of Fulton is located on the left bank of the Mississippi River, 520.1 miles above the mouth of the Ohio River, in Whiteside County, IL. Existing project. Local protection from Mississippi River floods to be provided by construction of 12 miles of earth levee, railroad raises, road ramps, closure structures, gravity drainage outlets, ponding areas, storm sewer interceptors, and pumping plants. The improvements will also protect an adjacent rural area in the Cat Tail Drainage District, thereby providing access for the city to high ground. Construction was initiated in January 1978. The estimated project cost is $20,550,000, including $2,150,000 non-Federal cost for lands and relocations. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction continued at a cost of $3,759,499. Work remaining consists principally of the completion of the main Mississippi River levees and the construction of the two pumping plants. The project is about 80 percent completed. 17. HANNIBAL, MO Location. The project area is on the right bank of the Mississippi River at the city of Hannibal, MO, 309 miles above the mouth of.the Ohio River. Existing project. The authorized project provides for flood protection to the business and industrial area 28-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 of the city of Hannibal by the construction of a system of levees and floodwalls. The plan also included a pumping plant, closure structures for railroads and streets, alteration of the existing sewage sytem, and a tainter gate closure at the mouth of Bear Creek. Advance planning on the project was begun in 1962; however, in 1965 further work was discontinued because of lack of local support, Local interest revived in 1979, and the project was reclassified from "Inactive" to the "Active" category. A study has been undertaken to reformulate the project to meet existing needs of the project area and to reflect current Federal and State criteria for water resources projects. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests would also be required to modify or relocate buildings, utilities, and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project. No action toward the fulfillment of local cooperation requirements has been taken. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Detailed studies for reformulation of the project and evaluation of alternatives were continued at a cost of $41,217. 18. MILAN, IL Location. The village of Milan is located on the south bank of the Rock River several miles upstream from the confluence of that stream with the Mississippi River at mile 479.1 above the mouth of the Ohio River, in Rock Island County, IL. Existing project. Local protection against direct flooding from Rock River and Mill Creek and against backwater flooding from the Mississippi River to be provided the community by construction of levees, flood walls, closure structure, bridges, pumping stations, drainage facilities, and street ramps. Construction was initiated in March 1981. The estimated project cost is $17,560,000, including $3,360,000 non- Federal cost for land and relocations. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction of the project continued at a cost of $1,527,638. The principal work items were levee construction and utilities relocations. The project is about 23 percent completed. 19. MOLINE, IL Location. The city of Moline is located on the left bank of the Mississippi River, 485.7 miles above the mouth of the Ohio River, in Rock Island County, IL. Existing project. Local protection at Moline from Mississippi River floods to be provided by construction of 4 miles of earth levee and flood wall, closure structures, aesthetic and recreational development, and interior drainage facilities consisting of gravity outlets, storm sewer interceptors, and pumping plants. Construction has not yet been initiated. The estimated project cost is $23,320,000, including $820,000 for land and relocations. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 193,6, applies. Local interests will also provide relocations, bear not less than one-half of the separable first cost for recreational development, and prevent encroachment on ponding areas. Local interests will be requested to furnish assurances after a firm project plan is established. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning continued at a cost of $209. 20. MONROE COUNTY, IA, HIGHWAY BRIDGES Location. The sites of this project are seven highway bridges on North Cedar Creek, Cedar Creek, Whites Creek, English Creek, and Morman Branch Creek, all small streams in Monroe County, IA. Existing project. The existing project consists of restoring streambanks to their original configurations at bridge locations where floodwaters have eroded the banks, precluding use of the bridges. Construction was initiated in February 1982 and completed in March 1982. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. In addition, Monroe County, the local sponsor, must comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970; must contribute any funds required in excess of the $250,000 Federal cost limitation; and grant the Federal Government the right to enter upon the project lands. The requirements of local cooperation have been complied with. Operations during fiscal year. The project was completed at a cost of $49,100. 21. MUSCATINE, MAD CREEK, IA Location. The project area is located on the right bank of Mad Creek, a short distance upstream from the confluence of that stream with the Mississippi River at mile 455.8 above the mouth of the Ohio River, in the city of Muscatine, Muscatine County, IA. Existing project. The project provides local protection to a 75-acre industrial area at Muscatine from coincidental floods on Mad Creek and the Mississippi River. The site is upstream from a previous Federal flood control project on Mad Creek, but some modification of that project is required. The current project consists mainly of earth levees and concrete flood walls. Stage I of the project, which consisted of 1,010 feet of earth levee, 240 feet of concrete floodwall, a ponding area, a street closure, gatewells, a bridge raise, and railroad track modifications, was initiated in November 1977 and completed in February 1979. Stage II, which consists of raising 2,000 feet of existing railroad embankment, was initiated in October 1981 and is presently in progress. The estimated project cost is $1,146,600, including $50,000 non-Federal 28-6 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT cost for land and relocations. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction of Stage II of the project was continued at a cost of $478,125. The principal work item was the placement of fill for raising the railroad embankment. The project is substantially completed. 22. RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA Location. The site of this project is on the Des Moines River, chiefly in Marion County, but extending into Jasper, Warren, and Polk Counties. The dam is 142.9 miles above the mouth of the Des Moines River, which empties into the Mississippi River at mile 361.4 above the mouth of the Ohio River. The city of Des Moines lies northwesterly from the site, about 60 miles upstream. Existing project. See page 28-6, Annual Report for 1981 for description of the project. Construction began in May 1960, and the dam was placed in beneficial use for storage of flood water in January 1969. Land acquired for the project consisted of 47,610 acres in fee and 28,214 acres in flowage easement. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction of recreational facilities and incidental work was performed at a cost of $1,397,449. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities were continued at a cost of $1,966,265. Expenditures from the return of recreation use fees were $56,550. 23. ROCKFORD, IL Location. The city of Rockford is located along both banks of the Rock River, in Winnebago County, IL. Kent Creek is a small stream, tributary to the Rock River, which flows through the right-bank portion of the city. Existing project. The project provides flood protection for the right-bank portion of the city from floods on Kent Creek. It consists of a rolled earth dam with outlet works and spillway on North Branch Kent Creek in Page Park; 12,000 feet of channel cleanout and straightening on North Branch Kent Creek; raise of Levings Lake Dam on South Branch Kent Creek and construction of spillway and diversion channel; 10,800 feet of channel cleanout and straightening on South Branch Kent Creek; and relocations. Construction was initiated in October 1978. The estimated project cost is $15,810,000, including $6,630,000 for land and relocations. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction of the project was continued at a cost of $117,433. The principal work items were channel cleanout and straightening on North Branch Kent Creek and construction of the diversion channel on South Branch Kent Creek. The project is about 56 percent completed. 24. ROCK RIVER AGRICULTURAL LEVEES, IL Location. The project area lies along both banks of the Rock River in Rock Island, Henry, and Whiteside Counties, IL. Existing project. The project provides for construction of levees and appurtenant works with incidental channel improvements for flood control in five areas along the lower Rock River, mainly agricultural in character, as follows: Area 1, Carbon Cliff to Canoe Creek, right bank, 15.8 miles Area 2, Canoe Creek to Rock Creek, right bank, 16.2 miles Area 3, Rock Creek to Lyndon, right bank, 15 miles Area 4, Near Spring Hill to Prophetstown, left bank, 10.2 miles Area 5, Penny Slough Levee and Drainage District, left bank, 9.1 miles Estimated project cost is $41,270,000, including $8,170,000 non-Federal cost for land and relocations. No construction has been performed. The project was authorized in 1958, but remained unfunded until FY 1979 when local interest in the project developed. A study has been undertaken to reformulate the project to meet existing needs of the project area and to reflect current Federal and State criteria for water resources projects. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests would also bear the cost of relocations, except railroad bridges, and contribute in cash. No action toward fulfilling the requirements of local cooperation has been taken at this time. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Detailed studies for reformulation of the project and evaluation of alternatives were continued at a cost of $167,998. 25. SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA Location. The project site is chiefly in Polk County, IA, but portions extend into Dallas and Boone Counties. The dam is about 213.7 miles above the mouth of the Des Moines River and about 5 miles upstream from the city of Des Moines, IA. Existing project. The dam is an earth embankment 6,750 feet long at crest with a height of 120 feet. Outlet works are a single circular concrete conduit, 22 feet in diameter, located at the toe of the west bluff. Control structure is at upstream end of conduit and houses three gates. A stilling basin is provided to dissipate energy of discharge from outlet conduit. Spillway is in west bluff, weir 430 feet long. Water flowing over the spillway weir discharges into a paved chute and thence into an excavated earth channel to the Des Moines River. Top of spillway is about 31 feet below top of earth embankment section, and flow over weir is uncontrolled whc n: r in reservoir reaches its crest. 28-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Watershed area above dam site is 5,823 square miles. With pool at spillway crest elevation, lake area is 16,700 acres and contains about 676,000 acre-feet of water at that height (602,000 for flood control and 74,000 for a conservation pool to maintain minimum flows at downstream points). Lake supplements capacity of downstream Lake Red Rock at river mile 142.9. The two lakes provide a high degree of flood protection to the lower Des Moines River Valley. Reaches along the Mississippi River downstream from the mouth of the Des Moines River are also benefited. A project modification plan to minimize the adverse environmental effects at Ledges State Park, located upstream from the dam, was authorized in 1976. The project modification includes relocation of affected park facilities, acquisition of additional park land, and the development of a floodway corridor, with recreational facilities, from the dam downstream to Sixth Avenue in Des Moines. Construction began in June 1965, and the dam was placed in operation for the storage of flood water in April 1977. Remedial work in Big Creek Valley, consisting of a diversion dam and channel and a barrier dam, for the protection of the town of Polk City was completed in December 1974. The land acquisition program involved 25,852 acres acquired in fee, flowage easements for 1,445 acres, and roadway easements for 40 acres. The estimated project cost is $106,500,000, including $2,500,000 non-Federal cost as a cash contribution from the State of Iowa toward recreational development. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The principal work item was the construction of recreational facilities. Work was also continued on the archeological program and on engineering and design work for the downstream floodway corridor. New work costs were $2,305,398. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities were continued at a cost of $1,632,312. Expenditures from return of recreation use fees were $55,200. The project is about 92 percent completed. 26. SOUTH FABIUS RIVER, KNOX COUNTY, MO Location. The project site is at the Pleasant Valley highway bridge on the South Fabius River, in Knox County, MO. Existing project. The existing project consists of repairs to a bridge wingwall and a part of the bridge approach which had been damaged by floods on the South Fabius River. Construction of the project was accomplished in January 1982. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. In addition, the county must comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970; must contribute any funds required in excess of the $250,000 Federal cost limitation; and grant the Federal Government the right to enter upon the project lands. The requirements of local cooperation have been complied with by the county. Operations during fiscal year. The project was constructed at a cost of $29,300. 27. WATERLOO, IA Location. The city of Waterloo is located along both banks of the Cedar River in Black Hawk County, IA. Existing project. The project provides local protection to the city of Waterloo from floods on the Cedar River, Black Hawk Creek, Virden Creek, and Blowers Creek. It consists of 15.4 miles of earth levee, 2 miles of flood wall, 11,330 feet of channel improvement, an impounding dam on Virden Creek, and interior drainage facilities including 8 pumping plants. Extensive urban renewal, undertaken by the city, has been coordinated with the flood control project. Construction was initiated in August 1972. The estimated project cost is $66,800,000, including $14,700,000 non-Federal cost for land and relocations. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction of the project was continued at a cost of $4,664,103. The principal work items were continuation of construction of levees and flood walls along the Cedar River. The project is about 95 percent completed. 28. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Federal flood-control regulations (part 208 of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations) provide that the structures and facilities constructed by the .United States for local flood protection shall be continuously maintained in such a manner and operated at such times and for such periods as may be necessary to obtain the maximum benefits. Costs during the period for inspections of projects turned over to local interests to ascertain compliance with Federal requirements were $90,638. (See Table 28-H for list of completed flood control projects inspected.) 29. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 28-E. 30. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities, Section 205, Public Law 84-685. See Table 28-I. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control, Section 208, Public Law 83-780. See Table 28-I. Emergency Flood Control Activities, Public Law 99, 84th Congress. See Table 28-I. ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT Steambank Erosion Control Evaluation and' Demonstration Act of 1974. A bank erosion problem on the Iowa River at Wapello, IA, was selected by the Chief of Engineers as a demonstration site under the above-cited act. The project consists of a combination of permeable timber jetties, erosion control mat, and steel jacks. Construction was accomplished in 1978, to be monitored for five years to evaluate its success. Flowing ice damaged the project in the winter of 1978-1979, and repairs were made in 1979-1980. On February 23, 1982, the project, except for the steel jacks, was transferred to the city of Wapello for operation and maintenance. At the request of the city, the steel jacks were later removed at Federa expense. Costs during the fiscal year were $12,330. General Investigations 31. SURVEYS Closing costs for the navigation study on Mississippi River Year-Round Navigation were $1,017. Flood control studies in progress included the Fox River and Tributaries, WI; the Iowa-Cedar Rivers, IA and MN; the Mississippi River, Coon Rapids to Ohio River, the Quad Cities Urban Study, IA and IL; the Rock River at Rockford and Vicinity, IL. Total cost of flood control studies was $1,063,391. Review of completed projects cost $241,795. Coordination studies with other agencies on soil conservation, water quality management, planning assistance to States, and technical assistance on shore and streambank erosion cost $62,318. Total cost of surveys was $1,368,541. 32. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Inspection of dams cost $4,017. Flood plain management services cost $187,490. Hydrologic studies, including general studies, sedimentation studies, steamflow studies, and rainfall studies cost $10,479. Total cost for collection and study of basic data was $201,986. 33. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Cost was $4 for expanded flood plain information study on Crow Creek, Scott County, IA. 28-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 28-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 1. Illinois Waterwa IL and IN ay, 2. Illinois and Mississippi Canal, IL 3. Mill Creek and South Slough at Milan, IL 7. Ackerman Creek, Tazewell County, IL 8. Bettendorf, IA 9. Burlington, IA Con' 10. Coralville Lake, IA 11. Davenport, IA 12. East Moline, IL Con 13. Evansdale, IA 14. Farm Creek, IL Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost tributed Funds Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost tributed Funds Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Total Cost to FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sepltember 1982 48 13,703,081 13,249,455 2,710,000 -1,332 14,766,600 12,056,579 745,000 990,201 -505 25,000 24,333 25,000 20,722 95,000 73,846 640,000 359,850 1,066,200 989,151 70,000 79,548 460,000 494,159 200,000 29,713 170,000 170,597 230,000 421,886 20,700 20,658 150,000 141,276 40,000 60,832 711,000 957,812 1,856,000 1,517,151 100,000 102,075 1,055,000 1,043,728 150,000 298,377 101,088 88,515 180,000 120,335 11,585,500 10,867,623 5,490,000 4,356,755 9,994,000 12,686,905 9,520,000 5,094,245 - 3,722,572 - 3,724,915 9,000 9,101 280,000 267,248 15,000 18,591 277,000 193,756 1,307,000 1,172,257 1,397,000 1,791,140 200,000 126,707 1,870,000 1,882,196 21,909 2,682,000 2,590,925 58,600 81,991 2,900 3,509 97,500 10,867 620,000 539,682 1,456,600 978,757 7,950 50,150 2,183,000 2,056,279 1,653,000 1,579,421 89,162 4,030,000 3,283,610 1,496,000 1,189,781 66,000 98,838 28-10 126,707,7511 126,706,4131 177,204,8122 175,650,2092 27,679,625 22,007,296 7,605,1433 7,605,1433 16,796,8104 16,794,2134 63,7195 63,7195 348,553 349,295 97,500 10,867 1,326,980 1,220,908 1,716,100 1,237,685 284,950 243,906 22,475,7886 22,127,5016 13,851,005 13,723,321 1,489,717 1,489,418 8,450,300 7,700,600 328,090 328,0909 4,409,088 4,098,854 9,859,0207 9,859,0207 2,304,421 2,299,883 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 28-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Fort Madison, I,A 16. Fulton, IL 17. Hannibal, MO 18. Milan, IL 19. Moline, IL 20. Monroe County, IA Highway Bridges 21. Muscatine, Mad Creek, IA 22. Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, IA 23. Rockford, IL Con 24. Rock River Agricultural Levees, IL 25. Saylorville Lake, IA 26. South Fabius River, Knox County, MO 27. Waterloo, IA Con 15. i Funding FY 79 New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost tributed Funds Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost tributed Funds Approp. Cost FY 81 FY 82 September 1982 2,000 1,348 2,350,000 3,080,160 135,000 119,861 200,000 207,714 15,000 39,443 1,000,000 652,715 1,522,700 1,774,056 1,200,000 2,018,083 60,000 59,879 2,825,000 3,768,856 1,155,600 1,259,863 5,670,000 6,538,275 FY 80 11,759 7,906 1,890,000 2,061,901 270,000 241,435 237,000 203,299 19,000 24,112 700,000 942,713 1,480,000 1,435,729 1,750,00.0 1,738,763 150,000 147,852 1,490,000 1,415,079 1,454,000 1,362,790 4,035,000 4,016,039 1. Includes $2,569,102 for previous projects. 2. Includes $1,028,468 for previous projects. 3. Includes $25,000 Emergency Relief Funds. 4. Includes $4,143,282 for Operating and Care under the "Permanent Indefinite Appropriation." 5. Includes $85 for previous project. 6. Includes cost of Mehaffey Bridge, $1,365,074 (excluding $100,000 contributed funds). 7. Excludes $161,813 contributed funds. 8. Excludes $950,000 non-Federal cost. 9. Refunded $21,909 to City of East Moline. 28-11 12,000 17,349 2,803,000 3,091,254 935,000 805,074 34,180 25,000 28,916 843,000 761,068 2,145,400 1,750,624 246,000 202,876 245,000 245,669 2,896,000 3,250,480 2,547,000 2,619,103 4,530,000 4,693,230 165,000 143,951 6,070,000 3,759,499 50,000 41,217 1,500,000 1,527,638 209 49,100 49,100 500,000 478,125 1,750,000 1,397,449 1,633,000 1,966,265 1,400,000 117,433 229,032 85,125 175,000 167,998 2,499,000 2,305,398 1,788,000 1,632,312 29,300 29,300 5,060,000 4,664,103 -- 200,759 179,174 16,675,200 14,318,831 160,933 152,150 3,038,400 2,936,112 1,069,000 1,067,514 49,100 49,100 1,146,600 1,124,666 95,252,484 94,713,429 13,509,693 13,308,966 6,428,736 5,086,550 229,032 85,125 630,000 623,398 96,422,200 96,205,9198 9,521,701 9,283,294 29,300 29,300 44,947,100 44,547,408 83,300 83,300 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 28-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 June 26, 19341 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 June 14, 1937 June 20, 1938 Oct. 23, 1943 Mar. 2 1945 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 69th Cong., 1st sess., and S. Doc. 130, 69th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 126, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN Channel 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide from mouth of Illinois River to Utica, 231 miles, modification of 2 U.S. locks and dams, removal of 2 State dams. (Act authorized appropriation of not to exceed $3,500,000 for carrying on work.) Channel 9 feet deep from Utica, IL to heads of present Federal projects on Chicago and Calumet Rivers, 94.6 miles to Lake Street, and 96.3 miles to turning basin 5, respectively, to be secured by means of completed dams, locks, lateral canals, and dredging begun by State of Illinois in general accordance with present plans of state for that work. Act adopting project authorized appropriation of not to exceed $7,500,000 for carrying on work. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriation for rivers and harbors. Construct modern locks and dams at LaGrange and Peoria and a channel 9 feet deep and 300 feet wide below Lockport, exact location and details of design of all structures to be left to discretion of Chief of Engineers, and, for time being, that no change be made in water authorized for navigation of Illinois River by act of July 3, 1930. Also provides for 3 passing places along Sag Channel and authorized channel in Calumet-Sag route to turning basin 5, and dredging at entrance of Lake Calumet. Realign portion of Calumet River and abandonment of bypassed section of Calumet River. Modifies local cooperation requirements in 1935 act. Pay damages to levee and drainage districts due to seepage and other factors, not to exceed $503,500. Enlarge Calumet-Sag Channel to 160 feet wide and a usable depth of 9 feet. Dredge a barge channel 160 feet wide with a usable depth of 9 feet in Grand Calumet and Little Calumet River Branch of Indiana Harbor Canal to deep (lake) draft through 141st St., East Chicago, IN. Construct in Little Calumet River a lock of suitable dimensions for large navigation. Rebuild or otherwise alter at Federal expense all obstructive railroad bridges across Calumet-Sag Channel, Little Calumet River, Calumet River, Grand Calumet River, and Indiana Harbor Canal, so as to provide suitable clearance, except that no Federal funds shall be expended for removal or alteration of Illinois Central R.R. bridge at mile 11.20 of Little Calumet River. 28-12 H. Doc. 184, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess.2 H. Doc. 180, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 711, 77th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 145, 76th Cong., 1st sess. ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 28-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Substitute following work for that authorized by act of Mar. 2, 1945; replace emergency dam in Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal; enlargement of that canal thence to Sag Junction and of Calumet-Sag Channel to afford channels 225 feet wide and usable depth of 9 feet; construct along general route depth of 9 feet to 225 feet wide between Little Calumet River and junction with Indiana Harbor Canal and 160 feet wide thence to Clark St., Gary, IN with a turning basin at Clark St., enlarge Indiana Harbor Canal to 225 feet wide and usable depth of 9 feet between Grand Calumet River and vicinity of 141st St., inclusive; remove Blue Island lock and construct a lock and control works in Calumet River near its head, and similar structures in proposed Grand Calumet Channel west of Indiana Harbor Canal; alter or eliminate railroad bridges across three channels lakeward of Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, or construct new railroad bridges to provide suitable clearance. H. Doc. 677, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. July 24, 1946 July 17, 1953 July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Aug. 18, 1968 3. July 3, 1930 7. July 24, 1946 (Section 14) 8. August 13, 1968 9. June 30, 1948 (Section 205) A small-boat harbor in vicinity of Peoria, IL, by H. Doc. 698, 79th Cong., construction of a basin 510 by 250 feet, dredged 2nd sess. to 7 feet deep. $48,933 to reimburse Nutwood Drainage and Levee H. Doc. 144, 81st Cong., District for additional pumping operation; 1st sess. supplementing $58,750 authorized in Oct. 1943 act. Federal participation in alteration of highway H. Doc. 45, 85th Cong., bridges, Calumet-Sag Modification, Part I, which 1st sess. 4 constitute unreasonable obstructions to navigation, in accordance with Public Law 647, 76th Cong., as amended. Construct auxiliary locks at Lockport, Brandon H. Doc. 31, 86th Cong., Road, Dresden Island, Marseilles, Starved Rock, 1st sess. Peoria, and LaGrange. Federal participation in alteration of highway Specified in Act. Also bridges, Calumet-Sag Modification, Part II, which H. Doc. 45, 85th Cong., constitutes unreasonable obstructions to 1st sess. navigation, in accordance with Public Law 647, 76th Congress as amended. MILL CREEK AND SOUTH SLOUGH AT MILAN, IL Channel diversion, flood gates, and other work Rivers and Harbors for flood protection. Committee Doc. 19, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. ACKERMAN CREEK, TAZEWELL COUNTY, IL Fill and riprap to prevent erosion of county road. None BETTENDORF, IA Levees, railroad raises, closure structures, and H. Doc. 348, 89th Cong., street raises and ramps for flood control. 2nd sess. BURLINGTON, IA Levee, floodwall, interior drainage, and railroad None closures for flood control. 28-13 July 24, 1946 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 28-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 10. June 28, 1938 July 14, 1960 11. December 31, 1970 CORALVILLE LAKE, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Highway bridge across Coralville Lake at or near the Mehaffey site. DAVENPORT, IA Levee, floodwall and pumping plants. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 161, 92nd Cong., 1st sess. 12. August 13, 1968 13. October 27, 1965 (Section 201) Approved by Committees on Public Works of House of Representatives and Senate, Sept. 23, 1976 and Oct. 1, 1976, respectively 14. 1944 Flood Control Act 15. September 3, 1954 16. August 13, 1968 17. October 23, 1962 18. August 13, 1968 19. October 27, 1965 (Section 201) Approved by Committees on Public Works of House of Representatives and Senate June 14, 1972, and June 21, 1972, respectively. 20. July 24, 1946 (Section 14) EAST MOLINE, IL Levee, railroad raises, street raises, closure H. Doc. 348, 90th Cong., structure, gravity drainage outlets, open ditches, 2nd sess. ponding areas, and pumping plants for flood control. EVANSDALE, IA Ievees, ponding areas, interior drainage, and road H. Doc. 563, 94th Cong., ramps for flood control. 2nd sess. FARM CREEK, IL Two flood detention dams and channel H. Doc. 802, 78th Cong., improvements. 2nd sess. FORT MADISON, IA Remove accumulated silt from Fork Creek, French None Creek, and Dry Creek for flood control. FULTON, IL Levee, railroad raises, road ramps, closure structures, H. Doc. 348, 90th Cong., gravity drainage outlets, ponding areas, storm 2nd sess. sewer interceptors, and pumping plants for flood control. HANNIBAL, MO Levee, floodwall, closure structures, and H. Doc. 564, 87th Cong., pumping plant for flood control. 2nd sess. MILAN, IL Levee closure structures; gravity drainage outlets H. Doc. 348, 90th Cong., ditches, ponding areas, and pumping plants for 2nd sess. flood control. MOLINE, IL Levee, closure structures, and interior H. Doc. 161, 92nd Cong., drainage facilities for flood control, and 1st sess. aesthetic and recreational development. MONROE COUNTY, IA, HIGHWAY BRIDGES Restore streambank at seven highway bridges for flood control. None 28-14 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 28-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents MUSCATINE, MAD CREEK, IA 21. June 30, 1948 Levee, wall, interior drainage facilities, and None (Section 205) closure structures for streets and a railroad for flood control. RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA 22. June 28, 1938 Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. ROCKFORD, IL 23. October 23, 1962 Channel enlargement and realignment, levees, and S. Doc. 142, 87th Cong., appurtenant works for flood control. 2nd sess. ROCK RIVER AGRICULTURAL LEVEES, IL 24. July 3, 1958 Levees and appurtenant works for flood control. H. Doc. 173, 85th Cong. SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA 25. July 3, 1958 Reservoir for flood control and recreation. S. Doc. 9, 85th Cong., 1st sess. October 22, 1976 Modification to minimize adverse project impact H. Doc. 487, 94th Cong., on Ledges State Park. 2nd sess. SOUTH FABIUS RIVER, KNOX COUNTY, MO 26. July 24, 1946 Repair bridge wingwall and bridge approach None (Section 14) for flood control. WATERLOO, IA 27. October 27, 1965 Levees, floodwalls, pumping plants, and closure H. Doc. 166, 89th Cong., structures for flood control. 1st sess. 1. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. Program Oct. 31, 1934, and Feb. 28, 1935. 2. Contains latest published map of Illinois and Des 4. Contains latest published maps of Calumet-Sag Plaines Rivers. portion. 3. Included, in part, in Public Works Administration TABLE 28-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 5 of Text) For Last Cost To September 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Squaw Chute at Quincy, IL Completed 1967 70,979' 9,345 Quincy, IL, Harbor Access Channel Completed 1970 35,4772 37,700 1. Excludes $25,851 contributed funds. 2. Excludes $35,350 contributed funds. 28-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 28-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 29 of Text) P'roject Completed Projects Banner Special l)rainage and Levee l)istricts, IL, Bear Creek I)am (('ity of Hannibal, MO) Big Lake l)rainage and Levee l)istrict, IL Canton, MO' Clinton, IA Coal Creek I)rainage and Levee I)istrict, IL Crane Creek I)rainage and Levee l)istrict, IL I)es Moines and Mississippi Levee l)istrict No. 1, MO Des Moines, IA Drury I)rainage I)istrict, IL, I)ubuque, IA East Liverpool I)rainage and Levee I)istrict, IL East Peoria I)rainage and Levee I)istrict, ILI Elkport, IA Fabius River I)rainage I)istrict, MO) Fabius River I)rainage I)istrict, MO Farmers Levee and I)rainage I)istrict, ILI Galena, IL Green Bay Levee and I)rainage I)istrict No. 2, IA Green Bay Levee and Drainage I)istrict No. 2, IA Gregory Drainage I)istrict, MO Gregory Drainage District, MO Henderson County Drainage I)istrict No. 1, IL, Henderson County Drainage I)istrict No. 2, IL, Henderson County Drainage l)istrict No. 3, ILI Hennepin Drainage and Levee I)istrict, ILI Hunt Drainage District and Lima Lake I)rainage District IL Indian Grave Drainage District, IL Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, IA Kishwaukee River at DeKalb, IL' Lacey, Langellier, West Mantanzas and Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee I)istrict, IL Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Marengo, IA' Marion County Drainage District, MO Marshalltown, IA Mason and Menard Drainage District, ILI Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, IL' Muscatine, IA (Mad Creek)' Muscatine Island Levee District and Muscatine- Louisa County Drainage District No. 13, IA Near Springfield on Sangamon River, IL Oakford Special Drainage District, IL Okabena Creek at Worthington, MN' For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1943 1962 1943 1964 1981 1954 1941 1969 1972 1964 1974 1941 1946 1951 1941 1963 1942 1952 1949 1967 1940 1972 1968 1968 1949 1940 1972 1972 1972 1957 1954 1943 1938 1981 1967 1978 1940 1977 1962 1970 1941 1940 1957 Cost To September 30, 1982 Operation and Construction Maintenance 274,822 1,679,056 144,910 1,496,555 26,001,996 1,923,145 68,898 1,492,016 4,993,224 1,144,875 10,861,170 207,826 279,963 34,200 60,500 1,621,841 155,562 844,100 299,000 1,727,711 77,100 1,538,963 1,453,217 1,043,902 42,700 109,593 4,772,498 3,551,961 6,044,693 123,300 1,290,000 , " 117,731 152,000 2,447,001 873,748 8,437,511 93,808 1,995,322 1,193,154 3,293,276 38,417 72,432 Contributed Funds Expended 761,050 23,323 145,415 118,000 20,626 252,136 269,739 220,000 28-16 f ROCK ISLAND, IL, I)ISTRICT TABLE 28-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 29 of Text) For Last Cost To September 30, 1982 Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Ottumwa, IA 1977 233,145 - Pekin and La Marsh Drainage and Levee District, IL 1955 158,383 - Penny Slough, Rock River, IL 1940 85,800 - Rock Island, IL 1979 7,582,373 - Rocky Ford Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 108,797 - Sabula, IA 1958 411,915 - Sangamon River (mouth) IL 1980 1,048,990 272,848 15,122 Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, IL 1945 32,281 - Sid Simpson Project, IL 1968 5,789,800 - Sny Basin, IL 1972 14,003,560 - Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL 1942 61,400 - Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL 1968 4,956,749 - South Beardstown and Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL 1942 220,729 - South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, IL 1942 171,839 - South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 1940 61,200 - South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 1968 1,231,243 - South River Drainage District, MO 1941 55,300 - South River Drainage District, MO 1966 1,106,056 - Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 185,980 - Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage Union No. 1 and Bay Island Drainage and Levee District No. 1, IL 1967 3,306,695 - Union Township Drainage District, MO 1947 116,576 - Van Meter, IA' 1965 113,842 - Inactive Projects Ames Lake, IA2 1974 1,790,723 - Farmers Levee and Drainage District, IL - -- Freeport, IL 1979 286,000 - Peoria, IL 1973 534,580 - South Beloit, IL 1979 270,000 - William L. Springer Lake, IL 1979 4,911,310 - 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act. 2. Includes $885,000 for disbursement in connection with realignment of Interstate Highway 35. 28-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 28-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Campbells Island, Mississippi River, IL 1969 1979 $ 76,664 - Carroll County Levee and Drainage District, IL 1938 1977 - - Central City Lake, Wapsipinicon River, IA 1970 1977 55,664 - Green Island Levee and Drainage District, IA 1938 1977 - - Henderson River, IL 1964 1977 102,310 - Janesville and Indian Ford Dams, WI 1938 1977 - - Keithsburg Drainage District, IL 1938 1977 - - Pecatonica River at Darlington, WI - 1977 - - Rochester Lake, Cedar River, IA - 1977 - - TABLE 28-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 28 of Text) Date Project Inspected Alpine Dam, Rockford, IL Banner Special Drainage and Levee District, IL Bear Creek, Hannibal, MO Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL Blackhawk Creek, Davenport, IA Canton, MO Clinton, IA Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL DeKalb, IL Des Moines, IA Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, MO Drury Drainage District, IL Dubuque, IA East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, IL East Peoria Sanitary District, IL Elkport, IA Fabius River Drainage District, MO Farmers Drainage and Levee District, IL Galena, IL Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA Gregory Drainage District, MO Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, IL Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, IL October 1981 February 1982 December 1981 January 1982 October 1981 December 1981 October 1981 January 1982 January 1982 July 1981 November 1981 November 1981 October 1981 September 1981 January 1982 January 1982 January 1982 September 1981 December 1981 January 1982 September 1981 October 1981 December 1981 October 1981 October 1981 28-18 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 28-H (Continued) Project INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 28 of Text) Date Inspected Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, IL Hergot Drainage and Levee District, IL Hunt Drainage District & Lima Lake Drainage District, IL Indian Grave Drainage District, IL Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, IA Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL Lacey Drainage and Levee District, IL Langellier Drainage and Levee District, IL Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Mad Creek, Muscatine, IA Mason and Menard Drainage District, IL Marion County Drainage District, MO Marshalltown, IA Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, IL Muscatine Island L&DD, & Louisa DD No. 13, IA Oakford Special Drainage and Levee District, IL Pekin-LaMarsh Drainage and Levee District, IL Penny Slough Drainage and Levee District, IL Rock Island, IL Sabula, IA Sanitary District of Beardstown, IL Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, IL Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, IL South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL South River Drainage District, MO Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage Union No. 1, and Bay Island L&DD No. 1, IL The Sny Basin, IL Union Township Drainage District, MO Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL Van Meter, IA West Matanzas Drainage and Levee District, IL February 1982 January 1982 December 1981 December 1981 October 1981 January 1982 January 1982 January 1982 January 1982 January 1982 November 1981 February 1982 December 1981 November 1981 October 1981 October 1981 January 1982 February 1982 October 1981 October 1981 September 1981 January 1982 January 1982 December 1981 January 1982 December 1981 December 1981 February 1982 October 1981 December 1981 December 1981 January 1982 November 1981 January 1982 28-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 28-I FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) (See Section 30 of Text) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Cedar River, Waverly, IA $17,658 Chelsea, IA 1,675 Coal Run Creek, Streator, IL 7,451 Horse Creek, Pawnee, IL 7,424 La Porte City, IA 80,344 North Lake, WI 7,500 Spoon River, Lewistown, IL 7,500 Union Township Drainage District, MO 46 Vermilion River, Pontiac, IL 13,105 TABLE 28-I Snagging and Clearing Navigable Streams and Tributaries in the Interest of Flood Control (preauthorization) (Sec. 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, P.L. 780, 83rd Congress) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Buckhart Creek, Stonington, IL $ 6,703 Honey Creek, Henderson County, IL 7,436 Iowa River, Iowa County, IA 7,500 TABLE 28-I FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation) (See Section 27 of Text) Project and Location Federal Cost Advance Preparation Emergency Operations Rehabilitation: Brennan and Wheeler Levee, MO Brooks No. 1 Levee, IL Bunchman Levee, IL Cassell Levee, IL Cincinnati Drainage and Levee District, IL David Winters Levee, IL Dobey Levee, IL. Gluek Levee, IL Hager Slough Levee, IL Herman Levee, IL Levee east of Chandlerville, IL Mauer-Woodrow Levee, IL Murphy Levee, IL Mud Creek Drainage District, IL Stout-Lipkin Levee, IL Thompson Drainage and Levee District, IL Misc. private levees, IA and IL Total Rehabilitation $170,843 75,097 11,619 14,030 7,970 209 55,731 1,045 10,641 922 2,996 1,202 43,741 88 29 28,678 29 1,021 31,895 $211,845 28-20 r. ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 28-J ILLINOIS WATERWAY: EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Depth on Dimensions Miter Sills at Low Water Available Lift at Miles Width of Length for Low Above Chamber Full Width Water' Lower Upper Lock Mouth Miles to Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) LaGrange Lock 80.2 7.8 below Beardstown, IL 110 600 10.0 13.0 15.5 Duplicate Lock3 80.2 7.8 below Beardstown, IL 110 1,200 10.0 13.0 15.5 Peoria Lock 157.7 4.1 below Peoria, IL 110 600 11.0 12.0 15.5 Duplicate Lock3 157.7 4.1 below Peoria, IL 110 1,200 11.0 14.0 14.0 Starved Rock Lock 231.0 Utica, IL 110 600 18.5 14.0 16.8 Duplicate Lock3 231.0 Utica, IL 110 1,200 18.5 14.0 13.0 Marseilles Lock 244.6 Marseilles, IL 110 600 24.45 14.0 18.6 Duplicate Lock3 244.6 Marseilles, IL 110 1,200 24.25 14.0 12.75 Dresden Island Lock 271.5 8 above Morris, IL 110 600 21.75 12.25 16.85 Duplicate Lock3 271.5 8 above Morris, IL 110 1,200 21.75 14.0 13.0 Brandon Road Lock 286.0 Joliet, IL 110 600 34.0 13.8 17.85 Duplicate Lock3 286.0 Joliet, IL 110 1,200 34.0 14.0 14.0 Lockport Lock 291.1 Lockport, IL 110 600 30.5-39.52 15.0 11.0-20.02 Duplicate Lock3 291.1 Lockport, IL 110 1,200 30.5-39.52 14.0 14.6 T.J. O'Brien Lock 326.5 Chicago, IL 110 1,000 - 14.0 14.0 Grand Calumet River 329.5 Hammond, IN 110 1,000 - 14.0 14.0 1. Lifts and depth on miter sills are those obtained with port is due to fluctuation of water surface in the sanitary flat pools. district canal. 2. Variation in lift and depth on upper miter sill at Lock- 3. Proposed. TABLE 28-K ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN LOCK AND DAM CONSTRUCTION, FOUNDATIONS, COST (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dam Estimated Federal Cost Under Type of Character of Type of Character of Year Existing Name Construction Foundation Kind Construction Foundation Complete Project Tllinni River - - - - - - $ 73499 mouth to Utica; channel improvement by dredging in Illinois River below Starved Rock, modification of two U.S. locks and dams, and removal of two State dams. LaGrange Duplicate Lock 4 Peoria Duplicate Lock4 Concrete Piles in sand Movable Concrete (wicket and timber with Aframe- crest) Concrete Piles in sand Concrete and timber Concrete Piles in sand Movable Concrete (wicket and timber type) Concrete Piles in sand Piles in sand Piles in sand Piles in sand 1939 1939 2,744,5921 97,630,000 3,381,0301 100,802,000 28-21 , v ,r si TABLE 28-K (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN LOCK AND DAM CONSTRUCTION, FOUNDATIONS, COST (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dam Estimated Federal Cost Under Type of Character of Type of Character of Year Existing Name Construction Foundation Kind Construction Foundation Complete Project Starved Rock Concrete Rock Movable Concrete Rock 1933 885,315' and (tainter structural gates) steel Duplicate Lock4 Concrete Rock 97,338,000 Marseilles Concrete Rock Movable Concrete Rock 1933 1,853,725' and (tainter structural gates) steel Duplicate Lock4 Concrete Rock 107,545,000 Dresden Island Concrete Rock Movable Concrete Rock 1933 2,503,376' and (tainter structural gates) steel Duplicate Lock4 Concrete Rock 79,681,000 Brandon Road Concrete Rock Movable Concrete Rock 1933 2,031,683' and (tainter structural gates) steel Pool Lowering4 Concrete Rock 216,996,000 Lockport Concrete Rock . Movable Concrete Rock 1933 133,608' and (Bear trap)2 structural steel Duplicate Lock4 Concrete Rock 241,008,000 T.J. O'Brien Concrete Piles in clay Fixed; Concrete Piles in clay 1960 6,954,700' and sheet and sheet piling piling Lock and dam - - - - - - 1,250,304' equipment Total Locks - - - - - - $965,511,832 and dams 1. Actual cost. 2. Six dams completed by the Corps; 48-foot bear trap at Lockport completed by State of Illinois. 3. Control works. 4. Planning on the Duplicate Locks is being held in abeyance awaiting reaffirmation of local cooperation support by the State. 28-22 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 28-L ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST (See Section 1 of Text) Dredging: Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers Calumet-Sag, 3 passing places Starved Rock to Lockport Starved Rock to Grafton Calumet-Sag Channel Peoria small boat harbor Protection piers at all locks Calumet-Sag modification engineering and design Calumet-Sag modification, supervision and administration Rebuild highway bridges Rebuild railway bridges: Calumet-Sag Channel Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers Recreation Facilities, Code 711 Removal of Blue Island lock Grand Calumet River controlling works 2 St. Louis District Total additional features Total existing project $ 2,135,3581 813,4181 3,650,635 2,686,307 19,238,200 24,9371 77,613' 5,141,474 5,466,804 19,327,850 20,828,4351 18,362,041' 445,000 288,6001 1,081,600' $ 99,569,604 $1,065,082,436 1. Actual cost. 2. Placed in inactive status 19 November 1974. TABLE 28-M EXISTING PROJECT See Section in Text Project Item Length (feet) Width (feet) Depth (feet) 1. Illinois Waterway, Nine locks and six dams with duplicate - - - IL and IN locks at seven locations Grafton to Lockport, IL 291.1 miles 300 9 Lockport to controlling works 2.0 miles 200-300 9 Controlling works to junction with 10.0 miles 225 9 Calumet-Sag Channel Calumet-Sag Channel to lock in Blue 16.0 miles 225 9 Island Calumet and Little Calumet Channel, 7.7 miles 300 9 from Blue Island to turning basin 5 Grand Calumet River Channel from 9.0 miles 9 - junction with Little Calumet River to and in Indiana Harbor Canal to 141st, East Chicago, IN Also, Grand Calumet River Channel 4.2 miles 160 9 from junction of Indiana Harbor Canal and Grand Calumet River to Clark St. in Gary, IN, with a turning basin at Clark St. A channel in Chicago Sanitary and 22.1 miles 175-300 9 Ship Canal and South Branch Chicago River from Sag-Junction to Lake St. in Chicago, IL 28-23 TABLE 28-N REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 (See Section 1 of Text) New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Total Regular Funds $118,317,640 $174,621,741 $22,007,296 $314,946,677 Public Works Funds 3,960,735 - - 3,960,735 Emergency Relief Funds 1,858,936 - - 1,858,936 Total $124,137,311 $174,621,741 $22,007,296 $320,766,3481 1. Includes $1,735,890 expended between 1927 and 1936 under the provisions of the permanent indefinite appropriaon the operation and care of the works of improvement tion for such purposes. 28-24 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN.* Section of river covered in this report is divided into three reaches, under supervision and direction of District Engineers at St. Louis, Rock Island, and St. Paul. Section in St. Louis District extends 105 miles from Mouth of Missouri River to mile 300 above Ohio River; Rock Location. Mississippi River rises in northern part of Minnesota, flows about 2,360 miles southerly and empties into Gulf of Mexico. Portion included in this report extends about 663 miles from mouth of Missouri River to Soo Line Railroad bridge, Minneapolis. Latest map and profile showing this section of river is in House Document 669, 76th Congress, 3d session. A map showing Lake Pepin is in House Document 511, 79th Congress, 2d session. A map of section Minneapolis to Dubuque is in House Document 515, 79th Congress, 2d session. A map showing location of drainage districts (Bellevue, Iowa, to Missouri River) is in Rivers and Harbors Committee Document 34, 75th Congress, 1st session. Previous projects. See page 1199 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides for a channel of 9-foot depth and adequate width between mouth of Missouri River (1,179 miles from the gulf) and Soo Line Railroad at Minneapolis, by construction of a system of locks and dams, supplemented by dredging. Project also provides for further improvements at St. Paul to provide a basin extending downstream from Robert Street Bridge for 2.7 miles, and at Minneapolis to provide adequate terminal facilities, and for other harbor improvements and miscellaneous work. Pertinent data on locks and dams, harbor improvements, additional features entering into cost of project, and authorizing legislation are given in Tables 29-C, 29-D, 29-E and 29-G. All dams are concrete. Three Island District extends about 314 miles from mile 300 to 614; and St. Paul District extends about 244 miles from mile 614 to Soo Line Railroad bridge, Minneapolis (mile 857.6). dams (Upper St. Anthony Falls, 1 and 19) are fixed, remainder are movable. Estimated cost for new work (1982) is $894,157,300 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. See House document 669, 76th Congress, 3d session, for a report of Chief of Engineers dated February 27, 1940, containing a general plan for improvement of Mississippi River between Coon Rapids Dam and mouth of Ohio River for purposes of navigation, power development, flood control, and irrigation needs. Local cooperation. Small-boat harbors authorized in the River and Harbor Act of 1962 are subject to conditions that local interests make a cash contribution toward cost of construction (except in case of Quincy Harbor which involves maintenance only of an existing harbor); furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance; hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain mooring facilities and utilities; reserve accommodations for transient small boats; accomplish all necessary relocations and alterations; and establish public bodies empowered to regulate use, growth, and development of the harbors. Rectification of seepage damages to privately owned lands in the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, Ill., is subject to the conditions that local interests acquire all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction and maintenance of the project; comply with applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 29-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 1970; accept, operate, and maintain the project upon its completion; and hold and save the United States free from damages arising from the construction and operation of the completed project; provided further that the local public entity shall be reimbursed by the Government in the amounts actually expended by it in the acquisition of real estate and for payments required under Public Law 91-646 if said amounts have been previously submitted to and approved by the Government. Local cooperation requirements for improvement of commercial harbor at Dubuque, Iowa; for improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, Iowa, for navigation; and for general navigation facilities at small-boat harbors at Rock Island, Ill.; Hannibal, Mo.; Fort Madison, Iowa; Davenport (Lindsay Park), Iowa; Muscatine, Iowa (including freight terminal approach channel); Andalusia, Ill.; Warsaw, Ill.; Moline, Ill.; Clinton, Iowa; and Savanna, Ill., have been complied with. Licenses. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission collects from non-Federal licensees annually to recompensate the United States for use of Government dams for generation of hydroelectric power. Amounts collected are returned to U.S. Treasury. (See table at end of chapter for license fees collected through the end of the fiscal year.) Terminal facilities. Considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. St. Paul District. New Work: Studies were continued under Section 107, small navigation project authority, for establishment of small-boat harbors at Lake City, Minnesota, at a cost of $34,813, at Pike Island, Minnesota at a cost of $21,740 and at Trempealeau, Wisconsin at a cost of $27,345. Construction of sanitary facilities at Blackhawk Park in pool 9 cost $8,002 by contract and $2,918 by hired labor. Construction contract for recreation facilities at Lake Rebecca in pool 2 was continued at a cost of $226.725. Engineering and design cost $39,252 and supervision and administration cost $12,633. Total costs for recreation facilities at Lake Rebecca were $278,610. Total cost of new work was $373,428. Maintenance: Channel dredging to remove shoal areas was performed. Government pipeline dredge WILLIAM A. THOMPSON removed -661,400 cubic yards of material at 11 locations at a cost of $1,553,127. Government derrick barge HAUSER removed 40,100 cubic yards of material at 4 locations for $395.775. Mechanical dredging contract costs were $1,525,399. Dewatering operations and repair work were conducted at Lower St. Anthony Falls for $7,590 and at Lock and Dam No. 5A for $658,570. Sandblasting and painting at locks and dams cost $521,880. A bridge rehabilitation contract at Lock and Dam No. 1 cost $465,000. Contracts to replace a water line and to repair gates at Lower St. Anthony Falls cost $10,000 and $48,054, respectively. Engineering work and miscellaneous surveys, reports, and other work were carried on by hired labor for $929,622 and by contract for $89,868. Total cost of maintenance was $8,332,960. Rehabilitation: Stage 1 work for rehabilitation of Lock and Dam No. 1 was accomplished by contract at a cost of $1,001,657. Contract work for State 2-Control Building, Stage 3-Sewer and Water Line, Stage 4-Stability Anchors, Stage 5A-Bluff Retaining Wall, and Stage 5B-Roads and Drainage was accomplished by contract at a cost of $2,904,384, $191,981, $1,676,474, $163,043, and $53,000, respectively. Government furnished materials for hydraulic machinery, lower miter gate bulkhead, structural equipment, and miscellaneous metals cost $126,405. Other miscellaneous contracts and hired labor for construction cost $90,414. Engineering and design cost $50,129 by contract and $246,346 by hired labor. Supervision and administration cost $352,490. Total rehabilitation costs were $6,856,323. Operating and care: Locks and dams were operated as required, and necessary repairs were made to those and appurtenant structures. Other studies, reports, and miscellaneous engineering work were also accomplished. Total cost of operating and care was $9,028,072. Costs to St. Paul District were $373,428 for new work, $17,361,032 for operation and maintenance, and $6,856,323 for rehabilitation, for a total of $24,590,783. Rock Island District. New work: Preconstruction planning for small boat harbor at Savanna, Ill., was continued at a cost of $13. Costs in connection with rectification of seepage damages in the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, Ill., were $141. Recreational work along the Mississippi River in Pools 13, 16, 18 and 21 was performed at a cost of $13,802.* Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation of auxiliary lock at Locks and Dam 14 was completed at a cost of $70,954. Construction of permanent closure at old Lock 19 was completed at a cost of $74. Total rehabilitation: $71,028. Maintenance: Channel dredging by Government cut- *Total new work costs were $13,956. 29-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. terhead pipeline dredge WILLIAM A. THOMPSON was performed at various locations in pools 12, 16, 18, 20, 21, and 22 at a cost of $1,194,300, with a total of 505,420 cubic yards of material being removed. Pre and post dredge disposal at various dredging sites cost $158,600. Other environmental concerns in connection with channel maintenance activities cost $187,600, which included sampling of tagged dredged material. Mechanical dredging was completed in pool 11 at a cost of $51,400 by Government derrick barge HAUSER, removing 3,425 cubic yards of material. Other dredging and excavation, including snagging and clearing, was performed by hired labor in ten pools at a cost of $381,900. Repair of regulating works structures was performed at a cost of $1,249,800. Structural repairs, including sandblasting and painting, was performed at a cost of $883,600. Repairs to lock structures damaged by towboats were performed at a cost of $465,900. Closure structure rock berm to protect cellular closure structure at old lock and drydock at Lock 19 was completed by contract at a cost of $348,600. Contractor completed raising the access road to Lock and Dam 20 at a cost of $48,800. Levee repairs were made at a cost of $1,600. Maintenance of public use areas was performed at a cost of $457,600. Building and utility maintenance at six lock sites was completed at a cost of $141,700. Permanent operating equipment costs were $118,800. Engineering and design work totaled $88,900. Supervision and administration and district overhead for the maintenance features totaled $764,300. Net credits to the project were $67,100, primarily as a result of collection of damages from towboat companies to lock and dam structures. Operating and care: Operation of the locks and dams and routine maintenance and minor repairs thereto were performed at a cost of $5,446,500. Real estate management services were provided at a cost of $128,200. Operation and contracted maintenance of public use areas cost $628,900. The amount of $11,900 was expended on Master Plans. Contract law enforcement at public use areas cost $63,800. Natural resources management costs were $75,300. Surveys, studies, and structural inspections cost $191,200. Water control management costs were $385,000. Channel inspection and hydrographic channel surveys were performed at a cost of $159,800. Supervision and administration and district overhead for operation features totaled $1,144,500. Total cost for operation and maintenance was $14,711,367. Cost to Rock Island District were $13,956 for new work, $71,028 for rehabilitation and $14,711,367 for operation and maintenance for a total of $14,796,351. St. Louis District. New work: Costs incurred for New Lock and Dam 26 were $407,547 for real estate management, $20,938 for relocations, $19,300 for reservoirs, $68,823,200 for dams, $53,438 for channels and canals, $2,011,000 for levees and floodwalls, $1,370,396 for buildings, grounds and utilities, $6,730,075 for engineering, $6,830 for fish and wildlife studies and $2,160,364 for supervision and administration. Total cost of new work was $81,603,088. Maintenance: Costs incurred for the year were $5,639,119, including $2,185,500 for dredging 2,194,948 cubic yards. Operating and care: The locks and dams were operated as required, and necessary repairs were made thereto and to appurtenant structures at a cost of $3,504,800. GREAT studies totaled $72,540. Costs to St. Louis District were $81,603,088 for new work and $9,216,459 for operation and maintenance for a total of $90,819,547. Condition at end of fiscal year. For information pertaining to locks, dams and harbors, see tables at end of chapter. St. Paul District. Work completed: Locks and Dams at St. Anthony Falls and Nos. 1 to 10, inclusive, except for relatively minor appurtenant work; major improvements of channels and harbors at St. Paul and Minneapolis; commercial harbors at Lake City, Red Wing, and Winona, Minn.; and Prairie du Chien, Wis.; small-boat harbors at St. Paul, Hastings, Red Wing, Wabasha, and Winona, Minn.; Lansing, Iowa; and Bay City, Pepin, and Prairie du Chien, Wis.; a remedial drainage ditch at Cochrane, Wis.; miscellaneous channel dredging and realignment; channel markers; pool clearing; and construction of various facilities for recreation use. Seepage damages totaling $90,027 were paid to 210 claimants. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Approximately 50,293.54 acres of land in fee, including 47,305 acres used by the Department of the Interior in accordance with a cooperative agreement and general plans, and easements of 15,549.63 acres of land are owned and controlled in pools 1 to 10, inclusive, at end of fiscal year. In addition, fee title to 12.46 acres and perpetual easements on 2.98 acres of land for St. Anthony Falls and perpetual easements over 244.39 acres of land for harbors have been obtained and Department of the Army holds special rights over 62,954.74 acres owned by Department of the Interior in pools Nos. 3 to 10, inclusive. Land acquisition is complete. 29-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Work remaining to complete portion of project in St. Paul District: Guidewall extension at Lock No. 3 (the uncompleted guidewall extensions at Locks Nos. 4, 5, 5A, 7, 8, 9 and 10 were reclassified from the "active" to the "inactive" category on April 13, 1973); realignment of channel at Wilds Bend; construction of small-boat harbor at St. Paul (Harriet Island), Minn.; and construction of additional recreational facilities. Condition of channel at end of fiscal year was such that controlling depths of 9 feet at low water and minimum widths for long-haul common carrier service were available in all pools. Except for Lock No. 1 which is in poor condition due to age and obsolescence, structures are in good condition. Rehabilitation of Lock No. 1 is inderway. Rock Island District. Work completed: Major construction items, including all locks and dams, are completed and in operation. The following related work has also been completed: Construction of small-boat harbors at Rock Island, Ill.; Moline, Ill.; Andalusia, Ill.; Warsaw, Ill.; Fort Madison, Iowa; Davenport (Lindsay Park), Iowa; Muscatine, Iowa; Clinton, Iowa; and Hannibal, Mo.; improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, Iowa, for navigation; improvement of commercial harbor at Dubuque, Iowa; rehabilitation of Locks and Dams 11 through 14; rehabilitation of old Locks 14 and 19; rock and conglomerate excavation in Pool 16; recreational facilities, and construction of a visitor center at Lock 15. Work remaining to complete portion of project in Rock Island District: Construction of guide wall extensions at 16, 18, and 21; mooring facilities at 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 22; upper approach improvement at 19; upper approach dike at 20; removal of remainder of lateral dam in Pool 14; rock and/or conglomerate excavation in Pools 14, 15, 18, and 21; rectification of seepage damage in the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, Ill.; and construction of small-boat harbors at Keokuk, Iowa, Savanna, Ill., and New Boston, Ill., and commercial harbor at Fort Madison, Iowa. Planning for the small-boat harbor at Savaimna, Ill., is currently under way. Small-boat harbors at Bellevue, Iowa, and Davenport (Credit Island), Iowa, have been deauthorized. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Acquisition of land in Pools 11 to 22, inclusive, consisting of 93,601 acres in fee and 10,541 acres in flowage easement, has been completed. Condition of the channel at end of fiscal year, was such that controlling depths of 9 feet at low water and widths suitable for long-haul common carrier service were being maintained in all pools. St. Louis District. Work completed: Locks and Dams Nos. 24, 25, and 26 (Henry T. Rainey Dam), except for guidewall extensions at Locks Nos. 24 and 25, have been completed as have recreation facilities at the three pools. Payments for rectification of damages have been completed. Other work remaining consists of construction of guidewall extensions at Locks Nos. 24 and 25 and replacement of Lock and Dam 26. Status of land and flowage acquisitions. Acquisition of lands in Pools Nos. 24, 25, and 26, involving. 41,451 acres of land in fee and flowage easements over 6,600 acres, is complete. A total of 1,560 acres have been acquired for Lock and Dam No. 26 replacement project. Condition of channel on 30 Sept. 1981 was such that controlling depth of nine feet at low water and generally suitable widths for long-haul common carrier services were maintained in all pools and between Locks and Dam, No. 26 and Missouri River. Tobtal Federal cost of existing project to 30 Sept. 1981 for the three Districts was $778,081,737 of which $277,355,064 was for new work, ($202,608,760 regular funds, $51,895,959 public works funds and $22,850,345 emergency relief funds), $451,436,803 regular funds for maintenance and $49,289,870 regular funds for rehabilitation. 29-4 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. TABLE 29-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 Mississippi River New work between Missouri Approp. 553,000 32,788,912 24,347,000 79,335,000 402,440,009 River and Cost 459,312 32,145,428 21,018,662 81,990,472 400,815,4881 Minneapolis, Maint. Minnesota Approp. 43,184,681 35,160,441 37,176,200 43,491,000 505,372,630 (Federal Funds) Cost 39,187,969 36,254,582 37,840,349 41,288,859 499,280,387 Rehab. Approp. 9,200,000 17,417,000 17,867,000 8,040,000 57,533,035 Cost 9,154,112 17,850,815 18,943,007 6,927,351 56,217,221 (Contributed New Work Funds) Approp. 59,000 0 - - 1,287,541 Cost 16,661 42,338 - - 1,287,540 1Includes $41,469,955 for new work on previous projects. TOTAL COSTS OF EXISTING PROJECT TABLE 29-B TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 Regular Public Work Emergency District Cost Funds Funds Relief Funds Total St. Paul New Work' $59,156,209' $24,210,071 $9,071,214 $92,437,494 District Maintenance' 191,710,580 - - 191,710,580 Rehabilitation 43,284,024 - - 43,284,024 Total 294,150,813 24,210,071 9,071,214 327,432,098 Rock Island New Work' 64,593,058' 17,403,322 11,338,865 93,335,245 District Maintenance 172,179,500 - - 172,179,500 Rehabilitation 12,933,197 - - 12,933,197 Total 249,705,755 17,403,322 11,338,865 278,447,942 St. Louis New Work 160,849,964 10,282,566' 2,440,266 173,572,796 Maintenance 128,835,597 - - 128,835,597 Total 289,685,561 10,282,566 2,440,266 302,408,393 'Excludes $1,228,541 contributed funds. Includes $7,673 'Excludes $58,999 contributed funds. expended in pool No. 11. '$687,709 was transferred to St. Louis District in fiscal 'Includes $159,359 transferred from Rock Island Dis- year 1958. Excludes $201,167 transferred to St. Paul and trict covering pro rata share of cost of derrick boat St. Louis Districts covering their pro rata shares of cost of Hercules. derrick boat Hercules. 'Includes $762,196 expended between 1930 and 1936 on 'Includes $47,800 transferred from Rock Island District operating and care of works of improvement under provi- covering pro rata cost of derrick boat Hercules and sions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such pur- $687,709 transferred from Rock Island District. poses. 29-5 Lock Dimensions Greatest Estimated Length Percent Cost of Width Avail- Upper Depth on Character of Foundation Complete Year Each Lock Miles of able for Normal Miter Sill Locks, Opened and Dam Lock Above Chain- Full Pool Dams, to Including and Ohio Miles from ber Width Lift Eleva- Upper Lower and Work Navi- Work Dam River Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) tion' (feet) (feet) Lock Dam in Pool gation in Pool St. Anthony 853.9 In city of 56 400 Falls, upper Minneapolis, lock Minn. St. Anthony 853.3 In city of 56 400 Falls, lower Minneapolis, lock and dam Minn. Lock and dam 847.6 Minneapolis- 56 400 1 St. Paul 56 400 Lock and dam 815.2 1.3 above 110 500 2 Hastings, Minn. 110' 600' Lock and dam 796.9 6.1 above Red 110 600 3 Wing, Minn. Lock and dam 752.8 Alma, Wis. 11 600 4 Lock and dam 738.1 Minneiska, Minn. 10 600 5 Lock and dam 728.5 3 above Winona, 110 600 5A Minn. Lock and dam 714.3 Trempealeau, 110 600 6 Wis. Lock and dam 702.5 Dresbach, Minn. 110 600 7 Lock and dam 679.2 Genoa, Wis. 110 600 8 Lock and dam 647.9 3.3 below 110 600 9 Lynxville, Wis. Lock and dam 615.1 Guttenberg, Iowa 110 600 10 Lock and dam 583.0 3.7 above 110 600 11 Dubuque, Iowa Lock and dam 556.7 Bellevue, Iowa 110 600 12 Lock and dam 522.5 4.3 above 110 600 13 Clinton, Iowa Lock and dam 493.3 3.7 below Le 110 600 14 Claire, Iowa Le Claire lock 493.1 3.9 below Le 80 320 (Canal) Claire, Iowa Lock and dam 482.9 Foot of Arsenal 110 600 15 Island Rock 110 360 Island, Ill. 49.2 799.2 15.7 13.7 Some lime- Limestone stone, mainly sandstone. No piles. 26.9' 750.0 13.7 10.3 Sandstone. No Sandstone piles. 35.94 725.1 13.5' 10.1 Rock and piles Piles in gravel 35.9 - 12.5' 7.6 in gravel. 12.2 - 16.0 15.1 Piles in sand, Piles in sand, 12.2 687.2 22.2 13.0 silt and clay. silt and clay 8.0 675.0 17.0 14.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand silt and clay. 7.0 667.0 17.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel, and gravel 9.0 660.0 18.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel. 5.5 651.0 18.0 12.5 Piles in sand. Piles in sand 6.5 645.5 17.0 12.5 Piles in sand, Piles in sand gravel and silt. and clay 8.0 639.0 18.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel. 11.0 631.0 22.0 14.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand gravel, and and gravel broken rock. 9.0 620.0 16.0 13.0 Piles in sand. Piles in sand 8.0 611.0 15.0 12.0 Piles in sand. Piles in sand 11.0 603.0 18.5 12.5 Piles in sand, Piles in sand gravel and silt. 9.0 592.0 17.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel, and gravel 11.0 583.0 19.0 13.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand clay and and gravel gravel. 11.0 572.0 20.5 13.5 Rock. Rock 11.0 - 17.6 10.9 Rock. Rock 16.0 561.0 24.0" 11.0 Rock. Rock 16.0 - 17.011 11.0 1 Nl' - $18 f 2.N00.NN 0 100 1959 12,382,000' 0 100 1917 2,358,000' 100 1930 6,492,000" 100 1948 79 1938 8,556,000 x 100 1935 4,865,000* O 100 1935 5,081,000* 57 1936 8,009,000* 100 1936 4,874,000 100 1937 5,574,000* 180 1937 6,061,000* 180 1938 6,539,000* 100 1936 4,750,000* 99 1937 7,428,000 99 100 92 100 95 1938 1938 1939 1922 1934 5,580,000 7,502,000 6,284,000 10,525,000 10,525,000 TABLE 29-C LOCKS~ AND DAMSS TABLE 29-C (Cont'd) LOCKS AND DAMS Lock Dimensions Greatest Estimated Length Percent Cost of Width Avail- Upper Depth on Character of Foundation Complete Year Each Lock Miles of able for Normal Miter Sill Locks, Opened and Dam Lock Above Cham- Full Pool Dams, to Including and Ohio Miles from ber Width Lift Eleva- Upper Lower and Work Navi- Work Dam River Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) tion' (feet) (feet) Lock Dam in Pool gation in Pool Lock and dam 457.2 1.8 above 110 600 9.0 545.0 17.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand 98 1937 9,788,000 16 Muscatine, Iowa and gravel. and gravel Lock and dam 437.1 4.2 above New 110 600 8.0 536.0 16.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand 99 1939 5,843,000 17 Boston, Ill. and gravel. Lock and dam 410.5 6.5 above 110 600 9.8 528.0 16.5 13.7 Piles in' sand. Piles in sand 90 1937 10,308,000 18 Burlington, Iowa Lock and dam 364.2 Keokuk, Iowa 110 358 38.2 518.2 4.5 9.2 Rock. Rock 100 1913 19 110 1,200 5.0 13.0 99 1957 14,813,000" Lock and dam 343.2 0.9 above Canton, 110 600 10.0 480.0 15.0 12.0 Rock. Rock and piles 97 1936 6,281,000 20 Mo. in sand and gravel Lock and dam 324.9 2.1 below Quincy, 110 600 10.5 470.0 16.5 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand 95 1938 8,065,000 21 Ill. and gravel. and gravel Lock and dam 301.2 1.5 below 110 600 10.2 459.5 18.0 13.8 Rock. Rock 99 1938 5,275,000 22 Saverton, Mo. Lock and dam 273.4 Clarksville, Mo. 110 600 15.0 449.0 19.0 12.0 Rock and piles. Piles in sand 99" 14 1940 10,337,000 24 Lock and dam 241.4 Cap Au Gris, Mo. 110 600 15.0 434.0 19.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand 99" 1939 13,694,000 25 and gravel. and gravel Lock and dam 202.9 Alton, Ill. 110 600 24.0 419.0 19.0 10.0 Piles in sand. Piles in sand 100 1938 12,824,000 26 (Henry T. 110 360 24.0 - 16.0 10.0 Rainey Dam) New Lock and 200.8 Alton, Ill. 110 1,200 24.0 419.0 23.0 18.0 Piles in Piles in 644,850,000' dam 26 bedrock. bedrock Total, Locks and dams $872,871,000 'Elevation of pools 1 to 22 and at St. Anthony Falls are 'In addition, $1,965,300 expended from previous promean sea level 1912 adjustment; pools 24, 26 are mean sea level 1929 adjustment. 'Includes existing dam, owned by Northern States Power Co. 'Includes dredging above upper lock. (Federal cost only.) 'Based on pool elevation 723.1 in pool 1 which is crest of dam. Pool is normally maintained at elevation 725.1 by flashboards. 'Includes lower approach dredging and dredging between upper and lower rock. (Federal cost only.) 'In addition $1,948,000 expended from previous projects and $1,349,600 from O & C appropriation for first of twin locks. Excludes lock and dam rehabilitation program. 'Old upper guard sill. 'Landward lock. jects. "Existing Le Claire Canal lock is used as auxiliary to lock 14; previous project cost $540,000. "Depth over upper poiree sill. Depth over upper miter sill is 27 feet, at lock 15. "$640,868 for first lock was reported by Mississippi River Power Company, transferred to Government free in lieu of improvements destroyed. (Annual Report, 1928, pp. 1118-1119.) Present estimate includes $13,132,600 for main lock and appurtenant work. "Includes cash contribution of $2,850,000. "Complete except for guidewall extensions. *Excludes uncompleted guidewall extensions $10,339,000 (1972) reclassified from active to inactive on 13 April 1973. C O ISM 0 M1 C 0 Z TABLE 29-D HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS Project Approximate size (feet) Actual or Miles above depth Percent Estimated Name Ohio River Location Type (feet) Width Length Complete Cost Harriet Island Harbor, St. Paul, Minn. St. Paul Harbor, Minn. Hastings Harbor, Minn. Red Wing Harbor, Minn. Red Wing Harbor, Minn. Bay City Harbor, Wis. Lake City Harbor, Minn. Pepin Harbor, Wis. Wabasha Harbor, Minn. Alma Harbor, Wis. Winona Harbors, Minn. Lansing Harbor, Iowa Prairie du Chien Harbor, Wis. Cassville Harbor, Wis. Dubuque Harbor, Iowa Savanna Harbor, Ill. Clinton Harbor, Iowa Moline Harbor, Ill. Davenport Harbor, Iowa (Lindsay Park) Rock Island Harbor, Ill. 840.2 In city of St. Paul, Minn. 836.5-839.2 In city of St. Paul, Minn. 839.7 Channel improvement, Small-boat harbor and channel enlargement. 813.2 Lower end of city of Hastings, Minn. 791.4 In city of Red Wing, Minn. 791.1 In city of Red Wing, Minn. 785.9 Upper end of Bay City, Wis. 773.0 In city of Lake City, Minn. 767.1 In city of Pepin, Wis. 760.0 Upper end of city of Wabasha, Minn. 751.3 Upper end of Alma, Wis. 726.0 In city of Winona, Minn., Latsch Island 726.2 Crooked Slough 663.3 Upper end of city of Lansing, Iowa 635.5 Upper end of city of Prairie du Chien, Wis. 635.0 In Marais de St. Friol East Channel below Hwy bridges. 606.6 At Cassville 579.4 At Dubuque, Iowa 537.3 At Savanna 519.0 At Clinton 488.0 At Moline, Ill. 484.2 At Lindsay Park Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat 70 925 9 400-1,000 2.7 (mile) 300 400 5 9 5 5 59 5 5 5 5 9 5 5 9 5 12 5 5 5 5 200 300 450 50-100 400 500 50 175-400 300 200 200 400 400 120 340 280 400 230 200 500 1,200 800 5,990 600 1,000 600 800 500 1,000 6,000 800 800 1,000 frontage 565 1,500 910 1,400 660 1,150 n $eql nn i 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 0 100 0 78 100 V 479.8 At Rock Island, Ill. Entrance channel 6 small-boat harbor. 217,100 230,200 0 74,300 '1 146,800' 8,700 0 39,500' 93,500 205,500' M 41,700 O 56,300 89,800 84,700 95,300 a 85,500 0 93,100 r 178,000 55,200 310,000 101,912 110,328 262,100 100 1,100 100 31,000 TABLE 29-D (Cont'd) HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS Project Approximate size (feet) Actual or Miles above depth Percent Estimated Name Ohio River Location Type (feet) Width Length Complete Cost Andalusia Harbor, Ill. 473.0 Andalusia Slough Small-boat 5 40 435 100 21,000 Muscatine Harbor, Iowa 455.5 At Muscatine, Iowa Small-boat 5 150 950 100 455.6 Freight terminal 9 200 1,890 100 approach channel New Boston Harbor, Ill. 433.1 In Boston Bay Small-boat 5 90-135 600 0 23,000 Fort Madison Harbor, 383.7 At Fort Madison, Iowa Small-boat 5 250 900 100 184,200 Iowa Fort Madison Harbor, 378.3 At Fort Madison Commercial 9 200 10,300 0 1,070,000 Iowa Keokuk Harbor, Iowa 363.5 At Keokuk, Iowa Small-boat 5 100-160 1,015 0 394,000 Warsaw Harbor, Ill. 359.1 At Warsaw, Ill. Small-boat 5 100 600 100 73,000 Quincy Harbor, Ill. 327.3 In Quincy Bay Small-boat 5 200-300 9,000 0 - Hannibal Harbor, Mo. 308.8 At Hannibal, Mo. Small-boat 5 180-260 600 100 129,000 Total $4,001,828 1In addition, local interests will contribute $257,000. 'In addition, local interests contributed $3,455. 'In addition, local interests contributed $9,533. 'In addition, local interests contributes $32,344. 'Maintenance only, estimated at $5,000 annually. Cu 0 M1 Ma TABLE 29-E REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST OF PROJECT Facilities for public use, convenience and safety Rectification of damages caused by seepage and backwater Regulating works between lock and dam 26 (Henry T. Rainey Dam) and Missouri River Improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, Iowa, for navigation Miscellaneous Total additional features Total existing project (new work) $ 3,359,600 7,049,700 s 545,000 193,600 1,312,900 12,460,800' $894,157,300 'Includes $129,000 (1979) for rectifying seepage damage to privately owned lands in the Sny Island Drainage District, Illinois. sIncludes $686,500 for repairs to Stone Arch bridge, Minneapolis, Minn. (FY 1969) 'Excludes $227,000 (1965) for inactive remedial measures at Sandy Slough, Mo. LICENSE FEES COLLECTED THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1982 Annual Collections to Dam Licensee Charge Sept. 30, 1981 St. Anthony Falls Northern States $ 3,300 $ 66,877 Lower Lock and Dam Power Co. (No. 2056) Lock and Dam No. 1 Ford Motor Co. 95,400 5,439,840 (No. 362) Total project $5,506,717 29-10 TABLE 29-F MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. TABLE 29-G AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Sept. 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 as amended by P.R. No. 10, Feb. 24, 1932 June 26, 1934 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 None Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Work Authorized MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. Dredging channels to landing places. Project adopted from Illinois River to Minneapolis; Chief of Engineers granted discretionary authority to make such modification in plan as may be deemed advisable. Operation of snag boats and operation and care of locks and dams to be provided for with funds from Department of the Army appropriations for rivers and harbors. Missouri River established as lower limit of project. Extension of 9-foot channel above St. Anthony Falls, Minn., including adequate terminal facilities for Minneapolis, Minn. St. Paul, Minn., harbor. Determine damages to drainage and levee districts caused by seepage and backwater, and cost of making rectification thereof. Public park and recreational facilities. Red Wing, Minn., harbor. Remedial works to correct damages caused by seepage and backwater at Cochrane, Wis. Such changes or additions to payments, remedial works, or land acquisitions authorized by River and Harbor Act of Aug. 26, 1937 (River and Harbor Committee Doc. 34, 75th Cong., 1st sess.), as Chief of Engineers deems advisable. St. Paul, Minn., channel enlargements small boat harbor, and roadway. Vertical bridge clearance at Minneapolis to 26 feet above estimated stage for discharge of 40,000 c.f.s. Winona, Minn., basin. Future modification of lock and dam No. 2 for power development Provides for cash contribution by local interests in lieu of alteration of privately owned bridges and utilities for St. Anthony Falls project. Lake City, Minn., harbor. Wabasha, Minn., harbor. Payment of damages caused by backwater and seepage, pools 3 to 11. Hastings, Minn., harbor. Lansing, Iowa, harbor. Fort Madison, Iowa, harbors. Payment of damages caused by pool No. 14 at Clinton, Iowa. Davenport, Iowa, harbor. Muscatine, Iowa, harbor. Alma, Wis., harbor Hannibal, Mo., harbor. Prairie du Chien, Wis., harbors. Documents None H. Doc. 290, 71st Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 137, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 137, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 44, 74th Cong., 1st seas. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 34, 75th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 103, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc 137, 76th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 547, 76th Cong., 3d sess. S. Doc. 54, 77th Cong., 1st seas. H. Doc. 263, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 432, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 449, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 511, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 514, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 515, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 559, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 192, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 661, 80th Cong., 2d seas. S. Doc. 197, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 642, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 733, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 66, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 67, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 71, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 29-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 29-G (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Sept. 3, 1954 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 Mar. 3, 1909 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 1966 Nov. 7, 1966 Oct. 21, 1978 'Deferred. 'Inactive. 29-12 Work Authorized Opposite Hamburg, Ill., harbor.' Permits such change in location of Winona, Minn., small boat basin authorized by River and Harbor Act of Mar. 2, 1945 (H. Doc. 263, 77th Cong., 1st sess.), as Chief of Engineers deems advisable. Construction of Crooked Slough Harbor at Winona, Minn., in lieu of previously authorized commercial harbor. Payment of damages caused by pool No. 24 at Louisiana, Mo. Permits modification of vertical bridge clearances and authorizes completion of St. Anthony Falls project. Small boat and commercial harbors at Alton, Ill.' Payment of lump sum amounts for damages to drainage and levee districts caused by operation of navigation pools. Improvement and maintenance of Beaver Slough at Clinton, Iowa. Reconstruction of structures as may be necessary to provide adequate facilities for existing navigation. Construction of Industrial Harbor at Red Wing, Minn. Construction of small-boat harbors at Savanna,' Moline, Andalusia, New Boston,' Warsaw, Quincy, and Grafton, Ill.; Bellevue,' Clinton, Davenport, and Keokuk, Iowa; St. Paul (Harriet Island), Minn.; and Bay City, Pepin, and Cassville, Wis. Payment of damages caused by pool 24 at Clarksville, Mo. Remedial works at Sandy Slough, Mo. Repair of Stone Arch bridge at Minneapolis, Minn. Commercial Harbor facilities at Fort Madison, Iowa.' Replacement of Lock and Dam 26 Documents H. Doc. 254, 81st Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 347, 83rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 251, 82nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 33, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 136, 84th C6ng., 1st sess. H. Doc. 135, 84th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 345, 84th Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 32, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 513, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 552, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 419, 87th Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 507, 89th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 95-502 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT * This district comprises Cook, McHenry, Lake, Kane, Porter Counties in Indiana, including a portion of DuPage and Will Counties in Illinois, and Lake and LaPorte County along Lake Michigan. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Burns Waterway Harbor, Ind .............................. 30-2 2. Calumet Harbor and River, Ill. and Indiana ............................................................ 30-2 3. Chicago Harbor, Ill. .................................... 30-3 4. Chicago River, Ill. .................................... 30-3 5. Indiana Harbor, Ind ................................................ 30-4 6. Michigan City Harbor, Ind ................................ 30-5 7. Waukegan Harbor, Ill ........................................... 30-5 8. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys............... 30-6 9. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ........................................ 30-6 Alteration of Bridges 10. Other authorized Bridge Alteration................................................................. 30-6 Beach Erosion Control 11. Hollywood-Ardmore Beach Chicago, Ill .................................... 30-6 12. Mount Baldy, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Ind. ................................ 30-6 Page 13. Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore Emergency Stone Repairs Beverly Shores, Indiana ................................. 30-7 14. Other authorized beach erosion control projects .................................... 30-7 15. Beach erosion control under special authorization................................... 30-7 Flood Control 16. Chicago River, Ill. North Branch ....................... 30-7 17. Little Calumet River, Ill ........................................ 30-8 18. Other authorized flood control projects........................................................ 30-8 19. Flood control work under special authorization........................ .............. 30-8 General Investigations 20. Surveys ..................................... 30-8 21. Collection and study of basic data .................... 30-8 22. Research and development ................................ 30-9 23. National Emergency Preparedness .................... 30-9 *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 30-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Navigation 1. BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IND. Location. On Indiana shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, 18 miles east of Illinois-Indiana State line, 14 miles east of Indiana Harbor, 9 miles east of Gary Harbor, 14 miles west of Michigan City Harbor, Ind, and 19 miles south-east of Calumet Harbor, Ill. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14905.) Existing project. Provides for (a) a north breakwater 4,630 feet long; (b) an outer west bulkhead 1,200 feet long; (c) an approach channel 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide, extending from deep water in Lake Michigan to north end of east bulkhead; (d) an outer harbor 28 feet deep; (e) an east harbor arm 27 feet deep with a width varying from 620 feet to 260 feet wide; (f) a west harbor arm 27 feet deep and 620 feet wide. Project was authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 160, 88th Cong. 1st sess.) Authorizing act also provides the'Secretary of the Army may reimburse State of Indiana for expenditure of funds used to construct such portions of project as approved by Chief of Engineers and constructed under supervision of the Chief of Engineers. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Nine wharves and docks are available, three on West Harbor Arm and three on East Harbor Arm. One dock on the west arm is used for shipment and receipt of steel products. One dock on the east arm is used for receipt of bulk supplies for making steel and shipment of steel products. Five facilities are administered by Indiana Harbor Port Commission and used primarily for handling miscellaneous bulk materials and general cargo. Operations and results during period. Maintenance and miscellaneous inspections and reports: Condition surveys were performed by hired labor at a cost of $16,270. Breakwater stone was purchased and placed in August 1982 on the north breakwater and the outer west bulkhead at a cost of $260,999. Supervision and inspection of these activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $23,354. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of North Breakwater and Outer West Bulkhead was completed in September 1968. Dredging was completed in August 1970. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1982, were $17,354,404, of which $13,599,990 was for new work ($13,584,000 Federal and $15,990 non- Federal), and $3,754,414 for maintenance. To date there has been no maintenance dredging, and all maintenance costs were incurred repairing the breakwater and bulkhead. The breakwater maintenance repairs were necessary to maintain design elevation of the north breakwater and the outer west bulkhead. 2. CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, ILL. AND IND. Location. Northeastern Illinois (Cook County), near southern end of Lake Michigan, 12.5 miles south of Chicago Harbor, and known on Great Lakes as South Chicago Harbor, is in southerly part of and within corporate limits of city of Chicago, except for a part of breakwaters and of anchorages behind same, which are in Indiana. Calumet River is within Chicago city limits. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14929). For description, see page 1471 of Annual Report for 1932. Previous projects. For details see page 1400 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. (See table 30-C.) For a more detailed description see page 1246 of Annual Report for 1963. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed modifications and acts of 1960 and 1962. For act of August 30, 1935, requirements for dredging in front of U.S. Steel Corp. remains. Terminal facilities. Calumet River and outer harbor: 38 docks handling foreign oversea, lake vessels, and river barge cargoes. Most important cargoes handled are iron ore, grain, petroleum products, coal, limestone, sand, gravel, iron and steel products, salt, and general overseas cargo. Government owns two docks. There are no other publicly owned docks on Calumet River, except one owned by the City of Chicago. Lake Calumet: Chicago Regional Port District owns and leases to others three transit sheds and two grain elevators. There are also three private docks handling chemicals, iron and steel products, and miscellaneous cargo. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $34,999. A credit of $27,345 was received relative to dredging work performed by U.S. Hopper Dredge Hains in 1980. Supervision and inspection was performed at a cost of $47,346. Under the diked disposal program, site selection studies and engineering and design were continued at a cost of $535,676. Construction was started in September of 1982 at a cost of $60,000. Supervision and inspection was performed at a cost of $32,499. 30-2 CHICAGO, ILL., DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is about 79 percent complete. Work remaining to complete project consists of removing hard materials in outer harbor and completing the widening, straightening and deepening of isolated remaining sections of Calumet River. Timber crib breakwater (6,714 feet, completed in 1904; concrete superstructure completed in 1924) is in fair condition. Under permit from the Secretary of War, the Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. and its predecessors removed all of south pier (completed in 1897) and replaced it with a concrete dock wall 2,961 feet long and 50 feet southerly of pier's original location. Under permits from the department, the Defense Plant Corp. built two sections of bulkheads on east side of river between a point opposite the Semet-Solvay slip and south side of former turning basin 3 at about 117th Street. United States widened and deepened the channel adjoining the new bulkhead except through the rock section, where widening was done by the corporation. Head of navigation for deepdraft vessels in the river is at turning basin 5 on north side of 130th Street. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1982 were $37,528,532, of which $21,722,594 was for new work ($18,685,991 regular funds and $3,036,603 public works funds), $14,280,270 regular funds for maintenance, $689,001 regular funds for rehabilitation, and $836,667 non-Federal funds. 3. CHICAGO HARBOR, ILL. Location. Northeastern Illinois, near southern end of Lake Michigan; 85 miles southerly from Milwaukee, Wis. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14928.) Previous projects. See page 1396 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. (See table 30-C.) For more detailed description-see page 1242 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed Federal cost is $4,342,822, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. (See table 30-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are seven docks for handling various types of cargo, including overseas general cargo, salt and newsprint. Passenger excursion boats use three docks. There is one marine service dock for pleasure craft and two yacht club docks. City of Chicago owns five docks, four of which are used for commercial purposes. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Condition surveys, inspections and reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $25,980. Breakwater stone was purchased and placed by contract at a cost of $252,484. Engineering and design was performed for exterior breakwater at a cost of $95,932. Structural investigation was done on the breakwater at a cost of $19,595. Supervision and inspection of these activities was performed by hired labor at a cost of $74,040. Under the diked disposal program, site selection studies and engineering and design were continued at a cost of $70,831. Contruction was started in September 1982 at a cost of $20,000, supervision and inspection was performed at a cost of $4,169. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Northerly arm of inner breakwater (timber 4,034 feet, with 304 feet of shore return on north end, completed in 1875; concrete superstructure completed in 1934) is in good condition except leaking water from Lake Michigan into Chicago River. Southerly arm of inner breakwater (timber 2,544 feet, completed in 1880; concrete superstructure completed in 1930) is in good condition after rehabilitation by conversion to rubblemound completed in August 1966. Exterior breakwater (timber cribs 5,421 feet, completed in 1889; concrete superstructure completed in 1930) deteriorated under water and was rehabilitated in 1966 by conversion of lake side structure to rubblemound. Southerly extension north arm (rubblemound 2,227 feet, completed in 1917) is in excellent condition. South arm (rubblemound 1,532 feet, completed in 1920; and concrete caisson 1,185 feet completed in 1922) are in good condition. Shorearm extension (timber cribs 2,250 feet, completed in 1917; inner 1,050 feet capped with concrete superstructure 1951; next adjoining 1,000 feet capped with stone blocks 1956; outer 200 feet capped with concrete superstructure 1952) is in good condition. Channel side of north pier (concrete superstructure, 960 feet, completed in 1908, repaired in 1949, and rebuilt with steel sheet piling in 1965) is in good condition. Water level landward of lock is controlled and maintained at an elevation lower than that of Lake Michigan except during excessive storm runoff. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1982 were $11,186,237 of which $4,342,822 was for new work, $5,516,815 for maintenance, and $1,326,600 for rehabilitation. 4. CHICAGO RIVER, ILL. Location. Cook and Lake Counties, Ill., navigable portions being wholly in Cook County and city of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14928.) For description, see page 1467 of Annual Report for 1932. Previous projects. See page 1394 of Annual Report for 1962. 30-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Existing project. Provides for a channel 21 feet deep in the main river from its mouth at Rush Street to the junction of North and South Branches (0.7 miles), in the North Branch from the junction to North Avenue (2.22 miles), in the North Branch Canal (1.04 miles), and in the North Branch Turning Basin just south of North Avenue. All depths are referred to normal pool elevation 576.2 feet above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec (International Great Lakes Datum-1955). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed modification. Act of July 24, 1946, provided improvement of channel is subject to condition that local interests furnish assurances they will hold the United States free from damages which may result from construction and maintenance of improvement. Requirement has not been complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 23 docks handling lake vessel and river barge cargoes. Most important cargoes handled are sand, gravel, coal, salt, cement, and petroleum products. There are three boatyards, two of which are used for servicing recreational craft and one engaged in constructing and servicing small craft as well as small Navy vessels. U.S. Government has one dock. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by hired labor at a cost of $24,586. Supervision and administration, performed by hired labor, cost $2,034. Under the Lake Michigan Water Diversion Monitoring program, engineering work was performed at a cost of $199,379. Under the diked disposal program, engineering and design was continued at a cost of $86,758. In September 1982 construction began at a cost of $20,000 and supervision and inspection at $7,224. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Head of navigation for deepdraft vessels is North Avenue on North Branch, 5.97 miles, respectively, from Michigan Avenue Bridge. Head of navigation for barge traffic is near Touhy Avenue on North Shore Channel, about 11 miles from Michigan Avenue Bridge. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1982 were $5,050,334 of which $544,679 was for new work and $4,505,655 for maintenance. 5. INDIANA HARBOR, IND. Location. Northwestern Indiana (Lake County), on southwest shore of Lake Michigan, 18 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14929.) Previous projects. For details see page 1943 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1520 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a northerly rubblemound breakwater, 1,120 feet long, an easterly reinforced concrete-caisson breakwater 201 feet long, an extension of this latter breakwater 2,324 feet to north, and construction and placing of a light-house crib; an outer harbor entrance channel generally 800 feet wide with a depth of 29 feet; dredging an anchorage and maneuver basin in the outer harbor to 28 feet, and canal entrance channel to 27 feet deep; a main canal generally 160 feet wide and 22 feet deep; a turning basin lakeward of Canal Street to 22 feet deep; a turning basin at The Forks to 22 feet deep; the Calumet River Branch generally 160 and 260 feet wide and 22 feet deep; the Lake George Branch generally 160 feet wide and 22 feet deep. Cost of completed new work exclusive of amount expended on previous projects are $4,848,980 Federal, and $782,000 non-Federal, which includes a cash contribution of $12,500. Local cooperation. Act of 1937 provides enlargement of Indiana Harbor Canal shall not be undertaken until local interests furnish a right-of-way 300 feet wide and construct substantial bulkheads along channel on established lines shown on map accompanying Rivers and Harbors Committee Document 13, 75th Congress, 1st session, provided that improvement on one side may proceed in any section on fulfillment of conditions for that side of section, and provided further, that south of turning basin at The Forks (beginning 450 feet south of intersection of present Calumet Branch and mainstem bulkhead lines), widening and deepening by the United States shall be done only as rights-of-way and bulkheads on at least one side of the channel are continuously provided southward from above limit of turning basin at The Forks. To provide for 300-foot channel, a parcel of land (of about 4.6 acres), generally 100 feet wide, lyink on east side of Calumet River Branch, commencing at north side of 141st Street and extending northward toward The Forks for about 2,170 feet, has been conveyed to and accepted by the United States. Local interests constructed about 1,350 feet of bulkhead along east side of Calumet River Branch, and reconstructed bulkhead on west side from The Forks to 141st Street. Defense Plant Corp. built a bulkhead along east side of canal between Pennsylvania Railroad Co.'s bridge and Dickey Place Bridge; the United States widened and deepened east side of this portion of widening. Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. constructed a bulkhead along west side of canal 30-4 CHICAGO, ILL., DISTRICT between Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co. bridge and the Pennsylvania Railroad Co. bridge, and the United States widened and deepened west side of this portion of widening. All prior requirements fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Four docks for handling iron ore, limestone and taconite; two docks for handling steel mill products by barge; eight docks for petroleum products; three docks for miscellaneous commodities and two docks used exclusively for winter mooring of vessels in layup. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Under the confined disposal program, site selection studies and engineering and design for a new containment area were continued at a cost of $81,383. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. North breakwater (rubblemound, 1,120 feet, completed in 1922) is in good condition. East breakwater (concrete caisson, 201 feet, completed in 1926) and northerly extension (rubblemound, 2,324 feet, completed in 1935) are in good condition. Head of navigation for commercial vessels is at the Baltimore & Ohio Terminal Railroad bridge on the Lake George Branch about 3 miles from outer harbor, and at 141st Street highway bridge about 2,200 feet south of The Forks on the Calumet River Branch about 2.5 miles from outer harbor. The total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1982 were $10,026,544, of which $8,393,493 were regular funds, $1,618,041 Public Works funds and $12,500 contributed funds; $4,848,980 being for new work and $5,177,564 for maintenance. 6. MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IND. Location. Northwest Indiana (in La Porte County), on southeast shore of Lake Michigan, 38 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14905.) For descriptions, see page 1482 of Annual Report for 1932. Previous projects. See page 1407 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See table 30-C. Costs of completed new work are $1,256,257 Federal, exclusive of amount expended on previous project and $37,800 non-Federal, which includes a cash contribution of $30,800. (See table 30-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Four fish docks, one city dock, and one grain elevator in this harbor. The commodity handled at this harbor is fresh fish. There are three small boatyards, which repair and construct recreational craft only. One public dock is owned by city and has not been used for commercial purposes. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: A contract for ground maintenance of the confined disposal area was performed at a cost of $200. Steps from the east pier to the east breakwater were constructed at a cost of $6,300. Supervision and inspection of these activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $1,519. A claim relative to dredging in 1978 was resolved at a cost of $9,280. Stone was placed on the detached breakwater and east pier at a cost of $34,999. Contract claims for maintenance dredging were resolved at a cost of $917. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. Concrete superstructure, 1,304 feet, on detached breakwater completed in 1931. Rehabilitation of detached breakwater by conversion to a rubblemound was completed in 1969 and the structure is in excellent condition. Rehabilitation of portions of the entrance piers have also been completed and are in excellent condition. The remainder of the entrance piers, completed in 1930, are in poor condition and are being repaired Under permit from Secretary of War, the Northern Indiana Public Service Co. removed 615 feet of inner end of west pier and about 719 feet of bulkhead south of pier, and replaced them with a steel sheet pile bulkhead located landward of former dock line. Area channelward of new bulkhead was dredged by permittee to 18 feet. Head of navigation for deepdraft commercial vessels and barges is at Franklin Street Bridge at head of project, 1.45 miles above outer end of west pier. Above this point, depths are sufficient only for small shallow draft launches. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1982 were $7,533,812, of which $1,287,057 was for new work ($1,256,257 Federal and $30,800 non-Federal funds), $4,628,085 for maintenance, and $1,618,670 for rehabilitation. 7. WAUKEGAN HARBOR, ILL. Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 51 miles south of Milwaukee and about 38 miles north of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) Previous projects. See page 1392. Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See table 30-C. For completed modifications see page 1239, Annual Report for 1963. The entrance channel in the outer 30-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 harbor is 22 feet and extends to that depth in Lake Michigan, at widths varying from 380 feet to 500 feet; the channel between the piers is a depth of 18 feet at a width of 200 feet; the inner basin is 18 feet deep; a small boat anchorage area is 8 feet deep. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed modifications. Terminal facilities. Two commercial docks receive coal, cement and gypsum. In addition there are three publicly owned docks, one owned by the city and used for fishing, and the other two owned by the Waukegan Port District. There is one boat yard for recreational craft. City dock is considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $12,771. Engineering and design for dredging, structural investigation, and north breakwater repair was performed at a cost of $110,506. A dredging contract was completed in June 1982 at a cost of $262,425. A structure repair contract was completed in November 1981 at a cost of $23,167., Supervision and inspection of those activities cost $89,516. Under the diked disposal program, engineering and design were conducted at a cost of $108,313. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete except for the 1970 modification which is inactive. Anchorage area in southwest corner of inner basin (1945 modification) was completed in 1966. North pier, completed in 1904, is in poor condition, allowing sand to pass through into the channel between the piers. South pier, completed in 1903 is in good condition. The outer 600 feet of breakwater, completed in 1904, and the shorearm extension, completed in 1931, are in generally good condition except for outer 100 feet which are in poor condition. Costs to September 30, 1982 for existing project were $604,793 for new work and $4,008,464 for maintenance, a total of $4,613,257. 8. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS See table 30-G. 9. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Small Navigation Projects Not Specifically Authorized bjy Congress (Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended, Public Law 645, 86th Congress). Project and Location SBH Burns Wtwy, Ind. Fiscal Year Costs to September 30, 1982 $264,989 Alteration of Bridges 10. OTHER AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION See table 30-D. Beach Erosion Control 11. HOLLYWOOD-ARDMORE BEACH ALONG LAKE MICHIGAN, ILL. Location. On Illinois shore of Lake Michigan in City of Chicago (Cook County), on Chicago Park District land, approximately 7 miles north of Chicago Harbor. Existing project. This project was authorized in fiscal year 1980 by House Resolution 7542. The project provides for a wall, approximately 1,400 feet long, running parallel to the shoreline. The purpose of the wall is to prevent fine beach sand from being blown off the beach and onto adjacent Lake Shore Drive. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish assurances that they will provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction of the project; provide without cost to the United States all necessary utility or other relocations and alterations; hold and save the United States free from damage due to the construction of the project, except for those damages caused by negligence of the United States or its contractors; and maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during period. New work: Construction was completed with expenditure of $199,630 for construction, $22,660 for supervision and inspection and $14,980 for engineering. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1982 were $237,271, for all new work. 12. MT. BALDY, INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE, IND. Location. On the south end of Lake Michigan shoreline, approximately two miles west of Michigan City, Indiana. Existing Project. The Corps of Engineers was 30-6 CHICAGO, ILL., DISTRICT funded under the Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act 1981, dated 1 October 1980, Public Law 96-367, to provide beach nourishment along approximately 3,000 feet of shore at the toe of Mt. Baldy in the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore. Local Cooperation. The work is within the National Park Service property and the National Park Service, acting through its Superintendent of the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, issued to the Corps of Engineers on 28 April 1981 a right-of-way permit to do the work. Access to the project was made possible through the cooperation of the Northern Indiana Public Service Company. On 28 August 1973, the State of Indiana granted a 10-year license to the National Park Service for the installation and maintenance of beach nourishment material and stone revetment in this area, which was still valid for this project. Operations and results during period. New Work: Engineering and design work was performed at a cost of $26,356.46. Work under a littoral drift monitoring contract was continued at a cost of $35,252 with in-house costs of $792.89. The construction contract for the beach nourishment was completed at a cost of $1,175,120. Supervision and inspection was performed at a cost of $35,086.92. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction was completed. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1982 were $1,272,608.27 13. INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE EMERGENCY STONE REPAIRS, BEVERLY SHORES, INDIANA Location. On Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Lake Michigan shoreline in the Town of Beverly Shores, Indiana, approximately 4 miles southwest of Michigan City, Indiana Existing project. The initial stone revetment was designed and constructed by the Chicago District, Corps of Engineers at the request of the National Park Service in 1973. Construction of approximately 13,000 feet of stone revetment was completed in 1974. Section 103 of Public Law 97-88 dated 4 December 1981, and a subsequent funding increase, authorized $660,000 for emergency shore protection at Beverly Shores, Indiana. Local cooperation. The work area is within the National Park Service property and the National Park Service, acting through its Superintendent of the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, issued to the Corps of Engineers a right-of-entry permit to do the work. Access to the project was made possible through the cooperation of the Town of Beverly Shores. On 28 August 1973, the State of Indiana granted a 10-year license to the National Park Service for the installation and subsequent maintenance of the stone revetment. This license was still valid, for this project. Operations and results during period. New Work: Surveying, mapping, engineering and design were initiated and completed, resulting in final plans and specification at a cost of $81,543. Environmental Assessment and Real Estate activities were performed at a cost of $3,499. The contract was awarded to a SBA contractor on 29 September 1982. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is under construction. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1982 were $88,514. 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS See table 30-E. 15. BEACH EROSION CONTROL UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section 103 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962, as amended. Project and Fiscal Year Costs Location to September 30, 1982 Greenwood Beach, Evanston, Ill $43,010 Langdon Park, Wilmette, Ill 57,114 Flood Control 16. CHICAGO RIVER, ILL. (NORTH BRANCH) Location. North Branch, Chicago River is located in Cook and Lake Counties in northeastern part of Illinois. Existing project. Provides for clearing the channel of the North Branch of the Chicago River, Illinois of fallen trees, roots, and other debris and objects which contribute to flooding, unsightliness and pollution of the river. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of December 31, 1970 (Sec. 116) and amended by River & Harbor Act of 1974 providing for maintenance of the project. Local cooperation. The 1970 Act provides that local 30-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 interests furnish without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and spoil-disposal areas necessary for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all the works after completion without cost to the United States; and, agree to bear all costs in excess of $200,000 for completing the work. Assurance of local cooperation for the 1970 modification was approved on 31 July 1972. The 1974 Act amends the 1970 Act so that the United States will maintain the channel free of trees, roots, debris and objects at a cost not to exceed $150,000 per year with non-Federal interests paying 25 per centum of the cost of maintenance. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Engineering and design costs were $22,411 with real estate costs of $1,720. Federal funds in the amount of $73,703 were expended on two contracts for snagging and clearing of the North Branch from the North Shore Channel in Chicago to the Tri-State Tollway, Interstate 94, bridge in Northbrook, Ill. Supervision and inspection costs associated with the contract were $9,175. The local sponsor, the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago, contributed $47,344 for the work. Condition at end of fiscal year. The initial project was completed 26 May 1973. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1981 were $1,163,869 of which $231,884 was for new work ($191,884 regular funds and $40,000 contributed funds), and $931,985 for maintenance, ($713,192 Federal funds and $218,793 contributed funds). 17. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, ILL. Location. Rises in western LaPorte County, Indiana, near Michigan City and flows generally westerly through Porter and Lake County, Indiana, into Cook County, Illinois, to its junction with the Calumet-Sag Channel in Calumet Park, Illinois. Approximately 12 miles of the Little Calumet River lies within the State of Illinois. Existing project. Provides for clearing the channel of the Little Calumet River, Illinois, from its confluence with the Calumet-Sag Channel eastward to the Indiana State Line, of fallen trees, roots, silt, and other debris and objects which contribute to flooding, unsightliness and pollution of the river. Project was authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1974, Section 66, approved 7 March 1974. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during period. New work: Planning and engineering studies were performed on the Phase II silt removal portion of the project with costs of $103,687. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1982 was $545,418, all new work. 18. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See table 30-F. 19. FLOOD CONTROL UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong. and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs Project and Location ............. to September 30, 1982 Disaster Preparedness $130,151 Emergency Operations 19,928 Repair and Restoration -376 Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act Public Law 526, 79th Cong). Fiscal year costs Project and Location ............. to September 30, 1982 Lakeside Blvd., Manitowac, Wis. $7,500 General Investigations 20. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $3,288,071 itemized as follows: Navigation Studies $ 55,934 Flood Damage Prevention Studies 585,034 Shoreline Protection Studies 57,287 Special Studies 63,105 Coordination Studies 69,886 Supplemental Pre-authorization 2,456,825 21. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs of $91,442 were for: National Dam Safety Program Flood Plain Management Services $ 6,065 85,377 30-8 CHICAGO, ILL., DISTRICT 22. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Cost for hydrologic studies during the fiscal year was $793. 23. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Fiscal year costs of $108,010 were for: Training and Exercises $26,100 Management 81,910 30-9 TABLE 30-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 September 30, 1982 1. Burns Waterway Harbor, Ind. [Federal Funds] [Contributed Funds] 2. Calumet Harbor and River Ill. and Ind. [Federal Funds] [Contributed Funds] 3. Chicago Harbor, Ill. 4. Chicago River, Ill. 5. Indiana Harbor, Ind. 6. Michigan City Harbor, Ind. [Contributed Funds] New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Rehab.: Approp. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Rehab.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Rehab.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost - - - - 13,584,000 - - - - 13,584,000 40,000 1,010,000 455,000 325,000 3,778,793 40,003 1,001,531 463,466 300,624 3,754,414 - - - - 15,990 - - - - 15,990 - - - - 22,578,567' - - - - 22,578,5671 98,000 540,000 320,000 1,519,000 15,131,774' 99,989 528,586 315,735 683,175 14,280,270' - - - - 689,001' - - - - 689,001' - - - - 836,667 - - - - 836,667 - - - - 4,788,827' - - - - 4,788,827' 107,000 258,000 260,000 793,000 5,746,786 107,009 256,707 261,291 563,031 5,516,815 - - - - 1,326,600 - - - - 1,326,600 - - - - 1,500,565' - - - - 1,500,565 9,000 145,000 290,000 545,000 4,710,757' 10,920 144,998 289,920 339,980 4,505,655" - - - - 4,897,148' - - - - 4,897,148' ' 88,000 257000 30,000 80,000 87,998 251,157 34,361 81,383 469,000 118,000 83,000 15,000 565,003 120,994 76,277 17,299 5,177,665� 5,177,564� 1,543,646'" 1,543,6461' 4,633,512 4,628,085 1,618,670 1,618,670 30,800 30,800 30-10 CHICAGO, ILL., DISTRICT TABLE 30-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 September 30, 1982 7. Waukegan New Work: Harbor, Ill. Approp. - - - - 823,02611 Cost - - - - 823,02611 Maint.: Approp. 320,000 27,000 200,000 765,000 4,224,309" Cost 320,001 25,326 144,131 606,698 4,008,4641' 11. Hollywood-Ardmore New Work: Beach, Ill. Approp. - 30,000 340,000 - 370,000 Cost - 3,504 129,225 237,271 370,000 12. Mount Baldy, Ind. New Work: Dunes National Approp. - - 1,500,000 - 1,500,000 Lakeshore, Ind. Cost - - 227,305 1,272,608 1,499,913 13. Indiana Dunes National New Work: Lakeshore, Beverly Approp. - - - 660,000 660,000 Shores, Indiana Cost - - - 88,514 88,514 16. Chicago River, Ill. New Work: North Branch Approp. - - - - 191,884 [Federal Funds] Cost - - - - 191,884 Maint.: Approp. 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 847,000 Cost 150,087, 13,995 195,188 107,010 713,192 [Contributed New Work: Funds] Contrib. - - - - 40,000 Cost - - - - 40,000 Maint.: Contrib. 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 300,000 Cost 52,904 9,721 50,842 47,344 218,793 17. Little Calumet New Work: River, Ill. Approp. - 50,000 100,000 - 458,000 Cost 20,822 112,909 - 441,731 1. Includes $855,973 for previous projects. 2. Excludes contributed funds in settlement pursuant 6. Includes $109,463 for previous projects. to decree [No. 54-C-1608] regarding removal of flue-dust 7. Includes $60,668 for previous projects. and includes $45,230 for previous projects. 8. Includes $2,509 for previous projects. 3. In settlement pursuant to decree [No. 54-C-16081 9. Excludes $12,500 contributed funds. regarding removal of flue-dust. 10. Includes $287,389 for previous projects. 4. Includes $446,005 for previous projects. 11. Includes $218,233 on previous projects. 5. Includes $955,886 for previous projects. 12. Includes $15,711 on previous projects. 30-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 30-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 June 25, 1910 Sept. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 19351 3 Aug. 30, 19351 3 Mar. 2, 1945= July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 July 11, 1870 June 14, 1880 Mar. 3, 1899 July 25, 1912 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1931 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, ILL. AND IND. (See Section 2 of Text) Outer harbor protected by breakwaters. Five turning basins Provided for shape and dimensions of turning basins Consolidated the 2 projects for Calumet Harbor and Calumet River. Detached breakwater, dredging outer harbor to existing project depth and dimensions; deepen river-entrance channel and river to existing project depths; widen and straighten river channel; 5 turning basins to same depth as adjacent channel. Dredging areas A and B in south end of Lake Calumet and an entrance channel 300 feet wide to 21 feet deep. An approach channel to harbor 3,200 feet wide and 28 feet deep through shoals outside breakwater and closing existing gap between breakwaters. Depth of 29 feet in lake approach to 28 feet in outer harbor; and 27 feet in river entrance up to E.J.&E. Ry. Bridge. Deepen, widen, and straighten channel in Calumet River from E.J.&E. Ry. Bridge to and including turning basin 5, to a depth of 27 feet in earth and 28 feet in rock; deepen turning basins 1, 3 and 5 to 27 feet; enlarge turning basins 3 and 5; a channel into Lake Calumet to 27 feet deep for 3,000 feet and a width of 1,000 feet; and eliminate turning basins 2 and 4 from project. Modification of Act of Oct. 23, 1962. Protection for Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Bridge over the Calumet River, to permit dredging to full width of the south draw to depth of 27 feet, and temporary protection for the center pier and south abutment of the New York, Chicago and St. Louis Railroad Bridge [Nickel Plate] to permit dredging of full width of south bridge draw to depth of 27 feet prior to its replacement. CHICAGO HARBOR, ILL. (See Section 3 of Text) Inner breakwaters and inner basin. Exterior Breakwater. Present project depth in basin, and entrance to Chicago River. Shore-arm and southerly extension of exterior breakwater. Modification of area to be dredged in inner basin. Shore-arm extension of exterior breakwater transferred to Lincoln Park Commissioners. Resumption of jurisdiction over shore-arm extension breakwater and over certain navigable waters in Lake Michigan which lie in northwestern part of outer harbor. Deepen a lake approach channel to 29 by 800 feet wide for 6,600 feet; and deepen a channel and maneuver area inside harbor entrance to 28 by 1,300 feet wide. CHICAGO RIVER, ILL. (See Section 4 of Text) For project depth of 21 feet in lieu of that fixed by act of June 3, 1896. Turning basins. Annual Report, 1896 pp. 2584 et seq., and H. Doc. 277, H. 54th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 172, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 349, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 494, 72d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 180, 73d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 233, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 149, 86th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 581, 87th Cong., 2d sess." H. Report No. 973, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Ex. Doc. 114, 41st Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report 1879, pp. 1562-1567 Annual Report 1870, pp. 1562-1567 Annual Report 1897, pp. 2790-2791 H. Doc. 710, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1303, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 797, 71st Cong. Public Law 14, 79th Cong. H. Doc. 485, 87th Cong., 2d sess.' Specified in act. Specified in act. 30-12 CHICAGO, ILL., DISTRICT TABLE 30-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1919 July 24, 1946 June 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 20, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 2, 1929 July 3, 193010 June 30, 1932 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 26, 1937 July 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 1965"1 Mar. 3, 1889 Mar. 3, 1905 Jan. 21, 1927 Interpreted by'Chief of Engineers, April 11, 1908 as adopting new work of the then existing project for 21-foot depth. Eliminated all work except maintenance of main river. Dredging channel 9 feet deep to within 30 feet of existing bulkheads and river banks from North Ave. to Belmont Ave., thence 9 feet deep and 50 feet wide to Addison St. INDIANA HARBOR, IND. (See Section 5 of Text) Maintenance of outer harbor. Maintenance of inner harbor channel when deeded free of cost to and accepted by the United States. Breakwaters. Lighthouse crib, present length and alignment easterly and northerly breakwaters. Reduce length of channel to be maintained in extension to Lake George. Authorized Secretary of War to modify project so far as relates to length and alinement of breakwaters and to sell Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. about 1,180 linear feet of shoreward end of existing north breakwater. Accept 2.3 acres of land for construction of the Forks Turning Basin. Existing project channel width and depth in Lake George Branch and turning basin at the Forks. Authorized Secretary of War to sell Inland Steel Co. about 1,903 linear feet of southerly end of existing east breakwater. Extended easterly breakwater, dredge entrance channel and outer harbor, deepen channel between bulkhead fills, widen main stem of canal and portion of Calumet River Branch to 141st St. Modified conditions of local cooperation required before enlargement of Indiana Harbor Canal is undertaken by United States. Increase authorized depths to 29 feet in outer harbor entrance channel; 28 feet in outer harbor, and 27 feet in canal entrance channel to first E.J.&E. Ry. Bridge. Deepen main canal from landward end of canal entrance channel to a point lakeward of Dickey Place Bridge over a modified channel width of 190 feet, except through bridge openings. MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IND (See Section 6 of Text) East breakwater and old east pier inclosing the outer basin. Extension of east pier. Extend east pier and construct detached breakwater. Lower turning basin. Rebuild west pier as at present located. Present project dimensions of entrance channel. Existing project depth in channel, and in lower and middle turning basins, eliminated improvement of Trail Creek above middle turning basin and uncompleted portion of detached breakwater, abandonment of old east breakwater and old east pier inclosing outer basin. H. Doc. 95, 56th Cong., 1st sess [Annual Report, 1900, p. 3863, and Annual Report, 1909, p. 709]. H. Doc. 1294, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 767, 78th Cong., 2d sess. ' H. Doc. 1113, 60th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 690, 62d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 65th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 176, 67th Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 219, 72d Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 75th Cong., let sess. H. Doc. 195, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 227, 89th Cong., 1st sess." Recommendation of a Board of Engineers, Annual Report, 1870, p. 123. Reports of Boards of Engineers, Annual Report, 1851, pp. 2187-2189; Annual Report 1882, pp. 2264-2266. Annual Report, 1897, pp. 2903-2904. Joint resolution of Congress approved May 13, 1908, Public Law 23. H. Doc. 279, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 30-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 30-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Sept. 30, 1966 Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 June 14, 1880 Aug. 3, 1882 June 13, 1902 July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 17, 1970 Sec. 201 Oct. 27, 1965 July 8, 1980 Oct. 1, 1980 Dec. 4, 1981 Restore and repair westerly 1,000 feet of east breakwater, dredging outer basin, and enlarging entrance to basin through east pier. Dredge river channel 50 feet wide and 6 feet deep from upper turning basin to E Street bridge. WAUKEGAN HARBOR, ILL. (See Section 7 of Text) Parallel piers and basins.' Modified location of harbor entrance. Detached breakwater, extend piers, increase width of harbor at inner end of north pier, and dredge channel and basin to depth of 20 feet. Extension of breakwater to shore, dredging near outer end of north pier, and enlarging inner basin. Dredge an entrance channel to existing project dimensions from outer end of north pier to project depth in lake, and dredge an anchorage area in southwest corner of inner basin to existing project depth. Abandonment of dredging triangular area in southwest corner of inner basin to 18 feet deep. Provides for deepening the existing entrance channel in the outer harbor to 25 feet and extending it to that depth in Lake Michigan, at widths varying from 380 feet to 500 feet; deepening the channel between piers to a depth of 23 feet at a width of 180 feet, and deepening the inner basin to 23 feet and extending its limits approximately 275 feet northward. HOLLYWOOD-ARDMORE BEACH ALONG LAKE MICHIGAN, ILL. (See Section 10 of Text) Provides for a reinforced concrete wall, together with grading and fill in order to stabilize the beach. MOUNT, BALDY, INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE, IND. (See Section 11 of Text) Provides for emergency beach nourishment. INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE, IND., BEVERLY SHORES, INDIANA. Provides for emergency shore protection repairs to stone revetment initially constructed in 1973. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 34, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Detailed Project Report June 1965.8 Annual Report, 1880, p. 1942. Annual Report, 1882, pp. 277, 2162. H. Doc. 343, 56th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 27, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 116, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 368, 90th Cong., 2d sess.8 Public Law 96-304 "Supplemental Appropriations and Rescission Act, 1980." Public Law 96-367. Public Law 97-88 1. Included in Public Works Administration Program Sept. 6, 1943, and Dec. 16, 1933. 2. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 [dredging in front of U.S. Steel Corp.] 3. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 [breakwater closure.] 4. Contains latest map of harbor. Uncompleted portion is inactive. 5. Contains latest map of river. 6. Latest published map is in Annual Report for 1914, opposite p. 2928. 7. Contains latest published, map of North Branch above North Ave. 8. Contains latest published map. 9. Completed under previous project. 10. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 [widen and deepen Lake George Branch.] 11. Included in Public Works Administration Program Sept. 6, 1933, and July 25, 1934. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 [widen and deepen main canal and Calumet River Branch.] 12. Project deauthorized in 1977. 30-14 CHICAGO, ILL., DISTRICT EXISTING PROJECTS See Section in Text Project Item Length Width Depth (feet) (feet) (feet) 1. Burns Waterway Harbor, Indiana 2. Calumet Harbor and River, Ill. and Ind. 3. Chicago Harbor, Ill. 4. Chicago River, Illinois 5. Indiana Harbor, Indiana North Breakwater Outer West Bulkhead Approach Channel Outer Harbor East Harbor Arm West Harbor Arm Northerly breakwater Southerly breakwater North pier Approach channel Outer harbor River entrance Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Bridge to turning basin No. 3 Turning basin No. 3 to turning basin No. 5 Approach into Lake Calumet Extension into Lake Calumet Turning basins 1, 3 and 5 Shore arm north breakwater Exterior breakwater Southerly extension North inner breakwater South inner breakwater North pier Approach channel Channel and maneuver area Entrance channel Inner basin Main Branch of Chicago River North Branch of Chicago River North Branch Canal North Branch Turning Basin Northerly Breakwater Easterly Breakwater Approach Channel Outer Harbor Entrance Channel Main Canal Turning Basin Lake George Branch Calumet River Branch 30-15 TABLE 30-C 4,630 1,200 2,200 3,700 2,200 3,800 6,714 5,007 2,450 9,700 10,500 3,000 21,10Q 8,000 4,000 3,000 2,250 5,421 4,944 3,034 2,544 960 6,600 2,200 7,300 1,270 3,800 11,100 5,500 1,120 2,525 7,200 4,200 3,600 7,400 3,700 2,500 400 Varies 260-620 620 3,200 3,000 290 200 and variable Variable 400 1,000 800 1,300 190-470 740 190-390 91-390 56-210 800 Varies 65-280 61-210 64-160 160-260 30 28 27 27 29 28 27 27 earth 28 rock 27 27 27 27 29 28 21 21 21 21 21 21 29 28 27 22 22 22 22 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982. TABLE 30-C EXISTING PROJECTS See Section in Text Project Item Length Width Depth (feet) (feet) (feet) 6. Michigan City Harbor, Detached breakwater 1,304 - - Ind. West pier 835 - - East pier 2,276 - - East breakwater 1,000 - - Entrance channel 1,900 150-425 18 Main channel 2,400 120-150 18 Outer basin 900 900 8-12 Trail Creek 3,000 50-100 8 Trail Creek 2,300 50 6 7. Waukegan Harbor, North breakwater and Shore Connection 1,894 - - Ill. North pier 1,442 - - South pier 3,111 - - Entrance channel 3,250 380-500 22 Channel to inner basin 1,700 180 18 Inner basin 1,650 375-500 18 Anchorage Area -' -' 8 'Area of about 6 acres. TABLE 30-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION (See Section 10 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Calumet River Bridges' 1967 $1,625,068 'Transferred to Department of Transportation in accordance with Section 6[g] of the Act of October 15, 1966, P.L. 89-670. 30-16 CHICAGO, ILL., DISTRICT TABLE 30-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS (See Section 14 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Evanston, Illinois 1979 $766,052 - Lake Michigan-Lake Bluff, Ill. 1976 244,889 - Lake Michigan-Lake Forest, Ill.' 1975 65,611 - 'Authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1954. OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 30-F FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 18 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance KANKAKEE RIVER, ILL. AND IND. Levee between Shelby Bridge and Baum's Bridge in Ind. 1938 LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, ILL. AND IND. Little Calumet River and Tributaries, Ill. and Ind.' 1968 53,136 'Classified inactive in November 1971. TABLE 30-G RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 8 of Text) Date Reconnaissance or Condition Survey Project Conducted Cost Chicago River, Ill. - $-15,577' Indiana Harbor, Ind. June 1982 42,629 Michigan City, Ind. May 1982 11,639 'Note: A credit of $15,577 occurred in 1982 as a result of condition surveys performed at Chicago River, Ill. during 1981. 30-17 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT* The district is composed of the upper and lower peninsulas of Michigan and portions of Indiana, Wisconsin and Minnesota, which border the lakes. It includes U. S. waters of Lakes Superior, Michigan, Huron, St. Clair and western Lake Erie. Unless otherwise indicated all depths stated in this report are referred to low water datum as follows: Lake Superior, 600 feet; Lake Michigan-Huron, 576.8 feet;. Lake Erie, 568.6 feet; and Lake St. Clair, 571.7 feet. Elevations in feet are above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec (International Great Lakes Datum-1955). IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Arcadia Harbor, MI ........................ 31-2 2. Ashland Harbor WI ...................... 31-2 3. Beaver Bay Harbor, MN ................... 31-3 4. Big Bay Harbor, MI ........................ 31-3 5. Black River, (Port Huron) MI ............. 31-3 6. Bolles Harbor, MI .......................... 31-4 7. Cedar River Harbor, MI .................... 31-4 8. Charlevoix Harbor, MI .................... 31-4 9. Cheboygan Harbor, MI ................ 31-5 10. Clinton River, MI...........................31-5 11. Cornucopia Harbor, WI.....................31-6 12. Cross Village Harbor, MI ................... 31-6 13. Detour Harbor, MI ......................... 31-7 14. Detroit River, MI ........................... 31-7 15. Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN and W I .................................... 31-8 16. Fox River, WI ............................ 31-8 17. Frankfort Harbor, MI ...................... 31-9 18. Grand Haven Harbor and Grand River, MI ........................... 31-9 19. Grand Traverse Bay Harbor, M I ...................................... 31-10 20. Green Bay Harbor, WI.................... 31-10 21. Hammond Bay Harbor, MI ............... 31-11 22. Harbor Beach Harbor, MI .............. 31-11 23. Holland Harbor, MI ...................... 31-11 24. The Inland Route, MI ..................... 31-12 25. Kenosha Harbor, WI...................... 31-12 26. Kewaunee Harbor, WI ..................... 31-13 27. Keweenaw Waterway, MI ................. 31-13 28. Knife River Harbor, MN ................ 31-14 29. Lac La Belle Harbor, MI .................. 31-14 30. Lake St. Clair, MI Channels.............. 31-14 Navigation (cont.) 31. Leland Harbor, MI ....................... 31-14 32. Lexington Harbor, MI .................... 31-15 33. Little Lake Harbor, MI ................... 31-15 34. Ludington Harbor, MI .................... 31-15 35. Lutsen Harbor, MN ................... 31-16 36. Manistee Harbor, MI ..................... 31-16 37. Manistique Harbor, MI ................. 31-16 38. Manitowoc Harbor, WI ................... 31-17 39. Marquette Harbor, MI.................. 31-18 40. Menominee Harbor and River, MI and WI ............................... 31-18 41. Milwaukee Harbor, WI ................... 31-18 42. Monroe Harbor, MI ....................... 31-19 43. Muskegon Harbor, MI .................... 31-19 44. New Buffalo Harbor, MI ................. 31-20 45. Ontonagon Harbor, MI ................. 31-20 46. Pensaukee Harbor, WI .................... 31-20 47. Pentwater Harbor, MI .................... 31-21 48. Point Lookout Harbor, (Au Gres River) MI ....................... 31-21 49. Portage Lake Harbor, MI ................. 31-21 50. Port Sanilac Harbor, MI .................. 31-21 51. Port Washington Harbor, WI ............. 31-22 52. Presque Isle Harbor, MI ................ 31-22 53. Racine Harbor, WI ....................... 31-22 54. Rouge River, MI .......................... 31-23 55. Saginaw River, MI ....................... 31-23 56. St. Clair River, MI ....................... 31-24 57. St. Joseph Harbor, MI .................... 31-24 58. St. Marys River, MI ...................... 31-25 59. Saugatuck Harbor and Kalamazoo River, MI................................ 31-26 60. Sebewaing River, MI ..................... 31-26 * All cost and Financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in textand also appear at the end of this chapter. 31-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Navigation (cont.) Page 61. Sheboygan Harbor, WI ................. 31-26 62. South Haven Harbor, MI ............... 31-27 63. Sturgeon Bay and Lake Michigan Ship Canal, WI .......................... 31-27 64. Two Harbors, MN ........................ 31-27 65. Two Rivers Harbor, WI ................. 31-28 66. White Lake Harbor, MI ........... ..... 31-28 67. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys.................................. 31-28 68. Other authorized navigation projects.................................. 31-28 69. Navigation work under special authorization .......................... 31-29 Beach Erosion Control 70. Authorized beach erosion control projects ........................ 31-29 71. Emergency shore protection ............. 31-29 72. Beach erosion work under special authorization .......................... 31-29 73. Mitigation of Shore damages ............ 31-29 Flood Control 74. Red Run Drain-Lower Clinton River, M I ............................... 31-29 75. Saginaw River, MI ..................... 31-30 76. Sebewaing, Sebewaing River, M I ...................................... 31-31 Navigation 1.' ARCADIA HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 193 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 15 miles northerly from Manistee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 14907). Existing project. Provided for maintenance dredging of the existing harbor built by private interests for a period of five years. The five years covered by this project were the calendar years 1905 to 1909, inclusive. Funds were also appropriated and maintenance was performed in calendar years 1911, 1912, 1913 and 1915, inclusive. There is at present no approved project for the improvement of this harbor. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Dock facilities are considered adequate for existing recreational traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by government forces at a cost of $6,589. An adjustment of $-5,293 was made in cost for maintenance dredging contract performed in FY 81. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging at a cost of $29,641. Approximately 11,700 cubic yards, place measure, of shoal material was removed by hydraulic dredge. Engineering and design for breakwater repair was performed at a cost of $10,637. Engineering, Flood Control (cont.) Page 77. Inspection of completed flood control projects .......................... 31-31 78. Other authorized flood control projects.... ........................... 31-32 79. Flood control under special authorization .......................... 31-32 80. Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters ................................ 31-32 General Investigations 81. Surveys.................................. 31-34 82. Collection and study of basic data .................................. . 31-34 Tables Table 31-A Cost & Financial Statement ...... 31-35 Table 31-B Authorizing Legislation ........ 31-49 Table 31-C Features of Existing project ........................ 31-67 Table 31-D St. Marys River, MI: Existing Project ............... 31-68 Table 31-E Fox River, WI: Locks & Dams .... 31-69 Table 31-F Reconnaissance & Condition Surveys ....................... 31-70 Table 31-G Other Authorized Navigation Projects .............. 31-71 Table 31-H Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............... 31-72 Table 31-I Deauthorized Projects .......... 31-73 surveys, supervision and administration cost $6,776. Existing project was completed in 1909. Varying depths of 5-12 feet exist in the channel at present. Future maintenance of the harbor will be based on providing a 9-foot depth. Piers and revetments are in fair condition with some sections in need of major repair. Total cost at end of FY for existing project was $623,390. 2. ASHLAND HARBOR, MI Location. At head of Chequamegon Bay, on south shore of Lake Superior, about 65 miles east of Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14974.) Existing project. A west channel 20 and 21 feet deep and an east basin 25 and 27 feet deep, both all protected by an 8,000-foot breakwater. For additional details see page 1008 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. City of Ashland owns 4,150 feet of waterfront for future public needs. Wharves for handling coal, ore, limestone, logs, and pulpwood are served by railroads. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Handling of ore and logs has been discontinued for the present. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies and miscellaneous reports and services were performed by Govern- 31-2 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT ment forces at a cost of $15,619. Repairs to breakwater and seawalls were performd at a cost of $127,074. The contract for maintenance dredging awarded last FY was completed at a cost of $25,829. An estimated 3,780 cubic yards, place measure, of shoal material was removed by hydraulic dredge. Engineering, surveys, supervision and administration cost $42,480. Work authorized prior to 1960 Act was completed in 1950. Work authorized by 1960 Act was completed in November 1962. Breakwater is in generally good condition, except for settled portions. Total cost of existing project to end of FY is $3,888,819, of which $1,748,176 was for new work and $2,140,647 for maintenance. 3. BEAVER BAY HARBOR, MN. Location. The harbor is located on the north shore of Lake Superior 53 miles northeasterly from Duluth, MN, and 56 miles southwesterly from Grand Marias, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14966.) Existing project. Project as modified provides a rubblemound breakwater 552 feet in length, and an excavated harbor basin approximately 2 acres in size, and 8 feet deep. See page 1659 of Annual Report for 1945 for improvements authorized by the River and Harbor Act approvedMarch 2, 1945 (H. Doc. No 446, 78th Cong., 2d sess.). This document contains the latest published map. Estimated Federal cost (1981) for new work is $2,750,000 and non-Federal cost is $198,000 which includes a cash contribution of $38,900. Local coopeFation. See page 1659 and 1660 of Annual Report for 1945. Final assurances executed in June 1981. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $398 and is near completion with the work on the construction plans and specifications essentially complete. 4. BIG BAY HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior 33 miles northwesterly from Marquette, MI, and 38 miles easterly from Portage entry to Keweenaw Waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14964.) Existing project. Provides for two converging piers extending from shore, an entrance channel between piers and rectangular harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet in entrance channel and 10 feet in harbor basin. For details see page 1009 of Annual Report for 1965 and page 1261 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $14,663. An adjustment of $-4,800 was made in the dredging contract awarded in FY 81 and cancelled this FY. Project was completed in June 1961 except for protection at inner end of east breakwater, completed in November 1961. A contract for repair of breakwater, damaged by storms, was completed in August 1969. Total cost to end of FY was $1,295,080, of which $375,412 was for new work and $919,668 for maintenance. 5. BLACK RIVER (PORT HURON), MI Location. This river has its source in the northern part of Sanilac County, MI, is about 60 miles long, and flows in a southeasterly direction into the St. Clair River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14852.) Previous project. For details see page 1441 of Annual Report for 1916, and 1554 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. This provides for a channel 20 feet deep from deep water in St. Clair River to the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge, 160 feet wide at the mouth, decreasing to 100 feet about 800 feet from the mouth, thence 100 feet wide for 2,600 feet, decreasing to 75 feet for a distance of 4,800 feet; widening two bends to 100 feet, one at the foot of 12th Street, and the other below the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge; for a settling basin 75 feet wide and 20 feet deep, beginning at the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge in Port Huron and extending upstream a distance of about 2,300 feet; and then for a distance of 2.6 miles as a 100-foot wide river channel, 8 feet deep to the I-94 bridge where it decreases to 6 feet deep and continues to the vicinity of the Black River Drainage Canal with suitable widening where required at bends in the channel. The project modification authorized by the Act of August 30, 1935 is considered to be inactive and is excluded from the foregoing cost for new work. The cost of this modification was last revised in 1954 and was estimated to be $194,000 exclusive of $194,000 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are docks on both sides of Black River, near its mouth, and between these docks and the upper limit of improvement there are 5 other docks varying in length from 100 to 500 feet. All docks are privately owned and are restricted to the use of the owners. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Public recreational boating facilities constructed by the State and local agencies are available as are privately owned and operated marinas. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $3,258. An adjustment of $-2,603 was made in engineering and design cost. All work, except that authorized by Act of August 30, 1935 and the latest modification, has been completed. Total costs for existing project to end of FY were $1,322,962, of which $830,165 (includes $349,921 contributed funds) was for new work and $492,797 for maintenance. 31-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 6. BOLLES HARBOR, MI Location. On west shore of Lake Erie at mouth of La Plaisance Creek, 7 miles southwest of Monroe, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14846.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel in Lake Erie, 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide from deep water to a point opposite the outer end of existing jetty, thence widening to 100 feet at creek mouth; an accesss channel in La Plaisance Creek, 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide at the mouth widening to 120 feet and extending to the first bend, thence narrowing to 50 feet wide and continuing at that width to the La Plaisance Road bridge; a steel sheet pile revetment, about 200 feet long, located along Michigan State Conservation Department property on west side of channel at creek mouth. Project also provides for inclusion of existing 400-foot long steel sheet pile jetty constructed by Michigan State Waterways. Commission at the mouth of La Plaisance Creek. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Monroe Boat Club and three marinas provide facilities adequate for existing recreational boat traffic. There is also a public launching ramp and parking area at Conservation Department fishing site at creek mouth. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and services were performed by Government forces at a cost of $5,903. An adjustment of $-4,356 was made in the dredging contract completed last FY. Maintenance of disposal area was performed at a cost of $3,765. Engineering, surveys, supervision and administration cost $397. The existing project was completed in 1970. (Adequate depths exist over the project length except for upstream 800 feet). Total costs to end of FY were $2,474,330, of which $426,413 was for new work ($255,000 contributed funds) and $2,047,917 for maintenance. 7. CEDAR RIVER HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Cedar River on west shore of Green Bay, an arm of Northern Lake Michigan, about 68 miles north of City of Green Bay. Nearest harbors are Menominee, MI, 27 miles southwest and at Escanaba, MI, 20 miles northeast. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14909.) Existing project. Two parallel entrance piers, a west pier 230 feet long and a rubblemound east pier 875 feet long with a sport fishing walkway; an entrance channel 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in Green Bay to mouth of Cedar River about 900 feet long; and inner channel in Cedar River 1,400 feet long, 80 feet wide, and 8 feet deep upstream to about 150 below State Route 35 bridge; and a turning basin 150 feet wide near upstream end of inner bridge channel. Estimated costs (1981) of new work are $1,270,000 Federal (Corps of Engineers) and $258,000 non-Federal. Total project cost is $1,548,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. The 1965 modification provides that local interests will contribute in cash 15 percent of the first cost of the new navigation facilities and 50 percent of the first cost of structural modifications necessary to provide for sport fishing walkway on top of the new east pier, the total of such contributions being $258,000 (Oct 1981 estimate) to be paid in a lump sum prior to initiation of construction and to be subject to final adjustment after actual costs have been determined; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil; and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads and embankments therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and maintenance of the project; provide and maintain without cost to the United States necessary mooring facilities utilities, including an adequate public landing with provision for the sale of motor fuel, lubricants and potable water and a parking lot with adequate sanitary facilities available to all on equal terms and including dredging of berthing areas to depths commensurate with the related project depths; and reserve anchorage spaces and mooring facilities adequate for the accommodation of transient craft. Formal assurances were executed in September 1981. Terminal facilities. There are no permanent docking, mooring or handling facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning is near completion with the work on the construction plans and specifications essentially complete. 8. CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 276 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 75 miles northerly from Frankfort, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14942.) Existing project. A channel 24 feet deep in Lake Michigan and a river channel 23 feet deep in the lower and upper channels connecting Lake Michigan with Lake Charlevoix via Round Lake. The channels are protected where needed by piers and revetments. For additional details see page 1476 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required except the latest project modification is subject to the following: (a) Provide, without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the modified project upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers, to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of excavated materials and any necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embank 31-4 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT ments, therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; (b)Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and maintenance of the modified project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (c) Provide and maintain without cost to the United States depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with the depths provided in the related project areas; (d) Accomplish, without cost to the United States, such alterations of submarine utility crossing as are required by the modified project; (e) Establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the harbor by users thereof which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; (f) If acquiring lands, easements and rights-ofway for construction of the project, local interests will comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970; Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971; (g) Contribute all costs in excess of $1,000,000 should the total cost of construction of the general navigation facilities exceed that amount, in accordance with provisions of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. The total first cost of construction is presently estimated at $652,000. Terminal facilities. Several small landing places in Round Lake at Charlevoix for handling fish and miscellaneous commodities, a wharf for petroleum products at west end of Lake Charlevoix, and coal wharves at Advance and Boyne City. Charlevoix, Boyne City, and East Jordan provide public docks for small craft. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, operation of safety features, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost $27,348. The contract awarded last FY for major repair of North Pier, Sections A&B, and repair of Sections Al, A2, C, D, F, G, H & I North and South Piers and Revetments was completed this FY at a cost of $1,202,533. Engineering and design, supervision and administration cost $91,015. Existing project was completed in 1939 except for the latest modification. A controlling depth of 18 feet is available throughout the entire project, except for minor shoaling along the channel limits. Total costs to end of FY were $5,518,038, of which $180,623 was for new work, $5,961,588 for maintenance (Emergency Bank Protection $46,352), and $1,129,396 for rehabilitation. 9. CHEBOYGAN HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Cheboygan River which empties into Western Lake Huron about 16 miles southeast of the Straits of Mackinac Bridge. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14881 and 14886.) Previous project. For details see page 1956 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1546 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A channel 21 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 21-foot contour in Lake Huron to outer end of west pier; thence, between lines parallel to and 25 feet from the docks, 21 feet deep from this point to East First Street and thence 18.5 feet deep and 60 feet wide from this bridge to the lock in Cheboygan River; a turning basin 21 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 420 to 770 feet long on east side of existing project channel just below East First Street; and rubblemound breakwater about 775 feet long on the site of existing west pier at mouth of river. Improvement is 12,000 feet long, of which about 6,000 feet are in Straits of Mackinac. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned wharves used for receiving coal, stone and petroleum products. Public recreational boating facilities constructed by the State and local agencies are avilable. These facilities satisfy existing commerce and vessel traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, cooperative stream gaging, boundary monumentation and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $30,678. A contract was awarded and completed for minor repairs and safety features at a cost of $271,998. An adjustment of $20,000 was made in structure repair costs previously performed. Engineering and design, supervision and administration cost $35,504. Existing project was completed in 1950. The latest modification was completed during FY 1969. Controlling depths of 21 feet exist in the channel from Lake Huron to East First Street, including the turning basin; 18.5 feet from East First Street to the State Road Bridge; thence 5.0 feet to the lock at the upper limits of the project. Total costs to end of FY were $1,353,823, of which $504,236 was for new work and $849,587 for maintenance. 10. CLINTON RIVER, MI Location. Has its source in Oakland County, MI, flows easterly about 60 miles and empties into Anchor Bay in northwestern part of Lake St. Clair. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14850.) Previous project. For details see page 1958 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1556 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel in Anchor Bay 8 feet deep, 300 feet wide at 8-foot depth contour in bay, gradually decreasing to 50 feet wide at about 1,000 feet upstream from mouth of Clinton River, a length of about 4,600 feet; a channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide in the river about 38,700 feet long from entrance channel upstream to Mt. Clemens at Cass Avenue; closing old channel and making a cutoff at Shoemakers Bend; closing Catfish Channel; construction of revetments as needed in the river; and a harbor basin, 5 feet deep and 11 acres in area at entrance along bay channel, protected by breakwaters on north and south sides. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 31-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Terminal facilities. River is used exclusively by recreational craft. There are numerous public and private piers and wharves along the river below the City. They are considered adequate. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and services were performed by Government forces at a cost of $22,348. Maintenance of the disposal area was performed at a cost of $4,479. Engineering and surveys were performed at a cost of $71. Engineering and design for a confined disposal area for polluted dredged material was performed at a cost of $20,444. Existing project was completed in 1966. Total costs to end of FY were $1,727,035, of which $260,046 was for new work, $1,177,237 for maintenance, and $289,752 contributed funds for new work. 11. CORNUCOPIA HARBOR, WI Location. At mouth of Siskiwit River on south shore of Lake Superior, 49 miles east from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14973.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel between piers; an irregular-shaped turning basin; two inner channels, and reconstruction and Federal maintenance of deflection dike and entrance piers constructed by local interests. Project depths are 10 feet between piers and 8 feet in turning basin and inner channels. For additional details see page 1010 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. About 1,000 linear feet of privately owned docking space is available. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $14,554. Repairs to the east pier, placing riprap and concrete, were performed at a cost of $93,501. An adjustment of $-745 was made in dredging contract completed last FY. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $858. Work authorized by earlier Act was completed in 1939; that for later modification in July 1958, except for extension of east pier, completed in September 1963. Controlling depths at the end of the FY were 9 feet in the harbor entry and 7 feet in the basins. 12. CROSS VILLAGE HARBOR, MI Location. On northeast shore of Lake Michigan, about 26 miles northeast of Charlevoix, Michigan. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14902.) Existing project. Provides for two breakwaters having an aggregate length of about 2,300 feet with provisions for recreational fishing on the main breakwater; an anchorage and maneuver area of about 8 acres and 10 feet deep and a flared entrance channel 12 feet deep decreasing in width to 100 feet through the breakwaters. Estimated (1981) Federal cost for new work is $3,515,000 and $2,225,000 non-Federal cost which is a cash contribution. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Responsible local interests must furnish assurances that they will contribute in cash 38 percent of the first cost of construction of the general navigation facilities and 50 percent of the first cost of facilities necessary to provide for recreational fishing on the main breakwater, such contributions presently estimated at $1,940,000 and $285,000, respectively, to be paid in a lump sum prior to initiation of construction, subject to final adjustment after actual costs have been determined; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements and rights-of-way required for the construction and maintenance of the project and of aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor or the costs of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent use, operation, and maintenance of the project; provide and maintain without cost to the United States necessary mooring facilities and utilities, including an adequate public landing with provision for the sale of motor fuel, lubricants, potable water, a parking lot with adequate sanitary facilities, and a launching ramp, open to all on equal terms, the dredging of berthing areas to be commensurate with the depth of the Federal channel improvements; establish a competent and properly constituted public body empowered to regulate the use, growth, and development of the harbor and recreationoriented facilities with the understanding that said facilities shall be open to all on equal terms: reserve spaces within the anchorage and mooring facilities adequate for the accommodation of transient craft; provide and maintain, without cost to the United States, for recreational fishing: access facilities, parking areas, and adequate sanitary facilities; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the waters of the harbor by users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of the recreational fishing facilities, the amount involved currently being estimated at $2,000 on an average annual basis; and provided further that the improvement for navigation may be undertaken independently of the public recreational fishing facilities on the main breakwater whenever funds for that purpose are available and the required local cooperation has been furnished. Terminal facilities. No facilities are available except a small launching ramp for recreational craft. 31-6 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT Complete boating facilities are planned by State and local agencies in connection with the harbor construction. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Work was initiated on the Phase II General Design Memorandum. The Final Phase I General Design Memorandum was approved on January 21, 1982. The Final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with EPA on October 8, 1981. The Record of Decision was signed on December 29, 1981. Costs in FY 82 were $60,475. 13. DETOUR HARBOR, MI Location. On the west side of DeTour Passage, about 2 miles upstream from Lake Huron. The passage forms the mouth of the St. Marys River which connects Lakes Huron and Superior. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14882.) Existing project. Provides for small boat harbor and harbor of refuge by dredging a 10-foot deep entrance channel and providing an 8-foot deep access channel protected by a 1,305-foot breakwater. Thetotal estimated (October 1981) project cost is $2,650,000; the Federal cost is $1,400,000, and the non-Federal cost is $1,250,000 which is a cash contribution. Local cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Public docking, landing, parking and sanitary facilities will be provided by the State of Michigan. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The contract for a recreational boat harbor awarded in FY 1980 was completed this FY at a cost of $481,886. Engineering and design during construction cost $5,135. Surveys, layouts, miscellaneous services, supervision and administration cost $41,061. Of the above, $313,101 was contributed funds. The existing project is complete. 14. DETROIT RIVER, MI Location. One of the Great Lakes connecting channels, 31 miles long and flows south from Lake St. Clair to Lake Erie. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14848.) Previous project. For details see page 1958 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1541 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Improving Detroit River main channels to provide 25.5-foot draft navigation; improving certain auxiliary and side channels; and construction of various water level and crosscurrent control structures. Details are in accompanying Table 31-C. Project depths are referred to local low water datum planes which correspond to low water datums for Lakes St. Clair and Erie, 571.7 and 568.6 feet above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec (International Great Lakes Datum-1955.)(See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Estimated 1978 Federal cost for new work, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects, is $159,300,- 000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. No local 31-7 cooperation is required for modifications authorized by Acts of July 1946 and March 1956. The Trenton Channel modification approved August 13, 1968 is considered inactive. Terminal facilities. Numerous commercial installations used for handling coal, iron ore, limestone, steel products, petroleum products, and other items such as overseas general cargo. Detail on actual port and harbor facilities is in Port Series No. 45 (revised 1972) prepared and published as part 2 by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Information on port and steamship services is prepared and published as part I by Port Development Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, Hi-Fix surveys, support of Water Control Center, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $1,491,- 016. Environmental studies for extended navigation season cost $46,944. Studies were continued for construction of a Marsh under Section 150 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1967 at a cost of $35,249. An adjustment of $94,743 was made in the cost of financial participation of dredging by industry and hopper dredge HAINS cost from last FY. Adjustment of $12,376 for U.S. Hopper Dredge LYMAN and $- 32,418 for U.S. Hopper Dredge HOFFMAN was made in dredging costs for work performed last FY. The U.S. Hopper Dredges HAINS and HOFFMAN performed maintenance dredging removing 6,053 and 156,545 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material at a cost of $34,832 and $755,800, respectively. Maintenance of disposal area and modification of booster pump system cost $643,297. An adjustment of $-548,682 was made in cost of contract completed in last FY for dredging the East Outer Channel. An adjustment of $-3,997 was made in dredging contract at the South Turning Basin Pte. Mouillee Access Channel completed last FY. A contract was awarded and completed for the maintenance dredging of South Turning Basin of Pte. Mouillee at a cost of $262,300. A contract was awarded late in FY 82 in the amount of $4,192,875 for dredging East Outer Channel, Lower Livingstone Channel and Pte. Mouillee Access and South Interior Channels. No work was performed this FY. An adjustment of $-3,985 was made in contract for repair of Stony Island Compensatory Dike. This contract has not been closed out and is awaiting ruling on claim. A contract was awarded for repair of Sugar Island Compensation Dike. The contract amount is $1,048,085; no work was performed this FY. Location and removal of obstructions cost $1,742,- 275. Engineering, design, surveys, and layouts, supervision and administration cost $268,303. An adjustment of $-4,599 was made in contract cost for Phase I diked disposal area. Phase II was completed at a cost of $690,947. Operation of Pte. Mouillee Booster pump cost $124,542. Engineering and design during construction cost $14,229. Surveys and layouts, supervision and administration cost $139,173. Latest modification of connecting channels project in the Detroit River is complete except for compensating REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 works. All work in Trenton Channel is complete- Pertinent data concerning channels covered by project at end of FY is set forth in Table 31-C. Costs for existing project were $162,547,702, of which $74,780,103 was for new work ($72,969,197 regular funds and $1,530, 688 Public Work Funds) and $87,767,599 for maintenance. 15. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN AND WI Location. At extreme western end of Lake Superior. Cities of Duluth, MN, and Superior, WI, are on north and south sides, respectively. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14975.) Previous projects. See page 1246 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Provides for rebuilding canal piers at Duluth entry, replacement or construction of piers and breakwater at Superior entry and dredging approaches and channels within harbor, St. Louis Bay, and St. Louis River. Channels vary in depth from 32 to 28 feet in entrances, are 27 feet deep in iron-ore route channels, and are from 20 to 23 feet in inner channels. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) For details of authorized channel dimensions and dimensions of structures, see page 1246 and 1247 of Annual Report for 1962 and page 1011 of Annual Report for 1965. Portion of project for deepening Twenty-first Avenue West Channel is inactive. Estimated cost (1967) of this portion was $577,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for active portion of project. Terminal facilities. There are 113 docks or terminals including some 54 major ones; all but one are privately owned. Facilities for handling iron ore, coal, limestone, petroleum, steel and scrap iron, cement, general cargo, and grain are believed adequate for most existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, boundary surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $243,148. Operation of service facilities and museum were performed at a cost of $256,957. Reconnaissance reports for economic analysis and major rehabilitation was continued at a cost of $16,896. Repairs to breakwaters and seawalls were performed by government forces at a cost of $230,249. Maintenance of disposal area was performed at a cost of $342,724. An adjustment of $-148,091 was made in the contract completed last FY for maintenance dredging. The U.S. Hopper Dredge GAILLARD and the Derrick boat COLEMAN performed maintenance dredging removing 91,068 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $449,645. Maintenance of service facilities and park pier were performed at a cost of $16,856. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $176,528. Work authorized prior to 1960 Act was completed in June 1956. Under the 1960 Act, work on the outer harbor, included in House Document 150, was com pleted in June 1965. Work on the inner harbor, included in House Document 196, started in May 1963, was completed in November 1968 except for the 21st Avenue West channel portion which is inactive. The United States owns 34.90 acres of land in fee in Minnesota and Wisconsin of which 2.15 acres are used for a vessel yard. Total cost of existing project was $41,351,135, of which $14,562,063 was for new work and $26,789,072 was for maintenance. 16. FOX RIVER, WI Location. Rises in Columbia County, WI, and flows about 176 miles northerly into Green Bay. Wolf River, physically a main river but by designation a tributary of Fox River, rises in central part of Fort County, WI, and flows southerly. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14916 for Lake Winnebago and lower Fox River.) Previous projects. See page 1368 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Deepening and widening channel of Fox River from DePere 7 miles above mouth to confluence of Wolf River, a total length of 59 miles, to be 6 feet, with 9.6 feet in rock cut below DePere lock and 7 feet in other rock cuts on lower river below Menasha lock; construction and reconstruction of 19 locks and 9 dams; a concrete retaining wall at Kaukauna; construction and maintenance of harbors having depths of 6 feet on Lake Winnebago; widening Neenah Channel to 100 feet, with a 6-foot depth for about 1 mile; and dredging, snagging, and otherwise improving Wolf River 47 miles from its mouth to New London, depth to be 4 feet. Cost of completed portion of project is $513,424 for the lower river exclusive of previous projects. River and Harbor Act of 1925 portion of project is considered inactive and excluded from cost estimate. Estimated cost (1924) of this portion is $2,886,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Wharf and landing facilities are, in general, adequate for existing needs. (See Table 31-E on locks and dams, Fox River, WI.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Boundary monumentation, condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $168,364. Plans for flood emergencies at federal dams were prepared at a cost of $77,602. Water control studies, monitoring and regulation of water levels were performed at a cost of $162,393. Locks were operated and maintained at a cost of $488,320. Dams were operated and maintained at a cost of $275,830. Sluice gates at Appleton Upper Dam and miter gates and valves at DePere Lock were sandblasted, overhauled and painted at a cost of $126,067. Rebuilding of wood miter gates and valves was performed for Appleton 3rd Lock at a cost of $80,706. Security fencing was installed at Kaukauna Boatyard, Menasha Lock, Combined Locks and Cedars Lock, for a cost of $59,846. Repairs to the federal canal banks cost $96,416. Engineering, design, miscellaneous maintenance, supervision and administration cost $47,104. Existing project is complete except for in 31-8 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT active portion. Nineteen original locks and nine original dams have been rebuilt. (See Table 31-E for year of completion of each.) Structures and dredging in pools have increased original depths generally about 2 feet. Work remaining to complete project consists of dredging in upper portion of Wolf River, and rock removal and deepening of Neenah Channel on lower Fox River, which are no longer considered necessary. Existing locks and dams are in generally fair to good condition. Costs for existing project to end of FY were $513,424 for new work and $31,097,881 for operation and maintenance, a total of $31,611,305. Funds in the amount of $3,706,187 were expended between July 5, 1884, and June 30, 1935, on operating and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 17. FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 204 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 28 miles northerly from Manistee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907). Existing project. Provides for constructing an exterior basin in Lake Michigan formed by two breakwaters, 450 feet apart at the outer ends, diverging at an angle of about 90 degrees, the main arm and shore connection on north breakwater are 972 and 1,000 feet long, respectively, and the main arm and shore connection of south breakwater 1,188 and 1,400 feet long, respectively; for removing 801 feet of north and 1,172 feet of south pier; dredging basin 20 feet deep and 800 feet wide at entrance, decreasing toward new pier heads to 600 feet wide, dredging approach and entrance channel through outer basin to a depth of 24 feet from deep water in Lake Michigan to a point 500 feet landward of opening between breakwaters, over the entire width outside the breakwaters and to a maximum width of 500 feet inside the breakwaters; thence to 23 feet deep through inner portion of outer basin to outer end of north pier, over widths decreasing from 500 to 160 feet; and thence to 22 feet deep between the piers to the inner basin in Lake Betsie; dredging an 18-foot deep interior basin in Lake Betsie from within 50 feet of existing structures on the west and extending eastward about 1,550 feet to easterly boundary and from within 50 feet of existing structures on the north and extending southward 800 feet to the southerly boundary; dredging a recreational craft anchorage area 10 feet deep and 300 feet wide, extending 600 feet eastward of the east limit of the interior basin, with its north side in line with the north limit of the basin. Breakwaters and shore connections are built of concrete caissons and piling capped with concrete. Inner piers and revetments are built of stonefilled timber cribs and piling, all capped with concrete, except for 476 feet of south revetment which consists of steel sheet piling. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two car ferry slips on south shore and several docks along north shore of Lake Betsie. The City and State provide a recreational docking facility on north side of Lake Betsie which is open to all on equal terms. There is also a marine railway capable of handling small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, operation of safety features, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $74,832. Repairs to the north breakwater were performed at a cost of $75,343. A contract was awarded for dredging the maneuvering and anchorage area. The work was completed at a cost of $179,337. Approximately 37,000 cubic yards, place measure, of shoal material was removed by hydraulic dredge. A contract was awarded for rehabilitation of N. Pier and S. Pier and Revetment Sections, K, K-1, L-1, M-1, N, O and P. The contract amount is $847,258. No work was performed for this contract. Engineering, design, surveys, layouts, supervision and administration cost $85,776. A contract for construction of confined disposal area was awarded and is approximately 99% complete at a cost of $612,157. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $87,382. Existing project was completed in 1939, with exception of the latest modification which was completed in 1969. Navigation structures are generally in good condition and programmed for major repair on an as needed basis. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1474 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project to end of FY were $7,026,227, of which $1,955,159 (including $31,709 contributed funds) was for new work, $5,911,129 for maintenance, and $274,776 for rehabilitation. 18. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR AND GRAND RIVER, MI Location. Harbor is on east shore of Lake Michigan, 108 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 23 miles northerly from Holland, MI. River rises in Jackson County, MI, and flows 260 miles westerly into Lake Michigan. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14933, and Geological Survey Grand Rapids quadrangle.) Previous project. For details see page 1949 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1481 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel protected by parallel piers and revetments at mouth of Grand River, a deep draft channel in river extending to Spring Lake, a turning basin, and a shallow draft channel in river extending 14.5 miles upstream to Bass River. Project depths are 23 feet in entrance channel, 21 feet in river to turning basin, 18 feet in turning basin and channel to Spring Lake, and 8 feet in upper Grand River channel. For additional details see page 1461 of Annual Report for 1962. Dredging on northerly side of inner channel is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $38,600. (See Table 31-B for 31-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several wharves exist for handling coal, limestone, sand and gravel, petroleum products, fish and miscellaneous commodities. There is also a car ferry slip which is inactive. The State and local agencies provide recreational boating facilities which are open to all on equal terms. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, operation of safety features, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $56,901. Repairs to the north and south breakwater and the north and south revetment were performed at a cost of $110,583. The contract, awarded last FY, for repair of north revetment, section E, was completed at a cost of $303,181. An adjustment of $23,304 was made in cost for maintennce dredging by the HAINS performed previously. Maintenance of the disposal area cost $10,223. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed at a cost of $425,756. Engineering, design, surveys, layouts, supevision and administration cost $77,430. Condition surveys and environmental studies in connection with Section 111 mitigation of shore damage cost $15,000. Existing project was substantially completed in 1949. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1463 of Annual Report for 1962. Structures are generally in good condition; repairs are made on an as needed basis. Total cost of existing project to end of FY were $16,822,246, of which $1,458,469 was for new work, $14,550,164 for maintenance, and $813,613 for rehabilitation. 19. GRAND TRAVERSE BAY HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Traverse River on eastern shore of Keweenaw Peninsula about 20 miles northeasterly from Portage entry to Keweenaw Waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14964.) Existing project: Provides two parallel piers, an entrance channel between piers and a harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet between piers and 10 feet in basin. Project area extended 200 feet upstream in 1966. For additional details see page 1015 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests furnished easements on 5.1 acres of land. Terminal facilities. -Several privately owned fishing wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $6,710. An adjustment of $20,000 was made in breakwater repairs performed in previous fiscal years. An adjustment of $-4,800 was made for maintenance dredging contract awarded and cancelled last FY. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded this FY and is approximately 91 percent complete at a cost of $57,258. Approximately 5,000 cubic yards, place measure, of shoal material was removed by hydraulic dredge. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $56,443. Existing project was completed in 1950 except for extension of north pier completed in 1964. Steel cells and piers are in good condition. Timber and round wood-pile structures are deteriorated but still in serviceable condition. 20. GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI Location. At mouth of Fox River, at head of Green Bay, about 180 miles from Milwaukee, WI, via Sturgeon Bay Canal, and about 49 miles southwest of Menominee Harbor, MI, and WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14918.) Previous projects. See page 1366 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District 1979 Annual Report, Table 30-C, p. 30-30. For more detailed description of project see page 1216 of Annual Report for 1963. Cost of completed portion of project is $9,334,421, Federal, and non-Federal cost is $490,000 including $100,000 contributed funds. Local interests requested that the inactive portion of the 1962 River and Harbor Act, consisting of dredging the reach from 150 feet downstream of the C.&N.W. Railway Bridge to 1,700 feet upstream of this bridge, be reactivated and the authorization modified to include deepening the adjacent turning basin and modifying the C.&N.W. Railway Bridge to provide increased horizontal clearance. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 16 wharves for handling coal, petroleum products, cement, limestone, general overseas cargo and miscelleneous commodities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $149,817. The U.S. Hopper Dredge MARKHAM performed maintenance dredging removing 209,602 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material at a cost of $353,551. Additional handling of,dredge material cost $66,900. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded this FY in the amount of $933,966 with work scheduled to begin early in FY 1983. Maintenance of the disposal area was performed at a cost of $26,673. Engineering design, surveys, layouts, supervision and administration cost $59,594. Engineering and design for confined disposal site cost $9,740. Existing project is complete. The 1962 modification was started in November 1966 and completed in 31-10 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT September 1973. Dredging turning basin above Chicago & Northwestern Railways Bridge was commenced in August 1938. The turning basin was enlarged under authority of Section 5 of the River and Harbor Act of March 4, 1915 in order to provide sufficient area for the large ships that use it. The work was performed as part of a maintenance dredging contract in September and October 1973. East revetment at Grassy Island was entirely removed in July 1935. Dredging Fox River and entrance channel to Tail Point Light was completed in September 1967. The total costs of the existing project were $25,221,580, of which $18,005,884 were regular funds and $940,800 Public Works funds; $9,431,795 for new work and $15,789,785 for maintenance. The new work costs do not include $100,000 contributed funds. 21. HAMMOND BAY HARBOR, MI Location. On northwest shore of Lake Huron, 35 miles southeast of Straits of Mackinac. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14881.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge, protected by breakwater structures, extending to 12- foot depth contour in the lake; for dredging a harbor basin 10 feet deep; and for dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Public facilities being planned by State and local agencies. Plans and specifications are complete, but construction has not started. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Reparation of plans and specifications for Section 111 project was completed at a cost of $16,825. Beach nourishment was performed by purchase order at a cost of $46,688. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $8,736. A contract for stone placement and restoration of the east breakwater was awarded. The contract is approximately 65 percent completed at a cost of $118,250. Minor repairs to breakwater were performed by hired labor at a cost of $4,602. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $8,041. The existing project was completd in 1965. 22. HARBOR BEACH HARBOR, MI Location. On west shore of Lake Huron about 60 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Harbor of refuge protected by three breakwaters; a main entrance 23 feet deep; and an anchorage area 21 feet deep. For additional details see page 1485 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Coal and limestone are received at a private wharf. In addition there is a public recreational craft pier, a Coast Guard pier, and several small installations engaged in docking and servicing light-draft commercial and recreational vessels. These facilities satisfy current commerce and traffic requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $12,544. An adjustment of $20,000 was made in structure repair cost performed in FY 81. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY at a cost of $568,869. Approximately 260,621 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material was removed by hopper dredge. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision, and administration cost $32,587. Existing project was completed in 1928. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1485 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs to end of FY were $6,641,392, of which $1,200,598 was for new work, $5,246,290 for maintenance, and $194,504 for rehabilitation. Private interests have offered to provide a confined disposal facility for dredged material. 23. HOLLAND HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan 95 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 23 miles southerly from Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical chart 14932.) Previous project. For details see page 1948 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1478 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An outer breakwater protected approach channel in Lake Michigan, an entrance channel to Lake Macatawa protected by piers and revetments, a channel through Lake Macatawa into Black River, and a turning basin. Project depths are 23 feet in outer portion of approach channel decreasing to 21 feet at outer end of inner piers, 21 feet to upper end of project, and 18 feet in turning basin. For additional details see page 1458 of Annual Report for 1962. Widening bend of entrance channel into Lake Macatawa is in an active category as a result of a reclassification recommendation approved by the Office of the Chief of Engineers on August 20, 1981. Estimated cost of this portion (1956) is $449,500. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portions of project. Work authorized by Act of 1954 is subject to condition that work on either or both proposed modifications may be undertaken by the United States provided local interests furnish all lands except 1.5 acres of Federal lands, easements, rights-ofway, and suitable spoil disposal areas for initial work and future maintenance; remove buildings and other structures, except existing revetments, from lands to be furnished; and hold the United States free from damages. Terminal facilities. Wharves are at inner end of Lake Macatawa, and used for handling coal, building materials, petroleum products, and miscellaneous 31-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 commodities. Two shipbuilding yards are on south shore of the lake. Holland provides a public wharf for small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, operation of safety features, miscellaneous inspections and reports. were performed by Government forces at a cost of $80,958. Repairs to the south breakwater and the south revetment were performed at a cost of $76,448. Claims on the contract for repair of South Pier Section I & J, awarded in FY 1980, totaled $60,300. An adjustment of $37,858 was made in maintenance dredging performed by the HAINS last FY. Maintenance of the disposal area cost $4,572. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY at a cost of $89,207. Approximately 18,505 cubic yards of shoal material was removed. Engineering, design, surveys, layouts, supervision and administration cost $99,216. Surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports in connection with Section 111 mitigation of shore damage cost $25,875. Existing project, with exception of widening bend in revetted entrance channel authorized by Act of September 3, 1954, was completed in 1957. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1460 of Annual Report for 1962. Costs of existing project to end of FY were $1,392,841 for new work ($1,180,502 regular funds, $176,620 for previous project and $35,705 contributed funds), $8,552,347 regular funds for maintenance, and $502,452 regular funds for rehabilitation, for a total of $9,945,186. 24. THE INLAND ROUTE, MI Location. A series of interconnected lakes and streams stretching across northern tip of Lower Peninsula of Michigan, and extends from Conway near Lake Michigan, to Cheboygan on Lake Huron; a distance of 35 miles. Crooked and Indian Rivers are connecting channels in the waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14886.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 30 feet wide and 5 feet deep, with necessary widening at bends, through Crooked and Indian Rivers, and Crooked, Burt, and Mullett Lakes, and from Conway (west end of Crooked Lake) to navigation lock at Cheboygan; in Pickerel Channel from Pickerel Lake to Crooked Lake. It also provides for suitable jetties at head of Indian River. The addition of a lock and dam was approved by the Chief of Engineers on September 2, 1964, to correct a design deficiency. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None for commercial cargohandling exist along the Crooked and Indian Rivers. Numerous small privately owned timber piers and wharves, some equipped with covered boat wells for serving and storing recreational craft, have been constructed. Landings maintained by hotel and resort operators are open to the public for transfer of passengers. Public docks are at Conway and Oden on Crooked Lake; the Village of Indian River, Topinabee, and Mullett Lake Village on Mullett Lake; and at Cheboygan. About 30 highways dead end at the water's edge, permitting public access for various marine activities. Dock facilities are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The navigation lock was maintained and operated on a 2 shift basis from April 1, 1982 to November 15, 1982. The State of Michigan operated and maintained the lock at a cost of $94,400 (U.S. Government funds). Condition surveys, cooperative stream gaging, miscellaneous inspections and services were performed at a cost of $56,823. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY at a cost of $202,343. Approximately 10,800 cubic yards, place measure, of shoal material was removed by hydraulic dredge. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $14,351. A contract for construction of disposal area was awarded and completed at a cost of $176,649. Engineering, design, surveys, layouts, supervision and administration cost $19,252. The existing project was completed in 1958. The lock and dam was completed in FY 1968. For additional details see page 1382 of Annual Report for 1960. Total costs at end of FY were $3,005,685, of which $770,222 was for new work and $2,087,463 for maintenance with $148,000 contributed by local interests. 25. KENOSHA HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 35 miles south of Milwaukee, WI, and about 54 miles north of Chicago, IL. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) Previous projects. See page 1390 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. For detailed description see page 1237, Annual Report for 1963. Estimated (1975) Federal cost is $552,000 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Non-Federal estimate is $43,000 (July 1975) including $3,000 contributed by local interests. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Three wharves used for miscellaneous foreign overseas commodities and autos, and also several fishing wharves. While these facilities are considered generally adequate for existing commerce, more efficient use of existing terminals and utilization of available frontage for development of additional terminals should be made. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $59,578. An adjustment of $20,000 was made in structure repair cost performed in previous fiscal years. The U.S. Hopper Dredge HAINS performed maintenance dredging removing 49,233 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material at a cost of 31-12 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT $109,170. Maintenance of disposal area was performed at a cost of $54,391. Engineering design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $22,701. Existing project is complete except for dredging 25 foot strips adjacent to the north and south piers which will be completed after rehabilitation of the piers. The north and south piers were completed in 1900 and the breakwater in 1909. The north pier is in excellent condition. The south pier and breakwater are in generally fair condition. The total costs of the existing project to end of FY were $8,201,397, of which $7,907,899 were regular funds and $27,658 Emergency Relief funds; $390,130 being for new work, $6,540,992 for maintenance and $1,270,275 for rehabilitation. The new work costs do not include $3,000 contributed funds. 26. KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan, about 105 miles north of Milwaukee, WI, and about 78 miles from Green Bay, via Sturgeon Bay Canal. Harbor is at mouth of Kewaunee River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14903.) Previous projects. See page 1375 of Annual Report of 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District 1979 Annual Report, Table 30-C, p. 30-31. Costs of completed project are $603,021, Federal, and $9,000 non-Federal, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. Uncompleted portion (estimated $200,000-July 1965) of 1935 River and Harbor Act is considered inactive, and excluded from present cost estimate. The portion authorized by the 1960 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two car-ferry slips, a petroleum tank farm, a Corps of Engineers project office, and several fishing wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition survey, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $21,663. The U.S. Hopper Dredge HAINS performed maintenance dredging, removing 120,558 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material at a cost of $321,124. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $11,595. The contract for construction of a confined disposal facility awarded last FY was completed at a cost of $579,688. Hired labor work was performed on the disposal facility at a cost of $43,719. Engineering and design during construction and for value engineering cost $58,138. Supervision and administration cost $104,917. Active portion of existing project is complete. The north pier was completed in 1897 and the remaining portion is in generally good condition. Rehabilitation of the south pier was completed in June 1967. Construction of north breakwater and shore connection except for a gap of 150 feet about 830 feet from shoreward end, and removal of outer 706.5 linear feet of north pier were commenced in September 1935 and completed in June 1937. Removed 500 linear feet of north pier in April/ May 1963 and widened and deepened the adjacent channel in 1965. Outer end of the north pier was struck and severely damaged by car ferry vessel in October 1973 and a 24 foot section at outer end was subsequently removed, thus reducing the structure to a length of 626 feet. Dredging entrance channel in interior basin to existing project depth was commenced in April and completed in October 1938. Kewaunee River is navigable to about 6.5 miles above mouth for craft drawing not more than 4 feet. Total cost of existing project to end of FY was $6,176,945, of which $603,021 was for new work ($183,021 regular and $420,000 emergency relief funds) $4,956,624 regular funds for maintenance and $617,300 regular funds for rehabilitation. 27. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI Location. In Lake Superior across Keweenaw Peninsula in upper peninsula of Michigan. The west entrance is 169 miles east of Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14972.) Existing project. A navigable channel, minimum width 300 feet, 25 miles long, partially natural and partially artificial across Keweenaw Peninsula via Portage Lake. For details see page 1121 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed cost for new work is $5,967,700. Portion of project providing for extension of lower entrance breakwater and necessary alteration or replacement of structures due to deepening channels is inactive and excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost (1957) of this portion was $3,315,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Six coal docks, a petroleum dock, and several general merchandise and miscellaneous wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Also present is a government constructed recreational area with facilities to include a picnic area and small boat landing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, operation of recreational facilities, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $35,170. An adjustment of $20,000 was made in structure repair cost performed in previous years. Repairs to breakwater rubblemound was performed by hired labor at a cost of $339,553. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $6,262. Engineering and design for confined disposal area cost $7,000. Active portion of the project is complete. Breakwaters are in generally good condition except for a weakness occurring in about 300 feet of substructure of breakwater lower entrance, and major storm damage repairs needed for stone-covered portions of breakwater at upper entrance. Mooring pier at Lily Pond requires 31-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 repairs to halt movement and permit dredging to project depth adjacent thereto. The flared revetment at the upper entry should be modified to restrict wave action from the stilling basin entrance. 28. KNIFE RIVER HARBOR, MN Location. Near mouth of Knife River on north shore of Lake Superior, 19 miles northeasterly from Duluth, MN, and 7 miles southwest of Two Harbors, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14966.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel with a system of overlapping breakwaters, using the existing breakwater and a new breakwater constructed of 731 feet of rock rubblemound. The entrance channel is 9 feet deep and an inner straight channel is 8 feet deep, 50 feet wide, and 600 feet long with a public marina and side channel at its inner end. For additional details see page 1110 of Annual Report for 1963. A modification to correct a design deficiency was authorized in 1974. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Total estimated approved Federal cost (1981) is $1,761,900 and $21,700 non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. Local interests are to furnish easements on 15.08 acres of land. Terminal facilities. Local interests have installed pile-and-timber docks on both sides of straight channel. Lake County has completed construction by contract of a marina along the east wing of the inner harbor. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Engineering plans and specifications for a modification to correct a design deficiency were essentially complete at a cost of $17,233. Project was completed in June 1958. Breakwater and spending beach are in good condition. The existing breakwater does not effectively prevent waves caused by northeasterly winds from entering the entrance channel. This results in unsatisfactory and unsafe harbor entrance conditions during storms. Mooring conditions in the main channel and Y-branches of the inner harbor are also adversely affected. Plans and specifications for construction of a breakwater to reduce wave damage and improve navigation conditions have been completed. 29. LAC LA BELLE HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior on eastern shore of Keweenaw Peninsula 41 miles northeasterly from Portage entry to Keweenaw Waterway. Lac La Belle, Bete Grise Bay, and Mendota Ship Canal combine to form the harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14964.) Existing project. Provides for construction of two parallel piers at the entrance having lengths of 584 and 682 feet for north and south piers, respectively; for an entrance channel between the piers 50 feet wide and 12 feet deep, about 820 feet long with a flared approach; and for an inner canal 50 feet wide and 10 feet deep, about 730 feet long. For additional details see page 1039, Annual Report for 1964. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several small, privately owned wharves are available in the harbor for use of small craft engaged in fishing and recreational activities. A state owned dock for small craft is located at northwest corner of Lac La Belle Bay. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $19,012. A contract in the amount of $11,270 was awarded for maintenance dredging. Actual dredging has not commenced, however, cost of $2,633 was for mobilization of contractor's equipment. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $7,830. Project was completed in January 1960. Controlling depths were about 11 feet in the approach channel and 10 feet in the inner channel. 30. LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI CHANNELS Location. Lake St. Clair, a section of Great Lakes connecting channels, is an expansive shallow basin having a vessel track length of about 15 miles from mouth of St. Clair River to head of Detroit River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14850.) Previous project. For details see page 2882, Annual Report for 1896; pages 1957-58, Annual Report for 1915; and page 1539, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An improved channel through Lake St. Clair 800 feet wide, 27.5 feet deep, and about 14.5 miles long; extending from mouth of Southeast Bend cutoff channel at lower end of St. Clair River to head to Detroit River Channel. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, support of Water Control Center, Hi-Fix Surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $174,804. Environmental studies in connection with the extended navigation season were performed at a cost of $31,317. Maintenance of disposal areas was performed at a cost of $119,359. The hopper dredge MARKHAM performed maintenance dredging removing 79,479 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material at a cost of $364,915. Engineering and design, supervision and administration cost $6,937. Total costs for existing project at end of FY were $17,386,809, of which $7,019,237 was for new work ($6,010,582 regular funds and $1,008,595 public works funds), and $10,602,918 for maintenance. 31. LELAND HARBOR, MI Location. A light-draft harbor on eastern shore of Lake Michigan at mouth of Carp River, about 40 miles north of Frankfort, MI, and 40 miles southwest of Charlevoix, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14912. Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge consisting of a breakwater about 1,200 feet long, a 31-14 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT protected anchorage and maneuver area about 3 acres in extent and 10 feet deep, a 12-foot deep flared approach channel decreasing in width to 90 feet, an existing south pier 440 feet long, a 35-foot long cellular extension to south pier, an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide extending to mouth of Carp River, and for elimination of existing north pier. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves on each side of river below the dam which is 400 feet above the river mouth. These wharves serve the local fishing interests and recreational craft. Public facilities are operated by the State and local agencies. All available dockage space is utilized. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $8,309. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging at a cost of $48,126. Approximately 19,800 cubic yards, place measure, of shoal material was removed by hydraulic dredge. Engineering, surveys, supervision and administration cost $14,236. The existing project was completed in 1932 except for the 1962 Authorization which was completed in 1967. Total costs of existing project to the end of FY were $1,873,524, of which $1,027,089 was for new work and $846,435 for maintenance. 32. LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI Location. On southwest shore of Lake Huron, 20 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Provides for two offshore breakwaters opening to the southeast and totaling about 2,400 feet long with provisions for recreational fishing on the main breakwater; an anchorage and maneuver area of about 5 acres, 8 feet deep; and a flared approach channel 10 feet deep, decreasing to 160 feet in width through the breakwaters. Project also provides for recreational fishing facilities. Estimated (1979) Federal cost for new work is $1,647,306 excluding $1,088,888 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation were furnished by Michigan Department of Natural Resources to the Secretary of the Army. The cash contribution was $1,088,888. Terminal facilities. An existing public fishing pier of open pile construction is not adequate for existing and prospective commerce. Complete boating facilities are planned by State and local agencies in connection with the harbor construction. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: An adjustment of $541 was made in cost for placing sand which was completed last FY. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $35,000. Maintenance of shore erosion mitigation under Section 111 program was performed at a cost of $112,364. Approximately 48,000 tons of sand were placed. Engineering, surveys, supervision and administration cost $23,061. The existing project was completed during FY 1977. Total cost of existing project to end of FY is $3,325,991, of which $3,106,653 (includes $1,088,888 contributed funds) is for new work and $219,338 for maintenance. 33. LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior 21 miles west of Whitefish Point and 30 miles east of Grand Marais, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14962.) Existing project. Provides for a small-craft harbor of refuge by dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep from Lake Superior into Little Lake, suitably protected by breakwaters and revetments. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Only terminal facility at project site consists of a public dock built by State of Michigan for light-draft craft. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $22,848. The design deficiency study was continued at a cost of $11,387. An adjustment of $-7,715 was made in the maintenance dredging contract completed last FY. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded in FY 82. The contract is 91 percent complete at a cost of $115,809. Approximately 16,506 cubic yards, place measure, of shoal material was removed by hydraulic dredge. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $25,683. This project is considered complete; however, because of shifting sand, the harbor entrance shoals rapidly with the result that full project depth is not usually available. An analysis for the Design Deficiency Report was submitted to North Central Division in March 1978 and approved. Total cost at end of FY is $2,582,251. 34. LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 156 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 67 miles northerly from Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14937.) Previous project. For details see page 1951 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1491 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 1307 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides for an exterior basin in Lake Michigan protected bynorth and south break water, north breakwater is 1,800 feet long and south breakwater 1,700 feet long, 550 feet apart at outer ends, diverging at an angle of 90 degrees, with shore connections, 1,103 and 2,004 feet long, respectively; for dredging exterior basin to 18 feet deep with a maximum 31-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 width of 1,500 feet; for a channel with a depth of 29 feet from deep water in Lake Michigan decreasing to 27 feet at the west end of the north pier, over a maximum width of 600 feet; thence a channel with a depth of 27 feet, over a minimum width of 230 feet with necessary widening at Pere Marquette Lake; and for inner piers and revetments 1,649 feet long on north and sufficiently long on the south for turn at Pere Marquette Lake. The estimated(1977) Federal cost for new work is $8,250,000. Estimated total costs for local interests is $147,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Has been complied with. Terminal facilities. In addition to main terminal of Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., consisting of three car ferry slips, a wharf, and warehouses, there are several wharves which handle coal, limestone, and miscellaneous commodities. Facilities adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Payment of claim in the amount of $84,574 was made for contract completed last FY for latest project modification. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $4,485. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $47,606. An adjustment of $-6,509 was made in the contract for breakwater and revetment repairs completed last FY. A contract for emergency repairs to south breakwater head was awarded this FY. The contract is 37 percent complete at a cost of $108,121. Breakwater maintenance was performed at a cost of $37,880. An adjustment of $53,873 was made in maintenance dredging performed in previous years. The U.S. Hopper Dredge HAINS performed maintenance dredging removing 64,697 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material at a cost of $120,563. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $70,697. Maintenance of shore erosion mitigation under the Section 111 program was performed at a cost of $15,000. Existing project was completed in 1918. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1469 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project to end of FY were $15,253,065, of which $8,532,201 was for new work, $6,362, 959 for maintenance, and $357,913 for rehabilitation. 35. LUTSEN HARBOR, MN Location. The harbor relocation will be at the mouth of the Poplar River on the north shore of Lake Superior, 79 miles northeasterly from Duluth, MN, and 30 miles southwesterly from Grand Marais, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14967.) Existing project. Project as modified provides for two rubblemound breakwaters totaling 1,200 feet, with an excavated harbor basin approximately 2 acres with a 10-foot depth. For additional details see page 1658 of Annual Report for 1945 for improvements authorized by the River and Harbor Act approved March 2, 1945. (H. Doc. No. 446, 78th Cong., 2d sess.). This document contains latest published map. Estimated Federal cost (1981) for new work is $7,090,000 and non-Federal cost is $406,000, which includes a cash contribution of $66,800. Local cooperation. See page 1658 of Annual Report for 1945. Local interests furnished local assurances in December 1969 and again in December 1976, and confirmed in October 1979. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning was continued by hired labor at a cost of $31,519, and is nearing completion. Work on the construction plans and specifications continued. 36. MANISTEE HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 179 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 26 miles northerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14938.) Previous project. For details see page 1952 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1493 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel in Lake Michigan protected by a breakwater, piers, and revetments; a channel in Manistee River to Manistee Lake; and Federal participation in cost of replacing Maple Street Bridge. Project depths are 25 feet in entrance channel and 23 feet in river channel. For additional details see page 1470 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Installations are on both sides of river and on Manistee Lake. Commerce handled includes coal, sand, salt, and general cargo. In addition, there is a Government wharf and a State and City owned recreational craft pier which is open to the public. These facilities satisfy current commerce requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $12,466. Repairs to south breakwater were performed by hired labor at a cost of $204,631. An adjustment of $40,177 was made in maintenance dredging performed in previous FY. Maintenance dredging was performed by Hopper Dredge HAINS at a cost of $118,635, removing 32,838 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $17,205. Existing project was completed in August 1967. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1470 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project from regular funds to end of FY were $7,201,306, of which $2,341,523 was for new work, $3,485,619 for maintenance, and $1,374,164 for rehabilitation. 37. MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MI Location. On north shore of Lake Michigan 135 31-16 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT miles northeasterly from Green Bay Harbor, WI, and 220 miles northerly from Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14908.) Previous project. For details see page 1933 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1422 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A breakwater protected entrance channel in Lake Michigan, a channel in Manistique River, and a pier at river mouth. Project depths are 19 feet in outer portion of entrance channel, 18 feet in inner portion of entrance channel, and 18 feet in river channel. For additional details see page 1451 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A car ferry slip, two coal and building material wharves, two fishing wharves, and numerous lumberyard slips. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $16,377. Repairs to the west pier were performed at a cost of $148,654. Supervision and administration cost $727. Existing project was completed in 1961. For additional details on completion of existing project see Annual Report for 1962. All structures are generally in good condition. Project is being maintained to 12 feet below IGLD in lieu of authorized depths which is adequate for current usage. Total costs to end of FY were $3,319,811, of which $1,299,355 was for new work, $1,538,365 for maintenance and $316,333 for rehabilitation. 38. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 79 miles north of Milwaukee and about 106 miles from 'Green Bay via Sturgeon Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14922.) Previous projects. See page 1379of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The total estimated (Oct 1981) project cost is $3,080,000; the Federal cost is $1,085,000 and the non-Federal cost is $1,995,000, which is a cash contribution. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C. For detailed description see page 1228 of Annual Report for 1963. Estimated costs (1970) of new work for 1968 modification are $81,000 Federal and $30,000 non- Federal which includes a cash contribution of $18,000. Work on the 1968 modification was postponed until 1982. The portion authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act is inactive and estimated (1970) at $1,150,- 000, Federal, and $105,000 non-Federal. (See Table 31- B for authorizing legislation.) Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, June 26, 1979, and 720-foot channel extension reaffirmed in July 1982, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for complete modifications. For 1968 modification local interests must make an annual cash contribution equivalent to 50% of the annual costs associated with construction and maintenance of the channel extension until such time that a second user utilizes the channel extension. Such a contribution is presently estimated at $14,200; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of dredged materials, and the necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefore or the costs of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent use, operation, and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide and maintain without cost to the United States adequate berthing areas at the docks adjacent to the improvement; accomplish at no cost to the United States all relocations and alterations of utilities necessary for the project; assume full responsibility for all project first costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $2,000,000; and comply with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970. Terminal facilities. Three car-ferry slips, a grain elevator, one shipbuilding yard, and three other wharves used for handling coal, building materials, cement, and miscellaneous commodities. While these facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce, it is believed the City should provide a suitable wharf with warehouse and railway connnection open to the general public. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The contract awarded last FY for construction of a small boat harbor is approximately 67 percent complete at a cost of $1,539,993. Engineering and design during construction cost $15,663. Supervision and administration cost $65,918. Of the above cost, $995,914 was contributed funds. Engineering and design was completed on extension of channel at a cost of $38,212. A contract was awarded late in this FY in the amount of $99,250. No work was performed. Preconstruction planning cost $1,099. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $60,297. Repairs to south breakwater were performed at a cost of $56,041. Maintenance of the disposal area was performed at a cost of $58,052. The U.S. Hopper Dredge HAINS performed maintenance dredging removing 46,628 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal materisl at a cost of $205,151. An adjustment of $50,965 was made in HAINS dredging cost performed last FY. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $33,482. Existing project is completed except for the 1962 and 1968 modifications. The 1962 modification is inactive. Work on the 1968 31-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 modification to be completed in FY 83.The breakwater, completed in 1910, is in generally fair condition. Dredging a channel through outer basin to existing project depth and removal of a portion of old north stub pier at the river entrance were completed in December 1937. Dredging river channel was completed in July 1942. Costs of existing project are $2,396,299 for new work (includes $995,914 contributed funds) and $6,468,- 262 for maintenance; a total of $8,864,571. 39. MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI Location. In Marquette Bay on south shore of Lake Superior, 160 miles west of Sault Ste. Marie, MI, and 265 miles east from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14970.) Existing project. Provides for a breakwater, and a harbor basin 26.5 feet deep, giving a protected area of 350 acres. Project was modified in 1960 to provide a 27-foot depth in harbor area. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required for earlier authorizations. Fully complied with for the 1960 Act. Terminal facilities. One ore dock, unused at present; two coal docks; one petroleum dock; and three other unused docks. There are also several small fish wharves without railroad connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $10,482. Repairs to the rubblemound breakwater were performed at a cost of $104,418. Supervision and administration cost $4,205. Project authorized by earlier Acts was completed in 1935. Deepening under the 1960 Act was completed in September 1966. Rehabilitation of rubblemound portion of breakwater was completed in November 1965. 40. MENOMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, MI AND WI Location. On west shore of Green Bay, about 49 miles northeast of Green Bay Harbor, and about 155 miles from Milwaukee via Sturgeon Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14917. Previous projects. See page 1361 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-26. For detailed description see page 1214, Annual Report for 1963. The portion authorized by 1960 River and Harbor Act is inactive and estimated (1964) at $442,000, Federal, and $105,000 non-Federal. Costs of completed new work exclusive of inactive work and amount expended on previous projects are $221,053 Federal and $50,762 non-Federal, which includes a cash contribution of $36,762. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. There are 9 wharves for handling coal, limestone, pulp and miscellaneous commodities. City of Marinette, WI provided a public wharf. Facilities are considered fairly adequate for existing commerce, except that there is need for a public wharf owned by City of Menominee, MI, with warehouse and railway connection. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspection and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $14,964. Maintenance dredging was performed by Hopper Dredge HAINS at a cost of $34,000. Approximately 6,216 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material was removed. Surveys and layouts cost $4,871. Engineering and design for confined disposal area for polluted dredge spoil was continued at a cost of $37,653. The project in effect prior to the modification of March 2, 1945 was completed in 1938. No additional work was necessary under the modification of March 2, 1945 to provide a depth of 12 feet in the extension of the channel to the vicinity of the Marinette Yacht Club as project depth or more was available. The entrance piers were completed in 1884, and were rehabilitated (1954-1964) and are in excellent condition. Dredging of the channel below the Marinette municipal wharf, together with enlarging the turning basin to existing project depth, was commenced in May 1938. Modification of the project authorized by the 1960 River and Harbor Act is inactive. Construction for the 1967 modifications was started August 17, 1968 and completed in October 1968. The costs of the existing project were $221,052 for new work, $1,838,025 for maintenance and $1,351,852 for rehabilitation; a total of $3,410,930. 41. MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 85 miles north of Chicago, IL, and about 83 miles west of Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14924.) Previous projects. See page 1385 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-26. For detailed description see page 1232 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed new work costs are $6,937,804, Federal and $478,000, non-Federal, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. The uncompleted portion authorized by the 1935 River and Harbor Act was placed in the inactive category in June 1973. Estimated costs are $119,000 (July 1972) Federal and $1,170,000 (July 1972) non-Federal for this portion. Uncompleted portion of 1945River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with for Acts of March 2, 1945, October 23, 1962, and July 14, 1960, except inactive portion of 1945 Act. Act of August 30, 31-18 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT 1935, provided that original dredging of outer harbor area be done by City of Milwaukee and City of Milwaukee be reimbursed at actual cost but not to exceed 10 cents per cubic yard, place measurement, for original dredging done subsequent to authorization of work by Congress. Agreement covering dredging was executed by Secretary of War, February 23, 1934, after this work was originally authorized as part of public works program. City was reimbursed for 10 percent of dredging. Terminal facilities. Four car-ferry slips, and 57 other wharves, private and municipal, used for handling coal, grain, building materials, cement, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. As facilities in inner harbor were inadequate for existing commerce, Milwaukee Harbor Commission has constructed nine docks in the outer harbor for handling general cargo. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $92,386. Repairs to the south breakwater were performed by hired labor at a cost of $132,153. The south breakwater was damaged by a private company; estimated cost is $500,000. The case is in litigation. The contract for maintenance dredging awarded in FY 81 was completed at a cost of $444,608. Approximately 83,016 cubic yards, place measure, of shoal material was removed. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $68,237. Existing project is complete except for inactive portions. The 1962 modification was completed in July 1967. North breakwater and shore connection 9,954 feet long, was completed in August 1925. North pier was completed in 1905 and construction of south pier was completed in November 1910. Construction of south breakwater and shore connection was completed in October 1929. Before modification of August 30, 1935, City of Milwaukee also dredged most of the area in the outer harbor south of inner entrance piers and lakeward of pierhead line to more than 21 feet below datum without cost to the United States. City of Milwaukee also dredged a portion of the area of the outer harbor north of inner entrance piers to provide an approach channel to the passenger and auto pier opposite East Claybourn Street. Work on the 1945 modification was completed in August 1957, except for inactive portion which consists of dredging the Milwaukee River from Buffalo Street to upper limit of the project at Humbolt Avenue. In recent years, some repairs were completed on the north shore breakwater; however, additional repairs are required. South breakwater and shore connections are in generally good condition. Costs of existing project were $6,937,804 for new work, $28,466,- 501 for maintenance, and $1,891,810 for rehabilitation; a total of $37,296,175. 42. MONROE HARBOR, MI Loction. On lower reach of River Raisin, which empties into Lake Erie and is 36 miles south of Detroit, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14830.) Existing project. Provides for a channel in Lake Erie and River Raisin to City of Monroe, for a turning basin, and for riprapping protecting dikes at river mouth. Project depths are 21 feet to turning basin, 18 feet in turning basin, and 9 feet to upstream end of project. For additional details see page 1490 of Annual Report for 1962. Project feature for riprapping protecting dikes is considered inactive. Estimated costs of this feature (1954) is $90,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned docks and a municipal terminal. Port of Monroe Authority built a steel and concrete wharf on southeast side of turning basin for commercial use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $64,574. An adjustment of $-3,185 was made in maintenance dredging cost for the U.S. Hopper Dredge HOFFMAN performed in FY 1980. The U.S. Hopper Dredge HAINS performed maintenance dredging removing 248,069 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material at a cost of $593,419. Operation of the booster pump cost $149,004. Maintenance of the disposal area was performed at a cost of $40,250. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $20,076. A contract for construction of the diked disposal area was awarded this FY. The contract is 27 percent complete at a cost of $10,700,005. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $800,013. Existing project was completed in 1936, except for riprapping protective dikes on each side of the Bay Channel. Due to combined effect of severe storms and continued high water, dikes have largely disappeared. Total costs to end of FY were $21,462,929, of which $987,340 was for new work (including $300,000 contributed by the Port Commission of Monroe), and $20,475,589 for maintenance including $166,667 contributed funds. ($125,000 by Consolidated Paper Company and $41,667 by River Raisin Company.) 43. MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 114 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 80 miles easterly from Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14934.) Previous project. For details see page 1950 of Annual Report for 1915; page 1399, Annual Report for 1924; and page 1484, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A breakwater protected outer basin in Lake Michigan and an entrance channel from Lake Michigan to Muskegon Lake protected by piers and revetments. Project depths vary from 29 feet in the lakeward portion of the outer basin to 27 feet in the channel between the inner piers to Muskegon Lake. For additional details see page 1303 of Annual Report for 31-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 1963. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned wharves primarily for commercial use. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series, No. 48 (revised 1973) prepared and published as part 2 by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Information on port terminal services and charges, and steamship services is prepared and published as part I by the Port Development Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, operation of safety features, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $35,169. The HAINS performed maintenance dredging this FY removing 58,451 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material at a cost of $166,084. Riprap and stone placement of the north breakwater was performed at a cost of $135,260. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $60,022. Condition surveys for maintenance of shore erosion mitigation under Section 111 cost $20,000. Existing project, including latest project modification, was completed in 1965. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1465 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs to end of FY were $10,511,129, of which $2,403,702 was for new work, $4,235, 301 for maintenance and $3,872,126 for rehabilitation. 44. NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Galien River on southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Berrien County, about 45 miles easterly from Chicago, IL. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14905.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 10 feet deep by 80 feet wide and 850 feet long, to mouth of Galien River; new north and south breakwaters 1,305 and 740 feet long, respectively, and deepening inner channel to Galien River to 8 feet and 80 feet wide and 1,250 feet long. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Terminal facilities. One village owned Loat ramp and three privately operated marinas and a private boat club facility. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and services were performed by Government forces at a cost of $12,650. Engineering and design for confined disposal area for polluted dredge material was continued at a cost of $6,419. Existing project is complete. Total costs at end of FY were $3,110,899, of which $1,285,716 was for new work and $1,025,183 for maintenance, Federal funds; and contributed funds in the amount of $1,186,467. 45. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior. It consists of improvement of mouth of Ontonagon River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Previous project. For details see page 1931 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1406 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for approach channel 16 feet deep, a channel between piers with 17 and 15- foot depths, an inner basin 12 feet deep, and maintenance of channels, basin, and entrance piers. Completed project cost $19,619. See page 1100 of Annual Report for 1966 for details. A modification authorized by 1962 River and Harbor Act provides for increasing depths of channels, construction of an inner basin and a sedimentation basin. This portion of project is inactive. Estimated cost (1965) of this work is $6,040,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required for earlier authorization. See page 1020 of Annual Report for 1965 for requirements of 1962 Act. Terminal facilities. There are no publicly owned wharves. There are three coal wharves, an oil receiving facility, and a few small fish wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $37,993. Repairs to the north breakwater were performed at a cost of $38,546. An adjustment of $-40,919 was made in the maintenance dredging contract completed last FY. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY at a cost of $469,199. Approximately 70,000 cubic yards of shoal material was removed. Engineering, design, surveys, layouts, supervision and administration cost $48,113. Engineering and design for confined disposal facility cost $6,000. All work authorized under previous Acts was completed in 1938. Work authorized under the 1962 Act is in an inactive status. Totals costs to end of FY for existing project were $5,662,944, of which $112,101 was for new work and $5,550,843 for maintenance. 46. PENSAUKEE HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Green Bay, about 22 miles northeasterly from Green Bay Harbor, and about 33 miles southwesterly from Menominee Harbor, MI and WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14910.) Previous projects. For details, see Annual Report for 1899, page 2734, and Annual Report for 1938. page 1429. Existing project. An entrance channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep at low water datum from the depth in Green Bay about 4,300 feet to mouth of Pensaukee River. Fluctuations of water level are seasonal changes of about one-half foot above or below the annual mean stage, and extreme fluctuations of a temporary nature, due to wind and barometric pressure, of about 2 feet above or below mean lake level prevailing at the time. 31-20 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT New work for completed project cost $24,851, exclusive of amounts expended under previous projects. Existing project was authorized by 1937 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 478, 74th Cong., 2d sess.). Latest published map is in project document. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Small private wharves along lower half mile of river, used by the local fishing interests. Ample spice is available for additional fishing wharves when required. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and services were performed by Government forces at a cost of $6,710. Engineering and design for diked disposal facility cost $9,728. The existing project was completed in 1938. Total cost at the end of FY is $177,673, of which $34,035 was for new work and $143,638 for maintenance. 47. PENTWATER HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 146 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 14 miles southerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907.) Existing project. Provides for widening old entrance channel to 150 feet between parallel piers and revetments, channel to extend from Lake Michigan to Pentwater Lake, with a depth of 16 feet. Piers and revetments are built of stonefilled timber cribs and piling and capped with concrete. The 200-foot extension to south pier portion of project is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion is $65,100. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Several small privately owned wharves on west end of Pentwater Lake. The City and Michigan Waterways Commission jointly constructed a dock on northwest side of Pentwater Lake for public use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspection and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $33,881. Repairs to south breakwater and north revetment were performed at a cost of $21,033. An adjustment of $-1,725 was made in the contract for dredging performed last FY. A contract was awarded and completed this FY at a cost of $63,931. Approximately 26,300 cubic yards, place measure, of shoal material was removed by hydraulic dredge. Engineering, surveys, supervision and administration cost $11,463. Existing project was completed in 1959 except for a 200-foot extension to the south pier which is not considered necessary under present conditions. For additional details see page 1468 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project at end of FY were $2,654,500, of which $179,899 was for new work, and $2,474,601 for maintenance. 48. POINTE LOOKOUT HARBOR (AU GRES RIVER), MI Location. At Au Gres River on westerly shore of Lake Huron at entrance to Saginaw Bay, about 17 miles northeast of mouth of Saginaw River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a small boat harbor having a 12-foot deep, 100-foot wide, 2,800-foot long outer entrance channel; a 5,600-foot long, 100-foot wide inner entrance channel having a 10-foot depth; an 8,270-foot long 6-foot deep river channel ending just downstream from U.S. 23 highway bridge and having a width of 60 feet; a 4,000-foot long north breakwater and a 3,800-foot long south breakwater. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Small boat marina facilities are under construction by State of Michigan. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $28,633. Construction was completed during FY 1974. Total costs to end of FY were $2,978,032, of which $2,642,584 was for new work and $335,447 for maintenance. An analysis for the Design Deficiency Report was continued. 49. PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan about 186 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and about 37 miles northerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14939.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge with an entrance channel from Lake Michigan to Portage Lake protected by piers and revetments. Project depth is 18 feet. For additional details see page 1297 of Annual Report for 1958. Latest published map is in H. Doc. 588, 64th Congress, 1st session. (See Table 31-B fQr authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are landing places and marinas at inner end of Portage Lake. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $9,323. An adjustment of $-17,581 was made in the contract for maintenance dredging performed last FY. Existing project was substantially completed in 1912. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1298 of Annual Report for 1958. The structures are generally in fair condition. 50. PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI Location. On southwest shore of Lake Huron, 30 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge 31-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 protected by breakwater structures extending to 12- foot depth contour in lake; for dredging a harbor basin 10 feet deep; for dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep; a 70-foot extension of the south breakwater; a 300-foot arm added to the north breakwater; and riprap placed at the lakeward side of the breakwater additions. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one privately owned dock used principally as a fishing terminal by owner and a municipally owned pier for recreational craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $24,622. Leveling of the disposal area and installation of a ramp was performed at a cost of $47,142. Engineering design, supervision and administration cost $2,455. A contract was awarded this FY for hauling and placing of sand under Section 111. The contract is approximately 80 percent complete at a cost of $123,836, with approximately 33,800 tons of sand placed. Engineering, surveys, layouts, supervision and administration cost $23,997. Project was completed in 1951 except for latest project modification which was completed in FY 76. Breakwaters are in good condition. 51. PORT WASHINGTON HARBOR, WI Location. On the west shore of Lake Michigan, about 53 miles south of Manitowoc and about 29 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) Previous project. For details, see page 1938 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1459 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 30-14 of Chicago District Annual Report for 1975. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, June 12, 1975, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one coal wharf, a petroleum tank farm and several fishing wharves. City provided a wharf which is open to public use. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations duringfiscalyear. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $22,475. Repairs of the north breakwater were performed at a cost of $86,425. An adjustment of $-13,416 was made in the cost for maintenance dredging contract completed last FY. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $8,372. The existing project was completed in 1936. The 1958 modifica tion was deauthorized in 1977. Total costs to end of FY were $6,007,856, of which $3,768,816 was for new work, and $2,239,040 for maintenance. 52. PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior at Marquette, MI. It is an indentationabout 1.5 miles long and one-half mile wide in shore behind Presque Isle Point. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14970.) Existing project. A breakwater off Presque Isle Point and dredging harbor to depth of 28 feet an inner portion with 30 feet at entrance. For details see page 1021 of 1965 Annual Report. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One merchandise and petroleum receiving wharf and one ore dock. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $4,999. Engineering and design for a confined disposal area was continued at a cost of $10,333. Project authorized by earlier Acts was completed in 1939. A contract for harbor deepening authorized by 1960 Act was completed in April 1962 except for a section where -rocks were encountered in southeast portion of harbor. Rock removal has been accomplished intermittently by hired labor and the project is completed. Breakwater is in good condition. A Section 111 project was approved by Chief of Engineers in Oct 1981 providing a rock groin, beach restoration and nourishment program at vicinity of Shiras Park and 3,000 feet west of park. 53. RACINE HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 26 miles south of Milwaukee, WI, and about 64 miles north Chicago, IL. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14925.) Previous project. See page 1389 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. For detailed description see page 1235, Annual Report for 1963. New work for project as completed cost $777,775, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and exclusive of inner 300 linear feet of pile pier and 450 linear feet of rubblemound originally part of south breakwater but no longer considered necessary. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, June 26, 1979, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Five wharves used for handling coal, limestone, petroleum products, and fish. City provided a public wharf. 31-22 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $19,550. Structure repairs were performed on the south breakwater by hired labor at a cost of $118,835. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed at a cost of $22,972. Approximately 925 cubic yards, scow measure, of shoal material was removed. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $6,669. Existing project substantially completed in 1946. Construction of north breakwater and shore connection was completed in November 1918. Removal of old north pier was completed in 1913. Construction of south breakwater and shore connection and removal of old south pier were commenced in June 1916 and completed in December 1924. Removal of outer shoals, widening and deepening channel through outer basin to existing project depth and width, and dredging river channel began in July and completed in November 1946. 54. ROUGE RIVER, MI Location. Rises in Oakland and Washtenaw Counties, MI, 30 miles long, flows southeasterly through Wayne County, and joins Detroit River at westerly limit of City of Detroit. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14854.) Previous project. For details see page 1530 of Annual Report for 1932, and page 1558 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for: (a) Main channel from Detroit River through Short Cut Canal extending to upstream limit of the project, a distance of 3.5 miles. Project depths are 25 and 21 feet in navigation channel, 21 feet in turning basin, and 13 feet in upper reach of project. (b) Old channel from Detroit River extending to junction of Old Channel with Short Cut Canal. Project depths are 25, 18, 17, and 21 feet. For additional details see page 1324 of Annual Report for 1963. In 1973, work authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act was reclassified from the active to inactive category. Estimated cost (1972) of this work is $880,000. Except for dredging 25-foot channel 1,150 feet upstream from mouth of Old Channel, work authorized in Act of August 30, 1935, is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1958) of inactive portion is $255,000. Work authorized by Act of July 3, 1958 is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1960) of this work is $210,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Act of October 23, 1962, requires local interests to provide lands and rights-of-way for construction upon request of the Chief of Engineers; hold the United States free from damages; provide terminal facilities to accommodate prospective commerce considered in report of District Engineer; dredge and maintain areas between the Federal improvement and terminal facilities to depths commensurate with improved Federal channel; make alterations in docks, bulkheads and other structures, and take such other measures as may be necessary to assure stability of banks adjacent to channel; and provide bridge protection. The assurances of local cooperation for the River and Harbor Act of 1962 were furnished by the Michigan State Waterways Commission and accepted on January 7, 1965. Fulfillment of all items of local cooperation has not been accomplished. Terminal facilities. Numerous large commercial docks for handling various type cargo. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are contained in the Port Series No. 45 (revised (1972) prepared and published as part 2 by the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Information on port administration and Federal services, port steamship services is prepared and published as part 1 by the Port Development Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $161,745. Adjustments of $- 13,930 and $2,207 were made in cost for maintenance dredging performed by the HOFFMAN last FY and the LYMAN in FY 1980, respectively. An adjustment of $180 was made in cost for operation of the booster pump last FY. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded this FY in the amount of $324,950. Work for this contract is expected to begin in early FY 83. Maintenance of the disposal area cost $49,350. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $36,996. The contract for construction of Phase II diked disposal area was completed at a cost of $224,329. Engineering, supervision and administration cost $171,301. Work authorized before 1962 modification is complete or deauthorized. For additional details on completion of existing project see Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project to end of FY were $27,836,687, of which $675,251 was for new work and $27,161,436 for maintenance. In addition, $29,563 was expended for new work from Emergency Relief Act Funds. 55. SAGINAW RIVER, MI Location. Formed by union of Tittabawassee and Shiawassee Rivers, 22 miles long, and flows northerly into extreme inner end of Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron. Cities of Saginaw and Bay City are on the river. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14867.) Previous project. For details, see page 1957 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1550 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 27 feet deep and 350 feet wide from 27-foot contour in Saginaw Bay to river mouth; thence a channel 26 feet deep and 200 feet wide to New York Central Railroad Bridge at Bay City; thence 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide to C&O Railroad Bridge in Saginaw; thence 16.5 feet deep and 200 feet wide to upstream limit at Green Point. Project also provides for five turning basins; one 31-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 25 feet deep at Essexville, 600 feet wide with a maximum length of 1,850 feet; one 22 feet deep on east side of channel about 1 mile upstream from Cass Avenue in Bay City, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; one 20 feet deep at Carrollton, 100 to 300 feet wide and 900 feet long; one 20 feet deep just downstream from C&O Bridge in Saginaw, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; and one 15 feet deep between Bristol Street Bridge and New York Central Railroad Bridge in Saginaw. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Numerous large commercial docks for handling a great variety of cargo. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series No. 45 (revised 1972) prepared and published as part 2 by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Information on port administration and Federal services, port and terminal services and charges, and steamship services is prepared and published as part 1 by Port Development Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, Hi-Fix surveys, support of Water Control Center, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $319,893. Adjustments of $62,928, $1,152, $-11,973, and $-33,045 were made in maintenance dredging performed last FY by the U.S. Hopper Dredges HAINS, LYMAN, HOFFMAN and MARKHAM. Maintenance dredging was performed this FY by the HAINS and the MARKHAM removing 16,181 and 565,828 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material at a cost of $110,619 and $972,359, respectively. Hired labor support, materials and services in connection with the HAINS and MARKHAM dredging cost $42,890. A contract for maintenance dredging of the river section awarded this FY is 99 percent complete at a cost of $453,998. Approximately 52,000 cubic yards of shoal material was removed. Maintenance of disposal area cost $296,- 581. Engineering, design, survey, supervision and administration cost $88,337. Settlement of a claim was made in the amount of $424,705 on contract for construction of diked disposal area awarded in 1976. Engineering, design, supervision and administration for construction of a disposal area for upper Saginaw River cost $136,110. Existing project is complete except for a small part of the work authorized by the Act of October 23, 1962. Section D (Sixth Street Turning Basin) of the 1962 Act is complete except for the channel portion, which is pending modification. Total costs for existing project to the end of FY were $54,552,002, of which $14,662,299 was for new work and $39,889,703 was for maintenance. 56. ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI Location. A 40 mile long section of Great Lakes connecting channels which flows southerly from Lake Huron and discharges into Lake St. Clair. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14852.) Existing project. Provides for channels through St. Clair River, which, at low water datum, are suitable for vessels drawing 25.5 feet. Project also provides for improvement of North Channel outlet, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep, for recreational craft. Project depths are referred to low water datums for Lakes Huron and St. Clair, 576.8 and 571.7 feet above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec; International Great Lakes Datum 1955. (See Table 31-B and 31-C for authorizing legislation and features of existing project.) Act of July 24, 1946 provides for widening and deepening of southeast bend and improvement of outlet of north channel. Estimated cost (1971) is $600,000. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. This improvement serves through commerce between upper and lower Great Lakes, and has not materially influenced terminal facilities along its route. A number of privately owned piers and wharves are at Port Huron, Marysville, St. Clair, and Marine City, MI, which handle coal, limestone, petroleum products, woodpulp, salt and general cargo. These installations satisfy present commerce requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, support of North Central Division Water Control Center and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $405,384. Environmental studies in connection with the extended navigation season were performed at a cost of $85,201. An adjustment of $-29,756 was made in cost for location and removal of obstructions performed previously. An adjustment of $28,823 was made in cost for maintenance dredging by the U.S. Hopper Dredge HAINS performed last FY. The HAINS performed maintenance dredging removing 37,564 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material at a cost of $173,038. Maintenance of the disposal area cost $164,764. Surveys, supervision and administration cost $12,233. Existing project is complete. Total cost of existing project to end of FY was $28,640,205, of which $19,213,246 was for new work and $9,426,959 for maintenance. 57. ST. JOSEPH RIVER, MI Location. St. Joseph River rises near Hillsdale, MI, flows southwesterly into Indiana, thence, northwest, and empties into Lake Michigan at St. Joseph, MI. The length is about 14 miles following the general course and not including small bends. It has a drainage area of 4,586 square miles. Its discharge in cubic feet per second varies from about 300 to 21,600, with an average of about 3,000. High water occurs in spring, with a rise of from 4 to 6 feet, and low water in summer. It is a crooked stream with rapid current and numerous shoal crossings 24 to 30 inches deep, with intervening pools from 4 to 8 feet deep. The average width below Berrien Springs, MI, is from 300 to 400 feet. The navigable part extends from the mouth to the dam at Berrien Springs, a distance of about 22 miles by river, with a drop at low water of 17 feet from Berrien Springs to Lake Michi- 31-24 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT gan. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14905 and 14930.) Existing project. This provides for a channel 2 to 3 feet deep at low water and from 30 to 50 feet wide from the mouth to Berrien Springs, a distance of about 22 miles, by building wing dams, making cuts through the shoals, and removing snags. Fluctuations in water surface due to floods vary from about 4 to 6 feet above low water. Local cooperation. None. Terminal facilities. None, except as use is made of St. Joseph Harbor. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, operations of safety features, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $51,509. Repairs to the North and South Breakwater were performed at a cost of $54,183. The U.S. Hopper Dredge HAINS performed maintenance dredging removing 152,981 cubic yards, bin measure, of shoal material at a cost of $73,501. An adjustment of $37,291 was made in dredge cost performed previously. Maintenance of disposal area was performed at a cost of X27,777. Engineering, design, surveys and layouts, supervision and administration cost $25,837. Maintenance of shore erosion mitigation under Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 was performed by the U.S. Hopper Dredge HAINS at a cost of $450,652. (Part of this cost was for purchase of sand and equipment rental). Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $30,347. Engineering and design for confined disposal area for polluted dredged material was continued at a cost of $41,801. Existing project was completed in 1956. The structures are in generally good condition. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1454 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $10,697,544, of which $1,301,373 was for new work, $8,433,955 for maintenance and $962,216 for rehabilitation. 58. ST. MARYS RIVER, MI Location. A Great Lakes connecting channel about 63 miles long, flows southeasterly between State of Michigan and Province of Ontario, Canada, from eastern end of Lake Superior into northern end of Lake Huron. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14882, 14883, and 14884.) At. Sault Ste. Marie, MI, about 14 miles downstream from Lake Superior, there are four parallel locks and a hydroelectric powerplant. Previous project. For details see page 1955, Annual Report for 1915; and page 1529, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Channels permitting 25.5-foot draft navigation in St. Marys River and Lake Superior and Lake Huron approaches thereto; constructing and operating four locks and two canals; constructing an electric plant of 14,000 kilowatt capacity (45,000 kilowatt ultimate capacity) constructing anchorage areas in river above and below locks; and constructing various other works in conjunction with project. Subsequently, in 1932, the Unit 10 powerhouse was installed raising the capacity to 18,400 kilowatts (45,000 ultimate capacity). Original State locks were operated and maintained under permanent indefinite appropriation from June 9, 1881, to November 2, 1886, after which they were destroyed by excavation for the Poe Lock in 1896. Weitzel Lock, destroyed in 1942 by excavation for MacArthur Lock, was operated and maintained under the same appropriation from September 1, 1881, to June 30, 1935. Poe Lock was operated and maintained under the same appropriation from August 3, 1896, Davis Lock from October 21, 1914, and Sabin Lock from September 18,1919, to end of FY 1935. The 1,200 foot by 110 foot new Poe Lock was authorized in 1962 and put into operation in 1968. Details of existing project are set forth in Table 31-D. Project depths are referred to low water datum corresponding to sloping surface of river as follows: Above locks: When water surface of Lake Superior is at elevation 600 feet and at upstream side of locks is 577.8 feet above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec (International Great Lakes Datum 1955). Estimated (1973) cost for new work is $164,630. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. This improvement serves through commerce between Lake Superior and lower lakes and has not materially influenced terminal facilities at localities along its route. Three piers at Sault Ste. Marie receive coal and petroleum products. Limestone is shipped from a pier at Drummond Island. Vessel refueling stations are at Lime Island and Village of Detour; they receive coal and petroleum products. Present terminals satisfy current traffic requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Operation, maintenance and care of locks: Two canals and four locks were operated as required. Necessary repairs and improvements were made thereto and to appurtenant structures and equipment. Canals were open to navigation 278 days from Oct 1, 1981 thru Sep 30, 1982. During that period, a total of 9,600 vessels, aggregating 75,200,000 short tons of freight and 157,000 passengers passed through the MacArthur, Poe, Davis and Sabin locks. Cost for operation, maintenance and care of the locks for the FY was $3,985,698, including $103,099 for extended season operation and maintenance. Powerhouse and equipment: Two hydroelectric powerhouses were operated and maintained. Cost of work done by hired labor was $478,650 less a deduction of $34,266 for interdepartmental electricity sold. Compensating Works Structure: A contract for installation of post tensioned rock anchors at piers 9 thru 16 was completed at a cost of $144,500; of which $70,000 was Federal and $74,500 non-Federal cost. Other operation and care items: Buildings and grounds were maintained, condition surveys, operation studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $691,327. Security measures cost $406,529, including a contract for $380,933. Janitorial service of the Administration 31-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 and Davis buildings was done by contract at a cost of $29,026. A study on the extended navigation season was performed at a cost of $1,000,464. An ice boom was installed and removed and the construction of ice stabilization islands were performed at a cost of $255,123. An engineering study on the compensating works was performed at a cost of $156,858. Channels and canals: St. Marys River Channels and canal approaches were examined by sweeping. Removal of shoals in St. Marys River channels and canal approaches was accomplished by hired labor and U.S. Derrickboats NICOLET and HARVEY at a cost of $1,298,591, including engineering and design. Recreational facilities: Information center, comfort stations, park fountain, observation and overlook platforms, including engineering and design were operated and maintained at a cost of $100,270, including a janitorial contract for the information center at a cost of $14,512. A total of 649,678 visitors used the observation and overlook platforms and the information center during the FY. Project in effect prior to modification of March 21, 1956 is complete and work authorized by 1956 modification to provide a safe draft of 25.5 feet for both upbound and downbound traffic is also complete. Public Works Acceleration Funds used for maintenance were $118,000. Total costs to end of FY were $160,135,124 for new work and $138,660,602 for maintenance, for a grand total of $292,878,602. 59. SAUGATUCK HARBOR AND KALAMAZOO RIVER, MI Location. Harbor is on east shore of Lake Michigan, 90 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 22 miles northerly from South Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14906.) Previous project. For details see page 1947 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1475 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Entrance channel protected by parallel piers at mouth of Kalamazoo River and a river channel to Village of Saugatuck, MI. Project depths: 16 feet in entrance channel, 14 feet in river channel. Additional details on page 1456, 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At Village of Saugatuck, MI, there are several landing places for recreational craft and one for small commercial vessels. At Village of Douglas, MI, there is alanding pier. Facilities are considered adequate for present traffic. Operations duringfiscalyear. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $31,764. Repairs to north and south revetment and south pier were performed at a cost of $74,618. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY at a cost of $52,996. Approximately 21,800 cubic yards, place measure, of shoal material was removed by hydraulic dredge. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $14,488. Existing project was completed in 1911. Total costs for existing project to end of FY were $2,849,829, of which $364,527 was for new work and $2,485,302 for maintenance. 60. SEBEWAING RIVER, MI Location. At mouth of Sebewaing River on south shore of Saginaw Bay about 10 miles south of Bay Port, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Previous project. For details see page 1007 of Annual Report for 1912. Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 15,000 feet long in Saginaw Bay. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Terminal facilities. A number of small wharves used by fishing vessels and other light-draft craft are along the river. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $18,971. An adjustment of $-3,094 was made in the contract for maintenance dredging completed last FY. Engineering and design for diked disposal facility cost $1,347. Existing project was completed in 1903. Total costs to end of FY were $2,300,350, of which $35,573 was for irew work and $2,264,777 for maintenance. 61. SHEBOYGAN HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 26 miles south of Manitowoc and about 55 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14922.) Previous project. See page 1381 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. For detailed description see page 1230, Annual Report for 1963. New work for project as completed cost $648,271, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Three wharves for handling coal, petroleum products and miscellaneous commodities. City provided a public wharf. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspection and reports were performed at a cost of $23,409. The rental contract for mainteqtance dredging awarded last FY was completed at a cost of $160,800. Approximately 37,510 cubic yards of shoal material was removed. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $31,827. Engineering and design for confined disposal site cost $33,557. Existing project was completed in 1904. Construction of north breakwater was commenced in October 1913 31-26 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT and completed in October 1915. Dredging turning basin was commenced in October 1928 and completed in September 1931. Dredging entrance channel to existing project depth was commenced in June and completed in July 1938. Work on 1954 modification was completed in December 1956. Piers and breakwaters are in generally good condition. Inner 260 feet of south pier replaced with a revetment by private interests under permit granted July 16, 1931, by the Secretary of War. Piers, therefore are maintained only for a length of about 2,490 feet. Sheboygan River is navigable about 2.4 miles above its mouth for craft drawing not more than 2 feet. Costs of existing project are $3,176,294 for maintenance, $609,028 for rehabilitation and $1,136,088 for new work; for a total of $4,921,410. 62. SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 77 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 24 miles northerly from St. Joseph, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14906.) Previous project. For details see page 1947 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1473 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel protected by parallel piers and revetments at mouth of Black River, a river channel and a turning basin. Project depths are 21 feet in entrance channel and 19 feet in river channel and turning basin. For additional details see page 1455 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several wharves for handling coal, building materials, woodpulp, fish, and miscellaneous commodities will have warehouses. Facilities satisfy current commerce requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, operation of safety features, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $20,162. Repairs to the north revetment, south pier and the north breakwater were performed at a cost of $222,853. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $9,469. An adjustment of $34,100 was made in the contract cost under Section 111 shore erosion mitigation completed last FY. Engineering, surveys, supervision and administration cost $22,430. Existing project was completed in 1960. Project now being maintained to 14-foot and 12-foot depths, respectively, in lieu of the 21 feet and 19 feet authorized, which is adequate for current usage. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1456 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project to the end of FY were $6,096,586, of which $797,193 was for new work, $3,337,317 for maintenance, and $1,632,076 for rehabilitation. 63. STURGEON BAY AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 52 miles northeast of Green Bay and about 128 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14919.) Previous projects. See page 1373 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 31-C, page 30-27. For detailed description, see page 1223, Annual Report for 1963. See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. As the canal and connecting channel is a through waterway, only terminal facilities are in City of Sturgeon Bay, 4 miles from west end of revetted portion of canal. These facilities consist of two wharves for handling coal, petroleum products and miscellaneous commodities and four shipbuildingyards. City of Sturgeon Bay provided a public wharf about 5 miles northwesterly from City of Sturgeon Bay. Two major shipyards are located in Sturgeon Bay where repair facilities are available including dry docks, marine railways and hoists. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $60,470. Repairs to south revetment by hired labor cost $91,960. Supervision and administration cost $9,251. Existing project was completed in 1946. Breakwaters were completed in 1880, and canal revetments in 1903. Dredging and rock removal at east entrance to canal and dredging in west section of canal to existing project depth were commenced in May and completed in September 1940. Deepening and widening middle section of canal to existing project depth and width was commenced in May and completed in August 1942. Dredging turning basin was commenced in June and completed in July 1946. Breakwaters are in good condition. North revetment and section of south revetment have been rehabilitated and are in good condition. Remainder of south revetment is in fair to poor condition and requires repair. Total cost of existing project is $736,303 for new work, $6,372,353 for maintenance and $884,899 for rehabilitation, a total of $7,993,555. In addition, $235,940 was expended between April 25, 1893 and June 30, 1917 on operating and care of works of improvements under provision of permanent indefinite appropriations for such purposes. 64. TWO HARBORS, MN Location. Harbor is on north shore of Lake Superior, 27 miles northeasterly from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14966.) Existing project. Narrowing natural entrance by construction of two breakwaters, 1,628 and 900 feet long, from eastern and western points of bay, respectively; and dredging a maneuvering area on north side of harbor to 28 and 30 feet deep. A walkway on east breakwater is provided for public recreational use. For 31-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 details see page 1026 of Annual Report for 1965. Dredging to deepen areas along easterly and northerly edges of channel was completed in 1980. This portion of project was reclassified from the "inactive" to "active" category in 1973. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. A section 221 local cooperation agreement was entered into with the City of Two Harbors on August 14, 1978. Terminal facilities. No publicly owned wharves. Three ore docks, tug wharf, an unused coal dock, and merchandise wharf are privately owned. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Claim and administrative close out of dredging contract completed in FY 80 was performed at a cost of $90,086. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $4,000. Repairs to East Breakwater were performed by Government forces at a cost of $72,432. An adjustment of $1,325 was made in contract cost for maintenance dredging completed in FY 80. Supervision and administration cost $4,036. The existing project is complete. Total cost to end of FY is $4,125,710 for new work and $1,664,781 for maintenance, for a total of $5,790,491. 65. TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 82 miles north of Milwaukee and about 101 miles from Green Bay, WI, via Sturgeon Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14903.) Previous projects. See page 1377, Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-28. For detailed description see page 1226 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed project cost $147,463, exclusive of the amount expended on previous projects. The 1935 River and Harbor Act portion of project is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $14,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A coal wharf and several fishing wharves. City provided a wharf for receipt of petroleum products and public use. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $8,622. An adjustment of $-37,044 was made in maintenance dredging contract completed last FY. Supervision of close out of contract cost $3,109. Existing project is complete except for inactive portion of project which consists of dredging a 10-foot width along east side of lakeward portion of entrance channel between the piers. This dredging was omitted to avoid removal of necessary riprap along entrance piers. Present width of channel is considered adequate for present and reasonably prospective commerce. South pier was completed in 1883 and is in generally good condition. North pier was completed in 1908. North revetment, completed in 1917, was rebuilt in May to August 1962. Dredging entrance channel and inner basin to existing project depth was commenced in March and substantially completed in May 1937. Total costs of existing project were $147,463 for new work and $6,349,461 for maintenance; a total of $6,496,924. In addition, $58,057 was expended for minor rehabilitation. 66. WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan 120 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 45 miles southerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14935.) Existing project. Parallel piers, revetments, and a channel. Channel is 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, 1,950 feet long, and extends from Lake Michigan to White Lake. For additional details see page 1465 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. A privately owned chemical shipping dock on north side of lake about 3 miles from inner end of revetted entrance channel. Across lake, at village of Whitehall, there are several installations serving light draft vessels. These terminals satisfy present recreational and commercial traffic requirements. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design for beach nourishment was completed at a cost of $11,084. A contract was awarded for placing 38,000 cubic yards of sand. The contract is approximately 70 percent complete at a cost of $85,000. Supervision and administration cost $2,208. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $36,404. Repairs to the North and South piers were performed by hired labor at a cost of $83,342. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $7,399. Existing project was completed in 1908. Stone was placed on the north and south revetments in FY 1972. The structures are in generally good condition. Project now being maintained to 14-foot and 12-foot depths, respectively, in lieu o the 16-foot depth authorized, which is adequate for current usage. Total cost to end of FY is $2,205,306, of which $415,698 was for new work and $1,789,608 was for maintenance. 67. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS See Table 31-F. 68. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 31-G. 31-28 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT 69. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (pre-authorization.) Reimbursement for completed negative reconnaissance studies at Baraga, MI ($7,500) and Mona Lake, MI ($2,050). Detailed project studies continued at Bayfield, WI ($35,586). Construction continued on Manitowoc, WI, small boat harbor ($625,660), and physically completed at Detour, MI ($214,981). Detailed project report completed and approved, plans and specifications and construction advertisement and award completed for Manitowoc, WI, channel extension ($39,311). Coordination with local sponsors on small boat harbor continued at Racine, WI ($920) and Harrisville, MI ($40), and financial closeout at Port Washington, WI ($789). Beach Erosion Control 70. AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Beach erosion control projects are authorized at Berrien County Shore (St. Joseph) MI and the Shore of Manitowoc County, WI. For last full report see Annual Report for 1963 (Berrien County). Both projects are in the inactive category. 71. EMERGENCY SHORE PROTECTION Authority for emergency streambank and shoreline protection of public works and non-profit public services. (Section 14 Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended.) Negative reconnaissance studies were completed and funds reimbursed at Kahle Park, Alger County, MI ($7,500), Manitowoc (Manitowoc River), WI ($7,500), Manitowoc (Sanitary Treatment Plant Rd), WI ($7,500), Marine City, MI ($7,500), and Weidman, MI ($600). A positive reconnaissance study at Racine (Zoo), WI was completed and approved in Jul 1982 ($8,000). Other negative reconnaissance studies were completed at Algoma, WI, and Port Sanilac, MI. Meridian Township, MI - A contract for Erosion Control Project - Section 14 was awarded and completed this FY at a cost of $103,258. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $34,488. Siena Center, Racine, WI - A contract for Erosion Control Project - Section 14 was awarded and completed this FY at a cost of $90,571. Alpena, MI - Completion of plans and specifications, and construction advertisement and award completed this FY at a cost of $21,697. 72. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion activities pursuant to Section 103 of the 1962 River and Harbor Act. During the fiscal year work was conducted for the following studies: Ashland Harbor, WI $233, Escanaba, MI $4,962, Two Harbors, MN $25,955. Final Detailed Project Report at Ashland, WI, approved by Office of Chief of Engineers in Apr 1982 recommending revetment protection of approximately 775 feet of shoreline at Lake Park. Two Harbors, MN, study terminated Jul 15, 1982 due to lack of economic feasibility. 73. MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGES Mitigation of Shore Damages pursuant to Section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968. A negative reconnaissance study was completed at Keweenaw Waterway, MI ($7,000) and reconnaissance report reimbursement for completed project at Racine, WI ($1,999). Detailed project studies were conducted on Big Bay Harbor, MI ($12,045), Grand Traverse Harbor, MI ($2,717), Grand Marais Harbor, MI ($5,000), and Presque Isle Harbor, MI ($30). Big Bay Harbor study was recommended for termination and Grand Traverse, Grand Marais, and Presque Isle studies recommended construction. Presque Isle was approved by Office of the Chief of Engineers in Oct 1981. Construction during the FY was also completed for the following harbors: Hammond Bay, MI ($63,513), and White Lake, MI ($98,292). Plans and specifications were initiated at Harrisville, MI ($25,246), and financial closeout at Lexington, MI ($541). Flood Control 74. RED RUN DRAIN-LOWER CLINTON RIVER, MI Location. The Clinton River basin has an area of 760 square miles and includes parts of Macomb, Oakland, St. Clair and Lapeer Counties in the Southeastern portion of the lower peninsula of Michigan. The project itself is located in the southeastern section of the basin. Existing project. Provides for abandonment of the upper 2 miles of the Red Run Drain in Oakland County and for enlarging and paving the Red Run Drain from Dequindre Road oj, the west downstream to the Main Branch, Clinton River, a distance of approximately 8% miles. Bottom widths of the channel would vary from 70 to 240 feet. The Main Branch, Clinton River would be widened, deepened and straightened for a distance of about 4% miles. The channel width would vary from 180 to 200 feet and adjacent lands would be maintained as a floodway with a width of 500 feet. The authorized plan provides for a rectangular concrete-lined channel below this point, varying in width from 180 to 210 feet, to the existing Clinton River Cut-Off Canal, a distance of about 2 miles. The Cut-Off Canal would consist of a rectangular channel with concrete bottom 210 feet wide and steel sheet pile walls in the upper 1% miles and a trapezoidal concrete-lined channel with a 170-foot bottom width and 75-foot wide benches placed on each bank over the lower mile of the Canal to Lake St. Clair. The authorized plan would provide protection for surrounding urban areas against rainfall and flood having a 1.0 percent chance of occurrence under 31-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 anticipated urbanized basin conditions in the year 2000. The cost estimate for new work (Oct 1981) is $125,000,- 000 excluding $24,540,000 to be contributed by local interests. Estimate of cost to local interests (Oct 1981) is $44,407,000. Local cooperation. Prior to construction, local interests must furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-ofway, utility relocations, and highway bridge alterations necessary for construction of the channel improvements; presently estimated at (Oct 1981) $9,775,000 for Red Run Drain and (Oct 1981) $12,145,000 for Lower Clinton River; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; contribute in cash a sum presently estimated at (Oct 1981) $26,880,000, which, together with items applicable to Red Run Drain to be furnished in above, would constitute 50 percent of all flood control costs for Red Run Drain; prevent or restrict development in the project area by providing easements or by establishing and enforcing flood plain regulations where such development would result in the increase of damage able property in the flood plain or would necessitate modifications, or reduce the efficiency of, the project; prevent encroachment on the project channels and ponding areas which would decrease the effectiveness of the improvements, and, if ponding areas and capacities are impaired, promptly provide substitute capacities to restore the effectiveness of the project channels by establishing and enforcing water quality standards commensurate with Federal, State, and local standards; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and operation of any pollution abatement structures constructed by local interests on Red Run Drain in Oakland County; to bring the non- Federal share of costs to at least 50 percent of the total costs of recreation development, which may consist of the actual cost of carrying out an agreed upon portion of the development, a cash contribution, or a combination of both; operate and maintain the recreation facilities for the life of the project; and provide access to all on equal terms. Operations during fiscal year. Work continued at a cost of $165,900, on completing detailed hydraulic, hydrologic and economic analyses in response to issues raised by Federal, State and local governments and the public, on the post-authorization studies. Results of these analyses are being utilized to reformulate project alternatives. This effort includes a reanalysis of structural and non-structural alternatives and an investigation of several alternative plans to alleviate basement flooding in the Twelve Towns area of the project. The preparation of a Re-evaluation Report to determine the most appropriate plan, if any, to alleviate flooding and major drainage related damages in the project area is not complete; subsequently, construction has not started. 75. SAGINAW RIVER, MI Location. Saginaw River basin including its tributaries, Tittabawassee, Shiawassee, Flint and Cass Rivers, drains an area of 6,260 square miles in the east central part of Michigan and empties into Saginaw Bay, an arm of Lake Huron. Bay City, near mouth of river, and Saginaw, 22 miles upstream from mouth, are on Federally improved deep-draft Saginaw River navigation channel. (See Saginaw and Flint Geological quadrangles and NOAA Nautical Chart 14867.) Existing project. Provides for improvements in Saginaw River Basin for flood control and other purposes: (a) at Middle Branch and South Branch, Cass River, to provide for major drainage improvements by channel improvements on Middle and South Branches, including a short reach of East Branch, at an estimated U.S. cost (July 1961) for construction of $1,448,000 for Middle and South Branches; provided local interests contribute in cash 42 percent of first cost of major drainage project on Middle Branch, and 38 percent of first cost of major drainage project on South Branch, exclusive of cost of rights-of-way and other work required as local cooperation, and give assurances satisfactory to Secretary of the Army they will construct and maintain local drainage work required to fully and effectively utilize improvements to be provided under the Federal projects; (b) at Vassar on Cass River, to provide for flood protection of areas on north and south sides of river by channel improvement, levee construction, floodwalls, modification of Moore Drain, and related work at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct 1981) of $8,260,000 and non-Federal cost of $205,000 for construction; (c) at Frankenmuth on Cass River, to provide for flood protection of areas on north side of river by channel improvement, levee construction related work, at an estimated U.S. cost (Jul 1974) of $410,900 for construction; (d) at Flint on Flint River, to provide for flood protection of areas on both sides of main stem of Flint River and its tributaries, Swartz and Thread Creeks by channel improvement, bridge alterations, floodwall and levee construction, and related work, at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct 1981) of $17,927,600 and non-Federal cost of $2,578,000 for construction; provided local interests contribute in cash 1 percent of first cost of project, exclusive of costs of rights-of-ways (e) at Corunna on Shiawassee River, to provide for flood protection by channel improvement, levee construction, and related work at an estimated U.S. cost (July 1961) of $48,000 for construction; provided local interests modify spillway of mill dam at Corunna at their own expense, substantially in accordance with plan of District Engineer and subject to approval of Chief of Engineers, or in lieu thereof, contribute to the United States actual cost of modification to be performed by the United States; (f) at Owosso on Shiawassee River, to provide for flood protection by channei improvement at an estimated U.S. cost (July 1961) of $425,000 for construction; (g) at Midland on Tittabawassee River, to provide for flood protection through non-structural (permanent evacuation) measures at an estimated U.S. 31-30 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT cost (Oct 1981) of $4,760,000 and non-Federal cost of $1,445,000 for implementation; (h) at Shiawassee Flats along lower reaches of the four principal tributaries of Saginaw River, to provide for flood protection, including fish and wildlife areas; by channel improvement, levees, lateral reservoirs with control structures and related work at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct 1981) of $54,081,500 for new work, of which $50,341,500 is allocated to flood control and $3,740,000 to fish and wildlife purposes, and a non-Federal cost of $7,386,000 which includes a cash contribution of $1,920,000; provided local interests contribute in cash 5 percent of cost of rights-of-way for flood control and other work required as local cooperation, and furnish one-half of land required for fish and wildlife areas; provided that the Federal allocation for conservation does not exceed amount obtained by taking 28 percent of project cost for Shiawassee Flats unit and subtracting therefrom onehalf cost of lands for conservation; and provided further that before starting works for flood control to Shiawassee Flats, Chief of Engineers and Director, Fish and Wildlife Service, prepare a plan mutually acceptable to Secretary of the Army and Secretary of the Interior for operation of fish and wildlife areas to required degree of controlled storage of flood-waters while preserving the maximum fish and wildlife benefits. Total estimated cost for new work, for active portion (1981) is $76,137,- 500, including $3,740,000 Fish and Wildlife costs and $1,920,000 to be contributed by local interests. Total estimated cost (1981) to local interests is $9,036,000. Local cooperation. Responsible local interests must make cash contributions as called for above; furnish lands, and rights-of-way, including removal of buildings, for construction; hold the United States free from damage; maintain and operate all works after completions; establish and enforce regulations designed to prevent encroachments in improved channels; and bear expense of constructing highway relocations and highway bridges, alter bridge approaches and existing highway bridge approaches and existing highway bridges (except underpinning and bridge raising), and alter utilities. Required assurances for Flint River at Flint were furnished by City of Flint and accepted by the United States on November 23, 1962. Estimated required cash contribution for Flint ($56,000) was furnished February 20, 1963. An additional $117,000 was furnished by the City to cover increased construction costs. Required assurances for Cass River at Frankenmuth were accepted on September 8, 1964. All necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way have been provided. The Midland City Council adopted a resolution on June 7, 1982 declaring its intent not to sponsor the Flood Control project on the Tittabawassee River at Midland. The Vassar City Council, in a letter dated January 26, 1982, indicated a willingness and capability to provide the assurances of local cooperation for the Vassar Flood Control Project. Saginaw County, in a resolution dated August 11, 1982, indicated a willingness and capability to provide the assurances of local cooperation for the Shiawassee Flats Flood Control Project. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Midland: The Final Phase II General Design Memorandum and the Real Estate Design Memorandum were completed during this FY at a cost of $111,656. As a result of the Midland City Council action, the Midland Flood Control project has been recommended for reclassification to the inactive category. Shiawassee: A Draft Re-evaluation Report on the project was prepared during the summer of 1982. The final report is now undergoing revision to address the public's comments and concerns. Total cost for Shiawassee for new work this FY is $297,853. Flint: Settlement of claims for contract completed in FY 80 cost $124,902. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $38,578. Vassar: The Draft Re-evaluation Report was prepared, submitted to North Central Division, and approved. It was also coordinated with the public for review and comment. The Final Re-evaluation Report was initiated. Total cost for new work for Vassar this FY is $116,960. The Frankenmuth and Flint portions of the project are complete. 76. SEBEWAING, SEBEWAING RIVER, MI Location. Sebewaing River drains an area of 105 square miles in Huron and Tuscola Counties on westerly side of Thumb area of Lower Peninsula of Michigan and discharges into Saginaw Bay, an arm of Lake Huron, 20 miles northeast from mouth of Saginaw River. Village of Sebewaing is near mouth of river. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. Enlarging present channel of Sebewaing River through Village of Sebewaing, Michigan, to a capacity of 7,500 cubic feet per second from junction of Columbia and State drains to a point 4,500 feet lakeward from railroad bridge near mouth; altering railroad bridge and three highway bridges to permit free passage of ice; and removal of present dike on south side of channel lakeward from railroad bridge. Project is designed to provide protection for Village of Sebewaing from floods with a frequency of once in 15 years and with a magnitude greater than the maximum flood of record. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except for furnishing easements and rights-of-way for removal of remaining portion of dike on south side of channel lakeward from railroad bridge. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition survey, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $26,000. 77. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS The listed projects were inspected during this period. 31-31 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Battle Creek, Kalamazoo River, MI; Kawkawlin, Kawkawlin River, MI; Sebewaing, Sebewaing River, MI; Flint, Flint River, MI; Frankenmuth, Cass River, MI; Mount Clemens Spillway and Cutoff Canal, Clinton River, MI; Red Run, Clinton River, MI; East Rockwood; Silver Creek, MI; Estral Beach, Lake Erie, MI; Fort Wayne Mechanic St. Dike, St. Marys River, IN; Burr Oak, Prairie River, MI. Fiscal year costs were $88,000. Total costs to end of FY year were $710,669. 78. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 31-H. 79. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Flood Control Activities, Flood Fighting (Public Law 84-99 and P.L. 93-288 and Antecedent Legislation). 1. a. Heavy rainfall accompanied by high winds between noon September 30, to noon October 1, 1981, with measured amounts from 2 to almost 9 inches caused flooding in 11 counties of southern lower Michigan. Significant overland flooding was experienced in the following river basins from October 1 to 5, 1981: (1) Grand River Basin including the Rogue River and Maple River sub-basins; (2) Saginaw River Basin including the Flint river, Shiawassee River and Cass River sub-basins; (3) River Rouge Basin; and (4) Clinton River Basin. b. Federal damage estimates attributed to this flood event were $168.3 million, of which $161.4 million was agricultural damage. Corps personnel conducted emergency operations by staffing the District's Emergency Operations Center (EOC), instituting aerial and ground reconnaissance, and providing technical assistance, equipment (sandbags & pumps), and information to local emergency operations coordinators under the auspices of P.L. 99. At the request of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the District provided three engineers for joint Federal/State preliminary damage assessment teams. c. During this flood event the Detroit District furnished 25,000 sandbags and 15 pumps for the use of local authorities. A total of 142 man-days were contributed to work under P.L. 84-99 and 10 man-days contributed at FEMA's request, for work under P.L. 93-288. Total costs for FY 82 are: P.L. 99 work = $63,610; P.L. 238 assistance = $1,409. 2. a. Flooding occurred in areas of northeastern Indiana and southern lower Michigan as a result of intense snowmelt created by sudden, moderating temperatures and accompanying rainfall of 2 to 4 inches. Severe overland flooding was experienced in the following river basins from March 12 to 25, 1982: (1) Maumee River Basin including the St. Marys River and St. Joseph River sub-basins, IN; (2) Kaukakee River Basin including the Yellow River tributary, IN; (3) St. Joseph River Basin (MI) including the Elkhart River sub-basin, IN; and (4) River Raisin River Basin, MI. b. Serious flooding was experienced in six Indiana counties and four Michigan counties within the Detroit District. Significant damages occurred in the City of Fort Wayne, IN. Total Federal damage estimates approximated $35.7 million, of which $19.4 million occurred in Fort Wayne, $2.0 million in other Indiana areas, and $14.3 million in the four Michigan counties. President Reagan declared Allen and La Porte Counties, IN, and Berrien and Monroe Counties, MI, "Major Disaster Areas." In response to this event, the District staffed the EOC; dispatched eight.reconnaissance teams to monitor conditions; established an emergency area office at Fort Wayne to provide direct aid to the extensive flood fighting efforts taking place in that community; provided technical assistance; contracted for equipment and supplies, aerial photography coverage of flood extent; and coordinated information to local emergency operations under the auspices of P.L. 99. In response to FEMA's request under P.L. 93-288, the District furnished 10 engineers to aid in preliminary damage assessments and damage survey reports. c. During this flood emergency the District furnished 995,400 sandbags and provided 17 Corps-owned and 89 rental pumps to local authorities. Ten emergency contracts and 84 emergency purchase orders were let for approximately $1.02 million. District employees contributed 453 man-days for P.L. 99 work and 88 man-days for FEMA work. Total costs for FY 82 were: P.L. 99 work = $1,464,608; P.L. 288 assistance: $20,000. 3. a. During the period of July 16-17, 1982, up to 10 inches of rain fell on the counties of Allegan, Ottawa, and Van Buren in southwest Michigan. This localized intense rainfall caused flash floods from storm drain overflows and sheet runoff in the City of Holland and South Haven. b. During July 17-18, 1982, the District provided field reconnaissance and office support for the affected areas. No supplies or equipment were requested or furnished. Approximately 9 man-days were expended by Corps personnel under P.L. 99, with costs in FY 82 of $1,692. Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. Detailed project studies . were continued on Paw Paw Lake, MI, at a cost of $60,369. 80. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS Field Operations. The following field operations were conducted during the current period: In support of the development/calibration of Detroit District mathematical models, soundings and discharge measurements were conducted on the St. Clair, Detroit, and St. Marys Rivers; velocity measurements and under-ice discharge measurements were collected on the St. Marys River; and aerial drouge velocity studies were completed on the St. Clair and St. Marys Rivers. 31-32 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT During the winter months, the District observes the presence of ice in the St. Marys, St. Clair, and Detroit Rivers as an ongoing mission. The District monitors key telemetric water level gages (telemark) in these rivers for continuous updating of the hydrograph for possible detection of ice jams and associated potential for flooding to provide advance warning to area residents and other governmental agencies (in support of respective Flood Alert Plan). International Activities. The following activities were conducted specifically for the International Joint Commission (IJC) Boards and Committees: Members of the Detroit District staff attended the spring and fall semi-annual appearances of the International Great Lakes Boards before the Commission in Washington, DC and Ottawa, Ontario, respectively. a. International Lake Superior Board of Control. The Detroit District Engineer is the United States Regulation Representative for the Board of Control. In support of the U.S. Section of the Board, the District provided monthly Lake Superior outflow recommendations based upon a review of the hydrologic factors which influence the future regulation of Lake Superior. These recommendations were based on the use of probability forecasts of water supplies routed through the lakes, rendering outflows under Plan 1977, the currently approved operating rule. Because of conflicts between power and fishery interests on the St. Marys River, the Regulation Representatives have investigated various alternatives to provisions under Plan 1977, which governs minimum flow in the St. Marys Rapids. The draft report of their findings has been sent to the Board for review and comment. Payback of predischarge from Lake Superior for Great Lakes Power Limited (GLPL) redevelopment began in October 1981 and was achieved by June 1982, as originally scheduled. However, due to delays in construction and the breaching of the cofferdams, excess storage has begun to accumulate on Lake Superior. The first generation of power is now expected to be at the end of November 1982. The accumulated deviations that have occurred since July 1982, will be discharged from the lake during the winter months. Since Stage II water quality monitoring for GLPL redevelopment began, in October 1981, the alert levels of various parameters have been exceeded. When deemed necessary, appropriate actions, as per the Action Plan, were taken by the Regulation Representatives to alleviate the problem. Based on the January 1982 International Ad Hoc Advisory Committee's report on the upgrading of the compensating works, remedial work has been started on the structure, and an inspection and maintenance program is being prepared. b. International Niagara Board of Control and International Niagara Working Committee. A member of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology staff is on the U.S. Section of the Working Committee. The District was involved in the engineering and development of a revised rating curve for the Ashland Avenue gage. In 1981, the International Niagara Board of Control selected a representative rating and requested that it be accepted and implemented by the International Niagara Committee. The Board directed the Working Committee to make further cableway flow measurements to verify the accuracy of the new rating curve with emphasis placed on the low flow range. A series of discharge measurements were made at both the upper and the lower flow ranges during the fall of 1981. The measurements in the upper range fell noticeably to the right of the curve, and so the Board directed the Working Committee to remeasure the upper range flow in FY 83. The Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch was also involved in the development of new "M" factors, which are traditionally used to compute storage in the Maid-of-the-Mist Pool during transition hours when changes are made in the fall's flows. In coordination with Canada the Branch provided new "M" factors which were adopted by the Niagara Committee. c. International St. Lawrence River Board of Control. When requested, the Detroit District supported the Buffalo District in its activities. d. International Great Lakes Diversions and Consumptive Uses Study Board. The Detroit District Engineer is Chairman of the U.S. Section of the Working Committee. Personnel from the District hold membership on the Diversions and Environmental Evaluation Subcommittees and on the Public Involvement Ad Hoc Group. Staff of the Detroit District were involved in the finalization of the study report, including its annexes and appendices. Copies of the report were sent to the IJC for distribution to interested parties. Public hearings on the study are anticipated but not yet scheduled. e. International Lake Erie Regulation Study Board. Chief, Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch is Chairman of the U.S. Section of the Regulation Subcommittee. Staff members also provided input to the other subcommittees. f. International Great Lakes Technical Information Network Board. The Chief of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch is Chairman of the U.S. Section of this Board. The Detroit District also provides the U.S. Secretary to the Board as well as membership on the Hydraulics and Hydrology Committees. The Committees are drafting a directory describing existing hydromet data networks and a report on hydraulic data needs. The Boards main report to the IJC is scheduled for completion in March 1984. District personnel are participating in a gamma radiation snow survey on the Lake Superior basin, which has relevance to this Board's activities. Coordinating Committee onGreat Lakes Basin Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data. The Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch of the District provided the U.S. Secretary to this committee, as well as membership on its subcommittees. Operations continued pertaining to the coordination of basic 31-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 hydraulic and hydrologic data with Canada. Work continues on other Committee reports, among which is a report that documents the procedures used to determine St. Clair River and Detroit River flows for the period 1900-1978. This report is being reviewed by the Committee and is scheduled to be published prior to the end of 1982. Another report being worked on in the Branch documents the discharge measurements made on the Great Lakes Connecting Channels and St. Lawrence River during the period 1900-1978. Through the auspices of the Coordinating Committee, the Corps of Engineers is providing funds to Canada, in the amount of $200,000, to aid in completion of precise leveling in the International Section of the St. Lawrence River. This survey, as well as similar surveys conducted in the U.S. by NOAA, is part of a program to update the International Great Lakes Datum (IGLD). The new IGLD will revolve around the epic year 1980. Field surveys should be completed in 1983, with datum analyses to follow. NCD Master Plan for Water Control Data System. The District completed its input for presentation to OCE. The District's plan calls for an annual average charge of $376,000 for updating the Great Lakes gaging network for fiscal years 1983-1987. In addition, $250,000 has been requested in FY 84 for a dedicated in-house mini-computer for real-time water control activities. Hydraulics and Hydrology of the Great Lakes. Studies to improve the existing Great Lakes water level forecasting system, including investigations into the factors affecting the Great Lakes water balance relationship (i.e. runoff, precipitation over water, evaporation, ice retardation, etc.) and use of real-time hydrologic data were continued by Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch staff members. Levels of the Great Lakes. The Branch provided technical information and expertise regarding lake levels and long range still water forecasts to many interested parties such as Congressmen, State and local officials, news media, navigation and power interests, and concerned property owners. Explanation of the water levels was supplied to the public in the form of direct answers to numerous inquiries, addresses to various civic groups, and interviews with news media. The publication of an International (U.S. and Canada) Forecast of Great Lakes Water Levels, under the auspices of the Coordinating Committee on Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data was continued during the period. In support of these forecasts and to assist in lake regulation, funds have been provided to the Department of Commerce for maintenance of eleven telemetric water level gages (Telemeter) at selected sites throughout the Great Lakes to obtain more realtime data. Costs for FY 82 are $1,104,894. General Investigations 81. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,053,186 for navigation studies, and $897,364 for flood control studies. Special studies which continued during the FY included Great Lakes water levels study $3,450. The Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Seaway Navigation Season Extension study was financially closed out at a cost of $966. Restudy of the deferred project at Holland, MI, was completed at a cost of $112. (For details see Section 23 of text). Coordination studies with other agencies include soil conservation coordination studies $1,002; Coastal Zone Management, $125 and coordination studies with states (Section 22) $62,298 and technical assistance for erosion (Section 55) $656; and Flood Plain Management Services program, $134,415. 82. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA A draft report for the Lansing Flood Preparedness Plan was submitted to the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) for review and coordination in July 1980. The draft study was based on hydraulic data (HEC 2 computer input data) supplied by the Michigan DNR which was developed for the Lansing Flood Insurance Study. Comments on the draft report were received from Michigan DNR on June 5, 1981 recommending the use of revised flood insurance data. This report was completed in FY 82. Twelve Michigan flood Insurance studies, Alpena City of Alpena County, MI; Alpena Township of Alpena County; Banks Township of Antrim County; Boyne City of Charlevoix County; Charlevoix City of Charlevoix County; East Jordan City of Charlevoix County; Elk Rapids Village of Antrim County; Elmwood Township of Leelanau County; Ellsworth Village of Antrim County; Milton Township of Antrim County; Petoskey City of Emmet County; Traverse City of Grand Traverse County, initiated late in FY 79 were completed. Public meetings to announce the results of these studies were held in FY 82. Five additional studies; Fort Wayne, IN, Ann Arbor Township, MI, Great Lakes Flood Levels study, Decatur, IN, and Ypsilanti, MI, initiated in previous FY's, were also completed. Costs in FY 82 were $5,156 to complete all the above FIS studies. A special hydrologic study to develop a regional flood frequency study for the Saginaw River Basin was initiated in FY 80 and scheduled to be completed in FY 83. 31-34 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Tiext Project Funding FY 79 1. Arcadia Harbor, New Work MI Approp. - Cost Maint. Approp. 58,000 Cost 57,969 2. Ashland Harbor, New Work WI Approp. - Cost - Maint. Approp. 5,000 Cost 5,000 3. Beaver Bay, New Work MN Approp. - Cost 1,162 Maint. Approp. Cost 4. Big Bay Harbor, New Work MI Approp. 22,000 Cost 9,307 Maint. Approp. 46,000 Cost 41,379 8. Black River New Work Harbor, MI Approp. - (Port Huron) Cost - FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 September 30, 1982 53,000 66,000 56,000 53,031 65,992 48,350 65,000 - - 52,527 - - 37,000 448,000 193,000 37,000 448,000 211,002 25,000 70,000 24,875 69,795 398 531 531 10,000 3,000 15,000 15,097 10,575 12,045 39,000 58,000 -38,942 41,649 11,231 9,863 Contributed Funds New Work Approp. - - - Cost - - - Maint. Approp. 26,812 10,612 3,846 Cost 14,092 23,337 13,192 6. Bolles Harbor; New Work MI Approp. - - - Cost - - - 7. Cedar River Harbor, MI 8. Charlevoix Harbor, MI Maint. Approp. 8,000 145,000 128,000 Cost 26,644 143,619 125,168 Diked Disposal 5,000 -78,000 - Approp. 4,999 77,994 - Cost New Work Approp. 100,000 100,000 15,000 Cost 99,997 94,251 20,000 New Work Approp. 26,000 - - Cost 26,019 - - Maint. Approp. 77,000 67,000 891,200 Cost 73,819 67,223 887,546 654 1,435 5,710 631,048 623,390 1,760,645 1,748,172 2,141,796 2,140,647 293,000 293,000 531 531 390,4331 387,4571 919,668 919,668 480,2442 480,2442 349,921 349,921 492,7968 492,7968 426,4134 426,4134 857,368 857,368 - 1,190,550 - 1,190,550 - 215,000 - 215,000 - 180,623 - 180,623 1,329,000 4,222,900 1,320,896 4,208,019 31-35 TABLE 31-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project 9. Cheboygan Harbor, MI 10. Clinton River MI 11. Cornucopia Harbor, WI 12. Cross Village, MI 13. Detour Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 14. Detroit River, MI 15. Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN Funding Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 September 30, 1982 - - - - 1,129,396 - - - - 1,129,396 - - - - 504,236 - - - - 504,236 13,000 7,000 20,460 357,455 849,862 11,000 7,000 21,460 358,180 849,587 - - - - 549,7985 - - - - 549,7985 172,161 -16,534 31,827 26,881 979,597 172,320 -16,566 31,879 26,898 979,597 16,500 11,000 2,000 25,000 202,200 18,691 11,443 2,884 20,444 197,640 - - - - 462,653 - - - - 462,653 67,600 5,000 103,000 67,600 5,000 93,598 70,000 79,000 130,000 69,998 77,994 130,942 98,766 108,168 85,065 60,475 692,073 692,073 364,000 339,409 25,000 100,000 797,000 250,000 1,389,510 24,877 69,065 824,952 214,981 1,354,320 - 500,000 500,000 250,000 1,250,000 - - 916,961 312,101 1,230,062 - - - - 76,877,3576 - - - - 76,877,3576 3,584,200 11,390,800 11,797,500 5,515,500 3,555,331 11,381,618 11,799,911 4,798,059 10,697,600 11,832,000 7,993,700 10,701,152 11,815,315 8,004,553 47,138,578 46,402,697 982,000 41,389,694 964,292 41,364,902 2,215,900 2,151,000 1,940,000 1,581,000 2,199,690 2,161,465 1,930,938 1,584,912 881,000 -99,000 754,755 127,584 -1,900 -1,898 16,109,2587 16,109,1587 25,252,170 25,232,823 1,556,249 1,556,249 31-36 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 September 30, 1982 16. Fox River, WI 17. Frankfort Harbor MI 18. Grand Haven Harbor, MI Section 111 19. Grand Traverse, MI 20. Green Bay Harbor, WI New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 2,700,000 1,735,100 1,628,000 1,571,000 2,814,731 1,751,963 1,555,877 1,582,634 1,507,000 360,000 136,000 1,891,000 1,502,218 367,146 138,797 415,288 77,700 77,867 175,000 174,909 81,000 76,254 736,000 80,855 64,778 699,539 91 543,000 481,000 1,614,000 983,000 543,424 474,240 1,595,885 1,007,378 2,000 2,000 124,000 -60,000 15,000 124,000 -60,000 15,000 23,000 15,841 79,000 79,019 110,000 104,788 3,000 4,983 3,200 3,000 8,354 2,717 46,000 57,000 113,000 46,448 24,135 135,611 3,753,3348 3,753,3348 31,252,6739 31,187,1929 1,955,15910 1,955,1591� 6,265,397 4,789,591 274,776 274,776 1,169,500 1,121,527 1,458,46911 1,458,46911 13,691,29312 13,690,76512 813.(613 813.613 780,400 780,400 79,000 79,000 229,971 229,660 1,291,483 1,281,229 40,000 55,000 10,000 9,946,39513 28,043 72,097 1,909 9,938,23213 1,385,000 445,000 1,171,000 1,066,500 1,389,452 435,343 1,181,114 656,535 2,532,000 2,722,338 30,000 -250,000 10,000 19,094 -236,094 9,740 10,644,21315 10,234,15415 5,564,807 5,564,547 31-37 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 September 30, 1982 21. Hammond Bay Harbor, MI 22. Harbor Beach Harbor, MI 23. Holland Harbor, MI Section 111 24. Inland Route, MI 25. Kenosha Harbor, WI New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - - 87,000 - - - 63,513 - - 4,148 200,000 - - 4,148 139,629 21,000 1,683,000 40,000 634,000 21,185 1,682,999 40,002 634,000 9,000 9,569 -7 - - - 723,000 665,000 567,000 437,000 723,165 657,625 561,194 448,559 83,000 19,000 7,200 25,000 83,000 19,000 6,325 25,875 21,000 -12,000 19,313 -10,311 47,000 92,000 160,000 399,000 46,998 94,385 159,213 367,917 23,000 30,000 26,000 245,000 24,551 28,778 27,013 195,901 95,000 79,000 67,000 267,000 95,000 78,999 61,995 265,840 31-38 1,102,366 1,078,879 362,242 301,871 1,200,598 1,200,598 5,003,190 5,003,190 194,504 194,504 243,100 243,100 1,392,84116 17 1,392,84116 17 6,884,132 6,882,440 134,200 134,200 502,452 502,452 1,663,300 1,663,300 918,22218 918,22218 1,720,488 1,688,492 448,300 398,970 846,96919 20 846,96919 20 2,190,37721 2,184,21021 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 September 30, 1982 26. Kewaunee Harbor, WI 27. Keweenaw Waterway, MI 28. Knife River Harbor, MN 29. Lac La Belle Harbor, WI 30. Lake St. Clair, MI, Channels Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 71,000 71,000 8,000 359,000 6,951 354,382 33,000 70,000 1,769,000 33,036 61,792 1,770,999 781,000 786,462 - - - 7,000 - - - 7,000 27,000 132,000 511,000 393,000 20,100 133,888 506,487 400,985 - - - 7,000 - - - 7,000 20,000 60,000 18,300 44,466 17,233 6,241 18,100 4,048 4,203 6,241 18,100 4,048 4,203 43,000 -2,653 42,555 -2,207 40,000 29,475 59,000 662,000 90,000 701,000 65,500 660,187 74,942 697,332 -5,000 -5,500 1,000 1,000 681 1,321 31-39 1,270,275 1,270,275 4,378,600 4,378,600 752,33322 752,3332 2,089,94123 2,084,27423 617,300 617,300 2,961,461 2,960,714 5,974,141 5,974,141 9,741,68424 9,739,66024 7,000 7,000 412,945 412,944 224,629 224,629 269,270 269,270 222,641 212,116 7,675,35725 7,675,35725 5,504,08426 5,483,11926 5,119,800 5,119,800 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 September 30, 1982 31. Leland Harbor, MI 32. Lexington Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Section 111 33. Little Lake Harbor, MI 34. Ludington Harbor, MI Section 111 35. Lutsen Harbor, MN 36. Manistee Harbor, MI New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost "Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 92,000 103,000 37,000 75,000 92,092 100,270 39,783 70,671 - 389,000 -25,000 2,009 179,843 177,156 -7,000 541 -136,112 - - - 16,000 10,680 4,860 35,000 - - - 180,000 - - - 135,425 239,149 233,000 168,000 168,000 236,614 236,285 168,122 168,012 959,000 1,250,000 1,613,450 2,608,405 - 85,000 .41,569 89,058 33,000 179,000 204,000 618,000 33,155 101,069 279,859 432,231 - - - 15,000 - - - 15,000 - 25,000 113,000 1,029 25,074 81,533 31,519 145,000 109,000 54,000 402,000 138,127 111,724 58,280 393,114 31-40 1,027,08927 1,027,08927 921,445 917,106 70,678 70,678 2,018,304 2,018,304 1,088,888 1,088,888 83,913 83,913 180,000 135,425 600,47828 600,47828 1,981,774 1,981,772 8,532,2022 8,532,2022 6,535,800� 6,347,95930 357,913 357,913 15,000 15,000 357,000 357,000 2,696,52231 2,696,52231 3,645,43332 3,636,52932 1,374,164 1,374,164 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 September 30, 1982 37. Manistique New Work Harbor, MI 38. Manitowoc Harbor, WI Contributed Funds 39. Marquette Harbor, MI 40. Menominee Harbor & River, MI & WI Contributed Funds 41. Milwaukee Harbor, WI Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 22,669 3,659 5,790 99,000 176,279 24,802 99,000 165,758 27,700 180,000 97,000 745,000 14,452 158,765 120,470 664,971 110,000 104,000 316,000 468,000 97,623 116,377 315,982 463,988 -1 - - - 200,000 1,423,000 - 995,914 149,000 149,000 120,000 119,105 55,000 -14,000 24,850 57,367 12,404 23,596 24,850 53,835 45,000 76,000 51,700 40,000 41,049 71,561 60,076 37,653 900,000 56,000 1,446,000 1,243,000 902,996 41,709 1,445,281 1,237,384 1,299,355w 1,299,355" .1,714,644 1,704,123 1,930,864" 1,839,822" 3,444,825" 3,440,794" 3,081,756 3,081,756 1,623,000 995,914 1,282,893 1,282,893 1,506,780 1,505,885 465,757 465,757 533,476@ 533,476w 1,479,45437 1,475,92237 1,351,852 1,351,852 400,661 398,297 36,762 36,762 8,231,024" 8,231,024 s 22,565,57439 22,544,93939 1,891,810 1,891,810 31-41 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 September 30, 1982 42. Monroe Harbor, MI 43. Muskegon Harbor, MI Section 111 44. New Buffalo Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 45. Ontonagon Harbor MI Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 1,409,000 519,000 533,000 872,000 1,408,928 520,700 522,194 864,138 64,100 206,000 319,000 11,599,000 42,007 193,652, 326,309 11,508,018 - -5,000 - - -6,992 1,995 - - 213,000 379,000 170,000 409,000 208,072 381,314 172,835 396,535 10,000 288,000 -115,000 10,000 288,000 -115,000 1,685,000 -263,000 1,558,182 -140,493 20,000 20,000 4,874 -64,000 -63,993 -20,533 2,510 150,000 222,000 1,200,000 149,998 216,205 1,203,832 10,650 12,650 17,000 63,000 96,500 5,000 16,990 60,246 97,845 6,419 20,000 25,850 9,150 86,000 163,000 687,000 556,000 85,966 125,324 724,698 552,932 - - 15,000 6,000 - - 15,000 6,000 31-42 6,380,925 6,380,925 987,34040 987,34040 8,088,77040 8,069,74240 12,525,900 12,405,845 3,017,11041 3,017,11041 4,491,11542 4,478,48342 203,000 203,000 3,877,000 3,877,000 1,285,716 1,285,716 1,186,467 1,186,467 1,643,683 1,643,683 181,500 181,500 396,90343 396,90343 5,646,2534 5,643,169" 21,000 21,000 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 September 30, 1982 46. Pensaukee New Work 47. Pentwater Harbor, MI 48. Point Lookout Harbor, MI 49. Portage Lake, MI 50. Port Sanilac Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Contributed Funds Section 111 Harbor, WI Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 34,035 34,035 - - - 6,710 - - - 6,710 - - - 10,000 - - - 9,728 101,000 67,000 92,000 131,000 101,114 64,948 94,019 128,583 31,000 39,000 10,000 26,528 31,000 38,699 8,197 28,633 13,000 94,000 -7,400 - 13,558 86,228 372 - 25,984 118,941 194,001 -6,000 12,884 131,308 194,812 -8,258 - -12,975 - - - -12,975 - - - -3,082 - - - 12,975 - - 476,000 -23,000 49,000 52,000 721,249 -22,469 26,596 74,219 115,000 - - - 70,899 12,625 - - - 36,000 95,000 177,000 - 10,959 120,041 147,833 31-43 133,910 133,910 10,000 9,728 179,899 179,899 2,477,052 2,474,602 2,642,584 2,642,584 251,113 251,113 121,600 121,600 256,129 256,129 1,411,971 1,409,680 1,245,963 1,245,963 487,018 487,018 1,537,152 1,534,414 115,000 83,527 9,158 9,158 308,000 278,833 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 September 30, 1982 51. Port Washington New Work Harbor, WI Contributed Funds 52. Presque Isle Harbor, MI 53. Racine Harbor, WI 54. Rouge River, MI 55. Saginaw River, MI (Federal Funds) Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Contrib Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 445,000 1,128,000 -313,000 - 104,945 1,086,721 56,529 - 110,000 395,000 243,000 106,000 110,002 ' 301,639 336,358 103,856 140,000 1,459,000 25,000 - 0 1,375,913 248,087 - 4,210 23,000 3,000 13,546 8,213 4,000 4,001 30 7,000 10,849 4,999 7,001 10,849 4,999 - - 5,500 11,000 - - 5,470 10,333 28,300 65,000 32,000 2,000 20,318 66,042 38,020 2,919 90,000 89,907 1,787 260,338 168,000 1,880 260,312 168,026 795,800 707,000 593,000 568,000 798,312 708,564 592,382 236,548 4,073,800 3,960,000 3,033,200 4,074,984 3,959,950 3,032,905 420,000 395,630 31-44 2,603,20445 2,581,39845 2,235,06846 2,232,92146 10,621 10,621 1,624,000 1,624,000 1,216,492 1,216,492 530,880 530,880 76,500 76,500 16,500 15,803 1,332,31547 1,332,31447 2,798,79048 2,798,79048 1,253,645 1,253,645 3,948,754 3,948,754 675,25149 675,25149 13,005,7885 12,673,68650 14,513,823 14,488,941 14,917,12751 14,917,12751 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 September 30, 1982 (Contributed Funds) 56. St. Clair River, MI 57. St. Joseph Harbor, MI Section 111 58. St. Marys 'River, MI 59. Saugatuck Harbor, MI and Kalamazoo River, MI 60. Sebewaing River MI New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 680,000 1,767,000 2,371,000 2,305,000 655,487 1,765,226 2,396,906 2,303,739 1,190,000 480,000 2,770,000 1,189,176 480,699 2,770,177 570,000 560,815 766,000 432,000 392,900 895,000 765,840 428,980 389,001 839,687 -1,000 -798 297,000 212,000 366,000 272,000 296,386 212,803 365,898 270,089 39,500 45,176 61,000 80,400 42,000 62,021 80,761 41,801 294,000 375,000 -45,000 481,000 294,809 377,111 -45,000 480,999 -165,000 -157,050 -30,000 112 -24,718 7,075,554 8,254,000 7,972,400 8,394,000 7,087,664 8,265,172 7,881,832 8,368,270 31,001 31,115 57,215 70,601 180,000 57,215 70,411 173,866 21,476,880 21,468,570 18,430,400 18,421,135 19,213,246"2 19,213,24652 9,489,557 9,426,959 1,804,4855 1,804,4855 6,199,949 6,197,089 962,216 962,216 429,776 429,569 1,807,300 1,807,298 160,657,07154 160,657,070" 138,816,352 138,624,182 13,100 13,100 364,527" 364,527" 2,491,627M 2,485,302M 31-45 13,600 13,600 35,573 35,573 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 September 30, 1982 61. Sheboygan Harbor, WI 62. South Haven Harbor, MI Section 111 63. Sturgeon Bay, WI & Lake MI Ship Canal, WI 64. Two Harbors, MN 9,113 470,479 55,687 15,877 9,113 360,479 165,687 15,877 1,046,000 1,052,331 3,000 1,000 4,704 -161 1,347 295,000 46,700 375,000 54,000 282,622 59,078 208,742 216,036 Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 47,000 33,557 25,591 -4,151 76,000 257,000 '25,590 -4,153 75,976 252,484 725 - - - - - 324,000 -15,000 23 - 320,670 -11,670 250,000 30,790 88,000 160,000 238,102 43,168 72,993 161,681 9,000 35,000 -7,100 7,000 9,000 25,865 2,000 5,716 305,000 126,594 23,660 23,618 0 173,058 85,000 386 90,086 4,000 7,000 86,000 4,000 7,041 79,143 31-46 961,412 961,412 1,303,446 1,303,446 1,136,08867 1,136,08867 2,709,39258 2,705,170x 609,028 609,028 571,792 558,256 984,42659 984,426w 3,136,71760 3,132,17760 1,632,076 1,632,076 42,381 42,381 324,000 324,070 1,059,72261 1,059,72261 6,351,61562 6,338,28962 255,119 253,800 884,899 884,899 4,125,7106 4,125,71063 1,671,639 1,664,781 57,000 67,800 57,000 67,224 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 September 30, 1982 65. Two Rivers New Work 66. White Lake Harbor, MI 67. Red Run, Lower Clinton River, MI 68. Saginaw River, MI (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 69. Sebewaing River, MI 80. Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters Harbor, WI 16,104 1,380,000 346,000 16,106 376,203 1,334,920 -40,191 25,313 Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work SApprop. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 24,877 5,550 24,876 5,551 790,000 290,000 596,128 484,208 820,000 1,367,890 77,313 3,000 3,000 - 129,000 - 127,145 507,000 166,000 510,556 165,980 710,000 530,000 686,000 693,449 545,638 689,949 6,000 - 26,000 4,891 1,109 26,000 780,000 800,000 934,000 1,091,700 770,857 754,228 951,549 1,104,894 360,320 360,320k 5,195,10165 5,195,101 5 1,187,472 1,187,472 58,057 58,057 417,862 416,154 1,791,463 1,789,608 3,778,000 3,777,918 21,859,959 21,855,628 173,000 172,997 365,64266 365,6426 344,144 344,144 34,899,33467 34,872,38967 Footnotes are shown on the following page. 31-47 82,000 31,000 -3,000 100,000 42,530 67,014 456 98,292 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 'Excludes $56,500 Contributed Funds. 2Includes $85,849 for new work previous projects. 3Includes $12,008 for maintenance previous projects. 4Includes $255,000 Contributed Funds. 5Includes $25,500 for previous projects and $289,752 Contributed funds for existing projects. 6Includes $2,097,254 for previous projects. 7lncludes $1,547,195 for new work for previous projects. 8Includes $3,239,910 for previous projects. 9Includes $89,309 for previous projects. o�Includes $31,709 Contributed Funds. "Includes $311,329 for previous projects. '2Includes $13,437 for previous projects. 1SIncludes $396,974 for previous projects. a"Includes $109,463 for previous projects. 'Includes $8,918 for previous projects. 'eIncludes $176,620 for new work $127,598 for maintenance. ?7Includes $35,705 Contributed Funds. '8Includes $148,000 Contributed Funds for existing project. 19Includes $453,839 for previous projects. "Excludes $3,000 Contributed Funds. 21Includes $21,818 for previous projects. "Includes $149,312 for previous projects. 2Includes $88,364 for previous projects. 2Includes $402,242 for previous projects. "Includes $656,000 for previous projects. 2Includes $235,346 for previous projects. 7Includes $354,139 Contributed Funds. 2Includes $57,670 Contributed Funds. 2Includes $491,416 for previous project. 30Includes $126,451 for previous projects. 1Includes $354,999 for previous projects. "Includes $150,910 for previous projects. "Includes $3,955 for previous projects. "Includes $400,126 for previous projects. 35Includes $54,288 for previous projects. 36Includes $312,423 for previous projects. *'Includes $36,194 for previous projects. "Includes $1,293,220 for previous projects. 39Includes $459,305 for previous projects. 4 0Includes Contributed Funds of $300,000 for new work and $166,667 for maintenance Contributed by: Port Commission of Monroe, $300,000; Consolidated Paper Co. $125,000 and River Raisin Paper Co., $41,667. 4 Includes $613,408 for previous projects. 42Includes $446,183 for previous projects. 43Includes $284,802 for previous projects. 44Includes $113,326 for previous projects. 45Includes $188,495 for previous projects. 46Includes $15,123 for previous projects. 47Includes $427,240 for previous projects. 4"Includes $79,537 for previous projects. 49Includes $50,084 for previous projects. 5Includes $56,608 for previous projects. 51Includes $962,556 for previous projects. 52Includes $1,671,660 Public Works Funds and $49,419 Emergency Relief Funds. 6Includes $503,113 for previous projects. "Includes $2,904,807 for previous projects. "Includes $90,232 for previous projects. "Includes $117,554 for previous projects. 57Includes $487,817 for previous projects. 58Includes $87,131 for previous projects. 59Includes $187,233 for previous projects. "Includes $131,239 for previous projects. 61Includes $323,419 for previous projects. 62Includes $219,730 for previous projects. 63Includes $48,404 National Industrial Recovery Act for new work funds. "4Includes $212,857 for previous projects. 65Includes $33,113 for previous projects. 66Includes $15,000 for previous projects. 67Includes $3,973,897 for previous projects. 31-48 TABLE 31-B DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents ARCADIA HARBOR, MI (See Section 1 of Text) Mar. 3, 1905 Maintenance of Existing 12-Foot Channel. ASHLAND HARBOR, WI (See Section 2 of Text) Aug. 5, 1886 Breakwater 7,900 feet long and dredging to remove a shoal. Aug. 11, 1888 Appropriation of $60,000 for 'Continuing improvement on enlarged project.' (On completion of Poe Lock in 1896, with available depth of 20 feet, dredging at Ashland Harbor was carried to a similar depth.) Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 6, 1900 Aug. 8, 1917 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Detached breakwater extending 4,700 feet out from shore at a point 2,600 feet east of main breakwater (prolonged) and parallel thereto. Project modified by omitting detached breakwater and defining depth and extent of channel to be dredged. Widening part of present channel for entrance channel and for basin in eastern part of harbor. Deepening east basin to 25 feet and west channel, as far as 8th Ave. West extended to 21 feet. Widening west channel to 750 feet at its westerly end. Deepening portions of East Basin and West Channel to 27 and 21 feet, respectively. BEAVER BAY HARBOR, MN (See Section 3 of Text) A combination primarily of rubblemound breakwaters with a steel sheet piling cell at each side of the harbor entry totalling 650 feet in length, and an excavated harbor basin approximately 2 acres in size, and 8 feet deep. BIG BAY HARBOR, MI (See Section 4 of Text) Provides for converging piers extending from shore, an entrance channel between piers and a rectangular harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet in entrance channel and 10 feet in harbor basin. H. Doc. 194, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 89, 48th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Reports, 1886, p. 1674; and 1887, p. 1966. H. Doc. 1698, 64th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 133, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 46, 82d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 337, 77th Cong., I1st sess. H. Doc. 165, 86th Cong., 1st sess.1 H. Doc. No.446, 78th Cong., 2d sess. 1 H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' 31-49 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sep. 19, 1890 Jul. 13, 1892 Sep. 22, 1922 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Apr. 23, 1970 Jul. 6, 1965 Aug. 2, 1882 Oct. 28, 1965 Aug. 14, 1876 Aug. 2, 1882 Jun. 13, 1902 Jun. 20, 1938 Mar. 29, 1977 Jun. 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 Oct. 21, 1964 BLACK RIVER (PORT HURON), MI(See Section 5 of Text) Channel from Mouth of Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge. Channel from Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge to Washington Ave. Consolidation of Projects for Black River at Port Huron and Mouth of Black River. Settling Basin. Deepening Channel and Settling Basin to 20 Feet, and Widening to 100 Feet 2 Bends; 1 at the Foot of 12th St., the Other Below the Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge. Extension of Existing Channel. BOLLES HARBOR, MI (See Section 6of Text) Entrance Channel in Lake Erie, Access Channel in LaPlaisance Creek, Steel Sheet Pile Revetment. CEDAR RIVER HARBOR, MI (See Section 7 of Text) Dredge an entrance channel (datum at 580.69 feet above mean tide at New York) and construct two parallel piers extending lakeward from mouth of Cedar River. Modification of project to provide for two parallel entrance piers including a new rubblemound east pier with a sport fishing walkway; an entrance channel from Green Bay to mouth of Cedar River; and a turning basin. CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI (See Section 8 of Text) Channel from Lake Michigan to Round Lake Protected Where needed by Piers and Revetments. Channel from Round Lake to Lake Charlevoix. Project Depth Increased to 15 Feet. Project Depth Increased to 18 Feet. Project Depth Increased to 24 and 23 Feet, and Construction of Revetment Upstream of Highway Bridge. CHEBOYGAN HARBOR, MI (See Section 9 of Text) 18%2 Foot Channel. 8%2 Foot Channel. Turning Basin. 21 Foot Channel to East 1st St., Enlarge Turning Basin Deepen to 21 Feet. Breakwater. Annual Report 1889, p. 2291 No Printed Report H. Doc. 436, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Dec. 162, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Dec. 54, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. Section 107,1960 River and Harbor Act. S. Ex. Doc. 12, 47th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 248, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 S. Ex. Doc. 16, 44th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report 1876, p. 523 No Prior Survey of Estimates. -oP rior Survey of Estimates. S. Doc. 163, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.' Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. Annual Report, 1895, p. 2823 H. Doc. 357, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 134, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 269, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.' Section 107, 1960 River and Act. 31-50 TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 19, 1963 Aug. 26, 1937 Sep. 3, 1954 Nov. 7, 1966 Jun. 3, 1969 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1910 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19353 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 CLINTON RIVER, MI (See Section 10) of Text) Channel in River and Lake St. Clair, Pile Dike, Closing Channels and Making Cutoff, and Revetments as Needed. Widening Entrance Channel and Constructing Protected Harbor Basin CORNUCOPIA HARBOR, WI (See Section 11 of Text) Entrance channel 50 feet wide and 10 feet deep between existing piers from bay to a turning basin 200 feet long, 8 feet deep, with maximum width of 180 feet, with 150 and 300-foot inner channels each 50 feet wide and 8 feet deep. Reconstruction and Federal maintenance of east and west entrance piers, a 25-foot extension of west pier and a 300-foot extension of existing westerly inner channel at a depth of 8 feet and a width of 50 feet. CROSS VILLAGE HARBOR, MI (See Section 12 of Text) Breakwaters with entrance channel and maneuver area. DETOUR HARBOR, MI (See Section 13 of Text) Small boat harbor and harbor of refuge, 10-foot channel, 8-foot deep access channel protected by 1,000-foot breakwater. DETROIT RIVER, MI (See Section 14 of Text) Amherstburg Channel and Removal of Grosse Ile Shoal. Fighting Island Channel. Livingstone Channel. Channel Depths of 26 and 25 Feet. Channel to Wyandotte 21 Feet Deep and 300 Feet Wide Through Middle Ground Opposite Head of Fighting Island. Trenton Channel and Turning Basin (West of Grosse Ile). American Channel North of Belle Isle Between Windmill Point and Fairway Slip, Detroit. Deepen Westerly 300 Feet of Amherstburg Channel and Ballards Reef Channel Below Livingstone Channel to 27 Feet to Provide Depths Adequate for 24-Foot Draft Navigation When Governing S. Doc. 199, 46th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1880, p. 2062 and H. Doc. 210, 44th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report 1886, p. 219 Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. S. Committee, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 434, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 490, 89th Cong., 2d Sess. Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. H. Doc. 712, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. and 40, 58th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 17, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 266, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. 676, 61st Cong., 2d Sess, and 32, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 205, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. 'Doc. 734, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. 31-51 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 19504 Mar. 21, 1956 Jul. 14, 1960 Aug. 13, 1968 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 May 28, 1908 Jul. 27, 1916 Lakes are at Datum, with Necessary Widening at Approaches and Bends and Construction of Necessary Compensating Works. Detroit River. Extend Turning Basin in Trenton Channel 600 Feet. Dredge Through East Draw of Lower Grosse Ile Bridge, and Extend 300-Foot Width of Channel North of Lower Grosse Ile Bridge. Channel Depth of 28.5 Feet Throughout Downbound and Two-Way Channels, Except in Upper (27.7-Foot Depth) and Lower, (29-Foot Depth) Livingstone Channel, and in Upbound Channel; 27-Foot Depth in Ballards Reef Channel Below Junction with Livingstone Channel. 27.5-Foot Depth in Westerly 300-Foot Width of Limekiln Crossing and Amherstburg Reaches, and 28.5- Foot Depth in Westerly 300-Foot Width of Hackett Beach, with Necessary Compensation Works. Also 28.5-Foot Depth in Lake Erie from Detroit River to Pelee Passage Shoal. Inclusive. Trenton Channel; Deepen to 27 Feet, Where Necessary, Wyandotte Reach from Detroit River to Upper Grosse Ile Bridge, About 5.5 Miles, Deepen to 28 Feet and Widen to 300 Feet Below Upper Grosse Ile Bridge to and Including a Turning Basin 28 Feet Deep and 15 Across in Area Outside Project Limits. Trenton Channel: Deepen to 28 Feet and Widen to 300 Feet from the Upper Turning Basin at Trenton to Gibraltar, about 20,500 Feet Downstream: Construct a Turning Basin at Gibraltar at a Depth of 28 Feet. Width of 830 Feet, and Length of 1,500 Feet: Build Compensating Works to Maintain Water Levels. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN AND WI (See Section 15 of Text) Dredging. Rebuilding piers at Superior Entry. Enlarge plan for Superior Entry and additional dredging near draw span of Burlington Northern railway bridge. Dredging additional area for basin inside Duluth entrance to 22-foot depth. EnlargingSuperior Harbor Basin. S. Doc. 30, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 319, 86th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 338,90th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Ex. Doc. 59, 53d Cong., 3d Sess. and Annual Report, 1895, p. 2538. H. Doc. 82, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 221, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 651, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 31-52 TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 30, 19303 Aug. 30, 19303 Jul. 16, 19526 Jul. 14, 19607 Oct. 4, 1961 Aug. 5, 1886 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 19258 Jun. 26, 19349 Jul. 3, 1958 '0 Jun. 23, 186611 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 27, 1965 Removal of shoal point at southerly end of East Gate Basin. Howards Bay Channel, 20 feet deep. Deepening and widening channels and basins. Deepen Superior Front Channel and a portion of East Gate Basin to 25 feet. Present project dimensions of channels and basin. Abandons northerly portion of 21st Avenue West Channel. FOX RIVER, WI (See Section 16 of Text) Improvement of Fox River Dredging Fond du Lac Harbor on Lake Winnebago. Improvement of Wolf River Improvement of Stockbridge, of Calumet and Miller Bay, and of Brothertown Harbor, on Lake Winnebago. Increased depth in rock cuts on lower river, widen Neenah Channel, and a concrete retaining wall at Kaukauna. Operation and-care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Sec. 108. That Federal project structure, appurtenances, and real property of Upper Fox River, WI, be disposed of to State of Wisconsin. FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI (See Section 17 of Text) A New Outlet 12 Feet Deep Protected by Piers and Revetments. Exterior Breakwaters, Removal of Portions of Piers, Project Dimensions of Outer Basin. Dredge the Area in Lake Betsie Deepen Approach and Entrance Channels, Extend Inner Basin, and Dredge Recreational Anchorage Area. H. Doc. 1018, 64th Cong., 1st Sess H. Doc. 145, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 32, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 482, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 374, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 150, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 196, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1885, pp. 2041-2045 [plan of a board approach Dec. 10, 1884, as modified by Corps of Engineers, May 14, 1886]. H. Ex. Doc. 24, 51st Cong. 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1890, p. 2390. No prior survey or estimates. No prior survey or estimates. No prior survey or estimates, H. Doc. 294, 68th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Bill 3910, 85th Cong.,. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 482, 55th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 208, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 511, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 16, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' 31-53 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 23, 1866 Jun. 14, 1880 Sep. 19, 1890 Jul. 13, 1892 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 23, 1866 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 26, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 19352 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI (See Section 18 of Text) Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Present Project Dimensions of Harbor Channel to Grand Trunk Car Ferry Slip and River Channel, Eliminating all of that portion of Grand River Above Bass River, Consolidation of Projects for Harbor and River. Channel to Spring Lake Present Project Dimensions of Harbor Channel from Car Ferry Slip to Grand Trunk Railway Bridge and Turning Basin GRAND TRAVERSE BAY HARBOR, MI (See Section 19 of Text) Two Parallel piers, and entrance channel between piers and a harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet between piers and 10 feet in basin. Project area extended 200 feet upstream in 1966. GREEN BAY HARBOR WI (See Section 20 of Text) Outer Channel and revetment at Grassy Islands.12 Inner channel.12 Turning basin at DePere. Maintenance of turning basin at DePere. Increasing depth of inner channel and turning basin to 18 feet. Deepen outer channel to 22 feet with widening and straightening inside of Tail Point Bend, widen channel in Fox River through City of Green Bay to 22 feet. Turning basin above Chicago & North Western Ry. Bridge. Turning basin at mouth of East River. Deepen and widen 9 miles of entrance channel to 26 by 500 feet; 3.6 miles of entrance channel to 24 by 300 feet; and 3.2 miles of existing Fox River to 24 feet deep S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 88, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 3d Sess.' H. Doc. 661, 76th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1867, p. 70. Unpublished report approved Aug. 3, 1892. H. Doc. 222, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1017, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 294, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 40, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 73, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 95, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 470, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 31-54 TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 3, 1871 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1852 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 3, 1905 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 2, 1964 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 19352 May 17, 1950 Oct. 23. 1962 HAMMOND BAY HARBOR, MI (See Section 21 of Text) Harbor of Refuge, breakwaters 10-foot depth in harbor basin 12-foot depth in entrance channel. HARBOR BEACH, LAKE HURON, MI (See Section 22 of Text) Adopted Site and made provision for harbor. Closing North Entrance and Dredging Main Entrance and Anchorage Area. Removal of Portion of Breakwater in interest of sanitation. HOLLAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 23 of Text) Artificial Channel Between Lakes Macatawa and Michigan.' 2 Piers and Revetments. 12 Extending Inner Piers. Converging Breakwater. Channel to Holland and Turning Basin at Holland. Present Project Dimensions of Channels and Turning Basin. Widen Bend in Reveted Entrance Channel into Lake Macatawa, Dredge Channel in Black River, and Widen and Extend Turning Basin. THE INLAND ROUTE, MI (See Section 24 of Text) Channel 30 Feet Wide and 5 Feet Deep Through Lakes and Rivers with Suitable Jetties. Lock and Dam. KENOSHA HARBOR, WI (See Section 25 of Text) Parallel piers and 600 feet of breakwater.' " Extending breakwater 200 feet. Present project dimensions of entrance channel and basin. Channel northwesterly from basin. Deepen lake approach channel to 27 feet and 800 feet wide; deepen approach channel to 26 feet, entrance channel and inner basin to 25 feet. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1873, p. 292 H. Doc. 1700, 64th Cong., 2d Sess S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report 1866, p. 106. H. Doc. 272, 51st Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report 1887, p. 2950. Annual Report 1905, p. 2176. H. Doc. 588, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 48, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 282, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 142, 82nd Cong., 1st Sess.' Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 328, 54th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1897, p. 2772, H. Doc. 164, 55th Cong., 3d Sess. Annual Report, 1899, p. 181. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 750, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 496, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' 31-55 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1881 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 19352, 14 Jul. 14, 1960 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1936'" Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 2, 1945 KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI (See Section 26 of Text) Entrance piers. Turning basin. North breakwater, remove old north pier, widen and deepen entrance channel and turning basin to 20 feet and remove outer south shoal. Enlarge existing turning basin, extend existing project into north basin, and increase depth of north basin to 20 feet at a maximum width of 500 feet and eliminate removal of outer shoal. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI (See Section 27 of Text) Acquisition of waterway; for a 16-foot channel of 70-foot bottom width, renew canal revetments, reconstruct and extend piers at upper entrance to 30-foot depth of water, and at proper time for increase of channel depth to 20 feet with bottom width of not less than 120 feet (increase in width and depth of channel approved Mar. 15, 1898). Anchorage basin just within lower entrance about one-half mile long, 800 feet wide; a mooring pier on its westerly side 2,000 feet in length, and for purchase of necessary land. Princess Point Cutoff channel. General deepening, widening and straightening of channels and basins to provide 25-foot depth with additional overdepth at entrances, extend lower entrance breakwater, and necessary alteration or replacement of structures due to deepening channels. KNIFE RIVER HARBOR, MN (See Section 28 of Text) Dredging. Breakwater and modified channels. Construction of measures to correct the design deficiencies which results in unsatisfactory entrance and mooring conditions. LAC LA BELLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 29 of Text) Two parallel piers at the entrance, 584 and 682 feet; an entrance channel between the piers 50 feet wide and 12 feet deep, 82() feet long with a flared approach and inner canal 5() wide andl 10f(e)et (leep and 780) feet long. Annual Report, 1881, p. 2082. H. Doc. 324, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 19, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Ex. Doc. 105 49th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report 1887, p. 1977. H. Doc. 325, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 835, 63rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 55, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 686, 77th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report for 1949. H. D c. 463, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1961, p. 1039. 31-56 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19333 Mar. 21, 1956 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1867 Sep. 19, 1890() Jul. 25, 1912 LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI, CHANNELS(See Section 30 of Text) Two Dikes. Deepening Canal and Dredging Channel at Grosse Point. Second Canal for Downbound Vessels. 21-Foot Depth in Grosse Pointe Channel for About 5.25 miles. 25-Foot Depth Through Canals and Channel Through Lake St. Clair. Removal of Center Dike and Widening Channel to 700 Feet. Deepening Channel to 27.5 Feet and Abandonment of Channel above Mouth of Southeast Bend Cutoff Channel. LELAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 31 of Text) Entrance Channel Protected by Piers. Outer Breakwater, Anchorage Area. Approach Channel and Removal of North Pier. LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI (See Section 32 of Text) Approach Channel and Maneuver Area Protected by Breakwaters.' LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 33 of Text) 12-Foot Deep Channel From Lake Superior into Little Lake Breakwaters and Revetments. LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI (See Section 34 of Text) Entrance Piers. Pier Extension Reconstruction and Repairs to Existing Structures and Present Project Dimensions of Channel. Breakwaters, Shore Connections, and Removal of Outer Ends of the Two Inner piers. Deepen Channels and Widen Opening Between Breakwaters. LUTSEN HARBOR, MN (See Section 35 of Text) Project as modified provides for two rubblemound breakwaters totalling 1,400 feet, with an excavated harbor basin approximately 2 acres with an 8-foot depth. MANISTEE HARBOR, MI (See Section 36 of Text) Entrance Piers. Extendling ('hannel 8,0()(00 Feet to Connect with Manistee Lake. andil Iurther Pier Extension. )ep)th of 20 Feet in ()"utelt' l arl)or 57"( Vet Wide, Annual Report 1885, p. 2150. H. Doc. 297, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 188, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 23, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 413, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 301, 88th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report 1867, p. 11416 H. Doc. 273, 54th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report 1897, p. 2951. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. 16 H. Doc. 342, 91st Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report 1945, River and Harbor Act, p. 1658. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess., contains latest published map.' Annual Report 1867 p. 115. Annual Report 1891, p. 2(78. H. I)oc. 599. 62d ('ong., 2d( Sess. 31-57 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 3, 1920 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 3; 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 193517 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 23, 1962 Jul. 14, 1960 (Sec. 107 of 1960 R& H) Mar. 2, 1867 Aug. 11, 1888 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935' Jul. 11, 1960 to Outer End of South Pier 18 Feet Deep in River, South Breakwater with Shore Connection, and Extend NorthPier if Required. 23-Foot Depths in Entrance Channel and 21-Foot Depths in River Channel. Remove Old South Revetment, Construct New South Pier and Revetment, and Widen River Entrance Channel. Present Project Dimensions of Channel Through Outer Basin and River and Federal Participation in Cost of Replacing Maple Street Bridge. MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MI (See Section 37 of Text) Breakwaters and Outer Harbor. Present Location of West Breakwater and Pier at River Mouth. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WI (See Section 38 of Text) Breakwaters. Present project dimensions of channel through outer basin, removal of old north stub pier, and approach channel to a proposed city terminal south of shore end of south breakwater. Channel in river. Deepen Lake approach to 25 feet by 800 feet wide, deepen outer harbor to 25 feet, river channel to 23 feet to 8th St., and Upper River Channel to 22 feet to Soo Line R.R. Dredge River Channel to 12 feet from Soo Line R.R. 720 feet upstream. MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI (See Section 39 of Text) Breakwaters, 2,000 feet long. Extending the breakwater 1,000 feet. Additional 1,500-foot extension to breakwater and removing a shoal in northerly part of harbor. Deepening harbor to 25 feet. Deepening harbor to 27 feet. S. Doc. 131, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 380, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 358, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 429, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1908, p. 648, and Unpublished Report of Mar. 13, 1908. Approved by Secretary of War, Apr. 3, 1908. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess., as modified by Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 39, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. ~0, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 479, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Jun 1967 Detailed Project Report; Apr 1982 Supplement.' H.Ex. Doc. 56, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. pts. 1 and 2, and Annual Report, 1866, pp. 8 and 77. Annual Report, 1889, pp. 272 and 2021. H. Doc. 573, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.. H. Doc. 154, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' 31-58 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1871 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 4, 1913 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Jun. 27, 1967 Sec. 107 Aug. 30, 1852 Mar. 3, 1883 Mar. 2, 1907 Sep. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 194518 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Feb. 24, 1835's Jul. 3, 1930 Jul., 14, 193221 Jun. 13, 1902 MENOMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, MI AND WI (See Section 40 of Text) Entrance piers. Consolidation of project for harbor and river, and a channel 18 feet deep. Partial restoration of work above bridge which had been eliminated by act of May 3, 1905. 20-foot depth in channel and 18-foot depth in turning basin. 21-foot depth in channel and turning basin and enlarge turning basin. Extend channel 12 feet deep to vicinity of Marinette Yacht Club. Deepen existing approach channel to 26 feet, entrance and river channels to 24 feet and enlarge turning basin. Deepen 1,100 feet of river channel generally north of Marinette Corp. facilities to 19 feet. MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI (See Section 41 of Text) North pier. 12 Inner 7,600 feet of breakwater. 12 South pier. Extending north breakwater 1,000 feet. Extend north breakwater; a south breakwater; present project dimensions of inner entrance channel. Dredging a portion of outer harbor to 21-foot depth. Dredging river channels to 21-foot depth. Deepen South Menominee and Burnham Canals to 21 feet. Deepen an approach channel to 30 feet by 800 feet wide and 300 feet wide through breakwater; deepen entrance channel 28 feet through piers, outer harbor to 28 feet south of entrance channel, and a channel to 27 feet in Milwaukee River to Buffalo St., and in Kinnickinnic River to Chicago & North Western Ry. bridges. MONROE HARBOR, MI (See Section 42 of Text) 9-Foot Channel, Protecting Revetments and Piers. 21-Foot Channel, DI)ikes and Turning Basin.2" Modified Conditions of Local Cooperation Imposed by Act of Jul 3, 1930 MUSKEGO()N HARBO()R, MI (See Section 43 of Text) Piers and Revetments. Annual Report, 1867, P. 132. H. Doc. 419, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 171, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 228, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 112, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Detailed Project Report Dec. 1960.1 S. Doc. 175, 25th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1881, p. 2122. Annual Report 1906, p. 1752. [No prior survey or estimate affecting breakwater extensions.] H. Doc. 804, 66th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 289, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 29, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 285, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 134, 87th Cong., 1st Sess.' Annual Renort 1872, p. 237. Rivers and Harbors Comm Doc. 22, 71st Cong., 1st Sess., Rivers and Harbor Comm Doc. 12, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 45, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 104, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. 31-59 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 2, 1882 1883 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1873 Jul. 5, 1884 Jul. 13, 1892 Mar. 25, 1907 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 3, 1879 Breakwaters. Repairing Revetments Around Car Ferry Slip. Channel Deepening and Present Project Dimensions of Channel. Piers and Revetments. NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MI (See Section 44 of Text) Entrance channel 10 feet deep by 80 to 180 feet wide and 850 feet long to mouth of Galien River, new no. and so. breakwaters 1,305 and 740 feet, respectively, deepening inner channel to Galien River to 8 feet and 80 feet wide and 1,250 feet long. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI (See Section 45 of Text) Channel 17 feet deep and 150 feet wide through bar and 15 feet deep and 100 feet wide between piers, and pier maintenance. Modified project widths and provide inner basin. PENSAUKEE HARBOR, WI (See Section 46 of Text) Construction of slab pier 2,500 feet long on the north side of the channel and dredging a channel 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep. Extending pier to 10-foot contour (2,700 feet) and dredging to 10 feet below datum. (Datum elevation 580.69 feet) Dredging entrance channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep. PENTWATER HARBOR, MI (See Section 47 of Text) Piers and Revetments, Dredging. Piers and Revetments, Dredging. Piers and Revetments, Dredging. Piers and Revetments, Dredging. Present Project Depth of Channel POINT LOOKOUT HARBOR (AU GRES RIVER), MI (See Section 48 of Text) Breakwater, Anchorage Area, Channel Dredging. PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 49 of Text) Entrance Channel 18 Feet Deep Protected by Piers and Revetments. H. Doc. 494, 67th Cong., 4th Sess. Rivers and Harbor Comm Doc. 64, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. 1 H. Doc. 474, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.1 H. Doc. 474, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 602, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Committee print, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. No. 153, 42d Cong., 3d Sess. R & H Act Aug. 2, 1882 Modified H. Doc. No. 478, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., .2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 181, 59th Cong., 2d Sess.1 H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1879, p. 1634w 31-60 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI (See Section 50 of Text) Mar. 2, 1945 Entrance Channel 12 Feet Deep, Anchorage Basin, Breakwater. PORT WASHINGTON HARBOR, WI (See Section 51 of Text) Jul. 11, 1870 North pier and south basin. 12 Aug. 14, 1876 North basin. Aug. 30, 193523 North breakwater, removal of 650 feet of north pier, outer turning basin, present project dimensions of channel and basin and extension of south breakwater. Jul. 3, 195824 Extending and raising of north breakwater and placing rubble along sides; removing 456 feet of south breakwater and dredging in outer basin. PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 52 of Text) 'Jun. 3, 1896 Breakwater, 1,000 feet long. Jun. 13, 1902 Shore extension, 216 feet long. Aug. 30, 1935 For dredging and rubble mound extension to breakwater 1,600 feet long. Changed designation of project. Jul. 14, 1960 Deepening harbor from 26 and 28 feet to 28 and 30 feet, respectively. RACINE HARBOR, WI (See Section 53 of Text) Mar. 2, 1907 Breakwaters. Aug. 26, 1937 Remove shoals lakeward of harbor entrance, enlarge 19-foot channel through outer basin and 19-foot channel in river. Mar. 2, 1945 Present project dimensions of channel through outer basin and in river. ROUGE RIVER, MI(See Section 54 of Text) Aug. 8, 1917 21-Foot Channel via The Shortcut Canal. Aug. 30, 19352,26,27 25-Foot Channel at Mouth of Old Channel, 1,425 Feet Long and Adjacent to Latter, and 21-Foot Channel Extending from Junction of Old Channel and Shortcut Canal into Old Channel to Detroit, Toledo & Ironton R.R. Bridge. Jul. 3, 19582 Old Channel; 100 Feet Wide from Peerless Cement Corp. to Junction with Shortcut Canal Widened to 150 Feet at 2 Bends. Oct. 23, 19622 25-Foot Channel Over Modified Limits from Detroit River to Jefferson Ave. (via (Shortcut Canal). H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 28, 41st Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1879, p. 119. Annual Report, 1876, pt. 2, p. 379. H. Doc. 168, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 446, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 318, 54th Cong., 1st Sess., Annual Report for 1903, pp. 474, 1823. H. Doc. 473, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 145, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report 1909, p. 1973. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 46, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 816, 77th Cong., 2d Sess. and H. Doc. 255, 78th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc.1063, 64th Cong,2d Sess 25 H. Doc. 125, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 509, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' 31-61 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 H. Doc. 740, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 30, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Comm Doc. 21, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 576, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 500, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 554, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 240, 89th Cong.,lst Sess.' SAGINAW RIVER, MI (See Section 55 of Text) Channel 200 Feet Wide, with Depth of 18.5 Feet in Bay and 16.5 Feet in River. Project Depth of 18.5 Feet Extended Up River to Saginaw Turning Basin. Present Project Channel Dimensions from Bay to Sixth Street Bridge in Saginaw. New Channel in Bay, 350 Feet Wide and 24 Feet Deep from 24-Foot Contour to River Mouth, Project Depth of 24 Feet in River Channel Up to Detroit & Mackinac Railway Bridge, Project Depth of 22 Feet in River Channel Up to Sixth Street Bridge, Turning Basins at Essexville and Carrollton, and Elimination of Present Channel in Bay. Deepen Bay Channel, Deepen River Channel to Detroit & Mackinac Bridge, Extend 22-Foot Project Above 6th St. Bridge, Deepen Essexville Turning Basin, and Construct 2 New Turning Basins.3 Deepen River Channel to 25 Feet, from Detroit & Mackinac Bridge to New York Central Railroad Bridge. ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI (See Section 56 of Text) 20-Foot Channel in the River. Deepen Channel to 25 and 26 Feet, and Compensating Works. Widening Channel at Southeast Bend to 700 Feet. Widen and Deepen Southeast Bend and Improve Outlet of North Channel, St. Clair River. Deepen and Further Improve Channels in St. Clair River Between Limits of 27.1 to 30 Feet to Provide Safe Navigation by Vessels with Drafts of 25.5 Feet. A Cutoff Channel in Canada of Southeast Bend and Abandon Old Southeast Bend Channels. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI (See Section 57 of Text) Interior Revetments.28 Benton Harbor Canal.28 Present Project Dimensions of Piers and a Turning Basin. Present Project Dimensions of Paw Paw River. Abandon Easterly 1,000 Feet of Channel Above West Line of 9th St. 31-62 H. Doc. 207, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 309, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 160, 43rd Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report 1875, pt. 1, p. 162. Annual Report 1880, pp. 2030, 2031, 2049, and 2055. H. Doc. 307, 55th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report 1898, p. 2496. Rivers and Harbors Comm Doc. 52, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Jul. 13, 1892 Jul. 8, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Mar. 21, 1956 Mar. 3, 1875 Jun. 14, 1880 Mar. 3, 1899 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 2, 1937 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 11, 1870 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1907 Mar. 3, 1909 Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 4, 1915 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Jun. 26, 19349 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 7, 1942 Jun. 15, 1943 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Turning Basin Above Mouth of Morrison Channel and Eliminate Turning Basin Near Mouth of Paw Paw River. Maintenance of Turning Basin Near Mouth of Paw Paw River. ST. MARYS RIVER, MI (See Section 58 of Text) Weitzel Lock (Replaced in 1943 by Mac Arthur Lock), Widen and Deepen Existing State Channel." Poe Lock.' Dredging Through Shoals Above Falls and Shoals Below Falls Between Lower End of Canal and Upper Entrance Channel into Lake Nicolet (Formerly Hay Lake). Enlarging the Old Channel. Lake Nicolet and Neebish Channels Work in that Section of River Below Locks. David Lock Second Canal, and Emergency Dam. Lease of Waterpower at Falls. Lease Entered Into with Michigan Northern Power Co. Provided for Construction of Remedial and Compensating Works. Fourth Lock (Renamed 'Sabin' Lock in 1943). Deepen Tailrace of Power Plant. Widen Upper Approach to Canals Through Vidal Shoals, Extend Anchorage and Maneuver Area Below Locks. Remove Round Island, Middle Ground Extension of Northwest Canal Pier, and Widen Channels Middle Neebish Route. Deepen Channels Throughout Downbound Route. Operation and Care of Canal and Locks Provided from War Department Appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Widen Brush Point Turn and Channel from Brush Point to Point Louise. Construct New (Mac Arthur) Lock on Site of Former Weitzel Lock, Deepen Approach Channels to 27 Feet, and Reconstruct Approach Piers. Name 'Mac Arthur' Lock and Changed Name of 'Fourth' Lock to 'Sabin' Lock. Remove Bridge Island and Construct New Hydroelectric Power Plant. Replace Poe Lock at St. Marys Falls Canal with a New Structure 800 Feet Long, 100 Feet Wide and 32 Feet Deep, with Necessary Construction of Nose and Center Piers, and Widen and Deepen Channel Across Point Iroquois Shoals and in Lake Nicolet to Provide Wider Anchorage and Maneuver Areas in St. Marys River. H. Doc. 129, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 95, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' Report by Maj. O. M. Poe, Corps of Engineers, Not Published. H.Ex.Doc. 72,49th Cong.,2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 207, 51st Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report 1891, p. 2810 H. Doc. 138, 56th Cong., 2d Sess., and 215, 58th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 128, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 333, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. (Plan 3) H. Doc. 65, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. District Engineer Report, Oct. 29, 1920. H. Doc. 270, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. River and Harbor Comm Doc. 53, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 218, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 679, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. and H. Doc. 339, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. 31-63 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 21, 1956 Jul. 9, 1956 Jun. 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 1910 Jun. 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 11, 1888 Mar. 3, 1905 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 3, 1873 Jul. 13, 1892 Deepen to Provide a Project Safe Draft of 25.5 Feet Over Full Width to Downbound and 2-Way Channels (Including Anchorage Areas) and Over Westerly 300-Foot Width of Upbound Middle Neebish Channel, When Levels of Lake Superior and Huron are at Their Respective Low-Water Datum. Repeal Authorization of Bridge as a Part of Project, Authorize Alteration With Cost to be Apportioned by Sec. 6, Truman Hobbs Act, June 21, 1940. SAUGATUCK HARBOR AND KALAMAZOO RIVER, MI (See Section 59 of Text) Entrance Channel, Piers and Revetments. Deepening Entrance to 16 Feet. Deepening Channel in River to 14 Feet. SEBEWAING RIVER, MI (See Section 60 of Text) Entrance Channel 8 Feet Deep, 100 Feet Wide and 15,000 Feet Long in Saginaw Bay. SHEBOYGAN HARBOR, WI (See Section 61 of Text) North breakwater. Preserving south pier as part of project, providing turning basin, and elimination of proposed south breakwaters. Present project dimensions of channel. Widen and deepen outer harbor entrance channel to 450 feet, widen and deepen river channel from present project limit to north side of Jefferson Ave. SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI (See Section 62 of Text) Channel from Inner End of Piers to Highway Bridge. 2 Present Dimensions of Piers and for a Turning Basin. Present Project Dimensions of Channel and Turning Basin STURGEON BAY AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WI (See Section 63 of Text) Breakwaters. ' 2 Acquisition of the canal. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' None H. Doc. 912, 54th Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report 1896, Vol. 2. Pt. 5, p. 2739 Annual Report 1907, P. 6416 H. Doc. 635, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 71, 54th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 475, 68th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 47, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 554, 82d Cong., 2d Sess.' No Prior Survey or Estimate. H. Doc. 119, 58th Cong.,.2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Comm Doc. 9, 73d Cong., 1st Sess.' and Unpublished review Report of Chief of Engineers, Dated Dec. 21, 1934. H. Ex. Doc. 34, 42d Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1872, p. 171. H. Ex. Doc. 106, 49th Cong., 2d Sess. 31-64 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 30, 1935 Nov. 7, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1871 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 3, 1958 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1873 Jul. 5, 1884 Jul. 13, 1892 Mar. 2, 1907 Dec. 30, 1970 Jul. 3, 1958 TWO HARBORS, MN (See Section 64 of Text) Breakwater and dredging. Construction of two breakwater piers. Shore connection to east breakwater and dredging maneuvering area. Consruct new east breakwater and enlargement of maneuvering basin. Deepen harbor project depths from 26 and 28 feet to 28 and 30 feet, respectively. TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI (See Section 65 of Text) South pier, 750 feet of north pier, and about 44 feet of north revetment.12 Remainder of north pier and stilling basin. Deepening entrance channel and inner basin to 18 feet. Extend existing project in West Twin River to 18 feet deep and in East Twin River to 10 feet deep to 22d Street Bridge. WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 66 of Text) New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. Present Project Depth of Channel. RED RUN DRAIN-LOWER CLINTON RIVER, MI (See Section 74 of Text) Flood control and major drainage improvements to Red Run.Drain and Lower 'Clinton River. SAGINAW RIVER, MI FLOOD CONTROL (See Section 75 of Text) Flood Control Improvements to Saginaw River and its Tributaries Including Tittabawassee, Shiawassee, Flint, and Cass Rivers. H.Ex.Doc. 94, 48th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report for 1887, p. 1952. Rivers and Harbors Comm Dec. 17. 72d Cong., 1st Sess H.Doc.805, 78th Cong.,2d Sess. H.Doc.146, 86th Cong., 1st Sess Annual Report, 1871, p. 123 [as modified by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 27, 1897]. H. Doc. 730, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. Modification of Plan A. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 362, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.1 Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. No Prior Survey or Estimate.2 H. Doc. 431, 91st Cong., 2d$Sess. H. Doc. 346, 84th Cong., 2d Sess. 31-65 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents SEBEWAING, SEBEWAING RIVER, MI (See Section 76 of Text) Aug. 18, 1941 Enlarging Present Channel of Sebewaing River, H. Doc. 286, 76th Cong., 1st Sess' Altering Railroad and Highway Bridges, Removal of Dike. 'Contains latest published map. 2Including Emergency Relief Administration Work authorized May 28, 1935. 3Included in Public Works Administration Program September 6, 1933. 4This modification deauthorized August 5, 1977 under Section 12, Public Law 93-251. 5Administrative Act, Section 4. 6Public Law 568, 82d Congress. 7Public Law 388, 87th Congress. W1'his portion inactive. 9Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. "oTransfer completed June 1962. "Amended 1868, 1879, 1892. '2Completed under previous project. '3Included in Public Works Administration Program January 3, 1934. a"Inactive portion; removal of 200 linear feet of north pier, widening inner 200 feet of channel through outer basin, and closing gap in north shore connection of breakwater. 5SLatest published map is in Annual Report 1914, p.2974. '6Latest published map in Annual Report 1914, p. 2914. ' 7Superceded by Act of October 23, 1962. 'Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (dredging Milwaukee River from Buffalo St. Bridge to North Humboldt Ave. Bridge). 19Modified by Act of June 10, 1872. 2 Riprapping of protecting dikes portion of project is inactive. 21War Department Appropriations Act. 22Latest published map is in House Document 588, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 23Work recommended in H. Doc. 588, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 24Deauthorized in 1977. 25Contains latest published maps. See also map with Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 26Except for dredging 25-foot channel to 1,150 feet upstream of mouth in old channel, work authorized in this Act is considered inactive. 27This modification deauthorized August 5, 1977 under Section 12, Public Law 93-251. 2 Completed under previous projects. Public Law 130, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. 29Latest published map is in H. Doc. 2053, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. 31-66 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT TABLE 31-C FEATURES OF EXISTING PROJECT Project Datum Planes Length Miles Used by Above Mean of from Upbound Water Level Channel Mouth or Down- Project Project at Father of bound Width Depth Point, Quebec Year Name of Channel (Feet) River Vessels (Feet) (Feet) (Feet) Complete DETROIT RIVER, MI (SEE SECTION 14 OF TEXT) Channel North of Belle Isle' 22 Channel at Heat of Detroit River Miscellaneous Shoals and Obstructions, Belle Isle to Fighting Island Channel Fighting Island Channel Ballards Reef Channel North of Junction with Livingstone Channel Livingstone Channel Upper Livingstone Channel Lower: CS 260+00 to 368+87 CS 368+87 to 492+00 East Outer Channel Misc., Shoals and Obstructions, Detroit River to Pelee Passage Pelee Passage Shoal Amherstburg Channel: Upper Section, Ballards Reef Channel Middle Section Lower Section, Hackett Range West Outer Channel Trenton Channel: Wyandotte Reach Trenton Reach (Upper) Trenton Reach (Lower) Grosse Ile Shoal .30 38,800 32 44,500 25 24,800 17 12,200 12 Both Both Both Both Both 26,000 10 Down 10,887 12,313 42,000 6,500 12,000 24,000 21,000 31,500 5,100 600 600 10 17 14 1144 Down Both Both Both Both Up Up Up Down Local Local Local Local 200 800 800 600 450 450,800 800-1,200 1,200 21.0 571.3 28.5 571.5-570.9 28.5 570.9-570.3 1964 1964 1964 28.5 569.8 1962 28.5 569.8 1963 27.7 569.8-568.6 1964 29.0 29.0 38.5 - 28.5-29.53 - 29.5 600 600 6000 800 300 300 250-300 27.5 21.27.54 21.28.55 22.0 27.0 28.0 28.0 20.0 568.6 568.6 568.6 1961 1961 1964 568.6 1962 568.6 1964 569.8-569.5 569.5-568.9 568.9-568.6 568.6 569.9-569.7 569.7-569.6 569.6-568.8 569.8 1960 1960 1960 1929 19644 1964 1941 1904 ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI (SEE SECTION 56 OF TEXT) Channel at Foot of Lake Huron Channel North of Blue Water Bridge Port Huron to Stag Island Widening at Upper and Lower Ends of Stage Island St. Clair to Russel Island Russel Island to Southeast Bend Southeast Bend CS 324+00 to 250+00 Cutoff Channel North Channel Outlet 26,500 44 4,100 39 38,000 37,600 77,000 20,600 7,400 30,300 8,000 39 31 24 11 5 - Both Both Both Both Both Both Both Both Small Craft 800 800 800 900-1,000 1,000 700-1,000 700 700 100 30.0 576.8-576.5 1961 30.0 576.4-576.1 1962 30.0 27.4 27.3 17.2 576.4-576.1 574.9-573.8 573.8-572.4 572.4-572.1 27.1 573.1-572.0 27.1 572:1-571.7 10.0 571.7 1961 1962 1962 1962 1962 1962 1962 'This is a Side Channel. 'This is a Side Channel. 2Extends from Deep Water Near Windmill Point to a Point Opposite Fairview Slip, about 3,000 Feet. 3Project Depth 29.5 Feet over Rock Shoals and 28.5 Feet over other than Rock Shoals. 'Project Depth 21 Feet in Easterly 300-Foot Width of Channel and 27.5 Feet in Westerly 300-Foot Width. 5Project Depth 21 Feet in Easterly 300-Foot Width of Channel and 28.5 Feet in Westerly 300-Foot Width. 6Project Complete Except for Work Authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1950. 31-67 TABLE 31-D REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 ST. MARYS RIVER, MI: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 58 of Text) Lock Davis Sabin MacArthur New Poe Miles Above Mouth 47 47 47 47 Clear Width of Chamber Feet 80 80 80 110 Length Between Gate Quoins Feet 1,350 1,350 800 1,200 Lifts Feet 21.7 21.7 21.7 21.7 Depth Over Upper Breast Walls' Feet 24.3 24.3 31 32 Depth Over Lower Breast Walls' Feet 23.1 23.1 31 32 Foundation Rock Rock Rock Rock Type of Construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Estimated Cost $6,200,002 $3,275,0003 $12,909,440 $39,000,000 Actual Cost $2,200,0005 $1,750,0006 $12,718,8064,7 $34,813,066 Completed (Open to Commerce) Oct. 21, 1914 Sept. 18, 1919July 11, 1943 June 26, 1969 Emergency Dam for South Canal North Canal Miles Above Mouth 47 47 Estimated Cost -9 $300,000 Type Steel Stoplogs Recessed Steel Stoplogs Recessed Into Lock Masonry Into Lock Masonry Cost Completed -9 $169,2248 Year Completed 1943 1922 (Modified 1963) 'At low water datum 599.5 above and 577.8 below. 2Includes Cost of North Canal. 3Includes cost of canal excavations to provide necessary approaches to lock, canal walls, piers, and emergency dam, $662,919. 4Excludes cost of deepening and enlarging South Canal, $1,653,378. 5Excludes cost of North Canal, $2,572,611. 6Excludes cost of canal excavations to provide necessary approaches to lock, canal walls, piers, and emergency dam, $662,919. 7Excluding cost of lower guard gates which were never installed. 8Including engineering office, and inspection. 9Not separable from cost of locks. Note: Limiting draft to locks is determined by depth over breast walls. 31-68 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT FOX RIVER, WI: LOCKS AND DAMS TABLE 31-E (See Section 16 of Text) Depth At Normal Pool Miles Avail- Lower from Dis- Clear able Breast Miter Character Kind Ye Green Nearest tance Width Length Lift Wall' Sill of of Type of Co Name of Lock and Dam Bay Town (miles) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Foundation Dam Construction ple DePere lock2 7.1 DePere - 36.0 146.0 8.9 10.3 12.0 Rock - Concrete 19 DePere dam2 7.2 DePere - - - - - - Rock FixedS ' Concrete 19 Little Kaukauna lock2 13.0 DePere 6 36.0 146.0 7.2 8.0 9.5 Clay - Concrete 19 Little Kaukauna dame 13.1 DePere 6 - - - - - Clay and gravel Fixed* Piers and concrete 19 Rapide Croche lock2 19.2 Wrightstown 2 36.0 146.0 8.3 8.8 9.3 Rock - Concrete 19 Rapide Croche Dam2 19.3 Wrightstown 2 - - - - - Rock Fixed s ' Concrete 19: Kaukauna fifth lock2 22.8 Kaukauna - 35.6 144.0 9.1 6.7 9.3 Rock - Composite 18 Kaukauna fourth lock2 23.1 Kaukauna - 36.6 144.1 10.2 6.9 6.0 Rock - Stone masonry 18 Kaukauna third lock2 23.3 Kaukauna - 30.6 144.0 10.2 6.9 6.3 Rock - Stone masonry 18 Kaukauna second lock2 23.4 Kaukauna - 35.0 144.0 9.6 6.0 6.0 Rock - Stone masonry 19 Kaukauna first lock 2 23.6 Kaukauna - 35.1 144.4 11.0 6.9 6.0 Rock - Stone masonry 181 Kaukauna Dam2 24.0 Kaukauna - - - - - - Rock FixedS Concrete 19: Kaukauna guard lock 24.0 Kaukauna - 40.0 - - 9.4 - Rock - Stone masonry 18 Little Chute combined lock: Lower 24.4 Little Chute 1 35.4 146.5 10.9 6.0 8.6 Rock - Stone masonry 18 Upper 25.4 Little Chute 1 36.3 144.1 10.6 7.6 6.0 Hardpan - Stone masonry 18 Little Chute second lock2 26.4 Little Chute - 35.0 144.2 13.8 8.0 6.1 Rock - Stone masonry 18 Little Chute first (guard) lock' 26.5 Little Chute - 35.4 - - 6.6 - Rock - Stone masonry 19 Little Chute Dam2 26.6 Little Chute - - - - - - Rock Fixeds Concrete 19: Cedars lock2 27.3 Little Chute 1 35.0 144.0 9.8 6.8 7.3 Rock - Stone masonry 18 Cedars Dam2 27.4 Little Chute 1 - - - - - Rock Fixed3 Concrete 19: Appleton fourth lock2 30.7 Appleton 1 35.0 144.0 7.6 8.1 7.9 Rock - Stone masonry 19 Appleton lower dam2 30.9 Appleton 1 - - - - - Rock Fixeds ' Concrete 19 Appleton third lock2 31.3 Appleton - 35.0 144.0 8.7 6.0 8.6 Rock - Stone masonry 19( Appleton second lock2 31.6 Appleton - 35.1 144.6 9.6 6.9 6.0 Clay - Stone masonry 19( Appleton first lock2 31.9 Appleton - 35.0 144.7 10.0 6.6 6.0 Rock - Stone masonry 18 Appleton upper dam 32.2 Appleton - - - - - - Rock FixedS Concrete 194 Menasha lock2 37.0 Menasha - 35.4 144.0 8.5 7.2 8.0 Clay - Composite 18 Menasha Dam2 37.8 Menasha - - - - - - Hardpan Fixeds Concrete 19 ar m"- Actual ete Cost 36 $229,308 29 209,536 38 362,427 26 179,398 34 228,738 30 118,975 98 13,3105 79 37,536 79 39,948 03 24,313 83 38,704 31 123,763 91 12,630 79 102,304 79 - 31 48,555 04 7,8175 32 82,554 88 34,972 33 84,973 07 40,893 34 73,903 DO 32,238 )1 22,940 4 36,004 40 151,558 )9 19,3265 37 84,686 'Depth shown is on breast wail, which is controlling depth for upper pool. Original structure built prior to assumption of control by United States on Sept. 18, 1872. SProvided with sluices. iFlash boards used. 5Partially rebuilt. 31-69 TABLE 31-F REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 RECONNAISSANCE & CONDITION SURVEYS Name of Project Date Survey Conducted Algoma Harbor, MI Alpena Harbor, MI Au Sable Harbor, MI hBayfield Harbor, WI Bayport Harbor, MI Belle River, MIch. Big Suamico Harbor, WI Black River, MI Caseville Harbor, MI Chippewa Harbor, MI Eagle Harbor, MI Grand Marias Harbor, MI Grand Marias, MN Grays Reef Passage, MI Harrisville Harbor, MI La Pointe Harbor, WI Les Cheneaux Isls. Channels, MI Mackinac Island Harbor, MI Mackinaw City Harbor, MI Oconto Harbor, WI Petoskey Harbor, MI Pine Run, MI Port Austin Harbor, MI Port Wing Harbor, WI St. James Harbor, MI Straits of Mackinac, MI Tawas Bay Harbor, MI Traverse City Harbor, MI Washington Isl, WI Whitefish Point Harbor, MI August 1982 June 1982 May 1982 July 1982 March 1982 May 1982 March 1982 June 1982 February 1982 November 1982 August 1982 July 1982 November 1982 September 1982 August 1982 March 1982 May 1982 August 1982 August 1982 October 1982 May 1982 May 1982 August 1982 September 1982 September 1982 September 1982 October 1982 August 1982 June 1982 June 1982 31-70 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT TABLE 31-G OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost To September 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Algoma Harbor, MI 1981 205,010 889,184 Alpena Harbor, MI 1980 337,3941 409,260 Au Sable Harbor, MI 1979 209,7761 2,420,135 Bayport Harbor, MI 1975 93,597 38,679 Bayfield Harbor, WI 1979 183,855 64,214 Belle River, MI 1980 24,301 39,252 Big Suamico River, WI 1975 20,243 117,609 Black River Harbor, MI 1980 383,350 481,423 Black River (Alcona Co.), MI 1907 Caseville Harbor, MI 1981 587,314 87,077 Channels Straits of Mackinac, MI 1972 2,832,629 90,318 Chippewa Harbor, Isle Royale, MI 1959 125,629 7,173 Eagle Harbor, MI 1979 205,164 54,352 Forestville, MI 1969 Grand Marais Harbor, MI 1980 1,055,871 1,666,014 Grand Marais Harbor, MN 1981 1,680,9722 558,969 Grays Reef Passage, MI 1970 190,521 635,526 Harrisville Harbor, MI 1981 1,656,638 608,100 La Pointe Harbor, WI 1981 130,874 64,744 Les Cheneaux Islands Channels MI 1980 399,478 283,973 Little Bay De Noc, Gladstone Harbor, MI 1966 332,832 54,086 Mackinac Island Harbor, MI 1969 229,0583 71,469 Mackinaw City Harbor, MI 1969 136,2864 37,574 Northport Harbor Oconto Harbor, WI 1980 130,754 1,037,863 Petoskey Harbor, MI 1979 118,239 315,695 Pine River, MI 1980 13,649 28,550 Port Austin Harbor, MI 1980 1,128,334 1,159,654 Port Wing Harbor, WI 1980 63,393 581,029 St. James, Beaver Island, MI 1957 49,1715 41,340 St. Joseph River, MI 1975 54,555 19,185 Saxon Harbor, WI 1981 573,500 339,690 Tawas Bay Harbor, MI 1978 1,954,821 12,780 Traverse City Harbor, MI 1976 366,579 110,815 Washington Island, WI 1950 62,838 35,684 Whitefish Pointe, MI 1981 771,639 209,788 'Includes $114,786 for previous projects and $16,000 Contributed Funds. 2Includes $1,230,000 Rehabilitation Funds. 3Excludes Contributed Funds of $105,004. 4Excludes Contributed Funds of $136,286. 5Excludes Contributed Funds of $7,500. 6Includes $838,284 Contributed Funds. 31-71 TABLE 31-H REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost To September 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Grand River, Grandville, MIi 1966 Grand River, Lansing, MI 1971 7,300 Kalamazoo River (Battle Creek) MI2 1975 4,471,235 Kalamazoo River (Kalamazoo) MI 1975 421,466 Kawkawlin River, MI3 1971 1,204,5594 Mount Clemens, Clinton River, MI3 1953 1,136,0086 Upper River Rouge, MI6 1968 7,935 River Rouge, MI 1981 31,960,332 - 'Awaiting Appropriation of Funds. 2Includes $108,335 Contributed Funds. 3Completed. 'Includes $204,559 Contributed Funds. 5Includes $202,996 Contributed Funds. 6Planning indefinitely suspended due to lack of local cooperation. 31-72 TABLE 31-I I Project Black River Harbor, MI (30 Aug 1935 R&H Act) Detroit River, Trenton ChnJ., MI (17 May 1950 R&H Act) Grand Haven Harbor, MI (2 Mar 1945 R&H Act) Grand River at Grandville, MI (27 Oct 1965 Flood Control Ait) Kewaunee River, WI (1960 R&H Act) Lansing, (Grand River), MI (3 Jul 1958 Flood Control Act) Pentwater Harbor, MI (13 Jul 1892 R&H Act) Rogers City Harbor, MI (25 Jun 1910 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI (23 Oct 1962 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI (3 Jul 1958 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI (30 Aug 1935 R&H Act) St. Clair River Compensating Works, MI (3 Jul 1930 R&H Act) South Milwaukee Harbor, WI (1836 Flood Control Act) St. Marys River (MacArthur Lock Guard Gates), MI (7 Mar 1942 R&H Act) 31-73 DETROIT, MICHIGAN DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual Date Report For Deauthorized 1976 Nov 1977 1976 Aug 1977 1976 Nov 1977 1966 Nov 1977 1976 Aug 1977 1971 Jun 1981 1976 Nov 1977 1926 Aug 1977 1976 Aug 1977 1976 Aug 1977 1976 Aug 1977 1976 Aug 1977 1906 Aug 1977 1977 Oct 1978 0FECuponendtrdsiebduted Federal Funds Expended 0 0 0 0 0 7,000 0 5,892 22,000 12,000 0 0 0 0 Contributed Funds Expended 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT* The district comprises northern Ohio, northwestern Pennsylvania and western and northern New York, embracing U.S. waters of Lake Erie exclusive of small portion of western end, Lake Ontario, and St. Lawrence River, with their tributary drainage basins from boundary between the states of Ohio and Michigan to international boundary line east of Frontier, New York. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio .................. 32-2 2. Barcelona Harbor, N.Y.................... 32-2 3. Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, N.Y. ................. 32-2 4. Buffalo Harbor, N.Y.......................32-3 5. Cape Vincent Harbor, N.Y.................. 32-3 6. Cattaraugus Harbor, N.Y ................ 32-4 7. Cleveland Harbor, Ohio ................... 32-4 8. Conneaut Harbor, Ohio ................... 32-5 9. Dunkirk Harbor, N.Y...................... 32-5 10. Erie Harbor, Pa...........................32-5 11. Fairport Harbor, Ohio ..................... 32-6 12. Geneva-on-the-Lake, Ohio ................. 32-6 13. Great Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y.............32-7 14. Huron Harbor, Ohio ..................... 32-7 15. Irondequoit Bay, N.Y...................... 32-7 16. Little Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y...............32-7 17. Lorain Harbor, Ohio........................32-8 18. Oak Orchard Harbor, N.Y. ............... 32-8 19. Ogdensburg Harbor, N.Y. ................ 32-8 20. Olcott Harbor, N.Y ...................... 32-9 21. Oswego Harbor, N.Y. ................... 32-9 22. Port Clinton Harbor, Ohio .................. 32-9 23. Port Ontario Harbor, N.Y................... 32-9 24. Rochester Harbor, N.Y....... ............. 32-10 25. Rocky River Harbor, Ohio ................... 32-10 26. Sackets Harbor, N.Y................... ... 32-10 27. Sandusky Harbor, Ohio ................... 32-10 28. Toledo Harbor, Ohio ............... .... 32-11 29. Vermilion Harbor, Ohio ................... 32-11 30. West Harbor, Ohio ....................... 32-11 31. Wilson Harbor, N.Y. ..................... 32-12 32. Reconnaissance and condition surveys ....... 32-12 33. Other authorized navigation projects ........ 32-12 34. Navigation work under special authorization .................... 32-12 Beach Erosion Control Page 35. Lakeview Park, Lorain, Ohio ............... 32-12 36. Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, Pa............. 32-12 37. Other authorized beach erosion control projects ......... .... ........... 32-13 38. Beach erosion work under special authorization .................... 32-13 Flood Control 39. Cayuga Creek, Cheektowaga, N.Y........... 32-14 40. Cuyahoga River Basin, Ohio ............... 32-14 41. Dansville and vicinity, Canaseraga Creek, N.Y. ....... ... ....... 32-14 42. Ellicott Creek, N.Y. .................. 32-15 43. Mt. Morris Lake, N.Y., Genesee River.........................32-15 44. Point Place, Toledo, Ohio. ................. 32-15 45. Reno Beach - Howard Farms Area, Ohio ................ 32-16 46. Scajaquada Creek, N.Y. ................. 32-16 47. Inspection of completed flood control projects ................... . 32-16 48. Other authorized flood control projects .......................... 32-16 49. Flood Control work under special authorization. ................ .32-16 Deauthorized Projects 50. Deauthorized projects .................... 32-16 General Investigations 51. Surveys. ............................. 32-17 52. Collection and study of basic data ....... .... 32-17 53. Hydrologic studies ........ ............ 32-17 * All cost and financial statements for projects are listed in Table 32A at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 32-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Navigation 1. ASHTABULA HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Ashtabula River, 59 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14836.) Previous Projects. For details see page 1963 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1593 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description see pages 1297-99 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost of completed project is $12,240,147. Non-Federal costs of $5,743,000, including contribution of $47,000, were for construction of access roads, docks, storage and handling facilities and dockside dredging. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $47,000 for work authorized by 1936 and 1970 acts. Terminal facilities. There are 16 piers and wharves. One facility is owned by city of Ashtabula and one is owned by Coast Guard. Ten facilities are along banks of Ashtabula River and six are on southside of outer harbor. Eleven terminals have railroad connections and six have mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Major Rehabilitation: Contract operations, initiated in June 1981, for rehabilitation of approximately 3,692 feet of the east breakwater and 3,888 feet of the west breakwater, were completed in August 1982. The rehabilitation consisted of placing over 205,000 tons of armor, underlayer, and bedding stone on the slopes and rebuilding the structures to their design height. Total construction cost was $5,770,717 with $2,106,755 expended during FY 1982. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $62,015. New stone purchase cost $27,000. Adjustment of FY81 dredging contract costs resulted in a credit of $190,382. Particle size and specific gravity testing of harbor bottom sediment, by contract, cost $2,560. Engineering effort on major repairs to the east and west breakwaters cost $49,252. Costs related to the Diked Disposal Program were $14,941. 2. BARCELONA HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Erie about 17 miles southwesterly of Dunkirk, N.Y., and 29 miles northeasterly of Erie, Pa. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Previous projects. Adopted by July 4, 1936, River and Harbor Act. Only information available is in index to re port of Chief of Engineers under title "Portland Harbor, N.Y." Existing Project. For description of existing project see page 1506 of Annual Report for 1961. Actual costs for new work for completed project were $1,124,286. Non-Federal costs of $60,000 were incurred by local interests. Of this amount, $7,500 was a cash contribution and remainder was for providing necessary lands and construction of public wharf. Existing project was authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2nd sess.). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $7,500. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $8,190. Adjustment of FY81 dredging contract costs resulted in a credit of $4,342. In-house related engineering effort cost $7,239. 3. BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, N.Y. Location. Improvement is esentially that of upper 13.5 miles of Niagara River from its head at Lake Erie, Buffalo, N.Y., to and including Tonawanda Harbor, N.Y. It comprises improvements formerly designated by three titles; viz, Lake Erie entrance to Black Rock Harbor and Erie Basin, N.Y., Black Rock Harbor and Channel, N.Y., and Tonawanda Harbor and Niagara River, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14832.) Previous projects. For details see items 5 and 7, page 1970 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1612 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project and Federally owned Black Rock ship lock, see page 1548 of Annual Report for 1962. Improvement of guide pier at Black Rock lock, as authorized by 1935 act was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. Cost for completed portion of new work is $10,457,093. Enlarging of existing 21-foot turning basin and deepening lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda inner harbor from 16 to 21 feet, authorized by the 1954 act, was deauthorized by Congress in May 1981, and is excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost (1961) of this portion is $339,000. Non- Federal costs are estimated at $1,540,000 for costs incurred by New York State for construction of Erie Basin and protecting breakwater, and construction and extension of Bird Island pier, and by other local interests for relocation of utilities. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two facilities are along upstream end of channel. Below Black Rock lock and at Tonawanda Harbor there are 13 privately owned terminals. There are two State-owned barge canal terminals at Tonawanda, N.Y., and several marine service and supplydocks for recreational and other small craft. The Corps owns a wharf adjacent to Black Rock Lock which is private. Ten terminals have railroad connections and six mechanical- handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (Port Series No. 41, re- 32-2 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT vised 1971, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year: Operation and care (Black Rock Lock): Lock was in operation 280 days and closed for underwater cleaning and repairs from January 9 through April 4, 1982. Ordinary maintenance and repair of structures and grounds were accomplished throughout year by Government plant and hired labor. Total costs of $1,624,585 were distributed as follows: Operation and care: operation of lock, ordinary maintenance and repair $586,349; security service maintenance of grounds $47,801; miscellaneous inspection and condition surveys, project supervision, real estate, and support of Water Control Center $177,648; maintenance (structure repairs) by U.S. derrickboat Mc- Cauley at Bird Island Pier, fenderings, and lock gates cost $274,466. Clearing and snagging in project channels by Government plant and hired labor cost $46,503. Replacement of lock building windows and doors, by contract, cost $47,619. Widening of the east wall concrete walkway commenced, by contract, cost $603,156. Engineering in-house effort on installation of windows and doors at the lock, widening of concrete walkway on east wall, repairs to fenders on lockwall, and repairs to lock watering pumps cost $41,043. 4. BUFFALO HARBOR, N.Y. Location. At eastern end of Lake Erie, at head of Niagara River, 176 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14820 and 14833.) Previous projects. For details see page 1967 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1606 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing projects. For description see page 1368 of Annual Report for 1963. In addition, on 15 December 1980, OCE authorized the removal of bridge abutments of South Michigan Avenue Bridge. New work for completed project cost $18,837,601. Estimated non-Federal costs were $9,188,000 for deepening, widening, and improving Buffalo River and ship canal, constructing piers, retaining walls, and dikes and performing dockside dredging. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 45 wharves and piers of which 4 piers, owned by Niagara Frontier Port Authority, and 9 privately owned and operated facilities are on outer harbor and along sides of Lackawanna and Union ship canal, 4 are along banks of Buffalo ship canal, and 26 along Buffalo River. Coast Guard facilities are at mouth of Buffalo River along left bank. City of Buffalo owns a slip on right bank of Buffalo River just north of Michigan Avenue Bridge for mooring city fireboat. Thirty-four terminals have railroad connections and 29 mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 41, revised 1971, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Removal of South Michigan Avenue bridge abutment, by contract, was initiated in March 1981; however, the contractor was unable to complete the work and was terminated for default on August 16, 1982. Approximately 2500 cubic yards of the east pier and west abutment remains. Completion of the work will be done by U.S. derrickboat McCauley during October and November, 1982. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, conditions surveys by Government plant and hired labor, water control management, and real estate activities cost $260,279. Repairs to about 150 l.f. on the South and Old breakwaters by U.S. derrickboat McCauley cost $262,484. Repairs to pumpout units by U.S. derrickboat McCauley cost $2,072. Repairs to about 500 l.f. of the North breakwater, by contract, cost $672,054. Maintenance dredging of Buffalo River and Ship Canal, outer harbor, and entrance channel with disposal in Spoil Disposal Facility No. 4, was accomplished by U.S. hopper dredge Hoffman and 130,035 cubic yards bin measure of material were removed at a cost of $345,086. Removal of 165,860 cubic yards scow measure of shoaled material, by contract, cost $834,857. Snagging and clearing in project channels by Government plant and hired labor cost $1,325. Sediment sampling for heavy metals cost $1,996. Particle size and specific gravity tests, by coptract, were completed at a cost of $1,048. Feasibility study at the harbor, by contract, cost $6,627. In-house engineering costs for preparation of plans and specifications for dredging under Industry Capability Program (ICP) environmental testing and structure inspections were $64,794. 5. CAPE VINCENT HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of St. Lawrence River about 2.5 miles from Lake Ontario and 49 miles northerly from Oswego Harbor, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14800.) Previous projects. For details see page 1975 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1634 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project see page 1566 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual costs for completed portion of project were $275,082. Deepening remainder of 16-foot area of project as authorized by 1945 act, at estimated cost of $159,000 (1954) is classified deferred. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two privately owned terminals for fish and a United States fish hatchery are located along waterfront bordering project. A ferry to Wolfe Island, Ontario, uses wharf owned by village. A yacht club dock and several other privately owned servicing and storage docks are for recreational and other small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services by hired labor cost $4,456. Completion of repairs to concrete cap of the 1,381-foot breakwater, by contract, cost $83,285. In-house engineering effort cost $1,983. 32-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 6. CATTARAUGUS HARBOR, N.Y. Location. At mouth of Cattaraugus Creek on south shore of Lake Erie about 12 miles northeasterly from Dunkirk Harbor, N.Y. and 24 miles southwesterly from Buffalo Harbor, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Existing project. Provides for navigation, flood control and recreational breakwater fishing by constructing: (a) arrowhead breakwaters in Lake Erie at mouth of Cattaraugus Creek; (b) an entrance channel, 200 feet wide at lakeward end, 100 feet wide and eight feet deep from that depth in lake to a point 1,575 feet upstream; (c) a channel 100 feet wide, six feet deep an additional 3,425 feet upstream; and (d) development of recreational facilities at mouth for breakwater fishing. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $4,500,000 (Oct. 1981). Estimated non-Federal cost for new work is $2,520,000 (Oct. 1981) including cash contribution of $2,500,000 and the remainder for lands and damages. Existing project was authorized by 1968 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 97, 90th Cong., 1st sess.). Local cooperation. See page 32-5 of Annual Report for 1976 for details of requirements of local cooperation. Required cash contribution is presently estimated at $2,500,000. The State of New York executed local cooperation agreement in July 1981. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction was initiated in October 1981 and is 91 percent complete. The north and south breakwalls and approximately 75 percent of the concrete walkway were completed at a total cost of $3,217,467. Remaining work includes channel dredging and miscellaneous cleanup items. Final completion is expected in December 1982. 7. CLEVELAND HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Cuyahoga River, 176 miles westerly from Buffalo, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14839.) Previous projects. For details see page 1962, Annual Report for 1915, and page 1585, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project, as authorized thru the 1966 modification, see page 1269 of Annual Report for 1967. Further improvements were recommended by 1976 WRD Act which authorized preparation of Phase I design memorandum for proposed new work comprising of: (a) extension of lake approach and entrance channel at arrowhead entrance and deepening of those areas to 32 feet; (b) incremental removal, as required, of 500 feet of existing west breakwater spur and 400 feet of existing east breakwater spur to facilitate turning movements; (c) construction of a 1,200-foot rubblemound breakwater extension at east end of east breakwater; (d) deepening of fan shaped approach channel and a 1,000-foot wide entrance channel extending 2,900 feet into east basin, to a depth of 32 feet; (e) deepening of existing 500-foot wide east basin channel to 28 feet; (f) construction of a diked disposal area; and, (g) recreational facilities, for fishing on west breakwater, including pedestrian handrail, pedestrian bridge and public parking. Estimated total Federal cost of new work is $65,215,000 (Oct. 1981) of which $29,315,100 is for completed work and balance of $35,900,000 (Oct. 1981) is for new work proposed by 1976 WRD Act. Estimated non-Federal cost is $10,263,000 (Oct. 1981) of which $9,203,000 is actual cost for completed work and balance of $1,060,000 is required cash contribution for work authorized by 1976 WRD Act. Remaining work authorized by 1946 River and Harbor Act consisting of widening and deepening right bank of Cuyahoga River at downstream end of Cut 4 is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated Federal cost (1966) of this portion is $85,600 and non-Federal cost (1966) is $5,000,000. Remaining work authorized by 1958 R & H Act consisting of planning and replacement of bridges number 19 (E.L.R.R.) and 32 (B.&O.R.R.) and widening Cuyahoga and Old River channels and remaining work authorized by 1960 R&H Act consisting of deepening remainder of Cuyahoga River from bridge number 1 to and including Old River to a depth of 27 feet has been classified as deferred and is also excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated Federal cost (Oct. 1976) of this portion is $18,033,300 and estimated non-Federal cost (Oct. 1976) is $21,251,000. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. See page 32-5 of Annual Report for 1977 for details of requirements of local cooperation for work recommended by 1976 WRD Act. Assurances will be requested upon completion of Phase II General Design Memorandum. Terminal facilities. There are 72 piers and wharves. Eleven are owned by city of Cleveland, of which 7 are operated by the Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority. Fourteen are on outer harbor, 11 on banks of Old River and remaining 47 along deep-draft section of Cuyahoga River. Forty-seven terminals have railroad connections and 39 mechanical-handling facilities. The Corps owns a wharf at foot of East 9th Street. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 43, revised 1970, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preparation of Phase I General Design Memorandum, as authorized by 1976 WRD Act, was continued under the General Investigation Appropriation at a cost of $246,020. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $200,621. Repairs to approximately 500 1.f. of the east breakwater by U.S. derrickboats Tonawanda and Ohio cost $697,332. Maintenance of the Cuyahoga and Old Rivers to 23-foot depth, by contract, employing clanishell bucket dredge was accomplished and 474,023 cubic yards scow measure of shoaled material were removed. Total cost of contract dredging opera- 32-4 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT tion was $3,663,979. Expenditures of $28,156 was attributed to the permanent lay-up of the U.S. hopper dredge Lyman. Repairs to the pumpout facility by Government plant and hired labor cost $12,886. Odor control contract of the Diked Disposal facility cost $4,000. Monitoring water quality at diked disposal, by contract, cost $6,303. Particle size and specific gravity study at the harbor, by contract, cost $1,000. Sediment study consisting of bulk chemistry and elutriate testing, by contract, cost $60,615. Costs for Co-Operative Stream Gaging Program were $15,880. In-house engineering costs for preparation of plans and specifications on contract dredging, major repairs to east breakwater, environmental testing, and structure inspections were $99,403. Adjustment of costs in support of the Diked Disposal program resulted in a credit of $12,589. 8. CONNEAUT HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Conneaut River, 73 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14824.) Previous projects. For details see page 1964, Annual Report for 1915. Existing Project. For description see page 1274 of Annual Report for 1967. Actual costs for new work for completed portion of the project were $7,541,369. Entire project modification authorized by 1966 act providing for a recreational small boat harbor is classified as deferred. Estimated cost (1970) of this modification is $717,000. For completed work non-Federal costs were $200,000 for dockside dredging and removal of existing dolphins. Estimated non-Federal cost of $2,877,000 (1970) includes cash contribution of $717,000 and the remainder is for construction of service facilities for the 1966 project modification. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. See page 32-6 of Annual Report for 1971 for requirements of local cooperation for deferred project modification as authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1966. Terminal facilities. There are seven piers and wharves. Six are privately owned and operated and located in inner harbor. Remaining facility is city owned on the south side of outer harbor. Six terminals have railroad connections and four mechanical-handling facilities. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys were done by Government plant and hired labor at a cost of $40,221. Repairs to 312 l.f. of the west breakwater by U.S. derrickboat Tonawanda cost $330,735. Removal of 53,811 cubic yards of shoaled material, by contract, cost $191,510. Expenditure of $28,156 was attributed to the permanent lay-up of U.S. hopper dredge Lyman. Particle size and specific gravity analysis testing, by contract, was completed at a cost of $1,000. In-house related engineering effort cost $12,905. 9. DUNKIRK HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, 37 miles southwesterly from Buffalo, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Previous projects. For details see page 1966 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1604 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of completed portion of existing project see page 32-8 of Annual Report for 1976. For description of small boat harbor project as authorized under Section 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965, see page 32-8 of Annual Report for 1978. Actual costs for completed work are $3,010,024. Actual non-Federal costs are $1,961,000. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $6,889. In-house engineering costs were $1,744. 10. ERIE HARBOR, PA. Location. On southerly side of bay formed by Presque Isle Peninsula, on south shore of Lake Erie, 78 miles westerly from Buffalo, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14835.) Previous projects. F'or details see page 1965 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1600 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1363-64 of Annual Report for 1963. Entire project modification authorized by 1945 River and Harbor Act, providing for deepening channel and basin, both 23 feet deep, to Penn Central Company coal docks at westerly end of harbor, was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. Actual costs for new work for completed portion of project were $2,860,906. Extension of north pier portion as authorized by 1899 act was deauthorized in November 1981. Estimated cost (1955) of this portion is $1,071,000. A portion of work authorized by 1960 act, deepening strips adjacent to north and south piers, was deauthorized in August 1982. Estimated cost (July 1962) of this portion is $78,000. Non-Federal costs for completed work were $51,000 for providing ore dock and dredging slip adjacent thereto. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Sixteen piers and wharves, of 32-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 which 12 are privately owned and operated. Erie International Marine Terminal No. 1 owned by Port Commission, city of Erie, is along main waterfront on south side of Presque Isle Bay and Coast Guard facilities are on north side. Two off-shore oil docks are on Lake Erie. Eight terminals have railroad connections and six mechanical- handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $62,469. Expenditure of $24,855 was attributed to the permanent lay-up of U.S. hopper dredge Lyman. Environmental sediment testing at the harbor, by contract, cost $19,073. In-house engineering costs for design analysis and plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of North and South Piers were $80,875. 11. FAIRPORT HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Grand River, 33 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14837). Previous projects. For details see page 1963 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1590 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project as authorized thru the 1960 modification, see page 1526 of Annual Report for 1962 for description of small boat harbor as authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. Estimated total Federal cost of new work is $4,931,000 (Oct. 1980) of which $2,591,000 is actual cost for completed portion of project and the balance of $2,340,000 is for proposed work authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 FC Act. Entire project modification authorized by 1960 River and Harbor Act, providing for deepening lake approach channel, 800-foot wide channel through outer harbor and channel in Grand River, and enlargement of turning basin, is classified inactive and is excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost of this modification is $3,170,000 (1963). Estimated non-Federal cost is $4,991,000 of which $101,000 were for bulkheads and dockside dredging for completed portion of project and $2,560,000 which includes cash contribution of $2,330,000, is for work authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 FC Act. For the inactive 1960 project modification, estimated non-Federal cost of $3,821,000 (1963) is for lands, relocations, utility changes, dock dredging and dock and bulkhead modifications. See Table 32B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. See page 32-11 of 1976 Annual Report regarding assurances of local cooperation for work authorized by R&H Acts of 1927 and 1960 and page 32-11 of 1977 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation for work authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. Terminal facilities. Sixteen piers and wharves, all along banks of Grand River. One facility is owned by Coast Guard. Nine terminals have railroad connections and ten mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $42,446. Expenditure of $13,337 was attributed to the permanent lay-up of U.S. hopper dredge Lyman. U.S. Hopper dredges Hoffman and Markham removed 40,500 and 16,021 cubic yards bin measure, respectively, of shoaled material from about 48,000 square yards of lake approach channel and upper river channel to project depths of 29 and 28 feet at a combined cost of $330,130. Removal of 58,936 cubic yards place measure of shoaled material, by contract, cost $152,149. Biological and chemical testing of sediment, by contract, cost $6,943. In-house engineering effort cost $26,799. Bioassay contract and planning for Diked Disposal facility cost $33,045. 12. GENEVA-ON-THE-LAKE, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, about 17 miles east of Fairport Harbor, Ohio and 12 miles west of Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) Existing project. Small boat harbor project provides for: (a) breakwaters in Lake Erie aggregating about 1,050 feet in length; (b) entrance channel about 770 feet long, 100 feet in width, 8 feet deep; (c) inner channels, 100 feet wide totaling 1,680 feet in length and 6 feet deep; (d) a mooring area 0.9 acres in area with depths varying from 6 to 8 feet (e) development of recreational facilities, and (f) development of wetland mitigation features. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $2,920,000 (Oct. 1981). Non-Federal cost estimate of $2,830.000 (Oct. 1981) is cash contribution toward first cost of construction. Existing project was authorized under provision of Section 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965. (H.D. 402, 91st Cong. 2 sess.) Local cooperation. See page 32-11 of 1978 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation for work authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. By letters dated November 10, 1977, 15 April 1981, and September 10, 1982 the State of Ohio Department of Natural Resources, the responsible agency, has indicated its willingness and ability to furnish the assurances. Assurances of local cooperation will be requested upon approval of Design Memorandum, Phase II, and draft Local Cooperation Agreement. Terminal facilities. There are no commercial or recreational facilities at the harbor. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $18,595 under Construction, General appropriation. In FY82 preconstruction planning was changed to General Investigations appropriation. Expenditures for FY82 are reported in Section 50 of Report. 32-6 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT 13. GREAT SODUS BAY HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On Sodus Bay, which is a nearly landlocked indentation on south shore of Lake Ontario, 29 miles westerly from Oswego, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14814.) Previous projects. For details see page 1972 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1526 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description, see page 1380 of Annual Report for 1963. Improvements authorized by 1962 act, consisting of deepening lake approach channel, entrance channel and inner approach channel were deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. Actual costs of new work for completed portion of project were $249,187. Costs incuirred by local interests are not available. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $456. An environmental study, by contract, was completed at a cost of $183. 14. HURON HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Huron River, 47 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14843.) Previous project. For details, see page 1961 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1576 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1347 of Annual Report for 1963 and page 32-12 of Annual Report for 1978. Cost of completed portion of existing project was $4,834,006. Construction of detached breakwater as authorized by 1962 R&H act is deferred. Estimated cost of construction of breakwater is $12,970,000 (July 1972). Non-Federal costs of $163,000 were incurred by local interests in 1963 for dockside dredging of areas between Federal improvement and terminal facilities. See Table 32B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Six privately owned wharves and docks, one along left bank of Huron River and remainder along right bank. Four terminals have railroad connections and four mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are regarded as adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $45,010. Removal of the A-frame pumpout units from the pier by the U.S. derrickboats Ohio and Tonawanda cost $25,767. U.S. dredge Hoffman removed 135,174 cubic yards bin measure of shoaled material from about 80,000 square yards of the lake approach and entrance channels to project depths of 29 and 28 feet at a cost of $534,256. Adjustments to a FY81 dredging contract resulted in an additional charge of $18,769. Particle size and specific gravity analysis testing, by contract, was completed at a cost of $1,060. In-house engineering effort cost $8,564. 15. IRONDEQUOIT BAY, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, 4 miles east of Rochester, N.Y. at mouth of Irondequoit Creek, Monroe County, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14804 and 14815.) Existing project. Provides for: (a) entrance channel located at easterly end of bay, 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide, extending from 9-foot depth in Lake Ontario to junction with inner bay channels a distance of about 1350 feet; (b) inner channel, 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from entrance channel to deep water in bay, a distance of about 3,035 feet; (c) access channel, 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 500 feet in length from the inner bay channel to the site of a proposed State marina; (d) two stone rubblemound structures 1,350 feet and 750 feet in length at the natural entrance; and (e) recreational facilities of 0.63 acre parking area, two comfort stations, and hand railings on the breakwater and jetty. Estimated Federal cost presented in the Phase II General Design Memorandum for new work is $3 490,000 (April 1982). Estimated non-Federal cost for new work is $9,840,000 (April 1982) including cash contribution of $2,590,000 (April 1982) and remainder for lands, damages and highway bridge relocation. Existing project was authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc 332, 84th Cong. 2nd. sess.) Local cooperation. By letters dated June 13, 1980, December 24, 1981, and June 19, 1982, New York State Office of Parks and Recreation reaffirmed its intent to provide assurances of cooperation. Assurances will be requested upon approval of the local cooperation agreement. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private (locks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning for the project was continued at a cost of $113,752. 16. LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, N.Y. Location. Little Sodus Bay, on south shore of Lake Ontario, 15 miles west of Oswego, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14803.) Previous projects. For details see page 1973 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1628 of Annual Report for 32-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1378 of Annual Report for 1958. New work for completed project cost $69,066. Non-Federal costs of $6,000 were incurred for channel dredging. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $3,251. Completion of an environmental study, by contract, cost $209. In-house engineering costs were $543. 17. LORAIN HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Black River, 28 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14841.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1961 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1580 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1319-22 of Annual Report for 1966. Estimated Federal cost of new work is $26,246,000 (Oct. 1976). Deepening and widening remainder of Black River Channel at Cut 1 and construction of bank stabilization as authorized by 1960 act and modified by 1965 act is classified deferred. The estimated cost of $5,317,000 for this work is included in. the above estimate. A portion of work authorized by 1960 act, dredging of 15- to 25-foot wide strips adjacent to the U.S. East and West piers is also deferred and estimated cost of $60,200 (July 1966) is excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Total non-Federal cost estimate is $8,853,000 (Oct. 1976) including $3,000 contributed by local interests toward construction of west breakwater shorearm. For work authorized by 1960 act, including deferred portion, non-Federal costs are estimated to be $8,805,000 for lands, relocations of utilities, modifications of existing dock and bulkheads, construction of new bulkheads and dockside dredging. For work authorized by 1965 act, classified as deferred, local interests must make a cash contribution presently estimated at $45,000. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. For completed work, local interests contributed $3,000. Work authorized by 1960 act (and modified by 1965 act) is classified deferred. All other conditions fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 23 piers and wharves, of which three are on outer harbor and remainder are along banks of Black River. Two are owned by the city. Eight terminals have railroad connections and 15 mechanicalhandling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection surveys and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $82,138. Repairs to about 475 1.f. of the east breakwater by the U.S. derrickboat Ohio cost $506,372. Expenditure of $45,938 was attributed to the permanent layup of U.S. dredge Lyman. Removal of 96,504 cubic yards bin measure of shoaled material, by contract, cost $358,712. Costs for Co-Operative Stream Gaging Program were $4,880. An economic study of the harbor, by contract, was completed at a cost of $2,560. In-house engineering costs were $5,370. 18. OAK ORCHARD HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario at mouth of Oak Orchard Creek, 33 miles westerly of Rochester, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14805.) Previous project. For details see page 628 of Annual Report for 1905. Existing project. For description of completed existing project see page 32-14 of 1975 Annual Report. Actual Federal cost for completed project was $1,613,500. Estimated non-Federal cost is $270,000 (July 1971) including cash contribution of $170,700 and $54,002 for recreational facilities and remainder for lands and construction of wharf. Existing project was authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2nd sess.). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $224,702. Terminal facilities. There is no commercial navigation at Oak Orchard Harbor. Terminal facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection and condition surveys cost $2,024. In-house engineering costs were $566. 19. OGDENSBURG HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of St. Lawrence River, 62 miles by water from Lake Ontario. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14764.) Previous projects. For details see page 1975 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1635 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1568 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual cost for new work for completed portion of project was $375,086. Removal of hard material shoals from lower basin portion of project as authorized by 1935 act, at an estimated cost of $183,000 (1954) is classified inactive. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 7 terminals in harbor and 3 in Federal project area. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. 32-8 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $9,824. Feasibility study by contract cost $6,555. Environmental study by contract cost $11,989. In-house engineering costs were $2,005. 20. OLCOTT HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario at mouth of Eighteen Mile Creek about 18 miles east of mouth of Niagara River and 63 miles by water west of Rochester, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14806.) Previous project. For details see page 1971 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1621 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1555 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of new work for completed project was $1,500, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects, all of which was contributed by local interests. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $1,500. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $2,258. Environmental study, by contract, was completed at a cost of $12,747. In-house engineering costs were $861. 21. OSWEGO HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Oswego River, 59 miles easterly from Rochester, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14813.) Previous projects. For details see page 1973 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1630 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1383-84 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed portion of project cost $7,242,039 and non-Federal costs for completed work were $4,440,000 for lands, dockside dredging, construction of terminal, wharves and cargo handling facilities. Deepening a 200-foot wide strip along harbor line east of mouth of Oswego River, remaining feature of work authorized by the 1930 act, is classified as inactive. Deepening to 22 feet a 150-foot wide strip along harbor line in west outer harbor, remaining feature of work authorized by 1940 act, was deauthorized in May 1981. Estimated Federal costs for this work are $246,000 (July 1957) and $2,419,000 (July 1966) respectively, and estimated non-Federal costs are $500,000 (July 1966) for dockside dredging for work authorized by 1940 act. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Seven piers and wharves in harbor and along river channel. In addition, Port of Oswego Authority owns two public terminals, one of which is west of river and includes a grain elevator and warehouse for miscellaneous freight. Other terminal is east of river and used for handling aluminum and general cargo. State of New York owns a river terminal used for mooring vessels. City of Oswego owns one dock and shore facilities for recreational craft. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $29,490. Repairs to about 1,185 l.f. of west arrowhead breakwater by U.S. derrickboat McCauley cost $441,175. Removal of 35,789 cubic yards bin measure of shoaled material, by contract, cost $147,769. In-house engineering effort cost $14,341. Reduced requirements in a bioassay contract for the Diked Disposal program resulted in a credit of $7,661. 22. PORT CLINTON HARBOR, OHIO Location. Cojiprises lower half-mile of Portage River. River empties into Lake Erie 72 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See Great Lakes Chart 14820). Existing project. Provides for parallel jetties at river mouth and a channel in Lake Erie and Portage River with a project depth of 10 feet. For additional details see page 1899 of Annual Report for 1951. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There is one public fish dock, one private sand dock, one private fuel, lumber and coal dock, and five additional private docks. A dock at foot of Madison Avenue is owned by. village of Port Clinton and open to the public. A shipyard builds small boats. Terminal facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Miscellaneous inspection services and hired labor cost $1,330. Stone purchase for minor structure repair cost $1400. Contract for repairs to east pier was.awarded. In-house engineering effort on repairs to the east and west jetties cost $24,051. 23. PORT ONTARIO HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On southeasterly end of Lake Ontario, 19 miles northeasterly of Oswego, N.Y., and 32 miles southerly of Sackets Harbor, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14803.) Previous projects. Adopted by the River and Harbor Act July 4, 1836. Only information available is in the index to the report of the Chief of Engineers. Existing project. Existing project, as modified by Phase I General Design Memorandum, provides for: (a) 32-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 two shore connected rubblemound breakwaters in Lake Ontario at mouth of Salmon River, south breakwater about 1,450 feet long and north breakwater about 350 feet long; (b) entrance channel between breakwaters, 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep, from deep water in lake to a limit about 1,200 feet from 8-foot depth contour in lake; (c) river channel 85 feet wide and 6 feet deep from inner limit of entrance channel for a distance upstream of about 450 feet. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $5,220,000 (Jul. 1981). Estimated non-Federal cost for new work is $501,300 (Jul. 1981) including cash contribution of $211,300. Existing project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945 (H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess.). Local cooperation. See page 32-16 of Annual Report for 1976 for details of requirements of local cooperation. Assurances will be requested upon approval of Phase II Design Memorandum. Terminal facilities. There is no commercial navigation at Port Ontario Harbor. Terminal facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $161. 24. ROCHESTER HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Genesee River, 59 miles westerly from Oswego, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14815.) Previous project. For details see page 1471 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1623 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1556 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual cost for new work for completed project is $21,191,514. Non-Federal costs are estimated at $2,260,000, all for 1960 act, for lands, relocation of submarine cable crossing, relocations of small docks and boathouses, dockside dredging, structure modifications,and replacement of Baltimore & Ohio coal loader. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Complied with except provision for replacement of coal loading facility as required by River and Harbor Act of July 14, 1960. Terminal facilities. One terminal facility at mouth of Genesee River has been leased to the Great Lakes Division of Pittston Stevedoring Corp. Facilities also consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $42,900. Snagging and clearing in project channels by Government plant and hired labor cost $9,430. Expenditure of $41,493 was attributed to the permanent lay-up of U.S. hopper dredge Lyman. Removal of 142,431 cubic yards place measure of shoaled material, by contract, cost $473,438. In-house engineering effort cost $31,616. 25. ROCKY RIVER HARBOR, OHIO Location. At mouth of Rocky River which empties into Lake Erie 7 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See Lake Survey Chart 14826). Existing project. For description see page 1329 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost for completed project was $343,494 and non-Federal cost was a cash contribution of $249,346. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $249,346 for new work. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately-owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and project condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $7,943. Completion of an environmental study, by contract, cost $8,558. Adjustment of FY81 dredging costs resulted in a credit of $3,917. 26. SACKETS HARBOR, NEW YORK Location. On south shore of Black River Bay at easterly end of Lake Ontario, about 41 miles northerly of Oswego, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14802.) Previous project. For details see page 3160 of Annual Report for 1896 and page 2809 of Annual Report for 1898. Existing project. For description see page 2456 of Annual Report for 1948. Actual cost for new work for completed portion of project was $19,010. Deepening of the harbor area to project dimensions as authorized by 1945 act, was deauthorized by Congress in May 1981. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. See page 2457 of 1948 Annual Report for details. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and in-house hired labor cost $951. 27. SANDUSKY HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, in southeasterly portion of Sandusky Bay, 50 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14845.) Previous projects. For details see page 1960 of Annual 32-10 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT Report for 1915, and page 1574 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1511-12 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual costs for new work for completed project were $6,250,121, excluding $325,000 contributed .by local interests. Non-Federal costs for completed project are estimated at $675,000 including $325,000 cash contribution and remainder of $350,000 is for dockside dredging adjacent to deepened channels authorized by 1960 act. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $325,000 for new work. Terminal facilities. Fourteen piers and wharves, three at west end of harbor and remainder along dock channel. One is a base for State-owned fish research and patrol boats. One publicly owned and six privately owned are used for mooring fishing boats and recreational craft and for ferry service. Five terminals have railroad connections and five mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $43,516. Repairs to about 1040 linear feet of east jetty rubblemound construction by U.S. derrick boat Tonawanda cost $277,712. U.S. hopper dredge Markham removed 141,892 cubic yards bin measure of shoaled material from about 100,000 square yards of lake approach, Moseley Channel, Dock and Bay Channels to project depths of 26, 22 and 25 feet, at a cost of $376,105. Adjustment to the prior year dredging contract resulted in a credit of $205,181. Particle size and specific gravity testing was completed at the harbor, by contract, at a cost of $1,000. Costs for Co-Operative Stream Gaging Program were $4,110. In-house engineering effort cost $19,922. Minor in-house hired labor effort for the Diked Disposal facility cost $1,001. 28. TOLEDO HARBOR, OHIO Location. Comprises lower 7 miles of Maumee River and channel through Maumee Bay to Lake Erie. Maumee River has its source in northern Indiana and empties into Lake Erie. Harbor is at westerly end of Lake Erie, 99 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847.) Previous projects. For details see page 1959 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1565 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project see pages 32-18 and -19 of Annual Report for 1978. Cost of completed existing project was $15,567,147. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Maumee River through city of Toledo has been developed extensively for deep-draft navigation. Detailed information on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series No. 44 (revised 1972) prepared and published as Part 2, by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Information on port administration and Federal services, port and terminal services and charges, and steamship services is prepared and published as Part I by the Port Development Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, support of Water Control Center, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $158,490. U.S. hopper dredge Markham performed maintenance dredging removing 899,937 cubic yards of shoaled material; U.S. hopper dredge Lyman removed 171,927 cubic yards bin measure of shoaled material at a combined cost of $2,865,463. Expenditures of $180,944 was attributed to the permanent lay-up of U.S. hopper dredge Lyman. Removal of 310,000 cubic yards of shoaled material place measure, by contract, cost $707,941. Repairs to Diked Disposal facility, by contract, cost $21,504. Repairs to mooring dolphins, by contract, cost $122,000. Sediment sampling for heavy metals cost $1,996. Particle size and specific gravity analysis, by contract, cost $1,000. In-house engineering effort cost $41,854. Minor engineering and design for Diked Disposal facility cost $354. 29. VERMILION HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Vermilion River, 37 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (see NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) Existing project. For description of existing project see pages 32-17 and 32-18 of Annual Report for 1975. Actual Federal cost for the completed existing project was $1,156,118. Estimated non-Federal cost for new work is $754,679 including cash contribution of $740,679 and remainder for relocation of submarine cable and construction of public wharf. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $740,679. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $4,765. Study of the adverse effects of the completed project was completed at a cost of $35,764. An environmental study, by contract, cost $9,152. In-house engineering costs were $2,244. 30. WEST HARBOR, OHIO Location. On southwest shore of Lake Erie, 13 miles 32-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 northeast of Port Clinton, Ohio (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847.) Existing Project. Existing project, as modified by Phase I General Design Memorandum, provides for two arrowhead breakwaters with an aggregate length of approximately 2,925 feet; entrance channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide to mouth of natural entrance and thence 80 feet wide to a depth of 8 feet; and access channel 3,980 feet in length, 80 feet wide and 8 feet deep from inner entrance to "Y" near center of harbor where channel divides northerly about 2,733 feet and southerly about 4,295 feet. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $3,150,000 (Oct. 1980). Estimated non-Federal cost is $4,330,000 (Oct. 1980), including cash contribution of $3,570,000. Existing project was authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 245, 88th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. See page 32-20 of 1978 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation. By letter dated January 31, 1978, State of Ohio has stated its intent to furnish assurances of local cooperation, and executed LCA was received on 9 March 1981. Terminal facilities. Commerce at the harbor presently consists of recreational boating and affiliated activities. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction, initiated on 1 June 1981, was continued at a cost of $1,838,914, plus $2,402,908 contributed funds. Construction is approximately 98 percent complete. Work remaining includes the navigation markers and grading and seeding of the disposal sites. 31. WILSON HARBOR, N.Y. Location. At mouth of east branch of Twelve Mile Creek, which enters Lake Ontario 12 miles easterly of mouth of Niagara River, and 67 miles westerly of Rochester Harbor, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14806). Previous project. For details see page 2395 of Annual Report for 1889, and page 628 of Annual Report for 1905. Existing project. For description see page 32-18 of Annual Report for 1975. Actual Federal cost for the completed existing project was $477,904. Estimated non- Federal costs are $774,000 which includes costs of $16,000 for previously completed work. Remainder of non-Federal costs are for work required for 1968 R & H Act including cash contribution of $166,988. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operation and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $287. Environmental study, by contract, cost $11,756. 32. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Survey was conducted at Niagara River, N.Y., at a cost of $1,498. 33. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 32-C. 34. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION See Table 32-D. Beach Erosion Control 35. LAKEVIEW PARK, LORAIN, OHIO Location. In the City of Lorain, Lorain County, Ohio, on south shore of Lake Erie between 1,500 and 3,000 feet west of Lorain Harbor west breakwater. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14841.) Existing project. For description of existing project see page 32-19 of Annual Report for 1977. The Federal cost of the completed project was $1,360,986 and estimated non-Federal cost (Oct. 1976) was $50,000 for relocation. In addition, local interests contributed $583,280. Annual cost of 5-year program for beach replenishment and monitoring was approximately $75,000. Existing project authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act (H.Doc. 224, 83rd Cong. 1st sess.). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work. Five year monitoring program which was initiated in 1978 was continued at a cost of $35,000. Cooperative beach nourishment was conducted in FY 80 and FY 81, during which time a total of 9,000 cubic yards of sand has been placed within the project limits. The Federal cost for nourishment has totalled approximately $73,000 and costs to local interests totalled approximately $30,000, annually. 36. PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, ERIE, PA. Location. At Erie, Pa., on south shore of Lake Erie, 78 miles southwest of Buffalo, N.Y. and 102 miles eastnortheast of Cleveland, Ohio, (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14824 and 14835.) Existing project. For description of completed portion of existing project see page 1393 of Annual Report for 1963. The Water Resources Development (WRD) Act of March 7, 1974, reinstated and extended authorization for beach erosion control project, as provided in 1960 R&H Act, for a period of five years from date of enact- 32-12 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT ment of 1974 WRD Act, or if the review study of such project is not completed prior to end of such period, until such study is completed and a report thereon submitted to Congress. The 1976 Water Resources Development Act provides for continued annual nourishment by stating: "At expiration of authorization provided in Section 57 of Water Resources Development Act of 1974, the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, may provide periodic beach nourishment in accordance with cost sharing provisions of Section 103(a) (2) of Act of October 23, 1962." The act also authorized preparation of a Phase I General Design Memorandum. The Final Phase I General Design Memorandum was completed in August 1981 and the recommended plan provides for construction of 58 offshore rubblemound breakwater segments, beach restoration by placement of sand fill, and annual beach replenishment for shore protection. Estimated Federal cost (Oct. 1982) is $30,946,000 which includes $2,146,000 for completed work authorized by the 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and $6,400,000 for completed work authorized by the 1974 and 1976 WRD Acts. Estimated non-Federal cost (Oct. 1982) is $16,723,000 which includes $2,483,000 for completed work authorized by 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and $2,742,000 for completed work authorized by the 1974 and 1976 WRD Acts. See Table 32-b for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed project as authorized by 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRD Act. An agreement between the United States of America and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, acting through the Department of Environmental Resources, was entered into on February 21, 1979 for the annual nourishment which was extended by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. The plan recommended in the Final Phase I General Design Memorandum is contingent upon local sponsor, namely the Department of Environmental Resources of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, agreeing in writing to provide without cost to United States all lands, easements and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow andspoil disposal areas for excavated material as determined by the Chief of Engineers necessary for construction of project; provide a cash contribution equal to appropriate percentage of final construction cost exclusive of lands, easements, and rights-of-way, the percentage to be in accordance with existing law based on shore ownership and use existing at time of construction, and the President's proposed cost-sharing policy, which contribution is presently estimated at $9,300,000 or 35 percent; pay 30 percent of annual beach replenishment costs for the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction works, except for damages due to fault or negligence of Government or its contractors; maintain and operate all the works, including breakwaters and periodic sand replenishment and redistribution as needed, after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; assure continued public ownership and continued public use, without cost to United States, of appropriate access and facilities including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of public benefits upon which Federal participation is based, and administer and maintain beach for continued public use during life of project; control water pollution to extent necessary to safeguard health of bathers; and, comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646 approved 2 January 1971) in acquiring land, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and inform affected persons of pertinent benefits, policies, and procedures-in connection with said Act. Formal assurances of local cooperation will be requested and executed prior to initiation of construction of improvements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Beach replenishment as authorized by 1974 WRD Act and extended by the 1976 WRD Act was continued as a total cost of $1,428,571. For its share of cost of improvement, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania contributed $428,571 for a cumulative total contribution of $2,741,514. The Final Phase I General Design Memorandum was submitted to the Secretary of the Army in October 1981 for his review and transmittal to Congress. A hydraulic model study of the plan recommended in the Phase I General Design Memo was completed. 37. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 32-E. Beach Erosion Work under Special Authorization 38. LAKESHORE PARK ASHTABULA, OHIO Location. Lakeshore Park is located in Ashtabula, Ashtabula County, Ohio, about 40 miles southwest of Erie, Pennsylvania, and about 50 miles northeast of Cleveland, Ohio. Existing project. The project, authorized by Chief of Engineers on April 26, 1982 under Section 103(a) of the River and Harbor Act of 1962, as amended, provides for the construction of 3 offshore detached breakwaters, restoration of an 800-foot long recreational beach and an access road to the beach to facilitate the initial placement of the beachfill and subsequent periodic nourishment as necessary. The breakwaters, each 125 feet long with 200-foot gaps between them, will be of rubblemound construction and located approximately 150 feet offshore of the restored beach. These breakwaters will protect 37,000 cubic yards of clean sandfill called for to restore the 800-foot long beach fronting the clay bluff. Total construction cost is estimated at $1.3 million, of which 70 percent is Federal cost and 30 percent required non-Federal or local cash contribution. Local cooperation. Among other requirements, local interests provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way and relocations required for construction, includihng peri- 32-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 odic nourishment. The locals will carry out the periodic beach nourishment program for the 50-year life of the project with the only cost to the United States being the said reimbursement to the town of 70 percent of the town expenditure thereof, subject to availability of funds and the 1.0 million total Federal expenditure limitation under Section 103 authority, whichever occurs first. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: The Final Detailed Project Report and plans and specifications were completed in May 1982. Construction started late in July 1982. Three offshore detached breakwater sections were begun, bank was graded to reduce bluff slope, and access road was cut for bringing in the sand. Total cost of project to date is $585,947. Flood Control 39. CAYUGA CREEK, CHEEKTOWAGA, N.Y. Location. Project area of Cayuga Creek is located in vicinity of Union Road and William Street in town of Cheektowaga, N.Y. Existing project. Provides for (a) concrete tee on right bank beginning at Union Road bridge and extending about 700 feet upstream, two feet of freeboard above 100-year flood stage, (b) about 600 feet of earth levee and 250 feet of concrete wall, with freeboard of three feet for levee and two feet for wall and an additional amount added for velocity head, (c) riprap on left bank beginning at Union Road Bridge and extending 850 feet upstream; on right bank from 700 feet to 850 feet above bridge, and 400 square yards in vicinity of junction of the floodwall along the creek and the transverse levee, (d) removal of earth to bedrock to place tee wall and excavation for bank erosion protection and channel work. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $1,240,000 (Aug. 1981). Project authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Local cooperation. See page 32-16 of FY82 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation. On Setember 3, 1980, the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation signed the formal cooperation agreement. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction operations began in November 1981 and were approximately 83 percent comnplete by the end of FY 1982. Completion of the entire project is expected by December 1982. Total costs for FY 1982 are $1,233,558. 40. CUYAHOGA RIVER BASIN, OHIO Location. The project is located in northeastern Ohio, in Cuyahoga and Summit Counties, in the Cuyahoga River watershed. (See Geological Survey Map of Cleveland- South.) Existing project. Big Creek flood control improvement project, as developed in reformulation studies, Phase II General Design Memorandum, provides for: (a) relocation of approximately 4,950 linear feet of Baltimore and Ohio railroad mainline and 1,290 linear feet of spurline, construction of embankment for new track and construction of two new railroad bridges, (b) floodway channel, 2,700 feet long from existing channel in Brookside Park to existing channel, upstream from West 25th Street Bridge, including spillway, staged channel and associated work, (c) diversion channel extending 1,000 feet from existing channel, about 140 feet upstream from West 25th Street Bridge to existing channel approximately 300 feet from Protector Products, including two open channel segments, and, (d) modifications to existing channel. Estimated cost (Oct. 1982) for ne'w work is Federal $23,000,000 and non-Federal $1,080,000 for lands, damages and relocations. Existing project was authorized by Section 108 of 1970 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. See page 32-17 of 1981 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation. These items were adopted and agreed to by the Cleveland Metro Park System on January 20, 1982. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $81,750. 41. DANSVILLE AND VICINITY, CANASERAGA CREEK, N.Y. Location. In towns of North Dansville and West Sparta, Livingston County, New York ('See Geological Survey Map Dansville, N.Y. 1942.) Existing project. Flood control improvements as proposed, Phase II General Design Memorandum, provide for: (a) two levees, 2 feet high and 215 feet long and 4 feet high and 290 feet long respectively, extending from each side of Sewage Plant Road to southbound ramps of the Genesee Expressway. (b) steel sheet pile and concrete floodwall, 405 feet in length, along right bank between Route 36 bridge and north bridge abutment of Genesee Expressway, (c) steel sheet pile floodwall, 285 feet in length and concrete bank stabilization to provide protection along rightbank between Route 36 bridge and Hartman Road, and (d) removal of Hartman Road bridge and construction of two gravity walls, 14 to 19. feet in height, to provide protection and to replace the existing deteriorated bridge abutments. Federal cost for new work is $1,070,000 (October 1982). Non-Federal cost estimate of $33,000 (October 1982) is for lands. Existing project was authorized by Sec. 203 of 1948 Flood Control Act (H.D. 206, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.). Local cooperation. See page 32-17 of 1981 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation. Formal assurances of local cooperation will be requested prior to completion of final plans and specifications. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preliminary plans and specifications were completed at a cost of $13,355 and approved subject to minor comments by higher authority. 32-14 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT 42. ELLICOTT CREEK, N.Y. Location. The proposed channel improvement is located on the downstream portion of Ellicott Creek in the towns of Amherst and Tonawanda, Erie County. (See Geological Survey maps of Tonawanda East and Buffalo Northeast, N.Y.) Existing project. For detailed description of the original project as authorized by Section 201 of the 1970 Flood Control Act, see page 32-24 of Annual Report for 1973. The basic authorization, as modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 provides authority to undertake flood control measures to alleviate flooding that is compatible with authorized project and any alternatives currently under restudy pursuant to Flood Control Act of 1970. As a result of restudy of alternatives, the project provides for: (a) widening, straightening and deepening about 2.1 miles of existing creek channel including the existing by-pass channel in Ellicott Creek Park; (b) construction of a diversion channel about 5,850 feet long between Maple Road and Millersport Highway; (c) construction of a diversion channel about 1,950 feet long through Pfohl Park; (d) construction of a diversion channel about 9,150 feet long from Niagara Falls Boulevard upstream to about Pfohl Park; (e) construction of 2 highway bridges; (f) modification of culverts at Tonawanda Creek Road; (g) foundation protection of 1 highway bridge; (h) modification of utilities and drainage outlets; and, (i) recreation facilities consisting of a bike and hike path about 5.4 miles long, with open space park areas. The estimated Federal cost of existing project, as reported in the completed Final Design Memorandua, is $19,800,000 (June 1982). The estimated non-Federal cost is $8,300,000 (June 1982) which includes a cash contribution of $300,000 (June 1982). Completion of preconstruction planning and construction was authorized December 29, 1981, under Section 5, P.L. 97-128. Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation see page 32-22 of Annual Report for 1976. On October 25, 1976, the New York State Department of Conservation furnished a letter of intent to cooperate toward construction of project. Formal assurances will be requested upon completion of Phase II Design Memorandum. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $116,912. 43. MT. MORRIS LAKE, N.Y., GENESEE RIVER Location. Dam is on Genesee River 66.9 miles above river mouth and about 32 miles southwesterly of Rochester, N.Y. Reservoir is in Livingston and Wyoming Counties, N.Y. (See Geological Survey maps of Nunda and Portage, N.Y.) Existing project. For description of existing project as authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act see page 1575 of Annual Report for 1962. New work for completed project cost $23,365,559. In addition $5,000 contributed funds expended for new work. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests contributed $5,000 for new work. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance: Operation and ordinary maintenance of dam, reservoir, and service facilities, condition and operation studies and miscellaneous reports were accomplished by hired labor for $331,058. Debris removal accomplished by contract, cost $150,454. Installation of log boom to collect debris, by contract, cost $150,254. Co-Operative Stream Gaging Program accomplished by U.S. Geological Survey and National Weather Service reporting and hydroclimatic networks cost $43,900. Operation of the Water Control Center cost $175,995. Engineering and design costs of $67,778 were incurred for the preparation of specifications for debris removal, log boom installation, annual facility inspection, electrical maintenance repairs, dam safety study and monitoring of seismic instruments. 44. POINT PLACE, TOLEDO, OHIO Location. Point Place is located on a peninsula in northeast portion of city of Toledo, Ohio. Its shores are bounded on the east by Maumee Bay of Lake Erie and on the west by Ottawa River. The peninsula extends in a northeasterly direction immediately north of mouth of Maumee River. Existing project. Existing project, as recommended in Phase II General Design Memorandum, provides for: (a) combination of protective structures consisting of 4,400 feet of steel sheet pile wall and 13,700 feet of levee; (b) three new pumping stations and 3,800 feet of new storm sewer facilities; and, (c) facilities for fishing and related recreational activities. Estimated costs (Oct. 1982) are $8,900,000 Federal and $3,990,000 non-Federal including a cash contribution of $2,240,000. Existing project was authorized by 1972 Flood Control Act (H.D. 363, 92nd Cong., 2d sess.) Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation see pages 32-24 and -25 of Annual Report for 1978. The Local Cooperation Agreement was executed by city of Toledo on January 27, 1982. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Worki Preconstruction planning was completed, and contract operations were initiated in July 1982, for a total cost of $587,705. Phase I for rehabilitation of .1800 l.f. existing stone dike on Maumee Bay was completed in September 1982. Phase IA for rehabilitation of 980 l.f. of existing stone dike was awarded in September 1982. 32-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 45. RENO BEACH-HOWARD FARMS AREA, OHIO Location. Area is located in Lucas County, on the south shore of Lake Erie about 15 miles east of Toledo, Ohio. Existing project. The project, as authorized, provides for construction of 8,200 feet of roadway seawall, consisting of an earth dike, faced on the lakeward side with a quarry-run stone fill; and a steel sheet pile floodwall connecting the easterly end of this seawall at Wards Canal to the existing inland dike paralleling the canal. Estimated Federal cost for new work consisting of one alternative for making a permanent project of the "Operation Foresight" work which was completed in 1973, is $6,590,000 (February 1982). Non-Federal cost estimate of $2,197,000 (February 1982) is a cash contribution toward first cost of construction and the value of all lands, easements, and rights-of-way. Project was authorized under provision of Flood Control Act of 1948. (H.D. 554, 80th Congress, 2nd Sess.). Local cooperation. Responsible local interests, prior to construction must furnish assurances satisfactory to Secretary of the Army that they will: Provide a cash contribution in the amount of 25 percent of the construction cost presently estimated to be $670,000. Provide without cost to the United States all land, easements, rights-of-way, and borrow areas necessary for construction of the project presently estimated to be $1,527,000. Make all necessary bridge alterations and provide access to all public bathing beaches at their own expense. Hold and save the United States free from all claims incident to construction and operation of the project except from damages due to the fault of the Government or its Contractors. Maintain the entire protective works after completion including the existing jetties on the east side of Cooley Creek and on the west side of Wards Canal, the bathing beaches, and their protective structures, and a sufficient outlet channel in Wards Canal to carry the free flow into Lake Erie at all times all in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Construction shall not be commenced until the non-Federal interest has entered into a Swritten agreement to furnish such cooperation as may be required by the particular project authorization, by the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-646), or by other law, and such agreement has been approved. Provisions of Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-611) requiring a legally enforceable contract regarding local assurances are applicable. A Local Cooperation Agreement will be requested upon approval of the Phase II General Design Memorandum. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $5,488, under Construction, General appropriation. In FY82, preconstruction planning was changed to General Investigations appropriation. Expenditures under GI are reported in Section 50 of report. 46. SCAJAQUADA CREEK, N.Y. Location. Scajaquada Creek is a small stream draining to the Black Rock Canal and thence to Niagara River at Buffalo, New York. It flows from east to west and its drainage area is all in Erie County. About 65 percent of the watershed is upstream from the city of Buffalo, mostly in the towns of Cheektowaga and Lancaster, and the village of Depew. (See Geological Survey Maps of Buffalo-Northeast, N.Y. and Lancaster, N.Y.) Existing project. For description of existing project see page 32-23 of Annual Report for 1977. Estimated costs (Oct. 1980) are $5,065,000 Federal and $4,060,000 non-Federal. Existing project was authorized by Section 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contract operations for Stage II, initiated in April 1979, were completed in January 1981 at a cost of $3,082,800. Additional work required to stabilize embankment slopes and reseed certain areas was completed in October 1981 at a cost of $231,000. The project was turned over to the local sponsor in November 1981 for continiuance of operation and maintenance. 47. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed flood control works for compliance with Federal requirements were made during the period at a cost of $116,200. Total cost to Sept. 30, 1982 was $295,172. 48. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 32-F. 49. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION See Table 32-G. 50. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS See Table 32-H. 32-16 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT 51. SURVEYS During FY 1982, costs of $2,571,249 were incurred as shown below: Navigation Studies ...................... 1,033,804 Flood Damage Prevention Studies .......... .626,265 Shoreline Protection Studies ............... .$60,052 Special Studies........................... $348,239 Coordination Studies ...................... $3,263 Phase I GDM Studies ................... .$262,097 Advance Engineering and Design ........... $237,529 52. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the period, costs of $13,032 were incurred in connection with International Water Studies under the General Investigations appropriation and $105,832 incurred under the Operation and Maintenance appropriation for total costs of $118,864. Flood plain management services were performed during the year at a cost of $157,966. During the year, flood hazard evaluation studies were continued for'the Seneca Nation of Indians, NY, and Town of Batavia and Ellicott Creek, Alden, NY. 53. HYDROLOGIC STUDIES Hydrologic studies to provide drainage area information for streams in that portion of New York State under jurisdiction of the Buffalo District were accomplished by U.S. Geological Survey at a cost of $6,000. 32-17 TABLE 32-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 1. Ashtabula Rarbor, New Work Ohio Approp. - - - - 12,805,339' 2. Barcelona Harbor, N.Y. 3. Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, N.Y. 4. Buffalo Harbor, N.Y. 5. Cape Vincent Harbor, N.Y. 6. Cattaraugus Harbor, N.Y. (Contrib. Funds) 7. Cleveland Harbor Ohio 8. Conneaut Harbor, Ohio 9. Dunkirk Harbor, N.Y. (Federal Funds) 7,550 340,000 276,978 20,276 17,884 685,000 780,000 744,154 780,753 - 3,665,000 - 3,663,962 10,857 20,432 Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 1,247,613 1,247,363 35,000 31,170 55,000 46,713 150,000 64,878 17,051,000 17,208,896 3,000,000 1,042,579 144,000 130,221 650,000 210,986 934,500 938,245 1,005,000 75,088 305,506 292,147 1,170,000 990,594 1,370,000 1,356,667 380,000 1,287,156 37,000 382,500 45,082 208,323 - 450,000 84,854 5,788,000 6,054,122 5,450,000 7,397,311 215,000 185,800 800,000 1,236,918 268 3,643,182 4,201,154 1,380,000 1,363,651 474,400 511,609 -19,400 -16,483 112,000 -34,614 2,512,000 2,357,273 12,805,339' 7,794,666 7,643,311 6,177,000 6,021,235 - 1,185,8532 - 1,185,8532 -3,239 362,166 11,087 362,166 - 10,515,120* -- 10,515,120' 1,408,000 25,874,348' 1,624,585 25,850,2674 - 23,115,187' - 23,115,187' 00 45,816,800' 22 45,213,524' - 295,457 - 295,457 - 275,082 - 275,082 00 1,562,206 24 1,561,565 3,050,000 4,049,500 3,217,467 4,041,851 - 450,000 - 31,653,299' - 31,653,299' 5,067,801 122,712,860' 4,777,586 122,389,990' - 10,294,903 16,967 10,285,331 - 8,346,641' - 8,346,641' 630,000 6,352,40210 604,527 6,320,93810 - 651,850 - 651,850 - 3,010,02411 - 3,010,02411 32-18 3,042,0 2,452,6 55,0 89,7 1,105,000 843,0000 1,128,477 803,060 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 32-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Total Cost to Text Project (Contrib. Funds) 10. Erie Harbor, Pa. 11. Fairport Harbor, Ohio 12. Geneva-on-the Lake, Ohio 13. Great Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y. 14. Huron Harbor, Ohio (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 15. Irondequoit Bay N.Y. 16. Little Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y. 17. Lorain Harbor, Ohio Funding Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 13,362 5,265 950,000 1,110,000 1,267,462 922,268 896,751 162,000 133,148 5,122 2,395 210,000 910,718 643,000 481,091 57,298 100,000 86,522 35,114 35,066 164 578,000 566,583 25,055 31,473 1,000,000 1,499,407 135,000 175,382 425,000 448,004 140,000 149,800 2,000 4,517 1,038 433,000 557,976 110,000 111,633 -5,000 625 -30 439,000 453,703 5,439 8,633 190,000 187,272 580,000 604,849 18,595 20,000 18,485 450,593 256,000 253,772 445,000 407,162 210,000 235,727 23,000 22,786 509,000 546,850 125,000 137,817 18,000 15,469 -27,000 -22,990 525,000 519,884 660,000 633,426 125,000 113,752 4,004 59 1,004,000 1,005,970 1,427,941 1,427,941 1,950,000 1,950,00012 3,597,87313 3,597,87313 11,848,81914 11,839,49914 1,154 1,154 2,959,61115 2,959,61115 10,642,203 10,625,941 662,000 662,000 610,959'1 610,959'1 2,352,127 2,352,127 713,544 713,544 5,103,7951' 5,103,7951' 12,267,403 12,238,472 247,030 247,030 63,079 63,079 865,000 852,132 301,394'" 301,3941' 3,031,051 3,031,009 742,822 742,822 20,739,55819 20,739,558 18,388,429 18,385,250 184 639 32-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 32-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 18. Oak Orchard New Work Harbor, N.Y. Approp. - - - - 1,586,996" 19. Ogdensburg Harbor, N.Y. 20. Olcott Harbor, N.Y. 21. Oswego Harbor, N.Y. 22. Port Clinton, Ohio 23. Port Ontario Harbor, N.Y. 24. Rochester Harbor, N.Y. 25. Rocky River Ohio 26. Sackets Harbor, N.Y. 27. Sandusky Harbor, Ohio Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 12,237 17,058 9,195 11,212 6,764 70,000 70,396 4,822 4,822 90,000 76,984 580,000 576,366 7,564 7,564 1,000 784,123 766,953 3,936 3,889 8,010 2,667 11,463 12,623 32,000 31,621 5,227 5,227 205,000 232,959 1,070,000 575,062 25,000 22,128 7,000 2,955 521,700 416,883 7,897 10,998 45,007 34,913 17,011 8,733 80,000 70,010 37,000 36,654 15,000 16,689 365,000 854,160 840,000 833,557 3,000 6,094 1,040,300 1,157,595 849 2,590 6,424 23,818 15,867 620,000 625,113 260,000 26,781 161 595,000 598,867 4,208 12,584 951 525,000 518,185 1,586,996" 79,660 79,555. 646,46621 646,46621 1,325,59522 1,325,36522 140,21023 140,21023 461,90824 461,908' 14,47725 14,47725 8,430,016" 8,430,016" 5,288,81527 5,283,56027 307,590 307,590 71,950 71,950 730,049 487,477 810,0002" 810,000" 2,439,308" 2,439,308" 11,200,8163* 11,195,1783" 343,494 343,494 1,567,015 1,566,076 25,0101 25,010'1 23,639 23,639 6,727,270"2 6,727,270"2 10,328,199 10,315,979 32-20 i BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 32-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 28. Toledo Harbor, Ohio 29. Vermilion Harbor, Ohio 30. West Harbor, Ohio (Contrib. Funds) 31. Wilson Harbor N.Y. 35. Lakeview Park, Lorain, Ohio (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 36. Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, Pa. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 38. Lakeshore Park Ashtabula, Ohio (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 39. Cayuga Creek Cheektowaga, NY 40. Cuyahoga River Basin, Ohio 41. Dansville and Vicinity, Canaseraga Creek, N.Y. 42. Ellicott Creek, N.Y. Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 2,685,390 2,949,016 400,000 118,188 90,000 40,442 1,959 2,066 25,000 54,864 750,000 757,766 321,429 310,675 100,000 51,686 13,168 250,000 338,340 93,000 83,461 260,000 257,602 1,554,000 1,654,161 140,000 426,459 2,388,000 2,377,534 67,000 57,656 100,000 800,000 143,982 808,224 - 800,000 - 764,079 9,674 3,886 70,000 61,801 750,000 768,870 321,429 331,881 50,000 60,556 44,000 41,840 87,000 78,021 75,000 82,090 72,000 92,928 25,012 18,802 80,000 61,911 850,000 850,115 364,286 364,611 7,000 51,605 53,000 30,116 100,000 72,615 70,000 61,164 150,000 151,067 32-21 675,606 675,606 4,315,000 4,101,546 42,404 51,950 1,840,000 1,838,914 45 12,048 54,655 61,797 1,000,000 994,477 410,000 404,205 262,000 150,337 1,249,000 1,233,558 50,000 81,750 13,355 150,000 116,912 17,191,842" 17,191,842" 59,973,364'2 58,194,189" 1,156,118" 1,156,118" 1,373,167 1,373,167 139,775 139,775 3,075,000 3,071,919 800,000 764,079 535,246" 535,246" 219,671" 219,671" 1,716,125 1,686,280 729,000 729,000 8,695,562 8,690,026 3,641,426 3,640,081 2,476 2,476 591,844 585,947 262,000 150,337 1,462,000 1,421,514 1,107,000 1,095,426 465,300 463,521 1,819,000 1,783,885 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 32-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 43. Mt. Morris New Work Lake, N.Y. Approp. - - - - 23,365,55937 Genesee River Cost - - - - 23,365,55937 Maint. Approp. 647,000 708,000 890,300 905,000 7,045,309 Cost 666,716 734,473 864,402 919,439 7,023,033 44. Point Place New Work Toledo, Ohio Approp. 300,000 239,000 250,000 800,000 1,999,000 Cost 122,421 415,773 250,855 J 587,705 1,785,211 45. Reno Beach-Howard New Work Farms, Ohio Approp. - 70,000 80,000 - 150,000 Cost - 69,938 74,574 5,488 150,000 46. Scajaquada Cr., New Work N.Y. Approp. 1,030,000 1,715,000 680,000 40,345 4,975,652 Cost 1,105,336 1,843,529 623,276 92,343 4,950,427 1. Includes $565,192 for previous projects. Excludes $47,000 contributed funds. 2. Includes $56,616 for previous projects. Excludes $7,500 contributed funds. 3. Includes $58,027 for previous projects. 4. Includes $4,922 emergency relief authority administrative costs transferred from new work to maintenance upon conversion to programming and budgeting system July 1, 1953, by direction of Office, Chief of Engineers. Also includes appropriations and costs under appropriation titles 96x3123 Operation and Maintenance and 96x5125 Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other. Improvements of Navigable Waters. 5. Includes $4,277,586 for previous projects. Excludes expenditures of $239,305 for work authorized by Section 107. 6. Includes $1,883,647 for previous projects. Excludes $446,805 contributed funds. 7. Includes $1,564,154 for previous project and appropriations and costs of $16,596 for modification authorized for construction under authority of Sec. 107, 1960 R & H Act. 8. Includes appropriations and costs under appropriation titles 96x3123 Operation and Maintenance and 96x5125 Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other improvements of Navigable Waters. Excludes $201,960 contributed funds. 9. Includes $805,272 for previous projects. 10. Includes $39,784 for previous projects. 11. Includes $811,250 for previous projects. Excludes $11,000 contributed funds. 12. Includes $176,520 for previous projects. 13. Includes $736,967 for previous projects. 14. Includes $104,900 for previous projects. Excludes $154,500 contributed funds. 15. Includes $368,940 for previous projects. 16. Includes $361,772 for previous projects. 17. Includes $269,789 for previous projects. 18. Includes $232,328 for previous projects. 19. Includes $292,203 for new work for previous projects. Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. Also excludes appropriation and cost of $29,570 under authority of Section 107, 1960 R & H Act. 20. Excludes $224,702 contributed funds. 21. Includes $271,380 for previous projects. 22. Includes $130,512 for previous projects. 23. Includes $140,210 for previous projects. Excludes $1,500 contributed funds. 24. Includes $38,959 for previous projects. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 25. Excludes $186,000 Public Works Acceleration Act funds. 26. Includes $1,187,977 for previous projects. 27. Includes $945,684 for previous projects. 28. Includes $50,000 for previous projects. 29. Includes $247,794 for previous projects. 30. Includes $617,529 for previous projects and $478 emergency relief authority administration costs transferred from new work to maintenance upon conversion to programming and budgeting system, July 1, 1953, by direction of Office, Chief of Engineers. 31. Includes $6,000 for previous projects. 32. Includes $477,149 for previous projects. Excludes $325,000 contributed funds. 33. Includes $1,624,695 for previous projects. 34. Excludes $740,679 contributed funds. 35. Includes $57,342 for previous projects. Excludes $166,998 contributed funds. 36. Includes $16,914 for previous projects. 37. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 32-22 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 32-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents ASHTABULA HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 1 of Text) June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1905 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 11, 1888 June 3, 1896 June 13, 1902 June 13, 1902 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1905 July 27, 1916 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 2, 1945 Construction of breakwater. Enlarge outer harbor by extending west breakwater and constructing new east breakwater; pierheads on lakeward ends of breakwaters; and remove part of old east breakwater. Extend west breakwater to shore; dredge outer harbor to a depth of 20 feet. Remove portion of east breakwater, extend breakwaters to present project dimensions, and dredging restrictions in portion of west basin. Dredge channel through outer harbor, channel of approach to Penn Central Co. slip, channel in Ashtabula River, to and in turning basin, all to present project dimensions; remove portion of old east inner breakwater; and maintenance to 24-foot depth of portion of outer harbor. Extend river channel to present project limit. Dredging approach channel and turning basin in east outerharbor to 25-foot depth. A depth of 29 feet in soft and 30 feet in hard material in entrance channel to just inside outer ends of breakwaters; thence 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in a channel to inner breakwater; thence 27 feet in soft and 28 feet in hard material in a channel extending to Penn Central Co. slip and extending 2000 feet up Ashtabula River; 22 feet in hard material in turning area; and 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in areas adjacent to 250-foot section of inner breakwater when that section is removed as now authorized. Dredging approach channel and turning basin in east outer harbor to 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material. BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 3 of Text) Dredging channel through Horseshoe Reef at outlet of Lake Erie and Tonawanda Inner Harbor, to 16 feet. Deepening Tonawanda Creek to 16 feet. Dredging channel from Buffalo outer harbor to foot of Maryland St., Buffalo, to 21 feet. Dredging channel from foot of Maryland St., Buffalo, to natural deepwater pool upstream from Tonawanda Harbor to 21 feet; construction of ship lock and bridge; and repair of Bird Island pier and towpath wall. Dredging channel along Tonawanda Island, with turning basin at its downstream end at the foot of the Island, to 21 feet. Dredging triangular area at junction with Buffalo north entrance channel. Annual Report, 1895, p. 2132. H. Doc. 654, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 997, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 43, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 78, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 321, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 486, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 148, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 269, 89th Cong., 1st sess.� H. Ex. Doc. 83, 50th Cong., 1st sess., Annual Report, 1888, p. 2066, and Annual Report, 1897, pp. 3116- 3120. H. Doc. 143, 56 Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1900, p. 4152. H. Doc. 125, 56th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1901, p. 3343. H. Doc. 428, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 658, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1004, 65th Cong.,'2d sess, and H. Doc. 92, 79th Cong., 1st sess. 32-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sept. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 June 26, 19345 Aug. 30, 19356 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 May 20, 1826 June 23, 1866 June 23, 1874 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 3, 1909 June 6, 1900 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 190710 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935" Aug. 30, 1935 Widening channel at foot of Maryland St., Buffalo. Widening canal south of International Bridge and removal of westerly end of Rattlesnake Island shoal. Operation and care of improvements provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Removal of rock shoals in Lake Erie entrance to canal, and in canal south of Ferry Street Bridge, to 22 feet; enlargement of North Tonawanda turning basin; extension of Bird Island pier; improvement of guide pier at the lock; and elimination of upper 150 feet of Tonawanda Creek channel from the project.7 Widening Lake Erie entrance to canal. Deepen lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda inner harbor and enlarge turning basin. BUFFALO HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 4 of Text) Construction of south pier (extended in 1868)9 Construction of old breakwater.9 Extension of old breakwater.9 Stony Point and south breakwater.9 North breakwater.9 Deepening entrance channel to inner harbor and removing rock shoal therein. Dredging at entrance to canals at South Buffalo in outer harbor.' South entrance breakwater.9 Extension of Federal project to Commercial St. and removal of Watson elevator site.9 Deepening areas A, B, and D in outer harbor to 21 feet, and area C in north entrance to 23 feet. Deepening areas F and G in outer harbor to'21 feet. Removal of shoal between entrance channel to Buffalo River and Erie Basin to 21 feet. Deepening areas H, I, and K in outer harbor to 21 feet. Extension of south entrance and south breakwaters, deepening outer harbor to present project dimensions, and removal of shoals on approach to south entrance. Maintenance of channels in Buffalo River and Buffalo ship canal to 21 feet, in cooperation with city of Buffalo. H. Doc. 981, 66th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 289, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 28, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 92, 79th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 423, 83rd Cong., 2d sess. ''" Annual Report, 1868, pp. 222 and 232. Annual Report, 1868, pp. 232-236. Annual Report, 1876, pt. 2, pp. 569 and 573. Annual Report, 1895, p. 3153. H. Doc. 72, 55th Cong., 1st. sess., and Annual Report, 1897, p. 3245. Specified in acts. Specified in act. H. Doc. 240, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 298, Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 550, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1139, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 481, 68th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 71st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 46, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 54, 74th Cong., 1st sess. 32-24 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945"1 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 15, 1980 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 3, 1875 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 11, 1888 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 27, 1916 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 29, 1937 Aug. 30, 193512 Deepening North and Buffalo River entrance channels, and deepening and maintaining Buffalo River and Buffalo ship canal to present project dimensions. Deepening approach to south entrance channel to 30 feet; deepen to 30 feet in outer area and 29 feet in inner area of south entrance channel; and deepen to 28 feet southerly part of outer harbor. Deepening portion of outer harbor to 27 feet over a width of 500 feet for 2,500 feet northward from 28-foot project area, widening within 1,700 feet to limits within 150 feet of breakwater axis and 75 feet from harbor line and continuing within these limits for 7,000 feet. Elimination of 25-foot wide strip between presently authorized and proposed easterly dredging limits. Elimination of easterly 50-foot wide undred ed strip in existing 23-foot depth project area, extending northerly from 27-foot depth area to Buffalo River entrance channel. Previously authorized but uncompleted portions of work authorized by 1935 act, combined with this act as a single improvement. Removal of abandoned abutments of South Michigan Avenue bridge. CAPE VINCENT HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 5 of Text) Breakwater 1,000 feet long, and shore arm not to exceed 150 feet. Deepening to project dimensions; elimination from project of uncompleted portion of breakwater. CLEVELAND HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 7 of Text) West breakwater Part of east breakwater.� Extension of east breakwater.� Reconstruction of piers.� Dredging channel between piers and outer harbor to depth of 19 feet; dredging to depth of 23 feet in any portion of harbor in discretion of Secretary of War. Arrowhead breakwater and extension of. east breakwater. Removal of deflecting arm of old east breakwater and closure of gap between old and new east breakwaters. Pierhead at easterly end of east breakwater. Maintenance and improvement of channels in Cuyahoga and Old Rivers to a depth of 21 feet to a point 2,000 feet upstream from Clark Ave. viaduct and 18-foot turning basin. Deepening outer harbor and channel between piers to present project dimensions, construction of 400-foot spur breakwater at gap in shore arm of west breakwater; removal of easterly 150 feet of west main breakwater; elimination from project of a 298-foot southerly extension of west pier; and abandonment of inner 932 feet of shore arm of west breakwater. H. Doc. 352, 78th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 151, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc., 451, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. Annual Report, 1897, pp. 3286-3288. H. Doc. 363, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 4' ' Annual Report, 1876, p. 558. H. Ex. Doc. 116, 48th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1886, p. 1865. H. Ex. Doc. 189, 50th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1888, p. 2005. H. Doc. 326, 54th Cong., 1st. sess., and Annual Report, 1896, p. 2949. H. Doc. 156, 55th Cong., 3d sess., and Annual Report, 1899, pp. 3075 and 3078. H. Doc. 118, 56th Cong., 2d sess. No printed report. H. Doc. 891, 63d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 707, 63d Cong., 2d sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 84, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Dec. 477, 72d Cong., .2d sess. 32-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 193511 Mar. 2, 194514 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 6, 1966 Oct. 22, 1976 (Sec. 175) Maintenance dredging in Cuyahoga and Old Rivers for 1 year as an emergency measure. Maintenance of extension of Cuyahoga River channel. Extension, maintenance, and improvement to a depth of 21 feet of Cuyahoga River channel to present project limit. 5', Improvement of Cuyahoga and Old Rivers to a depth of 23 feet and replacement or pier construction of 7 railroad bridges. 2 Deepening channel 25 feet through east basin of outer harbor; replacement of Erie - Lackawanna Railroad bridge over Cuyahoga River at mile 4.1 and widening of channel at that point, with elimination of reconstruction of east pier of bridge as previously authorized; and replacement of Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Bridge over Old River near its mouth and Willow Avenue Highway Bridge about 800 feet above mouth and widening channel at four locations along lower 2,000 feet of river.3 Depth of 29 feet in lake approach to main entrance; 28 feet in entrance channel to lakeward ends of piers at mouth of Cuyahoga River; 27 feet in river to a point just above its junction with Old River, and in Old River to upstream limit of present 23-foot project; 28 feet in west basin within existing project limits as modified to eliminate a triangular area at west end and to extend limits to a line parallel to and 75 feet from harbor line; and 28 feet in westerly 800 feet of east basin.25 An area in east basin 27 feet deep extending about 3,800 feet easterly of 28-foot area with project limits 380 feet from east breakwater and on landward side generally by a line 75 feet lakeward of and parallel to harbor line. A dock channel to Nicholson Cleveland Terminal Co. pier, at easterly end of east basin, from 25-foot contour to a limit 75 feet north of pierhead line, 400 feet wide at shoreward end and flared toward the lake. Deepening upper end of Old River channel from 21 to 27 feet. Preparation of Phase I design memorandum for improvements consisting of removal of portions of entrance breakwater; construction of breakwater extension at east entrance; deepening approach and entrance channels; construction of diked disposal area; and, installation of recreational fishing facilities on west breakwater. CONNEAUT HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 8 of Text) Extension of east breakwater, construction of new west breakwater; removal of portion of old west breakwater; and dredging of outer harbor to 19 feet. Realinement of west breakwater; removal of remainder of old west breakwater, and deepening outer harbor to 20 feet. Removal by Bessemer & Lake Erie R.R. Co. of inner 635 feet of west pier. H. Doc. 653, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 983, 64th Cong., 1st sess. 32-26 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 39, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 95, 79th Cong., 1st. sess. H. Doc. 629, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 107, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 152, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 527, 87th Cong., 2d sess.4 Sec. 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935" Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 1966' Mar. 2, 1827 Mar. 2, 1867 June 3, 1896 June 25, 1910 June 30, 1948 Dec. 15, 1970 (House Public Works Comm.) June 22, 1971 (Senate Public Works Comm.) Sec. 201 of F.C. Act of 1965 May 26, 1824 Mar. 3, 1899 June 15, 1910 Nov. 28, 19222o Removal of a portion of west breakwater; extension of breakwaters to present project dimensions; construction of pierheads on outer ends of breakwaters; deepening outer harbor to present project dimensions; removal of portions of river pier, and elimination from project of a 255-foot shoreward extension of west breakwater. Deepening easterly part of outer harbor to 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material; deepening remaining triangular area of outer harbor to 22 feet in soft material and 23 feet in hard material; deepening inner harbor for 2,450 feet upstream of outer end of west pier to 27 feet in soft material and 28 feet in hard material; removal of east pier; extension of east breakwater to shore; and an access channel 8 feet deep in outer harbor to city dock. Previously authorized but uncompleted portion of work authorized by 1917 and 1935 acts combined with this act for accomplishment as a single improvement. Recreational small-boat harbor provided by: a stone dike about 2,200 feet long; access channels 6 feet deep, 2,800 feet long and 100 feet wide; closing of .100-foot gap in existing west breakwater; and personnel guard rail on west breakwater. DUNKIRK HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 9 of Text) Construction of west pier.'" Breakwater and excavation of entrance channel to 13 feet.' Deepening of entrance channel and harbor basin to a depth suitable for vessels of 16-foot draft. Removal of rock reef bordering the inner entrance channel. Deepening outer entrance channej to present project depths; removal of rock shoal on the west side of the entrance channel to a depth of 17 feet, and changed limits of the inner entrance channel and basin to present project dimensions. Construction of small boat harbor. ERIE HARBOR, PA. (See Section 10 of Text) Breakwaters and piers; dredging entrance channel; and brushwood protection of beach of Presque Isle Peninsula.' Deepening channel and harbor basin to 18 feet; repair and extension of piers; and plant growth and emergency protection work on peninsula. Deepening channel and part of harbor to 20 feet. Reconveyed Presque Isle Peninsula to the State of Pennsylvania for park purposes. H. Doc. 48, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 415, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 484, 89th Cong., 2d sess.' S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1866, pt. IV, p. 155 Annual Report, 1871, p. 214. H. Doc. 63, 54th Cong., 1st. sess. H. Doc. 720, 61st Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 632, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 91-423, 91st Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report, 1915, p. 1965. H. Doc. 70, 55th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report, 1896, p.3237."' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 61st Cong., 2d sess. 32-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 3, 182521 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 193522 Aug. 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 July 14, 196030 Deepening, widening, and straightening entrance channel, dredging channel at easterly end of harbor basin, deepening a portion of harbor basin, all to present project dimensions; elimination of north breakwater from project; and limitation of south breakwater to a length of 1,200 feet. Protection of the peninsula south of the waterworks settling basin. Widen 25-foot deep approach channel to ore dock. Depth of 29 feet in the entrance channel to a point opposite the inner end of the north pier; thence 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in the remainder of the entrance channel, within the general limits of the 25-foot basin and inner channel opposite the ore dock except as modified to eliminate from the project a triangular area along the easterly side; and a depth of 28 feet over a 300-foot westward extension of the 25-foot basin.2" Depth of 27 feet in soft material and 28 feet in hard material in approach area to Duquesne Marine Terminal. Previously authorized but uncompleted portion of work authorized by 1935 act is combined with this act as a single improvement. FAIRPORT HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 11 of Text) Construction of piers. Breakwaters and dredging outer harbor to a depth of 18 feet. 1,400-foot extension of east breakwater, present project dimension of east pier; and deepening of harbor to 19 feet. 4,000-foot extension of east breakwater at limit of cost to the United States of $715,000. Deepening of outer harbor and entrance channel to present project dimensions; extending the west breakwater to present project dimensions with pierhead at its outer end; removal of west pier; and construction of bulkhead on west side of river channel. Dredging of 21- and 24-foot river channels and turning basin in Grand River to present project dimensions. Dredging of 8-foot river channel. Depth of 29 feet in the approach channel from the lake; a depth of 28 feet over a width of 800 feet in the outer harbor; a depth of 27 feet in soft and 28 feet in hard material in Grand River, over a width of 200 feet to the upstream limit of the turning basin, with suitable widening at the bends, thence over widths reducing from 200 to 100 feet to the upstream limit of the existing Federal project, except in the 8-foot channel; enlargement of the turning basin, including deepening of the entire basin to 21 feet; and minor modification of the existing project limits in the outer harbor. H. Doc. 52, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 345, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 199, 86th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 340, 87th Cong., 2d sess.4 Annual Report, 1889, pp. 2147-2153 H. Doc. 347, 54th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Reports, 1896, p. 2956; 1903, p. 2084; 1905, p. 2349. H. Doc. 206, 63d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 592, 69th Cong., 2d sess., Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc 472, 72d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Coinmittee Doc. 79, 74th Cong., 2d sess.4 H. Doc. 706, 79th Cong., 2d sess.4 H. Doc. 347, 86th Cong., 2d sess.4 32-28 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 10, 1977 (House Public Works Comm.) Oct. 1, 1976 (Senate Public Works Comm.) Sec. 201 of F.C. Act of 1965 Mar. 2, 1829 Aug. 2, 1882 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1905 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 193522 Oct. 23, 1962 Aug. 30, 1852 June 23, 1866 Mar. 3, 1871 Mar. 3, 1881 June 13, 1902 Construction of small boat harbor. H. Doc. 627, 94th Cong., 2d sess. GREAT SODUS BAY HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 13 of Text) Construction of piers and breakwater.' Extension of piers to 15-foot contour in the lake. Deepening and widening of channel to 18-foot depth and 150-foot width. Widening channel lakeward of piers to 250 feet. Dredging channel to present project dimensions. HURON HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 14 of Text) Extension of west pier; construction of east breakwater; removal of part of old east pier; deepening of channel to 19 feet; and dredging of sheltered area. Widening river to 200 feet; removal of remainder of old east pier; construction of new spur pier; enlargement of sheltered area; and closure of breach at shore end of west pier. Extension of west pier with pierhead at its outer end; removal of outer end of east breakwater and constructing pierhead on new outer end; widening and deepening channel to present project dimensions; enlargement of turning basin at head of channel; shore protection west of west pier; and elimination from project construction of spur pier and dredging sheltered area outside channel limits. Depths of 29 feet in approach channel, 28 feet in entrance channel, 27 feet in river channel, 21 feet in turning basin, a detached breakwater, 1,575 feet long 2,000 feet lakeward of outer end of existing west pier; and, abandohment of lakeward end of existing approach channel."' LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 16 of Text) West entrance pier.' Extension of west pier and construction of west breakwater, and dredging channel 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide.' East pier and east breakwater.' Extension of piers lakeward to 15.5-foot contour, and dredging channel to 15.5 feet. Extension of east pier 300 feet lakeward. Annual Report, 1876, pt. II p. 589. Annual Report, 1881, p. 2442. H. Doc. 192, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 17, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 23, 72d Cong., 1st sess H. Doc. 122, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 5, 63d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 478, 72d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 165, 87th Cong., 1st sess.4 Annual Report, 1874, p. 256. Annual Report, 1874, p. 256. Annual Report, 1871, p. 234. Annual Report, 1881, pp. 2444 and 2446. Annual Report, 1901, p. 3364. 32-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents LORAIN HARBOR. OHIO (See Section 17 of Text) Mar. 3, 1899 Breakwaters and extenpions of piers to present dimensions. Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 23 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 1965 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935"11 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 4, 1913, Extend 18-foot channel from inner end of piers to Erie Avenue Bridge. Extend breakwaters and dredge to depth of 19 feet in outer harbor. Extend breakwaters to present project dimensions. Deepen outer harbor and river channel to Erie Avenue Bridge to 20 feet. Extend 20-foot channel to American Shipbuilding Co. drydock 2. Widen 2 bends in river and enlarge turning basin opposite National Tube Co. dock. 12 Approach channel to municipal pier. Deepen outer harbor and river channel to American Shipbuilding Co. drydock 2 to present project dimensions and extension of river channel to upper end of National Tube Co. dock with turning basin opposite that dock. Maintenance dredging m Black River from American Shipbuilding Co. drydock 2 upper end of National Tube Co. dock was authorized Apr. 7, 1934, by Public Works Administration. Enlarging turning basin opposite National Tube Co. dock to present project dimensions. Turning basin in bend of Black River immediately upstream from Baltimore & Ohio RR coal dock. Replace Norfolk and Western Railway swing bridge with a vertical lift bridge; construct two detached arrowhead breakwaters lakeward of existing breakwaters; construct extension of east breakwater to shore; remove 300 feet of lakeward end of west breakwater; remove outer 1,100 feet of east pier; deepen lake approach to 29 feet, 800-foot wide outer harbor channel to 28 feet, southwesterly portion of outer harbor to 25 feet and river channel to 27 feet; widen river channel at bends; and construct a new turning basin 21 feet deep near upstream limit of existing project.32 Construct bank of stabilization works at cut numbered 1 along left bank of river channel above Erie Avenue Bridge.8 OGDENSBURG HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 19 of Text) Deepening the several channels to 19 feet. Widening upper entrance channel to 400 feet, and city front to 350 feet. Enlarging and deepening lower basin to 21 feet, and removal of elevator wharf. OLCOTT HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 20 of Text) Dredging a channel 11 feet deep between parallel piers9 Deepening channel to 12 feet and maintenance of west pier. H. Doc. 131, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1898, p. 2718. H. Doc. 560, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 644, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 980, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 985, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 587, 69th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 469, 72d Cong., 2d sess. Senate Committee print, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 51, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 161, 77th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 166, 86th Cong., 1st sess. PL 89-298. H. Doc. 920, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 663, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 266, 72d Cong., 1st sess.4' 24 Annual Report, 1866, pt. III, p. 15 and pt. IV, p. 158. H. Doc. 780, 62d Cong., 2d sess.4 32-30 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 11, 1870 Mar. 2, 1907 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 17, 1940 June 30, 1948 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 June 10, 1872 Mar. 2, 1829 Aug. 2, 1882 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935' Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 OSWEGO HARBOR (See Section 21 of Text) Construction of outer west breakwater.' Repair of outer west breakwater under Plan (A).' Construction of arrowhead breakwaters; deepening outer harbor between arrowhead breakwaters, west outer harbor east of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, and Oswego River north of Seneca St., to 21 feet; and deepening west outer harbor, west of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, to 16 feet.26 Widening channel to harbor lines in Oswego River north of Seneca St. Closing gap in west breakwater; deepening west outer harbor, west of east line of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, to project depth.33 Construction of east outer breakwater; removal of inner end of east arrowhead breakwater; and dredging channel and basin in east outer harbor.27 Construction of detached breakwater at harbor entrance and removal of shoals in approach to harbor entrance to 25 feet deep. Depth of 27 feet in lake approach channel; 25 feet deep in outer harbor channel 800 feet wide from entrance gap to a turning basin 25 feet deep about 750 by 1,100 feet, at mouth of Oswego River; depth of 24 feet in earth and 25 feet in hard material in river channel from turning basin to upstream end of Port of Oswego Authority's east side terminal, a distance of about 1,600 feet; relocation of Federal project limits in Oswego River upstream of 24-foot channel to Federal project limit at north line of West Seneca St., on lines parallel to 50 feet channel ward of established harbor lines; elimination of maintenance of inner west breakwater; and, elimination of modification authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1948. PORT CLINTON HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 22 of Text) Parallel stone and pile jetties at mouth of river, east jetty 2,200 feet long and west jetty 1,980 feet long extending to 10-foot contour in lake. Channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide for outer 4,200-foot length and 200 feet wide for inner 800-foot length to Highway Bridge. ROCHESTER HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 23 of Text) Construction of piers.' Extension of piers to 15 foot contour in the lake. Concrete superstructure on piers.' Deepening channel to 20 feet. Dredging of the entrance channel and turning basin, and the elimination of the inner ends of the east and west piers, all to present project dimensions. Maintenance of the existing channel upstream of the Penn Central Co. bridge. Depth of 24 feet in the channel from the lake to the west pier; a depth of 23 feet between the piers and in the lower river to the Penn Central Co. bridge, including the existing turning basin; a depth of 21 feet from the bridge to the upstream project limit, with suitable widening at the bends; and, an upstream turning basin 21 feet deep and 650 feet wide adjacent to the improved channel, with two mooring dolphins. Annual Report, 1870, pp. 54, 220. and 221. H. Doc. 55, 58th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 24, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 7, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 96, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 722, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 487, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 471, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report, 1875, p. 295 Annual Report, 1874, p. 247. Annual Report, 1881, p. 2437. Annual Report, 1905, p. 2383. H. Doc. 342, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 484, 72d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 139, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 409, 86th Cong., 2d sess.4 32-31 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 10, 1872 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 2, 1882 Aug. 13, 1888 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 193528 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1899 June 25, 1910 ROCKY RIVER HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 25 of Text) East pier and dredging of channel. Extension of east pier and deepening channel to present project dimensions. Realign and extend channel and construct an anchorage basin. SACKETS HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 26 of Text) Deepening harbor area to 12 feet. Construct timber crib mooring place, and brush and stone jetty. Build 2 stone groins (OCE-June 8, 1896) Deepening to project dimensions. SANDUSKY HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 27 of Text) Construction of channel protection works. Widening of straight and dock channels and deepening to 19 feet. Extension of east jetty to total length of 6,000 feet, with pierhead on outer end; deepening of the outer, straight, and easterly portion of dock channels to 21 feet, and westerly portion of dock channel to 20 feet. Deepening of dock channel to 22 feet. Enlargement of turning basin and construction of rock dike. Maintenance of bay channel to 22 feet; and elimination from project of portion of turning basin and rock dike. Extending Moseley channel and deepening that channel and the outer end of Straight channel to 26 feet, from deep water in the lake to the vicinity of Cedar Point dock; widening the bend at the junction of the Moseley and Straight channels and deepening to 26 feet; deepening the Straight Channel to 25 feet from the vicinity of Cedar Point dock to junction with Bay channel; deepening the Bay channel from junction with the Straight channel to the outer end of the Pennsylvania coal dock No. 3 to 25 feet, thence from outer end of the coal dock to the turning basin to 24 feet in soft material and 25 feet in hard, with no Federal dredging within 50 feet of the dock; and enlarging the turning basin, including removal of approximately 300 feet of the rock dike, and deepening to 24 feet in soft material and 25 feet in hard. TOLEDO HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 28 of Text) A Channel 400 Feet Wide and 21 Feet Deep from 25-Foot Contour in Maumee Bay to Fassett Street Bridge, 200 Feet Wide and 19 Feet Deep Above that Point and a 500-Foot Turning Basin at Upper End. A stone Revetted Earth Dike in Maumee Bay Channel. Act 1899 Modified to Insure a Navigable Channel to 21 Feet from Fassett Street Bridge to Lake. Annual Report, 1871, p. 211. H. Doc. 70, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 352, 88th Cong., 2d sess.' Sen. Ex. Doc. 29, 47th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1888 pt. III, p. 2086. Annual Report, 1896, pt. III, p. 3160. H. Doc. 732, 79th Cong., 2d sess.' 3 * H. Doc. 362, 55th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1898, p. 2708. H. Doc. 120, 56th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 982, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 584, 69th Cong., 2d sesq. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 328, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 144, 86th Cong., 1st sess.4 H. Doc. 198, 55th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report 1898, p. 2693. H. Doc. 865, 60th Cong., 1st sess. 32-32 TABLE 32-B (Con Acts Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 July 4, 1836 Mar. 3, 1875 Mar. 3, 1905 July 3, 1958 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 13, 1968 Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Mar. 7, 1974 Oct. 22, 1976 (Sec. 101) BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT tinued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Channel 25 Feet Deep and 500 Feet Wide from 25- Foot Contour to Mouth of Maumee River (300 Feet Wide on Each Side of Center Dike in Bay Channel), Thence 400 Feet Wide to Fassett Street Bridge, 200 Feet Wide Above That Point and a Turning Basin at Upper End 18 Feet Deep. Widening at Bend of Mouth of River Opposite Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Dock. Removal of Center Dike in Maumee Bay Channel. Enlarge Widening at Bend Opposite Chesapeake and Ohio Dock and Turning Basin Opposite American Shipbuilding Co. Dock. Deepen Bay Channel Including Widenings to 28 Feet, Deepen River Channels to New York Central Railroad Bridge to 27 Feet and Construct New Turning Basin Below Anthony Wayne Bridge." VERMILION HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 29 of Text) Parallel piers and dredging channel to 8 feet deep. Deepening of channel to 12 feet. Reconstruction of piers. New entrance formed by two overlapping arrowhead breakwaters and extension of existing river channel upstream to Liberty St. Bridge. WILSON HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 31 of Text) Entrance channel 80 feet wide and 8 feet deep; and restore east and west piers. Extend existing channel 300 feet; and construct new channel 3,800 feet long through Tuscarora Bay. PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, ERIE, PA. (See Section 36 of Text) Construction of groin system, seawall, bulkhead, placement of beach material at waterworks reservation and along remainder of peninsula; removal of portions of existing structures. Periodic nourishment of shore for a 10-year period. Periodic nourishment of shore for a 5-year period. Preparation of Phase I design memorandum for improvements consisting of construction of five sections of spaced off-shore breakwaters and replenishment of beach area with sandfill. 32-33 Documents Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 189, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 620, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 436, 84th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 153, 86th Cong., 1st sess.' Annual Report, 1880, p. 2122. Annual Report, 1874, p. 219. H. Doc. 252, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 231, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 679, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 112, 90th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 231, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 397, 86th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 796, 93d Cong., 2d sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 1. Authorized by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. 2. Widening Cuyahoga River at downstream and of Cut 4 classified inactive. 3. Replacement of bridges 19 and 32, widening Cuyahoga and Old River Channels, classified deferred. 4. Contains latest published map. 5. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 6. Authorized May 28, 1935 by Emergency Relief Administration Act of 1935. 7. Improvement of guide pier at Black Rock lock was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. 8. Classified deferred. 9. Completed under previous projects. 10. Also Sundry Civil Act of Mar. 3, 1905. 11. Authorized in part by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. 12. Authorized by Public Works Administration Sept. 6, 1933. 13. Previously authorized by Public Works Administration. 14. First Deficiency Appropriation Act approved April 1, 1944. 15. Authorized by Defense Plant Corp., May 19, 1942. 16. Deepening left half of channel extension was eliminated from project by 1962 R&H Act. 17. Permit of Secretary of War, Aug. 5, 1927. 18. Modified 1828 and 1852. 19. Extension of north pier portion of this modification was deauthorized Nov. 81. 20. Public 366. 21. Modified 1830, 1881, and 1890. New work completed under previous projects. 22. Partly included in Public Works Administration program, Nov. 15, 1933. 23. First supplemental National Defense Appropriation Act, 1944, approved Dec. 23, 1943. 24. Removal of remaining hard-material shoals in lower basin is classified inactive. 25. Deepening remainder of Cuyahoga River from bridge 1 to and including Old River, classified deferred. 26. Deepening a 200-foot strip along harbor line east of mouth of Oswego River is classified inactive. 27. Modification eliminated by River and Harbor Act of Oct. 26, 1962. 28. Included in Public Works Administration program, Nov. 15, 1933. 29. Deepening strips adjacent to north and south piers was deauthorized Aug. 82. 30. Modification classified inactive. 31. Construction of breakwater classified deferred. 32. Deepening and widening remainder of Black River channel at Cut 1 classified deferred. 33. Deepening to 22 feet a 150-foot wide strip in west outer harbor deauthorized in May 1981. 34. The 27-foot project extended 2,800 feet and turning basin relocated under authority of Chief of Engineers. 35. Deauthorized in May 1981. TABLE 32-C (See Section 33 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control 1974 $ 1,137 - Big (Cunningham) Creek, Ohio' 2 19,7633 - Black River Harbor, N.Y.4 _2 42,401 - Cattaraugus Creek, N.Y.5 _2 57,410 - Elk Creek Harbor, Pa.6 1978 101,500 - Grasse River (Massena), N.Y.4'7 1891 9,0003 - Hamlin Beach Harbor, N.Y.6 1973 72,052 Kelleys Island, Ohio 197415 129,874 - Little River at Cayuga Island, N.Y.9 1969 46,8043 42,355 Maumee River, above Toledo, Ohio" 1873's 12,000 - Morristown Harbor, N.Y.9 1949 6,221 9,65612 Niagara Remedial Works, N.Y.9'10 1966 6,069,395 510,819 Niagara River, N.Y.'6 1964 559,45711 141,059 Ottawa River Harbor, Michigan and Ohio' 1977'1 99,000 - Port Bay, N.Y. - - - Pultneyville Harbor, N.Y.'3 1934 68,219 20,087 Put in Bay, Ohio 1951's 51,609 12,532 Sandusky River, Ohio' 1894 58,0003 557 32-34 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 32-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 1. No commerce reported. 2. Only information available is in index to reports of Chief of Engineers. 3. Amount includes maintenance; not separable. 4. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 5. Abandonment recommended in Ex. Doc. 16, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. 6. Project classified deferred. 7. Channel improved by local interests. 8. Includes local interests' contribution of $25,742. 9. Completed. 10. Costs of operation and maintenance of this project will be settled directly by concerned power agencies. No further appropriations will be made to this project. 11. Includes local interests contribution of $27,563. 12. Includes local interests contribution of $5,000. 13. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 375, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 14. Project classified inactive. 15. Annual Report for Detroit District. 16. Construction of compensating works as authorized by 1930 R&H Act was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. 17. Project deauthorized by Congress in Nov. 1977. TABLE 32-D NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 34 of Text) Snagging and Clearing for Navigation (Sec 3, 1945 River and Harbor Act, P.L. 14, 79th Congress) Project and Location Fiscal Year Cost Cooley Creek, Jerusalem, OH $7,500 Turtle Creek, Port Clinton, OH 9,154 Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) Study Identification Fiscal Year Cost Barcelona Harbor, NY $ 7,403 Cooley Canal, Lucas Cty., OH 7,498 Edgewater Marina, Cleveland, OH 44,864 Ogdensburg Harbor, N.Y. 154,146 South Michigan Ave. Bridge, Buffalo, N.Y. 43,092 Mitigation of Shore Damages Attributable to Navigation Projects (Section 111, Public Law 90-483) Study Identification Fiscal Year Cost Cleveland Harbor, OH $93,446 Conneaut Harbor, OH 62,205 Huron Harbor, OH 49,308 Lorain, OH 5,430 Vermilion Harbor, OH 20,180 32-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 32-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 37 of Text) For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Cleveland and Lakewood, Ohio: Edgewater Park' - - White City Park' - - Fair Haven Beach State Park, Lake Ontario, N.Y. 2 Fort Niagara State Park, N.Y.3 - - Hamlin Beach State Park, N.Y.5 1976 $1,769,600 - Selkirk Shore State Park, Lake Ontario, N.Y.4 1963 58,978 $2,946 1. Project authorized by River and Harbor Act of 4. Federal participation was limited to one-third of first September 3, 1954 is classified as deferred. cost when project was authorized by 1954 River and Harbor 2. Project authorized by River and Harbor Act of July 3, Act. Federal participation was changed from one-third to 70 1958 is classified as deferred. percent of remaining work under Public Law 87-874. Uncom- 3. Project authorized under provisions of Section 201, pleted portion of project is classified as deferred. 1965 Flood Control Act is classified inactive. 5. Project completed. TABLE 32-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 48 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Auburn, N.Y. Owasco Outlet' 1962 $ 371,985 - Batavia and vicinity, Tonawanda Creek, N.Y.' 1957 335,385 - Caledonia, Genesee River, N.Y. 1950 - - Camp Perry, Ohio' 196713 275,00012 Chittenango Creek and tributaries, N.Y.' 4 .1948 12,464 - Eastlake, Ohio, Chagrin River' 1976 506,344 - Fremont, Ohio, Sandusky River' 1976 8,589,824" - Hammondsport, Oswego River Basin, N.Y.2 1951 18,6918 - Ithaca, N.Y., Cayuga Inlet' 1978 3,929,330" - Lackawanna, N.Y., Smokes Creek' 1971 3,542,068� - Lancaster, Cayuga Creek, N.Y.' 1954 797,300 - Marsh Creek, Geneva, N.Y. 6 - 226,429 - Montour Falls, Oswego River Basin, N.Y.' 1954 1,681,785 - Onondaga Creek, Nedrow, N.Y.',6 1964 330,231 - Ottawa, Ohio 1967 '3 - - Owasco Inlet and Outlet, Montville and Dry Creek, State Ditch and Crane Brook, N.Y.5 1950 281,559 Red Creek, N.Y.4 1975 361,241 Reno Beach-Howard Farms, Lucas County, Ohio 1953'" 4,467 Syracuse, Oswego River Basin, N.Y.' 1954 3,349,248 Warsaw, N.Y., Oatka Creek ' ,6 1969 558,31710 Wellsville, N.Y., Genesee River' 1978 3,145,303"s 32-36 BUFFALO. N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 32-F (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 1. Completed. 2. Project classified deferred. 3. Local interests required to contribute $25,000. 4. Project not considered economically justified and is inactive. 5. Inactive portion of work for State ditch has been done by local interests and work on Crane Brook has been deferred at the request of local interests. 6. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers. 7. Excludes costs of $188,732 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, June 1972. 8. Excludes costs of $6,766 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, June 1972. 9. Includes local interests contribution of $50,000. 10. Excludes costs of $26,807 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, June 1972. 11. Includes local interests contribution of $6,944. Excludes costs of $383,786 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, for emergency restoration of levees damaged during 1973. 12. Includes local interests contribution of $125,000. 13. Annual Report for Detroit District. 14. Includes local interests contribution of $99,000. Excludes costs of $104,005 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, June 1972. 15. Includes local interests contribution of $50,000. Excludes costs of $374,042 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storms. TABLE 32-G FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 49 of Text) Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress as amended (preauthorization) Study Identification Buffalo River, Buffalo, N.Y. Cazenovia Creek, Buffalo, NY Chagrin River, Willoughby Hills, OH Conesus Lake Outlet, N.Y. Euclid Creek, Ohio Glen Brook Flume, Hammondsport, NY Limestone Creek, Fayetteville, N.Y. Oneida Creek, Oneida, N.Y. Silver-Walnut Creeks, Silver Creek, NY St. Regis River, Hogansburg, NY W. Br. Limestone Creek, N.Y. Fiscal Year Cost $ 112 18,135 43,060 1,140 100,497 7,440 5,003 108,593 7,477 539 120,982 Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., as amended by Sec. 206 of Flood Control Act of 1962) Project Federal Cost Disaster preparedness $143,093 Emergency operations 34,268 TOTAL 177,361 . Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control. (Sec. 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, PL. 780, 83rd Cong. Project and location Fiscal Year Cost Ganarqua Creek, Madedon, NY $7,500 32-37 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 32-G (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 49 of Text) Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Study Identification Fiscal Year Cost Beaver Creek, Grand Rapids, OH $ 5,000 Blanchard River, Ottawa, OH 7,500 Crawford Creek, Belfast-Caneadea, NY 3,000 Genesee River, Amity, NY 147,489 Keshequa Creek, Nunda, NY 58,102 Mentor Beach Park, OH 34,169 Mentor on the Lake, OH 2,000 State University at Oswego, NY 96 Wendt Beach, Evans, NY 63,648 TABLE 32-H DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Section 50 of Text) Authorization Date Project Type Act Deauthorized Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY Navigation 1935 R&H Act' Aug. 1977 Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY Navigation 1954 R&H Act May 1981 Crane Creek State Park, OH Beach Erosion 1962 R&H Act Nov. 1979 Erie Harbor, PA Navigation 1945 R&H Act Aug. 1977 Erie Harbor, PA Navigatidn 1899 R&H Act Nov. 1981 Erie Harbor, PA Navigation 1960 R&H Act Aug. 1982 Grandview Bay Harbor, NY Navigation 1945 R&H Act Aug. 1977 Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY Navigation 1962 R&H Act Aug. 1977 Ithaca, NY - Cascadilla Creek Flood Control 1941 FC Act Aug. 1977 Ithaca, NY - Fall Creek Flood Control 1941 FC Act Aug. 1977 Maumpee River above Toledo, Ohio Navigation 1872 Act Nov. 1977 Niagara River Compensating Works, NY Navigation 1930 R&H Act Aug. 1977 Oswego Harbor, NY Navigation 1940 R&H Act2 May 1981 Sackets Harbor, NY Navigation 1945 R&H Act May 1981 Sheffield Lake Community Park, Ohio Beach Erosion 1962 R&H Act Aug. 1977 Watkins Glen, NY Flood Control 1941 FC Act Aug. 1977 1. Extension of guide pier only, other improvements completed. 2. Deepening of west outer harbor; other improvements completed. 32-38 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT * This district (total area, about 226,000 square miles) comprises those drainage basins tributary to the Pacific Ocean that are in California between the M exican boundary and Cape San Martin (about 265 miles north of entrance to Los Angeles Harbor); lower Colorado River drainage basin (below Lee Ferry, AZ), which is in southeastern California, southeastern Nevada, southwestern Utah, western New Mexico, and all of Arizona, except the northeastern corner; that part of the Great Basin that is in southern Nevada and southeastern California; and the United States parts of those small drainage basins in southern Arizona and southwestern New Mexico west of the Continental Divide that drain southward into Mexico. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Channel Islands Harbor, CA ......... 33-2 2. Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, CA .......................... 33-2 3. Newport Bay Harbor, CA ........... 33-3 4. Oceanside Harbor, CA ............... 33-3 5. Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), CA .................... 33-4 6. San Diego River and Mission Bay, CA .............................. 33-4 7. Santa Barbara Harbor, CA ............ 33-4 8. Ventura Marina (Ventura Harbor), CA ....................... 33-4 9. Reconnaissance and condition surveys .......................... 33-5 Beach Erosion Control 10. Imperial Beach, San Diego County, CA ....... ,.................... 11. Oceanside, San Diego County, CA ....... 33-5 33-5 Flood Control 12. Alamo Lake, Bill Williams River, AZ .......................... 33-5 13. Allenville, AZ ....................... 33-5 14. Cucamonga Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, CA .................... 33-6 15. Gila River Basin, AZ: ................. 33-6 15A. Indian Bend Wash, AZ ................ 33-6 15B. Painted Rock Dam (Gila River), AZ ............................ 33-6 15C. Phoenix, AZ, and vicinity (including New River) .............. 33-7 15D. Santa Rosa Wash (Tat Momolikot Dam and Lake St. Clair), AZ ......................... 33-7 15E. Tucson diversion channel, AZ .......... 33-7 15F. Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek, AZ ............................ 33-8 16. Goleta, CA, and vicinity ............... 3-8 Flood Control (Cont'd) Page 17. Los Angeles County drainage area, CA ............................. 33-8 18. Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, CA ...................... 33-9 19. Pine and Mathews Canyons Dams, Colorado River Basin, NV ............. 33-9 20. San Luis Rey River, San Luis Rey River Basin, CA ................. 33-9 21. Santa Ana River Basin, CA ........... 33-9 22. Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA .................. 33-10 23. Santa Maria Valley levees, Santa Maria River Basin, CA .......... 33-10 24. Santa Paula Creek channel and debris basins (including Mud Creek), Santa Clara River Basin, CA ......... 33-10 25. Sespe Creek at Fillmore, Ventura County, CA ................... 33-11 26. Sweetwater River, Sweetwater River Basin, CA ...................... 33-11 27. Inspection of completed flood control projects ....................... 33-11 28. Scheduling flood control reservoir operations ........................... 33-11 29. Flood control work under special authorization .................. 33-11 General Investigations 30. Surveys ........................ 33-11 31. Collection and study of basic data .................................. 33-12 32. Research and development ......... 3..33-12 33. Continuation of planning and engineering ................. 33-12 33A. Holbrook levee, Little Colorado River, Colorado River Basin, AZ ....... 33-12 33B. Santa Ana River main stem-- including Santiago Creek and Oak Street Drain, Santa Ana River Basin, CA ... .. ..................... 33-12 33-1 REPORT dF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 General Investigations (Cont'd) Page 33C. Special Study, Santa Ana River main stem - including Santiago Creek and Oak Street Drain, Santa Ana River Basin, CA ................ 33-12 34. Advance engineering and design ....... 33-12 34A. Goleta, CA, and vicinity, Santa Barbara County ................ 33-12 34B. San Luis Rey River, San Luis River Basin, CA .................... 33-13 Tables Table 33-A Cost and financial Table 33-B Table 33-C Table 33-D statement ......... ..... . 33-14 Authorizing legislation ................... 33-19 Other authorized navigation projects ........... 33-24 Other authorized beach erosion control projects .......... ,..... 33-25 Navigation 1. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA Location. On coast of southern California about a mile northwest of existing harbor of Port Hueneme, 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor, and 345 miles south of San Francisco. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 5007 and 5202.) Existing project. For details, see page 33-2 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One thousand and eight hundred boat slips in 6 marinas, with restroom and shower facilities; dry storage area for 300 boats with 3-ton and 1-ton hoist facilities; 2 marine construction and repair yards with 5-ton travel lift and 35-ton hoist to 70-ton boatway haulout capacities; a fuel dock facility; a sportfishing complex; 5 restaurants; 2 coffee shops; 800 waterfront apartments-many with adjoining slips; 274 motel units; 4 yacht club buildings; 3 public convenience docks; a 40-slip transient boat complex; a harbor administration building/harbor patrol office and dock complex; a marine emporium complex, housing a chandlery store, a sail loft, a delicatessen, a fishing tackle shop, yacht sales, a marine engine repair facility, and an adjacent dock complex; a 7-lane free access public launch ramp, with paved parking for cars and trailers; a boaters' convenience center; a commercial fishing pier and hoist; 2 large public parks; and a fire station. Waterway-connected and north of the harbor is Mandalay Bay, a private keys-type waterfront homes development with an area for about 500 homes and connected dockage for boats. Transition from harbor to Tables (Cont'd) Page Table 33-E Other authorized flood control projects ............. 33-26 Table 33-F Not applicable Table 33-G Deauthorized projects ........ 33-27 Table 3,3-H Los Angeles County .drainage area, CA: Latest approved estimated first costs for all units of improvement under existing project .............. 33-28 Table 33-I Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA: Lasted approved estimated Federal first cost for all units ........................ 33-30 Table 33-J Inspection of completed flood control projects ......... 33-31 Table 33-K Flood control work under special authorization ......... 33-31 Mandalay Bay is restricted by a 4-lane high-rise bridge with a clearance height of 29 feet at high tide. Operations during fiscal year. Completed maintenance dredging of sand trap and entrance channel in May 1982 at a cost of $2,165;000 regular funds and $508,000 Navy funds. 2. LOS ANGELES AND LONG BEACH HARBORS, CA Location. On coast of southern California in San Pedro Bay about 25 miles south of City of Los Angeles, about 96 miles northwest of San Diego Harbor, and about 410 miles southeast of San Francisco Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5147.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1977 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1646 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A stone breakwater 11,152 feet long (San Pedro breakwater) extending eastward from Point Fermin; a stone-and-earth detached breakwater 18,500 feet long (middle breakwater); a stone-and-earth detached breakwater 13,350 feet long (Long Beach breakwater); maintenance of original Long Beach breakwater south of outer end of pier A (now an integral part of pier A as extended); an entrance channel 1,000 feet wide and 40 feet deep to outer Los Angeles Harbor, with a turning basin 3,500 feet long and 1,500 feet wide of same depth opposite end of pier 1, and enlargement of entrance to inner harbor by dredging to a depth of 35 feet a triangular area at junction of inner harbor with this turning basin; irregular anchorage areas (areas A and B) 40 feet deep adjacent to 40-foot-depth entrance 33-2 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT channel; an inner harbor channel (Los Angeles channel) 35 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide, with a turning basin at its north extremity 35 feet deep; a channel (East Basin channel) 35 feet deep and 650 feet wide extending from turning basin to slip 5; a channel (Cerritos channel) 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide from slip 5 to a turning basin in Long Beach inner harbor; a turning basin 35 feet deep in Long Beach inner harbor; an entrance channel to Long Beach inner harbor 35 feet deep and 300 to 500 feet wide; a settling basin at mouth of Los Angeles River diversion channel, dredged material to be deposited on the beaches eastward therefrom to Belmont pier; a siltdiversion channel (Los Angeles River) for protection of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors; and maintenance of entire project, except silt-diversion channel. Dredging to a depth of 35 feet in East Basin was authorized as a modification of existing project in 1954. Dredging to a depth of 35 feet in West Basin was authorized as a further modification of existing project in 1960. As authorized in 1976, existing project was further modified to provide for depths of 45 feet in all inner harbor channels and basins of Los Angeles Harbor and in the Los Angeles entrance channel, and to provide maintenance for the new dimensions. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 5.5 feet. Extreme range is about 10 feet. Latest approved estimated (1981) first cost for project as modified is $65,316,000, comprising $30,545,000 Federal (including $45,000 for Coast Guard costs) and $34,771,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. All items of local cooperation required under the terms of the previous authorizing acts have been fully complied with. See page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1981 for requirements under the terms of the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. Terminal facilities. In Los Angeles Harbor, 80,702 feet of wharves, of which 73,695 feet are owned by the city and 7,007 feet are owned by private interests. In Long Beach Harbor, 58,705 feet of wharves, of which 48,865 feet are owned by the city and 9,840 feet are owned by private interests. Federal Government owns 18,587 feet of wharves and bulkheads. Operations during fiscal year. Continued channel and basin dredging (1976 modification of existing project), which is about 89 percent complete, at a cost of $12,838,743 regular funds; $548,526 required contributed funds; and $14,893,514 other contributed funds. 3. NEWPORT BAY HARBOR, CA Location. On coast of southern California 24 miles southeast of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, and 72 miles northwest of San Diego Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1508.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1400 of Annual Report for 1936. Existing project. Plan provides for rubblemound entrance jetties, 900 feet apart, 1,620 and 2,860 feet long on the east and west sides of the channel, respectively; an entrance channel 20 feet deep and 500 feet wide; a main channel 20 feet deep, 700 feet wide just inside the entrance, narrowing to a general width of 350 feet; an anchorage area 20 feet deep, about 3,800 feet long, and ranging in width up to 520 feet on the north side of the main channel in the eastern end of the bay; an anchorage area 20 feet deep, about 5,200 feet long, and ranging in width up to 600 feet on the south side of the main channel in the eastern end of the bay; a yacht-anchorage area 15 feet deep, 1,200 feet wide, and 1,700 feet long on the south side of the main channel midway of the bay; the Newport channel 15 feet deep, about 6,000 feet long, and ranging in width up to 330 feet; a turning basin 20 feet deep, about 2,000 feet long, and ranging in width up to 1,000 feet at the western end of the bay; and a depth of 10 feet in the remainder of the main bay area. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 5.3 feet. Extreme range is about 10 feet. Latest approved estimated (1958) Federal first cost for project is $2,038,000. Local cooperation. All items of local cooperation required under the terms of the previous authorizing acts have been fully complied with. See page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1981 for requirements under the terms of the 1945 River and Harbor Act. Terminal facilities. A public wharf 300 feet long; 10 privately operated marine railways; and 7 privately operated vertical hoists for the construction and servicing of small craft. Operations during fiscal year. Completed maintenance dredging in October 1981 at a cost of $1,532 regular funds. In addition, a reconnaissance and condition survey was conducted at a cost of $553. 4. OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA Location. On coast of southern California at Oceanside, about 30 miles north of City of San Diego. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5101.) Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for mainte-' nance to date. Terminal facilities. Berthing for 828 boats (718 slips, 76 side-ties, 28 visitors slips, and 6 dry storage spaces at Oceanside Marine Center); a fuel dock; a boat hoist; a launching ramp, which can accommodate 4 launchings at the same time; parking for 1,684 cars; temporary parking for about 144 boat trailers; a boatrepair facility; a pump-out facility; a Coast Guard cutter; restaurants; retail stores; yacht brokers; a boatel/- motel; condominiums; and a sport-fishing facility. Operations during fiscal year. Completed contract payment for maintenance dredging at a cost of $13 regular funds; $20,000 other contributed funds; and $13 Navy funds. In addition, a reconnaissance and condition survey was conducted at a cost of $17,825. 33-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 5. REDONDO BEACH HARBOR (KING HARBOR), CA Location. On coast of southern California in southern (downcoast) part of Santa Monica Bay about 18 miles northwest of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors and about 417 miles southeast of San Francisco Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 5101 and 5144.) Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Consist of 3 boat basins containing 1,500 small boat slips; outer harbor containing 80 moorings; limited dry boat storage facilities; fuel dock; sewage pump-out station; 3 boat hoists; launching ramps for hand carried boats; boat repair facilities; sport fishing pier, with facilities for the on-and offloading of passengers from vessels for hire; and a commercial/recreational pier just outside the harbor. Operations during fiscal year. Completed preparation of plans and specifications for repair of north breakwater; awarded contract; and completed repair of north breakwater in April 1982 at a cost of $327,437 regular funds. 6. SAN DIEGO RIVER AND MISSION BAY, CA Location. The San Diego River has its source on the tableland in the Cuyamaca Mountains near Santa Ysabel, CA, and flows southwestward 52 miles to the Pacific Ocean at the City of San Diego. Mission Bay Harbor is adjacent to the outlet of the San Diego River, 77 miles southeast of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors and 8 miles north of San Diego Harbor. Existing project. A leveed flood channel 800 feet wide, with a capacity of 115,000 cubic feet per second, from 0.4 mile above Morena Boulevard, 3.3 miles directly to the ocean; an altered railroad bridge over the leveed river flood channel; an entrance channel about. 5,200 feet long, 670 feet wide, and 20 to 25 feet deep into Mission Bay; in the bay, a main channel and turning basin about 2,700 feet long, 1,000 feet wide, and 20 feet deep, and two anchorage basins, one about 3,200 feet long, 600 feet wide, and 15 feet deep, and the other about 1,600 feet long, ranging from 800 to 1,800 feet wide, and 20 feet deep; three jetties at the entrance; and stone revetment for the banks of the entrance and main channels and turning basin. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 4.4 feet. Extreme range is about 10 feet. Approved estimated (1982) first cost is $36,700,000 ($19,200,000 Federal and $17,500,000 non- Federal). This project modified the flood control project: "San Diego River Basin, California" (See H. Doc. 635, 77th Cong., 2d sess.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None, with the exception of mooring facilities for recreational craft and commercial sport-fishing boats only. Operations during fiscal year. Continued preparation of supplemental project plan, which is about 85 percent complete. Continued preparation of environmental assessment, which is about 50 percent complete. 7. SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA Location. On coast of southern California 90 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor and 320 miles southeast of San Francisco Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5261.) Existing project. Maintenance dredging of depths existing in 1934 in harbor formed by breakwater constructed by local interests. See page 1014 of Annual Report for 1969 for detailed description of 1962 authorized modification. Further modification was authorized in December 1970 (Public Law 91-611) to provide for dredging and maintenance of existing project by the United States. Also, see Annual Report for 1971 for detailed description of previous authorized maintenance. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 5.4 feet. Extreme range is about 10 feet. Latest approved estimated (1969) first cost for project as modified is $6,810,000, comprising $3,480,000 Federal (including $40,000 for Coast Guard costs) and $3,330,000 non-Federal (including cash contribution of $3,320,000). Prior to adoption by Congress, work was authorized by Public Works Administration. Local cooperation. See page 1015 of Annual Report for 1969 for items of local cooperation under 1962 authorized modification of existing project. Terminal facilities. A wharf 2,000 feet long; a pier 325 feet long in harbor for tie-up mooring for Coast Guard cutter; a landing float; an open mooring and slip anchorage for small craft; and a launching ramp for small craft. Operations during fiscal year. Completed maintenance dredging in December 1981 at a cost of $845,235 regular funds. In addition, a reconnaissance and condition survey was conducted at a cost of $9,923. 8. VENTURA MARINA (VENTURA HARBOR), CA Location. On coast of southern California about 65 miles northwest of the City of Los Angeles, about 70 miles northwest of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, and about 6 miles northwest of Channel Islands Harbor. Existing project. For details, see page 33-5 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two fuel docks; guest berthing docks; 3 boat-repair facilities, 1 with a 60-ton travelift; 1 full service with a 150-ton marine elevator, and 1 do-it- 33-4 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT yourself boatyard with a 20-ton travelift; Fisherman's Pier, with 3 50-ton jib cranes for off-loading commercial fishing vessels; flake ice manufacturing and distribution system; 3 wholesale fish buying stations; a retail fish market and seafood restaurant; offshore oil industry crew transportation; 1,800 boat slips; a dry storage area for 155 boats; a 3-lane deluxe launch ramp; 2 yacht clubs; a restaurant and cocktail lounge; a carpenter shop; 2 sport-fishing facilities; sightseeing cruises; 3 yacht sales; marine communications; 3 marine chandleries; 3 public restroom buildings; a harbor administration building/harbor master's office; paved jetties with handrails for sport fishing; and headquarters and visitor center for Channel Islands National Park. Under construction are a Fisherman's Quay recreational complex, with 4 restaurants and 26 marine related ancilliary businesses; Marine Center, with 18 outlets for goods and services; and Marine Arts and Science Center, with fisheries training facilities. Completed in this complex are a convenience grocery store; a marine bookstore; an accountant office; secretarial services; sport fishing; and harbor tours. Plans are under way for constructing a saltwater aquarium and a 230-room resort hotel. Operations during fiscal year. Completed emergency dredging of entrance channel and sand trap in October 1981 and completed maintenance dredging of entrance channel and sand trap in November 1981. Cost fo' dredging was $1,009,958 regular funds. 9. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Reconnaissance and condition surveys were conducted in September 1982 at Dana Point Harbor; Marina del Rey, Los Angeles County; Morro Bay Harbor; and Port Hueneme, all in California. Beach Erosion Control 10. IMPERIAL BEACH, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CA Location. On coast of southern California at Imperial Beach in San Diego County. Existing project. Plan as modified by Chief of Engineers in August 1979 provides for a submerged offshore breakwater about 5,000 feet long, extending southward from northern groin; extension of northern groin about 100 feet to connect with breakwater; and a groin about 600 feet long from shoreline to southern end of breakwater. Approved estimated (1982) first cost for project as modified is $5,730,000, comprising $3,280,000 Federal (including $30,000 for Coast Guard costs) and $2,450,000 non-Federal. Map of modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No. 4, General Design Memorandum, Imperial Beach Erosion Control Project, San Diego County, California," prepared by Los Angeles District in September 1978. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-6 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Continued preparation of plans and specifications, which are about 80 percent complete. 11. OCEANSIDE, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CA Location. On coast of southern California at Oceanside in San Diego County. Previous project. For details, see pages 1579 to 1581 of Annual Report for 1960. Existing project. A protective beach generally 200 feet wide and about 13,000 feet long between Camp Pendleton Harbor and Witherby Street and 100 feet wide and about 4,500 feet long south ofLoma Alta Creek by deposition of about 2,200,000 cubic yards of suitable material, including 500,000 cubic yards as advance nourishment; and a groin about 800 feet long near northern limit of fill. In addition, a groin extension (not part of authorized project) was constructed at non- Federal expense. Federal first cost of new work on completed project was $4,337,032 (including $2,967,461 for beach nourishment). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Completed beach nourishment to replenish existing project in May 1982 at a cost of $2,607,937 regular funds. Flood Control 12. ALAMO LAKE, BILL WILLIAMS RIVER, AZ Location. About 70 miles southeast of Kingman, AZ, in a narrow gorge at river mile 39 on Bill Williams River, AZ, a tributary of Colorado River. Existing project. For details, see page 33-7 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. 13. ALLENVILLE, AZ Location. On Gila River 1.5 miles south of Buckeye and 35 miles west of Phoenix, Maricopa County, AZ. Existing project. A 60-acre tract near intersection of Interstate 10 and Palo Verde Road, about 8 miles northwest of Buckeye, AZ, with streets, utilities, community center, park, and houses. Latest approved estimated (1980) first cost for project is $3,723,000 ($2,866,000 Federal and $857,000 non-Federal). Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-7 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Completed construction of buildings, grounds, and utilities in October 1981 at a cost of $329,776 regular funds and $28,769 required contributed funds. 33-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 14. CUCAMONGA CREEK, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA Location. In and near the Cities of Upland, Rancho Cucamonga, and Ontario, and the communities of Alta Loma and San Antonio Heights, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, CA. Existing project. Plan as modified provides for a debris basin on Cucamonga Creek and a concrete channel along Cucamonga Creek from the debris basin to Prado Dam; an improved San Antonio Heights diversion system that would include 6 debris basins and a concrete diversion channel to divert West Cucamonga Creek headwaters into Cucamonga Creek; a collection levee and a debris basin downstream from Demens, Thorpe, and Angalls Canyons and a concrete outlet channel from the debris basin to Cucamonga Creek; a debris basin in Deer Canyon and a channel along Deer Creek from the debris basin to Cucamonga Creek; the Hillside debris basin in a canyon just west of Deer Canyon with an outlet channel to Deer Creek channel; improvement of an existing levee system along the west bank of Day Creek to assure that flows from Day Canyon do not enter Deer Creek channel; turnouts to mitigate ground water basin recharge losses; landscaping appropriate for esthetic treatment; and recreational facilities in the project area. Subdrainage would be provided along specific reaches of the channels. Approved estimated (1982) first cost for modified project is $121,300,000 (includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period), comprising $97,500,000 Federal and $23,800,000 non-Federal. Map of modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No. 2, General Design for Flood Control and Recreation, Cucamonga Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, California," prepared by Los Angeles District in June 1973. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-7 and 33-8 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Completed construction of sixth contract, Cucamonga Creek, Foothill Boulevard to Cucamonga Creek debris basin, north half of Ontario International Airport box conduit, and Demens channel and debris basin, in October 1981; seventh contract, San Antonio Heights diversion system, in March 1982; and eighth contract, Deer Creek channel, Cucamonga Creek channel to Haven Avenue, in September 1982. Completed preparation of plans and specifications for ninth contract, Deer and Hillside debris basins, north half of Deer Creek channel, Hillside channel, and Deer-Day separation levee; awarded contract; and initiated construction, which is about 83 percent complete. Initiated and completed preparation of plans and specifications for tenth contract, erosion control of San Antonio Heights, and awarded contract. Continued preparation of plans and specifications for eleventh contract, erosion control of Cucamonga and Demens Creeks channels (part 1), which are about 99 percent complete. Administered rights-of-way acquisition continued by local interests. Continued preparation of operation and maintenance manual, which is about 98 percent complete. Costs for construction of channels were $13,672,501 r egular funds and $1,525,486 other contributed funds; cost for relocations was $491,517 regular funds; and cost for construction of levees was $164,400 regular funds. 15. GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ 15A. INDIAN BEND WASH, AZ Location. On Indian Bend Wash in Scottsdale and Tempe, AZ. Existing project. Plan as modified provides for a greenbelt floodway with an unlined inlet channel, including an unlined interceptor channel, a siphon to carry Arizona Canal irrigation waters under Indian Bend Wash, and a wasteway structure to discharge floodwaters from the canal into the inlet channel; an unlined outlet channel to discharge floodwaters into the Salt River; a collector and side channels system to relieve ponding west of the Arizona Canal; beautification; and recreational facilities. Design flood of 30,000 cubic feet per second would be controlled by improvements. Approved estimated (1982) first cost for modified project is $45,130,000 ($34,400,000 Federal and $10,730,000 non-Federal). Map of modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design Memorandum Phase II, Project Design for Indian Bend Wash, Arizona," prepared by Los Angeles District in May 1975. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-8 of Annual Report for 1981. Uperations during fiscal year. Completed construction of seventh contract, recreation and beautification features for interceptor channel, in June 1982. Completed preparation of plans and specifications for eighth contract, reaches 1, 2, and 3 of side channels system; awarded contract; and initiated construction, which is about 1 percent complete. Initiated and completed preparation of plans and specifications for ninth contract, bike stop, and awarded contract. Initiated preparation of plans and specifications for tenth contract, reach 4 of side channels system, which are about 70 percent complete. Continued preparation of operation and maintenance manual, which is about 58 percent complete. Cost for construction of channels was $573,313 regular funds and cost for construction of recreational facilities was $440,706 regular funds. Administered rights-ofway acquisition continued by local interests. 15B. PAINTED ROCK DAM (GILA RIVER), AZ Location. On Gila River (mile 126) about 20 miles downstream from Gila Bend, AZ, in Gila River Basin, which is a part of Colorado River Basin. Existing project. For details, see page 33-9 of Annual Report for 1981. 33-6 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-9 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. 15C. PHOENIX, AZ, AND VICINITY (INCLUDING NEW RIVER) Location. On Cave Creek, Skunk Creek, Dreamy New River, and Agua Fria River in and adjacent to metropolitan Phoenix, AZ. Existing project. Plan as modified by Division Engineer, South Pacific Division, in July 1977, provides for four dams and detention basins, one each on Dreamy Draw, Cave Creek, Skunk Creek, and New River; Arizona Canal diversion channel; channel improvements on Cave Creek, Skunk Creek, and New River; flowage easements with some floodproofing along Skunk Creek and New and Agua Fria Rivers; flood plain management along Dreamy Draw, Cave Creek, Skunk Creek, and New River; and recreational facilities. Approved estimated (1982) first cost for modified project is $548,888,000 (full funding estimate and includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period), comprising $311,298,000 Federal and $237,590,000 non-Federal. Map of modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No. 3, General Design Memorandum--Phase I, Plan Formulation for New River and Phoenix City Streams, Arizona," prepared by Los Angeles District in March 1976. Local cooperation. Requirements are decribed in full on page 33-9 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Completed construction of Adobe Dam in April 1982 at a cost of $1,381,004 regular funds; $32,263 required contributed funds; and $77,223 other contributed funds. Cost for bridge alterations was $97,254 regular funds. Completed preparation of plans and specifications for Skunk Creek channels and levees; awarded contract; and initiated construction, which is about 42 percent complete. Continued preparation of part 1A of project plan, phase II, Cave Creek floodway delineations, which is about 90 percent complete. Continued preparation of part 5 of project plan, phase II, Arizona Canal diversion channel, which is about 30 percent complete. Continued preparation of part 3 of project plan, phase II, New River Dam, which is about 98 percent complete. Completed preparation of master plan for overall project, for Cave Buttes Dam, and for Dreamy Draw Dam. Continued preparation of master plan for Adobe Dam, which is about 85 percent complete. Administered rights-of-way acquisition continued by local interests. Continued preparation of operation and maintenance manual for Cave Buttes Dam, which is about 60 percent complete. 15D. SANTA ROSA WASH (TAT MOMOLIKOT DAM AND LAKE ST. CLAIR), AZ Location. On Santa Rosa Wash in Papago Indian Reservation and about 20 miles south of Casa Grande, AZ. Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam with ar maximum height of 75.5 feet above streambed, a crest length of about 12,500 feet, and a detached spillway with a crest length of 1,000 feet; a multiple-purpose reservoir with a capacity at spillway crest of 198,500 acre-feet (July 1968), comprising 145,000 acre-feet for flood control, 15,000 acre-feet for water conservation, and 40,000 acre-feet for sediment; and development of 1,640 acres of cultivated land in Vaiva Vo irrigation project, which is authorized for construction by U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairson Papago Indian Reservation downstream from dam. Operation of reservoir would regulate runoff from a tributary area of 1,780 square miles, reducing flow of standard project flood of 77,000 cubic feet per second to a maximum outflow of 4,960 cubic feet per second. Latest approved estimated (1977) Federal first cost is $12,160,000, including $1,560,000 Bureau of Indian Affairs costs. Authorized project was modified by Design Memorandum No. 2, approved in July 1971, which contains a map of modified project plan. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-13 of Annual Report for 1979. Operations during fiscal year. Administered real estate and continued acquisition of rights-of-way at a cost of $41,269 regular funds. 15E. TUCSON DIVERSION CHANNEL, AZ Location. In Pima County in drainage areas of Tucson Arroyo and Julian Wash, tributaries of Santa. Cruz River near Tucson, AZ. Existing project. Protection for city of Tucson, AZ, and suburban areas by diverting runoff from upstream part of Tucson Arroyo drainage area to an adjacent drainage area, and thence to Santa Cruz River. After project was authorized, local interests developed a plan of improvement differing substantially from projectdocument plan and constructed a major part of improvement under their plan. Subsequently, local interests requested a modification of project-document plan to provide more flood control than would be available under plan developed by local interests. General provisions of modified plan, which replaced document plan, were approved by Chief of Engineers on September 2, 1958. Modified plan provided for increasing capacity of diversion-channel project under construction by Pima County to accommodate standard project flood discharge; and conveying floodflow to Santa Cruz River by means of an improved channel along Julian Wash. Work under modified plan involved completing diversion channel 33-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 between Tucson Arroyo and Southern Pacific railroad and enlarging that channel at Tucson Arroyo; enlarging existing diversion channel between Southern Pacific railroad and detention basin; completing excavation of detention basin and increasing discharge capacity; increasing capacity of diversion channel between detention basin and Julian Wash; constructing an improved channel alongJulian Wash; reconstructing or modifying eight highway bridges and two railroad bridges; and constructing five new highway bridges. First cost of new work for completed project as modified was $6,490,805, comprising $6,096,441 Federal (including $331,816 for Code 710 recreation project) and $394,364 non-Federal, including $1,008,000 spent for that part of completed improvements under plan developed by local interests used under modified plan. Map of modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design for Tucson Diversion Channel, Tucson, Arizona," prepared by Los Angeles District in November 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Completed preparation of master plan. 15F. WHITLOW RANCH DAM, QUEEN CREEK, AZ Location. On Queen Creek, AZ, a tributary of Gila River, about 10 miles west of Superior, AZ. Existing project. For details, see page 33-10 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintained dam in good operating condition; continued acquisition of rightsof- way; and administered real estate. 16. GOLETA, CA, AND VICINITY Location. Goleta Valley, along Atascadero Creek and its tributaries, including Tecolotito, Carneros, San Pedro, Las Vegas, San Jose, and Maria Ygnacio Creeks, from the Santa Ynez Mountains in Santa Barbara County to Pacific Ocean near Goleta, CA. Existing project. Plan provides for about 12.5 miles of channel improvement, comprising about 1.3 miles of channel clearing and about 11.2 miles of channel construction. Channel clearing would be required on Maria Ygnacio, San Jose, Las Vegas, San Pedro, and Carneros Creeks. Channel construction would include the improvement of Atascadero Creek from San Marcos Road to ocean; Maria Ygnacio Creek from Hollister Avenue to Atascadero Creek; San Jose Creek from 0.2 mile north of U.S. Highway No. 101 to San Pedro Creek; Las Vegas Creek from Cathedral Oaks Road to San Pedro Creek; San Pedro Creek from a point 0.1 mile downstream from Stow Canyon Road to Atascadero Creek; Carneros Creek from 0.6 mile upstream from U.S. Highway No. 101, by means of a diversion route, to Tecolotito Creek; and Tecolotito Creek from U.S. Highway No. 101 to Atascadero Creek. Plan also provides for beautification and recreation features. Approved estimated (1982) first cost for project is $58,900,000 ($45,200,000 Federal and $13,700,000 non-Federal). Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on pages 33-10 and 33-11 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Continued preparation of project plan, phase I, which is about 50 percent complete. 17. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA Location. Along Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers, Rio Hondo, and Ballona Creek, and tributaries thereof in Los Angeles County, CA. Previous project. For details, see pages 1768 to 1772 of Annual Report for 1941; page 1602 of Annual Report for 1942; and page 1535 of Annual Report for 1943. Existing project. Plan provides for flood control improvements in four stream basins in Los Angeles County, CA, as follows: Los Angeles River Basin, San Gabriel River Basin, Rio Hondo Basin, and Ballona Creek Basin. Provides for protection of about 326,000 acres in densely populated Los Angeles County, including areas in Los Angeles, Pasadena, Glendale, Burbank, and other cities. Plan provides for construction of 5 flood control dams (Hansen, Lopez, Santa Fe, Sepulveda, and Whittier Narrows); debris basins at mouths of 22 canyons; channel improvements along 101.3 miles of Los Angeles River, San Gabriel River, Rio Hondo, and Ballona Creek; and channel improvements along 193.69 miles of tributary channels. All units of improvement are physically completed in those four stream basins, except the one listed below, and are described in Annual Report for 1962. Unit of improvement not physically completed in Rio Hondo Basin is Sierra Madre Wash. Plan provides for the construction of about 0.8 mile of concrete channel on Sierra Madre Wash extending from inlet to existing Santa Anita Wash channel. (See table 33-H for latest approved estimated (1976) first costs for all units of improvement under existing project.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-11 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Operations for units in Los Angeles River Basin: (a) Compton Creek: Maintained channel in good operating condition from Alameda Street to Hooper Avenue storm drain. (b) Haines Canyon: Maintained debris basin and channel upstream from Plainview Avenue in good operating condition and administered real estate. (c) Hansen Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. Completed construction of second contract for recreational facilities in April 1982 at a cost of $583 regular funds and $1,290 required contributed funds. (d) Lopez Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. (e) Los Angeles River channel, Lankershim Boulevard to Stewart and 33-8 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT Gray Road: Administered real estate. (f) Los Angeles River channel, Santa Ana Branch, Pacific Electric railway bridge to Pacific Ocean: Completed contract payment for phase 2 construction of recreational facilities at a cost of $26,956 regular funds and $51,822 required contributed funds. (g) Sepulveda Dam: Completed contract payment for thirdcontract for recreational facilities at a cost of $708 required contributed funds. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. Operations for units in San Gabriel River Basin: (a) Santa Fe Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. Completed construction of segments 1 and 2, phase 4, recreational facilities, in January 1982 at a cost of $591,383 regular funds and $43,482 required contributed funds. (b) San Gabriel River channel, San Gabriel Canyon to Santa Fe Dam, Approach channel to Santa Fe Dam (remedial work): Maintained channel in good operating condition. (c) Whittier Narrows Dam: Initiated preparation of plans and specifications for fourteenth contract for recreational facilities, riparian stream development, which are about 90 percent complete. Initiated preparation of plans and specifications for fifteenth contract for recreational facilities, group camping, which are about 10 percent complete. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. Operations for units in Rio Hondo Basin: (a) Alhambra Wash: Maintained channel upstream from Valley Boulevard in good operating condition. (b) Rio Hondo channel, Whittier Narrows Dam to Los Angeles River (lower): Completed contract payment for phase 2 construction of recreational facilities at a cost of $26,956 regular funds and $51,822 required contributed funds. Operations for unit in Ballona Creek Basin: Ballona Creek channel and jetties: Maintained channel downstream from Washington Boulevard to La Salle Avenue and downstream from Los Angeles city boundary to ocean; jetties; and Pacific Avenue bridge in good operating condition. Initiated and completed preparation of plans and specifications for second contract for recreational facilities; awarded contract; and initiated construction, which is about 70 percent complete, at a cost of $405,700 regular funds and $324,700 required contributed funds. 18. MOJAVE RIVER DAM, MOJAVE RIVER BASIN, CA Location. On Mojave River at the Forks site, just downstream from mouth of Deep Creek and about 14 miles upstream from Victorville, in Mojave River Basin, CA. Existing project. A flood control dam and reservoir. Dam is a rolled-earthfill structure with a maximum height of 200 feet above streambed, a crest length of 2,200 feet, and a detached spillway with a crest length of 200 feet. Reservoir has a total capacity at spillway crest of 89,670 acre-feet (1965), including 11,000 acre-feet for sediment. Reservoir regulates runoff from a tributary area of 215 square miles, reducing flow of design flood from 94,000 cubic feet per second to a maximum outflow of about 23,500 cubic feet per second. Latest approved estimated (1981) first cost for modified project is $18,190,000 ($17,900,000 Federal and $290,000 non- Federal). Modification of project was authorized by the Chief of Engineers on November 27, 1964. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-13 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. 19. PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS DAMS, COLORADO RIVER BASIN, NV Location. In Lincoln County, NV, about 100 miles north of Hoover Dam and about 17 and 20 miles, respectively, east of Caliente, NV. Existing project. For details, see page 33-13 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintained dams in good operating condition and administered real estate. 20. SAN LUIS REY RIVER, SAN LUIS REY RIVER BASIN, CA Location. Lower San Luis Rey River Valley, along San Luis Rey River from Murray Road (river mile 7.2) to Pacific Ocean, San Diego County, CA. Existing project. Plan provides for about 5.7 miles of earth-bottom trapezoidal channel along San Luis Rey River from Murray Road to about 1 mile upstream from U. S. Highway No. 101; about 1.5 miles of channel grading, which would generally be limited to the removal of spoil banks, from about 1 mile upstream from U. S. Highway No. 101 to ocean; and about 800 feet of stone-revetted levee on the left (south) bank from the Atcheson, Topeka and Santa Fe railroad to ocean. Plan also provides for beautification features. Approved estimated (1982) first cost for project is $47,400,000 ($30,600,000 Federal and $16,800,000 non-Federal). Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-14 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Completed preparation of project plan, phase I. Continued preparation of project plan, phase II, which is about 75 percent complete. 21. SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA Location. On Santa Ana River and tributaries and on other streams in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties, CA. General plan of improvement. Although a singie comorehensive plan for flood control has been developed 33-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 for Santa Ana River Basin, improvements provided are divided into two projects in accordance with congressional authorizations. Pertinent information on the first of these two projects is given under a subsequent heading, "Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA." Santa Ana River Basin project, the second of these two projects, provides for flood control on Devil, East Twin, Warm, Lytle, Mill, and Bautista Creeks, and on Santa Ana and San Jacinto Rivers. Existing project. For details, see pages 1547 through 1553 of Annual Report for 1959. For other pertinent information, see table 33-E, "Other Authorized Flood Control Projects." One unit of existing project, San Jacinto River levee and Bautista Creek channel, has project deficiencies to be corrected. Approved estimated (1982) first cost for project unit is $15,630,000 ($13,600,000 Federal and $2,030,000 non-Federal). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Initiated preparation of plans and specifications, which are about 95 percent complete, for construction of 48 rock groins to correct ' project deficiency on San Jacinto River. Initiated preparation of supplement, which is about 50 percent complete, to Design Memorandum No. 3 to correct project deficiency on Bautista Creek. 22. SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CA Location. On Santa Ana River and tributaries and on other streams in Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, CA. General plan of improvement. Although a single comprehensive plan for flood control has been developed for Santa Ana River Basin, improvements provided are divided into two projects in accordance with congressional authorizations. Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County) project, the first of these two projects, provides for protection of metropolitan area of Orange County, which includes some areas outside Santa Ana River Basin, and flood control on San Antonio, Chino, Lytle, and Cajon Creeks. Pertinent information on the second of these two projects is given under a previous heading, "Santa Ana River Basin, CA". Existing project. For details on active units, see Annual Report for 1968. For other pertinent information, see table 33-E, "Other Authorized Flood Control Projects," and table 33-G, "Deauthorized Projects." (See table 33-I for latest approved estimated Federal first cost for all units.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Operations for units in existing project: (a) Brea Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. (b) Carbon Canyon Dam and channel: Maintained project in good operating condition; administered real estate; and continued acquisition of rights-of-way. (c) Fullerton Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. (d) Prado Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. Completed contract payment for construction of third contract for recreational facilities at a cost of $4,858 regular funds and $4,858 required contributed funds. (e) San Antonio Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. (f) San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel: Maintained project in good operating condition and administered real estate. 23. SANTA MARIA VALLEY LEVEES, SANTA MARIA RIVER BASIN, CA Location. Along Santa Maria River and Bradley Canyon in Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo Counties, CA, about 60 miles northwest of City of Santa Barbara. Improvements along Santa Maria River extend about 21.9 miles from Fugler Point (at junction of Cuyama and Sisquoc Rivers) to Pacific Ocean. Improvements along Bradley Canyon extend from Canyon mouth to Santa Maria River. Existing project. Levee and channel improvements along Santa Maria River and along Bradley Canyon. Principal features include: about 17 miles of revetted levee along left bank of Santa Maria River from Fugler Point to State Highway 1 bridge at Guadalupe; about 5 miles of revetted levee along right bank of Santa Maria River from about 1.3 miles downstream from U.S. Highway 101 to about 1.5 miles upstream from Southern Pacific railroad bridge; about 1.8 miles of channel and revetted levee from mouth of Bradley Canyon to Santa Maria River, about 21.9 miles of cleared channel along Santa Maria River from Fugler Point to Pacific Ocean; and ,raised Southern Pacific railroad bridge. Latest approved estimate&(1980) first cost is $13,710,000 (includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period), comprising $12,600,000 Federal and $1,110,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Tully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Completed construction in June 1982 to correct project deficiencies at a cost of $2,304,635 regular funds. 24. SANTA PAULA CREEK CHANNEL AND DEBRIS BASINS (INCLUDING MUD CREEK), SANTA CLARA RIVER BASIN, CA Location. Along lower Santa Paula Creek, a tributary of Santa Clara River, Ventura County, CA. Existing project. Plan as modified provides for a debris basin on Santa Paula Creek; a concrete channel along Santa Paula Creek from Santa Paula Creek debris basin to Santa Clara River; a debris basin on Mud Creek, a tributary of Santa Paula Creek; and a concrete channel along Mud Creek from Mud Creek debris basin to confluence with Santa Paula Creek. 33-10 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT Approved estimated (1982) first cost for modified project is $40,850,000 (includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period), comprising $37,800,000 Federal and $3,050,000 non-Federal. Authorized project was modified by Design Memorandum No. 4, approved in April 1973, which contains a map of modified project plan. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-15 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Continued preparation of supplement to Design Memorandum No. 4, which is about 70 percent complete. Continued preparation of environmental assessment, which is about 70 percent complete 25. SESPE CREEK AT FILLMORE, VENTURA COUNTY, CA Location. In and near the City of Fillmore, Ventura County, CA. Existing project. Plan provides for a 2-mile long rock-revetted single levee on the east bank of Sespe Creek; 25 rock groins to divert flows away from levee toe; floodgates in levee at Southern Pacific Railroad crossing; a new east span for Old Telegraph Road bridge; reinforcement of both spans of railroad bridge; and floodproofing2 homes on west bank. Latest approved estimated (1980) first cost for project is $6,600,000 ($4,000,000 Federal and $2,600,000 non-Federal). Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-15 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Completed preparation of plans and specifications, awarded contract; and initiated construction, which is about 74 percent complete. Cost for construction was $1,471,134 regular funds and cost for relocations was $80,000 regular funds. 26. SWEETWATER RIVER, SWEETWATER RIVER BASIN, CA Location. Lower Sweetwater River Valley, along Sweetwater River from Bonita Mesa Road to San Diego Bay, San Diego County, CA. Existing project. Plan provides for about 3.4 miles of improved trapezoidal channel along Sweetwater River from Bonita Mesa Road to San Diego Bay as part of a combined flood control and highway project. Approved estimated (1982) first cost for project is $41,400,000 ($21,900,000 Federal and $19,500,000 non-Federal). Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-16 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Continued preparation of project plan, which is about 99 percent complete. Continued preparation of final environmental statement, which is about 99 percent complete. 27. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection costs for fiscal year from regular funds for maintenance were $578,225. (See table 33-J on inspection of completed flood control projects.) 28. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, studies of reservoir operations for flood control were conducted; and preparation of regulations for the use of storage allocated for flood control was continued for the following Bureau of Reclamation projects: Hoover Dam and Twitchell Dam. Costs for fiscal year from regular funds for maintenance were $31,864. 29. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended (preauthorization) See table 33-K on flood control work under special authorization. Emergency bank protection (seec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Federal costs for fiscal year were $43,286 for Pismo Beach, CA, seawall; and $6,895 for Man A War bridge, $7,107 for River Road bridge, and $7,370 for Washington bridge, all in St. George, UT. Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation) Federal cost for fiscal year was $648,354, of which $157,587 were for advance preparation; $2,388 were for flood emergency operations; and $488,379 were for rehabilitation. Flood insurance activities (sections 1301-1877, 1968 Housing and Urban Development Act, Public Law 90-448, as amended) In coordination with flood control activities, flood insurance studies were continued in accordance with Inter-Agency Agreements at fiscal year cost of $60,783 under Housing and Urban Development reimbursable order. General Investigations 30. SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $2,617,837 regular funds, of which $510,463 were for navigation studies; $58,485 were for beach erosion control studies; $1,548,159 were for flood control studies; $148,159 were for surveys; $32,156 were for special studies involving coordination with other agencies; $306,332 were for review of authorized projects; and $14,083 were for supplemental preauthorization studies, phase I. 33-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 31. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $168,445 for technical services, including $1 for Luke Air Force Base and $1,828 for Salt and Gila Rivers, both in Maricopa County, AZ; $1,378 for Vandenberg Air Force Base, Santa Barbara County, CA; and $17 for Point Mugu, Ventura County, CA; $76,490 for flood plain management; and $9,113 for inspection of dams. 32. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Fiscal year cost was $10,081 for hydrologic studies. 33. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING 33A. HOLBROOK LEVEE, LITTLE COLORADO RIVER, COLORADO RIVER BASIN, AZ Holbrook levee is on Little Colorado River at Holbrook, Navajo County, AZ, in northeastern Arizona, about 200 miles northeast of Phoenix. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611, dated December 31, 1970. Plan of improvement provides for raising existing north bank levee and adding a new south bank levee, a low flow channel, recreational facilities, and mitigation features. Existing levee (north) would be raised to a height ranging from 23 feet high upstream from Apache Railroad bridge to about 12 feet high downstream from bridge, and would be about 18,000 feet long. South side levee would be about 5,000 feet long and would have a maximum height of 23 feet. Initiated preparation of project plan during fiscal year. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $853,000. Total costs during fiscal year were $109,209. 33B. SANTA ANA RIVER MAIN STEM -INCLUDING SANTIAGO CREEK AND OAK STREET DRAIN, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA Santa Ana River main stem-including Santiago Creek and Oak Street Drain, Santa Ana River Basin, CA, is on Santa Ana River and tributaries and on other streams in Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, CA. Project was authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1976, Public Law 94-587, dated October 22, 1976. Plan of improvement provides for construction of Mentone Dam near community of Mentone, San Bernardino County; managementof flood plain between Mentone Dam and Prado Reservoir; improvement of Oak Street Drain in Corona, Riverside County; enlargement of existing Prado Dam and reservoir, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties; improvement of lower Santa Ana River channel from Prado Dam to Pacific Ocean: and improvement of lower reach of Santiago Creek channel in Orange County; recreational development along project length; purchase of 8 acres of salt marsh for mitigation of project effects; purchase of 84 acres of tidal lands at mouth of Santa Ana River for preservation of endangered least tern habitat; landscaping; and recreational features. Completed preparation of project plan, phase I; and initiated detailed design studies leading to project plan, phase II, during fiscal year. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $18,600,000. Total costs during fiscal year were $374,879. 33C. SPECIAL STUDY, SANTA ANA RIVER MAIN STEM-INCLUDING SANTIAGO CREEK AND OAK STREET DRAIN, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA Special study, Santa Ana River main stem-including Santiago Creek and Oak Street Drain, Santa Ana River Basin, CA, is on Santa Ana River and tributaries and on other streams in Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, CA. Study was authorized by Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) on May 14, 1982. Special study consists of: (a) cost allocation analysis based upon apportionment of benefits to each county for three alternative plans - (1) All River Plan with Mentone Dam; (2) All River Plan without Mentone Dam; and (3) All River Plan without Mentone Dam and with a standard project flood channel from Prado Dam to Pacific Ocean; and (b) evaluation of San Bernardino Valley Municipal District Three-Dam Proposal to replace Mentone Dam in All River Plan. Initiated and completed special study during fiscal year. Total costs during fiscal year were $156,635. 34. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND -DESIGN 34A. GOLETA, CA, AND VICINITY, SANTA BARBARA COUNTY Goleta, CA, and vicinity is in Goleta Valley along Atascadero Creek and its tributaries, including Tecolotito, Carneros, San Pedro, Las Vegas, San Jose, and Maria Ygnacio Creeks, from the Santa Ynez Mountains in Santa Barbara County to Pacific Ocean near Goleta, CA. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611, dated December 31, 1970. Plan of improvement provides for about 12.5 miles of channel improvement, comprising about 1.3 miles of channel clearing and about 11.2 miles of channel construction. Channel clearing would be required on Maria Ygnacio, San Jose, Las Vegas, San Pedro, and Carneros Creeks. Channel construction would include the improvement of Atascadero Creek from San Marcos Road to ocean; Maria Ygnacio Creek from Hollister Avenue to Atascadero Creek; San Jose Creek from 0.2 33-12 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT mile north of U.S. Highway No. 101 to San Pedro Creek; Las Vegas Creek from Cathedral Oaks Road to San Pedro Creek; San Pedro Creek from a point 0.1 mile downstream from Stow Canyon Road to Atascadero Creek; Carneros Creek from 0.6 mile upstream from U.S. Highway No. 101, by means of a diversion route, to Tecolotito Creek; and Tecolotito Creek from U.S. Highway No. 101 to Atascadero Creek. Plan also provides for beautification and recreation features. Continued preparation of project l1an, phase I, during fiscal year. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $2,650,000. Total costs during fiscal year were $286,818. 34B. SAN LUIS REY RIVER, SAN LUIS REY RIVER BASIN, CA San Luis Rey River, San Luis Rey River Basin, CA, is in the lower San Luis Rey River Valley, along San Luis Rey River from Murray Road (river mile 7.2) to Pacific Ocean, San Diego County, CA. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965, Public Law 89-298, dated October 27, 1965. Final date of approval by House and Senate Public Works Committees resolution was December 17, 1970. Plan of improvement provides for about 5.7 miles of earth-bottom trapezoidal channel along San Luis Rey River from Murray Road to about 1 mile upstream from U.S. Highway No. 101; about 1.5 miles of channel grading, which would generally be limited to removal of spoil banks, from about 1 mile upstream from U.S. Highway No. 101 to ocean; and about 800 feet of stonerevetted levee on the left (south) bank from the Atcheson, Topeka and Santa Fe railroad to ocean. Plan also provides for beautification features. Completed preparation of project plan, phase I; and continued preparation of project plan, phase II, during fiscal year. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $1,854,000. Total costs during fiscal year were $279,731. 33-13 TABLE 33-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 1. Channel Islands Harbor, CA 2. Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, CA (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. (Other Contrib. Funds) 8. Newport Bay Harbor, CA (Regular Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 4. Oceanside Harbor, CA (Regular Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 5. Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), CA 6. San Diego River and Mission Bay, CA 7. Santa Barbara Harbor, CA 8. Ventura Marina bVentura Harbor), A i Total Cost to Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep. 30, 198 2 New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost $1,755,800 1,749,607 1,897,000 613,231 1,032,592 984,783 - 2,500,000 - 125,353 38,000 37,903 11,000 20,332 $135,000 $2,; 120,000 2,; 9,525,000 12,1 9,208,416 13,( 80,322 1 131,664 1 599,000 365,188 18,688,000 11,E 15,661,607 14,E - 342,000 72 315,459 - 7,700 - 7,000 - 1,063,000 - 998,795 ( - 1,200,000 - 1,160,000 316 235,000 238,522 573,000 572,770 1,000 1,036 270,000 228,165 7,308 7,540 116,000 670,000 256,539 669,003 75,000 3 46,524 3 250,000 2 222,763 2 7,701 7,701 819,088 8 820,922 8 $583,421 629,844 445,000 483,356 103,500 100,118 33-14 - $5,123,345' - 5,123,345' 212,577 15,438,5062 226,683 15,429,6692 968,000 59,796,719 626,683 58,828,517 980,000 5,373,4594 972,371 5,365,8304 390,000 989,000 548,526 913,714 294,000 34,154,5756 893,514 32,353,049' - 87,1206 - 87,1206 - 796,8977 - 796,8977 -20,767 569,259' 5,551 569,0118 - 7,700 - 7,000 692,825 4,953,890' 649,198 4,844,556' - 491,28610 - 491,28610 - 1,200,000 20,000 1,180,000 - 4,766,898" - 4,766,898" 336,277 974,39612 354,908 964,39512 .85,000 11,870,099' .69,031 11,713,300" - 1,247,473" - 1,247,473' - 172,0001' - 172,000'6 55,169 6,973,576 '6 355,755 6,973,444 '" - 1,711,539'7 - 1,711,539*' LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Total Cost to Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep. 80, 1982 10. Imperial Beach, CA (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds 11. Oceanside, San Diego County, CA 12. Alamo Lake, Bill Williams River, AZ 13. Allenville, AZ (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) 14. Cucamonga Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, CA (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) Other Contrib. Funds) 15A. Gila River Basin, AZ, Indian Bend Wash (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 15B. Gila River Basin, AZ, Painted Rock Dam (Gila River) 15C. Gila River Basin, AZ, Phoenix, AZ, and vicinity including New River) (RegularFunds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Other Contrib. unds) Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 1,200,000 448,800 1,119,489 1,047,100 9,152,4378 1,197,803 423,228 1,124,735 1,046,894 9,129,244"' - - 246,900 -28,000 849,75719 14,942 - 58,135 38,174 724,248"' -- - - 25,601 -- - - 25,584 - - 1,000,000 2,000,000 4,369,571' - - 280,724 2,686,737 4,337,032k - - - 16,934,06(P0 8,665 - 51 - 16,934,060"( 248,300 212,000 272,000 424,000 2,901,799 245,607 208,931 266,153 411,266 2,870,146 40,000 179,857 2,780,000 - 2,999,857 12,906 195,298 2,335,961 390,474 2,934,639 - - 200,000 - 200,000 - - 159,196 28,769 187,965 13,660,000 10,360,000 23,754,000 17,256,000 87,596,900 14,090,894 10,568,282 23,239,439 15,700,133 85,110,291 -- - - 85,512 -- - - 72,264 1,284,900 3,574,144 1,264,509 900,000 9,835,668 1,199,826 1,747,264 1,596,452 1,645,662 8,849,382 5,877,600 1,133,000 3,243,000 2,515,000 24,596,480 8,203,954 1,199,929 3,198,191 1,869,796 23,706,810 38,802 695,378 1,800 8,319 752,000 784,208 6,269,000 8,235,861 58,711 - 46,190 400,401 43,632 - 4,089 283,249 31,450 - 359,000 2,695,260 194,893 20,275 8,345 2,254,756 - - - 19,980,564e - 208 - 19,980,564@ 1,827,000 325,500 592,000 4,716,148 1,803,377 309,586 629,289 4,711,390 5,023,000 11,400,000 6,198,000 45,215,297 5,064,307 11,008,053 5,399,656 43,438,670 2,214 359,000 - 127,000 868,214 146,578 178,751 202,521 47,262 671,935 - 296,000 - 38,700 459,700 6,604 -906 240,960 77,223 396,562 33-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 33-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section iin Text Project 15D. Gila River Basin, AZ, Santa Rosa Wash (Tat Momolikot Dam and Lake St. Clair) 15E. Gila River Basin, AZ, Tucson diversion channel 15F. Gila River Basin, AZ, Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek 16. Goleta, CA, and vicinity 17. Los Angeles County drainage area, CA (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) Other Contrib. Funds) 18. Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, CA (Regular Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 19. Pine and Mathews Canyons Dams, Colorado River Basin, NV Total Cost to FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep. 30, 1982 __ Funding New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: -115,000 21,333 70,000 45,569 Approp. 35,000 Cost 34,620 20. San Luis Rey River, New Work: San Luis Rey River Approp. 290,000 Basin, CA Cost 280,413 21. Santa Ana River New Work: Basin, CA Approp. - Cost - 22. Santa Ana River New Work: Basin (and Orange Approp. 60,000 County), CA Cost 626,278 (Regular Funds) Maint: (Required Contrib. Funds) Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 903,000 2 893,883 1 278,800 245,600 7,000 37,000 10,218,900 3,360 2,488 41,283 10,218,640 -30,000 48,277 20,000 20,033 ,920,000 3 ,664,856 4 ,055,600 3 ,116,442 3 554,665 2 491,091 2 33-16 22 22 83,000 80,000 - 6,097,625! 8 66,448 106,851 7,237 6,096,441" " - - - 1,867,963 - - - 1,867,963" 52,000 33,000 47,000 478,413 48,685 36,566 42,645 474,058 100,000 400,000 - 500,000 97,271 377,275 15,870 490,416 1,568,000 2,697,000 815,000 376,082,985' " 1,528,809 1,990,086 1,337,870 375,585,896! ' 1,837,700 3,234,600 3,044,000 35,725,020P" ,808,269 2,773,217 2,719,160 34,857,273' ,747,300 616,467 127,500 13,646,523 !,755,063 760,513 527,013 13,323,324" - - - 36,644,865" - - - 36,639,888! - - - 17,838,198 8,544 9,927 244 17,838,198 207,000 241,000 773,000 1,758,548 235,064 240,158 754,707 1,739,126 - - - 286,300 - - - 284,501 - - - 1,401,248 - - - 1,401,248 51,000 28,000 44,000 553,356 48,620 30,760 39,883 549,239 200,000 300,000 - 1,364,000 210,973 235,956 67,190 1,364,000 - - 239,000 13,742,279" - - 212,270 13,715,549" 46,000 92,000 - 47,151,6388" " -2,114 154,058 -1,367 47,121,614" " x,172,500 1,606,000 1,291,700 16,588,810 " 1,965,343 1,744,626 1,224,904 16,428,187" * 29,000 45,000 - 3,253,156" 262,595 118,891 44,056 3,191,4730 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep. 30, 1982 23. Santa Maria Valley New Work: levees, Santa Maria Approp. 117,400 150,000 1,600,000 2,405,000 10,080,134" River Basin, CA Cost 208,853 106,269 1,475,037 2,466,494 9,972,929 ' 24. Santa Paula Creek New Work: channel and debris Approp. - 49,000 250,000 310,000 4,6591,000" basins (including Cost 8,045 17,016 213,732 313,444 4,525,9784 Mud Creek), Santa Clara River Basin CA (Regular Funds) (Other Contrib. New Work: Funds) Contrib. - - 11,400 -155,542 49,458 Cost - - - 2,192 49,458 25. Sespe Creek at New Work: Fillmore Ventura Approp. 165,000 25,000 40,000 2,630,000 2,920,000 County, (A Cost 154,239 24,229 46,769 1,784,599 2,066,120 (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. New Work: Funds) Contrib. - - - 1,397,808 1,397,808 Cost - - - 1,212,266 1,212,266 26. Sweetwater River, New Work: Sweetwater River Approp. - 100,000 15,100 50,000 1,479,503 Basin, CA Cost 17,603 40,948 72,395 53,603 1,479,501 1. Excludes $1,361,668 Navy funds; Coast Guard costs; and $210,748 other contributed funds. 2. Includes $7,178 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. Excludes $3,619,008 for maintenance accomplished with Navy funds. 3. Includes $2,187,047 for new work for previous project; $1,593,667 public works funds; a credit of $33,050 for transfer of land at Reservation Point; and $996,792 emergency relief funds. Excludes Federal funds spent by the Navy for new work on middle breakwater, and Coast Guard costs. 4. Includes $139,347 for maintenance for previous project and $121,523 for reconnaissance and condition survey costs since FY 1958. 5. Includes $1,672,575 for new work betterments desired by local interests prior to 1976 modification. 6. Includes $87,120 for maintenance betterments desired by local interests prior to 1976 modification. 7. Public Works Administration funds. Excludes $796,897 required contributed funds and $1,100 preauthorization costs. 8. Includes $87,336 for reconnaissance and condition survey costs since FY 1958. 9. Includes $42,155 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. Excludes $3,942,660 for maintenance accomplished with Navy funds. 10. For jetty and groin extensions desired by local interests. 11. Excludes Coast Guard costs. 12. Includes $20,517 for reconnaissance and condition survey costs since FY 1958. 13. Excludes $557,832 other contributed funds. Includes $2,610,000 regular funds and excludes $2,910,000 required contributed funds, both for new work on flood control project, "San Diego River Basin, Calif." 14. Includes $81,941 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. 15. Excludes Coast Guard costs. 16. Includes $29,198 public works funds; $11,000working funds for work performed in addition to existing project;an $19,198 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. Excludes $462,986 other contributed funds spent by the Corps for maintenance-dredging betterments desired by local interests. 17. Excludes $1,708,836 required contributed funds and Coast Guard costs. 18. Includes $53,899 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. 19. Excludes $66,124 other contributed funds and Coast Guard costs. 20. Excludes $604,817 other contributed funds. 21. Includes $57,000 Code 710 funds since FY 1975. 22. Includes $357,469 Code 710 funds since FY 1962. 23. Excludes $394,364 other contributed funds. 24. Includes $333,000 Code 710 funds since FY 1977. 25. Includes $331,816 Code 710 funds since FY 1977. 26. Includes ,758 Code 710 funds since FY 1962. 27. Includes 11,008,935 emergency relief funds for new work. Excludes 16,726,888 emergency relief funds spent by Corps in connection with emergency relief (previous) project and $107,939 for minor rehabilitation. 28. Includes $22,820,000 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($1,226,100 for Sepulveda Dam; $6,290,000 for Whittier Narrows Dam; $22,000 for LACDA prototype; $556,000 for Hansen Dam; $9,456,400 for Santa Fe Dam;: 215,000 for Tujunga Wash channel; $8,500 for Lopez Dam; $3,571,000 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels; and $1,475,000 for Ballona Creek channel). 29. Includes $22,322,910 Code 710 funds since FY. 1974 ($1,222,041 for Sepulveda Dam; $6,289,218 for Whittier Narrows Dam; $22,000 for LACDA prototype; $533,181 for Hansen Dam* $9,176,837 for Santa Fe Dam; $215,000 for Tujunga Wash channel; $8,500 for Lopez Dam; $3,527,348 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels; and $1,328,785 for Ballona Creek channel). 30. Includes $13,646,523 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($992,650 for Sepulveda Dam; $6,527 817 for Whittier Narrows Dam; $200,000 for Tujunga Wash channel* $460,500 for Hansen Dam; $2,824,056 for Los Angeles kiver and Rio Hondo channels; $1,469,000 for Santa FeDam; and $1,172,500 for Ballona Creek channel). 31. Includes $13,323,324 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($992,545 for Sepulveda Dam; $6,511 792 for Whittier Narrows Dam; $199,542 for Tujunga Wash channel; $457,623 for 33-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 33-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Hansen Dam; $2,779,335 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels; $1,442,018 for Santa Fe Dam; and $940,469 for Ballona Creek channel). 32. Non-Federal funds spent by the Federal Government to September 30, 1982, for replacements required as part of local cooperation and betterments desired by local interests. Excludes $4,238,000 other contributed funds spent by the Corps in connection with emergency relief (previous) project. 33. Excludes $200,000 required contributed funds for Devil, East Twin, and Warm Creeks channel improvements and Lytle Creek levee; and other contributed funds, as follows: $1,641,668 for Devil, East Twin, and Warm Creeks channel improvements and Lytle Creek levee; $35,830 for Mill Creek levees; and $327,723 for San Jacinto River levee and Bautista Creek channel. 34. Comprises funds for Brea, Fullerton, Prado, and San Antonio Dams, Carbon Canyon Dam and channel, Lytle and Cajon Creeks channel improvements, and San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel (active units). 35. Includes $5,000 working funds for San Antonio Dam; $67,361 for San Juan Dam (inactive unit)(also reported under "Other Authorized Flood Control Projects"); and $85,310 undistributed funds. Excludes other contributed funds spent by the Corps, as follows: $124,105 for water conservation betterments desired by local interests at Prado Dam; $8,500 for betterments desired by local interests at San Antonio Dam; $234,709 for betterments desired by local interests on San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel; and $601,762 for required items'of local cooperation on Lytle and Cajon Creeks channel improvements. Excludes $290,000 spent direct by local interests on San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel for local cooperation items not required. 36. Includes $5,077,731 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($1,058,731 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel; $1,273,000 for Fullerton Dam; and $2,746,000 for Prado Dam). 37. Includes $5,047,707 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($1,058,731 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel; $1,264,236 for Fullerton Dam; and $2,724,740 for Prado Dam). 38. Excludes maintenance for Lytle and Cajon Creeks channel improvements, which are operated and maintained by local interests. 39. Includes $3,253,156 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($1,424 926 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel; $1,334,230 for Fullerton Dam; and $494 000 for Prado Dam). 40. Includes $3 191,473 Code 710 funds since FY 1975 $1,388 424 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel; $1,312,523 for Fullerton Dam; and $490,526 for Prado Dam). 41. Excludes $106,364 other contributed funds. 42. Excludes non-Federal costs of $295,000 for local cooperation items not required. 33-18 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. Sep. 3, 1954 2. June 3, 1896 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Do. Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 17, 1940 Sep. 3, 1954 CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA Harbor for light-draft vessels and shore protection works. H. Doe. 862, 88d Cong., 2d sess. LOS ANGELES AND LONG BEACH HARBORS, CA A breakwater 8,500 feet long, east of Point Fermin. S. Doec. 18, 55th Cong., 1st sess. Extend said breakwater to shore, making a total length H. Doc. 969, 60th Cong., of 11,152 feet from Point Fermin. 1st seas. Dredge Los Angeles outer harbor west of entrance Rivers and Harbors channel. Commit.,*. Doec. 8, 62d Cong., 2d sess. For silt-diversion works. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 64th Cong., 2d sees. Triangular area approach to Los Angeles inner harbor H. Doc. 1013, 66th Cong., entrance channel. 3d seas. Dredge Los Angeles Harbor main channel and entrance H. Dc 8349, 68th 35 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide; dredge inner harbor Cong., I1st seas. turning basin 35 feet deep; and reclamation of Reservation Point. A detached breakwater 12,500 feet long in prolongation Rivers and Harbors of existing breakwater (authorized by act of 1896). Committee Doc. 3388, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Widen fairway on east side of entrance to Los Angeles S. Doc. 130, 71st Cong., inner harbor dredge a channel 35 feet deep and 650 2d sees. feet wide in East Basin from turning basin to U.S. station 406; dredge 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide in Cerritos channel from U.S. station 406 to Long Beach turning basin; a turning basin 35 feet deep at Long Beach; entrance channel to Long Beach Harbor 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide; and maintenance of the Long Beach breakwater south of outer end pier A. This act provides that in no case shall dredging be done within 50 feet of established pierhead lines of existing piers and wharves. Dredge 1,000-foot-wide entrance channel to Los Angeles S. Committee print, outer harbor to 40-foot depth and a turning basin 3,500 74th Cong., 1st ses. feet long and 1,500 feet wide to same depth; and enlarge entrance to inner harbor by dredging to 35-foot depth a triangular area at its junction with turning basin. Dredge to a depth of 40 feet areas A and B adjacent to H. Doc. 843, 76th Cong., 40-foot-depth entrance channel; construct and maintain a 3d sess. rubblemound breakwater of composite type 21,000 feet long in eastward direction from northeast end of existing detached breakwater; dredge about 4 million cubic yards initially for a settling basin at mouth of Los Angeles River diversion channel, and deposit material on beaches eastward therefrom to Belmont pier; maintenance dredging of areas A and B, and at mouth of Los Angeles River diversion channel; all subject to such modifications as in discretion of the Chief of Engineers may be advisable to meet requirements of the Navy. Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in East Basin as a modifi- H. Doc. 161, 83d Cong., cation of existing project. This act provides that the Secre- 1st seas. tary of the Army is authorized to reimburse local interests for work they have done upon this project prior to July 1, 1953, at actual cost to local interests so far as same shall be approved by Chief of Engineers and found to have been done in accordance with the project hereby adopted and that such reimbursement shall be subject to appropriations applicable thereto or funds available therefor and shall not take precedence over 33-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 33-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents July 14, 1960 Oct. 22, 1976 3. Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 4. Oct. 27, 1965 5. May 17, 1950 6. July 24, 1946 7. Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 31, 1970 8. Aug. 13, 1968 other pending projects of higher priority for harbor improvements; and that such payments shall not exceed $500,000. Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in West Basin as a modification of existing project. Dredge Los Angeles Harbor entrance channel 45 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and about 5,500 feet long; Los Angeles channel 45 feet deep, 750 feet wide, and about 12,500 feet long; inner harbor turning basin 45 feet deep, 1,350 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long; East Basin channel 45 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long; West Basin 45 feet deep, from 350 to 1,350 feet wide, and about 3,800 feet long; and East Basin 45 feet deep, from 400 to 950 feet wide, and about 2,000 feet long. This act provides that no dredging shall be done within 125 feet of established pierhead lines, wharves, or other structures NEWPORT BAY HARBOR, CA Maintenance of work authorized by Public Works Administration. Widening the main channel to a general width of 350 feet and a width of 700 feet just inside the entrance; deepening Newport channel to 15 feet over a width varying up to 330 feet; and dredging two anchorage areas to a depth of 20 feet. OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA Maintenance of general navigation features of Del Mar Boat Basin and of Oceanside Harbor. REDONDO BEACH HARBOR (KING HARBOR), CA Reconstruction of part of original breakwater and construction of extension; construction of south breakwater; and maintenance of breakwaters. SAN DIEGO RIVER AND MISSION BAY, CA Modification of existing flood control project for San Diego River, CA, to include a multiple-purpose project for flood control on San Diego River and small-boat navigation on Mission Bay. SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA Maintenance dredging present depths into harbor formed by breakwater constructed by local interests. Permits maintenance by means of a fixed sand-intercepting plant to be provided and operated by and at expense of local interests. United States to contribute to operating expense an amount not to exceed $30,000 annually, * whenever funds are allotted therefor; funds thus contributed to be reduced by actual cost of harbor maintenance if and when intercepting plant has been installed. Modification of existing project. Dredging and maintenance by United States. VENTURA MARINA (VENTURA HARBOR), CA Adoption and maintenance of existing general navigation features of harbor, excluding interior basins; construction of an offshore breakwater; dredging a sand trap in lee of breakwater; repairing existing north and middle jetties; and construction of recreational fishing facilities on jetty crests. 33-20 H. Doc. 401, 86th Cong., 2d less. H. Doc 94-594, 94th Cong., 2d sess.' S. Committee Print, 75th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 138, 78th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 76, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 303, 81st Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 760, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 348, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 518, 87th Cong., 2d sess.' None H. Doc. 356, 90th Cong., 2d sess. LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 10. July 3, 1958 11. Mar. 29, 1961 Oct. 20, 1980 12. Dec. 22, 1944 13. July 15, 19802 14. Aug. 13, 1968 15A. Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 7, 1974 15B. May 17, 1950 15C. Oct. 27, 1965 15D. Oct. 27, 1965 15E. June 30, 1948 15F. July 24, 1946 16. Dec. 31, 1970 17. June 22, 1936 May 15, 1937 IMPERIAL BEACH, CA Federal participation by contribution of Federal funds toward cost of five groins. OCEANSIDE, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CA Protective beach and stone groin. Beach nourishment. ALAMO LAKE, BILL WILLIAMS RIVER, AZ Multiple-purpose dam and reservoir. ALLENVILE, AZ Relocate community, streets, utilities, community center, and park; and replace houses. CUCAMONGA CREEK, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA Debris-collection facilities, with a system of channels, and a diversion system. INDIAN BEND WASH, GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ Channel, levees, a siphon system, and transition works. Cost of siphon system borne by United States. PAINTED ROCK DAM (GILA RIVER), GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ Dam and flood control basin. PHOENIX AZ., AND VICINITY (INCLUDING NEW RIVER), GILA RIVER BASIN Detention basins, diversion channels, and channel improvements. SANTA ROSA WASH (TAT MOMOLIKOT DAM AND LAKE ST. CLAIR), GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ Multiple-purpose dam and reservoir, irrigation works, and recreation and fish and wildlife facilities. TUCSON DIVERSION CHANNEL, GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ Channel improvements. WHITLOW RANCH DAM, QUEEN CREEK, GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ Dam and flood control basin. GOLETA, CA, AND VICINITY Channel improvement, and beautification and recreational features. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA Reservoirs and flood channels for flood control and related purposes at an estimated construction cost not to exceed $70 million. Added flood channels on Ballona Creek and tributaries to project. H . Doc. 399, 84th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 456, 86th Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 625, 78th Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 323, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 303, 88th Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 331, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 216, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 189, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 274, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 220, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 91-392, 91st Cong., 2d sess. None None 33-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 33-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sep., 1954 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 30, 1963 June 18, 1965 18. July 14, 1960 19. May 17, 1950 20. Dec. 17, 19703 21. May 17, 1950 22. June 22, 1936 Provision of lands, easements, and rights-of-way and relocations by Federal Government instead of by local interests. (Resultant additional cost to the United States, $12,541,000.) Project extended to include additional flood control reservoirs, flood control channels, and debris basins for flood control and related purposes. Also authorized to be appropriated $25 million for further accomplishment of plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $25 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan approved in Flood Control Act of Aug 18, 1941. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $25 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Rio Hondo channel improvement, Whittier Narrows Reservoir to Los Angeles River (in lieu of enlarging channel and bridges on San Gabriel River downstream from reservoir). Also authorized to be appropriated an additional $40 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $12,500,000 for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $44 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $32 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $3,700,000 for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $30 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. In addition to all previous authorizations, completion of improvements under the comprehensive plan for flood control in the Los Angeles River Basin at a presently estimated cost of $31 million for completion. MOJAVE RIVER DAM, MOJAVE RIVER BASIN, CA Dam and reservoir, and an earthfill dike. PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS DAMS, COLORADO RIVER BASIN, NV Dams and flood control basins. SAN LUIS REY RIVER, SAN LUIS REY RIVER BASIN, CA Channel and levee, and beautification features. SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA Levees along Mill Creek in zone 1; a system including levees and channel improvements generally along Devil, East Twin, and Warm Creeks in zone 5; levees along Santa Ana River near Riverside in zone 7; and levees along Bautista Creek and San Jacinto River in zone 9, at an estimated construction cost not to exceed $17,577,000. SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CA Reservoirs and flood channels for flood control and related purposes for protection of metropolitan area of Orange County, at an estimated construction cost not to exceed $13 million. None H. Doc. 838, 76th Cong., 3d sess. None None None None None None None None None H. Doc. 164, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 530, 81st Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 91-106, 91st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 135, 81st Cong., 1st seas. None 33-22 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents June 28, 1938 San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel portion of H. Doc. 688, 75th Cong., improvement. Authorized to be appropriated $6,500,000 3d sess. for initiation and partial accomplishment of plans for those creeks. Rescinded provisions of Flood Control Act of 1936, providing that local interests pay for relocations, lands, easements, and rights-of-way. (Estimated resultant additional cost to United States, $3,500,000.) Aug. 18, 1941 Authorized to be appropriated an additional $2,500,000 for None prosecution of projects approved in above flood control acts. Dec. 22, 1944 Authorized to be appropriated an additional $10 million H. Doc. 534, 78th Cong., for prosecution of proects adopted in above-mentioned 2d sess.' flood control acts, including projects on Lytle and Cajon Creeks for local flood protection at San Bernardino and Colton, CA. July 3, 1958 Authorized to be appropriated an additional $8 million None for prosecution of projects approved in abovementioned flood control acts. SANTA MARIA VALLEY LEVEES, SANTA MARIA RIVER BASIN, CA 23. Sep. 3, 1954 Levee and channel improvements. H. Doc. 400, 83d Cong., 2d sess. SANTA PAULA CREEK CHANNEL AND DEBRIS BASINS (INCLUDING MUD CREEK), SANTA CLARA RIVER BASIN, CA 24. June 30, 1948 Channel improvement. H. Doc 443, 80th Cong., 1st sess. SESPE CREEK AT FILLMORE, VENTURA COUNTY, CA 25. Aug. 11, 19802 Levee, rock groins, floodgates, bridge span, and None floodproofed homes. SWEETWATER RIVER, SWEETWATER RIVER BASIN, CA 26. Aug. 13, 1968 Channel improvement, as part of a combined flood H. Doc. 148, 90th Cong., control and highway project. 1st sess. 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Date approved by Chief of Engineers under provisions of section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. 3. Final date of approval by House and Senate Public Works Committees resolution under provisions of section 201, Public Law 89-298. 33-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 33-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 830, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Dana Point Harbor, CA Completed 1972 $4,737,550' $40,3962 Marina del Rey, Los Angeles County, CA Completed 1981 4,238,752' 1,322,173' Morro Bay Harbor, CA Completed 1980 2,612,093' 4,955,524' Port Hueneme, CA Completed (part) 1976 1,272,6577 40,1568 Port San Luis, CA Completed & 1977 1,137,759' 69,58910 Active (mod) San Diego Harbor, CA Completed 1980 28,091,7761 1,506,436"s 1. Excludes $4,777,000 required contributed funds and 9. Includes $568,417 for new work prior to modification Coast Guard costs. by 1965 River and Harbor Act. Excludes Coast Guard costs. 2. Includes $40,396 for reconnaissance and condition 10. Includes $54,715 for maintenance for project prior to surveys, modification by 1965 River and Harbor Act and $14,874 for 3. Excludes $4,238,752 required contributed funds; reconnaissance and condition surveys. $1,843,146 other contributed funds; and Coast Guard costs. 11. Includes $154,704 for new work for previous projects' 4. Includes $75,418 for reconnaissance and condition $86,352 public works funds; and $1,226,793 emergency relief surveys. Excludes $114,000 required contributed funds. funds. Excludes $254,795 Navy funds for dredging entrance 5. Navy funds. Excludes $2,128,411 for rehabilitation, channel in FY 1961 to depth of -42 feet mean lower low water 6. Includes $260,972 for reconnaissance and condition (or 2 feet below project depth); $715,215 required contributed surveys since FY 1958 and $307,945 Navy funds. Excludes funds; $1,900,063 other contributed funds, including $4,441 $124,578 other contributed funds. Includes $10 expended in for betterments desired by local interests prior to modification FY 1982. by 1968 River and Harbor Act; and Coast Guard costs. 7. Excludes $57,609 other contributed funds. Includes 12. Includes $59,904 for maintenance for previous projects $260,105 expended in FY 1982 as a contract payment adjust- and $118,899 for reconnaissance and condition surveys since ment. FY 1958. In addition, includes $144 for retroactive pay 8. Includes $40,156 for reconnaissance and condition increase, as reported in 1958 Annual Report, page 1430. surveys. 33-24 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Anaheim Bay Harbor, Orange County, CA' Completed 1967 $89,119 - Bird Rock area, La Jolla, San Diego County, CA= Completed 1967 25,881' - Coast of California, Point Mugu to San Pedro breakwater, CA Completed 1972 1,253,594' - Doheny Beach State Park (Doheny State Beach), CA Completed 1968 578,717' - Las Tunas Beach, San Diego County, CA Active 1976 107,484 - Ocean Beach, San Diego County, CA6 Completed 1960 7,912 - San Diego (Sunset Cliffs), CA Active 1979 365,000' San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Orange County, CA Active 1979 6,203,494 - Ventura-Pierpont area, CA Completed (part) 1969 715,819' - & Deferred (part) 1. The project authorized by the Act of Congress of October 23, 1962, H. Doc. 602, 87th Cong., 2d sess., in lieu of part of the original Anaheim Bay Harbor project is covered under San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Orange County, CA. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of section 103, Public Law 87-874. 3. Excludes $75,614 required contributed funds. 4. Excludes $1,238,418 required contributed funds. 5. Excludes $431,260 required contributed funds. 6. Plant in service. 7. Excludes $180,438 required contributed funds. 8. Excludes $2,983,021 required contributed funds. Includes $33,321 expended in FY 1982. 9. Excludes $117,406 other contributed funds for beachnourishment betterments and $618,949 required contributed funds. 33-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 33-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance City Creek levee, San Bernardino County, CAI Completed - $400,0002 - Gila River Basin, AZ: Camelsback Dam (Gila River) Deferred 1963 Gila and Salt Rivers levee and channel improvements Active (part) 1966 73,201 - & Deferred (part) Lower Gila River levee and channel improvements (Gila River and tributaries downstream from Painted Rock Dam) Inactive 1975 2,413,051 - Middle Gila River channel improvements, upper end of Safford Valley to Buttes damsite (Camelsback damsite to Salt River) Active 1970 402,867 - Pinal Creek channel improvements (Globe) Deferred 1968 121,5098 - Holbrook levee, Little Colorado River, Colorado River Basin, AZ Completed 1950 335,000 - Lytle and Warm Creeks, Santa Ana River Basin, CA Completed 1981 35,043,3044 - Needles, San Bernardino County, CA' Completed 1973 1,000,000 - Oro Grande Wash channel improvements, Mojave River Basin, CA' Completed 1970 1,000,0006 - Quail Wash levee, Joshua Tree, San Bernardino County, CA' Completed - 212,745 - Ridgecrest, Kern County, CAI Terminated 1973 195,194 - Rose Creek channel improvements, San Diego, CA'. Completed 1972 982,432 - San Diego River (Mission Valley), San Diego River Basin, CA Inactive 1978 1,708,4378 - Santa Ana River Basin, CA: Devil, East Twin, and Warm Creeks channel improvements and Lytle Creek levee Completed 1962 7,753,9379 - Mill Creek levees Completed 1961 617,89010 - Riverside levees Completed 1959 2,104,478 - San Jacinto River levee and Bautista Creek channel Completed 1962 3,239,24411 - Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA: Aliso Creek Dam Inactive- - - San Juan Dam Inactive 1950 67,361 Trabuco Dam Inactive - - - Santa Clara River levee improvement, Santa Clara River Basin, CA Completed 1961 2,126,672 - Tijuana River Basin, CA Completed . 1979 1,703,03112 - University Wash and Spring Brook, Riverside, CA Inactive 1975 213,313 - Ventura River Basin, CA: Stewart Canyon debris basin and channel Completed 1964 939,908's - Ventura River levee Completed 1950 1,349,638" - Whitewater River Basin, CA: Banning levee-San Gorgonio River, Riverside County' Completed 1966 97,868 - Chino Canyon improvements, Palm Springs' Completed 1973 819,878' - 33-26 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-E (Cont'd) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Tahchevah Creek detention basin and channel improvements Completed 1967 1,420,552' - Tahquitz Creek Inactive 1974 1,063,600 - Winslow (tributaries of Little Colorado River), Little Colorado River Basin, AZ Completed (part) 1973 1,831,300 - & Deferred (part) 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of 9. Excludes $200,000 required contributed funds and section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. $1,641,668 other contributed funds. 2. Excludes $371,058 other contributed funds. 10. Excludes $35,830 other contributed funds. 3. Advance planning only. 11. Excludes $327,723 other contributed funds. Includes 4. Excludes $5,436,616 other contributed funds. Includes $212,270 expended in FY 1982. $774 expended in FY 1982. 12. International Boundary and Water Commission funds. 5. Excludes $619,912 required contributed funds and 13. Excludes $179,148 other contributed funds. $91,160 other contributed funds. 14. Includes $6,000 Code 710 funds since FY 1977. Excludes 6. Excludes $514,806 required contributed funds and $17,006 other contributed funds. $176,295 other contributed funds. 15. Excludes $8,718 required contributed funds and $53,470 7. Excludes $251,000 required contributed funds and other contributed funds. $154,733 other contributed funds. 16. Excludes $74,718 required contributed funds. 8. Includes $9 expended in FY 1981. TABLE 33-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Hodges Dam, San Dieguito River Basin, CA 1958 1978 - Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251 Las Vegas Wash tributaries, Colorado River Basin, NV 1964 1977 $295,191 - Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251 Villa Park Dam, Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA - 1978 - Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251 33-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 33-H LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA CA: LATEST APPROVED ESTIMATED FIRST COSTS FOR ALL UNITS OF IMPROVEMENT UNDER EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 17 of Text) Latest Approved Estimated Cost 1976' Project Units Federal LocalP Total UNITS IN $70 MILLION PROJECT Los Angeles River Basin: Compton Creek, Los Angeles River to Hooper Ave. storm drain $2,510,500 - $2,510,500 Haines Canyon 524,000 - 524,000 Hansen Dam 11,343,000 - 11,343,000 Los Angeles River channel: Lankershim Blvd. to Steward and Gray Rd. 40,807,300 - 40,807,300 Los Angeles River channel, Long Beach Blvd. 34,200 - 34,200 Sepulveda Dam 6,657,000 - 6,657,000 Sycamore Wash 24,000 - 24,000 Verdugo Wash, Concord St. to upper Canada bridge 1,087,000 - 1,087,000 San Gabriel River Basin: San Gabriel River channel: San Gabriel Canyon to Santa Fe Dam 810,800 - 810,800 Approach channel to Santa Fe Dam (remedial work) 951,900 - 951,900 Santa Fe Dam to Walnut Creek 32,300 - 32,300 Santa Fe Dam 12,647,000 - 12,647,000 Rio Hondo Basin: Alhambra Wash 1,109,000 - 1,109,000 Ballona Creek Basin: Ballona Creek channel and jetties 1,280,000 - 1,280,000 Subtotal 79,818,000 - 79,818,000 UNITS OUTSIDE $70 MILLION PROJECT Los Angeles River Basin: Blanchard Canyon 682,000 $476,000 1,158,000 Blue Gum Canyon 533,000 233,000 766,000 Burbank-Eastern system 7,149,000 1,850,000 8,999,000 Burbank-Western system (lower) 1,279,000 268,000 1,547,000 Burbank-Western system (upper) 4,930,000 2,959,000 7,889,000 Caballero Creek 1,484,200 493,000 1,977,200 Compton Creek: Los Angeles River to Hooper Ave. storm drain 149,000 - 149,000 Hooper Ave. storm drain to Main St. 1,052,000 457,000 1,509,000 Dead Horse Canyon and Royal Blvd. channel 664,000 316,000 980,000 Lopez Canyon diversion 743,500 665,000 1,408,500 Lopez Dam 729,000 - 729,000 Los Angeles River channel: Owensmouth Ave. to Lankershim Blvd. 8,135,800 4,247,000 12,382,800 Lankershim Blvd. to Stewart and Gray Rd. 9,202,100 - 9,202,100 Steward and Gray Rd. to Santa Ana Branch, Pacific Electric railway bridge 5,860,900 81,000 5,941,900 Santa Ana Branch, Pacific Electric railway bridge to Pacific Ocean 32,612,000 9,173,000 41,785,000 Pacoima Wash channel 3,178,100 1,306,000 4,484,100 Tujunga Wash channel 7,322,900 2,557,000 9,879,900 Verdugo Wash, upper Canada bridge to debris basin 635,000 363,000 998,000 Wilson Canyon and Mansfield St. channel 3,917,500 857,000 4,774,500 Winery Canyon 413,000 265,000 678,000 San Gabriel River Basin: Coyote Creek (including North Fork) 18,802,300 8,426,000 27,228,300 Emerald Wash and Live Oak Wash 1,658,600 1,182,000 2,840,600 Marshall Creek 2,577,900 968,000 3,545,900 San Gabriel River channel: Santa Fe Dam.to Whittier Narrows Dam 5,748,800 1,797,000 7,545,800 Whittier Narrows Dam to Pacific Ocean 20,887,200 3,108,000 23,995,200 Thompson Creek and San Jose Wash (including San Jose Creek) 21,274,600 6,095,000 27,369,600 Walnut Creek inlet channel 2,879,000 1,091,000 3,970,000 Walnut Creek system 17,232,600 8,715,000 25,947,600 Whittier Narrows Dam 32,254,000 38,000 32,292,000 33-28 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA CA: LATEST APPROVED ESTIMATED FIRST COSTS FOR ALL UNITS OF IMPROVEMENT UNDER EXISTING PROJECT TABLE 33-H (Cont'd) (See Section 17 of Text) Latest Approved Estimated Cost 1976' Project Units Federal Locale Total Rio Hondo Basin: Arcadia Wash system Eaton Wash Rio Hondo channel: Peck Rd. to Rosemead Blvd. (upper) Whittier Narrows Dam to Los Angeles River (lower) Rubio Canyon diversion Santa Anita Wash Sawpit Wash Sierra Madre Villa channel Sierra Madre Wash Ballona Creek Basin: Ballona Creek channel Benedict Canyon system Centinela Creek Sawtelle-Westwood system (including Sepulveda channel) Subtotal Grand total for comprehensive plan 1. Excludes estimated cost for Code 710 funds and estimated cost for minor rehabilitation. 2. Approved by Los Angeles County Flood Control District as of September 30, 1976, except for Walnut Creek system 5,236,800 1,893,000 4,225,100 1,194,000 4,412,000 550,000 8,165,000 2,565,000 1,066,400 254,000 3,045,700 434,000 2,348,600 745,000 781,400 366,000 1,732,000 248,000 746,600 - 15,284,900 3,785,000 4,083,800 4,788,000 9,620,700 1,492,000 274,736,000 76,300,000 7,129,800 5,419,100 4,962,000 10,730,000 1,320,400 3,479,700 3,093,600 1,147,400 1,980,000 746,600 19,069,900 8,871,800 11,112,700 351,036,000 354,554,000 76,300,000 430,854,000 channel estimate, which was increased by $42,000 to permit rounding of overall non-Federal estimate to three sigmficant figures. 33-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 33-I SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CA: LATEST APPROVED ESTIMATED FEDERAL FIRST COST FOR ALL UNITS (See Section 22 of Text) Estimated Cost Project Total Latest Revision Date ACTIVE UNIT' Completed: Brea Dam $1,189,0682 * Fullerton Dam 411,0762 3 Lytle and Cajon Creeks channel improvements 7,612,000 ' Prado Dam 9,473,2732 3 San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel 10,924,170 San Antonio Dam 7,001,1764 Completed Except for Minor Completion Items: Carbon Canyon Dam and channel 5,150,0002 1961 INACTIVE UNITS' Aliso Creek Dam 340,000 1954 San Juan Dam 5,960,000 1954 Trabuco Dam 2,190,000 1954 DEAUTHORIZED UNITE Villa Park Dam 2,270,000 1954 1. For details, see section 22 of text. 2. Not including estimated cost of Code 710 funds. 3. Plant in service. 4. Includes $5,000 working funds. 5. For additional information, see "Other Authorized Flood Control Projects." 33-30 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-J INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 27 of Text) Project Banning levee-San Gorgonio River, Whitewater River Basin, CA City Creek levee, Santa Ana River Basin, CA Devil, East Twin, and Warm Creeks channel improvements and Lytle Creek levee, Santa Ana River Basin, CA Los Angeles County drainage area, CA, channels Lytle and Cajon Creeks channel improvements, Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA Mill Creek levees, Santa Ana River Basin, CA Needles, San Bernardino County, CA Oro Grande Wash channel improvements, Mojave River Basin, CA Quail Wash levee, Joshua Tree, San Bernardino County, CA Riverside levees, Santa Ana River Basin, CA San Jacinto River levee and Bautista Creek channel, Santa Ana River Basin, CA Santa Clara River levee improvement, Santa Clara River Basin, CA Stewart Canyon debris basin and channel, Ventura River Basin, CA Tahchevah Creek detention basin and channel improvements, Whitewater River Basin, CA June 1982 June 1982 June 1982 Apr., May, June, July, and August 1982 June 1982 June 1982 June 1982 June 1982 July 1982 June 1982 June 1982 August 1982 August 1982 June 1982 FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858, As Amended (Preauthorization) TABLE 33-K (See Section 29 of Text) Project Fiscal Year Costs Bear Creek, La Quinta, CA $59 Los Coches Creek, San Diego County, CA 112,557 Newhall Creek, Newhall, CA 82,423 South Fork of the Santa Clara River, Santa Clarita Valley, CA 63,388 Telegraph Canyon Creek, Chula Vista, CA 116,097 West Magnesia Canyon channel, Rancho Mirage, CA 116,524 33-31 Date SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT * This district comprises the Klamath River Basin in southern Oregon and portions of northern and western California consisting of drainage basins tributary to the Pacific Ocean from the Oregon-California state line on the north to Cape San Martin, CA, on the south, except for basins tributary to the San Francisco Bay system which lie east of the Benicia-Martinez Bridge. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Crescent City Harbor, CA .............. 34-1 2. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)......................... 34-2 3. San Francisco Bay and Delta Model, CA ....................... 34-2 4. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .... 34-3 5. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization.......................... 34-83 Flood Control 6. Russian River Basin, CA ............... 34-3 7. Walnut Creek, CA ....................... 34-4 8. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ......................... 34-4 9. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization.......................... 34-4 General Investigations 10. Surveys ............................... 34-4 Navigation 1. CRESCENT CITY HARBOR, CA Location. Harbor is 17 miles south of Oregon State line, 125 miles south of Coos Bay, OR, 70 miles north of Humboldt Bay, CA, and midway between San Francisco Bay and mouth of Columbia River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5895.) Existing project. A rubblemound outer breakwater extending about 3,700 feet on a bearing of S. 27 degrees E.; from Battery Point, thence about 1,000 feet on a bearing of S. 80 degrees E.; for maintenance dredging of an outer harbor basin 1,800 feet long and 1,400 feet wide to 20 foot depth at mean lower low water, except in rock; a rubblemound sand barrier from Whaler Island to easterly shore and maintenance dredging at seaward end of sand barrier; an inner breakwater extending northwesterly about 1,200 feet from Whaler Island, thence westerly 400 feet to form a protected fish-boat General Investigations (Cont'd) Page 11. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........ 34-4 12. Continuation of Planning and Engineering ......................... 34-4 13. Advance Engineering and Design........ 34-4 Tables Table 34-A Table 34-B Table 34-C Table 34-D Table 34-E Table 34-F Table 34-G Cost and Financial Statement ................... 34-6 Authorizing Legislation..................... 34-9 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........... 34-10 Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ................ 34-10 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................ 34-11 Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects .......... 4-11 harbor; for removal of pinnacle rock in fish-boat harbor to 20-foot depth; and a T-shaped inner harbor basin 20 feet deep, 1,500 feet long extending along north side of Citizen's Dock for 325 feet, with a stem 1,000 feet long. Deepening of the harbor adjacent to Citizen's Dock was found to be not economically feasible, and this portion was reclassified to the "inactive" category. Approved estimated cost for new work (1982) is $3,842,000, of which $8,691,000 is Federal cost (includes $11,000 Coast Guard costs) and $151,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $54,000 cash contribution). Local cooperation. Fullycomplied with for completed modifications and acts of 1927, 1937, 1945, and 1965 portion for construction of 400-foot extension of the inner breakwater. The Board, by its Resolution No. 77-10, dated September 6, 1977, reaffirmed its intention to meet the requirements of local cooperation. A notifica- 34-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 tion was received by letter from the President of the Board, dated February 10, 1978, stating that the area serving the Citizen's Dock should not be included at this time. By Board of Harbor Commissioners letter dated February 10, 1978, local interests reaffirmed support for dredging in the vicinity of the oil dock. Rights-ofway are publicly owned and available for public use. Resolution No. 81-1 of March 17, 1981 gives assurance that the Harbor District will provide a cash contribution of $54,000 in lieu of providing land disposal sites. An agreement in conformance with the requirements of Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611, was obtained from the local sponsor in April 1982. Terminal facilities. Three piers, one of which is publicly owned and from which boats are fueled; one oil terminal; and a private mooring for barges discharging petroleum products to pipelines on inner breakwater. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A contract to dredge the channel at the oil dock to a depth of 20 feet was awarded and work was performed during the months of August-September 1982. The bid for the work was lower than estimated and $650,000 was revoked in FY 1982. Funds in the amount of $352,000 programmed for FY 1983 were also eliminated. Rock and hard materials were encountered during the dredging and the design depth of 20 feet was not attained. Estimates are now being prepared to determine the necessary funds to dredge the channel to the authorized depth. Maintenance: Dredging by contract removed 18,300 cubic yards of material. Historical summary. Project is complete except for deepening and enlarging the inner harbor basin adjacent to Petroleum Dock to a depth of 20 feet and deepening of the harbor adjacent to Citizen's Dock which was found to be not economically justified and reclassified to the "inactive" category in 1978. The 3,000-foot outer breakwater was completed in 1930, sand barrier in 1939, inner breakwater in 1946, removal of pinnacle rock in 1951, and outer breakwater extension in 1957. Major rehabilitation of outer breakwater was completed in 1964 and again in 1980. The 400-foot extension of inner breakwater was completed in 1973. 2. SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA (JOHN F. BALDWIN AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNELS) Location. On navigation channels extending from entrance to San Francisco Bay to vicinity of Pittsburg through San Francisco, Marin, Contra Costa, and Solano Counties. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 5527 and 5532-5534 for respective areas.) Existing project. Project provides for modification of existing San Francisco Harbor, Richmond Harbor, San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, Suisun Bay Channel to vicinity of Pittsburg and Navigation projects to provide depths of 55 feet for San Francisco Bar Channel (completed), 45 feet (currently 35 feet) for main internal bay channels upstream to vicinity of Pittsburg; enlargement and deepening to 45 feet (currently 35 feet) of maneuvering areas adjacent to major petroleum refinery terminals along channel route; widening Suisun Bay Channel. San Francisco Harbor Main Channel was completed February 1974. Approved cost estimate (1982) of Federal cost (Corps), see Sacramento District Annual Report. Existing project was adopted by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 208, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. See Sacramento District Annual Report. Terminal facilities. See Part 2, Port Series No. 30, 31, and 32, revised 1974, titled respectively: "The Ports of San Francisco and Redwood City, Calif."; "The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, Vallejo, and Ports on Carquinez Strait, Calif." Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and will be adequate for future commerce upon completion of new terminal facilities. Operations during fiscalyear. New work: Continued planning activities. 3. SAN FRANCISCO BAY AND DELTA MODEL, CA Location. The model, including a regional visitor center, is located in Sausalito, CA, adjacent to San Francisco Bay about two miles north of the Golden Gate Bridge. Existing project. The San Francisco Bay/Delta Model, which covers 17 miles of the Pacific Ocean beyond Golden Gate, all of San Francisco Bay proper, San Pablo Bay, Suisun Bay, and all of the Sacramento- San Joaquin Delta east of Suisun Bay to the cities of Sacramento on the northeast and Stockton and Tracy on the south, was constructed in a rehabilitated warehouse at Sausalito, CA, as a part of the San Francisco Bay, including San Pablo Bay, Suisun Bay, and other adjacent bays, California Study, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950 (PL 81-516, Section 110). Operation and maintenance of the model was authorized in the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (PL 93-251, Section 8). The model has successfully reproduced to the proper scale the rise and fall of the tide, flow and currents of water, salinity intrusion, and trends in disposition of sediments. It is a useful tool to examine forces existing in the bay and estuarine system and to predict results of proposed changes. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the model continued. Completion of the central exhibits was accomplished in December 1981. Historical summary. Original model construction was initiated 1956 and completed 1957, and addition of Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to the original model 34-2 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, DISTRICT was initiated 1966 and completed 1969. Continued testing of proposals affecting the environmental quality of the region including, but not limited to: salinity intrusion, dispersion of pollutants, water quality, improvements for navigation, dredging, bay fill, physical structures, other shoreline changes. Total cost of regional visitor exhibits and model as of September 30, 1982, was $7,614,549, of which $3,393,776 was for the regional visitor center, $525,805 for exhibits, and $3,694,968 for maintenance. 4. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Reconnaissance and condition surveys of channels and harbor structures conducted in January, May, June, and July 1982 for San Francisco Harbor, CA, and in July 1982 for Bodega Bay, CA. 5. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs for preauthorization studies were $77,273, of which $7,362 was for Humboldt Harbor (Fields Landing), Humboldt County, CA, $6,145 for Petaluma Harbor, Sonoma County, CA, $52,658 for Pillar Point Marina, San Mateo County, CA, and $11,108 for South Beach SBH San Francisco, San Francisco County, CA. Flood Control 6. RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA Location. Russian River rises in Coast Range in northwestern California, flows southerly for 87 miles, and then turns westerly to flow for 23 miles to Pacific Ocean at Jenner, 60 miles northwest of San Francisco, CA. (For general location see Geological Survey map for California.) Existing project. Active authorized project provides for construction of a dam on East Fork of Russian River at Coyote Valley to a height of 160 feet; a dam on Dry Creek at Warm Springs to a height of 319 feet; and channel stabilization works on Russian River between mouth and mile 98, on lower reaches of several tributaries, and on Dry Creek downstream from dam. Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino), completed in 1959, is operated and maintained by the United States. (See tables 34-H and 34-I for latest approved estimated costs.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for Coyote Valley Dam and channel improvements accomplished to date. For the Dry Creek portion, local interests are required by the authorizing act to comply with the usual a., b., c. requirements for channel improvements and, in addition, prevent any encroachment in the channel of Dry Creek which would interfere with proper functioning of the channel improvement works; adjust all claims concerning water rights arising from the construction and operation of the improvements, including acquisition of water rights needed for preservation of fish and wildlife resources affected by the project; and reimburse the United States in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, for that part of the construction cost, (27.8% of total construction cost, currently estimated at $88,700,000) and the annual operation, maintenance and replacement costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, tentatively estimated at $308,000. The estimated annual cost to local interests for maintenance of channel improvement works is $70,000. Sonoma County Water Agency (formerly Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District) provided assurances of willingness and ability to meet requirements by Resolutions No. DR 00793-1, September 25, 1961, No. DR 4770-1, December 17, 1962, and No. DR 45759, August 5, 1974, for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel. By letter dated March 7, 1967, Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District further indicated their interest in optimization of the Dry Creek (Warm Springs) damsite to provide additional water supply storage. Reimbursement to the United States for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel costs allocated to 212,000 acre-feet of water supply storage are specified in a water supply contract with the local sponsor approved in October 1982. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Planning is underway for the relocation of Hot Springs Road, the boat launching ramp, which will be inundated by the reservoir, inclusion of incidental hydropower facilities within the control structure, determining effects of the reservoir upon the riparian habitat and the possible impacts of mitigation downstream from the damsite, implementing the vegetation management program, planning for minimum Federal recreation facilities, and initiating upgrade of Rockpile Road. Contract for construction of the Warm Springs Dam and appurtenances awarded May 1978, is 96 percent complete. Construction completions include fish hatchery in December 1980, reservoir clearing in July 1981, project overlook in May 1981, and downstream stabilization sills in October 1981. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance continued on Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel and Coyote Valley Dam and in April 1982 responsibility was transferred to the Sacramento District. Historical summary. Entire project, exclusive of recreation facilities at completed project (Lake Mendocino), is about 85 percent complete. Coyote Valley Dam, initiated November 1958, was completed April 1959 (cost $17,550,000, of which $11,952,000 was Federal; and $5,598,000 contributed). Work, including removal of slides resulting from storms in 1958, was completed April 1959. Bank stabilization work on Russian River near Geyserville was completed in 1957 and channel improvements in remaining reaches on Russian River and East Fork of Russian River were completed in 1974 34-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 (cost $2,483,900). Work remaining is construction of Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel and channel improvements on Dry Creek. 7. WALNUT CREEK, CA Location. Project is on Walnut Creek and lower reaches of its principal tributaries, Pacheco, Grayson, San Ramon, Las Trampas, Galindo, and Pine Creeks in Contra Costa County, CA. Improvement will extend from Suisun Bay to head of project about 1 mile above southern limits of city of Walnut Creek. City of Walnut Creek is about 10 miles south of Suisun Bay. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area). Responsibility for new work construction was transferred to the Sacramento District in April 1982. See Sacramento District Annual Report for description of project, local cooperation, authorization, and cost and financial statement. FY 1982 costs for San Francisco District only were: regular funds, $800,278; required contributed funds, $262,076; and other contributed funds, $177,082. 8. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, as amended and supplemented, included requirement that local interests maintain and operate completed flood control works in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of War. Inspections made throughout the year to determine effectiveness of operation and maintenance by local interests of completed local protection projects and works constructed under emergency and special authorities of Sections 205 and 208 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, and Public Law 99, 84th Congress. Fiscal year cost was $52,894. Total cost to September 30, 1982 was $543,680. Projects inspected included Alameda Creek, May and June 1982; Corte Madera Creek, March and May 1982; Coyote Creek, March and May 1982; East Weaver Creek, June 1982; Eel River at Sandy Prairie, June 1982; Mad River at Blue Lake, June 1982; Pajaro River, March, May, June, and September 1982; Pinole Creek, June 1982; Redwood Creek, June 1982; Rheem Creek, June 1982; Rodeo Creek, June 1982; Russian River, August 1982; San Leandro Creek, May and June 1982; San Lorenzo Creek, May and June 1982; and San Lorenzo River, June 1982. 9. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs for preauthorization studies were $20,541, of which $5,541 was for Belmont Creek, Belmont, San Mateo County, CA; $7,500 for Berryessa Creek, Milpitas, Santa Clara County, CA. (Excludes $50,700 Sacramento District costs. Responsibility for Berryessa Creek was transferred to the Sacramento District in April 1982); $532 for City of Yountville, Napa County, CA; $805 for Salinas River, Atascadero, San Luis Obispo County, CA; and $6,163 for San Clemente Creek, Marin County, CA. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs of $143,331 were incurred for emergency flood control activities, of which $116,150 was for disaster preparedness, and $27,181 for emergency operations. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Fiscal year costs were $56,637 for emergency bank protection of which $6,826 was for Beach Boulevard, Pacifica, San Mateo County, CA, and $49,811 for Sewage Treatment Plant, Mad River at Blue Lake, County, CA. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (Section 208, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress. $7,600 for Salinas River (mile 16), Monterey County, CA. General Investigations 10. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs for surveys were $1,222,316, of which $482,190 was for navigation; $733,359 for flood damage prevention; $2,619 for shoreline protection; and $4,148 for coordination with other agencies. 11. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year total costs of $16,746 were incurred, of which $12,570 was for flood plain management service program and $3,176 was for hydrologic studies. 12. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Fiscal year total costs were $82,047 of which $13,823 was for Fisherman's Wharf, CA and $68,224 was for Oakland Outer Harbor (Deepening), CA. 13. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN BODEGA BAY, CA Bodega Bay is a triangular lagoon on the California coast, 85 miles south of Noyo River and 58 miles north of San Francisco, In March 1965, the Committee on Public Works authorized a modification to the existing project and the General Design Memorandum was approved by the Office of Chief of Engineers on June 30, 1982. The plan of improvement consists of a 19-acre marina located at Spud Point on the west side of the harbor and 34-4 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, DISTRICT protected by a 1,306 foot long baffled concrete pile breakwater and an access channel 1,960 feet long, 100 feet wide and 12 feet deep. Federal construction would consist of the access channel and the breakwater: The marina would be constructed by local interests and would accommodate 238 commercial fishing and recreational boats. Advance engineering and design for the channel and breakwater is complete. Plans and specifications are 90% complete. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $585,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $28,721; of which $25,437 were General Investigation costs and $3,284 were Construction, General costs. NOYO RIVER AND HARBOR, CA Noyo River rises in the Coast Range, flows westerly, and empties into Noyo Harbor. Noyo Harbor is a cove on the California Coast about 87 miles south of Humboldt Bay and 135 miles northwest of San Francisco. The 1962 Rivers and Harbors Act modified by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act authorized up to two breakwaters as necessary to provide protection. The 1976 WRDA authorized construction of additional channel improvements. Recommended plan of improvement for the breakwater and channel improvement were previously considered as a single project. Due to significant differences in the time required for planning and construction, each part is now reported separately. The plan of improvement for Noyo River and Harbor (Breakwater), CA, provides for a single detached breakwater immediately south of entrance channel in Noyo Harbor. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $1,300,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $80,248 of which $47,970 were General Investigation costs and $32,278 were Construction, General costs. Planning is about 30 percent complete. A physical model is being constructed to test alternative plans. The plan of improvement for Noyo River and Harbor (Channel Extension), CA, provides for a 100 foot wide extension channel 10 feet deep, about 3,000 feet upstream from the existing river channel to the Dolphin Cove Marina. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $450,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $42,890 with General Investigation funds. Planning is about 50 percent complete. PAJARO RIVER BASIN, CA Pajaro River and tributaries drain an area of 1,300 square miles in the Coast Range and empty into Monterey Bay about 75 miles south of San Francisco. Pajaro Valley sub-basin in Santa Cruz and Monterey Counties includes 112 square miles in lower 13 miles of Pajaro River. Plan of improvement consists of construction of a variable setback levee beginning approximately 1,000 feet upstream of Miller Avenue and ending 2,000 feet below the Thomas Road Bridge on north side of Uvas Creek. Phase I General Design Memorandum and Environmental Impact Statement was completed by San Francisco District in FY 1982. A Post Authorization Change was approved by the Office of Chief of Engineers on August 4,1982. Responsibility for remaining portions of advance engineering and design, plans and specifications and construction was transferred to the Sacramento District in April 1982. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $450,000. Total cost during the fiscal year was $17,228 with Construction, General funds. 34-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 34-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT in Text Total Cost to FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep 30, 1982 25,000 106,000 25,000 129,000 10,571 108,674 33,471 28,721 39,000 260,000 153,000 - 38,960 259,627 153,414 - Project Funding Bodega Bay, CA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost Crescent City New Work Harbor, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost Humboldt Harbor New Work and Bay, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Moss Landing New Work Harbor, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Napa River, CA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Noyo River and New Work Harbor, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost Oakland Harbor, CA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Petaluma River, CA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Redwood City New Work Harbor, CA Approp. Cost 120,000 100,000 1,070,000 113,944 138,763 549,307 2,095,000 264,000 2,117,000 2,095,700 255,228 1,677,366 - 87,223 - - 302,678 202,312 - - 1,113,000 710,600 1,636,000 2,123,000 1,145,574 679,111 1,653,268 2,098,890 7,000 110,464 5,000 341,000 256,000 4,731 74,622 520,680 -. - -. -. 57,496 79,500 885,000 100,000 57,423 69,655 293,412 527,787 115,000 240,000 145,000 204,000 72,445 270,930 124,347 123,148 405,000 240,000 246,000 279,000 412,620 239,292 239,864 264,329 779,000 1,206,000 469,000. 1,191,000 778,966 1,205,305 439,711 1,185,137 25,000 508,000 358,000 1,560,000 24,951 392,086 467,773 76,490 250,000 212,473 50,000 49,253 34-6 See Section 1,226,7651 2 1,122,8021 a 794,1844 794,1844 397,7796 397,7796 8,696,9726 8,171,4586 9,178,6747 8,730,2217 525,0008 525,0008 9,847,299' 4 9,847,299' 48 33,553,67210 4a 33,509,18610 4 338,21511 4 338,21511 4 3,261,63112 45 3,259,66512 48 1,021,2741 46 1,021,27413 48 1,703,8091 14 48 1,530,0911 14 48 1,167,482'16 1 1,054,35216 17 3,893,75418 1O 3,872,06018 1s 222,810w *4 222,8100 48 9,646,98421 48 9,646,98421 48 23,226,2738 4 23,190,372* 48 297,146 48 297,146 48 6,260,159 48 4,770,459 48 1,672,7222 48 1,672,722w 8 1. SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Projeet Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep 30, 1982 Maint. Approp. Cost Richmond Harbor, CA New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost 2. San Francisco Bay New Work to Stockton, CA Approp. (John F. Baldwin and Cost Stockton Ship Channels) 3. San Francisco Bay New Work and Delta Model, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost San Francisco New Work Harbor, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost San Francisco New Work Harbor and Bay CA Approp. (Removal of Drift) Cost Maint. Approp. Cost San Leandro New Work Marina, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost San Pablo Bay New Work and Mare Island Approp. Strait, CA Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Santa Cruz New Work Harbor, CA Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Suisun Bay Channel, New Work CA Approp. Maint. Approp. Cost - 20,000 1,199,000 90,000 4,790,3252 " - 19,717 1,042,130 227,129 4,770,301" 28 S- - - 2,886,695 2" - - - 2,886,695 2 817,3652 542,000 606,000 2,011,000 11,200,1162 815,292 542,463 601,144 1,987,571 11,171,03428 S- - - 164,689 - - - 164,689 - 410,000 665,000 600,000 6,910,200 671,407 404,541 434,944 555,315 6,575,070 2,628,000 1,685,000 736,000 513,000 7,700,700 2,356,599 1,965,818 618,490 584,347 7,614,549 - - - 2,689,356P - - - 2,689,356 0 830,000 751,000 47,700 2,119,500 17,009,545 831,524 750,834 41,709 1,928,330 16,808,20"' - - - - - 4 - 48 1,255,000 1,260,000 1,304,726 1,257,633 1,324,000 1,167,000 16,812,182' 1,257,564 1,101,096 16,661,471" 18,000 17,96655 644,1161 644,071= - 1,369,372" = - 1,369,372" 856,800 1,015,000 858,412 1,012,515 1,132,800 2,923,000 23,486,433 1,034,491 2,415,274 22,878,298" S- - - 1,852,340 S- - - 1,852,340 - - - - 160,000" - - - 160,000" 450,000 530,000 675,000 595,000 6,245,159 471,440 529,983 503,639 679,855 6,158,586 - - - -6 - - 6 194,000 320,000 193,965 318,963 297,000 253,000 1,649,338s " 297,632 61,595 1,457,493" " 34-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S ARMY 1982 TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep 30, 1982 Suisun Channel, CA New Work Approp. - - - - 217,677# Cost - - - - 217,677U Maint. Approp. - - 51,000 561,000 1,367,758' Cost - - 50,806 434,762 1,241,5262 Pajaro River Basin, New Work CA Approp. 125,000 135,000 - - 1,949,968* Cost 112,986 62,627 .67,159 17,228 1,949,968 0 6. Russian River Basin, New Work CA Approp. - - - - 14,435,86941 42 Coyote Valley Dam Cost - - - - 14,435,8694' a (Lake Mendocino) and Channel Improvements prop. 1,558,000 1,744,000 1,829,000 1,246,000 15,327,616 " Cost 1,618,069 1,334,220 2,056,798 1,305,758 15,162,552 a 4 Dry Creek (Warm New Work Springs) Lake and Approp. 57,775,000 43,930,000 34,400,000 37,900,000 243,786,645 Channel Improvements Cost 58,389,782 39,841,016 38,001,042 34,273,493 239,152,489 CA Maint. Approp. - - 581,000 797,000 1,378,000 " Cost - - 552,149 753,145 1,305,2944 47 1. Includes $641,800 for jetties, bulkheads, main Bodega Bay Channel and turning basin completed in 1948. 2. Includes $585,000 for Preconstruction Planning ($456,000 Construction, General funds and $129,000 General Investigation funds). 3. Includes $481,000 Preconstruction Planning costs ($455,563 Construction, General costs and $25,437 General Investigation costs). 4. Includes $83,534 for reconnaissance and condition surveys FY 1956-1982. 5. Excludes contributed funds of $2,000. 6. Excludes contributed funds of $257,116 and $2,138 surplus material from Corps military activities. 7. Excludes contributed fundsof 44,340. Includes $61,031 for reconnaissance and condition surveys FY 1966-1982. 8. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds in lieu of royaltyfree rock. 9. Includes $2 261,371 for previous project. Excludes $95,000 contributed funds for existing project. 10. Includes $98,206 for previous project and $1,641 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1982. 11. Excludes $5,337 previous project costs. 12. Excludes $8,539surplus material from Corps' military activities. Includes $48,112 for reconnaissance and condition surveys FY 1956-1982. 13. Excludes previous project costs. Excludes $132,681 contributed funds. 14. Includes $203,684 for reconnaissance and condition surveys FY 1956-1982. 15. Includes $11,986 for previous project. Excludes $7,180 contributed funds for previous project. 16. Includes $869,000 for Preconstruction Planning ( ,000 for Breakwater of which $500S000 allocated under Construction, General and $54,000 under General Investigations); ($315,000 for Channel Extension of which $165,000 allocated under Construction General and $150,000 under General Investigations.) 17. Includes $755,870 Preconstruction cost ($547,970 for Breakwater of which $500,000 was under Construction, General and p47,970 under General Investigations); ($207,900 for Channel Extension of which $165 000 under Construction, General and $42,900 under General investigations.) 18. Includes $32,097 for previous project and $1,436 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1982. Excludes contributed funds of $820 for previous project. 19. Excludescontributed fundsof $4,000 in lieu of providing dike disposal areas on existing project. 20. Excludes contributed funds of $1,700. 21. Includes $2,899,232 for previous projects. Excludes $397,266 contributed funds on existing project. 22. Includes $684,028 for previous projects and $501 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1982. 23. Includes $212,083 for previous project. Excludes contributed funds of $15,559 for previous project. 24. Includes $314,692 for previous project and $75,909 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1982. 25. Includes previous project costs $31,443. Excludes $119,572 contributed funds for existing project. 26. Includes $67,759 for reconnaissance and condition surveys FY 1966-1982. 27. Excludes contributed funds of $524,778. Includes $105,000 Public Works Administration funds. 28. Excludes modification authorized October 27, 1966, under project "San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)." 29. Excludes $34,800 contributed funds. Includes $8,138 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1982. 30. Includes $1,030,399 for previous projects. Excludes $134,591 contributed funds for existing project. 31. Includes $475,321 for previous proects and $20,319 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1982. 32. Authorized by FC Actof 1965(Sec. 201); Maintenance R&H Act of 1970 (Sec. 103). Includes $24,116 for reconnaissance and condition surveys FY 1979-1982. See FY 1977 Annual Report for last full report. 33. Includes $1,086,703 for previous peroets. 34. Includes $1,359,380 for previous proects and $904 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1982. 34-8 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, DISTRICT TABLE 34A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 35. Excludes $810,046 contributed funds. 36. See Sacramento District FY 1974 Annual Report for details. 37. Project maintenance responsibility to Point Edith was transferred to San Francisco District January 1,1974. Excludes Sacramento District's portion. Includes $8,588 for reconnaissance and project condition surveys FY 1976-1982. 38. Project maintenance assigned to San Francisco District from Sacramento District January 1, 1974. See Sacramento District 1972 Annual Report for full report. 39. Includes $28,448 for reconnaissance and condition surveys FY 1978-1982. 40. Includes $748,283 for previous project (1944 act) and $941,685 for (1966 act) which was placed in a deferred category in 1976. TABLE 34-B AUTHORIZING 41. Excludes $5,598,000 contributed funds and $400,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Public Work Acceleration Program. 42. Excludes $1,628,411 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Code 711. 43. Responsibility for maintenance transferred to Sacramento District in April 1982. 44. Excludes $215,400 recreation user fee funds. Includes $780,484 Sacramento District funds. 45. Excludes $315,392 recreation user fee costs. Includes $615,420 Sacramento District costs. 46. Includes $413,886 Sacramento District funds. 47. Includes $341,180 Sacramento District costs. 48. See FY 1981 Annual Report for last full report. LEGISLATION See Date Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. CRESCENT CITY HARBOR, CA July 18, 1918 Breakwater H. Doec. 434, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Sep. 22, 1922 Conditions of local cooperation modified. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 67th Cong., 2nd sess. Jan. 21, 1927 Extend breakwater to 3,000 feet long. H. Doc. 595, 69th Cong., 2nd seas. Aug. 30, 1935 Dredge harbor basin, 1,800 feet long, 1,400 feet Rivers and Harbors wide, and 20 feet deep. Committee Doe. 40, 74th Cong., 1st seas. Aug. 26, 1937 Sand barrier and maintenance dredging in vicinity of S. Commerce Committee seaward end thereof. print, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Mar. 2, 1945 Extend breakwater to Round Rock (modified by H. Doc 688, 76th Cong., Chief of Engineers). 3rd sess. Mar. 2, 1945 Inner breakwater and removal of rock in inner harbor. Report on file in Office, Chief of Engineers. Oct. 27, 1965 Extend inner breakwater 400 feet and dredge T-shaped H. Doec. 264, 89th Cong. basin 20 feet deep. 6. RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA May 17, 1950 Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino): Channel H. Doc. 585, 81st Cong., improvements on lower 98 miles of Russian River and 2nd sess. lower reaches of tributaries. Feb. 10, 1956 Increased appropriation authorization for initial stage of Public Law 404, 84th project development. Cong., 2nd sees. Oct. 23, 1962 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake; Channel Improvements on H. Doec. 547, 87th Cong., Dry Creek below dam. 2nd sess. Mar. 7, 1974 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and channel; compensate Sec. 95, 1974 WRDA for fish losses on the Russian River which may be attributed to the operation of the Coyote Dam component of the project through measures such as possible expansion of the capacity of the fish hatchery at the Warm Springs Dam component of the project. 1. Contains latest published map. 34-9 TABLE 34-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Berkeley Harbor, CA' Completed 1966 155,550 - Berkeley Marina, CA' Completed 1979 505,201' - Halfmoon Bay Harbor, CA Completed 1979 6,697,3968 - Lower San Francisco Bay, CA Inactive 1935 - - Monterey Harbor, CA Inactive 1971 1,108,1825 83,0096 San Francisco Marina (Gas House Cove), CAx Completed 1974 180,4727 - San Francisco Harbor (Islais Creek), CA' Completed 1976 848,2278 - San Leandro Marina (Breakwater), CA' Completed 1976 210,3909 - San Rafael Creek, CA Active/ 1981 32,35910 1,981,90211 no FY 82 expenditure 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107, Public 7. Includes preauthorization costs $26,855 and excludes Law 86-645). contributed funds $153,618. 2. Excludes $155,561 contributed funds. 8. Includes $94,550 preauthorization costs. 3. Excludes $100,000 contributed funds and $105,000 9. Includes $72,000 preauthorization costs and excludes contributed in lieu of royalty-free rock. contributed funds $138,189. 4. Excludes $378,989 contributed funds. 10. Excludes $41,094 contributed funds. 5. Includes $207,800 Public Works Administration funds 11. Includes $81,455 for reconnaissance and condition and breakwater modifications (1960 Act) placed inactive surveys FY 1956-1982. 1974. 6. Includes $5,170 for reconnaissance and condition surveys for FY 1956-1982. TABLE 34-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Humboldt Bay, CA Inactive 1958 2,000 - Santa Cruz County, CA Inactive 1966 245,639 - 34-10 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Alameda Creek, CA"1 1978 26,995,350 54,7881 Alhambra Creek, CA2 15 Inactive 1981 300,000 - Corte Madera Creek, CA15 1979 6,999,7254 - Coyote Creek, CA s 15 Completed 1968 705,622 - East Weaver Creek, CA s 15 Completed 1965 220,6365 - Eel River, CA15 Inactive 1971 1,272,8166 - Klamath River, CA 1 Completed 1972 4,838,000 - Mad River Basin, CA6 '6 Inactive 1973 4,243,7507 - Napa River Basin, CA Inactive 1979 2,639,955 - Pinole Creek, CA s 15 Completed 1968 885,750 - Redwood Creek, Humboldt County, CA15 Completed 1970 4,620,0708 - Rheem Creek, CA8 15 Completed 1962 400,000' - Rodeo Creek, CA s 15 Completed 1966 974,100 - Salinas River, CA 1� 15 Inactive 1952 94,213 - San Leandro Creek, CA 1" Completed 1973 1,000,00011 - San Lorenzo Creek, CA1" Completed 1962 5,130,8211 - San Lorenzo River, CA15 Completed 1966 4,314,40618 - Sonoma Creek, CAr s15 Inactive 1973 781,500 - Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA1 1979 1,110,000 - 1. Scheduling of reservoir operations costs. 9. Excludes $52,549 contributed funds. 2. Placed inactive 1982. 10. Improvement inactive. Cost includes engineering and 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, Public design prior to June 30, 1952 and costs of $4,288 FY 1962 and Law 86-645). 1963 to determine if project classification to an active category 4. Excludes $97,400 contributed funds. was justified. 5. Includes $174,938 Public Works Acceleration Program 11. Excludes $285,329 contributed funds. Funds. 12. Excludes $200,000 estimated value of work performed 6. Excludes $194,821 contributed funds and placed in- in lieu of cash contribution. active 1973. 13. Excludes $421,182 contributed funds. 7. Placed inactive 1974. Excludes $225,000 applicable to 14. Placed inactive 1974. Public Works Acceleration Program and $162,761 previous 15. Responsibility transferred to Sacramento District April project, Blue Lake levee. 1982. 8. Includes $107 000 costs for remedial work to drainage system completed in IY 1977. TABLE 34-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Knights Valley Lake, R.R. Basin, CA Oakland Harbor CA (Deepen Tidal (anal) Oakland Harbor, CA (Fruitvale Avenue Bridge) San Lorenzo Creek, CA (Upper Portion) San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, CA (Approaches to Vallejo and South Vallejo) 1974 1981 1981 1962 1982 Aug. 5, 1977 Nov. 6, 1977 Nov. 6, 1977 Nov. 6, 1977 Nov. 6, 1977 34-11 TABLE 34-H REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: ESTIMATED COST FOR NEW WORK (See Section 6 of Text) Estimated Cost Non-Federal Project Feature Federal Contribution Total Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino); Channel Improvements Below Dam on Lower 98 Miles of Russian River $ 14,436,000 $ 5,598,000 $ 20,034,0001 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake; Channel Improvements Below Dam 233,300,000 88,700,0002 322,000,000 Total $246,936,000 $95,098,000 $342,034,000 1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities at over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of storage is completed projects. initiated and exclusive of lands and damages. 2. Reimbursement by local interests to Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage to be paid TABLE 34-I RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: PROJECT FEATURES AND ESTIMATED COSTS (See Section 6 of Text) Height of Reservoir Nearest City Distance Dam and Capacity Estimated Name (California) Above Mouth Type (Acre-Ft) Cost Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Ukiah Mile 0.8-East Fork 160 Feet-Earthfill 122,500 $ 17,550,000' Mendocino) of Russian River Channel Improvement (East Fork Ukiah Mile 0 to 0.8 East - - 2,484,000 Fork Below Coyote Valley Dam and Guerneville Mile 0 to 98, Russian - - Lower 98 Miles of Russian River) River Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake Healdsburg Mile 14.4 Dry Creek 319 Feet-Earthfill 381,000 319,350,000 Channel Improvement (Dry Creek) Healdsburg Mile 1 to 14.4 Dry - - 2,650,000 Below Dry Creek (Warm Springs Creek Dam) 1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects. 34-12 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT * This district comprises basins of Suisun Bay and San Joaquin and Sacramento Rivers in California; Goose Lake in Oregon; basins of the Great Salt Lake and Sevier Lake in Utah; an intervening portion of Great Basin in northern Nevada, northern California, and southeastern Idaho; and the upper Colorado River basin, which is in southwestern Wyoming, eastern Utah, northeastern Arizona, northwestern New Mexico, and western Colorado, west of the Continental Divide. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Sacramento River, CA ................. 35-1 2. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels).............. ........... 35-2 3. San Joaquin River, CA ................... 35-3 4. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .... 35-4 Flood Control 5. Buchanan Dam-H.V. Eastman Lake, Chowchilla River, CA ...................... 35-4 6. Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and tributaries, including New Hogan Lake and Farmington Dam, CA ................................ 35-4 7. Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake, Fresno River, CA ............................ 35-5 8. Isabella Lake, Kern River, CA ............ 35-6 9. Kaweah and Tule Rivers, including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, CA ..... 35-7 10. Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, NV and CA .............................. 35-8 11. Merced County Stream Group, CA ....... 35-8 12. Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, CA ....... .............................. 35-9 13. Sacramento River and tributaries, CA from Collinsville to Shasta Dam ....... 35-10 14. Walnut Creek, CA ..................... 35-12 Navigation 1. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Location. Rises in Trinity Mountains in north-central California, flows generally southerly about 374 miles and empties into Suisun Bay, an arm of San Francisco Bay, at Collinsville, CA. (See Geological Survey topographic map of Sacramento Valley, CA.) Flood Control (Cont'd) Page 15. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects..........................35-12 16. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ........................ 35-13 17. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations...............................35-13 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 18. New Melones Lake, CA.................... 35-13 General Investigations 19. Surveys ................................. 35-14 20. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........ 35-15 21. Research and Development .............. 35-15 22. Advance Engineering and Design......... 35-15 Tables Table 35-A Table 35-B Table 35-C Table 35-D Table 35-E Table 35-F Table 35-G Cost and Financial Statement ..................... 35-17 Authorizing Legislation ..................... 35-20 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............ 35-22 Not Applicable Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............ 35-23 Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects .......... 35-25 Previous projects. For details see page 1985 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1708 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, see Annual Report for 1969. Total first cost for completed portion was $43,932,558 35-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 ($39,560,558 Federal (Corps), $300,000 (Coast Guard), and $4,072,000 non-Federal for lands and damages, including relocations) and excludes local interests cost $10,741,000 (June 1963) for 30-foot deep water ship channel and 13-foot deep connecting canal basic terminal facilities required under terms of project authorization. Project also provides for a shallow-draft channel 10 feet deep at mean lower low water 150 to 200 feet bottom width, from Suisun Bay to Sacramento, CA, 60 miles; a depth of 6 feet at low water between Sacramento and Colusa, 85 miles; a depth of 5 feet at low water between Colusa and Chico Landing, 50 miles; and such depths as practicable between Chico Landing and Red Bluff, 53 miles, a total distance of 248 miles. Estimated Federal cost (July 1973) of new work for shallow-draft river channel is $1,360,000 (includes $1,163,000 for deferred portion between Colusa and Chico Landing). (See table 35-H on tidal and flood conditions prevailing.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for deep water ship channel project. None required on shallowdraft feature. Terminal facilities. Piers, wharves, and docks at Port of Sacramento for shallow-draft navigation are open-pile structures with timber decks, some of which are designed to meet extreme high waters of flood stages. All main wharves at Sacramento have rail connections. Three of above facilities are owned by city of Sacramento and remainder by private interests; all are privately operated. For full description see "Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif., 1975." Deep water terminal facilities comprise wharves and piers, administration and storage buildings, and belt railroad facilities. Majority of these facilities are owned and operated by Sacramento-Yolo Port District; remainder are privately owned and operated. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, Deep Water Ship Channel: None. Maintenance: Shallow Draft Channel: Minor maintenance and operation activities continued in Sacramento River, Sacramento upstream to Colusa. Deep Water Ship Channel: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Fiscal year costs for major maintenance items consisted of: Maintenance dredging on Sacramento River, mile 4.5 to mile 13.5 by suction dredge by contract, $2,496,570 and stone protection on levees continued by contract, $155,764. Historical summary. Construction of 7-foot shallowdraft channel below Sacramento was initiated in September 1899 and completed in 1904. Modified 10-foot shallow-draft channel up to Sacramento was initiated in FY 1928 and completed in 1931. Shallow-draft channel above Sacramento was begun in April 1946 but new work was discontinued when about 48 percent complete. In February 1974, remaining work for shallowdraft portion of project, provision of a 5-foot depth between Colusa and Chico Landing (50 miles), was reclassified as "deferred." Channel is navigable all year; however, there is no regular navigation above Colusa, 145 miles above river mouth. Construction of 30-foot deep water ship channel was initiated in July 1949; improvement dredging by continuing contracts resulted in provision of an operational facility for oceangoing vessels during June 1963. Bascule bridge was completed in April 1960, barge lock in August 1961, barge canal in November 1961, and entire deep water ship channel in June 1970. 2. SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA (JOHN F. BALDWIN AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNELS) Location. On navigation channels extending from entrance to San Francisco Bay to Port of Stockton through San Francisco, Marin, Contra Costa, Solano, Sacramento, and San Joaquin Counties. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 5527 and 5532-5534 for respective areas.) Existing project. Project provides for modification of existing San Francisco Harbor, Richmond Harbor, San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, Suisun Bay Channel, and San Joaquin River navigation projects to provide depths of 55 feet for San Francisco Bar Channel, 45 feet for main internal bay channels upstream to vicinity of Avon, and 35 feet from Avon to Stockton; enlargement and deepening to 45 feet of maneuvering areas adjacent to major petroleum refinery terminals along channel route; widening Suisun Bay Channel; reclaiming shoreline marshes and inundated or lowlying areas by spoil deposit for public recreation and for industrial use; providing basic recreation facilities on some of the reclaimed areas for public use; and placing additional rock revetment on waterside of levees bordering channels. Approved project estimate (October 1982) is $241,000,000, (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) comprising Federal cost (Corps) of $189,000,000, including basic recreation facilities ($5,900,000); Federal cost (Coast Guard) for navigation aids $1,300,000; and non-Federal cost of $50,700,000 for lands and damages, relocations, berthing areas, and spoil retention dikes, including the cash contribution ($250,000) that local interests must make for land enhancement at time of construction. Local interests must also pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest one-half of separable cost of project allocated to recreation ($2,800,000). Existing project was adopted by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 208, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Local interests, through a public body legally authorized and financially capable, must give assurances they will furnish lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation, including spoildisposal areas designated by the Chief of Engineers; 35-2 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA DISTRICT provide necessary spoil retention dikes, bulkheads, and embankments except as applicable to spoil-disposal areas designated as public recreation areas; make utility modifications and relocations required for construction, including new bridges or bridge alterations (except for railroad bridges), and absorb any increased annual maintenance and operation costs resulting therefrom; provide and maintain all necessary berthing areas, at a depth commensurate with project depth, at all terminals and wharves to be served by the deepened channels; and in recognition of the local land enhancement benefits to result from landfill during dredging, contribute to the United States 4 cents per cubic yard of all spoil material placed during initial contruction for modification of Suisun Bay Channel project on areas not developed for public use. Local interests must also give satisfactory assurances, before starting construction of the affected units, that they will maintain and operate the Federally provided recreation areas and facilities, continue to maintain to adequate standards the levees altered, set back or provided revetment protection, and hold the U.S. Government free from damages due to deposition of spoil and construction of new levees or reconstruction of existing levees. Local interests, represented by Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County and Stockton Port District, must, at time of construction, contribute $250,000 in cash for land enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest one-half of separable cost of project allocated to recreation ($2,800,000); and maintain and operate basic recreation facilities after construction and install additional basic facilities required as demands on area expand. No work shall be undertaken on a modification of Suisun Bay Channel project unit to deepen the channel to more than 35 feet between Avon and a proposed refinery or manufacturing plant, until local interests furnish formal assurances and definite plans for such installation within the Avon-Chipps Island reach of channel. Also, no work shall be undertaken on modification of San Joaquin River navigation project unit, regarding access channels in vicinity of Antioch, until local interests furnish formal assurances and definite plans for Port of Antioch. Formal assurances for deepening and otherwise improving the Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel from Pittsburg to Stockton were furnished by Stockton Port District April 9, 1970. The Stockton Port District, in August 1980, formally provided their intent to sponsor the Avon to Pittsburg reach (Suisun Bay Channel) and recreation development on Roberts Island. The Port of Stockton, by letter of October 20, 1981, stated that they would furnish the necessary assurances for fish and wildlife mitigation and enhancement, and on April 13, 1982, provided formal updated assurances for the Avon to Stockton portion. No sec. 221 agreements are required for this project. Terminal facilities. See Part 2, Port Series No. 30 and 31, revised 1974, titled respectively: "The Ports of San Francisco and Redwood City, Calif." and "The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, and Vallejo, and Ports on Carquinez Strait, Calif."; and Port Series No. 32, revised 1975, "The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif." Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and will be adequate for future commerce upon completion of new terminal facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Sacramento District: Engineering continued. Channel improvemcnt--dredging mile 41.0-mile 30.9 John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channel was initiated at contract cost of $249,999. San Francisco District: Continued planning activities including model studies. Historical summary. Construction of project was initiated in June 1971 and is about 1 percent complete. 3. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA Location. Rises in east central California and flows westerly and northwesterly about 340 miles to its confluence with Sacramento River at head of Suisun Bay, 48 miles northeast of San Francisco. Deep water channel in San Joaquin River extends 41 miles from its mouth in Suisun Bay at Pittsburg to city of Stockton. Waterborne access to city provided by Stockton Channel, an artificial cut extending from river about 2 miles into city. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Sheet 5527.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement, modifications, and authorizing acts, see Annual Report for 1967. (See table 35-I for total cost of new work for project completed in May 1960.) Projects units (1950 modification) reclassifed and excluded from project cost are set forth in table 35-J. Modification of existing project is included as one unit of San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA, (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) project, authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 209, 89th Cong., 1st sess.); this modification is reported in detail under Sacramento District, Improvement No. 2. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project; for details of required cash contributions on completed, inactive and deferred portions of project, see Existing project paragraph, Annual Report for 1967. Terminal facilities. For description of harbor facilities at Port of Stockton, CA, see Port Series 32, "The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif.," revised 1975. Downstream from Stockton, traffic is accommodated by bank landings and sheds except at Antioch and near Pittsburg, where there are wharves for shallow- and deep-draft vessels. Terminal transfer facilities at public ocean terminal of Port of Stockton are adequate for present and immediate future. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition studies and miscellaneous inspections and reports were accomplished by hired labor. (Repair or restoration of wavewash protection is required by legislation authorized by Improvement No. 2.) 35-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Historical summary. Active portion of existing project was completed in May 1960. Construction of project was initiated in December 1877. 4. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Record and condition surveys were conducted at various times during fiscal year at several navigation projects at a cost of $17,000. Flood Control 5. BUCHANAN DAM-H. V. EASTMAN LAKE, CHOWCHILLA RIVER, CA Location. On Chowchilla River about 36 miles above its mouth and about 16 miles northeast of city of Chowchilla, CA. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a 205- foot high rockfill dam to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 150,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, recreation, and fish and wildlife. In conjunction with dam, project plan provides for about 12 miles of downstream levee and channel construction on Ash Slough to accommodate a project design flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second within slough and 7 miles of levee and channel improvement on Berenda Slough. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Cost estimate (October 1980) for existing project is $28,920,000, of which $27,370,000 is Federal cost, including $4,580,000 for basic recreation facilities, and $1,550,000 non-Federal costs for lands and damages, including relocations for downstream levee and channel improvements. Local interests have contracted with the Bureau of Reclamation (known as the Water and Power Resources Service between November 6, 1979, and May 18, 1981) for irrigation service. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Local interests have also, over a period of years, expended about $500,000 for construction of low levees and clearing downstream channels to provide some local flood protection in project area. This work is inadequate during major floods. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 98, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Lake formed by Buchanan Dam on Chowchilla River was designated "H. V. Eastman Lake" by Public Law 93-217. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering continued. (Construction of Buchanan and Hidden dam and appurtenances combined under one contract.) A project resources interpretive display was completed by contract. Road relocation around archeological sites was completed. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities were continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at fiscal year cost of $29,993. Runoff of Chowchilla River above Buchanan Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 143,200 acre-feet occurred May 24, 1982. Maximum bihourly inflow to reservoir was 13,400 cubic feet per second on April 11, 1982. Maximum release of 2,135 cubic feet per second on April 2, 1982, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, 41,600 acre-feet of water was released for flood control and a total of 38,000 acre-feet of water was released for irrigation and other purposes. Project prevented an estimated $1,500,000 in damages from the December 1981-April 1982 rainfloods. Historical summary. Construction began in July 1971 and was completed in May 1979. Project is about 99 percent complete. Dam closure was in March 1975; dam was completed in January 1976. Reservoir clearing and boundary marking were completed May 1975. Bifurcation structure was completed in February 1976. Channel improvement, Ash and Berenda Sloughs, was completed in March 1976. Recreation areas: Phase I was completed in January 1976; Phase II was completed in February 1978. Residences, administration building, and visitors center contract was completed in May 1978. Landscaping was completed in May 1979 and erosion control was completed in April 1979. A resources interpretive display and road relocation were completed in FY 1982. Work remaining consists of completion of installation of piezometers (now deferred indefinitely). Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1981. 6. CALAVERAS RIVER AND LITTLEJOHN CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, INCLUDING NEW HOGAN LAKE AND FARMINGTON DAM, CA Location. Streams comprising Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek groups rise in Sierra Nevada and its foothills, flow easterly across flatlands of San Joaquin Valley and empty into San Joaquin River directly, or through various sloughs, in vicinity of Stockton, CA. Littlejohn Creek is in Calaveras, Stanislaus, and San Joaquin Counties. The three principal stream systems of the group are, from south to north, Lone Tree Creek, Littlejohn Creek, and Duck Creek. Calaveras River group is in Calaveras and San Joaquin Counties. The two principal streams of the groups are, from south to north, Calaveras River and Bear Creek. (See Geological Survey Valley Springs quadrangle for New Hogan reservoir area and Trigo and Bachelor Valley quadrangles for Farmington reservoir area.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements consisting of Farmington Dam, New Hogan Lake, and Bear Creek levee and channel improvement, and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1967. (a) Farmington: Total first cost (July 1955) for project was $3,995,684, of which $3,676,384 was Federal and $319,300 non-Federal for lands and damages including relocations. (b) New Hogan: Federal cost for project is 35-4 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA DISTRICT $15,906,150, including $543,514 for basic recreation facilities. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost for recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $897,742. (c) Bear Creek: Project cost is $6,485,734, of which $3,242,867 is Federal, including reimbursement ($488,096) to local interests of one-half of excess local interest cost of lands, rights-of-way, and relocations over estimated Federal construction cost in accordance with section 3, Public Law 738, 74th Congress. Non- Federal cost included in above amount is $3,242,867 for relocations and lands and damages, exclusive of above Federal reimbursement. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. New Hogan: Local interests must pay portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to conservation functions of project. These costs are estimated at 36.2 percent of first cost and 38 percent of annual costs. In addition, local interests contributed land, the (July 1964) market value of which was $556,000. For years 1961 through 1970, an interim contract between the Bureau of Reclamation (known as Water and Power Resources Service between November 6, 1979, and May 18, 1981) and local water users provided for storage and payment of irrigation water; local interests paid $2,032,088 through December 31, 1981. A longterm contract between that agency and local water users was executed August 25, 1970. A concessionaire at New Hogan Marina provided public use facilities in accordance with lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $100,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: New Hogan Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Bear Creek, San Joaquin County: None. Maintenance: Bear Creek-Levee and channel improvement prevented $3,500,000 in damages from the December 1981-April 1982 rainfloods. Farmington Dam- Maintenance and operation activities continued; structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at fiscal year cost of $6,962. During the rainflood season, maximum flow of Duck Creek diversion was 513 cubic feet per second March 31, 1982. Maximum flow of Littlejohn Creek at Farmington was 2,029 cubic feet per second March 31, 1982. Maximum storage in reservoir was 19,300 acre-feet on January 6, 1982, and maximum bihourly inflow to reservoir was 14,400 cubic feet per second on March 31, 1982. Project prevented an estimated $1,500,000 in damages from the December 1981- April 1982 rainfloods. New Hogan Lake-Maintenance and operation activities continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Calaveras River above New Hogan was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 278,800 acre-feet occurred May 15, 1982. Maximum bihourly inflow to reservoir was 23,600 cubic feet per second on March 31, 1982. Maximum release of 8,018 cubic feet per second on March 31, 1982, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, 219,300 acre-feet of water was released for flood control and 82,400 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Project prevented an estimated $13,000,000 in damages from the December 1981-April 1982 rainfloods. Historical summary. Farmington Dam: Construction of Farmington project was initiated in July 1949 and completed for beneficial flood control operation in 1952. Duck Creek channel improvement was completed in November 1951; and channel improvement on south Littlejohn Creek was completed in May 1955. There are no recreation facilities or public-use areas. All work completed. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1982. New Hogan Lake: Construction was initiated May 1960, main dam closure November 1963, project completed for operational use in June 1964, and all work completed October 1973. Recreation facilities have been provided from Code 710 appropriations. Seepage measurement weir constructed in June 1980. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980. Bear Creek, San Joaquin County: Construction began in June 1963 and was completed in June 1967. Final cash contribution was made to local interests December 23, 1970. 7. HIDDEN DAM-HENSLEY LAKE, FRESNO RIVER, CA Location. On Fresno River about 50 miles above its mouth and about 15 miles northeast of Madera, CA (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a 163- foot high earthfill dam to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 90,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, recreation and other purposes. In conjunction with the dam, the project provides for about 13 miles of downstream levee and channel improvements on Fresno River immediately upstream of Chowchilla Canal crossing to accommodate project design flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Total first cost for existing project is $31,785,426, of which $30,555,426 is Federal cost, including $3,564,168 for basic recreation facilities, and estimated $1,230,000 non-Federal cost for lands and damages including relocations for downstream levee and channel improvements. Local interests have contracted with the Bureau of Reclamation (known as the Water and Power Resources Service between November 6, 1979, and May 18, 1981) for irrigation service. For future non- Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Local interests have also, over a period of years, expended about $300,000 for construction of low levees and clearing downstream channels to provide some local flood protection in the project area. This work is inadequate during major floods. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 37, 87th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Lake created by Hidden Reservoir project on Fresno River was designated "Hensley Lake" by Public Law 93-603. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 35-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Operations and results during fiscal year. New work. None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities were continued. Fiscal year costs for major maintenance items at Hidden Dam consisted of: Seepage control at main dam continued by contract, $474,055, and erosion control at boat ramp continued by contract, $139,610. Piezometer installation was completed by contract; $28,692. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at fiscal year cost of $29,927. Runoff of Fresno River above Hidden Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 85,500 acre-feet occurred April 24, 1982. Maximum bihourly inflow to reservoir was 7,800 cubic feet per second on April 11, 1982. Maximum release of 2,032 cubic feet per second on April 12, 1982, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, 82,300 acre-feet of water was released for flood control and about 59,400 acre-feet of water was released for irrigation and other purposes. Project prevented an estimated $500,000 in damages from the December 1981-April 1982 rainfloods. Historical summary. Construction began in July 1971 and was completed in January 1979. Dam closure was in March 1975; dam was completed November 1975. Instrumentation was completed in January 1976. Downstream channel improvement, Fresno River, was completed April 1976. Recreation areas: Phase I was completed in March 1976; Phase II was completed in June 1978. Residences, administration building, grounds, and utilities contract was completed in February 1978. Landscaping was completed in December 1978 and erosion control was completed in January 1979. Project was completed in September 1980. Final land audit was approved February 5, 1980. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in fiscal year 1980. Piezometer installation was completed in September 1982. 8. ISABELLA LAKE, KERN RIVER, CA Location. About 35 miles northeast of city of Bakersfield, CA, near confluence of north and south forks of Kern River; auxiliary dam is about one-half mile east of main dam. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1967. Federal cost for new work is $22,027,452. For future non-Federal reimbursement see Local cooperation and Licenses paragraphs. Federal cost funded from Code 710 appropriations is $2,199,085. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. California officially adopted project by chapter 1514 of statutes of 1945, State of California. Local interests, represented by North Kern, Buena Vista, and Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage Districts and La Hacienda Water District, were required to reimburse the Federal Government the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation functions of project. These costs based on a cost allocation study completed in December 1955, are $4,573,000 of first cost and 21.7 percent of annual operation and maintenance cost. For the years 1956 through 1964, an interim contract between the Bureau of Reclamation (known as the Water and Power Resources Service between November 6, 1979, and May 18, 1981) and local water users provided for storage and payment of irrigation water. Under provisions of this interim contract, local interests paid $1,936,229 through December 31, 1964. A long-term contract between the Bureau and local water users was executed October 23, 1964. Balance due on allocated first cost of $4,573,000 was paid by the water users on March 31, 1965. Kern County assumed administration of recreation and development and maintenance of public use areas at project in accordance with a 25-year license February 15, 1955. The agreement with Kern County provided for joint operation and development by the Corps and Kern County including permits granted to concessionaires by the county to provide certain services. As of September 30, 1971, Kern County relinquished all administration of recreation and development and maintenance of public use areas at the project. A State law permitting the Department of Boating and Waterways (known as the Department of Navigation and Ocean Development prior to January 1979) to participate in inland water development with Federal agencies was signed by the Governor on August 11, 1972. All concessionaires will operate under permits granted by the Corps. Total cost of present recreation facilities developed by the county and the marina concessionaires is about $880,000; $235,000 of this was a grant from the California Wildlife Conservation Board and about $370,000 is investment by marina concessionaires. Licenses. In accordance with Federal Power Commission Docket No. E-6578, issued April 1, 1963, payment of $377,426 was made to the Federal Government byj Pacific Gas and Electric Co. ($108,352) and Southern California Edison Co. ($269,074) for headwater benefits to downstream existing plants from Isabella Dam to cover benefits from April 15, 1954, to December 31, 1962. Subsequent to 1962, the power companies have in the aggregate made annual payments of $44,650 for headwater benefits. That amount is to be paid each year until changes in operation, development, or costs indicate some modification to be advisable. Federal Power Commission Docket No. E-6578 is being modified to increase cumulative use charges for subsequent years. Cumulative use charges collected by the Federal Power Commission (known as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission since January 9, 1978) and returned to the U. S. Treasury through period ending September 30, 1982, amounted to $1,270,426. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: Engineering continued. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation continued. Installation of piezometer initiated and com- 35-6 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA DISTRICT pleted by contract, $29,685. Dam safety assurance studies at Isabella Dam were continued at a fiscal year cost of $10,225. Structures were maintained in good condition. Runoff of Kern River above Isabella Lake was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 560,100 acre-feet occurred June 29, 1982. Maximum bihourly inflow to the reservoir was 15,100 cubic feet per second on April 11, 1982, and maximum outflow of 2,715 cubic feet per second occurred June 16, 1982. During the year, no water was released for flood control, but a total of 845,700 acre-feet was released for irrigation and spreading uses. Project prevented an estimated $1,000,000 in damages from the December 1981-April 1982 rainfloods and the May-June 1982 snowmelt runoff. Historical summary. Construction began in March 1948 and was completed in June 1968. Main dam, Borel Canal outlet works and appurtenances, and auxiliary dam were completed in April 1953. Storage impoundment began December 1952. Piezometer was installed in August 1982. Project is operating to provide flood protection and irrigation benefits for which it was designed. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in fiscal year 1979. 9. KAWEAH AND TULE RIVERS, INCLUDING TERMINUS DAM AND SUCCESS LAKE, CA Location. Terminus Dam is on Kaweah River about 20 miles east of Visalia, CA. Success Lake is on Tule River about 5 miles east of Porterville, CA. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Existing project. Terminus Dam: For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost of new work is $19,302,957, including $242,605 for basic recreation facilities and excluding spreading works constructed by local interests at an estimated (July 1957) cost of about $750,000. Spreading works portion of project has been deauthorized. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, Public Law 93-251, as amended, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of that portion of project. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $700,004. Success Lake: For description of completion improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost of new work for Success Lake is $14,247,221, including $253,697 for basic recreation facilities. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $747,048. For future non-Federal reimbursements, see Local cooperation paragraph. Operation and maintenance of reservoirs is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. California officially adopted projects by chapter 1514 of statutes of 1945, State of California. Local interests for Terminus Dam are represented by Kaweah Delta Water Conservation District. Local interests for Success Lake are considered to be represented by the Vandalia, Porterville, and Lower Tule River Irrigation Districts, the Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District, and Pioneer Water Co., which represent over 90 percent of irrigated land and waterright holders along Tule River below damsite. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation functions of projects. These costs are estimated at 14.1 percent of first and annual costs for Terminus and 9.5 percent of first and annual costs for Success. Local interests for Terminus stated they will continue to operate and maintain spreading works and downstream channel systems to provide required capacity for disposal of floodwaters. Local interests for Success stated they will continue to maintain downstream channel systems to provide required capacity for disposal of floodwaters. Repayment contracts between the Bureau of Reclamation (known as the Water and Power Resources Service between November 6, 1979, and May 18, 1981) and local water users for irrigation supply from Terminus and Success reservoirs were executed January 11, 1965, and April 30, 1965, respectively. Reservoirs are being operated for irrigation storage as well as flood control and incidental recreation use. Tulare County acquired water for recreation pools at the projects. Local interests paid the following total amounts for irrigation services from the reservoirs through December 31, 1981: Terminus, $1,358,455 and Success, $618,067. Tulare County was granted a 25-year license for planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Success, July 10, 1960, and at Terminus, June 5, 1961. Basic public-use facilities constructed by Corps at the Success reservoir were transferred to jurisdication of Tulare County on January 18,1962; facilities at Terminus were transferred June 20,1962. In March 1967, an amendment to the license agreements was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army. Under these amended licenses, Tulare County retained administration of only specified land areas and operation and maintenance of recreation facilities in these areas. In addition, they continued their program of water safety, boat inspection, and law enforcement at both reservoirs. The Corps took over the administration of the remainder of the project land areas and the operation and maintenance of recreation facilities in these areas. Calif. Department of Fish and Game expended funds to improve fishery resources of the Terminus reservoir. As of April 1, 1972, Tulare County relinquished all planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Terminus Dam. Tulare County by expenditure of county funds and by a lease to a marina concessionaire has aided in the development of recreation facilities at an estimated cost of $145,000. Calif. Department of Fish and Game expended funds in conjunction with Tulare Sportsman's Council, developing a habitat for upland game birds at Success Lake. As of April 1, 1972, Tulare County relinquished all planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Success Lake, except 35-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 for the Bartlett Park recreation area. Tulare County has aided in development of recreation facilities. Total cost of present recreation facilities developed by the county ($340,000) and the marina concessionaires ($150,000) is about $490,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Terminus Dam, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Success Lake, regular funds, None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Terminus Dam: Maintenance and operation continued. Dam safety assurance studies at Terminus Dam were continued at fiscal year cost of $5,001. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Kaweah River above Terminus Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 143,300 acre-feet occurred on June 30, 1982. Maximum daily inflow to the reservoir on April 11, 1982, was about 28,800 cubic feet per second. Maximum outflow of 3,600 cubic feet per second occurred May 4, 1982. Water released for flood control amounted to 458,400 acre-feet and irrigation and spreading releases totaled 284,300 acre-feet. Project prevented an estimated $7,800,000 in damages from the December 1981-April 1982 rainfloods and the May-June 1982 snowmelt runoff. Success Lake: Maintenance and operation continued. Piezometer installation was completed in August 1982 at contract cost of $102,779. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at Success Dam at fiscal year cost of $56,032. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Tule River above the reservoir was above normal during the year. Maximum bihourly inflow to the reservoir was 10,900 cubic feet per second on April 11, 1982, and maximum outflow of 860 cubic feet per second occurred on April 26,1982. Maximum storage of 92,800 acre-feet occurred on May 23, 1982. Storage exceeded gross pool by approximately 10,000 acre-feet due to a temporary barrier placed on spillway sill from May 2, 1982, through June 28, 1982. Water released for flood control amounted to 131,500 acre-feet and irrigation and spreading releases amounted to 71,400 acrefeet. Project prevented an estimated $26,700,000 in damages from the December 1981-April 1982 rainfloods and the May-June 1982 snowmelt runoff. Historical summary. Terminus Dam: Construction of project began in July 1957 and was completed in June 1968 except for final settlement for one tract of land upon decision of pending court case. Construction of main dam and appurtenances, initiated in February 1959, was completed in June 1962.. Dam has been operating since November 1961 to provide flood protection for which it was designed; conservation impoundment was commenced May 1962. Appurtenances are in good condition. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in fiscal year 1979. Success Lake: Construction of project began in November 1956, was completed in June 1968, and final audit of historical land record was approved December 17, 1979. Construction of main dam and appurtenances, initiated in October 1958, was completed in May 1961. Dam has been operating since October 1960 to provide flood protection for which it was designed; conservation impoundment was commenced March 1962. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in fiscal year 1979. 10. MARTIS CREEK LAKE, MARTIS CREEK, NV AND CA Location. Reservoir is on Martis Creek a tributary of Truckee River, near Truckee, CA; intermittent channel improvements are on Truckee River in Reno, NV. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for areas.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost for project was $8,503,789 including $289,506 for basic recreation facilities. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations was $1,200. Construction of recreation facilities under Code 710 was determined to be infeasible. Operation and maintenance of reservoir is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation of project, including recreation facilities, was continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at fiscal year cost of $14,797. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff above Martis Creek Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 1,560 acre-feet occurred on February 16, 1982. Maximum bihourly inflow to the reservoir on February 16, 1982, was about 1,100 cubic feet per second and maximum outflow of 391 cubic feet per second occurred February 16, 1982. Historical summary. Project construction began in August 1967; dam closure was in October 1971; dam was completed in August 1972; basic recreation facilities were completed in December 1972; and project was completed in June 1974. Recreation facilities under Code 710 funding were considered infeasible. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in fiscal year 1981. 11. MERCED COUNTY STREAM GROUP, CA Location. Reservoirs and channel improvements are on Bear, Burns, Mariposa, and Owens Creeks, in foothills of Sierra Nevada about 15 to 20 miles east of city of Merced, CA. (See Geological Survey Haystack Mountain quadrangle for Burns and Indian Gulch quadrangle for Bear, Owens, and Mariposa areas.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1962. Improvements consist of reservoirs at Mariposa, Owens, Burns and Bear Creeks and diversions 35-8 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA DISTRICT from Black Rascal Creek to Bear Creek and from Owens Creek to Mariposa Creek. Total first cost for project was $3,899,259, of which $2,751,259 was Federal and $1,148,000 non-Federal for lands including relocations and channel improvement. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary maintenance and operation of the four completed reservoirs continued. Structures were maintained in a serviceable condition. Runoff from drainage areas above Merced County stream group reservoirs was above normal for the year. (See table 35-K for maximum inflow storage and outflow for projects.) Outflows were less than channel capacity rates in the project streams. Project prevented an estimated $6,000,000 in damages from the December 1981-April 1982 rainfloods. Historical summary. Construction was initiated March 1948, with construction of Mariposa project, which was completed in November 1948. Construction of Owens project, initiated in March, was completed in October 1949; Burns project, initiated in July 1949, was completed in January 1950; and Bear project initiated in April, was completed in December 1954. Black Rascal and Owens Creek diversion channels and streamgaging stations were completed in April 1956. Local interests completed channel enlargement and restoration of channel capacities of Miles, Burns, Owens, and Mariposa Creeks in 1956 at their expense. Improvement of Bear Creek and Black Rascal Slough, below their confluence, was deferred pending possible improvements downstream, outside limits of project. 12. PINE FLAT LAKE AND KINGS RIVER, CA Location. Reservoir is on Kings River, about 25 miles east of Fresno, CA, and channel improvements are on Kings River downstream from Lemoore weir, about 25 miles south of Fresno. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Existing project. Improvement is a unit in comprehensive plan for flood control and other related purposes for Sacramento-San Joaquin Basins. Project consists of a 429-foot high concrete gravity dam, including a gated overflow section with a maximum discharge capacity of 391,000 cubic feet per second, creating a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 1 million acre-feet, for flood control, irrigation, and related purposes. Outlet provisions for future power development are included in dam, but Federal construction of power-generating facilities is not authorized. Improvement also includes levee and channel work on Kings River and its distributaries on valley floor about 25 miles south of Fresno. Channel improvement work will enlarge channel capacities and regulate flows in lower branches of the Kings River. There are nine public-use and recreation areas: One maintained by the Corps, four by the Forest Service, three jointly by the Corps and concession, and one by Fresno County. Also, five boat access-only areas are maintained by the Corps on the south side of the reservoir. Project cost is $42,072,330, of which $41,502,330 is Federal (including $13,700 for basic recreation facilities) and $570,000 non-Federal for rights-of-way for downstream channel improvements. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost of recreation facilities for Pine Flat Lake, funded from Code 710 appropriations is $1,595,100 exclusive of recreation facilities previously provided at a cost of $13,700. In addition, Federal cost of recreation facilities for Pine Flat Lake, funded from Public Works Acceleration Executive Act of 1962 appropriations, was $239,235 (July 1963). Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is Federal responsibility. Existing project . was adopted by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 630, 76th Cong., 3d sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for first costs allocated to irrigation functions of reservoir portion of project in accordance with reclamation law. Under provision of War Department Civil Appropriations Act of 1947, the Secretary of War, with concurrence of the Secretary of the Interior, determined allocation of cost to irrigation should be set at an amount not to exceed $14,250,000. In addition, local interests must pay 37.4 percent'of annual maintenance, operation, and replacement costs of dam and reservoir allocated to irrigation function. Repayment contracts between the Bureau of Reclamation (known as the Water and Power Resources Service between November 6, 1979, and May 18, 1981) and the local water users for the irrigation use of the reservoir were executed December 23, 1963. The Bureau is administering the contracts in accordance with reclamation law; however, local interests are testing in court the validity of reclamation law in regard to the Pine Flat contracts. Prior to execution of the final contracts, the Bureau provided conservation water to local interests under an interim contract. Irrigation interests paid $12,305,440 for irrigation services through December 31, 1981. With respect to the downstream channel improvements, sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. King River Conservation District represents local interests; assurances were accepted November 20, 1959. Local interests have furnished all requirements for construction rights-of-way for construction of channel improvements required to date. Three concessionaires- one each at Lakeridge Marina (Deer Creek), Lakeview Marina (Lombardo's Fishing Village), and Trimmer Marina provided public-use facilities in accordance with lease agreements with the Secretary of the Army. Estimated cost of facilities installed by these concessionaires is $525,000. Fresno County developed public-use facilities on an 85-acre tract immediately downstream from dam for picnicking, camping, swimming, and playground activities, at an estimated cost of $350,000 under provisions of a license agreement. The U.S. Forest Service developed and operates a picnic 35-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 area at the upper end of reservoir. Cost of site development is about $37,500. Licenses. License No. 1988, effective April 1, 1955, was issued by Federal Power Commission to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. for hydroelectric power development of North Fork Kings River by the company upstream from the Pine Flat reservoir. Under interim Contract No. DA-04-167-eng-1182 with the Department of the Army, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. paid for storage of power water in the Pine Flat reservoir May 15, 1954, through March 31,1955. Current Contract No. DA-04-167-eng-1328 with the Department of the Army provides for storage of power water at the rate of 0.1375 per acre-foot; the contract covers April 1, 1955, through March 31, 2005. By an agreement of January 1972, supplementing the December 1954 contract, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. transferred ownership of most of its Kings River system water to the Kings River Water Association. Accordingly, no further significant storage service to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. by the reservoir at Pine Flat is anticipated. Total payment under these contracts through June 30, 1972, (last year of payment), amounts to $2,478,798; these funds are paid to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Entry station and road modification at Island Park recreation area initiated and completed by contract, $61,052. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Kings River above Pine Flat Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 984,500 acre-feet occurred on July 8, 1982. Maximum bihourly inflow to the reservoir was 62,600 cubic feet per second on April 11, 1982, and maximum outflow of 12,310 cubic feet per second occurred on May 11, 1982. During the year, 1,369,100 acre-feet of water was released for flood control and 1,095,500 acre-feet of water was released for irrigation and spreading. Project prevented an estimated $37,600,000 in damages from the December 1981-April 1982 rainfloods and May- June 1982 snowmelt runoff. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at a fiscal year cost of $273,581. Historical summary. Construction began in April 1947 and project, including channel improvement, was completed in September 1977. Main dam was initiated in January 1950, completed in June 1954, and has been operating since February 1954 to provide flood protection for which it was designed. Total of 35.2 miles of new and reconstructed levees and 13.2 miles of channel clearing have been transferred to the Kings River Conservation District for maintenance. Recreation facilities for various recreation areas under Code 710 appropriation are complete. Completed preliminary design and cost estimates for Pine Flat fish barrier were reviewed by the State, but the State was unable to provide necessary assurances of local cooperation. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1982. 13. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM Location. Rises in Trinity Mountains in north-central California, flows generally southerly about 374 miles and empties into Suisun Bay, an arm of San Francisco Bay at Collinsville, CA. Works covered by this improvement are on Sacramento River and tributaries from Collinsville to Shasta Dam, about mile 312. Drainage area above Rio Vista is 26,500 square miles (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area for Sacramento River and Upper Butte Basin; Flournoy and Fruto quadrangles for Black Butte Lake; and Tuscan Buttes, Tehama, Redding, and Hooker quadrangles for Table Mountain Lake.) Existing project. Improvement of Sacramento River and tributaries, from Collinsville to Shasta Dam was authorized as a unit of a comprehensive plan for flood control and other related purposes in Sacramento River Basin. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries, for flood control purposes: Enlargement of existing levees on Sacramento River between vicinity of Moulton weir and Ord Bend; construction of new levees from present levee terminus to vicinity of Chico Landing; construction of a weir near Chico Landing, extension of Moulton weir, and construction of a bypass through Upper Butte Basin; construction of new levees in Lower Butte Basin; enlargement of existing levees in Sutter, Tisdale, Sacramento, and Yolo Bypasses; and levee construction and/or channel enlargement on following minor tributaries of Sacramento River: Antelope Creek; Chico and Mud Creeks and Sandy Gulch; Butte and Little Chico Creeks; Cherokee Canal; Elder Creek; Deer Creek (Tehama County); Thomes Creek; and Willow Creek; Improvement provides for about 155 miles of channel improvement and about 294 miles of levees with an average height of 12 feet and a freeboard of 3 feet. Improvement also provides for revetment as required for protection of bypass levee slopes against erosion. Total first cost for project is $18,300,000 (October 1982), of which $11,900,000 is Federal, and $6,400,000 non-Federal for lands and damages, including relocations. (See table 35-L on project units classified and excluded from cost estimate.) (b) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff, CA: An extension of the existing Sacramento River Flood Control project which provides for construction of bank protection works and minor channel improvements as required on Sacramento River between Chico Landing and Red Bluff for flood control purposes. Estimated first cost (October 1982) for project work in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties is $15,270,000, of which $13,500,000 is Federal cost and $1,770,000 non-Federal cost for lands and damages including relocations. (c) Sacramento River, CA, Bank Protection Project: Includes initial phase covering 405,000 lineal feet of bank protection and a second phase covering 430,000 lineal feet of bank protection under a long range program of bank protection, erosion control works, and setback levees at critical locations 35-10 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA DISTRICT within limits of authorized or existing levees included in the Sacramento River Flood Control project to protect integrity of levee system for flood control purposes. Total estimated (October 1982) first cost for project is $135,000,000, of which $90,000,000 is Federal (including $2,760,000 for recreation facilities) and $45,000,000 non-Federal comprising $25,800,000 for lands and damages including relocations and $19,200,000 required cash contribution toward first cost. Construction in (a), (b), and (c) above supplements program of levee improvements as accomplished pursuant to 1917 Flood Control Act, as amended by subsequent acts, including 1941 Flood Control Act, and which are reported by California DebritCommission under Sacramento River, CA, flood control. (d) Authorization also provided for Black Butte Lake. For description of completed project see Annual Report for 1975. Federal first cost for project is $14,508,820, including $475,507 for basic recreation facilities. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost for recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $1,000,162. A concessionaire at Black Butte Marina provided public use facilities in accordance with lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $80,000. (e) Authorization also provided for construction of Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) project, an earthfill dam on Sacramento River about 3 miles north of Red Bluff, CA. This project unit was deauthorized August 5, 1977. For details, see Annual Report for 1978. Local cooperation. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Fully complied with for all work completed or under contract, and local interests indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. Levee construction (107 miles) total requirement for the "active" project has been completed, transferred to, and accepted by the State. (b) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies; local interests must also assume responsibility for flood plain zoning. Fully complied with for portions completed in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties; completed work, bank protection at 29 sites, was transferred to and accepted by the State. (c) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests must also contribute an amount in cash that, when added to costs of lands, easements, rights-of-way and utility modifications, equals one-third of cost of each unit of remedial work; this contribution is estimated (October 1982) at $19,200,000. Local interests fully complied with requirements for all work completed or under contract, and indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. In addition, for reaches where local interests request bank stabilization in lieu of more feasible levee setbacks, local interests will contribute costs over and above costs of setbacks, and provide local contribution indicated above. Completed units transferred to and accepted by the State. (d) Black Butte Lake: None required for construction. Local interests must pay the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to the conservation functions of the project; these costs are estimated at 39.9 percent of first cost and 40.2 percent of annual costs. From March 2, 1960, to October 22,1970, contract between the Bureau of Reclamation (known as the Water and Power Resources Service between November 6, 1979, and May 18, 1981) and the State of California provided for repayment of irrigation storage costs; Bureau administered contract in accordance with reclamation law. Local interests paid a total of $77,205 for irrigation services during this period. Public Law 502, 91st Cong., 2d sess., October 23, 1970, provided that Black Butte project be financially integrated with the Central Valley project, coordinated operationally with other Central Valley project storage units by the Bureau under the Secretary of the Interior, and that dam and reservoir at Black Butte be physically operated and maintained by the Corps in a manner compatible with recreational use of the reservoir. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries-Minor engineering and design activities continued. Inspection of bypass levees after 1981-1982 winter floodflows indicated that erosion was insufficient to justify remedial work in current fiscal year. Project prevented an estimated $300,000 in damages from the December 1981-April 1982 rainfloods. (b) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project-Engineering and design activities continued. Project prevented an estimated $900,000 in damages from the December 1981-April 1982 rainfloods. (See table 35-M for construction accomplished and contract costs.) (c) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff-General Design Memorandum, Supplement No. 3 completed; plans and specifications for bank protection, one site, mile 215, Sacramento River, Tehama County, completed; and bank protection contract ($650,000) was awarded on September 21, 1982. Project prevented an estimated $50,000 in damages from the December 1981-April 1982 rainfloods. (d) Black Butte Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at fiscal year cost of $328,862. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff above Black Butte Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 140,800 acre-feet occurred April 27, 1982. Maximum bihourly inflow to Black Butte reservoir was 14,100 cubic feet per second on January 19, 1982, and maximum outflow of 8,892 cubic feet per second occurred on March 31, 1982. Releases of water for irrigation totaled 222,000 acre-feet and flood control releases totaled 542,600 acre-feet. Project prevented an estimated $700,000 in damages from the December 1981-April 1982 rainfloods. (e) Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) Lake: None. Historical summary. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries (active portions): Construc- 35-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 tion was initiated in May 1949 on Deer Creek and Butte Creek units; Cherokee Canal, Elder Creek, Chico and Mud Creeks, and Sandy Gulch units have been completed. Active portion of this improvement is about 93 percent complete. Work remaining is bypass levee revetment as required. (b) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: Construction of first unit was initiated in June 1963; initial phase of project was completed in November 1974. Phase II is underway, and overall project is about 55 percent complete. (c) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff: Active portion of project, bank protection in Tehama County, was initiated in June 1963 and completed in March 1964. Project was reopened in June 1968 to place additional necessary bank protection. Work at 29 sites was completed in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties as of September 1979. Contract for bank protection, mile 215, Sacramento River, Tehama County, was awarded September 21, 1982. (d) Black Butte Lake: Construction began in March 1960 and project is complete. Final land acquisition was completed in December 1966. Construction of main dam was initiated in June 1960 and completed in December 1963. Dam has been operating since November 1962 to provide the flood protection for which it was designed. Final cost allocation approved May 3, 1977. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in fiscal year 1980. (e) Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) Lake: Project unit deauthorized as of August 5, 1977. 14. WALNUT CREEK, CA Location. Project is on Walnut Creek and lower reaches of its principal tributaries, Pacheco, Grayson, San Ramon, Las Trampas, Galindo, and Pine Creeks in Contra Costa County, CA. Improvement will extend from Suisun Bay to head of project about 1 mile above southern limits of city of Walnut Creek. City of Walnut Creek is about 10 miles south of Suisun Bay. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Comprises extension of existing levees, construction of new levees and concrete channels, channel rectification and enlargement, and utilization of improvements constructed or planned by local interests. Plan provides for about 21.8 miles of channel improvement, two reinforced-concrete drop structures, two stilling basins, and 13.8 miles of levees. Cost estimate (1982) is $95,360,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $72,100,000 is Federal cost and $23,260,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $17,500,000 for lands and damages and relocations except railroad facilities, and $5,760,000 required cash contribution for land enhancement benefits provided by the project). Local interests have expended about $3 million for flood control in the project area during the period 1955-1965, including the concrete conduits constructed through the city of Walnut Creek at an estimated cost of $1,000,000 considered a preproject condition to be incorporated in the Corps project. The cost thereof is not included in above costs of local cooperation. Improvement adopted by 1960 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 76, 86th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies, except that relocation of railroad facilities is a Federal responsibility. In addition, local interests must make a cash contribution to the United States, in amount of 7.4 percent of cost of construction for land enhancement benefits provided by project. Cash contribution is estimated (October 1982) at $5,760,000. Local interests are represented by Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; formal assurances, including evidence of financial and legal ability to fulfill requirement for the cash contribution, were acceptd by the Sacramento District Engineer on November 15, 1963. The Flood Control District furnished all rights-of-way required to date and indicated that it will furnish all requirements as needed for future construction. The Flood Control District will arrange for highway bridge modifications and utility relocations before start of work by the Corps contractor. Payment of required contributed funds will be made in installments in amounts equal to 7.4 percent of the estimated construction expenditure for each fiscal year. To date, $2,956,000 has been furnished. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design for the uncompleted portions of Walnut and San Ramon Creeks and all of Upper Pine Creek are continuing. Construction of channel improvement continued on lower Pine Creek (Clayton Road to BART) and Galindo Creek (Detroit Avenue to San Miguel Road). Construction responsibility was transferred from San Francisco District on 1 April 1982. Historical summary. Construction was initiated June 1964; project is about 75 percent complete. Total of 13.1 miles of channel improvement, 9.2 miles of levee construction, part of channel improvement landscaping, and Drop Structures No. 1 and 2 have been transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Planning and design continued on remaining reaches. Work remaining consists of channel improvement on Walnut Creek (SPRR bridge to Broadway Avenue) and San Ramon bypass (Ignacio Valley Road to Rudgear Road along SPRR alignment) and Upper Pine Creek. 15. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Approved regulations for operation and maintenance of flood control works, part 208, title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, provide for inspection of completed projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance to determine status of project and insure compliance with regulations. During fiscal year, inspections were made of: Completed units of Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries; completed units of Sacramento River flood control project, Kings River Channel Improvement (Pine Flat Lake project), and Walnut Creek project; American River levees; Chester, 35-12 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA DISTRICT North Fork Feather River; levee and channel improvements on Chowchilla River (Buchanan project) and Fresno River (Hidden project); Middle Creek; Duck Creek diversion, Green Valley Creek, Littlejohn Creek, Mormon Slough, Bear Creek, Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, and North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, all in California; Truckee River, CA and NV; completed units of lower San Joaquin River and tributaries, CA; Big Dry Creek Dam and diversion, CA; Reese River, Battle Mountain, NV; Sevier River, Redmond and vicinity, Jordan River, Big Wash near Milford, and Kays Creek, all in Utah; various emergency flood control works under authority of sec. 208, Flood Control Act of June 30, 1948, and September 3, 1954; Public Law 99, June 28, 1955, and antecedent legislation; and sec. 14 of Flood Control Act of July 24,1946. Maintenance inspections conducted indicate that existing agreements and regulations are being complied with on completed flood control works. Continuing effort is required to improve maintenance practices and active steps are being taken by responsible State and local agencies to achieve desired results. Local agencies were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain these projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. Total cost of inspection for fiscal year of $981,921 included continuation of dam safety assurance program for Folsom Lake, CA ($879,666). 16. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Costs for preauthorization studies for fiscal year were as follows: Berryessa Creek, CA, $50,700 (excludes $7,500 reconnaissance report cost by San Francisco District; project responsibility transferred to Sacramento District April 1,1982); and Fourteenmile Slough, CA, $2,592. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal cost for fiscal year was $383,851, of which $134,890 was for disaster preparedness, $207,940 for flood emergency operations, and $41,021 for repair and restoration. Emergency bank protection (sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Federal cost for fiscal year was $20,139. Bank protection was initiated on Cosumnes River, Dillard Road, CA ($7,492), Mormon Slough, Jack Tone Road, CA ($7,500), and on Sutter Creek near lone, CA (reconstruction of revetment displaced by high flows) ($5,147). Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (sec. 208,1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83d Cong.) Total Federal cost for fiscal year was $21,363. Reconnaissance reports were initiated for snagging and clearing on Calaveras River, Bellota, CA ($659), Cottonwood Creek, CA ($5,674), Dry Creek, CA ($5,956), Sand Creek, CA ($1,930), and South Fork Fresno River, CA ($5,872); all studies were found to be infeasible and were terminated. Minor Detailed Project Report costs for Orestimba Creek, CA ($1,271). Flood insurance activities (sec. 1301-1377, 1968 Housing and Urban Development Act, Public Law 90-448 as amended). No flood insurance activities this fiscal year. 17. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with sec. 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, summaries of monthly operations at Big Dry Creek, Boca, Camanche, Del Valle, Folsom, Friant (Millerton Lake), Indian Valley, Los Banos Detention, New Bullards Bar, New Don Pedro, New Exchequer (Lake McClure), New Melones, Oroville, Prosser, Shasta, and Stampede, CA; East Canyon, Echo, Lost Creek, Pineview, Starvation, and Wanship, UT; Blue Mesa, Lemon, Peonia, Ruedi, and Vallecito, CO; and Navajo, NM reservoirs were prepared. Working agreements and new flood control diagrams for Friant, Camanche, and New Exchequer were signed. Corps personnel provided advice as requested during flood control operations at all sec. 7 reservoirs. Fiscal year cost was $162,933. Total cost to September 30, 1982, $1,810,287. Multiple-Purpose Projects including Power 18. NEW MELONES LAKE, CA Location. On Stanislaus River about three-quarters mile downstream from existing Melones Dam and about 35 miles northeast of city of Modesto. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of the area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of (a) an earth and rockfill dam about 625 feet high to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of about 2,400,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, power, general recreation, fish and wildlife, and other purposes, and (b) a powerplant below the dam with an installed capacity of 300,000 kilowatts. Upon completion of construction of dam and powerplant by the Corps, the project became an integral part of Central Valley project and is being operated and maintained by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to Federal reclamation laws, except that the flood control operation of the project shall be in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Maintenance of Stanislaus River channel from Goodwin Dam to San Joaquin River to a capacity of at least 8,000 cubic feet per second will also be Corps responsibility. Approved estimated (October 1982) Federal cost is $376,000,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period). For future non-Federal reimbursement, 35-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 see Local cooperation paragraph. In addition, local interests expended $300,000 for levees along lower reaches of Stanislaus River. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 453, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). This act modified original authorization adopted by 1944 Flood Control Act. (H. Flood Control Committee Doc. 2, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) The 1944 Flood Control act established $8 million monetary limitation for partial accomplishment of project. Further monetary authorizations of $2.5 million, $5 million, $13 million, $2 million, $17 million, $18 million, $44 million, $83 million, $46 million, $6 million, and $61 million were provided for this project by Public Laws 235 and 780, 83d Cong., and 85-500, 90-17, 90-483, 91-282, 92-222, 93-251, 94-397, 95-104, and 95-189, making a total monetary authorization of $305,500,000 available for the basin plan comprising Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, CA. Since FY 1979, appropriations have not been subject to the river basin monetary limitation and legislation is before Congress to eliminate the monetary limitation ceiling. Local cooperation. Based on approved preliminary cost allocation studies (July 1965) local interests will be required to pay 35.2 percent of first cost and 12.7 percent of annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation. In addition, 31.1 percent of first cost and 62.5 percent of annual cost would be allocated to power. Local interests must also maintain existing private levees along Stanislaus River from Goodwin Dam to San Joaquin River and prevent encroachment on channel and floodway between levees to preserve safe carrying capacity throughout the reach of at least 8,000 cubic feet per second. Recovery of costs allocated to irrigation and power will be the responsibility of the Bureau of Reclamation (known as the Water and Power Resources Service between November 6, 1979, and May 18,1981). Reimbursement of costs will be in accordance with Bureau policies and procedures for the Central Valley project. State of California officially adopted project by chapter 918 of statutes of 1963, and by chapter 1438 of those statutes authorized State Reclamation Board to furnish required assurances. The Board, by letter dated December 13, 1963, stated it would furnish required assurances when formally requested to do. Assurances were requested by letter of December 30, 1977. On October 2, 1979, the Board reaffirmed its intent to furnish the required assurances. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering activities continued including continuation of plans and specifications for the Lower Stanislaus recreation areas, minimal recreation facilities only. Fiscal year costs for major items of work included: Continuation of land acquisition activities, $2,630,419; completion of reservoir area clearing contract, $1,095,088; completion of Oakdale recreation contract, $26,165; continuation of Glory Hole Phase I recreation area contract $4,016,057; and continuation of Tuttletown Phase I recreation area contract, $1,527,648. Remaining recreation facilities were unscheduled pending development of cost sharing agreements with local interests. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued on Lower Stanislaus River. Project prevented an estimated $7,300,000 in damages from the December 1981-April 1982 rainfloods. Historical summary. Construction was initiated in August 1966. Main dam contract which was awarded in March 1974 has been completed; dam dedication ceremonies were held July 14, 1979. Cultural resources preservation contract, water intake facilities contract, flood control and irrigation tailrace modification contract, reservoir area clearing contract, and Oakdale recreation contract have been completed. Glory Hole recreation area contract and Tuttletown recreation area contract have been initiated. Overall project is nearing completion except for Lower Stanislaus River recreation facilities. Remaining recreation facilities were unscheduled pending development of cost sharing agreements with local interests. A Memorandum of Understanding between the Department of the Interior and the Department of the Army transferring the New Melones dam and reservoir from the Corps of Engineers to the Bureau of Reclamation was executed on November 20, 1979. Agreement provides that the Corps complete land acquisition actions and retain budgeting, design, and construction responsibility for reservoir clearing and recreation development; completion of cultural resources mitigation in project area was vested in the Department of the Interior. The California State Water Resources Control Board's Decision 1422 of April 1973 established conditions which impacted on the planned filling and operation of the project by the Department of the Interior. As a result, the Department of Interior brought suit against the State of California claiming State limitations on project operation were contrary to Congressional intent and authority. The case was heard before the U.S. District Court in Fresno, CA, and in early March 1981, a Federal judge ruled that the Federal Government could fill the New Melones reservoir for purpose of generating electrical power, but not for agricultural or other purposes. Both the Government and the California State Resources Control Board have appealed this decision to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, CA. A court decision is still pending. Project is about 90 percent complete. General Investigations 19. SURVEYS See table 35-N. MORRISON CREEK STREAM GROUP, CA (PHASE I, FEASIBILITY STUDY) Phase I studies (estimated cost $3,000,000) were authorized by sec. 101(a), Water Resources Development Act, of 1976, in accordance with Report of Chief of 35-14 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA DISTRICT Engineers, March 2, 1976. Proposed plan of improvement would be located on streams in Morrison Creek Stream Group Basin in the central part of Sacramento County and would provide for construction of a dam with an 11,000 acre-foot reservoir at the Vineyard site on Elder and Laguna Creeks, diversion of Morrison Creek flows into this reservoir, construction of 26 miles of levee and 66 miles of channel work along streams in the basin, and purchase of lands and related construction for a 7,800-acre flood retardation basin in the Beach- Stone Lakes area. Phase I studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $583,786. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING REDBANK AND FANCHER CREEKS, CA Project is located northeast of Fresno-Clovis metropolitan area in Fresno County, CA. Plan of improvement includes flood control detention basins on Redbank Creek, Pup Creek, and Alluvial Drain; construction of a flood control reservoir on Fancher Creek; and enlargement of Big Dry Creek project to provide increased flood protection and recreation opportunities. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $3,800,000. General Design Memorandum studies including environmental, hydrology, real estate, cultural resources, and foundation exploration (including fault evaluation) studies and surveys were initiated at a fiscal year cost of $216,167. SACRAMENTO RIVER DEEP WATER SHIP CHANNEL, CA Plan of improvement consists primarily of deepening to 35 feet the Suisun Bay and Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channels from New York Slough to Port of Sacramento, and the Avon to New York Slough reach to 35 feet which will be accomplished under the San Francisco Bay to Stockton (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) project. Selected plan also provides for a water quality monitoring program, authority to construct a submerged sill, 45 acres of land for establishment of wetland habitat, and 156 acres of land for upland habitat to mitigate for losses of such habitat. Preconstruction planning estimate is $3,500,000. Continuation of planning and engineering(including explorations and water quality studies) was initiated at a fiscal year cost of $214,408. 20. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Under the National Program of Inspection of Dams, as authorized by the Dam Safety Act, Public Law 93-367, August 8, 1972, the dam inventory and dam inspection program was completed, including final state audits, for California, Nevada, and Utah at a fiscal year cost of $29,911. Technical assistance was performed for other Federal agencies as well as non-Federal agencies in connection with Flood'Plain Management Services Program at fiscal year cost of $392,731. No Flood Plain Information Studies were prepared after FY 1980. Fiscal year costs for hydrologic studies were $8,000. 21. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT The Hydrologic Engineering Center was designated as a separate Field Operating Agency as of January 1, 1979, in accordance with OCE permanent orders 1-1, January 10, 1979, but Sacramento District is continuing to provide advisory and administrative support services to HEC as specified in local support agreement DACWO5-79-A-0038 of March 1979. Fiscal year costs were $972,083, of which $764,965 was for analytical techniques, $86,919 for Water Conservation and Supply, and $120,199 for earth resources satellites, all at the Hydrologic Engineering Center. 22. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN COTTONWOOD CREEK, CA Project will be located on main stem and the North, South, and Middle Forks of Cottonwood Creek on eastern slope of the Coast Range and southern slope of Trinity Range between cities of Redding and Red Bluff, CA, and was authorized by the 1970 Flood Control Act (Document not yet printed). Plan of improvement provides for two multiplepurpose reservoirs, one at Dutch Gulch (capacity 900,000 acre-feet) and one at Tehama (capacity 700,000 acrefeet), and includes base facilities for future installation of hydropower generating equipment. Draft of General Design Memorandum and Environmental Impact Statement was completed. Estimated preconstruction planning estimate is $20,900,000. HUMBOLDT RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, NV Project will be located on the headwater tributaries of the Humboldt River in the general vicinity of Elko, NV. Existing project provides for construction of three storage reservoirs, Hylton, Devils Gate, and Vista, on headwater tributaries and minor channel improvements at critical locations along Humboldt River above Rye Patch Reservoir, and was authorized by the 1950 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 586, 81st Cong., 2d sess.). Current plan of improvement, as in the Stage 2 Planning Document, provides for construction of Hylton Dam and reservoir only. Activities on Phase I, General Design Memorandum and Environmental Impact Statement were suspended pending investigation by local interests of a recreation 35-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 reservoir near the Hylton damsite. Estimated preconstruction planning costs is $6,000,000. MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA Project will be located on streams draining from Mariposa County foothills of Sierra Nevada into Merced County in vicinity of city of Merced, CA. Project is modification of Merced County Stream Group, CA, Improvement No.11, authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act and completed FY 1957. Project providing for construction of three new reservoirs-Castle, Haystack Mountain, and Marguerite on Canal, Black Rascal, and Deadman-Dutchman Creeks, respectively, and enlargement of four existing reservoirs-Burns, Bear, Owens, and Mariposa, was authorized by 1970 Flood Control Act (Document not yet printed). Current plan of improvement would defer enlargement of existing Burns reservoir, Mariposa reservoir, construction of Marguerite Dam, and the irrigation function associated with the latter two facilities, enlargement of existing Owens reservoir and about 32 miles of levee and channel improvement on Owens, Mariposa, and Deadman-Dutchman Creeks. Phase I General Design Memorandum was approved February 1982 and Phase II General Design Memorandum was approved June 1982. Plans and specifications for Castle were completed in August 1982. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $6,350,000. 35-16 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT i Total Cost to FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep 30, 1982 343,000 393,001 250,000 1,020,965 in Text Project Funding 1. Sacramento River, New Work CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2. San Francisco Bay New Work to Stockton, CA Approp. (John F. Baldwin and Cost Stockton Ship Channels) 3. San Joaquin River, New Work CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5. Buchanan Dam-H.V. New Work Eastman Lake, Approp. Chowchilla River, CA Cost (Federal Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds, New Work Other)8 Contrib. Cost 6. Calaveras River and New Work Littlejohn Creek and Approp. Tributaries including Cost New Hogan Lake and Maint. Farmington Dam, CA Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost (Contributed Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 7. Hidden Dam-Hensley New Work Lake, Fresno Approp. River, CA Cost (Federal Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 8. Isabella Lake, Kern New Work River, CA Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 9. Kaweah and Tule New Work Rivers including Approp. Terminus Dam and Cost Success Lake, CA Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost - - - 40,331,1921 - - - 40,331,192' 1,682,200 2,597,300 2,927,000 32,910,8312 290,722 3,480,162 3,057,288 32,528,713 a 585,000 850,000 1,574,000 10,983,0004 609,722 647,007 1,437,564 10,556,1206 - - - 5,833,117' - - - 5,833,117' 415,000 -79,000 20,000 9,509,4767 397,979 -61,787 18,645 9,508,0117 - 60,000 - 27,369,597 31,149 41,050 42,078 27,369,564 570,000 647,000 769,000 3,420,500 550,952 598,841 704,757 3,281,137 - - - 111,187 - - - 111,187 - - - 23,723,1449 51,515 - - 23,723,14410 969,000 841,000 921,000 8,436,16911 936,875 765,773 915,116 8,312,34712 - - - 1,294,25118 14 - - - 1,294,2518 14 - - - 30,555,426 13,402 - - 30,555,426 632,000 1,499,000 1,216,000 4,732,500 591,310 946,240 1,456,926 4,367,962 - - - 165,1121 - - - 165,11216 -10,000 - - 24,450,5371" is 5,762 - - 24,450,53717 18 1,153,000 1,550,000 1,461,640 13,563,598" 1,087,662 1,596,512 1,244,401 13,324,167 so - - - 438,00021 - - - 438,0002' - - - 34,997,230" - - - 34,997,23022 1,729,000 1,575,000 1,616,000 14,054,52528 1,718,138 1,532,424 1,534,147 13,877,036U - - - 42,420" - - - 42,420" 35-17 TABLE 35-A See Section 295,000 974,182 366,192 514,500 563,626 140,000 124,111 596,000 635,276 285,914 507,000 526,743 -200,000 477,677 877,350 951,900 96 1,316,400 1,439,897 1,420 12,419 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep 30, 1982 10. Martis Creek Lake, New Work Martis Creek, NV, and CA 11. Merced County Stream Group, CA 12. Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, CA (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds, Other) 13. Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA from Collinsville to Shasta Dam (Federal Funds) (Required Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds, Other) 14. Walnut Creek, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds, Other) 18. Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, CA including Tuolumne fiverst, A,_New Melones Lake, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - - 8,504,989w - - - 8,504,989w 151,750 160,000 210,000 192,000 1,892,350 198,596 152,515 217,492 192,004 1,881,104 -- - - 2,751,2592 -- - - 2,751,2592 90,000 117,700 81,000 89,000 1,062,506 128,764 125,290 69,548 66,942 1,026,642 110,000 250,000 - - 43,356,2652 29 80 753,825 271,440 - - 43,356,26529 81 749,700 1,686,000 1,232,000 1,337,000 12,329,28582 831,798 1,657,512 1,187,602 1,383,372 12,264,2458 -- - - 110,0004 -- - - 110,00084 765,000 1,841,000 3,215,000 3,726,000 77,983,508 86 3,713,939 1,516,498 3,564,715 2,759,156 76,857,8503 87 632,400 938,000 826,000 1,589,000 8,483,33485 716,465 921,588 787,350 1,159,591 7,954,5018 200,000 350,000 463,000 950,000 13,985,538 639,652 341,003 775,433 1,011,197 13,914,251 1,420 - - - 2,442,362"'"42 " 12,419 - - - 2,442,3624" " 4e4 1,550,000 1,000,000 5,045,000 5,965,000 32,191,429" " 1,557,855 1,115,815 4,454,990 4,971,022 30,519,398k 156,020 - - 482,688 2,135,45847 53,115 123,572 22,194 393,269 2,042,1124 82,327 31,700 42,000 232,200 1,462,045" 40,452 73,375 29,080 177,082 1,361,197" 13,405,000 11,461,692 9,000,000 12,700,000 324,188,9961 5 27,590,740 10,716,483 9,828,850 12,207,662 323,250,08361 2 115,000 191,000 311,000 388,000 1,102,000 113;658 189,147 311,609 361,647 1,064,806 1. Includes the following amounts for new work: Regular 4. Includes $4 072,800 funds for Sacramento District funds: Previous project, $185,198; existing project, $585,436 and $6,910,200 for Ban Francisco District. for shallow-draft and $39,560,558 for deep-draft. 5. Includes $3,981,049 costs for Sacramento District and 2. Includes the following funds for maintenance: Regular $6,575,071 for San Francisco District. funds: Previous project, $553,720; existing project, $15,223,907 6. Includes $1,158,348 public work funds, of which $207 198 for shallow-draft and $17,063,204 for deep-draft; and deferred was for work done along 30-foot channel in Suisun Iay maintenance funds, $70,000 for shallow-draft. Channel; excludes $19,000 expended for engineering for 3. Includes the following costs for maintenance: Regular inactive portion of 1950 modification. In addition, $1,342,500 funds: Previous project, $553,720; existing project, $15,169,519 was expended from required contributed funds. for shallow-draft and $16,735,473 for deep-draft; and deferred 7. In addition, $1,250 was expended from required conmaintenance funds, $70,000 for shallow-draft. tributed funds. 35-18 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 8. Contributed funds, other, from State of California for design and construction of downstream channel improvements on Ash and Berenda Sloughs below Buchanan Dam. 9. Includes Code 710 funds for recreation facilities at New Hogan Lake: $140,000 for fiscal year 1979: Total to date $897,742. 10. Includes Code 710 costs for recreation facilities at New Hogan Lake: $124,111 and $51,515 for fiscal years 1979 and 1980, respectively. Total to date $897,742. 11. Includes $99,000 special recreation use fees at New Hogan Lake. 12. Includes $99,000 special recreation use costs at New Hogan Lake. 13. For miscellaneous construction under local cooperation requirements, primarily Bear Creek, San Joaquin County; includes $108,056 as related to Duck and Littlejohn Creeks channel improvements as part of Farmington Dam project unit. 14. Includes $393,195 contributed funds, other, from California Department of Boating and Waterways for design and construction of boat launching and related facilities, and $30,000 for design and construction of a boarding float at North Shore recreation area at New Hogan Lake. 15. Contributed funds, other, from State of California for miscellaneous design and construction at Hidden Dam. 16. Includes total Code 710 funds for recreation facilities at Isabella Lake: -$200,000 and -$10,000 for fiscal years 1979 and 1980, respectively. Total to date $2,199,085. 17. Includes total Code 710 costs for recreation facilities at Isabella Lake: $477,593 and $5,762 for fiscal years 1979 and 1980, respectively. Total to date $2,199,085. 18. Includes $224,000 Code 713 funds and costs for improvement at Tillie Creek and Live Oak campgrounds. 19. Includes $141,000 special recreation use fees at Isabella Lake. 20. Includes $141,640 special recreation use costs at Isabella Lake. 21. Funds from California Department of Boating and Waterways for design and construction of boat launching and related facilities at Old Isabella Road and Isabella Peninsula. 22. Includes Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities: Success Lake: Total to date $747,048. Terminus Dam: Total to date $700,004. 23. Includes $165,000 special recreation use fees at Success Lake. 24. Includes $164,719 special recreation use costs at Success Lake. 25. Funds from State of California Department of Boating and Waterways and costs for acquisition of a boarding float at Success Lake, $30,000 and at Terminus Dam, $12,420. 26. Includes $1,200, initiation of plans and specifications for Code 710 recreation facilities, for fiscal year 1978. Construction of recreation facilities at Martis Creek Lake under Code 710 was determined to be infeasible. 27. In addition, $66,532 expended for new work from contributed funds, other, for miscellaneous construction under local, cooperation requirements as related to acquisition of rights-of-way and utility alterations for project. 28. Includes Code 710 funds for recreation facilities at Pine Flat Lake: $110,000 and $250,000 for fiscal years 1979 and 1980, respectively. Total to date $1,595,100. 29. Includes Code 710 costs for recreation facilities at Pine Flat Lake: $753,825 and $271,440 for fiscal years 1979 and 1980, respectively. Total to date $1,595,100. 30. Includes Public Works Acceleration, Executive (PL 87-658) (Transfer to Corps of Engineers, Civil) 1963 funds for recreation facilities: Total appropriations $239,235 and total costs $239,235. 31. Includes $19,600 Code 713 funds and costs for Pine Flat fish barrier. 32. Includes $158,300 special recreation use fees at Pine Flat Lake. 33. Includes $158,300 special recreation use costs at Pine Flat Lake. 34. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services (non-project) accomplished at expense of State of California under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way and utility alterations at Pine Flat Lake. 35. Excludes $614,608 for Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) project, deauthorized August 5, 1977, and $531,000 for Sacramento River and Major and Minor Tributaries portions which are considered inactive and deferred. 36. Includes Code 710 funds for recreation facilities at Black Butte Lake: $60,000 and $110,000 for fiscal years 1979 and 1980, respectively. Total to date $1,000,162. 37. Includes Code 710 costs for recreation facilities at Black Butte Lake: $51,857, $212,747, and $2,868 for fiscal years 1979,1980, and 1981, respectively. Total to date $1,000,162. 38. Includes $74,100 special recreation use fees at Black Butte Lake. 39. Includes $74,100 special recreation use costs at Black Butte Lake. 40. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services (non-project) accomplished at expense of State of California under local cooperation requirements in conniection with acquisition of rights-of-way and utility alterations (primarily for Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries project. 41. Includes State Highway Commission payment, $789,008 for use of excess excavation from Chico and Mud Creeks and Sandy Gulch (Sacramento River and Major and Minor Tributaries) for freeway embankment through city of Chico. 42. Includes $7,984, contributed funds, other, from State of California for required modification of existing private facilities, Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff. 43. Includes $15,977 contributed funds, other, from State of California Department of Boating and Waterways for replacing a boarding float at Orland Buttes boat launching ramp at Black Butte Lake. 44. All costs and construction responsibility was transferred from Sacramento District to San Francisco District January 31, 1977. Construction responsibility and remaining FY 82 funds were transferred from San Francisco to Sacramento April 1, 1982. 45. Includes $122,225 FY 82 construction allotment from San Francisco. 46. Includes $800,278 FY 82 construction costs from San Francisco. 47. Includes $258,148 FY 82 required contributed funds from San Francisco. 48. Includes $262,075 FY 82 required contributed costs from San Francisco. 49. Includes $131,352 FY 82 contributed funds, other from San Francisco. 50. Includes $177,082 FY 82 contributed funds, other costs from San Francisco. 51. Excludes funds applicable to other units of this basin authorization (Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries and Tuolumne River Basin, CA) (See table 35-E). 52. Includes $110,000 utilized for preparation of 1957 Economic Feasibility Report and of Revised Feasibility Report (FY 1960,1961, and 1962) applicable to 1962 reauthorization of project. 35-19 TABLE 35-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep 30, 1982 Cottonwood Creek, New Work CA Approp. 1,100,000 1,250,000 1,650,000 3,150,000 8,675,0001 Cost 1,246,900 1,111,715 1,773,318 3,088,134 8,567,6332 Humboldt River and New Work Tributaries, NV Approp. 15,000 285,000 300,000 110,000 1,532,932* Cost 41,110 220,953 272,949 201,099 1,532,9324 Merced County New Work Streams, CA Approp. 268,000 655,000 1,350,000 1,344,000 5,850,0006 Cost 870,172 777,725 1,368,594 1,317,691 5,820,8066 1. Includes $3,150,000 General Investigation funds. 4. Includes $110,000 General Investigation costs. 2. Includes $3,042,635 General Investigation costs. 5. Includes 1,034,000 General Investigation funds. 3. Includes $110,000 General Investigation funds. 6. Includes $1,005,539 General Investigation costs. TABLE 35-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See * Date Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1899 July 25, 1912 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA A depth of 7 feet below Sacramento H. Doc. 186, 55th Cong., 2d sess., and 48, 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Annual Report 1898, p. 2844 and 1899, p. 3171). For work above Sacramento. H. Doc. 76, 62d Cong., 1st sess.' The 10-foot channel up to Sacramento. H. Doc. 123, 69th Cong., 1st sess. A depth of 6 feet between Sacramento and Colusa and 5 feet Rivers and Harbors between Colusa and Chico Landing, at a cost of $390,000 Committee Doc. 35, provided flow of rivers is increased to minimum flow of 73d Cong., 2d sess. 5,000 cubic feet per second after Shasta Reservoir is built. Authority for a special direct participation of Federal Rivers and Harbors Government of $12 million in cost of Shasta Reservoir. Committee Doc. 35, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Transfer of authority for expenditure of above $12 million from Secretary of War to Secretary of the Interior. Modified existing navigation project for Sacramento River, S. Doc. 142, 79th Cong., CA, to provide for construction of a ship channel 30 2d sess. feet deep and 200 to 300 feet wide from deep water in Suisun Bay to Washington Lake, including such works as may be necessary to compensate for or alleviate any detrimental salinity conditions resulting from ship channel; a triangular basin of equal depth, 2,400 by 2,000 by 3,400 feet at Washington Lake; and connecting channel 13 feet deep and 120 feet wide, with lock and drawbridge, thence to Sacramento River. 35-20 TABLE 35-B (Cont'd) SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 13. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM Dec. 22, 1944 Modify Sacramento River Flood Control Project to provide H. Doc. 649, 78th Cong., for extensions in levees and other structures along 2d sess.2 Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries; construct Black Butte Dam and Reservoir; construct lowlevel Table Mountain Dam and Reservoir with power facilities; and provision of monetary authorization of $15 million for initiation of modification. May 17, 1950 Improvement for protection of Upper Butte Basin (included H. Doc. 367, 81st Cong., full monetary authorization). 1st sess.2 July 3, 1958 Extend existing Sacramento River Flood Control Project to H. Doc. 272, 84th Cong., Keswick Dam for purposes of zoning area below dam and 2d sess.2 modification of project by construction of bank protection and incidental channel improvements between Chico Landing and Red Bluff (included full monetary authorization). July 3, 1958 Additional authorization of $17 million for comprehensive plan approved in act of December 22, 1944. July 14, 1960 Further modification of Sacramento River Flood Control S. Doc. 103, 80th Cong., Project by construction of initial 10-year phase of 2d sess.2 bank erosion control works and setback levees on Sacramento River and authorization of $14,240,000 for prosecution of modification. May 12, 1967 Additional authorization of $7 million for bank protection PL 90-17 approved in act of July 14, 1960. Mar. 7, 1974 Initiation of construction of second phase of bank erosion PL 93-251 control works and setback levees on Sacramento River as approved in act of July 14, 1960, and additional authorization of $16 million for such purpose.* June 19, 1975 Deauthorization of Table Mountain Dam and Reservoir4 H. Doc. 94-192, 94th Cong., 1st sess. 1. Contains latest published map of section above Sacramento. For map of section below Sacramento, see H. Doc. 1123, 60th Cong. 2d sess. and S. Doc. 142, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 2. Contains latest published map. 3. Total monetary authorization available, exclusive of preauthorization studies from general investigations appropriations, amounts to $72,740,000. 4. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, PL 93-251, as amended by sec. 157, PL 94-587, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of project unit. 35-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 35-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Feather River, CA 1951 - 5,7521 2 Middle River and Connecting Channels, CA Completed 1974 8,3543 93,4944 Mokelumne River, CA Completed 1974 8,500 189,152 Navajo Reservoir, NM Completed - 2,132 s - Old River, CA Completed 1970 23,1857 631,128 Stockton and Mormon Channels, CA Completed 1970 253,1518 218,854 Suisun Bay Channel, CA Completed 1974 200,928 10o 1 3,316,62212 13 Suisun Channel, CA Completed 1973 217,677 733,4891 14 Suisun Point Channel, CA Completed 1965 191,728 15 - 1. Maintenance project, channels adequate for commerce. 2. Includes $10 for maintenance for previous project. Excludes $6,160 for previous project and $3,840 for existing project for maintenance expended from contributed funds. 3. Includes $1,600 for previous project. 4. Includes $790 for previous project. 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended. 6. All costs transferred from Los Angeles District in FY 1968. 7. Estimated cost to local interests was $3,600 for lands, damages, and public landings. 8. Upon completion of Mormon Slough, Calaveras River, CA in February 1970, local interests accepted maintenance responsibility for Mormon Slough as well as for Stockton and Mormon Channels, CA, and Federal maintenance was discontinued. No Federal maintenance costs have been incurred since FY 1969. 9. Includes $58,901 for previous projects. 10. Excludes $59,551 expended from required contributed funds for previous project. 11. Excludes work accomplished under existing project at a cost of $207,198 from Public Works Administration funds allotted to San Joaquin River, CA. 12. Includes $59,817 for previous projects. Excludes $5,449 expended from required contributed funds for previous project. 13. Maintenance responsibility transferred to San Francisco District, January 1, 1974. 14. Includes reconnaissance and condition surveys of $5,496 and $483 for fiscal years 1963 and 1964, respectively. 15. Estimated cost (July 1964) to local interests was $12,000 for lands, damages, and spoil retention dikes. 35-22 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA DISTRICT TABLE 35-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Alameda Creek, CA Alhambra Creek, CA American River, CA Aquatic Plant Control, CA Bear River, CA Big Dry Creek Dam and diversion, CA Big Wash, Milford, Beaver County, UT Burch Creek, Weber County, UT Chester, CA Corte Madera Creek, CA Coyote Creek, CA Duck Creek, San Joaquin County, CA East Weaver Creek, CA Eel River, CA Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA Folsom Lake, American River, CA Gleason Creek, NV Green Valley Creek, Solano County, CA Kays Creek, UT Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, CA Klamath River, CA Lake Camanche, CA Lake Oroville, CA Lakeport Lake, CA Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, CA Mad River Basin, CA Marysville Lake, CA Merced River, CA Middle Creek, CA Mormon Slough, CA Napa River Basin, CA New Bullards Bar, CA North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, CA Pinole Creek, CA Redwood Creek, Humboldt County, CA Reese River, Battle Mountain, NV Rheem Creek, CA Rodeo Creek, CA Salinas River, CA Salt Lake City, Jordan River, UT San Leandro Creek, CA San Lorenzo Creek, CA San Lorenzo River, CA Sevier River near Redmond, UT Sonoma Creek, CA Completed Inactive Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Active/no FY 82 expenditure Completed Completed Completed Inactive Active/no FY 82 expenditure Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Inactive Active/no FY 82 expenditure Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive 1978 1981 1959 1967 1980 1955 1961 1964 1981 1979 1968 1967 1965 1971 1977 1967 1977 1963 1973 1977 1972 1976 1981 1976 1976 1973 1980 1976 1967 1976 1979 1972 1974 1968 1970 1969 1962 1966 1952 1961 1973 1962 1966 1952 1973 26,995,350 300,0001 a 2,125,8184 1,000 _- 1,369,9316 217,8797 8 26,0497 3,566,564' 6,999,7251 1o 705,622' 7 664,8257 1 220,6361 7 12 1,272,816'1 ' 687,000" 63,014,810'" 215,82616 136,0267 17 407,9897 i8 1,503,0737 "9 4,838,000' 10,252,95090 70,425,470"1 2,353,00392 27,835,2638 4,243,750' 24 -25 10,918,7968 2,643,49997 2,965,4029 2,639,955' 12,890,625" 904,2787 8o 1S 885,750' 7 4,620,070' 8 133,3397 "a 400,000' 974,100' 7 94,2131 " 1,227,570" 1,000,000' a 5,130,8211 *' 4,314,4061 8 919,0000 781,500' "a 35-23 54,7781 ' REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 35-E (Cont'd) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Truckee River and tributaries, Active/no FY 82 1968 1,038,960 - CA and NV expenditure Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA Active/no FY 82 1979 1,110,0001 expenditure 1. Project responsibility transferred from San Francisco District to Sacramento District April 1, 1982. 2. Scheduling of reservoir operations costs. 3. Project classified as "inactive" January 19, 1982. 4. Excludes $54,919 other contributed funds for miscellaneous construction for local interests pursuant to requirements of local cooperation. Total costs for all requirements of local cooperation were $951,000 (1959) for lands and reloca. tions. 5. Due to infeasibility, Bear River Phase I study was suspended and project classified as "inactive" on November 6, 1981. 6. Excludes $44,008 other contributed funds for construction in connection with bridge construction pursuant to requirements of local cooperation. Total cost to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation was $370,000 (1959) for lands and relocations. 7. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of sec. 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. 8. Excludes $22,000 for preauthorization studies. 9. Excludes $69,262 other contributed funds from State of California for two low water crossings and appurtenances at Chester. 10. Excludes $97,400 contributed funds. 11. Excludes $50,000 for preauthorization studies. Estimated costs to local interests were $665,000 for lands and damages including relocations. 12. Includes $174,938 Public Works Acceleration Program Funds. 13. Excludes $194,821 contributed funds and placed inactive 1973. 14. Due to lack of local support, Fairfield project was reclassified as "deferred" on September 15, 1977, but reclassified as "active" June 23, 1982, after receipt of local support. 15. Transferred to Bureau of Reclamation in May 1956 for operation and maintenance by that agency in conjunction with other units of Central Valley project. 16. Due to lack of local support, Gleason Creek project was reclassified as "deferred" on November 3, 1977. Fiscal year 1978 carryover funds of $27,984 were revoked. 17. Excludes $20,000 for preauthorization studies. 18. Includes $30,000 for preauthorization studies. Estimated costs (FY 1973) to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $150,117 for lands and damages including relocations. 19. Includes $73,000 for preauthorization studies. Non- Federal (Kern County Water Agency) cost for road relocation was $18,260 (required contributed funds). 20. Constructed by East Bay Municipal Utility District. Final Federal contribution of $51,202 made July 18, 1978 (total $10,111,684). Non-Federal costs $24,876,842. 21. Constructed by State of California. Final Federal contribution of $64,186 was made on February 9, 1981 (total $69,994,015) for flood control reservation. 22. Preconstruction planning complete. Necessary reaffirmation of local cooperation assurances by Lake County Flood Control and Water Conservation District not received. Project was reclassified as "deferred" on September 15,1977. Includes $298,500 costs for advance acquisition of land, Public Law 91-439. 23. Cherry Valley and New Don Pedro Reservoirs constructed by local interests. Federal contributions of $9,000,000 and $5,464,000, respectively, for flood control reservation. Final Federal contribution of $308,898 was made on January 18, 1972, for New Don Pedro. Excludes $3,004,946 contributed funds, other, for miscellaneous engineering and construction (non-project) at local interests expense under local cooperation requirements for acquisition of rights-ofway for levee and channel improvements on Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries. 24. Placed inactive 1974. Excludes $225,000 applicable to Public Works Acceleration Program and $162,761 previous project Blue Lake levee. 25. Planning and any future development is uncertain awaiting State of California's position on support of Marysville project. 26. Constructed by Merced Irrigation District. Final Federal contribution of $839 was made December 2, 1975 (total $10,818,638) for flood control reservation. 27. Estimated costs (FY 1967) to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $1,340,000 for lands and damages including relocations. 28. Non-Federal cost $2,965,402 (FY 1976) for lands and relocations. Federal contribution of $599,336 made to State Reclamation Board. 29. Constructed by Yuba County Water Agency. Final Federal contribution of $33,470 was made in FY 1972 (total $12,759 127) for flood control reservation. 30. Includes $41,800 for preauthorization studies. 31. Excludes $146,000 other contributed funds for miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way, relocation, and utility alterations. 32. Includes $107,000 costs for remedial work to drainage system completed in FY 1977. 33. Includes $19,000 for preauthorization studies. 34. Excludes $52,549 contributed funds. 35. Cost includes engineering and design prior to June 30, 1952 and costs of $4,288 FY 1962 and 1963 to determine if project classification to an active category was justified. 36. Estimated costs to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $463,000 (July 1962) for lands and damages including relocations. 37. Excludes $285,329 contributed funds. 38. Excludes $200,000 estimated value of work performed in lieu of cash contribution. 39. Excludes $421,182 contributed funds, 40. Excludes $48,000 required contributed funds toward first cost. Costs to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation, including required contributions, were $118,000 (1951). 41. Placed inactive 1974. 35-24 TABLE 35-G SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Little Valley Wash, Magna, UT 1951 1977 - - Spanish Fork River, UT 1955 1977 20,000 Weber River and Tributaries, UT 1974 1972 75,120 - TABLE 35-H SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA: TIDAL AND FLOOD CONDITIONS PREVAILING (See Section 1 of Text) Miles from Range in Feet Mouth of Mean Extreme Ordinary Extreme Place River Tidal1 TidalP Floods Flood' Collinsville 0 4.3 7 8 10 Sacramento 59 2.02 3 20 28 Verona (Mouth of Feather River) 80 - Trace 22 30 Colusa 144 - - 26 32 Chico Landing 193 - - 20 25 Red Bluff 248 - - 24 30 1. Mean lower low water to mean higher high water. 3. Mean lower low water to flood stage. 2. Tide at low water season only. 4. Extreme low water to indicated flood condition. TABLE 35-I SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA: TOTAL COST OF NEW WORK FOR PROJECT' (See Section 3 of Text) Federal Non-Federals Corps of Coast Required Lands and Engineers Guard Cash Damages (includ- Total Modification (Construction) (Construction) Contribution ing Relocations) Total Project Prior to 1950 Modification $4,009,938 $80,000 $1,307,500 $1,042,000 $2,349,500 $6,439,438 1950 Modification 1,823,179 - 35,000 135,000 170,000 1,993,179 Total $5,833,117 $80,000 $1,342,500 $1,177,000 $2,519,500 $8,432,617 1. Completed in May 1960. 2. Excludes $5 865,000 (Feb. 1954) local interests costs for Stockton Deep Water Channel terminal facilities required under terms of project authorization. 35-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 35-J SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA: PROJECT UNITS (1950 MODIFICATION) RECLASSIFIED AND EXCLUDED FROM PROJECT COST (See Section 3 of Text) Non-Federal Federal Required Lands and Corps of Cash Damages (includ- Total Unit Engineers Contribution ing Relocations) Total Project Settling Basin above head of Burns Cutoffs $1,073,000 $ 30,000 $ 200,000 $ 230,000 $1,303,000 Burns Cutoff improvement; new turning basin; dredging Mormon Channel2 7,882,000 431,000 1,455,000 1,886,000 9,768,000 Upper Stockton Channel enlargement' 535,000 34,000 15,000 49,000 584,000 1. July 1959 price index. Deauthorized August 5, 1977. 4. Deleted by 1965 River and Harbor Act authorization 2. Deferred; July 1960 price index, of San Francisco Bay to Stockton Channel, Sacramento 3. For lands and construction. District, Improvement No. 2. TABLE 35-K MERCED COUNTY STREAM GROUP, CA, MAXIMUM INFLOW, STORAGE, AND OUTFLOW FOR PROJECTS (See Section 11 of Text) Maximum Inflow Maximum Maximum (c.f.s.) Storage Outflow Stream (bihourly) (acre-feet) (c.f.s.) Burns 3,500 1,530 1,657 Bear 5,600 3,740 1,668 Owens 1,100 1,060 140 Mariposa 7,200 7,950 965 TABLE 35-L SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM: PROJECT UNITS RECLASSIFIED AND EXCLUDED FROM COST ESTIMATE (See Section 13 of Text) Current Estimated Cost Unit Classification Federal Non-Federall Total 1944 Modification: Antelope Creek2 Inactive $1,400,000 $ 340,000 $1,740,000 Lower Butte Basins Deferred 7,286,000 2,285,000 9,571,000 Thomes Creek2 Deferred 1,140,000 140,000 1,280,000 Willow Creek2 Inactive 1,290,000 120,000 1,410,000 Bypass Levees' Deferred 7,100,000 940,000 8,040,000 Bypass Levees' Inactive 3,010,000 - 3,010,000 1950 Modification: Upper Butte Basin 2 Deferred 3,530,000 1,787,000 5,317,000 1. For lands and damages, including relocations. 2. July 1960 price level. 3. Excludes work applicable to extension of Moulton weir (July 1954 price level). 4. July 1961 price level. 35-26 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA DISTRICT TABLE 35-M SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM: CONSTRUCTION ACCOMPLISHED AND CONTRACT COSTS (See Section 13 of Text) Required Contract Federal Contributed Total Contract 34A completion (boat ramp and parking lot at Elkhorn Park, Sacramento River) $ 55,966 $ 12,285 $ 68,251 Contract 35 continuation (Bank protection, Sacramento River, miles 110.0-184.0) 1,826,356 726,074 2,552,430 Contract 36 continuation (Bank protection, selected sites, Sacramento River, downstream from Freeport) 556,789 197,636 754,425 TABLE 35-N SURVEYS (See Section 19 of Text) Fiscal year costs were as follows: Navigation studies $ 0 Flood damage prevention studies 1,295,182 Little Dell, UT project reevaluation study 87,570 Coordination with Soil Conservation Service 2,000 Coordination with Bureau of Reclamation pertaining to projects under reclamation program (including PL 984) 9,000 Coordination with other agencies on Truckee, Carson, and Walker River Basins 10,000 $1,403,752 35-27 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION This division comprises the State of Hawaii. The division Guam and American Samoa as provided for under River and also performs such actions pertaining to preservation and Harbor Act of 1899. protection of navigable waters on and about the island of IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Auasi Harbor, American Samoa ........... 36- 1 2. Aunuu Harbor, American Samoa .......... 36- 2 3. Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii ....... 36- 2 4. Hilo Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii .............. 36- 2 5. Honolulu Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii ........... 36- 2 6. Kahului Harbor, Maui, Hawaii ............ 36- 3 7. Kaulana Bay Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii .......................... 36- 3 8. Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii .......... 36- 3 9. Rota Harbor, Northern Marianas .......... 36- 4 10. Saipan Small Boat Harbor, Northern Marianas ..................... 36- 4 I1. Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa ........................ 36- 4 12. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .......................... 36- 5 Beach Erosion Control 13. Kualoa Regional Park, Oahu, Hawaii ....... 36- 5 14. Beach Erosion Work Under Special Authorization ..................... 36- 5 15. Inspection of Completed Beach Erosion Projects ......................... 36- 5 Flood Control 16. Iao Stream, Maui, Hawaii ................ 36- 5 Navigation 1. AUASI HARBOR, AMERICAN SAMOA Location. On the southeast end of Tutuila Island in American Samoa which is about 2,300 miles southwest of Hawaii, 1,500 miles northeast of Auckland, New Zealand and 80 miles southeast of Western Samoa. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4190.) Existing project. Project provides for an entrance channel 360 feet long, 80 feet wide and 10 feet deep; a turning basin 230 feet long, 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep; a breakwater of armor stones 125 feet long; ani exterior revetment 165 feet long; and east jetty of armor stones 100 feet long; a west jetty of armor Page 17. Kahoma Stream, Maui, Hawaii ............ 36- 5 18. Kaneohe-Kailua Area, Oahu, Hawaii ....... 36- 6 19. Namo River, Territory of Guam ........... 36- 6 20. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ..................... 36- 6 21. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ......................... 36- 6 General Investigations 22. Surveys .............................. .. 36- 6 23. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........ 36- 6 Tables Table 36-A Cost and Financial Statement ........... .......... 36- 8 Table 36-B Authorizing Legislation ............ 36-10 Table 36-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ....................... 36-12 Table 36-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects .................. 36-13 Table 36-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........................ 36-13 Table 36-F Not Applicable Table 36-G Deauthorized Projects ............. 36-14 Table 36-H Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ......................... 36-14 stones 450 feet long; and appurtenant aids to navigation. The range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 2.5 feet. Project authority is Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Project was approved for construction in June 1978. Construction was initiated in September 1978 and completed in April 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Project condition survey was completed in September 1982 for $42,438. Project was financially completed in February 1982. 36-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 2. AUNUU HARBOR, AMERICAN SAMOA Location. On the north coast of Aunuu Island in American Samoa which is about 2,300 miles southwest of Hawaii, 1,500 miles northeast of Auckland, New Zealand, and 80 miles southeast of Western Samoa. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4190.) Existing project. Project provides for an entrance channel 175 feet long, 70 feet wide and 14 feet deep; a turning area of 7,500 square feet and 14 feet deep; a northern revetted mole of armor stones 300 feet long; a stub breakwater of armor stones 90 feet long; a southern revetted mole of armor stones 220 feet long; a mooring area of 13,500 square feet and 8 feet deep; and appurtenant aids to navigation. Range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 2.5 feet. Project authority is Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act, as amended. Project was approved for construction in June 1976. Construction was initiated in September 1978 and completed in April 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Project condition survey was completed in September 1982 for $2,425. Project was financially completed in February 1982. 3. BARBERS POINT HARBOR, OAHU, HAWAII Location. On the west coast of Oahu, about 25 miles from metropolitan Honolulu. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 4110 and 4133.) Existing project. Deep-draft harbor provides for an entrance channel 4,280 feet long, 450 feet wide and 38 to 42 feet deep; an inshore harbor basin of about 92 acres and 38 feet deep; and 4,700 feet long wave absorber. Light-draft harbor provides for a main access channel 1,200 feet long, 80-140 feet wide, and 12 feet deep; and wave absorber 300 feet long. Plane of reference is mean lower low water datum. The mean tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water level is 1.8 feet; extreme range under normal condition is 2.3 feet. Approved project cost estimate (October 1982) is $66,600,000 of which $58,300,000 (includes $400,000 in Coast Guard cost) is federal cost and $8,300,000 is non-federal cost including lands and right-of-way and cash contribution of $2,500,000. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interest must provide lands and right-of-way for construction and future maintenance, provide and maintain mooring facilities and utilities open to all on equal terms; provide such utility and drainage relocations or alterations as necessary; hold the United States free from damages; and provide a cash contribution estimated to be $2,500,000 for the deep-draft harbor. Terminal facilities. Existing privately owned barge harbor consists of a concrete marginal wharf, 250 feet long along south side of the barge basin. An offshore tanker facility is connected to the oil refinery by pipelines. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning for light-draft harbor deferred since FY 1970 as requested by the State of Hawaii. The State of Hawaii has agreed to a voluntary contribution of 4.4 percent based on increased volume and value of the dredged material from the construction of the harbor. A construction contract of the harbor was awarded in March 1982 for $48,182,000 and scheduled for completion in March 1985. A separate construction contract for the Regional Vistor Center at Fort De Russy was awarded in January 1982 for $649,796 and scheduled for completion in March 1983 which includes repair of the roof utilizing military funds. Progress of construction work for the harbor is 12 percent and the RVC is 53 percent. 4. HILO HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII Location. On the northeast coast of the island of Hawaii in the city of Hilo. (See NOAA Chart 19324.) Existing project. Completed portion of project comprises of rubblemound breakwater 10,080 feet long, an entrance 35 feet deep, and a harbor basin 1,400 feet wide, 2,300 feet long and 35 feet deep. The modification of the project authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of 1960 and 1962 was deauthorized in 1977. Range of tides between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 2.4 feet and extreme tidal range under normal conditions is 5.4 feet. Construction for breakwater repair work with tribars and concrete ribs was initiated in September 1980 and completed in September 1981 for a total cost of $1,746,200 utilizing Operations and Maintenance, General funds. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Three piers, and pipelines for petroleum products, liquid fertilizer and molasses, owned by the State, and privately owned facilities for handling bulk commodities and for storage of sugar, molasses, petroleum products and liquid fertilizer. Equipment includes heavy-lift cranes. Facilities are open to all on equal terms and considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Project condition survey was completed in August 1982 for $12,132. Project was financially completed in July 1982. 5. HONOLULU HARBOR, OAHU, HAWAII Location. On the southern coast of the island of Oahu, in the city of Honolulu. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4109.) Existing project. Completed portion of project comprises three channels 35-40 feet deep, two harbor basin 35 feet deep, and a double-leaf-bascule bridge. Last full report on this is on page 1828 and 1829 of Annual Report for 1962. Modifications provide deepening seaward 3,600 feet of Fort Armstrong entrance channel to 45 feet, deepening main harbor basin and Kapalama Channel to 40 feet; widening Kapalama Channel by 60 feet along Sand Island side for 3,100 feet; and relocating project line to provide a 100 foot offset from pierheads in Kapalama Channel and at piers 9, 10, and I 1, and an offset of 50 to 75 feet elsewhere in the harbor. The mean tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 1.9 feet. The usual extreme range is 2.3 feet. Total project cost for modifications is $7,820,842 of which $7,615,143 is federal cost and $205,699 is non-federal cost. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 34 piers and 2 marginal wharves, which include 3 piers and I marginal wharf owned 36-2 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION by the federal government: 13 piers and I marginal wharf owned by the State of Hawaii: and 18 piers State owned. All non-federal piers are open to all on equal basis, although certain ones are reserved for passenger terminals, for container ships or for handling specific bulk commodities such as petroleum products, pineapple, sugar, animal feeds, and cement. Operations during fiscal year. Project condition survey was completed in November 1981 for $23,651. The contractor's submittal of 4 claims for changed conditions during prosecution of the work have been settled for a total of $3,784,725 for (I) Kapalama Basin: $970,00: (2) Kapalama Channel: $384,670: (3) Main Turning Basin: $1,103,057 and (4) Fort Armstrong Channel, $1,326,998. A suit against the government filed in September 1981 for damages to a marine railway is pending. 6. KAHULUI HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII Location. On the northern coast of the island of Maui, at the town of Kahului. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4124.) Existing project. Rubblemound breakwaters on east and west sides of harbor, approximately 2,766 and 2,315 feet long, respectively, and an entrance 600 feet wide between breakwaters and harbor basin, 2,050 feet wide, 2,400 feet long, and 35 feet deep. Range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 2.2 feet and extreme tidal range under normal conditions is 4.5 feet. Estimated total project cost for the major rehabilitation is $2,924,000. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two wharves owned and operated by State of Hawaii which are open to shipping on equal terms. Pipelines for fuel oil, distillate, kerosene, gasoline, molasses, and water are available. There is also a bulk-sugar plant of 30,000-ton storage capacity with a conveyor loading system capable of conveying at a rate of about 750 tons per hour. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Project condition survey was completed in June 1982 for $7,557. A construction contract for rehabilitation of breakwater was awarded in July 1982 for $2,437,500 and scheduled for completion in March 1984. Progress of construction work is 5 percent. 7. KAULANA BAY BOAT HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII Location. On the southern tip of the island of Hawaii in the Ka'u Judicial District about 80 road miles southwest of the city of Hilo. (See NOAA Chart 19320.) Existing project. Project provides for an entrance channel 135 feet long, 60-80 feet wide tapered and 8.5 feet deep; a turning basin 200 feet long, 100 feet wide and 6.5 feet deep; and a rubblemound main breakwater 155 feet long, with a +11.5 feet crest elevation at the head and a +8.0 feet crest elevation at the trunk; a new single-lane launch ramp; and appurtenant aids to navigation. Range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 2.5 feet. Estimated project cost is $1,300,000 of which $1,196,000 (includes $20,000 in Coast Guard cost) is federal cost and $104,000 is non-federal cost. Project authority is Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Project was approved for construction in April 1982. Local cooperation. (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and right-of-way required for construction of the project. (b) Provide without cost to the United States an area suitable to the Chief of Engineers for the disposal of spoils and if necessary, retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments or the cost of such work. (c) Provide and maintain without cost to the United States the necessary launch ramp facility, as well as all appropriate onshore structures, access roadways and parking areas to insure a complete and adequate project. These facilities must be open to all on equal terms. " (d) Establish regulations prohibiting the discharge of pollutant into the waters of the channel and basin by users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control. (e) Hold and save the United States free from claims for damages due to the construction work and subsequent maintenance of the project, excluding damages due to fault or negligence of the United States or its contractor. (f) Assume all project costs (excluding costs for aids to navigation) in excess of the $2 million statutory Federal limitation under Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Formal assurances in accordance with Section 221 of the River and Harbor Act of 1970 will be executed prior to initiation of construction. Terminal facilities. There is an existing boat launching ramp owned by the State of Hawaii and open to all on equal basis. Operations during fiscal year. Preparation of plans and specifications initiated in June 1982 is ten percent complete. 8. NAWILIWILI HARBOR, KAUAI, HAWAII Location. On the southwest coast of the island of Kguai and about 100 nautical miles, northwest of Honolulu, (See NOAA Chart 19383.) Existing project. Rubblemound breakwater 2,150 feet long; an entrance channel 2,400 feet long, 600 feet wide and 40 feet deep; a harbor basin 1,950 feet long, 1,540 feet wide and 35 feet deep; and a revetted fill on the west side of the harbor. The tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 1.8 feet. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Estimated total project cost for the major rehabilitation is $5,070,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The State of Hawaii owns a reinforced concrete wharf with two sheds. Bulk-storage facilities and pipeline are available for petroleum products, liquid fertilizer and molasses. There is also a bulk sugar plant of 28,000-ton storage capacity with a conveyor system capable of loading at a rate of about 750 tons per hour. 36-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Operations during fiscal year. Project condition survey was completed in May 1982 for $11,768. Major rehabilitation of breakwater utilizing Operation and Maintenance, General funds. The reconnaissance report was approved in August 1982. Preparation of a General Design Memorandum was initiated in September 1982 and is scheduled for completion in September 1983. 9. ROTA HARBOR, NORTHERN MARIANAS Location. On the island of Rota within the commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands which is located in the Western Pacific, approximately 3,820 miles west of Hawaii and approximately 40 miles north of Guam. (See U.S. Defense Mapping Agency Hydrographic May No. 81063.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel 800 feet long, 300 feet wide, 20 feet deep; a turning basin 400 feet long, 200-400 feet wide, 16.5 feet deep; a revetted mole of armor stones 500 feet long, 10 feet high; a basin extension 250 feet long, 150 feet wide, 16.5 feet deep; and appurtenant aids to navigation. Range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 2.4 feet. Estimated project cost is $3,885,000 of which $2,075,000 (includes $75,000 in Coast Guard cost) is federal cost and $1,810,000 is non-federal cost. Project authority is Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Project was approved for construction in October 1980. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is an existing 144 foot long concrete dock at the West Harbor. Presently, cargo is lightened from offshore of West Harbor by a U.S. Government surplus LCM which is able to navigate the narrow and shallow entrance at high tide and off-load at the existing concrete dock. Operations during fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded in September 1982 for $2,482,982 and scheduled for completion in April 1984. Notice to proceed issued in October 1982. 10. SAIPAN SMALL BOAT HARBOR, NORTHERN MARIANAS Location. On the island of Saipan within the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas which is located in the Western Pacific, approximately 3,820 miles west of Hawaii. (See U.S. Defense Mapping Agency Hydrographic Map No. 81067.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel 240 feet long and 14 feet deep; a turning basin 250 feet by 150 feet, 12 feet deep; a main access channel 175 feet long and 12 feet deep; a rubblemound breakwater 1,520 feet long; a rubblemound stub breakwater 690 feet long; and appurtenant aids to navigation. Range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 2.4 feet. Estimated project cost is $4,972,000 of which $2,020,000 (includes $20,000 in Coast Guard cost) is federal cost, and $2,952,000 is non-federal cost. Project authority isSection 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Project was approved for construction in December 1981. Local cooperation. (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction of the project. (b) Provide without cost to the United States an area suitable to the Chief of Engineers for the disposal of spoils and if necessary, retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments or the cost of such work. (c) Provide and maintain without cost to the United States the necessary pier and docking facilities, as well as all appropriate onshore structures, access roadways, utilities, parking areas, restrooms, and launching facilities to insure a complete and adequate project. These facilities must be open to all on equal terms. (d) Accomplish without cost to the United States the necessary alterations and relocations of all utilities as necessary for project purposes. (e) Hold and save the United States free from claims for damages due to the construction work and subsequent maintenance of the project, excluding damages due to fault or negligence of the United States or its contractor. (f) Provide a cash contribution based on the percentage to be determined by final benefit and cost allocation analysis of the total Corps of Engineers first cost of the project before apportionment. In addition, local interest must provide all cost in excess of the $2 million statutory federal limitation under Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Formal assurances in accordance with Section 221 of the River and Harbor Act of 1970 will have to be executed prior to initiation of construction. Operations during fiscal year. Project was approved for construction in December 1981. Local interests have indicated that planning for the deep-draft harbor and onshore port facilities should be accomplished prior to further commitment on the small boat harbor for an orderly port development plan. 11. TAU SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AMERICAN SAMOA Location. On the island of Tau, American Samoa, about 2,300 miles southwest of Hawaii, 1,236 miles northwest of Tahiti, and 80 miles southeast of Western Samoa. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4190.) Existing project. Project provides for an entrance channel 520 feet long, 130 feet wide, 16 feet deep; a turning basin 85,000 square feet, 14 feet deep; a rubblemound breakwater 290 feet long, 13 feet high; revetments with a total length of 975 feet; and a rubblemound groin 200 feet long. Plane of reference is mean sea level. The range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 2.5 feet. Estimated project cost is $1,567;500 of which $1,515,100 (includes $4,800 in Coast Guard cost) is federal cost and $52,400 is non-federal cost. Project authority is Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Project was approved for construction in January 1975. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Project condition survey was completed in September 1982 for $2,424. Contractor claim 36-4 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION filed in May 1981 for different site conditions is pending. Alternatives for corrective post-construction navigation difficulties are underway. 12. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645. Preauthorization studies were initiated on Merizo Harbor, Guam, $81,712; Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii $65,353; and completed on Saipan Small Boat Harbor, Northern Marianas, $119; Agat Harbor, Guam, $22,437; Kaulana Bay Boat Harbor, Hawaii, $8,096. Beach Erosion Control 13. KUALOA REGIONAL PARK, OAHU, HAWAII Location. On the northeast coast of the island of Oahu, about 20 miles from downtown Honolulu, Oahu, (See NOAA Chart 19359.) Existing project. Project provides for an initial beach fill of 45,000 cubic yards of beach sand with a berm width of 50 feet, a berm elevation between 4.5 to 6.5 feet mean lower low water and a foreshore slope of about 1 vertical to 8 horizontal. Periodic nourishment is estimated to be 18,000 cubic yards once every four years. Estimated project cost is $637,800 of which $470,500 is federal cost and $167,300 is non-federal cost. Project authority is Section 103a of the 1962 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Project was approved for construction in June 1978. Construction was initiated in November 1979 and terminated in April 1980 as a Circuit Court ruled sand mining to be illegal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Project was financially closed in March 1982. 14. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency streambank and shoreline protection activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 79-526. Preauthorization study was completed on Asquiroga Bay Shoreline, Guam, $26. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874. Preauthorization studies were initiated on Paseo de Susana, Guam, $49,288; Sand Island Shore Protection, Oahu, $26,493; and completed on Black Sand Beach, Hawaii $22,000; Kahaluu Beach Park, Maul, $53. 15. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS Inspection and survey were conducted on Kaaawa Beach, Oahu; Kapaa Beach, Kauai; Kekaha Beach, Kauai; Kihei Beach, Maul and Waikiki Beach, Oahu, in November 1981 for a total cost of $6,600. Flood Control 16. IAO STREAM, MAUI, HAWAII Location. Iao Stream on the island of Maui drains a portion of the slopes of the West Maui mountains, and its lower course runs into the sea just to the east of the town of Wailuku, Maui. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4124.) Existing project. Project provides for a debris basin 2.5 miles upstream of stream mouth; channel improvement from the debris basin to about 1,100 feet downstream of Market Street bridge; diversion levees and flood plain management from the channel improvements for about 1,400 feet downstream of Waiehu bridge. The standard project design discharge is 26,500 cubic feet per second at the stream mouth. Total project cost is $11,140,000 of which $10,540,000 is federal cost (allocation received $11,753,000) and $600,000 is non-federal cost for lands and relocations. Project was completed in May 1981. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Project is not financially completed. Contractor claim for damage to work and delay due to floodings in 1978 and 1979 is pending. Report on corrective measures for levee protection at an estimated cost of $470,00 completed in July 1982 pending approval. 17. KAHOMA STREAM, MAUI, HAWAII Location. Kahoma Stream drainage basin is located in Lahaina, Maui. Lahaina is on the west coast of Maui about 4 miles from Kaanapali. The drainage basin of Kahoma Stream totals 5.3 square miles. (See NOAA Chart 19348.) Existing project. The project provides for a debris basin with 120 feet maximum based width and a capacity of 55,000 cubic yards; a concrete trapezoid channel 5,415 feet long; three concrete bridges with a clear span of 60 feet; and a revetted outlet extending 70 feet seaward of the river mouth. Approved project cost estimate (October 1982) is $21,800,00 of which $14,200,000 is federal cost and $7,600,000 is nonfederal cost for lands, damages, relocations and cash contributions ($1,900,000). (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements and right-of-way; all relocation of building and utilities, highway and street bridges and driveways, railroad track and bridge, and other related facilities which may be required for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all the work after completion; and prohibit encroachment on improved channels and debris basin. Local interests have agreed to voluntarily pay a minimum of 35 percent of the costs allocated to flood control, but not less than that required by the project authorization. Operations during fiscal year. Model study by Waterway Experiment Station was completed in July 1982. General Design Memorandum was approved by Chief of Engineers in February 1982. This project was included among those to be started under the FY 1983 Budget Amendment of 25 May 1982. 36-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 18. KANEOHE-KAILUA AREA, OAHU, HAWAII Location. Kamooalii-Kaneohe Stream drainage basin is on the east coast of the island of Oahu. The drainage basin is bounded on west and south by the Koolau Mountain range, on the east by the remnants of Kaneohe volcanic cone and on the north by Kaneohe Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4134 and U.S. Geological Survey quadrangles Kaneohe, Hawaii and Honolulu, Hawaii.) Existing project. Project provides for a dam and reservoir about 3.2 miles above the mouth of Kaneohe Stream on the tributary Kamooalii Stream. Project consists of an earth-fill dam 80 feet high, with a crest length of about 2,300 feet, and about 1,274 feet of channel improvements, a concrete side channel and chute spillway and reservoir with storage of 2,500 acre-feet, of which 500 acre-feet for sediment reserve and recreation use and 2,000 acre-feet for flood control. Total project cost is $23,800.000 of which $17,800,000 is federal cost (allocation received $24,637,900) and $6,000,000 is nonfederal cost for recreation facilities, lands and damages, and relocations. Non-federal reimbursement of construction cost is $5,668,313 at 5.116 percent with a repayment life of 35 years and an annual payment of $359,220. Project was completed in May 1981. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance manual was published in September 1980 and revision was issued in January 1982. Contractor claims are pending for defective specifications filed in October 1979 and suspension of work on spillway filed in December 1980. 19. NAMO RIVER, TERRITORY OF GUAM Location. The Agat-Santa Rita River (Namo) is on the west coast of the island of Guam and about 10 miles southerly of Agana, the capital of Guam. The island of Guam is approximately 3,800 miles west of Honolulu, Hawaii, and 1,500 miles south of Tokyo, Japan. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4196.) Existing project. Provides for channel improvements for the lower 2,000 feet reach of the river, and flood plain management for the area extending from the upper part of the channel improvement to the existing Agat-Santa Rita bridge. Channel improvements include realignment and enlargement of the existing river, lining the channel with riprap, providing a stub outlet channel on the upstream side of Route 2 bridge, and constructing a levee on the north bank of unnamed tributary. Project authority is Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Project was approved for construction in Janury 1975. Construction was initiated in January 1978 and completed in September 1979. A storm drain modification contract was awarded in May and completed in September 1981 for $30,668. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Project was financially completed in April 1982. 20. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858. Preauthorization study was initiated on South Makaha Stream, Oahu, $9,154; and completed on Lake Susupe, Northern Marianas, $14,402; Asan Village, Guam, $14,527; Paauau Stream, Hawaii, $84,686; Waimea Stream, Kauai, $14,251; Waiakea Stream, Hawaii $7,500. Emergency flood control activites pursuant to Public Law 84-99. Federal cost for fiscal year was $183,878 of which $109,888 was for disaster preparedness and $73,990 was for rehabilitation. 21. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection was conducted on Hanapepe River, Kauai; Wailoa Stream, Hawaii; Kaunakakai Stream, Molokai; lao Stream, Maui, in November 1981; Kaneohe-Kailua area, Oahu, in October 1981; and Namo River, Guam, in September 1982 for a total cost of $7,800. General Investigations 22. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,432,215 of which $731,038 was for navigation studies, $544,715 for flood damage prevention studies, and $156,251 for coordination with other agencies. 23. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Inpection of Dams. The non-federal dams inspected under this program are Hazard Category I dams, having a potential for loss of life and high property damage should a failure occur. This program was completed with a total of 52 dams inspected. Eighteen of the dams were classified as unsafe but in a non-emergency status and seven dams were classified as unsafe in an emergency status. Total FY 1982 costs were $34. The program also includes verifying and updating the inventory of dams for which costs were $12 for FY 1982. Flood plain management services. Flood Plain Management Services Program comes under Section 206 of the 1960 Flood Control Act, PL 86-645, as amended. Through technical services and planning guidance, the program provides information .on floods and flood related information to improve planning for the careful use of the nation's flood plains, thereby reducing the potential for losses to life and property from floods and wave actions. Federal and nonfederal agencies and the private sector are assisted with flood hazard evaluation and planning information for flood and coastal hazard areas. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, National Flood Insurance requirements, and Executive Order 11988 requirements for federal 36-6 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION agencies. Such assistance may include flood information and Hydrologic Studies. For the on-going storm study series, a timing, flood-water velocity, extent of flooding, duration of storm which struck Oahu in March 1951 was investigated. flooding, flood frequency and regulatory floodway limits. The meteorological storm conditions and rainfall data were Services accomplished during fiscal year. Requests for researched and compiled. Costs for hydrologic studies during technical services and planning assistance totaling 743 were the fiscal year were $7,007. furnished. Of this total. 75 were from other federal agencies; Total costs for collection and study of basic data for FY 119 from non-federal agencies: and 549 from individuals, 1982 were $172,643. realtors, corporations, lending institutions, engineers, architects and others. Assistance resulted in 3,211 site specific responses. Cost for providing these services in FY 1982 totaled $165,590. 36-7 TABLE 36-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep. 30, 1982 1. Auasi Harbor, American Samoa (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Aunuu Harbor, American Samoa (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Hilo Harbor Hawaii, Hawaii (Federal Funds) 5. Honolulu Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 6. Kahului Harbor Maui, Hawaii (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 7. Kaulana Bay Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost $ 20,000 430,930 57,282 793,000 696,166 37,929 333,000 180,951 $ 391,100 $ 110,000 137,662 378,029 -8,437 5,409 $ 3,779 270 23,544 378 696,000 -- 80,000 675,480 290,316 -1,563 49,600 137,319 6,589 238,500 500,000 10,192,000 309,049 422,970 5,954,543 - - 594,095 - - 220,615 - 1,163,000 601,700 - 62,063 1,641,922 18,500 42,215 2,500,000 1,273,521 2,480,000 1,195,000 531,413 2,379,441 3,142,126 1,338,290 - 171,199 - 158,489 90,000 76,859 107,000 119,572 34,500 39,805 569 - 364,000 - 208,034 - 21,000 - 20,082 79,000 78,441 20,000 8,096 $ 1,033,015 1,033,015 86,563 86,563 1,783,129 1,783,129 231,437 231,437 11,882,178 7,484,897 594,095 220,615 5,423,440 5,423,440 3,667,533 3,667,533 16,093,395 16,036,144 2,038,271 2,038,271 205,699 198,294 2,388,693 2,388,693 6,738,020 6,738,020 364,000 208,034 30,200 30,200 120,000 106,619 36-8 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION TABLE 36-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Tet Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep. 30, 1982 8. Nawiliwili Harbor. New Work: Kauai, Hawaii (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 9. Rota Harbor, Northern Marianas (Federal Funds) 10. Saipan Small Boat Harbor, Northern Marianas (Federal Funds) 11. Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 13. Kualoa Regional Park, Oahu, Hawaii (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 16. lao Stream, Maui, Hawaii (Federal Funds) 17. Kahoma Stream, Maui, Hawaii (Federal Funds) 18. Kaneohe-Kailua Area, Oahu, Hawaii (Federal Funds) 19. Namo River, Guam (Federal Funds) Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost - 111,500 - 67,552 80,000 78,478 85,000 79,069 -10,000 -40,061 2,500 4,009 117,000 105,1.36 72,376 57 39,000 311,400 18,300 239,628 167,300 10,000 96,001 70,000 63,308 8,000 9,676 121,917 1,840 -120,000 -3,203 22,059 4,205,000 310,000 903,000 2,877,168 3,695,735 1,271,121 230,000 225,000 239,000 229,170 213,603 233,317 1,474,000 4,073,540 1,611,229 260,000 2,876,368 62,000 61,410 705,000 987,547 29,000 87,363 - 2,127,724 - 2,127,724 4,260,820 4,216,872 233,261 233,261 509,500 159,151 194,000 194,000 1,537,766 1,528,350 52,450 52,296 355,472 355,472 177,300 177,300 11,753,000 11,711,099 719,000 718,805 350,000 6,356 119 27,500 18,181 59,240 52,394 25,000 42,915 8,000 24,637,900 29,744 24,627,373 9,445 2,416,314 2,416,314 36-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 36-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1907 Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 3, 1905 Aug. 8, 1917 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935; included in Public Works Administration program Sep. 6, 1933 Jul. 24, 1946 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 27, 1916 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 2, 1919 Sep. 3, 1954 Dec. 31, 1970 Aug. 13, 1968 BARBERS POINT HARBOR, OAHU, HAWAII An entrance channel 42 feet deep, 450 feet wide, and 3,100 feet long; an inshore basin of about 46 acres, 28 feet deep, a breakwater on the north side of the entrance channel, if model study shows it to be necessary; spending beaches with wave absorbers within the harbor totaling 1,320 feet in length; and a main access channel 12 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 1,200 feet long to a smallboat harbor on the west side of the deep-draft harbor to be developed by local interests. HILO HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII For rubblemound breakwater. Dredging entrance of Kuhio Bay without increasing original limit of cost. Extension of the breakwater and dredging in the bay. HONOLULU HARBOR, OAHU, HAWAII Deepening to 35 feet the inner harbor with a general width of 1,200 feet and casing the curve between the entrance channel and the inner harbor. For the channel 1,000 feet long. Channel connecting Honolulu Harbor and Kapalama Basin. Enlarging entrance channel to present project dimensions, widening of the harbor basin by 320 feet and the maintenance of the improved 400-foot wide portion of the reserved channel. A depth of 35 feet over the full width of 600 feet throughout the reserved channel; a turning basin in Kapalama Basin 35 feet deep by 1,000 feet wide and 3,000 feet long; and a slip of like depth 1,000 feet long on the easterly side of Pier 39. The second entrance channel; and installation of a moveable-type bridge across the 2nd entrance channel. (Modified by the Chief of Engineers.) Reopening Fort Armstrong entrance channel to 45 feet, Main Harbor Basin and Kapalama Channel to 40 feet, and relocating existing project lines. KAHULUI HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII Extending east breakwater and dredging the basin. For the west breakwater. Extend both breakwaters and enlarge dredged basin. Enlarge harbor basin, 600 feet wide, 2,500 feet long, 35 feet deep. NAWILIWILI HARBOR, KAUAI, HAWAII An entrance channel 35 feet deep; a harbor basin 1,100 feet wide, 35 feet deep, and about 1,950 feet long; and a rubber-mound breakwater. Deepening entrance channel to 40 feet; enlarging harbor basin; and constructing a revetted-fill area. (Modified by the Chief of Engineers.) Modification of General Navigation features. IAO STREAM, MAUI, HAWAII Channel enlargement, levees, a debris basin and related works. H. Doc. 93, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 407, 59th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 417, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 235, 68th Cong., Annual Report, 1905, p. 2565 H. Doc. 392, 64th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 753, 69th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 54, 73rd Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 705, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 717, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. (Contains latest published map.) H. Doc. 93, 89th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 593, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 1330, 62nd Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 235, 69th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 109, 86th Cong., Ist sess. (Contains latest map.) H. Doc. 609, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess., as modified by the Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 453, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. (Contains latest published maps.) River and Harbor Act. H. Doc. 151, 90th Cong., Ist sess. 36-10 16 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION TABLE 36-B (Cont.) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 17 KAHOMA STREAM, MAUI, HAWAII Oct. 22, 1976 A debris basin 100 feet wide and 700 feet long with a capacity of H. Doc. 94-488, 94th Cong., 22,000 cubic yards; a rock sill, a diversion levee which is 80 feet 2nd sess. long to direct flows into the concrete channel; a concrete trapezoidal channel about 5,280 feet long; three concrete bridges with clear span of 50 feet; and revetted outlet extending 70 feet seaward of the stream mouth. 18 KANEOHE-KAILUA AREA, OAHU, HAWAII Dec. 31, 1970 Provide a dam and reservoir about 3.2 miles above the mouth of H. Doc. 92-141,92nd Cong., Kaneohe Stream on the tributary Kamooalii Stream. Project con- Ist sess. sists of an earthfill dam 80 feet high, with a crest length of about 2,300 feet and about 1,000 feet of channel improvements at the entrance of Kaneohe Stream to Kaneohe Bay; and reservoir with storage of 2,500-acre-feet, of which 500 acre-feet would be for sediment reserve and recreation use and 2,000 acre-feet for flood control. 36-11 TABLE 36-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Agana Small Boat Harbor, Territory of Guam Completed 1978 $ 937,,798' $ 11,196 Ala Wai Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Deferred 1976 40,117 - Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1978 527,0472 208,902 Heeia-Kea Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Deferred 1972 1,481 - Honokohau Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1971 781,0363 63,693 Kahului Beach Road, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1976 751,8674 - Kailua Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Deferred 1967 - - Kalaupapa Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii Completed 1968 157,9975 3,127 Kaunakakai Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii Deferred 1966 138,188 292,441 Kawaihae Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Active 1981 5,983,5016 61,800 Keehi Lagoon, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1956 3,348,0007 41,857 Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Active 1981 193,000 - Lahaina Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii Inactive 1977 186,937 - Maalaea Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii Active 1981 195,000 - Manele Small Boat Harbor, Lanai, Hawaii Completed 1967 372,0008 255,256 Maunalua Bay Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Deferred 1972 30,378 - Nawiliwili Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1976 584,5139 30,707 Ofu Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa Completed 1976 980,01810 502,426 Pohoiki Bay, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1979 432,523" - Port Allen Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1962 752,64512 863,622 Reeds Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Deferred 1967 - - Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1979 1,940,01113 17,767 Wake Island Harbor, Wake Island Inactive 1950 - 14,493 Wells Harbor, Territory of Guam Completed 1950 2,448,056'4 2,111 'Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in October 1977. In addition, Contributed Funds of $282,747 for Construction. 'Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in November 1975. In addition, Contributed Funds of $410,077 for Construction and $84,388 for Operation and Maintenance. ?Completed in March 1970. In addition, Contributed Funds of $630,568 for Construction. 4Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in April 1976. SAuthorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in September 1967. 61n addition, Contributed Funds of $62,102 for Construction. 7Abandonment authorized by R&H Act of 1965 (HD 98, 89th Congress, Ist Session.) gAuthorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in December 1965. In addition, Contributed Funds of $370,845 for Construction. gAuthorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in November 1974. In addition, Contriubted Funds of $405,471 for Construction. '0 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in August 1965. In addition, Contributed Funds of $61,953 for Construction. "Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in April 1979. 121n addition, Contributed Funds of $200,000 for Construction. '31n addition, Contributed Funds of $1,791,068 for Construction. 14Completed in 1941 and Maintenance transferred to Department of Navy. 36-12 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION TABLE 36-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Project Status For Last Full Report See Annual Report for: Cost to September 30, 1982 Construction Operation and Maintenance Afono Area and Aoa Area, American Samoa Haleiwa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Hanapepe Bay, Kauai, Hawaii Kaaawa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Kapaa Town, Kauai, Hawaii Kekaha Beach, Maui, Hawaii Kihei Beach, Maui, Hawaii Pago Pago to Nuuuli, American Samoa Poloa Area, American Samoa Sand Island, Oahu, Hawaii Vatia Area, American Samoa Waikiki Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Waimea Beach. Kauai, Hawaii Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Active Completed Completed Completed Active Deferred 'Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in October 1977. Inn addition $209, 549 in Contributed Funds. 'Completed in April 1965. In addition $160,098 in Contributed Funds. 3Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in August 1975. In addition $97,075 in Contributed Funds. 4Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in September 1976. In addition $60,000 in Contributed Funds. SAuthorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in December 1980. In addition $1,672,524 in Contributed Funds. 6Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in June 1971. In addition $154,313 in Contributed Funds. TABLE 36-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOI 1978 1967 1965 1976 1977 1981 1972 1978 1978 1981 1978 1979 12 $ 254,015' 240,1482 176,4883 158,9164 999,9965 154,3136 394,1877 136,0408 301,8799 154,30910 729,087" 85,043 7Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and Phase I completed in September 1978. In addition $312,480 in Contributed Funds. gAuthorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in October 1977. In addition $101,547 in Contributed Funds. 'Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in April 1981. In addition $401,000 in Contributed Funds. "'Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in October 1977. In addition $132,075 in Contributed Funds. "In addition $82,000 in Advanced Funds and $17,640 in Contributed Funds. 'No previous full report; project authorized by R&H Act of 1958. OD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Hanapepe River, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1967 $ 784,867' - Kaunakakai Stream, Molokai, Hawaii Completed 1950 73,7482 Kawainui Swamp, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1967 1,265,5673 Kuliouou Stream, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1971 1,000,0004 - Wailoa Stream and Tributaries, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1966 1,044,888 - 'Completed in November 1966. In addition $11.953 in Contributed Funds. 'Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in December 1950. 'Completed in August 1966. 4Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in February 1970. In addition $540,335 in Contributed Funds. sCompleted in August 1965. 36-13 L11 - REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 36-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report for: Authority Expended Expended Hana Small Boat Harbor, 1967 November 1977 - - Maui, Hawaii HD #94-413 Hanalei Small Boat Harbor 1967 November 1981 - - Kauai, Hawaii HD #97-59 Kaimu Black Sand Beach 1975 July 1981 $ 86,235 - Hawaii, Hawaii Director of Civil Works Kapaakea Homestead Flood 1979 July 1981 221,500 - Control, Molokai, Hawaii Director of Civil Works Kewalo Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1976 September 1975 98,800 - Director of Civil Works TABLE 36-H RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Date Reconnaissance or Condition Survey Project Conducted Cost Agana Small Boat Harbor, Guam September 1982 $ 3,254 Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, March 1982 7,557 Honokohau Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii August 1982 8,357 Kahului Harbor, Maui, Hawaii June 1982 15,890 Kaunakakai Harbor, Molokai, September 1982 4,989 Kawaihae Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii August 1982 13,360 Manele Small Boat Harbor, Lanai, Hawaii August 1982 3,034 Nawiliwili Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii May 1982 9,152 Ofu Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa September 1982 2,425 Port Allen Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii May 1982 10,497 Waianae Small Boat Harbpr, Oahu, Hawaii July 1982 6,724 36-14 PORTLAND, OR, DISTRICT * The territorial limits of the Portland District include the Pacific coastal drainage area of the State of Oregon, the portions of the States of Oregon and Washington which lie within the Columbia River watershed downstream of the Umatilla Bridge below McNary Dam, and south central Oregon west of the Malheur River and the Steens Mountains, but not including that part which drains into the Klamath Lake and River. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Bandon Small Boat Basin, Coquille, OR ... 37-2 2. Chetco River, OR ....................... 37-2 3. Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below Vancouver, WA, and Portland, OR .. 37-2 4. Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA ........ 37-4 5. Columbia River between Chinook, WA, and Head of Sand Island ..................... 37-4 6. Columbia River at the Mouth, OR and WA ................................ 37-4 7. Columbia River between Vancouver, WA and The Dalles, OR ................... .. 37-4 8. Coos Bay, OR ......................... 37-5 9. Coos and Millicoma Rivers, OR ........... 37-6 10. Coquille River, OR ....................... 37-6 11. Depoe Bay, OR ........................ 37-6 12. Lewis River, WA ....................... 37-7 13. Multnomah Channel, OR................. 37-7 14. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .......................... 37-7 15. Nehalem Bay, OR ...................... 37-7 16. Port Orford, OR ......................... 37-7 17. Project Condition Surveys ................ 37-8 18. Rogue River Harbor at Gold Beach, OR .... 37-8 19. Siuslaw River, OR ...................... 37-8 20. Skamokawa Creek, WA ................. 37-9 21. Skipanon Channel, OR .................. 37-9 22. Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR .............. 37-9 23. Umpqua River, OR...................... 37-9 24. Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, OR ..................... 37-10 25. Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR ..................................... 37-11 26. Winchester Bay, Umpqua River, OR ....... 37-11 27. Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR ........... 37-11 28. Yaquina River, OR ...................... 37-12 Flood Control 29. Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR ... 30. Blue River Lake, OR .................... 31. Cottage Grove Lake, OR................. 32. Days Creek Lake, OR ................... 37-12 37-12 37-13 37-13 Page 33. Dorena Lake, OR ........................ 37-13 34. Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR ... 37-13 35. Fall Creek Lake, OR ..................... 37-14 36. Fern Ridge Lake, OR .................. .. 37-14 37. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ......................... . 37-14 38. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................................ 37-15 39. Lower Columbia River Basin, OR and W A .................................... 37-15 40. Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection, OR and WA ................. 37-16 41. Scappoose Drainage District, OR .......... 37-16 42. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ............................. 37-16 43. Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District No. 1, WA ..................... 37-17 44. Willamette River Basin, OR............... 37-17 45. Willamette River Basin, Bank Protection, OR .................................... 37-17 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 46. Bonneville Lock and Dam - Lake Bonneville, OR and WA ............ 37-18 47. Cougar Lake, OR ....................... 37-19 48. Detroit Lake, OR ........................ 37-19 49. Green Peter-Foster Lakes, OR ............. 37-19 50. Hills Creek Lake, OR .................... 37-20 51. John Day Lock and Dam - Lake Umatilla, OR and WA ............. 37-20 52. Lookout Point Lake, OR .................. 37-21 53. Lost Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR... 37-21 54. The Dalles Lock and Dam - Lake Celilo, WA and OR................. 37-22 General Investigations 55. Surveys.................................. 37-22 56. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........ 37-22 57. Continuation of Planning and Engineering ............................ 37-23 58. Advance Engineering and Design ........ 37-23 37-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Tables Page Table 37-A Cost & Financial Statement ..... 37-24 Table 37-B Authorizing Legislation. ........ 37-31 Table 37-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...................... 37-40 Table 37-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ....................... 37-41 Table 37-F Other Authorized Multiple Purpose Projects, Including Power ....................... 37-45 Table 37-G Deauthorized Projects .......... 37-45 Table 37-H Columbia and Lower Willamette River Below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR ................. 37-46 Table 37-I Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 ........................ 37-47 Navigation 1. BANDON SMALL BOAT BASIN, COQUILLE RIVER, OR Location. Coquille River rises in Coast Range, flows generally westerly for about 100 miles, and empties into the Pacific Ocean at Bandon, OR, 225 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 420 miles north of nSan Francisco Bay. (See NOAA charts 18580 and 18186.) Existing project. Provides for a protective rubblemound breakwater and an entrance and access channel, 13-feet deep, for a small boat basin at Bandon. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth is 7 feet and extreme about 10 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. At Bandon, there is a privately owned mill dock used exclusively for shipping lumber on coastwise vessels, a public owned wharf, and a smallboat basin open to all on equal terms. Operations during fiscal year. Construction contract awarded September 1, 1982 and is currently underway. 2. CHETCO RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Siskiyou Mountains of Coast Range at an elevation of 4,000 feet, flows for about 51 miles in a circuitous route, and empties into Pacific Ocean at Brookings, OR, 300 miles south of entrance to Columbia River and 345 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Charts 18600 and 18203.) Existing project. Provides for two jetties at the mouth of the river. Modification in 1965 authorized an entrance channel 120 feet wide by 14 feet deep; a barge turning basin about 250 feet wide, 650 feet long, and 14 feet deep; and a small boat access channel 100 feet wide by 12 feet deep. Also authorized was a 450-foot extension of north jetty with an increase in elevation of existing portion and a protective dike about 1,800 feet long with a Page Table 37-J Willamette River at Willamette Falls OR, Principal Features of Existing Canal and Locks ...... 37-47 Table 37-K Flood Control Reservoir Operations ................... .. 37-48 Table 37-L Lower Columbia River Basin, OR and WA Levees and Improvements to Existing Works ........ 37-49 Table 37-M Willamette River Basin Comprehensive Plan ........... 37-50 Table 37-N Principal Data Concerning Navigation Lock, Spillway Dam and Powerplant .................. 37-51 top elevation of 18 feet. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between lower low water and mean higher high water is 6.9 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. Construction of jetties was completed December 1957. Removal of rock pinnacles and an abandoned bridge structure was accomplished in June 1959. Under authorized modification of October 1965, two contracts were completed. Construction of entrance channel and extension of north jetty was initiated in July 1968 and completed in July 1969. Construction of a protective dike, turning basin and small boat access channel was started in September 1969 and completed in March 1970. (For plan of improvement authorized by Public Law 97-88, Dec. 4, 1981, see Section 58.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Port Commission of Brookings has developed two large boat basins, one for commercial fishing boats and the other for small private boats, and a public boat launching ramp. There are four fish receiving docks and a sea going barge dock for lumber loading and storage. There is also a privately owned marina and a Coast Guard Station. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 65,116 cubic yards of material was removed by the U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina and the contract hopper barge Sandsucker. 3. COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WA, AND PORTLAND, OR Location. The Columbia River rises in British Columbia, through which it flows for 425 miles. It enters the United States in northeastern Washington, and empties into the Pacific Ocean 645 miles north of San Francisco Bay and 160 miles south of Strait of Juan DeFuca. Total length of river is 1,210 miles. (See NOAA Charts 18520, 18521, 18522, 18523, 18524, 18526, & 18531; also Geological Survey Map of Washington). Willamette River rises in Cascade Range in southwestern Oregon, flows 37-2 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT northerly, and empties into Columbia River about 100 miles from the sea. Its length from source of Middle Fork is about 294 miles. Project embraces 103.5 miles of Columbia River below Vancouver, WA, and 14.6 miles of Willamette River below Portland, OR (See NOAA Chart 18526 and Geological Survey Map, State of Oregon.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide from River Mile 106.5 to 105.5, the distance between existing highway and railroad bridges; a channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Vancouver, WA, River Mile 105.5 to mouth of Columbia River, River Mile 3; a turning basin at Vancouver, WA, 40 feet deep, 800 feet wide, and about 5,000 feet long; a turning basin at Longview, WA, 40 feet deep, average width of 1,200 feet, and about 6,000 feet long; and a channel 40 feet deep in the Willamette River with varying widths of 600 to 1,900 feet from mouth (River Mile 0 to Broadway Bridge (River Mile 11.6) which encompasses Portland Harbor area, subject to provisions that channel from mouth of Willamette River to turning basin at Vancouver, WA, be limited to 500 feet in width until need for additional width is demonstrated by developed traffic. Existing project also provides for auxiliary channels 10 feet deep and 300 feet wide near Cathlamet, WA; 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide in St. Helens (Oregon) Channel; and 30 feet deep and 500 feet wide connecting upper end of St. Helens Channel with main ship channel of Columbia; 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide along frontage of town of Rainier, OR, extended at its upper and lower ends to deep water in Columbia River, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide from this depth in Columbia River through old mouth of Cowlitz River to a point about 3,000 feet upstream from present terminus of harbor line; a channel from Longview Port dock downstream along pierhead line and past Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. plant at Longview to a connection with main ship channel below Mount Coffin, the downstream 2,400 feet of this channel to be 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide and remainder to be 28 feet deep and 250 feet wide; construction of a small-boat mooring basin at Astoria, OR, to include a sheet-pile, sand-filled breakwater about 2,400 feet long with a 30-foot roadway along its full length, and steel pile shore wings totaling about 1,460 feet long and for stone-and-pile dikes and revetments. Plane of reference in estuary from mouth to Harrington Point is mean lower low water; thence to Portland and Vancouver, low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth of Columbia is about 8 feet, and at Portland and Vancouver about 3 feet at low stages of rivers. Extreme tidal ranges are about 13 and 3 feet, respectively. Annual freshets have little effect on stage of tide at mouth of Columbia; at Portland and Vancouver they average about 12 feet, while highest known reached a stage of 33 feet above low water at Portland. Work on the 40-foot channel in Columbia River from Portland, OR, and Vancouver WA, to the sea was completed in 1976 except for observation of channel to determine if additional control structures or dredging will be required. Auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview was completed in 1949, and improvement of mouth of Cowlitz River and small boat mooring basin at Astoria were completed in 1950. Project depths are maintained all year except for the period immediately following the annual freshet in May-June when shoaling occurs at several locations. Timing of vessel movement with tidal fluctuations permit maximum draft conditions. In Columbia and Willamette Rivers between mouth and Broadway Bridge at Portland a depth of 40 feet at low tide and 42 feet at high tide is practicable all year. In Columbia River between mouth of Willamette River and Vancouver, WA, depths of 40 and 42 feet at low and high tide, respectively, are practicable all year. (For details relating to previous project, see pages 1995 and 1998 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1746 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At Portland, OR, there are six Port of Portland terminals consisting of 43 berths with total capacity of 8,800,000 tons equipped to handle general cargo, bulk cargo, lumber, automobiles, lift on-lift off and roll on-roll off containers, and breakbulk vessels. The Port of Portland owns and operates a major ship repair yard, which includes the West Coast's largest, and the world's third largest, floating dry dock. The Port of Portland also has a 450,000-cubic-foot cold storage warehouse. Also available in the harbor area are privately operated facilities with total capacity of 16,200,000 tons for receiving, storing and outloading petroleum, wood chips, grain, logs, sand and gravel, cement and steel products. At Astoria, OR, there is a terminal with facilities for receiving and handling all types of general cargo. At Vancouver, WA, there are municipal facilities capable of berthing five ships simultaneously. Each berth is completely outfitted with mechanical and lift facilities for receiving and handling all types of cargo. The port has a low dock to handle roll on-roll off and side-port discharging vessels. The grain terminal has a storage capacity of 4,500,000 bushels. Port of Longview has a public terminal on Columbia River and a privately owned grain elevator with a capacity of 6,900,000 bushels. This port also has a heavy lift facility, with a capacity of about 600 tons. Port of Kalama has two berthing areas, one port owned and one private, with a capacity of 6,000,000 tons. At other locations on Columbia River between Portland and Columbia River entrance there are sufficient private facilities to accommodate river vessels and fishing craft. These facilities, with planned extensions, are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port Series Nos. 33 and 34, Corps of Engineers, published in 1974 and 1975 respectively.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Regular maintenance continued through the year. A total of 3,685,469 cubic yards of material was removed by the U.S. hopper dredges Biddle, Yaquina, and Pacific. The pipeline dredge Oregon removed 1,254,444 cubic yards. Eruption of Mount St. Helens on May 18, 1980 and the ensuing "mud flow" deposited more than 50,000,000 cubic yards of material in the Columbia River near Longview. Immediate start of dredging operations permitted deep draft vessel traffic to resume operations on 37-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 May 23, 1980, with full draft passage available by July 30, 1980. Dredging activities are continuing. Emergency dredging, to September 30, 1982, including both pipeline and hopper dredges, equalled 33,159,728 cubic yards of material. 4. COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA Location. Baker Bay is a shallow body of water about 15 square miles in extent on the north side of Columbia River near its mouth. Bay is separated from river by Sand Island, a low-lying sand bar only a few feet above high tide level. (See NOAA Chart 18521.) Existing project. A mooring basin 10 and 12 feet deep, about 20 acres in extent with protecting breakwaters; and a west channel 10 feet deep connecting basin with deep water in Columbia River, with a width of 150 feet, increased to 200 feet for 2,000 feet at southerly end; a channel east of Sand Island to Port of Ilwaco, a distance of about 5 miles. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and extreme about 13 feet. Channel extending through easterly passage of Sand Island was completed in 1934. This portion of authorized project is not passable and is not maintained at the present time. Dredging west channel to 8 feet was accomplished September 1948. Deepening west channel to 10 feet, and boat basin and breakwater construction at Ilwaco, WA, finished December 1957, completed the project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Wharves, floats, ramps, and berths, for fishing craft, barges and towboats. Small-boat basin and protecting breakwater provides moorings for numerous fishing and recreational craft all year. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 21,480 cubic yards of material was removed by the U.S. hopper dredges Pacific and Yaquina. 5. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK, WA, AND HEAD OF SAND ISLAND Location. At easterly end of Baker Bay, lying on north side of Columbia River near mouth. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 6151.) Existing project. Channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, extending from head of Sand Island to Chinook: a turning and mooring basin at upper end of channel, 10 feet deep, 660 feet long, and ranging from 275 to 500 feet wide; reconstruction of easterly 393 feet of existing breakwater; and extension of existing breakwater easterly and thence northerly to connect with shore in vicinity of Portland Street, Chinook, WA. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet and extreme about 13 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1940. The 10-foot channel depth modification was accomplished September 1958. Rehabilitation of existing breakwater was completed September 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Chinook Packing Company owns a wharf for receiving fresh fish, and one additional fish buying company is located at Chinook. A portion of wharf is also used as a public landing. At upper end of channel there is a turning and mooring basin with facilities for mooring 350 fishing and recreational craft. Adequate terminal and mooring facilities include a public launching ramp, hoist with 10-ton capacity and suitable supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Pacific removed 20,750 cubic yards of material, and a contract pipeline dredge removed 8,800 cubic yards. 6. COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR, AND WA Location. The Columbia River entrance is 645 miles north of San Francisco Bay. Project is about 120 miles downstream of Portland, OR, and Vancouver, WA. For description of Columbia River see Improvement No. 3. Existing project. Provides for a channel across bar 48 feet deep (mean lower low water), one-half mile wide to be secured by two rubblemound jetties, spur jetty "B" on the north shore and by dredging. The north jetty is about 2.5 miles long and the jetty about 6.6 miles long. The unconstructed spur jetty "B" would be about 1 mile long. Tidal range on bar between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and extreme about 13 feet. The originally authorized project depth of 40 feet was completed in 1918; south jetty completed in 1914 and north jetty in 1917. A spur jetty (jetty "A") was completed in 1939 (repaired in 1961) for the purpose of channel stabilization. Spur jetty "B" currently is classified "inactive." Dredging of the 48-foot bar channel started April 1956, was completed in September 1957. South jetty rehabilitation started June 1962, was completed September 1964. North jetty rehabilitation started January 1965, was completed April 1965. Project dimensions were available at end of fiscal year. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1999, Annual Report for 1915 and page 1740 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $500,000 toward construction of the north jetty which was completed in 1917. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The hopper dredge Biddle removed 3,573,372 cubic yards of material and the contract dredge Eagle I removed 527,245 cubic yards. Rehabilitation: Additional south jetty rehabilitation started May 1982, essentially completed September 1982. New Work, Code 710: Construction initiated on access road, parking and boundary fencing at Ft. Stevens State Park under State of Oregon cost-sharing agreement. 7. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA, AND THE DALLES, OR Location. On Columbia River, between Interstate Bridge at Vancouver, WA, 106.5 miles above mouth and 37-4 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT The Dalles, OR, mile 191, a distance of 84.5 miles. For description of Columbia River, see Improvement No. 3, "Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Below Vancouver, WA, and Portland, OR." Existing project. Channel 27 feet deep at low water and 300 feet wide between Vancouver, WA, and The Dalles, OR, 84.5 miles; a channel 10 feet deep at low water and 300 feet wide at upstream entrance to Oregon Slough, OR, a suitable turning basin adjacent to site of port development in vicinity of Camas and Washougal, WA, a boat basin at Hood River, OR, 500 by 1,300 feet and 10 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, with a connecting channel of same depth to deepwater, and a protecting breakwater on easterly side; a barge channel to waterfront at Bingen, WA, 10 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, 200 feet wide and about 1 mile long, and an access channel 7 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, 100 feet wide and about 1,000 feet long, to a natural mooring basin for small boats near east end of channel; and construction of The Dalles small boat basin, to provide a breakwater and shear boom protected basin about 400 by 800 feet in size with depth of 8 feet below a pool elevation of 72.5 feet at mean sea level. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at Vancouver is about 3 feet and at Bonneville about 0.2 foot at low stages of the river. Extreme tidal ranges are about 4 feet and 0.4 foot, respectively. Existing project is complete. Construction of The Dalles small boat basin, was completed in 1949. Channel dredging at upper end of Oregon Slough was accomplished in 1957. Project depth of 27 feet between Bonneville and The Dalles, OR, was achieved April 1959. The 27-foot channel depth between Vancouver, WA, and Bonneville, OR, was completed May 1960. Improvement of lower entrance of Bonneville Dam lock was completed in May 1961. At the present time, the channel is maintained to a depth of 16 feet, which is adequate for using traffic. Construction of a boat basin at Hood River, OR, and of Camas-Washougal, WA, turning basin was accomplished February 1962. Cosntruction of a barge channel in Columbia River near Bingen, WA, was completed September 1963. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. At Vancouver, WA, upstream of Interstate Highway bridge at River Mile 108.1 on site of former shipyard are numerous idle ship-building facilities equipped with railway and river moorage facilities. Also in this area are a paper-storage warehouse with barge slip, two boat building businesses (one temporary), and a storage dock with gantry crane. Sites are available for development to suit lessee. At Camas, WA, about 13.5 miles upstream from Vancouver, there is a private wharf used for transfer of papermill supplies and paper to and from barges, and facilities for discharging bulk oils from barges. At Port of The Dalles (mile 44 above Bonneville) there is a municipal wharf 125 by 1,100 feet for use by tugs and barges. There are two 1-story timber and corrugated iron warehouses, each 94 by 461 feet, on this wharf. A private elevator with a capacity of 40,000 bushels and a public elevator of 1,113,800-bushel capacity for handling bulk grain to tugs and barges are also at The Dalles. Public elevator has rail, truck, and water connections. There is a port owned rail connection about three-fourths mile below municipal wharf where certain types of cargo may be handled between railroad cars and tugs or barges. At numerous locations over entire waterway are log rollways for transfer of logs to water from trucks and public and private boat basins. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The U.S. hopper dredge Pacific removed 33,500 cubic yards of material. 8. COOS BAY, OR Location. On Oregon coast 200 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 445 miles north of San Francisco Bay. It is about 13 miles long and 1 mile wide, with an area at high tide of about 15 square miles. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18587.) Existing project. Two rubblemound, high-tide jetties at entrance; a channel across the outer bar 45 feet deep and 700 feet wide, reducing gradually to 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide near River Mile 1 and continuing to about mile 9; thence a channel 35 feet deep and generally 400 feet wide to mile 15; an anchorage area 35 feet deep, 800 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at Empire (River Mile 5.5); turning basins at North Bend (River Mile 12.5) and Coalbank (River Mile 14.7) 35 feet deep, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; a channel 22 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Smith's Mill (River Mile 15) to Millington (River Mile 17); a small boat basin, about 500 by 900 feet at Charleston, with a connecting channel, 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, to deep water in Coos Bay, and construction of a protecting breakwater and bulkhead. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 7 feet and extreme is about 11 feet at both the entrance and at Coos Bay. South jetty was completed in 1928, north jetty in 1929, and 24-foot channel in 1937. The south jetty was restored in 1941 and 1942 by construction of a concrete cap for full length of the jetty. Excavation of channel to 30 feet deep and generally 300 feet wide from entrance to Isthmus Slough was completed in 1951. Dredging outer bar channel to a depth of 40 feet, decreasing to 30 feet at Guano Rock was completed in 1952. Construction of the Charleston Channel and small-boat basin was completed in September 1956. Rehabilitation of south jetty was started in June 1962 and completed December 1963. Repair of north jetty was completed in August 1970. Construction of the deeper and wider channel to mile 15 was completed in 1979. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1987 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1728 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-5 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At North Bend there is a municipal dock 649 feet long fronting on channel, about 2,380 feet of privately owned mill docks, and three oil-receiving terminals in vicinity. 37-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 At Coos Bay there is a privately owned dock with a frontage of 1,345 feet, open to the public on equal terms; several small landings for fishing and harbor craft; and three lumber docks with 1,300, 576, and 500-foot frontages, respectively. At Eastside, on Isthmus Slough, there is a 200-foot dock. At Empire there is a privately owned lumber dock with frontage of 510 feet, and an oil terminal, also privately owned, for receipt of petroleum products by barge. At Charleston there are four wharves, one public and three private, with usable areas of 1,200, 750, 7,000, and 12,000 square feet, respectively, for receipt of fresh fish and shellfish and a large seafood receiving and processing plant. There is also a municipally owned small-boat basin, open to all on equal terms, capable of mooring 250 fishing and recreation craft. Servicing facilities for small craft are available at all facilities, and public launching ramps have been constructed in Charleston area by private interests. A privately owned floating moorage on Joe Ney Slough has facilities for mooring about 50 fishing vessels. At Jordan Cove area there is a dock, 248 feet long, for wood chip ships. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port Series No. 33, Corps of Engineers, published in 1975.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Pacific removed 52,500 cubic yards; U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 466,873 cubic yards; contract hopper dredge Eagle I removed 919,191 cubic yards; and the contract hopper barge Sandsucker, removed 140,240 cubic yards of material. 9. COOS AND MILLICOMA RIVERS, OR Location. South Fork and Millicoma Rivers rise in Coast Range in southern Oregon, flow generally westerly and join to make Coos River, 5.3 miles above mouth of Coos River in Coos Bay. (See NOAA Chart 18587, Allegany and Daniels Creek Quadrangle.) Existing project. Originally authorized project: a channel depth of 3 feet, generally, from mouth of Coos River and 1 foot near head of navigation. Project as modified: two channels 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide from mouth of Coos River to Allegany on Millicoma River, mile 13.8 and to Delwood on South Fork, mile 14, and thence a channel 3 feet deep and 50 feet wide to mile 14.7 on South Fork, including stabilization works on Coos River. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at the mouth of Coos River is 7 feet and extreme about 11 feet. Tidal range at head of navigation in both forks is about 1 foot. Freshet stages usually reach a height of from 10 to 15 feet at Allegany, head of navigatibn on Millicoma River. Originally authorized project providing for a channel from mouth of Coos River to head of navigation in both forks, to provide a depth of 3 feet generally and 1 foot near head of navigation, was completed in 1899. In March 1966 construction of project as modified by 1948 River and Harbor Act was completed. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several small privately owned docks and landing places on the river are used by towboats and pleasure craft. There are no publicly owned docks. Present facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 38,041 cubic yards of material. 10. COQUILLE RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Coast Range, flows generally westerly for about 100 miles, and empties into Pacific Ocean at Bandon, OR, 225 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 420 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18186.) Existing project. Two rubblemound high-tide jetties at river mouth, south jetty 2,700 feet long and the north, 3,450 feet long; and a channel 13 feet deep at mean lower low water and of suitable width from the sea to a point 1 mile above old Coquille River Lighthouse, and snagging to State highway bridge at city of Coquille. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth is 7 feet and extreme about 10 feet. Jetties were completed in 1908 and entrance channel in 1933. North jetty was reconstructed in 1942 and a 750-foot extension to easterly end was constructed in 1951. South jetty was repaired in 1954 and north jetty in 1956. Coquille Lighthouse rehabilitation was completed June 21, 1976. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1986 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1727 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. None required. However, restoration of lighthouse using Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects, funding required 50 percent cost sharing with non-Federal sponsor (Oregon State Parks). Terminal facilities. At Bandon: A privately owned mill dock used exclusively for shipping lumber on coastwise vessels, a publicly owned wharf, and a smallboat basin open to all on equal terms. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 31,395, and contract hopper barge Sandsucker removed 69,978 cubic yards of material from entrance channel. 11. DEPOE BAY, OR Location. Harbor on Oregon coast 100 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5902.) Existing project. Two breakwaters north of entrance; an entrance channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide; and inner basin 750 feet long, 390 feet wide and 8 feet deep with retaining wall along easterly side; and a stone spending beach. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between lower low water and higher high water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1939 and 37-6 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT project modification, enlarging the basin and deepening to 8 feet, was accomplished in June 1952 and August 1966. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities, in inner basin, consist of landings and floats to accommodate operators of excursion and commercial fishing boats. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed. 12. LEWIS RIVER, WA Location. Rises in Cascade Range in Washington, flows westerly and southwesterly 110 miles, and empties into Columbia River about 88 miles from its mouth. (See NOAA Chart 18524.) Existing project. A low-water channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide to mouth of East Fork (3.75 miles); 4 feet deep and 50 feet wide on East Fork from its mouth to La Center (3 miles); 4 feet deep and 50 feet wide on Lewis River from the mouth of East Fork to Woodland (2.5 miles), secured by dredging and construction of regulating works and channel clearing to Merwin Dam (12.5 miles from Woodland). Maximum variation of water level, due to tide, ranges from about 3 feet at mouth to 1.5 feet at La Center and zero at Woodland. During ordinary freshetsa stage of 14 feet and, at extreme floods, a stage of 24 feet is reached in main river at Woodland, WA. Existing project was completed in 1927. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 2001, Annual Report for 1915, and page 1762, Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At Woodland on Lewis River there are several privately owned facilities for mooring, fishing and pleasure craft. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Port of Woodland subleases a commercial log facility at River Mile 1.8, consisting of log rollways and booms for storage. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed. 13. MULTNOMAH CHANNEL, OR Location. Multnomah Channel is a back channel about 22 miles long, connecting the Willamette River at the north boundary of the city of Portland with the Columbia River near the town of St. Helens. Scappoose Bay is a tidal inlet entering Multnomah Channel about one mile upstream of the channel's junction with the Columbia River. Existing project. Provides for an extension of existing Multnomah Channel 10 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 2,950 feet long. It also provides for a channel in Scappoose Bay 10 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 7,080 feet long. A gravel source located on the Santosh Slough, about 5 miles upstream of St. Helens, generates a large volume of tug and barge traffic. A rock reef in Multnomah Channel near the entrance to Scappoose Bay restricted available depths to about -8 feet (Columbia River datum). The gravel operators' access channel in Santosh Slough was restricted by terms of their permit to 10 feet due to adjacent flood control levee. Project work was completed in September 1981. Contract cost for construction was $266,000. Local cooperation. Port of St. Helens, project sponsor. Operations during fiscal year. Contractual work fiscally completed. 14. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). See Table 37-I. Aquatic plant control (Section 302, Public Law 89-298): Total costs for fiscal year were $222. Streambank erosion control evaluation and demonstration (Section 32, Public Law 93-251): Total costs for fiscal year were $243. Shoreline erosion control demonstration (Section 54, Public Law 93-521): Total costs for fiscal year were $40. 15. NEHALEM BAY, OR Location. On Oregon coast, 40 miles from Columbia River mouth and 10 miles north of the entrance to Tillamook Bay. Existing project. Provides for a jetty about 3,850 feet long on the north side of entrance and a jetty 4,950 feet long on the south side. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet, extreme is about 15 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1918. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for existing project. Local cooperation has been acquired for the major rehabilitation. Terminal facilities. Facilities for pleasure craft only: Dart's Marina, Brighton Moorage, Jetty Fishery, Port of Nehalem and city of Nehalem Dock. All areas have approximately 50-60 slips. However, due to shoaling, all are semi-usable. Operations during fiscal year. Major rehabilitation of both north and south jetties continued and is 96 percent complete. Federal estimated cost (1982) is $12,200,000. 16. PORT ORFORD, OR Location. On Oregon coast 250 miles south of Columbia River entrance and 390 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (NOAA Chart 18203 and Geological Survey Quadrangle, Port Orford, OR.) Existing project. Improvement of harbor by 550-foot extension of existing locally constructed breakwater and dredging of a turning basin, 340 feet long, 100 feet wide and 16 feet deep. Breakwater was completed October 1968. Turning basin was completed September 1971. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 37-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Terminal facilities. A dock which is a timber piling structure about 210 by 70 feet, equipped with hydraulic crane for lifting boats from the water to dock for repairs and/or storage and removing fish catches from boats. About 500 fishing and private boats use this dock each year. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The sand-bypasser Sandwick displaced shoal areas to provide longer periods of channel depths for navigation traffic within the authorized project. 17. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Surveys were conducted January 1982 at Oregon Slough, OR and Youngs River, OR for total cost of $5,717. 18. ROGUE RIVER HARBOR AT GOLD BEACH, OR Location. Rises in Cascade Range in southwestern Oregon, flows westerly through Coast Range, and empties into Pacific Ocean 264 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 381 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Chart 18202.) Existing project. Two jetties at entrance, and a channel 13 feet deep and 300 feet wide from ocean to a point immediately below State highway bridge, about 1 mile, including widening channel at a point about 0.25 mile below bridge to form a turning basin 13 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 650 feet long. At request of local interests, turning basin was located in south portion of estuary downstream from a point 0.25 mile below bridge. This change was effected to permit adequate terminal facilities to be constructed adjacent to turning basin. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 7 feet, and extreme about 14 feet. Project as authorized has been completed. Construction of two jetties at entrance was completed September 1960. Dredging river channel by contract and entrance bar by government plant was completed October 1961. North jetty rehabilitation along channel side was completed October 1966. Breakwater construction and dredging, under contract awarded in September 1964, was 17 percent accomplished when flood of December 1964 destroyed all completed works. Contract was terminated as further construction at that location was considered unfeasible. Bank protection work at Wedderburn location was completed in October 1972. A breakwater, constructed by Port of Gold Beach, was completed during 1973. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are various landings for fishing and recreational craft. At Wedderburn, across river from Gold Beach, is a facility to accommodate excursion passengers and small freight items destined for various private landings between Wedderburn and Agness, OR. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The sand-bypasser Sandwick displaced shoal areas to provide longer periods of channel depths for navigation traffic within the authorized project. The U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 50,905 cubic yards of material. Contract dredging was accomplished to clear the boat basin entrance channel. A total of 44,633 cubic yards of material was removed by contract pipeline dredge, and contract hopper barge Sandsucker removed 62,013 cubic yards. 19. SIUSLAW RIVER, OR Location. Rises in coast range, flows about 110 miles westerly and empties into Pacific Ocean about 160 miles south of entrance of Columbia River and 485 miles north of San Francisco Bay, CA. (See NOAA Charts 18583 and 18580.) Existing project. Provides for 2 high-tide, rubblemound jetties 750 feet apart at the outer end, the north jetty 8,390 feet long (600 feet unconstructed) and the south jetty 4,200 feet long; an entrance channel 18 feet deep and 300 feet wide from deep water in ocean to a point 1,500 feet inside the outer end of existing north jetty; thence a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide with additional widening at bends, and about 5 miles long, to a turning basin, 16 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 600 feet long, opposite Suislaw dock at Florence; a channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide from Florence to mile 16.5; and at River Mile 15.5 a turning basin 12 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 500 feet long. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth of river is 7 feet and extreme about 41 feet. During low stages of river, tidal effect extends to Mapleton, 20.5 miles above mouth. (For details relating to previous project see page 1988 of Annual Report for 1915. For plan of improvement authorized by Public Law 96-367, October 1, 1980, see Section 58.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The principal terminal facility on the river is at Davidson Lumber Dock at Mapleton which accommodates ocean-going barges with packaged lumber. Port dock at Florence, 150 feet wide and 350 feet long, is about 5.3 miles above river entrance and accommodates a fish-receiving station at east end of wharf which maintains a 2-ton capacity winch and supplies gasoline, oil and ice to fishermen. Other facilities at Florence consist of various floatways which provide docking facilities for fishing vessels and other small craft and a floating dock with accommodations for 75 commercial fishing vessels. The Port has recently acquired a marine travel lift to accommodate vessels 70 feet in length or 60 tons in weight. Adjacent to commercial basin is mooring basin with accommodations for 200 sport boats of all sizes. Across the river and below highway bridge at Glaneda are floatways used by small craft. A modern dock for loading ocean-going barges with packaged lumber is maintained at Mapleton by U.S. Plywood Champion Lumber Company. There are also a number of private landings and log booms between Cushman and Mapleton to accommodate river traffic. These facilities are considered adequate for existing traffic. 37-8 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 193,390 cubic yards, and contract hopper barge Sandsucker removed 150,027 cubic yards of material. 20. SKAMOKAWA CREEK, WASH. Location. Rises in Wahkiakum County, in southwestern part of the State of Washington, flows southwesterly and southerly about 10 miles, and empties into Columbia River about 34 miles above mouth. (See NOAA Chart 18523.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6.5 feet deep at low water and 75 feet wide, between Steamboat and Brooks Sloughs, about 1,600 feet long. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 7 feet and maximum variation of water level due to tides or freshets is about 12 feet. During ordinary freshets a stage of 12 feet is reached in creek at Skamokawa, WA. Project as authorized was completed in 1920. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are several privately owned docks on Skamokawa Creek, Steamboat Slough, and Brooks Slough for use of towboats and pleasure craft. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports. 21. SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR Location. In tidal waterway extending south 2.7 miles from deep water in Columbia River. Channel enters Columbia about 10 miles above mouth and 4 miles below Astoria, OR. (See NOAA Chart 18523.) Existing project. Channel 30 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide extending from deep water in Columbia River to railroad bridge at Warrenton, OR, distance of 1.8 miles, turning basin of same depth, mooring basin 12 feet deep at mean lower low water at Warrenton, OR, and channel 6 feet deep, generally 40 feet wide, with increased widths at log dumps and terminals, for 4,500 feet via cutoff channel above railroad bridge. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, extreme is about 13 feet. Project as authorized is complete. Dredging river channel and turning basin was completed in 1939. Construction of small-boat mooring basin at Warrenton, OR, was completed October 1957, and fill stabilization work was accomplished in August 1958. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. City of Warrenton owns wharf with a 300-foot frontage open to public on equal terms. One privately owned cannery wharf with a 300-foot frontage is used for unloading fish and handling fish nets. One privately owned boatyard has floats and moorage facilities for use of a maximum of 80 small boats. In channel above railroad bridge, facilities consist of log rollways used for sorting logs which are no longer operated. Small-boat basin has facilities for numerous fishing and recreation craft. These facilities, except during the fishing season, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredge removed 223,793 cubic yards of material. 22. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR Location. Bay is on Oregon coast about 50 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18520 and 18558.) Existing project. Provides for a jetty about 5,700 feet long on north side of entrance and a jetty 8,000 feet long on south side; a channel through bar 18 feet deep and of such width as can be practically and economically obtained; for a channel 200 feet wide and 18 feet deep from deep water in bay to Miami Cove; and for initial dredging to 12 feet deep of a small-boat basin and approach thereto at Garibaldi, OR. Project also provides for improvement of Bayocean Peninsula, OR, by construction of sand and rockfill dike 1.4 miles long, on alinement extending between Pitcher Point and town of Bayocean. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet, extreme is about 14 feet. Hobsonville Channel portion of project is inactive. Except for construction of Hobsonville Channel portion, classified inactive, channels were completed in 1927, north jetty in 1933, improvement of Bayocean Peninsula in 1956, and small-boat basin in 1958. Rehabilitation of north jetty was accomplished September 1965. Construction of south jetty was initiated April 1969 and was completed in September 1979. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1989 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1474 of Annual Report for 1936.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-9 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At Garibaldi: A facility owned by the Port of Bay City, for shipping lumber and receiving logs, a public landing suitable for mooring fishing vessels, towboats, and other craft. Small-boat basin has adequate facilities for mooring fishing and recreational craft. A privately owned boat ramp and moorage is available for recreational craft. At Bay City: A privately owned wharf used exclusively for receipt of fresh fish and shellfish. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract pipeline dredge removed 3,800 cubic yards of material, to clear a 1,000-foot channel at Old Mill Marina. 23. UMPQUA RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Cascade Range, flows westerly about 120 miles, and empties into Pacific Ocean 180 miles south of Columbia River and 465 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18584.) Existing project. A jetty on north side of entrance about 8,000 feet long, a south jetty 4,200 feet long extending to a point 1,800 feet south of outer end of north jetty; dredging to provide a usable entrance channel 26 feet deep, and a river channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide, from mouth to Reedsport, a distance of about 12 miles with a turning basin at Reedsport 1,000 feet long, 600 feet 37-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 wide, and 22 feet deep; a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from deep water in the river to vicinity of docks in Winchester Bay with a mooring and turning basin 12 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at inner end; and a channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from main river channel near mile 8 to Gardiner, OR, and a turning basin of same depth, 500 feet wide, and 800 feet long, opposite Gardiner. Project was modified in 1954 to provide a channel in Scholfield River, but this portion of the project is currently inactive. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at river mouth is 7 feet, and extreme range is about 11 feet. FY 1979 Appropriation Act included authorization to extend the training jetty to the tip of the south jetty. Project is complete. North jetty was completed in 1940. Extension to original south jetty was completed in 1938. Dredging a 22-foot channel from mouth of river to Reedsport was completed in 1941. Gardiner Channel and turning basin was completed in 1949 and Winchester Bay Channel and mooring basin in 1956. The 12-foot channel in Scholfield River is currently classified inactive. Rehabilitation of south jetty was completed August 1963. Extension of training jetty was completed October 9, 1980. (For details relating to previous projects see page 2967 of Annual Report for 1898 and page 1732 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Complied with for all work except Scholfield River channel modification. Terminal facilities. At Gardiner there is about 650 feet of wharf frontage. Also, there is an oil unloading facility owned by International Paper Co. for exclusive use of tanker barges. Port of Umpqua owns one wharf with 456 feet of water frontage, of which 228 feet is usable for vessels and another with about 75 feet of water frontage which has not been used generally for commercial shipping. On Bolon Island across the river from Reedsport a wharf was constructed which has about 5 acres of open storage for lumber and available to all on equal terms. At Winchester Bay, 2 miles from river entrance there is a major sports and commercial fishing harbor. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 351,313 cubic yards of material and contract hoplper barge Sandsucker removed 143,008 cubic yards. 24. WILLAMETTE RIVER ABOVE PORTLAND AND YAMHILL RIVER, OR Location. Yamhill River rises in Coast Range, flows easterly, and empties into Willamette River about 42 miles above Portland. Its length from source of South Fork is about 52 miles. (See NOAA Chart 18526 and Geological Survey map, State of Oregon.) For description of Willamette River see Improvement No. 3. Existing project. Provides for improvement of Willamette River between Portland (mile 14) and Oregon City (mile 26) by a channel 8 feet deep at low water, 200 feet wide below Cedar Island and 150 feet wide thence to Oregon City; such channel improvement and contraction works as may be necessary to secure with streamflow regulation, controlling depths of 6 feet at low water and of no prescribed width, from Oregon City to mouth of Santiam River (mile 108.5), 5 feet from that point to Albany (mile 120) 2.5 to 3.5 feet deep from Albany to Corvallis (mile 132), and for necessary snagging between Corvallis and Eugene (mile 185). Local interests dredge and maintain a 20-foot channel to the dock at Lake Oswego for receipt of limerock. Project also provides for a channel in Yamhill River 4 feet deep at low water and 60 feet wide from its mouth to McMinnville (18 miles) secured by means of a lock and dam near Lafayette and by removal of obstructions. Section of Willamette River in vicinity of Willamette Falls at Oregon City is covered by Improvement No. 25. For Willamette River below falls at Oregon City ordinary fluctuation of stage of water is 15 feet and extreme fluctuation due to flood conditions 35 to 50 feet. Above Oregon City ordinary fluctuation is 12 to 20 feet and extreme is 20 to 27 feet. For Yamhill River ordinary fluctuation is 35 feet and extreme 48 feet. Tidal changes vary from about 2.5 feet at mouth of Willamette to zero, 26 miles above mouth. Project is about 18 percent complete. The 8-foot channel between Portland and Oregon City and 2.5- to 3.5-foot channel between Oregon City and Albany were completed in 1939. The 2.5- to 3.5-foot channel between Albany and Corvallis was completed in 1945. Remaining work required to complete project consists of construction of such contraction works and channel improvements as may be necessary, with streamflow regulation, to secure controlling depths of 6 feet at low water from Oregon City to mouth of Santiam River, and 5 feet from that point to Albany. This remaining portion has been placed in the deferred category. Due to lack of use by commercial traffic for which facilities were provided, operation of Yamhill lock was discontinued February 7, 1954, and the lock and adjacent property reported surplus and turned over to Yamhill County January 16, 1959. There is no maintenance of the channel above Newberg, so it is only usable during higher river stages. (For details relating to previous projects see page 1997 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1754 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Between Ross Island Bridge at Portland and Willamette Falls at Oregon City: Privately owned mill docks, sand and gravel wharves, a cement loading facility, a small shipyard, and oil-receiving stations. Above the falls there are privately owned landings including a facility at Pulp Siding (3 miles above the falls) with rail and water connections for shipment of clay and receipt of papermill products by barge. At Wilsonville and Newberg there are sand and gravel facilities. At numerous locations as far as Corvallis (River Mile 132) there are log rollways which are currently inactive. At Lake Oswego there is a dock for the receipt of limerock used in the manufacture of cement. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, coordination with Port authorities and resource monitoring continued. 37-10 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 25. WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR Location. Locks and dam covered by this project are at Willamette Falls, a rocky reef in Willamette River at Oregon City, OR, about 26 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. Provides for construction of a new single-lift main lock and a guard lock each with clear dimensions of 56 by 400 feet and a minimum depth over sills of 9.5 feet, to replace existing facilities which were provided for by purchase, rehabilitation, and deepening to 6 feet at low water of existing canal and locks and separation of canal from waterpower intake by construction of a concrete division wall. Construction of a new lock is currently an inactive project. The existing locks are on the National Register for historic sites, making their replacement unlikely. Total length of existing canals and locks is about 3,500 feet. Principal features of existing canal and locks at Willamette Falls are set forth in Table 37-J. Ordinary fluctuation of stage of water above locks is 12 feet and extreme, due to flood conditions, 20 feet. Below locks, ordinary fluctuation is 15 feet and extreme 50 feet. Canal and locks originally constructed by private interests in 1873 were purchased by the United States in April 1915 for $375,000. Final report on purchase and rehabilitation of canal and locks is in Annual Report for 1923, when project was reported 98 percent complete. Replacement of gates Nos. 6 and 7 was completed August 1967 under minor rehabilitation funds. Existing locks and grounds are in fair condition and in continuous operation except when flooded out by high water or undergoing repair. Facilities are obsolete and inadequate for existing traffic. No construction work has been done on lock and guard lock, which was authorized to replace existing facilities by Flood Control Act of 1939, and River and Harbor Act of 1945. This portion of the project has been reclassified "deferred." Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Crown Zellerbach Corp. has a timber wharf about 850 feet long, extending to and supported by concrete division wall built in lock canal by United States. This wharf is used for receiving mill supplies and shipping paper and paper products. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Repair of Lock Chamber No. 4 and Lock Gates Nos. I1a nd 7. 26. WINCHESTER BAY, UMPQUA RIVER, OR Location. Bay is on the Oregon coast about 180 miles south of the Columbia River, 465 miles north of San Francisco Bay (see NOAA charts, 18580 and 18584). Existing Project. A channel 16 feet and 100 feet wide from deep water in the river to vicinity of docks in Winchester Bay with a turning basin 16 feet deep, 175 feet wide and 300 feet long; thence a channel 100 feet wide and 16 feet deep for approximately 500 feet, thence 75 feet wide and 12 feet deep for approximately 950 feet; a channel 100 feet wide and 16 feet deep extending from deep water in the river approximately 4,100 feet in length to a turning basin 160 feet wide, 16 feet deep and 200 feet long at the southerly end of the west basin. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Construction contract awarded September 1982 and is currently underway. Contractor has partially completed preparation of disposal site. 27. YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR Location. Bay is on Oregon coast, 113 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18581.) Existing project. Two high tide rubblemound jetties at entrance, north jetty 7,000 feet, and south jetty 8,600 feet long; a spur jetty on channel side of south jetty 4,700 feet from its sea end, 800 feet long; five groins channelward from south jetty; channel 40 feet deep for a general width of 400 feet across bar and at outer end of entrance channel; a channel 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide to a turning basin of same depth, 900 to 1,200 feet wide and 1,400 feet long, and a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 30-foot channel at about mile 2.4, thence upstream to abandoned railroad terminus at Yaquina, a distance of about 4.5 miles. Project also provides for two small boat mooring basins at Newport, OR. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in May 1952. Restoration of jetties was completed in 1934 and extension of north jetty 1,000 feet seaward was completed in 1940. Construction of mooring basin at Newport and dredging of channel and turning basin to project dimensions were completed during fiscal year 1949. Restoration of north jetty was again accomplished in 1956. Under modification of July 3, 1958, extension of north jetty was completed in September 1966, dredging of 40-foot bar channel and 30-foot river channel was completed in October 1968, and extension of south jetty was completed in June 1972. (For details relating to previous projects see Annual Report for 1893, part 4, page 3314, and Annual Report for 1938, page 1736.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. At McLean Point, on north side of bay, about 2 miles from entrance, Yaquina Terminals has two berths capable of serving ocean-going vessels, one 435 feet long, the second 520 feet long. At the time the second berth was dredged, a retaining wall and fill of 6 acres were constructed adjacent to deep water. The company now has 40 acres of filled land adjacent to deep water, and of this total, 7 acres were constructed in 1956- 57. This facility has necessary carriers and lift trucks for handling lumber cargoes, warehouse for covered cargo storage, and is open to all on equal terms. No deep draft commerce presently use these facilities. Port of Newport has a public wharf within 300 feet of frontage for servicing fishing boats. In addition, Port of Newport maintains 510 berths for mooring commercial and sport fishing vessels. There are several seafood companies on the bay which have their own facilities for handling fresh fish and crab. Supplies and petroleum products are readily available for small vessels. On south 37-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 side of bay about 1.2 miles above entrance, Port of Newport has constructed South Beach Marina which can handle approximately 600 small pleasure craft and shallow draft fishing boats. Public facilities include public automobile and boat trailer parking, boat launching ramp, fuel dock, fishing pier, and picnic area. A dry boat moorage for 120 boats, is nearing completion. A swing hoist with 3-ton capacity is currently available and one with 60-ton capacity is planned. About 1.5 miles above entrance, Oregon Aqua Foods, subsidiary of Weyerhaeuser Company, maintains a commercial fish farm facility. About 2.0 miles above entrance, Oregon State University, in conjunction with the Marine Science Center on 52 acres, maintains a 220-foot pier for docking large and small research vessels and a 100-foot float for docking small boats. Docking facilities are restricted to research vessels and State of Oregon small boats. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 81,190 cubic yards of material, and contract hopper barge Sandsucker removed 249,990 cubic yards. 28. YAQUINA RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Coast Range, flows about 50 miles in a westerly direction, and empties into Yaquina Bay, on Oregon Coast. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 5802 and 6058.) Existing project. Provides for two controlling halftide dikes of piling, brush, and stone, each about 1,100 feet long (constructed by local interests), and for a channel 10 feet deep and generally 150 feet wide on Yaquina River and 200 feet wide in Depoe Creek, extending from town of Yaquina to Toledo, about 9 miles. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme about 12 feet. Freshet heights are about 12 feet at mouth of Depoe Creek. Channel work authorized March 1913 was completed in 1914. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Near town of Yaquina at river mouth, which is also head of Yaquina Bay, there is a moorage for small vessels and a small-craft shipyard. Both port and city of Toledo have public-terminal facilities for accommodation of local craft. There are also privately owned facilities for loading lumber barges, receipt of bunker fuel oil, and log rollways for receipt of logs. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, coordination with Port authorities and resource monitoring were performed. Flood Control 29. APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. In Jackson County, OR, on Upper Applegate River, a tributary of Rogue River, at River Mile 46, about 23 airline miles southwest of Medford, OR. Existing project. A gravel-fill embankment dam, 242 feet high from streambed to crest with an overall length of 1,300 feet. A gate-controlled concrete chute-type spillway on the left abutment, and a regulating outlet conduit, and intake tower with multilevel intakes on the left side of valley floor. Lake, 7.5 miles long, provides of usable acre-feetstorage for flood control and water conservation utilization. Project controls runoff from a drainage area of 223 square miles. In addition to flood control, reservoir is operated to provide irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control, and recreation benefits. Estimated cost of project is $91,281,000 including $3,679,000 estimated for recreation facilities constructed by the Corps of Engineers and operated and maintained by the U.S. Forest Service. Local cooperation. Authorizing act requires that State of Oregon insure maintenance of stream flow released for fishery. In addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife made filing May 31, 1962 with State Engineer for water rights for use of stored water and natural flows for fish habitat improvement in amounts and at times specified in project authorization. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation has made a feasibility study of Applegate Irrigation Division. The results of the study indicate that at present there does not appear to be a feasible irrigation project for the Applegate River valley. Local interests have furnished all local cooperation specified by the 1970 Flood Control Act. The assurances were approved by the Secretary of the Army on May 8, 1975. Operations during fiscal year. The main dam, spillway and intake structure was completed in the fall of 1980. Initial filling began in December 1980. Some miscellaneous contracts for earth work completion are still in progress. Project is essentially complete and operating. Freshets regulated by Applegate Lake on Applegate River and Rogue River are shown in Table 37-K. 30. BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR Location. On Blue River, a major tributary of McKenzie River, 1.8 miles above confluence of the two streams at the confluence of Quartz Creek and Blue River and about 42 miles easterly of Eugene, OR. Existing project. A gravel-fill embankment dam 1,329 feet long at crest including spillway and 319 feet above the lowest point of the general foundation. A concrete gravity chute-type spillway with two gates is located on left abutment. Outlet works are in left abutment. On left shore of reservoir an earth-and-gravel fill embankment, about 1,535 feet long and 70 feet high, closes a low saddle between Blue River and McKenzie River. Project controls runoff from drainage area of 88 square miles. Reservoir provides 85,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service under a Memorandum of Agreement. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1963 and operation for 37-12 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT flood control was effective in October 1968. Settlement of claims was completed in May 1974. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Eugene Water and Electric Board made an application in April 1982 for permit to install two small hydropower units at Blue River Lake project. They also made an application in 1982 for permit to build a dam with two hydropower units, called Sunnyside Dam, between Foster and Green Peter project. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Blue River Lake project on Blue River, a major tributary of McKenzie River, are shown in Table 37-K. 31. COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR Location. On Coast Fork of Willamette River, 29 miles from mouth. Coast Fork rises in Douglas County, OR, on western slope of Cascade Range and northern slope of Calapooia Range, flows north for 49 miles, and unites with Middle Fork to form main Willamette River. Existing project. An earthfill dam, 1,750 feet long at crest, 114 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation, a concrete gravity free overflow spillway 264 feet long near the right abutment, and a concrete gravity non-overflow section 96 feet long forming the right abutment. Total length of dam is 2,110 feet. Outlet works, consisting of three gate-controlled conduits, pass through spillway section. Reservoir provides 30,060 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of drainage area of 104 square miles. Project is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflow for navigation and for other purposes. Recreational development consists of day use and overnight facilities at four sites operated by the Corps of Engineers. Construction of project initiated August 1940 was completed April 1952. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since September 1942. Local cooperation. None required. No cost-sharing sponsor for recreation facilities has expressed an interest in this project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Restroom facilities completed under Code 710 funding. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Cottage Grove Lake on Coast Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-K. 32. DAYS CREEK LAKE, OR Location. In Douglas County on South Umpqua River, 60 miles from its junction with North Umpqua River, 172 miles from mouth of Umpqua River, and one mile upstream from the town of Days Creek. Existing project. Plan provides for a gravel embankment dam, 254 feet high from lowest point of foundation to crest and 1,031 feet long; aconcrete gravity spillway on the right abutment with five electrically operated tainter gates; and regulating outlet works under the center of the dam. Reservoir will provide for 260,000 acre-feet of multiple-use storage for flood control, irrigation, fishery enhancement, water supply, recreation and water quality improvement and will control 640 square miles of drainage area. Authorization is for Phase I Advance Engineering and Design only. Final EIS was filed with CEQ October 6, 1972. Phase I planning has been terminated and study was reclassified as "deferred" on February 22, 1980. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 37-17 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. None. 33. DORENA LAKE, OR Location. On Row River, OR, 7 miles from mouth. Row River rises in Lane County on western slope of Cascade Range, flows northwest for 19 miles, and enters Coast Fork of Willamette River 19.5 miles above mouth. Existing project. An earthfill embankment dam, 3,352 feet long at crest and 145 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation. Concrete gravity free-overflow spillway, 200 feet long, forms right abutment. Outlet works on five slide-gate-controlled conduits pass through spillway section. Reservoir provides 70,500 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of 265 square miles, practically entire drainage area tributary to Row River. Project is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Construction of project initiated June 1941 was completed October 1952 except for construction of additional recreation facilities to be funded from Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Recreation facilities construction will be accomplished in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane County, OR. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since November 1949. Local cooperation. Future recreational development is contingent upon a cost-sharing agreement with a non- Federal sponsor. Lane County Parks isparticipating in a multiple project cost-sharing (50 percent) contract, for many of the existing parks at four projects, including Dorena Lake. Operations during fiscal year. New work, code 710: Construction of restroom facilities are currently underway at Schwarz Park. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Dorena Lake project on Row and Coast Fork Willamette Rivers are shown in Table 37-K. 34. ELK CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. In Jackson County, OR at River Mile 1.7 on Elk Creek, a tributary of Rogue River, about 26.5 miles northerly from Medford, OR. Existing project. Plan provides for a 233-foot high roller compacted concrete gravity dam, 2,600 feet long at the crest, with a gate controlled concrete chute spillway, regulating outlet conduits, power penstock and multiple use intake tower attached to the upstream face of the dam. Reservoir 6.2 miles long will provide 95,000 acre-feet of usable storage for flood control and water conservation utilization. Project will control runoff from a drainage area of 127 square miles. Reservoir will be operated to provide future municipal and industrial water supply, 37-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control, and recreation benefits. Construction of the project was initiated in February 1971. Work completed to date includes construction of a bypass road to route traffic away from the damsite and stockpiling of gravels to be used in the main dam and relocated roads. All private lands for the project have been acquired. Final environmental statement was filed with Council of Environmental Quality June 15, 1972 and Supplement in March 1980. The Oregon Water Policy Review Board voted October 3, 1975 not to support the Elk Creek project. On April 4, 1981 the Board reversed its previous position and voted to support Elk Creek project. Estimated Federal cost of project is $142,000,000 (1982). Local cooperation. Authorizing act requires that State of Oregon take action prior to construction to insure maintenance in stream of flow to be released for fishery. In addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation laws and policies. On February 24, 1966 State of Oregon Water Resources Board filed for withdrawal rights of 25 cfs to maintain minimum flow for fish. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation is working on a feasibility study for irrigation of Medford Division from Lost Creek and Elk Creek Lakes, and will determine repayment requirements by local interests. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Administration of project land continued. 35. FALL CREEK LAKE, OR Location. On Fall Creek, a tributary of Middle Fork Willamette River, about 7 miles above confluence of the streams and about 19 miles southeasterly of Eugene, OR. Existing project. An earth-and-gravel fill embankment about 5,100 feet long at crest and 193 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation. A gated concrete gravity spillway is in left abutment. Outlet is in right abutment. Reservoir provides 115,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Construction of project began May 1962 and was essentially complete November 1965. Reservoir storage for flood control was effective October 1965. Sky Camp Lodge was completed October 1978. Future recreation facilities will be provided in accordance with the costsharing contracts with Lane County and Bethel School District, federally funded from Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Local cooperation. Additional recreational development is contingent upon a cost-sharing agreement with a non-Federal sponsor. Lane County Parks is participating in a multiple project cost-sharing (50 percent) contract for many of the existing parks at four projects, irncluding Fall Creek Lake. Also, Bethel School District is cost-sharing 50 percent for Sky Camp. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Fall Creek Lake project on Fall Creek, a tributary of Middle Fork, Willamette River, are shown in Table 37-K. 36. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR Location. On Long Tom River, 23.6 miles from the mouth. Long Tom River rises in Lane County, OR, on eastern slope of Coast Range, flows north for 50 miles, and enters Willamette River 147 miles above its mouth. Existing project. A main dam, 6,624 feet long at crest and 49 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation and two auxiliary dikes, 915 and 3,929 feet long, along northeasterly boundary of lake. Main dam consists of an earthfill embankment dam 6,330 feet long, a concrete gravity spillway near left abutment with a nonoverflow structure 46 feet long, containing outlet works, and an overflow structure, 248 feet long, controlled by six automatic gates. Project includes rectification of channel of Long Tom River downstream of dam. Reservoir provides 110,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 275 square miles. Reservoir protects Long Tom River Valley and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley generally and to increase low water-flows for navigation and other purposes. Dam was originally constructed in 1941 to height of 47 feet. Provision of additional storage for flood control was obtained in 1965 by raising embankments 2 feet to 49 feet above lowest point of the general foundation. Construction of project initiated April 1940 was completed August 1951, except for provision of additional storage for flood control authorized in 1962 and completed April 1965, and construction of additional recreation facilities to be funded from Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since December 1941. Development of recreation facilities in accordance with the costsharing contract with Lane County continues. Local cooperation. Additional recreational development is contingent upon a cost-sharing agreement with a non-Federal sponsor. Lane County Parks is participating in a multiple project cost-sharing (50 percent) contract for many of the existing parks at four projects, including Fern Ridge Lake. Operations during fiscal year. New work, code 710: Construction of additional recreation facilities is presently underway. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Fern Ridge Lake project on Long Tom River are shown in Table 37-K. 37. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs for preauthorization studies were: Alder Creek Lane, Molalla, OR, $7,460; North Santiam River, Idanha, OR, $7,407; Tualatin, OR, $31,341. Emergency bank protection (Section 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.). 37-14 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Fiscal year costs for preauthorization studies were: Salmon Creek, Clark County, WA, $9,760; Tilton River, Morton, WA, $7,500; Tollbridge Location, Hood River, OR, $116; Trask River, Tone Road, Tillamook County, OR, $5,266; Woodworth Location, Hood River, OR, $982. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting and. rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for fiscal year were $248,540 for disaster preparedness, $1,813,420 for emergency operations, $51,135 for rehabilitation and $10,349,648 for advance measures. Cowlitz-Toutle Operations. The May 18, 1980 eruption of Mt. St. Helens dramatically altered the hydraulic and hydrologic regimes of the Cowlitz and Toutle river valleys. Volcanic debris substantially reduced the river's hydraulic capacity to the point where major flooding could be expected with even normal runoff. A major recovery program for the Cowlitz and Toutle rivers funded under advance measures was initiated a short time after the eruption and was essentially completed during FY 1982. Total payments and funding commitments for the Cowlitz-Toutle recovery program, from initiation through the end of the fiscal year, with some contract modifications remaining to be negotiated, totaled $236,139,800. The authorized navigation channel on the Cowlitz between River Mile 0 and 4.2 remains unusable due to continued sedimentation. Spirit Lake, WA. Portland District was directed on August 24, 1982 to respond to the Presidential Declaration of a State of Emergency for the Spirit Lake area. This declaration was precipitated by the release of a U.S. Forest Service Spirit Lake Interagency Task Force report assessing the flood hazard posed by that body of water, which has been without a natural outlet since the May 18, 1980 eruption of Mt. St. Helens. The report concluded that Spirit Lake will fill to an extremely dangerous level by as early as Spring 1983 and also mentioned concern over the structural stability of the debris plug holding back the lake due to the development of an extensive system of deep erosion gullies on its surface, some as deep as 40 feet. To contain the threat of a possible devastating flood caused by a failure of the Spirit Lake debris plug, and in response to a tasking from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the Portland District initiated a program aimed at meeting two objectives: (1) Undertake interim measures to assure that the lake is not allowed to continue rising unchecked so that the threat of a possible flood during 1983 is averted, and, (2) Perform field investigations and preliminary design work necessary to make a recommendation to FEMA for a permanent solution to the threat of flooding from Spirit Lake. By the end of FY 1982, plans for an interim solution to the Spirit Lake problem were well underway. Two contracts had been awarded; one for $3,119,914 to construct a 3,400-foot-long 60-inch diameter pipeline and outlet structure on the debris plug, a second for $3,751,419 to install and operate a barge-mounted pumping plant capable of pumping a sustained flow of 180 cubic feet per second through the pipeline until July 1983. The contracts call for the completion of the pipeline by October 30, 1982, and the start of pumping operations by November 5, 1982. Total funding for Spirit Lake under advance measures was $11,510,000, with $1,191,533 expended in FY 1982. 38. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Funds appropriated for inspection of completed local flood protection works are used to determine condition of completed works and to ascertain whether those works are being properly maintained by local interests. A total of 33 leveed areas and 262 bank protection works were inspected at various locations along both banks of Lower Columbia River below Bonneville Dam, along Oregon Coast, in eastern Oregon, in southern Oregon and in Willamette River Basin. Of this total, 19 leveed areas in Oregon and 14 leveed areas in Washington along Lower Columbia River were inspected October 1981 through September 1982. A representative of sponsoring districts accompanied the Portland District representatives performing the levee inspections. Aerial inspection of revetments in Willamette River Basin was supplemented by an onsite inspection at locations requiring maintenance. Deficiencies in maintenance and need for repairs were discussed with sponsoring districts' representatives and a report was made to each sponsor with recommendations for improving maintenance. The campaign to improve maintenance of completed Federal projects initiated by House Appropriations Committee on Civil Functions was continued. Periodic contact was maintained with uncooperative areas reported in FY 1982 to ascertain any change in attitude and to provide technical assistance, if requested. Of the 81 sponsors of local flood protection projects inspected in Portland District, one was reported deficient in maintenance. Fiscal year costs were $50,723 and total costs to September 30, 1982 were $867,199. 39. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River and minor tributaries, channels, and sloughs, between Sandy River, OR, about 15 miles east of Vancouver, WA, and mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. Plan for bank protection work, improvements to existing projects, and construction of flood control works in Lower Columbia River Basin provides for new construction and supplementing and extending pxojects constructed in Lower Columbia River Basin under authority of 1936 Flood Control Act: (a) Lower Columbia River Bank Protection, OR and WA provides for bank protection works at 82 locations on Columbia River and tributaries between Sandy River and mouth of Columbia River, totaling about 175,000 linear feet. Estimated total Federal cost is $26,400,000 (full funding) and non-Federal cost is $286,000; (b) See Table 37-L on Levees and Improvements to Existing Works; (c) Lower Columbia River Basin levees at new 37-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 locations, Oregon and Washington, provides for construction of flood control works at: Washougal area, Clark County, WA, about 5.5 miles of levee and appurtenant works at a Federal cost of $1,803,488, and non-Federal cost at $98,000; and Vancouver Lake area in vicinity of Vancouver, WA, about 18 miles of levee and appurtenant works at an estimated Federal cost (1980) of $19,500,000 and non-Federal cost at $900,000. This portion, Vancouver Lake, WA, has been reclassified "deferred." Total estimated Federal costs (1980) for both areas of work are $21,303,488 and non-Federal costs $998,000. Approved (1982) Federal cost for all work under project, Lower Columbia River Basin, OR, and WA, is $68,145,651. Construction of improvement to existing project in Sandy Drainage District, OR, was completed by local interests at no construction cost to the Government. Improvements of levees have been accomplished by contract at the following locations: Multnomah County Drainage District, No. 1, OR, June 1962; Sauvie Island Drainage District, OR, October 1962; Woodson Drainage District, OR, December 1963; Rainier Drainage District, OR, June 1964; Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District, No. 15, WA, December 1965; Cowlitz County Diking Improvement Districts, Nos. 2 and 13, WA, June 1965; Midland Drainage District, OR, April 1967; Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District, No. 2, WA, June 1974; Beaver Drainage District, OR, June 1978; Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District No. 1, WA, October 1979; and Scappoose Drainage District, OR, September 1980. Washougal Area, WA, (new location) levee construction has been completed. Under authorization for Lower Columbia River Basin bank protection works, construction is complete at 68 locations. Local cooperation. Flood Control act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate completed works. Total non- Federal costs for all work are $4,284,000. For details of status or requirements of local cooperation see individual project reports. Operations during fiscal year. See individual projects. 40. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River and tributaries between Sandy River, OR, and mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. Provides for construction of 175,000 linear feet of bank protection works at 82 locations along Lower Columbia River below River Mile 125 and along principal tributaries in this reach, to protect existing improvements such as levees and developed industrial lands from further erosion. Existing project is a unit of general comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation, and other purposes in Columbia River Basin. Construction of project began in July 1961 and is 89 percent complete. A total of 153,598 linear feet of bank protection work at 68 locations has been completed. Estimated Federal cost is $26,400,000 (full funding). Local cooperation. Flood Control Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate works after completion. Estimated costs for all requirements of local cooperation are $286,000. Operations during fiscal year. Work at Hubcap, Nelson, and Leino locations that will provide 2,259,870, and 2,100 linear feet of protection, respectively, has been started and is scheduled for completion by December 1982. 41. SCAPPOOSE DRAINAGE DISTRICT, OR Location. In Columbia County, OR, along left bank of Multnomah Channel opposite Columbia River Miles 90.3 to 97.0. Existing project. The project as originally authorized by the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, provided for reconstruction of the existing levee system. Additional improvements provide for raising and strengthening 52,000 feet of levee, construction of toe drains, and additional pumping capacity. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1941. Design memorandum approved by higher authority in September 1971. Final Environmental Impact Statement filed with CEQ April 24, 1972. Supplement to EIS was filed with CEQ July 29, 1974. Additional improvements were completed in September 1980. Estimated Federal cost is $3,568,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-14 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Completed contract was finalized. 42. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Corps of Engineers monitored flood control operations at four Water and Power Resources Service projects (Prineville, Ochoco, Emigrant, and Scoggins) and (Mossyrock) a municipal power project operated by Tacoma City Light. The Bureau of Reclamation projects were partially constructed with flood control funds, thereby subjecting project operation to monitoring by the Corps of Engineers under Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944. Monitoring of Mossyrock flood control operation is assigned to the Corps by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission as the Mossyrock license calls for specific flood control regulation. Under licensing agreement, the Tacoma City Light utility is required to provide 360,000 acre-feet of flood storage by December of each year. Last year's special operation involving additional flood control storage was not required in FY 1982 as channel dredging provided an acceptable channel capacity for flood control operations. The Bureau of Reclamation sponsored projects were operated satisfactorily during Fiscal Year 1982 for flood control. At Mossyrock, three winter high water periods occurred in December 1981, January 1982 and February 1982 with the major high water occurring in February. The spring snowmelt runoff was near normal. During the February high water 37-16 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT period, reservoir regulation stored approximately 330,000 acre-feet at Mossyrock. Peak discharges at Castle Rock were observed to be 68,000 cubic feet per second, slightly below the regulation goal of 70,000 cubic feet per second. Unregulated flow would have been near 100,000 cubic feet per second. All reservoirs filled to normal full pool levels during the refill season. Preparation of reservoir Regulation Manuals for Scoggins and Mossyrock projects is scheduled. Total cost of monitoring the five projects during Fiscal Year 1982 was $5,261. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 43. WAHKIAKUM COUNTY CONSOLIDATED DIKING DISTRICT NO. 1, WA Location. District occupies both Puget and Little Islands in Columbia River between River Miles 38.4 and 45.0. These islands are in Wahkiakum County, WA, near town of Cathlamet. Existing project. Provides for raising and strengthening existing levees, removing several abandoned tide boxes, constructing a new tide box, extending an existing tide box and adding a gate well structure, constructing a new pumping station and relocating three existing pumping stations; raising the discharge lines of all pumping stations; and filling borrow ditches along the landward levee toe. Construction of new tide box was completed January 1976. Replacement of three pump stations and one tide box and addition of one pumphouse is complete. Final EIS filed September 18, 1972. Estimated Federal cost is $5,290,833. Local cooperation. Flood Control Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate completed works. Operations during fiscal year. Contractual claim settled. 44. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. Willamette River, formed by Coast and Middle Forks which join a few miles above Eugene, OR, flows north 189 miles, and enters Columbia River 101.5 miles above its mouth. Basin has an area of 11,200 square miles and lies between Cascade Range on the east and Coast Range on the west. Major tributaries of Willamette River rise in Cascade Mountains and consist of Coast and Middle Forks and McKenzie, Calapooia, Santiam, Molalla, and Clackamas Rivers. Important tributaries that head in the Coast Range are Luckiamute, Yamhill, and Tualatin Rivers. Minor tributaries, all of which enter main stream from the west, are Marys River, Rickreall Creek, and Long Tom River. Existingproject. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved general comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation, and other purposes in Willamette River Basin and authorized $11,300,000 for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan recommended for initial development: the reservoirs and related works to be selected by Chief of Engineers. Subsequent Flood Control Acts, 1941 through 1974, authorized additional flood control and other works and increased monetary authority. Following projects were completed as authorized and in continuous operation: Fern Ridge Lake, August 1951; Cottage Grove Lake, March 1952; Dorena Lake, October 1952; Detroit Lake, December 1960; Lookout Point Lake, June 1961. Hills Creek Lake, June 1963; Cougar Lake, March 1964; Fall Creek Lake, November 1965; Green Peter-Foster Lakes, June-December 1967 respectively; and Blue River Lake, October 1968. Under the authorization for construction of recreation facilities at completed projects, work has been accomplished at Fern Ridge, Cottage Grove, Dorena, Lookout Point, and Fall Creek Lakes. Advance engineering and design for proposed construction of Holley Lake project was placed in deferred status pending completion of a study to determine extent of increased capacity required in Calapooia River for flood control operation of the project. Details of operation, construction, and financial status of projects are in individual reports. During low-water season, July-September, supplemental water releases are made from Willamette River Basin Reservoirs for conservation purposes. Interests which benefit from increased downstream flows include irrigation, navigation, power, pollution abatement, and recreation. Although optimum regulation cannot be provided for every conservation interest, water released from reservoirs during the low-water season for a particular purpose will usually provide benefits to other conservation uses as well. Basic policy is to provide most beneficial overall uses as well. Basic policy is to provide most beneficial overall regulation, consistent with established water-use priorities. (See Table 37-M on Willamette River Basin comprehensive plan.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Local cooperation for other projects is in individual reports for those projects. Operations during fiscal year. See individual reports. 45. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR Location. On Willamette River and tributaries, between Cascade Range and Coast Range, from a point south of Eugene to Portland, OR. Existing project. Provides for clearing, sloping, and revetting riverbanks; construction of pile and timber bulkheads and drift barriers; minor channel improvements; and maintenance of existing works for control of floods and prevention of erosion at various locations along Willamette River and its tributaries. The current scope of the project is a total of 510,000 linear feet of bank protection at 236 locations. Estimated Federal cost is $33,400,000 (full funding). Construction of project began in 1938 and is 94 percent complete. A total of 479,402 linear feet of bank protection work at 225 locations consisting of revetment of riverbanks, pile and timber bulkheads, drift barriers, and channel improvements, have been completed on Willamette River and tributaries. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 applies. Estimated costs for all requirements of local 37-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 cooperation under terms of project authorization were $383,000 (1982). Operations during fiscal year. New work: A total of 3,694 linear feet of riprap revetment bank protection has been constructed at two locations. Maintenance: Annual inspection of revetments was made by helicopter in July 1982. Minor repairs were made to one Corps sponsored revetment. 46. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAMLAKE BONNEVILLE, OR AND WA Location. Project is on Columbia River, 40 miles east of Portland, OR, about 146 miles above mouth of river. For description of Columbia River see Improvement No. 3. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, and lock for power and navigation. Spillway dam extends across main channel from Washington shore to Bradford Island, which divides the river at this point. Overflow crest at 24 feet above mean sea level is surmounted by 18 vertical-lift steel gates and 10 remote control main dam hoists placed between piers which extend to elevation 99 feet where a service roadway permits operation of two 350-ton gantry cranes for regulating gates. Powerhouse No. 1 extending across Bradford Slough to the Oregon shore has an installation of 10 units, consisting of two units of 43,200 kilowatts and eight units of 54,000 kilowatts each, totaling 518,400 kilowatts. Ordinary and extreme fluctuations of river at lower lock gate are about 21 and 47 feet respectively. Project includes fish ladders and locks to serve both main channel and Bradford Slough channel. Navigation lock and powerhouse are founded on andesite, and main dam rests upon solidified sedimentary rock of volcanic origin. The pool created by dam provides a navigable channel 15 feet deep between Bonneville and The Dalles Dams, a distance of 47 river miles. Principal data concerning navigation lock spillway dam, and powerplant are set forth in Table 37-N. Dam, navigation lock, 10-unit power generating installation, fishways, and attendant buildings and grounds cost $83,239,395, of which $6,072,480 is for navigation facilities, $39,350,824 for power facilities and $37,816,091 for joint facilities, consisting of dam, fishways, buildings and grounds, and headwall section of power units 0 to 6, cost of which $2,106,000 is allocated to dam and lake facilities. In response to flow regulations and peakings from upstream plants operating under conditions of Canadian storage and Pacific Northwest Southwest Intertie, two modifications were undertaken at the Bonneville project. The modification for peaking project was undertaken to minimize adverse environmental effects under rapidly changing flow conditions from upstream dams. The project was completed in 1978 at a cost of $27,195,000. The second modification provides for increased power installation by building a second powerhouse located on the Washington shore adjacent to the end of the existing spillway. The new powerhouse contains eight units of 66,500 kilowatts each and two fish turbine generator units of 13,100 kilowatts each for a combined capacity of 558,200 kilowatts, bringing the entire Bonneville capacity to 1,076.6 megawatts. Additional fish facilities consist of the powerhouse collection system, second fish ladder on the Washington shore, transportation channel connecting existing Washington shore fish ladder with new exit control section, and fingerling bypass facilities which include fish screens in both the powerhouses. To provide for the anticipated increased visitor use, onsite visitor facilities are included. Under authority of the Bonneville Project Act (August 20, 1937), a letter from Bonneville Power Administration to North Pacific Division dated January 21, 1965, requested construction of a second powerhouse. Construction of project started October 1933, was completed February 1953. Modification of powerhouse control equipment started March 1957, was completed September 1958. First two power units were placed in operation during fiscal year 1938. Powerhouse with complete installation of 10 units, was in operation December 1943. Construction of modification for peaking work commenced in September 1970 and was completed in September 1978. Construction of second powerhouse is near completion. Final environmental impact statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in April 1972. In response to increasing visitation which now exceeds 800,000 a year at the dam site itself and 1,500,000 projectwide, a visitor center with windows into the fish ladders, a 60-seat theatre, exhibits and displays was completed in 1975. Contracts for relocation of the highway, railroad and town of North Bonneville as well as excavation of the powerhouse are 99 percent complete. Construction of the main powerhouse and supply contracts for associated powerhouse equipment are 99 percent complete and Units 12 through 18 were on-line by September 17, 1982. The visitor facility for the new powerhouse (which does not require cost-sharing) is an integral part of that structure. Estimated cost for construction of second powerhouse is $643,000,000 (full funding). Construction of future recreational facilities is contingent upon a cost-sharing contract with a non-Federal sponsor. Skamania County, WA has indicated an interest in cost-sharing at Home Valley upstream from Bonneville Lock and Dam; however, a cost-sharing contract has not been consummated. Through September 1982 power generation totaled 167.6 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $142,954,450 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required, except for non- Federal cost-sharing for development of Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contract for main turbine was awarded October 1976 and is 99 percent complete. Contract for powerhouse excavation vias awarded March 1977 and is complete. The main powerhouse contract was awarded April 1978 and is 99 percent complete. 37-18 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance was performed during period. During the fiscal year 5,700,374,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated, of which 5,675,189,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Traffic through the navigation lock consisting of rafted logs, petroleum products, grains, and miscellaneous cargo amounted to 9,716,330 tons during calendar year 1981. Construction of modification for peaking work commenced in September 1970 and was completed in September 1978. 47. COUGAR LAKE, OR Location. At mile 4.4 on South Fork McKenzie River which joins McKenzie River about 56.5 miles above its confluence with Willamette River. Project is about 42 miles east of Eugene, OR. Existing project. A rockfill dam with an impervious earth core, about 1,738 feet long at crest and 445 feet high above the streambed. Reservoir is 6 miles long with storage capacity at full pool of 219,000 acre-feet and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 210 square miles. Spillway is on right abutment and outlet and power tunnels in left abutment. Outlet tunnel is provided with a chute and stilling basin. Powerplant consists of two 12,500 kilowatt units with minimum provisions for installing a third unit of 35,000 kilowatts for future peaking capacity. Improvement functions as a unit in coordinated system of reservoirs for multiple-purpose development of water resources in Willamette River Basin. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service. Also authorized (but unconstructed) is a reregulating dam, Strube Lake, below Cougar Lake which would permit Cougar to operate as a peaking powerplant. The Strube dam would contain two units totalling 4,600 kilowatts. Construction of project initiated June 1956 is complete, excluding Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit for which planning is essentially complete. Also, plans and specifications for the first construction contract (relocations) have been completed. Generating units 1 and 2 were placed in commercial operation March 23 and February 4, 1964, respectively. Physical in-service date for flood control was November 29, 1963. Through September 1982 power generation totaled 2.5 billion kilowatthours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $11,758,550 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Estimated Federal cost of Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit is $110,000,000 (full funding). Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year, 156,844,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project, of which 153,201,000 kilowatthours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Cougar Lake on South Fork McKenzie River are shown on Table 37-K. 48. DETROIT LAKE, OR Location. On North Santiam River with dam 50 miles from mouth 45 miles southeast of Salem, OR North Santiam River flows north and west for 85 miles, and unites with South Santiam River to form Santiam River, which 10 miles downstream enters Willamette River 108 miles above its mouth. Existing project. One main dam and a reregulating dam, both with power-generating facilities. Detroit Dam is a concrete gravity structure about 1,522 feet long and 454 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to roadway deck. Spillway is a gate-controlled overflow section, and outlet works are gate-controlled conduits through dam. Powerhouse with two units having a capacity of 50,000 kilowatts each is in right abutment immediately below dam. Reservoir has a storage capacity at full pool of 454,900 acre-feet and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 438 square miles. It is being operated as a unit in coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette Valley from floods, to increase low water flows in interest of navigation and irrigation, to generate power, and for other purposes. Reregulating dam 3 miles downstream at Big Cliff site is concrete gravity type, about 191 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to roadway deck. Power installation consists of one unit with a capacity of 18,000 kilowatts. Reservoir has a storage capacity of 5,930 acre-feet at full pool. Project is a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Willamette Basin. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service, Oregon State Park System and the town of Detroit. Construction of project begun in May 1947 was completed December 1960. The two powerhouse generating units were placed in commercial operation June and October 1953. At Big Cliff powerhouse, single generating unit was placed on-line June 1954. Use of Big Cliff Dam for reregulating fluctuating flow from Detroit units was effected October 1953. Through September 1982 power generation totaled 14.0 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by BonnevillePower Administration, $16,037,300 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 466,499,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project of which 464,033,000 kilowatthours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by the Detroit Lake project on North Santiam River are shown in Table 37-K. 49. GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OR Location. At approximate mile 5.5 on Middle Santiam River which joins South Santiam River about 56.8 miles above its confluence with Willamette River. Dam is about 30 miles southeast of Albany in Linn County, OR. Existing project. One main dam and a reregulating dam, both with power-generating facilities. Green Peter Dam is a concrete gravity structure, 1,400 feet long and 37-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 385 feet high above the lowest point of the general foundation with a gate-controlled spillway. Outlet works consist of two conduits through spillway, discharging into a stilling basin. Powerplant, on right bank adjacent to spillway stilling basin, consists of two units with an installed capacity of 80,000 kilowatts. Reservoir provides storage capacity at full pool of 430,000 acre-feet, extending 6.5 miles up Quartzville Creek and some 7.5 miles up Middle Santiam River above creek junction, forming a Y-shaped pool. Reservoir controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 277 square miles. Foster Dam, 7 miles downstream from Green Peter Dam is located on South Santiam River about 38 miles above its confluence with Santiam River and 1.5 miles below its confluence with Middle Santiam River. Foster Dam consists of an earth, gravel, and rock-filled embankment, 146 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation and a concrete gravity gate-controlled spillway and stilling basin for a total length of 4,800 feet. Power installation consists of two units with a capacity of 20,000 kilowatts. Foster Lake has a storage capacity, at full pool, of 61,000 acre-feet. Project functions as a unit in coordinated system of reservoirs for multiple-purpose development of water resources in Willamette River Basin. All construction on Green Peter-Foster Lakes project initiated June 1961 is completed. Green Peter Lake was placed in operation for useful flood control June 1967 as a unit of coordinated reservoir system for protection of the Willamette River Basin. First power-generation unit was placed on the line June 9, 1967 and second, June 28, 1967. Use of Foster Lake for reregulating fluctuating flows from Green Peter units was effective December 1967. First power generation unit was placed on-line August 22, 1968 and second, September 6, 1968. Through September 1982 power generation totaled 5.1 billion kilowatthours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $26,322,250 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. During the fiscal year 296,067,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project of which 294,277,000 kilowatthours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Green Peter Lake project on Middle Santiam River are shown in Table 37-K. 50. HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR Location. On the Middle Fork, Willamette River, 47.8 miles from mouth and 26.5 miles upstream from Lookout Point Dam. Middle Fork, Willamette River rises on west slope of Cascade Range and flows northwesterly to its junction with Coast Fork, Willamette River. Dam is about 45 miles southeast from Eugene, OR. Existing project. An earth-and-gravel-fill dam about 2,150 feet long at the crest and 338 feet above lowest point of the general foundation. A gate-controlled concrete gravity chute-type spillway is in right abutment. Diversion tunnel, outlet tunnel and power tunnel are in same abutment. Powerhouse with two 15,000 kilowatt units is located next to spillway. Hills Creek Lake is about 8.5 miles long and provides storage capacity at full pool of 356,000 acre-feet. Project controls runoff of drainage area of 389 square miles and is an integral unit of comprehensive plan for development of water resources of Willamette River Basin. Hills Creek Lake and Lookout Point Lake are operated as a unit for control of floods and generation of power on Middle Fork Willamette River. These projects, in conjunction with Dexter reregulating dam and Fall Creek Lake flood control system, will effectively control floods on Middle Fork and provide maximum efficient generation of hydroelectric power. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service. Construction of project, initiated May 1956, was completed June 1963. The project was placed in service for useful flood control in November 1961. On May 2, 1962, the two power generation units were placed on-line. Through September 1982 power generation totaled 3.1 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $12,343,700 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Ordinary operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 177,676,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power were generated, of which 177,087,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Hills Creek Lake on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-K. 51. JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAMLAKE UMATILLA, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River about 3 miles downstream from mouth of John Day River and about 215 miles above mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladders, and appurtenant facilities with a slackwater lake about 75 miles long extending to McNary Lock and Dam. Included is relocation of railroads, highways, utilities, and communities affected by the impoundment. The project as originally authorized would have provided 2,000,000 acre-feet of flood control storage. As modified, the project provides 500,000 acre-feet of flood control storage between elevations 257 and 268. The structure is 5,900 feet in length and stands about 161 feet above streambed. Powerhouse has space for 20 generating units of 135,000 kilowatts each; 16 units have been installed for a present capacity of 2,160,000 kilowatts. Principal project data are set forth in Table 37-N. A detailed description of project as authorized and modified is on pages 1992 and 1993 of Annual Report for 1962 under the Walla Walla District. Construction began July 1958 and the project was opened to navigation April 1968. The main dam contract is complete. Fingerling bypass construction is scheduled to start mid-1983. Rehabilitation work begun in FY 1980 is essentially complete. Entire project is estimated to be 99 percent complete. Through September 1982 Power 37-20 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Generation totaled 148.0 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration $158,275,400 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Estimated Federal cost of new work is $519,333,000 (full funding), consisting of $519,000,000 Corps of Engineers and $333,000 for Coast Guard navigation aids. Estimated Federal cost for major rehabilitation is $7,200,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Completed service building and continued fish and wildlife studies for fingerling bypass. Rehabilitation: Navigation lock work was completed. Code 710: Initiated preliminary design and a draft cost-sharing agreement with city of Umatilla for Umatilla Old Town Site. Operation and maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 11,702,680,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power were generated by the 16 generating units of which 11,686,381,000 kilowatthours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Traffic through the navigation lock, consisting of petroleum products, grains, and miscellaneous cargo, amounted to 8,427,244 tons during calendar year 1981. 52. LOOKOUT POINT LAKE, OR Location. On Middle Fork, Willamette River at Meridian site, 21.3 miles from mouth. Middle Fork, Willamette River, rises in Lane County on western slope of Cascade Range and flows northwesterly to its junction with Coast Fork, which is head of main stem Willamette River. Dam is about 22 miles southeast from Eugene, OR. Existing project. A main dam at Meridian site and a reregulating dam 3 miles 'downstream at Dexter site. Both dams are earth-and-gravel-fills with concrete spillways and have power generating facilities. Main dam is 258 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to deck and is 3,381 feet long at crest forming a reservoir 14.2 miles long providing storage of 456,000 acre-feet at full-pool level. Reservoir controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 991 square miles. Spillway, 274 feet long, is a gate-controlled overflow type, forming right abutment. Outlet works consisting of slide-gate-controlled conduits pass through spillway section. Powerhouse has three main generating units with a capacity of 120,000 kilowatts. Reregulating dam has a maximum height of 107 feet above lowest point of the general foundation and is 2,765 feet long at crest, forming a full pool of 27,500 acre-feet extending upstream to main dam and providing pondage to regulate Lookout Point powerhouse water releases to a uniform discharge. Spillway consists of a gate-controlled overflow section 509 feet long forming right abutment. Flow regulation is accomplished by use of spillway gates and releases through powerhouse, which contains one 15,000-kilowatt unit. Lookout Point and Dexter Lakes are operated as a single unit of a coordinated system of reservoirs to protect Willamette River Valley against floods, to provide needed hydroelectric power, and to increase low water flows for navigation, irrigation, and other purposes. Existing project authorized as a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Willamette River Basin. Construction of project initiated May 1947 was completed June 1961, except for construction of additional recreation facilities to be funded from Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Future recreation facilities will be provided in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane County. At Lookout Point powerhouse, generating units 1, 2 and 3 were placed in commercial operation December 1954, February 1955, and April 1955, respectively. At Dexter powerhouse the single unit was placed on-line May 1955. Use of Dexter Lake for reregulating fluctuating flows from Lookout Point units was effected in December 1954. Through September 1982 power generation totaled 11.2 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $45,961,600 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Lane County Parks is participating in a multiple project cost-sharing (50 percent) contract for many of the existing parks at four projects, including Lookout Point-Dexter. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 463,286,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 461,911,000 kilowatthours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Lookout Point Lake project on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-K. 53. LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. On upper Rogue River at mile 153.6 about 30 miles northeasterly from Medford, OR. Existing project. A rock and gravel-fill embankment dam about 327 feet high from streambed to crest, with an overall length of 3,750 feet with an impervious earth core and a gate-controlled concrete spillway. Powerhouse is on right abutment and houses two Francis-type turbines with installed capacity of 24,500 kilowatts each. Regulating outlet facility with provisions for temperature regulation for releases in interest of fishery enhancement is also on right bank. Reservoir 10 miles long provides 315,000 acre-feet of usable storage. Project provides control of runoff of drainage area of 674 square miles. In addition to hydroelectric power generation, project provides flood control, irrigation, future municipal and industrial (M&I) water supply, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control and recreation benefits. Federal cost of new work is $135,863,450. Construction of project initiated July 1967 is complete. Generating units 1 and 2 were placed in commercial operation July 6 and July 13,1977, respectively. Physical in-service date for flood control was February 18, 1977. Final environmental statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in June 1972. Through September 1982 power generation totaled 1.4 billion 37-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $5,953,350 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local -cooperation. Authorizing act required that local agencies furnish assurances prior to construction that demands will be made for future use of water supply storage within a period that will permit repayment of costs, including interest, allocated to water supply within life of the project; that State of Oregon take action, prior to construction to insure maintenance in stream of flows to be released for fishery; in addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in manner and to an extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies; and costs allocated to power will be repaid on a system basis by revenue from sales of power in Pacific Northwest Federal system by Bonneville Power Administration. A survey in September, 1980 of M&I water supply needs showed nine communities with water supply needs. A contract for M&I supply has been completed with one of the communities. Assurances for municipal and industrial water supply were obtained from six communities in Rogue River Valley. On February 26, 1966 Oregon State Department of Fish and Wildlife agreed to operate Rogue River hatchery for mitigation and enhancement of fish. The hatchery became operational in 1972. A cost allocation has been developed by the Portland District and forwarded to higher authority for all of the purposes for which water is used which includes power, flood control, fishery enhancement, M&I water supply, irrigation and recreation. Operations during fiscal year. During fiscal year 295,824,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 293,429,000 kilowatthours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Lost Creek Lake on Rogue River are shown in Table 37-K. 54. THE DALLES LOCK AND DAMLAKE CELILO, WA AND OR Location. On Columbia River at head of pool behind Bonneville Dam, about 192 miles above mouth of river and 88 miles east of Portland, OR. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, and appurtenant facilities. Improvement provides for navigation and hydroelectric power generation. Dam is designed for a normal pool at elevation 160 feet at mean sea level. Normal pool forms a reservoir extending upstream about 23 miles providing slackwater to John Day Dam site. The Dalles Dam is 8,700 feet long and consists of a rock, gravel, and sand river closure section from Oregon shore connecting to a nonoverflow section which in turn joins powerhouse, then concrete non-overflow sections connecting spillway with powerhouse and spillway with navigation lock at right abutment on Washington shore. Fish-passing facilities including two ladders and a fish lock are provided. Powerhouse was constructed for 14 units initially and substructure for eight additional units, an ultimate total of 22 units. Initial installation, excluding two 13,500 kilowatt fishwater units, is 1,092,000 kilowatts. With eight units installed for a capacity of 687,800 kilowatts, the 22 unit total is 1,808,000 kilowatts. Structures are founded on Columbia River basalt. Principal data concerning lock, spillway, and powerhouse are.set forth in Table 37-N. Major construction of project initiated February 1952, was completed October 196), when unit No. 14 was placed in commercial operation. Initial contract for additional units 15-22 was awarded in September 1967. Additional 8-unit phase was completed when unit 22 was placed in commercial operation in November 1973. Remaining work consists of improvement of fish facilities. Construction of future recreational facilities is contingent upon a cost-sharing contract with a non-Federal sponsor. Studies for adding power generation facilities to the North Shore Fish Ladder Auxiliary Water Supply System were initiated in October 1979 and completed in December 1980. These facilities would provide baseload generation (3.5 megawatts) and would not impact the present operation of the North Fish Ladder. Seufert Visitor Center was completed in September 1980. Through September 1982 power generation totaled 168.8 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $201,059,050 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required except for non- Federal cost-sharing for development of Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 8,910,642,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 8,890,436,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Traffic through the navigation lock, consisting of petroleum products, grains and miscellaneous cargo amounted to 8,603,285 tons during calendar year 1981. General Investigations 55. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $2,021,627 of which $874,600 was for navigation studies, $1,054,839 for flood damage prevention studies, $20,459 for comprehensive studies, and $34,284 for coordination with other agencies, and review of authorized projects, $37,445. 56. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Inspection of dams program was completed in FY 1982 with costs of $2,951. International water studies. The Columbia River Treaty between Canada and the United States of America relating to cooperative Development of the Water Resources of the Columbia River Basin was signed at Washington, D.C., on January 17,1961, and the exchange of ratifications took place on September 16, 1964. Implementation of the Treaty by the United States and Canada entities under the guidance of the Permanent Engineering Board has continued. The two permanent committees established by the entities, the Operating 37-22 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Committee and the Hydrometeorological Committee, continue to function. Costs for support of both committee activities were $15,000 for the fiscal year. Flood plain management services. Flood Plain Management Services Program comes under Section 206 of the 1960 Flood Control Act, PL 86-645, as amended. Through technical services and planning guidance, the program encourages comprehensive flood plain management planning at all levels to reduce the potential for losses to life and property from floods. Federal and non- Federal agencies and the private sector are assisted with planning and development information for flood hazard areas. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, Federal Insurance Program requirements, and Executive Order 11988 guidelines. Such assistance may include factual flood information (available or determined) and interpretation on flood frequencies, extent of flooding, flood-water velocity, duration of flooding and floodway limits. Services accomplished during fiscal year. Technical services and planning guidance responses furnished totaled 825. Of this total, 80 were from other Federal agencies; 270 from non-Federal agencies; and 475 from individuals, realtors, corporations, lending institutions, engineers, architects, and others. Cost for providing these services during FY 1982 totaled $199,454. Hydrologic studies. Environmental and ecological aspects are being considered on all hydrologic studies. Improvements in procedures to determine reservoir temperatures, nitrogen supersaturation, dissolved oxygen, suspended sediment, turbidity, design floods, flood forecasting and flood regulation are a continuing program. Costs for hydrologic studies during the fiscal year were $4,130. Total costs for collection and study of basic data for fiscal year 1982 were $221,535. 57. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING" Bonneville Navigation Lock, OR and WA. The proposed project would provide for a new lock just south of the existing lock on the Oregon shore and will have dimensions of 86 feet wide, 675 feet long and 15.0 feet deep over the sill. Work on the General Design Memorandum and a feature Memo (Relocation) was initiated in FY 1982 and are 23 percent and 17 percent complete, respectively. Total costs to September 30, 1982 are $1,757,202. Estimated Federal project cost is $177,018,000 (October 1982); Corps of Engineers, $177,000,000 and U.S. Coast Guard, $18,000. 58. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Chetco River, OR. The modification to the existing project was authorized by Public Law 97-88, December 4, 1981. Plan of improvement would deepen the existing navigation channel and turning basin by two feet to a depth of 16 feet MLLW and extend the existing jetty system 750 feet for the north and 1,250 feet for the south jetty. (For details relating to previous project, see Section 2.) Work on the General Design Memorandum was initiated in FY 1982 and is 95 percent complete. Total costs were $203,188. Estimated project cost (full funding), is $8,353,000; Corps of Engineers $8,250,000; U.S. Coast Guard, $2,000; Non-Federal, $101,000. Johnson Creek, OR. Project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1950. Plan of improvement provides for channel clearing, rectification and enlargement to increase flow capacities and various reaches from the mouth through the city of Gresham, a distance of about 17 miles. (For further details see page 37-12 of Annual' Report for 1981.) The completion of AE&D has been delayed since it has become apparent that Metro (formerly Metropolitan Service District) has encountered opposition from local interests with their planning efforts. Metro public awareness program was terminated in April 1982 when Federal grant ended and Metro lacked resources to continue the program. Hydrology and economic studies were initiated with FY 1982 funding and formulation studies regarding possible solutions to flood problems considered. Plan formulation would be undertaken only if sponsorship is assured. All items would be coordinated with similar work to be accomplished by Metro and are predicated upon future political actions and considerations both locally and in State legislature. Planning is approximately 56 percent complete. Fiscal year costs including Construction, General appropriation were $46,779 for total cost to September 30, 1982 of $169,309. Total estimated project cost (October 1982) is $8,000,000 $5,310,000 Federal and $2,690,000 non-Federal. Siuslaw River and Bar, OR. The proposed modification to the existing project was authorized by Public Law 96-367, October 1, 1980. Plan of improvement provides for extending the north and south jetties by 1,900 and 2,300 feet respectively. The jetty extensions would terminate at approximately the minus 25-foot contour. Spur jetties should be constructed on each jetty extension to prevent longshore currents from transporting material around the heads of the jetties. Each spur jetty should be about 400 feet long and originate approximately 900 feet shoreward of the jetty head. The north jetty spur should be oriented 45 degrees to the north of the existing jetty alignment and the south jetty spur 45 degrees to the south of the jetty alignment. (For details relating to previous project, see Section 19.) General Design Memorandum was completed in FY 1982 for costs of $107,637, including Construction, General appropriation, and total cost to September 30,1982 of $303,741. Total estimated project cost is $41,395,000; $41,100,000 Corps of Engineers, $249,000, non-Federal, and $46,000, U.S. Coast Guard. 37-23 TABLE 37-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep. 30, 1982 1. Bandon Small Boat Basin, Coquille, OR 2. Chetco River, OR 3. Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA 5. Columbia River Between Chinook, WA, and Head of Sand Island 6. Columbia River at The Mouth, OR and WA 7. Columbia River Between Vancouver, WA and The Dalles, OR 8. Coos Bay, OR (Federal Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost 33,000 24,092 54,000 67,189 15,000 438,691 15,101 111,798 576,314 249,404 -- - - 2,043,7131 -- - - 2,043,7131 210,000 218,000 438,000 515,000 2,904,174 210,607 220,562 414,518 536,070 2,901,016 -- - - 28,349,3042 -- - - 28,349,3042 4, 346,800 49,893,300 10,007,000 9,027,100 172,847,1263 4,604,694 25,420,498 28,326,565 14,286,451 171,592,5593 -- - - 665,9544 -- - - 665,9544 -- - - 941,252 -- - - 941,252 209,000 179,000 208,497 129,258 80,000 114,461 92,000 107,273 34,900 317,000 158,000 847,000 35,405 317,040 148,446 229,649 -20,000 18,000 250,000 11,524 17,000 198,546 3,394,058 3,008,000 5,326,000 3,443,183 2,976,030 4,768,601 100,000 -35,955 4,075,000 4,583,878 - 3,105,000 - 3,089,332 2,123,374 2,122,171 220,2835 220,2835 2,641,541 2,013,965 17,557,7616 17,369,3526 60,257,1597 60,156,8837 7,145,878 7,130,210 - 5,989,5098 - 5,989,5098 366,000 560,736 485,000 601,075 342,500 622,000 206,000 352,115 615,974 216,968 -53,608 1,801 9,797,5489 9,797,1349 - 29,750,09210 - 29,750,09210 3,476,000 3,355,000 2,737,200 4,566,000 3,473,667 3,304,736 2,701,903 3,632,308 45,906,74811 44,878,45611 - 2,335,966 - 2,335,966 37-24 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep. 30, 1982 (Contributed Funds) 9. Coos and Millicoma Rivers, OR 10. Coquille River, OR 11. Depoe Bay, OR 12. Lewis River, WA 13. Multnomah Channel, OR 15. Nehalem Bay, OR 16. Port Orford, OR 18. Rogue River Harbor at Gold Beach, OR New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost 79,680 79,680 73,000 171,800 124,483 125,524 33,000 24,142 308,000 309,022 4,000 3,314 15,500 32,658 11,667 14,120 67,000 130,000 109,343 132,768 53,000 292,000 383,000 52,855 230,454 438,165 26,000 165,000 26,471 140,925 1,500 2,804 3,500 2,468 30,000 270,000 26,572 234,328 -6,000 18,224 1,419 15,036 54,136 486,680 486,680 350,23812 350,23812 1,227,999 1,226,724 693,366'a 693,36613 3,925,94414 3,918,57014 367,364 367,364 580,764 580,087 58,13215 58,13215 687,44716 687,35316 419,558 419,558 302,00617 302,00617 44,760 44,760 - 160,000 2,232,000 9,020,000 - 156,584 2,201,795 8,648,997 76,100 77,382 70,000 70,649 60,500 179,000 56,486 175,849 11,412,000 11,007,376 758,69218 758,69218 1,251,728 1,244,258 - 4,156,25219 - 4,156,25219 425,000 685,700 399,000 755,000 382,785 599,711 552,841 718,623 5,542,52020 5,498,83420 635,783 635,783 37-25 TABLE 37-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep. 30, 1982 19. Siuslaw River, OR New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost 20. Skamokawa Creek, New Work WA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 21. Skipanon Channel, New Work - 1,159,35721 - 1,159,35721 654,000 385,000 943,000 1,088,000 651,792 384,838 909,802 1,122,756 22,000 20,686 WA Approp. - Cost - Maint. Approp. 104,500 Cost 116,997 22. Tillamook Bay and New Work Bar, OR Approp. 3,641,000 Cost 3,629,119 Maint. Approp. 48,500 Cost 48,122 Rehab. Approp. - Cost - 23. Umpqua River, OR New Work Approp. 5,000,000 Cost 4,986,139 Maint. Approp. 745,000 Cost 743,274 Major Rehab. Approp. - Cost - 24.' Willamette River New Work Above Portland and Approp. - Yamhill River, OR Cost - Maint. Approp. 59,000 Cost 28,416 25. Willamette River at New Work Willamette Falls, Approp. - OR Cost - Maint. Approp. 330,000 Cost 312,095 35,000 35,799 15,000 3,713 -10,000 59 66,000 487,000 177,000 67,244 304,010 357,460 -5,399 8,868 66,500 69,269 230,000 229,073 8,037,64322 8,034,02022 879,285 879,285 2,400 2,400 294,799 292,917 280,854 280,854 1,592,407 1,589,572 - 22,434,82723 - 22,434,82723 67,000 2,550,48324 60,312 2,542,59724 - 2,839,799 - 2,839,799 10,150,000 10,157,855 964,500 956,832 15,000 -170,736 650,000 602,890 -100,000 18,076 1,201,000 1,167,055 17,768,87725 17,695,21125 18,607,305 18,514,676 - 2,500,677 - 2,500,677 - 862,91826 - 862,91826 83,000 107,520 47,000 54,802 10,000 11,359 17,638,05627 17,636,61627 520,00531 520,00531 1,150,200 1,172,411 526,000 625,000 515,060 631,011 11,713,82332 11,706,24932 37-26 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep. 30, 1982 26. Winchester Bay, Umpqua River, OR 27. Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR 28. Yaquina River, OR 29. Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR 30. Blue River Lake, OR 31. Cottage Grove Lake, OR 32. Days Creek Lake, OR 33. Dorena Lake, OR 34. Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR 35. Fall Creek Lake, OR Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 234,794 234,794 27,000 24,406 65,000 37,678 60,000 533,0 80,685 78,1 461,000 287,000 420,000 737,0 458,823 291,721 408,591 741,9 )00 688,598 .48 224,515 - 19,242,046"8 - 19,242,04628 )00 14,473,50729 )18 14,466,59429 12,005 12,005 28,800 28,800 7,000 6,043 21,000 107,720 23,500 159,000 19,547 16,413 27,450,000 33,130,000 5,784,480 27,444,201 33,078,782 5,866,394 - - 80,500 - - 75,849 3,600,000 2,658,965 410,700 405,951 751,74530 605,14730 91,281,089 90,303,254 491,200 481,800 - 32,038,22535 - 32,038,22535 88,000 87,642 9,000 27,130 82,300 82,210 25,000 24,904 107,000 100,028 255,000 254,267 142,700 115,732 9,025 9,874 431,900 416,000 509,000 531,480 557,563 407,342 507,201 472,734 60,000 69,833 9,500 9,500 -417 17,000 16,150 455 33,000 32,323 -3 42 450,000 96,831 160,000 202,000 251,000 260,500 159,378 202,962 247,184 225,543 51,000 162,643 30,000 94,332 24,450 87,739 14 4,084 1,148,391 1,113,800 4,013,12336 4,013,12336 5,436,98037 5,362,77437 1,098,77738 1,098,77738 14,567,06239 14,212,36639 3,036,974 2,997,584 8,550 1,495,000 10,513,079 23,072 1,460,877 10,448,244 - - 22,118,26440 916 14 22,118,26440 37-27 TABLE 37-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep. 30, 1982 Maint. Approp. 307,000 491,000 261,000 Cost 315,162 478,862 297,580 36. Fern Ridge Lake, OR New Work Approp. -56,984 4,786 10,000 Cost -50,339 3,140 12,817 Maint. Approp. 385,000 669,000 519,000 Cost 390,985 479,303 705,536 40. Lower Columbia New Work River Basin Bank Approp. 1,329,000 1,035,000 810,000 Protection, OR & WA Cost 1,416,725 979,961 721,022 41. Scappoose Drainage New Work District, OR Approp. 40,000 1,659 50,000 Cost 93,501 23,471 8,759 43. Wahkiakum County New Work Consolidated Diking Approp. 107,725 250,000 - District No. 1, WA Cost 1,429,213 194,681 36,201 45. Willamette River New Work Basin Bank Protec- Approp. 1,558,275 172,550 1,935,000 tion, OR Cost 1,626,146 179,958 1,931,497 Maint. Approp. 225,000 75,000 93,000 Cost 218,823 84,498 87,657 46. Bonneville Lock and New Work Dam-Lake Bonneville, Approp. 131,400,000 148,336,000 84,232,000 OR and WA Cost 131,713,437 148,464,079 84,275,102 Maint. Approp. 5,146,900 5,103,000 5,560,000 Cost 4,873,077 5,293,379 5,207,930 47. Cougar Lake, OR New Work Approp. 900,000 -59,251 - Cost 877,210 106,449 12,353 Maint. Approp. 474,000 526,000 508,000 Cost 484,863 424,205 591,598 48. Detroit Lake, OR New Work Approp. - - - Cost - - - Maint. Approp. 925,000 942,500 1,190,000 Cost 960,857 971,951 1,183,361 Minor Rehab. Approp. - - - Cost - - - 49. Green Peter-Foster New Work Lakes, OR Approp. - - - Cost - - - Maint. Approp. 1,317,000 1,185,000 1,547,500 Cost 1,353,089 1,187,043 1,501,227 50. Hills Creek Lake, New Work OR Approp. - - - Cost - - - 308,000 261,448 188,975 171,983 510,700 423,165 550,000 690,173 26,867 300,000 317,775 1,150,000 1,054,893 50,000 43,024 25,417,000 25,151,114 6,440,800 5,652,065 -12 86 555,700 523,511 3,045,365 2,988,032 8,526,9354' 8,509,9014' 6,733,93342 6,642,20042 12,424,745 12,403,208 3,992,558" 3,957,321 5,290,833 5,280,139 21,547,316;4 21,448,02414 3,050,944 3,038,523 687,284,6044: 686,922,4784: 91,092,60744 89,780,84544 58,621,39345 58,621,39345 6,116,816 6,064,813 - 62,729,698 - 62,729,698 1,206,600 1,142,679 17,972,767 17,889,340 - 363,086 - 363,086 - 84,005,78846 - 84,005,78846 1,310,800 1,236,338 13,437,984 13,302,349 - 45,700,619 - 45,700,619 37-28 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep. 30, 1982 Maint. Approp. 255,000 354,500 360,000 510,600 4,831,367 Cost 254,011 355,031 320,090 447,630 4,726,170 51. John Day Lock and New Work Dam-Lake Umatilla, Approp. 350,984 441,000 1,009,000 2,143,000 482,846,2464' OR and WA Cost 406,356 272,902 1,252,292 1,737,709 482,426,0904' Maint. Approp. 5,019,700 7,740,000 6,199,500 7,795,000 54,825,60548 Cost 4,904,842 5,664,016 7,573,634 7,056,756 53,162,51048 Major Rehab. Approp. - 2,255,000 4,300,000 645,000 7,200,000 Cost - 2,207,522 4,339,347 502,806 7,049,675 52. Lookout Point New Work Lake, OR Approp. - - 10,000 - 88,238,395'9 Cost - - 9,968 32 88,238,39549 Maint. Approp. 1,673,000 1,798,000 1,746,000 1,911,900 25,161,450 Cost 1,839,412 1,769,206 1,695,300 1,697,620 24,850,322 53. Lost Creek Lake, New Work Rogue River Approp. 3,525,000 655,000 -8,550 - 135,863,450 Basin,-OR Cost 3,092,415 980,866 -218,984 85,018 135,339,763 Maint. Approp. 1,200,000 1,443,500 1,908,000 1,620,000 7,646,500 Cost 1,229,140 1,409,880 1,722,303 1,761,302 7,563,696 54. The Dalles Lock and New Work Dam-Lake Celilo, Approp. 26,000 1,976,000 -85,480 - 301,064,28850 WA and OR Cost 130,239 1,636,272 254,888 301 301,064,2885o Maint. Approp. 3,894,000 4,484,000 5,317,000 4,196,000 55,265,84851 Cost 3,872,539 4,374,992 4,877,000 4,151,104 54,542,80151 1. Excludes $17,742 contributed funds for new work. 2. Includes $1,529,413"for previous project. 3. Includes $150,955 allotted from deferred maintenance funds, Code 700, $62,296 for public works accelerated program repair, and $1,214,865 for previous project. Excludes $24,320 expended from contributed funds prior to 1964. 4. Excludes $31,636 contributed by city of Astoria and Bumble Bee Sea Foods, Astoria, Oregon (not part of regular project.) Includes $223,026 expended from contributed funds prior to 1964 and $428,137 contributed by Port of Portland and $14,792 by Port of Vancouver. 5. Includes $84,930 rehabilitation funds. 6. Includes $1,986,253 for previous project and $608,111 allotted and $419,702 expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. Excludes $500,000 contributed funds. 7. Includes $2,186,000 for previous project and $1,188,625 under deferred maintenance, Code 700. 8. Includes funds under Code 721 (small authorized projects) $30,393 Entrance to Oregon Slough; $161,897 Camas- Washougal Turning Basin; $227,908 Hood River Small Boat Basin; $157,470 Bingen, Wash., Barge Channel; and $140,619 The Dalles Small Boat Basin. 9. Includes $2,033,408 under Code 700 (Deferred Maintenance). 10. Includes $802,096 for previous project. Excludes contributed funds. 11. Includes $178,801 for previous project and $1,444,640 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. Excludes $8,387 contributed funds. 12. Excludes $80,000 (other funds) contributed for new work by Port of Coos Bay to cover additional cost of disposing of dredge spoils in Coos Bay, OR; includes $8,000 for previous project. 13. Includes $340,726 for previous project. Excludes $72,891 contributed funds. Includes $36,000 under Code 711. 14. Includes $41,467 for previous project and $78,500 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. 15. Includes $22,252 for previous project. 16. Includes $8,098 for previous project. 17. Excludes $304,826 contributed funds. 18. Excludes $9,900 contributed funds. 19. Excludes $13,779 (other funds) contributed for additional landfill and extension of drainage lines. 20. Includes $20,750, Wedderburn Study Funds. 37-29 TABLE 37-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 21. Includes $151,701 for previous project. Excludes $322,532 expended from contributed funds. 22. Includes $10,611 for previous project and $188,000 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. 23. Includes $77,209 for previous project and $57,767 under Code 720 (Small Authorized Projects) Garibaldi Boat Basin. Excludes $592,622 contributed funds and $300,000 channel dredging by local interest. 24. Includes $71,498 for previous project. Excludes $6,450 expended from contributed funds. 25. Includes $39,242 for previous project and $58,824 under Code 720 (Small Authorized Projects) Winchester Bay and Schofield River, OR. Excludes $267,500 contributed funds. 26. Includes $247,748 for previous project. Excludes $484,900 Emergency Relief Administration flood control funds for bank protection. 27. Includes $51,500 deferred maintenance funds Code 700, and $35,935 for Public Works Acceleration program repair. In addition $7,500 for maintenance from contributed funds and $246,637 on operating and care of improvements under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation. 28. Includes $707,313 for previous project and $170,000 appropriated from public works acceleration program for north jetty rehabilitation. 29. Includes $6,026 for previous project. 30. Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. 31. Excludes $300,000 contributed funds. 32. Includes $452,110 on operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation and $150,000 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of . navigable waters. 33. Includes $424,310 for previous project. 34. Excludes $93,733 contributed funds. 35. Includes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. 36. Includes $1,639,828 allotted and $1,639,828 expended under Code 711, recreation facilites at completed project. 37. Includes $132,180 special recreation use fees. 38. Excludes $208,440 allotted and $208,440 expended for Phase I G.I. funds. 37-30 39. Includes $1,037,590 allotted and $682,894 expended under Code 711, recreation facilities at completed project. 40. Includes $259,650, Code 711, recreation facilities at completed project. Includes $766,614 allotted and expended under Code 713. 41. Includes $464,029 allotted; $446,995 expended, Code 711, $2,421,978 Code 712, and $1,008,666 under Code 713, recreation facilities at completed projects and $136,482 allotted under 721 (small authorized projec.t) reservoir modification. Excludes $2,100 (other funds contributed). 42. Includes $9,750 allotted under Code 700, deferred maintenance. 43. Includes $12,200,000 Public Works Administration funds, $20,240,700 National Recovery Act funds, $27,195,400 modification for peaking funds, $436,457 code 711, recreation facilities at completed project funds and $576,413,352 allotted and $576,051,226 expended second powerhouse funds. 44. Includes $540,000 deferred maintenance funds, Code 700 and $1,506,704 maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 45. Includes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. Includes $1,774,988 allotted and expended, for Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit. 46. Includes $113,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Sweet Home Lake. 47. Includes $25,984 under Code 713, recreation facilities at completed projects. 48. Includes $1,516,850 for O&M and fish evaluation of Spring Creek Hatchery (funds revoked and paid to USFWS at OCE level, but a cost to project); includes $403,800 special recreation use fees. Includes $747,994 allotted under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 49. Includes $457,611 allotted and expended under Code 713, recreation facilities at completed project. 50. Includes $985,318 Code 712, $138,682 Code 711, $16,747 Code 713, recreation facilities at completed project, and $52,997,220 allotted and expended additional units 15- 22 funds. 51. Includes $455,619 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. TABLE 37-B PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. July. 14, 1960 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 Dec. 4, 1981 3. Feb. 27, 1911 July 25, 1912 July 27, 1916 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 4, 19232 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 3, 1927 July 3, 1930 Sep. 6, 19333 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 BANDON SMALL BOAT BASIN, COQUILLE, OR A breakwater 413 feet in length, an entrance channel 100 feet wide, 250 feet long and 13 feet deep, an access channel 50 feet wide, 500 feet long, and 13 feet deep. CHETCO RIVER, OR To provide for the stabilization of the channel, by constructing jetties and dredging. Modification of channel entrance and channel improvements. Deepen channel 2 feet to 16 feet, extend the existing jetty system 750 feet for the North, and 1,250 feet for the South jetty. COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WA AND PORTLAND, OR 2 pipeline dredges and accessories. Increasing main channel to 30 feet. Consolidating improvement below Portland, OR, and between Vancouver, WA, and mouth of Willamette. For the Cathlamet channel. Construct an additional dredge (dredge was not built) and accessories for better maintenance, and construct contraction works. Channel from deep water in Willamette Slough to deep water in Columbia River. Depth of 25 feet and width of 300 feet from mouth of Willamette River to Vancouver, WA. Closing east channel at Swan Island in Willamette River on condition that main channel to be opened to project dimensions on west side of island by Port of Portland. For a 35-foot channel 500 feet wide from Portland to the sea. A channel 28 feet deep and 300 feet wide from mouth of Willamette River to Vancouver, with 2 turning basin, each generally 28 feet deep by 800 feet wide by 2,000 feet long. A channel in Columbia River from mouth of Willamette to interstate highway bridge at Vancouver, WA, 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with 2 turning basins at Vancouver. Maintenance of not to exceed 35-foot depth at low water in Portland Harbor and Willamette River between its mouth and Broadway Bridge at Portland. Auxiliary channels, 30 feet deep, 300 feet and 500 feet at St. Helens. Extension of lower turning basin at Vancouver, WA, 1,000 feet downstream. Section 107, P.L. 86-645, Approved by Chief of Engineers Nov. 18, 1981 H. Doc. 817, 77th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 21, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 10, 96th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 1278, 61st Cong., 3d Sess.' H. Doc. 1278, 61st Cong., 3d Sess.' No Prior Report. H. Doc. 120, 63d Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 1009, 66th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 156, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 126, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 195, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 71st Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 249, 72d Cong., 2d Sess.' Rivers and Harboxs Committee Doc. 1, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6 73d Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 235, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 81, 74th Cong., 2d Sess.' 37-31 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 37-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 11, 1933 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 5. June 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 6. Mar. 3, 1905 Sep. 3, 1954 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 An auxiliary channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide along waterfront at Rainier, OR. Improvement of old mouth of Cowlitz River. An auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview, WA. A small-boat mooring basin at Astoria, OR. A channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide from mouth of Willamette River to interstate highway bridge at Vancouver, WA, with 2 turning basins of same depth. A channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Vancouver, WA, to mouth of Columbia River; a turning basin at Vancouver, WA, a turning basin at Longview, WA, and a channel 40 feet deep in Willamette River from mouth to Broadway Bridge which encompasses Portland Harbor area. COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA Main channel. Main channel. West channel 8 feet deep. West channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin with protecting breakwaters. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK, WA AND HEAD OF SAND ISLAND Channel 8 feet deep. Channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin. COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR AND WA Extend South Jetty and construct North Jetty and dredging. Bar channel of 48-foot depth and spur jetty on north shore. 9 Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. COLUMBIA RIVER, BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA, AND THE DALLES, OR Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet from Vancouver, WA, to Bonneville, OR. Construct Camas-Washougal turning basin. Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet wide from Bonneville, OR, to The Dalles, OR. Construct a boat basin at Hood River, OR, 10 feet deep, 500 feet wide, by 1,300 feet long. Construct a barge channel at Bingen, WA, 10 feet deep, 200 feet wide, by 1 mile long, and an access H. Doc. 203, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 341, 77th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 630, 77th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 692, 79th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 203, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 452, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' Public Works Administration H. Doc. 44, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 443, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 95, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 50, 75th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 8, 83d Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 94, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 249, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.' Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Committee Doc. 94, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. 1 H. Doc. 218, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. 37-32 4. 7. TABLE 37-B (Continued) PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents July 24, 1946 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 Dec. 31, 1970 June 3, 1896 June 30, 1948 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Aug, 26, 1937 8. channel 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, by 1,000 feet long to natural mooring basin. Construct The Dalles Harbor 8 feet deep, 400 feet wide by 800 feet long. COOS BAY, OR Dredging the Ocean Bar Channel. A channel 22 feet deep to Smith's Mill. Restore North Jetty 9,600 feet long, construct a South Jetty about 3,900 feet long, extend 22-foot bay channel from Smith's Mill to Millington. Extend jetties to such lengths as may be practicable within estimate of total cost of jetties, $3,250,000 as given in H. Doc. 150, 67th Cong. A channel 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide, through Pigeon Point Reef, following a location along westerly side of bay. For 24-foot channel from Pigeon Point Reef to Smith's Mill and a turning basin above Marshfield. Increased dimensions of channel across bar and to Isthmus Slough and turning basin opposite Coalbank Slough and at city of North Bend; anchorage basins at mile 3.5 and near mile 7. A mooring basin and connecting channel at Charleston. Increase dimensions to provide for bar channel 45 feet deep, inner channel 35 feet deep to mile 15, and deepening and widening existing turning basins and anchorage area. COOS AND MILLICOMA RIVERS, OR Dredging channel from mouth to head of navigation. For a 5 ft. depth from mouth to head of navigation on the Millicoma River and South Fork. Except on South Fork above M. 14 where 3 ft. will suffice. COQUILLE RIVER, OR Dredging shoals between mouth and Riverton, and removing obstruction between mouth of North Fork and Bandon. For a 13-foot channel from ocean to Bandon. Deepen channel to 16 feet between sea and eastern end of North Jetty. Present project depth between sea and eastern end of North Jetty For 13-foot depth from sea to a point 1 mile above Coquille River Lighthouse and snagging to State Highway Bridge. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. DEPOE BAY, OR Construction of inner basin 375 feet long, 125 feet wide and 5 feet deep, with entrance channel of same depth and 50 feet wide. 37-33 S. Doc. 89, 79th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 958, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 325, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 150, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 320, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 110, 70th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d Sess.' S. Doc. 253, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 646, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 151, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 237, 53rd Cong., 3d Sess. S. Doc. 124, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 673, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 207, 65th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 186, 70th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Committee Print, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 672, 76th Cong., 2d Sess.' Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 202, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. 10. 11. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 37-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 3, 1897 Mar. 4, 1913 July 14, 1960 July 25, 1912 Oct. 27, 1965 Dec. 31, 1970 Sep. 3, 1954 June 25, 1910 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1958 Oct. 22, 1976 Oct. 1, 1980 Mar. 2, 1919 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 June 30, 1948 July 26, 1912 Mar. 4, 1913 12. Construction of inner basin 750 feet long, 390 feet wide and 8 feet deep, with entrance channel at same depth and 30 feet wide. LEWIS RIVER, WA Provide a channel to head of navigation. Increase the control depth and widen channel. MULTNOMAH CHANNEL, OR Extension of channel 10 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 2,950 feet long. Provides channel in Scappoose Bay 10 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 7,080 feet long. NEHALEM BAY, OR Two rubber-stone jetties. PORT ORFORD, OR Extension of existing breakwater by 550 feet. Dredging of turning basin 340 feet long, 100 feet wide, 16 feet deep. ROGUE RIVER HARBOR AT GOLD BEACH, OR Two jetties at entrance and improvement of channel. SIUSLAW RIVER, OR Extends North Jetty 3,700 feet from old work constructed under previous project and provides for 4,200 foot South Jetty. 12-foot deep channel. 18-foot bar channel and 16-foot river channel and a 600-foot extension of North Jetty. (600-foot extension classified deferred.) Phase I advance engineering and design for north and south jetty extensions. Extending north and south jetties about 2,000 and 2,500 feet, respectively. SKAMOKAWA CREEK, WA Channel 6.5 feet deep and 75 feet wide, a low water between Steamboat and Brooks Slough. SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR Channel from deep water in Columbia River to railroad bridge.' Channel extending upstream from railroad bridge a distance of 4,500 feet. Mooring basin 12 feet deep at Warrenton. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR Construct North Jetty 5,700 feet long and dredging channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, to Bay City. 37-34 H. Doc. 350, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 64, 55th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 28, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. Section 107, PL 86-645, Approved Chief of Engineers Dec 4, 1979. H. Doc. 623, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 62, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 151, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 83, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 648, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Committee Print, Serial, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 204, 85th Cong., 91st Sess.' Final Report of Chief of Engineers P.L. 96-367, Energy & Water Development Act of 1981 H. Doc. 63rd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 278, 70th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 201, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 95, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 349, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. 13. 15. 16. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 37-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 Sep. 3, 1954 24. June 3, 1896 June 3, 1896 July 25, 1912 July 3, 1930 June 26, 19346 Abandon that portion of project above Bay City. Abandon Bay City Channel and present project dimension of channels and turning basins with regulating works as needed. 4 Repair damage and check erosion on Bayocean Peninsula caused by storm Jan. 1939. Dredging small-boat basin and approach at Garibaldi, OR, to depth of 12 feet. Closure of breach in Bayocean Peninsula. Construct South Jetty, 8,000 feet long. UMPQUA RIVER, OR North Jetty, 7,500 feet long. Present project dimensions of North Jetty and dredging ocean bar. A short south jetty. A full length south jetty and maintenance dredging to a 26-foot depth. Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from mouth to Reedsport. Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from river channel to Gardiner, and turning basin 22 feet deep, 500 feet wide and 800 feet long. Channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel to dock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 10 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at inner end. Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel to dock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 12 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at inner end. Channel 12 feet deep, Scholfield River.5 WILLAMETTE RIVER ABOVE PORTLAND AND YAMHILL RIVER, OR Improvement of Willamette River above Oregon City. Improvement of Yamhill River by lock and dam construction. Project modified in 1904 by abandoning 20-mile stretch of river between Harrisburg and Eugene as unworthy of improvement. A 6-foot channel in Willamette River below Oregon City. For 8-foot channel between Portland and Oregon City. Operating and care of lock and dam at Yamhill River and provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. H. Doc. 760, 65th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 562, 68th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 35, 79th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 650, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 128, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.' S. Doc. 43, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 913, 65th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 320, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 317, 70th Cong., 1st Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 158, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.' S. Doc. 86, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 191, 77th Cong., 2d Sess.' S. Doc. 154, 80th Cong., 2d Sess.' S. Doc. 133, 81st Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 260, 54th Cong., 1st Sess. (Annual Report, 1896, p. 3300) Annual Report, 1895, p. 3602 Annual Report, 1904, p. 3529 H. Doc. 438, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 372, 71st Cong., 2d Sess.' 37-35 23. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 37-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents June 28, 19387 25. June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 June 26, 19346 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Mar. 4, 1913 29. Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 Streamflow regulation with controlling depths of 6 feet to mouth of Santiam River and 5 feet to Albany with enlargement of locks at Oregon City.8 Operation of Yamhill Lock was discontinued Feb. 7, 1954, and the lock and adjacent property turned over to Yamhill County Jan. 16, 1959. WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR For purchase and rehabilitation of system and construction of concrete division wall. Deepening of locks. Operation and care of canal and locks provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Construction of New Willamette Falls Locks.8 WINCHESTER BAY, UMPQUA RIVER, OR Channel 16 feet deep, 100 feet wide, changing to 75 feet wide by 12 feet deep in Winchester Bay; channel 100 feet wide, 16 feet deep, 4,100 feet long to turning basin 160 feet wide, 16 feet deep and 200 feet long in west basin. YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR Restoration and extension of jetties constructed under previous projects, rock removal at entrance, and dredging in bay up to railroad terminus at Yaquina. Extension of north jetty seaward 1,000 feet. 26-foot channel of suitable width across entrance bar, so far as rock bottom will allow, a 20-foot channel 300 feet wide along south side of bay to and including a turning basin 22 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 1,200 feet long. Construct a small-boat mooring basin at Newport, OR. 40-foot bar channel and 30-foot river channel extension of jetties at entrance. A small boat basin, south shore. YAQUINA RIVER, OR Construction of channel 10 feet deep and generally 150 feet wide on Yaquina River and 200 feet wide in Depoe Creek. APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Authorizes a rockfill embankment dam. Authorizes construction of project but no operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. H. Doc. 554, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 202, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. and Annual Report, 1900, p. 4374 H. Doc. 1060, 62d Cong., 3rd Sess.' H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645 Approved by Chief of Engineers July 6, 1982. H. Doc. 109, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Committee Print, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 119, 77th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 246, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 8, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.' Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Approved Chief of Engineers, Mar. 4, 1977 R&H Act, H. Doc. 579, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 93-251, Water Resources Development Act of 1974. 37-36 26. 27. 28. TABLE 37-B (Continued) PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 30. BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 39. May 17, 1950 Mar. 16, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 7, 1974 Oct. 22, 1977 Mar. 16, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 7, 1970 May 17, 1950 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 16, 1938 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended May 17, 1950 40. 41. 43. May 17, 1950 June 22, 1936 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Authorizes gravel-filled embankment dam. COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR Earthfill dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. DAYS CREEK LAKE, OR Earthfill dam. (Phase I.) Authorized $250,000 to complete Phase I. DORENA LAKE, OR Earthfill dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. ELK CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Rock and gravel embankment dam. Authorizes construction but not operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. FALL CREEK LAKE, OR Earth and gravel fill embankment dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR Earthfill embankment dam. Raise height of dam to obtain additional storage. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, OR AND WA Bank protection work, improvements to existing projects, and construction of flood control works in Lower Columbia River Basin. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR AND WA Provides bank protection on Columbia River below river mile 125 and along principal tributaries. SCAPPOOSE DRAINAGE DISTRICT, OR Construction of levee system. Raising and strengthening of levee. WAHKIAKUM COUNTY CONSOLIDATED DIKING DISTRICT NO. 1, WA Raising and strengthening all levees encircling islands. Construct drainage canal, tide box and pumping plant. 37-37 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 544, 7th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 371, 92d Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 94-587, Water Resources Development Act. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 91-439, Public Works Approp. Act, 1971 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. F.C. Act 1936 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 37-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 44. Mar. 16, 1938 May 17, 1950 45. June 22, 1936 Mar. 16, 1938 May 17, 1950 46. Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 20, 1937 Mar. 7, 1974 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 16, 1938 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 May 26, 1960 May 17, 1950 WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OR Comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation and other purposes in Willamette River Basin. General improvements. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR Bank protection works, with channel clearing. Provide additional protection against flooding. Addition of 77 locations to scope of projects. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM-BONNEVILLE LAKE, OR AND WA Existing project was originally authorized Sep. 30, 1933, by Federal Emergency Administration of Public Works. Existing project authorized by Congress. Completion, maintenance, and operation of Bonneville Project under direction of Secretary of War and supervision of Chief of Engineers, subject to certain provisions therein relating to powers and duties of Bonneville Power Administrator. Authorizes relocation of town of North Bonneville to new town site. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. COUGAR LAKE, OR Rockfill dam. Addition of Power. Strube Lake reregulating dam. DETROIT LAKE, OR Authorizes concrete gravity structure. Addition of power and regulating dam with power. GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OR Authorized Green-Peter Dam in lieu of originally authorized Sweet Home Lake (1938). Addition of power at Green-Peter and White Bridge Reregulating Dam. Changes location of reregulating dam from White Bridge location to Foster. HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR Earth and gravel fill dam. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. F.C. Act 1936 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d Sess., (Report of Chief of Engineers Dated Aug. 21, 1933) P.L. 93-251, Water Resources Development Act. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 83-780 F.C. Act 1954 P.L. 87-874 F.C. Act 1962 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. P.L. 858, 80th Cong., 92d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 83-780 F.C. Act 1954 S. Doc. 104, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. 37-38 47. 48. 49. 50. TABLE 37-B (Continued) PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 51. JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM-LAKE UMATILLA, OR AND WA May 17, 1950 Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation and H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., power. 2d Sess. Mar. 24, 1965 John Day waterfowl management area. S. Doc. 28, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. Dec. 22, 1944 Construction, operation, and maintenance of Sec. 4, Flood Control as amended recreation facilities. Act of 1944 52. LOOKOUT POINT LAKE, OR Mar. 16, 1938 Earth-and-gravel filled dam. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. May 17, 1950 Addition of power. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Dec. 22, 1944 Construction, operation, and maintenance of Sec. 4, Flood Control as amended recreation facilities. Act of 1944 53. LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Sep. 21, 1962 Rock and gravel fill embankment dam, including H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., power. 2d Sess. Oct. 15, 1966 Authorizes construction of project but not operation P.L. 89-689, Public Works for irrigation until local interest agree to repay cost Approp. Act, 1967. allocated. 54. THE DALLES LOCK AND DAMLAKE CELILO, WA AND OR May 17, 1950 Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation and H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., power. 2d Sess. Dec. 22, 1944 Construction, operation, and maintenance of Sec. 4, Flood Control as amended recreation facilities. Act of 1944 'Contains latest Dublished mas. 5Inactive. 2Public Resolution 105, 67th Cong. 3Public Works Administration. 4Includes following work, classified inactive. A channel to Hobsonville 200 feet wide and 16 feet deep, with a turning basin 500 feet wide at Hobsonville, and regulating works as needed. 6Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 7Flood Control Act. 8Classified deferred. 9Spur Jetty "B" classified inactive. 37-39 TABLE 37-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1982 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance' Alsea River, OR Astoria Turning Basin, OR2 Bridges, Columbia River, Cascade Locks and Hood River, OR (Alteration) Cathlamet, WA2 Clatskanie River, OR3 Cowlitz River, WA Cushman-Mapleton Channels (Siuslaw River), OR2 Deep River, WA3 Depoe Bay, OR2 Elochoman Slough, WA3 Grays River, WA3 Hammond Small Boat Basin, OR2 Interstate Bridge, Columbia River, Portland, OR to Vancouver, WA (Alteration) Interstate Highway Bridge (Barge Channel), OR2 Lake River, WA Long Tom River, OR Mooring for Battleship Oregon, OR Multnomah Channel, OR3 Oregon Slough (North Portland Harbor), OR3 Salmon River, OR3 Smith River, OR South Slough (Charleston), OR2 The Cascades Canal, Columbia River, OR' � The Dalles-Celilo Canal, OR and WA" Umatilla Harbor, OR' 3 Westport Slough, OR3 Yaquina Bay and Harbor Small Boat Basin, OR2 Yaquina River, OR2 Youngs and Klaskanine River, OR Youngs Bay and Youngs River, OR3 Completed - 2.000 - Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Abandoned Abandoned Abandoned Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1977 1944 1971 1969 1980 1975 1963 1971 1971 1941 1977 1961 1963 1981 1949 1963 1949 1974 1970 1939 1957 1952 1966 1979 1971 1979 870,139 1,081,806 171,467 19,2404 277,4367 329,423 15,384 145,5888 18,6419 2,500 519,0906 1,154,16216 15,281 2,700 4,000 25,000 18,112 16,881 2,145 143,120 26,821 3,903,780 4,716,205 16,276 891,69514 195,31312 2,000 9,348 9,348 78,582 'Includes Project Condition Surveys. 2Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107). 3Channel adequate for present commerce. 4Includes $15,537 for previous project. 5Includes $23,489 for previous project. 6Excludes $75,000 contributed funds. 7Includes $239,529 for Sec. 107 project. 8Excludes $42,000 expended from contributed funds. 9Excludes $19,555 contributed funds and $67,031 (other funds) contributed for additional dredging by Port of Cathlamet. "�Project abandoned due to flooding by Bonneville Dam pool. "1Projecta bandoned due to flooding by The Dalles Dam pool. 12 Excludes $50,565 contributed funds. 13Project transferred to Portland District from Walla Walla District FY 1974 and abandoned due to flooding by the John Day Dam pool. 14Excludes $969,342 contributed funds. 15Includes $48,184 for previous project. 1 6 Non-Federal funds, $1,204,100. 37-40 206,2955 1,484,54615 7,080 54,905 33,358 14,757 71,036 6,147 109,410 501 235,877 559,858 2,833,888 183,720 78,582 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1982 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN Blind Slough Diking District, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1939 163,397 Consolidated Diking and Improvement District 1, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1941 163,291 Deep River Area, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed 1942 69,724 Deer Island Area, Columbia County, OR Completed 1943 574,123 Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 43,150 Diking District 5, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 25,609 Diking and Improvement District 5, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1940 161,381 Diking District 1 and 3 (Puget Island) and Little Island, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed 1941 258,795 Diking Improvement District 1, Pacific County, WA Completed 1941 26,810 Diking and Improvement District 4, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed 1951 169,542 Drainage District 1, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1939 240,939 John Day River Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 33,080 Karlson Island, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1941 25,773 Knappa area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 18,789 Lewis and Clark River Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 158,419 Lower Cowlitz River Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1962 181,652 Magruder Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 61,186 Marshland Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 39,475 Midland Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1939 77,7743 Multnomah Drainage District 1, OR Completed 1951 593,0344 Peninsula Drainage District 1, Multnomah County, OR Completed 1942 211,160 - Peninsula Drainage District 2, Multnomah County, OR Completed 1942 241,148 - Port of Kalama, WA' Completed - 99,844 - Rainier Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1942 47,662 Sauvie Island Areas A and B, Multnomah County, OR Completed 1951 1,623,505 Skamokawa Creek Area, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed 1946 178,885 37-41 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 37-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (Continued) CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1982 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Tenasillahe Island, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1939 133,778 - Upper Grays River Area, WA Completed 1947 61,263 30,000 Walluski River, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 66,932 Warrenton Diking District 1, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 69,503 Warrenton Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 117,143 Warrenton Diking District 3, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 74,596 Webb District Improvement Co., Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 84,592 Westland District Improvement Co., Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 205,531 Westport District, Columbia and Clatsop Counties, OR Completed 1943 40,658 Woodson Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 22,797 Youngs River Dikes, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 248,802 - Total Columbia River Basin - 6,613,742 30,000 LEWIS RIVER BASIN Diking and Improvement District 11, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1943 172,521 COWLITZ RIVER BASIN Cowlitz County Drainage Improvement District 1, WA Completed 1939 42,978 Diking Improvement District 2, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1940 121,165 Diking Improvement District 13, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1939 28,592 - Total Cowlitz River Basin - 192,735 - LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN Beaver Drainage District, OR Completed 1981 3,121,631 Columbia Drainage District 1, OR Inactive Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District No. 2, WA Completed 1977 1,661,367 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 2, WA Completed 1967 363,000 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 13, WA Completed 1967 65,345 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 15, WA Completed 1967 304,794 Cowlitz River, Hopkins Creek, WA' Completed 236,860 Deer Island Drainage District, OR Inactive 37-42 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-E (Continued) Project Hayden Island, OR Midland Drainage District, OR Multnomah County Drainage District 1, OR Peninsula Drainage District 2, OR Rainier Drainage District, OR Sandy Drainage District, OR Sauvie Island Drainage District, OR Vancouver Lake Area, WA Wahkiakum Co. Diking District 4, WA Washougal Area Levees, Clark County, WA Woodson Drainage District, OR Total Lower Columbia River Basin WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN Amazon Creek, OR Cascadia Lake, OR Gate Creek Lake, OR Holley Lake, OR Sandy River and Sleepy Hollow, OR' Shelton Ditch, OR Willamette River Basin Channel Clearing and Snagging Total Willamette River Basin ALL OTHER FLOOD CONTROL Arlington, Alkali Canyon, OR 7 Bear Creek, Medford, OR' Beaver Creek Near Tillamook, OR2 Castle Rock, Cowlitz River, WA Catching Inlet Drainage District, Coos River, OR2 Chewaucan River, Paisley, ORi Clackamas River at Dixon Farm Location, OR2 Depoe Bay, Lincoln County, OR' McKenzie River Near Walterville, OR 2 Miami River, OR' Mill Four Drainage District, Yaquina River, OR Molalla River at Milk Creek Location, OR 2 Molalla River at Ressel Location, OR2 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1982 Full Report Operation See Annual and Status Report For Construction Maintenance Inactive Completed Completed Active Completed Completed Completed Deferred Inactive Completed Completed Completed Deferred Deferred Deferred Completed Inactive 1950 1971 1964 1961 1967 1954 1966 1981 1971 1973 1964 1960 1976 1972 1963 1967 Inactive Abandoned Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed .304,511 1,491,425 35,265 593,945 154,0125 674,086 839,391 48,619 1,803,488 162,500 11,860,239 1,214,3006 1,066,114 840,001 241,992 276,571 39,624 3,678,602 1950 1967 1957 1959 1952 1967 1948 1955 1952 23,439 23,050 106,198 104,921 182,655 42,761 70,8458 22,963 148,358 15,321 118,433 55,007 55,189 37-43 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 37-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1982 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Nestucca River, Condor Road, OR' Completed 11,690 Nestucca River, Vicinity Pacific City, OR' Completed 16,000 Pendleton Levees, Umatilla River, OR1 ' 1960 (a)Riverside Area Units Deferred 9,100 (b)State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 1) Completed 1959 267,748 (c)State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 2)2 Completed 1960 161,540 Pendleton, Umatilla River, OR 1 ' Completed 1939 143,263 Reedsport Levees, Umpqua River, OR2 Completed 1971 968,7169 Rogue River, OR' Completed - 86,230 - Salmon Creek at Oakridge, OR2 Completed 1960 288,447 - Siuslaw River, Lane County, OR' Completed 215,939 Stillwell Drainage District, Tillamook Bay, OR2 Completed 1961 176,351 - Sumner Parker Airport, OR' Completed - 92,500 - Umpqua River and Tributaries, OR Completed 1952 428,881 - Umpqua River, Stanfield, OR' Completed - 33,835 - Vicinity of Nehalem, Nehalem River, OR Completed 1952 45,677 Wilson River, Vicinity Highway 101, OR' Completed 30,000 Total All Other Flood Control $3,945,057 'Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 14). 2Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205). 3Includes $26,241, Emergency Relief Act funds. 4In addition $25,000 contributed funds expended for new work. 5Previous completed project, $138,956; $15,056 engineering costs project constructed by local interests. 6In addition, $154,751 contributed funds expended for new work, $88,784 "Required" and $65,967 "Other". 7Project transferred from Walla Walla District FY 1974 and abandoned due to flooding by the John Day Dam pool. Includes $3,328 FY 1960 preauthorization costs, Sec. 205, P.L. 80-858. See FY 1960 Annual Report, page 1887. 81n addition $2,520 contributed funds expended for new work. 9Excludes $230,070 contributed funds for new work and $31,284 Government furnished sheet steel pile. 37-44 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Restoration of Indian Fishing Grounds, Bonneville, OR Completed 1969 185,000 TABLE 37-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Contri- Full Report Date Federal buted See Annual Deauth- Funds Funds Project Report For orized Expended Expended Area East of Albany, OR - 1977 - - Bachelor Island, WA - 1977 - - Bear Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1966 1971 4,559 - Calapooya River, OR 1959 1965 11,595 - Clatskanie River Area, Columbia County, OR 1960 1965 268 - Clatskanie Drainage Dist. 1, OR 1964 1978 18,543 - Clatsop County Drainage District 1, OR 1960 1974 4,472 - Clatsop County Diking District 3, OR 1938 1961 258 - Clatsop County, Diking District 4, OR - 1978 - - Clatsop County Diking District 6, OR 1961 1978 8,824 - Columbia Slough, OR 1953 1978 - - Coquille River, OR 1948 1953 908 - Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District 1, OR - 1977 - - Cowlitz River at Randle, WA 1962 1977 11,095 - Coyote and Spencer Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1960 1970 6,819 - East Muddy and Lake Creek, OR 1959 1970 6,465 - Ferguson Creek, Long Tom River, OR - 1978 - - Flat Creek, Long Tom River, OR - 1977 - - Floodwall and Levees at Portland, OR - 1977 - - John Drainage District, OR 1961 1979 23,754 - John Day River, OR 1974 1974 210,220 - Kalama River (South Area) Levee, Cowlitz County, WA 1969 1978 55,594 - Lake River Delta Area, WA - 1977 - - Lewis River Area, WA - 1978 - - Magruder Drainage District, OR 1940 1974 774 - Mud and Basket Slough Rickreall Creek, OR 1977 - - Peninsula Drainage District 1, OR 1942 1977 43,292 - Pilot Rock, Birch Creek, OR 1963 1968 4,558 - Prescott Area, Columbia County, OR 1941 1978 125 - 37-45 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 37-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Contri- Full Report Date Federal buted See Annual Deauth- Funds Funds Project Report For orized Expended Expended Prineville Area, Crooked River and Ochoco Creek, OR 1962 1977 11,318 - Pudding River, OR 1950 1979 5,000 - Skamokawa (Steamboat Slough), WA 1939 1979 - - Soap Creek, WA - 1977 - - Turner Prairie, Mill Creek, OR - 1978 - - Umatilla River (Echo), OR 1960 1964 24,145 - Waldo Lake Tunnel, OR - 1958 - - West Muddy Creek and Mary's River, OR 1962 1970 4,056 Westport Slough, OR (Modification for 32-foot channel) 1966 1977 - - Wiley Creek Lake, OR - 1960 112,000 - Willamette Falls Fishladder, OR - 1961 - - TABLE 37-H COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVER BELOW VANCOUVER WA, AND PORTLAND, OR TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEP. 30, 1982 (See Section 3 of Text) Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular 28,349,304 171,592,559 199,941,863 Public Works 446,296 14,515 460,811 Emergency Relief Administration 138,449 98,668 237,117 Total U.S. 28,934,049 171,705,742 200,639,791 Contributed Prior to 1964 223,026 24,320 247,346 Contributed.(1975) 35 to 40-foot Channel 442,928 - 442,928 Total Contributed 665,954 24,320 690,274 Total All Funds 29,600,003 171,730,062 201,330,065 37-46 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-I Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs (1982) Astoria West Side Boat Basin, OR $ 1,815 Charleston Small Boat Harbor, OR 67,032 Columbia River, Ilwaco, WA 57,528 Port of Camas - Washougal, WA 1,705 Siuslaw R&B Small Boat Basin, OR 1,214 South Channel, Government Island, OR 28,763 Wind River, WA 9,254 TOTAL $ 167,311 TABLE 37-J WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF EXISTING CANAL AND LOCKS (See Section 25 of Text) Usable Lock Dimensions Series of 4 locks, each 175 feet by 37 feet1 Lift of Each Lock Lock 1 (Lower), 22.5 feet; Lock 2, 8.7 feet; Lock 3, 10.9 feet & Lock 4 (Upper), 8.1 feet 2 Depth on Miter Sills at Lower Water Lower Lock, 8.4 feet; Upper Lock, 6 feet Character of Foundation Rock Kind of Dam Fixed3 Type of Construction Concrete Year of Completion 1873; Purchased by United States Apr. 26, 1915 Cost Unknown; purchase price, $375,000 'A guard lock 210 by 40 feet, which is used only at higher stages of water, is at upper end of canal basin. 2A concrete division wall, 1,227 feet long, extending from Lock 4 to Guard Lock, separates upper basin of canal from head race, which formerly led directly from basin and supplied water for powerplants operated by Crown Zellerbach Corp., and Portland Ry., Light & Power Co., which is now being operated by Portland General Electric Co. 3The dam is owned by private parties. 37-47 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 37-K FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS See Section Peak Inflow Storage Used in Text Project Date of Peak Inflow cu. ft./sec. acre/feet 29. Applegate Lake, OR December 19, 1981 14,380 31,090 30. Blue River Lake, OR 31. Cottage Grove Lake, OR 47. Cougar Lake, OR 48. Detroit Lake, OR 33. Dorena Lake, OR 35. Fall Creek Lake, OR 36. Fern Ridge Lake, OR 49. Foster Lake, OR 49. Green Peter Lake, OR 50. Hills Creek Lake, OR 52. Lookout Point Lake, OR December 16, 1981 December 6, 1981 December 15, 1981 December 19, 1981 January 24, 1982 February 14, 1982 December 6, 1981 December 15, 1981 December 19, 1981 January 23, 1982 February 14, 1982 December 6, 1981 December 15, 1981 December 19, 1981 February 19, 1982 December 5, 1981 December 15, 1981 December 19, 1981 January 24, 1982 February 20, 1982 December 6, 1981 December 15, 1981 December 19, 1981 January 26, 1982 February 14, 1982 December 6, 1981 December 15, 1981 December 19, 1981 December 26, 1981 January 23, 1982 February 21, 1982 December 6, 1981 December 15, 1981 January 24, 1982 February 20, 1982 December 6, 1981 December 2, 1981 December 5, 1981 December 15, 1981 January 24, 1982 February 20, 1982 December 6, 1981 December 15, 1981 December 19, 1981 February 14, 1982 December 6, 1981 December 15, 1981 December 19, 1981 January 24, 1982 February 20, 1982 7,450 7,900 5,900 5,800 3,700 7,100 13,050 4,300 2,000 3,400 2,275 14,130 8,690 6,850 9,060 22,540 18,160 18,160 11,550 28,800 30,000 12,600 8,000 5,600 9,000 18,200 7,250 4,400 5,000 5,600 5,600 18,050 6,700 6,600 4,100 13,865 21,330 21,740 16,190 16,300 22,970 28,785 13,960 11,280 22,440 40,065 23,070 14,805 11,780 18,170 22,150 8,930 16,570 13,840 8,290 55,520 17,270 8,535 4,400 6,790 13,210 33,980 23,545 13,200 98,670 99,470 51,360 26,060 32,100 251,450 49,480 17,710 12,040 20,320 32,560 36,635 18,610 11,990 1,050 18,080 50,565 44,390 19,440 21,290 17,760 5,280 34,290 65,150 32,650 51,440 202,300 35,280 19,230 32,040 123,110 136,300 56,240 27,840 30,150 176,670 37-48 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-K (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS See Section Peak Inflow Storage Used in Text Project Date of Peak Inflow cu. ft./sec. acre/feet 53. Lost Creek Lake, OR December 6, 1981 11,600 28,160 December 19, 1981 13,680 33,820 February 21, 1982 12,740 69,150 TABLE 37-L LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, OR AND WA LEVEES AND IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING WORKS (See Section 39 of Text) Estimated Cost of Work Location Approved 1982 Beaver Drainage District, OR $ 2,847,053 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 2, WA 363,000 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 13, WA 65,345 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 15, WA 304,794 Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District 2, WA 1,661,367 Midland Drainage District, OR 304,511 Multnomah County Drainage District 1, OR 1,491,425 Peninsula Drainage District No. 2, OR 3,100,000 Rainier Drainage District, OR 593,945 Sandy Drainage District, OR 15,0561 Sauvie Island Drainage District, OR 674,086 Scappoose Drainage District, OR 3,568,248 Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District 1, WA 5,290,833 Woodson Drainage District, OR 162,500 Total Estimated Cost, Federal Funds $ 20,442,163 Estimated Non-Federal Cost $ 3,000,000 Locations deauthorized or reclassified inactive and excluded from above cost estimate: Bachelor Island, WA (Deauthorized - 1977) Clatskanie Drainage District, OR (Deauthorized - 1978) Clatskanie River Area, OR (Deauthorized - 1965) Clatsop County Drainage District 1, OR (Deauthorized - 1974) Clatsop County Diking District 4, OR (Deauthorized - 1978) Clatsop County Diking District 6, OR (Deauthorized - 1978) Columbia Drainage District 1, OR (Inactive) 1,192,000 (1954) Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District 1, WA (Deauthorized - 1977) Deer Island Drainage District, OR (Inactive) 547,000 (1960) Hayden Island, OR (Inactive) 615,000 (1960) John Drainage District, OR (Deauthorized - 1979) Kalama River Levee, WA (Deauthorized - 1978) Lake River Delta Area, WA (Deauthorized - 1977) Lewis River Area, WA (Deauthorized - 1977) Magruder Drainage District, OR (Deauthorized - 1974) Peninsula Drainage District 1, OR (Deauthorized - 1977) Wahkiakum County Diking District 4, WA (Inactive) 758,000 (1960) Cost of These Locations is $ 3,112,000 1Cost is for Engineering only. Project was constructed by local interests. 37-49 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 37-M WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (See Section 44 of Text) Estimated Federal Project Authorizing Act Cost (1982) Blue River Lake, McKenzie Basin' 3 Cascadia Lake, South Santiam River4 5 Channel Clearing and Snagging on Willamette River and Major Tributaries6 Channel Improvements for Flood Control Major Drainage on 16 Streams Tributary to Willamette River' 7 Cottage Grove Lake, Coast Fork' Cougar Lake, South Fork McKenzie' 3 Detroit Lake, Including Big Cliff Lake, North Santiam River' Dorena Lake, Row River 1 Fall Creek Lake, Middle Fork' Fern Ridge Lake, Long Tom River' Gate Creek Lake, McKenzie Basin3 5 Green Peter-Foster Lakes, Middle Santiam' 4 Hills Creek Lake, Middle Fork' Holley Lake, Calapooya River5 Johnson Creek, Vicinity of Portland, OR' Lookout Point Lake, Including Dexter Lake, Middle Fork' Strube Lake & Cougar Additional Unit, (South Fork McKenzie)(Modification to Cougar Lake) Waldo Lake Tunnel and Reregulating Works North Fork, Middle Fork, Willamette River Willamette River Bank Protection' May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong. Oct. 23, 1962, H. Doc. 403, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc., 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. and Sep. 3, 1954, S. Doc. 131, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. and June 30, 1948, Public Law 858. June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. June 28, 1938k H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. Oct. 23, 1962, H. Doc. 403, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. and Sep. 3, 1954, S. Doc. 131, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. and July 14, 1960, S. Doc. 104, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. and May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Oct. 23, 1962, H. Doc. 403, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 5318 81st Cong., 2d Sess. June 22, 1936, Special Report Division Engr., June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess., and May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. $ 32,038,2252 104,000,000 (1975) 3,005,000 (1960) 1,214,3002 4,013,1232 9 56,750,4052 10 62,729,6982 14,212,3662 9 22,118,2642 9 8,509,9012 9 127,000,000 (1980) 84,005,7882 45,700,6192 13,300,000 (1960) 5,310,000 (1982) 88,238,3952 9 110,000,000 (1982) 33,400,000 (1982) 37-50 1See individual reports for details of the project. 2Actual cost. 3For construction in lieu of originally authorized Quartz Creek Lake. 4For construction in lieu of originally authorized Sweet Home Lake. 5Project classified deferred. 6Project classified inactive. 7Does not include Reclassified Locations. TABLE 37-N PRINCIPAL DATA CON 8Authorization rescinded August 28, 1958, Public Law 85-820. 85-820. 9Includes cost of Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects (710). '�Does not include $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake and Strube Lake and Cougar additional unit. ICERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, AND POWERPLANT Project Bonneville Lock and Dam, OR and WA-Lake Bonneville (See Section 46 of Text) NAVIGATION LOCK Dimensions: Clear Width of Chamber Greatest Length Available for Full Width Lift (Vertical): At Extreme Low Water and Normal Pool Level At Normal River Stage At Extreme High Water Depth Over Miter Sills at Adopted Low Water Character of Foundation Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Capacity Elevation of Gate Sills on Crest of Spillway Height Above Lowest Foundation Length of Dam Proper Length of Dam Overall Width at Base Gate Openings Crest Overflow (Above Mean Sea Level) Pool Elevation(Normal)(Above Mean Sea Level) POWERPLANT Length Width Height (Roof to Bedrock) Generator (Station Unit) Generators Total Rated Capacity 76 Feet 500 Feet 66 Feet 59 Feet About 30 Feet 24.2 Feet Andesite January 1938 Concrete Gravity 1938 1,600,000 Cubic Feet Per Second 23.3 Feet About 170 Feet 1,090 Feet 1,230 Feet 200 Feet 18 24 Feet 72 Feet 1,027 Feet 190 Feet 190 Feet 1--4,000 kw 0.8 Power Factor 1-51,500 kw 0.9 Power Factor 1-43,200 kw 0.9 Power Factor 8-54,000 kw 0.9 Power Factor 526,700 kw 0.9 Power Factor 37-51 TABLE 37-M (Continued) PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (See Section 44 of Text) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, AND POWERPLANT Project Speed John Day Lock and Dam, OR and WA-Lake Umatilla (See Section 51 of Text) The Dalles Lock and Dam WA and OR-Lake Celilo (See Section 54 of Text) 75 Revolutions per Minute NAVIGATION Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Space for Additional Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Total Potential Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Flood Control Storage Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 268 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Type Lift Normal Net Clear Length Net Clear Width Normal Depth Over Upper Sill Minimum Depth Over Lower Sill Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type Elevation of Crest Top of Crest Gates 86 Feet 669 Feet 97 Feet 105 Feet 113 Feet 15 Feet April 1968 Concrete Gravity March 1968 2,250,000 cfs 210 Tainter 50 Ft. by 58.5 Ft. 20 1,975 Feet 243 Feet 16 4 135,000 kw 2,160,000 kw 2,700,000 kw 235 Feet July 1968 268-257 276 500,000 Ac.-Ft. 76.4 Miles 55,000 Acres 15 Ft. by 250 Ft. 200 Miles Single Lift 87.5 Feet 675 Feet 86 Feet 20 Feet 15 Feet March 17, 1957 Controlled 121 Ft. msl 162 Ft. msl 37-52 TABLE 37-N (Continued) PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-N (Continued) PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, AND POWERPLANT Project 23 50 by 43 Feet 120 Feet 2,290,000 cfs Number of Gates Size of Gates Height (Foundation to Crest) Design Flood POWERPLANT Powerhouse Dimensions Generators Main Units Generators Main Units 240 by 2,150 Feet 14 @ 78,000 kw each Additional 8 @ 85,975 kw each Ultimate 22- 1,779,800 kw 2 @ 13,500 kw each 2 @ 3,000 kw each Total Rated Capacity Fishwater Supply Units Station Service Units 37-53 SEATTLE, WA, DISTRICT * This District comprises Washington State except southern and southeastern portions, northern Idaho, and northwestern Montana embraced in drainage basins tributary to Pacific Ocean south of international boundary to Cape Disappointment, and to Columbia River above Yakima River, inclusively. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Anacortes Harbor, WA ................... 2. Bellingham Harbor, WA ................ 3. East Bay Marina, Olympia Harbor, WA ... 4. Ediz Hook, WA ........................ 5. Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA ............................... 6. Floating Breakwater Prototype Test Program, West Point, Seattle, WA .... 7. Friday Harbor Marina, WA ............... 8. Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA........".... .............. 9. Kenmore Navigation Channel, WA ........ 10. Lake Crockett, WA .................. .... 11. Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA ........ 12. Navigation Work under Special Authorization .......................... 13. Neah Bay, WA .......................... 14. Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA .................... 15. Quillayute River, WA .............. ..... 16. Seattle Harbor, WA ...................... 17. Swinomish Channel, WA ................. 18. Tacoma Harbor, WA ................... 19. Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, WA ....................... Flood Control 20. Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA............. 21. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ........................ 22. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization-Emergency Bank Protection ......................... 23. Mud Mountain Dam, WA ................. 24. Naches River, Naches, WA ............... 25. Okanogan River, Oroville, WA ............ 26. Placer Creek, ID ........................ 27. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ................... 28. Skagit River, WA (Levee and Channel Improvements) .................. Page 38-2 38-2 38-2 38-3 29. Stillaguamish River, WA ................. 30. Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA ............. 31. Willapa River at Raymond, WA ........... 32. Wynoochee Lake, WA .................... Page 38-10 38-10 38-10 38-11 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 38- 33. Albeni Falls Dam, ID ................. 38-11 38-3 34. Chief Joseph Dam - Rufus Woods Lake, WA ............................... 38-11 38-4 35. Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa, MT ........ 38-12 38-4 General Investigations 38-4 36. Surveys ............................... 38-12 38-5 37. Collection and Study of Basic Data ............................. 38-13 38-5 38: Continuation of Planning 38-6 and Engineering ........................ 38-13 38-6 Tables 38-6 Table 38-A Cost & Financial Statement ..... 38-14 38-7 Table 38-B Authorizing Legislation ........ 38-19 38-7 Table 38-C Other Authorized Navigation 38-7 Projects ..................... 38-25 Table 38-E Other Authorized Flood Control 38-8 Projects ....................... 38-26 Table 38-F Other Authorized Multiple Purpose Projects, Including 38-8 Power ........................ 38-30 Table 38-G Deauthorized Projects .......... 38-31 38-8 Table 38-H Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA, Principal Features of Double Lock and Dam ................. 38-31 38-9 Table 38-I Project Condition Surveys ...... 38-32 38-9 Table 38-J Flood Control Activities 38-9 Pursuant to Section 205, Public 38-9 Law 80-858 ................... 38-32 38-9 Table 38-K Emergency Flood Control Activities - Public Law 99, 84th 38-10 Congress ...................... 38-33 38-10 38-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Navigation 1. ANACORTES HARBOR, WA Location. On northern point of Fidalgo Island in Puget Sound, 17 miles south of Bellingham, WA, and 64 miles north of Seattle. The main harbor is on Guemes Channel. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18427.) Existing project. Channel in Capsante Waterway, 12 feet deep and 150 to 250 feet wide, between east side of Q Avenue and deep water in Fidalgo Bay, a distance of 2,850 feet; and mooring basin 12 feet deep, 570 feet wide, and 960 feet long adjacent to north side of Capsante Waterway, protected by two pile breakwaters, each 470 feet long, east and southeast of basin. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.2 feet. Extreme range is about 15.5 feet. Project was completed in July 1957, excluding the inactive portion and inner portion of boat basin. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1958.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 24 piers and wharves in the Port of Anacortes; 15 on Guemes Channel, 3 on Capsante Waterway, and 7 on Fidalgo Bay. Three wharves on Guemes Channel are open for public use; of these, one is publicly owned and operated and used for handling general cargo in foreign and domestic trade. In addition, two wharves are used for ferries plying to the San Juan Islands and to Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Both are publicly owned and operated. Two of the wharves on Capsante Waterway and basin are publicly owned and operated and used for receiving petroleum products, and as a moorage for fishing and pleasure craft. All other wharves are used for general industrial purposes. In addition, there are two oil-refinery wharves located to the south of Capsante Waterway that are privately owned and operated and used for handling petroleum products in foreign and domestic trade. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Everett, Bellingham, Port Angeles, and Anacortes, WA, revised 1976). Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Routine condition and operation studies were conducted throughout the year. Maintenance, contract: A contract, awarded in August 1981 for dredging of channel in Capsante Waterway, was completed in November 1981, with 16,600 cubic yards of material being removed at a cost of $78,500. 2. BELLINGHAM HARBOR, WA Location. Part of Bellingham Bay, an arm of Puget Sound, at Bellingham, in northwestern Washington. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18424.) Existing project. Channel 30 feet deep in Whatcom Creek Waterway from deep water to head of harbor, 363.2 feet wide to 750 feet from inner end, thence 18 feet deep for inner 750 feet; Squalicum Creek Waterway, including dredging an entrance channel 200 feet wide and 26 feet deep from deep water in the bay to main pierhead line, and maintenance of southerly half and westerly end of Squalicum Creek basin to' 26 feet deep, provided that no dredging can be done within 75 feet of wharves, piers, or similar structures; and small-boat basin adjacent to Squalicum Creek Waterway by construction and maintenance of two sections of rubblemound breakwater with combined length of 5,400 feet, including maintenance of minimum depths of 12 feet in entrance to basin. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.6 feet. Extreme range is about 16 feet. Project was completed in February 1961. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1961. For details relating to previous projects, see page 2006 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1888 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. /n complying with terms of local cooperation, the Port of Bellingham expended $2,157,473 for bulkheads, groins, dredging, mooring and terminal facilities and utilities, and land development. Terminal facilities. Of the forty wharves and piers in Bellingham Harbor, 9 are on Whatcom Creek Waterway; 3 on Squalicum Creek Waterway; 3 on I&J Street Waterway; and 9 on Bellingham Bay. Two wharves on Whatcom Creek Waterway serve general cargo terminals. One is publicly owned and operated and is suitable for use by ocean-going vessels; the other one is privately owned and operated. Also, there is one publicly owned terminal and small boat harbor with 11 wharves handling private craft and fishing boats. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Everett, Bellingham, Port Angeles, and Anacortes, WA., revised 1976.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Conducted channel condition surveys. 3. EAST BAY MARINA, OLYMPIA HARBOR, WA Location. The city of Olympia, capital of the State of Washington, is located at the extreme southern end of Puget Sound. East Bay is just north of Olympia. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18445 and 18456.) Existing project. Construction of 700 feet of concrete floating breakwater and dredging of the entrance and access channels and a turning basin for a new 800-boat marina. Estimated total cost of project is $2,390,000, of which $1,300,000 is Federal funds and $1,090,000 is non- Federal funds. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in fuill on page 38-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. New work, contract: Dredging was completed in July 1982. A contract for the floating breakwaterwas awarded in May 1982; construction is underway and is about 10 percent complete. 38-2 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT 4. EDIZ HOOK, WA Location. Ediz Hook and the city of Port Angeles are on the Strait of Juan de Fuca in Clallam County, WA, about 100 miles northwest of Seattle. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18468.) Existing project. Provides for about 13,300 lineal feet of rock revetment and 3,100 linealfeet of rock blanketing, together with initial beach replenishment and annual nourishment. Project was completed in October 1978. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1979.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys of revetment and immediate offshore area accomplished. 5. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA Location. On Port Gardner Bay, at northern end of Possession Sound, an arm of Puget Sound at Everett, in northwestern Washington; and Snohomish River for 6.3 miles above mouth. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18443.) Existing project. Training dike extending from a point opposite 23d Street northward,12,550 feet to outlet of Snohomish River, with spur dike extending 400 feet to pierhead line from north end of main dike; spur dike extending 1,410 feet westward from Preston Point; removal of a section of training dike north of Snohomish River outlet; channel 150 to 425 feet wide and 15 feet deep from deep water in Port Gardner Bay to 14th Street dock; thence a settling basin 700 feet wide, 1,200 feet long, and 20 feet deep, thence a channel 150 feet wide and 8 feet deep up river to head of Steamboat Slough, a total distance of about 6.3 miles; settling basin within upper channel reach about 1 mile long with a capacity of 1 million cubic yards and maintaining East Waterway to 30 feet deep. The 1968 modification included raising the southerly 4,100 feet of existing training dike, extending the training dike 1,500 feet farther south, and constructing a breakwater along the south and west sides of the existing small boat basin. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.1 feet. Extreme tidal range is about 19 feet. The boat basin breakwater has been deleted at the request of the local sponsor, and the remainder of the 1968 modification has been deferred indefinitely. Project was completed in April 1963, excluding the deleted and deferred portions. (For further details, see page 1683 of Annual Report for 1963. For details relating to previous projects, see page 704 of Annual Report for 1905, page 2005 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1883 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. There are 42 piers and wharves in the Port of Everett, 17 in Port Gardner and 25 on the Snohomish River. These include: 19 publicly owned terminals with 4 berths handling ocean-going vessels and 1 publicly owned terminal and small-boat basip handling fishing and pleasure craft. The rest are at Bayside and the Snohomish River. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout the year. 6. FLOATING BREAKWATER PROTOTYPE TEST PROGRAM, WEST POINT, SEATTLE, WA Location. West Point is a point of land located about 6.8 miles northwest of Elliott Bay in Puget Sound within the boundaries of the city of Seattle, WA. The area is well suited for the project in that it will experience waves within the test period that equal and exceed design waves contemplated at most proposed project sites. The site is situated within quick and easy access for purposes of maintenance and monitoring. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18440.) Existing project. Provides for the construction, placement, monitoring, and removal of two types of floating breakwater at a site with a high occurrence of wave attack. The prototype structures to be built and monitored are a concrete box design, 16 feet wide and 150 feet long, with a depth of 5 feet and a 3.5-foot draft, and a pipe-tire mat design, 40 feet wide and 100 feet long. Structures and anchor systems are designed to withstand the maximum wave predicted (6 feet) for the West Point site, and calculated maximum loads on the concrete breakwater are approximately 1,930 pounds per foot of concrete breakwater and 500 pound per foot for the pipe-tire breakwater. Upon completion the concrete floating breakwater is programmed for placement as part of the Section 107 small boat basin project at Friday Harbor, WA. Pos-' sibilities for disposition of the pipe-tire structure include: Government surplus action; placement at another Section 107 project; contract for removal, salvage, or placement at other marinas; or sinking to form a fishing reef. Most equipment and instruments used for the monitoring program will remain the property of the U.S. Government. Information from the test program will be used on other Corps of Engineers projects throughout the nation to design and build more economical and efficient wave protection structures. Test program information will also be available to other public entities and to the private sector. Construction was begun in March 1982. Estimated total cost is $1,400,000, Federal funds. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work, contract: Construction and installation of the concrete box breakwater and the pipe-tire mat breakwater were completed in July 1982, and sensors, installed by the University of Washington, are now measuring wind, waves, anchor forces, pressures, and internal stresses. Remaining work includes collection of field data, maintenance and modification of structures, conducting special tests, submission of monitoring reports, and removal of breakwaters. The test program is scheduled to be completed by April 1983. 7. FRIDAY HARBOR MARINA, WA Location. Friday Harbor is located on the eastern shore of San Juan Island on the inland waters of northwestern Washington, about 28 nautical miles east of Victoria, British Columbia, and 60 nautical miles north 38-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 of Seattle, WA. San Juan Island is one of over 170 islands in the San Juan Archipelago. Friday Harbor is the San Juan County seat and a United States Customs Port of Entry. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18425.) Existing project. Construction of a 1,600-foot breakwater seaward of the existing breakwater to protect the existing port facilities and to allow the port to provide 294 additional permanent moorage spaces and 44 additional transient spaces. The moorage area would be protected by the new concrete floating breakwater. Estimated total cost of project is $3,567,000, of which $1,970,000 is Federal funds and $1,597,000 is non-Federal funds. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 38-4 of Annual Report for 1981.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-4 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Preparation of plans and specifications continued and are about 95 percent complete. 8. GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA Location. Harbor lies at mouth of Chehalis River, in southwestern part of Washington, 45 miles north of entrance to Columbia River. Inner portion comprises two main channels, the south and the north, connecting harbor proper with Chehalis River at Aberdeen. Chehalis River rises in southwestern part of Washington about 40 miles east of Pacific Ocean, flows generally northwesterly and empties into eastern part of Grays Harbor. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18502.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel across the bar 600 feet wide and 30 feet deep, to be secured by a south jetty 13,734 feet long and a north jetty 17,200 feet long, both at an elevation of 16 feet, and by dredging; maintenance of channel 30 feet deep and 350 feet wide from deep water in Grays Harbor 14 miles to Cow Point; thence 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide, suitably widened at bends, to a point 13,700 feet upstream from Union Pacific Railroad bridge at Aberdeen, a distance of 4.125 miles; a turning basin 30 feet deep, 550 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at upstream end of 30-foot channel near Cosmopolis; a channel 14 feet deep and 100 feet wide in South Bay to Bay City; three breakwaters at, and maintenance of entrance channel to Westhaven Cove; and protection of Point Chehalis for an exposed length of about 7,500 feet. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.9 feet at Point Chehalis, 10.1 feet at Aberdeen, and 8.1 feet at Montesano. Extreme range is 17.5 feet at Point Chehalis, 17.8 feet at Aberdeen, and 23.8 feet at Montesano (river flood of 1935). Project was completed in March 1965 excluding deferred and inactive portions. Rehabilitation of 4,000 feet of the south jetty was completed in October 1966. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1967. For details relating to previous projects, see pages 2002-03 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1863 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. In Aberdeen, there are 2 terminals with 7 berths owned by the Port of Grays Harbor handling ocean-going vessels and 10 usable privately owned piers and wharves; and 1 each at Markham and Cosmopolis, 7 at Hoquiam, 5 private wharves and 1 Coast Guard station at Westhaven Cove. Of the 22 privately owned, 1 is used for the receipt of sand and gravel, 3 for fish, and 7 for lumber or logs. In addition, there are 8 log dumps or receiving areas in Grays Harbor. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout the year. Maintenance, contract: Approximately 1,330,571 cubic yards of shoaled material were removed from the North Channel, Crossover, South Channel, Hoquiam, Cow Point, and Cosmopolis reaches by contractor hopper dredge between March and May 1982 at a cost of $1,974,356. A contract was awarded in August 1982 to dredge 160,000 cubic yards of material from the Cow Point turn at an estimated cost of $495,000. Completion is scheduled for November 1982 and is 39 percent complete. Code 713 Funds. Construction of a steel viewing tower and low level overlook platform with handicap access, and parking facilities were completed. 9. KENMORE NAVIGATION CHANNEL, WA Location. The Kenmore Navigation Channel lies at the northern end of Lake Washington adjacent to the Sammamish River. Kenmore, an unincorporated industrial and business center in King County just north of Seattle, WA, encompasses the lands to the north of the channel. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18447.) Existing project. The construction of a navigation channel to serve the Kenmore industrial area, King County, WA involves a 15-foot-deep channel which would consist of a 100-foot-wide inner channel 900 feet long, an 800-foot-long transition channel with a 240 30- foot bend and a maximum width of 190 feet, and a 120- foot-wide outer channel 1,200 feet long. Dredged material from the construction of the navigation channel was disposed in open water at Four Mile Rock in Elliott Bay in Puget Sound. The project also consists of the installation of a goose nest area on property adjacent to the new channel as mitigation for the removal of goose nests on the existing jetty which was removed during construction of the project. The U.S. Coast Guard installed and maintains aids to navigation for the project. Maintenance dredging will be provided by the Corps of Engineers after completion of the project. Local interests will maintain the goose nest area. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Project fiscally completed. Construction was physically complete in March 1981. 10. LAKE CROCKETT, WA Location. The harbor is on the west side of Whidbey Island, about 35 nautical miles north of Seattle, WA. The lake lies parallel to Admiralty Bay and is separated from it by a narrow strip of gravel beach. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18441.) 38-4 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Existing project. Provides for a basin in Lake Crockett with an area of about 6 acres and 18 feet deep at mean lower low water, connected with Admiralty Bay by a channel of the same depth and 150 feet wide, protected by a breakwater. The diurnal tidal range in Admiralty Bay is 8.4 feet and the extreme range is about 16.5 feet. Project was completed in January 1948. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1948.) Recreational facilities at project were completed in 1980 under cost-sharing agreement with Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. One publicly owned and privately operated passenger and automobile ferry landing within the dredged basin is open for public use, and is adequate for existing commercial traffic. The basin contains two publicly owned boat ramps open for public use. The ramps are adequate for recreational craft. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys conducted. 11. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA Location. Entirely within city of Seattle and extends from Puget Sound through Shilshole Bay, Salmon Bay, Lake Union, Portage Bay, and Union Bay to deep water in Lake Washington. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18447.) Existing project. Provides for a double lock and fixed dam with gated spillway and necessary accessory works, including fishladder, at the Narrows at entrance to Salmon Bay, about 1.25 miles from deep water in Puget Sound; for a channel 34 feet deep and 300 feet wide from Puget Sound to Burlington Northern Railway bridge, about 5,500 feet, with a passing basin 34 feet deep and log basin 8 feet deep at turn below railway bridge; then 34 feet deep and 150 feet to 200 feet wide to locks, about 900 feet; and a guide pier 600 feet long; for revetment of canal banks between locks and Lake Union and between Lakes Union and Washington; and for a channel 30 feet deep with a width of 100 feet from locks to Lake Union, 200 feet thence to Portage Cut, 100 feet through Portage Cut, and thence 200 feet wide through Union Bay to Lake Washington. Section included in project is about 10 miles long. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Extreme tidal range is 19.3 feet. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.3 feet, and between mean lower low water and extreme low water is 4.6 feet. Ordinary fluctuation in upper pool is about 22 inches; extreme fluctuation has been 3.6 feet. Principal features of double lock and dam (structures are at Seattle, WA) are set forth in Table 38-H. Project was completed in 1934. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1935. For details relating to previous projects, see page 2003 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1880 of Annual Report for 1938.) Estimated Federal cost of major rehabilitation is $8,620,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 104 wharves and piers on Lake Washington Ship Canal and adjacent inland waters, including Salmon Bay, Lake Union, Portage Bay, and Lake Washington. Of these, 18 are publicly owned, 3 of which are privately operated. The other wharves include 61 used for building, outfitting, or repair of vessels, 6 for handling petroleum products, 38 for various industrial purposes, and 7 for mooring and servicing pleasure craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 36-The Port of Seattle, Washington - Revised 1975.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Locks were operated and maintained all year, passing 20,000 commercial and 80,000 pleasure vessels, and 2,000,000 tons of commerce. Fishladder passed 500,000 fish and there were more than 800,000 project visitors. Maintenance, contract: A $517,210 contract for entryway development was completed. Major Rehabilitation. New work: A $197,900 contract was awarded in March 1982 for rehabilitation of small lock downstream service gate. Work is physically complete. A $686,730 contract was awarded in September 1982 for rehabilitation of upstream guide pier, downstream small boat waiting pier, and a maintenance pier. Plans and specifications were completed for the new emergency closure system and are now ready for advertising. 12. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs for preauthorization studies were: Brownsville Marina, WA, $178 (Detailed project report terminated); Gooseberry Point Small Boat Harbor, Hale Passage, WA, $111,500; Neah Bay Small Boat Basin, WA, $682 (Detailed project report terminated); Sandy Point Harbor, Whatcom County, WA, $12,499. Aquatic plant control (Section 302, Public Law 89-298): The program consists of control measures for selected water bodies currently infested with Eurasian watermilfoil and measures to prevent its spread into infested waters. Operations under the cost-share program included mechanical harvesting of 240 acres and maintaining 5 acres of fiberglass bottom screens at Lake Washington and Lake Sammamish, WA; treating with 2,4D granular 13 acres at Lake Osoyoos, WA and 100 acres at Okanogan River, WA; and treating with 2,4D/ invert (2 acres) and 2,4D/polymer (2 acres) at Pend Oreille River, WA. Experiments done by the Waterways Experiment Station under the research program included treating with 2,4D/invert (2 acres), 2,4D/polymer (2 acres), and 2,4D granular (2 acres) at Osoyoos Lake and Okanogan River, WA. Total costs for fiscal year were $280,271. Streambank erosion control evaluation and demonstration (Section 32, Public Law 93-251). Total costs for fiscal year were $10,564. Shoreline erosion control demonstration (Section 54, Public Law 93-251). Total costs for fiscal year were $24,261. Mitigation of shore damages (Section 111, Public Law 90-483): Total costs for fiscal .year were $7,940 at Swinomish Channel, La Conner, WA. 38-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 13. NEAH BAY, WA Location. On south side of the Strait of Juan de Fuca, 5 miles east of Cape Flattery, at the entrance to the Strait from the Pacific Ocean, and about 60 miles west of Port Angeles, WA. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18480, 18485 and 18484.) Existing project. Provides for (1) rubblestone breakwater about 8,000 feet long between Waada Island and the westerly shore of the bay; and (2) reinforcement of existing rock revetment extending approximately 2,200 feet west from Baada Point, and about an 800-foot extension of the revetment westward. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.2 feet. Extreme range is 15.8 feet. Project was completed in July 1956. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1957.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are six wharves at Neah Bay, including two owned by the United States which are used by the Coast Guard, and four privately owned wharves, three of which are open to general public use to accommodate small commercial fishing vessels. In addition to the wharves, there is a facility for dumping and rafting logs. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Project fiscally completed. 14. PUGET SOUND AND ITS TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA Location. Puget Sound is in western part of Washington. Cities of Seattle, Tacoma, Olympia, Everett, Bellingham, and many small towns are on its bays and inlets. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18400, 18441 and 18448.) Existing project. Maintenance of Puget Sound and its tributary waters by snagging and dredging; and removal, in cooperation with city of Seattle, of floating debris from Seattle Harbor area. Work consists of collecting floating and partially floating logs and larger-sized debris from Puget Sound and federally authorized channels. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 2003 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1869 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. None required. City of Seattle is cooperating in a program for control of floating debris in Seattle Harbor. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities at numerous localities on Puget Sound and its tributary waters are, in general, considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: U.S. debris boat W.T. Preston operated until its retirement in October 1981. U.S. debris boats, Walton, a reconditioned 31-foot patrol boat which replaced the W.T. Preston, and Puget operated continuously throughout Puget Sound and its tributary waters. Together they removed approximately 3,300 tons of floating debris and hazards to navigation. Debris was disposed of locally or loaded aboard barges and disposed of by contract. Snagging operations were accomplished at Blaine Harbor, Bellingham Harbor, Swinomish Channel, Skagit River, Everett Harbor, Lake Washington Ship Canal, Lake Washington, Tacoma Harbor, Olympia Harbor, Duwamish River, and Elliott Bay. Maintenance, contract: 2,584 tons of harbor debris were disposed of at a cost of $83,980. Current contractor is recycling approximately 90 percent of the debris and placing the remainder in a landfill. 15. QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA Location. River is formed by junction of Soleduck and Bogachiel Rivers, in northwestern Washington, and flows westerly 5 miles to Pacific Ocean at La Push, about 30 miles south of Cape Flattery. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18480.) Existing project. Provides for: (a) Jetty 15 feet high on easterly side of river mouth, and a dike on westerly side, with a view of stabilizing entrance; (b) channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending 2,000 feet upstream from deep water; (c) basin 10 feet deep, 300 to 425 feet wide, and 2,400 feet long upstream of channel; and (d) maintenance of an ocean spit. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at La Push is 8.3 feet. Extreme range is about 15 feet. The spit was nourished in conjunction with channel dredging contracts completed in 1973 and in 1977. The spit was rehabilitated with quarry rock in 1974 and in 1979-80. Project was completed in February 1960; however, the channel upstream of the boat basin has been classified as inactive. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1963.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that the requirement to provide a public landing open to all on equal terms in the boat basin was not complied with between May and July 1981, due to the closure of the Quileute Indian Reservation to the landing of salmon by sport and charter fishermen. Terminal facilities. There are 6 privately-owned docks at La Push, near the mouth of the Quillayute River. In addition, there is a protected boat basin owned by the Quileute Tribe which is used by fishing boats, pleasure craft, and the Coast Guard, which has a separate pier. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys and studies were made of the river channel throughout the year. Minor entrance channel dredging was performed in June 1982 by the U.S. agitation dredge Sandwick at a cost of $18,000. Maintenance, contract: A contract was awarded in September 1982 for dredging of the boat basin and is scheduled for completion in November 1982, with 60,000 cubic yards of material to be removed at an estimated cost of $127,200, and is 50 percent completed. A contract was awarded in June 1982 for major repair of 1,580 feet of the upper spit and construction of a 500-foot breakwater on the lower spit which protects the boat basin and navigation channel. The work is scheduled to be completed in November 1982, with placement of 45,000 tons of armor rock and 40,000 tons of quarry rock fill at an estimated cost of $1,772,500, and is 59 percent completed. 38-6 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT 16. SEATTLE HARBOR, WA Location. Harbor at Seattle, WA, includes all waterways within city limits. Chief anchorage basin is Elliott Bay, an arm of Puget Sound. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18450.) Existing project. Maintenance of East and West Waterways, 34 feet deep and 750 feet wide for 6,500 and 5,200 feet, respectively, from pierhead line in Elliott Bay; maintenance of East Waterway between upper end of 750-foot section and Spokane Street, 34 feet deep, 700 feet long, and 400 feet wide, and a turning basin, including head of East Waterway at junction of waterways south of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Bridge, to 30 feet deep, after these sections of waterway are dredged by local interests to full project dimensions; and dredging Duwamish Waterway 200 feet wide and 30 feet deep between West Waterway and First Avenue South, 150 by 20 feet between First and Eighth Avenues South, thence 150 feet by 15 feet to a point about 1.4 miles above 14th Avenue South Bridge, with turning basin 600 by 350 feet and 20 feet deep just south of First Avenue South Bridge, and turning basin 500 by 250 feet and 15 feet deep, and settling basin of about 100,000 cubic yardscapacity at upper end of waterway, a distance of 5.12 miles. Total length of waterways included in project is about 7.5 miles. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.3 feet. Extreme tidal range is 19.3 feet. Project was completed in 1931, excluding the settling basin at upstream end which is classified inactive and East Waterway above the 750-foot section. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1932.) Local cooperation. Complied with, except for inactive portion of project. Terminal facilities. There are 102 wharves and piers on Seattle Harbor, exclusive of those given in report for Lake Washington Ship Canal. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and are described in Port Series No. 36 - The Port of Seattle, WA, revised 1975. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys made of channels. Maintenance, contract: 125,000 cubic yards of material removed from Duwamish Waterway at upper end above First Avenue South Bridge during February and March 1982 at a cost of $275,500. 17. SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA Location. An inland passage, 11 miles long, between Saratoga Passage and Padilla Bay, in northwestern part of Washington, about 60 miles north of Seattle. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18400, 18427 and 18421.) Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide and 12 feet deep for 11 miles from deep water in Saratoga Passage to deep water in Padilla Bay, by dredging and dike construction where necessary; and removal of protecting rocky points of McGlinn and Fidalgo Islands obstructing navigation at "Hole-in-the-Wall." Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.5 feet at south end of channel, 8.4 feet at north end, and 10 feet at La Conner. Extreme tidal range is about 19.5 feet at south end of channel and about 16 feet at north end. Project was completed in March 1965. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1965.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 18 wharves, docks, and piers on Swinomish Channel, all but 3 of which are privately owned. Of these, 1 is used for handling general cargo, 5 are used exclusively for moorage, unloading, and servicing of fishing vessels; 2 are used for handling petroleum products; 3 facilities are used for log dumps; and 2 for handling non-metallic minerals. Three publicly owned facilities for launching, mooring, and servicing small craft are within the city limits of La Conner. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of various reaches of the channel. Clamshell dredging removed 12,354 cubic yards of material during fiscal year. 18. TACOMA HARBOR, WA Location. Harbor includes Commencement Bay and tributary waterways at Tacoma, in Northwestern Washington (See NOAA Survey Chart 18453.) Existing project. Provides for: (a) Channel in City Waterway 500 feet wide and 29 feet deep from deep water in Commencement Bay to 11th Street Bridge, 500 feet wide and 22 feet deep to 14th Street Bridge, and varying from 500 to 250 feet wide and 19 feet deep from 14 Street Bridge to end of this waterway, a total length of 8,500 feet; (b) channel in Hylebos Waterway 30 feet deep, 3.1 miles long, and 200 feet wide except where width is increased to 250 feet at the bend below East 11th Street, to 300 feet at Lincoln Avenue bend, and to 510 feet and 770 feet, respectively, at the channel widening above Lincoln Avenue and the turning basin at the head of the waterway; (c) construction of two training walls, each about 700 feet long at mouth of Puyallup River; and (d) channel in Blair Waterway 2.6 miles long, including a portion seaward of East 11th Street, 650 feet wide and 30 feet deep over southerly 350 feet, and 35 feet deep over northerly 300 feet; and remaining portion, 35 feet deep and 150 feet wide at East 11th Street, 600 feet wide between East 11th Street and Lincoln Avenue, and 300 feet wide between Lincoln Avenue and a 1,200-foot wide turning basin at head of waterway. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.8 feet. Extreme tidal range is about 20 feet. Project was completed in December 1966. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1967. For details relating to previous projects, see pages 1372 to 1376 of Annual Report for 1934 and page 1875 of Annual Report for 1938 for Puyallup Waterway, and page 1702 of Annual Report of 1944 and page 1502 of Annual Report for 1954 for Blair (formerly Wapato and Port Industrial) Waterway.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 99 privately owned piers and wharves, 12 of which handle general cargo, 14 handle petroleum products, 1 is a copper-handling dock, 5 handle wood chips or hogged fuel, 5 handle industrial 38-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 chemicals and salt, 4 receive sand and gravel, and there is 1 ferry dock. The remainder of the privately owned facilities are used for various activities normal to a port of this size. In addition, the Port of Tacoma owns 27 wharves or terminals, including 1 industrial yard, and an industrial area. The Port of Tacoma is presently in an expansion program. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were conducted during the year. 19. WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR AND NASELLE RIVER, WA Location. Willapa Harbor consists of lower reaches of Willapa River and Bay, an inlet of Pacific Ocean about 30 miles north of mouth of Columbia River in Washington. Willapa River rises about 30 miles east of harbor, flows generally westerly, and empties into the bay. Naselle River enters the bay near its southerly end. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18504.) Existing project. Provides for: (a) channel over bar at mouth of Willapa Bay, 26 feet deep and at least 500 feet wide; (b) channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide from deep water in Willapa Bay to foot of Ferry Street at South Bend, thence 300 feet wide to westerly end of narrows, thence 250 feet wide to forks of river at Raymond, including a cutoff channel 3,100 feet long at narrows and a closing dike at Mailboat Slough; (c) channel 24 feet deep and 150 feet wide up south fork to deep basin above Cram lumber mill, and up north fork to 12th Street, with a turning basin 250 feet wide, 350 feet long, and 24 feet deep at latter point; (d) channel 10 feet deep and 40 feet wide from deep water in Palix River to Bay Center dock, with widening at shoreward end to provide a small mooring basin; (e) mooring basin 15 feet deep, 340 feet wide, and 540 feet long adjacent to port wharf at Tokeland; (f) entrance channel at Nahcotta 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide, and mooring basin 10 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 1,150 feet long, protected by a rubblemound breakwater about 1,500 feet long; and (g) removal of snags, piles, and other obstructions in navigable channel of Naselle River between Naselle and mouth. Project includes about 26 miles of channel from entrance through Willapa River forks, 2,800 feet of Palix River-Bay Center channel, and 9 miles of Naselle River upstream of U.S. Highway 101 Bridge. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.9 feet at Toke Point; 9.9 feet at Raymond; 8.9 feet at Bay Center; and 10.8 feet near Naselle. Extreme range is 18 feet at Toke Point; 19.3 feet at Raymond; 16 feet at Bay Center; and 18 feet near Naselle. Project was completed in November 1958. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1959. For details relating to previous projects, see page 968 of Annual Report for 1910, page 2001 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1861 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local sponsor is financially unable to dredge Tokeland Boat Basin moorage area which has resulted in the deferral of maintenance dredging of the boat basin access channel. Terminal facilities. There are 24 wharves on Willapa River and Harbor, including 5 in Willapa Bay, 4 in Bay Center, 12 in Raymond and South Bend, and 1 in Tokeland. Two of the wharves at Raymond and South Bend are suitable for use by ocean-going vessels; one of these is publicly owned and operated as a general cargo terminal, and one is located at a sawmill. The other wharves, including 3 that are publicly owned and operated, are used by shallow-draft vessels. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of various segments of the project. Flood Control 20. HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WA Location. Green River, in northwestern Washington, flows westerly for 40 miles to Auburn, thence northerly 32 miles to its mouth in Elliott Bay at Seattle. Dam is at river mile 64, 6 miles southeast of Kanaskat, and 1 mile downstream from mouth of North Fork. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, "Cedar Lake quadrangle, Wash.") Existing project. Rockfill dam about 235 feet high, with gated spillway having a concrete weir at elevation 1176 feet above mean sea level and top of gates at elevation 1206, creating a reservoir with capacity of 106,000 acre-feet. Dam along crest is about 675 feet long. Improvement is designed to control flooding in Green River Valley to alleviate agricultural and urban flood damage, and make possible further expansion of Seattle industrial area. It also supplements Tacoma water supply which was included as a betterment. Project was completed in June 1963. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1966.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Operation continued all year. Routine maintenance was accomplished on roads, gages, debris booms, turbidimeter, ditches, powerline, and other project features. The outlet works stilling basin was inspected and repaired. Work continued on water quality surveys, water storage studies, and channel capacity study. Maintenance, contract: Settlement of the fill for the relocated Burlington Northern Railway between stations 10989 and 10991 was under continued surveillance. The deferred construction period has been extended to cover this area to observe effect of remedial work. (Improvements to the drainage system have apparently stabilized the railroad fill.) 21. INSPECTION OFCOMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections are made of Federally constructed local flood protection projects which are maintained by local interests; and agencies responsible for their operation and maintenance are advised of any needed repairs. During the fiscal year, inspections were made on the Yakima, Okanogan, and Snohomish River Basins, WA; Clark Fork River Basin, MT; Coeur d'Alene and St. Joe River Basins, ID. Fiscal year costs were $49,133. Costs to date have been $383,912. 38-8 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT 22. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Bank Protection, Section 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 79-526. Fiscal year costs for preauthorization studies were: Hoh River, Highway 101, North Forks, WA, $7,500 (Unfavorable reconnaissance report); Quillayute River, Clallam County, WA, $109 (Plans and specifications terminated); Yakima River, Yakima, WA, $7,500. 23. MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA Location. On White River, principal tributary of Puyallup River, near Mud Mountain, 28 miles above its confluence with Puyallup River, and 38 miles above mouth of Puyallup River. Dam is 6 miles southeast of Enumclaw, in northwestern Washington, and 38 miles east of Tacoma. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet "Cedar Lake quadrangle, Washington.") Existing project. Rockfill dam, 700 feet long at crest elevation, rises 425 feet above bedrock. Reservoir has storage capacity of about 106,000 acre-feet. Outlet works are in right abutment and permit controlled discharge of 17,700 cubic feet per second through two concrete-lined tunnels with uncontrolled discharge over spillway having maximum capacity of 139,000 cubic feet per second. Improvement affords flood protection to White and Puyallup River Valleys and protects Tacoma industrial district in conjunction with Puyallup River project at Tacoma against floods about 50 percent greater than maximum discharge of record. Project was completed in June 1953, except for recreational facilities. (For further details,see Annual Report for 1953.) To date the Corps has constructed two vistas, a picnic area, and playground adjacent to the project office, a reservoir access point for hunters and fishermen, and a 1,760-foot trail leading to the lower vista area. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Project features were operated all year. Maintenance was accomplished on dam facilities, 9-foot regulating outlet tunnel, intake structure, gages, debris booms, power lines, roads, ditches, and fish facilities. 1,462 fish were removed from the fish collection facility, a 34 percent increase over FY 1981. Maintenance, contract: A $308,000 water treatment contract was completed. 24. NACHES RIVER, NACHES, WA Location. On Naches River, Yakima County, WA. The project is located on the left bank of the river at River Mile 27.4, 15 miles northwest of Naches, WA. (See Geological Survey topographic map, Nile Quadrangle, WA.) Existing project. A 270-lineal-foot riprap bank protection consisting of riprap 36 inches thick on a 1V to 2H slope and a 12-foot-wide, 4-foot thick weighted riprap toe. The riprap is necessary to prevent future erosion. Minor clearing of the 315-foot reach is required. Proposed work is considered the most effective and least costly method of protecting the community church and septic tank and drain field. Total estimated cost of the project is $65,000 of which $64,000 is Federal. Local participation costs are estimated to be $1,000 for real estate requirements. Construction began December 8, 1981. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. In addition to the normal "a-b-c" requirements, the local sponsor agreed to the following: (1) accomplish, without cost to the United States, all relocations and alterations to existing improvements, other than railroad bridges, which may be required for the construction of the project; (2) prevent future encroachment which might interfere with the proper functioning of the project; and (3) assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of Federal cost limitation of $250,000, as provided in Section 27 of Public Law 93-251, approved March 7, 1974. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Proposed work, including plans and specifications and construction by equipment rental, was completed on December 16, 1981 at a cost of $59,000, Federal funds. 25. OKANOGAN RIVER, OROVILLE, WA Location. The city of Oroville is located within Okanogan County in the north central portion of Washington State. Oroville is 42 miles north of Omak, the major town in Okanogan County, and 4 miles south of the Canadian border. The city is bounded by Lake Osoyoos to the north, the Similkameen River (River Mile 4) to the west and south, and the Okanogan River (River Mile 77) to the east. The area surrounding Oroville consists of orchard land; apple farming, fruit processing, and wood processing are the main economic activities of the area. Existing project. A levee improvement plan which provides protection against a 100-year flood, with 3 feet of freeboard, consists of raising 6,900 feet of existing levee an average of 2 feet and provides 2,400 feet of new levee averaging 6 feet in height. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Fiscally completed. Levee construction and landscape maintenance were physically complete in FY 1981. 26. PLACER CREEK, ID Location. Placer Creek rises in the St. Joe Mountains of northern Idaho, flows northerly about 7.8 miles, and discharges into the South Fork of Coeur d'Alene River at the city of Wallace. Existing project. Provides for flood control by construction of a 3,700-foot-long concrete channel to confine Placer Creek flows through Wallace. A debris basin capable of storing 17,000 cubic yards of debris would be located upstream from the channel to prevent plugging of the channel. Construction was begun in July 1981. Estimated cost is $6,410,000, including $5,950,000 Federal funds and non-Federal costs of $460,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-10 of Fiscal Year 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contractor completed the debris basin before winter shutdown. 38-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Work was initiated on the concrete channel and is scheduled for completion in November 1982. Remaining work includes landscaping and fencing. 27. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Flood control storage space was available in Hungry Horse Reservoir, MT, Flathead Lake, MT (controlled by Kerr Dam), Grand Coulee Project, WA, and Ross Reservoir, WA. Guidance forecasts were made during the flood control season, as required. At the Upper Baker Dam, WA, a total of 74,000 acre-feet of flood storage was provided in accordance with rule curves and flood forecasts. No lost valley storage replacement was requested at Rocky Reach, Priest Rapids, and Wells Dams. Daily and/or hourly data were collected and tabulated as required to check compliance with operating criteria. Coordination necessary in preparation or revision of reservoir regulation manuals was carried on during the year with agencies responsible for the operation of these projects. Fiscal year costs were $73,237. 28. SKAGIT RIVER, WA, (LEVEE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS) Locatibn. On Skagit River in Skagit County, WA, downstream from Burlington and Mount Vernon about 17 miles to tidewater. Existing project. Provides for raising and strengthening existing levees and minor channel improvements reaching from the mouths of the north and south forks of Skagit River to about 17 miles upstream, all as authorized in 1966. Reformulation of the authorized project resulted from detailed review of the authorized plan, reexamination of the flood problem, consideration of alternatives, and extensive coordination. Technical data were developed through field investigations, topographic mapping, hydrologic and hydraulic studies, evaluation of flood damages, appraisals of property values within and adjacent to the flood plain, foundation and materials exploration, inventory of environmental base conditions, assessment of impacts, fish and wildlife studies, recreation studies, and detailed design investigations. Total cost of the revised program was estimated to be $55,000,000, with $13,750,000 being non-Federal costs, as estimated under President Carter's proposed cost-sharing policies. In 1979 the citizens of Skagit County voted against granting the Commissioners authority to indebt the County for the purpose of constructing flood control facilities. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 38-10 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Project was placed in "inactive" category in November 1980. 29. STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA Location. Formed by confluence of its north and south forks at Arlington, in northwestern Washington, Stillaguamish River flows westerly 22 miles to Puget Sound, entering Port Susan through Hat Slough and South Pass, and Skagit Bay through West Pass. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18441, and Geological Survey quadrangles Stanwood, Marysville, and Stillaguamish, WA.) Existing project. Works to reduce bank erosion and channel changes on Stillaguamish River 15 miles between Arlington and head of Hat Slough, and on Cook Slough, 3 miles long, as follows: Revetment at 26 places on river and Cook Slough; concrete weir 275 feet long between steel-sheet-pile piers at head of Cook Slough to limit flow through slough; and two cutoff channels, each about 900 feet long, to eliminate sharp bends in Cook Slough. Tidal influence extends about 3 miles into improved section. Flood stages of 16 feet above low water at Cook Slough weir have been observed. Project was completed in July 1939. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1940.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Removed brush and trees on 17,000 linear feet of 14 segments, repaired 2 segments with riprap, and repaired one embankment area with gravel. 30. TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA Location. Puyallup River has its source in glaciers on western slopes of Mount Rainier, WA, flows northwesterly 50 miles, and empties into Commencement Bay, an arm of Puget Sound, at Tacoma. Work covered by this project is on Puyallup River, within city limits of Tacoma. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18453.) Existing project. A channel with a capacity of 50,000 cubic feet per second between East 11th Street Bridge and lower end of inter-county improvement, a distance of about 2.2 miles, by straightening channel, building levees, revetting channel and levees, and making necessary bridge changes. The 11th Street Bridge at lower end of project is 0.75 mile above mouth of Puyallup River. Diurnal tidal range at mouth of river is 11.8 feet and extreme range is 20 feet. Improvement was planned in conjunction with Mud Mountain Dam and affords protection against floods about 50 percent greater than maximum discharge of record. Project was completed in May 1950. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1950.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Removed brush and trees on levee backslope (16,000 linear feet). Sedimentation ranges were surveyed, plotted, and analyzed. Code 710: Local cost sharing possibilities are being reviewed. 31. WILLAPA RIVER AT RAYMOND, WA Location. Willapa River rises in the Willapa Hills, in the southwestern part of the State of Washington, and flows in a general northwesterly direction for about 37 miles to Willapa Bay, an inlet of the Pacific Ocean about 30 miles north of the mouth of the Columbia River. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 6185.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provides fora levee system at Raymond to protect municipal areas from tidal waters. The lower end of the protected area is 10 miles above the mouth of the Willapa River. The diurnal tidal range at Raymond is 9.9 feet and the extreme range is 19.3 feet. The project was authorized in 1944, but was placed in a deferred status because the city of 38-10 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Raymond (local sponsor) was unable to provide required items of local cooperation. A restudy of the project was requested by the Raymond City Commission in October 1970 and was completed in September 1975. Based upon the 1975 restudy, the estimated cost for construction is $2,985,000 (October 1980), including $2,730,000 Federal funds and non-Federal costs of $255,000. Local cooperation. The city of Raymond has withdrawn its support because of inability to provide local cooperation requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Project was placed in "inactive" status in January 1981. 32. WYNOOCHEE LAKE, WA Location. On Wynoochee River, a tributary of Chehalis River, about 28 miles north of Montesano, Grays Harbor County, WA. (See Geological Survey quadrangles, Grisdale, Wynoochee Valley, and Montesano.) Existing project. Provides for a concrete and earthfill dam, 177 feet high, and reservoir of 70,000 acre-feet of total storage for water supply, flood control, irrigation, and fish and wildlife. Upstream fish facilities were operational in the fall of 1970. The project was completed and became operational in December 1972. Installation of power-generating facilities was not authorized, pending a reexamination report by the Chief of Engineers. In February 1966, the Federal Power Commission asserted that power production as part of the Wynoochee project was not feasible at that time. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-12 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Project facilities were operated all year. Maintenance was accomplished on dam and fish facilities, roads, ditches, culverts, and visitors' facilities. A tank truck hauled 2596 fish past the dam, a 44 percent increase over FY 1981. , Maintenance, contract: A $214,547 fire protection system contract was completed. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 33. ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID Location. Dam is on Pend Oreille River about 25 miles west of Sandpoint, in northern Idaho, and 50 miles northeast of Spokane, WA. Dam is 838 and 90 miles upstream from mouths of Columbia and Pend Oreille Rivers, respectively. (See Geological Survey topographic sheets, Sandpoint, ID, and Newport, WA.) Existing project. Provides flood control, hydroelectric power, and related water uses on Pend Oreille River as a part of the multiple-purpose plan for development of Columbia River Basin, including recreation development. At the dam, channel was formerly divided by an island and a waterfall of about 7 feet. Dam is a gated, gravity-structure spillway in left channel and a powerhouse having an installation of 42,600 kilowatts in right channel, creating a reservoir with a usable storage capacity of 1,13,000 acre-feet. Project was completed in June 1957. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1957.) Recreational facilities for public use have been provided at Albeni Cove, Priest River, Riley Creek, Johnson Creek, Trestle Creek, Strongs Island, and Springy Point. (Strongs Island was closed in FY 1982 to reduce O&M costs.) (Refer to Albeni Falls Master Plan dated June 1981 for further planned development.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Reservoir was operated through its annual cycle of storage and release. Routine structural, mechanical, and electrical maintenance was performed on spillway, dam, powerhouse, and equipment. 34. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM, RUFUS WOODS LAKE, WA Location. On Columbia River in north central Washington, at river mile 545, just upstream from mouth of Foster Creek, 1.5 miles upstream from Town of Bridgeport. (Geological Survey topographic sheet Okanogan, WA, shows general locality.) Existing project. A concrete gravity structure which consists of a 19-gate spillway and a 27-unit powerhouse. The powerhouse has sixteen 64,000 kilowatt and eleven 95,000 kilowatt generators with nameplate capacity of 2,069,000 kilowatts. Pool raising to elevation 956 was completed in 1981 which increased the powerplant capability to 2,450,000 kilowatts. Project providing initial 16 power units was completed in FY 1961. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1962.) Generator units 17 through 27 are producing power; however, additional work will be required to bring turbine efficiency up to design standards. Construction of structural modifications to dam and powerhouse, installation of additional units, uprating and plant modernization of units 1-16, and other miscellaneous project work is approximately 85 percent complete. Estimated cost of current construction project is $366,000,000 (full funding). Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Completed earthquake analysis and Preliminary Design Report for Units 1-16 uprating and plant modernization; initiated stability analysis and rewrite of design memorandum for project security. Plans and specifications were completed for Units 1-16 uprating and plant modernization; 15 kv circuit breakers; wildlife mitigation; irrigation and miscellaneous facilities; Bridgeport State Park parking facilities; roads, paving and utilities; and administration building renovation. New work, contract: Completed construction on wildlife mitigation: raptor poles, fencing (Phase II), and ancestral burial relocations. Continued cultural resources relocation; real estate acquisition; and plant propagation. New contracts started and completed included Bridgeport State Park parking facilities and cultural resources: reconnaissance and survey, RM 590. New contracts started and continuing included spillway gate deficiencies; wildlife mitigation: irrigation and miscellaneous facilities; mule deer study; units 1-16 uprating 38-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 and plant modernization: protective relays; renovate administration building; and, roads, paving and utilities. Maintenance, hired labor: Project was operated all year, and routine maintenance work was performed. Maintenance, contract: Contract was completed for replacement of the stator winding in main generator #5. 35. LIBBY DAM - LAKE KOOCANUSA, MT Location. On Kootenai River in Lincoln County, MT, about 17 miles upstream from Libby, and 219 miles upstream from confluence of Kootenai with Columbia River. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, Thompson Lakes, MT.) Existing project. Provides storage for local flood control protection in Montana and Idaho, and main stem flood control in Lower Columbia River, hydroelectric power generation at-site and at downstream plants through storage release. Project will be operated as a unit of comprehensive system for improvement of Columbia River Basin for flood control, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Libby Dam-Lake Koocanusa Project. Dam is a straight concrete gravity overflow type, 420 feet high, 3,055 feet long, with normal full pool at elevation 2459 feet above mean sea level. Powerhouse has an initial installed capacity of 420,000 kilowatts from four hydroelectric generating units with provision for four additional units which are currently under construction. Lake Koocanusa is 90 miles long, backing water 42 miles into Canada and has a usable storage capacity of 4,965,000 acre-feet at 50 percent drawdown. Construction of dam was in accordance with treaty between United States and Canada relating to international cooperation in water-resource development of the Columbia River Basin. Project features include: Relocation of 52 miles of Montana State Highway; 60 miles of Burlington Northern Railroad, including a sevenmile tunnel; 50 miles of Forest Development roads, including a 2,400-foot long steel truss bridge; construction of a selective withdrawal structure to control temperature and oxygen conditions of water released past the dam; school facilities for education of dependents of construction personnel; participation in airport facilities at Kelley Flats, MT; use of $4,000,000 project funds for fish production measures; acquisition and conveyance to the State of Montana not more than 12,000 acres of land, at cost not to exceed $2,000,000, for the prevention of wildlife grazing losses caused by the project; relocating Deep Creek Bridge, Boundary County, ID; compensating drainage districts and owners of leveed and unleveed tracts in Kootenai Flats, Boundary County, ID, for modification of pumping facilities, crops and other damages caused by duration of higher flows during drawdown operation of Libby Dam; constructing central sewage collection and treatment facilities as part of the relocation of municipal facilities of Rexford, MT; and 7 campground recreation facilities. Recreation development beyond the initial 7 sites will be by the U.S. Forest Service. Cost estimate for the new work (units 1-4) is $484,000,000 (full funding) Corps of Engineers funds and $960,000 U.S. Forest Service funds. Planning and design is essentially complete with remaining work consisting of: continued meetings with Canada for water quality protection, cultural resources survey, and hydrology and reservoir operations. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Plans and specifications were completed on powerhouse circuit breaker barriers, downstream restoration (Phase II), rock slide detection system, sluice vent modification, monolith crack grouting, and spillway repair. Other efforts include investigative work of downstream effects, development of a master plan, and continued supervision and administration of cultural resources contracts. New work, contract: Contracts were awarded for powerhouse circuit breaker barriers, downstream restoration (Phase II), rock slide detection system, sluice vent modification, monolith crack grouting, and spillway repairs. Maintenance, hired labor: Reservoir was operated through its annual cycle of storage and release. Routine structural, mechanical, and electrical maintenance was performed on spillway, dam powerhouse, and equipment. Libby Additional Units Project. Provides for installation of 4 additional units at the Libby Dam Powerhouse. Estimated Federal cost is $52,800,000 (full funding). Operations during fiscal year. New work: Work was completed on installation of turbines. Fabrication of generators for units 5 through 8 was continued; however, only unit 5 will be installed. Manufacture of auxiliary electrical equipment was continued. Libby Reregulating Dam Project. Provides for construction of a reregulating dam about 10 miles downstream of Libby Dam and associated relocation of about 9 miles of Burlington Northern Railroad, 7.5 miles of St. Regis log haul road, 0.5 miles of Forest Development Road, and 7.5 miles of Montana State Highway. Estimated Federal cost is $285,000,000 (October 1982). Funds were provided for a construction start in 1977; however, courts have found that Congress did not authorize construction of the reregulating dam. Operations during fiscal year. Construction work continues to be halted due to a court injunction. Libby Reregulating Dam - Power Units Project. Provides for installation of three hydroelectric generating units at the reregulating dam with 78,900 kilowatt installed capacity. A General Design Memorandum 1, Phase II, Preliminary Design Report was approved by the Office, Chief of Engineers on March 3, 1981. Cost to install the three units is estimated at $74,000,000 (October 1982). General Investigations 36. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,872.917, of which $1,052,862 was for navigation studies, $343,073 was for flood control studies, $314,094 was for comprehensive basin studies, $133,157 was for special studies, and $29,731 was for preauthorization studies. 38-12 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT 37. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The work programmed for collection and study of basic data covers international water studies, flood plain management services, and hydrologic studies. Work on international water studies included checking Kootenay Lake storage computations to determine compliance of West Kootenay Power & Light Co. with orders of International Joint Commission, and coordination with International Kootenay Lake, Osoyoos Lake, and Skagit River Boards of Control in enforcement of International Joint Commission orders. Technical assistance was provided other Federal and non-Federal agencies in flood hazard evaluation and related services as requested. Fiscal year costs were -$560 for inspection of dams, $3,094 for international water studies, $145,943 for flood plain management services, and $8,507 for hydrologic studies, a total of $156,984. 38. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Blair and Sitcom Waterways, Tacoma Harbor, WA. Tacoma Harbor, Pierce County, is located in southern Puget Sound in the northwest corner of Washington about 30 miles south of Seattle in Washington's 6th Congressional District. The proposed plan of improvement provides for (a) modification of the existing Federal project for Blair Waterway to provide for the construction and maintenance of a 45-foot and a 41-foot channel including replacement of the East 11th Street Bridge and (b) Federal maintenance of the locally constructed Sitcum Waterway to depths of 40 and 35 feet. Continuation of planning and engineering studies were initiated in May 1982 which included environmental studies necessary for a Section 404 evaluation report and a bridge design report being conducted by the Washington State Department of Transportation. Bioassay testing and evaluation for Section 404 evaluation report has been completed. The bridge design report is about 75 percent complete. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $980,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $191,617. 38-13 TABLE 38-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 1. Anacortes Harbor. New Work WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 2. Bellingham Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 3. East Bay Marina, Olympia Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 4. Ediz Hook, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 5. Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost 19,875 140,000 19,875 104,113 95,000 382,300 89,213 384,579 1,953 25,000 60,608 49,000 50,687 222,345 222,345 612,761 612,4821 59,523 59,523 5,000 5,000 1,566,840 1,566,8402 1,091,075 1,090,828' 3 31,581 31,5814 89,000 104,541 10,000 175,000 905,000 14,562 162,464 917,529 1,614,000 1,044,205 -258,000 -475 38,104 38,104 150,000 166,326 8,977 25,000 25,000 24,000 22,588 34,000 31,394 9,103 9,103 1,388,976 1,388,8955 1,614,000 1,044,205 5,876,880 5,876,880 121,104 117,0861 396,000 4,605 - 396,000 5,700 320,000 900,000 164,515 1,071,683 1,655 3,284 54,000 522,000 52,654 523,497 7,355 3,284 1,775,744 1,775,7446 5,465,652 5,465,6521 7 5,618 5,618 - 441,000 - 441,000 457,000 457,000 38-14 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 6. Floating Breakwater Prototype Test Program, WA 7. Friday Harbor Marina, WA 8. Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 9. Kenmore Navigation Channel, WA 10. Lake Crockett, WA 11. Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA 13. Neah Bay, WA 14. Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 100,000 95,175 -3,000 110,000 114,810 2,000 1,249 251,000 793,000 250,121 792,047 55,000 115,000 52,700 110,148 60,000 60,259 37,545 38,026 3,700,648 2,660,000 3,972,800 3,193,000 3,718,042 2,661,536 3,946,277 3,224,499 41,000 76,232 333 6,691 6,691 -313,000 -18 74,000 732,000 69,365 736,250 1,281 22,000 26,657 41,858 138,000 37,852 140,955 59,000 58,502 472 1,032 -7,545 -7,519 4,316,000 3,499,600 2,938,000 2,837,000 4,436,293 3,183,942 3,429,332 2,814,197 - - - 1,100,000 - - - 1,099,779 540,000 1,090,000 -116,000 507,943 1,122,245 -116,088 1,044,000 1,042,168 423,037 415,8708 5,130,396 5,130,3859 62,421,464 62,417,79010 120,592 120,592 4,606,145 4,606,145 35,834 35,834 47,889 47,889 946,000 946,00011 352,240 352,24012 574,465 574,4461 4,803,952 4,803,95213 47,923,230 47,887,68914 1,100,000 1,099,779 2,057,266 2,057,266 1,834,466 89 1,834,466 38-15 43,337 43,337 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 Maint. Approp. 880,000 1,168,500 1,160,800 927,000 14,062,302 Cost 891,983 1,162,637 1,168,840 928,715 14,061,03315 15. Quillayute River, New Work WA Approp. - - - - 521,850 (Federal Funds) Cost - - - - 521,85016 Maint. Approp. 1,010,000 150,000 370,000 3,074,000 8,438,760 Cost 1,014,558 151,429 369,427 2,262,394 7,626,196 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. - - - - 20,000 Cost - - - - 20,000 16. Seattle Harbor, WA New Work (Federal Funds) Approp. - - - - 170,335 Cost - - - - 170,335 Maint. Approp. 30,000 325,000 378,000 312,000 5,143,716 Cost 27,880 327,356 377,121 312,240 5,143,0771 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. - - - - 69,333 Cost - - - - 69,333 17. Swinomish Channel, New Work WA Approp. - - - - 808,332 Cost - - - - 808,33217 Maint. Approp. 120,000 70,000 276,500 114,000 5,077,243 Cost 145,853 72,376 265,245 124,922 5,076,910 18. Tacoma Harbor, WA New Work (Federal Funds) Approp. - - - - 2,435,500 Cost - - - - 2,435,50018 Maint. Approp. 28,054 78,633 - 40,000 1,426,335 Cost 28,168 78,583 -1,311 40,072 1,425,0461 19 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. - - - - 559,581 Cost - - - - 559,58120 19. Willapa River and New Work Harbor and Naselle Approp. - - - - 1,579,269 River, WA Cost - - - - 1,579,26921 (Federal Funds) Maint. Approp. 162,000 80,000 77,000 113,000 12,518,978 Cost 208,711 88,788 73,863 116,137 12,518,97822 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. - - - - 78,372 Cost - - - - 78,37223 20. Howard A. Hanson New Work Dam, WA Approp. - - - - 37,048,061 (Federal Funds) Cost - - - - 37,048,061 Maint. Approp. 565,000 369,000 588,000 530,000 7,095,251 Cost 584,187 400,360 588,848 531,095 7,094,968 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. - - - - 2,000,000 Cost - - - - 2,000,000 38-16 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 23. Mud Mountain New Work 24. Naches River near Naches, WA 25. Okanogan River, Oroville, WA 26. Placer Creek, ID 28. Skagit River, WA (Levee and Channel Improvements) 29. Stillaguamish River, WA 30. Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA 31. Willapa River at Raymond, WA 32. Wynoochee Lake, WA 33. Albeni Falls Dam, ID 34. Chief Joseph Dam- Rufus Woods Lake, WA 875,000 837,500 1,162,000 828,000 927,016 861,114 1,163,507 830,027 13,295,848 13,295,84824 11,718,372 11,706,674 285,908 285,908 Dam, WA 59,000 59,000 5,000 5,669 Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 900,000 128,000 899,824 143,363 21,000 20,752 39,000 36,376 85,000 72,008 9,600 12,731 162,500 250,000 118,594 293,906 4,148 1,740 32,000 141,000 37,257 148,672 4,000 730 32,000 29,593 63,000 59,414 42,200 95,292 3,270 39,000 41,406 3,586 1 - 1,241,700 974,881 1,013,000 891,000 1,221,468 877,626 1,158,860 873,785 -200 15,990 16 - 1,470,800 1,351,000 1,408,000 1,377,320 1,495,453 1,372,010 1,391,276 1,364,305 26,980,000 16,597,000 20,858,000 8,170,000 27,153,982 15,835,523 21,556,256 8,091,788 3,779,500 3,904,552 3,743,200 4,551,800 4,381,000 3,669,785 4,648,742 4,379,283 59,000 59,000 1,779,500 1,779,50025 4,630,000 4,622,846 1,934,792 1,934,792 220,594 220,594 1,059,845 1,058,612 3,947,853 3,947,85326 326,597 326,596 508,130 508,13027 23,494,445 23,494,44528 6,927,069 6,898,265 31,878,297 31,878,29729 19,025,576 18,981,77130 450,978,235 450,625,13831 49,125,935 49,090,670 38-17 280,000 375,000 750,000 3,225,000 270,227 384,471 732,345 3,235,803 975,000 490,000 105,000 858,302 601,845 117,650 TABLE 38-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sept. 30, 1982 Major Rehab. Approp. - - - - 297,630 Cost - - - - 297,630 35. Libby Dam, Lake New Work Koocanusa, MT Approp. 20,403,800 14,123,000 8,913,000 10,090,000 534,101,14032 (Federal Funds) Cost 21,483,655 13,154,883 9,959,243 9,943,442 533,927,8823. Maint. Approp. 1,693,000 2,005,000 2,180,000 1,997,000 13,479,079 Cost 1,708,685 2,033,236 2,168,699 1,990,590 13,446,863 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. - - - - 1,458,252 Cost - - - - 1,458,252 'Includes applicable portion of Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys appropriations and costs. 2Includes $56,582 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $13,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 'Includes $1,092 appropriated and expended for previous project. 4Excludes $2,157,473 expended by Port of Bellingham in fulfilling requirements of local cooperation. 5Includes $330,517 appropriated and expended for preauthorization cost. 6Includes $418,209 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $43,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 7Includes $5,869 appropriated and expended for previous projects. sIncludes $43,037 for previous project and $235,341 preauthorization cost, appropriated and expended. 9Includes $99,545 appropriated and $99,534 expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710), and $113,134 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $162,000 Navy funds and $6,000 Coast Guard funds expended. o0Includes $37,415 appropriated and expended for previous projects. "Includes $148,765 appropriated and expended for preauthorization cost. 12Includes $92,000 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 13Includes $779,655 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710) and $485,002 for previous projects, appropriated and expended. "4Includes $1,631,195 appropriated and expended between 1916 and 1936 on operation and care of works of improvement, under provisions of the permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. '5Includes $67,496 appropriated and expended for previous project. 16Excludes Navy funds expended on dredging river channel in 1944 and Coast Guard funds expended for channel dredging in 1948 and 1949. 17Excludes $1,000 Coast Guard funds expended. '8Includes $159,584 appropriated and expended for previous projects. 19Includes $5,347 appropriated and expended for previous projects. 20Includes $62,697 value in work contributed and expended by Port of Tacoma. 21Includes $228,084 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $40,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 22Includes $309,177 appropriated and expended for previous projects. 23Includes $6,597 appropriated and expended for previous project. 24Includes $87,785 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 25Includes $160,700 appropriated and expended for preauthorization cost. 26Includes $5,035 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 27Includes $32,630 appropriated and expended for preconstruction planning costs. 28Includes $102,200 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 29Includes $136,736 Public Works Acceleration Act Funds and $971,947 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710), appropriated and expended. 30Includes $128,020 Special Recreation Use Fees, appropriated and expended. 31Includes $58,000 Public Works Acceleration Act Funds and $147,983 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710), appropriated and expended. 32Includes $33,556,634 for additional units, $16,276,363 for reregulating dam, and $475,000 for power planning. 33Includes $33,513,818 for additional units, $16,276,363 for reregulating dam, and $475,000 for power planning. 38-18 TABLE 38-B SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. ANACORTES HARBOR, WA Mar. 2, 1919 Sep. 3, 1954 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Sep. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 as amended Mar. 7, 1974 5. June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 June 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Aug. 13, 1968 6. July 14, 1960 as amended Channel in Capsante Waterway. 2. H. Doc. 1117, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 102, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1161, 60th Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 187, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 70, 74th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 558, 82d Cong., 2d Sess.2 S. Doc. 46, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. 3 Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 13, 1981 H. Doc. 93-101, 93d Cong. 1st Sess., P.L. 93-251 Mooring basin. BELLINGHAM HARBOR, WA Whatcom Creek Waterway 26- and 18-foot channels. Entrance channel in Squalicum Creek Waterway. Maintenance of southerly half and westerly end of Squalicum Creek Basin. Small-boat basin adjacent to Squalicum Creek Waterway. Whatcom Creek Waterway, 30-foot channel. EAST BAY MARINA, OLYMPIA HARBOR, WA Construction of 700 feet of concrete floating breakwater and dredging of the entrance and access channels and turning basin. EDIZ HOOK, WA Construction of 10,000 lineal feet of rock revetment, together with initial beach replenishment and annual nourishment. Emergency interim measures necessary to prevent breaching of Ediz Hook prior to construction of authorized project. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA Training dike 10,500 feet long extending across bar at outlet of old river channel. Raise 6,000 feet of training dike, extend spur dike, widen gap in dike as required, maintain East Waterway and channel to gap. Abandon project for Snohomish River and provide settling basin near 14th Street. Spur dike at Preston Point, remove training dike north of river outlet, enlarge channel to 14th Street, and deepen settling basin. Widen channel from settling basin to gap; extend channel to head of Steamboat Slough; and a settling basin within upper channel reach. Raise and extend existing training dike; and construct breakwater on westerly and southerly sides of 14th Street small-boat basin.4 FLOATING BREAKWATER PROTOTYPE TEST PROGRAM, WEST POINT, SEATTLE, WA Construction, placement, monitoring, and removal of two types of floating breakwater, a concrete box design and a pipe-tire mat design. Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 5, 1981 38-19 H. Doc. 1108, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 377, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 546, 75th Cong,. 3d Sess. H. Doc. 569, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 348, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 357, 90th Cong., 2d Sess. 5 4. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 38-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 7. FRIDAY HARBOR MARINA. WA 8. July 14, 1960 as amended June 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 as amended Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Construction of 1600 feet of concrete floating breakwater. GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA South jetty. A north jetty 9,000 feet long. The 18-foot channel. Extend north jetty 7,000 feet; length of south jetty fixed at 13,734 feet. A 6-foot channel above Cosmopolis. Dredging in bar channel. Dredging in bar channel. 16-foot channel from Cosmopolis to Montesano. 6 Reconstruct north and south jetties to an elevation of 16 feet above mean lower low water. Maintain 26-foot channel below Aberdeen (as authorized by Public Works Administration Dec. 11, 1933) and combining projects for Grays Harbor and bar entrance and Grays Harbor, inner portion, and Chehalis River under a modified project for Grays Harbor and Chehalis River. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Maintain 30-foot depth in channel from deep water in Grays Harbor to Port of Grays Harbor Commission terminal, which was deepened from 26 to 30 feet with Navy funds. 14-foot channel to Bay City; breakwater at Westhaven; protection of Point Chehalis; and maintenance of Westhaven entrance channel.7 Dredging and maintenance of a 30-foot channel and turning basin from Aberdeen to Cosmopolis. Additional breakwater, 1,400 feet long, at Westhaven Cove. KENMORE. NAVIGATION CHANNEL, WA Construction of navigation channel 15 feet deep consisting of a 100-foot wide inner channel 900 feet long, an 800-foot long transition channel with 240 30-foot bend and maximum width of 190 feet, and a 120-foot wide outer channel 1,200 feet long. LAKE CROCKETT, WA Small-boat basin. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. 38-20 Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, July 9, 1981 Annual Report, 1895, pp. 3517-3533 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 507, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1125, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1729, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 582, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 315, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 53, 73d Cong., 1st Sess.; Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 Report in Office, Chief of Engineers H. Doc. 635, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 412, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 30, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. 5 Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Oct. 7, 1980 H. Doc. 303, 77th Cong., 1st Sess.5 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 9. 10. TABLE 38-B (Continued) SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 11. June 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 June 26,19348 Aug. 30,19359 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended June 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 14. July 13, 1892 15. July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 17. July 13, 1892 LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA For a double lock and fixed dam with gated spillway and necessary accessory works at entrance to Salmon Bay; dredging a channel from locks to deep water in Puget Sound, and excavation by local interests of a channel from locks into Lake Washington. Dredging below locks and revetting canal basis. Increased dimensions of channel between Puget Sound and locks and a 600-foot extension of lower guide pier. Operating and care of locks and dam provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Enlarge channel between locks and Lake Washington. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. NEAH BAY, WA Rubblestone breakwater. Reinforcement of existing revetment. PUGET SOUND AND ITS TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA Maintenance of the rivers tributary to Puget Sound by snagging and dredging; and removal of floating debris from Seattle Harbor. QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA Jetty (5 feet high) on easterly side of mouth, and a dike with groins, on westerly side, to stabilize entrance.1i Maintenance dredging to provide a channel 6 feet deep and of suitable width from ocean to within river mouth. Raising jetty to 15 feet; channel 10 by 100 feet, 2,000 feet long; moorage basin.' 2 SEATTLE HARBOR, WA Maintenance of East and West Waterways 750 feet wide and 34 feet deep, and of Duwamish Waterway 20 feet deep and 150 feet wide as far south as Eighth Avenue South Bridge. Enlargement of Duwamish Waterway. 13 Maintenance of East Waterway between 750-foot section and Spokane Street, and turning basin at junction of East and Duwamish Waterways. SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA Channel 4 feet deep and 100 feet wide, and dike construction. H. Doc. 953, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 800, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 324, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 140, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 5 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 51, 75th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 404, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. 5 Annual Report for 1893, page 342510 H. Doc. 125, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 218, 78th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 579, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. 5 S. Doc. 313, 65th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 108, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. and H. Doc. 126, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. 5 H. Doc. 211, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 5 H. Doc. 31, 52d Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report, 1892, p. 2752 38-21 13. 16. i REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 38-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 June 13, 1902 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 19. July 27, 1916 Aug. 30, 19359 Aug. 30,193514 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 20. May 17, 1950 Aug. 6, 1958 June 22, 1936 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 as amended 18. Enlargement of channel to present project dimensions. Removal of navigation hazards at "Hole-in-the-Wall". TACOMA HARBOR, WA City Waterway. Hylebos Waterway. Training walls at mouth of Puyallup River (previously authorized by Public Works Administration Sep. 6, 1933). Blair Waterway extension. Blair and Hylebos Waterways extension. WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR AND NASELLE RIVER, WA Channel 24 feet deep, 200 feet wide, in Willapa River, and 150 feet wide in the forks. Maintenance of channel over bar to a depth of 26 feet and minimum width of 500 feet. For cutoff channel at Narrows. Channel from deep water in Palix River to Bay Center dock. Widen Willapa River channel to 360 and 250 feet between South Bend and the forks; Tokeland and Nahcotta basins; and Naselle River clearance. HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WA Eagle Gorge flood control dam on Green River. Redesignation of project as Howard A. Hanson Dam. MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA Flood control dam on White River. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. NACHES RIVER, NACHES, WA Construction of riprap bank protection. OKANOGAN RIVER, OROVILLE, WA Provides for raising 6900 feet of existing levee an average of two feet and provides 2400 feet of new levee averaging six feet in height and would provide 38-22 S. Committee Print, 73d Cong,. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 499, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 5 H. Doc. 76, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Does. 25, 71st Cong., 2d Sess., and 91, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 55, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 171, 84th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 101, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 5 H. Doc. 706, 63d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 37, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 481, 76th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 425, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. 5 H. Doc. 271, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. 5 P.L. 85-592 S. Comm. Print, Puyallup River, WA, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 Sec. 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Dec. 2, 1981 Sec. 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Mar. 15, 23. 24. 25. TABLE 38-B (Continued) SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents protection against a 100-year flood. 1979 Dec. 15, 19'10 Nov. 7, 1966 June 22, 1936 June 28, 1938 June 22, 1936 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Dec. 22, 1944 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 May 17, 1950 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 July 9, 1952 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Oct. 22, 1976 as amended on May 4,1977 26. 28. PLACER CREEK, ID Construction of 3,700 feet concrete channel to confine Placer Creek flows through Wallace, Idaho. SKAGIT RIVER, WA (LEVEE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS) Provides for raising and strengthening existing levees and minor channel improvements to increase minimum channel capacity from 91,000 to 120,000 cubic feet per second. STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA Improvement of flood channel by clearing and bank revetment at 26 places; concrete weir at head of Cook Slough; and 2 cutoff channels in Cook Slough. Maintenance of improvements. TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA Channel improvement to protect people and industrial section of city of Tacoma. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. WILLAPA RIVER AT RAYMOND, WA Levee system at Raymond to protect municipal areas from tidal waters. WYNOOCHEE LAKE, WA Dam and reservoir for water supply, flood control, irrigation, fish and wildlife, and recreation. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Transfer to State of Washington as a part of project costs $696,000 for construction of fish hatchery facilities. Amend contract between city of Aberdeen and United States for use of storage space, permitting deferral of the major portion of the first 10-year payments. ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID Multi-purpose dam with powerhouse. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM - RUFUS WOODS LAKE, WA Multi-purpose dam and powerhouse on Columbia River at Foster Creek. Redesignation of the project as Chief Joseph Dam. Designation of reservoir as Rufus Woods Lake. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. School facilities for education of dependents of construction personnel. S. Doc. 9, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. 5 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 693, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. 5 P.L. 858, 80th Cong,. 2d Sess. P.L. 469, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 P.L. 94-587 P.L. 95-26 38-23 H. Doc. 357, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. 5 H. Doc. 483, 89th Cong., 2d Sess. 5 H. Doc. 657, 71st Cong., 3d Sess. 5 S. Comm. Print, Puyallup River, Wash, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. 5 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 701, 77th Cong., 2d Sess. 5 H. Doc. 601, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 5 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. i REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 38-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 35. May 17, 1950 Nov. 7, 1966 Jan. 2, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec. 31, 1970 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 LIBBY DAM - LAKE KOOCANUSA, MT Multi-purpose dam and powerhouse, and reregulating facilities. School facilities for education of dependents of construction personnel, Libby project. Airport facility at Kelley Flats, MT. Design standards for relocation of Montana State Highway 37 to be those adopted by State of Montana pursuant to provisions of Highway Safety Act of 1966. Participation with State of Montana in construction, operation and maintenance of fish hatchery facilities. Designation of lake formed by the waters impounded by Libby Dam as Lake Koocanusa. Design and construction of sewage collection and sewage treatment facility as part of relocation of municipal facilities of Rexford, MT; and compensation for railroad employees suffering longterm economic injury through reduction of income as result of the relocation of rail transportation facilities due to the construction of Libby Dam. Phase I design memorandum stage for installation of power generating facilities at Libby Reregulating Dam. Construction of fish production measures to compensate for fish losses attributed to the project, and for acquisition of necessary real estate, construction of access roads and utilities (Amends P.L. 91-282 by increasing limitation from $750,000 to $4,000,000). Acquisition of land not to exceed $2,000,000 for prevention of wildlife grazing losses caused by the project. Reimbursement (not to exceed $350,000) to Boundary County, ID for reconstruction of Deep Creek Bridge made necessary by duration of high flows during drawdown operations at Libby Dam. Compensation, not to exceed $1,500,000, to Drainage Districts and owners of leveed and unleveed lands, in Kootenai Flats, Boundary County, ID, for damages caused by duration of higher flows during drawdown operations at Libby Dam. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. 5 P.L. 89-789 P.L. 90-2391s P.L. 90-48316 P.L. 91-28217 P.L. 91-625 P.L. 91-611 S. Doc. 93-29, 93d Cong., 1st Sess., P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 1Contains latest published map of Squalicum Creek Waterway. 2Contains latest published map of small-boat basin. 3Contains latest published map of Whatcom Creek Waterway. 4Deferred. 5Contains latest published map. 6Inactive. 'A portion deferred. 8Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 9Included in Public Works Administration Program. '0Annual Report for 1913 contains latest published map (page 3127). 1IA portion inactive. '2Maintenance ofthese items, as well as sandspit north of James Island, is included in this modification. '3Includes settling basin of 100,000 cubic yards capacity which has been classified as inactive. '4Included in Emergency Relief Program, May 28, 1935. '5 Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1968, Section 502. 16Flood Control Act of 1968, Section 212. '7River Basin Monetary Authorization and Miscellaneous Civil Works Amendments Act of 1970, Section 7. 38-24 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1982 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Anacortes Navigation Channel, WA'4 Completed 1977 825,2632 Bellingham Harbor, WA (I&J Street Waterway)' 4 Completed 1966 125,634 6,570 Bellingham, Squalicum Small Boat Harbor, WA' 4 Completed 1981 1,703,2353 - Blaine Harbor, WA Completed 1958 346,650 32,642 Columbia River, Wenatchee to Kettle Falls, WA Completed 1923 274,3904 7,693 Edmonds Harbor, WA' 6 Completed 1966 - 16,889 Flathead River, MT Completed 1901 9,811 - Hammersley Inlet, WA Completed 1950 9,000 30,707 Hoquiam River, WA Completed 1950 51,294 13,221 Kingston Harbor, WA Completed 1967 262,5705 25,9426 Kootenai River, ID and MT Completed 1933 9,255 5,643 Mats Mats Bay, WA'4 Completed 1970 137,6797 28,736 Okanogan and Pend Oreille Rivers, WA Abandoned 1913 63,880 7,634 Olympia Harbor, WA Deferred 1975 442,7828 651,6309 Polson Bay, Flathead Lake, MT Completed 1918 4,491 259 Port Angeles Harbor, WA Completed 1960 470,873 53,268 Port Gamble Harbor, WA Completed 1953 11,91110 51,410 Port Orchard Bay, WA Completed 1928 42,804 12,731 Port Townsend, WA Completed 1974 480,89911 57,441 Shilshole Bay, Seattle, WA Completed 1962 2,575,091 61,294 Skagit River, WA Completed 1950 102,33012 60,265 Stillaguamish River, WA Inactive 1946 4,23413 - Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, WA Completed 1975 73,322 248,712 Westhaven Cove Small.Boat Basin, WA 14 Completed 1981 2,000,000 ' 5 'Includes applicable portion of reconnaissance and condition survey costs. 2Excludes $457,200 contributed funds expended. 3Excludes $1,626,000 contributed funds expended. 4Includes $8,005 expended for previous project. 5Excludes $117,585 contributed funds expended. 6Includes $5,000 for mitigation shore damages study expended. 7Excludes $28,288 contributed funds expended. sIncludes $183,257 for previous projects, and $2,803 expended for restudy Fiscal Years 1971-1973. 9Includes $14,418 expended for previous project. 1'Excludes $21,260 contributed funds expended. "Excludes $85,223 contributed funds expended. 12Includes $2,500 expended for previous project. '3 For economic study only. 14Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 107, Public Law 86-645. 15Excludes $1,251,000 contributed funds expended. 16Constructed by local interests. 38-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Project American Lake, Vicinity of Fort Lewis, WA1 Bear Creek, Flathead County Bridge, near Essex, MT2 Blackfoot River, Matt Little Road, MT2 Bogachiel River, Highway 101, near Forks, WA2 Bogachiel River, Undie Road, Forks WA2 Cedar River, Renton, WA2 Chehalis River, City of Chehalis, Raw Water Pumphouse, WA2 Chehalis River, Independence Road, Thurston County, WA2 Chehalis River, Montesano, WA2 Clallam Bay, Sekiu, WA2 Clallam River, Highway 112, WA2 Clark Fork River, Drummond, MT2 Clark Fork River, Missoula, MT2 Clark Fork River, Superior, MT2 Clark Fork River, Vicinity of Plains, MT2 Clearwater River, Jefferson County Road, WA2 Clearwater, River, Queets River Bridge, WA2 Coeur d'Alene, Spokane River, ID Coeur d'Alene River, Springston, ID2 Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, ID, MT, and WA: Clark Fork River, Missoula, MT Entiat River, WA Lightning Creek, Clark Fork, ID Methow River, WA Okanogan River, WA Yakima River at Ellensburg, WA Deschutes River, Gleason Road Bridge, near Tumwater, WA2 For. Last Cost to Sep 30, 1982 Full Report Operation See Annual and Status Report for Construction Maintenance Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Inactive Inactive Inactive Completed 1957 1971 1964 1981 1981 1949 1966 1965 1977 1977 1981 1978 1978 1971 1950 1968 1950 1941 1950 1981 1958 1959 1958 1958 1980 1965 59,5826 1,424 17,836 156,000 57,000 32,264 35,454 47,916 140,080 48,698 43,500 18,660 31,548 28,356 27,947 50,000 49,165 152,872 25,452 384,0116 42,726 1,1007 30,0008 26,292 38-26 TABLE 38-E SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1982 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Deschutes River, Rich Road Bridge, near East Olympia, WA2 Dungeness River, Area #5, WA2 Dungeness River, Area #8, WA 2 Dungeness River, Clallam County, WA' Dungeness River, Sequim, WA 2 Dungeness River, Taylor Cut-off Road, WA 2 Entiat River, Chelan County, WA2 Elwha River, Clallam County, WA2 Flathead River, MT2 Flathead River, Bradley Channel Area, MT2 Flathead River, near Kalispell, MT2 Flathead River, Old Steel Bridge, near Kalispell, MT2 Foster Creek Road, Douglas County, WA 2 Green River between Kent and Auburn, WA and Allentown, WA2 Green River, State Highway 181, WA2 Henderson Bay, Purdy, WA2 Hoh River, County Road 16, WA 2 Hoh River, U.S. Highway 101, WA2 Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1360)2 Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1361)2 Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1362)2 Hoko River, Sekiu, WA2 Hood Canal, Hoodsport, WA2 Hoquiam River, WA2 Kootenai River,. Bonners Ferry, ID 2 Kootenai River, Kootenai Flats Area District #1, ID2 La Conner, Swinomish Channel, WA2 Methow River, WA (MET 1-74)2 Methbw River, WA (MET 2-74)2 Methow River, WA (MET 3-74)2 Methow River, Barclay Canal, WA2 Methow River, Twisp, WA2 Status Report for Construction Maintenance Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1967 1950 1950 1964 1981 1961 1978 1951 1972 1955 1948 1964 1962 1972 1976 1977 1980 1980 1956 1961 1964 1977 1977 1977 1950 1965 1979 1974 1974 1974 1976 1949 22,956 2,155 2,895 52,0409 99,000 14,093 38,000 17,303 20,940 26,265 33,347 13,438 50,000 24,605 27,001 37,359 143,000 194,000 22,08210 11,916 41,622 21,083 59,812 52,600 42,325 14,885 40,525 15,700 11,200 13,450 19,810 31,783 38-27 TABLE 38-E (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1982 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Methow River, Twisp-Carlton Highway, Vicinity of Twisp, WA2 Methow River, Vicinity of Pateros, WA2 Mineral Creek, Lewis County, WA2 Moclips River, Moclips, WA2 Newaukum River, Lewis County, Hamilton, WA2 Nisqually River, near Elbe, WA2 Nisqually River, Thurston County, WA2 Nisqually River, Vicinity of Elbe, WA2 Nooksack River, Guide Bridge Location, WA2 Nooksack River, above Highway 1Z Bridge, WA2 North Fork Skykomish River, WA2 Okanogan River, WA2 Okanogan River, Omak, WA' Pilchuck River, WA2 Pilchuck River, Everett, WA2 Pilchuck River, State Highway, 92, Granite Falls, WA 2 Powell County High School, Deer Lodge, MT2 Pysht River, Sekiu, WA2 Queets River, Jefferson County Sewage Lagoon, WA2 Quillayute River, Quileute Tribal Float and Bridge, WA2 Quinalt River, Grays Harbor, WA2 Quinalt River Road, Jefferson County, WA2 Rock Creek, Granite County, MT2 Rock Creek, Missoula County, MT2 Rock Creek Road, MT2 Rye Creek, MT2 St. Maries, St. Joe River, ID Sammamish River, WA Sauk River, WA2 Sewage Treatment Plant, Missoula, MT 2 Shelton Creek, WA' Skagit River, WA (Avon Bypass) Status Report for Construction Maintenance Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred 1951 1951 1972 1977 1972 1948 1960 1952 1950 1960 1981 1974 1981 1971 1980 1971 1964 1977 1981 1972 1981 1961 1974 1973 1980 1973 1942 1967 1974 1965 1979 1968 33,200 11,726 11,836 17,608 24,792 37,636 26,790 19,445 6,075 10,807 222,500 10,100 2,230,00011 10,713 54,000 30,973 11,291 86,160 125,000 39,300 208,000 15,928 49,657 31,565 50,000 22,819 357,698 2,582,53612 20,860 50,00013 872,02114 54,4687 38-28 TABLE 38-E (Continued) SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Project Skagit River, Cape Horn Road, WA2 Skagit River, Deadman's Slough, WA2 Skagit River, Pressentin Creek, WA2 Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA2 Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA (Job 66-1)2 Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA (Job 67-1)2 Snohomish River, Lowell- Snohomish River Road, WA2 Snohomish River, Snohomish WA2 Snoqualmie River, West Snoqulamie, WA 2 Soleduck River Bridge, WA2 Soleduck River, near Mora Road Bridge, WA2 Spokane, Spokane River, WA Startup, Skykomish and Wallace Rivers, WA' Stillaguamish River, South Fork, Mountain Loop Highway, near Robe, WA2 Stillwater River, MT 2 Stillwater and Whitefish Rivers, MT2 Strong Creek, Hope, ID 2 Tahola, WA2 Upper Puyallup River, WA3 Wenatchee Canyons 1 and 2, WA4 West Fork Foster Creek, WA 2 Wynoochee River, County Road 141, WA2 Wynoochee River, near Montesano, WA2 Wynoochee River, near Montesano, WA (WR-1-72)2 Yakima, Yakima River, WA Yakima River, Cle Elum, WA2 Yakima River, below mouth of Teanaway River, near Cle Elum, WA2 For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1982 Full Report Operation See Annual and Status Report for Construction Maintenance Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1966 1980 1980 1963 1966 1967 1969 1970 1977 1961 1963 1939 1970 1964 1973 1977 1970 1979 1938 1977 1958 1976 1969 1972 1948 1949 1947 46,489 93,000 137,000 40,753 17,719 50,00015 44,227 60,900 15,565 16,436 11,433 2,9447 271,713 50,00016 17,457 34,513 8,442 223,893 71,49517 544,331 19,513 111,072 50,00018 50,000 381,961 8,047 48,272 38-29 TABLE 38-E (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 38-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1982 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Yakima River, West Richland, WA2 Completed 1977 36,768 - 'Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Sec- 8Excludes $14,300 for restudy. tion 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. 9Excludes Public Works Acceleration Act funds of $340,066. 2Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Sec- '�Excludes $21,807 contributed funds expended. tion 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended. "Includes $125,000 preauthorization cost. 'Authorized by Works Progress Administration Project No. '2Excludes $696,923 contributed funds expended. Includes OP 65-93-917. $117,420 preconstruction planning. 4Authorized by Secretary of Army under authority of Section '3Excludes $5,340 contributed funds expended. 201, Public Law 298, 89th Congress, H. Doc. 91-370. '4Includes $100,221 preauthorization cost. 5Excludes $10,000 contributed funds expended. 1'Excludes $43,000 contributed funds expended. 6Includes $6,999 for recreation facilities at completed project "6Excludes $46,182 contributed funds expended. (Code 710). Excludes $13,500 contributed funds expended. '7Emergency Relief Funds, Works Progress Administration. 7Preconstruction planning only. "'Excludes $21,311 contributed funds expended. TABLE 38-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1982 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Priest Rapids Dam, Columbia River, WA 1954 350,000' 'For partnership planning. Excludes funds expended for acquisition of lands under partnership arrangement for Priest Rapids and Wanapum Dams, in accordance with Public Law 544, 83d Congress. Project constructed by Grant County Public Utility District. 38-30 TABLE 38-G SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Contri- Full Report Date Federal buted See Annual Deauth- Funds Funds Project Report For orized Expended Expended Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, ID, MT, and WA: Crab and Wilson Creeks, WA 1958 1964 $ 9,1001 St. Regis River, MT 1958 1978 4,4002 Wenatchee River, WA 1958 1978 2,0003 Hammersley Inlet, WA 1950 1978 - - (Uncompleted Portion) Port Angeles Harbor, WA 1960 1977 - - (Uncompleted Portion) Port Gamble Harbor, WA 1953 1977 - - (Uncompleted Portion) Skagit River, WA 1950 1978 - - (Uncompleted Portion) 'Includes $100 for preauthorization studies and $9,000 2Includes $3,000 for preauthorization studies and $1,400 for preconstruction planning. for preconstruction planning. 3Includes $2,000 for preauthorization studies. TABLE 38-H LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF DOUBLE LOCK AND DAM (See Section 11) Section Large Lock Small Lock Miles above mouth 1% 1'A Clear width of chamber Feet 80 28 Maximum available length Feet 760 123 Lift Feet 26 26 Depth on upper miter sill' Feet 36 16 Depth on intermediate miter sill2 Feet 29 - Depth on lower miter sill2 Feet 29 16 Character of foundation Clay Clay Kind of dam Fixed dam with Fixed dam with gated spillway. gated spillway. Type of construction Concrete Concrete Year completed 1916 1916 Cost 3 3 'Low water in upper pool. 2Mean lower low water in Puget Sound. 3Cost of double lock and dam was $2,224,712 and the emergency gates, completed in 1923, $174,693. 38-31 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 38-I PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Name of Project Date Survey Conducted Washington: Blaine Harbor September 1982 Hammersley Inlet December 1981 Mats Mats Bay July 1982 Olympia Harbor January 1982 Port Angeles Harbor August 1982 Port Townsend August 1982 Shilshole Bay January 1982 TABLE 38-J Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization)1 Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs (1982) Bowman Hilton Mobile Home Park, WA $ 201,438 Cottonwood Creek, Deer Lodge, MT 54,219 Dosewallips River, Brinnon, WA 101,537 Elwha Klallam Reservation, Elwha River, WA2 9,688 Skagit River, Hamilton, WA2 13,000 Sultan, WA 75,849 Wallace River, Startup, WA3 102 TOTAL $ 455,833 'For fiscal year costs on Okanogan River at Oroville, WA, see Table 38-A. 2Unfavorable reconnaissance report. 3Detailed project report terminated. 38-32 SEATTLE WASHINGTON, DISTRICT TABLE 38-K Emergency Flood Control Activities Repair, Flood Fighting, and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs (1982) Advance preparation $ 221,989 Flood emergency operations 27,390 Repair and restoration: King County, WA -2,461 Kootenai County, ID 38,232 Missoula County, MT 77,000 Snohomish, County, WA 55,223 Yakima County, WA 72,185 TOTAL $ 489,558 38-33 WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT * This District consists of all Columbia River drainage Dam, except the Yakima River Basin above the Van and tributaries thereto between the head of the McNary Giesen Street Bridge near Richland, WA. pool (River Mile 345.4) and the Umatilla Bridge below McNary IMPROVEMENTS Flood Control 1. Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Protection Projects.................. 2. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ...... ............... 3. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................. ............. 4. Lucky Peak Lake, ID ...................... 5. Mill Creek Lake, WA ......... ............ 6. Ririe Lake, ID ................ ............. 7. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ...................... 8. Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, OR ............ 9. Zintel Canyon Dam, WA................. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 10. Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID ........... 11. Ice Harbor Lock and Dam-Lake Sacajawea-WA ..................... 12. Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge, ID and W A ..................... ............. 13. Little Goose Lock and Dam- Lake Bryan-WA ........................ 14. Lower Granite Lock and Dam, WA .......... 15. Lower Monumental Lock and Dam-Lake Herbert G. West-WA........... 16. Lower Snake River Fish & Wildlife Compensation Plan, WA, OR, ID ............ 17. McNary Lock and Dam-Lake Wallula- OR and WA.. .......... ............. Page 39-1 18. Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, OR, WA and ID............... 39-2 General Investigations 19. Surveys ................... ................ 39-2 20. Collection and Study of Basic Data........... 39-2 21. Continuation of Planning and 39-2 Engineering ................. ............. 39-3 Page 39-8 39-8 39-8 39-8 Tables 39-3 Table 37-A Cost & Financial Statement ..... 39-9 39-3 Table 37-B Authorizing Legislation ........... 39-11 39-4 Table 37-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............... 39-13 Table 37-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............. 39-13 39-4 Table 37-G Deauthorized Projects ............. 39-15 Table 37-H Columbia River Basin, Local 39-4 Flood Control Projects........... 39-16 - Table 37-I Inspection of Completed 39-5 Flood Control Projects........ 39-17 Table 37-J Principal Data Concerning Navi- 39-5 gation Lock, Spillway Dam, Power- 39-6 plant and Impoundment ........ 39-18 Table 37-K Snake River Downstream from 39-6 Johnson Bar Landing, OR, WA and ID ......................... . .... 39-22 39-7 39-7 Flood Control 1. COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS Location. Improvements included in this project are along Columbia River and its tributaries. Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1950 approved a general comprehensive plan for Columbia River Basin for flood control and other purposes based on plans in H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. and authorized $75 million to be appropriated for partial accomplishment of certain projects. Of that authorization, an amount not to exceed $15 million was allotted for construction of local flood protection works throughout Columbia River Basin, subject to conditions that all work undertaken pursuant to 39-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 authorization should be economically justified prior to construction, and local cooperation specified in 1936 Flood Control Act, as amended, should be required. (See Tables 39-B and 39-H for projects in Walla Walla District.) Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations during fiscal year. No projects were recommended for deauthorization during the fiscal year. 2. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended. Fiscal year costs for preauthorization studies were $7,500 for Baxter Creek, OR; $7,500 for Garden City, ID; $7,500 for Lapwai Creek, ID; and $44,299 for Mill Slough, ID. Emergency bank protection, Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress. Federal costs of $7,500 for streambank protection preauthorization study at Lawyer Creek, Kamiah, ID were incurred in FY 1982. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for fiscal year were $100,211 for disaster preparedness, $67,744 for emergency operations, and $492,455 for rehabilitation. 3. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Federal law requires local interests to maintain and operate completed local protection projects in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of Army. Inspections were made to determine extent of compliance and to advise local interests as necessary of measures required to correct deficiencies. See Table 39-I for inspections made during fiscal year. Fiscal year costs were $83,045. Total costs to September 30, 1982 have been $623,151. 4. LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID Location. On Boise River in southwestern Idaho about 10 miles southeast of city of Boise. Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam about 250 feet high above streambed and 1,700 feet long at crest, with a lake providing a total storage at upper operating lake level of 306,000 acre-feet. (For further details see page 2000 of Annual Report for 1962.) Construction of existing project was initiated November 1949 and completed June 1961. A feasible method of achieving better flood control through diversion into New York Canal, through Lake Lowell, and into the Snake River has been developed but rejected by local interests due to the infrequent use of this diversion method. Since 1961, $50,039,000 in potential flood damages have been prevented by the project. Final Environmental Impact Statement on the initial project was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on November 29, 1976. A revised draft Environmental Impact Statement for the modification work was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on September 18, 1978. During the detailed investigation of outlet capacity and the potential for adding hydropower to the existing project, a need for an auxiliary outlet became apparent. Construction of an auxiliary outlet was authorized in the Water Resource Development Act of 1976 but to date it has not been funded. In FY 1978, an "Interim Feasibility Report on Modification of Lucky Peak Dam and Lake" (power facilities) was submitted to the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors and approved. States, agencies, and the Chief of Engineers have commented on the report to the Secretary of the Army. The report was forwarded to the Bureau of Reclamation in August 1980. No further action has been taken. A license to construct and operate power facilities at the project was issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Project #2832) to the Boise Project Board of Control on June 10, 1980 and modified on October 9, 1980. The license required that construction begin within two years and be completed within four years of the issuing date of the license. A two year extension of the license was granted on June 10, 1982 by FERC. Federal cost of completed project was $19,081,250. Expenditures on recreation facilities for completed project have been $499,431 for a total project cost of $19,580,681. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Normal operation for flood control, recreation, and irrigation continued. 5. MILL CREEK LAKE, WA Location. In and upstream from Walla Walla, WA, on Mill Creek, a tributary of Walla Walla River. Existing project. Off-stream earthfill storage dam about 145 feet high and 3,200 feet long at the crest, two concrete-lined outlet channels, an earthfill diversion dam, and division structures. A channel through the city of Walla Walla was added to the project in 1941. Federal cost of original project was $2,162,155. Adding recreation facilities has thus far increased project costs by $68,446 to $2,230,601. Not included in that cost is $80,000 contributed by local interests toward construction of the channel through Walla Walla. (For further details see page 2005 of Annual Report for 1962.) Operations during fiscal year. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was completed in 1942. Paving of channel through city of Walla Walla was completed in 1948. Park and recreation facilities were opened to public July 1, 1964. Since 1942, $4,121,000 in potential flood damages have been prevented by the combined storage and channel operation. Final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on December 12, 1975. 39-2 WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT The rehabilitation of the existing project is designed to correct the seepage and internal erosion which have occurred during each subsequent filling of the reservoir requiring during limited flood control use of the project. Project cost estimate for the rehabilitation is $15,800,000 (full funding). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 2006 of Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year. Contract for concrete cutoff wall at the dam is 95 percent complete. Remedial action has also been approved on deteriorated segments of the project channels. This work will enable the channels to handle short duration standard project floods. Operation and maintenance: Routine maintenance by Government forces continued, which included regulation of water control structures and care of recreation area. 6. RIRIE LAKE, ID Location. On Willow Creek, a tributary of Snake River, in Bonneville County, ID. The channel improvement extends from junction of Sand and Willow Creeks to a point on Snake River about 4 miles upstream from city of Idaho Falls, ID. (See Geological Survey quadrangle map, Ucon, ID.) Dam is about 5 miles below confluence of Willow Creek and Meadow Creek and about 15 miles northeast of city of Idaho Falls, ID. (See Geological Survey quadrangle map, Poplar, ID.) Existing Project. A rockfill dam about 840 feet long at the crest and about 184 feet high above streambed and downstream channel construction. Spillway has a concrete- lined channel in right abutment. Outlet works utilize a reinforced concrete conduit leading from an intake tower upstream to a stilling basin downstream at the toe of left abutment. Lake has gross storage capacity of 100,000 acre-feet; 90,000 acre-feet of active space for flood control, irrigation, and recreation and 10,000 acre-feet of space for sediment storage and conservation. Floodway channel is about 8.0 miles long with a capacity of 900 cubic feet per second. Authorization specified that the project shall be constructed by the Corps of Engineers and operated and maintained by the Bureau of Reclamation. Federal cost of completed project is $39,716,448 including $30,000 for value of public-owned lands. Construction began June 1967 and was completed in September 1980. All necessary real estate has been acquired. Entire project is complete. A Project Transfer Agreement with the Bureau of Reclamation was signed on October 14, 1976 for transfer of the project for flood control and recreation use only until the irrigation water rights and space allocation issues are resolved. The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality February 13, 1973. Local Cooperation. Complete except for irrigation contracts. Operations during fiscal year. A contractor's claim was disapproved by the courts and liquidated damage monies were subsequently released with $38,267 used for preliminary seismic stability analysis. 7. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Functional regulation of non-Corps projects was accomplished under several authorities. Regulations of Palisades, Little Wood, and Anderson Ranch Reservoir in Idaho, and Bully Creek, Warm Springs, Agency Valley, and Mason Reservoirs in Oregon, was accomplished as authorized under Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, and coordinated with the Bureau of Reclamation. Flood control operations at Jackson Lake, Arrowrock Reservoir, and Lake Lowell were in accordance with formal agreements with the Bureau of Reclamation. Regulation of American Falls, Owyhee, Magic, Mackay, Cascade, and Deadwood Reservoirs, Idaho, for flood control was accomplished under informal agreements. Brownlee, Oxbow, and Hells Canyon Reservoirs provided flood control regulation in accordance with provisions of the Federal Power Commission license to Idaho Power Company. Fiscal year costs were $171,530. 8. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, HEPPNER, OR Location. On Willow Creek just upstream from Heppner and just downstream from junction of Balm Fork and Willow Creek in Section 35, Township 2 South, Range 26 East, Willamette Meridian. Existing project. Project will provide flood protection to the city of Heppner and downstream area by controlling runoff from a drainage area of 96 square miles. The dam will be a roller compacted concrete structure 160 feet high at crest elevation 2130. Ancillary features include a center uncontrolled spillway with a maximum flood capacity of 93,300 cfs, an outlet works with a capacity of 500 cfs, a minor flow works and diversion works. Gross storage capacity of the project will be 13,250 acre-feet, consisting of 7,750 acre-feet for exclusive flood control, 1,750 acre-feet for joint flood control and irrigation, 1,750 acre-feet exclusive irrigation, and 2,000 acre-feet dead storage for fish, wildlife, recreation, sediment accumulation, and aesthetics. Limited recreation facilities will be provided. The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Environmental Protection Agency on December 20, 1979. The provisions of the Clean Water Act were met by a Section 404(b)(1) Evaluation and a public notice issued January 12, 1980, and a Section 401 certification from the State of Oregon on February 15, 1980. Land acquisition is about 95 percent complete. Contracts have been completed for relocation of the city water main, water tank, and road. Estimated Federal Cost (full funding) is $36,100,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A contract for the main dam was awarded November 5, 1981. The non-overflow section of the main dam structure was topped out in September 1982. The project is 90 percent complete and provides nearly all the flood protection benefits to the city of Heppner. 39-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 9. ZINTEL CANYON DAM, WA Location. In Zintel Canyon, 2.1 miles southwest of Kennewick, WA, in Section 16, Township 8, North, Range 29 East, Willamette Meridian. Existing project. The proposed project consists of a roller compacted concrete dam 102 feet high with uncontrolled spillway and a fixed maximum release outlet works that would create a detention reservoir of 2,500 acre-feet of capacity. The storage comprises 2,100 acrefeet for flood control and 400 acre-feet for sediment. In addition, the project also includes a channel with a capacity of 400 cfs. The plan of improvement would provide protection against heavy rainfall, snowmelt, and thunderstorm floods to the city of Kennewick, WA. Project adopted by resolution of House Committee on Public Works December 15, 1970 and by resolution of Senate Committee on Public Works December 17, 1970 under authority of Section 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 (P.L. 298, 89th Cong.). The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality January 8, 1975. Estimated Federal cost (October 1982) in $8,350,000 and non-Federal cost $1,130,000. Local cooperation. The city of Kennewick, WA has provided a new letter of intent dated February 17,1982 to sponsor the project. Operations during fiscal year. Study update was initiated for reevaluation of project feasibility. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 10. DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID Location. Dam is on North Fork Clearwater River 1.9 miles above its junction with Clearwater River, near Orofino, ID, and about 35 miles east of Lewiston, ID. Existing project. A straight concrete gravity dam about 717 feet in maximum structural height above foundation and 3,300 feet long at crest elevation 1613. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 3,453,000 acre-feet, of which 2,000,000 acre-feet are effective for both local and regional flood control, and for at-site and downstream power generation. In addition, the reservoir, extending 53 miles into a rugged and relatively inaccessible timberland, provides important transportation savings in connection with movements of marketable logs. The project also provides substantial recreation benefits. Powerhouse includes two 90,000 and one 220,000 kilowatt generating units, with provisions for three additional 220,000 kilowatt units for an ultimate installed capacity of 1,060,000 kilowatts. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Fish passage at Dworshak Dam is not feasible, and a hatchery has been built below the dam to assure continuance of fish runs. The reservoir area has been habitat for elk, deer, and other wildlife. Project plans include acquisition of land outside reservoir limits to mitigate losses of big game winter browse areas inundated by reservoir. Construction of the project started April 1963 and is complete except for recreation facilities, and fish and wildlife development. It became operational for flood control June 1972 and has prevented about $728,000 in potential flood damages downstream since then. All project lands have been acquired except those required to replace the loss of wildlife browse areas from inundation by reservoir. Relocations are estimated to be 100 percent complete; dam, 100 percent; fish and wildlife facilities, 95 percent; powerplant, 100 percent; reservoir clearing, 100 percent; and recreation facilities, 93 percent. A reconnaissance report justifying the feasibility and cost benefits for the addition of a 220,000-kilowatt fourth generating unit was completed in FY 1978. Environmental and economic studies on additional generating units have been curtailed due to public opposition. Units 4, 5, and 6 are now classified "inactive." Power generating Unit No. 1, 90,000-kilowatt capacity, was put in service March 1, 1973; Unit No. 2, also 90,000- kilowatt capacity, began producing April 6, 1973; Unit No. 3, 220,000-kilowatt capacity, went on the line April 20, 1973. Power generation through September 1982 has been 17.62 billion kilowatt hours. Eighty mini-recreation sites have been established along the reservoir shoreline. Each site includes at least a picnic table, U.S. Forest Service-type fireplace, and chemical toilet. Some of the sites have several picnic tables. Dent Acres recreation site was opened to the public in August 1976. Facilities consist of a boat launching ramp, boat docks, car-trailer parking, comfort stations, and fully developed overnight camping. Freeman Creek recreation site is open to boat access. Estimated total cost for new work is $330,740,000 consisting of $328,000,000 (full funding) for construction and $2,740,000 for value of public-domain lands. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Wildlife habitat browse development continues on project lands to provide winter browse for elk and deer. Acquisition efforts for Smith Ridge to mitigate losses of winter browse areas were discontinued. A contract to pass dam drainage water around the ice sluice was awarded and is scheduled for completion in FY 1983. Operation and maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. A release of 2,678,497 smolts weighing 344,682 pounds was made in the spring of 1982. These fish came from 1,968 adult steelhead that returned to the hatchery and were spawned in the spring of 1981. The 1982 return of adults totaled 3,054 and they are expected to produce 2,600,000 smolts, weighing 340,000 pounds, for release in 1983. Rainbow trout releases into the reservoir totaled 231,070 fish and 71,700 pounds in 1982. A total of 1.89 billion kilowatt hours of electric energy was delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. 11. ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAMLAKE SACAJAWEA, WA Location. On Snake River, 9.7 miles above river mouth at head of Lake Wallula and 12 miles east of Pasco, WA. 39-4 WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladders, appurtenant facilities, and relocation of railroads. Project provides for navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. Reservoir has normal operating range between elevations 440 and 437 mean sea level, and extends upstream about 31.9 miles, providing slack water to Lower Monumental Lock and Dam. Structure is about 2,790 feet long and about 130 feet high above streambed. Beginning at south end, project consists of a concrete nonoverflow section, concrete powerhouse, spillway dam, navigation lock, and an earth and rockfill embankment at north abutment. Fish passing facilities, including two ladders, are provided. Powerplant now has three 90,000-kilowatt units and three 111,000-kilowatt units in operation. Spillway dam is 610 feet long, and overflow crest at Elevation 391 mean sea level is surmounted by 10 radial gates, 50 feet wide by 51 feet high, which provide capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Deck is at Elevation 453 mean sea level and provides a service road and track for a gantry crane. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide and 14 feet deep is provided from mouth of Snake River to dam. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction started December 1955 and the pyoject was placed in useful operation January 1962. The project is considered complete. An Environmental Impact Statement concerning power units 4 through 6 was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality August 1971. Power generation through September 1982 has been 46.45 billion kilowatt hours. Estimated cost for new work is $168,117,595 consisting of $129,578,479 for the completed project, $36,702,316 for power units 4 through 6, $87,000 for U.S. Coast Guard navigation aids, $22,300 for value of public-domain lands, $1,645,000 for recreational facilities, and a non- Federal contribution of $82,500 toward an artificial fish spawning channel. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. Contract was awarded for State of Washington wildlife habitat maintenance. 2.80 billion kilowatt hours of electric energy were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. A total of 4,386,471 tons of cargo passed through navigation lock during calendar year 1981. 12. LEWISTON-CLARKSTON BRIDGE, ID AND WA Location. On the Snake River, River Mile 141.3, 1.7 miles upstream of the existing interstate bridge connecting the towns of Lewiston, ID and Clarkston, WA. Existing project. The project consists of a new fixed high-level four laie highway bridge and approaches on U.S. Highway 12 across the Snake River to be constructed at a cost "not to exceed $21,000,000." In December 1981 Congress authorized an additional expenditure of $2,200,000 for construction of Lewiston's North Ramp which had been an unfunded additive item. Final Environmental Impact Statement Supplement filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on July 16, 1979. Local cooperation. Non-Federal interests have provided, without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction of the bridge and its approaches, and after construction have agreed to own, operate toll free, and maintain the bridge and approach facilities. The non-Federal costs for land and relocation are $755,193. Operations during fiscal year. Construction of the bridge structure is complete. Contract was awarded in April 1982 for construction of the North Ramp and is 60 percent complete with completion scheduled by December 1982. 13. LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAMLAKE BRYAN, WA Location. Dam is 70.3 miles above mouth of Snake River at head of Lower Monumental Lake, about 40 airline miles northerly of Walla Walla, WA, and 50 miles westerly of Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladder, and appurtenant facilities. Improvements provide navigation, hydroelec tric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 638 and 633 mean sea level. Lake Bryan extends upstream about 37.2 miles and provides slack water to Lower Granite Lock and Dam. Dam structure is 2,670 feet long and about 160 feet high above streambed and consists of a powerhouse, spillway dam, navigation lock, and necessary nonoverflow sections. Fish passing facilities include one ladder with entrances on both shores with a fish channel through spillway which connects to powerhouse fish collection system and south shore ladder. Powerhouse now has six 135,000-kilowatt generating units for a capacity of 810,000 kilowatts. Spillway dam can pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and a minimum depth of 15 feet over the sills. Relocations along the lake include 32 miles of Camas Prairie Railroad, 5.8 miles of county roads, 2.2 miles of state highways, and Central Ferry bridge. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on January 8, 1975. Power generation through September 1982 has been 33.17 billion kilowatt hours. Estimated cost for new work is $220,687,527 consisting of $160,413,215 for the completed project, $59,885,312 for power units 4 through 6, $87,000 for U.S. Coast Guard navigation aids, and $302,000 for value of publicly-owned land. Local cooperation. None required. 39-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Wildlife habitat development continued as well as maintenance of previously developed habitat. Operation and maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. A total of 3.51 billion kilowatt hours of electric energy was delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. A design contract was awarded for repairs on the navigation lock discharge culvert bulkhead and guide with repair work scheduled for FY 1983. A total of 3,536,124 tons of cargo passed through the navigation lock during calendar year 1981. 14. LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WA Location. At River Mile 107.5 on Snake River at head of Lake Bryan and about 33 miles downstream from Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The facility includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladder, and appurtenant facilities, and requires about 8 miles of backwater levees along Snake and Clearwater Rivers at Lewiston, ID. Benefits afforded by project include slack-water navigation, power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. Water surface at the dam varies between Elevations 738 and 724 to maintain a normal operating range between Elevations 738 and 733 in the Lewiston, ID-Clarkston, WA area. Dam structure is about 3,200 feet long and about 146 feet high above streambed. Powerhouse now has six 135,000-kilowatt units. Spillway has a capacity for a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Navigation lock is a single-lift type (105 feet maximum) with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and a minimum depth of 15 feet over the sills. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction started July 1965 and is about 99 percent complete. Acquisition of lands is complete. Lake was filled February 15, 1975 and the first power generating unit went on the line April 15, 1975. Approximately $3,245,000 in potential flood damage has been prevented since the levees became functional. An Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality November 1971. A revised statement to include the additional units was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on July 23, 1975. Installation of three additional 135,000-kilowatt generating units was completed in May 1978. Remaining items of work include final modifications to Lewiston's water intake andacquisition of a permanent trash shear boom. Power generation through September 1982 has been 20.65 billion kilowatt hours. Estimated cost for new work is $367,878,645 consisting of $321,530,134 for the initial installation, $46,211,511 forpower units 4 through 6, $135,000 for U.S. Coast Guard navigation aids, and $2,000 for value of publicly-owned lands. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Contracts were completed for repair of stator winding on generator No. 3 and relocation of the navigation lock bridge. Fingerling facility modifications and wildlife habitat development contracts continued with completion scheduled in FY 1983. Contracts awarded in FY 82 include: a containment boom for trash handling, a temporary trash shearboom at the powerhouse forebay, a temporary back-flush for Lewiston's water intake, miscellaneous recreation site deficiencies additional fingerling collection facility raceways, and new irrigation pumps for Goose Pastures. Operation and maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. Contracts were awarded for State of Washington wildlife habitat maintenance and dredging of the Clearwater River at Lewiston. A total of 3.58 billion kilowatt hours of electric energy were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. A total of 2,135,284 tons of cargo passed through the navigation lock during calendar year 1981. 15. LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAMLAKE HERBERT G. WEST, WA Location. On Snake River at head of Lake Sacajawea, about 45 miles northeast of Pasco, WA, and 41.6 miles above river mouth. Existing project. The facility includes a dam, powerplant, fish ladders, navigation lock, appurtenant facilities, and relocated railroads and highways. The project functions include navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation and irrigation. Reservoir has normal operating range between Elevations 540 and 537. The lake extends about 28.7 miles upstream to Little Goose Lock and Dam. The dam is concrete gravity type with earthfill and rockfill abutments. It is 3,800 feet long including abutments, spillway, navigation lock, and powerhouse, and is about 135 feet high above streambed. There are two fish ladders, one at each end of the dam. Powerhouse has six 135,000-kilowatt units for a total capacity of 810,000 kilowatts. Spillway is 508 feet long, and overflow crest at Elevation 483 feet above mean sea level is surmounted by 8 radial gates, each 50 feet wide and 61 feet high. Deck is at Elevation 553 feet and provides a service road and track for a gantry crane. Navigation lock is single-lift type, with lock chamber 86 by 675 feet and minimum depth of 15 feet over the sills. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction began June 1961, and the project was opened to navigation April 1969. The project is complete. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on May 21, 1976. Power generation through September 1982 has been 34.71 billion kilowatt hours. Estimated cost for new work is $236,445,211 consisting of $184,712,361 for the completed project, $51,645,850 for power units 4 through 6, and $87,000 for U.S. Coast Guard navigation aids. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Contract was completed for fish pump noise control installation. Operation and maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. A contract was awarded to the State of Washington for wildlife habitat maintenance. A 39-6 WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT total of 2.80 billion kilowatt hours of electric energy was delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Cargoes totaling 3,754,625 tons passed through navigation lock during calendar year 1981. 16. LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH & WILDLIFE COMPENSATION PLAN, WA, OR, ID Location. At various locations within the Columbia Snake River drainage in the States of Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Existing project. The project will consist of a series of fish hatcheries and wildlife development areas at sites to be selected. The project will compensate for loss of wildlife habitat and anadromous and resident fishery inundated as a result of construction of four multiple purpose dams and reservoirs on the Lower Snake River (Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, Lower Granite). In 1980 the first release from the McCall, ID summer chinook hatchery was made, and the adult trapping facility which provides the fish egg supply for the McCall Hatchery became operational. The real estate design memorandum, feature design memorandum on the McCall Hatchery, Hagerman Hatchery, Lookingglass Hatchery, Lyons Ferry Hatchery, Dworshak Hatchery Expansion, Sawtooth Hatchery, East Fork Salmon River Satellite Facility, the off-project wildlife lands, and the site selection report have all been approved. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality on November 2, 1977. The compensation plan is 27 percent complete. Estimated Federal cost of the project is $177,000,000 (full funding). Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. McCall Hatchery released 122,247 summer chinook smolts. A total of 551 adults were trapped this year and it is expected that 400,000 smolts will be released next year from the 648,000 eggs collected. Three facilities became operational: Lyons Ferry (Phase I), Spring Chinook Rearing Facilities at Dworshak National Fish Hatchery, and Lookingglass Hatchery. The facilities began raising steelhead at Lyons Ferry and spring chinook at the latter two facilities with first releases anticipated in FY 1983. Contracts were awarded for the expansion of Hagerman National Fish Hatchery and the East Fork Salmon River Satellite Facility. The design for Sawtooth Hatchery is 98 percent complete and the design for Lyons Ferry, Phase II, is 65 percent complete. Studies are continuing to identify potential hatchery sites in Idaho and contacts with landowners for participation in off-project wildlife programs in Washington are progressing. 17. McNARY LOCK AND DAMLAKE WALLULA, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River 292 miles above mouth, near Umatilla, Oregon, and 3 miles above mouth of Umatilla River. Existing project. Includes a concrete dam 7,300 feet long overall and 183 feet high above streambed, powerplant with 14 power generating units, navigation lock, fishways, levees and pumping plants, incidental irrigation, and modification and relocation of railroad bridges over the Columbia and Snake Rivers in order to eliminate hazards to navigation. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction started May 1947 and is complete. Project placed on permanent operating basis and lake raised to Elevation 340 in November 1953. Except for maintenance interruptions, all 14 power units have been in commercial operation since February 1957. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in June 1976. Power generation through September 1982 has been 170.08 billion kilowatt hours. Estimated total cost for new work is $330,723,486 consisting of $322,154,486 for construction, $69,000 for Coast Guard navigation aids, and $8,500,000 for modification of the Union Pacific Railroad bridge over Columbia River by the Coast Guard. Expenditures on recreation facilities for completed' project have been $1,572,983. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A navigation study was completed which evaluated hazardous conditions for downbound river traffic in the navigation channel below the Ice Harbor powerhouse. The study determined that while crosscurrent problems exist, none of the technically feasible solutions proposed met the approval of the Columbia River Towboat Association representatives. No further action is anticipated at this time. A study also continued to evaluate the feasibility of installing two tube turbine generators with a combined capacity of 6.5 megawatts in the water supply conduits for the North Shore Fishway Attraction Water System. Anticipated annual energy production is 43,500,000 kilowatt hours. The contract for dredging of the navigation channel was completed in April 1982. A fourth fish transportation barge was placed in service in March 1982. Code 710: Federal recreation cost sharing funds of $146,573 were expended for 1.1 miles of Chinawa Bike Trail development, final development of Wye and Two Rivers Parks, and repair work at Columbia Park swimming lagoon. Operation and maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. A report justifying the need for major powerhouse rehabilitation at McNary was not approved. A revised report outlining a repair and modernization program was approved and funded as a high priority program. Contracts awarded included: heat pumps, drainage pump, protection relays, transfer oil heat exchanger, battery chargers, oil pumps and 3-D cams, generator thrust bearing, radio system, telephone system, governor air compressors, bridge crane alignment, and transformer cooling and fire protection. Approximately 6.70 billion kilowatt hours of electric energy were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. A total of 7,995,446 tons of 39-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 commodities passed through the navigation lock during calendar year 1981. 18. SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM JOHNSON BAR LANDING, OR, WA, AND ID Location. On Snake River downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, River Mile 231. Snake River, which is largest tributary of Columbia River, rises in Yellowstone National Park in western part of Wyoming, flows generally westerly for about 1,000 miles, and empties into Columbia River near Pasco, WA, 324 miles from Pacific Ocean. Existing project. The River and Harbor Act of 1945 authorized construction of dams as necessary and open channel improvements for purposes of providing slackwater navigation and irrigation between mouth of Snake River and Lewiston, ID. That authorization modified previous authorizations only for that portion of improvement below Lewiston, ID. Acts of June 13, 1902, and August 30, 1935, as they pertain to open river improvement from Lewiston, ID, to Johnson Bar Landing, remain part of existing project. Improvements included in existing project are Ice Harbor Lock and Dam--Lake Sacajawea; Little Goose Lock and Dam-Lake Bryan; Lower Granite Lock and Dam; Lower Monumental Lock and Dam-Lake Herbert G. West; and open-river improvement, Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing. Each of the four locks and dams is described in an individual report, and cost and financial data for the entire project are shown on Tables 39-A and 39-K. Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose and Lower Granite are in full operation. Lower Granite construction is about 99 percent complete. (See individual reports for details.) (For further details see Annual Reports, page 2246 for 1903; page 1986 for 1906; page 1991 for 1915; and page 1981 for 1962.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. On Snake River from the mouth to Johnson Bar Landing there are 11 privately owned barge terminals in use for shipping grain, petroleum products, fertilizers, cement, and other general cargo. There are also 4 marinas and 28 small-boat launching ramps, all open to public use. The facilities serve slackwater navigation to Snake River Mile 138, the site of Lewiston, ID. That slack-water reaches the Lewiston, ID-Clarkston, WA area since the lake behind Lower Granite Dam was filled in February 1975. Operations during fiscal year. See individual reports for Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite locks and dams. On Snake River from Lewiston, ID, to Johnson Bar Landing, reconnaissance and condition surveys were conducted and navigation aids were maintained. General Investigations 19. SURVEYS The Upper Snake River and Tributaries is the principal ongoing survey. The area covered by the study extends from the headwaters of the Snake River in Wyoming down to and including the Weiser River in Idaho. The potential for supplemental water storage, power generation, and streamflow augmentation to enhance fisheries, continues to be the primary focus. The Columbia River and Tributaries is a survey study directed by the North Pacific Division in which the Walla Walla District is participating. The feasibility of utilizing an outlet at McNary Lock and Dam to furnish water downstream on the Oregon shore for municipal, industrial, irrigation, and fish enhancement use is the primary investigation for Walla Walla District under this study. Also, identification of additional potential water storage sites for the Columbia River System was continued. Total cost of surveys during fiscal year was $566,918. That sum was expended for: flood control studies, $470,049; special studies including Soil Conservation Service, Bureau of Reclamation, Water Quality Management, Cooperation with States, $55,026; review of deferred projects, $1,732; and $40,110 for review of completed projects. 20. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the fiscal year flood hazard data for a number of locations in the District were collected and analyzed. Flood information was provided to several Federal agencies, to the States of Idaho, Oregon, and Washington, to various cities and counties in those states, and to some private organizations. Total cost of collection and study of basic data during fiscal year was $145,826 which was expended for dam inspection program, $753; dam inventory, $70; flood plain management services, $60,002; and technical services, $85,000. 21. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING McNary Lock and Dam (Second Powerhouse) OR and WA. McNary Second Powerhouse is a proposed addition on the south shore of McNary Lock and Dam on the Columbia River near Umatilla, OR. The project will increase the present 1127 megawatt generating capacity by an additional 742 megawatts. Provisions are included for compensation of negative impacts on fish and wildlife. The project is estimated to cost $600,000,000 at October 1, 1982 price levels. Annual power benefits are estimated to be $79,327,000. The General Design Memorandum Phase I was prepared under the Water Resource Development Act of 1976, Public Law 94-587, and submitted to the Secretary of the Army on July 1, 1981. Studies were initiated in FY 1982 on the General Design Memorandum Phase II and the Powerhouse Preliminary Design Report with expenditures of $1,498,697. 39-8 TABLE 39-A WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section In Text Project 4. Lucky Peak Lake, ID 5. Mill Creek Lake, WA 6. Ririe Lake, ID 8. Willow Creek Lake, OR 9. Zintel Canyon Dam, WA 10. Dworshak Dam and Reservior, ID 11. Ice Harbor Lock and Dam, WA 12. Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge, ID 13. Little Goose Lock and Dam, WA 14. Lower Granite Lock and Dam, WA 15. Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, WA Funding FY 79 New Work Approp. 50,000 Cost 49,961 Maint. Approp. 389,000 Cost 399,478 New Work Approp. - Cost - Maint. Approp. 775,400 Cost 773,744 Rehab. Approp. - Cost - New Work Approp. 1,150,000 Cost 1,040,498 New Work Approp. 373,100 Cost 372,662 New Work Approp. - Cost - New Work Approp. 4,720,700 Cost 4,722,655 Maint. Approp. 3,126,200 Cost 3,128,900 New Work Approp. * 1,567,200 Cost 1,567,782 Maint. Approp. 2,937,700 Cost 2,949,302 New Work Approp. 880,000 Cost 869,359 New Work Approp. 3,281,000 Cost 3,322,622 Maint. Approp. 2,029,900 Cost 2,016,697 New Work Approp. 5,877,100 Cost 5,905,756 Maint. Approp. 2,290,500 Cost 2,296,935 New Work Approp. 3,156,400 Cost 3,193,911 Maint. Approp. 1,708,800 Cost Total Cost to FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep. 30, 1982 35.000 - - 19.580,6811 15,797 19,242 495,700 641,500 658,700 451,111 653,207 647,109 196,900 196,946 473,830 465,524 138,623 1,778,275 1,423,064 15,000 15,000 7,618,000 7,204,811 3,629,100 3,584,353 2,126,000 2,047,262 3,117,100 2,677,636 6,535,000 6,521,804 2,569,600 2,348,876 2,318,800 2,142,940 3,905,395 3,491,903 2,811,100 2,612,169 1,367,300 1,363,277 3,398,000 220,140 215,360 6,382,000 6,313,198 5,283,000 5,543,180 4,616,000 4,729,546 3,911,700 3,879,789 972,000 951,132 2,953,000 3,216,745 9,050,000 8,632,959 2,095,850 1,779,273 2,447,360 2,528,912 3,724,000 4,063,602 3,350,000 3,372,373 261,150 221,243 2,173,000 220,400 223,960 2,770,000 2,846,712 -39,000 -38,267 19,730,000 19,820,937 25,000 19,250 3,755,000 4,061,316 4,798,496 4,079,228 30,000 131,082 3,549,684 3,665,786 4,535,000 4,979,230 505,000 1,044,258 2,896,600 2,913,390 2,885,000 2,956,258 4,684,500 4,788,472 49,298 2,372,100 1,693,972 3,230,045 2,143,387 2,540,071 , vv vv _ 19,580,6811 6,354,404 6,306,853 2,230,6012 2,230,6012 4,983,149 4,980,272 9,625,830 9,625,435 39,677,448 39,677,434 2,7,855,574 27,851,041 425,153 419,403 320,779,1963 320,774,1393 29,382,0654 28,578,5414 166,993,9455 166,993,9366 32,400,4337 32,307,3357 21,545,000 21,544,321 220,298,5278 220,298,5149 21,270,69222 21,169,60522 365,258,64510 365,250,91311 19,342,36212 19,250,05112 236,358,211'3 236,358,20414 19,548,504s15 19,492,60615 39-9 TABLE 39-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep. 30, 1982 16. Lower Snake Fish & New Work Wildlife Compensa- Approp. 6,480,000 4,538,600 14,811,000 18,660,000 46,049,600 tion, ID, OR & WA Cost 6,481,737 3,663,819 15,030,546 19,253,981 45,988,326 17. McNary Lock & New Work Dam-Lake Wallula Approp. 3,456,700 7,665,000 8,126,000 1,137,000 321,854,48616 OR & WA Cost 3,534,504 7,534,824 6,531,897 2,822,859 321,813,16317 Maint. Approp. 4,457,200 6,386,600 6,229,200 8,944,380 79,131,05618 Cost 4,461,398 5,258,598 7,009,520 8,582,087 78,376,20218 18. Snake River Down- New Work stream from John- Approp. 13,881,700 9,968,295 7,053,000 3,420,000 989,344,09119 son Bar Landing, Cost 13,990,071 9,251,318 7,015,246 4,180,896 989,336,33019 OR, WA & ID Maint. Approp. 8,981,900 11,663,000 10,943,360 13,533,584 93,040,51420 Cost 8,971,919 10,677,118 11,274,502 13,933,979 92,683,06421 IIncludes $499,431 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 2Excludes $80,000 contributed funds, but includes $68,446 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Oompleted Projects. 3Includes $2,046,100 regular project construction funds appropriated for and expended by Department of Interior in Fiscal Years 1969 through 1972 for hatchery operations. Includes $655,000 appropriated and expended for additional unit. 4Includes $10,744,800 regular project operation and maintenance funds expended by Department of Interior starting FY 1972 for hatchery operations. Includes $38,996 allotted and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees. 5Includes $713,150 appropriated for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Excludes $82,500 contributed for artificial spawning channel. Includes $36,702,316 appropriated for additional units 4 through 6. 6Includes $713,150 expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Includes $36,702,307 expended for additional units 4 through 6. 7'Includes $49,984 allotted and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees; $455,619 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 3Includes $59,885,311 appropriated for additional units 4 through 6. 9Includes $59,885,299 expended for additional units 4 through 6. '�Includes $46,211,511 appropriated for additional units 4 through 6. "Includes $46,211,511 expended for additional units 4 through 6. Excludes $405,819 contributed funds on lock and dam project. 12Includes $152,719 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 13Includes $51,645,850 appropriated for additional units 4 through 6. 14Includes $51,645,843 expended for additional units 4 through 6. 1"Includes $186,932 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. '6lncludes $1,572,986 appropriated for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 'Includes $1,572,983 expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. lsIncludes $85,280 allotted and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees and $850,416 allotted and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 19Includes $400,150 for new work on previous projects (Pasco to Lewiston), and $34,613 for new work appropriation used for maintenance prior to 1953. Excludes $167,500 contributed funds for new work consisting of $85,000 for previous projects (Pasco to Riparia), plus $82,500 for new work on existing artificial spawning channel. 20Includes $186,570 appropriated for maintenance on previous projects (Pasco to Lewiston) and $291,953 open river Pasco to Lewiston and Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing. 21Includes $186,570 expended for maintenance on previous projects (Pasco to Lewiston) and $276,897 open river Pasco to Lewiston and Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing. 22Includes $435,619 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 39-10 TABLE 39-B WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN. LOCAL FLOOD May 17, 1950 July 24, 1946 Oct. 22, 1976 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 PROTECTION PROJECTS Blackfoot Area, Snake River, ID. Levee left bank. Blackfoot River, ID. Levees, channel improvement, and rectification works. Boise Valley, Boise River, ID, Channel improvement and enlargement, levees, and revetments in Ada County. Canyon County unit was deauthorized April 18, 1967. Grande Ronde Valley, OR. Levees and channel clearing, straightening, and realignment; would complement stream regulation by upstream storage projects. Heise-Roberts Extension, Snake River, ID. Channel clearing and rectification, levees, and bank protection. Kendrick, Potlatch River, ID. Revetted levee. Malheur River, OR. Channel rectification, levees, and bank protection at Vale. Willow Creek unit was deauthorized October 14, 1969. Palouse River, WA. Flood protection for urban and rural areas at Garfield and near Malden. Payette Valley, ID. Channel rectification, levees, and bank protection along 38 miles of Payette River below Black Canyon Dam. Payette Valley was deauthorized 3 October 1978. Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, ID. Concrete-lined channel through Pocatello. Inkom-Marsh Creek unit was deauthorized October 14, 1969. Shelley Area, Snake River, ID. Bank protection. Weiser River, Weiser Area, ID. Intermittent channel realignment and improvement, levees, and bank protection, lower river area. LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID Dam for flood control, irrigation, and recreation. Second outlet for streamflow maintenance. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. MILL CREEK LAKE, WALLA WALLA, WA Off-stream storage project upstream from Walla Walla. Channel improvement through Walla Walla; concrete lined channel. RIRIE LAKE, ID Storage project for flood control,irrigation, recreation, and sports fishery. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, OR Storage project for flood control, recreation, and fish and wildlife. ZINTEL CANYON DAM, KENNEWICK, WA Dam and storage space for temporary detention of flood flows plus channel improvement downstream. 39-11 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 526-79, Chief of Engineers Report dated May 13, 1946 P.L. 94-587 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 578, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 719, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 562,87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 233, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 416, 89th Cong., 2d Sess. 5. 9. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 39-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 10. July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Aug. 15, 1963 11. Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Oct. 22, 1976 Dec. 29, 1981 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 May 25, 1978 Oct. 22, 1976 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended 18. June 13, 1902 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 (BRUCES EDDY) DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID Preparation of detailed plans. Bruces Eddy dam and reservoir for flood control, navigation, power, recreation, and area redevelopment. Redesignation of project as Dworshak Dam and Reservoir. ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM - LAKE SACAJAWEA, WA Unit 1 of 4, Lower Snake River project, Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and irrigation. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. LEWISTON-CLARKSTON BRIDGE, ID AND WA Four lane highway bridge and approaches. Increase of authorized amount to $23,200,000 LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAMLAKE BRYAN,WA Unit 3 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and Dam for navigation, power, and recreation, and irrigation. Designation of reservoir as Lake Bryan. LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WA Unit 4 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, irrigation. LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAMLAKE HERBERT G. WEST, WA Unit 2 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and irrigation. Designation of reservoir as Lake Herbert G. West. LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH & WILDLIFE COMPENSATION PLAN, WA, OR AND ID Fish hatcheries and replacement of wildlife habitat. McNARY LOCK AND DAM-LAKE WALLULA, OR AND WA Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and irrigation. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. SNAKE RIVER MOUTH TO JOHNSON BAR, OR, WA AND ID Open-river navigation. Riparia to Pittsburg Landing. Mouth to Riparia. Pittsburg Landing to Johnson Bar. Supersedes previous legislation mouth to Lewiston, ID, only. See Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite Locks and Dams. S. Doc. 51, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 403, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 88-96 H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 P.L. 94-587 P.L. 97-140 H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. P.L. 91-638 H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. P.L. 95-285 P.L. 94-587 H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 127, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 411, 55th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 2d Sess. 39-12 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 39-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1982 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Columbia River and Tribu- Completed 1968 1,851,195 - taries above Celilo Falls to Kennewick, WA' 'Obviated by The Dalles, John Day, and McNary Projects. TABLE 39-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1982 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Asotin Creek, Asotin, ID' Completed 1951 12,019 - Bear Creek, Kendrick, ID' Completed 1970 133,518 - Blackfoot Area, Snake River, Columbia River Basin, ID Completed 1958 42,796 Blackfoot Reservoir, ID Inactive 1980 267,626 - Blackfoot River, Columbia River Basin, ID Completed 1965 391,143 Boise Valley, Ada County Unit, Columbia River Basin, ID Deferred 1967 46,084 - Catherine Creek Lake, OR Deferred 1978 1,552,000 - Colfax, Palouse River, WA Completed 1966 5,557,240 - Connell, WA' Completed 1967 60,000 - Cottonwood Creek Dam, Boise, ID Active 1973 183,100 - Dayton, Touchet River, WA Completed 1966 380,617 - Dry Creek, WA' Completed 1961 384,426 - Esquatzel Coulee, Connell, WA' Completed 1967 232,792 - Esquatzel Coulee, Mesa, WA' Completed 1969 2,665 Gooding Area, ID' Completed 1954 59,167 - Grande Ronde Lake, OR Deferred 1966 Grande Ronde Valley, Columbia River Basin, OR Deferred 1958 102,458 - Graves Creek, ID' Completed 1953 75,469 - Heise-Roberts Area, Snake River, ID Completed 1955 1,575,838 Heise-Roberts Extension, Columbia River Basin, ID 1968 (a) Henrys Fork Unit Deferred 27,800 - (b) Snake River Unit Completed 3,375,158 - Jackson Hole, Snake River, WY Completed 1978 2,388,270 Kendrick, Potlatch River, Columbia River Basin, ID Completed 1960 59,942 Lapwai Creek, Culdesac, ID' Completed 1972 176,833 - 39-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 39-E OTHER AUTHORIZED (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1982 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Lava Hot Springs, Portneuf River, ID' Completed 1973 113,296 Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, WA' Completed 1972 17,592 Lower Walla Walla River, Columbia River Basin, WA Inactive 1953 4,000 - Lyman Creek, ID' Completed 1971 230,315 - Malheur Improvement District, Snake River, OR Completed 1957 55,894 Malheur River, Vale Unit, Columbia River Basin, OR Completed 1961 325,581 Milton-Freewater, Walla Walla River, OR3 Completed 1968 1,786,753 Mission and Lapwai Creeks, ID' Completed 1965 54,538 Mud Lake, Columbia River Basin, ID Inactive 1957 5,996 Orofino Creek & Clearwater River, Orofino, ID2 Inactive 1949 23,050 Palouse River, Columbia River Basin, WA Deferred - - - Pataha Creek, Pomeroy, WA 2 Completed 1977 110,815 - Payette River, Emmett Sewage Lagoon, ID2 Completed 1967 39,172 Portneuf River & Marsh Creek Pocatello Unit, Columbia River Basin, ID Completed 1969 6,456,032 - Pullman, Palouse, WA Deferred 1964 99,540 - Riverside Area, Pasco, WA' Completed 1972 28,839 - Shelley Area, Snake River, Columbia River Basin, ID Completed 1958 32,335 - Shobe Canyon, Heppner, OR' Completed 1970 5,000 Snake River, Blackfoot, ID' Completed 1980 131,700 - Snake River, Heise Bridge Location, ID2 Completed 1952 8,501 Snake River, Stevens, Blackfoot, ID' Completed 1968 - 32,425 South Fork Clearwater River, Columbia River Basin, ID Inactive 1973 3,899 South Fork Clearwater River, Kooskia-Stites, ID' Completed 1973 61,055 Teton River, Columbia River Basin, ID Inactive 1955 10,387 - Tomanovich-Salmon City, ID' Completed 1955 128,635 - Touchet River, Waitsburg, WA' Completed 1973 72,140 - Tucannon River, Wooten, WA' Completed 1971 73,932 - Umatilla River, OR' Completed 1961 161,540 - Wallowa River, WeaverBridge OR2 Completed 1960 16,118 Weiser River, Columbia River Basin, ID Deferred 1960 37,757 39-14 WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 39-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1982 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Whitebird Creek, Columbia River Basin, ID Inactive 1956 1,896 - Willow Creek, ID' Completed 1963 976 - Yakima River, West Richland, WA 1 4 Completed 1964 238,890 - 'Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 14, PL 79-526. 205, PL 80-858. 3Exclusive of $6,300 contributed funds. 2Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 4Includes $9,000 contributed funds. TABLE 39-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Contri- Full Report Date Federal buted See Annual Deauth- Funds Funds Project Report For orized Expended Expended Asotin Dam, Snake R., ID & WA 1964 1975 -- Boise Valley, Canyon County Unit, ID 1967 10,600 - Camas Creek, ID 1965 9,080 - Little Wood River, ID 1965 21,334 - Malheur River, Willow Creek Unit, ID 1969 13,000 Mill Creek, WA 1977 3,537 Payette Valley, ID 1978 23,178 Portneuf River, Inkom-Marsh Creek, ID - 1969 - - Stuart Gulch Dam, Boise, ID 1974 1979 234,100 - Touchet River,WA - 1977 11,198 - Weiser River, Cambridge- Midvale, ID 75,000 39-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 39-H COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 1 of Text) Estimated Cost to Sep. 30, 1982 Federal Project Status Cost Blackfoot Area, Snake River, ID Completed - 42,796 Blackfoot River, ID Completed - 391,143 Boise Valley, ID Ada County Unit Deferred 1,060,000 46,084 Canyon County Unit Deauthorized - 10,600 Camas Creek, ID Deauthorized - 9,080 Grande Ronde Valley, OR Deferred 8,639,000 102,458 Heise-Roberts Extension, ID Henrys Fork Unit Deferred 165,000 27,800 Snake River Unit Completed - 3,375,158 Kendrick, Potlatch River, ID Completed 59,942 Little Wood River, ID Deauthorized - 21,334 Lower Walla Walla River, WA Inactive 372,000 4,000 Malheur River, OR Vale Unit Completed - 325,581 Willow Creek Unit Deauthorized - 13,000 Mill Creek, WA Deauthorized - 3,537 Mud Lake, ID Inactive 1,187,000 5,996 Palouse River, WA Deferred 914,000 - Payette Valley, ID Deauthorized - 23,178 Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, ID Pocatello Unit Completed - 6,456,0321 Shelley Area, Snake River, ID Completed - 32,335 South Fork Clearwater River, ID Inactive - 3,899 Teton River, ID Inactive - 10,387 Touchet River, WA Deauthorized - 11,198 Weiser River, ID Deferred 1,565,000 37,757 Weiser River, ID Cambridge-Midvale Deauthorized 75,000 Whitebird Creek, ID Inactive - 1,896 Total 11,090,191 'Exclusive of $36,800 contributed funds. 39-16 TABLE 39-I WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 3 of Text) Bear Creek, Kendrick, ID Blackfoot, Blackfoot River, ID Camp Wooten, Tucannon River, WA Colfax, Palouse River, WA Culdesac, Lapwai Creek, ID Dayton, Touchet River, WA Esquatzel, Coulee, WA Ferry Butte, Snake River, ID Gooding Area, Little Wood River, ID Heise-Roberts Area, Snake River, ID Heise-Roberts Extension, Snake River, ID Jackson Hole, Snake River, WY Lower Dry Creek, Lowden WA Lyman, Lyman Creek, ID Malheur Improvement District, Snake River, OR Milton-Freewater, Walla Walla River, OR Mission Creek, ID Pocatello, Portneuf River, ID Shelley Area, Snake River, ID Tomanovich-Salmon City, Salmon River, ID Vale, Malheur River, OR Walla Walla, Mill Creek, WA West Richland, Yakima River, WA April 1982 August 1982 April 1982 April 1982 April 1982 July 1982 August 1982 August 1982 August 1982 August 1982 August 1982 August 1982 February 1982 August 1982 March 1982 September 1982 August 1982 September 1982 August 1982 August 1982 July 1982 October 1982 September 1982 39-17 I REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project SPILLWAY DAM Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID (See Section 10 of Text) Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Space for Additional Rating, Each Ice Harbor Lock and Dam, WA. (See Section 11 of Text) Total Capacity Installed Total Potential Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Flood Control Storage Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 1600 Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Concrete Gravity September 1974 150,500 Cubic Feet Per Second 1613 Feet Tainter 50 Ft. by 55 Ft. 2 428 Feet 3 3 2 @ 90,000 kw; 4 @ 220,000 kw 400,000 kw 1,060,000 kw 150 Feet March 1973 1600-1445 Feet 1605 Feet 2,000,000 Ac.-Ft. 53 Miles 17,090 Acres 175 Miles 86 Feet 675 Feet 97 Feet 100 Feet 103 Feet 15 Feet May 1962 Concrete Gravity January 1962 850,000 cfs 391 Feet Tainter 50 Ft. by 51 Ft. 10 671 Feet 6 3 @ 90,000 kw; 3 @ 111,000 kw 39-18 TABLE 39-J TABLE 39-J (Continued) WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project Little Goose Lock and Dam, WA (See Section 13 of Text) Lower Granite Lock and Dam, WA (See Section 14 of Text) Total Installed Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 440 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 638 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills 603,000 kw 226 Feet December 1961 440-437 Feet 446 Feet 31.9 Miles 9,200 Miles 14 Ft. by 250 Ft. 80 Miles 86 Feet 675 Feet 93 Feet 98 Feet 101 Feet 15 Feet May 1970 Concrete Gravity January 1970 850,000 cfs 581 Feet Tainter 50 Ft. by 60 Ft. 8 656 Feet 243 Feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 244 Feet March 1970 638-633 Feet 646.5 Feet 37.2 Miles 10,025 Acres 14 Ft. by 250 Ft. 92 Miles 86 Feet 675 Feet 95 Feet 100 Feet 105 Feet 15 Feet 39-19 TABLE 39-J (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, WA (See Section 15 of Text) SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type: Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 738 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line Concrete Gravity February 1975 850,000 cfs 581 Feet Tainter 50 Ft. by 60.5 Ft. 8 656 Feet 243 Feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 kw 246 Feet April 1975 738-733 Feet 746.5 Feet 38 Miles 8,900 Acres 14 Ft. by 250 Ft. 91 Miles 86 Feet 675 Feet 97 Feet 98 Feet 103 Feet 15 Feet April 1969 Concrete Gravity March 1969 850,000 cfs 483 Feet Tainter 50 Ft. by 61 Ft. 8 656 Feet 243 Feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 kw 242 Feet May 1969 39-20 TABLE 39-J (Continued) WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project McNary Lock and Dam, OR and WA (See Section 17 of Text) IMPOUNDMENT Elevation; Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 540 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type: Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units Number Installed Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 340 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline 540-537 Feet 548 Feet 28.7 Miles 6,590 Acres 14 Ft. by 250 Ft. 78 Miles 86 Feet 675 Feet 67 Feet 75 Feet 83 Feet 15 Feet November 1953 Concrete Gravity October 1953 2,200,000 cfs 291 Feet Vertical Lift 50 Ft. by 51 Ft. 22 1,348 Feet 241 Feet 14 70,000 kw 980,000 kw 193 Feet November 1953 340-335 Feet 356.5 Feet 64 Miles 38,800 Acres 14 Ft. by 250 Ft. 242 Miles 39-21 TABLE 39-K REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM JOHNSON BAR LANDING, OR, WA, AND ID (See Section 18 of Text) Estimated Cost (Corps New Work Maintenance Percent of Engineers to Sep. 30, 1982 to Sep. 30, 1982 Com- Constr. Project Funds Only) Approp. Cost Approp. Cost pleted Started Ice Harbor Lock & Dam Initial Project 129,578,479 129,578,479 129,578,479 32,400,433 32,307,335 100 FY 57 Code 710 Recreation Facilities 1,645,000 713,150 713,150 - - 43 FY 57 Power Units 4-6 36,702,316 36,701,316 36,702,307 - - 100 FY 71 Totals 167,925,795 166,993,945 166,993,936 32,400,433 32,307,335 100 Little Goose Lock & Dam Initial Project 160,413,215 160,413,215 160,413,215 21,270,692 21,169,605 100 FY 63 Power Units 4-6 59,885,312 59,885,312 59,885,299 - - 100 FY 74 Totals 220,298,527 220,298,527 220,298,514 21,270,692 21,169,605 100 Lower Granite Lock & Dam Initial Project 321,530,134 319,047,134 319,039,402 19,342,362 19,250,051 99 FY 65 Power Units 4-6 46,211,511 46,211,511 46,211,511 - - 100 FY 74 Totals 367,741,645 365,258,645 365,250,913 19,342,362 19,250,051 99 Lower Monumental Lock & Dam Initial Project 184,712,361 184,712,361 184,712,361 ' 19,548,504 19,492,606 100 FY 61 Power Units 4-6 51,645,850 51,645,850 51,645,843 - - 100 FY 75 Totals 236,358,211 236,358,211 236,358,204 19,548,504 19,492,606 100 Open River Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing 34,613 34,6131 34,6131 287,603 272,547 Open River Pasco to Lewiston - - - 4,350 4,350 Totals Existing Project 992,358,791 988,943,941 988,936,180 92,853,944 92,496,494 99 Previous Projects Pasco to Lewiston 400,150 400,150 400,150 186,570 186,570 Totals Authorized Project 992,758,941 989,344,091 989,336,330 93,040,514 92,683,064 'New work appropriations used for maintenance prior to 1953. 39-22 ALASKA DISTRICT * This District consists of the State of Alaska. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation .1. Anchorage Harbor, AK ..................... 2. Bar Point Harbor, AK ...................... 3. Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK ............ 4. Cordova Small Boat Harbor, AK ........ 5. Craig Small Boat Harbor, AK .............. 6. Dillingham Harbor, AK .................... 7. Dry Pass, AK ............................. 8. Homer Harbor, AK ....................... 9. Hoonah Harbor, AK ...................... 10. Kake Harbor, AK ..... ................ 11. Metlakatla Harbor, AK ..................... 12. Ninilchik Harbor, AK .................. 13. Nome Harbor, AK ........................... 14. Port Lions Small Boat Harbor, AK ......... 15. Stikine River, AK ................ ........ Flood Control 16. Chena River Lakes, AK ................ 17. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................... 18. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .......................... Page Multiple-Purpose Projects, 40-1 Including Power 40-1 19. Snettisham, AK ............................ 40-2 40-2 40-2 40-3 40-3 40-3 40-3 General Investigations 20. Surveys ..................................... 21. Collection and Study of Basic Data.............................. 22. Advance Engineering and Design .......... Tables 40-4 Table 40-A Cost & Financial Statement ..... 40-4 Table 40-B Authorizing Legislation .......... 40-4 Table 40-C Other Authorized Navigation 40-5 Projects .......................... 40-5 Table 40-E Other Authorized Flood Control 40-5 Projects ........................ Table 40-G Deauthorized Projects ............ 40-6 Table 40-H Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .................... 40-6 40-6 Page 40-6 40-6 40-7 40-7 40-8 40-10 40-12 40-13 40-13 40-14 Navigation 1. ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK Location. Anchorage is in southcentral Alaska on the southeast shore of Knik Arm, north of Turnagain Arm near its junction with Cook Inlet. (See NOAA Charts 16660 and 16664.) Existing project. Provides for dredging along a 3,000 foot baseline adjacent to the Port of Anchorage dock to a depth of 35 feet below mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 29.0 feet and the extreme range is 42.0 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Port of Anchorage facility consists of a POL terminal at the southern end and three general cargo terminals northward. The northernmost terminal, completed during 1976 and 1977 was outside the Federal project limits. Extension of limits from 2,070 feet northward to 3,000 feet was authorized by Public Law 94-587, and funded in FY 1978. Operations during fiscal year. Regular funds, maintenance: The maintenance dredging contract was awarded in June 1982 and 252,300 cubic yards of material were removed by the contractor. Excessive shoaling continued throughout the year which forced the contractor to concentrate his efforts along the dock. Maintenance dredging was accomplished across the entire project during 1982 with the area adjacent to the dock face dredged to the authorized depth of-35 feet mean lower low water. Controlling depth at the close of the contract was -34 feet MLLW along the face of the dock with the remaining areas varying between -30 and -38 MLLW. 2. BAR POINT HARBOR, AK Location. On coast of Revillagigedo Island, on northeasterly side on Tongass Narrows. Ketchikan is 40-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 approximately 220 nautical miles southeast of Juneau, AK. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 8075, 8094, and 8095.) Existing project. As originally authorized and constructed, Bar Point Basin consisted of a 780,000 square foot basin at depths of 10 and 15 feet below mean lower low water, protected by three rock breakwaters. An additional 25 acres protected by a 960-foot long floating breakwater has been added and the State of Alaska is in the process of adding additional floats to this area. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 15.3 feet, with an extreme range of 26 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Publicly owned facilities are four small-boat floats, including two in project basins, and two ferry docks. Privately owned facilities include two general cargo docks open to public use, one of which serves as a passenger terminal; three oil wharves, which include facilities for fueling small boats; and approximately 25 industrial wharves, piers, and floats. Additional facilities are available at Saxman and Ward Cove in the immediate area. One wharf is used exclusively for Government vessels. Operations during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: The contract for addition of whalers was awarded September 22, 1981 and completed December 14, 1981. 3. BETHEL SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK Location. The city of Bethel is 65 miles upriver on the north bank of the Kuskokwim River, which flows through southwestern Alaska. Bethel is about 400 miles west of Anchorage. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 9302 and USGS Map Bethel D8.) Existing project. Project includes provision of a 12- acre small boat harbor and 1,270 foot entrance channel by deepening, widening, and straightening a portion of the Lousetown Slough which is 0.3 miles east of Bethel. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 4.0 feet and extreme tidal range is 10.0 feet, during low summer water flow in Kuskokwim River. Water level also depends on river state; tidal effects decrease with higher river flows, disappearing only at the 20-year-frequency flood stage Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Bethel serves as a regional transportation center for approximately 50 villages. A medium-draft port facility was built along the city's riverfront in 1975. Goods, including gas, oil, food, clothing, and construction material are all brought into Bethel for redistribution to outlying villages. Generally, river shipments of bulk goods are transported by medium-draft barges. Personal supplies are often moved in individually owned riverboats which also are used for fishing activities. The riverboat fleet in Bethel is estimated to number between 1,000 and 1,100 boats, of which 400 are transient boats from other villages along the Kuskokwim River. There are also eight river barges varying in size to as large as 30 by 100 feet. The barges are powered by five locally-based tug boats with lengths ranging from 25 to 40 feet. No protected berthing areas exist at Bethel for any water craft. The riverboats are beached on the sandbars and banks for temporary storage. Brown's Slough is particularly popular as a berthing area, resulting in overcrowding and congestion. Operations during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: An expedited design effort was accomplished late in FY 1982 and both Federal and State funds were obtained to allow a September construction start. 4. CORDOVA SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK Location. Cordova is on Orca Inlet, a strait near the eastern entrance of Prince William Sound, about 150 air miles south-southeast of Anchorage, Alaska. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 8520, 8525, and 8551.) Existing project. The Office of the Chief of Engineers approved construction of a harbor expansion from 8.26 acres to 20 acres by removal of the existing 1400-foot breakwater and construction of a new 2000-foot long breakwater. The entrance channel is dredged to -16 feet mean lower low water and the turning basin is dredged from -10 to -12 mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 12.4 feet with an extreme range of 21.7 feet. The dredged material will be disposed of in two diked upper tidal areas which will be used as staging facilities. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Two municipal docks accommodate general cargo and passengers, including automobile ferry traffic. One privately owned wharf, reduced by fire, provides oil handling and bunkering facilities. Three privately owned wharves are used for industrial purposes. A small boat float system for public use is in original basin. State ferry dock in basin has been superseded by municipal dock and is inactive. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Contract was awarded May 15, 1981 for construction of breakwater and diked disposal areas and is 78 percent complete. 5. CRAIG SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK Location. Craig is located on Craig Island, adjacent to Prince of Wales Island in southeastern Alaska, about 200 miles south of Juneau. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 8152 and 8155.) Existing project. The Office of the Chief of Engineers approved construction for navigation improvements at South Cove Harbor at Craig, AK on February 19, 1980. Improvements consisted of construction of two short rubblemound breakwaters, a 70-foot-long north breakwater and a 200-foot-long south breakwater. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 10 feet, with an extreme range of 18 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Publicly owned facilities are one general cargo wharf and three small boat floats, including one in project basin. Privately owned facilities are two oil piers and several industrial wharves. One float is used by Government boats. Operations during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Contract was awarded for the construction of two 40-2 ALASKA DISTRICT breakwaters on April 8, 1981, and completed on September 4, 1981. Another contract to extend the north breakwater 40 feet was awarded October 16, 1981 and is scheduled for completion in FY 1983. 6. DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK Location. At head of Nushagak Bay, an arm of Bristol Bay, on right bank of Nushagak River just below its confluence with Wood River; about 470 miles northeasterly of Dutch Harbor and 300 miles southwest of Anchorage, AK. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 9052.) Existing project: A small-boat basin 230,000 square feet in area with a depth of 2 feet above mean lower low water along Scandinavian Creek; with entrance channel 1,100 feet long and 40 feet wide in Scandinavian Creek; and a sheet pile sill across the basin outlet with a top elevation of 7 feet above mean lower low water. During design stage the project was revised to include a rock sill with adjacent scour-protection blankets and the embankment was relocated to include a berm between the basin and the embankment. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 19.8 feet. Extreme range is 30.0 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Three docks at the city of Dillingham, all privately owned, and a publicly owned smallboat float in the project basin. Two docks are used for salmon-cannery operations; the third is an oil handling and bunkering terminal. Small boat approach and floats were installed in small-boat basin in summer of 1963, and were demolished by winter ice movement. New floats were installed in June 1982, and removed before fall freezeup. They will be replaced each spring. Cargo and passengers from ocean vessels are lightered from the anchorage just below Snag Point, and are unloaded at the docks or in the small-boat basin. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Regular funds, maintenance: Government plant and hired labor performed maintenance dredging from June through September 1982. 67,800 cubic yards of material were dredged this fiscal year. Maintenance dredging was accomplished across entire project. An area-wide strike by fishermen forced most boats to remain in the harbor throughout much of the season. Vessels occasionally surrounded the dredge, preventing its operation. 7. DRY PASS, AK Location. Dry Pass is a 2-V2-mile section of a natural waterway between Kosciusko and Prince of Wales Islands, in southeastern Alaska. It is part of the small-boat trade route through southeast of Juneau, AK. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 8172 and 8152.) Existing project. The original project provided for dredging of a channel 60 feet wide and 6 feet deep at mean lower low water through five shoals between El Capitan Passage and Shakan Strait. This project was modified in 1954 to provide a channel 70 feet wide and 12 feet deep at mean lower low water through 7 shoals. The tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.7 feet and the extreme range is about 19 feet. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. The improvement forms a part of an existing trade route. There are no terminal facilities within the limits of the improvement. Operations during fiscal year. Regular funds, maintenance: In April 1980, towing interests reported shallow conditions within the project. Hydrographic surveys were performed in December 1980 and preliminary estimates prepared. For FY 1982 $475,000 was appropriated to perform maintenance dredging throughout shoal #1. The Government estimate exceeded available funding, therefore, the invitation for bids was cancelled and available funds transferred to other dredging projects. Plans and specifications were prepared in FY 1982 at a cost of $15,468. 8. HOMER HARBOR, ALASKA Location. In Kachemak Bay, on Kenai Peninsula, 152 miles by water southwest of Anchorage. Harbor site is land based near the extremity of Homer Spit which varies to one-quarter mile in width and extends 4.5 miles southeasterly from the mainland. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 8554 and 8531.) Existing project. Provides for sheltered small-boat harbor, relocated and based within Homer Spit about 10 acres in area, with a 2.75-acre berthing area 14 feet deep and a 7.25-acre anchorage area 15 feet deep, below mean lower low water; a north entrance channel; protected by a main rock breakwater 1,018 feet long and secondary rock breakwater 238 feet long. Tidal range between mean lower low and mean higher high water is 18.1 feet, with an extreme range of 30.4 feet. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1593 of Annual Report for 1964.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One publicly owned and operated wharf capable of handling oceangoing vessels serves for passengers and general cargo. Small-boat facilities in basin area include publicly owned mooring floats, a publicly owned wharf, and an industrial wharf. A separate basin with unloading facilities for barges and small boats is being constructed by private interests. A detailed project report has been prepared recommending doubling the size of the harbor. The city of Homer is tripling the size of its fish dock located at the southern end of the harbor. Completion is scheduled for Spring 1983. Operations during fiscal year. Regular funds, maintenance: During FY 1982, 17,800 cubic yards were removed by the Government-owned pipeline dredge Warren George. The material was disposed of in a low depression located on the southern tip of the spit. Maintenance dredging of the entrance channel is scheduled for completion in October 1982. A final survey has not yet been performed. 9. HOONAH HARBOR, AK Location. Hoonah is located on the eastern shore of Port Frederick, a deep tidal fjord on the northeastern 40-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 shore of Chichagof Island in southeastern Alaska. The city is 70 miles west of Juneau. (See National Geodetic Survey Charts 8202 and 8302.) Existing project. Consists of an authorized smallboat basin to be 16 acres in extent, and an entrance channel and turning basin; with the entrance channel 100 feet wide and 400 feet long (widening to 150 feet for 600 feet along the western edge of the basin) all to a depth of 18.5 feet below mean lower low water, three rubblemound breakwaters 140,800 and 1,459 feet long; and one rubblemound diversion dike 1,165 feet long. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.8 feet. Extreme tidal range is 25 feet. Total project cost of the basin is $4,255,000 Corps of Engineers funds. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Publicly owned facilties are two general cargo docks, a ferry dock and a small boat float attached to one of the cargo docks. Privately owned facilities are one oil dock and one industrial-oil dock. Facilities are not sufficient or suitable for moorage of more than a small portion of the resident and transient commercial fishing vessels operating Hoonah. The constructed harbor will provide the necessary moorage. Operations during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Construction completed. Claim was settled September 1982. 10. KAKE HARBOR, AK Location. Kake Harbor is located in the city of Kake, on the northwest corner of Kupreanof Island in southeastern Alaska, 39 air miles west of Petersburg, AK, and 850 water miles northwesterly of Seattle, WA. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart 8201.) Existing project. The authorized project consists of a 1,580-foot-long west breakwater and a 900-foot long south breakwater, enclosing a 7-acre berthing area. Poor foundation conditions found during preconstruction investigations have forced modification of the project to include a 1,760-foot-long west breakwater and a 1,750-foot-long south breakwater. Estimated project cost is $11,132,000 (October 1982), including $11,100,000 Corps of Engineers funds, $19,000 Coast Guard funds, and $13,000 non-Federal cost. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.0 feet with an extreme range of 22 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. At Kake, a publicly owned wharf with seaplane float equipped airplanes and shallow-draft vessels is located within area of proposed basin. At cannery 1 mile from city, there are two privately owned deep-draft piers: one for cargo, open to all local boat owners, the second for fuel, including a float for fueling small boats. At Portage Cove, there is one publicly-owned small-boat float. Facilities are not considered adequate for present commerce due to the following deficiencies in small-boat facilities: the complete lack of protection in the directions of the most severe storms; shallow water at Portage Cove float and its approaches; ice formation on the cove during the winter months causes major boat damage and limits the use of the mooring float; and transportation problems between city and present smallboat float at Portage Cove. Operations during fiscal year. Plans and specifications have been completed. 11. METLAKATLA HARBOR, AK Location. Metlakatla is located in the southern portion of Port Chester, a small bay on the northwest coast of Annette Island in southeastern Alaska, 18 miles south of Ketchikan. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 8074, 8075, and 8102.) Existing project. Consists of two small-boat basins. Existing basin is 2.18 acres in extent with a depth of 10 feet below mean lower low water, protected by a rubblemound breakwater 900 feet long. New basin consists of two rubblemound breakwaters, 1,255 and 1,150 feet long, and an entrance channel and maneuvering area, 1,100 feet long, 100 feet wide, dredged to a depth of 15 feet below mean lower low water and a basin area of 6.25 acres dredged to a depth of 15 feet below mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.7 feet, with an extreme range of 24 feet. Estimated project cost of basin is $5,101,470 (October 1982)Corps of Engineers funds. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Publicly owned facilities are one general-cargo dock, one barge ramp, and a small-boat float system in existing basin. Privately owned facilities are one oil pier and one industrial wharf. Facilities are not adequate for mooring the commercial fishing vessels operating from Metlakatla. Existing protected harbor area is fully utilized. Operations during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Construction is essentially complete with some underwater removal of isolated rocks to be completed by January 1983. 12. NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK Location. At mouth of Ninilchik River in Cook Inlet, at the community of Ninilchik, AK, about 40 miles upcoast from Homer and 112 miles southwest of Anchorage. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 8554.) Existing project. A small-boat basin 320 feet long by 150 feet wide dredged to elevation of 2 feet above mean lower low water, with an approach channel 400 feet long and 50 feet wide dredged to an elevation of 9 feet above mean lower low water; protected by a pile jetty 410 feet long. Project was modified in design stage to delete pile jetty and revise harbor dimensions to 400 feet long by 125 feet wide, and was completed in November 1961. Modification, including river channel diversion, two armor rock jetties, and beach protection, was accomplished 1967 and 1969. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 19.1 feet, with an extreme range of 33.5 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities, limited to shallowdraft vessels and accessible from Cook Inlet only at halftide or higher, are a cannery dock ailong Ninilchik River 40-4 ALASKA DISTRICT available for offloading fish, and small-boat floats in project basin, provided by State of Alaska. Other supplies are landed on beach or brought by road from deep-draft ports in the vicinity. Facilities are extremely inadequate for the number of boats presently using harbor. Expansion of facilities would require construction of additional protected harbor area. Operations during fiscal year. Regular funds, maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the harbor and entrance channel was accomplished with 10,200 cubic yards removed in 1982. Maintenance on the Gabion revetment was performed in August 1982. A survey of the basin during May 1982 indicated project depth was available throughout the Federal limits. 13. NOME HARBOR, AK Location. At mouth of Snake River at the city of Nome, AK, on northerly shore of Norton Sound, an arm of Bering Sea. It is a shallow open roadstead, 581 nautical miles north of Dutch Harbor and 545 air miles northwest of Anchorage. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 9302 and 9380.) Existing project. Provides for two jetties, the easterly 951 and the westerly not exceeding 676 feet long, at mouth of Snake River; a channel 8 feet at mean lower low water, 75 feet wide, from Norton Sound through Snake River to mouths of Bourbon and Dry Creeks, in city of Nome, ending in a turning basin of the same depth, 250 feet wide and 600 feet long; revetting banks of rivers; and protecting all existing water-front improvements on easterly beach by means of rock-mound seawall 3,350 feet long extending easterly from east jetty. Project has been completed except extension of jetties beyond present 400 and 240 feet, which is classified inactive. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 1.6 feet and extreme tidal range is 7.5 feet, but water levels are influenced more by wind than tide. Levels of 5 feet below mean lower low water have been observed during offshore winds, and a level of 14 feet above mean lower low water has been observed during a southerly storm. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Cargoes and passengers from ocean vessels are lightered to and from shore a distance of about 2 miles. Traffic enters dredged channel and is handled over revetment, where lighterage company has transfer facilities which are open to the public. Facilities considered inadequate for existing commerce. The State of Alaska is conducting a study of the feasibility of constructing a causeway with unloading facilities and docking berths for deep draft vessels. If constructed, the proposal calls for modifying the existing harbor into a small boat basin requiring shallower draft. Operations during fiscal year. Regular funds, maintenance: Maintenance dredging by contract was accomplished throughout the ice-free season. 12,300 cubic yards were removed in FY 1982. Damage to the East Jetty during spring 1982 caused a separation of the last 40 feet. Removal of the damaged section and capping of the remaining jetty was not accomplished pending further study. 14. PORT LIONS SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK Location. Port Lioxis is located on the north end of Kodiak Island, approximately 19 air miles west of the city of Kodiak. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 8534.) Existing Project. The Office of the Chief of Engineers approved construction for a small boat harbor at Port Lions on April 9, 1979. Construction consists of a 600-foot-long breakwater, a 170-foot-long stub breakwater inclosing a 12-acre harbor. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 9.6 feet with an extreme range of 18 feet. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A municipal timber pile dock at Port Wakefield serves as both a shallow-draft and deepdraft facility for Port Lions. Operations during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Contract was awarded for construction of a small boat harbor on December 19, 1980. Work was initiated in March 1981 and construction completed on July 21, 1981. During a storm system that moved through the North Pacific November 9-12, 1981 the main breakwater and protection of the disposal area sustained damage. The seaward side of the main breakwater eroded with the displacement of armor and secondary rock along approximately 450 feet of the breakwater. A 150-foot length of the staging (disposal) area protection received minor damage. A damage report delineating the extent of damage was submitted in a letter to the Office of the Chief of Engineers dated December 9, 1981. The breakwater repair will include replacing material of the existing main breakwater, extending the main breakwater 125 feet, changing the seaward breakwater slope to a 2.OH:10V, adding a layer of armor rock and raising the design crest elevation. Minor dredging in the entrance channel is also included. Maintenance: A contract for the repair work was advertised and bids were opened on September 30, 1982. The contract is scheduled for award in October 1982. 15. STIKINE RIVER, AK Location. Rises in northwestern Canada and flows southwesterly through Canada for about 200 miles, then about 30 miles westerly across Panhandle of Alaska to Sumner Strait. Mouth of river is on coast of mainland about 3 miles north of Wrangell. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 8201.) Existing project. Snagging Stikine River from its mouth for about 30 miles to Canadian border. The Canadian Government maintains that portion of the river between Alaskan border and Telegraph Creek, British Columbia, a distance of 130 miles. The head of navigation is at Telegraph Creek, B.C., about 160 miles above the mouth. No data is available concerning stages of high and low water in river. At mouth, tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 13.9 feet, and maximum range is about 25 feet. Tidal effects have been reported at a distance of 20 miles from the mouth. Local cooperation. None required. 40-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Terminal facilities. None along Alaskan portion of river. Vessels operating on Stikine River are dependent on terminal facilities at Wrangell Harbor. Facilities include a city operated pier for general cargo and passengers; two publicly operated small-boat mooring floats; two privately operated small-boat fueling floats; a State of Alaska Ferry Pier, and three industrial wharves. Operations during fiscal year. Regular funds, maintenance: Memorandum of Understanding between Corps and Forest Service, signed August 1972, provided for Forest Service personnel to do project clearing. However, due to environmental restraints, no work was accomplished until 1977 after completion of an environmental assessment. The work has been accomplished annually by the U.S. Forest Service since 1977. Flood Control 16. CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK Location. In the vicinity of Fairbanks, AK, and encompassing the Tanana River, Chena River, Little Chena River, and their tributaries. (See USGS map Fairbanks, C1, D1, D2, and Big Delta D6.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Existing project. Moose Creek Dam has been constructed 17 miles east of Fairbanks with control works on Chena River. The dam itself extends from a bluff one mile north of the Chena River and south past the control works for approximately six miles to the Tanana River. The dam connects with a completed 22-mile levee system along the north boundary of the Tanana River to a point south and west of Fairbanks. Estimated Federal cost is $263,000,000, (full funding), and estimated non-Federal cost is $12,175,000. Operations during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Repair of the levee due to settling was completed and some miscellaneous earthwork construction was performed. Contracts were awarded to install an impervious silt blanket and relief wells adjacent to the dam, to protect the slope of the dam with armor rock, to install a second emergency gate at the control works, and to make repairs to the Interior Drainage Channel "B" culverts. The Tanana River Levee system is complete except for anticipated repair work due to settling and construction of protective groins. Interior Drainage Channel "A" is scheduled for construction in FY 1983. 17. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities, Section 205, Public Law 80-858: Fiscal year preauthorization study costs for Salmon Creek, AK, were $7,500. Emergency flood control activities -repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $55,291 for disaster preparedness. 18. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections were made of flood control works at Klutina River (Copper Center) on September 14, 1982, Lowell Creek on March 10, 1982 and Talkeetna River, May 10, 1982. Minor repairs at each project were recommended to the responsible local authority. Total costs for the fiscal year: $13,525. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 19. SNETTISHAM, AK Location. At mouth of Speel River, between Crater Lake to the west and Long Lake to the north, 28 nautical miles southeast of Juneau, AK. (See Coast Geodetic Survey Chart 8227.) Existing project. Snettisham is a multi-stage power project. The initial stage which was completed in 1977 tapped Long Lake and included an underground powerhouse with two 23.4 megawatt units and two transmission lines to Juneau, AK. The project was turned over to the Alaska Power Adminstration for operation and maintenance. The second stage, (under design), would provide a tap to Crater Lake and add a third unit. The final stage will provide a dam on Long Lake to increase storage and the energy capability of Long Lake. The Long Lake Dam is in a "Deferred" status. The existing Long Lake (elevation 815 feet) water is transported through an approximately horizontal tunnel 8,400 feet long and a 1,400-foot penstock dropping at a 46 degree angle to the undergound powerhouse at tidewater to drive two turbines with a generating capacity of 46,700 kilowatts. Power from two generators is supplied to Juneau by 138 kilovolt overhead transmission lines with a submarine cable traversing Taku Inlet. Crater Lake phase of construction provides for tapping Crater Lake (elevation 1,022 feet) to drive a third turbine to be installed in the underground powerhouse to provide an additional generating capacity of 27,000 kilowatts. Estimated cost of initial stage construction is $154,000,000 (October 1982). Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Regular funds, new work: Engineering and Design on the Crater Lake Phase included approximately 60 percent completion of the feature design memorandum for power tunnel, penstock, lake tap, gate structure and surge tank; 75 percent completion of plans and specifications for the access road and construction camp facilities and 60 percent completion of plans and specifications for turbine generator, powerhouse completion and electrical contracts. Investigations included extensive geological explorations, an evaluation of alternative power tunnel schemes and an extensive study of the lake tap area and applicable lake tap methodology. General Investigations 20. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs of $1,893,558 for surveys include $170,802 for navigation studies, $1,687,756 for flood control studies, and $35,000 for coordination studies. 40-6 ALASKA DISTRICT 21. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Technical assistance, information, flood plain management guidance and other flood plain management services have been provided to military and nonmilitary Federal agencies, local communities, State agencies, Architectural/Engineering firms, lending institutions and private individuals at a fiscal year cost of $116,814. Other activities included revisions of the Type 15 Flood Insurance Studies for the communities of Nome, Kotzebue, Delta-Junction, and the Matanuska-Susitna Borough. No funds were provided for the dam inspection or inventory programs. All information has been turned over to the State of Alaska. Fiscal year costs for Hydrologic Studies were $14,812. 22. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Bradley Lake, AK. Bradley Lake, AK, is located at the head of Kachemak Bay near the southwestern end of Kenai Peninsula about 110 air miles south of Anchorage and 25 miles northeast of Homer. The project was authorized under the Flood Control Act of October 23, 1962. The proposed project includes construction of a concrete gravity dam 850 feet in length and 130 feet in height, a 17,310-foot long power tunnel, a 23.5-foot diameter surge tank, a 2,711-foot long x 11-foot diameter steel penstock, an above ground powerhouse with three Francis- type turbine units (135,000 KW capacity), and an 18- mile wood pole transmission line (115KV). Bradley Lake is one of the projects approved to proceed under the Administration's Innovative Financing Program. The State of Alaska has forwarded a letter of intent to fund 100 percent of the cost. A memorandum of understanding (three-party agreement) between Alaska Power Authority, Alaska Power Administration and Office of the Chief of Engineers has been written. Work on implementing agreement is underway. General Design Memorandum #2 was completed in February 1982 and approved subject to comments. Work is underway on Feature Design Memorandum #3 "access and construction facilities." Environmental Impact Statement completed and filed with Environmental Protection Agency. Review period extended at the request of State of Alaska. Fiscal year costs including Construction, General appropriation, were $842,498 for total cost to September 30, 1982 of $6,396,854. Total estimated project cost (October 1982) is $396,000,000. 40-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 40-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep. 30, 1982 1. Anchorage Harbor, New Work AK Approp. - - - - 533.235 2. Bar Point Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 3. Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 4. Cordova Small Boat Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 5. Craig Small Boat Harbor, AK 6. Dillingham Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 7. Dry Pass, AK 8. Homer Harbor, AK 9. Hoonah Harbor, AK Cost Maint.' Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint.' Approp. Cost Maint.' Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint.' Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint.' Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 1,713,550 1,196,700 1,935,000 2,374,900 1,516,681 1,387,648 1,923,216 2,001,021 1,511,556 1,058,225 1,318,421 1,027,297 343,792 806,461 240,495 50,000 208,000 45,000 201,645 2,871 695 499 26,785 14,500 25,855 690,000 73,665 2,000,000 40,000 101,000 1,410,000 299,975 49,733 94,041 1,166,754 550,205 - - 4,647,200 - - - 2,403,878 1,954,080 53,340 53,340 43,700 590,000 28,633 468,136 -37,000 99,416 275,000 841,000 331,000 384,500 285,021 335,076 808,750 352,356 - 1,700 - - - 1,700 - - 25,000 14,468 133,900 247,000 267,000 296,400 112,035 268,821 249,473 288,570 1,505,000 2,243,000 400,000 1,502,647 2,244,096 279,627 21,612 533,235 11,781,825 11,388,970 2,000,000 1,999,837 1,318,421 1,295,076 1,213,272 596,937 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,999,606 4,674,200 4,357,958 656,240 655,725 548,790 548,790 4,074,122 4,008,628 1,700 1,700 943,351 943,351 129,515 118,983 1,512,3492 1,512,349 2,576,310 2,550,909 67,974 67,974 4,355,000 4,254,982 40-8 ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep. 30, 1982 (Contrib. Funds) 10. Kake Harbor, AK 11. Metlakatla Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 12. Ninilchik Harbor, AK 13. Nome Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 14. Port Lions Small Boat Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 15. Stikine River, AK 16. Chena River Lakes, AK New Work Contrib. 1,225,000 Cost 1,011,479 New Work Approp. Cost 113,525 151,000 255,000 150,516 253,210 New Work Approp. 575,000 Cost 573,807 Maint.1 Approp. 9,719 Cost 9,719 New Work Contrib. 886,600 Cost 211,600 New Work Approp. - Cost - Maint.' Approp. 227,200 Cost 229,931 New Work Approp. - Cost - Maint.' Approp. 526,200 Cost 528,007 New Work Contrib. - Cost - Maint.' Contrib. 2,500 Cost 5,000 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint.' Approp. Cost 13,304 13,304 3,160,000 3,116,770 38,190 - 38,190 - 80,000 79,588 860,000 184,628 2,685 621,898 - - 200,000 328,483 329,656 200,007 208,000 216,000 270,700 206,635 216,881 260,871 506,000 488,000 753,700 472,901 475,218 432,511 2,500 2,500 2,500 70,000 1,700,000 19,823 1,697,929 2,500 5,000 -7,000 44,738 - 80,000 - 32,008 694,000 1,110,000 591,537 100.000 13,000 12,986 New Work Approp. 23,047,159 Cost 23,150,520 Maint. 1 Approp. - Cost - 14,000 8,249 5,000 7,451 22,000 17,544 8,770,000 14,758,806 15,100,000 8,752,012 14,726,776 14,794,879 - 350,000 459,700 - 176,685 571,821 40-9 1,225,000 1,163,194 640,700 640,699 5,101,470 5,003,573 66,420 66,420 1,126,600 1,109,746 428,720 428,720 2,533,985 2,523,630 1,348,240 1,348,240 7,523,621 7,156,020 125 125 150,000 150,000 1,825,311 1,824,801 80,000 32,008 1,804,000 691,537 168,168 160,376 170,858,4653 170,387,1953 811,3244 750,1304 i REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 40-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep. 30, 1982 19. Snettisham, AK New Work Approp. -22,159 -18,200 - 2,000,000 83,382,856 Cost 9,979 -19,239 4,872 1,347,018 82,729,605 'Includes applicable portion of Reconnaissance and 3Includes $310,000 for previous project (Fairbanks). Condition Surveys appropriations and costs. 4Includes $1,624 for previous project (Fairbanks). 2Includes $2,672 of code 710 Rec. funds. TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK July 3, 1958 Oct. 22, 1976 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1960 July 3, 1958 Aug. 30, 1935 Sep. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 Deep water harbor, adjacent to docks, dredge to 35 feet below mean lower low water, protected by two jetties.' Extension of project limits. BAR POINT HARBOR, AK Construct two breakwaters 963 feet, and 120 feet. BETHEL SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK Construct 7,700-foot-long small boat harbor and entrance channel by deepening, widening, and straightening the upper 6,800 feet of Brown's Slough. CORDOVA SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK Construction of 2,000-foot breakwater. CRAIG SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK Construction of 2 short rubblemound breakwaters. DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK Basin 230,000 square feet in area with depth of 2 feet above mean lower low water along Scandinavian Creek, with entrance channel 1,100 feet long and 40 feet wide. DRY PASS, AK Dredge channel 60 feet wide, 6 feet deep through 5 shoals. Provide additional dredging for channel 70 feet wide and 12 feet deep through 7 shoals. HOMER HARBOR, AK Basin 2.7 acres in area with depth of 12 feet below mean lower low water, and rock breakwater 1,260 feet long. H. Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 P.L. 94-587 Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, June 29, 1978 Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, June 29, 1978 Section 107. P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, April 23, 1981 Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 19, 1980 H. Doc. 390, 84th Cong., 2d Sess. 2 H. Doc. 470, 70th Cong., 2d Sess. 2 H. Doc. 414, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. 2 H. Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 40-10 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 8. ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 19, 1964 Relocation and rehabilitation of project destroyed by P.L. 88-451 March 27, 1964 earthquake, by construction of basin 10 acres in area with 12-foot depth over 2.75 acres and 15-foot depth over 7.25 acres protected by rock breakwaters, 1,018 feet and 238 feet long. Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 13, 1968 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 July 3, 1958 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 30, 1935 June 16, 1948 July 14, 1960 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 13, 1968 HOONAH HARBOR, AK Entrance channel, a rubblemound breakwater and diversion dike and two rubblemound breakwaters inclosing a 15.1 acre harbor area. KAKE HARBOR, AK Basin 7-acre berthing area, 15 feet deep, inclosed by a 1,580-foot west rock breakwater and a 900-foot south rock breakwater. METLAKATLA HARBOR, AK Dredging small boat basin 2.18 acres in extent to a depth of 10 feet below plane of mean lower low; water; construction of rubblemound breakwater 900 feet long. Improvement consists of entrance channel and two rubblemound breakwaters inclosing a 7.0 acre basin. NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK Basin 320 feet long by 150 feet wide with depth of 2 feet above mean lower low water, approach channel 400 feet long and 50 feet wide with depth of 9 feet above mean lower low water, protected by 410-foot jetty. NOME HARBOR, AK Two jetties, easterly 335 feet and westerly 460 feet long revetment, channel and basin 200 feet wide and 250 feet long. Extension of the jetties and enlarging basin to 250 feet wide and 600 feet long. 3 Sea wall. PORT LIONS SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK Construction of a 600-foot breakwater and a 170-foot stub breakwater inclosing a 12-acre harbor. STIKINE RIVER, AK Snagging from mouth to Canadian border. CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK Dam and reservoir on the main Chena River, a dam and detention reservoir on the Little Chena River, and a levee along the north side of the Tanana River. Section 201, P.L. 89-298 H. Doc. 92-900, 92d Cong., 2d Sess. 2 Authorized Oct. 12, 1972 S. Doc. 70, 90th Cong., 2d Sess. 2 H. Doc. 138, 76th Cong., 91st Sess. Section 201, P.L. 89-298 S. Doc. 92-64, 92d Cong. 2d Sess. 2 Authorized Oct. 12, 1972 H. Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 H. Doc. 1932, 64th Cong 2d Sess. 2 H. Doc. 404, 71st Cong., 2d Sess., and Rivers and Harbors, Committee Doc. 38, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. 2 Report of Chief of Engineers dated March 8, 1948. Section 107, P.L. 86-645 April 9, 1979. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 210. 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 2 S. Doc. 89, 90th Cong., 2d Sess. 2 40-11 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 40-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 19. SNETTISHAM, AK Oct. 23, 1962 Multi-purpose dam, with powerhouse and transmission H. Doc. 40, 87th Cong., facilities. 1st Sess. 2 'Purchase of dredge and deepwater jetties deauthorized 2Contains latest published map. November 6, 1977 under Section 12, Public Law 93-251. 3Extension of jetties classified "inactive". TABLE 40-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1982 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance' Apoon Mouth of Yukon River, AK2 Completed 1920 $ 128,896 $ 4,581 Cook Inlet Shoals, AK Completed 1977 1,220,000 5,000 Cordova Harbor, AK Completed 1978 843,534 752,132 Craig Harbor, AK Completed 1974 377,260 128,063 Douglas Harbor, AK Completed 1963 282,019 111,772 Egegik River, AK Completed 1972 4,441 25,298 Elfin Cove, AK Completed 1959 154,191 37,872 Gastineau Channel, AK Completed 1964 789,461 210,317 Haines Harbor, AK 3 Completed 1977 1,000,0004 75,392 Humboldt Harbor, AK Completed 1977 3,679,6835 41,500 Iliuliuk Harbor, AK Completed 1941 66,037 16,696 Juneau Harbor, AK Completed 1974 1,381,150 495,438 Kasilof Harbor, AK3 Completed 1975 109,848 - Ketchikan Harbor, AK Completed 1979 1,602,417 530,231 King Cove Harbor, AK Completed 1974 2,264,948 37,042 Kodiak Harbor, AK Completed 1973 1.891,2126 140,058 Myers Chuck Harbor, AK Inactive 1970 9,700 - Naknek River, AK Completed 1961 20,789 20,690 Neva and Olga Straits, AK Completed 1960 155,009 6,906 Old Harbor, Kodiak Island, AK3 Completed 1972 370,415 173,654 Pelican Harbor, AK Completed 1964 369,683 65,561 Petersburg Harbor, AK Completed 1972 252,932 173,188 Port Alexander, AK Completed 1949 17,000 14,776 Rocky Pass, AK Completed 1960 337,668 92,895 Seldovia Harbor, AK Completed 1974 1,051,8837 115,882 Sergius Whitestone, AK Completed 1973 1,798,010 24,323 Seward Harbor, AK Completed 1973 712,3698 337,803 Sitka Harbor, AK Completed 1973 1,611,009 100,683 Skagway Harbor, AK Completed 1972 133,180 141,092 St. Michael Canel, AK Completed 1916 377,062 1,360 Valdez Harbor, AK Completed 1968 649,7409 334,828 Wrangell Harbor, AK . Completed 1969 537,020 227,662 Wrangell Narrows, AK Completed 1979 3,562,343 943,674 'Includes applicable portion of reconnaissance and condition survey costs. 2Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 3Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107). 4In addition $925,500 of State funds. 5In addition $857,000 of State funds. 6Includes $594,163 for rehabilitation. 7Includes $400,000 for rehabilitation. 8Includes $90,026 for rehabilitation and $2,528 Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed projects. 9Includes $73,000 for rehabilitation and $2,713 Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed projects. 40-12 ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1982 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Fairbanks, Tanana River & Chena Slough, AK Completed 1943 557,000 2,657 Gold Creek, AK Completed 1975 876,006 4,301 Klutina River, Copper Center, AK' Completed 1973 260,681 - Lowell Creek, AK Completed 1945 416,3822 30,7713 Salmon River, AK Completed 1963 37,7704 5 - 6 Skagway River, AK Deferred 1966 26,385 1,253 Talkeetna River, AK Completed 1981 516,694 - 'Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205). 5Includes $34,197 of PWA funds. 2In addition, $25,000 expended from contributed funds. 6In addition, $138,957 expended for emergency flood 3In addition, $12,000 expended from contributed funds. activities (1963), and $27,400 expended from contrib- 4In addition, $7,000 expended from contributed funds. uted funds. TABLE 40-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Contri- Full Report Date Federal buted See Annual Deauth- Funds Funds Project Report For orized Expended Expended Anchorage Harbor, AK 1967 1977 - - (Uncompleted Portion) Ketchikan Harbor, AK 1979 1979 - - (West Breakwater) Port Alexander, AK 1949 1977 - - (Inner Harbor) Tolovana River, AK 1931 1977 - - (Snagging) 40-13 TABLE 40-H REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorizaiton) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Chignik, AK $11,000 Dillingham Small Boat Harbor, AK 90,338 Homer Harbor, AK 90,786 Juneau Harbor, AK 48,268 Mekoryuk, AK 53,784 Ninilchik Harbor, AK 113,434 Sand Point, AK 7,500 Saxman, AK 122,064 Seward Harbor, AK 6,305 Total $543,479 40-14 BOARD OF ENGINEERS FOR RIVERS AND HARBORS The Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors is a continuing body created by Section 3 of the 1902 River and Harbor Act. The Board is selected by the Chief of Engineers and is comprised of seven senior engineer officers. The Deputy Chief of Engineers normally serves as Chairman. Five members are Division Engineers rotated from within continental U. S. Army Engineer Divisions. The seventh member, assigned full time to the Board as Resident Member, also directs the staff in carrying out the responsibilities of the Board. The Board meets on call of the Chairman. The Board has several statutory duties. It conducts independent reviews of Corps survey reports covering water resources projects and reports its conclusions and recommendations to the Chief of Engineers. The Chief of Engineers then forwards the reports with his conclusions and recommendations to the Secretary of the Army for transmission to the Congress. The Board also conducts independent reviews of special reports ordered by the Congress. It also considers and approves general plans for major modification and reconstruction of any lock, canal, canalized river or other work for the use or benefit of navigation. In addition to its statutory duties, the Chief of Engineers has assigned further duties to the Board. It reviews Corps policies and procedures as directed, additional special reports for the Secretary of the Army and the Chief of Engineers, reports of other Federal agencies pertaining to water resource development as directed, and conducts a ten-month program of in-service training for approximately fifteen Corps planners annually-generally at GS 12 and 13 levels-in all aspects of Federal water resources development. The training program helps meet Corps need for increased numbers of qualified people in the planning field. The Board also has administrative responsibility for processing proposed reports of the Chief of Engineers, along with Final Environmental Impact Statements, to states and Federal agencies for their 90- day review. In addition to other duties, the Resident Member of the Board has served as second alternate for the Secretary of the Army on the Foreign Trade Zones Board. By memorandum dated 6 April 1982, the Secretary of the Army appointed the Resident Member to serve as his representative on the Committee of Alternates of the Foreign Trade Zones Board and authorized him to act directly on the Secretary's behalf on all nondiscretionary matters involving Foreign Trade Zones. Secretary Marsh's memorandum stated that this appointment would relieve the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works of his formal duties in this regard; however, discretionary matters concerning the Foreign Trade Zones Board would remain under previous delegations of authority. The Resident Member of the Board also serves as ex-officio secretary of the U. S. Section, Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses (PIANC), a quasi-official organization. The membership of the Board on September 30, 1982 was as follows: MG E. R. Heiberg III, Chairman, Deputy Chief of Engineers, Pulaski Building, Washington, DC MG William E. Read, Division Engineer, U. S. Army Engineer Division, Lower Mississippi Valley, Vicksburg, MS MG Hugh G. Robinson, Division Engineer, U. S. Army Engineer Division, Southwestern, Dallas, TX BG Scott B. Smith, Division Engineer, U. S. Army Engineer Division, North Central, Chicago, IL BG Homer Johnstone, Jr., Division Engineer, U. S. Army Engineer Division, South Pacific, San Francisco, CA BG Richard S. Kem, Division Engineer, U. S. Army Engineer Division, Ohio River, Cincinnati, OH COL Frederick W. Mueller, Jr., Resident Member, Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors, Fort Belvoir, VA Official Board Actions. In compliance with resolutions of the Congress and instructions from the Chief of Engineers, the Board completed 50 offical report reviews during Fiscal Year 1982. The favorable reports category includes favorably recommended projects for Federal construction as well as projects for solving water resources problems for major metropolitan areas, even though they may not include recommendations for c6nstruction by any agency of the Federal Government. The urban studies listed below fall into this latter category. Reports Recommending Favorably for Federal Construction: The Board recommended 17 projects estimated to cost a total of $2,912,041,000, of which $2,882,006,000 is the first cost to the United States, as follows: Gallipolis Locks and Dam Replacement, Ohio River, OH & WVA New Haven Harbor, CT Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, GA & SC Cooper Lake and Channel, TX Wallisville Lake, TX, Post-authorization Change Report South-Central Railbelt, Valdez and Cooper River Basin, AK Big River Reservoir; RI (Pawcatuck and Narragansett Bay Drainage Basins, RI, MA & CT) Gowanus Creek Channel, NY Maline Creek, MO Mississippi River Ship Channel, Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA Village Creek, Jefferson County, AL Brush Creek and Tributaries, MO & KS Richmond Harbor, CA Blue River Lake, Willamette River Basins, OR Gregory County Hydroelectric Pumped Storage Facility, SD Mississippi River at St. Paul, MN Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE, KS & MO One special study was recalled by reporting officers without Board action: Lake Michigan Diversion at Chicago, Illinois. 41-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Reports Recommending Unfavorably for Federal Construction: During Fiscal Year 1982, the Board concurred in the unfavorable recommendations of the reporting officers for Federal construction on 22 projects: Kihei Flood Control Study, HI Tributaries to the Delaware River, New York State Westchester County Streams, NY Rock River, Rockford and Vicinity, IL Poso Creek Stream Group, CA Stranger Creek Basin, KS Barataria Bay Waterway, Dupre Cut, LA Chesapeake Bay Bridge, MD Big Five Drainage and Levee Districts, IL Carmel River, Monterey County, CA Searsport Harbor, ME Little Lagoon, at Gulf Shores, AL Sabine River and Tributaries, TX & LA Alsea River and Tributaries, OR Grand Lake, St. Marys, OH Lower Rock River, IL Chesapeake Bay Bridge, MD Little Lagoon at Gulf Shores, AL Brewton and East Brewton, AL Irondequoit Creek Watershed, NY Russian River Basin, CA Hempstead Harbor, NY General Design Memoranda: The Board reviewed and submitted favorable recommendations on 2 General Design Memoranda during the reporting period: Barnegat Inlet, New Jersey, and San Juan Harbor, Puerto Rico. Urban Studies: In response to Congressional resolutions, the Board submitted its findings on 9 urban studies: Little Rock Metropolitan Area, AR Metropolitan Atlanta Area Water Resources Management Study Brevard County, FL American Samoa Water Resources Study New Orleans-Baton Rouge Metropolitan Area, LA Great River Resource Management Study, GREAT I and II Memphis Metropolitan Areas, MS, AR & TN Metropolitan Sioux City and Missouri River, IA, NE & SD Grand Forks, ND - East Grand Forks, MN During Fiscal Year 1982, the Board held two meetings: March 8-9, 1982 and September 1-2, 1982 Since 1902, the Board has acted on 8,592 survey reports, recommending favorably on 3,825 and unfavorably on 4,765. 41-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION* The Mississippi River Commission (MRC) was created by an act of Congress on Jun. 28, 1879. The Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928, authorized the Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries (MR&T) Project. The Commission consists of three officers of the Corps of Engineers, one from the former Coast and Geodetic Survey (presently the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), and three civilians, two of whom must be civil engineers. All members are appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. During the fiscal year the Commissioners were: MG William E. Read, U.S. Army, President, appointed Dec. 1, 1981; Mr. Roy T. Sessums, civil engineer; Mr. Sam E. Angel; Mr. R. D. James, civil engineer, appointed Dec. 1, 1981; MG Hugh G. Robinson, U.S. Army, appointed Dec. 1, 1981; BG Richard S. Kem, U.S. Army, appointed Dec. 1, 1981; and RA Herbert R. Lippold, NOAA, appointed March 23, 1982; COL Joseph Yore, U.S. Army served as Secretary of the Commission. The MRC is charged, under direction of the Secretary of the Army and supervision of the Chief of Engineers, with prosecution of improvements for flood control of the Mississippi River and of its tributaries and outlets in its alluvial valley, so far as they are affected by Mississippi River backwater, between Head of Passes, LA (mile 0), and Cape Girardeau, MO (1,006 miles AHP-Lower Mississippi mileage terminates at mile 954 AHP), and with prosecution of improvements in the interest of navigation between Cairo, IL (954 miles AHP), and Baton Rouge, LA (234 miles AHP); and for stabilization of the lower 7 miles of the right bank of the Ohio River, to former mouth of Cache River. It also is charged with prosecution of certain flood control works on the Mississippi River and tributaries, as far as they are affected by backwater, between Cape Girardeau, MO, and Rock Island, IL (1,437 miles AHP), and with prosecution of improvements on designated tributaries and outlets below Cape Girardeau for flood control, navigation, major drainage, and related water uses. Authorized operations of the Commission below Cape Girardeau are conducted by District Engineers of New Orleans, Vicksburg, and Memphis Districts within the areas described below, in accordance with approved directives and programs and congressional appropriations therefor. New Orleans District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required from Head of Passes, mile 0 to 320 AHP, including south bank levee of Red River to Hotwells, LA; construction of four salinity-control structures for fish and wildlife enhancement in lower Mississippi River Delta region; Bonnet Carrb and Morganza Floodways; maintenance and improvements of Mississippi River navigation channel from Baton Rouge, LA (mile 234 AHP), to mile 320; Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp); navigation improvement of Atchafalaya and Old Rivers from Mississippi River to Morgan City; control of Old and Atchafalaya Rivers; Atchafalaya Basin Floodways; flood control and drainage improvements in Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, in Bayou des Glaises, and in Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area; flood protection in eastern Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, LA; and freshwater distribution from Atchafalaya River to Teche-Vermilion Basins. Vicksburg District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required from upper limits of New Orleans District (mile 320 AHP) in vicinity of Black Hawk, LA, to Coahoma-Bolivar County line, MS (mile 620 AHP) on left bank, and to vicinity of mouth of White River, AR (mile 599 AHP), on right bank including south bank Arkansas River levee to vicinity of Pine Bluff, AR, and north bank levee to vicinity of Tucker on left bank of Plum Bayou, AR; bank stabilization in lower 36.1 miles of Arkansas River; maintenance and improvement of Mississippi River navigation channel between miles 320 and 599 AHP; Vicksburg and Greenville Harbors; specific fish and wildlife facilities in Tensas, Yazoo, and Big Sunflower Basins; a streambank erosion control project in the Yazoo Basin; flood control and drainage improvements in Red River backwater area including leveed portion east and west of Black River and south of Red River; Jonesville, LA, Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon Basins and tributaries, AR and LA, and Bayou Lafourche, LA; Yazoo River Basin, MS, including backwater area; Big and Little Sunflower Rivers, Deer Creek, and Steele Bayou, MS; and Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR, including provision for agricultural water supply. Memphis District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required, from upper limits of Vicksburg District to north bank of Little River diversion channel, MO (1,003 miles AHP), a few miles below Cape Girardeau, MO, on right bank, and to Cache River diversion channel (967 miles AHP) above Cairo, IL, on left bank, including levees and revetment on right bank of Ohio River, in Mounds-Mound City * Authorizing legislation (Tables 42-D and 42-E) is listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 42-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 area, IL; except operations above Cairo, IL, do not include channel stabilization on the Mississippi River. Maintenance and improvement of Mississippi River navigation channel between mile 599 and 954 AHP and of Memphis Harbor, TN; specific fish and wildlife facilities in St. Francis Basin; levees in White River backwater area up to vicinity of Augusta, AR, and a pumping plant near mouth of White River; levees and pumping plants at De Valls Bluff and Des Arc, AR; channel improvements in Cache River Basin, AR; channel improvements in Big Creek and tributaries, AR; improvement works in St. Francis River Basin, MO and AR, including backwater area improvements in Belle Fountain Ditch and Drainage District No. 17, AR; Little River diversion channel, MO, and L'Anguille River, AR; Wolf River Basin, TN; Obion and Forked Deer River Basins, TN; Reelfoot Lake area, including channel improvement for Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9, TN and KY; West Kentucky tributaries, KY; Mud Lake pumping station, TN; and pumping plants and outlet structures in the Cairo-Mounds-Mounds City area, IL. Field operations of the Commission restricted to levee construction under Sec. 6, 1928 Flood Control Act (local interests contributing one-third of costs and furnishing rights-of-way) are conducted within the following limits by two districts reporting directly to the Commission on matters within their jurisdiction- St. Louis District: Mississippi River (Sec. 6) levees from upper limits of Memphis District to Clemens Station, MO (1,254 miles AHP), on right bank, and Hamburg Bay, IL (1,215 miles AHP), on left bank, and Illinois River from its mouth to mile 120 at Havana, IL. Rock Island District: Mississippi River (Sec. 6) levees from upper limits of St. Louis District to Rock Island, IL (1,437 miles AHP). For work accomplished see Table 42-N, page 42-50, Annual Report for 1975. MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ALLUVIAL VALLEY BELOW CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO. Location and description. The Mississippi River rises in Lake Itasca, MN, and flows generally southerly for 2,340 miles through the central portion of United States to empty into the Gulf of Mexico 115 miles below New Orleans. It is improved for barge navigation for 1,832 miles to Minneapolis, MN. The Mississippi River and its major tributaries, the Missouri, Ohio, St. Francis, White, Arkansas, Yazoo, and Red-Old Rivers, drain 1,245,000 square miles in all or part of 31 states between the Rocky and Appalachian Mountains and part of two Canadian provinces. Below Cape Girardeau, MO, 53 miles above Ohio River, river bottomlands widen abruptly into an alluvial valley of 35,460 square miles which was originally subjected to flood overflow. A major part of the alluvial valley has been protected from floods by levees which confine floodflows within a floodplain having an average width of 5 miles. (See map of alluvial valley of Mississippi River, scale 1:500,000.) Observations made by Mississippi River Commission to Sep. 30, 1982, show approximate alltime maximum and minimum discharges between levees as follows: Cairo to White River, 2,000,000 and 70,000 cubic feet per second; thence to Red River, 2,150,000 and 90,000 cubic feet per second; thence to the Gulf of Mexico, 1,500,000 and 50,000 cubic feet per second in Mississippi River and 660,000 and 11,000 cubic feet per second in Atchafalaya River. As the 1927 floodflow was not confined between levees, maximum discharges recorded do not include entire flow of the 1927 flood, maximum of record below White River. High water and flood stages usually occur in late winter or early spring, but great floods such as that of 1937 occurred as early as January. Low water stages generally prevail from August to December. Extreme all-time ranges in stages recorded at representative gages (rounded to nearest foot) are 60 feet at Cairo, 49 feet at Memphis, 57 feet at Red River Landing, and 21 feet at New Orleans (Carrollton). The river is nontidal above Red River Landing where tidal amplitude rarely exceeds 0.1 foot during extreme low water. Previous projects. For details see page 1944, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. The Mississippi River and Tributaries Project in the alluvial valley between Head of Passes, LA, and Cape Girardeau, MO, provides protection from floods by means of levees, floodwalls, floodways, reservoirs (in Yazoo and St. Francis Basins), bank stabilization, and channel improvements in and along the river and its tributaries and outlets insofar as affected by backwater of Mississippi River, including levee work on the main stem between Cape Girardeau and Rock Island. When completed, 23,621 square miles will be protected from the Mississippi River project flood. The project also provides for a 12- by 300-foot navigation channel between Baton Rouge, LA, and Cairo, IL; for salinity-control structures; and for channel realinement and improvement including bank stabilization and dikes to reduce flood heights, control natural tendency of river to lengthen by meandering, and protect levees from being destroyed by caving banks. Locations of major main stem Mississippi River improvements are shown in Table 42-A and those for offmain stem tributaries are shown in Table 42-B. Pertinent data on dams and lakes are shown in Table 42-C. Authorizing and incorporating legislation are shown in Tables 42-D and 42-E. Summary of presently estimated Federal cost of authorized improvements is shown in Table 42-F. Construction of the existing project began in 1928 and has continued throughout ensuing years. Based on the estimated cost of $13,786,742,000 (Cost projected through the construction period), and actual expenditures through Sep. 30, 1982, of $3,252,722,463, the entire project is about 74 percent complete. Recommended modifications. None. Local cooperation. The Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended, applies. Such requirements have, in general, been complied with by local interests. 42-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION Terminal facilities. See volume 1 of two-volume Port Series No. 21, 1969, "Ports on the Gulf Coast of the United States," for Baton Rouge and Lake Charles, LA; Port Series No. 20, 1977, for New Orleans, LA; also folio of Flood Control and Navigation Maps of Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to the Gulf of Mexico (49th edition), 1981. Project cost. Total allotted for flood control, including maintenance charges through Aug. 18, 1941, chargeable under authorizations to Sep. 30, 1982, was $3,266,309,836. (See Table 42-S.) (See also Tables 42-R, 42-T, and 42-U for additional financial statements.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Commission activities: The 314th session was held on October 26-29, 1981, on board the U.S. MV Mississippi en route on the Mississippi River from Cape Girardeau, MO, to Morgan City, LA. Bank protection works, levees and channel conditions were observed en route, as well as an inspection of the St. Johns-New Madrid Floodway project area, and the Atchafalaya Basin. Approximately, 185 persons attended public meetings held at Cape Girardeau, MO; Memphis, TN; Greenville, MS; and Morgan City, LA. About 31 of the representatives presented various problems pertaining to flood control and navigation. This session adjourned at Morgan City, LA, at 4:30 p.m., October 29, 1981. The 315th session was held January 28-29, 1982. The Commission met at its headquarters in Vicksburg, MS, to consider final Phase I GDM's on the following three projects: St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, MO; Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries, including Cow Pen Creek, TN and MS; and Nonconnah Creek, TN and MS. This session adjourned at 9:40 a.m., January 29, 1982. The 316th session was held April 19-20, 1982. The Commission met at its headquarters in Vicksburg, MS, to consider two survey reports on the Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, LA, and Louisiana State Penitentiary Levee, Mississippi River. This session adjourned at 11:30 a.m, April 20, 1982. The 317th session was held May 17-20, 1982, on board the U.S. MV Mississippi en route on the Mississippi River from Caruthersville, MO, to New Orleans, LA. Bank protection works, levees, and channel conditions were observed en route. The Commission members made an inspection of the Old River complex as well as an on-site inspection of the Bonnet Carr& structure and Mississippi River levees in the New Orleans area. Public meetings held at Caruthersville MO; Helena, AR; Vidalia, LA; and New Orleans, LA, were attended by approximately 180 representatives of local governmental, navigation, levee, commercial, and other interests. About 33 of those present addressed the Commission and presented problems pertaining to flood control and navigation. This session was adjourned in New Orleans, LA, at 1:40 p.m., May 20, 1982. Records of Proceedings of all sessions of the Mississippi River Commission are on file in the office of the President. Alluvial Valley Mapping General. Contoured quadrangles and general maps of the alluvial valley are available for departmental use and public distribution under prescribed regulations. Preparation, revision, and publication of quadrangle maps (scale 1:62,500) continued. Road-map-type information brochures of principal portions of the overall project were published along with pamphlets on the subject of flood control and navigation. Maps and supplemental data sheets for active works were updated and published as required. The 1981 (49th) edition of the folio of flood control and navigation maps (scale 1:62,500) covering the Mississippi River from Cairo, IL, to the Gulf of Mexico was revised and printed. Approximately 2052 flight-line miles of infra-red color; 4586 flight-line miles of black-and-white aerial photography (various scales); and about 38.8 hours of oblique photography were flown along the Mississippi River and tributaries in the New Orleans, Vicksburg, and Memphis Districts. Work accomplished in the Districts: New Orleans District-The Southwest Pass, Loss Lake, and Slidell quadrangles were scheduled for printing. Memphis District-Series conversion of U.S. Geological Survey 1:24,000-scale to 1:62,500-scale quadrangles of Hayti, MO-AR; Malden, MO, and Pascola, MO, are ready for printing and Sedgwick, Weiner, and Tilton, AR, are in progress. Revision of Rolla, Paducah, Poplar Bluff, Dyersburg, Memphis, and Blytheville, scale 1:250,000, is in progress. Vicksburg District-Series conversion of U.S. Geological Survey 1:24,000-scale quadrangles with addition of flood damage features of Malvern, El Dorado, Strong, Moro Bay, Felsenthal, AR and Oxford and Phillip, MS, were completed and printed. Raymond, Terry, Seven Pines, Lexington, Greenwood, Hernando, and Mileston, Mississippi are in progress. Floods Streamflow observations during the fiscal year follow: Memphis District-Mississippi River crest stage of 47.8 feet at Cairo gage on March 26-27, 1982, and maximum discharge of 1,169,000 cubic feet per second, occurred on March 27, 1982, at Hickman, KY and crest stage of 30.9 feet at Memphis on March 31, 1982, with maximum discharge of 1,171,000 cubic feet per second on March 31, 1982. Vicksburg District-Flooding was non-existent in Vicksburg District during FY 82. There were no bankfull stages reached on the Mississippi River Vicksburg District's reach. Maximum stages and discharges were as follows: Arkansas City -peak stage of 32.6 feet on April 5 and peak discharge of 1,249,000 cubic feet per second; Vicksburg, - peak stage of 37.7 feet on April 6 and peak discharge of 1,215,000 cubic feet per second; and Natchez - peak stage of 43.7 feet on April 7 42-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 and peak discharge of 1,159,000 cubic feet per second. No significant long duration flooding occurred on the Ouachita, Yazoo, Black, or Big Black Rivers in the Vicksburg District during FY 82. New Orleans District-On the Mississippi River, the Red River Landing gage recorded a maximum stage of 47.20 feet NGVD on Apr. 10, 1982, and the New Orleans gage recorded a maximum stage of 13.05 feet NGVD on Apr. 10, 1982. On the Atchafalaya River, the Simmesport gage recorded a maximum stage of 30.10 feet NGVD on Apr. 9, 1982. On the Red River the Alexandria gage recorded a maximum stage of 67.91 feet NGVD on Jun. 30, 1982. Studies and Investivations General investigations. Surveys and reports, authorized by laws and by Senate and House Public Works Committee resolutions, were made as required. Collection and study of basic data continued. Actions taken on various requests for modifications of the existing project, Mississippi River and Tributaries, authorized by the Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928, as amended (see Table 42-D), follow: St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, MO, Phase I GDM - The MRC Report dated January 29, 1982, contained recommendations for a total of 143.7 miles of channel improvements and construction of a 1,000-cfs and a 1,500-cfs pumping station. Environmental features included purchase of 2,500 acres in mitigation lands, development of a greentree reservoir, and construction of a fish pool weir. The total estimated cost of this recommended improvement is $108,000,000 (Oct 82). Nonconnah Creek, TN and MS, Phase I GDM - The MRC Report dated January 28, 1982, contained recommendations for 18.2 miles of channel improvement on Nonconnah Creek and recreation features consisting of picnic tables, sanitation facilities, hike/bike trails, and a nature area. The total estimated cost of this recommended improvement is $26,400,000 (Oct 82). Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries, including Cow Pen Creek, TN and MS, Phase I GDM - The MRC Report dated January 28, 1982, recommended 10.67 miles of various channel improvements in the area of Horn Lake & Cow Pen Creeks, and 4.57 miles of hike/bike trails. The total estimated cost of this improvement is $3,600,000 (Oct 82). Louisiana State Penitentiary Levee, Mississippi River - The MRC Report dated April 19, 1982, recommended raising and strengthening the existing non-Federal mainline levee at Angola, LA, to provide additional protection to the state penitentiary. Also one drainage structure would be replaced. Total estimated cost of this improvement is $21,671,000 (Oct 82). Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, LA, Interim Feasibility Report/Phase I GDM - The New Orleans District report of January 1982, recommended a comprehensive flood control plan including provisions for management and preservation of the Atchafalaya Basin. The MRC Report dated April 20, 1982, concurred in the district's report, except for the floodway land use plan, the recreation plan, management units, canal closures, and circulation improvements (unauthorized features) on which the'Commission could not reach a majority view. The total estimated cost of the New Orleans District's recommended plan is $1,067,220,000 (Oct 82). Engineering studies. A research program was continued for development of materials and more effective and economical design of regulation features for placing and stabilizing the Mississippi River in a suitable alinement. Potomology investigations of river behavior continue to be made. Investigations into the major cause-andeffect relationships attributable to major changes in stage-discharge relationships on the Mississippi River as a result of both natural and man-made modifications are continuing. Individual studies in hydrology, channel geometry, sedimentation, and hydraulic characteristics are complete and an interim report on results of the studies is being published. Mississippi River and Tributaries-Levees Operations and results during fiscal year. This feature consists of construction of new, and enlargement of existing, levees to approved grade and section; construction and restoration of levee berms; and construction, repair, and maintenance of roads on levees. Work accomplished is summarized in Table 42-N and further broken down as follows: New Orleans District-Surfaced 21.4 miles of roads on Atchafalaya Basin and Floodway levees. See Table 42-K. Vicksburg District-Constructed 4.0 miles of berms, and 2.3 miles of levees, in the Main Stem System. See Table 42-L. Memphis District-No construction this fiscal year. See Table 42-M. Condition as of Sep. 30. (See Tables 42-K, 42-L, 42- M, and 42-N.) There are 1,608.3 miles of levees authorized for the Mississippi River below Cape Girardeau, of which 1,601.5 are in place with 1,168.5 built to approved grade and section. The Main Stem Levee System consists of 2,202.1 miles, of which 2,195.3 are in place with 1,560.6 miles completed to approved grade and section. Included in this system are additional levees and structures along the south bank of Arkansas River (85.4 miles); along the south bank of Red River (59.2 miles, with 59.2 completed); and 449.2 miles in the Atchafalaya River Basin, with 449.2 in place with 257.5 completed to grade and section (see Table 42-N). Of the authorized 703.4 miles of berms, 476.0 are complete. Graveled or hard-surfaced roads have been constructed on 1,789.0 miles of these levees. There are an additional 1,604.2 miles of authorized levees off the main stem, of which 1,109.2 are in place with 812.6 to approved grade and section. Berms have been completed on 9.8 miles and 805.7 miles of graveled 42-4 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION or hard-surfaced roads have been constructed on the levees. For last summary of levee work accomplished under Sec. 6, 1928 Flood Control Act, see Table 42-N, pages 42-50, Annual Report for 1975. Mississippi River and Tributaries- Channel Improvements Operations and results during fiscal year. Dredging: Mississippi River Main Stem-(See Table 42-G). Work included dredging 31,018,400 cubic yards for maintenance of channel and harbor improvements. Minimum channel depth of 9 feet was maintained. Dredging was done with the following plant: New Orleans District, channel maintenance dredging was performed by the dredge Jadwin. Vicksburg District, two Government-owned dustpan dredges and one leased cutterhead dredge. The Vicksburg District channel maintenance dredging was performed by the dredges Burgess and Ockerson. The harbors were maintained with the leased contract cutterhead dredge Butcher, Memphis District, two Government-owned dustpan dredges, one leased cutterhead dredge, and one contract dustpan (ICP). The Memphis District channel maintenance dredging, mile 599 to 800, was advertised under the Industry Capability Program in April 1982. Bids were opened in May 1982. Two bids were received from the dredging industry. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded to Bean Dredging Corp. May 1982 under ICP on LMR Miles 599 to 800. In addition to the contract dustpan, channel maintenance dredging was performed by the dredges Burgess and Ockerson. The McKellar Lake Harbor was maintained with the leasedcontract cutterhead dredge Natchez. Bank revetment and dikes: (See Table 42-H, 42-I, and 42-J.) Construction of 12.26 miles of new bank revetment and 89,847 squares of concrete mattress, for maintenance, along the Mississippi River was completed by Government plant and hired labor. Also, 1.42 miles of new dikes were constructed and 0 squares were placed for maintenance. In addition, work on tributaries consisted of placement of 0 miles of new dikes and 0 squares for maintenance. Other work performed in the interest of navigation, supplementing maintenance dredging on Mississippi River between Cairo, IL, and Baton Rouge, LA, included removal of snags, wrecks, and obstructions; issuance of bulletins by the Vicksburg District providing information on available high-water velocities at selected locations; maintaining bulletin boards showing daily gage readings at regular MRC gages; and contract pilot service furnishing navigation interests with latest information and advice on channel conditions and obtaining their views as to needs of navigation interests. Cost of this work is given in Table 42-R. Condition as of Sep. 30. In carrying out authorized channel improvement program between Baton Rouge and Cairo, 16 cutoffs were developed between 1933 and 1942. These, combined with chute channel development and alinement improvements, decreased channel length between these cities by about 170 miles. However, current velocities increased the attack on the banks and the river began to regain its length. As a result, the net shortening between 1933 and 1962 was 114 miles of the theoretical 170-mile cutoff. There are now in place 802.20 miles of operative bank revetment and 190.07 miles of dikes on the lower Mississippi River. This amount of channel stabilization should prevent the river from regaining much more of its length due to meandering. A navigation channel 9-by 300-feet is being accomplished by revetment and dikes and maintained by dredging as required during the low-water season. Due to growing effectiveness of channel improvement program, average maintenance dredging requirements are steadily being reduced, and an increase in navigable depth is being obtained. Approximately 99.8 miles of foreshore protection have been constructed along the lower Mississippi River. There are 62.74 miles of revetment and 5.20 miles of dikes on tributary channels as listed in Tables 42-H, 42-I, and 42-J. New Orleans District ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor: Real estate activities and planning for construction were continued. New work by contract: Construction of floodside and landside berms and levee enlargement continued intermittently on the east and west protection levees, although there was considerable delay during the year due to exceptionally high water flooding the borrow pits. One contract on the west protection levee, initiated Feb. 13, 1980, was completed over a distance of 5.3 miles with placement of 364,777 cubic yards and one contract initiated Feb. 18, 1980, was completed over a distance of 2.2 miles with placement of 97,375 cubic yards. One contract on the east protection levee, initiated Oct. 1, 1979, was completed over a distance of 4.3 miles with placement of 93,381 cubic yards and one contract, initiated Apr. 17, 1980, was completed over a distance of 1.5 miles. An additional 7.1 miles of levee enlargement and floodside and landside berms are under construction on the west protection levee involving placement of 836,422 cubic yards during this period. A contract for Pointe Coupee pumping station, Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area, was initiated Mar. 23, 1981, and is 84 percent complete. Contract for the new Tiger Island floodwall was awarded Oct. 30, 1981, initiated Jan. 18, 1982, and is 55 percent complete. Maintenance by hired labor: Operation and maintenance of Bayou Boeuf, Berwick, and Bayou Sorrell Locks, Morganza Control Structure, and numerous 42-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 drainage structures as required, condition and operation studies, and water control management. Maintenance by contract: Miscellaneous painting and repair of Berwick Lock initiated Jul. 20, 1981, was completed Jan. 7, 1982. Contract for resurfacing and expanding roadways and parking areas at Bayou Boeuf Lock was awarded May 24, 1982, initiated Sep. 22, and is 13 percent complete. Maintenance dredging was performed, resulting in the removal of 977,740 cubic yards by one leased cutterhead dredge from Berwick Bay harbor between Jul. 23 and Sep. 2, 1982. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated Aug. 7, 1929, with commencement of the west protection levee from Bordelonville to Hamburg, LA. The project is 65 percent complete, based on the current estimated Federal cost of $1,433,000,000 and non-Federal cost of $11,000,000. Of the 449.2 miles of levees and floodwalls authorized for the Atchafalaya system, 257.5 miles are built to grade. See Table 42-K for status of levees. Major items remaining to be completed include completion of levees to grade and section, channel improvement by dredging to reduce flow line, and bank stabilization. The channel has been enlarged to 60,000 square feet from mile 54.5 to 96.2, and 40,000 square feet from mile 96.2 to 112.3. Enlargement to 100,000 square feet from mile 54.5 to 112.3 remains to be done. Drainage improvements in Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area have not been initiated. Approximately 36.7 miles of bank stabilization have been placed as shown in Table 42-H. BATON ROUGE HARBOR (DEVILS SWAMP), LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by contract: Dredging for the removal of shoal from the entrance channel was performed, resulting in the removal of 149,293 cubic yards between Aug. 16 and Aug. 22, 1982. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of the first 2.5 miles of the proposed 5.0 miles of channel was initiated in January 1958 and completed in July 1959, with 7,458,086 cubic yards excavated. The project is 16 percent complete, based on the current estimated Federal cost of $699,200 and cash contributions of $650,000. Completion of the remaining 2.5 miles is dependent on economic justification by developments on the initial channel. BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of water control management. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in June 1946 and is 57 percent complete, based on the current estimated cost of $38,900,000. See page 2031, Annual Report for 1961, for description of completed work. Work required to complete the project consists of enlargement of 13.5 miles of upper Bayou Boeuf, channel improvement of 25.3 miles of Bayou Cocodrie, enlargement of Bayou Courtableau from Washington, LA, to the west protection levee, and additional culverts through the west protection levee at 100 percent Federal cost in lieu of the previously authorized diversion channel from Washington to the Bayou Courtableau drainage structure. BONNET CARRIL SPILLWAY, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor: Condition and operation studies, water control management, and ordinary maintenance of the control structure and spillway continued. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of the spillway was initiated in Fiscal Year 1929. The control structure was completed in 1931, levees were completed in 1932, and utility crossings were completed in 1936. The cost of the completed work is $14,212,200. It was necessary to operate the structure to reduce flood stages in 1937, 1945, 1950, 1973, 1975, and 1979. LOWER RED RIVER-SOUTH BANK RED RIVER LEVEES, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor consisted of engineering studies. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of water control management, and economic studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in Fiscal Year 1929 and is 50 percent complete, based on the current estimated cost of $37,100,000. Of the 59.2 miles of levees authorized, 59.2 miles are complete. (See Table 42-K for status of levees and Table 42-H for status of revetments.) OLD RIVER, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor consisted of engineering studies. New work by contract: Old River Control Auxiliary Structure, Phase I construction, initiated Jul. 9, 1981, is 88 percent complete. Contract for Phase II construction was awarded Sep. 30, 1982. Contract for low sill overbank bridge painting, initiated Jul. 29, 1981, was completed Nov. 17, 1981. Contract for radar and TV surveillance system at the control structure, initiated Apr. 21, 1981, is 91 percent complete. The new picket boat M/V Kent, was delivered on Sep. 27, 1982. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of operation and maintenance of the lock and control structures as required, condition and operation studies, maintenance of cleared areas, levee shaping, operation of a picket boat at the inflow channel to the low-sill control structure during high river stages, and engineering studies. Maintenance by contract: During the period Aug. 24 to Sep. 2, 1982, 155,699 cubic yards of shoal were 42-6 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION dredged from the lock forebay. Contract for the overbank structure modifications, confining levees and scour protection, initiated Jun. 12, 1980, was completed Dec. 18, 1981. Contract for resurfacing and expanding roadways and parking areas at the lock was awarded May 28, 1982, initiated Aug. 9, and completed Sep. 10, 1982. Contract for berm erosion protection at the control structure was awarded Jan. 22, 1982, initiated Feb. 12, and completed Feb. 26, 1982. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began September 1955 and is 65 percent complete based on the current estimated Federal cost of $332,000,000. Principal items completed are as follows: Low-sill structure, June 1959; overbank structure, October 1959; levees and levee enlargements, October 1963; inflow and outflow channels, February 1961; navigation lock completed December 1962 and opened to navigation March 1963, at which time Old River was closed to navigation with a rock and earthfill dam; highway approaches and bridge over the lock completed March 1965. Approximately 4.7 miles of bank protection have been constructed at the inflow and outflow channels. (See Table 42-H for details of bank protection.) Principal items remaining to complete the project consist of constructing additional bank protection works, providing additional scour protection in the inflow and outflow channels, and completion of the Auxiliary Structure. TECHE VERMILION BASINS, LA (WATER SUPPLY) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor consisted of engineering studies. New work by contract: A contract for Loreauville Canal Navigable Control Structure was initiated Mar. 19, 1981, and completed Aug. 23, 1982. A contract for construction of a pumping station was initiated May 27, 1980, and is 98 percent complete. A contract for the Bayou Courtableau borrow pit control structure was awarded Jul. 15, 1982, initiated Aug. 18, 1982, and is 43 percent complete. Contract for the state canal siphon and bypass channel was initiated Oct. 18, 1979, and completed May 6, 1982. Condition as of Sep. 30. The project is 63 percent complete based on the current estimated Federal cost of $35,700,000 and non-Federal cost of $4,000,000. Construction was authorized by the Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928, as modified by the Flood Control Act of 1966 (Public Law 89-789 approved Nov. 7, 1966) of the following: a low leveed excavated channel on the west bank of the Atchafalaya River north of Krotz Springs; an inverted siphon under Darbonne Bay; a grated control structure in the WABPL; a gated culvert in the berm between Bayou Courtableau and the WABPL borrow pit to the south; a slotted weir in Bayou Fusilier near Arnaudville; and a navigable sector control structure in the Loreauville Canal. Improvements are to provide additional surface water in Bayou Teche, Vermilion River, and the WABPL borrow pit to satisfy the present and future needs for municipal, industrial, and irrigation water supply and to prevent pollution of these streams. Vicksburg District TENSAS BASIN, ARK AND LA Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, and Bayou Macon, AR and LA. Planning and design were continued on project features. Contracts for the pumps and motors, Phase I recreational facilities, Connerly Bayou Dam, Ditch Bayou Dam, slurry trench, and storage building are complete on the Lake Chicot Pumping Plant Project. The contract was for the Lake Chicot Pumping Plant is underway. Work was completed on relocation of the Illinois Central Gulf Railroad bridge located in Reach 3, Big and Colewa Creeks. (b) Red River backwater area. Planning and design continued on project features. The channel improvement contract for Wild Cow Bayou and additional channel work contract for the Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant has been completed. The gravity structure contract is complete, and the pumping plant contract is scheduled for award in late FY 84 due to funding restraints. Design and right-of-way acquisition are continuing for the remainder of the Tensas-Cocodrie levee enlargement. Design of the Six Mile Bayou drainage structure and connecting channel has been completed. The Sicily Island Levee Project GDM has been approved and the Vicksburg District has initiated preparation of Item 1A and lB Plans and Specifications for Sicily Island Levee. Work on the Below Red River Phase II GDM is underway. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, and Bayou Macon, AR and LA. Channel improvement has been accomplished on 744.6 miles of project streams, providing major drainage outlets for the tributary areas. Additional 57.2 miles of channel previously enlarged has been further enlarged and 61.6 miles of the Tensas River have been cleared and snagged. A Phase I GDM study addresses drainage of lands above mile 61.6. This study is being reviewed. (b) Red River backwater area. Levees in Tensas- Cocodrie area are complete except for levee raising necessary to conform to the Refined 1973 MR&T Project Flood Flowline on the Mississippi River of which 17.8 miles have been completed. The work comprised 93.1 miles of new levee, excluding 2.1 miles of high ground where no levees are required, and 86.9 miles of gravel road on levees. Construction of 68.6 miles of levee, Larto Lake to Jonesville levee system, has been completed. LOWER ARKANSAS BASIN, AR Condition as of Sep. 30. Arkansas River levees. A total of 56.2 miles of the 61.5 miles of north bank levees 42-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 and all of the 85.4 miles of south bank levees have been completed to approved grade and section. These levees above mile 36.1 are protected by bank-protection works constructed as a feature of project for Arkansas River and tributaries, AR and OK. For present status of this work, see report of Little Rock District. Below mile 36.1, needed bank protection is constructed with project maintenance funds. YAZOO BASIN, MS Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Yazoo City and Belzoni protection works. Hired labor forces continued operation and maintenance of levees, drainage facilities, and pumping plant. (b) Greenwood protection works. Hired labor forces continued operation and maintenance of pumping plant, levees, and drainage facilities. A review of the protection provided to Greenwood and vicinity is complete and results were submitted for approval in August 1982 in Supplement C to Greenwood Protection Work (GDM #1). (c) Main stem. Planning is under way to provide drainage structure and levee closure at Bee Lake. Construction is substantially complete on the Wasp Lake drainage structure and levee closure. Channel maintenance. Random clearing and snagging and herbicide willow control continued, as required, in Coldwater, Tallahatchie, and Yazoo Rivers, and Will M. Whittington Auxiliary Channel. (d) Big Sunflower River. A Phase II GDM for additional work in the Steele Bayou Basin was approved Dec. 20, 1978. Construction on a 11.4 mile item of channel improvement began in April 1982. (e) Tributaries. Construction: (1) Levees. A contract was awarded for construction of a dike north of Big Sand Creek. The work is associated with plans to upgrade a portion of south Big Sand Creek levee. Plans and specifications are complete for this item of work; also plans and specifications are being finalized for levee work associates with the last item of work on Ascalmore-Tippo Project. (2) Channels. Removal of a portion of the plug on Alligator-Catfish Bayou channel at the site of bridge relocations was awarded in June 1982. The Alligator- Catfish channel enlargement project will be complete following this work except for removal of the remaining portion of the plug. Controls in Alligator-Catfish channel may be necessary prior to removal of the plug. A study is underway to evaluate these needs. Plans and specifications are being finalized on remaining channel work on the Ascalmore-Tippo Project. The planning of the Pelucia Creek Levee Project, printed as Supplement B to the Greenwood Protection Works (GDM #1), is complete and plans and specifications are being prepared for Item 1 contruction. Maintenance of channels of Yalobusha, Little Tallahatchie, and Yocona Rivers; Cassidy, David, Burrell, and Bobo Bayous; and Ascalmore Creek, by random clearing and snagging and herbicide willow control, continued. (f) Enid Lake. (See Table 42-C.) Construction of public use facilities is substantially complete. Maintenance of these facilities continued. The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Rehabilitation of boat channels and snagging and clearing of tributary streams in the lake area continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 252.42 feet above NGVD on Sep. 15, 1982, when storage in the flood control pool was 311,000 acre-feet. Peak 24 hr. inflow was 10,150 cubic feet per second on April 19, 1982. On Sep. 30, 1982, pool elevation was 248.73 feet above NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 250,100 acre-feet. (g) Grenada Lake. (See Table 42-C.) Construction and maintenance of public use facilities continued. The dam and appurtenant structures were operated and maintained. Maintenance snagging and clearing of tributary streams in the lake area continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 217.63 feet above NGVD on June 28, 1982, when storage in the flood control pool was 648,800 acre-feet. Peak 24 hour inflow was 35,750 cubic feet per second on April 20, 1982. On Sep. 30, 1982, the pool elevation was 211.48 feet above NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 432,600 acre-feet. Construction of a levee to provide protection to the community of Coffeeville from high Grenada Lake stages was begun in FY 82. In addition to the levee, other features of Coffeeville project include: three drainage structures through the levee; portable pumps; area rehabilitation; and raising of a town street. Construction of the levee and two of the drainage structures was complete in FY 82. The remaining feature of the Coffeeville project will be completed in FY 83. (h) Sardis Lake. (See Table 42-C.) Construction and maintenance of public use facilities continued. The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Clearing of tributary streams in the lake area continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 261.95 feet above NGVD on June 16, 1982, when storage in the flood control pool was 677,800 acre-feet. Peak 24 hour inflow was 13,150 cubic feet per second on April 19, 1982. On Sep. 30, 1982, pool elevation was 257.20 feet above NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 525,200 acre-feet. An 8-mile reach of the Little Tallahatchie River from Sardis Dam to Highway 51 was clogged with sediment restricting releases from the lake. This reach has been dredged to restore the design capacity of the river. Six disposal sites were selected, located in upland hill areas to reduce the adverse impact on prime agricultural lands along the river and still be in compliance with environmental laws and regulations. Dredging was completed in August 1982. (i) Arkabutla Lake. (See Table 42-C.) Construction of public use facilities is substantially complete. Maintenance of these facilities continued. The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. 42-8 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION Clearing of tributary streams in the lake area was continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 224.08 feet above NGVD on August 18, 1982, and storage in flood control pool was 180,600 arce-feet. Peak 24 hour inflow was 17,000 cubic feet per second on February 9, 1982. On Sep. 30, 1982, pool elevation was 218.80 feet above NGVD, and storage in the flood control pool was 107,900 acre-feet. (j) Yazoo Basin backwater. The Yazoo Area backwater levees are complete, including the backwater levee from the Mississippi River levee to the west levee of the lower Auxiliary Channel, the Little Sunflower River drainage structure, and the connecting channel from the Steele Bayou drainage structure to the Big Sunflower River. A Phase I GDM was completed in FY 82 which addresses rural flooding from ponded runoff inside the backwater levee. The Satartia area backwater levee is complete. Plans and specifications are being prepared for Structure and Item 1 of the Rocky Bayou Levee System. Completed backwater levees will require raising to provide the degree of protection intended based on the project design flow line developed for the Mississippi River following the 1973 flood. Four Greentree Reservoirs are now complete. Two of the three remaining reservoirs will be constructed when funds are appropriated. One reservoir has been indefinitely delayed because of right-of-way problems. Project funds will not be available until FY 85. The supply contract for the pumps and motors for the four completed reservoirs is scheduled for award in FY 86. The project is 42 percent complete. (k) Upper Yazoo projects. The first five items of work, approximately 40 miles of channel improvement, beginning at Yazoo City,' MS, and extending upstream to just south of Belzoni, MS, have been completed. The next item of work, Item 2-C, consisting of approximately 7.7 miles of channel improvement is under construction. Planning is continuing on the remainder of Items 2 and 3. (1) Streambank erosion control. Construction of the following projects has been completed: Tillatoba and Hunter Creeks, Items 1 and 2; Hunter Creek 1A; South Fork Tillatoba Creek, Items 5A and 5B; North Fork Tillatoba Creek, Items A and 3A; Batupam Boque, Items 4A, 4A-1, and 4A-2; Perry Creek, Items 6A and 6B; Johnson Creek, Items 9A, 9B, and vegetative treatment, Item 12; Goodwin Creek, Items 8A, 8B, and 8C; and Hotopha Creek, Item 7. All construction under this feature is complete, and a final report was submitted to the Secretary of the Army Jan. 5, 1982. All work constructed has been turned over to the local sponsors for operation and maintenance except for the instrumented system on Goodwin Creek where the structures were retained for possible future studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. The first feature of Yazoo Basin project was started in 1936, and the total project is about 35 percent complete. A total of 47.9 miles of backwater levee has been completed to the interim grade. The ongoing Yazoo Basin Comprehensive Study will address other water resources problems and needs in the area to include urban and rural flood damage prevention, hydropower, and water supply. Memphis District ST. FRANCIS BASIN, AR AND MO Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Little River drainage. A contract for construction of a county bridge across Ditch 19, Item 2, at mile 13.67 was completed Dec. 8, 1981. A contract for channel excavation, Castor River, Item 1, Parcel 1, was completed Jun. 17, 1982. A contract for channel enlargement, Item 1, Parcel No. 2, Castor River was awarded Aug. 6, 1982, and is 19 percent complete. A contract for channel enlargement, Ditch 19, Item 2, Parcel 2 was awarded Aug. 12, 1982, and is 19 percent percent. A contract for Ditch 24, County bridge, mile 5.4 was awarded Jul. 17, 1982, and is 41 percent complete. The contract for Castor River, Item 1, County bridge, mile 7.85 was awarded Jul. 16, 1982, and is 94 percent complete. Plans and specifications and alterations for railroad facilities, Castor River, Item No. 1, Little River Drainage were awarded Jul. 26, 1982, and no work was accomplished. The design and alternation of two gas lines, Castor River was awarded Oct. 16, 1981, and was completed Jul. 7, 1982. (b) Upper St. Francis River and Oak Donnick Floodway. Contract for excavation of Ditch 27 and Tributaries was completed. Contract for landside ditch cleanout below Locust Creek was completed. Contract for scour repair, Oak Donnick Floodway Levee, was completed. Contract for construction of Drainage District 17 Pumping Plan is complete. The contract for channel enlargement, Ditch Nos. 71, 21-A and 25 was awarded Jul. 30, 1982, and is 1 percent complete. The contract for landside Ditch Cleanout, Locust Creek was completed Mar. 26, 1982. A contract for channel enlargement Ditch 19, Item 2, Parcel 1 was completed Jun. 17, 1982. A contract for channel cleanout, Ditch No. 9, Lake City, AR, was awarded Aug. 26, 1982, and is 37 percent complete. The work for Landside Ditch Cleanout, Deason's Lake, Lester, AR, was completed Sept. 17, 1982. A contract for channel excavation, Item 2, Buffalo Creek was awarded Apr. 23, 1982, and is 95 percent complete. The alteration of three sewer lines on Ditch 27 was awarded Mar46, 1982, and is 74 percent complete. A contract for alteration of U.S. Highway 63 and placement of riprap stone protection was awarded Sept. 1, 1982. The work for alteration of six Lake City streets as necessitated by the enlargement of Ditch 9 was completed Sept. 24, 1982. (c) Lower St. Francis River. Reimbursable contract for alteration of four county bridges, Big Creek, Item 2 was completed May 7, 1982. Contract for channel enlargement and diversion, Item No. 1, Big Creek, is complete. Two contracts for landside ditch culvert 42-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 installation below Marianna above Haleside Levees Parts I and II, were both completed. A second contract for emergency repairs to U.S. Highway 63 bridge across Ditch 61 was completed. The work for roof removal and installation, Huxtable Pumping Plant, was completed Oct. 27, 1982. The gravel surfacing rehabilitation, Derossett, AR, was completed Jul 27, 1982. The gravel surfacing, rehabilitation Below Marianna was completed Oct. 1, 1982. The contract for Below Marianna, Above Haleside Levee, Levee Landside Ditch Culverts, Part 1, was completed Nov. 6, 1982. The contract for the relocation of a county raod and abandonment of one county road, Blackfish Bayou was awarded FY 78 with no work accomplished. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Little River Drainage. Project was initiated during 1938 and is 71 percent complete. (b), (c), and (d) St. Francis River and Tributaries (Upper and Lower). Project was initiated during 1937 and is 77 percent complete. (e) Wappapello Lake, MO. Project was initiated in 1938 and completed in 1941. LOWER WHITE RIVER Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Augusta to Clarendon Levee. There were no contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal year. (b) Clarendon Levee. There were no contracts awarded or completed. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Augusta to Clarendon Levee. Project was initiated during 1946 and is 39 percent complete. (b) Clarendon Levee. Project was initiated during 1972 and is 36 percent complete. CACHE BASIN, AR Operations and results during fiscal year. No contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1971 and is 4 percent complete. REELFOOT LAKE-LAKE NO. 9, TN AND KY Operations and results during fiscal year. No contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1974 and is 89 percent complete. WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES, TN Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Obion River, TN. Reimbursable contract for alteration of Illinois Central Gulf Railroad bridges across South and Middle Forks, Obion River, is essentially complete (remaining work, installing sway bracing, will be performed after channel excavation under the bridges has been completed by others). (b) Forked Deer River, TN. Reimbursable contract for alteration of Illinois Central Gulf Railroad bridges across North and'South Forks, Forked Deer River, is in progress and is 82 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Obion River, TN. Project was initiated during 1961 and is 25 percent complete. (b) Forked Deer River, TN. Project was initiated during 1966 and is 15 percent complete. WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KY Operations and results during fiscal year. Reimbursable contract for alterations of Illinois Central Gulf Railroad bridge across Obion Creek, Item No. 3, is under way. Phase I planning is complete, but construction has not started. However, the Interstate Commerce Commission has authorized the abandonment of this bridge. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1978 and is 4 percent complete. 42-10 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-A MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Head of Passes Locality Improvement Remarks 0-9571 Head of Passes, LA-Cairo, IL Dredging, revetment, and 10-81 11-25 38 45 59 75 44-91 81-96 91-104 96-279 101-234 127-129 235 279-287 287-303 303-314 306-572 437 437-721 490 537 646 605-666 672-993 722-725 721-734 contraction work Main line levee, right bank Main line setback, left bank The Jump-New Orleans, LA Baptiste Collette-Bayou Ostrica, Homeplace, LA Bohemia, LA Myrtle Grove, LA Scarsdale, LA Bohemia, LA-New Orleans, LA New Orleans, LA New Orleans, LA New Orleans-Morganza, LA New Orleans-Baton Rouge, LA Bonnet Carrd Floodway, LA Baton Rouge Harbor Morganza Floodway, LA Morganza-Old River, LA Old River, LA control Old River-Cypress Creek, AR Vicksburg Harbor, MS Vicksburg-Lake View, MS Wilson Point, LA Greenville Harbor, MS Long Lake, Helena, AR Henrico-Helena, AR St. Francis River-Commerce, MO3 Industrial levee (Ensley Bottoms) Memphis Harbor, TN Salinity control structure, right bank Salinity control structure, left bank Salinity control structure, right bank Salinity control structure, left bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Main line levee, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Main line levee, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Regulating spillway, left bank Devils Swamp barge channel Regulating spillway, right bank Main line levee, right bank Levee closure and enlargement, low and high water spillway structures, navigation lock, and approach channels, right bank Main line levee, right bank Harbor extension and industrial fill Main line levee, left bank Pumping Plant and drainage structure, right bank Harbor improvements and port area Culvert and floodgate, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, right bank Main line levee, right bank Levee and pumping station Closure of Tennessee Chute, industrial fill, levee, harbor channels, etc. 42-11 Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Modified by Public Law 87-874. Extends up south bank of Old River to Barbre Landing. Authorized by Public Law 83-780. Joins Arkansas River, south bank levee. a uthorized by Public Law 70-391. Modified by Public Laws 79-526 and 83-780. Unpublished Vicksburg District's MRC report approved Apr. 14, 1966.2 Authorized by Public Law 85-500. Authorized by Public Law 79-526.2 Authorized by Public Law 79-526. TABLE 42-A (Continued) Mileage Above Head of Passes 803-873 T 857 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS Locality 'iptonville-Obion River Near Mud Lake, TN Main exte RivE Pumr chaj 890 St. Johns Bayou, MO Drail clos 890 New Madrid Floodway, MO Drail clos 890-954 New Madrid-Birds Point, MO Flooc 902-922 Slough Bend, Hickman, KY Main 922 Hickman, KY Flooc 946 Peafield, MO Drail 9571 Cairo, Cairo drainage district Floo 9571 Cairo, Cairo drainage district, Flooc Mounds, Mound City, and plai vicinity Thebes-Rock Island, IL Leve Cape Girardeau, MO to Rock Leve Island, IL 1. Cairo, IL, is on Ohio River about 3 miles above its mouth (Mississippi River mile 954 AHP). 2. Also see Table 42-D, "Authorizing Legislation." Improvement 1 line levee, left bank, levee ension, and diversion Obion er ping station and adjacent * nnel improvements nage floodgate and levee ure nage floodgate and levee ure Iway, right bank I line levee, left bank dwall, left bank nage floodgate dwalls and levees dwalls, levees, and pumping nt es, both banks es Remarks Modified by Acts of Jul. 24, 1946 and Dec. 23, 1971. Authorized Dec. 15 and 17, 1970 under Sec. 201 of Oct. 27, 1965 FC Act. Modified by Jul. 24, 1946 Act. Modified by Sep. 3, 1954 Act. Authorized by Sep. 3, 1954 Act. Intermittent (Sec. 6). Intermittent (Sec. 6). 3. Commerce, MO, is on Upper Mississippi River, 39 miles above mouth of Ohio River. 42-12 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 117 Morgan City 117-129 Below Morgan City 117-129 Below Morgan City Atchafalaya Basin Floodway lower protection levee 105 Calumet 105-120 Below Morgan City 115 Berwick' 116 Patterson West protection levee (Atchafalaya Basin and West Atchafalaya Floodways) 5 Simmesport-Hamburg 5-105 Mansura to Wax Lake Outlet Coulee des Grues 29 West Atchafalaya Floodway 29 Morganza Floodway 40 Bayou Darbonne 40 West Atchafalaya Floodway 40 Morganza Floodway Floodway Floodway Floodway 0-54 27-54 54-117 20-27 25-117 27 0-27 31-57 80 53-117 ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA' Atchafalaya Basin. Morganza and West Atchafalaya Floodways West Atchafalaya Floodway between Red River and Alabama Bayou Morganza Floodway between Mississippi River and Alabama Bayou Atchafalaya Basin Floodway between Alabama Bayou and Morgan City East protection levee (Morganza and Atchafalaya Floodways) Lacour-Red Cross Morganza-Morgan City Bayou Latenache Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area Bayou Fordoche-Ramah Bayou Sorrel' Bayou Sorrel Lock-Morgan City 42-13 Levee, upper Morganza guide Levee and Morgan City floodwall Drainage structure, Pointe Coupee, and channel enlargement Additional drainage facilities Drainage channel Lock Alternate navigation channel, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Lock in Bayou Boeuf' Channel relocation Levee, floodwall Floodgate, east Levees, floodwall, drainage structures, and pumping plants Lock Water system Levee fuse plug Protection levee Levee enlargement and floodgate extension Railway Railway Gated drainage structures Highway Highway r Including lower Morganza Floodway guide levee. Through upper Morganza guide levee and enlargement of outlet channel. Enlargement of Bayou Latenache. Approved Jun. 4, 1970. See Table 42-D. Levee landside borrow pit. Alternate route, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Port Allen to Morgan City. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway utilizes levee west side borrow pit channel. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Bypass route for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. East of lower river. Bayou Teche-Wax Lake Outlet. Inclosed area between Wax Lake Outlet and Berwick. Lower Atchafalaya River. Adjustment to provide fresh water. West Atchafalaya Floodway. Through West Atchafalaya protection levee. TABLE 42-B (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 41 Bayou Courtableau 41 41 94 0-8 Charenton Canal 0-133 West Atchafalaya protection levee borrow pit channel 96 Bayou Courtableau spillway 133 Bayou des Glaises BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES Bayou Courtableau 0-17 Bayou Cocodrie 17-40 Bayous Cocodrie-Bouef diversion 10-51 Bayou Boeuf 1-60 Bayous Boeuf-Rapides diversion 17-42 Upper Cocodrie Bayou Boeuf 7-107 Bayou Lamourie to Kincaid Structures 40 Lecompte Control Structure 60 Bayou Rapides Control Structure West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Charenton Jaws-Lake Fausse Pointe Calumet Wax Lake Outlet Atchafalaya River Barbre Landing-Alabama Bayou Simmesport Simmesport-Bayou Garofier Melville Krotz Springs Below Alabama Bayou Mississippi River-Morgan City TECHE-VERMILION BASINS, LA Atchafalaya River to Teche- Vermilion Basins Courtableau Basin, LA, and outlets Gated drainage control structures and channels Railway Railway Floodgate and approach channels Outlet, Charenton drainage canal and protection levee. Floodgate, west Drainage canal-railway and highway bridges East bank, levee Levee, ring, and drainage structure West bank, levee Levee, ring Levee, ring Channel enlargement 12- by 125-foot navigation channel Pumping station above Krotz Springs, conveyance channels, and appurtenant works Drainage channel Drainage channel Drainage control structure Diversion channel Enlargement and additional culverts Enlargement and realinement New channel New channel New channel Enlargement, clearing, and snagging Enlargement, realinement, clearing and snagging Fixed elevation weir Gated drainage structure 42-14 Borrow pit channel to Grand Lake through West Atchafalaya protection levee. Restoration of drainage west of West Atchafalaya Basin protection levee. Bayou Teche and Wax Lake Outlet. To lower flood heights. Increase channel capacities to decrease flood heights. Through Grand and Six Mile Lakes. Freshwater distribution from Atchafalaya River to Teche-Vermilion Basins. Outlet to gulf. Intercepting drainage channel. Washington to west protection levee. 94 105 105 0-54 5-6 5-66 28-30 40-41 54-117 94-106 Mileage Above Mouth 51 14 1 8 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks Bayou Lamourie Control Structure Various LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA Lake Pontchartrain, Jefferson Parish, LA AMITE RIVER, LA Amite River, LA LOWER RED RIVER, SOUTH BANK, RED RIVER LEVEES, LA Moncla-Hotwells Red River-Moncla to Lake Long EASTERN RAPIDES AND SOUTH-CENTRAL AVOYELLES PARISHES, LA Eastern Rapides and southcentral Avoyelles Parishes, LA TENSAS BASIN, AR AND LA Red River backwater area Tensas-Cocodrie area Larto Lake-Jonesville Sicily Island area Below Red River area Black River, LA Six Mile Bayou area Jonesville, LA Ouachita River Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, AR, and LA Boeuf River, AR, and LA Below Bayou La Fourche Bayou LaFourche Boeuf River, AR, and LA above Bayou LaFourche Canal 19 Canal 19 extension Big and Colewa Creeks Gated drainage structure Railway, highway, and local road bridges, and pipeline crossing Flood protection Bank protection Levee, south bank Levees Flood protection and drainage improvement Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plant Levees, drainage channels, and structures Levees, drainage channels, and structures Levees, drainage channels, and structures Drainage structure and appurtenant channel works Levees, floodwall, pumping plant, and interior drainage Levees, drainage channels, and structures Clearing Channel improvement and realinement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvements (2, 3) Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Eliminated by Public Law 89-298. Intermittent (Sec. 6). Authorized by Public Law 91-611. (4) (4) (4) (4) Unpublished VXD-MRC Letter Report dated May 31, 1977. MR&T authority.2 Portion of levee built under Sec. 6. Incorporated in MR&T by Public Law 81-516.2 Monroe to Sandy Bayou and Bawcomville (Sec. 6). (6) (5) Authorized by Public Laws 78-534 and 79-526.2 3 (5) (6) Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 42-15 87 82-145 3-56 3-56 5 56 0-32 0-56 151-235 210-286 286-296 0-75 TABLE 42-B (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks Tributaries of Boeuf River-- Canal 19 Fleschmans Bayou Caney Bayou Big Bayou Canal 18 Kirsch Lake Canal Black Pond Slough Bayou Macon, AR, and LA Bayou Macon Canal 43 Canal 81 Pumping plant and drainage structure Tributary of Bayou Macon Rush Bayou Tensas River, AR and LA Tensas River Tributary of Tensas River Mill and Vidal Bayous Grant's Canal, LA Grant's Canal at Lake Providence LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, AR Yancopin-Pine Bluff Fletcher Bend, AR to Pine Bluff North Little Rock to Gillett (below Plum Bayou) Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement To divert flows from Lake Chicot Clearing 0-8 0-7 0-33 0-10 0-9 0-14 0-170 0-34 0-35 Lake Chicot 0-6 0-160 0-16 0-0.2 (6) (6) (5) (6) (6) (6) See Table 42-E (5) (5) Authorized by Public Law 90-483. (6) Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Levee, south bank Revetment Levee, north bank (5) GRAND PRAIRIE-BAYOU METO, AR Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR YAZOO BASIN, MS Yazoo Backwater area Yazoo River System below Arkabutla Lake Yazoo River between Yazoo City and Prichard Yazoo River between Yazoo City and Askew Will M. Whittington Auxiliary Channel Yazoo City protection Rocky Bayou area Belzoni protection Greenwood protection Arkabutla Lake Water supply and drainage improvements Levees and pumping plants Channel improvement Levees, right bank Levees, left bank Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Including Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers. Intermittent. Intermittent. Floodway channel Levee, drainage structure, and pumping plant Channel clearing and enlargement Levee and floodwall Levees, channel improvement, drainage structures, and pumping plants Flood detention and conservation Improvement of 7.8 miles was approved Apr. 29, 1970. See Table 42-C. 42-16 Channel improvement Channel improvement Filling canal 23-98 35-98 48-102 0-75 0-381 75-366 75-345 45-109 75 127 185 381 TABLE 42-E (Continued) Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River 0-64 64 0-24 0-26 26 0-13 13 0-88 137-260 75-381 0-8.3 0-23 0-42 275-290 0-204 0-8 0-28 0-81 0-43 0-4 0-27 153-160 0-68 13-55 0-68 99 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Locality Yalobusha River below Grenada Lake Grenada Lake Tallahatchie River-Little Tallahatchie River Little Tallahatchie River below Sardis Lake Sardis Lake Yocona River below Enid Lake Enid Lake Cassidy Bayou below Old Coldwater River Upper Yazoo Projects Area between main stem and hills including Bobo Bayou McKinney Bayou Alligator-Catfish Bayous Bear Creek Whiteoak Bayou Tallahatchie River, MS Big Sunflower River, etc. Big Sunflower River Hull Brake-Mill Creek Canal Hushpuckena River Quiver River Gin and Muddy Bayous, MS Bogue Phalia Ditchlow Bayou Little Sunflower River Deer Creek Steele Bayou Muddy Bayou LOWER WHITE RIVER AND BASIN, AR Laconia Circle-Old Town Lake Big Creek and tributaries Clarendon levee Levee, backwater including outlet Pumping plant Channel improvement and structures Levee and outlet structures 42-17 Improvement Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Levees, Panola-Quitman Floodway Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Floodway channel Levees and channel improvement Channel improvement and enlargement of pumping plant Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Two road crossings of Panola- Quitman Floodway, MS and for protection of Sheley Bridge Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Water-control structure Remarks See Table 42-C. See Table 42-C. See Table 42-C. Including Moores Bayou, Cutoff Bayou, Whiting Lake and outlet. Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. As modified in GDM in 1967. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 90-147. Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 87-874. Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 Modified in December 1970. See Table 42-D. Approved Mar. 3, 1970. See Table 42-D. Mile 605-645 Mississippi River. (6) Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. 3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 108-192 122 143 0-196 0-90 260 0-225 225 0-105 86 0-36 0-29 0-17 0-12 0-108 0-25 0-20 0-15 Augusta to Clarendon De Valls Bluff Des Arc, AR CACHE BASIN, AR Cache River, AR Bayou DeView, AR ST. FRANCIS RIVER AND BASIN, AR, AND MO Inter-River Drainage District in Missouri Mouth of St. Francis River- Wappapello Dam Wappapello Lake Little River Basin Marked Tree, AR Tyronza River Big Slough Ditch Mayo Ditch Cross County Ditch Belle Fountain Ditch Drainage District No. 17 L'ANGUILLE RIVER, AR L'Anguille River and tributaries, Brushy and First Creeks WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES Wolf River and tributaries, TN Obion River and tributaries, North, South, Middle, and Rutherford Forks Forked Deer River and tributaries, North, Middle, and South Forks Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY Porter Gap, TN REELFOOT LAKE-LAKE NO. 9, TN AND KY Running Reelfoot Bayou, TN Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9, KY and TN Levees, outlet structures Levee, outlet structure, and pumping station Levee, outlet structure, and pumping station Channel improvement and structures Channel improvement and structures Channel improvement and two outlet structures Floodway, levees, drainage channels, and structures Flood detention and conservation Floodway, levees, drainage channels, and structures .Marked Tree Siphon Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement and pumping station Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Pumping plant Flood control improvements Construction to main-stem standards, levee and appurtanent structures for flood control Channel improvement Channel improvements and pumping station (5) (5) Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized Dec. 16, 1975. See Table 42-D. See Table 42-C. Authorized by Public Law 90-483. Authorized by Public Law 90-483. Authorized by Public Law 80-858. (6) Authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act. Authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act. Authorized by Resolutions Dec. 15 and 17, 1970.2 Authorized by Water Resources Act of Oct. 22, 1976.2 Section 102, 1976.2 Section 183, 1976.2 Authorized by Public Law 83-780. Authorized in December 1970, See Table 42-D. 42-18 TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage. Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KY 0-47 Obion Creek, KY Channel improvement Authorized by Public Law 89-298. LITTLE RIVER DIVERSION CHANNEL, MO Delta to Ancell, MO Levees Mile 49 above Cairo. MISSOURI RIVER, MO 0-28 Mouth to St. Charles, MO Levees Intermittent (Sec. 6). ILLINOIS RIVER, IL 0-120 Mouth to Havana, IL Levees Intermittent (Sec. 6). OHIO RIVER, IL AND KY Cairo to Mound City and Mounds, Floodwall, levee, revetment, and IL pumping plant 1. General data concerning Bayou Boeuf, Bayou Sorrel, and Berwick locks where Atchafalaya Basin protection levees cross Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, alternate route to Plaquemine, LA and lower Atchafalaya River (extension of Bayou Teche Waterway), respectively, are in report of New Orleans district. 2. Also see Table 42-D, "Authorizing Legislation." 3. Public Law 81-516 modified requirements of local cooperation. 4. Authorized by Public Law 77-228. Modified by Public Law 89-298. 5. Authorized or incorporated in MR&T by Public Law 79-526. 3 See Table 42-D. 6. Authorized by Public Law 85-500. 42-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 42-C MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY DAMS AND LAKES Grenada Enid Sardis Arkabutla Wappapello Name' Lake Lake Lake Lake Lake River Yalobusha Yocona Little Tallahatchie Coldwater St. Francis Nearest town to damsite Grenada Enid Sardis Arkabutla Wappapello Drainage area, square miles 1,320 560 1,545 1,000 1,310 Conservation pool: Area, thousand acres 10 6 11 5 4 Volume, thousand acre-feet 86 58 108 31 31 Elevation, feet, NGVD 193 230 236.0 209.3 354.7 Flood control pool: Area, thousand acres 65 28 58.5 33 23 Volume, thousand acre-feet 1,252 602 1,462 494 582 Runoff, inches 17.8 20.2 17.7 9.3 8.4 Outlet gates: Number 3 2 4 3 3 Size, feet 7.5 by 14 8 by 16 6 by 12 8.5 by 19 10 by 20 Capacity, thousand cubic feet per second 10.7 9.4 10.0 10.0 18.0 Spillway: Type, uncontrolled Chute Chute Chute Chute Gravity Length, feet 200 200 400 300 740 Elevation, crest, feet, NGVD 231 268 281.4 238.3 394.7 Discharge capacity, thousand cubic feet per second 52 50 132 89 229 Surcharge pool: Area, thousand acres 106 41 90 63 32 Volume, thousand acre-feet 1,385 554 1,447 858 521 Runoff, inches 19.7 18.5 17.6 16.1 7.5 Elevation, feet, NGVD 247.5 284.0 301.0 256.3 413.7 Dam: Type, earthfill Rolled Rolled Hydraulic Rolled Rolled Length, thousand feet 13.9 8.4 15.3 11.5 2.7 Elevation, crest, feet, NGVD 256.0 293.0 311.4 264.3 419.7 1. Grenada, Enid, Sardis and Arkabutla Lakes are in Yazoo River Basin, MS; Wappapello Lake is in St. Francis River Basin, MO. 42-20 TABLE 42-D MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document May 15, 1928 Jun. 19, 1930 Feb. 15, 1933 Apr. 23, 1934 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 15, 1936 Flood protection in alluvial valley of Mississippi River, revetment and contraction works and dredging to provide least channel depth of 9 feet and width of 300 feet below Cairo. Provided for allotment of the balance of emergency rescue funds to reimburse levee districts and others for expenditures in floodcontrol works during the 1927 and subsequent floods. Provided for ownership of lands in Bonnet Carr4 Spillway and Floodway with proviso for granting rights-of-way, easements, and permits, in said lands Authorized payment for purchase of, or to reimburse states and local levee districts for the cost of, levee rights-of-way for flood control work in the Mississippi Valley, and for other purposes. Improvement of Wolf and Nonconnah Rivers, TN (Nonconnah Creek is correct title) Improvement of Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN Modification of the 1928 Act to provide for: Construction of a backwater levee at mouth of White River, AR Construction of Eudora floodway in lieu of Boeuf floodway; flood control, Yazoo River; construction of Morganza floodway; and an outlet to the Gulf of Mexico west of Berwick, LA, including a 6-year program for the improvement and regularization of the Mississippi River between Arkansas and Red Rivers, and Atchafalaya River; and construction of roads on levees and drainage adjustments incident to floodway levees. Provided for construction of floodwalls, levees, and revetments along Wolf River and Nonconnah Creek for protection of Memphis, TN Modify the Yazoo River project to substitute a combined reservoir floodway and levee plan. Construction of Mounds to Mound City levee and control works along Cache River, IL Modification of previous act pertaining to floodways and outlets and lands therein; including program for the improvement and regularization of the Mississippi River, between Cairo and Arkansas River, extension of levee road system; strengthening of levees. Enlarge main line levees to offset abandonment of floodways between Arkansas and Red Rivers, flood control works in backwater areas of Yazoo and Red Rivers, and in Bayous Rapides, Boeuf, and Cocodrie, LA Navigation channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide between Baton Rouge and Cairo; flood protection of Yazoo River Backwater Area in vicinity of Satartia, MS Continue prosecution of channel improvement and stabilization program, $200 million. Flood control on the Big Sunflower, Little Sunflower, Hushpuckena, and Quiver Rivers and their tributaries, and on Hull Brake-Mill Creek Canal, Bogue Phalia, Ditchlow Bayou, Deer Creek, and Steele Bayou, MS1 Improve Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, AR' Improve Bayou Lafourche, LA Improve Yazoo River tributaries. North bank, Arkansas River levees (below Plum Bayou).' Unpublished report on record in OCE. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 359, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 509, 78th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 534, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 151, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 191, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 74th Cong., 1st sess. *42-21 H. Doc. 90, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Public 395, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Public 351, 72d Cong. Public 171, 73d Cong. R&H Comm. Doc. 26, 72d Cong., 1st sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 45, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Unpublished report dated Apr. 2, 1925. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Aug. 28, 1937 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Jul. 24, 1946 TABLE 42-D (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Levees on White River (Augusta to Clarendon).' Bayou des Glaises diversion channel, LA' Modify local cooperation requirements in St. Francis and Yazoo Basins. Tiptonville-Obion levee and drainage improvements.' Improvement of St. Johns Bayou, MO Big Sunflower River, etc.' Tennessee Chute (Memphis Harbor), TN Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $100 million. Improve Mississippi River below Cape Girardeau, MO with respect to West Tennessee tributaries. Improve L'Anguille River, AR Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), LA' Flood protection at Des Arc, AR Improve St. Francis River and Basin, AR and MO Improve Cache River and Bayou DeView, AR and MO Improve Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR Flood protection, Lake Pontchartrain, Jefferson Parish, LA' Filling Grant's Canal, Lake Providence, LA Additional protection to Red River Backwater Area. Extend Federal jurisdiction to cover levees in Orleans Parish, LA Bank protection, Amite River; LA Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $200 million. Jonesville, LA levee, retaining wall, and drainage structure.' Modify requirements for local cooperation in White River Backwater Area, AR Navigation improvement of Atchafalaya from Mississippi River to Morgan City, LA Modify project for Vicksburg-Yazoo Area (Harbor), MS Improve New Madrid Floodway, MO, including Peafield drainage floodgate. Control of Old and Atchafalaya Rivers and a lock for navigation. Improve Reelfoot Lake area, KY and TN Improve Greenville Harbor, MS 42-22 t Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Oct. 30, 1951 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Document H. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 757, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doe. 138, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 51, 80th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 627, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 651, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 321, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 485, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 132, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 88, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 255, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 139, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 237, 82d Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 53, 82d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 85, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 183, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 478, 83d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 160, 83d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 15, 86th Cong., 1st sess. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 18, 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 Apr. 14, 19662 Nov. 7, 1966 Nov. 20, 1967 Aug. 13, 1968 Sep. 10, 19683 Mar. 3, 19703 42-23 Work Authorized Extensions to project for Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon in Arkansas. White River backwater area pumping plant. Wolf River and tributaries for flood protection in Tennessee. Continue prosecution of project for channel improvement-$50 million. Modification-Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), LA Construct improvements in Gin and Muddy Bayous, Yazoo River Basin, MS Replace 2 bridges with adequate floodway over Boeuf River and Big Bayou in Boeuf Basin, AR Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $53 million. Modify and expand levees and channel improvement features of main stem project. Modify flood control improvements in following tributary areas and basins: Cairo-Mounds-Mounds City, St. Francis, Lower White, Boeuf-Tensas-Macon, Red River backwater, Yazoo headwater, Grand Prairie, and Bayou Meto. Acquire any modified easements required in New Madrid Floodway as provided by Sec. 4 of May 15, 1928 act. Operate and maintain pumping plant in Red River backwater area (Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant). Provide improvements in West Kentucky tributaries. Provide fish and wildlife facilities in St. Francis and Big Sunflower Basins; Yazoo Headwater and Backwater Areas; and Mississippi Delta region. Deauthorize Amite River, LA project. Modify St. Francis River, MO and AR, project within District No. 7, Poinsett County, AR Provide pumping plant and drainage structure at Wilson Point, LA Construction of improvements to supplement freshwater supply in Teche-Vermilion Basins in Louisiana. Bank revetment for protection of existing industrial facilities along Mississippi River below Baton Rouge, LA Modification of West Tennessee tributaries feature to provide relocation of gas transmission lines at Federal expense. Continue emergency work, $87,135,000, which includes $100,000 for road crossing of Panola-Quitman Floodway, MS, and $80,000 for protection of Sheley Bridge, Tallahatchie River, MS Improvements in Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon Basin to divert flows that would otherwise enter Lake Chicot, AR Improvements in the Belle Fountain ditch and tributaries, MO, and Drainage District No. 17, AR Provide pumping plants and other drainage facilities in Cairo, IL, and vicinity. Modification of Yazoo Headwater Project to include cleanout along David Bayou, MS Modify Yazoo Backwater feature to include a control structure in Muddy Bayou, MS Document H. Doc. 108, 85th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 26, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 76, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 86-645. Public Law 87-874. Public Law 87-874. Public Law 87-874. Public Law 89-42. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 57, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Unpublished Vicksburg District's MRC report Approved-Apr. 14, 1966. H. Doc. 524, 89th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 89-789. Public Law 89-789. Public Law 90-147. H. Doc. 168, 90th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 339, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 90-483. Unpublished MRC report dated May 8, 1968. Unpublished MRC report dated Feb. 2, 1970. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 42-D (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Apr. 29, 19703 Jun. 4, 1970$ Dec. 31, 1970 Senate and House Public Works Resolutions adopted Dec. 17 and 15, 1970, respectively. 4 River Basin Monetary Act of Dec. 23, 1971 Jan. 19, 19732 TITLE I Water Resources Development Act of 1974. Modification of Yazoo Headwater Project to include drainage structure and channel improvement on Rocky Bayou, MS Provide for enlargement of Bayou Latenache from Pointe Coupee drainage structure to Alabama Bayou, LA Modify and expand project to include flood protection within the area of eastern Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, LA, that are drained by Bayou des Glaises diversion channel and Lake Long, and their tributaries. Modify the project for West Kentucky tributaries (Obion Creek), KY, to provide for all relocations, at Federal expense, of all transmission lines required by the project. Report on Western Tennessee Tributaries, TN and KY, authorized: a. Modification of Reelfoot Lake feature to provide channel improvements on Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9 in KY and TN b. Modification of Mississippi levee feature to include a pumping station near Mud Lake floodgate and adjacent channel improvements. Modification of Big Sunflower Basin feature to provide additional improvements in Steele Bayou Basin, MS Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $97 million. Modification of Tiptonville-Obion River levee feature to relieve local interests of all responsibility except that of providing maintenance. Modification of the Mississippi levee feature to provide additional drainage facilities in Long Lake area, vicinity of Helena, AR Projects recommended by four completed reports were authorized for accomplishment of Phase I design memorandum of advance engineering and design on: a. Greenville Harbor, Greenville, MS b. East bank of Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson Counties, MS (Natchez area). c. East bank of Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson Counties, MS (Vicksburg-Yazoo area). d. Bushley Bayou Area of Red River Backwater Area, LA Modification of West Tennessee tributaries feature (Obion and Forked Deer Rivers), TN, to acquire lands for fish and wildlife, recreation, and environmental purposes. Modification of the Yazoo Basin, MS, feature to provide for a streambank erosion control demonstration project for the delta and hill areas of basin. Modification of project to provide that the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, can substitute authorized mitigation lands, not yet acquired and no longer suitable, for like acreage in the same or adjacent subbasins of the project area. This section provides the authority to substitute authorized mitigation lands in: a. Tensas Basin, LA and AR, feature (Red River backwater). b. St. Francis Basin, AR and MO, feature. Modification of Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, LA, feature, to provide for: enlargement of Bayou Courtableau from Washington to west protection levee; right-of-way and spoil disposal areas at Federal expense; and necessary additional culverts through west protection levee. Unpublished MRC report dated Mar. 6, 1970. Unpublished MRC report dated Sep. 22, 1969. S. Doc. 91-113, 2d sess. Public Law 91-611. H. Doc. 91-414, 2d sess. S. Doc. 91-74, 2d sess. Sec. 1, Public Law 92-222. Sec. 7, Public Law 92-222. Unpublished Memphis District's MRC report dated Oct. 4, 1972. Sec. 1, Public Law 93-251. Mar. 7, 1974. S. Doc. 93-38, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-148, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-148, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-157, 1st sess. Sec. 3, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 32, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 42, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 87, Public Law 93-251. 42-24 TABLE 42-D (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document TITLE II River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974 River Basin Monetary Act of Oct. 2, 1975 Dec. 16, 19752 TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act 1976. TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1977. Water Resources Development Act of 1976. TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1978. Modification of Cache River Basin, AR, feature to provide for: acquisition by fee easements of lands for fish and wildlife management, recreation, and environmental purposes. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $211 million. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $158,000,000. Modification of St. Francis Basin, AR and MO, feature to provide relief from ponding of interior runoff in the Inter-River Drainage District of Missouri. Continue prosecution of project for comprehensive development during period Jul. 1- Sep. 30, 1976, $60,300,000. Continue prosecution of project for flood control, rescue work, repair, restoration, and control of bank erosion, $231,497,000. Sec. 101(a) authorized accomplishment of Phase I - Advanced Engineering and Design Memoranda - On: a. St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, MO, project: Report of OCE - Sep. 26, 1975. b. Nonconnah Creek, TN and MS, project: Report of OCE - Jun. 23, 1976, and as an independent part of the project: Improvements for flood control and allied purposes on Horn Lake Creek and tributaries, including Cowpen Creek, TN and MS. Modification of West Tennessee Tributaries feature (Obion and Forked Deer Rivers), TN, to: a. (Sec. 102)- Provide project for flood control for Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY: (H.D. 94-221) except that highway bridge relocations and alterations shall be at Federal expense. b. (Sec. 183) - Provide for construction of a levee and appurtenant works from mouth of Obion diversion channel to vicinity Highway 88 and thence to vicinity of Porter Gap, TN Continue prosecution of project for flood control, rescue work, repair, restoration, and control of bank erosion, $253,081,000. Sec. 99, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 201, Public Law 93-251. Mar. 7, 1974. Sec. 1, Public Law 94-101. Unpublished Memphis District's MRC report dated Nov. 11, 1975. Public Law 94-180, Dec. 26, 1975. Public Law 94-355, Jul. 12, 1976. Public Law 94-587, Oct. 22, 1976. Public Law 95-96 Aug. 7, 1977. 42-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 42-D (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Dec. 9, 1977, 5th Modification of the Tensas Basin Project, Red River Backwater Unpublished Vicksburg Ind. on VXD Area, to include a drainage structure and appurtenant channel District report dated May May 31, 1977, works in the Six Mile Bayou area of Concordia Parish, LA 31, 1977, on Cynthia and Letter Report.2 Six Mile Bayous, LA Jun. 28, 1980 The establishment of the Tensas River National Wildlife Refuge Public Law 96-285, Jun. 28, for the preservation and development of environmental 1980. resources and in lieu of mitigation acquisitions which otherwise would be required for certain water resources projects, within designated limits, in the basins of the Tensas, Boeuf, and Red Rivers in the State of Louisiana. Energy and For expenses necessary for prosecuting work of flood control Public Law 96-367, Oct. 1, Water projects, rescue work, repair, restoration or maintenance of 1980. Development flood control projects threatened or destroyed by flood, Appropriation $232,519,000: Provided, That not less than $250,000 be available Act, 1981 for control of bank erosion of streams in the Yazoo Basin, including the foothill area. Provided further, That funds for the Tensas Basin Red River Backwater Area, be used for flood control, etc. for Sicily Island and Below Red River including pumping stations. 1. Incorporated into Mississippi River and tributaries 3. Date minor modification was approved under disproject as shown in Table 42-E. cretionary authority of Chief of Engineers contained in May 2. Date minor modification for blocked drainage was 15, 1928, Flood Control Act, as amended. approved under delegated authority of the President, Missis- 4. Projects approved under the provisions of Sec. 201 of sippi River Commission, and in accordance with Sec. 10(p) of Flood Control Act of Oct. 27, 1965. the 1946 Flood Control Act (Public Law 79-526). TABLE 42-E INCORPORATING AND AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION For Last Public Full Report Act of Law Authorizing See Annual Incorporation No. Act Description Report for Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Jun. 22, 1936 Tiptonville-Obion levee and drainage 1941, p. 943 improvements, TN Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Jun. 22, 1936 Bayou des Glaises diversion ditch, LA 1946, p. 1029 Jul. 24, 1946 79-256 Jun. 22, 1936 From North Little Rock, AR, to Gillett, AR, on 1946, p. 1053 north bank of Arkansas River (portion below Plum Bayou). Jul. 24, 1946 79-256 Aug. 18, 1941 White River levees, Augusta to Clarendon and De 1946, p. 1083 Valls Bluff, AR Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Dec. 22, 1944 Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, LA 1945, p. 982 Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Dec. 22, 1944 Big Sunflower River, etc. 1946, p. 1061 Jun. 30, 1948 80-858 Jul. 24, 1946 Devils Swamp barge channel at Baton Rouge, LA 1948, p.1059 (Baton Rouge Harbor) May 17, 1950 81-516 Jun. 22, 1936 Jonesville, LA 1953, p.773 May 17, 1950 81-516 Jul. 24, 1946 Lake Pontchartrain-Jefferson Parish, LA 1953, p. 737 42-26 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-F SUMMARY OF PRESENTLY ESTIMATED FEDERAL FIRST COST OF AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS Project Title Estimated Cost' Fiscal Year 1982 Completed features2 Mississippi River levees Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Sec. 6 levees, 1928 Flood Control Act Channel improvement Atchafalaya Basin, LA Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, LA Old River, LA Lower Red River-- South Bank Red River levees, LA Eastern Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, LA Mississippi Delta Region, LA Teche-Vermilion Basins, LA Tensas Basin, AR and LA Bushley Bayou, LA Lower Arkansas River, AR Grand Prairie-Bayou Meto, AR Yazoo Basin, MS Lower White River, AR Cache Basin, AR St. Francis Basin, AR and MO L'Anguille Basin, AR West Tennessee Tributaries, TN Harris Fork Creek, TN & KY Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, TN & KY Reelfoot Lake, TN & KY (Completed) Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, TN & KY West Kentucky Tributaries, KY Tensas River National Wildlife Refuge TOTAL $ 165,432,000 1,725,000,000 5,230,000 4,000,000 5,206,000,000 2,800,000,000 39,500,000 383,000,000 47,200,000 53,700,000 28,800,000 35,700,000 655,000,000 40,400,000 34,300,000 130,900,000 1,616,000,000 49,400,000 136,000,000 389,000,000 22,600,000 115,000,000 7,770,000 (10,410,000) 440,000 9,970,000 46,400,000 40,000,000 $13,786,742,000 1. Inflation projected through the construction period. 2. Includes Bonnet Carre, Morganza, and New Madrid Floodways; Memphis, Greenville, and Vicksburg Harbors; Lake Pontchartrain; Wolf River; completed roads on main stem levees; channel construction works; Atchafalaya River and Basin; Wax Lake Outlet; Charenton Canal; Bayou des Glaises diversion channel, Boeuf Basin levees; Grant's Canal; De Valls Bluff, Jonesville, and Des Arc protection works; Baton Rouge Harbor; and miscellaneous features. 42-27 TABLE 42-G REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 MISSISSIPPI RIVER MAIN STEM CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS Operations in 1,000 Cubic Yards Location Fiscal Year 1981 Mileage Above Head Channel District of Passes Construction Maintenance Total New Orleans Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp) 235 - 149.3 149.3 Main stem channel 234-320 - 6,071.7 6,071.7 Vicksburg Main stem channel 320-600 - 6,200.0 6,200.0 Vicksburg Harbor 437 - 56.9 56.9 Greenville Harbor 537 - 420.0 420.0 Memphis Main stem channel 600-654 - 16,763.0 16,763.0 Memphis Harbor 726 - 1,357.5 1,357.5 TOTAL - 31,018.4 31,018.4 42-28 TABLE 42-H BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1982) Operations This FY Construction Nonop- Operaerative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Lower Childress- Fort Jackson, LA ............. 22 R 10,194 Buras, LA .................... 25 R 17,283 Tropical Bend, LA ........... 30 R - - - 20,692 Port Sulphur, LA ............. 39 R 5,875 300 29,854 - - - - 27,238 Point Michel, LA ............. 44 R 11,595 30 43,348 - - - - 17,842 Bohemia, LA ................ 46 L - - - - 12,380 Diamond, LA ................ 49 R - - - 8,750 Gravolet, LA ................. 51 L 17,435 Junior, LA .................. 54 R 17,570 Harlem, LA ................. 56 L 13,975 Myrtle Grove, LA ............. 59 R 15,925 Monsecour, LA ............. 61 L 10,020 Alliance, LA................ 62 R - - - - - - 7,150 Belair, LA .................. 65 L 21,295 Jesuit Bend, LA .............. 68 R 17,545 Linwood, LA ................ 71 L 9,125 0 Oak Point, LA .............. 72 R - - - - 7,040 Scarsdale, LA ............... 75 L - - - - 5,940 English Turn, LA ............ 78 R - - - - 6,910 Poydras, LA ................ 82 L 21,308 210 81,599 , - - - - 44,814 Cutoff, LA ................... 88 R 15,761 Third district reach, LA ........ 93. L 21,101 Z Algiers Point, LA ............. 95 R - - - 7,728 Gouldsboro Bend, LA ......... 96 R 4,960 Gretna Bend, LA ............. 97 R 9,662 Greenville Bend, LA .......... 100 R 22,045 Carrollton Bend, LA .......... 104 L 15,015 Avondale Bend, LA ........... 109 R 22,371 Kenner, LA ................ 114 L 22,219 Luling, LA ................... 119 R 27,528 Good Hope, LA ............... 126 L 14,980 Waterford, LA .............. 128 R 12,295 Montz, LA .................. 132 L 17,502 Lucy, LA ................... 136 R - - 17,826 Reserve, LA .................. 138 L 20,947 Willow Bend, LA ............ 144 R 7,618 Angelina, LA................. 145 L 19,000 Vacherie, LA ................. 148 R 13,295 Belmont, LA . ............... 152 L 3,545 150 21,535 - - 9,093 - 24,785 Rich Bend, LA .............. 157 R 5,020 - 11,652 - - - - 19,144 Romeville, LA .............. 161 L 15,334 TABLE 42-H BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 1982) Operations This FY Construction eNroantoivpe- Otpiverea- Above New Work ' Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet)- Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER continued Standard Revetment: St. Alice, LA ................ 165 Burnside, LA................. 170 Aben, LA .................... 172 St. Elmo, LA ............... 174 Smoke Bend, LA ............. 177 Marchand, LA .............. 180 Philadelphia Point, LA ........ 183 New River Bend, LA .......... 185 White Castle, LA ............. 193 St. Gabriel, LA .............. 201 Plaquemine, Bend, LA ........ 209 Manchac, LA ................ 215 Missouri Bend, LA ............ 222 Arlington, LA................ 227 Port Allen, LA .............. 231 Allendale, LA ............... 238 Springfield Bend, LA ......... 244 Arboth, LA ................ 250 Grand Bay, LA .............. 258 Bayou Sara, LA .............. 265 Red Store, LA .............. 269 Arrow Bend, LA ............ 272 Boies Point, LA ............. 275 Morganza, LA................ 279 Iowa Point, LA .............. 282 Brunette Point, LA ........... 285 Greenwood Bend, LA ......... 289 Hog Point, LA .............. 296 Carr Point, LA .............. 304 Above Old River, LA .......... 305 Fort Adams, MS ............. 308 Point Breeze, LA ............ 313 Coochie, LA ................ 317 Palmetto, MS ............... 322 Subtotal New Orleans District, Mississippi River ....... RLRLRLRLRLRL RLRRLRRL RL RRL RL RRRL RRL 8,380 55,723 (10.55 Miles) 300 - - 37,144 - 5,425 3,995 3,364 - 3,693 6,485 990 225,132 32,055 27,052 16,050 5,433 10,240 17,075 7,845 5,379 24,394 33,335 14,371 35,475 30,972 16,193 12,244 11,320 17,940 25,690 13,190 7,090 4,780 7,830 13,600 16,094 20,513 11,375 8,038 14,987 8,673 8,600 4,800 17,219 11,165 17,150 30,864 1,187,215 (224.85 Miles) Dikes: None 0 0 0 0 O rz OLD RIVER CONTROL Standard revetment: Inflow channel ............... Inflow channel ............... Outflow channel .............. Total standard revetment, Old River ................ ATACHAFALAYA RIVER Standard revetment: Mile One, LA ............... Coville, Bayou, LA ............ Legonier, LA ................ Simmesport, LA.............. Kuhlman Bayou, LA .......... Odenburg, LA ............... Cason, LA .................... McCrea, LA ............ Woodside, LA .............. Provosty, LA ............. Crooked Bayou, LA ........... Mercier, LA ................ Barberton, LA ............. Evans Point, LA .......... Goudeau, LA .............. Morris Bayou, LA ......... Goodwood, LA ................ Red Cross, LA .............. Melville, LA ................ Cross Bayou, LA ............ Melville South, LA .......... Toles, LA .................... Petite Prairie, LA ............ Holloway Lake, LA ........... Bayou Sherman, LA .......... Krotz Springs, LA .......... Sherburne, LA ............... Bayou Big Graw, LA ........ Morgan City ............... Total standard revetment ... 315 315 315 L RR S- - - - - - 2,415 S- - - - - - 4,365 S- - - - - - 17,754 24,534 (4.65 Miles) Below Confluence of Red and Atachafalaya Rivers 134679 12 13 14 17 18 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 33 35 36 37 38 40 43 46 115 LRLRLRRLRLRLRL R LRLRLRLRLLRRRL S- - - - - - 4,150 - - - - - - 6,550 - - - - - - 8,940 - - - - - - 10,636 - - - - - - 5,565 - - - - - - 5,375 - - - - - - 10,798 - - - - - - 5,027 S- - - - - - 13,002 - - - - - - - 7,768 - - - - - - 9,600 - - - - - - 10,478 - - - - - - 3,592 - - - - - - 4,961 S- - - - - - 3,938 - - - - - - 3,800 - - - - - - 8,505 S- - - - - - 8,065 S- - - - - - 4,870 - - - - - - 3,815 S- - - - - - 4,070 S- - - - - - 6,355 S- - - - - - 8,381 S- - - - - - 7,085 S- - - - - - 5,200 S- - - - - - 4,625 S- - - - - - 7,035 S- - - - - - 8,394 S- - - - - - 3,410 S- - - - - - 193,990 (36.74 Miles) Dikes:, None C,, rr C, C, C 0OH TABLE 42-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1982) Operations This FY Construction Nonop- Operaerative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) LOWER RED RIVER Standard revetment: Long Lake, LA ............. Naples, LA .............. Turnbill Island, LA .......... Total standard revetment Dikes: None RED RIVER2 Standard revetment:3 Dupre, LA ................. Bringol, LA ................ Egg Bend, LA .............. Cologne Bend, LA ............ Roxana, LA ................ Ryland, LA .................. Whittington, LA ............. Smith, LA ................ Latanier, LA .............. Hudson, LA ................ Robert, LA ................. Alexandria Front, LA ........ Callahan, LA ................ Cotton, LA ................. Rapides, LA ................ Boyce, LA ........... .... Total standard revetment, Red River .................... Dikes:3 Choctaw Bayou Bend, LA ..... Bringol (Egg Bend), LA ....... Egg Bend, LA ............... Cologne Bend, LA ............ Below Confluence of Old and Mississippi Rivers 10 79 69 73 75 77 83 88 89 91 93 99 10$ 110 116 119 125 71 73 75 77 RRL RR RRR RR RRRRRRR RR - - - - - - - 6,652 - - - - - - - 6,190 - - - - - - - 6,815 - - - - - - - 19,657 (3.72 Miles) - - - - - - - 2,690 - - - - - - - 4,000 - - - - - - - 2,400 - - - - - - - 650 - - - - - - - 3,325 - - - - - - - 3,925 - - - - - - - 2,900 - - - - - - - 2,700 - - - - - - - 2,460 - - - - - - - 1,458 - - - - - - - 5,500 - - - - - - - 5,280 - - - - - - - 4,000 - - - - - - - 14,700 - - - - - - - - 1,030 - - - - - - - 4,548 - - - - - - - 61,566 (11.66 Miles) RR RR 2,000 2,477 900 1,850 m Ct O - t23 z1 Echo, LA ................... Richardson, LA ............ Alexandria, LA ............ Bertrand, LA .............. Total dikes, Red River ...... 78 R 79 R 105 R 122 R - - - - - - (Rock groin) 1. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). 2. Mileages based on 1967 hydrographic survey. 3. Includes all types of dikes and retards. 1,900 2,700 270 7,630 19,727 (3.74 Miles) C)r M13 Cd n MC Cl Cl 0 TABLE 42-I BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1982) Operations This FY Construction Nonop- Operaerative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY . Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Bougere Bend, LA .......... Dead Mans Bend, MS ......... St. Catherine Bend, LA ....... Morville, LA ............... Natchez Island, MS ........... Carthage, MS .............. Natchez Front, MS ......... Gibson, LA ................. Ashland, LA-MS ........... Kempe Bend, LA ........... Browns Field, LA .......... Goldbottom, MA ............. Hardscrabble, LA .......... Grand Gulf, MS ............ Point Pleasant, MS-LA ........ Togo Island, LA ........... Lake Karnac, LA-MS ......... Diamond Point, LA-MS ....... Reid-Bedford, LA .......... Racetrack, MS ............. Barge Line Terminal, MS ..... Vicksburg Harbor, MS ....... Delta Point, LA ............. King's Point-Opposite Delta Point, LA-MS ......... False Point, LA ............... Marshall-Brown's Point, LA-M S .................... Milliken Bend, LA .......... Belle Island, LA-MS .......... Goodrich, LA................. Fitler-Cottonwood, MS ........ Hagaman, LA ................ Ben Lomond, MS ............. Baleshed Towhead-Stack Island, LA-MS ........... Lake Providence, LA ........ Mayersville, MS ............. Sarah Island-Opossum Point, LA-MS .................. 329 335 350 356 357 361 364 371 374 383 389 392 398 403 413 415 419 423 429 433 437 437 437 439 443 446 453 460 467 474 481 486 488 489 497 503 RLRRRLLRLRRLRLRRL RRLLL R L R LRLRLRL RRL R 4,665 1,880 345 14,950 5,664 535 1,950 - � 335 1,200 6,825 3,203 3,550 2,449 20,805 10,380 17,550 11,815 0 2,180 14,585 6,510 22,735 18,657 26,655 9,280 30,250 22,530 49,076 32,345 Z 5,670 19,260 Z 12,125 Z 18,392 13,935 3,040 r 7,350 7,650 r 19,330 12,860 19,580 - 44,650 oo 24,160 t 37,220 28,427 37,756 10,235 52,1242 11,600 34,992 16,970 709 IP IP Carolina, MS ................. Cracraft, AR ............... Worthington, MS-AR ......... Walnut Point Kentucky Bend, MS ................ American Cutoff, MS-AR ..... Sunnyside-Lakeport, AR ...... Vancluse, AR ................ Island 84, AR, MS .......... Warfield Point, MS ........... Leland-LaGrange, AR-MS .... Spanish Moss, AR ........... Tarpley Island, MS ......... Miller Bend, MS ............ Island 82, AR ............. Ashbrook Island, MS ......... Arkansas City-Yellow Bend, AR ................ Huntington Point, MS ........ Pair O'Dice, AR ............ Eutaw-Mounds, MS .......... Cypress Bend, AR .......... Catfish Point, MS .......... Ozark, AR-MS ............. Prentiss, AR-MS ............. Rosedale Bend, AR ........... Riverton, MS ............... Kl6ndike, AR ................ Victoria Bend-Terrene, MS ... Big Island, AR ............. Smith Point, MS ............. Dennis, MS ................ Cessions, MS ............... Total revetment, Vicksburg District, Mississippi River ......... Dikes: Jackson Point, MS .......... Natchez Island, LA-MS ....... Waterproof Bar, LA .......... Spithead Towhead, MS ....... Browns Field, LA ............ Cottage Bend, LA-MS ....... Bondurant Towhead, LA ...... Coffee Point, LA ............ Yucatan, MS ............... Togo Island, LA ............ Below Racetrack, MS ......... Racetrack Towhead, MS ...... Marshall Cutoff, LA .......... Forest Home Towhead, LA .... Willow Cutoff, LA .......... Point Lookout, LA ............ Ajax Bar, MS ............ 507 511 514 519 526 530 534 535 537 538 539 542 544 546 549 553 556 561 563 568 573 578 582 585 586 588 593 598 601 611 615 LRR LL RRLLL RRL RR RL RL RL RLLL RL RLLL 2,500 - 1,315 40 7,396 4,975 11,080 22,210 8,350 45,653 2,980 33,685 4,300 13,475 4,320 12,930 4,580 2,000 29,360 3,080 3,455 - - - - - - - 40,560 - - - - - - - 10,045 - - - - - - - 9,095 - - - - - - - 40,188 - - - - - - - 26,585 - - - - - - - 20,075 - - - - - - 22,015 - - - - - - 20,315 - - - - - - - 4,820 - - - - - - - 12,500 - - - - - - - 23,400 - - - - - - - 29,245 - - - - - - - 16,515 - - - - - - - 18,185 - - - - - - - 21,265 - - - - - - - 10,910 9,045 (1.71 Miles) 385 28,010 2,485 8,025 15,492 1,259,855 (238.6 Miles) (3) 330 358 379 386 388 389 394 405 410 416 430 431 448 449 462 478 482 L RR LRLRRR LLRR LRRL 4,160 1,000 2,350 4,251 7,975 11,372 3,5614 4,8354 14,765 4,421 3,260 9,010 8,246 10,299 1,752 5,1664 4,570 4,275 2,751 24,399 1,830 2,210 2,640 C12 M,, h,, Ct, 0C C zl) z TABLE 42-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1982) Operations This FY Construction Nonop- Operaerative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER continued Dikes: Ben Lomond, MS ............. Balshed Ldg., MS ............. Wilson Point, LA ............ Corregidor, MS ............... Carolina, AR ............. Cracraft Lower, AR .......... Cracraft, AR ................ Leota, MS ............... Island, 86, AR ............... Seven Oaks, AR .............. Walnut Point, MS .......... Refuge, MS .................. Island 84, AR ............ Leland Bar, AR-MS ........ Leland Neck, AR-MS ......... Tarpley Cutoff, MS-AR ....... Island 82-Miller Bend, AR-MS ............... Ashbrook-Miller Bend, AR-MS .................... Ashbrook Cutoff, MS ......... Chicot Ldg., AR ........... Catfish Point, MS ........... Below Prentiss, MS ........... Malone Field, AR ............. Terrene, MS ............... White River Landing, AR ..... Montgomery Towhead, AR .... Victoria Bend, AR ............ Smith Point, MS .............. Island 70, MS ................ Total dikes, Vicksburg District, Mississippi River ......... 488 493 500 505 509 510 513 514 520 523 525 528 532 538 540 540 544 547 549 564 571 580 585 590 591 592 596 600 608 LLRLLRRLRRLLLRLR R&L L&R L RL RRL RR RLL 24,6674 - - - - - - - ,238 3,592 - - - - - - - 6,730 - - - - - - - 2,897 - - - - - - 9,614 T - - - - - - - 3,809 n ...... . 7,571 - - - - - - - 6,592 - - - - - - - - 5,754 - - - - - - - 4,725 - - - - - - - 5,240 - - - - - - - 4,580 - - - - - - - 14,428 Z - - - - - - - 4,315 - - - - - - - 5,100 Z - - - - - - - 13,646 m - - - - - - - 10,799 - - - - - - - 8,728 - - - - - - - 17,451 v - - - - - - - 5,290 7,805 - - - - - - - 7,549 - - - - - - - 7,921 4 - - - - - - - 2,201 - - - - - - - 6,071 - - - - - - - 5,0334 tD - - - - - - - 7,602 - - - - - - - 14,949 7,510 6,680 (1.42 Miles) 357,805 (67.77 Miles) C3 ARKANSAS RIVER S Standard Revetment: Menard Bend, AR .......... Como, AR .................... Morgan Bend, AR .......... Yancopin, AR .............. Total standard revetment, Arkansas River ......... Dikes: Hopedale Cutoff, AR ........ Morgan Bend, AR ............ Fletcher Bend, AR .......... Total dikes, Arkansas River ... 1. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). 2. Contains 7,814 linear feet of trenchfill revetment (stone). 3. Linear feet of dike on which repairs were made. 4. Changed to correct previous errors. 5. See report on Arkansas River and tributaries, AR and OK, under Little Rock District. Miles Above Mouth L RL R 31 34 36 24 30 36 39 RL R 11,770 11,720 5,250 2,800 31,540 (5.97 Miles) 1,848 3,658 2,187 7,693 (1.46 Miles) rr M 1 rMJ)- M1 C n 01 - 0 x TABLE 42-J BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1982) Operations This FY Construction Nonop- Operaerative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares) (Squares) Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Big Island, AR ............... 598 R 3 ,905 * Scrubgrass Bend, AR ......... 600 R 7,315 Henrico, AR ................ 606 R - - - - - 7,186 - 25,040 Cessions Towhead, AR ........ 615 L - - - - - - - 10,615 Knowlton, AR ............... 620 R - - - - - - - 16,900 Island 67, MS ............... 621 L - - - - - - - 7,625 Island 68 Bar, AR ............ 622 R - - - - - - - 6,445 Ludlow, AR .................. 626 R - - - - - - 10,390 Rescue Landing, AR-MS ...... 629 L - - - - - - 27,020 Fair Landing, AR . .......... 632 R - - - - - 3,097 - 23,890 Burke Landing, MS ........... 637 L - - - - 19,070 Island 62, AR ................. 638 R 9,030 Island 63, MS ................ 639 L - - - - - 11,454 Island 63 Bar, MS ............ 639 L - - - - - - - 3,795 Oldtown Bend, AR ............ 644 R - - - - - - 25,995 Horseshoe, MS ............... 647 L - - - - - - - 16,385 Westover, AR ................ 650 R - - - - - - - 12,730 Delta-Friars Point, MS ....... 655 L - - - - - - 30,090 Helena, AR .................. 660 R - - - - - - - 36460 Trotters Landing, MS ......... 665 L - - - - - - 32,905 Flower Lake, MS ............. 667 L - - - - - - 16,385 St. Francis, AR ............. 672 R - - - - - - - 24,663 Harbert Point, MS ........... 675 L - - - - - - - 9,065 Walnut Bend, AR ............. 680 R - - - - - - - 27,220 Mhoon Bend, MS ............ 685 L - - - - - 35828 Peters, AR ................. 692 R 23,675 Commerce, MS ............... 695 L 11,615 Porter Lake, AR .............. 700 R 34,155 Pickett, MS-AR ............. 703 R 12,575 e Norfolk-Star, MS ............. 709 L - - - - 35582 Cow Island Bend, AR ......... 714 R 22,274 Cow Island Bend (Upper), TN ..................... 716 R - - - - - 1,965 - 6,853 Coahoma, TN ............... 717 L - - - - - -9,270 Ensley, TN ................. 723 L - - - - - - - 36,566 Dismal Point, AR ............. 724 R - - - - - - - 7,200 Bauxippi-Wyanoke, AR ....... 730 R - - - - - - - 23,200 Presidents Island, TN ......... 733 L - - - - - - - 12,755 Hopefield Point, AR, TN ...... 736 R - - - - - - - 5,390 Loosahatchie-Memphis, TN ... 737 L - - - - - -31,293 Loosahatchie Bar, TN ......... 740 R - - - - - - - 2,070 St.'Clair, AR ............... 742 R - - - - - - - 2,9302 Island 40, TN-AR ............ 744 R - - - - - - - 30,750 Brandywine, AR-TN .......... Shelby Forest, TN ............ Dean Island, AR .............. Cedar Point-Densford, TN .... Chute of Island 35, TN ........ Lookout Bar, TN ............. Lookout, TN ........... ... Sunrise Towhead, TN ......... Lower Bullerton, AR ........ Kate Aubrey Towhead- Island 30, TN ............. Osceola, AR ................ Osceola, AR .................. Ashport-Keyes Point, TN ...... Kate Aubrey, TN ............. Island 26, TN ............... Bend of Island 25, TN ......... Barfield, AR ................ Obion-Tamm, TN ............ Huffman-Hickman, AR-TN ... Heloise, TN ................. Island 18, MO .............. Linwood Bend, TN .......... Blaker Towhead, TN ........ Bells Point, MO ... ........ Gayoso-Caruthersville, MO .... Island 15, TN ................ Hathaway Landing, TN ....... Robinson Bayou, MO.......... Fritz Landing, TN ......... Lee Towhead, MO ......... Bend of Island 14, TN ....... Above Lee Towhead, TN ...... Little Cypress, MO .......... Merriwether-Cherokee, TN ... Linda, MO ................. Below Toney's Towhead, TN ... New Madrid Bend, MO ....... KentuckyPoint, KY .......... New Madrid Bar, KY ......... New Madrid, MO ........... La Forge, MO ................ Slough Landing Neck, TN-KY .................... Winchester Towhead, MO ..... Island 9, KY-TN ............ Milton Bell, MO .............. Chute of Island 8, KY ......... Bend of Island 8, MO ........ Island 8, KY .................. Hickman-Reelfoot, KY ....... Beckwith Bend, MO .......... Williams, KY ............ Wolf Island, KY ............ Columbus, KY'................ Belmont, MO ................ Island 3 and 4, KY .......... Campbell, KY ............... 750 753 756 759 764 772 774 776 782 786 786 786 791 793 798 803 808 819 826 831 836 841 845 845 848 851 852 852 857 859 859 861 864 869 876 879 886 887 888 889 892 899 900 905 914 914 919 924 927 934 937 938 940 943 RL RLRRRRR RRRLRRLRLRLRLLRRLLRLL LLRLRLRLRR R L RLRL RRL RL RL RRL 4,498 3,-060 3,176 - - - - 9,408 7,907 3,60 7,90 18,010 9,550 7,555 20,190 29,190 2,9902 5,005 14,615 28,350 28,658 1,3503 5,823 44,232 2,500 15,690 22,730 44,040 49,831 26,984 12,935 22,170 14,850 17,087 5,420 25,600 3,630 1,000 22,630 15,670 8,470 12,050 4,943 32,240 41,058 11,950 20,895 30,348 7,960 15,375 5,559 20,680 32,940 5,540 33,5854 14,375 12,620 9,800 85 13,175 41,909 14,588 10,015 19,205 3,825 5,785 19,970 6,865 Cci,,, C,, C,, C C M 0 z TABLE 42-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1982) Operations This FY Construction eNroantoivpe- Otpiverea- Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linea~t (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER continued Standard Revetment: Pritchard, MO ............. Mayfield Creek, KY .......... Wickliffe, KY .............. Cache-Cairo, IL (Ohio River) .. Total revetment, Memphis District Mississippi River ......... Dikes: Henrico, AR ................ Below Knowlton, AR ......... Island 67, MS ............... Below Ludlow, AR .......... Sunflower, AR ............. Island 64, AR ............... Island 62, AR ............... Island 63 Bar, MS .......... Island 63, MS .............. Kangaroo Point, AR .......... Friars Point, MS ............. Montezuma Bar, MS ....... Montezuma Towhead, AR ..... Prairie Point, AR ........... St. Francis Towhead, MS ..... Below Walnut Bend, AR ...... Bordeaux Point, MS .......... Commerce, MS ............... Basket Bar, AR ............. Buck Island, MS .............. Porter Lake, AR ............ Pickett, MS ................ Seyppel, AR ................ Cat Island, AR ............. Coahoma, TN .............. Armstrong, AR-TN .......... Dismal Point, AR ............ Hopefield Point, AR .......... Robinson Crusoe, TN ........ Loosahatchie Bar, TN ......... Above Loosahatchie, TN ...... 948 949 953 958 RLL R 2,003 0 42,300 (5) 603 616 621 624 627 630 638 639 640 649 652 657 656 668 671 676 681 694 696 700 701 704 706 710 718 720 724 736 738 739 742 RRLRLRRLL RLLRRLRLLRLRL RRL RRRRRL 15,045 5,935 8,455 26,152 85 1,788,070 (338.7 Miles) (6) 1,983 - - - 2,( 1,f 4,( 2, 1, 020 - 50- 800 - 300 - 225 - 150 - 360 - 200 - 200 - 00 - 6,310 10,233 4,320 5,040 5,520 7,330 23,180 2,600 5,640 5,730 6,870 12,430 3,450 10,336 3,380 6,420 4,920 5,700 5,060 4,890 7,930 7,180 11,640 15,590 4,640 18,690 22,170 1,330 21,9397 3,950 8,990 0 0 0 rPj to z �D C13 t Redman Point, AR ............ Randolph Point, TN ........ Poker Point, AR .............. Corona Bar, TN-AR .......... Densford, TN ................ Cedar Point, TN .............. Below Richardson Landing, TN ........................ Lookout, TN-AR.......... Plum Point, TN .............. Kate Aubrey, TN ........... Keyes Point, TN ............ Ashport-Goldust, TN-AR ...... Forked Deer, TN ........... Island 25, AR .............. Nebraska Point, TN ......... Below Tamm Bend, TN ....... Wrights Point, AR .............. Island 21, Chute, TN .......... Head of Island 21, TN ......... Island 20, MO-TN .......... Island 18, TN ................ Tennemo, TN .............. Caruthersville-Linwood Bend, MO .................. Sandy Hook, TN .............. Island 15, TN ................ Robinson Bayou, MO .......... Hathaway, TN............... Island 15 Neck, TN....... Above Lee Towhead, TN ...... Below Cherokee, TN ......... Stewart Towhead, MO ........ Ruddles Point, MO ............ Kentucky Point, KY ......... Morrison Towhead, MO ....... Donaldson Point, MO ........ Island 9, KY .................. Campbell, KY ............... Pritchard, MO ............... Island 1, KY ................ Total dikes, Memphis District, Mississippi River ......... 1. Gross squares-articulated square feet). 2. Lumber mattress revetment 3. Rock groins. 4. FY 81 error. 5. Stone in pile dike. concrete mattress (100 6. Linear feet of dike on which repairs were made. 7. Net change was result of a 274 foot extension (FY 75) and a 5 foot reduction (FY 73 correction error). 8. FY 81 omission (3,525 foot extension). 9. Linear feet of triangular frame retards and pile dikes. 335 425 500 700 743 747 748 755 757 759 767 771 784 791 791 795 798 804 808 813 820 824 828 831 837 842 844 850 851 853 854 854 859 866 871 874 887 890 905 906 942 944 948 RLRRLL LRLRLRL RLL RLL RLL RRL RLLLL R RLRRL L RL 2,150 3,525 1,099 2,515 1,950 250 350 1,400 1,400 700 800 700 7,750 16,740 8,050 8,430 7,780 2,890 5,950 5,538 7,910 9,220 14,1458 17,330 8,550 5,450 12,149 8,300 30,505 3,170 5,460 18,139 5,395 2,505 25,877 2,350 7,016 9,890 15,620 21,100 1,300 6,230 18,290 8,130 11,550 1,070 8,320 7,0109 2,610 9,390 15,260 Mai C,, MCI CC,, 0 F M 1 Cl) 1 1 0 zd 13,222 (2.5 Miles) 15,735 645,777 (122.3 Miles) TABLE 42-K PROJECT LEVEES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1982) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles) Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Location Total Grade andSectIon In In Corn- Authorized In Total System Com- System plete Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Comrn- This This Comrn- This This System FY FY FY pleted' FY FY pleted FY FY MISSISSIPPI RIVER Fifth Louisiana Levee District .......... (16.8) (16.8) (-) (7.3) (-) (-) (-) (15.5) (-) (15.5) Levees ............................. 15.5 15.5 - 6.02 - - - 15.5 - 15.5 Floodwalls .. ...................... - - - - - - - - - Old River structures and levees ....... 1.3 1.3 - 1.3 - - - - Atchafalaya Basin Levee District ........ (126.3) (126.3) (-) (76.1) (5.3) (-) (1.0) (118.7) (-) (118.7) Levees ............................. 118.7 118.7 - 68.5 5.3 - 1.0 118.7 - 118.7 Floodwalls .. ...................... - - - - - - - - - Morganza structure and levee ........ 0.8 0.8 - 0.8 - - - - Morganza forebay levee .............. 6.7 6.7 - 6.7 - - - - Port Allen lock ...................... 0.1 0.1 - 0.1 - - - - Lafourche Basin Levee District ......... .(61.7) (61.7) (-) (24.1) (0.1) (-) (0.1) (61.7) (-) (61.7) Levees ............................ 61.7 61.7 - 24.1 0.1 - 0.1 61.7 - 61.7 Plaquemines West Levee District ....... (37.9) (37.9) (-) (32.0) (-) (-) (-) (37.9) (-) (379) Levees ............................. 37.9 37.9 - 32.0 - - - 37.9 - 37.9 Z Floodwalls .... .......... - - - - - - - - Buras Levee District ................... (34.1) (34.1) (-) (34.1) (-) (-) (-) (34.0) (-) (34.0) Levees .............................. 34.0 34.0 - 34.1 - - - 34.0 - 34.0 Floodwalls .. ...................... - - - - - - - - - Empire lock ......................... 0.1 0.1 - - - - - - Baton Rouge front levees ............... .(2.1) (2.1) (-) (0.9) (-) (-) (-) (2.1) (-) (2.1) Pontchartrain Levee District ........... (124.9) (124.9) (-) (81.9) (4.7) (-) (-) (110.8) (-) (110.8) . Levees ...... ........................ 110.8 110.8 - 67.8 4.7 - - 110.8 - 110.8 Floodwalls .. ...................... - - - - - - - - Bonnet Carre guide levees ............ 11.3 11.3 - 11.3 - - - - - - Bonnet Carre forebay levee ........... 1.3 1.3 - 1.3 - - - - - - Bonnet Carre structure .............. 1.5 1.5 - 1.5 - - - - East Jefferson Levee District ........... .(11.6) (11.6) (-) (8.8) (-) (-) (-) (11.6) (-) (11.6) Levees ............................. 11.6 11.6 - 8.8 - - - 11.6 - 11.6 Floodwalls .. ...................... - - - - - - - - - West Jefferson Levee District............ (20.0) (20.0) (-) (4.5) (-) (-) (-) (19.9) (-) (19.9) Levees ............................. 19.8 19.8 - 4.3 - - - 19.8 - 19.8 Floodwalls ........................ 0.1 0.1 - 0.1 - - - 0.1 - 0.1 Harvey Canal Lock .................. 0.1 0.1 - 0.1 - - - - Orleans Levee District ................. (27.2) (27.2) (-) (16.4) (-) (-) (-) (18.4) (-) (18.4) Left descending, east bank Levees ................. ......... 4.6 4.6 - 2.3 - - - 4.6 - 4.6 Floodwalls ........................ 8.6 8.6 - 2.3 - - - - IHNClock ......................... 0.1 0.1 - 0.1 - - - - Right descending, west bank Levees .............................. Floodwalls ..... .............. Algiers Canal lock ................. Lake Borgne Basin Levee District ....... Levees .......................... Floodwalls ................... Grand Prairie Levee District ........... Levees ............................ Floodwalls ..... .............. Total Mississippi River ......... LOWER RED RIVER-SOUTH BANK RED RIVER Lower Red River-South Bank Red River levees ................... Hotwells to Moncla, LA, levees ........ Floodwalls ..... .............. Total Lower Red River ........... ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY Atchafalaya River and Bayou des Glaises ................ East bank Atchafalaya River ......... Bayou des Glaises ............... West bank Atchafalaya River ......... Simmesport Ring ................ Melville Ring .................. Krotz Springs Ring ............... Mansura Hills to Hamburg ........... West protection levee, Hamburg to Berwick drainage canal via Calumet ....... Levees west of Berwick, Berwick drainage canal to Charenton drainage canal ..... Morganza upper guide levee ............ East protection levee, Morganza to Cutoff Bayou, including 19.5 miles of Morganza lower guide levee ..................... Total Atchafalaya Basin and Floodway .................... Total-Main Stem System ...... LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA Lake Pontchartrain, LA ................ Item A levees ........................ Item B levees ........................ Item C levees ........................ Total ......................... 13.8 0.1 (11.6) 11.6 (37.4) 37.4 13.8 0.1 (11.6) 11.6 (37.4) 37.4 (-) (-) 11.6 0.1 (10.8) 10.8 (23.7) 23.7 (-) (-) - (-) - (-) ((-) -) - (-) (-) (-) 13.8 (11.6) 11.6 (37.4) 37.4 (-) (-) 13.8 (11.6) 11.6 (37.4) 37.4 511.6 511.6 - 320.6 10.1 - 1.1 479.6 - 479.6 (59.2) (59.2) (-) (49.2) (-) (-) (-) (59.2) (-) (42.8) 59.2 59.2 - 49.23 - - - 59.2 - 42.8 59.2 59.2 - 49.2 - - - 59.2 - 42.8 (148.4) (148.4) (-) (143.9) (-) (-) (-) (148.4) (-) (43.9) 52.5 52.5 - 52.5 - - - 52.5 - 20.2 7.9 7.9 - 7.9 - - - 7.9 - - 60.1 60.1 - 55.6 - - - 60.1 - 12.0 1.6 1.6 - 1.6 - - - 1.6 - - 4.1 4.1 - 4.1 - - - 4.1 - - 1.7 1.7 - 1.7 - - - 1.7 - - 20.5 20.5 - 20.5 - - - 20.5 - 11.7 (128.7) (128.7) (15.6) (66.3) (-) (-) (-) (127.7) (15.6) (66.3) (56.5) (56.5) (-) (9.6) (-) (-) (-) (56.5) (-) (-) (8.9) (8.9) (-) (8.9) (-) (-) (-) (8.9) (-) (8.9) (106.7) (106.7) (5.8) (28.8) (-) (-) (-) (105.0) (5.8) (28.8) 449.2 449.2 21.4 257.5 - - 446.5 21.4 147.9 1,020.0 1,020.0 21.4 627.3 10.1 - 1.1 985.3 21.4 670.3 (17.4) (17.4) (-) (17.4) (-) (-) (-) (17.4) (-) (17.4) 5.0 5.0 - 5.0 - - - 5.0 - 5.0 10.1 10.1 - 10.1 - - - 10.1 - 10.1 2.3 2.3 - 2.3 - - - 2.3 - 2.3 17.4 17.4 - 17.4 - - - 17.4 - 17.4 1. Figures indicate landside seepage berms only. 2. Design criteria changed and levees are now below grade. 3. Reflects results of flowline reanalysis. 1,, C, C, 00 C,, C 0 O O TABLE 42-L PROJECT LEVEES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1982) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles)' Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Location Total Grade and Section In In Com- In Total System Com- System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Com- This This Com- This This System FY FY FYZ pleted s FY4 FY pleted FY FY MISSISSIPPI RIVER East bank in Mississippi ............... 178.3' 178.3 - 109.1 154.9 4.0 108.1 168.4 - 168.4 Greenville Harbor dikes ................ 7.8 7.8 - 7.8 - - - West bank in Arkansas ................. 75.6 75.6 - 42.9 51.1 - 46.4 75.4 - 75.4 West bank in Louisiana (above Red River) .................. .. 198.7 198.7 2.3 62.6 89.1 - 66.0 197.8 197.8 Total Mississippi River ............. 460.4 460.4 2.3 222.4 295.1 4.0 220.5 442.5 442.5 YAZOO RIVER BASIN Headwater ......................... 620.76 305.1 (-) 130.1 - - - 620.7 (-) 281.5 Backwater ............................ 96.6 44.6 - 0.0 - - - 96.6 - 39.0 Total Yazoo River Basin .......... . 717.3 349.7 (-) 130.1 - - - 717.3 (-) 320.5 ARKANSAS RIVER, ARKANSAS North bank ......................... 61.57 56.2 - 56.2 8.3 - 8.3 47.4 - 47.4 South bank ......................... 85.4 85.4 - 85.4 24.7 - 24.7 84.1 - 81.1 Total Arkansas River .............. 146.9 141.6 - 141.6 33.0 - 33.0 131.5 - 128.5 RED RIVER BACKWATER LEVEES Total Red River backwater ......... 263.6 156.5 - 81.38 - - - 249.0 141.9 1. This tabulation does not include riverside berms which are considered an integral part of the levee section. Riverside berms will be constructed along with levee enlargements or seepage berm contracts. 2. Levee that has adequate freeboard based on the refined 1973 MR&T project flood flow line for the Mississippi River. Levees with more than 2 feet of freeboard are considered adequate. 3. Subject to change as planning progresses. Does not include existing berms which need restudy. 4. Includes 1.4 miles of concrete floodwall and 0.3 mile of levee on Vicksburg city front. 5. Based on refined 1973 MR&T project flood flow line. 6. Includes 33.1 miles of local protection works; 61.3 miles along Whittington Auxiliary Channel; 210 miles in Upper Yazoo Projects; 156.1 miles along main stem; and 160.2 miles on tributaries. 7. Includes 5.3 miles for Gillett new levee. 8. Revised to reflect 1973 project design flow line. 'T O O tE z 'Ti 0 z rTi x CTi C,, o TABLE 42-M PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1982) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles) ' Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Location Total Grade andSetion In In Com- In Total System Com- System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Com- This This Com- This This System FY FY FY pleted' FY FY pleted FY FY MISSISSIPPI RIVER Mounds, IL ............................ Mound City, IL .................. Cairo Drainage District ................ City of Cairo .......................... Little River Drainage District .......... Levee District No. 2, Scott County, MO ..................... Levee District No. 3, Mississippi County, MO ............... St. Johns Leveee and Drainage District ................... St. Francis Levee District of MO ........ City of Hickman, KY .............. Fulton County Levee District of Fulton County, KY .................... Reelfoot Levee District of Lake and Obion Counties, TN ................. Madrid Bend Levee District ............ Lake County Levee and Drainage District .................... Dyer County Levee and Drainage District No. 1............ Tipton-Obion levee extension ........... St. Francis Levee District of AR ........ Helena Improvement District No. 1 ..... Cotton Belt Levee District No. 1 ......... Laconia Drainage and Levee District Phillips County, AR ............... . Laconia Levee District No. I1o f Desha County, AR ................... . Laconia Circle Special Drainage District of Desha County, AR ........... Yazoo-Mississippi Delta Levee District .............................. New Madrid, MO, St. Johns Levee and Drainage District ........... 3.9 2.7 13.82 6.2 19.3 3.9 2.7 13.8 6.2 19.3 3.9 2.7 13.8 6.2 19.3 13.8 26.0 13.8 13.8 26.0 26.0 58.73 55.7 1.4 58.7 55.7 1.4 16.7 16.7 4.5 9.6 4.5 9.6 15.9 15.9 21.3 6.5 156.7 5.3 23.9 21.3 156.7 5.3 23.9 0.3 2.7 7.8 2.9 8.0 4.2 4.9 58.2 42.7 55.7 10.6 1.4 - 16.74 16.3 4.54 9.64 15.9 21.3 153.24 5.3 23.9 20.5 20.5 18.1 18.1 6.6 6.6 93.6 93.6 20.5 0.6 7.3 13.0 94.6 2.4 13.4 0.9 2.4 3.6 1.1 8.5 4.0 19.3 13.8 3.2 26.0 - 46.6 10.4 55.1 - 0.5 10.6 16.3 0.3 3.6 1.1 8.5 3.5 19.3 13.8 26.0 46.1 55.1 - 16.3 0 4.3 9.6 15.9 Z 21.3 156.7 4.2 23.9 4.5 9.6 4.5 15.9 - - 3.0 76.9 - 2.4 - 13.4 8.4 18.14 12.1 6.64 93.6 0.3 21.3 6.5 156.7 4.7 23.9 8.4 20.5 10.6 85.7 85.7 0.3 16.5 93.6 0.3 20.5 16.5 93.6 0&m1 TABLE 42-M (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1982) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles)' Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Location Total Grade andSection In In Com- In Total System Com- System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built lete When Built Thru for This This This Com- This This Com- This This System FY FY FY pleted' FY FY pleted FY FY MISSISSIPPI RIVER-continued Birds Point-New Madrid setback levee ....................... 35.3 35.3 - 35.3 35.3 - - 35.3 35.3 Total Mississippi River ............. 636.3 629.5 - 625.5 373.5 3.0 229.7 604.1 595.1 ST. FRANCIS RIVER East bank .......................... 159.5 156.2 - 156.2 - - - 156.7 - 81.7 West bank ........................... 148.7 146.7 - 146.7 - - - 144.3 - 38.8 Total St. Francis River ............. 308.2 302.9 - 302.9 - - - 301.0 - 120.5 LITTLE RIVER East bank (left) ...................... 40.7 40.7 - 40.7 - - - 40.7 - 13.1 West bank ...................... 35.1 35.1 - 35.1 - - - 35.1 - 23.7 Elk Chute ............................. 39.9 39.9 - 39.9 - - - 39.7 - 17.3 West Basin and middle valley ..........-. 14.4 14.4 - 14.4 - - - 13.4 - 13.4 Total Little River ................. 130.1 130.1 - 130.1 - - - 128.9 - 67.5 LOWER WHITE RIVER White River backwater levee ........... 40.2 40.2 - 40.2 - - - 38.8 - 38.8 Augusta to Clarendon .................. 49.2 39.5 - 39.5 - - - 49.2 - 36.2 Clarendon levee ....................... 6.2 6.2 - 4.4 - - - - Total Lower White River ........... 95.6 85.9 - 84.1 - - - 88.0 - 75.0 MEMPHIS HARBOR Memphis Harbor ...................... 10.5 10.5 - 10.5 7.0 - 1.5 10.5 10.5 1. Subject to change as planning ogresses. 2. Includes 5.1 miles of Cache River levee. This levee was enlarged to 1928 grades with Federal funds, but since that time has been classified as a secondary levee. 3. Includes 12.1 miles of Farrenburg levee. This levee was enlarged to 1928 grades with Federal funds, but since that time has been classified as a secondary levee. 4. Shown complete. Authority MSRC-ED-TL (MD 19 Mar. 80) 1st Ind. 21 Apr. 80. 0 00 r r z O zr v V u M ta CD w 00 t 3 TABLE 42-N RECAPITULATION PROJECT LEVEE TABLES 42-K, -L, AND -M (FISCAL YEAR 1982) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles) Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Location Total Grade andSection In In Com- In Total System Com- System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Corn- This This Com- This This System FY FY FY pleted FY FY pleted FY FY MISSISSIPPI RIVERMAIN STEM New Orleans District, Table 42-K ....... 511.6 511.6 Vicksburg District, Table 42-L ......... 460.4 460.4 Memphis District, Table 42-M .......... 636.3 629.5 Subtotal-Main Stem ................ TRIBUTARIES (OFF MAIN STEM) INCLUDED IN MR&T SYSTEM Atchafalaya Basin Floodway-NOD .................... Lower Red River- South Bank-NOD ................. Arkansas River-South Bank-VXD ..... Subtotal-Tribs. in MR&T System .... Total in MR&T System ............. OTHER TRIBUTARIES IN MR&T PROJECT Lake Pontchartrain, LA,-NOD ........ Yazoo River Basin-VXD .............. Arkansas River-North Bank-VXD ..... Red River Backwater-VXD ........... St. Francis River-MD ................. Little River-MD ...................... Lower White River-MD ............... Memphis Harbor-MD.................. Subtotal-Other Tribs. in MR&T Project ..................... Grand Total in Project ........... (-) 320.6 2.3 222.4 - 625.5 10.1 295.1 373.5 (-) 4.0 3.0 1.1 479.6 220.5 442.5 229.7 604.1 - .479.6 - 442.5 - 595.1 1,608.3 1,601.5 2.3 1,168.5 678.7 7.0 451.3 1,526.2 - 1,517.2 449.2 449.2 21.4 257.5 - - - 446.5 21.4 147.9 59.2 59.2 - 49.2 - - - 59.2 (-) 42.8 85.4 85.4 - 85.4 24.7 - 24.7 84.1 - 81.1 593.8 593.8 21.4 392.1 24.7 - 24.7 589.8 21.4 271.8 2,202.1 2,195.3 23.7 1,560.6 703.4 7.0 476.0 2,116.0 21.4 1,789.0 17.4 17.4 - 17.4 - - - 17.4 - 17.4 717.3 349.7 (-) 130.1 - - - 717.3 (-) 320.5 61.5 56.2 - 56.2 8.3 - 8.3 47.4 - 47.4 263.6 156.5 - 81.3 - - - 249.0 - 141.9 308.2 302.9 - 302.9 - - - 301.0 - 120.5 130.1 130.1 - 130.1 - - - 128.9 - 67.5 95.6 85.9 - 84.1 - - - 88.0 - 75.0 10.5 10.5 - 10.5 7.0 - 1.5 10.5 - 10.5 1,604.2 1,109.2 (-) 812.6 15.3 - 9.8 1,559.5 (-) 805.7 3,806.3 3,304.5 23.7 2,373.2 718.7 7.0 485.8 3,675.5 21.4 2,594.7 MI, Ct CI, CI, CI, 0 rcj _ n C Cl Cl) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 42-0 CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1982) In Total System Complete Year When Built Thru Location Initi- Com- This This Percent ated pleted FY FY Complete (Miles) Bayou des Glaise diversion channel ................. 938 6.0 - 6.0 100 Bayous Rapides, Boeuf, and Cocodrie ............... 1946 92.6 - 63.4 75 Charenton drainage and navigation canal ........... 1939 6.3 - 6.3 100 Wax Lake Outlet ................................. 1938 15.7 0 15.7 100 Atchafalaya Basin Floodway ...................... 1933 244.2 - 186.4 49 Morganza Floodway ............ ........ ................. 1941 3.3 - 3.3 100 Old River outflow channel ....................... 1956 8.3 - 7.4 89 Old River inflow channel ......................... 1960 2.3 - 0.4 17 Old River lock approach channels .................. 1961 2.2 - 2.2 100 Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp) ............... 1958 2.5 - 2.5 100 Eastern Rapides-S.C. Avoyelles .................... - 83.5 - - Teche-Vermillion Water Supply .................... - 6.3 - 6.3 100 42-48 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-P CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1982) In Total System Complete Year When Built Thru Location Initi- Com- This This Percent ated pleted FY FY Complete (Miles) BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, ETC., MS Big Sunflower River ............................... 1947 199.1 - 199.1 100 Quiver River ...................................... 1947 69.6 - 69.6 . 100 Deer Creek ...................................... 1947 7.0 - 7.0 100 Steele Bayou ...................................... 1947 54.9 - 54.9 100 Steele Bayou .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1965 71.2 - 51.6 50 Main Canal ....................................... 1959 21.1 - 21.1 100 Main Canal2 .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 22.2 - - Black Bayou ................................... - 36.5 - - - Big Sunflower River tributaries .................... 1957 227.2 - 227.2 100 Quiver River tributaries ........................... 1960 35.4 - 35.4 100 YAZOO BACKWATER Yazoo Backwater ................................ 1960 39.9 - 39.9 100 YAZOO BASIN HEADWATER, MS Upper Yazoo Project ............................ 1976 179.0 7.1 40.3 22 Coldwater River ................................. 1941 54.6 - 54.6 100 Arkabutla Canal ................................ 1948 0.4 - 0.4 100 Tallahatchie Canal .............................. 1940 74.8 - 73.5 85 Little Tallahatchie River and Panola-Quitman Floodway ...................... 1939 48.0 - 48.0 100 Greenwood protection works ....................... 1971 2.9 - 2.9 100 Yacona River ................................... 1952 1.8 - 1.8 100 Bobo Bayou ...................................... 1944 16.1 - 16.1 100 Cassidy Bayou ................................... 1934 69.0 - 69.0 100 Cassidy Bayou 3 .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 26.0 - - Bear Creek Diversion .............................. - 4.8 - - Lake Cormorant ................................ - 20.9 - - Hurricane Bayou ................................. - 2.5 - - Opossum Bayou ................................... - 20.8 - - Abaica Creek ..................................... - 7.7 - - Chicopa Creek ................................. - 7.0 - - Bear Creek ....................................... - 23.3 - - Rocky Bayou ...................................... - 7.8 - - Whiteoak Bayou ................................... - 55.9 - - Miscellaneous diteches ........................... - 12.3 - - Yalobusha River .................................. 1939 46.0 - 46.0 100 Yazoo River ...................................... 1940 160.2 - 160.2 100 Whittington Auxiliary Chanel ...................... 1956 30.8 - 30.8 100 Tchula Lake ...................................... 1964 26.4 - 26.4 100 David-Burrell Bayou .............................. 1957 40.4 - 40.4 100 McKinney Bayou .................................. 1960 3.5 - 3.5 100 Hillside Floodway .............................. 1964 11.0 - 11.0 100 Yazoo City protection works ...................... 1953 1.6 - 1.6 100 Ascalmore-Tippo Bayous ........................ 1975 29.8 - 15.1 50 Alligator-Catfish Bayou ......................... 1973 8.3 - 8.2 99 Pelucia Creek ................................... 1975 6.4 - 2.9 25 BOEUF & TENSAS RIVERS, ETC., LA AND AR Bayou Lafourche ............................... 1949 45.3 - 45.3 100 Bayou Lafourche 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1972 43.0 - 4.4 10 Big & Colewa Creeks ........................... 1947 81.4 - 81.4 100 42-49 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 42-P CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 1982) In Total System Complete Year When Built Thru Location Initi- Comrn- This This Percent ated pleted FY FY Complete (Miles) BOEUF & TENSAS RIVERS, ETC., LA AND AR- continued Big & Colewa Creeks ............................. 1965 86.8 - 51.5 60 Tensas River ..................................... 1947 96.5 - 06.5 100 Tensas River 6 ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1968 160.0 - 61.0 38 Boeuf River, AR and LA .......................... 1953 103.9 - 103.9 100 Fleschmans Bayou, AR ........................... 1963 6.6 - 6.6 100 Caney Bayou, AR ................................. 1964 7.4 - 7.4 100 Canal 18, AR ..................................... 1963 10.3 - 10.3 100 Big Bayou, AR ................................... 1952 33.3 - 33.3 100 Black Pond Slough, AR ........................... 1962 14.3 - 14.3 100 Bayou Macon, AR and LA 1959 150.8 - 150.8 100 Rush Bayou, AR .................................. 1964 6.7 - 6.7 100 Canal 19, AR ...................................... 1957 50.2 - 50.2 100 Canal 43, AR ..................................... 1956 34.5 - 34.5 100 Canal81, AR ..................................... 1957 32.7 - 32.7 100 Mill Bayou-Bayou Vidal .......................... - 15.0 - - Kirsch Lake Canal ............................... - 9.3 - - Canal 19 Extension ............................... 1964 9.4 - 9.4 100 Lake Chicot Pumping Plant ........................ - 2.5 - - RED RIVER BACKWATER, LA Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant ................... 1976 6.9 - 4.6 66 Six Mile Bayou, LA ............................... - 1.5 - - GRAND PRAIRIE, AR ........................... - 338.1 - - BAYOU METO, AR .............................. - 164.9 - - 1. Includes further work on 54.9 miles and adds 16.3 miles of channel to the proiect. miles of channel to the project. 2. Includes further work on 21.1 miles and adds 1.1 miles of channel to the project. 3. Includes further work on 26.0 miles. 4. Includes further work on 38.6 miles and adds 4.4 5. Includes further work on 75.3 miles and adds 11.5 miles of channel to the project. 6. Includes further work on 96.5 miles and adds 63.5 additional miles of channel to the project. 42-50 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-Q CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1982) In Total System Complete Year When Built Thru Location Initi- Comrn- This This Percent ated pleted FY FY Complete (Miles) BIRDS POINT-NEW MADRID FLOODWAY Birds Point-New Madrid Intercepting Ditch Enlargement, Samos and Vicinity, MO ........... 1952 9.6 - 9.5 100 ST. FRANCIS BASIN Little River Drainage, MO ........................ 1963 291.3 8.3 217.0 75 St. Francis River, MO and AR ...................... 1953 574.2 18.0 353.8 58 West Memphis Drainage, AR ..................... 1951 19.8 - 19.8 100 Big Slough and Mayo Ditch, AR ................... 1960 28.0 - 28.0 100 Tyronza River, AR ............................... 1939 12.7 - 12.7 100 L'Anguille River, AR ............................. (1) 112.0 - - LOWER WHITE RIVER BASIN, AR Cache River Basin, AR ........................... 1972 231.5 - 7.2 3 Big Creek and tributaries, AR ..................... (1) 103.8 - - WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES Obion Creek, KY ................................. (1) 41.7 - - WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES MS River, Western TN tributaries (Backwater Areas)(1946 Act) ................... 1952 34.3 - 34.3 100 Obion River Diversion Channel, TN (1946 Act).................................. (1)- 9.3 - - Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, KY and TN ........................................ 1974 15.8 - 3.0 19 Running Reelfoot Bayou, TN ...................... 1955 19.7 - 19,7 100 MS River Below Cape Girardeau; West TN tributaries. (1948 Act) ...................... 1961 225.0 - 84.8 38 Wolf River and tributaries, TN .................... 1960 25.5 - 25.5 100 1. Not started. 42-51 TABLE 42-R REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 COSTS DURING FISCAL YEAR 1982 Item Construction Maintenance Other FEDERAL FUNDS Flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries: Memphis District: General investigations Advance engineering and design Mississippi River levees St. Francis Basin Lower White River Cache Basin, Ark. Channel improvement West Tennessee tributaries West Kentucky tributaries Inspection of completed works Mapping Recreation facilities-completed projects Reelfoot Lake No. 9, TN-KY Mud Lake, TN Subtotal Vicksburg District: General investigations Advance engineering and design Mississippi River levees Lower Arkansas River Tensas Basin Yazoo Basin Channel improvement Mapping Inspection of completed works Streambank erosion control Tensas National Wildlife Refuge, LA Subtotal New Orleans District: General investigations Advance engineering and design Mississippi River levees Lower Red River Old River Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries Atchafalaya Basin Channel improvement Bonnet Carr& Teche-Vermilion Basin water supply Inspection of completed works Mapping Major Rehabilitation Old River Subtotal Total Federal Funds CONTRIBUTED FUNDS Memphis District: Nonconnah Creek-Nonconnah Blvd. New Orleans District: Old River Mississippi River Levees Teche-Vermilion Basin Total Contributed Funds Grand Total, Federal and Contributed Funds $ 60,841 2,200,428 8,762,857 (-10,742) 5,018,725 2,249,311 8,982 453,837 39,233 16,634 $ 1,706,775 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,201,055 5,334,115 308,511 22,529,710 173,126 85,507 18,800,106 29,632,024 1,706,775 -- -- 1,840,833 131,313 -- -- 7,320,167 412,760 -- -- 139,559 -- 23,347,956 194,858 -- 16,039,937 18,204,116 -- 11,735,675 11,666,043 -- -- 186,184 -- -- 174,488 -- 702,406 -- -- 4,765,992 -- -- 64,043,446 30,978,008 1,840,833 -- -- 610,778 83,373 -- -- 7,360,740 861,943 -- 109,195 120,161 -- 13,869,325 4,794,830 -- 68,351 36,541 -- 28,399,852 5,406,941 -- 33,817,645 7,457,141. -- -- 475,797 -- 9,491,856 -- -- -- 151,092 -- -- 19,630 -- -- 339,193 -- 93,204,337 19,663,269 610,778 176,047,889 80,273,301 4,158,386 -- -- 28,000 -- 145,998 -- 53,201 -- -- 53,201 145,008 28,000 176,101,090 80,418,309 4,186,386 42-52 -- -- MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-S STATEMENTS OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1982 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30,1982 ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES CHARGEABLE AGAINST FLOOD CONTROL ACT LIMITATIONS: COMPLETED WORKS: Waterways Experiment Station Office, Chief of Engineers Rock Island District: S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 St. Louis District: S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal Memphis District: Des Arc, Ark. Contraction works DeValls Bluff, Ark. Mapping Memphis Harbor New Madrid Floodway Wolf River and tributaries Roads on levees (Mississippi River levees) S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal Vicksburg District: Boeuf Basin levees Channel realignment, Arkansas River Contraction works Eudora Floodway Vicksburg Harbor Greenville Harbor Grants Canal (Mississippi River levees) Mapping Jonesville, LA Roads on levees S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal New Orleans District: Baton Rouge Harbor, LA Atchafalaya River and Basin, LA Bonnet Carr6 Spillway, LA Contraction works Mapping Roads on levees S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Wax Lake Outlet and Charenton Canal Morganza Floodway and structure Lake Pontchartrain Atchafalaya Basin, rights-of-way and flowage, Bayou des Glaises setback Subtotal All other completed items: Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 Impounded savings Plant transferred to revolving fund OCE (portion of allotment transferred to revolving fund, Washington Dist.) Subtotal Total completed works $ 874,000 19,158 14,010 $ 874,000 19,158 14,010 169,352 169,352 -- 1,076,520 1,076,520 -- 178,925 178,925 -- 8,692,791 8,692,791 -- 231,215 231,215 -- 1,450,337 1,450,337 -- 18,736,432 18,732,432 -- 6,521,543 6,521,543 -- 1,723,620 1,723,620 -- 12,426 12,426 -- 1,998,766 1,998,766 -- 39,546,055 39,546,055 -- 2,764,605 2,764,605 -- 125,074 125,074 -- 1,972,183 1,972,183 -- 826,235 826,235 -- 4,664,515 44,,46,6541,55 15 -- 2,864,516 2,864,516 -- 7,070 7,070 -- 1,531,021 1,531,021 -- 172,950 172,950 -- 105,660 105,660 -- 2,350,201 2,350,201 -- 17,384,030 17,384,030 -- 699,185 699,185 -- 3,375,492 3,375,492 -- 14,212,198 14,%1 2,198 -- 1,258,916 1,258,916 -- 1,112,967 1,112,967 -- 540,838 540,838 -- 2,701,566 2,701,566 -- 10,098,817 10,098,817 -- 35,992,117 35,992,117 -- 5,513,110 5,513,110 -- 387,917 387,917 -- 75,893,123 75,893,123 -- 4,995,215 4,995,215 -- 1,593,097 1,593,097 -- 24,924,578 24,924,578 -- 19,882 19,882 -- 31,532,772 31,532,772 -- 165,432,500 165,432,500 -- 42-53 TABLE 42-S (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 STATEMENTS OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1982 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30,1982 UNCOMPLETED WORKS: Rock Island District: Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 St. Louis District: Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Subtotal Memphis District: Mississippi River levees Mississippi River levees New Madrid Channel improvement: Revetments Dredging Dikes Reelfoot Lake Reelfoot Lake, Lake No. 9, TN-KY St. Francis Basin: Wappapello Lake St. Francis River and tributaries Big Slough and Mayo ditch Little River drainage Lower White River: Clarendon Levee Augusta to Clarendon, AR White River backwater levee, AR Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 West Tennessee tributaries Cache Basin, AR West Kentucky tributaries Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Subtotal Vicksburg Distict: Mississippi River levees (excludes Grants Canal, $7,070, shown under completed works) Lower Arkansas River: North Bank South Bank Tensas Basin: Lake Chicot pumping plant Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, etc. Red River Backwater: Red River backwater levee, LA Tensas, Cocodrie pumping plant Lower Red River South Bank Red River Levees Tensas National Wildlife Refuge, LA Channel improvement: Revetments Dredging Dikes Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Yazoo Basin: Sardis Lake Enid Lake Arkabutla Lake Grenada Lake Greenwood Belzoni Yazoo City 579,462 1,897,980 2,477,442 141,493,344 98,000 296,846,206 56,363,488 86,895,468 439,434 7,791,619 9,019,908 169,294,466 965,429 40,943,078 496,715 1,779,846 10,624,501 108,651 23,740,576 7,871,959 996,348 49,571 855,788,607 579,462 1,897,980 2,477,442 142,501,354 98,000 297,418,307 56,367,400 88,124,000 439,434 7,815,000 9,019,908 169,941,382 965,429 41,787,892 496,715 1,779,846 10,624,501 108,651 24,180,900 7,910,000 990,000 90,000 860,658,719 174,683,990 7,049,414 15,676,286 55,122,800 39,565,200 45,496,646 25,958,300 39,400 4,900,000 289,340,065 23,549,260 64,566,040 958,175 26,523,600 21,307,400 16,040,700 45,004,900 7,882,000 316,656 2,205,611 173,938,513 7,049,414 15,676,286 55,069,190 39,493,667 45,348,861 25,813,414 4,765,992 288,993,448 23,549,260 64,420,168 958,175 26,027,781 21,281,829 16,013,315 44,252,748 7,836,334 316,656 2,205,611 745,477 53,610 71,533 147,785 144,886 39,400 134,008 346,617 -- 145,872 495,819 25,571 27,385 752,152 45,666 -- 42-54 1,008,010 572,101 3,912 1,228,532 23,381 646,916 844,814 440,324 38,041 23,652 40,429 4,870,112 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-S (Continued) STATEMENTS OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1982 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30,1982 Yazoo Basin: (Continued) Will M. Whittington auxiliary channel Big Sunflower, etc. Main Stem Upper Yazoo Projects Yazoo Basin-Tributaries Tributaries (Except Ascal-Tippo-Opossum Bayous) Tributaries-Bank Stabilization Ascalmore-Tippo-Opossum Bayous Yazoo Basin Backwater Yazoo Backwater (Except Muddy Bayou) Muddy Bayou Streambank Erosion Control, Eval. and Demo. Subtotal New Orleans District: Teche-Vermilion Basin Water Supply Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries Channel improvement: Dredging Revetments Lower Red River (South Bank Levees) Levees Under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Mississippi River Levees Atachafalaya Basin: Atachafalaya Basin Floodway Atachafalaya River Navigation Old River Subtotal TOTAL UNCOMPLETED WORKS ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (CONSTRUCTION) Memphis District: L'Anguille River Basin, AR Reelfoot Lake, Lake No. 9 Cache River Big Creek and Tributaries, Lower White River Clarendon Levee, Lower White River West Kentucky Tributaries Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Harris Fork Creek, KY & TN Subtotal Vicksburg District: Yazoo Basin, Big Sunflower River, Steele Bayou Tensas - National Wildlife Refuge, LA Subtotal New Orleans District: Mississippi Delta Region, Teche Vermilion Basin-Water Supply East Rapides & S. Central Avoyelles Parishes Subtotal TOTAL ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN TOTAL COMPLETED WORKS, UNCOMPLETED WORKS AND ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 10,950,966 27,368,300 26,144,000 30,532,006 41,261,310 612,484 12,797,200 50,482,200 5,145,200 14,839,000 10,950,966 26,959,369 26,065,878 30,304,416 41,028,624 612,484 12,739,327 50,456,618 5,145,200 14,763,503 408,931 78,122 227,590 232,686 57,873 25,582 75,497 1,086,319,109 1,082,037,047 4,282,062 32,720,000 32,347,661 372,338 4,189,008 4,157,340 31,668 35,945,266 35,945,266 -- 371,214,117 369,788,073 1,426,044 18,056,600 18,054,033 2,567 200,680 200,680 -- 157,938,000 157,615,136 322,864 415,415,537 413,824,367 1,591,170 303,463 303,463 -- 101,517,000 100,981,008 535,992 1,137,499,671 1,133,217,027 4,282,644 3,086,954,941 3,073,520,123 13,434,818 150,000 150,000 -- 30,000 30,000 -- 420,000 420,000 -- 365,000 364,339 661 65,000 65,000 -- 175,000 175,000 -- 350,000 350,000 -- 540,000 540,000 -- 2,095,000 2,094,339 661 29,700 29,700 -- 200,000 175,867 24,133 229,700 205,567 24,133 69,753 69,753 -- 1,109,000 1,109,000 -- 965,247 893,664 71,583 2,144,000 2,072,417 71,583 4,468,700 4,372,323 96,377 3,256,856,141 3,243,324,946 13,531,195 42-55 TABLE 42-S (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 STATEMENTS OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1982 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30,1982 RECREATION FACILITIES-COMPLETED PROJECTS Eight-Year Program Funds Memphis District: Wappapello Lake, MO 1,577,300 1,521,122 56,178 Wappapello Lake, MO, Rockwood Landing 203,286 203,286 -- Subtotal 1,780,586 1,724,408 56,178 Vicksburg District: Sardis Lake 1,584,339 1,584,339 -- Enid Lake 2,268,209 2,268,209 -- Arkabutla Lake 2,189,280 2,189,280 -- Grenada Lake 1,631,281 1,631,281 -- Subtotal 7,673,109 7,673,109 -- Total Eight-Year Program Funds 9,453,695 9,397,517 56,178 Total chargeable against Flood Control Act Limitations excluding flood control emergencies 3,266,309,836 3,252,722,463 13,587,373 Total maintenance since Aug. 18, 1941 1,180,500,855 1,173,963,518 6,537,337 Total rehabilitation 31,250,000 31,131,385 118,615 Total flood control emergencies 14,900,300 14,900,300 -- Total general investigations 37,946,881 36,468,429 1,478,452 Total flood control, MR&T appropriations 4,530,907,872 4,509,186,095 21,721,777 Appropriations in addition to flood control, MR&T Other appropriations itemized in footnote (1), pp. 2068-69, Annual Report for 1953 32,068,909 32,068,909 -- Grand total appropriated to Sep. 30, 1982 4,562,976,781 4,541,255,004 21,721,777 Note: Preauthorization study costs chargeable to the MR&T authorization have been transferred to completed work. Costs not chargeable have been exluded from this report. TABLE 42-T STATEMENTS OF EXPENDITURES FOR LEVEES BY STATE AND LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS THROUGH DEC. 31, 1982 Engineer District Expenditures Rock Island $ 11,048,695 St. Louis 64,342,803 Memphis 213,941,099 Vicksburg 85,508,230 New Orleans 468,083,440 Total $842,924,267 42-56 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-U COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT' Total Project Funding FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep. 30, 1982 Mississippi River General investigations: and tributaries Alloted 2,979,000 3,090,000 3,720,000 5,315,000 37,946,8812 (Regular Funds)' Cost 3,174,950 3,185,080 4,101,537 4,158,386 36,468,430 Construction (includes advance engineering and design): Alloted 154,682,286 134,796,000 140,644,000 179,793,000 3,216,467,422 Cost 161,036,108 161,368,655 162,592,395 176,047,889 3,202,880,046 Maintenance Alloted 64,973,000 67,837,000 79,794,000 78,290,000 1,230,879,406 Cost 65,355,105 71,662,120 77,674,822 79,934,108 1,224,342,067 Rehabilitations Alloted 8,200,000 4,500,000 8,150,000 600,000 31,250,000 Cost 4,789,600 5,424,874 13,151,406 339,193 31,131,385 Flood control emergencies (Maintenance): Alloted -- -- -- -- 14,885,922 Cost -- -- -- -- 14,885,922 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contributed 68,500 193,871 53,201 40,736 8,805,566 Cost 68,663 198,812 1,876 81,201 8,789,868 Maintenance Contributed 76,245 427,594 54,930 169,852 1,631,416 Cost 99,397 316,015 145,254 145,008 1,574,919 1. Appropriations were as follows: Appropriations chargeable against Flood Control Act authorizations: Flood Control, MR&T except for emergencies (excludes Maintenance allotments Aug. 18, 1941, through Sep. 30, 1982): Net total allotted for works under Mississippi River Commission: Eight-Year Program Fundd, Construction General: Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 (not under MRC): Transferred to revolving fund: Impounded savings: Flood control emergencies: Net total alloted: Impounded savings: Additional funds not chargeable against Flood Control Act authorizations: Appropriations for Flood Control, MR&T, except for flood control emergencies: General investigations: Maintenance allotments Aug. 18, 1941, through Sep. 30, 1982 Appropriations in addition to appropriations for Flood Control, MR&T (itemized in footnote (1), pp. 2068-69, Annual Report for 1953): Budgetary and OCE Reserves: Grand total: Reconciliation of appropriations and allotments: Total allotted to Sep. 30, 1982 Transferred to revolving fund: Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 (not under MRC): Impounded savings withdrawn by Chief of Engineers: Budgetary and OCE Reserves: Total Appropriations to Sep. 30, 1982: Appropriations for past four reporting periods were as follows: FY 79: $230,834,286; FY 80: $210,223,000; FY 81: $232,308,000; and FY 82: $262,798,000. 2. Totals for General Investigations include four projects transferred from Construction totals per DAEN-CWB-W, Aug. 4, 78, teletype. $3,256,573,370 9,453,695 4,995,215 24,944,460 1,593,097 14,885,922 14,378 37,946,881 1,180,500,855 $3,297,559,837 14,900,300 1,218,447,736 32,068,909 4,562,976,782 4,531,429,632 24,944,460 4,995,215 1,607,475 4,562,976,782 42-57 COASTAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTER The 88th Congress passed Public Law 172 establishing the U.S. Army Coastal Engineering Research Center (CERC). This public law abolished the former Beach Erosion Board organized under authority of Sec. 2, 1930 Rivers & Harbor Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 426) and transferred its functions, other than review of investigation reports of erosion and shore protection of coastal and lake waters, to CERC. The Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors is responsible for reviewing the investigation reports, which puts beach erosion control reports and shore protection studies under the same review procedures as other water resources study programs of the Corps. The Coastal Engineering Research Board (CERB) gives guidance and advice to CERC and is similar to the former Beach Erosion Board. CERB has seven members: four senior officers of the Corps of Engineers, three of whom are normally division engineers of coastal and Great Lakes divisions, and three prominent civilians outstanding in the coastal engineering field. CERB is an advisory board to the Chief of Engineers, who makes all appointments. CERB meets semiannually, or at the call of the President, to considerthe Corps' coastal engineeringresearchprogram. It provides broad policy guidance and reviews plans and fund requirements for conducting coastal engineering and development. It also recommends research project priorities and performs other duties as assigned by the Chief of Engineers. During fiscal year 1982 the following served as members of the Coastal Engineering Research Board: Major General E.R. Hieberg, III, U.S. Army, Deputy Chief of Engineers, Office of the Chief of Engineers, President; Major General HUgh G. Robinson, Division Engineer, Southwest Division; Brigadier General James W. van Loben Sels, Division Engineer, Noth Pacific Division; Brigadier General Thomas E. Sands, Division Engineer, North Atlantic Division; Professor Robert L. Wiegel, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California at Berkeley; Mr. Willard Bascom, Director, Southern California Coastal Water Research Project; and Dr. Bernard LeMehaute, Chairman, Ocean Engineering Division, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science. Colonel Ted E. Bishop served as Executive Secretary to the Board and Commander and Director of the Center. CERC is the principal research and development facility of the Corps in the coastal engineering field. Its mission is to conceive, plan and conduct research and data collection in coastal engineering and nearshore oceanography to provide a better understanding of the littoral forces (e.g., waves, winds, tides, etc.) and the interaction of these forces with shores and beaches, coastal and offshore structures, and the materials forming them. It provides scientific and engineering data and design criteria, and determines the effects of the Corps' coastal activities on the ecology of the coastal zone. It conducts research on shore and beach erosion control; flood and storm protection; the location, layout, design, construction, operation, and maintenance ofharbor and coastal and offshore structures, and the materials forming them. It provides scientific and engineering data and design criteria, and determines the effects of the Corps' coastal activities on the ecology of the coastal zone. It conducts research on shore and beach erosion control; flood and storm protection; the location, layout, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of harbor and coastal and offshore structures; navigation improvement; and recreation. It provides consulting services to the Corps and other public agencies as requested or directed, on the planning and design of coastal and offshore works; coastal and nearshore phenomena; and relatedengineeringand environmental problems. Itreviews studies and plans and specifications for coastal and offshore works. It operates a Coastal Engineering Information and Analysis Center to collect, evaluate, analyze, and disseminate coastal engineering information. Operations and Results. The staff of CERC provided consulting services and reviewed Corps' projects in beach erosion control, navigation and coastal ecology. In keeping with its responsibility for publishing coastal phenomena information and data, CERC published a number of technical reports by staff members and is currently editing others. CERC issued five technical papers, nine miscellaneous reports, seven coastal engineering technical aids, four technical reports and two general investigations of tidal inlets. CERC issued as reprints thirteen technical papers by CERC staff published elsewhere in the technical press. Staff members participated in a number of committees of various technical societies (particularly ASCE). 43-1 CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION This Commission, consisting of three Corps officers appointed by the President with the consent of the Senate, created by act of March 1, 1893 (27 Stat. L., p. 507), was organized in San Francisco, CA, on June 8, 1893, and has jurisdiction and duties extending over drainage area of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, comprising great central valley of California and extending from crest of the Sierra Nevada on the east to that of the Coast Range on the west, and from Mount Shasta and Pit River Basin on the north to Tehachapi Mountains on the south. These rivers empty into head of Suisun Bay ultimately discharging into Pacific Ocean through connecting bays and straits and the Golden Gate. Duties of the Commission comprise regulation of hydraulic mining in drainage area of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, CA, so that debris will not be carried into navigable waters or otherwise cause damage; jurisdiction over construction and control of water storage facilities for domestic, irrigation, and power development purposes; and direction of improvements for control of floods on Sacramento River. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Regulation of hydraulic mining and preparation of plans ..................... 44-1 2. Sacramento River and tributaries, CA (debris control) ........................... 44-2 3. Treatment of Yuba River debris situation-restraining barriers, CA ........ 44-2 Flood Control Page 4. Sacramento River, CA .................... 44-3 Tables Table 44-A Cost and Financial Statement ..................... 44-5 Table 44-B Authorizing Legislation .................... 44-6 Navigation 1. REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC MINING AND PREPARATION OF PLANS Location. Operations largely limited to territory between Mount Lassen on the north and Yosemite Valley on the south, on western watershed of Sierra Nevada. (See Geological Survey sheets for the area, 25 in number.) Existing project. Provides for regulating hydraulic mining operations, planning improvement of conditions upon Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers and their tributaries affected by such operations, and preparation of plans to enable hydraulic mining to be resumed in their drainage areas. In addition, the Secretary of the Army is authorized to enter into contracts to supply storage for water and use of outlet facilities from debris-storage reservoirs for domestic and irrigation purposes and power development upon such conditions of delivery, use, and payment as he may approve. Applications of prospective miners are fully investigated by California Debris Commission and permits to operate are issued to those who provide satisfactory debrisrestraining basins by construction of suitable dams where necessary or agree to make payment for storage in Government-constructed debris-restraining reservoirs constructed under act of June 19,1934, as set forth below. For location and description of Governmentconstructed, debris-restraining reservoirs for general hydraulic mining, see Improvement 2. Local cooperation. Mineowners must bear all expenses incurred in complying with orders of the Commission for regulation of mining and restraint of debris. Operations and results during fiscal year. Minor administrative duties were accomplished. Administrative work overlaps that of improvements 2, 3, and 4, hereunder, and that of Sacramento District. Historical summary. The Commission received 1,292 applications for hydraulic mining licenses; 1 mine is licensed, but does not use storage behind Government debris dams. Work remaining is, in general, continuation of above or similar operations. 44-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 2. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA (DEBRIS CONTROL) Location. Project reservoirs are to be constructed in watersheds of Yuba, Bear, and American Rivers, CA (See Geological Survey sheets for basin areas, seven in number.) Existing project. For description of completed North Fork and Harry L. Englebright projects and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Initial recreation facilities were provided in FY 1959. Recreation areas at Harry L. Englebright Dam are maintained by the Corps. Recreation areas at North Fork Dam are no longer maintained and operated by Auburn Recreation Park and Parkway District, but have been turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation (known as the Water and Power Resources Service between November 6, 1979, and May 18, 1981) on a permit basis. Total Federal cost of new work for construction of these reservoirs was $4,646,872, including $40,000 and $25,000, respectively, for basic recreation facilities at Englebright Dam and North Fork Dam. Reservoir project sites on Middle Fork of American River and on Bear River have been deauthorized and excluded from foregoing cost. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, Public Law 93-251, as amended, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of that portion of the project. Estimated cost of that portion is $1,820,000 (1935). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Improvements made to facilities at North Fork Dam by Auburn Recreation Park and Parkway District under a lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army and Auburn Boat Clubs (concessionaire) at an estimated cost of $46,000 since September 1953. On March 1,1979, lands and waters at North Fork Dam were turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation on a 5-year renewable basis. Bureau will operate and maintain such use until Auburn project is completed, then a fee transfer will be made. Actual operation and maintenance of the recreation resource is being done by State of California by contract with the Bureau. Licenses. Under provisions of Contract No. W-1105- eng-2998 with Pacific Gas and Electric Co., payment is to be made to the Federal Government of $18,000 per year for the first 30 years (December 29, 1942 through December 28, 1972) and $48,000 per year between December 29, 1972, and December 28, 1992, in return for use of head at Englebright Dam and generation of hydroelectric power. Total payment through September 30, 1982, amounts to $990,393; these funds are paid to California Debris Commissionand deposited for return to the Treasury. License No. 2246, effective April 9, 1970 (date New Narrows powerplant put in operation) was issued by Federal Power Commission (known as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission since January 9, 1978) to Yuba County Water Agency for hydroelectric power development of Yuba River by the company upstream from Englebright Dam. Under provisions of Contract No. DA-04-167-CIVENG-66-95 with Yuba County Water Agency, payment is to be made to the Federal Government of $100,000 per year for no more than 50 years. First payment (partial) of $73,151 was made April 1,1971; total payment through September 30, 1982, amounts to $1,173,151. These funds are paid to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Englebright Dam, Code 710 funds-Water treatment facilities were upgraded at a fiscal year cost of $50,000. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued at North Fork Dam at a cost of $1,261; and at Harry L. Englebright Dam at a cost of $586,093, including recreation facilities. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at Englebright Dam at a fiscal year cost of $220,452. Historical summary. Construction of dams was initiated in 1937; North Fork project was completed and in use at end of FY 1939, and Harry L. Englebright project was completed in January 1941. The two debriscontrol structures are in good condition. Public use of these reservoir recreation areas greatly overtaxes present capacities. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at Englebright Dam in FY 1981. 3. TREATMENT OF YUBA RIVER DEBRIS SITUATIONRESTRAINING BARRIERS, CA Location. Works are on Yuba River between Marysville and where the river emerges from the foothills, near Hammonton, some 10 miles easterly from Marysville, or about 9 miles below the Narrows. (See Geological Survey Topographic map of Sacramento Valley, CA) Existing project. For description of completed project and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Total cost of new work was $723,259, of which $361,482 was U.S. funds and $361,777 required contributed funds by State of California. (For details of project in its original form, see Annual Repederal cost and $830,000 required contribution by State of California toward rehabilitation cost. During thy December 24, 1964, floodflows on the Yuba River, the rehabilitated Daguerre Point Dam sustained considerable damage. (See 1965 Annual Report, p. 1647 "Operations and results during fiscal year.") The reconstructed portion of the dam completed earlier in December 1964 was undamaged by the flood. Permanent repair of Daguerre Point Dam abutment and fish facilities was completed in October 1965 at a cost of $447,808 with Federal and required State contributed funds on a matching basis. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for new work and major rehabilitation work. Total first cost to local interests for new work was $361,777 (required contribution by State of California). In addition, training walls were built on each bank below Daguerre Point for 11,250 feet and just above Daguerre Point, on the south 44-2 CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION bank, for 11,000 linear feet by two gold-dredging companies in connection with their dredging operations. To build these training walls would have cost the United States $450,000 (1902 estimate). Flood channels were also built by gold-dredging companies within confines of project works. Cost to the United States of equally effective works to restrain debris movement would have been more than $776,000 (1926 estimate). Total costs to local interests for initial and permanent major rehabilitation works were $830,000 from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1962) of these project units is $2,560,000 and $520,000, respectively, a total of $3,080,000 plus U.S. costs, for construction. and $223,904, respectively, (required contribution by State of California). State of California must contribute annually an amount equal to the Federal allotment for maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Only minor costs. Historical summary. Construction of project works was initiated in November 1902. Construction of Daguerre Point Dam was completed in May 1906; diversion of river over dam was completed in 1910; training walls and dikes were completed in 1936. About 149 million cubic yards of debris are held in lower 7 miles of Yuba River between Marysville and downstream end of training walls. About 20 million cubic yards are confined in river channel by Daguerre Point Dam. Additional millions of yards of loose material are in mine tailing fields adjacent to project training walls in upper 7-mile reach of project. Initial rehabilitation of Daguerre Point Dam begun in July 1963 was completed in December 1964. Contract for permanent rehabilitation of structure was initiated in July and completed in October 1965. Flood Control 4. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Location. Works covered by this improvement are on Sacramento River and tributaries in north-central California from Collinsville to Ordbend, a distance of 184 miles. Previous project. For details see page 1815 of Annual Report for 1917, page 1995 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 2262 of Annual Report for 1907. Existing project. Sacramento River flood control project is a comprehensive plan of flood control for Sacramento River and lower reaches of its principal tributaries. Improvement extends along Sacramento River from Ordbend in Glenn County, CA, 184 miles downstream to its mouth at Collinsville at upper end of Suisun Bay, and comprises a system of levees, overflow weirs, drainage pumping plants, and flood bypass channels or floodways designed to carry surplus floodwaters without inundation of valley lands. About 980 miles of levee construction, with an average height of 15 feet, and 98 miles of bank protection are involved in project. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 2115. Estimated (October 1982) cost for existing project (exclusive of supplemental levee improvements), including new work and maintenance, is $174,300,000 of which $79,300,000 is Federal cost and $95 million non- Federal ($90,050,562 for lands and damages and relocations and $4,949,438 required contributed funds for levee construction, bank protection works, and levee setbacks). Of this amount, $4,939,752 was for new work and $9,686 for maintenance. In addition to project requirements, local interests constructed several pumping plants for drainage of agricultural and urban land protected by project levees. Some channel clearing work was accomplished by State of California and other local interests to supplement project levee construction. Dredging below Cache Slough and reconstruction of Cache Creek settling basin weir are considered deferred and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1962) of these project units is $2,560,000 and $520,000, respectively, a total of $3,080,000 plus U.S. costs, for construction. Operation and maintenance of completed project will be responsibility of local interests; as units of project are completed, they are transferred to agencies of State of California for operation and maintenance. Existing project was adopted by 1917 Flood Control Act (H. Doc 81, 62d Cong., 1st sess., as modified by Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 63d Cong., 1st sess.), 1928 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 23, 69th Cong., 1st sess.), River and Harbor Act of 1937 (S. Committee print 75th Cong., 1st sess.), and 1941 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 205, 77th Cong., 1st sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with requirements for all work completed or under contract, and indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. Local interest costs from required contributed funds for project work total $4,929,438 for levee construction, bank protection works, and levee setbacks, of which $4,939,752 was for new work and $9,686 for maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds: Engineering continued. Project prevented an estimated $130,000,000 in damages from the December 1981-April 1982 rainfloods. Historical summary. Construction of existing project began in FY 1918 and is about 99 percent complete. Channel improvement to date has produced a channel with a capacity of 579,000 cubic feet per second in Sacramento River below Cache Slough. In addition, discharges up to 21,000 cubic feet per second can be diverted from Sacramento River through Georgiana Slough. Completed major project items include about 977 miles of levees; five weirs with a combined discharge capacity of 602,000 cubic feet per second; two cutoff channels; two sets of outfall gates; channel improvement and clearing in Sacramento River, Butte Creek, Putah Creek, and Sutter and Tisdale Bypasses; construction of two main bypasses or floodways and secondary bypasses 44-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 at Tisdale and Sacramento weirs and at Wadsworth Canal; construction of Knights Landing ridge cut and of Cache Creek settling basin; installation of gaging stations; and enlargement of Sacramento River below Cache Slough. Cutoffs at Collins Eddy and between Wild Irishman and Kinneys Bends were made in 1918 and 1919, respectively. Sacramento weir was completed in 1917, Fremont weir in 1924, Tisdale and Moulton weirs in 1932, and Colusa weir in 1933. Outfall gates at Knights Landing were constructed in 1930 and at mouth of Butte Slough in 1936. Pumping plants on Sutter Bypass were completed in 1944. Work items with reference to clearing, snagging, rectification of channels, and bank protection on Sacramento River and tributaries in Tehama County and from Red Bluff southerly, provided for by 1941 Flood Control Act were accomplished in fiscal years 1947,1948,1949, and 1951. Work remaining comprises completion of levee stage construction, Yolo Bypass and Cache Slough. (See table 44-C for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1982.) 44-4 TABLE 44-A tion in Text Project CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1 Total Cost to FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 Sep 80, 1982 - - - 821,325 - - - - 821,325 1. lation of Hy'raulic Mining and Preparation of Plans 2. Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA (Debris Control) Otentrr)ibuted Funds, 3. Treatment of Yuba iver Debris ituation training Barrier, A (Federal Funds) (Reqiired Contributed contributed Funds, ther) 4. aramento River, (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) Funding M int. ro p " New Work App ro p . Cost M int. Coprop. New Work ntrib. New Work Aprop. MCosint. Mi roP. Rehab. New Work ontrib. Mc oits.t Reab. ontrib. C ost New Work ontrib. C ost New Work Ps rop. Mqint. New Work trib. Mairt. -8 20,491 807 10,000 68,911 - - -5 281,353 377,990 479,000 6 285,586 324,835 511,710 6 1,420 - - 12,419 - - -15,202 10 6,000 1,255 10 5,806 1. Exclusive of $644,503 appropriation and cost on inactive portion of project. 2. Includes $447,127 for recreational facilities at North Fork ($32,473) and Harry L. Englebright ($414,654), Code 710 appropriations. 3. Includes $447,127 for recreational facilities at North Fork ($32,473) and Harry L. Englebright ($414,654), Code 710 costs. 4. Includes $3?561,962 from regular funds and $936,082 from Hydraulic Mining in Califormnia funds. 5. Includes $3,561,962 from regular costs and $936,082 from Hydraulic Mining in California costs. 6. Funds from State of California Departmentof Navigation and Ocean Development for acquisition of a boarding float at Englebright Dam. 7. Includes deferred maintenance funds in amount of $207,500. 8. Miscellaneous engineering and construction accomplished at expense of local interests in connection with rehabilitation of Daguerre Point Dam necessitated by December 1964 floodflows. 9. Includes appropriation and cost of $680,000 for new work for previous project and $1,486,469 public works funds for new work for existing project. 10. Includes $680,000 required contribution for previous project; $4,939,752 required contributed funds for existing project; and $310,801 voluntary contribution for bank protection for existing project. 11. Includes $9,686 required contributed funds for existing project. 44-5 50,000 5,093,9991 S 50,000 5,093,9991 * 33,000 4,498,0444 35,354 4,465,940' - 12,420' - 12,420' - 361,482 - 361,482 28,804040 1,597,656' 1,569,806' - 1,0583,904 - 1,058,904 - - 336611,,777777 2,851 , -- 11,,0056833,,990044 - 34000' - 34:000' - 67,626,3350 3,255 67,624,078' - - 11,,997799,,110044 - 10,724,08510 - 10,724,08510 - 9,686n - 9,66i 1,245 2657,,090801 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 TABLE 44-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. Mar. 1, 1893 Feb. 27, 1907 June 19, 1934 June 25, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 and May 17, 1950 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC MINING AND PREPARATION OF PLANS Created California Debris Commission and authorized: (a) Ex. Doc. 267, 51st Cong., Hydraulic mining under its regulation in drainage areas of 2d sess., Ex. Doc. 98, Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, if possible without 47th Cong., 1st sess.' injury to navigability of these river systems or to lands adjacent thereto; and (b) preparation of plans by Commission for improvement of navigability of these river systems, and flood and debris-control therein. Authorized California Debris Commission to permit (Amendment of sec. 13, hydraulic mining without construction of impounding Act of Mar. 1, 1893.)1 works, provided there is no injury to navigability of above river systems or lands adjacent thereto. Amended act of Mar. 1, 1893, which provides for construction of debris dams or other restraining works by California Debris Commission and collection of a 3-percent tax on gross proceeds of each mine using such facilities, so as to eliminate this tax and substitute an annual tax per cubic yard mined, obtained by dividing total capital cost of each dam, reservoir, and rights-of-way, by total capacity of reservoir for restraint of debris; and authorized revocation of Commission orders permitting such mining, for failure to pay this annual tax within 30 days after its due date; and also authorized receipt of money advances, from mineowners to aid such construction, to be refunded later from annual payments of yardage taxes on material mined. Added at end of sec. 23 of above act, a provision that the Secretary of the Army is authorized to enter into contracts to supply storage for water and use of outlet facilities from debris-storage reservoirs for domestic and irrigation purposes and power development, upon such conditions of delivery, use, and payment as he may approve, these payments are to be deposited to credit of such reservoir project, reducing its capital cost to be repaid by tax on mining operations. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Additional levee construction and reconstruction, including H. Does. 649, 78th Cong., levee protection of Upper Butte Basin, and multipurpose 2d sess., and 367, 81st reservoirs.2 Cong., 1st sess. Bank protection and incidental channel improvements, H. Doc. 272, 84th Cong., Sacramento River from Chico Landing toRed Bluff, and 2d sess. local interests flood plain zoning above Chico Landing.2 Bank protection works at critical locations, Sacramento S. Doc. 103, 86th Cong., River.2 2d sess. 1. For latest published map, see Annual Report for 1913, p. 3170, and Rivers and Harbors Committee Document 50, 74th Cong., 1st sess. 2. This supplemental work is reported in detail under Sacramento District, Improvement No. 13. 44-6 4. , CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION TABLE 44-C SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA: TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 (See Section 4 of Text) Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular $65,457,609 $1,979,104 $67,436,7131 Public Works 1,486,469 1,486,469 Total U.S. $66,944,078 $1,979,104 $68,923,182 Contributed Project Work 4,939,752 9,686 4,949,438 Contributed, Other 5,104,333 -5,104,333 Total All Funds $76,988,163 $1,988,790 $78,976,953 1. Includes $429,671 representing book value of plant purchased with previous project funds and transferred to existing project without reimbursement. 44-7 U. S. ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION Organization and functions. The Waterways Experiment Station (WES) is a field operating agency of the Chief of Engineers operating under the staff supervision of the Director, Research and Development. COLS Tilford C. Creel, Corps of Engineers, is Commander and Director. Mr. Frederick R. Brown is Technical Director. WES, the Corps of Engineers largest laboratory complex for research, testing, and development, consists of four technical laboratories: Hydraulics, Geotechnical, Structures, and Environmental. The Hydraulics Laboratory, the largest laboratory of its kind in the world, uses a wide range of working models and computer-based numerical models for research and analysis of dams, levees, rivers, and harbor projects, soil and streambank erosion, thermal pollution, etc. The Geotechnical Laboratory conducts research in soil mechanics, structural foundation design, embankment design and slope stability, seepage analysis, military pavements, engineering geology, rock mechanics, expedient surfacing, earthquake engineering, and mobility and trafficability. The Structures Laboratory uses theoretical, analytical, experimental, and modeling approaches to research the effects of nuclear and nonnuclear explosions, the response of structures to natural and explosive disturbances, and various construction materials with emphasis on concrete, especially the testing, repair, and preservation of existing concrete structures. The Environmental Laboratory researches the problems caused by man's activities with respect to the environment. Research programs include Dredged Material, Aquatic Plant Control, Environmental and Water Quality Operational Studies, Environmental Impact, Wetlands, and the Recreation Research Program. These and other programs of the Environmental Laboratory range through waste management, environmental regulations, and military aspects of terrain and camouflage. WES Laboratories are engaged in research and engineering investigations in support of the civil and military missions of the Chief of Engineers. On a reimbursable basis, WES performs basic and applied research, develops state of the art methods and techniques, tests materials and equipment, and provides consulting services. Subject to the approval of the Chief of Engineers, studies and investigations may be undertaken for agencies outside the Department of the Army. WES maintains an extensive scientific and engineering reference library to serve the specialized needs of the Corps of Engineers and issues publications of general interest; operates DOD Information Analysis Centers in the fields of Pavements and Soils Trafficability, Concrete Technology, Hydraulic Engineering, and Soils Mechanics; and maintains the Corps of Engineers Engineering Computer Programs Library. During Fiscal Year 1982, 268 WES numbered reports of individual studies conducted at or for WES, 20 contract translations, and 70 unnumbered publications (conference reports, special study reports, etc.) for WES and other offices were printed and distributed to Corps offices and interested outside agencies. Operations and results during the period. Work accomplished at WES is, in general, initially financed by the Corps of Engineers Revolving Fund, with direct reimbursement from agencies requesting research investigations and related services. The Station's total program during Fiscal Year 1982 was $71,418,918 which included $12,236,412 performed by contract. Of the reimbursable work $35,735,132 was charged to civil, $35,235,827 to military, and $447,959 to non- Governmental activities. The plant replacement and improvement program was $2,914,000 for this period. 45-1 PERMANENT INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF NAVIGATION CONGRESSES (PIANC) The Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses (PIANC) is an international organization with headquarters in Brussels, Belgium. It is a clearing house where the views and experiences of engineers and port operators of the nations of the world are exchanged on problems relating to ocean and inland navigation improvements. Its objective is broadly stated "to promote the progress of inland and maritime navigation." The Association developed during the period 1885- 1902 from an international interest in perpetuating a series of Congresses for the exchange of technical information on problems related to inland and ocean navigation. The Permanent International Commission was formed during the 8th International Congress at Paris in 1900 and led to the formation of PIANC during the 9th International Congress at Dusseldorf, Germany in 1902. The United States became a member nation by authority of an Act of Congress approved June 28, 1902, which provided for annual appropriations toward the maintenance of the Association. In 1902, the United States appropriated $3,000 annually for support and maintenance of the Permanent International Commission of Congresses of Navigation and for payment of the actual expenses of properly accredited national delegates of the United States to meetings of the Congresses and Commissions. An increase in the appropriation to $5,000 annually was authorized by the 1948 River and Harbor Act and an appropriation to $22,000 annually by the 1965 River and Harbor Act. The current appropriation of $45,000 was authorized by the 1974 Water Resources Development Act. Of this amount, an annual subvention of about $6,900 is paid by the U.S. Section to the International Association in Brussels, Belgium. The objective of the Association-to promote the progress of inland and maritime navigation-is met by holding International Congresses and publishing technical bulletins and other documents. The Congresses are held in various member countries, usually at four-year intervals. The Association is supported principally by member goverments, but membership also extends to corporations and to individuals. Member governments are represented at the Congresses and at meetings of the Permanent International Commission by delegates, the number of official delegates to be determined by the amount of the annual subsidy paid by the government, but not to exceed ten in number. Corporate members may send one official representative to the Congresses. Currently, the Permanent International Commission has 40 countries represented. Individual membership is of two classes-Annual and Life-depending on the method of payment of dues. There are currently 1,283 annual international members, 689 life members, and 627 corporate members, for a total of 2,599 members. Membership of the U.S. Section on September 30, 1982 totaled 617, consisting of 121 life members, 418 individual members, and 78 corporate members. The affairs of the Association are managed by the Permanent International Commission composed of delegates from the supporting governments. The National Commission constitutes the governing body of the U. S. Section and the U. S. members of the Permanent International Commission. The Director of Civil Works, Office of the Chief of Engineers, U. S. Army, and the Resident Member, Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors are the ex-officio Chairman and Secretary, respectively, of the National Commission. The Secretary handles all administrative matters of the U. S. Section. During Fiscal Year 1982, National Commissioners were: Major General E. R. Heiberg I, USA, ex-officio Chairman; Colonel F. W. Mueller, Jr., CE, ex-officio Secretary; Rear Admiral Richard A. Bauman, USCG; Mr. Harry N. Cook; Mr. James M. Goldston; Colonel Herbert T. Haar, Jr., USA (Ret); Mr. Vernon J. Ljungren; Mr. William R. Murden; Mr. John W. Hernandez, Jr.; and Mr. George H. Kimmons. Lieutenant General John W. Morris USA (Ret) is an honorary Vice President of PIANC, having served two terms as a Vice President. Major General Charles G. Holle, USA (Ret), Secretary-General, XXth International Navigation Congress, 1961, is ex-officio member of the Permanent International Commission. Honorary American members of the Permanent International Commission include Brigadier General Herbert D. Vogel, USA (Ret); Colonel Alvin D. Wilder, USA (Ret); and Colonel Carl H. Bronn, USA (Ret). The annual meeting of the Permanent International Commission (PIC) was held in Monte Carlo, Monaco, on May 11, 1982 and was attended by all National Commissoners. Lieutenant General John W. Morris, USA (Ret); Major General Charles G. Holle, USA (Ret); and Brigadier General Herbert D. Vogel, USA (Ret) also attended the PIC meeting. American representatives attended meetings of the International Study Commissions, two Permanent Technical Committees (PTCs) and Work Groups of PTCs. U. S. representation on these groups is as follows: International Commission for Study ofLocks, Ship Lifts, and River Weirs - Mr. John Davis Permanent Committee for Developing Countries - Brigadier General Herbert D. Vogel, USA (Ret) Permanent Technical Committee I - Mr. J. W. Hershey Work Group I, Identification of Methods for Economic Study of Inland Waterways -Mr. Howard E. Olson Work Group 2, Disposal of Dredged Materials - Mr. Alt H. Sorensen Permanent Technical Committee II - Mr. Eugene H. Harlow Work Group 1, Shipping and Handling of Dangerous Cargo - Captain William R. Riedel, JCG (Ret) Work Group 2, Stability of Rubble Mound Breakwaters - Mr. Eugene H. Harlow Work Group 3a, Minimum Underkeel Clearances -Mr. Ronald C. Uhlin Work Group 3b, Navigation in Muddy Waters - Dr. John B. Herbich Work Group 4, Winter Ice Navigation - Professor C. Allen Wortley Work Group 5, Ocean Dredge Disposal - Colonel Herbert R. Haar, Jr., USA (Ret) Joint Sub-Committee for Advice on Sport and Pleasure Navigation - Mr. John M. Nichol 46-1 INVESTIGATIONS OF PROJECTS UNDER THE FEDERAL POWER ACT The Federal Water Power Act of June 10,1920, created the Federal Power Commission (in 1977 renamed to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, FERC) composed of the Secretaries of War, Interior, and Agriculture, with authority to grant permits and licenses for hydroelectric development in all waters over which Congress has jurisdiction. The act further required that work of the commission be performed by and through the Departments of War, Interior and Agriculture and their engineering, technical, and other personnel except as may be otherwise provided bylaw. By an act of June 23, 1930, entitled "An Act to Reorganize the Federal Power Commission," Secs. I and 2 of the Federal Water Power Act of 1920 were amended. A commission was provided for, to be composed of five commissioners to be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The necessity of performing work through the Departments of War, Interior and Agriculture was removed and the commission was authorized to appoint such officers and employees as necessary in executing its function. By Title II, Public Utility Act of 1935, the original Federal Water Power Act was made Part I of the Federal Power Act, and Parts II and III were added to that act. On October 1, 1977, pursuant to the provisions of the Department of Energy Organization Act (DOE Act), Public Law 59-91 Stat. 565 (August 4,1977) and Executive Order No. 12009, 42 Fed. Reg. 46267 (September 15, 1977), the Federal Power Commission ceased to exist and its functions and regulatory responsibilities were transferred to the Secretary and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) which, as an independent commission within the Department of Energy was activated on October 1, 1977. Section 4(e) of the Federal Power Act provides that no water power license affecting navigable capacity of any navigable waters of the United States shall be issued until plans of the dam or other structures affecting navigation have been approved by the Chief of Engineers and the Secretary of the Army. By an action, notice of which was published in the Federal Register Volume 40, Number 74, dated April 16, 1975, the Secretary of the Army delegated to the Chief of Engineers his authority under Section 4(e) of the Federal Power Act. The Chief of Engineers on 5 September 1980 delegated to the Corps division engineers the authority for Section 4(e)approval of plans for non-Federal hydropower development affecting navigation. The following work ofan engineeringnature was accomplished by the Corps division and district offices under the direction of the Chief of Engineers during the fiscal year: 1,190 applications from non-Federal entities for planning, design,construction and operation of hydropower projects were reviewed and appropriate recommendations in the interest of flood control, navigation, and structural safety, relative to Corps projects, were furnished to the Commission. Of the total 1,190 applications, 68 applications were for hydropower development at Corps projects. RecommendationswerefurnishedtotheCommission concerning the impact of hydroelectric power development on the existing and proposed Federal water resources projects. Recommendations also were provided to the Commission on the enviromental impacts of proposed and existing projects. To date, there are 23 constructed non-Federal power plants at Corps projects. Non-Federal entities had three power plants under active construction at Corps projects during the fiscal year. The Corps bills FERC licensees for the costs incurred by the Corps in approving final design, plans and construction of power plants at Corps projects. Reimbursements are made by the licensees to the United States Treasury. 47-1 REGULATORY, SUNKEN VESSEL REMOVAL & MOBILIZATION PLANNING ACTIVITIES 1. Regulatory Activities Authorities. The following authorities charge the Corps of Engineers with the regulation of various water-related construction activities: Sections 9 and 10 of the River and Harbor Act of 1899 (structures in an alteration of waterways, e.g. boat docks); Section 103 of the Marine Protection and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (ocean dumping); and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (discharge of dredged and fill material). Work Completed. During FY 1982, the Corps received 17,200 applications for individual permits, and issued 16,300 permits and letters of permission. The Corps reported or discovered a total of 4,700 violations. In addition, the Corps approved over 9,000 activities by regional permits, and many thousands of nationwide permits thus eliminating the requirement for making formal application. On May 7,1982, the President's Task Force on Regulatory Relief, after an intensive review, directed the Corps to implement a number of reforms to the regulatory program. The Corps issued new permit regulations on July 22, 1982, streamlining the program. A 1983 regulation will reflect the reform directives. Table 48-A GENERAL REGULATORY FUNCTIONS Obligations Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 81 ......... Allotments .......................................... $ 1,592,913 + 45,329,091 Total Funds Available .................... 46,922,044 Obligations ......................................... - 45,720,945 Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 82 ........ $ 1,201,059 Expenditures Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 81.......... Allotments ........................................... + 4,125,514 + 45,347,091 Total Funds Available ............................ 49,472,605 Expenditures .................................... + 46,495,330 Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 82 ........ $ 2,977,275 2. Investigation and Removal of Sunken Vessels Under authority of Sections 19 and 20 of the River and Harbor Act of 1899, the Corps of Engineers investigated sunken vessels in navigable waters and removed those obstructing navigation. For obligations expenditures, see Table 48-B TABLE 48-B REMOVAL OF SUNKEN VESSELS Obligations Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 81 ............... $ 99,405 Allotm ents ............................................... + 732,062 Total Funds Available .............................. 831,467 Obligations .............................................. - 554,987 Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 82 .............. $ 276,480 Expenditures Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 81 .............. $ 107,549 Allotments ............................................... + 732,062 Total Funds Available ................................. 839,611 Expenditures ........................................... - 562,142 Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 82 .............. $ 277,469 3. Mobilization Readiness Planning Activities Authority. Executive Order 11490, as amended, assigns responsibilities to executive departments and agencies to undertake national emergency planning and preparedness to develop an effective national capability to meet essential civilian and defense needs during major domestic emergencies and national security emergencies. Status: The Corps of Engineers Readiness Posture has improved through the preparedness activites undertaken to maintain a national engineering and construction capability for an effective response to any national emergency. Planning and preparedness initiatives were in these major program areas: (1) to define the Corps' national support requirements; (2) to prepare national emergency preparedness plans; (3) to develop an engineering organization structure which supports mission accomplishment; (4) to maintain an adequate level of national emergency operational readiness for rapid response to requirements; (5) to develop program controls which guide plan formulation and periodically test plans to ensure feasibility, applicability and effectiveness. For Fiscal Year obligations and expenditures see Table 48-C. TABLE 48-C MOBILIZATION READINESS PLANNING Obligations Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 81 .......... $ 493,280 Allotments ............................................ + 3,839,484 Total Funds Available .............................. 4,332,764 Obligations ............................................. - 3,485,753 Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 82 .......... 847,011 Expenditures Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 81 .......... 573,249 Allotments ............................................ + 3,839,484 Total Funds Available ........................... 4,412,733 Expenditures ........................................ -3,315,715 Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 82 .......... 1,090,018 48-1 INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY WATERS BOARDS In order to carry out United States obligations under international agreements, the Office of the Chief of Engineers and several Corps Divisions and Districts with jurisdiction over areas bordering Canada have representation on numerous 'international boards and committees. The majority of these boards were established by the International Joint Commission (IJC) as empowered in accordance with the provisions of the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909 between the United States and Great Britain (for Canada). IJC boards fall into two broad categories: boards of control, which are more or less permanent and supervise compliance over an IJC order; and engineering or technical boards, which are usually dissolved after completing and reporting on an investigation assignment. In addition to boards created by the Commission, other international boards and committees are created by treaties or other informal arrangement in matters concerned with the water resources of joint interest, and the members report directly to the Governments or establishing agency. International boundary waters boards and committees having Corps of Engineer memberships during the fiscal year are listed in Table 49-1. For an explanation of the constitution of the various boards and committees, see the FY 77 and FY 80 Annual reports. TABLE 49-1. IJC BOARDS OF CONTROL HAVING CE MEMBERS BOARD NAME YEAR ESTABLISHED 1. Int. Lakes Superior 2. Int. St. Croix River 3. Int. Lake of the Woods 1. Int. Lake Champlain 5. Int. Kootenay Lake 6. Int. Rainy Lake 7. Int. Osoyoos Lake 8. Int. Niagara 9. Int. St. Lawrence River 10. Int. Skagit River 1914 1915 1925 1937 1938 1941 1943 1953 1953 1967 UNITED STATES REPRESENTATION *Div. Engr., NCD *Div. Engr., NED *Dist. Engr., St. Paul *Dist. Engr., New York *1. Dist. Engr. Seattle 2. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Boise, ID *Dist. Engr. St. Paul 1. Dist. Engr. Seattle *2. Dept. of Interior, USGS, hIkcoma WA 3. Washington Dept. of Ecology, Olympia *1. Div. Engr. NCD 2. Dept. of Energy, FERC, Washington, D.C. *1. Div. Engr. NCD 2. St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation, Asst. Admin., Massena, NY 3. Dept. of Energy, FERC, Washington, D.C. 4. NY State Power Authority, Massena, NY *Dist. Engr. Seattle IJC ENGINEERING OR STUDY BOARDS HAVING CE MEMBERS BOARD NAME YEAR ESTABLISHED 11. Int. Souris-Red Rivers Engineering 12. Int. Champlain-Richelieu 13. Int. Lake Erie Regulation Study 14. Int. Great Lakes Diversions and Consumptive Uses Study 15. Int. Great Lakes Technical Information Network Board 1948 1975 1977 1977 1979 UNITED STATES REPRESENTATION 1. Dist. Engr. St. Paul *2. Dept. of Interior, WPRS, Washington, D.C. 3. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Washington, D.C. *1. New York Depart. Envir. Conser. 2. Dist. Engr., New York 3. Vermont Agency Envir. Conser. 4. New England River Basins Commission, Staff Associate 5. Dept. of Interior, F&WS, Boston, MA *1. Div. Engr. NCD 2. Ohio Dept. Nat. Res. 3. New York Dept. Envir. Conser. 4. Dept. of Interior, F&WS, Washington, D.C. *1. Div. Engr. NCD 2. Michigan Dept. Nat. Res. 3. Illinois Dept. of Trans. 4. Pennsylvania Dept. of Envir. Res. 5. Dept. of Energy, FERC, New York, NY *1. NCEED-L, Detroit, MI 2. Great Lakes Environmental Research Lab. NOAA, Ann Arbor, MI 3. USGS, Reston, VA 49-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS U.S. ARMY 1982 OTHER INTERNATIONAL BOARDS OR GROUPS HAVING CE MEMBERS 18. Int. Lake Memphremagog 17. Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data 18. Int. Niagara Committee 19. Columbia River Treaty Entities 20. Columbia River Treaty Permanent Engineering *Signifies U.S. Section Chairman. 1920 1953 1955 1964 1964 *Dist. Engr. New York *1. Eng. Div. North Central Div. 2. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, Rockville, MD *Div Engr. NCD 1. Div. Engr. NPD *2. Bonneville Power Admin. Portland, OR *1. OCE, DAEN-CWE, Washington, D.C. 2. Dept. of Energy, Washington, D.C. 49-2 U.S. ARMY CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING RESEARCH LABORATORY Organization and functions. The U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (CERL) is a field operating agency of the Chief of Engineers operating under the supervision of the Chief, Research and Development Office. CERL, which is located in Champaign, IL, was officially dedicated on July 25, 1969, and is one of the Corps' five major laboratories. The laboratory is closely affiliated with the University of Illinois, sharing laboratory, library, computer, and personnel resources with the University. Colonel Louis J. Circeo, Corps of Engineers, is Commander and Director. CERL research programs are oriented toward the support of the total Army, the Army in garrison, the military installation, the Department of Defense, and to the nation as a whole. The laboratory, which has base support, combat support, and civil works missions, is engaged in a construction research program designed to improve planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of a variety of Army facilities. The ultimate goal of the overall research effort is to create products that will save the Army resources. Research findings are transmitted directly to the field, as well as to private industry and the academic community. Within the Corps, research supports both military and civil works projects in the general areas of environmental quality, energy, materials, engineering management, and military engineering. In the area of environmental quality, CERL has developed a broad-based program designed to maintain military readiness standards, while still coriforming to environmental quality regulations. These programs have included development of methods to predict noise impacts, water and air pollution control techniques, adaptations of currently used technologies to more stringent fluid and solid waste control, and computerized methods to cut the time and costs involved in environmental impact assessment. Energy research is oriented toward helping the Army meet its energy conservation goals. These projects include development of computer simulation technology for selection of more fuel-efficient energy systems and design methods and exploration of alternative fuel sources like solar energy and biomass. CERL's materials program is designed to lower the Army's costs for construction, modification, operation, and maintenance of its facilities. These projects include investigations on protective coatings, polymer technology, seismic criteria, quality monitoring systems, and materials syntheses and selection programs. CERL supports the Army decision-maker through its engineering management programs that are designed to increase facility efficiency and productivity. The development of automated data processing systems for management information, cost estimating, profit determination, architecture and design, corrosion mitigation, pavement management, housing contract maintenance, and habitability information have helped reduce costs throughout the military. CERL's military engineering program provides direct support to the battlefield engineer and to the maintenance of military readiness. This research has developed training aids, field-protective structures to increase combat survivability, and methods to enhance the effectiveness of operations during combat situations. In mobilization, CERL research has led to the development of planning systems to evaluate installation troop housing and other requirements, and to the development of low-cost, troop constructible foam shelters for use as emergency housing during the critical early stages of mobilization. During Fiscal Year 1982, CERL produced 108 publications, of which 55 were technical reports, 25 were Army-level publications, and 28 were publications presented in the public domain. In addition, CERL personnel presented 44 papers at scientific meetings. CERL personnel prepared and presented 28 training programs in areas such as corrosion, automated specification editing, and energy conservation. Operations and results during the period. Work performed during Fiscal Year 1982 was funded both directly and through reimbursable programs. CERL's total program was $18.5 million, of which $8.8 million was direct RDT&E funding and $4.9 million was reimbursable funding from the Office of the Chief of Engineers and Corps Divisions and Districts. Other Federal agencies, such as the Air Force, Navy, Department of Energy, and Environmental Protection Agency accounted for $4.8 million. 50-1 U.S. ARMY ENGINEER TOPOGRAPHIC LABORATORIES Organization and functions. The U.S. Army Engineer Topographic Laboratories (ETL) began during World War I as a temporary Engineer Detachment, formed to test aerial photography for topographic mapping. Since that time, ETL has grown into a sophisticated, modern research and development laboratory, applying the latest advances in optics, electronics, computer data processing, space sciences, and related technologies to military and civil problems in mapping, surveying, land navigation, and geodesy. ETL is now a field operating agency of the Corps of Engineers and is commanded by Colonel Edward K. Wintz. The Engineer Topographic Laboratories is the only defense research and development laboratory that addresses the full range of development from basic research to a final product in the topographic sciences. Support is provided to both the Military and Civil Works elements of the Corps and to the Army Materiel Development and Readiness Command and the Defense Mapping Agency. To provide this support, ETL is organized into five operational elements, three of which are developmental laboratories. The Geographic Sciences Laboratory performs research and development associated with the extraction and presentation of geographic data for the Army in the field. The Topographic Development Laboratory supports technological developmentin surveying and mapmaking. The Computer Sciences Laboratory develops advanced computer techniques and systemsforprocessing,analyzing,anddisplayingtopographic data derived from digital photography. The Research Institute performs mostofthe Laboratories' basic and applied research, and the Terrain Analysis Center prepared terrain studies needed by field Army elements, as directed by the Assistant ChiefofStaffofthe Army for Intelligence. During Fiscal Year 1982 copies of 31 Engineer Topographic Laboratories numbered reports of individual studies conducted at or for the Engineer Topographic Laboratories were distributed to Corps' offices and interested outside agencies. ETL is the principal Corps of Engineers laboratory for remote sensing. Nearly every aspect of the work done at ETL involves this technology. Research Institute personnel are investigating the types of data derived from sensors and means for exploiting those data. Central to this work are studies regarding the possibilities of automating image interpretation. The Computer Sciences Laboratory staff is investigating the digital processing of remote sensing data. Geographic Sciences Laboratory members have defined remote sensing inputs required for Army terrain graphics and terrain data bases. In addition, a remote sensing consultant conducts short courses on remote sensing for Corps of Engineers and other government personnel. Finally, ETL also assists the Corps of Engineers Civil Works Directorate with remote sensing information relating to inland waterways, water resources, and flood control. Operations & results during FY 82. The Engineer Topographic Laboratories' total program for FY 82 was $38,985,000. This included work done for other agencies as well as for the Corps of Engineers. $26,428,700 of this program supported work performed by contract. Reimbursable work in FY 82 included $247,000 charged to civil works funds and $17,000 to non-governmental concerns. 51-1 U.S. ARMY COLD REGIONS RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING LABORATORY Background. The U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (USA CRREL), located in Hanover, New Hampshire, was created in January, 1961. It merged the Snow, Ice and Permafrost Research Establishment, created in 1949, and the Arctic Construction and Frost Effects Laboratory, created in 1953, both of which were outgrowths of the Army's World War II experience in Alaska, Iceland and Greenland. The laboratory's mission is to conduct and coordinate research and surveillance of technology applicable to the Army's needs in those geographic areas of the world where cold presents a severe problem. The total authorized strength of USACRREL is 278 (263 civilian and 15 military), with a budget for FY82 of over $18 million. USACRREL has five main buildings in Hanover which total 240,000 square feet on 24 acres of land. The buildings include the main laboratory, the ice engineering facility, the logistics and supply building, the plant and equipment building, and the equipment storage building. Construction of a new Frost Effects Research Facility was begun during FY82 and will be completed in FY83. This 27,000-square-foot laboratory will allow accelerated full-size testing of pavement, utility and foundation systems during freeze-thaw cycles. USACRREL also maintains an Alaskan Projects Office in Fairbanks with six buildings totaling 30,000 square feet. The Alaskan Projects Office manages the laboratory's unique permafrost tunnel, a 360-ft shaft drilled into frozen soil, serving as the site for numerous field studies on permafrost. USACRREL's basic and applied research covers a broad spectrum of cold regions studies. Basic research includes work in the physical, mechanical, and chemical properties of snow and other forms of frozen precipitation, freshwater ice, sea ice, and frozen ground. Basic research supports applied research in construction, transportation, and other problems encountered in arctic, subarctic, and temperate cold regions. Major cold regions research topics include ice engineering, energy conservation, environmental impact and preservation, roads and airfields, mobility, control of snow and ice, wastewater management, use of remote sensing, battlefield obscuration, and military engineering. As the only Federal laboratory dedicated to cold regions research, USACRREL has a national reputation and maintains close ties with Federal and state agencies where it provides consulting services on a reimbursable basis. As the center of cold regions scientific and engineering expertise for the Corps of Engineers, USACRREL supports Corps districts and divisions by publishing field engineering reports, sponsoring technical seminars for field engineers, and making field visits to consult on engineering problems. Operations and Results During FY82. During FY82, USACRREL published and distributed over 200 scientific and engineering reports (CRREL Reports, Special Reports, Technical Notes, Internal Reports, etc.), contributed to 28 U.S. Army publications and presented 15 technical seminars and meetings. CRREL personnel consulted with the Alaska and Philadelphia Districts to assist in erosion control and bank stabilization on inland waterways. The recommendations included methods of placing groins and revegetation techniques. In conjunction with the Pittsburgh District, CRREL recommended a solution to the annual ice jam flooding at the Allegheny River/Oil Creek junction. The proposal was an ice control structure placed on both rivers to reduce the buildup of slush ice at the confluence of the river and creek. The structures were installed before the 1982 winter. Another ice engineering development was the installation of an air screen at the New Cumberland dam gates to reduce ice accumulation in the lock. CRREL also finalized the Ice Engineering Manual for publication in early FY83. CRREL has developed a new snow water equivalent and soil moisture sensor which is simple, inexpensive, rugged and able to be implanted in the field. It can read remotely and should enable more accurate prediction of watershed yield. The information gathered in these and other experiments is being used to update Corps of Engineers hydrologic models 52-1 WATER RESOURCES SUPPORT CENTER The Water Resources Support Center, under the staff supervision of the Director of Civil Works Office of the Chief of Engineers, is commanded by Colonel Maximilian Imhoff. The Center is located at the new Humphreys Engineer Center Support Activity, Ft. Belvoir, Virginia. Its divisions are the Institute for Water Resources, Dredging Division, Data Collection and Management Division, the Publications and Training Division, and the Office of Budget and Management Support. Elements managed by the Center in other locations include the Hydrologic Engineering Center at Davis, California, the Marine Design Branch of the Dredging Division at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and the Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center of the Data Collection and Management Division at New Orleans, Louisiana. The accomplishments of the WRSC divisions during 1982 are listed by division. DATA COLLECTION AND MANAGEMENT DIVISION Remote Sensing Research Program Technical monitoring of the Remote Sensing Research Program continued with the addition of one new work unit in FY 1982. The Remote Sensing Demonstration Program completed the Upper Mississippi River Demonstration with NCD, initiated the Columbia River Demonstration with NPD, and continued integration with the Spatial Analysis Methodology demonstrations in cooperation with the NCD and initiated a demonstration with the ORD. In July 1982 LANDSAT-4, a second generation land remote sensing satellite was successfully launched by NASA. This system provides higher spatial and spectral resolution and is being integrated with the Remote Sensing Research and Demonstration programs. The test and evaluation of video disk technology for the storage and random retrieval of pictorial data was initiated with the development of a master disk consisting of typical Corps data such as maps, satellite imagery, aerial photography and surrogate travel to be delivered in FY 83. The U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Remote Sensing Sympoi in wa s rnrnnfiully conducted on November 30 to December 2, 1981, in Nashville, Tennessee, with representatives from ten divisions and 20 districts. Water Control Management The Corps increased its use of DCP's in 1982 by 120. The number installed or authorized now totals 693. Water Control Management procedures are becoming increasingly automated with the addition of several minicomputers dedicated to water control and more planned for the next two to three years. The cooperative stream gaging program with the U.S. Geological Survey was automated in 1982 and will be released to the field in 1983. Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center The Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center (WCSC) continued to address the need for a more timely and accurate reporting program, and to reduce operating costs in FY 83. The new System Engineering Laboratories' minicomputer system purchased last year was installed and new software is being developed. Utilization of the new system began with the input of CY 82 data, thus enabling modifications to data collection procedures and processing techniques. As conversion to the new system progresses, additional modifications will be phased which will reduce the backlogs and delays the old system caused and enhance the availability of the data. The 1980 edition of the Waterborne Commerce of the United States (WCUS) was available six months after the 1979 edition of the publication at 1/3 of the previous year's printing costs. As a result of contracting the collection functions of two divisions (LMVD and SAD) and the implementation of sampling procedures where feasible, additional savings were realized. The sampling of light trips (barges without cargo and towboats) has no effect on the accuracy of monitoring cargo movements and results in less than one percent degradation in the accuracy of the published trip tables. In complying with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, WCSC is accepting computer printouts from an increasing number of companies. This reduces the paperwork burden on the vessel operating companies where completion of the government forms was done manually. In addition, WCSC has been able to successfully receive machine readable vessel movement information from some vessel operating companies. Frequency Management On 1 December 1982, the Corp's Radio Spectrum Management Automation Program became operational. Utilizing the Water Resources Data Center's Harris S550 minicomputer, districts and divisions that require radio frequencies submit the request through their local terminals. This new procedure will significantly reduce the time required to obtain frequency authorization. The Corps, with over 7,000 radio frequencies assigned, is the largest user of the spectrum within the Army. We are the first to automate its field personnel in frequency management procedures within the government. Corps-wide Telecommunications Study A preliminary study early in FY 82 indicated that the Corps communications service had developed in a decentralized mode driven by local requirements. Since communication costs are expected to rise dramatically in the next few years, a five phase Corps-wide study managed by the Data Collection and Management Division was initiated. Its intent is to find a means to control cost increases, tie local systems together into an effective network and enhance Corps communications. Phase I and II of the subject study, completed in this fiscal year, began with a baseline data base specifying the current CONUS Corps communication system (people, cost, devices, service, etc.), and ended with a report from the contractor on those network architectures that satified Corps requirements. OCONUS will be separately analyzed. During the next fiscal year, sensitivity analyses will be performed on those candidate architectures to identify trade-off, growth potential, costs, etc., from which the 53-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS U.S. ARMY 1982 Corps will select the preferred architecture to be developed in greater detail. The final report is scheduled for the second quarter FY 83. Port Facilities Branch The Port Facilities Branch collects and publishes data on the physical characteristics of the coastal, Great Lakes, and inland waterway ports of the United States. Fiftythree port series reports are published at intervals of appoximately eight to nine years, covering approximately 120 ports areas. During FY 1982, seven ports covering 14 port areas were published and offered for sale: No. 24 - Houston, TX No. 60- Pittsburgh, PA and Ports on the Ohio, Monongahela, and Allegheny Rivers, PA No. 14 - Savannah and Brunswick, GA No. 72 - Natchez, Vicksburg, and Greenville, MS, and Ports on Lower Mississippi River, Miles 255- 620 AHP No. 16 - Miami, Port Everglades, Palm Beach, and Port Canaveral, FL No. 70 - St. Louis, MO, and Ports on the Upper Mississippi River, Miles 0-300 AOR No. 31 - Oakland-Alameda, Richmond, and Ports on Carquinez Strait, CA Due to larger sales than anticipated, Port Series Report No. 21 (Baton Rouge and Lake Charles, LA), was reprinted. THE HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER The Hydrologic Engineering Center conducted active programs in research, training, and field assistance during FY 82 in hydrologic engineering and planning analyses. Emphasis was placed on consolidation of recent R&D projects into field usable products. Areas of particular technical emphasis included real-time water control, automated flood-damage analysis, hydrologic and hydrdynamic system analysis, and erosion and sediment analysis. New computer programs were released for Corps and public use, hydrometeorologic analysis, real time water control, and hydrologic and flood damage data management. Increased capability routines for existing computer programs were released in reservoir systems analysis, modeling storm runoff, evaluating hydropower potential, and enhancing the display capabilities for all programs. User documentation and technical guidance were issued for the released computer programs and for hydrologic analysis of ungaged watersheds, analyzing nonstructural measures, performing complex frequency analysis and analyzing split flood plain flows. A total of 17 revised documents were issued. Eleven formal training courses were conducted for 340 Corps professionals. The general subject areas were flood hydrology, flood control and flood plain management planning, hydroelectric power, real time operation and interior area analysis. Several specific workshops in river hydraulics, flood hydrology, sediment transport and hydropower were held at the request of the districts. A total of 169 professionals attended these workshops. A seminar in water quality was held. A number of foreign visitors were hosted for periods ranging up to one week. The Center provided technical consultations to 18 Corps field offices in a variety of topics. Almost halfofHEC's FY 82 efforts were devoted to direct assistance to Corps offices in performance of their studies. Examples include real time water control in the Ohio Valley, urban hydrology in the Chicago area, river hydraulics and sediment analysis for 9 project areas across the country, reservoir systems analysis for the Lehigh and Mississippi headwaters, water quality studies for Denver reservoirs, small scale hydropower planning, groundwater withdrawal impact, and development of a dredged material disposal systems management model. Dredging Division National Dredging Program For maintenance and improvement dredging of rivers, channels, and harbors, the Corps spent an estimated $445 million to move 272 million cubic yards of material. This was a reduction of about $4 million or 3 percent from FY 81, as well as a decrease of 87 million cubic yards or 24 percent less than FY 1981. Private industry, however, continued to increase its share of dredging yardage from 75 percent in FY 81 to 78 percent in FY 82. Nonetheless, the 212 million cubic yards dredged by industry were 22 percent less than last year. Private industry increased its share of dollars for dredging from 77 to 83 percent in FY 82, and the dollar amount increased from $355 million in FY 81 to $369 million in FY 82. The Corps decreased its dredging from 88 million to 60 million cubic yards and its dollar amount from $104 million to $76 million. Major Construction Activities Utilizing funds available from the Corps Revolving Fund, construction of a two-story office facility and training center at Fort Belvoir was completed and dedicated in honor of General Hugh (Pat) Casey, World War II Engineer for Pacific Operations. Construction of a new office building for the Norfolk District was continued. Construction was also continued on the middle-class hopper dredge, ESSAYONS II and the large-class hopper dredge, WHEELER. Retirement of Dredges Consistent with the direction of Public Law 95-269 to increase private industry's share of dredging, the Corps 53-2 WATER RESOURCES SUPPORT CENTER continued to retire its dredges. In FY 82, four dredges were retired--two large-class hopper dredges, the GOETHALS and the LANGFITTr, one small-class hopper dredge, the LYMAN, and one dipper dredge, the GAILLARD. At the end of FY 82, the Corps fleet was reduced to 24 degredges from 102 in 1940. Corps of Engineers Reserve Fleet (CERF) Modeled after the Civil Reserve Air Fleet (CRAF) of the Air Force and the Navy Sealift Augmentation Program, the Corps developed a concept for activating a voluntary fleet of hopper dredges from private industry for defense and emergency situations to augment the declining Federal fleet of hopper dredges. It is expected that this concept will be fully implemented during the 3rd quarter of FY 83. Support for Other Agencies Technical support and training was performed for the Air Force to operate a cutterhead dredge in the Azores. The application of dredging technology was provided for the Navy at King's Bay in GA, for AID at Roseires Dam on the Blue Nile in Sudan, for the State Department in Guyana, South America, for EPA to develop suitable dumping sites within acceptable environmental tolerances, and the Department of Interior for the nourishment of beaches at Sandy Hook, NJ, and Virginia Beach, VA. Studies A revised version of the Minimum Dredge Fleet Study was provided the Assistant Secretary of the Army in April 1982. A "Study of National Dredging Needs for Ports and Harbors" was contracted with the National Academy of Engineering to provide information and recommendations for the long-range navigational requirements for the harbors of the Nation. Studies are also underway for designing the .alignment of channels to reduce energy-consuming bends and turns for vessels. A report on the Corps administration of ocean-dredged material was prepared and submitted to the London Dumping Convention in compliance with the International Treaty as specified in PL 95-254. Enviromental and Economic Issues The Joint Corps/EPA program for designating disposals of ocean sites for priority harbors continued. Negotiations for the final designation of the remaining 74 interim sites were started. Discussions and conferences with experts in dredging and environmental conditions to coordinate and manage disposal problems have been conducted. In another area of major concern, extensive negotiations were held with EPA to develop more acceptable criteria to comply with the Ocean Dumping Act and include economic considerations. Kepone deposits were successfully removed from the channel in the James River, VA, with infinitesimal dissipation by utilizing special attachments to dustpan and cutterhead dredges. Responding to National Emergencies The Corps continuously responds to dredging requirements with its limited fleet and with contracted dredges from private industry to mitigate the effects of spring flooding, hurricanes, or increased shoaling in navigational channels and harbors. Management of Resources Procedures have been developed to streamline and simplify the budgeting, reporting, and justifying processes connected with dredging. A plan for initiating a National Dredging Data Management System (NADDAMS) was initiated for improving stewardship over resources as well as to monitor and ensure efficient application of dredging and plant. When fully implemented during FY 83, the plan will also provide better reporting and more timely statistics for the Corps, Administration, and the Congress. Technical Support to Other Nations A study and recommedations on environmental problems related to mining metal from the bottom of the Red Sea was provided to the Saudi-Sudanese Red Sea Commission. A shoaling study, initial hydrographic survey, and monitoring were provided for deepening the access to the Port of Owendo, Gabon. A staff member assisted with the contracting, acquisitioning, fendering, and using of a U. S. Army barge in Jamaica. An exchange of technical practices in the management of sediments containing toxic substances was conducted under e Memorandum of Understanding with a Japanese delegation in New York. The first formal meeting with the Dutch for an exchange of dredging technology was conducted under a Memorandum of Understanding in New Orleans. Institute for Water Resources Organization and Functions The Institute for Water Resources (IWR), established in 1969, consists of four units: the Research Division, the Policy Division, the Navigation Analysis Center, and the Special Studies Division. IWR's mission includes performing planning and engineering research, conducting policy studies, managing data systems for planning and operations, serving as a center of expertise on water transportation, conducting national and special studies, presenting training on water resources planning and operations, and providing technical assistance on water resource related problems and studies confronting OCE, division and district offices, other government agencies, and foreign nations. Research In the Research Division work included development of a water demand forecasting model for use in water supply and conservation studies, development of a recreation evaluation manual, a methodology for determining the 53-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 benefits associated with the reduction of unemployment due to water project construction, and regional development benefits estimating models. Work continued in the areas of forecasting, lock congestion effects, and flood damage assesment techniques. Policy Studies The Policy Studies Division provides analysis and decision support on critical policy issues for the use of the Director of Civil Works. Fiscal year 1982 policy analysis included studies of permit enforcement, technical and planning assistance on flood damage reduction, project cost sharing, instream flow needs, nonstructural flood management measures and the effects ofthe public investment discount rate on the civil works program. Missionoriented studies included assessments of the Federal interest, various water programs, and an assessment of municipal and industrial water supply needs. Among studies involving evaluation of programs and methods were projects on the provision of planning information to non-Federal interests, the evaluation of unquantifiable amenities and the creation of a database on existing and potential hydropower projects. Navigation Analysis The Navigation Analysis Center (NAC) was transferred to the Institute in FY 1980 from the Office of the Chief of Engineers. The NAC provides support to Corps planners including development and maintenance of transportation planning data bases on waterway carriers, all transportation modes, and commodity movements; development of analytical capabilities; and dissemination of technical information and advice with regard to use of navigation data and analytical techniques. Because much of this support addresses economic issues, the NAC is a resource for benefit-cost, methodologies and related data bases such as the lock Performance Monitoring System (PMS). The PMS consists of a data base that contains information on Corps locks on the inland waterways. This data base enables Corps personnel to study lock operation and performance; to determine methods, benefits, and costs of improving the waterway system; to monitor traffic and commodites moving on the inland waterways; and to monitor conditions that could affect traffic flow. Special Studies The Special Studies Division is responsible for carrying out the National Waterways Study, the National Hydropower Study and a wide variety of studies assigned by the Office of the Chief of Engineers or requested by other Corps offices. The National Waterways Study is the first national study of water transportation since 1908. The study has produced an assessment of the capability of the nation's waterways to meet projected national needs including defense emergencies. The final report has been completed and is under preparation for transmittal to Congress in early 1983. The National Hydropower Study was completed in FY 1982. The study contains a comprehensive assessment of the nation's hydroelectric power potential and identifies about 2000 sites that warrant further detailed study for possible development. About 1500 of these sites are at existing dams, and the remaining 500 are undeveloped sites requiring a new dam or other structure. The 23 volume report is being prepared for final printing and the report will be presented to Congress early in FY 1983. The special studies program provides assistance to the Office of Chief of Engineers and to Corps field offices on projects which require both state of the art procedures and knowledge of policy sensitive issues. The projects cover many aspects of planning studies, advanced engineering and design studies, and construction-operation functions of the Corps. They also deal with navigation, hydroelectric, flood control, water supply, recreation, and fish and wildlife functional areas of the Corps program. Finally, IWR expertise in organizational effectiveness and management studies was utilized to support various OCE and field activities. Twenty five projects amounting to about $650,000 were conducted in 1982 including the following: Staff support to the Blue Ribbon Panels on Engineering Capability and Construction Quality, Regional Development Benefits of the Coosa River Navigation Project, Planner Training Study, impact of the Tennessee- Tombigbee Navigation Project on Railroads for the Enviromental Impact Assessment, Support of OCE Deep and Shallow Draft User Charge Analysis; Analysis of Impacts of Changes in the Discount Rate; Environmental Quality Tradeoff Analysis, organization of a workshop for Corps economists and social scientists and support to a National Regulatory Conference. These examples show the broad range of activities and organizations in the Corps supported by IWR. IWR's special study capability is maintained by its continued involvement in policy and research studies. The Institutes' training program provides a means for transferring policy sensitive technical information and state-of-the-art techniques to various Corps users. Two new courses, Enviromental Quality Planning and Economic Analysis for Water Resources Planning, were initiated during the year. Training also offers the opportunity for interaction between IWR and other Corps personnel. During FY 1982 approximately 400 persons attended ten sessions of eight training courses. 53-4 APPENDIX A FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 Permanent Pool Characteristics Cal. Year Total (Acreage)1 of Dam Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) Alaska Chena River Lakes Yukon - Kuskokwim Chena River Fairbanks 1981 2,000 NPP FR Earth Arizona Adobe Alamo Cane Buttes Painted Rock Dreamy Draw Tat Momolikot Whitlow Ranch Arkansas Blue Mountain DeQueen Dierks Gillham Millwood Nimrod California Gila Colorado Gila Gilla Gila Gila Gila Arkansas Red Red Red Red Arkansas Skunk Creek Phoenix Bill Williams River Wenden Cane Creek Phoenix Gila River Gila Bend Dreamy Draw Phoenix Santa Rosa Wash Casa Grande Queen Creek Superior Petit Jean River Paris Rolling Fork River DeQueen Saline River Dierks Cassatot River Gillham Little River Ashdown Fourche La Fave Riv. Plainview 1982 18,350 NPP FR Earth 1968 1,046,310 560 FRWX Earth 1979 46,600 NPP FRX Earth 1959 2,491,700 NPP FRWX Earth 1973 317 NPP FRX Earth 1974 198,550 NPP FWX Earth 1960 35,590 NPP FX Earth 50 40,200 109 2,275 283 975 109 2,275 181 4,780 50 448 75.5 12,500 149 837 1947 257,900 2,910 FRWX Earth 115 2,800 1977 136,100 1,680 FSQRW Earth 160 2,360 1975 96,800 1,360 FSRAW Earth & Rock 153 2,500 1975 221,800 1,370 FSQW Earth & Rock 160 1,750 1966 1,854,930 29,200 FSW Earth 88 17,554 1942 336,010 3,550 FSWX Concrete 97 1,012 Black Butte Sacramento Stony Creek Orland Brea Santa Ana Brea Creek Fullerton Buchanan Dam-H.V. Eastman Lake San Joaquin Chowchilla River Chowchilla Carbon Canyon Santa Ana Carbon Canyon Creek Brea Coyote Valley Russian East Fork Russian Riv. Ukiah Farmington San Joaquin Littlejohn Creek Farmington Fullerton Santa Ana East Fullerton Creek Fullerton Hansen Los Angeles Big Tujunga Wash Los Angeles Harry L. Englebright Sacremento Yuba River Marysville 1963 160,000 770 FIRX Earth ' 1942 4,010 NPP FRX Earth 156 2,970 87 1,765 1975 150,000 470 FIRW Earth & Rock 205.5 1,800 1961 6,610 NPP FRX Earth 99 2,610 1959 122,500 1,700 FRX Earth 160 3,500 1962 52,000 NPP F Earth 60 7,800 1941 760 NPP FRX Earth 46 575 1940 26,090 120 FRWX Earth 97 10,475 1941 69,000 400 DR Concrete 280 1,142 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 Permanent Pool Characteristics Cal. Year Total (Acreage)' of Dam Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.). Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) Calif (cont.) Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake Isballa Lopez Martis Creek Merced County Stream Group Bear Burns Mariposa Owens Mojave River New Hogan North Fork Pine Flat Prado San Antonio . Santa Fe S Sepulveda Success Terminus Whittier Narrows San Juoquin Fresno River San Juaquin Kern River Los Angeles Pacoima Wash Sacramento Martis Creek San Joaquin Bear Creek San Joaquin Burns Creek San Joaquin Mariposa Creek San Joaquin Owens Creek Mojave Mojave San Joaquin Calveras Sacramento American River San Joaquin Kings River Santa Ana Santa Ana River Santa Ana San Antonio Creek San Gabriel San Gabriel River Los Angeles Los Angeles River San Joaquin Tule River San Joaquin Kaweah River San Gabriel San Gabriel River and Rio Hondo Madera Bakersfield San Fernando Reno Merced Merced Merced Merced Victorville Valley Springs Auburn Piedra Corona Upland Duarte Van Nuys Porterville Visalia El Monte 1975 90,000 1953 570,000 1954 440 1971 20,400 1954 1950 1948 1949 1971 1963 1939 1954 1941 1956 1948 1941 1960 1961 1957 7,700 7,000 15,000 3,600 89,670 325,000 14,700 1,000,000 196,240 7,650 32,640 17,400 85,000 150,000 5,000 FIRW 1,850 FIRW NPP FX 71 FSR NPP F NPP F NPP F NPP F NPP FRWX 715 FIRX 280 DR NPP FIRX NPP FRX NPP FX NPP FRX NPP FRX 400 FIRX 345 FIRX 35,150 NPP FRWX Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth & Rock Concrete Concrete Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Colorado Bear Creek Chatfield Cherry Creek John Martin Trinidad Connecticut Black Rock Colebrook River Hancock Brook Hop Brook Mansfield Hollow Northfield Brook Thomaston West Thompson Missouri Missouri Missouri Arkansas Arkansas Bear Creek South Platte River Cherry Creek Arkansas River Purgatoire River Housatonic Branch Brook Connecticut West Branch, Farmington River Housatonic Hancock Brook Housatonic Hop Brook Thames Natchaug River Thames Northfield Brook Housatonic Naugatuck River Thames Quinebaug Denver Denver Denver Lamar Trinidad Thomaston Riverton Plymouth Middlebury Willimantic Thomaston Thomaston Thompson 1978 28,560 1974 235,000 1950 93,920 1948 615,500 1977 123,500 1970 1969 1960 1968 1952 1965 1960 1965 8,700 97,700 4,030 6,970 52,000 2,430 42,000 26,800 105 FRX 1,479 FRX 852 FRX NPP FIRXW 280 FIRXW 20 FR 760 FRSX 40 FRW 21 FR 450 FRW 8 FRW NPP F 200 FRW Earth Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 163 5,730 185 4,952 50 1,300 113 2,670 92 1,830 55 4,075 88 1,330 75 790M 200 2,200 210 1,960 155 620 429 1,820 106 2,280 160 3,850 92 23,800 57 15,444 142 3,490 250 2,375 56 16,960 280 5,300 148 12,500 141 14,300 118 13,780 200 6,860 154 933 223 1,300 57 630 97 520 68 12,420 118 810 142 2,000 70 2,550 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 Permanent Pool Characteristics Cal. Year Total (Acreage)1 of Dam Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) Idaho Lucky Peak Illinois Carlyle Farmdale Fondulac Shelbyville Rend Lake Indiana Brookville Cagles Mill Cecil M. Harden w Huntington Mississinewa Monroe Patoka Salamonie Columbia Boise River Upper Mississippi Kaskaskia River Upper Mississippi Farm Creek Upper Mississippi Fondulac Creek Upper Mississippi Kaskaskia River Upper Mississippi Big Muddy River Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio East Fork of Whitewater River Mill Creek Raccoon Creek Wabash River Mississinewa Salt Creek Patoka River Salamonie Iowa Caralville Rathbun Red Rock Saylorville Kansas Upper Mississippi Iowa River Missouri Chariton River Upper Mississippi Des Moines River Upper Mississippi Des Moines River Clinton Missouri Council Grove Arkansas El Dorado Arkansas Elk City Arkansas Fall River Arkansas Hillsdale Missouri John Redmond Arkansas Kanopolis Missouri Marion Arkansas Melvern Missouri Milford Missouri Pearson Skubitz Big Hill Arkansas Perry Missouri Romona Missouri Toronto Arkansas Wakarusa River Grand (Neosho) Walnut River Elk River Fall River Big Bull Creek Grand (Neosho) Smoky Hill River Cottonwood River Marais Des Cygnes Republican River Big Hill Creek Delaware River 110 Mile Creek Verdigris River Boise 1956 306,000 2,850 FIR Carlyle East Peoria East Peoria Shelbyville Benton Brookeville Terre Haute Rockville Huntington Peru Harrodsburg Ellsworth Wabash Iowa City Centerville Des Moines Des Moines Lawrence Council Grove El Dorado Independence Fall River Kansas City Burlington Salina Marion Melvern Junction City Cherryvale Perry Pomona Toronto 1967 1951 1951 1970 1970 1974 1952 1960 1969 1967 1964 1978 1966 Earth 983,000 26,000 FSNRWA Earth 15,500 NPP F Earth 3,780 NPP F Earth 684,000 11,100 FSNRW Earth 294,000 18,900 FQRSW Earth 250 1,700 67 6,570 80 1,275 67 1,000 108 3,000 54 10,600 359,600 2,250 FRSW Earth & Rock 182 3,000 228,120 1,400 FRX Earth 150 950 132,800 1,100 FRX Earth 117 1,790 153,100 500 FRW Earth 91 5,332 368,400 1,100 FRW Earth 137 8,100 441,000 3,280 FARS Earth 93 1,400 301,600 2,010 FRSQW Earth & Rock 84 1,550 263,600 976 FRW Earth 133 6,100 1958 492,000 1,820 FARW Earth 1969 552,000 11,000 FNRWXQ Earth 1969 1,830,000 8,950 FARWQ Earth 1975 602,000 74,000 FARWQ Earth 1977 1964 1981 1966 1949 1981 1964 1948 1968 1972 1965 1981 1969 1963 1960 100 1,400 86 10,600 110 5,676 125 6,750 397,200 7,000 FSWAXR Earth 114 9,250 112,265 3,235 FSQR Earth 96 6,500 236,200 8,000 FSQR Earth 99 20,930 284,300 4,450 FSQ Earth 107 4,840 256,400 2,350 FSX Earth 94 6,015 160,000 4,580 FSQR Earth 75 11,600 630,250 9,280 FSQR Earth 86.5 21,790 450,000 3,815 FRWX Earth 131 15,360 143,850 6,200 FRQS Earth 67 8,375 363,000 6,930 FRQWX Earth 98 9,700 1,160,000 15,600 FRSXWQ Earth & Rock 126 6,300 40,600 1,240 FSR Earth 83 3,870 770,000 12,200 FRSXW Earth & Rock 95 7,750 230,000 4,000 FRSWXQ Earth & Rock 85 7,750 200,835 2,657 FX Earth 90 4,712 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 Permanent Pool Characteristics Cal. Year Total (Acreage) of Dam Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) Tuttle Creek Wilson Kentucky Barren River Buckhorn Carr Fork Cave Run Dewey Fishtrap Grayson Green River Martins Fork Nolin Rough River Louisiana Bayou Bodcau Caddo Lake Wallace Lake Maryland Bloomington Lake Massachusetts Barre Falls Birch Hill Buffumville Conant Brook East Brimfield Hodges Village Knightville Littleville Tully West Hill Westville Missouri Missouri Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Cumberland Ohio Ohio Red Red Red Potomac Connecticut Connecticut Thames Connecticut Connecticut connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Blackstone Thames Big Blue River Saline River Barren River Middle Fork of Kentucky River Carr Fork Licking River Johns Creek Levisa Fork, Big Sandy River Little Sandy Green River Martins Fork Nolin River Rough River Bayou Bodcau Cypress Bayou Cypress Bayou North Branch Potomac River Ware River Millers Rivet Little River Conant Brook Quinebaug River French River Westfield River Middle Branch, Westfield River Tully River West River Quinebaug River Manhattan Wilson Glasgow Buckhorn Hazard Farmers Paintaille Pikeville Grayson Campbellsville Harlan Kyrock Leitchfield Shreveport Shreveport Shreveport Barnum Barre So. Royalston Charlton Monson Fiskdale Oxford Huntington 1962 2,346,000 15,800 FRWXQAN Earth & Rock 157 7,500 1964 776,000 9,000 FIRWXNA Earth 160 5,600 1964 815,200 4,340 FARS 1960 168,000 1976 47,700 1974 614,100 1949 93,000 1968 1967 1969 1978 1963 1958 164,360 118,990 723,200 21,000 609,400 334,400 1949 357,300 1971 175,00 1946 88,300 1981 130,900 1958 1941 1958 1966 1960 1959 1941 Chester 1965 Fryville 1949 Uxbridge 1960 Sturbridge 1961 24,000 49,900 12,700 3,740 30,000 12,800 49,000 32,400 22,000 12,300 11,100 550 FR 530 FQRW 6,790 FQRW 1,100 FARW 569 FARW 1,050 FORW 5,070 FRSQW 578 FQ 2,890 FAR 2,180 FRX NPP FRW 32,700 NFRS 2,300 FR 645 FQRS NPP FRW NPP FRW 200 FRW NPP F 360 FRW NPP FRW NPP FRW 275 FRWS 300 FRW NPP FRW 23 FRW Earth 146 3,970 Earth 162 1,020 Earth & Rock 130 720 Earth & Rock 148 2,740 Earth 118 913 Rock 195 1,100 Earth & Rock 120 1,460 Earth & Rock 142 2,350 Concrete 97 574 Earth & Rock 174 990 Earth & Rock 124 1,530 Earth 76 12,850 Concrete & Earth 3,600 Earth 48 4,934 Earth & Rock 296 2,130 Earth & Rock 62 885 Earth & Rock 56 1,400 Earth & Rock 66 3,255 Earth & Rock 85 1,050 Earth & Rock 55 520H Earth & Rock 55 2,140 Earth & Rock 160 1,200 Earth & Rock 164 1,360 Earth & Rock 62 1,570 Earth & Rock 51 2,400 Earth & Rock 78 560 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 Permanent Pool Characteristics Cal. Year Total (Acreage)' of Dam Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) Minnesota Big Stone Lake- Whetstone River Lac Qui Parle Chippewa River Lac Qui Parle Marsh Lake Orwell Red Lake Mississippi Arkabutla Lake Enid Lake Grenada Lake n' Okatibbee Sardis Lake Upper Mississippi Minnesota River Upper Mississippi Chippewa River Upper Mississippi Minnesota River Upper Mississippi Minnesota River Red River of the North Otter Tail River Red River of the North Red Lake River Lower Mississippi Coldwater River Lower Mississippi Yocona River Lower Mississippi Yalobusha River Pascagoula Okatibbee Creek Lower Mississippi Little Tallahatchie River Ortonville Montevideo Montevideo Montevideo Fergus Falls Red River Arkabutla Enid Grenada Meridian Sardis 1973 45,000 12,700 FRW 1950 (2) 1950 122,800 1950 35,000 1953 14,100 NPP FRWX 6,500 FRWX 5,100 FRWX 210 FARS Earth Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock 25 13,700 23.3 17,975 21 4,100 19.5 11,800 Earth & Rock 47 1,355 1951 2,680,000 279,000 FARSX Earth & Rock 1943 525,300 1951 660,000 1954 1,337,400 1969 142,400 5,100 FRSW 6,100 FRSW 9,800 FRSW 1,280 FQSR 1940 1,570,000 10,700 FRSW 15.5 36,500 Earth & Rock 95 11,500 Earth & Rock 99 8,400 Earth & Rock 102 13,900 Earth 67 6,543 Earth & Rock 117 15,300 Missouri Clearwater Long Branch Pomme de Terre Smithville Wappapello Nebraska White Black River Piedmont Grande Chariton Little Chariton Macon Missouri Pomme de Terre River Hermitage Missouri Little Platte River Smithville Lower Mississippi St. Francis River Wappapello 1948 1980 1961 1982 1941 413,700 65,000 650,000 246,500 613,200 1,630 FRWX Earth & Rock 154 4,225 2,430 FRSQW Earth 71 3,800 7,820 FRWX Earth & Rock 155 4,630 7,190 FSQR Earth 95 4,200 4,100 FR Earth & Rock 109 2,700 Harlan County Papillion Creek and Tributaries: Glenn Cunningham (Site 11) Standing Bear Lake (Site 16) Missouri Missouri Missouri Salt Creek & Tributaries Olive Creek (Site 2) Missouri Bluestem (Site 4) Missouri Wagon Train (Site 8) Missouri Stagecoach (Site 9) Missouri Yankee Hill (Site 10) Missouri Connestoga (Site 12) Missouri Twin Lake (Site 13) Missouri Republican River Knight Creek Trib of Big Pipillion Creek Salt Creek Salt Creek Salt Creek Salt Creek Salt Creek Salt Creek Salt Creek Republican City Omaha Omaha Kramer Sprague Holland Hickman Denton Denton Pleasantdale 1952 850,000 13,600 FIRWX Earth & Rock 107 11,827 1975 1973 1964 1963 1963 1964 1966 1964 1966 17,900 5,200 5,470 10,260 9,280 6,640 7,560 10,640 8,080 392 FWRX Earth 137 FRX Earth 174 FR 315 FR 303 FR 196 FR 208 FR 230 FR 255 FR 67 1,940 70 1,460 45 3,020 57 2,760 52 1,650 48 2,250 52 3,100 63 3,000 58 2,075 Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 Permanent Pool Characteristics Cal. Year Total (Acreage) 1 of Dam Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) Pawnee (Site 14) Missouri Holmes Lake (Site 17) Missouri Branched Oak (Site 18) Missouri Salt Creek Antelope Creek Oak Creek Emerald Lincoln Raymond 1965 1963 1968 29,520 728 FR 6,510 100 FR 97,560 1,780 FR Earth Earth Earth New Hampshire Blackwater Merrimack Edward MacDowell Merrimack Blackwater River Nubanusit Brook Franklin Falls Merrimack Pemigewasset River Hopkinton-Everett Merrimack Contoocook River Merrimack Piscataquog River Otter Brook Connecticut Otter Brook Surry Mountain Connecticut Ashuelot River Nevada Mathews Canyon Pine Canyon New Mexico Abiquiu Cochiti Conchas Colorado Colorado Rio Grande Rio Grande Arkansas Galisteo Rio Grande Jemez Canyon Rio Grande Two Rivers: Diamond "A" Dam Rio Grande Rocky Dam Rio Grande Santa Rosa Dam & Reservoir Pecos Mathews Canyon Pine Canyon Rio Chama Rio Grande Canadian River Galisteo Creek Jamex River Rio Hondo Rocky Arroyo Pecos New York Almond Arkport East Sidney Mount Morris Whitney Point North Carolina Susquehanna Canacadea Creek Susquehanna Canisteo Creek Susquehanna Ouleout Creek Genesee Genesee River Susquehanna Otselic River Webster West Perterborough Franklin West Hopkinton East Weare Keene Keene Caliente Caliente Abiquiu Pena Blanca Tucumcari Albuquerque BernalilloQ Roswell Santa Rosa Hornell Hornell Sidney Mount Morris Binghamton 1941 46,000 1950 12,800 1943 154,000 1962 71,500 1962 87,500 1958 18,300 1941 32,500 1957 1957 NPP FRW NPP FRW NPP FRW 200 FRW 120 FRW 85 FRW 265 FRW 6,270 NPP FX 7,750 NPP FX Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 1963 1,212,000 NPP FR Earth 1975 596,300 1,064 FRWX Earth 1939 529,000 3,020 FIRX Concrete & Earth 1970 89,000 NPP FRX Earth 1953 106,100 286 FX Earth 1963 168,000 NPP F Earth 1979 447,000 NPP FIRX Earth 1949 14,640 124 FRW Earth 1939 7,950 NPP F Earth 1950 33,550 210 FRW Concrete & Earth 1952 337,000 170 FR Concrete 1942 86,440 1,200 FRW Earth Wilkesboro 1963 153,000 1,470 FARSX Earth 65 5,000 55 7,700 70 5,200 75 1,150 67 1,030 140 1,740 76 790 115 2,000 33 1,288 86 1,670 71 800 92 884 325 1,540 251 28,815 200 14,840 158 2,820 136 780 98 4,885 118 2,940 212 1,950 90 1,260 113 1,200 130 2,010 210 1,028 95 4,900 148 1,740 W.(r Kerr ScottYaknPeDe adi APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 Permanent Pool Characteristics Cal. Year Total (Acreage)' of Dam Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) North Dakota Baldhill Bowman-Haley Homme Pipestem Ohio Red River of the North Missouri Red River of the North James River Alum Creek Ohio Berlin Ohio Caesar Creek Ohio Clarence J. Brown Ohio Deer Creek Ohio S Delaware Ohio Dillon Ohio Michael J. Kirwan Ohio Mosquito Creek Ohio Muskingum River Reservoirs Atwood Ohio Beach City Ohio Bolivar Ohio Charles Mill Ohio Clendening Ohio Dover Ohio Leesville Ohio Mohawk Ohio Mohicanville Ohio Piedmont Ohio Pleasant Hill Ohio Senecaville Ohio Tappan Ohio Wills Creek Ohio North Branch Kokosing River Lake Ohio Paint Creek Ohio Tom Jenkins Ohio West Fork Mill Creek Ohio William H. Harsha Ohio Sheyenne River North Fork, Grand River South Branch of Park River Pipestem Creek Alum Creek Mahoning River Caesar Creek Buck Creek Deer Creek Olentangy River Licking River West Branch, Mahoning River Mosquito Creek Indian Fork Sugar Creek Sandy Creek Black Fork Brushy Fork Tuscarawas River McGuire Creek Walhonding River Lake Fork Stillwater Creek Clear Fork Seneca Rork Little Stillwater Creek Wills Creek North Branch of Kokosing River Paint Creek East Branch, Sunday Creek Mill Creek Little Miami River Valley City Haley Park River Jamestown Africa Deerfield Wilmington Springfield New Holland Delaware Zanesville Newton Falls Cortland New Cumberland Beach City Bolivar Muffin Tippecanoe Dover Leesville Nellie Mohicanville Piedmont Perrysville Senecaville Tappan Conesville Fredericktown New Petersburg Gloucester Mount Healthy Williamsburg 1950 70,000 1967 92,980 1951 3,650 1974 146,880 1975 1943 1978 1974 1968 1951 1961 1966 1944 1937 1937 1938 1936 1937 1938 1937 1937 1936 1937 1938 1937 1936 1937 1973 1972 1951 1952 1978 134,800 91,200 242,200 63,700 102,500 132,000 273,000 78,700 104,100 49,700 71,700 149,600 88,000 54,000 203,000 37,400 285,000 102,000 65,000 87,700 88,500 61,600 196,000 14,900 145,000 26,900 11,380 284,500 325 FARS Earth 1,750 FSRWX Earth 51 FARS Earth 885 FRWX Earth 61 1,650 79 5,730 67 865 108 4,000 348 FRSW Concrete & Earth 93 10,000 240 FARSWQ Concrete & Earth 96 5,750 13,300 FRSQW Earth & Rock 165 2,750 1,010 FQRW Earth & Rock 72 6,620 727 FRW Earth 93 3,860 950 FARWX Earth 92 18,600 1,325 FRWX Earth 118 1,400 580 FAQRSW Earth 83 9,900 700 FARSWQ Earth 47 5,650 1,540 FRX Earth 65 3,700 420 FRX Earth 64 5,600 NPP FR Earth 87 6,300 1,350 FRX Earth 48 1,390 1,800 FRX Earth 64 950 350 FRX Concrete 83 824 1,000 FRX Earth 74 1,694 NPP FR Earth 111 2,330 NPP FR Earth 46 1,220 2,270 FRX Earth 56 1,750 850 FRX Earth 113 775 3,550 FRSX Earth 45 2,350 2,350 FRX Earth 52 1,550 900 FRX Earth 87 1,950 98 FRW Earth 71 1,400 710 FRSQW Earth & Rock 118 700 394 FRSWX Concrete 84 944 200 FRX Earth 100 1,100 18,760 FRSQW Earth 200 1,450 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 Permanent Pool Characteristics Cal. Year Total (Acreage) of Dam Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) Oklahoma Birch Canton Fort Supply Great Salt Plains Heyburn Hugo Hulah Kaw Oologah Optima Pine Creek Waurika Wister Oregon Applegate Blue River Cottage Grove Dorena Fall Creek Fern Ridge Pennalyvania Alvin R. Bush Aylesworth Creek Beltzville Blue Marsh Conemaugh Cowanesque Crooked Creek Curwenville East Branch, Clarion Rivea FosterJoseph Sayers Arkansas ASrkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Red Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Red Red Arkansas Brich Creek Barnsdall North Canadian River Canton Wolf Creek Woodward Salt Fork, Arkansas River Cherokee Polecat Creek Sapulpa Kiamichi River Hugo Caney River Bartlesville Arkansas River Ponca City Verdigris River Claremore North Canadian River Hardesty Little River WrightCity Beaver Creek Waurika Poteau River Wister Rogue River Applegate River Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Susqu Susqu Delay Delay Ohio uehanna uehanna rare ware Blue River Coast Fork, Willamette River Row River Middle Fork, Willamette River Long Tom River Kettle Creek Aylesworth Creek Pohopoco Tulephocken Conemaugh River Medford Blue River Cottage Grove Cottage Grove Eugene Eugene Renovo East Jermyn Lehighton Reading Saltsburg Susquehanna Cowanesque River Lawrenceville Ohio Crooked Creek Ford City Susquehanna RiverWest Branch, Susquehanna River Clearfield rOhio East Branch, Clarion River Wilcox Susquehanna Bald Eagle Creek Blanchard 1977 58,200 1948 388,110 1942 100,700 1941 1950 1974 1950 1976 1963 1978 1969 1977 1949 1981 1968 1942 1949 271,400 55,030 966,700 289,000 1,348,000 1,519,000 229,500 465,780 343,500 427,900 82,000 85,000 1,137 7,401 1,820 8,690 920 13,250 3,570 17,040 29,460 5,340 3,750 10,100 4,000 FSQRW Earth FSI Earth FSX Earth FRWX Earth FRWXS Earth FSQRW Earth FSAX Earth FSQRW Earth FSN Earth FSRW Earth FSQW Earth FISQWR Earth FSAX Earth 97 3,193 73 15,140 85 12,225 68 6,010 89 2,920 101 10,200 94 5,200 125 9,466 137 4,000 120 15,200 124 22,470 106 16,600 99 5,700 988 AFIQRSW Gravel Embankment 242 1,300 975 FINR Earth 319 1,329 30,060 1,155 FINR Concrete & Earth 70,500 1,885 FINR Concrete & Earth 1965 115,000 1,865 FINR Rockfill & Concrete 1941 110,000 10,305 FINR Rockfill & Concrete 1962 1970 1971 1979 1952 1980 1940 75,000 1,760 68,250 500,000 274,000 89,000 93,900 1965 124,200 1952 84,300 1969 99,000 160 FRW Earth & Rock NPP F Earth & Rock 947 FQRSW Earth & Rock 22,900 FAQRS Earth 300 F Concrete & Earth 410 FR Earth & Rock 350 FRW Earth 790 FR Earth 114 2,110 145 3,352 193 5,100 49 6,624 165 1,350 90 1,270 170 4,200 98 1,775 137 1,265 151 3,100 143 1,480 131 2,850 90 FARQW Earth 184 1,725 1,730 FRW Earth 100 6,835 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 Permanent Pool Characteristics Cal. Year Total (Acreage)' of Dam Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) Francis E. Walter (Bear Creek) Gen. Edgar Jadwin Indian Rock Kinzua Loyalhanna Delaware Delaware Susquehanna Ohio Ohio 1Mahining Creek Ohio Prompton Delaware Raystown Susquehanna Shenango Ohio Stillwater Susquehanna Tioga-Hammond Lakes Susquehanna Tionesta Ohio Union City Ohio C Woodcock Creek Ohio Youghiogheny River Ohio South Dakota Cold Brook Missouri Cottonwood Springs Missouri Lake Traverse: Reservation Control Red River of Dam the North White Rock Red River of the North Texas Addicks Bardwell Barker Belton Benbrook San Jacinto Trinity San Jacinto Brazos Trinity FCearnryeolnls Gaudalup Bridge Dam - Lake O' the Pines Red Granger Dam and Lake Brazos Grapevine Trinity Hords Creek Colorado Lake Kemp Red e Lehigh River Dyberry Creek Codorus Creek Allegheny River Loyalhanna Creek Mahoning Creek Lackawaxen River Raystown Branch, Juniata River Shenanago River Lackawanna River Tioga River Crooked Creek Tionesta Creek French Creek French Creek Youghiogheny River Cold Brook Cottonwood Springs Creek Bois de Sioux River Bois de Sioux River South Mayde Creek Waxahachie Creek Buffalo Bayou Leon River Clear Fork, Trinity River Guadalupe Cypress Creek San Gabriel River Denton Creek Hords Creek Wichita River Wilkes-Barre Honesdale York Warren Saltburg New Bethlehem Honesdale Huntingdon Sharpsville Forest City Tioga Tioga Tionesta Union City Meadville Confluence Hot Springs Hot Springs Wheaton Wheaton Addicks Ennis Barker Belton Fort Worth New Braunfels Jefferson Granger Grapevine Coleman Wichita Falls 1961 1959 1942 1965 1942 1941 1960 1973 1966 1960 1979 1979 1940 1970 1973 1943 1953 1970 110,000 24,500 28,000 1,180,000 95,300 74,200 52,000 762,000 191,400 12,000 62,000 63,000 133,400 47,640 20,000 254,000 90 FNRW Rockfill NPP F Earth NPP FRW Earth 1,900 PFAQRW Concrete & Earth 210 FRW Concrete & Earth 170 FRW Concrete 290 FNRW Earth 8,300 1,910 85 470 680 480 NPP 118 450 7,200 8,400 FRW Earth & Rock FAQRW Concrete FS Earth FR Earth & Rock FR Earth & Rock FRW Earth F Earth FQRAW Earth FARWQ Earth 36 FRWX Earth 41 FRWX Earth 1941 164,500 10,925 FRX Earth 1941 85,000 6,500 FRX Earth 1948 204,500 1965 140,000 1945 207,000 1954 1,097,600 NPP 3,570 NPP 12,300 FX Earth FRSX Earth FX Earth FIRSX Earth 1952 258,600 3,770 FNRXA Earth 1964 740,900 8,240 FRSX Earth 1959 1980 1952 1948 1972 842,100 244,200 435,500 25,310 502,900 18,700 4,400 7,380 510 15,590 FRS Earth FRSWX Earth FNRSXA Earth FARSX Earth FX Earth & Rock 263 3,500 109 1,255 83 1,000 177 1,877 144 960 162 926 140 1,230 225 1,700 68 720 77 1,700 140 2,738 122 6,000 154 1,050 88 1,420 90 4,650 184 1,610 127 925 123 1,190 14 9,100 16 14,400 49 61,166 82 15,400 37 72,844 192 5,524 130 9,130 224 6,830 97 10,600 115 16,320 137 12,850 91 6,800 115 8,890 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 Permanent Pool Characteristics Cal. Year Total (Acreage)' of Dam Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) Lavon Trinity Lewisville Trinity Navarro Mills Trinity North San Gabriel Dam, Lake GeorgetownBrazos 0. C. Fisher Colorado Pat Mayse Red Proctor Brazos Somerville Brazos Stillhouse Hollow Brazos Waco Brazos Wright Patman Red Vermont 0 Ball Mountain Connecticut North Hartland Connecticut North Springfield Connecticut Townshend Connecticut Union Village Connecticut East Fork, Trinity River Elm Fork, Trinity River Richland Creek Fort Wroth Lewisville Corsicana North Fork, San Gabriel River Georgetown North Concho River San Angelo Sanders Creek Paris Leon River Comanche Yegua Creek Somerville Lampasas River Belton Bosque River Waco Sulphur River Texarkana West River Jamaica Ottauguechee River North Hartland Black River Springfield West River Townshend Ompompanoosuc River Union Village 1953 748,200 21,400 FRSX 1954 989,700 23,280 FRSX 1962 212,200 5,070 FRSX 1980 1952 1967 1963 1967 1968 1965 1957 1961 1960 1960 1961 1950 130,800 396,400 189,100 374,200 507,500 630,400 726,400 2,654,300 54,600 71,420 51,067 33,700 38,000 1,310 FRSWX 5,440 FRSX 5,993 FRSX 4,610 FRSX 11,460 FRSX 6,430 FRSX 7,270 FRSX 20,300 FRSX 75 FRW 220 FRW 290 FRW 100 FRW NPP FRW Virginia John W. Flannagan Ohio Gathright Dam & Lake Moomaw James North Fork of Pound Ohio River Washington Howard A. Hanson Green Mill Creek Columbia Mud Mountain Puyallup Wynoochee Chehalis Pound River Jackson North Fork, Pound River Green River Mill Creek White River Wynoochee River Haysi Alleghany Pound Kanaskat Walla Walla Enumclaw Montesano 1963 145,700 1979 1966 123,739 11,293 1961 106,000 1942 8,300 1953 106,000 1972 70,000 310 FAQR 2,532 FQR 106 FR 1,600 FAS 225 FR NPP FR 1,150 FSARI Earth Earth Earth Rock Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Earth & Rock Rock Rock Earth Rock Concrete & Earth 69 9,499 125 32,888 82 7,570 164 6,700 128 40,885 96 7.080 86 13,460 80 26,175 200 15,624 140 24,618 100 18,500 265 915 185 1,520 120 2,940 133 1,700 170 1,100 250 960 257 1,172 122 600 235 675 145 3,200 425 700 177 1,700 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 Permanent Pool Characterisics Cal. Year Total (Acreage) of Dam Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) West Virginia Beech Fork Bluestone Burnsville East Lynn R. D. Bailey Summersville Lake Sutton Tygart River Wisconsin Eau Galle Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Chippewa Beech Fork New River Little Kanawha Twelve Pole Creek Guynabdot River Gauley River Elk River Tygart River Eau Galle Lavalette Hinton Burnsville East Lynn Justice Summersville Sutton Grafton Spring Valley 1977 1952 1977 1970 1979 1965 1960 1938 1969 37,540 631,000 65,400 82,500 203,700 413,800 265,300 287,700 43,600 450 FRW Earth 86 1,080 1,800 FRWX Concrete 180 2,048 550 FQRW Earth & Rock 89 1,400 823 FQRW Earth & Rock 122 650 440 FQRW Earth & Rock 310 1,397 407 FANR Rock 390 2,280 270 FARWX Concrete 220 1,178 620 FNARW Concrete 230 1,921 150 FR Earth 122 1,600 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS CONSTRUCTED OR CONTRIBUTED TO BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUT OPERATED BY OTHERS SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 Permanent Pool Characteristics Cal. Year Total (Acreage)' of Dam Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) Arizona Trilby Wash Detention Basin (McMichen) Gila Trilby Wash Phoenix 1956 19,300 NPP F Earth 34 50,140 California Big Dry Creek San Joaquin Big Dry Creek Camanche2 San Joaquin Mokelumne River Cherry Valley Tuolumne Cherry Creek Del Valle Alameda Arroyo Del Valle Eaton Wash Rio Hondo Eaton Wash S New Bullards Bart Sacramento Yuba River ' New Don Pedros San Joaquin Tuolumne River New Exchequer2 San Joaquin Merced River Oroville2 Sacramento Feather River Tahchevah Creek Whitewater Tahchevah Creek Colorado Fresno Clements Sonora Livermore Pasadena Marysville Modesto Merced Oroville Palm Springs 1948 16,250 NPP F Earth 40 20,038 1963 431,500 NPP FRS Earth & Rock 171 2,450 1956 268,000 475 FS Earth & Rock 315 2,500 1968 77,000 200 FRS Earth 223 880 1937 956 NPP F Sarth 82 1,795 1968 960,000 1,910 FIRPW Concrete 645 2,323 1970 2,030,000 3,520 FISP Earth & Rock 565 1,920 1966 1,026,000 1,900 FIR Rock 480 1,200 1964 3,539,000 5,838 FIRSW Earth 770 6,850 1965 960 NPP F Earth 42 3,610 Pinon Canyon Connecticut Colorado Pinon Canyon Arroyo Trinidad East Branch Housatonic East Branch Naugatuck River Torrington Hall Meadow Brook Housatonic Hall Meadow Brook Torrington Mad River Connecticut Mad River Winchester Sucker Brook Connecticut Sucker Brook Winchester 1964 1964 1962 1963 1970 4,350 NPP FRW 4,350 NPP FR 8,620 NPP F 9,700 10 FR 1,480 NPP F Earth 92 700 Earth 92 100 Earth & Rock 73 1,200 Earth 178 940 Earth 68 1,160 Upper Snake Willow Creek Potomac Savage Idaho Falls Western Port 1979 100,500 1952 20,000 Hannibal 1962 8,700 NPP F Idaho Ririe Maryland Savage River Missouri 364 FIR 360 FRS Earth Earth 184 840 184 1,050 Bear Creek pe issipiBa re Earth 6 ,5 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS CONSTRUCTED OR CONTRIBUTED TO BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUT OPERATED BY OTHERS SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 Permanent Pool Cal. Year Total (Acreage) of Dam Name River Basin Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) New York Onodaga Oswego Onodaga Creek Syracuse 1949 18,200 NPP F Earth 67 1,782 Oklahoma Lugert-Altus' Red North Fork, Red Altus 1948 154,145 6,260 FISR Concrete 98 1,112 Markham Ferry Arkansas Grand (Neosho) River Locust Grove 1964 444,500 10,9008 FRP Concrete & Earth 90 4,494 Pensacola5 Arkansas Grand (Neosho) River Disney 1941 2,197,000 46,5008 FRP Concrete 147 6,565 Utah Big Wash Beaver Big Wash Milford 1961 1,200 NPP F Earth 34 2,814 4 Vermont to East Barre Winooski Jail Branch East Barre 1960 23,550 NPP F Earth & Rock 65 1,460 Fill Waterbury Winooski Waterbury Waterbury 1958 82,100 900 FRH Earth & Rock 158 1,800 Fill Wrightaville Winooski North Branch, Winooski River Wrightsville 1958 36,000 90 FR Earth & Rock 115 1,525 Fill NOMENCLATURE FOR PROJECT FUNCTIONS: A -Low Flow Augmentation D - Debris Control F - Flood Control I - Irrigation N -Navigation P -Power Q -Water Quality Control R - Public Recreation (Annual Attendance exceeding 5,000) S - Water Supply W - Fish and Wildlife (Federal or State) X - Water Conservation and Sedimentation 1Acres of water surface at top of permanent pool. 'Federal Government contributed for flood control storage. 8Cherry Valley Reservoir: Planned and constructed by local interests as initial phase; provided flood control on interim basis. Second and final phase, New Don Pedro Reservoir: Federal Government contributed for flood protection, construction and operation by City and County of San Francisco, and Turlock and Modesto Irrigation Districts. 'Construction by Bureau of Reclamation Participation by Department of the Army to finance flood control portion. 6Construction by Grand River Dam Authorty Participation by Department of the Army to finance flood control portion. eTop of power pool. APPENDIX B FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1982 Fisca Year Project Starte Allenville, Az (Sec 205)............................. .......................... 1981 Alpena, M I (Sec. 14)........................................... ............................. 1982 Alum Creek Lake, OH.................................................................... . 1970 Applegate, OR.................................................................................... 1974 Aquilla Lake, TX ............................................................................. 1977 Arcadia Lake, OK .............................................................................. 1980 Arkansas-Red Basins Chloride Control (Area VIII), OK, TX, and KS (Stage 1).......................................... 1976 B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, NC .............................................. 1967 Bayshore Drive, Valparaiso, FL (Sec 14) ...................................... . 1981 Bear Creek Lake, CO......................................................................... 1973 Beech Fork Lake, W V........................................................................ 1970 Bettendorf, IA .................................................................................... 1982 Big South Fork National River & Recreation Area, KY and TN ........................................................ 1979 Big Stone Lake & Whetstone River, M N and SD ..................................................................................... 1971 Bloomington Lake, M D and W V....................................................... 1971 Brookville Lake, IN ............................................................................ 1966 Brush Bayou, LA ............................................................................... 1977 Buchanan Dam , H.V. Eastm an Lake, CA......................................... 1971 Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX ................................................ . 1956 Bull Run, PA (Sec 205).................................................................... 1979 Burketts Cr, Amory, M S (Sec 205) ................................................... 1982 Burlington, IA .................................................................................... 1982 Burnsville Lake, W V .......................................................................... 1972 Caesar Creek Lake, OH................................................................... 1971 Candy Lake, Ok .............................. ............ ............................. 1976 Carr Fork Lake, KY ....................................................................... 1966 Carolina Beach & Vicinity, NC ....................................................... 1965 Cave Run Lake, KY ........................................................................... 1965 Cayuga Creek, Cheektowaga, NY (Sec 205) ................................. . 1981 Central and Southern, FL ................................................................. 1950 Charles River (Natural Valley Storage), MA ............................... . 1977 Chatfield Lake, CO................................ ........................... 1967 Chena River Lakes, AK................................................................... 1973 Chillicothe, OH ................................................................................ 1971 Clinton Lake, KS............................................................................... 1972 Columbus, NE (Sec 205).................................................................... 1982 Cooper Lake and Channels, TX............................................................1958 Copan Lake, OK................................................................................ 1973 Connecticut River, No. Stratford, NH (Sec 14) ................................. 1981 Corte M adera Creek, CA ................................................................... 1966 Cowanesque Lake, PA ......................................... ............................ 1973 Placed in Useful Operation 1982 1983 1975 1981 1982 1980 1978 1975 1981 1974 1975 1982 1978 1976 1974 1976 1982 1982 1980 Fiscal Year Completed or Scheduled for Completion 1982 1983 1983 1982 1983 1985 1984 1988 1982 1982 1987 1986 1987 1985 1983 1983 1982 1982 Indefinite 1982 1983 1983 1984 1984 Indefinite 1984 1983 1985 1983 1999 1983 1986 1994 1983 1982 1984 Indefinite 1983 1982 Indefinite 1982 lI ed Nature of Project Local protection Local protection Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir Local protection Reservoir Reservoir Local protection Reservoir Local protection Reservoir Reservoir Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir Shore protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Non-structural local protection Reservoir Reservoirs and levee Local protection Reservoir Local protection Reservoir, channel improvement and levees Reservoir Local protection Local protection Reservoir APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1982 Project Cucamonga Creek, CA ...................................................................... Dade County, FL................................. Dayton, KY ......................................................................................... Deep Cr, Edgecombe, NC (Sec 205) ................................................... Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake & Channel, CA ....... .... Duck Creek Channel Improvement, TX............................................ East Brewton, AL (Sec 205) ............................................................. East Lynn Lake, WV .......................................................................... E ast M oline, IL .................................................................................. East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet & Jamaica Bay, NY, Part I.............................................................. East St. Louis and Vicinity, IL ........................................................ El Dorado Lake, KS................................................................... El Paso, TX..... ................. ............................... El Toque Beach, PR (Sec 103)............................................................ Elizabeth, NJ ...................................................................................... Elk Creek Lake, OR................................................................... Evansdale, IA ..................................................................................... E vansville, IN ..................................................................................... Falls Lake, N C .................................................................................... Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, NY............................................ (Remainder)..... .............. ......... ................ Fourm ile Run, V A ............................................................................. Four Rivers Basin, FL ........................................................................ Freeport and Vicinity, TX........................... Fulton, IL ............................................................................................ Gathright Dam and Lake Moormaw, VA.......................................... Genesee River, Amity, NY (Sec 14).................................................. Great Falls, MT....................... ........... Greenville, TX..... ................ ............................. Gypsum, KS (Sec 205) ................................. .............................. Highland Bayou, TX............................... Hillsdale Lake, KS................................ Housatonic River, Pittsfield, MA (Sec 205)....................................... 1-20 Bridge, Pearl River, Jackson, MS (Sec 14) ................................ Indian Bend Wash, AZ .................................................................... Island Ave., Quincy, MA (Sec 14) ..................................................... Joyce Creek, Camden Co, NC (Sec 205) ............................................ Kansas City, KS (1962 Mod.).......................................................... IKaskaskia Island Drainage & Levee Dist, IL................................... Keshequa Creek, NY (Sec 14)........................................................... Lake Pontchartrain, LA.................................................................. Lakeview Lake, TX.................................... ............................... L. Fiscal Year Started 1976 1975 1978 1982 1967 1973 1982 1965 1980 Placed in Useful Operation 1982 1970 1977 1981 1973 1982 1981 1979 1979 1980 1981 1981 1975 1972 1974 1971 1982 1972 1972 1981 1939 1973 1963 1963 1974 1966 1966 1978 1967 1981 1982 1973 1978 1974 1975 1982 1981 1976 1982 1982 1971 1980 1981 1967 1975 - 1Granger Dano & Lake Georgetown-complete FY 83 2South Fork-Construction deferred indefinitely, work on GDM only Fiscal Year Completed or Scheduled for Completion 1985 1982 1984 1983 Indefinite Indefinite 1983 1982 1983 1988 Indefinite 1983 Indefinite 1984 1986 Indefinite 1983 1988 1988 Indefinite Indefinite 1984 1991 1982 1983 1982 1982 1985 1983 1982 1987 1982 1983 1982 1984 1983 1983 Indefinite 1985 1982 Indefinite 1988 Nature of Project Local protection Shore protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection, FP evacuation Reservoir Local protection Beach nourishment Local protection Reservoir Local protection Shore protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1982 Fiscal Year Project Started Larose to Golden Meadow, LA............................................................1972 Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement, TX.......................................................... 1970 Leith Creek, NC (Sec 205) 1981 Levee Unit 5, Wabash River, IN...................................................... 1964 Lewisville Dam, TX........................................................................... 1979 Little Blue River Channel, MO......................................................... 1975 Little Blue River Lakes, MO............................................................. 1978 Long Branch Lake, MO..................................................................... 1973 Lower Columbia River Bank Protection, O R and W A ...................................................................................... 1962 Mankato and N. Mankato, MN......................................................... 1971 Martins Fork Lake, KY..................................................................... 1973 McGee Creek Drainage and Levee Dist., IL...................................... 1979 Mentor Beach Park, OH (Sec 14)...................................................... 1981 Mentor on the Lake, OH (Sec 14)...................................................... 1981 Meridian Township, MI (Sec 14)...................................................... 1982 M ilan, IL .............................................................................................. 1980 Miss R. Ag Area 8, Elsberry, MO ..................................................... 1979 Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, ND and SD......................................................................... 1965 Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS, and MO ......................................................................................... 1948 Muscatine (Mad Creek), IA............................................................. 1981 Muskingham River Lakes, OH ....................................................... 1976 Muskingum River Lakes, OH (Dam Safety Assurance) .............................................................. 1982 Naches River, Near Naches, WA (Sec 14)......................................... 1982 New London, CT ................................................................................ 1978 New Orleans to Venice, LA............................................................... 1969 Newark, OH ..................................................................................... 1976 Pago Pago International Airport, American Samoa (Sec 14).............................................................................. 1980 Paintsville Lake, KY ....................................................................... 1973 Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lake, NE ....................................... 1972 Patoka Lake, IN............................................................................... 1972 Pawtuket River, Warwick, RI (Sec 205)............................................ 1982 Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, KS.................................................. 1974 Perry County L & D Nos. 1, 2, 3, MO............................................... 1977 Phoenix, AZ, and Vicinity (including N ew River)...................................................................................... 1973 Placer Creek, ID................................................................................. 1981 Point Place, Oh.................................................................................. 1982 Port Arthur and Vicinity, TX ......................................................... 1966 Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR.................................................... 1975 Punta Salinas, PR (Sec 103)........................... 1981 Prairie Du Chien, WI................................ 1979 Fiscal Year Placed in Completed or Useful Scheduled for Operation Completion Nature of Project 1992 Local protection 1976 (mod.) 1969 1980 1978 1983 1982 1980 1982 1974 1978 1981 1981 1982 1983 1982 1984 1983 1985 1987 Indefinite 1989 1990 1982 1984 1982 1982 1983 1986 1982 1982 Indefinite 1982 1989 1989 1982 1984 Indefinite 1986 1983 1985 1987 1984 1985 1985 1983 1991 1983 1985 1982 1989 1982 1983 Reservoir and channel improvement Local protection Local protection Major rehabilitation Local protection Reservoir Reservoir Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Major rehabilitation Modernization of Dams Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Shore protection Reservoir Reservoirs Reservoir Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Shore protection Non-structural local protection �Co APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1982 Project Presque Isle Peninsula, PA............................................................. R. D. Bailey Lake, W V .................................................................... Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, NJ, Matawan and Union Beach Sections ............................................. Ray Roberts Lake, TX ..................................................................... Red Oak, IA (Sec 205)...................................................................... Red River below Denison Dam, Tx................................................... Rockford, IL (Kent Creek) .................................................................. Sacramento River Bank Protection, CA............................................ Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff, CA.................................. Sacremento River Flood Control, CA .................. =........................... Sacramento River, Major and Minor Tributaries, CA ............................................................................... Saginaw River, MI................................ Salmon River, Warwick, RI (Sec 205)............................................... San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX........................................... San Gabriel River, TX ....................................................................... Santa Maria Valley Levees, CA........................................................ Santa Rosa Dam and Reservoir, NM................................................. Sardis Lake, O K ................................................................................. Saylorville Lake, IA............................... Scajaquada Creek, NY........................................................................ Sebasticook River, Harland, ME (Sec 205)........................................ Sespe Creek at Fillmore, CA (Sec 205)............................................. Siena Center, Racine, WI (Sec 14).................................................... Skiatook Lake, OK .......................................................................... Sm ithville Lake, M O ....................................................................... Southwestern Jefferson County, KY ................................................. Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, CT (Sec 14) ........................................ Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV.......................................................... Taylors Bayou, TX.................................... .......................... Taylorsville Lake, KY ...................................................................... Texas City and Vicinity, TX (1958 authorization) ........................... Three Rivers, TX................................. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA ......................... Tombigbee River Tributaries, AL and MS........................................ Vince and Little Vince Bayous, TX.................................................. W alnut Creek, CA ............................................................................ W aterloo, IA ..................................................................................... Waurika Lake, OK ............................................................................ Wendt Beach, Evans, NY (Sec 14).................................................... Wild Rice River S. Branch Felton Ditch, M N ..................................................................................... Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, O R ........................................................................... .................... Fiscal Year Started Placed in Useful Operation 1975 1967 1965 1975 1982 1948 1979 1963 1963 1918 1949 1965 1982 1957 1973 1959 1974 1975 1965 1978 1982 1982 1981 1974 1974 1974 1982 1977 1982 1974 1962 1979 1972 1965 1968 1964 1973 1971 1982 1981 1938 1979 19811 1982 1979 1977 1982 1982 1978 1977 Fiscal Year Completed or Scheduled for Completion 1986 1985 Indefinite 1989 1983 1982 1986 Indefinite Indefinite Indefinite 1985 1992 1985 1990 19842 1982 1983 1983 1984 1982 1984 1983 1982 1987 1984 1987 1983 1988 1990 1986 1984 1983 Indefinite Indefinite 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1983 1988 Local protection Nature of Project Beach replenishment Reservoir Local Protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Reservoir Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1982 Project William H. Harsha Lake, OH ............................................................ Willow Creek, OR .............................................................................. Wilson Branch, Cheraw SC (Sec 205)............................................... W inona, M N ....................................................................................... Wood River Drainage and Levee District, IL.................................... Yatesville Lake, KY .......................................................................... Yonkers, N Y ....................................................................................... Zacate Creek, TX (Sec 205) ................................................................ Fiscal Year Started 1970 1974 1982 1979 1953 1964 1975 1981 Placed in Useful Operation 1978 1962 Fiscal Year Completed or Scheduled for Completion 1984 1984 1983 1986 1986 Not scheduled 1983 1983 Nature of Project Reservoir Reservoir Local Protection, FP Evacuation Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection 0 APPENDIX C NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Project Miles Community Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills AboveMouth In Vicinity of Length forNormal Pool Length Year Length Depth Width Chamber FullWidth Level Upper Lower Type (feet) Opened (miles)(feet) (feet) Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL Clairborne Lock and Dam 81.22 Clairborne, AL Millers Ferry Lock and Dam 142.32 Camden, AL Jones Bluff Lock and Dam 245.42 Benton, AL Allegheny River, PA and NY Lock and Dam No. 2 Lock and Dam No. 3 Lock and Dam No. 4 Lock and Dam No. 5 Lock and Dam No. 6 Lock and Dam No. 7 Lock and Dam No. 8 Lock and Dam No. 9 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, GA, AL and FL Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam George W. Andrews Lock and Dam Walter F. George Lock and Dam Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Albemarle and Chesapeake Canal Route: Great Bridge Lock Dismal Swamp Canal Route: Deep Creek Lock South Mills Lock Bayou Teche, LA Berwick Lock Keystone Lock Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY Black Rock Lock Black Warrior, Warrior, and Tombigbee Rivers, AL Coffeeville (Jackson) Lock and Dam Demopolis Lock and Dam 6.7 Aspinwall, PA 14.5 Cheswick, PA 24.2 Natrona, PA 30.4 Freeport, PA 36.3 Clinton, PA 45.7 Kittanning, PA 52.6 Templeton, PA 62.2 Rimer, PA 107.6' Chattahoochee, FL 154.36 Columbia, GA 182.86 Fort Gaines, GA 11.56 Great Bridge, VA 10.6' Deep Creek, VA 33.26 South Mills, NC 1.58 Berwick, LA 72.58 New Iberia, LA 0.0 Buffalo, NY 116.610 Coffeeville, AL 213.210 Demopolis, AL 84 84 84 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 600 600 600 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 30 45 45 11 13 10 12 12 13 18 22 16 16 16 11 12 9 10 11 11 14 11 13 Movable 13 Movable 13 Movable 12 Fixed 11 Fixed 10 Fixed 11 Fixed 11 Fixed 10 Fixed 10 Fixed 11 Fixed 82 450 33 14 14 Movable 82 450 82 450 75 600 52 300 52 300 45 307 36 162 68 625 110 600 110 600 25 19 13 Movable 88 18 13 Movable 3 167 16' None 12 12' 12' None 12 12' 12' None 79 97 9' None 9 9 8 Fixed 5 21,6 21,6 None 33 13 13 Movable 40 13 13 Fixed 3,160 9,900$ 14,962 1,393 1,436 876 780 1,140 916 984 950 1973 60.5 9 1969 103.1 9 1974 88.0 9 19340 19342 1927 1927 1928 1930 1931 1938 7.8 9 9.7 9 6.2 9 5.9 9 9.4 9 6.9 9 9.6 9 9.8 9 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 5,924 1957 46.7 6 100 620 1963 28.5 6 100 13,371 1963 85.0 6 100 1932 1940 1941 1950 175 1913 9 90 9 50 9 50 8 80 34.5 6 80 1914 7.1 21 200 1,185 1965 96.6 9 200 1,485 1962 47.9 9 200 N APPENDIX C-Continued NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Project Miles Community Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills AboveMueth In Vicinity of Length forNormal Pool Length Year Length Depth Width Chamber Full Width Level Upper Lower Type (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Warrior Lock and Dam Win. Bacon Oliver Lock and Dam Holt Lock and Dam John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam (new lock) Canaveral Harbor, FL Canaveral Lock Cape Fear River, NC Lock and Dam No.1 Lock and Dam No. 2 William O. Heake Lock and Dam Central and Southern Florida 861 Lock 8-65 8-65A Lock 8-65B 8-65C Lock 8-5D Lock 8.65E Lock 8-308B Columbia River, OR and WA Bonneville Lock and Dam The Dalles Lock and Dam John Day Lock and Dam McNary Lock and Dam Croses-Florida Barge Canal Ing lisLock, Dam and Spillway Eureka Lock and Dam Henry H. Buckman Lock Cumberland River, KY and TN Barkley Dam Cheatham Lock and Dam Old Hickory Lock and Dam Cordell Hull Dam and Reservoir Fox River, WI DePere Lock DePere Dam 261.11o Eutaw, AL 110 600 22 13 13 Movable 1,832 1962 77.0 9 200 338.11o Tuscaloosa, AL 347.010 Holt, AL 365.110 Adger, AL 2.7 Cocoa, FL 95 110 110 460 28 12 600 64 19 600 68 13 90 600 67.0 Kings Bluff, NC 40 200 99.0 BrownsLanding, NC 40 200 123.0 Tolars Landing, NC 40 300 0.0 St. Cloud, FL 56.0 Frostproof, FL 46.0 Avon Park, FL 32.0 Sebring, FL 25.0 Sebring, FL 16.0 Okeechobee, FL 12.0 Okeechobee, FL 38.7 Port Mayaca, FL 146.0 Bonneville, OR 190.0 The Dalles, OR 215.0 Rufus, OR 282.0 Umatilla, OR 168.611 Inglis, FL 20.0 90.4 Palatka, FL 30.6 Kuttawa, Ky 148.7 Ashland City, TN 216.2 Old Hickory, TN 313.5 Carthage, TN 30 90 30 90 30 90 30 90 30 90 30 90 30 90 56 400 76 500 86 675 86 675 86 675 84 84 84 110 110 84 84 600 600 600 12 Fixed 13 Movable 13 Fixed 700 1,138 1,170 3 14 14 None 11 9 9 2666765 14 65 88 110 75 28 20 20 800 57 800 26 400 60 400 59 9 12 9 9666666 14 32 15 15 15 18 14 11 14 14 14 9 Fixed 12 Fixed 9 Fixed 9 None 6 None 6 None 6 None 6 None 6 None 6 None 14 Movable 24 Movable 15 Movable 15 Movable 20 Movable 15 Movable 14 Movable 15 None 13 Movable 12 Movable 10 Movable 13 Movable 1940 8.9 9 200 1969 18.1 9 200 1975 42.7 9 200 1965 12 125 275 1915 32.0 8 100 229 1917 24.0 8 100 220 1935 20.0 8 100 2,680 8,735 5,900 7,365 1963 1964 1967 1965 1965 1964 1964 1977 1938 1957 1968 1953 28.0 10.0 14.0 7.0 9.0 4.0 15.0 47.5 25.0 76.0 64.0 83333338 27 14 14 14 5,100 1968 11.0 12 3,830 1971 12 1972 21.1 12 9,959 801 3,605 1,138 7.1 DePere, WI 36 146 9 10 12 Movable 7.2 DePere, WI Movable 1964 1959 1957 1973 118.1 67.5 97.3 71.9 20 30 30 30 30 30 30 10 300 250 250 250 150 150 150 9 150 9 150 9 150 9 150 1936 5.9 6 100 986 1929 C) to APPENDIX C--Continued NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Project Miles Community Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills AboveMouth In Vicinity of Length forNormal Pool Length Year Length Depth Width Chamber Full Width Level Upper Lower Type' (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Little Kaukauna Lock Little Kaukauna Dam Rapide Croche Lock Rapide Croche Dam Kaukauna Fifth Lock Kaukauna Fourth Lock Kaukauna Third Lock Kaukauna Second Lock Kaukauna First Lock Kaukauna Dam Kaukauna Guard Lock Little Chute combined Lock Lower Upper Little Chute Second Lock Little Chute First (Guard) Lock Little Chute Dam Cedars Lock Cedars Dam Appleton Fourth Lock Appleton Lower Dam Appleton Third Lock Appleton Second Lock Appleton First Lock Appleton Upper Dam Menasha Lock Menasha Dam Freshwater Bayou, LA Freshwater Bayou Lock Green and Barren Rivers, KY Green River: Lock and Dam No. 1 Lock and Dam No. 2 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Inner Harbor Navigation Channel Lock Harvey Lock Algiers Lock Bayou Boeuf Lock Bayou Sorrel Lock Port Allen Lock Vermilion Lock Calcasieu Lock Brazos River Floodgates 13.0 DePere, WI 13.1 DePere, WI 19.2 Wrightstown, WI 19.3 Wrightstown, WI 22.8 Kaukauna, WI 23.1 Kaukauna, WI 23.3 Kaukauna, WI 23.4 Kaukauna, WI 23.6 Kaukauna, WI 24.0 Kaukauna, WI 24.0 Kaukauna, WI 25.4 Little Chute, WI 25.4 Little Chute, WI 26.4 Little Chute, WI 26.5 Little Chute, WI 26.6 Little Chute, WI 27.3 Little Chute, WI 27.4 Little Chute, WI 30.7 Appleton, WI 30.9 Appleton, WI 31.3 Appleton, WI 31.6 Appleton, WI 31.9 Appleton, WI 32.2 Appleton, WI 37.8 Menasha, WI 37.8 Menasha, WI 19.08 IntracoastalCity, LA 9.1 Spottsville, Ky 63.1 Calhoun, Ky 92.612 New Orleans, LA 98.312 Harvey, LA 88.012 Algiers, LA 93.3 Morgan City, LA 131.018 Plaquemine, LA 228.512 Port Allen, LA 162.71s Abbeville, LA 238.518 Lake Charles, LA 404.118 Freeport, TX 36 36 36 37 31 35 35 40 35 36 35 35 35 35 35 35 34 34 84 146 146 144 144 144 144 144 147 144 144 144 144 144 145 145 144 600 10 10 96666 7 8 9 10 10 10 11 9 11 11 14 7 10 8 9 10 10 8 Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable 1938 588 1926 1934 461 1930 1898 1879 1879 1903 1883 603 1931 1891 562 654 549 691 401 16 16 None 84 600 12 12 11 Fixed 84 600 14 15 12 Fixed 75 75 75 75 56 84 56 75 75 640 425 797 1,158 800 1,198 1,200 1,205 99 109 109 69 109 45 39 69 31~ 13~ 13~ 13~ 14~ 13~ ii' 13~ 15' 1879 1879 1881 1904 1932 1888 1933 1907 1934 1900 1901 1884 1940 1899 1937 6.2 6 3.6 6 0.3 6 0.2 6 0.1 6 0.2 6 0.4 6 1.4 6 66 1.0 6 0.7 6 3.4 6 0.6 6 0.3 6 0.3 6 5.1 6 28.3 6 401 1968 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 12 125 482 1956 54.0 9 200 519 1956 45.4 9 200 317 None 137 None 137 None 137 None 147 None 147 None 117 None 13' None 15' None 1923 1935 1956 1956 1952 1961 1934 1950 1943 12 12 16 16 12 12 16 16 12 150 125 150 150 125 125 200 200 125 0 co APPENDIX C NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Project Miles Community Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills AboveMouth In Vicinity of Length for Normal Pool Length Year Length Depth Width ChamberFull Width Level Upper Lower Type (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) 444.8 Matagorda TX 444.8 Matagorda, TX 75 1,200 75 1,200 59 157 15 7 None 59 15' 15' None Hudson River, NY Troy Lock and Dam llinois Waterway, IL LaGrange Lock and Dam Peoria Lock and Dam Starved Rock Lock and Dam Marseilles Lock Marseilles Dam Dresden Island Lock and Dam Brandon Road Lock and Dam S Lockport Lock ' Thomas J. O'Brien Lock and Dam Inland Route, MI Crooked River Lock and Weir Kanawha River, WV Winfield Lock and Dam Marmet Lock and Dam London Lock and Dam Kaskaskia River, IL Kaskaskia Lock and Dam Kentucky River, KY Lock and Dam No.1 Lock and Dam No. 2 Lock and Dam No. 3 Lock and Dam No. 4 Lock and Dam No. 5 Lock and Dam No. 6 Lock and Dam No. 7 Lock and Dam No. 8 Lock and Dam No. 9 Lock and Dam No. 10 Lock and Dam No. 11 Lock and Dam No. 12 Lock and Dam No. 13 153.8 Troy, NY 80.2 Beardstown, IL 157.7 Peoria, IL 231.0 Utica, IL 244.6 Marseilles, IL 247.0 Marseilles, IL 271.5 Morris, IL 286.0 Joliet, IL 291.1 Lockport, IL 326.5 Chicago, IL 30.0 Alanson, MI 31.1 Winfield, WV 67.8 Marmet, WV 82.8 London, WV .8 Ellis Grove, IL 4.0 Carrolton, Ky 31.0 Lockport, KY 42.0 Gest, Ky 65.0 Frankfort, KY 82.2 Tyrone, KY 96.2 High Bridge, KY 117.0 High Bridge, Ky 139.9 Camp Nelson, Ky 157.5 Valley View, KY 176.4 Ford, KY 201.0 Irvine, Ky 220.9 Ravenna, KY 239.9 Willow, KY 44 493 17 16 13 Fixed 110 600 10 16 13 Movable 110 600 11 16 12 Movable 110 600 19 17 14 Movable 110 600 24 19 14 Movable 110 600 110 600 110 600 110 1,000 22 17 12 Movable 34 18 14 Movable 40 12 15 None 2 14 14 Movable 17.8 66 1 6.9 7.9 SSP Weir 56 56 56 360 360 360 84 600 28 24 24 18 18 18 12 Movable 12 Movable 12 Movable 1,495 1917 2.2 14 200 1,066 1939 536 1939 1,280 819 77.5 9 300 73.3 9 300 1933 13.6 9 1933 26.9 9 1933 24.6 300 300 1,616 1933 14.5 9 300 2,373 1933 5.1 9 300 1933 9 300 257 1960 6.9 9 300 83 1967 4.0 5 30 834 707 707 32 18 11 Movable 38 145 8 8 15 Fixed 38 145 14 8 6 Fixed 38 38 38 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 145 145 145 147 147 146 148 148 148 148 148 13 13 15 14 15 19 17 17 18 17 18 96 10 99 11 11 9 18 10 10 7 Fixed 6 Fixed 6 Fixed 6 Fixed 7 Fixed 6. Fixed 7 Fixed 6 Fixed 6 Fixed 6 Fixed 6 Fixed 1937 36.7 9 1934 15.0 9 1934 7.8 9 300 300 300 130 1973 35.0 9 225 424 1839 27.0 6 100 400 1939 11.0 6 100 465 543 556 413 350 257 362 472 208 240 248 1844 1844 1844 1891 1897 1900 1907 1907 1906 1910 1915 23.0 6 17.2 6 14.0 6 20.8 6 22.9 6 17.6 6 18.9 6 24.6 6 19.9 6 19.0 6 9.1 6 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Colorado River East Lock West Lock 1954 1954 12 125 12 125 APPENDIX C NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 Locks Dams Authorisd Channel Project Miles Community Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills AboveMouth In Vicinity of Length for Normal Pool Length Year Length Depth Width Chamber Full Width Level Upper Lower Type (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Lock and Dam No. 14 Lake Washington Ship Canal Hiram M. Chittenden Lock Large Lock Small Lock McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, AR and OK Norrell Lock and Dam Lock No. 2 Dam No. 2 Lock and Dam No. 3 Lock and Dam No. 4 Lock and Dam No. 5 David D. Terry Lock and Dam Murrary Lock and Dam Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam ' Lock and Dam No. 9 Dardanelle Lock and Dam Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam Lock and Dam No. 13 W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir Webber Falls Lock and Dam Chouteau Lock and Dam Newt Graham Lock and Dam Mississippi River Between Ohio and Missouri Rivers Lock and Dam No. 27 Mississippi River Between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN Lock and Dam No. 26 Lock and Dam No. 25 Lock and Dam No. 24 Lock and Dam No. 22 Lock and Dam No. 21 Lock and Dam No. 20 Lock and Dam No. 19 249.0 Heidelberg, KY 52 148 17 9 6 Fixed 248 1917 9.6 6 100 1.3 Seattle, WA 1.3 Seattle, WA 10.3 Arkansas Post, AR 13.3 Arkansas Post, AR 40.5 Arkansas Post, AR 50.2 Grady, AR 66.0 Pine Bluff, AR 86.3 Redfield, AR 108.1 Little Rock, AR 125.4 Little Rock, AR 155.9 Conway, Ar 176.9 Morrilton, AR 205.5 Russellville, AR 256.8 Ozark, AR 292.8 Fort Smith, AR 319.6 Fort Smith, AR 336.2 Sallisaw, OK 366.6 Webbers Falls, OK 401.5 Muskogee, OK 421.6 Inola, OK 185.114 Granite City, IL 202.915 Alton, IL 241.415 Cap Au Gris, MO 273.415 Clarksville, MO 301.215 Saverton, MO 324.915 Quincy, IL 343.215 Canton, MO 364.215 Keokuk, IA 80 760 26 16 29 Movable 28 123 26 16 16 110 110 110 110 110 600 600 600 600 600 30 20 20 14 17 16 18 18 18 18 15 Fixed 14 Movable 14 Movable 14 Movable 14 Movable 110 600 18 18 14 Movable 110 600 18 18 14 Movable 110 110 110 110 110 110 600 600 600 600 600 600 16 19 54 34 20 20 110 600 48 110 110 110 600 600 600 110 1,200 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 600 360 600 600 600 600 600 1,200 30 21 21 18 18 18 18 18 14 14 Movable 14 Movable 14 Movable 15 Movable 14 Movable 15 Movable 18 14 Movable 19 15 15 16 Movable 14 Movable 14 Movable 21 16 15 Fixed 24 24 15 15 10 10 10 38 19 16 19 19 18 17 15 15 10 Movable 10 12 Movable 12 Movable 14 Movable 12 Movable 12 Movable 13 Fixed 235 1916 17.0 34 150 4,677 42,073 6,110 5,745 7,455 1967 1967 1968 1968 1968 1968 3.0 9 36.9 9 15.8 9 20.3 9 21.8 9 250 250 250 250 250 8,890 1968 17.3 9 250 3,930 1969 30.5 9 250 1,580 1,505 1,815 2,480 4,725 7,400 1969 21.0 9 1969 28.6 9 1969 51.3 9 1969 36.0 9 1969 26.8 9 1970 16.6 9 250 250 250 250 250 250 7,230 1970 30.4 9 250 4,370 11,490 1,630 1970 34.8 9 1970 20.2 9 1970 23.7 9 250 150 150 3,240 1953 17.8 9 200 1,725 1,296 4,280 1,024 1,066 2,144 4,434 1938 1939 1940 1938 1938 1936 1913 38.5 9 32.0 9 27.8 9 23.7 9 18.3 9 21.0 9 46.3 9 200 200 200 NS NS NS NS APPENDIX C NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 Locks Dams Authoried Channel Protect Lock and Dam No. 18 Lock and Dam No.17 Lock and Dam No.16 Locks and Dam No. 15 Locks and Dam No. 14 Lock and Dam No.13 Lock and Dam No.12 Lock and Dam No. 11 Lock and Dam No. 10 Lock and Dam No. 9 Lock and Dam No. 8 Lock and Dam No. 7 Lock and Dam No. 6 Lock and Dam No. 5A Lock and Dam No. 5 S Lock and Dam No. 4 Lock and Dam No. 3 Lock and Dam No. 2 Lock and Dam No. 1 St. Anthony Falls Lower Lock and Dam Upper Lock and Dam Monongahela River, PA and WV Locks and Dam No. 2 Locks and Dam No. 3 Locks and Dam No. 4 Maxwell Locks and Dam Miles Community Width Available Lift at AboveMouth In Vicinity of Length for Normal Pool Chamber Full Width Level 410.515 Burlington, IA 110 600 10 437.115 New Boston, IL 100 600 8 457.215 Muscatine, IA 110 600 9 482.915 Rock Island, IL 110 500 16 110 360 16 493.11s LeClaire, IA 80 320 11 493.315 LeClaire, IA 110 600 11 522.515 Clinton, IA 110 600 11 556.715 Bellevue, IA 110 600 9 583.015 Dubuque, IA 110 600 11 615.115 Guttenberg, IA 110 600 8 647.915 Lynxville, IA 110 600 9 679.215 Genoa, WI 110 600 11 702.516 Dresbach, MN 110 600 8 714.3s15 Trempealeau, WI 110 600 6 728.515 Winona, MN 110 600 5 738.115s Minneiska, MN 110 600 9 752.815 Alma, WI 110 600 7 796.915 Red Wing, MN 110 600 8 815.215 Hastings, MN 110 600 12 500 12 847.615 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN 853.315 Minneapolis, MN 853.915 Minneapolis, MN 11.2 Braddock, PA 23.8 Elizabeth, PA 41.5 Monessen, PA 61.2 Maxwell, PA Locks and Dam No. 7 85.0 Greensboro, PA Locks and Dam No. 8 90.8 Point Marion, PA Morgantown Lock and Dam 102.0 Morgantown, WV Hildebrand Lock and Dam , 108.0 Morgantown, WV Opekiska Lock and Dam 115.4 Morgantown, WV Ohio River Locks and Dam No. 53 Locks and Dam No. 52 18.4 Mound City, IL 42.1 Brookport, IL Depth on Sills Upper Lower Type 17 14 Movable 16 13 Movable 17 12 Movable 27 11 Movable 27 11 18 11 21 14 Movable 19 13 Movable 17 13 Movable 19 13 Movable 15 12 Movable 16 13 Movable 22 14 Movable 18 12 Movable 17 13 Movable 18 13 Movable 18 12 Movable 17 13 Movable 17 14 Movable 22 13 Movable 16 15 56 400 38 13 8 Fixed 56 400 38 13 10 56 400 25 14 10 Movable 56 400 49 16 14 Fixed 56 110 56 56 56 56 84 84 56 56 84 84 84 110 110 110 110 360 720 360 720 360 720 720 720 360 360 600 600 600 600 1,200 600 1,200 99 88 17 17 20 20 15 19 17 21 22 12 12 12 12 16 16 12 12 20 20 21 21 11 15 18 14 18 15 15 15 15 16 Fixed 16 12 Fixed 12 11 Movable 11 15 Movable 15 10 Fixed 10 Movable 15 Movable 15 Movable 14 Movable Length Year Length Depth Width (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) 1,350. 1937 26.6 9 NS 921 1939 20.1 9 NS 1,099 1937 25.7 9 NS 1,203 1934 10.4 9 NS 1922 1,343 1939 29.2 9 NS 1,066 1939 34.2 9 NS 849 1938 26.3 9 NS 1,278 1937 32.1 9 NS 763 1936 32.8 9 NS 811 1938 31.3 9 NS 897 1937 23.3 9 NS 940 1937 11.8 9 NS 893 1936 14.2 9 NS 682 1936 9.6 9 NS 1,619 1935 14.7 9 NS 1,367 1935 44.1 9 NS 365 1938 18.3 9 NS 822 1930 32.4 9 NS 1948 574 1932 1917 188 1959 3,584 1963 5.7 9 NS 0.5 9 100 3.8 9 100 748 1951 12.6 9 300 195321 670 1907 17.7 9 300 190721 535 1932 19.7 9 300 193221 460 1964 23.8 9 300 1964 610 192521 5.8 9 300 560 19252122 11.2 9 300 410 1950 6.0 9 300 530 1959 7.4 9 300 366 1964 7.0 9 300 10 Movable 3,978 1929 23.7 9 300 10 Temporary Lock 1980 11 Movable 3,073 1928 35.8 9 300 11 Temporary Lock 1969 Depth on Sills r APPENDIX C NAVIGATION LOCKS ANDDAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 Project iles Community Width Available Ift at Depth on Sills AboveMoth In Vicinity o Length for Normal Pool ChamberFal Width Level Upper Lower Type Smithland Locks and Dam 35.3 Smithland, KY 110 1,200 22 34 12 Movable-- Uniontown Locks and Dam 135.0 Uniontown, KY Newburgh Locks and Dam 204.9 Newburg, IN Cannelton Locks and Dam 260.3 Cannelton, IN McAlpine Locks and Dam 374.2 Louisville, KY Markiand Locks and Dam 449.5 Markland, IN Capt. Anthonmy Meldahi Locks and Dam-- 544.8 Chilo, OH Greenup Locks and Dam 640.0 Greenup, KY Gallipolis Locks and Dam 701.8 Hogaett, WV Racine Locks and Dam 743.5 Letart Falls, OH Belleville Locks and Dam 777.1 Reedsville, Oh Willow Island Locks and Dam 819.3 Waverly, WV Hannibal Locks and Dam 854.6 New Martinsville, WV Pike Island Locks and Dam 896.7 Warwood, WV New Cumberland Locks and Dam 926.6 Stratton, OH Montgomery land Locks and Da 949.3 Industry, PA Dashield Locks and Dam 967.7 Glenwillard, PA Emswerth Locks and Dam 974.8 Emsworth, PA Okeechobee Waterway, FL St. Lucie Lock and Dam Moore Haven Lock Orton Laock and Dam W. P. ranklin Lock and Coonol Stroucture 15.1 Stuart, FL 78.0 Moore Haven, FL 93.6 LaBelle, FL 121.4 Fort Myers, FL 1,200 110 1,200 600 110 1,200 110 600 110 1,200 110 600 110 1,200 110 600 56 360 110 1,200 10 600 110 1,200 110 600 110 1,200 110 600 110 600 110 360 110 1,200 110 600 110 1,200) 110 600 110 1,200 110 600 110 1,200 110 600 110 1,200 110 600 110 1,200 110 600 110 600 56 360 110 600 56 360 110 600 56 360 50 250 50 250 50 250 22 22 22 16 16 25 25 37 37 37 35 35 30 30 30 30 23 23 22 22 22 22 20 20 21 21 21 21 21 21 18 18 10 10 18 18 13 2 11 34 34 34 32 32 38 38 49 19 19 50 50 45 45 45 45 18 18 37 37 37 37 35 35 38 38 17 17 17 17 16 16 13 13 17 16 14 10 12 12 12 Movable 12 16 Movable 16 13 Movable 13 12 Movable 11 11 15 Movable 15 15 Movable 15 15 Movable 15 15 Movable 15 15 Movable 15 15 Movable 15 15 Movable 15 17 Movable 17 18 Movable 18 15 Movable 15 15 Movable 15 18 Fixed 18 13 Movable 13 12 Movable 11 None 11 Movable 56 400 3 13 - Movable anm Authoried Chamd Length Year Length Depth Width (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) 3,560 1980 99.7 9 300 3,516 1975 69.9 9 300 2,272 1975 55.4 9 300 1,965 1972 116.3 9 400 8,627 1961 75.3 9 300 1921 1930 1,395 1963 95.3 9 300 1963 9 300 1,756 1962 95.2 9 300 1962 1,287 1962 61.8 9 300 1,132 1937 41.7 9 300 1,202 1970 33.6 9 300 1,206 1969 36.4 9 300 1,128 1973 35.3 9 1,000 1,098 1972 36.0 9 300 1,306 1965 29.9 9 300 1,315 1961 22.7 9 300 1,379 1936 18.4 9 300 1,585 1929 7.1 9 300 1,717 1921 6.2 9 300 170 1941 15.1 8 80 1963 15.6 8 90 104 1937 15.6 8 90 1,150 1965 7.9 8 90 APPENDIX C-Continued NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Project Miles Community Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills AboveMouth In Vicinity of Length for Normal Pool Length Year Length Depth Width ChamberFull Width Level Upper Lower Type (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Old River, LA Old River Lock Ouachita and Black Rivers, AK & LA Jonesville Lock and Dam (Black River) Columbia Lock and Dam (Ouachita River) Lock and Dam No. 6 (Ouachita River) Lock and Dam No. 8 (Ouchita River) Pearl River, MS and LA Lock 1 Lock 2 Lock 3 0 Sacramento River, CA Barge Canal Lock 304.0 Simmesport, LA 25.0 Joneeville, LA 117.2 Columbia, LA 223.4 Felsenthal, AR 282.8 Calion, AR 28.717 Pearl River, LA 40.817 Bush, LA 14.017 Sun, LA 42.8 West Sacramento, CA 75 1,200 84 84 55 55 65 65 65 600 600 268 268 310 310 310 86 600 35 11 11 None 30 18 10 14 17 15 11 18 18 14 17 10 10 10 14 Movable 13 Fixed 7 Movable 7 Movable 450 400 314 306 10 None 15 None 10 None 4 13 13 None 1963 1972 1972 1923 1926 12 125 92.2 9 106.2 9 59.4 916 55.2 916 100 100 100 100 1951 11.1 7 80 1951 3.2 7 80 1951 13.2 7 80 1961 1.5 13 120 Snake River, WA Ice Harbor Lock and Dam Lower Monumental Lock and Dam Little Goose Lock and Dam Lower Granite Lock and Dam St. Marys River, MI South Canal: MacArthur Lock Poe Lock North Canal: Davis Lock Sabin Lock Savannah River, GA New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam Tennessee River, TN, AL, MS, and KYiS 9.7 41.6 70.3 107.5 Pasco, WA Kahlotus, WA Starbuck, WA Pomeroy, WA 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, MI Sault Ste. Marie, 47.0 MI Sault Ste. Marie, 47.0 MI 187.2 August, GA 86 86 86 86 80 110 80 80 675 675 675 675 800 1,200 1,350 1,350 100 98 98 100 22 22 22 22 15 15 15 15 31 32 24 24 15 Movable 15 Movable 15 Movable 15 Movable 31 None 32 None 23 None 23 None 56 360 15 14 12 Movable 2,790 3,800 2,670 3,200 1962 1969 1970 1975 31.9 14 28.7 14 37.2 14 32.0 14 1943 1968 1914 1919 250 250 250 250 27 360 1936 16.2 9 90 APPENDIX C NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Project Miles Community Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills Above Mouth In Vicinity of Length for Normal Pool Length Year Length Depth Width Chamber Full Width Level Upper Lower Type (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Kentucky Lock and Dam 22.4 Gibertsville, KY 110 600 56 11 13 Tainter 7,976 1944 184.3 9 300 Pickwick Landing Lock and Dam 206.7 Hamburg, TN Waterway Connecting Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers, Alabama and Mississippi Rivers Gainesville Lock and Dam 49.1 Gainesville Aliceville Lock and Dam 89.8 Aliceville Columbus Lock and Dam 117.6 Columbus Wilson Lock and Dam Main Lock 259.4 Florence, AL Auxillary Lock 259.4 Florence, AL General Joe Wheeler Lock and Dam Main Lock 274.9 Florence, AL Auxillary Lock 274.9 Florence, AL Guntersville Lock and Dam S Main Lock 349.0 Guntersville, AL Auxillary Lock 349.0 Guntersville, AL Nickajack Lock and Dam 424.7 Chattanooga, TN Chicamauga Lock and Dam 471.0 Chattanooga, TN Watts Bar Lock and Dam 529.9 Breedenton, Tn For Loudon Lock and Dam 602.3 Lenoir City, TN Melton Hill Lock and Dam (Clinch River) 23.1 Kingston, TN 110 600 55 10 13 Bulkhead 110 110 110 600 600 600 36 27 27 15 15 15 15 Movable 15 Movable 15 Movable 110 600 94 13 13 Buklhead 60 292 94 11 11 Bulkhead 110 600 60 400 110 60 110 60 60 60 48 13 13 Bulkhead 48 15 13 Bulkhead 600 39 360 39 600 39 360 49 360 58 360 72 75 400 13 13 13 10 12 12 13 Tainter 12 Tainter 11 Tainter 14 Tainter 12 Tainter 12 Tainter 54 13 13 Tainter 7,385 1937 52.7 9 300 15,460 1978 49.1 9 300 14,790 1979 40.7 9 300 10,040 1981 27.8 9 300 3,728 1959 15.5 9 300 3,728 1927 15.5 9 300 5,738 1963 74.1 9 300 5,738 1962 74.1 9 300 3,837 1965 75.7 9 300 3,837 1939 75.7 9 300 3,763 1967 46.3 9 300 5,654 1940 58.9 9 300 2,646 1942 72.4 9 300 3,687 1943 49.8 9 300 1,072 1963 38.2 9 30019 Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR Lock No. 1 Lock No. 2 Lock No. 3 Lock No. 4 Guard Lock 26.0 Oregon City, OR 26.0 Oregon City, OR 26.0 Oregon City, OR 26.0 Oregon City, OR 26.4 Oregon City, OR 40 40 40 40 40 210 210 210 210 210 20 10- 10 20 10 8 None 8 None 8 None 8 None 8 None 1872 6 150 1872 1872 1872 4 1872 23.6 6 NS 1. Fixed&crestwithoutgatesorotherfacilityt 2. Above mouth of Mobile River. 3. Includes length of earth dikes. 4. From mouth of Apalachicola River. 5. From mouth of Chattahoochee River. tooontmle amtlow.Movable:inclu lesanytypeofcreatgateataintergategwicketsorotherstooontrolst eamflow. APPENDIX D NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION Project AIWW-Replacement of Federal Hwy Bridges in NC............................................................................... Aquatic Plant Control ..................................................................... Astabula Harbor, OH ....................................................................... Baltimore Harbor & Channels, MD (1958 Mod.).............................. Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii................................................ Bandon SBB, Coquille, OR (Sec 107)................................................. Bayou TEXAR, Pensacola, FL (Sec 3)............................................... Biloxi Harbor, MS (Sec 107).............................................................. Buffalo Harbor, NY (Sec 107) ........................................................... Calumet Harbor & River, IL and IN ................................................. Calumet-Sag. Mod., II Waterway, IL and IN, Part I ............................................................................... Cannelton Locks and Dam, Ohio River, IN and KY .................................................................................... Carolina Beach Inlet, NC (Sec 107).................................................. Cattaraugus Harbor, NY.................................................................... Cedar Point, McIntosh Co GA (Sec 107)............................................ Channel to Newport News, VA (1965 Mod.) ..................................... Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Started Operation Completion Nature of Project 1974 1959 1981 1961 1982 1982 1982 1979 1981 1964 1955 1962 1982 1981 1981 1967 1980 1966 1968 1966 1982 1968 Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC............................................... 1977 Cordova Harbor, AK (Sec 107)........................................................ Corea Harbor, Gouldsboro, ME (Sec 107).......................................... Jeremy Creek, McClellanville, SC (See 107)..................................... Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX..................................................... Craig Harbor, AK (Sec 107) .............................................................. Crescent City Harbor, CA ................................................................ Delaware River, PA, NJ, and DE Philadelphia to Sea (Anchorage)................................................... Detour Harbor, MI........................................................................... East Bay Marina, Olympia, WA (Sec 107)........................................ Emsworth Locks and Dams, Ohio River, PA ................................................................................ Dresden Island Lock and Dam Illinois Waterway, IL................................................................... Floating Breakwater Prototype Test Program, West Point, Seattle, WA (Sec 107) ................................................. Friday Harbor Marina, WA (Sec 107) ............................................... Inland Waterway, Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, DE and MD, Part H........................................... 1981 1982 1982 1972 1980 1970 1964 1980 1981 1980 1980 1982 1981 1982 1982 Indefinite Indefinite 1983 Indefinite 1985 1983 1983 1983 1982 Indefinite Indefinite 1982 1983 1983 1982 Indefinite 1984 1983 1983 1982 1987 1982 1983 Idefinite 1982 1983 1985 1983 1982 1984 1962 Indefinite Replacement of existing bridges Control and eradication of aquatic plants Rehabilitation of breakwater Dredging Dredging and breakwater Breakwater and channel Dredging Dredging Removal bridge abutment Dredging and channel, widening and deepening Channel Improvements and relocation Replacement of existing locks and dams 43-45 inclusive Dredging Breakwaters and berm Dredging Deep draft channel widening and deepening, deferred anchorage construction Rediversion of river and powerhouse construction Breakwater Dredging Dredging Dredging Breakwaters Dredging and breakwater Dredging Dredging and breakwater Dredging and breakwater Major rehabilitation of locks and dams Major rehabilitation of locks and dams Test Floating Breakwaters Breakwater Dredging and bridge const. APPENDIX D-CONTINUED NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION Project Island End River, Chelsea, MA (Sec 107)....................................... Kahului Harbor, Maui, Hawaiiu................................. Kaskaskia River, II............................................................................. Little River Inlet, NC & SC ............................................................... Lockwoods Folly Inlet, NC (Sec 107)................................................. Lock and Dam 26 Replace ILL-MO...... .................... Locks and Dam 52, IL and KY..................................................... ... Locks and Dam 53, IL and KY........................................................... Los Angeles--Long Beach Harbors, CA............................................ Manitowoe Harbor, WI...................................................................... McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System ........................................................................................... Metlakatla Harbor, AK..................................... Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers................................................................................. Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN .......................................................... Mississippi River, Gulf Outlet, LA................................................... Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to m outh .............................................................................................. Mobile Harbor (Theodore Channel)................................................. Murrells Inlet, SC .............................................................................. Multnomah Channel, OR (Sec 107).................................................. New York Harbor, NY and NJ......................................................... Newburgh Locks & Dam, Ohio River, IN and K Y ............................................................................................ Norfolk Harbor Channel, VA (1965 Mod.)........................................ Ouachita and Black River, AR and LA............................................. Port Everglades Harbor, FL.............................................................. Port Lions Harbor, AK (Sec 107)...................................................... Red River Emergency Bank Protection............................................. Red River WW, Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA.............................................................................. Rock Hall Harbor, MD (Sec 107)....................................................... Rota Harbor, Northern Marianas (Sec 107)...................................... Rysco Shipyard Channel, FL............................................................. Sais River, Camp Ellis Harbor, ME (Sec 107)................................... Saco River, Camp Ellis Harbor, ME (Sec 107).................................. Fiscal Year Started 1981 1982 1966 1981 1982 1980 1979 1979 1980 1981 1963 1979 1910 1979 1958 1912 Placed in Usefule Operation 1982 1974 1968 1981 1980 1981 1981 Incremental 1969 1967 1979 1977 1981 1976 1965 1966 1964 1979 1979 1973 1974 1981 1982 1981 1982 1982 1981 __ Fiscal Year Completed or Scheduled for Completion 1982 1984 1986 1984 1983 1989 1984 1985 1983 1984 1985 1983 1992 1983 1984 Indefinite 1982 1983 1982 1993 1983 Indefinite 1983 1982 1982 1982 1988 1982 1984 1982 1983 1983 Nature of Project Dredging Rehabilitation of Breakwater Lock, dam and channel Dredging and jetties Dredging Replace existing structure Major rehabilitation of locks and dam Major rehabilitation of locks and dam Dredging Dredging and breakwater Locks and dams Breakwater and dredging Regulating works Rehabilitation of Lock and Dam No.1 Dredging and jetties Navigation and bank stabilization completewildlife mitigation awaiting authorization Dredging Jetties and dredging Dredging Collection and removal of drift Replacement of existing locks and dams 46 and 47 Deep draft channel, deepening and deferred anchorage cont. Replacement of existing lock and dams 6 and 8 Dredging Breakwaters Bank protection Channel improvement and realignment Dredging and breakwater Dredging and breakwater Dredging Dredging & icebreaker structure Dredging & icebreaker structures APPENDIX D (Continued) NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION Project San Diego River and Mission Bay, CA.............................................. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) ............................................................................... Sesiut Harbor, Dennis, MA (Sec 107)................................................ Smith Island, MO (Sec 107)................................................................ Smithland Locks and Dam, IL, IN, and K Y ............................................................................. St. Lucie Inlet, FL............................................................................ Starved Rock Lock and Dam Illinois Waterway, IL................................................................... Tampa Harbor, FL (Main Channel)................................................... Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and M S ........................................................................... ........ d Texas City Channel, TX (Industrial Canal)....................................................................... Tilghman Island Harbor, MD (Sec 107) ............................................ Lilghman Island Harbor, MD (Sec 107) ............................................ Uniontown Locks and Dam, Ohio River, IN and KY ....................................................................................... W alliaville Lake, TX........................................................................ W est Harbor, OH .............................................................................. Weymouth-Fore River, Weymouth- Braintree, MA (Sec 107) ................................................................ Willow Island Locks and Dam, Ohio River, OH and WV ......................................................................... Winchester Bay, Umpqua River, OR (Sec 107)................................. Placed in Useful Operation Fiscal Year Started 1948 1971 1982 1982 1971 1979 1980 1976 1973 1980 1982 1982 1965 1967 1982 1980 1982 1970 1982 1972 1981 1982 1967 1982 Fiscal Year Completed or Scheduled for Completion Indefinite 1992 1982 1983 1987 1982 1983 1985 1985 1982 1983 1983 1983 Indefinite 1983 1982 1983 1983 Nature of Project Dredging and breakwater Deep draft channel, widening, deepening and dredging Dredging Dredging Replacement of existing locks and dams 50 and 51 Dredging, jetties & breakwaters Major rehabilitation of lock and dam Dredging Dredging and Locks and dams Dredging Breakwater Breakwater Replacement of locks and dams 48 and 49 Multipupose lake (navigation, salinity control, water supply, fish & wildlife, & recreation) Breakwaters Dredging Replacement of locks and dams 15-17 Channel Improvement APPENDIX E MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER IN OPERATION SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 Total anlor Storage Nay. Feature Capabi- Placed in Initial Existing Scheduled Ultimate Project Height Length Project River Community lit (acre- Useful Oper- Power Installation Instalation Installation Functions Type (Feet) (Fet) in Vicinity feet) ration CYT in FY (KW) (KW) (KW) Albeni Falls, ID Pad Oreille Allatoona Lake. GA Etowah Barkley Dam & Lake Barklsy, KY & TN Beaver Lake, AR Big Bend Dam (Lake Sharpe), SD Blakely Mountain Dam-Lake Ouachita, AR Bonneville L&D, J Lake Bonneville, OR & WA Broken Bow Lake, OK Buford Dam Lanier, GA Bull Shoals Lake, AR & MO Carters Dam, GA Center Hill Lake, TN Cheatham L&D, TN Chief Joseph Dam (Rufus Woods Lake), WA Clark Hill Lake, GA & SC Cordell Hull L&D, TN Cougar Lake, OR Dale Hollow Lake, TN & KY Dardanelle L&D, AR DeGray Lake, AR Denison Dam (Lake Texoma), TX & OK Detroit Lake, OR, including Big Cliff Lake, OR Newport, WA Cartersville, GA Grand Cumberland Rivers, KY White Eureka sprin, AR Chamberlain Missouri SD HotSprings Ouachita AR Columbia Mountain Fork Chattahoochee White Coosawattee Caney Fork Cumberland Columbia Savannah Cumberland S. Fork, McKenzie Obey Arkansas Caddo Red North Santiam Bonneville, OR Broken Bow, OK Buford, GA Mountain Home, AR Carters, GA Lancaster, TN Ashland City, TN Bridgeport, WA Augusta, GA Carthage, TN Blue River OR Celina, TN Dardanelle, AR Arkadelphia, AR Denison, TX Mill City, OR 1,153,000 670,000 2,082,000 1962 1950 1964 1,952,000 1963 1,883,000 1964 2,768,000 1953 537,000 1938 1,368,800 2,554,000 5,408,000 472,756 2,092,000 104,000 593,100 2,900,000 310,900 219,000 1,706,000 486,200 831,900 5,312,300 1968 1956 1952 1975 1948 1952 1955 1952 1973 1963 1943 1969 1969 1944 1955 1,153,000 74,000 1966 130,000 1965 112,000 1965 468,000 1956 75,000 42,600 NFPR 74,000 FPRW 130,000 NPFR 112,000 FPSR 468,000 FPRIW 75,000 FPRWN 1938 1,010,100 66,500 1,076,600 NPR 1970 1957 1953 1975 1951 1958 1956 1953 1974 1964 1949 1965 1972 1945 100,000 86,000 340,000 500,000 135,000 36,000 2,069,000 280,000 100,000 25,000 54,000 124,000 68,000 100,000 86,000 340,000 500,000 135,000 36,000 204,160 2,273,160 280,000 100,000 64,600 54,000 124,000 40,000 108,000 70,000 FPWSR NFPW FPR FPRW FPR NPR PIR NFPRS NPR NFPRI FPR NPR FNPRSA 175,000 FPSRN 461,000 1953 1954 118,000 118,000 NFPRI 90 190 CE CE 1,055 1,250 157 9,969 228 2,575 95 10,570 235 1,100 122 2,690 225 2,750 192 5,400 258 2,256 450 1,950 250 2,160 75 801 C E E C ER CE C C CE CE ER C C E 220 200 93 445 200 68 243 4,300 5,680 1,306 1,738 1,717 2,683 3,400 165 17,200 C 382 1.528 APPENDIX E--CONTINUED MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER IN OPERATION SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 Flood Control Total and/or Storage Nay. Feature Capabi. Placed in Project River Community lity (acre- Useful Operin Vicinity feet)' ation CY Dworshak Dam & N. Fork, Reservoir, ID Cleanwater Orofino, ID 3,453,000 Eufaula Lake, OK Canadian Eufaula, OK 3,798,000 Fort Gibson Lake, Grand Ft. Gibson OK (Neosho) OK 1,284,400 Fort Peck Lake, Glasgow, MT Missouri MT 18,909,000 Fort Randal Dam (Lake Francis Lake Andes, Case), SD Missouri SD 5,603,000 Garrison Dam (Lake Riverdale, Sakakawea), ND Missouri ND 24,137,000 Gavins Point Dam (Lewis & Clark Lake), SD & NE Missouri Yankton, SD 504,000 Green Peter Lake, tr OR, including Middle Sweet Home, to Foster Lake, OR Santiam OR 491,000 Greers Ferry Lake, Heber AR . Little Red Springs 2,844,000 Harry S. Truman Dam & Res. Osage Warsaw, MO 5,202,000 Hartwell Lake, GA Hartwell, & SC Savannah GA 2,842,700 Hills Creek Lake, Middle Fork Oakridge, OR Willamette OR 356,000 Ice Harbor L&D (Lake Sacajawea), WA Snake Pasco, WA 417,000 Jim Woodruff Dam (Lake Seminole), Appala- Chatta- FL, GA & AL chicola hoochee, FL 367,300 John Day L&D (Lake Umatilla), OR & WA Columbia Rufus, OR 2,500,000 John H. Kerr Dam & Reservoir, NC & VA Roanoke Boydton, VA 2,750,300 Jones Bluff L&D, AL Alabama Benton, AL 234,200 J. Percy Priest Dam & Nashville, Reservoir, TN Stones TN 652,000 Keystone Lake, OK Arkansas Tulsa, OK 1,737,628 Laurel River Lake, KY Laurel London, KY 435,600 Libby Dam, Lake Koocanusa, MT Kootenai Libby, MT 5,869,000 1972 1964 1950 1938 1953 1954 1956 1967 1962 1982 1961 1961 1962 1957 1968 1952 1972 1967 1964 1973 1972 Initial Existing Scheduled Ultimate Project Power Installation Installation Installation Functions Type' in FY (KW) (KW) (KW) 1973 400,000 1,060,000 PNFR C 1965 90,000 90,000 FNPSR E 1953 45,000 67,500 FPR CE 1944 185,250 185,250 FPRIW E 1954 320,000 320,000 NFPRIW E 1956 430,000 430,000 NFPRIW E 1957 100,000 100,000 NFPRIW E 1967 100,000 100,000 PFNIR C 1964 96,000 96,000 FPRS C 19825 160,000 160,000 FPRW CE 1962 264,000 330,000 NFPRS CE 1962 30,000 30,000 NFPRICE 3 1962 603,000 603,000 NPRI CE 1957 30,000 30,000 NPRW CE 1969 2,160,000 2,700,000 NPRFI CE 1953 204,000 204,000 FPRW CE 1975 68,000 68,000 NPRW CE 1970 28,000 28,000 FPRW CE 1968 70,000 70,000 FNPWSR E 1978 61,000 61,000 FPRW R 1975 420,000 420,000 848,000 FPR C Height Length (Feet) (Feet) 717 114 110 251 165 210 74 340 243 96 204 04 2,150 130 67 161 144 101 147 121 282 420 3,300 3,200 2,990 21,026 10,700 11,300 8,700 1,380 1,704 5,000 17,852 2,790 6,150 5,900 22,285 14,962 2,716 4,600 1,420 3,055 APPENDIX E MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER IN OPERATION SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 Flood Control Total and/or Storage Nay. Feature Capabi- Placed in Initial Existing Scheduled Ultimate Project Height Length Project River Community lity (acre- Useful Oper- Power Installation Installation Installation Functions Type2 (Feet) (Feet) in Vicinity feet)' ation CY in FY (KW) (KW) (KW) Little Goose L&D (Lake Bryan), Starbuck, WA Snake WA 565,000 1970 Lookout Point Lake, including Middle Fork, Dexter Lake, OR Willamette Lowell, OR 483,000 1954 Lost Creek Lake, OR Rogue Trail, OR 465,000 1977 Lower Granite Pomercy, L&D, WA Snake WA 484,000 1975 Lower Monumental Kahlotus, L&D, WA Snake WA 376,000 1969 McNary L&DLake Wallula, Umatilla, OR & WA Columbia OR 1,550,000 1953 Millers Ferry L&D, j AL Alabama Camden, AL 331,800 1969 S Narrows Dam- Lake Greeson, Murfreesboro, AR Little Missouri AR 407,900 1950 New Melones Lake, CA7 Stanislaus. Oakdale, CA 2,400,000 1978 Norfolk Lake, AR & MO North Fork Norfolk, AR 1,983,000 1943 Oahe Dam (Lake Oahe), SD & ND Missouri Pierre, SD 23,337,000 1959 Old Hickory L&D, Hendersonville, TN Cumberland TN 545,000 1954 Ozark-Jeta Taylor L&D, AR Arkansas Ozark, AR 148,400 1969 Philpott Lake, VA Roanoke Bassett, VA 318,500 1951 Robert S. Kerr L&D and Reservoir, OK Arkansas Sallisaw, OK 525,700 1970 Sam Rayburn Dam & Raervoir, TX Angelina Jasper, TX 3,997,600 1965 St. Mary's River, Sault Ste. MI Great Lakes Marie, MI - 1855 Snettisham, AK8 Speel Juneau, AK 352,400 Stockton Lake, MO Sac Stockton, MO 1,674,000 1969 Table Rock Lake, AR & MO White Branson, MO 3,462,000 1958 Tenkiller Lake, OK Illinois Gore, OK 1,230,800 1952 The Dalles L&D (Lake Celilo), The Dalles, WA & OR Columbia OR 53,000 1957 Walter F. George Chatta- Fort Gaines, AL&DG,A & FL hoochee GA 934,000 1963 1970 810,000 1955 1977 1975 810,000 NPRI 135,000 49,000 810,000 1969 810,000 1954 1970 1950 1979 1944 1962 1957 1973 1954 1972 1966 1952 1973 1973 1959 1954 CE 135,000 NFPRI CE 49,000 DFPISWR CE 810,000 NPRIF CE 810,000 NPRI 160 2,670 243 345 146 CE 980,000 645,0006 1,625,000 NPRI CE 75,000 75,000 NPRW CE 25,500 300,000 80,550 595,000 100,000 100,000 14,000 25,500 FPRW C 300,000 FIPRW ER 163,000 FPRS C 595,000 NFPRIW E 100,000 NPR CE 100,000 NPR C 14,000 FPR C 110,000 110,000 NPR E 52,000 52,000 FPWR CE 18,400 18,400 NP 46,700 27,0009 73,700 P C � 45,200 45,200 FPRW 200,000 200,000 FPR CE 36,550 36,550 FPR E 1957 1,806,800 1963 130,000 1,806,800 NPR CR 130,000 NPRW CE 3,381 3,600 3,200 135 3,800 183 90 183.5 625 216 245 98 58 220 75 120 Control Gate 18 128 252 197 300 114 7,300 11,380 941 1,560 2,624 9,300 3,605 2,480 892 7,230 19,430 338 5,100 6,423 4,350 8,875 13,585 _~~ APPENDIX E (Continued) MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER IN OPERATION SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 Flood Control Total and/or Storge Nay. Feature Capabi- Placed in Initial Existing Scheduled Ultimate Project Height Legth Project River Community lity (acre- Useful Oper- Power Installation Installation Installation Functions Tpe (Feet) (Feet) in Vicinity feet)' ation CY in FY (KW) (KW) (KW) Webber Falls L&D, Webbers OK Arkansas Falls, OK 170,100 1970 1974 60,000 60,000 NPR E 84 4,370 West Point Lake, Chatta- West Point, AL & GA hoochee GA 604,500 1975 1975 73,75 108,375 FPRW CE 97 7,250 Whitney Lake, TX Brazos Whitney, TX 1,999,500 1953 1954 30,000 30,000 FPR CE 159 17,895 Wolf Creek Dam (Lake Jamestown, Cumberland), KY Cumberland KY 6,089,000 1950 1952 270,000 270,000 FPR CE 258 5,736 'Total of all storage functions, including inactive and dead storage to nromal full pool level '2Gg:r avel; R: rock; C: concrete: E: earth 3Bonneville Second Powerhouse 4Chief Joseph Additional Units & Operating Units 1-16 SAll unitsare synchronized-to-line andtwo units havepassedthe pumpbacktest. However, due to damagingeffects to fish, no furtherpumpingwillbedone foreithertesting or operation until a solution to the problem is found. 6McNary Second Powerhouse Units 7Being operated for the Department of Interior by the Water and Power Resources Services J Being operated by the Alaska Power Administration ' 9Crater Lake Unit x0 Weir for Long Lake Nomenclature for Project Functions A-Low Flow Augmentation D-Debris Control F-Flood Control I-Irrigation N-Navigation P-Power R-Public Recreation (Annual Attendance exceeding 5,000) S-Water Supply W-Fish and Wildlife (Federal or State) APPENDIX F MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER UNDER CONTRUCTION SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 Fiscal Scheduled Scheduled Nameplate Capacity Project Year for for Scheduled Ultimate Started Operation Completion Functions Installation Installation Bonneville Second Power House, OR and WA................................ 1974 1981 1985 PR 558,200 558,200 Clarence Cannon Dam, Salt River, MO.............................................. 1966 1984 1988 FSRPW 58,000 58,000 Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO ..... 1965 1982x 19851 FRPW 160,000 160,000 Libby Additional Units 5-8, MT... 1977 1985 Indefinite P 420,000 420,000 Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, Savannah River, GA and SC .... 1975 1984 1989 FRP 600,000 600,000 St. Stephens, Cooper River, SC.... 1977 1984 1984 NWD 84,000 84,000 1All units are synchronized-to-line and two units have passed the pumpback test. However, due to damagingeffects to fish, no further pumpingwill be done for either testing or operation until a solution to the problem is found. KEY D-Redevelopment F-Flood Control I-Irrigation N-Navigation P-Power R-Recreation S-Water Supply W-Fish and Wildlife N FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY CORPS PROJECTS BY DISTRICTS (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) District During FY 1982 Memphis New Orleans St. Louis Vicksburg Kansas City Omaha New England Baltimore New York Norfolk Philadelphia Buffalo Chicago Detroit Rock Island St. Paul Alaska Portland Seattle Walla Walla Huntington Louisville Nashville Pittsburgh Pacific Ocean Charleston Jacksonville Mobile Savannah Wilmington Los Angeles Sacremento San Francisco Albuquerque Fort Worth Galveston Little Rock Tulsa 4,093 517,673 17,852 31,362 304,430 66,563 236,343 9,546 4,783 150 0 22,363 0 5,040 78,298 0 4,741 1,916,503 8,143 15,263 37,548 126,946 4,431 19,967 800 133 8,987 10,017 1,951 3,301 0 272,100 42,913 2,648 422,774 19,100 0 55,560 TOTAL 4,272,232 Cumulative through FY 82 4,973,601 41,501,107 1,072,921 21,810,5471 4,247,803* 1,566,086 931,445 2,316,932 96,900 5,682 25,252 398,150 02 36,137 630,2442 271,122 26,533 5,508,846 229,728 91,466 3,067,841 1,024,988 432,546 2,771,791* 10,887 3,310 494,447 101,6811 15,981 134,575 6,352,953 2,202,0253 100,0944 221,260 1,499,576s 364,363 267,946 881,562 105,693,328 *Revised figures 'Pearl River Basin transferred to LMVD in FY 1982. Cumulative flood damages through FY 1981 of $114,208 transferred to the Vicksburg District; however, Peal River Basin remains within the Gulf and South Atlantic Region. 2Adjustment in boundaries between Chicago and Rock Island District ($45,944 transferred from Chicago to Rock Island 3 lncludes 2 projects transferred from San Francisco District (Walnut Creek and Coyote Valley Dam) 4Excludes 2 projects transferred from San Francisco District (Walnut Creek and Coyote Valley Dam) 5Includes two projects previously in New Orleans District (Ferrell Bridge Dam, Lake O' the Pines, and Wright Patman Dam and Lake) G-1 FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY CORPS PROJECTS BY REGION (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) Region New England Mid-Atlantic Gulf and South Atlantic Ohio Tennessee Great Lakes Upper Mississippi Souris-Red-Rainy Missouri Arkansas-Red-White Lower Mississippi Rio Grande Texas and Gulf Colorado Great Basin California Columbia-North Pacific Alaska Hawaii TOTAL During FY 82 239,970 10,419 24,398 188,802 0 27,836 96,150 0 370,993 55,960 552,850 2,526 441,874 0 8,000 307,013 1,939,909 4,741 800 4,272,232 Cumulative through FY 82 948,724 2,411,847 869,202 7,287,680* 9,486 454,120 1,784,362 185,732 5,813,889* 2,145,045 67,248,179 148,591 1,863,939 312,331 11,525 8,331,216 5,830,040 26,533 10,887 105,693,328 *Revised Figures G-2 INDEX The following abbreviations are used in the index: LMK LMM LMN LMS MR+T MRK MRO NAB NAN NAO NAP NCB NCC NCD NCE NCR NCS NED NPA NPP VICKSBURG, MISS., DISTRICT MEMPHIS, TENN., DISTRICT NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT ST. LOUIS, MO., DISTRICT MISSISSIPPI, RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES PROJECT KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT OMAHA, NEBR., DISTRICT BALTIMORE, MD., DISTRICT NEW YORK, N.Y., DISTRICT NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT CHICAGO, ILL., DISTRICT MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT ROCK ISLAND, ILL., DISTRICT ST. PAUL, MINN., DISTRICT NEW ENGLAND DIVISION ALASKA DISTRICT PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT A Aberdeen, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Aberdeen Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-22 Abilene, Kans. (MRK) 20-18, 20-23 Abiquiu Dam, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-4, 17-10, 17-12 Absecon Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-27 Absecon Inlet, N.J. (NAP) 3-2, 3-19, 3-23 Accotink Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-33 Ackerman Creek, Ill. (NCR) 28-3, 28-10, 28-13 Adams, Mass. (NAN) 2-33 Adams Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-14 Adams Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-23, 24-27 Addison, N.Y. (NAB) 4-13, 4-24 Adena, Ohio (Short Creek) (ORP) 26-23 Adkin Branch, N.C. (SAW) 6-12, 6-22, 6-29 Afono Area and Aoa Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-13 Agana Small Boat Harbor, Guam (POD) 36-12, 36-14 AIWW-Mooring Basins, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Ala Wai Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Alabama River at Montgomery, Ala. (SAM) 10-39 Alabama-Coosa Rivers, Ala. and Ga. (SAM) 10-16, 10-27, 10-36, 10-41 Alameda Creek, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-11, 35-23 Alamo Lake, Ariz. (SPL) 33-5, 33-15, 33-21 Alamogordo Diversion Channel, Tularosa (Closed) Basin, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-13 Albemarle and Chesapeake Canal (Great Bridge, Va.) (NAO) 5-21 Albeni Falls Dam, Idaho (NAS) 38-11, 38-17, 38-23 NPS NPW ORD ORH ORL ORN ORP POD SAJ SAM SAN SAS SAW SPK SPL SPN SWA SWF SWG SWL SWT SEATTLE, WASH., DISTRICT WALLA WALLA, WASH., DISTRICT OHIO RIVER DIVISION HUNTINGTON, W. VA., DISTRICT LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT NASHVILLE, TENN., DISTRICT PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION JACKSONVILLE, FLA., DISTRICT MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT SAVANNAH, GA., DISTRICT WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT SACRAMENTO, CALIF., DISTRICT LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF., DISTRICT ALBUQUERQUE, N. MEX., DISTRICT FORT WORTH, TEX., DISTRICT GALVESTON, TEX., DISTRICT LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT Albuquerque Diversion Channels, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-1, 17-9 Alford, Mass. (NED) 1-27, 1-50, 1-58 Algoma Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-2, 31-44, 31-70, 31-7-1 Alhambra Creek, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-11, 35-23 Aliso Creek Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-30 Allatoona Lake, Ga. (SAM) 10-18, 10-27, 10-36 Allegany, N.Y. Unit II (Five Mile Creek Area) (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Allegany, .N.Y. Unit I (Allegheny River) (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-2, 26-14, 26-17, 26-21, 26-26 Allegheny River, Oil City, Pa. (ORP) 26-3, 26-14 Allentown, Pa. (NAP) 3-29 Allenville, Ariz. (SPL) 33-5, 33-15, 33-21 Alley Bay, Beals, Maine (NED) 1-50 Alloway Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-27 Alluvial Valley Mapping (MR + T) 42-3 Alma Harbor, Wis. (NCD) 29-8 Almond Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-13, 4-24 Almond Village, N.Y. (NAB) 4-37 Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, La. (LMN) 11-41, 11-42 Alpena Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-70, 31-71 Alpine Dam, Rockford, Ill. (NCR) 28-18 Alpine, Texas (SWA) 17-13 Alsea River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Altamaha, Oconee, and Ocmulgee Rivers, Ga. (SAS) 8-2, 8-11, 8-12 Alteration of Berwick Bay Bridge (LMN) 11-38 Alternative for Sugar Hill Reservoir (NED) 1-52 I-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Alton, Ind. (ORL) 24-24, 24-28 Altus Reservoir, Okla. (SWT) 19-13 Alum Creek Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-2, 25-11, 25-15 Alvin R. Bush Dam, Pa. (NAB) 4-17, 4-26 Amazon Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 American Lake, Vicinity of Fort Lewis, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 American River, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 Ames Lake, Iowa (NCR) 28-17 Amesbury, Mass. (NED) 1-27, 1-50, 1-59 Amite River, La. (MR + T) 42-15 Amite River and Bayou Manchac, La. (LMN) 11-38 Amite River and Tributaries, La. (LMN) 11-42 Amsterdam, Ohio (ORP) 26-22, 26-28 Anacortes Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-2, 38-14, 38-19 Anacortes Navigation Channel, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Anacostia River and Flats (NAB) 4-33, 4-39 Anacostia River and Tributaries, Flood Protection and Navigation Improvements, D.C. and Md. (NAB) 4-36 Anacostia River and Tributaries, Md. (N) 4-36 Anacostia River Basin, Md. (NAB) 4-39 Anaheim Bay Harbor, Orange County, Calif. (SPL) 33-25 Anahuac Channel, Tex. (SWG) 15-9 Anchorage Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-1, 40-8, 40-10, 40-13 Anclote River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Andalusia Harbor, Ill. (NCP) 29-9 Anderson, Ind. (ORL) 24-23 Anderson Park, Newport News, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Andover Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-52 Andrews, George W., Lock and Dam, Ala. and Ga. (SAM) 10-21, 10-27, 10-36 Andrews River, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Angler-Use Sites, Meramec Basin, Mo. (LMS) 14-14 Annapolis Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Ansonia, Conn. (NED) 1-26, 1-50, 1-58 Anthony Shoals Dam and Lake, Ga. (SAS) 8-17 Apalachee Bay, Fla. to New Orleans, La. (SAM) 10-32 Apalachicola Bay, Fla. (SAM) 10-2, 10-24, 10-29 Apalachicola Bay to St. Marks River, Fla. (SAM) 10-31 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, Ala. Ga. and Fla. (SAM) 10-19, 10-27, 10-36, 10-42 Apalachicola River to St. Andrew Bay, Fla. (SAM) 10-31 Apoon Mouth of Yukon River, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Appelton First Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-69 Appelton Fourth Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-69 Appelton Lower Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-69 Appelton Second Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-69 Appelton Third Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-69 Applegate Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-12, 37-27, 37-36, 37-48 Appomattox River, Va. (NAO) 5-22 Apponaug Cove, R.I. (NED) 1-45 Appoquinimink River, Del. (NAP) 3-27, 3-30 Aquashicola Reservoir, Pa. (NAP) 3-29 Aquatic Plant Control Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-34 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-2, 7-8, 7-10, 7-14 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 15-2, 15-14, 15-18, 15-29 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-2, 9-14, 9-29, 9-31, 9-35, 9-50 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-3, 10-24, 10-29 New England Division (NED) 1-3, 1-29, 1-40 New Orleans, La., District (LMN) 11-2, 11-25, 11-29 New York, N.Y., District (NAN) 2-2, 2-20, 2-24 Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP) 3-27 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-7 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-23 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS) 8-2, 8-11, 8-12, 8-16 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-5 Southwestern Division (SWG) 15-2, 15-14, 15-18, 15-29 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 27-15 Wilmington, N.C., District (SAW) 6-2, 6-20, 6-27 Aquia Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-33 Aquilla Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-3, 16-17, 16-21 Ararat River, Surry County, N.C. (SAW) 6-32 Arbuckle Reservoir, Okla. (SWT) 19-13 Arcadia, Wis. (NCS) 27-20 Arcadia Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-2, 31-35, 31-49 Arcadia Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-4, 19-18, 19-22 Arch Creek, Fla. (SAJ) 9-57 Archers Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-14 Ardsley, N.Y. (NAN) 2-11, 2-22, 2-27 Area East of Albany, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 Arecibo Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-2, 9-29, 9-35, 9-49 Argyle, Minn., Middle River (NCS) 27-25 Arkabutla Lake, Miss. (MR + T) 42-20, 42-56 Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control, Okla. and Tex. (SWT) 19-4, 19-5, 19-17, 19-18, 19-22, 19-24, 19-26 Arkansas River Basin, Ark. Okla. & Kans. (SWL) (SWT) 18-2, 18-10, 18-13, 18-15, 18-18, 19-2, 19-23 Arkansas River, Great Bend, Kans. to Tulsa, Okla. (SWT) 19-17 Arkansas River Project Levees (MR + T) 42-44 Arkansas River Standard Revetments and Dikes (MR + T) 42-37 Arkansas River Plan, Okla. (SWT) 19-24 Arkport Dam, N.Y. (NAB) 4-14, 4-24 Arlington, Alkali Canyon, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 Arlington Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-19 Armuchee Creek, Ga. (SAM) 10-39 Ashland, Ky. (ORH) 25-19, 25-21 Ashland Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-2, 31-35, 31-49 Ashley River, S.C. (SAN) 7-14 Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-2, 32-18, 32-23 Asotin Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-13 Asotin Dam, Idaho and Wash. (NPW) 39-15 Astoria Turning Basin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Atchafalaya Basin Floodway (MR + T) 42-43, 42-48, 45-55 Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, La. (LMN) 11-3, 11-25, 11-29 Atchalafaya River Basin, La. (MR + T) 42-5, 42-13, 42-27, 42-53, 42-55 Atchafalaya River, Morgan City to Gulf of Mexico, La. (LMN) 11-38 I-2 INDEX Atchalafaya River, Standard Revetments (MR + T) 42-31 Atchison, Kans. (MRK) 20-18 Athalia, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Athens, Ohio, (ORH) 25-19, 25-21 Atlantic Beach Channels, N.C. (SAW) 6-27, 6-30 Atlantic City, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 Atlantic Coast of N.J. Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlets (NAN) 2-32 Atlantic Gulf Ship Canal, Fla. (SAJ) 9-50 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns River, Fla. (NAO) (SAW) (SAN) (SAS) (SAJ) 5-2, 5-14, 5-17, 5-21, 5-24, 6-2, 6-20, 6-25, 7-2, 7-8, 7-10, 8-3, 8-11, 8-13, 9-2, 9-29, 9-35, 9-49 Au Sable Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-70, 31-71 Auasi Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-1, 36-8 Aubrey Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-11, 16-18, 16-22 Auburn, N.Y., Owasco Outlet (NCB) 32-36 Augusta Levee, Kans. (SWT) 19-26 Augusta, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Augusta, Ky. (ORH) 25-19 Aunuu Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-2, 36-8 Aurora, Ind. (ORL) 24-24, 24-29 Aurora, Westerly Creek-Kelley Road Dam, Colo. (MRO) 21-16, 21-21 Avoca, N.Y. (NAB) 4-14, 4-24, 4-37, 4-38 Avon Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Aylesworth Creek Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-13, 4-24 B B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, N.C. (Formerly New Hope Lake, N.C.) (SAW) 6-12, 6-22 Bachelor Island, Wash. (NPP) 37-45, 37-49 Back Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Back Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-10 Bad River, Bank Protection, Fort Pierre, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-20 Bagaduce River, Maine (NED) 1-45, 1-52 Bailey, R.D., Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-8, 25-13, 25-17 Bainbridge, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Baker Brook, Mass. (NED) 1-52 Bakers Haulover Inlet, Fla. (SAJ) 9-50 Ball Mountain Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-15, 1-33, 1-56 Baltimore Harbor, Md. Collection and Removal of Drift (NAB) 4-4, 4-21, 4-28 Baltimore Harbor, Md. Prevention of Obstruction and Injurious Deposits (NAB) 4-8, 4-22, 4-30 Baltimore Harbor and Channels, Md. and Va. (NAB) 4-3, 4-21, 4-27 Baltimore Harbor and Channels (Norfolk District) (NAO) 5-2, 5-14, 5-17, 5-24 Bandon Small Boat Basin, Coquille River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-2, 37-24, 37-31 Bank Revetments and Dikes (MR+T) 42-29, 42-32, 42-34 Bank Stabilization & Channel Rectification, Ark. (SWL) 18-2, 18-10, 18-17 Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification, Arkansas River, Ark. and Okla. (SWT) 19-3, 19-18 Bank Stabilization, Red River Below Dennison (SWT) 19-25, 19-26 Banner Special Drainage and Levee Districts (NCR) 28-16, 28-18 Banning Levee-San Gorgonio River, Calif. (SPL) 33-26, 33-31 Bar Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-45 Bar Point Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-1, 40-8, 40-10 Barataria Bay Waterway, La. (LMN) 11-3, 11-25, 11-29 Barbers Point Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-2, 36-8, 36-10 Barbourville, Ky. (ORN) 23-13, 23-19 Barcelona Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-2, 32-18 Bardwell Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-3, 16-17, 16-21 Barkley Dam and Lake Barkley, Ky. and Tenn. (ORN) 23-14 Barnard, Kans. (MRK) 20-18 Barnegat Inlet, N.J. (NAP) 3-2, 3-19, 3-23 Barnegat Light, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 Barnett Creek, Ky. (ORL) 24-27 Barre Falls Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-15, 1-33, 1-56 Barren River Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-5, 24-16, 24-30 Bartley, Nebr. (MRK) 20-18, 20-23 Bass Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-45 Bass Harbor Bar, Maine (NED) 1-45 Bassett Creek, Minn. (NCS) 27-3, 27-16 Bastrop Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-29 Batavia and Vicinity, N.Y. (NCB) 32-36 Bath, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Baton Rouge Harbor, La. (LMN) 11-38 Baton Rouge Harbor (Devil's Swamp), La. (MR + T) 42-6, 42-28, 42-48 Battle Creek, Bank Protection, Battle Creek, Nebr. (MRO) 21-21 Baudette Harbor, Minn. (NCS) 27-20 Bay City Harbor, Wis. (NCD) 29-8 Bay Ridge and Red Hook Channels, N.Y. (NAN) 2-2, 2-20, 2-24, 2-30 Bay River, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Bayard, W. Va. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Bayfield Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-70, 31-71 Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, Ark. and La. (LMK) 12-6, 12-9, 12-11, 12-14, 12-15 Bayou Bodcau and Tributaries, Ark. and La. (LMN) 11-16, 11-27, 11-33, 11-40 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, La. (LMN) 11-17, 11-27, 11-33, 11-39, 11-41 Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, La. (LMN) 11-41, 11-42 Bayou Bonfouca, La. (LMN) 11-38 Bayou Choupique, La. (LMN) 11-42 Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries, La. (MR + T) 42-6, 42-14, 42-27, 42-52, 42-55 Bayou Coden, Ala. (SAM) 10-3, 10-24, 10-29 Bayou Dorcheat, Loggy Bayou and Lake Bisteneau, La. (LMN) 11-38 Bayou Dupre, La. (LMN) 11-38 Bayou Galere, Miss. (SAM) 10-41 Bayou Grosse Tete, La. (LMN) 11-38 Bayou La Batre, Ala. (SAM) 10-3, 10-24, 10-29 I-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Bayou La Loutre, St. Malo, and Yscolskey, La. (LMN) 11-38 Bayou Lacombe, La. (LMN) 11-38 Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche-Jump Waterway, La. (LMN) 11-4, 11-25, 11-29 Bayou Meto, Ark. (MR + T) 42-50 Bayou Nicholas, Coushatta, La. (LMN) 11-40, 11-42 Bayou Pierre, La. (LMN) 11-17, 11-27, 11-33, 11-40, 11-41, 11-42 Bayou Plaquemine Brule, La. (LMN) 11-38 Bayou Queue de Tortue, La. (LMN) 11-38 Bayou Rapides, La. (LMN) 11-42 Bayou Segnette Waterway, La. (LMN) 11-38 Bayou Teche, La. (LMN) 11-5, 11-25, 11-29, 11-35 Bayou Teche and Vermilion River, La. (LMN) 11-5, 11-25, 11-29 Bayou Terrebonne, La. (LMN) 11-38 Bayou Vermilion, La. (LMN) 11-38 Bayous D'Arbonne and Corney, La. (LMK) 12-14 Bayous Des Glaise Diversion Channel, La. (MR+ T) 42-48 Bayous Rapides, Boeuf, and Cocodrie (MR + T) 42-48 Bayport, Fla. (SAJ) 9-50 Bayport Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-70, 31-71 Baytown, Tex. (SWG) 15-29 Beals Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-45 Beals Island, Maine (NED) 1-26 Bear Creek, Hannibal, Mo. (NCR) 28-18 Bear Creek, Kendrick, Idaho (NPW) 39-13, 39-17 Bear Creek, La Quinta, Calif. (SPL) 33-31 Bear Creek, Mont. (NPS) 38-26 Bear Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43, 37-45 Bear Creek Dam (City of Hannibal, Mo.) (NCR) 28-16 Bear Creek Lake, Colo. (MRO) 21-2, 21-10, 21-13 Bear River, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 Beards Brook Reservoir, N.H. (NED) 1-52 Beatrice, Nebr. (MKR) 20-19 Beaufort Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-4, 6-20, 6-26 Beaver and Mahoning Rivers, Pa. and Ohio (ORP) 26-21 Beaver Bay Harbor, Minn. (NCE) 31-2, 31-35, 31-49 Beaver Brook Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-52 Beaver Creek, Montezuma, Ga. (SAM) 10-39 Beaver Creek near Tillamook, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 Beaver Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42, 37-49 Beaver Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-7, 18-11, 18-20 Bedford, Iowa (MRK) 20-18 Beech Fork Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-2, 25-11, 25-15 Belfast Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-45 Belhaven Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-4, 6-20, 6-30 Bell Foley Lake, White River Basin, Ark. (SWL) 18-20, 18-21 Bellaire, Ohio (ORP) 26-23 Bellamy River, N.H. (NED) 1-45 Belle Fourche, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-16, 21-20 Belle River Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-70, 31-71 Belleville Locks and Dam, Ohio (ORD) 22-1, 22-8 Bellevue, Ky. (ORL) 24-24, 24-28 Bellingham Harbor, Wash. (I and J Street Waterway) (NPS) 38-25 Bellingham Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-2, 38-14, 38-19 Bellingham, Squalicum Small Boat Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Belpre, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Belton Lake Modification, Tex. (SWF) 16-14 Belton Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-3, 16-17, 16-21 Beltzville Lake, Pa. (NAP) 3-13, 3-21 Benbrook Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-4, 16-17, 16-21 Bennett-McDonald-Smithland D.D., Little Sioux River, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 Bennington, Vt. (NAN) 2-33 Bennington Reservoir, N.H. (NED) 1-52 Benwood, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Berkeley Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-10 Berkeley Marina, Calif. (SPN) 34-10 Berlin Lake, Ohio (ORP) 26-5, 26-14, 26-18 Berwick Bay Bridge Alteration (LMN) 11-38 Bethel Small Boat Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-2, 40-8, 40-10 Bethlehem, Pa. (NAP) 3-29 Bettendorf, Iowa (NCR) 28-4, 28-10, 28-13 Betterton Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Beverly Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Big and Little Sallisaw Creeks Navigation Project, Okla. (SWT) 19-2, 19-18, 19-22 Big Bay Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-3, 31-35, 31-49 Big Bend, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-7, 21-11, 21-15 Big Black River, Miss. (LMK) 12-14, 12-15 Big Blue Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-25, 24-31 Big Blue River, Nebr. (MRK) 20-9, 20-18 Big Choctaw Bayou, La. (LMK) 12-15 Big Creek and L'Anguille River, Ark. (LMM) 13-10 Big Creek Canal, Millington, Tenn. (LMM) 13-10 Big (Cunningham) Creek, Ohio (NCB) 32-34 Big Darby, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Big Dry Creek Dam and Diversion, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 Big Fossil Creek, Tex. (SWF) 16-24 Big Fossil Creek Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-24 Big Hole River, Pennington Bridge, near Twin Bridges, Mont. (MRO) 21-20 Big Horn River, Two Leggin Bridge, near Hardin, Mont. (MRO) 21-20 Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-16, 28-18 Big Pigeon and Little Pigeon Bayous, La. (LMN) 11-38 Big Pine Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-23 Big Pine Lake, Tex. (SWT) 19-6, 19-18, 19-22 Big Run, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-28 Big Sandy Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-4, 16-17, 16-21 Big Sandy River, W. Va. and Ky., including Levisa and Tug Forks (ORH) 25-5, 25-12, 25-18 Big Sioux River at Sioux City, Iowa and S. Dak. (MRO) 21-3, 21-10, 21-13 Big Sioux River, Fink Bridge, near Flandreau, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-20 Big Sioux River, Schofield Bridge, near Flandreau, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-20 Big Slough & Mayo Ditch, Ark. (MR + T) 42-54 Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, Ky. and Tenn. (ORN) 23-4, 23-9 Big Spring, Tex. (SWF) 16-24 I-4 INDEX Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, Minn. and S. Dak. (NCS) 27-4, 27-16 Big Stranger Creek, Kans. (MRK) 20-18 Big Suamico Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-70 Big Suamico River, Wis. (NCE) 31-71 Big Sunflower River, Miss. (LMK) (MR&T) 12-14, 42-49 Big Swan Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Big Timber Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-27 Big Walnut Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-23, 24-31 Big Walnut, Ohio (ORH) 25-23, 25-28 Big Wash, Milford, Utah (SPK) 35-23 Billings, Montana (MRO) 21-17 Biloxi Harbor, Miss. (SAM) 10-4, 10-24, 10-29 Binghamton, N.Y. (NAB) 4-14, 4-24, 4-37 Birch Hill Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-15, 1-33, 1-56 Birch Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-6, 19-18 Birch, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19 Bird Rock Area, La Jdlla, Calif. (SPL) 33-25 Birds Point-New Madrid Floodway, Mo. (MR + T) 42-51 Biscayne Bay, Fla., Hurricane Protection (SAJ) 9-57 Black Bayou Lake, La. (LMN) 11-41 Black Bayou-Pine Island Area, La. (LMN) 11-42 Black Bayou Reservoir, La. (LMN) 11-42 Black Creek, Gadsden, Ala. (SAM) 10-39 Black Fork at Hendricks, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22 Black River, Ark. & Mo. (SWL) 18-19 Black River, Mich. (NCE) 31-70, 31-71 Black River, N.C. (SAW) 6-12, 6-22, 6-27 Black River, Wis. (NCS) 27-20, 27-22 Black River Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-71, 31-73 Black River Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-34 Black River Lake, Wis. (NCS) 27-22 Black River, Poplar Bluff, Mo., to Knobel, Ark. (SWL) 18-21 Black River (Port Huron), Mich. (NCE) 31-3, 31-35, 31-50 Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-2, 32-18, 32-23, 32-38 Black Rock Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-19, 1-35, 1-58 Black Walnut Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-4, 4-21, 4-28 Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, Ala. (SAM) 10-4, 10-24, 10-30, 10-37 Blackbird Creek near Macy, Nebr. (MRO) 21-16, 21-21 Blackfoot Area, Snake River, Idaho (NPW) 39-13, 39-16 Blackfoot Reservoir, Idaho (NPW) 39-13 Blackfoot River, Idaho (NPW) 39-13, 39-16, 39-17 Blackfoot River, Mont. (NPS) 38-26 Blackhawk Creek, Davenport, Iowa (NCR) 28-18 Blackstone, Mass. (NED) 1-27 Blackstone River Basin, Mass. and R.I. (NED) 1-13, 1-27, 1-55 Blackwater Dam, N.H. (NED) 1-22, 1-36, 1-59 Blackwater River, Fla. (SAM) 10-38 Blackwater River, Va. (NAO) 5-22 Blaine, Maine (NED) 1-26 Blaine Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-25, 38-32 Blair and Sitcom Waterways, Tacoma Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-13 Blakely Mountain Dam-Lake Quachita, Ark. (LMK) 12-5, 12-8, 12-15 Blind Slough Diking District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Bloomington Lake, Md. and W. Va. (NAB) 4-12, 4-23, 4-32 Blue Marsh Lake, Pa. (NAP) 3-13, 3-21 Blue Mountain Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-5, 18-11, 18-18 Blue River Basin (Kansas City District) (MRK) 20-2, 20-14 Blue River Channel, Kansas City, Mo. (MRK) 20-2, 20-11, 20-14 Blue River Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-12, 37-27, 37-37, 37-48, 37-50 Bluestone Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-3, 25-11, 25-15 Bluff Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-38 Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors (BERH) 41-1 Bodega Bay, Calif. (SPN) 34-4, 34-6 Bodie Island, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, Ark. and La. (MR + T) 42-49 Boeuf River, La. (LMN) 12-14 Bogachiel River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Boggy Creek, Tex. (SWF) 16-4, 16-17, 16-21 Bogue Inlet, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 Boise Valley, Idaho (NPW) 39-13, 39-15, 39-16 Bolles Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-4, 31-35, 31-50 Bon Secour River, Ala. (SAM) 10-5, 10-24, 10-31, 10-38 Bonnet Carre Spillway, La. (MR + T) 42-6, 42-52, 42-53 Bonneville Lock and Dam-Lake Bonneville, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-18, 37-23, 37-28, 37-38, 37-51 Bonpas Creek, Ill. (ORL) 24-23, 24-27, 24-34 Bonum Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-4, 4-21, 4-28 Boone County, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-33 Booneville Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-23, 24-30 Boothbay Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-45 Boston Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-3, 1-29, 1-40, 1-60 Boswell Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-25, 19-26 Boulder Creek, Boulder, Colo. (MRO) 21-16 Bound Brook, Scituate, Mass. (NED) 1-50 Bowman, Leland, Lock, La. (formerly Vermilion Lock) (LMN) 11-10, 11-26, 11-31 Bowman-Haley Lake, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-3, 21-10, 21-13 Brackenridge, Tarentum and Natrona, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Bradford, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-28 Bradley Lake, Alaska (NPA) 40-7 Bramwell, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Brandenburg, Ky. (ORL) 24-33 Brandon Road Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-21,. 28-22 Branford Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Branson Cove, Va. (NAB) 4-34 Brant Rock Beach, Marshfield, Mass. (NED) 1-52 Braymer Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-18 Brazos Island Harbor, Tex. (SWG) 15-2, 15-14, 15-18, 15-30, 15-31, 15-36 Brazos River, Tex., Velasco to Old Washington (SWG) 15-29 Breton Bay, Md. (NAB) 4-34 I-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Brevard County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-19, 9-32, 9-43 Brevoort Levee, Ill. (ORL) 24-23, 24-32 Bridge Alterations Authorized Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 30-16 Nashville, Tenn., District (ORN) 23-4 New England Division (NED) 1-12 Bridgeport Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-3, 1-29, 1-52 Bridges, Columbia River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Bridgewater, Va. (NAB) 4-36 Brilliant, Ohio (ORP) 26-23 Bristol Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-4, 1-29, 1-40 Broad Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 Broad Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Broad Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-22 Broad Creek River, Del. (NAB) 4-34 Broadkill River, Del. (NAP) 3-27 Broadwater Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Broadway Lake, S.C. (SAS) 8-7, 8-11, 8-15 Brockway, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Brockway Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-52 Broken Bow, Nebr. (MRO) 21-21 Broken Bow Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-14, 19-20, 19-25 Bromley, Ky. (ORL) 24-24, 24-28 Bronx River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-30, 2-35 Brookfield Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-18 Brooklyn, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Brookport, Ill. (ORL) 24-22, 24-27, 24-32 Brookville, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-28 Brookville Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-5, 24-16, 24-30 Broward County, Fla., Beach Erosion Control and Hillsboro Inlet, Fla., Navigation Project (SAJ) 9-19, 9-32, 9-43 Brown, Clarence J., Dam and Reservoir, Ohio (ORL) 24-8, 24-17 Browns Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-5, 2-35 Brownstown, Ind. (ORL) 24-33 Brownwood Channel Improvement, Tex. (SWF) 16-24 Brunswick County Beaches, N.C. (Cape Fear to North Carolina-South Carolina State Line) (SAW) 6-28 Brunswick Harbor, Ga. (SAS) 8-3, 8-11, 8-13 Brush Bayou, La. (LMN) 11-17, 11-27, 11-33 Brushy Creek, Greenville, S.C. (SAN) 7-14 Buchanan Dam-H. V. Eastman Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-4, 35-17 Buck Creek, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-7, 7-15 Buckhannon, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22, 26-23, 26-28 Buckhannon River, W. Va. (ORP) 26-21 Buckhorn Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-6, 24-16, 24-30 Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, Maine (NED) 1-45 Bucksport Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-45 Buena Vista, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Buena Vista, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Buffalo, Wyo. (MRO) 21-16 Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, Tex. (SWG) 15-10, 15-15, 15-27 Buffalo Creek, Meadow Grove, Nebr. (MRO) 21-16, 21-21 Buffalo Creek, Scranton, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-16, 21-20 Buffalo Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-3, 32-18, 32-24 Buffalo River, Miss. (LMK) 12-15 Buffumville Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-25, 1-37, 1-60 Buford Dam, Ga. (SAM) 10-20 Bull Run, Pa. (NAB) 4-12, 4-24, 4-32 Bull Shoals Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-7, 18-11, 18-20 Bullocks Point Cove, R.I. (NED) 1-45 Bunker Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-45 Burbank-Eastern System, Calif. (SPL) 33-28 Burbank-Western System (Lower) Calif. (SPL) 33-28 Burbank-Western System (Upper) Calif. (SPL) 33-28 Burch Creek, Weber County, Utah (SPK) 35-23 Burgettstown, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Burgettstown-Slovan, Pa. (ORP) 26-28 Burial Hill Beach, Westport, Conn. (NED) 1-49 Burketts Creek, Amory, Miss. (SAM) 10-14, 10-35 Burlington, Iowa (NCR) 28-4, 28-10, 28-13 Burlington, Ohio (ORH) 25-19 Burlington Dam, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-4, 27-16 Burlington Harbor, Vt. (NAN) 2-31 Burns Waterway Harbor, Ind. (NCD) 30-2, 30-10, 30-15 Burnsville Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-3, 25-11, 25-15 Bush, Alvin R., Dam, Pa. (NAB) 4-17, 4-26 Bushley Bayou, La. (MR + T) 42-27 Bushy Park Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-10 Butler, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-28 Buttermilk Bay Channel, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Buttermilk Channel, N.Y. (NAN) 2-2, 2-20, 2-24 Byram River at Pemberwick, Conn. (NAN) 2-33 C Cache Basin, Ark. (MR + T) 42-10, 42-18, 42-27, 42-51 Cache La Poudre River, Ft. Collins, Colo. (MRO) 21-21 Cache River Diversion, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Caddo Lake, La. (LMN) 11-18, 11-27, 11-33, 11-40 Cadet Bayou, Miss. (SAM) 10-6, 10-24, 10-31 Cadle Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Caesar Creek Lake, Ohio (ORL) 24-6, 24-16, 24-30 Cagles Mill Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-7, 24-17, 24-30 Cahaba River, Ala. (SAM) 10-38 Cairo, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Calapooya River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 Calaveras River and Little John Creek and Tributaries, including New Hogan Lake and Farmington Dam, Calif. (SPK) 35-4, 35-17 Calcasieu River and Pass, La. (LMN) 11-6, 11-25, 11-30 Calcasieu River at Coon Island, La. (LMN) 11-38 Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, La. (LMN) 11-38 Calcasieu River Salt Water Barrier, La. (LMN) 11-38 Caledonia, N.Y. (NCB) 32-36 Calf Pasture Beach Park, Conn. (NED) 1-49 Calico Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 California (Cincinnati) Ohio (ORL) 24-24, 24-29 California Debris Commission (CDC) 44-1 Calion, Ark. (LMK) 12-15 Calumet Harbor and River, Ill. and Indiana (NCC) 30-2, 30-10, 30-12, 30-15 Calumet River Bridges, Ill. (NCC) 30-16 Camas Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-15, 39-16 Cambridge Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-34 I-6 INDEX Cambridgeport Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-52 Camden Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-45 Camelsback Dam, Ariz. (SPL) 33-26 Camp Ground Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-7, 24-17 Camp Perry, Ohio (NCB) 32-36 Camp Wooten, Wash. (NPW) 39-17 Campbells Island, Ill. (NCR) 28-18 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, La. (LMN) 11-40, 11-42 Canapitsit Channel, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Canaveral Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-3, 9-29, 9-35, 9-46 Candy Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-6, 19-18, 19-22 Cane River, La. (LMN) 11-38 Caney Fork River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Canisteo, N.Y. (NAB) 4-14, 4-25 Cannelton, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-27 Cannelton Locks and Dam, Ind. (ORD) 22-3, 22-9 Cannon, Clarence, Dam and Reservoir, Mo. (LMS) 14-7, 14-10, 14-12 Canton, Mass. (NED) 1-50 Canton, Mo. (NCR) 28-16, 28-18 Canton (Nimishillen), Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Canton Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-18, 19-6, 19-18, 19-23 Canyon Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-5, 16-17, 16-21 Cape Charles City Harbor, Va. (NAO) 5-22 Cape Cod Canal, Mass. (NED) 1-4, 1-29 Cape Fear River, N.C., above Wilmington (SAW) 6-4, 6-20 Cape Fear River Basin, N.C. (SAW) 6-12, 6-31 Cape Florida State Park, Fla. (SAJ) 9-51 Cape Girardeau, Mo., No. 2 (LMS) 14-14 Cape Girardeau, Mo., Reaches Nos. 1, 3 and 4 (LMS) 14-14 Cape Henry Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-2, 5-17 Cape Lookout, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Cape May City, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 Cape May Inlet to Lower Township, N.J. (NAP) 3-14, 3-22 Cape Porpoise Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-45 Cape Vincent Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-3, 32-18, 32-25 Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam, Ky. (ORD) 22-2, 22-8 Carden's Bottom Drainage District No. 2, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-21 Carl L. Estes Dam and Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-24 Carlyle Lake, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N.C. (SAW) 6-13, 6-23 Carr Fork Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-7, 24-17, 24-30 Carrabelle Bar and Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-38 Carrabelle Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-38 Carroll County Levee and Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-18 Carrollton, Ky. (ORL) 24-24, 24-28 Carters Creek, Va. (NAG) 5-22 Carters Lake, Ga. (SAM) 10-17, 10-27 Carthage Levee, Mo. (SWT) 19-25, 19-26 Caruthersville Harbor, Mo. (LMM) 13-1, 13-6, 13-8 Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, Maine (NED) 1-45 Cascadia Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43, 37-50 Caseville Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-5, 31-44, 31-70, 31-71 Caseyville, Ky. (ORL) 24-23, 24-27 Cashie River, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Cassville Harbor, Wis. (NCD) 29-8 Castle Rock, Wash. (NPP) 37-43 Castlewood Lake, Colo. (MRO) 21-16 Catching Inlet Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 Cathance River, Maine (NED) 1-45 Catherine Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPW) 39-13 Cathlamet, Wash. (NPP) 37-40 Catlettsburg, Ky. (ORH) 25-19, 25-21 Cattaraugus Creek, N.Y. (NCB) 32-34 Cattaraugus Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-4, 32-18 Cave Run Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-8, 24-17, 24-30 Cave-In-Rock, Ill. (ORL) 24-24, 24-28 Cayuga Creek, Cheektowaga, N.Y. (NCB) 32-14, 32-21 Cecil M. Harden Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-8, 24-17, 24-30 Cedar Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-2, 15-14, 15-18, 15-30, 15-36 Cedar Canyon Dam, S.Dak. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Cedar Island Bay, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Cedar Keys Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Cedar Point Lake, Kans. (SWT) 19-26 Cedar River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Cedar River Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-4, 31-35, 31-50 Cedars Lock and Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-69 Celina Dam, Ky. (ORN) 23-14 Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. (ORN) 23-6, 23-9, 23-18 Central and Southern Florida (SAJ) 9-25, 9-33, 9-44, 9-51, 9-52, 9-53, 9-54, 9-55 Central City Lake, Iowa (NCR) 28-18 Ceredo-Kenova, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19, 25-21 Chambersburg, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Channel between North and South Hero Island, Lake Champlain, Vt. (NAN) 2-31 Channel Clearing and Snagging on Willamette River and Major Tributaries, (NPP) 37-50 Channel Connecting Plain Dealing Creek and Oak Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Channel Connecting Thoroughfare Bay with Cedar Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Channel Connecting York River, Va. with Back Creek to Slaights Wharf (NAO) 5-22 Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N.C. (SAW) 6-5, 6-20 Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, Fla. (SAJ) 9-3, 9-29, 9-35, 9-49 Channel from Pamlico Sound to Rodanthe, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Channel from Phoebus, Va. to Deep Water in Hampton Roads (NAO) 5-22 Channel Improvements for Flood Control and Major Drainage on 16 Streams Tributary to Willamette River (NPP) 37-50 Channel Islands Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-2, 343-14, 33-19 Channel to Liberty, Tex. (SWG) 15-9 Channel to Newport News, Va. (NAO) 5-3, 5-14, 5-17 Channel to Port Bolivar, Tex. (SWG) 15-29 Channels Straits of Mackinac, Mich. (NCE) 31-71 Chaplin River, Perryville, Ky. (ORL) 24-22 1-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Charenton Drainage and Navigation Canal (MR + T) 42-48 Chariton River, Iowa (MRK) 20-9 Chariton River, Mo. (1944 Act) (MRK) 20-18 Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, Mo. (1965 Act) (MRK) 20-18 Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), Mass. (NED) 1-14, 1-33, 1-43 Charles River Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-27, 1-50 Charleston Harbor, S.C. (SAN) 7-2, 7-8, 7-10, 7-16 Charlestown, N.H. (NED) 1-26, 1-50, 1-57 Charlevoix Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-4, 31-35, 31-50 Charlotte Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-4, 9-29, 9-35 Chartiers Creek, Pa. (ORP) 26-3, 26-14, 26-28 Chaska, Minn. (NCS) 27-4, 27-16 Chatfield Lake, Colo. (MRO) 21-3, 21-10, 21-13 Chatham (Stage) Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-4, 1-29, 1-40 Chattanooga, Tenn. and Rossville, Ga. (ORN) 23-13 Chattooga Dams and Lakes, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-17 Cheat River, W. Va. (ORP) 26-21 Cheatham Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-14 Cheboygan Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-5, 31-36, 31-50 Cheesequake Creek, N.J. (NAN) 2-35 Chefuncte River and Bogue Falia, La. (LMN) 11-38 Chehalis River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Chena River Lakes, Alaska (NPA) 40-6, 40-9, 40-11 Cheney Reservoir, Kans. (SWT) 19-13 Cherry and Red Fork Creeks Channel Improvement, Okla. (SWT) 19-25, 19-26 Cherry Creek Lake, Colo. (MRO) 21-3, 21-10, 21-13 Cherryfield, Maine (NED) 1-26, 1-50 Chesapeake, Ohio (ORH) 25-19 Chesapeake Bay to Magothy Bay, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Chesconessex Creek, Va. (NAOs 5-22 Cheshire, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Chester, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 Chester River, Md. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 Chester River, Pa. (NAP) 3-27 Chester River at Chester, Pa. (NAP) 3-16 Chetco River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-2, 37-23, 37-24, 37-31 Chewaucan River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 Chicago Harbor, Ill. (NCC) 30-3, 30-10, 30-12, 30-15 Chicago River, Ill. (NCC) 30-3, 30-10, 30-12, 30-15, 30-17 Chicago River, Ill. (North Branch) (NCC) 30-7, 30-11 Chickamauga Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-17 Chicopee, Mass. (NED) 1-27, 1-50, 1-52, 1-57 Chicopee Falls, Mass. (NED) 1-50, 1-57 Chief Joseph Dam-Rufus Woods Lake, Wash (NPS) 38-11, 38-17, 38-23 Chillicothe, Ohio (ORH) 25-3, 25-11, 25-15 Chilo, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Chincoteague Bay, Va. (NAO) 5-22 Chincoteague Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Chincoteague Harbor of Refuge, Va. (NAO) 5-22 Clncoteague Inlet, Va. (NAO) 5-3, 5-10, 5-14, 5-18 Chino Canyon Improvements, Palm Springs, Calif. (SPL) 33-26 Chippewa Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-70 Chippewa Harbor, Isle Royale, Mich. (NCE) 31-71 Chittenango Creek and Tributaries, N.Y. (NCB) 32-36 Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, La. (LMN) 11-42 Choctawhatchee Bay to Pensacola Bay, Fla. (SAM) 10-32 Choctawhatchee Bay to West Bay, Fla. (SAM) 10-32 Choctawhatchee River, Fla. and Ala. (SAM) 10-38 Choptank River, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Chouteau Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-16, 19-23 Chouteau, Nameoki, and Venice Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Chowan River, N.C. (NAO) 5-22 Chowan River, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Christiansted Harbor, V.I. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Cibolo Creek, Tex. (SWA) 17-2, 17-9, 17-11 Cincinnati, Ohio (ORL) 24-22, 24-24, 24-27, 24-28 Cincinnatus, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39 City Creek Levee, Calif. (SPL) 33-26, 33-31 City of Aurora, Colo. (MRO) 21-16 Clackamas River at Dixon Farm Location, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 Claiborne Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Claiborne Lock and Dam, Ala. (SAM) 10-17, 10-27 Clallam Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Clallam River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Clanton, Ala. (SAM) 10-39 Claremont Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-52 Clarence Cannon Dam and Reservoir, Mo. (LMS) 14-7, 14-10, 14-12 Clarence J. Brown Dam and Reservoir, Ohio (ORL) 24-8, 24-17 Clarendon to Laconia Circle, Ark. (LMM) 13-10 Clarington, Ohio (ORP) 26-23 Clark Fork River, Mont. (NPS) 38-26 Clark Point, New Bedford, Mass. (NED) 1-12, 1-32 Clarks Hill Lake, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-8, 8-11, 8-15, 8-17 Clarkson, Nebr. (MRO) 21-16, 21-21 Clarksville, Ark. (SWL) 18-21 Clatskanie Drainage District 1, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45, 37-49 Clatskanie River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Clatskanie River Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45, 37-49 Clatsop County Diking District 3, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 Clatsop County Diking District 4, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45, 37-49 Clatsop County Diking District 6, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45, 37-49 Clatsop County Drainage District 1, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45, 37-49 Clear Creek, Franklin, Ohio (ORL) 24-22 Clear Creek, Tex. (SWG) 15-13, 15-14 Clear Creek and Clear Lake, Tex. (SWG) 15-3, 15-14, 15-18 Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Clearwater Lake, Mo. (SWL) 18-5, 18-11, 18-20 Clearwater Pass, Fla. (SAJ) 9-4, 9-29, 9-35, 9-49, 9-50 Clearwater River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Cleveland and Lakewood, Ohio (NCB) 32-36 Cleveland Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-4, 32-18, 32-25 Cleves, Ohio (ORL) 24-24, 24-28 Cliff Walk, Newport, R.I. (NED) 1-12, 1-32, 1-42 Clifton, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 I-8 INDEX Clifty Creek Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-25 Clinch River, Tenn., and Va. (ORN) 23-13 Clinton, Ind. (ORL) 24-24, 24-28 Clinton, Iowa (NCR) 28-16, 28-18 Clinton Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-5, 1-29, 1-41 Clinton Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 29-8 Clinton Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-3, 20-11, 20-14 Clinton River, Mich. (NCE) 31-5, 31-36, 31-51 Cloverport, Ky. (ORL) 24-23, 24-27, 24-33 Clyde, R.I. (NED) 1-52 Clyde Park, Mont. (MRO) 21-20 Coal Creek and Tributaries (Lake City), Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-16, 28-18 Coal Grove, Ohio (ORH) 25-19 Coal River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19 Coan River, Va. (NAB) 4-37 Coast of California, Point Mugu to San Pedro Breakwater, Calif. (SPL) 33-25 Coastal Engineering Research Center (CERC) 43-1 Coasters Island Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-45 Cobscook Bay, Maine (NED) 1-45 Cocheco River, N.H. (NED) 1-45, 1-50 Cochiti Lake, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-4, 17-10, 17-12 Cockrells Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-22 Coeur D'Alene, Idaho (NPS) 38-26 Cohansey River, N.J. (NAP) 3-27 Cohasset Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Cold Regions Research Engineering Laboratory (CRREL) 52-1 Cold Spring Inlet, N.J. (NAP) 3-3, 3-19, 3-23 Colebrook River Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-16, 1-33, 1-56 Colfax, Grant Parish, La. (LMN) 11-41, 11-42 Colfax, Wash. (NPW) 39-13, 39-17 Colliers, W. Va. (ORP) 26-28 Collinsville, Ala. (SAM) 10-39 Colonial Beach, Va. (NAB) 4-11, 4-23, 4-32 Colorado River, Matagorda, Tex. (SWG) 15-29 Colorado Springs, Colo. (Templeton Gap Floodway) (SWA) 17-13 Columbia, La. (LMK) 12-15 Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below Vancouver Wash., and Portland, Oreg. (NPP) 37-2, 37-24, 37-31, 37-46 Columbia Drainage and Levee District No. 3, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Columbia Drainage District 1, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42, 37-49 Columbia River and Tributaries above Celilo Falls to Kennewick, Wash. (NPW) 39-13 Columbia River at Baker Bay, Wash. (NPP) 37-4, 37-24, 37-32 Columbia River at the Mouth, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-4, 37-24, 37-32 Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Protection Projects (NPW) 39-1, 39-11, 39-16 Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, Idaho, Mont., and Wash. (NPS) 38-26, 38-31 Columbia River between Chinook, Wash., and Head of Sand Island (NPP) 37-4, 37-24, 37-32 Columbia River between Vancouver, Wash., and The Dalles, Oreg. (NPP) 37-4, 37-24, 37-32 Columbia River Treaty Permanent Engineering Board 49-2 Columbia River, Wenatchee to Kettle Falls, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Columbia Slough, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 Columbus, Nebr. (MRO) 21-21 Columbus, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Compo Beach, Westport, Conn. 1-49 Computer Sciences Laboratory 51-1 Conant Brook Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-16, 1-34, 1-56 Conchas Lake, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-2, 17-10 Concordia, Ky. (ORL) 24-23, 24-27 Conemaugh River Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-6, 26-15, 26-18 Conetoe Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-18 Coney Island Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Coney Island Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Congaree River, Cayce, S.C. (SAN) 7-14 Conklin-Kirkwood, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Conneaut Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-5, 32-18, 32-26 Connecticut River (above Hartford), Conn. (NED) 1-45 Connecticut River Basin, Vt., N.H., Mass. and Conn. (NED) 1-14, 1-27, 1-56 Connecticut River below Hartford, Conn. (NED) 1-5, 1-30, 1-41, 1-52 Connecticut River, North Stratford, N.H. (NED) 1-17, 1-34, 1-43 Connecticut River, W. Stewartstown, N.H. (NED) 1-50 Connell, Wash. (NPW) 39-13 Conoho Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (CERL) 50-1 Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio River (ORD) 22-1, 22-5, 22-6 Contentnea Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27, 6-28, 6-29 Conway County Drainage & Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-21 Conway County Levee District No. 6, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-21 Conway County Levee Districts Nos. 1, 2, & 8, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-21 Cook, Minn., Little Fork River (NCS) 27-25 Cook Inlet Shoals, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Cooper Lake and Channels, Tex. (LMN) 11-42 Cooper Lake and Channels, Tex. (SWF) 16-5, 16-17, 16-21 Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, S.C. (SAN) 7-3, 7-8, 7-11 Cooper River, N.J. (NAP) 3-27 Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basin Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data 31-52 Coordinating Committee on Greak Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data Board 49-2 Coos and Millicoma Rivers, Oreg. (NPP) 37-6, 37-25, 37-33 Coos Bay, Oreg. (NPP) 37-5, 37-24, 37-33 Coosa River Navigation, Ala. (SAM) 10-18, 10-27 Copan Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-6, 19-18, 19-22 Copes Corner Lake, New York (NAB) 4-37 Coquille River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-6, 37-25, 37-33, 37-45 Coralville Lake, Iowa (NCR) 28-4, 28-10, 28-14 I-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Coraopolis, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Corbin (Lynn Camp Creek), Ky. (ORN) 23-13 Corbin, Ky. (ORN) 23-19 Cordell Hull Lock and Dam, Tenn (ORN) 23-14 Cordova Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Cordova Small Boat Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-2, 40-8, 40-10 Core Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Corea Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-5, 1-30, 1-41 Corning, N.Y. (NAB) 4-15, 4-25 Cornucopia Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-6, 31-36, 31-51 Corpus Christi, Tex., Channel to Navy Seaplane Base, Encinal Peninsula (SWG) 15-29 Corpus Christi Beach, Tex. (Restoration Project) (SWG) 15-10, 15-15, 15-27 Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Tex. (SWG) 15-3, 15-14, 15-18, 15-30, 15-31, 15-36 Corsica River, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Corte Madera Creek, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-11, 35-23 Cortland, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Cottage Grove Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-13, 37-27, 37-37, 37-48, 37-50 Cottonwood Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-15, 35-20 Cottonwood Creek Dam, Boise, Idaho (NPW) 39-13 Cottonwood Slough Pumping Plant, Ill. (LMN) 13-10 Cotuit Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-45, 1-52 Cougar Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-19, 37-28, 37-38, 37-48, 37-50 Council Bluffs, Iowa (MRO) 21-16, 21-21 Council Grove Lake, Kans. (SWT) 19-7, 19-18 Courtenay Channel, Fla. (SAJ) 9-50 Cove Island, Stamford, Conn. (NED) 1-49 Covington, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-27, 24-32 Cow Castle Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-14 Cow Creek Channel Improvement, Kans. (SWT) 19-26 Cowanesque Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-17, 4-26 Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District 1, Wash. (NPP) 37-41, 37-45, 37-49 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement Districts 2, 13, and 15, Wash. (NPP) 37-42, 37-49 Cowlitz County Drainage Improvement District 1, Wash. (NPP) 37-42 Cowlitz River, Wash. (NPP) 37-15, 37-40, 37-42 Cowlitz River at Randle, Wash. (NPP) 37-45 Cowlitz River Basin, Wash. (NPP) 37-15 Cowpen Swamp, S.C. (SAN) 7-7, 7-15 Coyote and Spencer Creeks, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 Coyote Creek, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-11, 35-23 Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino) and Channel Improvements, Calif. (SPN) 34-8, 34-12 Crabtree Swamp, S.C. (SAN) 7-7, 7-15 Craig Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Craig Small Boat Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-2, 40-8, 40-10 Cramerton, S. Fork, S.C. (SAN) 7-14 Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District (NCR) 28-16, 28-18 Crane Creek State Park, Ohio (NCB) 32-38 Cranes Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-22 Crawford County Levee District, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-21 Creede, Willow Creek, Colo. (Floodway) (SWA) 17-13 Crescent City Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-1, 34-6, 34-9 Criehaven Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-45 Crisfield Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 Crooked Creek Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-6, 26-15, 26-18 Crooked Creek Lake & Levee, Ark. (SWL) 18-21 Cross-Florida Barge Canal (SAJ) 9-5, 9-29, 9-35, 9-46, 9-47 Cross Rip Shoals Nantucket Sound, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Cross Village Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-6, 31-36, 31-51 Crutcho Creek Channel Improvement, Okla. (SWT) 19-26 Crystal River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Cucamonga Creek, Calif. (SPL) 33-6, 33-15, 33-21 Cuckold'Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Cuivre River, Mo. (LMS) 14-13 Culdesac, Idaho 39-17 Cumberland, Ky. (ORN) 23-9, 23-18 Cumberland, Md., and Ridgeley, W. Va. (NAB) 4-12, 4-24, 4-32, 4-39 Cumberland River, Tenn. and Ky. (ORN) 23-2, 23-9, 23-11, 23-15 Cummings Park, Stamford, Conn. (NED) 1-49 Cunninghill Cove, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Current River, Ark. & Mo. (SWL) 18-19 Curry Creek Dam and Lake, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Curwensville Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-18, 4-26 Cushman-Mapleton Channels Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Cuttyhunk Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Cuyahoga River Basin, Ohio (NCB) 32-14, 32-21 Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, Tex., and Shreveport, La. (LMN) 11-38 Cypress Creek, Ky. (ORL) 24-33 Cypress Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 D Dade County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-20, 9-32, 9-43 Dale Hollow Lake, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. and Ky. (ORN) 23-6, 23-9, 23-18 Dallas Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-24 Dam "A" Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-15, 16-21 Damariscotta River, Maine (NED) 1-45 Dana Point Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-5, 33-24 Danbury, Conn. (NED) 1-26, 1-50, 1-58 Dancing-Swann Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Dansville and Vicinity, N.Y. (NCB) 32-14, 32-21 Dardanelle Lock & Dam (No. 10), Ark. (SWL) 18-7, 18-12, 18-16 Darien Harbor, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Dashields Locks and Dam, Pa. (ORD) 22-1, 22-7 Data Collection and Management Division, 53-1 Dauphin Island Bay, Ala. (SAM) 10-6, 10-25, 10-31 Davenport, Iowa (NCR) 28-4, 28-10, 28-14 Davenport Center Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-37 Davenport Harbor, Iowa (Lindsay Park) (NCD) 29-8 David D. Terry Lock & Dam, Ark. (SWL) 18-2, 18-15 Davids Creek Lake, Iowa (MRO) 21-16 Davis, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Davis Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-22 I-10 INDEX Day, John, Lock and Dam-Lake Umatilla, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-20, 37-29, 37-39, 37-52 Day, John, River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41, 37-45 Days Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-13, 37-27, 37-37 Dayton, Ky. (ORL) 24-3, 24-16, 24-27 Dayton, Wash. (NPW) 39-13, 39-17 Dayton, Wyo. (MRO) 21-17 De Kalb, Ill. (NCR) 28-18 De-authorized Projects Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-38 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-41 New England Division (NED) 1-53 Deep Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-14, 6-23 Deep Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-22 Deep Creek, Newport News, Va. (NAO) 5-22 Deep Fork Channel Improvement, Okla. (SWT) 19-25 Deep River, Wash. (NPP) 37-40 Deep River Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-41 Deer Creek Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-3, 25-11, 25-15 Deer Creek Prairie Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-24, 24-28 Deer Island Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Deer Island Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42, 37-49 Deer Island Thoroughfare, Maine (NED) 1-45 Degonia and Fountain Bluff Levee and Drainage District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Degray Lake, Ark. (LMK) 12-5, 12-8, 12-15 Delaware Coast Protection, Del. (NAP) 3-14, 3-22 Delaware Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-4, 25-11, 25-15 Delaware River, N.Y., N.J., and Pa., at or near Mouth of Neversink River (NAP) 3-30 Delaware River, Pa., N.J. and Del., Philadelphia to the Sea (NAP) 3-4, 3-19, 3-24 Delaware River at Camden, N.J. (NAP) 3-5, 3-19 Delaware River at East Branch, N.Y. (NAP) 3-16 Delaware River between Philadelphia, Pa., and Trenton, N.J. (NAP) 3-3, 3-19, 3-23 Delphi, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-27, 24-32 Denison Dam-Lake Texoma, Tex. and Okla. (SWT) 19-14, 19-21 Dennis Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-27 Depere Lock and Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-69 Depoe Bay, Oreg. (NPP) 37-6, 37-25, 37-33, 37-40, 37-43 Dequeen Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-5, 18-11, 18-19 Derby, Conn. (NED) 1-26, 1-50, 1-58 Derby, Ind. (ORL) 24-24, 24-28 Deschutes River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26, 38-27 Des Moines, Iowa (NCR) 28-16, 28-18 Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, Mo. (NCR) 28-16, 28-18 Detour Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-7, 31-36, 31-51 Detroit Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-19, 37-28, 37-38, 37-48, 37-50 Detroit River, Mich. (NCE) 31-7, 31-36, 31-51, 31-67, 31-73 Devil, East Twin, and Warm Creeks Channel Improvements and Lytle Creek Levee, Calif. (SPL) 33-31 Devils Lake, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-25_ Devil's Swamp, La. (MR + T) 42-6, 42-28, 42-48 Dewey Lake, Ky. (ORH) 25-4, 25-12, 25-15 Dickey-Lincoln School Lakes, Maine (NED) 1-24, 1-37, 1-44 Dickinson Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-29 Dicks Creek, Amanda Station, Ohio (ORL) 24-22 Dierks Lake, Little River Basin, Ark. (SWL) 18-5, 18-11, 18-19 Diking and Improvement District 4, Wahkiakum County, Wash. (NPP) 37-41 Diking and Improvement District 5, Cowlitz County, Wash. (NPP) 37-41 Diking and Improvement District 11, Cowlitz County, Wash. (NPP) 37-42 Diking Districts 1 and 3 (Puget Island) and Little Island, Wash. (NPP) 37-41 Diking Districts 2, 3, and 5, Clatsop County, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Diking Improvement District 1, Pacific County, Wash. (NPP) 37-41 Diking Improvement Districts 2 and 13, Cowlitz County, Wash. (NPP) 37-42 Dillingham Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-3, 40-8, 40-10 Dillon Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-4, 25-12, 25-15 Dillonvale, Ohio (Short Creek) (ORP) 26-23 Dismal Swamp Canal (South Mills, N.C.) (NAO) 5-22 Dismal Swamp Canal, (Deep Creek), Va. (NAO) 5-21 Dively Drainage & Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Dodge City, Kans. (SWA) 17-13 Dodge City, Kans. (SWT) 19-25 Dog and Fowl Rivers, Ala. (SAM) 10-7, 10-25, 10-31 Doheny Beach State Park (Doheny State Beach), Calif. (SPL) 33-25 Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Dorena Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-13, 37-27, 37-37, 37-48, 37-50 Double Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-4, 15-14, 15-20 Double Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-27 Douglas Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Douglass Lake, Kans. (SWT) 19-26 Dover, Ky. (ORH) 25-19 Downeyville Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-23, 24-31 Drainage District 1, Clatsop County, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Dresden Island Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-21, 28-22 Drinkwater Sewer, Mo. (LMM) 13-4, 13-6, 13-8 Drum Inlet, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Drum Point Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-10 Drury Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-16, 28-18 Dry Creek, Hawarden, Iowa (MRO) 21-16, 21-21 Dry Creek, Wash. (NPW) 39-13 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Improvements, Calif. (SPN) 34-8, 34-12 Dry Fork and East Fork Lakes, Mo. (MRK) 20-18 Dry Pass, Alaska (NPA) 40-3, 40-8, 40-10 Dry Run, Iowa (NCS) 27-21 Dubois, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-28 Dubuque, Iowa (NCR) 28-16, 28-18 Dubuque Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 29-8 Duck Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 Duck Creek Channel Improvement, Tex. (SWF) 16-6, 16-17, 16-21 Duck Island Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Duck Point Cove, Md. (NAB) 4-5, 4-21, 4-28 I-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Duck River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Duluth-Superior Harbor, Minn. and Wis. (NCE) 31-8, 31-36, 31-52 Dungeness River, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Dunkirk Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-5, 32-18, 32-27 Dunn Branch, Woodbine, Camden County, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Duval County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-21, 9-32, 9-43 Duxbury Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, Idaho (NPW) 39-4, 39-9, 39-12, 39-18 Dyersburg, Tenn. (LMM) 13-10 Dyersburg, Tenn. (Southwest) (LMM) 13-10 Dymers Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-22 E Eagle Bay and Fort Yates Highway Bridges, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-16 Eagle Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-14 Eagle Creek Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-23 Eagle Creek Reservoir, Ohio (ORP) 26-22 Eagle Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-70, 31-71 Ealmouth Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-13, 24-22, 24-34 East Barre Dam, Vt. (NAN) 2-33 East Bay (Hanna Reef), Tex. (SWG) 15-29 East Bay Marina, Olympia Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-2, 38-14, 38-19 East Boothbay Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-45 East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-6, 26-15, 26-18 East Branch Dam, Conn. (NED) 1-50, 1-58 East Brimfield Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-25, 1-38, 1-60 East Cape Girardeau and Clear Creek Drainage District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 East Chester Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-30, 2-31 East Hartford, Conn. (NED) 1-26, 1-50, 1-57 East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District (NCR) 28-16, 28-18 East Lynn Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-4, 25-12, 25-15 East Moline, Ill. (NCR) 28-4, 28-10, 28-14 East Muddy and Lake Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 East Muddy Creek, Mo. (MRK) 20-18 East Nishnabotna River, Near Griswold, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 East Nishnabotna River, Page Co. Bridge, Near Essex, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 East Nishnabotna River, Red Oak, Iowa (MRO) 21-4, 21-10, 21-13 East Pass Channel from Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, Fla. (SAM) 10-25, 10-31 East Peoria Drainage and Levee District (NCR) 28-16, 28-18 East Peoria Sanitary District, Ill. (NCR) 28-18 East Point, La. (LMN) 11-42 East Poplar Bluff & Poplar Bluff, Mo. (SWL) 18-21 East Rainelle, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19, 25-21 East River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 East Rockaway (DEBS) Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 East Rockaway Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-3, 2-20, 2-24, 2-30 East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part I) (NAN) 2-10, 2-22, 2-27 East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part II) (NAN) 2-33 East Sidney Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-15, 4-25 East St. Louis and Vicinity, Ill. (LMS) 14-3, 14-9, 14-11 East Weaver Creek, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-11, 35-23 Eastern Branch, Va. (NAO ) 5-19 Eastern Rapides and South-Central Avoyelles Parishes, La. (MR + T) 42-15, 42-27, 42-48, 42-55 Eastlake, Ohio (NCB) 32-36 Eastman, H. V., Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-4, 35-17 Eastport Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-45 Eau Galle River, Wis. (NCS) 27-5, 27-16 Eau Gallie Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Echo Bay Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Edenton Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Edgartown Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Edisto River, S.C. (SAN) 7-7, 7-14, 7-15 Edisto River, North Fork, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Edisto River, Vicinity Canadays Landing, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Ediz Hook, Wash. (NPS) 38-3, 38-14, 38-19 Edmonds Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Edward Macdowell Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-22, 1-36, 1-59 Eel River, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-11, 35-23 Eel River, Ind. (ORL) 24-33 Egegik River, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Eighteen Mile Island, Ky. (ORL) 24-33 El Dorado, Kans., W. Br., Walnut River, Channel Improvement (SWT) 19-26 El Dorado Lake, Kans. (SWT) 19-7, 19-18, 19-22 El Paso, Tex. (SWA) 17-2, 17-10, 17-11 El Tuque Beach, P.R. (SAJ) 9-21, 9-32, 9-43 Eldred, Pa. (ORP) 26-28 Eldred and Spankey Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-3, 14-9, 14-11 Eldred, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Elfin Cove, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Elizabeth, N.J. (NAN) 2-12, 2-22, 2-28 Elizabeth River, N.J. (NAN) 2-35 Elizabethtown, Ill. (ORL) 24-24, 24-28 Elk and Little Elk Rivers, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Elk City Lake, Kans. (SWL) (SWT) 18-18, 19-7, 19-19, 19-23 Elk Creek, Clyde, Kans. (MRK) 20-18 Elk Creek Harbor, Pa. (NCB) 32-34 Elk Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-13, 37-27, 37-37 Elk River, Ala. and Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Elk River, Minn. (NCS) 27-21 Elk River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-18 Elkhorn River, Q Street Bridge, near Gretna, Nebr. (MRO) 21-21 Elkhorn River, Ray Bridge, near Norfolk, Nebr. (MRO) 21-21 Elkins, W. Va. (ORP) 26-4, 26-14, 26-18, 26-26 Elkland, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Elkport, Iowa (NCR) 28-16, 28-18 Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Ellicott Creek, N.Y. (NCB) 32-15, 32-21 I-12 Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Elm Fork Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-6, 16-17, 16-21 Elmira, N.Y. (NAB) 4-15, 4-25 Elochoman Slough, Wash. (NPP) 37-40 Elwha River, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Emergency Bank Protection Activities Albuquerque, N. Mex., District (SWA) 17-9 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-38 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 15-13 Huntington, W. Va., District (ORH) 25-10 Kansas City, Mo., District (MRK) 20-8 Little Rock, Ark., District (SWL) 18-7 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL) 33-11 Louisville, Ky., District (ORL) 24-15, 24-24 Nashville, Tenn., District (ORN) 23-19 New England Division (NED) 1-28 New York, N.Y., District (NAN) 2-37 Omaha, Neb., District (MRO) 21-7 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-15 Pittsburgh, Pa., District (ORP) 26-29 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-14 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-13 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN) 34-4 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-9 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS) 14-14 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 27-25 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 19-13 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK) 12-7 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW) 39-2 Emergency Flood Control Activities Alaska District (NPA) 40-6 Albuquerque, N. Mex., District (SWA) 17-9 Baltimore, Md., District (NAB) 4-19 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-37 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-7 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 30-8 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 31-32 Fort Worth, Tex., District (SWF) 16-14 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 15-13 Huntington, W. Va., District (ORH) 25-10 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-28 Kansas City, Mo., District (MRK) 20-8 Little Rock, Ark., District (SWL) 18-7 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL) 33-11 Louisville, Ky., District (ORL) 24-15 Memphis, Tenn., District (LMM) 13-5 New England Division (NED) 1-28 New Orleans, La., District (LMN) 11-24 Omaha, Neb., District (MRO) 21-7 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-6 Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP) 3-15 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-15 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR) 28-20 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-13 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN) 34-4 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS) 8-7 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-32 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS) 14-7 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 27-25 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 19-13 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK) 12-7 INDEX Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW) 39-2 Wilmington, N.C., District (SAW) 6-17 Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection New York, N.Y., District (NAN) 2-37 Empire-Stratton, Ohio (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Emsworth Locks and Dam, Pa. (ORD) 22-1, 22-7 Enderlin, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-5, 27-16, 27-24, 27-25 Endicott-Johnson City and Vestal, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Engineer Topographic Laboratories (ETL) 51-1 England Pond Levee, Ill. (ORL) 24-22, 24-27, 24-32 English Coulee, Grand Forks, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-25 English, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-33 Enid Diversion Canal and Levee, Okla. (SWT) 19-25 Enid Lake, Miss. (MR + T) 42-20, 42-56 Enid Levee Floodway, Okla. (SWT) 19-26 Entiat River, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Erie Harbor, Pa. (NCB) 32-5, 32-19, 32-27, 32-38 Escambia and Conecuh Rivers, Fla. and Ala. (SAM) 10-38 Esquatzel Coulee, Connell, Wash. (NPW) 39-13, 39-17 Essex River, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Estes, Carl L., Dam and Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-24 Eufaula Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-18, 19-14, 19-21, 19-23 Evansdale, Iowa (NCR) 28-5, 28-10, 28-14 Evanston, Ill. (NCC) 30-17 Evansville, Ind. (ORL) 24-3, 24-16, 24-27, 24-32, 24-33 Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, Wash. (NPS) 38-3, 38-14, 38-19 Everglades Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Exeter River, N:H. (NED) 1-45 Existing levees and extensions from Bastrop, La. to mouth of Boeuf River (LMK) 12-15 Experimental Chloride Control Project, Red River Basin, Estelline and Guthrie, Tex. (SWT) 19-26 F Fabius River Drainage District, Mo. (NCR) 28-16, 28-18 Fair Haven Beach State Park, N.Y. (NCB) 32-36 Fairbanks, Tanana River and Chena Slough, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Fairbury, Nebr. (MRK) 20-18 Fairfield Vicinity Streams, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 Fairport Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-6, 32-19, 32-28 Fajardo Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-50 Fall Brook Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-37 Fall Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP). 37-14, 37-27, 37-37, 37-48, 37-50 Fall River Basin, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-4, 21-10, 21-13 Fall River Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-6, 1-30 Fall River Lake, Kans. (SWL) (SWT) 18-18, 19-7, 19-19, 19-23 Falls Lake, N.C. (SAW) 6-15, 6-23 Falmouth Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Falmouth Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-23, 24-30 Fancy Bluff Creek, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 1-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Far Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-5, 6-20 Fargo, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-24 Farm Creek, Ill. (NCR) 28-5, 28-10, 28-14 Farmers Drainage and Levee District (NCR) 28-16, 28-18 Farmers Levee and Drainage District (NCR) 28-17 Farmington, N.H. (NED) 1-27 Farmstead Levees, N.D. (NCS) 27-25 Faulkner County Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-21 Feather River, Calif. (SPK) 35-22 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 47-1 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Licenses at Locks and Dams, Ohio River (ORD) 22-6 Ferguson Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 Fern Ridge Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-14, 37-28, 37-37, 37-48, 37-50 Fernandina Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-5, 9-29, 9-35 Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O' The Pines, Tex. (LMN) 11-42 Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O' The Pines, Tex. (SWF) 16-6, 16-17, 16-21 Ferry Butte, Idaho (NPW) 39-17 Filberts Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Fire Island Inlet to Jones Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-3, 2-20, 2-24, 2-32 Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, N.Y. (NAN) 2-12, 2-22, 2-28 Fisher, O. C., Dam and Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-10, 16-18, 16-22 Fishing Bay, Md. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 Fishing Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-5, 4-21, 4-28 Fishing Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Fishing Creek, Pine Grove, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Fishtrap Lake, Ky. (ORH) 25-5, 25-12, 25-16 Fitchburg, Mass. (NED) 1-27, 1-50 Fivemile River Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-45, 1-52 Flannagan, John W., Dam and Reservoir, Va. (ORH) 25-5, 25-12, 25-16 Flat Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 Flat Rock Creek Channel Improvement, Tulsa, Okla. (SWT) 19-25, 19-26 Flathead River, Mont. (NPS) 38-25, 38-27 Fletcher and Sunshine Gardens Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-24, 24-28 Floating Breakwater Prototype Test Program, Seattle, Wash. (NPS) 38-3, 38-15, 38-19 Flood Control, Nashville, Tenn., District (ORN) 23-19 Flood Control and Coastal Emergency Activities Huntington, W.Va., District (ORH) 29-10 Pittsburgh, Pa., District (ORP) 26-13 Flood Insurance Activities, Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 19-13 Floodwall and Levees at Portland, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 Florence Levee, Kans. (SWT) 19-25, 19-26 Floyd River, Sioux City, Iowa (MRO) 21-16, 21-21 Flushing Bay and Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-3, 2-20, 2-24, 2-30 Fly Creek, Ala. (SAM) 10-38 Follansbee, W. Va. (ORP) 26-23 Folly Brook, Wethersfield, Conn. (NED) 1-50, 1-57 Folly River, S.C. (SAN) 7-3, 7-8, 7-11 Folsom Lake, American River, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 Fore River, Braintree and Weymouth, Mass. (NED) 1-6, 1-30, 1-41 Forest Heights, Md. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Forestville, Mich. (NCE) 31-71 Forked Deer River, Tenn., including South Fork (LMM) 13-10 Forsyth, Mont. (MRO) 21-16, 21-20 Forsythe, Mont. (M1RO) 21-16 Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5 and Stringtown Drainage and Levee District No. 4, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Fort Cobb Reservoir, Okla. (SWT) 19-13 Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N.C. (SAW) 6-11, 6-22 Fort Gibson Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-18, 19-14, 19-21, 19-23 Fort Kent, Maine (NED) 1-26, 1-50 Fort Leavenworth, Kans., Bridge Removal (MRK) 20-18 Fort Loudon Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-17 Fort Macon State Park, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Fort Madison, Iowa (NCR) 28-5, 28-11, 28-14 Fort Madison Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 29-9 Fort Myers Beach, Fla. (SAJ) 9-5, 9-29, 9-36, 9-49 Fort Niagara State Park, N.Y. (NCB) 32-36 Fort Peck Lake, Mont. (MRO) 21-2, 21-10, 21-12 Fort Pierce, Fla. (SAJ) 9-22, 9-32, 9-43 Fort Pierce Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-6, 9-30, 9-36, 9-49 Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-8, 21-11, 21-15 Fort Scott Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-18, 20-23 Fort Smith, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-21 Fort Supply Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-7, 19-19 Fort Worth Floodway (Clear Fork), Tex. (SWF) 16-24 Fort Worth Floodway (West Fork), Tex. (SWF) 16-24 Foss Reservoir, Okla. (SWT) 19-13 Foster Creek Road, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, Pa. (NAB) 4-18, 4-26 Four Pole Creek, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Four River Basins, Fla. (SAJ) 9-26, 9-33, 9-45, 9-56 Fourche Creek, Little Rock, Ark. (SWL) 18-21 Fourmile Run, Va. (NAB) 4-12, 4-24, 4-32 Fox Point Barrier, R.I. (NED) 1-50 Fox River, Wis. (NCE) 31-8, 31-37, 31-53 Fox River Locks and Dams, Wis. (NCE) 31-69 Francis E. Walter Dam, Pa. (NAP) (NAB) 3-15, 3-22, 4-20 Frankfort Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-9, 31-37, 31-53 Frankfort, Kans. (MRK) 20-18 Frankfort, Ky. (ORL) 24-23, 24-27, 24-32 Franklin Falls Dam, N.H. (NED) 1-22, 1-36, 1-59 Franklin, W. P., Lock and Dam, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Frazer-Wolf Point, Mont. (MRO) 21-4, 21-10, 21-13 Frazeysburg, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Free Nancy Branch & Forth Creek, N.C. (SAN) 7-14 Freeport, Ill. (NCR) 28-17 Freeport, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Freeport and Vicinity, Tex. Hurricane-Flood Protection (SWG) 15-11, 15-16, 15-27 Freeport Harbor, Tex. (SWG) 15-4, 15-14, 15-20, 15-30, 15-31, 15-36 Fremont, Ohio (NCB) 32-36 1-14 INDEX French Broad and Little Pigeon Rivers, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Frenchboro Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-45 Freshwater Bayou, La. (LMN) 11-7, 11-25, 11-30 Friday Harbor Marina, Wash. (NPS) 38-3, 38-15, 38-20 Friendly, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Friendsville, Md. (ORP) 26-22, 26-28 From North Little Rock to Gillett, Ark. (Above Plum Bayou) (SWL) 18-21 Fullerton, Ky. (ORH) 25-19 Fulton, Ill. (NCR) 28-5, 28-11, 28-14 G Galax, Va. (ORH) 25-19, 25-21 Galena, Ill. (NCR) 28-16, 28-18 Galisted Dam, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-5, 17-10, 17-12 Gallepolis Locks and Dam, W. Va. (ORD) 22-2, 22-8 Gallipolis, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Galveston Harbor and Channel, Tex. (SWG) 15-5, 15-14, 15-21, 15-30, 15-31, 15-36 Gapway Swamp, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) (SAW) 6-28, 7-7, 7-15 Garden Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-12 Gardner, Mass. (NED) 1-27, 1-50, 1-57 Gardners Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Garland City, Ark. (LMN) 11-40, 11-42 Garnett Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-18, 20-23 Garrison Dam-Lake Sakakawea, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-8, 21-11, 21-15 Gasconade River, Mo. (MRK) 20-18 Gastineau Channel, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Gate Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43, 37-50 Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, Va. (NAO) 5-11, 5-16, 5-21 Gauley River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-18 Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake, Nebr. and S. Dak. (MRO) 21-8, 21-12, 21-15, 21-16 Gaysville Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-52 Genegantslet Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-37 General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, Pa. (NAP) 3-15, 3-22 General Joe Wheeler Dam (ORN) 23-17 Geneva-On-The-Lake, Ohio (NCB) 32-6, 32-19 Genoa Sewer Facility, N.C. (SAW) 6-32 Geographic Sciences Laboratory 51-1 George, Walter, F., Lock and Dam, Ala. and Ga. (SAM) 10-22, 10-28, 10-37 George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, Ala. and Ga. (SAM) 10-21, 10-27, 10-36 Georges River, Maine (NED) 1-45 Georgetown Harbor, S.C. (SAN) 7-4, 7-8, 7-11, 7-16 Gering Valley, Nebr. (MRO) 21-16, 21-21 Gila and Salt Rivers Levee and Channel Improvements, Ariz. (SPL) 33-26 Gila River Basin, Ariz. (SPL) 33-6, 33-15, 33-16, 33-26 Giles Creek, Elkhorn, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17 Gill Township Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-32 Gill's Creek, Lancaster, S.C. (SAN) 7-14, 7-16 Gillham Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-5, 18-11, 18-19 Girty's Run, Millvale, Pa. (ORP) 26-4, 26-14 Glasgow, Mont. (MRO) 21-16, 21-20 Glasgow Area, Rockbridge, Va. (NAO) 5-12 Gleason Creek, Nev. (SPK) 35-23 Glen Cove Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Glen Cove Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-30, 2-35 Gloucester Harbor and Annisquam River, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Goat Island, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-17 Golconda, Ill. (ORL) 24-22, 24-27, 24-32 Gold Creek, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Goldsboro, Neuse River, N.C. (SAW) 6-14, 6-23 Goleta, Calif., and Vicinity (SPL) 33-8, 33-12, 33-16, 33-21 Gooding Area, Idaho (NPW) 39-13, 39-17 Goose Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Goose Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-14 Goose Hill Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Gordons Creek, Hattiesburg, Miss. (SAM) 10-14, 10-26, 10-35 Gordons Landing, Lake Champlain, Vt. (NAN) 2-31 Goshen Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-27 Governor's Run, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Gowanus Creek Channel, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Grafton, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-6 Grafton Small Boat Harbor, Ill. (LMS) 14-13 Grahn, Ky. (ORH) 25-21 Granada, Colo. (SWA) 17-3, 17-10, 17-11 Grand Bayou Pass, La. (LMN) 11-38 Grand Calumet River Lock, Ind. (NCC) 28-21 Grand Forks, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-24 Grand Haven Harbor and Grand River, Mich. (NCE) 31-9, 31-37, 31-54, 31-73 Grand Isle and Vicinity, La. (LMN) 11-18, 11-27, 11-33 Grand Marais Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-70, 31-71 Grand Marais Hairbor, Minn. (NCE) 31-13, 31-47, 31-70, 31-71 Grand Prairie-Bayou Meto, Ark., (MR + T) 42-16, 42-27 Grand River, Grandville, Mich. (NCE) 31-72, 31-73 Grand River, Lansing, Mich. (NCE) 31-72 Grand Tower Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Grand Traverse Bay Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-10, 31-37, 31-54 Grande Ronde Lake, Oreg. (NPW) 39-13 Grande Ronde Valley, Oreg. (NPW) 39-13, 39-16 Grandview, Ind. (ORL) 24-24, 24-28 Grandview Bay Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-38 Grant Parish, Below Colfax, La. (LMN) 11-41, 11-42 Grant's Canal Lake Providence, La. (MR + T) 42-53 Granville, -Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-28 Grapevine Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-7, 16-17, 16-21 Grasse River (Massena), N.Y. (NCB) 32-34 Grassy Creek, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-33 Graves Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-13 Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, Wash. (NPS) 38-4, 38-15, 38-20 Grays Landing Lock and Dam, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Grays Reef Passage, Mich. (NCE) 31-70, 31-71 1-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Grays River, Wash. (NPP) 37-40 Grayson Lake, Ky. (ORH) 25-5, 25-12, 25-16 Great Bend, Kans. (SWA) 17-13 Great Chazy River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-30, 2-31 Great Coharie Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-32 Great Falls, Mont. (MRO) 21-4, 21-10, 21-13 Great Kills Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Great Lakes to Hudson River Waterway, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Great Pee Dee River, S.C. (SAN) 7-14 Great Salt Plains Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-8, 19-19 Great Salt Pond, R.I. (NED) 1-7, 1-30, 1-41 Great Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-7, 32-19, 32-29, 32-38 Great South Bay, N.Y. (NAN) 2-30, 2-31 Green and Barren Rivers, Ky. (ORL) 24-2, 24-16, 24-20, 24-26, 24-30 Green Bay Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-10, 31-37, 31-54 Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, Iowa (NCR) 28-16, 28-18 Green Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-7, 1-30, 1-41 Green Island Levee and Drainage District, Iowa (NCR) 28-18 Green Peter-Foster Lakes, Oreg. (NPP) 37-19, 37-28, 37-38, 37-48, 37-50 Green River, Wash. (NIS) 38-27 Green River Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-9, 24-17, 24-30 Green Valley Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 Greene, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-40 Greenfield Bayou Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-23, 24-27 Greenport Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Greenup, Ky. (ORH) 25-19 Greenup Locks and Dam, Ky. (ORD) 22-2, 22-8 Greenvale Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-22 Greenville, Tex. (SWF) 16-7, 16-18, 16-21 Greenville Floodway, Tex. 16-24 Greenville Harbor, Miss. (MR + T) 42-28, 42-53 Greenwich Bay, R.I. (NED) 1-45 Greenwich Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Greenwich Point Beach, Conn. (NED) 1-52 Greers Ferry Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-7, 18-12, 18-20 Gregory Drainage District, Mo. (NCR) 28-16, 28-18 Grenada Lake, Miss. (MR + T) 42-20, 42-56 Greybill, Wyo. (MRO) 21-16, 21-20 Griffithsville-Yawkey, W.Va. (ORH) 25-21 Grove Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-18 Guadalupe River (Remove Log Jams), Tex. (SWG) 15-29 Guayanes Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-50 Guilford Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-7, 1-31, 1-41 Guilford Point Beach (Jacobs Beach), Guilford, Conn. (NED) 1-49 Gulf Beach, Milford, Conn. (NED) 1-49 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla. and Mexican Border (Mobile District) (SAM) 10-25, 10-31 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla., and Mexican Border (New Orleans Dist.) (LMN) 11-7, 11-25, 11-30, 11-36 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla., and Mexican Border (SWG) 15-5, 15-15, 15-22, 15-30, 15-34, 15-35, 15-36 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway St. Marks to Tampa Bay, Fla. (SAJ) 9-50 Gulfport Harbor, Miss. (SAM) 10-8, 10-25, 10-32 Gull Lake Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 27-23 Guntersville Lock and Dam, Ala. (ORN) 23-17 Guttenberg, Iowa (NCS) 27-21 Guyandotte River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-18 Gypsum, Kans. (MRK) 20-3, 20-11, 20-14 H H. V. Eastman Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-4, 35-17 Hackleman Corners Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-19 Haines Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Haleiwa Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12, 36-14 Halfmoon Bay Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-10 Hall Meadow Brook, Conn. (NED) 1-26 Hall Meadow Brook Dam, Conn. (NED) 1-50, 1-58 Hamburg L-575, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 Hamlin Beach Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-34 Hamlin Beach State Park, N.Y. (NCB) 32-36 Hammersley Inlet, Wash. (NPS) 38-25, 38-31, 38-32 Hammonassett Beach, Madison, Conn. (NED) 1-49 Hammond Bay Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-11, 31-38, 31-55 Hammond Small Boat Basin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Hammondsport, N.Y. (NCB) 32-36 Hampton Beach, Hampton, N.H. (NED) 1-49 Hampton Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Hampton Harbor, N.H. (NED) 1-7, 1-31, 1-42 Hampton Institute, Va. (NAO)'5-24 Hampton Roads and Harbors of Norfolk and Newport News, Va.-Collection and Removal of Drift (NAO) 5-4, 5-14, 5-18 Hampton Roads Harbor, Supervision of (NAO) 5-8, 5-15 Hana Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-14 Hanalei Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-14 Hanapepe Bay, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Hanapepe River, Hawaii (POD) 36-6, 36-13 Hancock Brook Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-19, 1-35, 1-58 Hanging Rock, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Hannibal, Mo. (NCR) 28-5, 28-11, 28-14 Hannibal Harbor, Mo. (NCD) 29-9 Hannibal Locks and Dam, W. Va. (ORD) 22-1, 22-7 Hanson, Howard A, Dam, Wash. (NAS) 38-8, 38-16, 38-22 Harbor Beach Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-11, 31-38, 31-55 Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, R.I. (NED) 1-8, 1-31 Harbor of Refuge, Delaware Bay, Del. (NAP) 3-5, 3-20, 3-24 Harbor of Refuge, N.C. (SAW) 6-27, 6-29 Harbor of Refuge, Pt. Judith, R.I. (NED) 1-45 Harden, Cecil M., Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-8, 24-17, 24-30 Hardwick Dams (NAN) 2-33 Harlan County Lake, Nebr. (MRK) 20-3, 20-11, 20-14, 20-23 1-16 INDEX Harlem River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Harpers Ferry, W. Va. (NAB) 4-37 Harpswell, Maine (NED) 1-26 Harraseeket River, Maine (NED) 1-45 Harriet Island Harbor, St. Paul, Minn. (NCD) 29-8 Harris Fork Creek, Tenn. and Ky. (MR + T) 42-55 Harrisburg, Ill. (ORL) 24-22, 24-27, 24-32 Harrisburg, Pa. (NAB) 4-20 Harrison County, Miss. (SAM) 10-40 Harrisonville Levee and Drainage District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Harrisville Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-15, 31-47, 31-70, 31-71 Harrodsburg, Ky. (ORL) 24-33 Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Mo. (MRK) 20-9, 20-13, 20-17, 20-23 Harsha, William H., Lake, Ohio (ORL) 24-14, 24-18, 24-30 Hartford, Conn. (NED) 1-26, 1-50, 1-57 Hartford, Vt. (NED) 1-50, 1-57 Hartford, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Hartwell Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-3, 14-9, 14-11 Hartwell Lake, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-8, 8-12, 8-15, 8-17 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, La. (LMN) 11-42 Hastings Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 29-8 Haverhill, Mass. (NED) 1-27 Havre, Mont. (MRO) 21-16, 21-20 Havre, Scott Coulee-Bull Hook Dam, Mont. (MRO) 21-20 Hawarden, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 Hawesville, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-27, 24-32, 24-33 Hay (West Harbor), Fisher's Island, N.Y. (NED) 1-45 Hay Creek, Birdsboro, Pa. (NAP) 3-16, 3-22 Hayden Island, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43, 37-49 Hays, Kans. (MRK) 20-19 Haysi, Va. (ORH) 25-19 Hayward Creek, Mass. (NED) 1-27 Hayward Creek, Quincy-Braintree, Mass. (NED) 1-50 Heeia-Kea Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Heise-Roberts Area, Idaho (NPW) 39-13, 39-17 Heise-Roberts Extension, Idaho (NPW) 39-13, 39-16, 39-17 Helena Harbor, Ark. (LMN) 13-2, 13-6, 13-8 Hellens Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Helm Lake, Ill. (ORL) 24-25, 24-31 Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, Ark. (LMN) 11-41, 11-42 Hempstead Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Henderson Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Henderson County Drainage Districts Nos. 1, 2 and 3, Ill. (NCR) 28-16, 28-18 Henderson River, Ill. (NCR) 28-18 Henderson, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Hendrick's Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-45 Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-16, 28-19 Henry, Robert F., Lock and Dam, Ala. (SAM) 10-17, 10-27 Henry T. Rainey Dam, Ill. (NCD) 29-7 Hergot Drainage and Levee District (NCR) 28-19 Herkimer, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33 Herreid, Spring Creek, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-16, 21-20 Herring Bay & Rockhold Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-5, 4-21, 4-28 Herring Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 Heyburn Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-8, 19-19 Hickman Harbor, Ky. (LMM) 13-2, 13-6, 13-8 Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake, Fresno River, Calif. (SPK) 35-5, 35-17 Higginsport, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Highland Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-11, 15-16, 15-27 Highway 12, Colo. (SWA) 17-3, 17-10, 17-11 Hildebrand Lock and Dam, W. Va. (ORP) 26-25 Hills Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-20, 37-28, 37-38, 37-48, 37-50 Hillsborough Bay, Fla. (SAJ) 9-57 Hillsborough River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-42 Hillsdale Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-3, 20-11, 20-14, 20-23 Hillview Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-4, 14-9, 14-11 Hilo Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-2, 36-8, 36-10 Hingham Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Hitchins, Ky. (ORH) 25-21 Hiwassee River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Hockingport, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Hodges Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-27 Hodges Village Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-26, 1-38, 1-60 Hog Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Hoh River, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Hoko River, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Holbrook Levee, Ariz. (SPL) 33-12, 33-26 Holland Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-11, 31-38, 31-55 Holley Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43, 37-50 Holly, Colo. (SWA) 17-3, 17-10, 17-11 Hollywood-Ardmore Beach along Lake Michigan, Ill. (NCC) 30-6, 30-11, 30-14 Holmes Bay, Whiting, Maine (NED) 1-50 Holmes Creek, Fla. (SAM) 10-38 Holston River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Holyoke, Mass. (NED) 1-27, 1-50, 1-57 Homer Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-3, 40-8, 40-10 Hominy Swamp, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Homme Lake and Dam, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-6, 27-16 Homochitto River, Miss. (LMK) 12-14, 12-15 Homosassa River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Honey Creek Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-24, 24-28 Honey Hill Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-52 Honga River and Tar Bay, Md. (NAB) 4-5, 4-21, 4-29 Honokohau Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12, 36-14 Honolulu Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-2, 36-8, 36-10 Hood Canal, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Hoonah Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-3, 40-8, 40-11 Hooper, Nebr. (MRO) 21-16, 21-21 Hoosic Falls, Hoosic River Basin, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33 Hop Brook Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-20, 1-35, 1-58 Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, N.H. (NED) 1-22, 1-36, 1-59 Hoquiam River, Wash. (NPS) 38-25, 38-27 Hords Creek Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-7, 16-18, 16-22 Horn Harbor, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Hornell, N.Y. (NAB) 4-15, 4-25 I-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Horseshoe Cove, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Hoskins Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Hot Springs, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-20 Houlka Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-14, 10-26, 10-35 Houma Navigation Canal, La. (LMN) 11-10, 11-26, 11-31 Housatonic River, Conn. (NED) 1-45, 1-52 Housatonic River, Pittsfield, Mass. (NED) 1-20, 1-35, 1-43 Housatonic River, Salisbury, Conn. (NED) 1-20, 1-36, 1-43 Housatonic River, Sheffield, Mass. (NED) 1-50 Housatonic River Basin, Conn. (NED) 1-19, 1-27, 1-58 Houston Ship Channel, Tex. (SWG) 15-7, 15-15, 15-24, 15-30, 15-32 Howard A. Hanson Dam, Wash. (NAS) 38-8, 38-16, 38-22 Howards Mill Lake, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Hudson River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-50 Hudson River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-4, 2-20, 2-24, 2-29, 2-30 Hudson River Channel, N.Y. (NAN) 2-30, 2-31 Hugo Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-8, 19-19, 19-25 Hulah Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-8, 19-19 Humboldt Bay, Calif. (SPN) 34-10 Humboldt Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Humboldt Harbor and Bay, Calif. (SPN) 34-3, 34-6 Humboldt River and Tributaries, Nev. (SPK) 35-16, 35-20 Hunt Drainage District and Lima Lake Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-16, 28-19 Hunting Island Beach, S.C. (SAN) 7-7, 7-9, 7-13 Huntingdon, Tenn. (LMM) 13-4, 13-6, 13-8 Huntington, Mass. (NED) 1-50, 1-57 Huntington, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19, 25-21 Huntington Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-30, 2-35 Huntington Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-9, 24-17 Huron Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-8, 32-19, 32-29 Hurricane Barrier Operations, New England Division (NED) 1-27 Hutchinson Levee and Channel, Kans. (SWT) 19-25, 19-26 Hyannis Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-46 Hyde County Dike, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Hydraulics and Hydrology of the Great Lakes 31-34 Hydrologic Engineering Center (53-2) I IAO Stream, Hawaii (POD) 36-5, 36-6, 36-9, 36-10 Ice Harbor at Marcus Hook, Pa. (NAP) 3-27 Ice Harbor at New Castle, Del. (NAP) 3-27 Ice Harbor Lock and Dam-Lake Sacajawea, Wash. (NPW) 39-4, 39-9, 39-12, 39-18, 39-22 Ida Grove, Iowa (MRO) 21-16, 21-21 Iliuliuk Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Illinois and Mississippi Canal, Ill. (NCR) 28-3, 28-10 Illinois River, Ill. (MR + T) 42-19 Illinois Waterway, Ill. and Ind. (NCR) 28-2, 28-10, 28-12, 28-21, 28-22, 28-23, 28-24 Imperial Beach, Calif. (SPL) 33-5, 33-15, 33-21 Indian Bend Wash, Ariz. (SPL) 33-6, 33-15, 33-21 Indian Creek Area, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Indian Creek, Corydon, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-33 Indian Creek Lake, Iowa (MRO) 21-17 Indian Grave Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-16, 28-19 Indian Hills, Ohio (ORL) 24-33 Indian Island, Maine (NED) 1-26 Indian Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-18 Indian River Inlet and Bay, Del. (NAP) 3-5, 3-20, 3-24 Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore Emergency Stone Repairs, Beverly Shores, Ind. (NCC) 30-7, 30-11, 30-14 Indiana Harbor, Ind. (NCC) 30-4, 30-10, 30-13, 30-15, 30-17 Indianapolis, Ind. (ORL) 24-23, 24-32 Indianapolis, Ind. (Fall Creek Section) (ORL) 24-22 Indianola, Nebr. (MRK) 20-18, 20-23 Industry, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Inez, Ky. (ORH) 25-21 Inland Route, Mich. (NCE) 31-12, 31-38, 31-55 Inland Waterway from Chincoteague Bay, Va., to Delaware Bay, Del. (NAP) 3-27 Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, Del. and Md. (NAP) 3-7, 3-20, 3-25 Inland Waterway from Franklin to Mermentau River, La. (LMN) 11-38 Inland Waterway from the Mississippi River to Bayou Teche, La. (LMN) 11-38 Inland Waterway, Rehoboth Bay to Delaware Bay, Del. (NAP) 3-6, 3-20, 3-24 Institute for Water Resources (53-3) Intercounty D. D., Little Sioux River, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 International Boundary Waters Boards, 49-1 International Champlain-Richelieu Board 49-2 International Great Lakes Diversions and Consumptive Uses Study Board 31-33, 49-2 International Great Lakes Technical Information Network Board 31-33, 49-2 International Joint Commission Board of Control (IJC) 49-1 International Kootenay Lake Board of Control 49-1 International Lake Champlain Board of Control 49-1 International Lake Erie Regulation Study Board 31-33, 49-2 International Lake Memphremagog Board 49-2 International Lake of the Woods Control Board 49-1 International Lake Superior Board of Control 31-33, 49-1 International Niagara Board of Control, 31-33, 49-1 International Niagara Committee 49-2 International Niagara Working Committee 31-33 International Osoyoos Lake Board of Control 49-1 International Rainy Lake Board of Control 49-1 International Skagit River Board of Control 49-1 International Souris-Red Rivers Engineering Board, 49-2 International St. Croix River Board of Control 49-1 International St. Lawrence River Board of Control 31-33, 49-1 Interstate Bridge, Portland, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 1-18 INDEX Interstate Highway Bridge (Barge Channel), Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-6, 9-30, 9-36 Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, Fla. (SAJ) 9-7, 9-30, 9-36 Intracoastal Waterway, Miami to Key West, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Intracoastal Waterway, Mississippi River to Bayou Teche, La. (LMN) 11-38 lola Levee, Kans. (SWT) 19-25, 19-26 Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, Iowa (NCR) 28-16, 28-19 Ipswich River, Mass. (NED) 1-46 Irondequoit Bay, N.Y. (NCB) 32-8, 32-19 Ironton, Ohio (ORH) 25-19, 25-21 Irving Township, Jackson Co., Wis. (NCS) 27-25 Irvington Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Isabella Lake, Kern River, Calif. (SPK) 35-6, 35-17 Island Avenue, Quincy, Mass. (NED) 1-21, 1-36 Island Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Island Creek, St. Georges Island, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Island End River, Chelsea, Mass. (NED) 1-8, 1-31, 1-42 Island Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-23, 24-27 Isle Au Haut Thoroughfare, Maine (NED) 1-46 Isle of Shoals Harbor, Maine and N.H. (NED) 1-46 Israel R., Lancaster, N.H. (NED) 1-57 Ithaca, N.Y., Cascadilla Creek (NCB) 32-38 Ithaca, N.Y., Cayuga Inlet (NCB) 32-36 Ithaca, N.Y., Fall Creek (NCB) 32-38 J J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. (ORN) 23-7, 23-9, 23-18 Jackson, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-27, 24-33 Jackson and East Jackson, Miss. (SAM) 10-39 Jackson Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Jackson Hole, Wyo. (NPW) 39-13, 39-17 Jacksonburg, Fishing Creek, W.Va. (ORH) 25-21 Jacksonville Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-8, 9-30, 9-37 Jadwin, General Edgar, Dam and Reservoir, Pa. (NAP) 3-15, 3-22 Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (NAN) 2-30, 2-31 James River, Va. (NAO) 5-4, 5-14, 5-18 Jamestown Reservoir, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-16 Janesville and Indian Ford Dams, Wis. (NCR) 28-18 Jarvis Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Jefferson River, Bank Protection, near Waterloo, Mont. (MRO) 21-20 Jefferson River, Willow Creek Bridge, near Three Forks, Mont. (MRO) 21-20 Jeffersonville-Clarksville, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-27, 24-32 Jemez Canyon Dam, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-5, 17-10, 17-12 Jenkins, Tom, Dam, Ohio (ORH) 25-14, 25-17 Jenkins, Tom, Reservoir, Ohio (ORH) 25-9 Jenks Levee, Okla. (SWT) 19-25, 19-26 Jennings Beach, Fairfield, Conn. (NED) 1-49 Jeremy Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-4, 7-8, 7-11 Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, Ga. and Fla. (SAM) 10-21, 10-27, 10-36 Joe Creek Channel Improvement, Okla. (SWT) 19-25 John Day Lock and Dam-Lake Umatilla, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-20, 37-29, 37-39, 37-52 John Day River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41, 37-45 John Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45, 37-49 John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, Va. and N.C. (SAW) 6-17, 6-23 John Martin Reservoir, Colo. (SWA) 17-3, 17-10 John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, Kans. (SWT) 19-9, 19-19 John W. Flannagan Dam and Reservoir, Va. (ORH) 25-5, 25-12, 25-16 Johns Pass, Fla. (SAJ) 9-8, 9-30, 9-37 Johnson Bay, Lubec, Maine (NED) 1-50 Johnson Bayou, La. (SWG) 15-29 Johnson Creek, Vicinity of Portland, Oreg. (NPP) 37-23, 37-50 Johnsonburg, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26, 26-28 Johnstown, Pa. (ORP) 26-5, 26-14, 26-18 Jones Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-5, 2-20, 2-25 Jonesport Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-46 Jordan, B. Everett, Dam and Lake, N.C. (SAW) 6-12, 6-22 Josias River, Maine (NED) 1-46 Joyce Creek, Camden County, N.C. (SAW) 6-14, 6-23 Julian, Nebr. (MRO) 21-21 Juneau Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 K Kaaawa Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Kahoma Stream, Hawaii (POD) 36-5, 36-9, 36-11 Kahului Beach Road, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Kahului Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-3, 36-8, 36-10, 36-14 Kailua Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Kaimu Black Sand Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-14 Kake Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-4, 40-9, 40-11 Kalama River (South Area) Levee, Wash. (NPP) 37-45, 37-49 Kalamazoo River (Battle Creek), Mich. (NCE) 31-72 Kalamazoo River (Kalamazoo), Mich. (NCE) 31-72 Kalaupapa Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Kanawha River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-2, 25-11, 25-15 Kaneohe-Kailua Area, Hawaii (POD) 36-6, 36-9, 36-11 Kankakee River, Ill. and Ind. (NCC) 30-17 Kanopolis Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-4, 20-11, 20-15 Kansas City, Kans. (1962 Mod.) (MRK) 20-18 Kansas Citys on Mo. and Kansas Rivers, Mo. and Kans. (MRK) 20-18, 20-23 Kansas River Navigation, Kans. (MRK) 20-18 Kapaa Town, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Kapaakea Homestead Flood Control, Hawaii (POD) 36-14 Karlson Island, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 1-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Kasilof Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-4, 14-9, 14-11, 14-14 Kaskaskia River, Ill. (LMS) 14-2, 14-9, 14-11 Kaukauna Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-69 Kaukauna Fifth Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-69 Kaukauna First Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-69 Kaukauna Fourth Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-69 Kaukauna Guard Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-69 Kaukauna Second Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-69 Kaukauna Third Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-69 Kaulana Bay Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-3, 36-8 Kaunakakai Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-6, 36-11, 36-13, 36-14 Kaunakakai Stream, Hawaii (POD) 36-6, 36-13 Kaw Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-9; 19-19 Kawaihae Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12, 36-14 Kawainui Swamp, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Kaweah and Tule Rivers, including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-7, 35-17 Kawkawlin River, Mich. (NCE) 31-72 Kays Creek, Utah (SPK) 35-23 Keach Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Keehi Lagoon, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Keene, N.H. (NED) 1-26, 1-50, 1-57 Kehoe Lake, Ky. (ORH) 25-19 Keithsburg Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-18 Kekaha Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Kelleys Island, Ohio (NCB) 32-34 Kendrick, Idaho (NPW) 39-13, 39-16 Kenmore Navigation Channel, Wash. (NPS) 38-4, 38-15, 38-20 Kennebec River, Maine (NED) 1-8, 1-31, 1-42 Kennebunk River, Maine (NED) 1-9, 1-31 Kenosha Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-12, 31-38, 31-55 Kentucky Lock and Dam, Ky. (ORN) 23-17 Kentucky Peninsula, Ky. (ORL) 24-33 Kentucky River, Ky. (ORL) 24-2, 24-16, 24-26 Keokuk Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 29-9 Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 Kerr, John H., Dam and Reservoir, Va. and N.C. (SAW) 6-17, 6-23 Kerr, Robert S., Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-14, 19-15, 19-21, 19-23 Kerr, Robert S., Marine Terminal, Sallisaw, Okla. (SWT) 19-23 Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCC) 28-19 Ketchikan Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12, 40-13 Kewalo Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-14 Kewaunee Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-13, 31-39, 31-56 Kewaunee River, Wis. (NCE) 31-73 Keweenaw Waterway, Mich. (NCE) 31-13, 31-39, 31-56 Key West, Fla. (SAJ) 9-51 Key West Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Keyport Harbor, N.J. (NAN) 2-30, 2-31 Keystone Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-18, 19-15, 19-21, 19-23 Kihei Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 King Cove Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Kings Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Kingston-Edwardsville, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Kingston Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Kingston Harbor (North Plymouth), Mass. (NED) 1-46 Kingstree Branch, S.C. (SAN) 7-7, 7-15 Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Pa. and N.Y. (ORP) 26-7, 26-15, 26-19 Kirwan, Michael J., Dam and Reservoir, Ohio (ORP) 26-8, 26-15, 26-19 Kishwaukee River at De Kalb, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 Kissimmee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Kittanning, Pa. (ORP) 26-28 Kittanning, Pa. Part I (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Kittanning, Pa. Part II (ORP) 26-23, 26-24 Kitzmiller, Md. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Klamath River, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-11, 35-23 Klutina River, Copper Center, Alaska (NPA) 40-6, 40-13 Knappa Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Knapps Narrows, Md. (NAB) 4-6, 4-21, 4-29 Knife River Harbor, Minn. (NCE) 31-14, 31-39, 31-56 Knights Valley Lake, Calif. (SPN) 34-11 Knightville Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-16, 1-34, 1-56 Knobb's Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Kodiak Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Kootenai River, Idaho and Mont. (NPS) 38-25, 38-27 Kualoa Regional Park, Hawaii (POD) 36-5, 36-9 Kuliouou Stream, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 L L'Anguille Basin, Ark. (MR +T) 42-27 L'Anguille River, Ark. (MR + T) 42-18 La Conner, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 La Crosse, Wis. (NCS) 27-7 La Farge Lake and Channel Improvement, Wis. (NCS) 27-7, 27-17 La Grange Bayou, Fla. (SAM) 10-38 La Grange Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-21 La Pointe Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-70, 31-71 La Trappe, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Lac La Belle Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-14, 31-39, 31-56 Lac Qui Parle Lake, Minnesota River, Minn. (NCS) 27-7, 27-17 Lacey Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCC) 28-19 Lacey, Langellier, West Mantanzas and Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 Lackawanna, N.Y. (NCB) 32-36 Lackawanna River Basin, Pa. (NAB) 4-13, 4-32 Lafayette Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-23 Lafayette River, Va. (NAO) 5-5, 5-15, 5-18, 5-23 Lago De Cerrillos, P.R. (SAJ) 9-45 Lago De Portugues, P.R. (SAJ) 9-45 Lagoon Pond, Martha's Vineyard, Mass. (NED) 1-46 Lahaina Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-8, 27-17 Lake Borgne and Chef Menteur-Bulkheads and Jetties (LMN) 11-38 1-20 INDEX Lake Brownwood Modification, Tex. (SWF) 16-8, 16-18, 16-22 Lake Bryan, Wash. (NPW) 39-5 Lake Camanche, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 Lake Celilo, Wash. and Oreg. (NPP) 37-22, 37-29, 37-39, 37-52 Lake Champlain Narrows, N.Y. and Vt. (NAN) 2-6, 2-21, 2-25 Lake Charles Deep Water Channel, La. (LMN) 11-38 Lake Chautauqua and Chadakoin River, N.Y. (ORP) 26-23, 26-26 Lake City, Tenn. (ORN) 23-19 Lake City Harbor, Minn. (NCD) (NCS) 27-24, 29-8 Lake Crescent and Dunns Creek, Fla. (SAJ) 9-50 Lake Crockett, Wash. (NPS) 38-4, 38-15, 38-20 Lake Darling, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-8, 27-17 Lake Douglas, Ga. (SAM) 10-39 Lake Erie-Ohio Canal, Ohio and Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Lake Fork Lake, Sabine River, Tex. (SWF) 16-24 Lake Francis Case, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-8, 21-11 Lake Greeson, Ark. (LMK) 12-5, 12-9, 12-15 Lake Herbert G. West, Wash. (NPW) 39-6 Lake Kemp, Tex. (SWT) 19-9, 19-19 Lake Mendocino, Calif. (SPN) 34-15, 34-19, 34-20 Lake Michigan-Lake Bluff, Ill. (NCC) 30-17 Lake Michigan-Lake Forest, Ill. (NCC) 30-17 Lake Montauk Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-30, 2-31 Lake Ocklawaha, Fla. (SAJ) 9-5 Lake Ogleton, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Lake Oroville, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 Lake Ouachita (Blakely Mountain Dam), Ark. (LMK) 12-5, 12-8, 12-15 Lake Pontchartrain, La. (MR + T) 42-15, 42-26 Lake Pontchartrain, La. Project Levees (MR + T) 42-43 Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity, La., (Hurricane Protection) (LMN) 11-19, 11-27, 11-33 Lake Providence Harbor, La. (LMK) 12-1, 12-8, 12-10 Lake River, Wash. (NPP) 37-40 Lake River Delta Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-45, 37-49 Lake Rousseau, Fla. (SAJ) 9-5 Lake Sacajawea, Wash. (NPW) 39-4 Lake Sakakawea, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-8, 21-11 Lake Sharpe, S. Dak (MRO) 21-7, 21-11 Lake Shelbyville, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Lake Sidney Lanier, Ga. (SAM) 10-27, 10-36 Lake St. Clair, Mich., Channels (NCE) 31-14, 31-39, 31-57 Lake Texoma, Tex. and Okla. (SWT) 19-14, 19-21 Lake Thunderbird, Okla. (SWT) 19-13 Lake Traverse, Minn. and S. Dak. (NCS) 27-20 Lake Traverse and Boise De Sioux River, S. Dak. and Minn. (NCS) 27-9, 27-17 Lake Umatilla, Greg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-20, 37-29, 37-39, 37-52 Lake Wallula, Wash. (NPW) 39-6, 39-10 Lake Washington Ship Canal, Wash. (NPS) 38-5, 38-15, 38-21, 38-31 Lake Wichita, Tex. (SWT) 19-17 Lakeport Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 Lakeshore Park, Ashtabula, Ohio (NCB) 31-13, 32-21 Lakeview Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-8, 16-18, 16-22 Lakeview Park, Lorain, Ohio (NCB) 32-12, 32-21 Lamoille River, Vt. (NAN) 2-33, 2-35 Lamprey River, N.H. (NED) 1-46 Lancaster, Mass. (NED) 1-27 Lancaster, N.H. (NED) 1-16, 1-34, 1-43 Lancaster, N.Y. (NCB) 32-36 Langellier Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCC) 28-19 Langston Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-14 Lansing (Grand River), Mich. (NCE) 31-73 Lansing Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 29-8 Lapwai Creek, Culdesac, Idaho (NPW) 39-13 Larchmont Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Largo Sound Channel, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Lamed, Kans. (SWA) (SWT) 17-4, 17-10, 17-11, 19-25 Larose to Golden Meadow, La. (Hurricane Protection) (LMN) 11-20, 11-27, 11-33 Las Animas, Colo. (SWA) 17-13 Las Cruces, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-13 Las Tunas Beach, Calif. (SPL) 33-25 Las Vegas Wash Tributaries, Nev. (SPL) 33-27 Latrobe, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26, 26-28 Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ky. (ORN) 23-7, 23-9, 23-18 Lava Hot Springs, Idaho (NPW) 39-14 Lavaca-Navidad River, Tex. (SWG) 15-29 Lavon Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-8, 16-18, 16-22 Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement, Tex. (SWF) 16-8, 16-18, 16-22 Lawrence, Kans. (MRK) 20-18, 20-23 Lawrenceburg, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-27, 24-32 Lead Bayou, Miss. (LMK) 12-4, 12-8, 12-10 Leading Creek, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19 Leaf and Chickasawhay River, Miss. (SAM) 10-38 Leavenworth, Ind. (ORL) 24-24, 24-28 Lebanon Junction, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-32 Le Claire Lock (Canal), Iowa (NCD) 29-6 Lee, Mass. (NED) 1-27, 1-50 Lee County, Fla. (8AJ) 9-51 Leech Lake Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 27-23 Leesville, Va., Roanoke River, Sec. 32, Demo. Project (SAW) 6-15, 6-23 Leetonia, Ohio (ORP) 26-22 Leetsdale, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Lehigh River at Allentown, Pa. (NAP) 3-16, 3-29 Lehigh River at Bethlehem, Pa. (NAP) 3-16 Leipsic River, Del. (NAP) 3-27 Leith Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-7, 7-9, 7-13 Leland Bowman Lock, La. (formerly Vermilion Lock) (LMN) 11-10, 11-26, 11-31 Leland Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-14, 31-40, 31-57 Lemon Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Les Cheneaux Islands, Channels, Mich. (NCE) 31-70, 31-71 Letart, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Letart Falls, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Levee Unit No. 1, Ill. (ORL) 24-23 Levee Unit No. 5, Ind. (ORL) 24-4, 24-16, 24-32 Levee Unit No. 8, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-32 Levees (LMK) (LMS) (MR + T) 42-4, 42-6, 42-21, 42-26, 42-27, 42-42, 42-44, 42-46, 42-47, 42-52, 42-53, 42-54, 14-14 1-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, W. Va., Va., and Ky. (ORH) 25-5, 25-12, 25-16 Lewis and Clark Lake, Nebr. and S. Dak. (MRO) 21-8, 21-12, 21-19 Lewis and Clark River Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Lewis River, Wash. (NPP) 37-7, 37-25, 37-34 Lewis River Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-45, 37-49 Lewisport, Ky. (ORL) 24-23, 24-27 Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge, Idaho and Wash. (NPW) 39-5, 39-9, 39-12 Lewisville Dam, Tex. (SWF) 16-8, 16-18, 16-22 Lexington Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-15, 31-40, 31-57 Libby Dam-Lake Koocanusa, Mont. (NAS) 38-12, 38-18, 38-24 Liberty Local Protection Project, Tex. (SWG) 15-29 Liberty State Park Levee and Seawall, N.J. (NAN) (NAP) 2-15, 2-22, 2-28, 3-22 Lick Run, Roanoke, Va. (SAW) 6-28 Licking River, Ky. (ORL) 24-21 Lido Key, Fla. (SAJ) 9-51 Lighthouse Point Park, Conn. (NED) 1-49 Lincoln, N.H. (NED) 1-27 Lincoln, Nebr. (MRO) 21-21 Lincoln Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-25 Linton, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-16 Lisle, N.Y. (NAB) 4-16, 4-25 Little Bay De Noc, Gladstone Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-71 Little Bay, Tex. (SWG) 15-29 Little Blue River Channel Improvement, Mo. (MRK) 20-4, 20-11, 20-15 Little Blue River Lakes, Mo. (MRK) 20-4, 20-12, 20-15 Little Caillou Bayou, La. (LMN) 11-38 Little Calumet River, Ill. (NCC) 30-8, 30-11, 30-17 Little Chute Combined Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-69 Little Chute Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-69 Little Chute First (Guard) Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-69 Little Chute Second Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-69 Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, Ala. (SAM) 10-39 Little Creek, Kent Island, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Little Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-10 Little Egg Harbor, N.J. (NAP) 3-27 Little Goose Lock and Dam-Lake Bryan, Wash. (NPW) 39-5, 39-9, 39-12, 39-18, 39-22 Little Harbor, N.H. (NED) 1-46 Little Harbor, Woods Hole, Mass. (NED) 1-46 Little Kanawha River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-18 Little Kaukauna Lock and Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-69 Little Lake Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-15, 31-40, 31-57 Little Machipongo River, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Little Manatee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-50 Little Missouri River, Ark. (LMK) 12-14, 12-15 Little Neck Bay, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Little Nemaha River, Nebr. (MRO) 21-16 Little Papillion, Nebr. (MRO) 21-16, 21-21 Little Pee Dee and Pee Dee Rivers, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-16 Little River, Del. (NAP) 3-27 Little River, La. (LMK) 12-14 Little River (Creek), Va. (NAO) 5-23 Little River at Cayuga Island, N.Y. (NCB) 32-34 Little River Basin (Little Rock District) (SWL) 18-4, 18-10, 18-19 Little River Diversion Channel, Mo. (MR + T) 42-19 Little River Inlet, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-4, 7-8, 7-12 Little River Project Levees (MR + T) 42-46 Little Rock Levee, Ark. (East End Fourche Bayou) (SWL) 18-14, 18-21 Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Little Sioux River and Tributaries, Iowa (MRO) 21-16 Little Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-8, 32-19, 32-29 Little Sugar Creek, Charlotte, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Little Tallahatchie River, Miss. (LMK) 12-14 Little Tennessee River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Little Valley Wash, Magna, Utah (SPK) 35-25 Little Wicomico River, Va. (NAB) 4-6, 4-21, 4-29 Little Wood River, Idaho (NPW) 39-15, 39-16 Littleville Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-16, 1-34, 1-56 Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-16, 28-19 Lock and Dam No. 1, Minn. (NCD) 29-6, 29-10 Lock and Dam No. 2, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Lock and Dam No. 2, Ark. (SWL) 18-2, 18-15 Lock and Dam No. 2, Minn. (NCD) 29-6 Lock and Dam No. 2, Monongahela River, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Lock and Dam No. 3, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Lock and Dam No. 3, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-15 Lock and Dam No. 3, Minn. (NCD) 29-6 Lock and Dam No. 3, Monongahela River, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Lock and Dam No. 4, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Lock and Dam No. 4, Ark. (SWL) 18-4, 18-15 Lock and Dam No..4, Monongahela River, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Lock and Dam No. 4, Wis. (NCD) 29-6 Lock and Dam No. 5, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Lock and Dam No. 5, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-15 Lock and Dam No. 5, Minn. (NCD) 29-6 Lock and Dam No. 5A, Minn. (NCD) 29-6 Lock and Dam No. 6, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Lock and Dam No. 6, Wis. (NCD) 29-6 Lock and Dam No. 7, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Lock and Dam No. 7, Minn. (NCD) 29-6 Lock and Dam No. 7, Monongahela River, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Lock and Dam No. 8, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Lock and Dam No. 8, Monongahela River, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Lock and Dam No. 8, Wis. (NCD) 29-6 Lock and Dam No. 9, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Lock and Dam No. 9, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-15 Lock and Dam No. 9, Wis. (NCD) 29-6 Lock and Dam No. 10, Iowa (NCD) 29-6 1-22 INDEX Lock and Dam No. 11, Ark. (SWL) 18-16 Lock and Dam No. 11, Iowa (NCD) 29-6 Lock and Dam No. 12, Iowa (NCD) 29-6 Lock and Dam No. 13, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-16 Lock and Dam No. 13, Iowa (NCD) 29-6 Lock and Dam No. 14, Iowa (NCD) 29-6 Lock and Dam No. 15, Ill. (NCD) 29-6 Lock and Dam No. 16, Iowa (NCD) 29-7 Lock and Dam No. 17, Ill. (NCD) 29-7 Lock and Dam No. 18, Iowa (NCD) 29-7 Lock and Dam No. 19, Iowa (NCD) 29-7 Lock and Dam No. 20, Mo. (NCD) 29-7 Lock and Dam No. 21, Ill. (NCD) 29-7 Lock and Dam No. 22, Mo. (NCD) 29-7 Lock and Dam No. 24, Mo. (NCD) 29-7 Lock and Dam No. 25, Mo. (NCD) 29-7 Lock and Dam No. 26, Ill. (NCD) 29-7 Lock and Dam No. 52, Ill. (ORD) 22-9 Lock and Dam No. 53, Ill. (ORD) 22-10 Lock and Dam No. 54, Ill. (ORD) 22-10 Lock S-53, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-55, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-57, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-58, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-59, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-60, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-61, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-62, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-63, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-63A, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-65, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-65A, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-65B, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-65C, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-65D, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-65E, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-96, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-96A, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-157, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-158, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-193, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-308B, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock S-310, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Lock Haven, Pa. (NAB) 4-36 Locklies Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Lockport Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-21, 28-22 Locks in Pearl River Project, La. (LMK) 12-13 Lockwoods Folly River, N.C. (SAW) 6-5, 6-20 Logan, Ohio (ORH) 25-19 Logan Creek, Bank Protection, near Bancroft, Nebr. (MRO)21 -21 Long Beach Island, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 Long Branch Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-5, 20-12, 20-15 Long Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-10 Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, N.Y. (NAN) 2-5, 2-20, 2-25, 2-30 Long Lake Area, Helena, Ark. (LMM) 13-4, 13-6, 13-8 Long Tom River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Longboat Pass, Fla. (SAJ) 9-9, 9-30, 9-37 Lookout Point Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-21, 37-29, 37-39, 37-48, 37-50 Lopez Canyon Diversion, Los Angeles River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-32 Lopez Dam, Los Angeles River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-28 Lorain Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-8, 32-19, 32-30 Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, Calif. (SPL) 33-2, 33-14, 33-19 Los Angeles County Drainage Area, Calif. (SPL) 33-8, 33-16, 33-21, 33-28, 33-31 Los Coches Creek, Calif. (SPL)( 33-31 Lost and Little Lost Cr., Channel Improvement, Mo. (SWT) 19-26 Lost Creek, Columbus, Nebr. (MRO) 21-5, 21-10, 21-13 Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-16, 28-19 Lost Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-21, 37-29, 37-39, 37-49 Lost River, Minn. (NCS) 27-21 Louisville, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-27, 24-32 Louisville Lake, Ill. (ORL) 24-10,24-17, 24-31 Loup River, Columbus, Nebr. (MRO) 21-16 Lowell, Mass. (NED) 1-27, 1-50 Lowell, N.H. (NED) 1-59 Lowell Creek, Alaska (NPA) 40-6, 40-13 Lower Arkansas River, Ark. (MR + T) 42-16, 42-27, 42-52, 42-54 Lower Arkansas River Basin, Ark. (MR + T) 42-7 Lower Big Sioux River, Iowa and S. Dak. (MRO) 21-16 Lower Branch Rush River, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-21 Lower Columbia River Basin, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-15, 37-37, 37-49 Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-16, 37-28, 37-37 Lower Cowlitz River, Wash. (NPP) 37-41 Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, Wash. (NPW) 39-14, 39-17 Lower Gila River Levee and Channel Improvements (Gila River and Tributaries) Downstream from Painted Rock Dam, Ariz. (SPL) 33-26 Lower Grand River, Mo. (MRK) 20-18 Lower Granite Lock and Dam, Wash. (NPW) 39-6, 39-9, 39-12, 39-19, 39-22 Lower Guyandotte River Basin, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19 Lower Heart River, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-16 Lower Machodoc Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-34 Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, Wash. (NPW) 39-6, 39-9, 39-12, 39-18, 39-20, 39-22 Lower Red River Standard Revetments (MR + T) 42-32 Lower Red River-South Bank, Red River Levees, La. (MR + T) 42-6, 42-15, 42-27, 42-43, 42-54, 42-55 Lower San Francisco Bay, Calif. (SPN) 34-10 Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, Calif. (SPK) 35-18, 35-23 Lower Snake River, Wash., Oreg., Idaho, Fish and Wildlife Compensation (NPW) 39-7, 39-10, 39-12 Lower Thorofare, Deal Island, Md. (NAB) 4-11, 4-34 Lower Walla Walla River, Wash. (NPW) 39-14, 39-16 Lower White River and Basin, Ark. (MR + T) 42-10, 42-17, 42-27, 42-51 Lower White River Levees (MR + T) 42-10, 42-46, 42-51, 42-54 Lower Woonsocket, R.I. (NED) 1-50, 1-55 1-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Lowes Wharf, Md. (NAB) 4-6, 4-22, 4-29 Loyalhanna Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-7, 26-15, 26-19 Lubec, Maine (NED) 1-26 Lubec Channel, Maine (NED) 1-46 Lucky Peak Lake, Idaho (NPW) 39-2, 39-9, 39-11 Ludington Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-15, 31-40, 31-57 Ludlow, Ky. (ORL) 24-25, 24-28 Ludlow Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-52 Lukfata Lake, Okla. and Ark. (SWT) 19-9, 19-19, 19-25 Lumber River, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-16 Lutsen Harbor, Minn. (NCE) 31-16, 31-40, 31-57 Lyford Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-32 Lyman, Idaho (NPW) 39-17 Lyman Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-14, 39-17 Lynches River and Clark Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-5, 7-8, 7-12, 7-16 Lynn Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-46 Lynn-Nahant Beach, Mass. (NED) 1-9 Lynnhaven Inlet, Va. (NAO) 5-5, 5-15, 5-18 Lytle and Cajon Creeks Channel Improvements, Calif. (SPL) 33-31 Lytle and Warm Creeks, Calif. (SPL) 33-26 M Maalaea Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Macdowell, Edward, Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-22, 1-36, 1-59 Machias River,Maine (NED) 1-46 Mackay Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27, 6-29 Mackinac Island Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-70, 31-71 Mackinaw City Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-70, 31-71 Macon, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Macy, Nebr. (MRO) 21-21 Mad Creek, Muscatine, Iowa (NCR) 28-19 Mad River, Conn. (NED) 1-26, 1-56 Mad River Basin, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-11, 35-23 Mad River Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-50 Madison, Ind. (ORL) 24-25, 24-28, 24-33 Madison, Nebr. (MRO) 21-16, 21-21 Madison Bay, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Madison Parish Port, La. (LMK) 12-2, 12-8, 12-10 Magruder Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41;, 37-45, 37-49 Mahnomen, Minn., Wild Rice River (NCS) 27-25 Mahoning Creek Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-8, 26-15, 26-19 Maiden Creek Reservoir, Pa. (NAP) 3-29 Maintenance and Repair Fleet and Marine Terminals, Ark. (SWL) 18-3 Maintenance and Repair Fleet and Marine Terminals, Okla. (SWT) 19-3, 19-18, 19-22 Malden River,Mass. (NED) 1-46 Malheur Improvement District, Oreg. (NPW) 39-14, 39-17 Malheur River, Oreg. (NPW) 39-15, 39-16 Mamaroneck Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Manasquan River, N.J. (NAP) 3-8, 3-20, 3-25 Manatee County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-22, 9-33, 9-44 Manatee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Manchester, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Manchester Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-52 Mandan, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-16, 21-20 Manele Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12, 36-14 Manhasset Bay, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Manhattan, Kans. (MRK) 20-18, 20-23 Maniece Bayou, Ark. (LMN) 11-40, 11-42 Manistee Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-16, 31-40, 31-57 Manistique Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-16, 31-41, 31-58 Manitowoc Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-17, 31-41, 31-58 Mankato and North Mankato, Minn. (NCS) 27-9, 27-17 Mann's Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Manokin River, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Mansfield Hollow Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-26, 1-38, 1-60 Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-6, 6-20 Mantua Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-27 Maple River, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-22 Mapleshade, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Marblehead Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-52 Marengo, Iowa (NCR) 28-5, 28-9, 28-16 Marietta, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Marina Del Rey, Calif. (SPL) 33-5, 33-24, 33-30 Marion, Ind. (ORL) 24-23, 24-31 Marion, Kans. (SWT) 19-9, 19-19, 19-22 Marion County Drainage District, Mo. (NCR) 28-16, 28-19 Marion Diversion Channel and Levee, Kans. (SWT) 19-25 Marion Lake, Kans. (SWT) 19-10, 19-20 Markham Ferry Lake, Okla. (SWL) 18-18 Markham Ferry Reservoir, Okla. (SWT) 19-14, 19-23 Markland Locks and Dam, Ind. (ORD) 22-2, 22-9 Marmarth, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-16, 21-20 Marquette Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-18, 31-41, 31-58 Marseilles Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-21, 28-22 Marsh Creek, Geneva, N.Y. (NCB) 32-36 Marshall, Minn. (NCS) 27-21 Marshalltown, Iowa (NCR) 28-16, 28-19 Marshland Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Martin, John, Reservoir, Colo. (SWA) 17-3, 17-10 Martin, Ky. (ORH) 25-6, 25-12, 25-16 Martins Ferry, Ohio (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Martins Fork Lake, Ky. (ORN) 23-5, 23-9, 23-18 Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, Nev. and Calif. (SPK) 35-8, 35-18 Marysville, Kans. (MRK) 20-19 Marysville Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 Mason, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Mason and Menard Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-16, 28-19 Mason J. Niblack Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-4, 24-16, 24-22, 24-27, 34-32 Massillon, Ohio (ORH) 25-6, 25-12, 25-16 Matagorda Ship Channel, Tex. (SWG) 15-7, 15-15, 15-24, 15-32, 15-36 Matawan Creek, N.J. (NAN) 2-31 Matinicus Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-46 Mats Mats Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-25, 38-32 Mattapoisett Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-52 1-24 INDEX Mattituck Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-6, 2-34, 2-31 Matunuck Beach, South Kingston, R.I. (NED) 1-49 Mauckport, Ind. (ORL) 24-25, 24-28 Maumee River, above Toledo, Ohio (NCB) 32-34, 32-38 Maunalua Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Maurice River, N.J. (NAP) 3-30 Maxwell Locks and Dam, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Mayaguez Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-9, 9-30, 9-37, 9-49 Mayo, W. D., Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWT) 19-23 Mayse, Pat, Lake, Tex. (SWT) 19-10, 19-20 Maysville, Ky. (ORH) 25-19, 25-21 McAlpine Locks and Dam (ORD) 22-3, 22-9 McCook Lake, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-16 McGee Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-5, 14-9, 14-11 McGinnis Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-25, 24-28 McGregor, Iowa (NCS) 27-25 McKees Rocks, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 McKenzie River near Walterville, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 McKinney Bayou, Ark. (LMN) 11-40, 11-42 McKinney Bayou, Ark. and Tex. (LMN) 11-20, 11-28, 11-33 McKinney Bayou, Finn Bayou Segment, Ark. (LMN) 11-42 McLean Bottom Levee District No. 3, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-21 McNary Lock and Dam-Lake Wallula-Oreg. and Wash. (NPW) 39-7, 39-10, 39-12, 39-21 Meadow Grove, Nebr. (MRO) 21-21 Medomak River, Maine (NED) 1-46 Melbourne Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Meldahl, Captain Anthony, Locks and Dam, Ky. (ORD) 22-2, 22-8 Melton Hill Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-17 Melvern Lake and Pomona Lake (Road Improvement), Kans. (MRK) 20-23 Melvern Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-5, 20-12, 20-15, 20-23 Memphis Harbor, Tenn. (MR + T) 42-28 Memphis Harbor Project Levees (MR + T) 42-46, 42-47 Memphis, Wolf River, and Nonconnah Creek, Tenn. (LMM) 13-10 Menasha Lock and Dam (NCE) 31-69 Menemsha Creek, Martha's Vineyard, Mass. (NED) 1-46 Menominee Harbor and River, Mich. and Wis. (NCE) 31-18, 31-41, 31-59 Meramec Park Lake, Mo. (LMS) 14-4, 14-9 Meramec River Basin, Mo. (LMS) 14-4, 14-11, 14-13 Merced County Stream Group, Calif. (SPK) 35-8, 35-18, 35-26 Merced County Streams, Calif. (SPK) 35-16, 35-20 Merced River, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 Mercer Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-18 Meredosia, Ill., and Meredosia, Willow Creek, and Coon Run Drainage and Levee Districts, Ill. (LMS) 14-5, 14-9, 14-12 Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-5, 14-9, 14-12, 14-14 Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-16, 28-19 Merherrin River, N.C. (NAO) 5-23 Mermentau River, La. (LMN) 11-10, 11-26, 11-31 Mermentau River, Bayou Nezpique, and Bay Des Cannes, La. (LMN) 11-38 Merom, Ind. (ORL) 24-33 Merriam, Kans. (MRK) 20-19 Merriconeag Sound, Harpswell, Maine (NED) 1-50 Merrimack River, Mass. (NED) 1-46 Merrimack River Basin, N.H. and Mass. (NED) 1-21, 1-27, 1-59 Metamora Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-25, 24-30 Methow River, Wash. (NAS) 38-27, 38-28 Metlakatla Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-4, 40-9, 40-11 Metropolis, Ill. (ORL) 24-23, 24-27 Miami Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-9, 9-30, 9-38, 9-49 Miami River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 Mianus River, Conn. (NED) 1-46 Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio (ORP) 26-8, 26-15, 26-19 Michigan City Harbor, Ind. (NCC) 30-5, 30-10, 30-13, 30-16, 30-17 Middle Beach, Conn. (NED) 1-49 Middle Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 Middle Gila River Channel Improvements, Upper End of Safford Valley to Buttes Damsite (Camelsback Damsite to Salt River), Ariz. (SPL) 33-26 Middle River and Connecting Channels, Calif. (SPK) 35-22 Middle River and Dark Head Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Middleport, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Middlesboro, Ky. (ORN) 23-5, 23-9 Middlesboro, Ky. (Diversion Canal) (ORN) 23-19 Middlesboro, Ky. (Yellow Creek) (ORN) 23-13, 23-18, 23-19 Middleton Shoals, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-17 Midland Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41, 37-43, 37-49 Milan, Ill. (NCR) 28-6, 28-11, 28-14 Miles City, Mont. (MRO) 21-5, 21-10, 21-13, 21-17 Milford Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-46 Milford Haven, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Milford Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-5, 20-12, 20-15, 20-23 Mill Creek, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-33 Mill Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Mill Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Mill Creek, Ohio (ORL) (ORH) 24-4, 24-16, 25-20 Mill Creek, Tex. (SWG) 15-29 Mill Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Mill Creek, Wash. (NPW) 39-15, 39-16 Mill Creek and South Slough at Milan, Ill. (NCR) 28-3, 28-10, 28-13 Mill Creek Lake, Wash. (NPW) 39-2, 39-9, 39-11 Mill Creek Levees, Calif. (SPL) 33-31 Mill Four Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 Mill Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-18 Miller, Ohio (ORH) 25-19 Miller Pond Drainage District, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, Ala. (SAM) 10-18, 10-27 Millersburg, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Millican Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-10, 16-18, 16-22 Millwood, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Millwood Lake, Little River Basin, Ark. (SWL) 18-6, 18-11, 18-19 1-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Milton, Ky. (ORL) 24-25, 24-28 Milton, Pa. (NAB) 4-39 Milton-Freewater, Oreg. (NPW) 39-14, 39-17 Milton Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-30, 2-31 Milwaukee Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-18, 31-41, 31-59 Mineral Creek, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Mingo Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-14 Mingo Junction, Ohio (ORP) 26-23 Mining City Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-23, 24-30 Minneota, Minn. (NCS) 27-21 Minnesota River, Minn. (NCS) 27-2, 27-16, 27-19 Minot, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-9, 27-17 Mispillion River, Del. (NAP) 3-9, 3-20 Misquamicut Beach, Westerly, R.I. (NED) 1-49 Mission and Lapwai Creeks, Idaho (NPW) 39-14 Mission Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-17 Mississinewa Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-10, 24-17 Mississippi and Leech Rivers, Minn. (NCS) 27-20 Mississippi Delta Region, La. (MR + T) 42-27 Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 8, Mo. (LMS) 14-6, 14-10, 14-12 Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 10, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 12, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Mississippi River Alluvial Valley Mapping (MR + T) 42-3 Mississippi River and Alluvial Valley below Cape Girardeau, Mo. (MR + T) 42-2 Mississippi River and Tributaries (MR + T) 42-1 to 42-57 Mississippi River and Tributaries-Channel Improve- - ments (MR + T) 42-5 Mississippi River and Tributaries-Levees (MR + T) 42-4 Mississippi River at Alton, Ill. (LMS) 14-13 Mississippi River at St. Louis, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Mississippi River, Alton to Gale, Ill., Underseepage Measures (LMS) 14-15 Mississippi River Bank Revetments and Dikes (MR + T) 42-29, 42-34, 42-38 Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to Gulf of Mexico, La. (LMN) 11-11, 11-26, 11-31 Mississippi River between Brainerd and Grand Rapids, Minn. (NCS) 27-20 Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minn. (NCD) (NCS) 27-2, 29-1, 29-5, 29-11 Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers, Mo. and Ill. (LMS) 14-2, 14-9, 14-11 Mississippi River Channel Improvements (MR + T) 42-48, 42-49, 42-50, 42-51 Mississippi River Commission (MR + T) 42-1 Mississippi River Delta at and below New Orleans, La., (New Orleans to Venice, La., Hurricane Protection) (LMN) 11-21, 11-28, 11-33 Mississippi River Delta Region, La. (MR + T) 42-55 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, La. (LMN) 11-13, 11-26, 11-32 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Michoud Canal, La. (LMN) 11-38 Mississippi River Headwater Reservoirs, Minn. (NCS) 27-2, 27-16, 27-19 Mississippi River Improvements (MR + T) 42-11 Mississippi River Levees (LMK) (LMS) (MR + T) 43-3, 43-25, 42-27, 42-42, 42-44, 42-45 Mississippi River Main Stem Channel Improvements (MR + T) 42-28 Mississippi River near Aitkin, Minn. (NCS) 27-21 Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, La. (LMN) 11-13, 11-26, 11-32 Mississippi River Tributary and Outlet Improvements (MR + T) 42-13 Mississippi River Tributary Dams and Lakes (MR + T) 42-20 Mississquoi River at Richford, Vt. (NAN) 2-33 Missouri National Recreational River, Nebr. and S. Dak. (MRO) 21-5, 21-10, 21-13 Missouri River, Mo. (MR + T) 42-19 Missouri River at New Haven, Mo. (MRK) 20-18 Missouri River, Aten, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17 Missouri River, Bank Protection, Greenwood, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-20 Missouri River, Bank Stabilization, Fort Benton, Mont. (MRO) 21-20 Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-5, 21-10, 21-13 Missouri River, Kenslers Bend, Nebr. to Sioux City, Iowa (MRO) 21-5, 21-10, 21-13 Missouri River Levee System, Iowa, Nebr., Kans., and Mo. (Rulo, Nebr. to Mouth) (MRK) 20-5, 20-12, 20-15, 20-22, 20-23 Missouri River Levee System, Iowa, Nebr., Kans., and Mo. (Sioux City, Iowa, to Rulo, Nebr.) (MRO) 21-6, 21-11, 21-13, 21-18, 21-22 Missouri River, Marina, Sioux City, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 Missouri River, Niobrara, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17 Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa, to Fort Benton, Mont. (MRO) 21-16 Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa, to Mouth (Rulo, Nebr., to Mouth) (MRK) 20-2, 20-11, 20-14, 20-20 Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa, to Mouth, Terminal Facilities (MRK) 20-21 Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa, to Rulo, Nebr. (MRO) 21-2, 21-12, 21-18, 21-19 Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa, to Rulo, Nebr., Terminal Facilities (MRO) 21-19 Mobile Bay, Ala. to New Orleans, La. (SAM) 10-32 Mobile Harbor, Ala. (SAM) 10-9, 10-25, 10-32 Mocassin Swamp, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Moccasin Springs, Mo. (LMS) 14-13 Moclips River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Mojave River Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-9, 33-16, 33-22 Mokelumne River, Calif. (SPK) 35-22 Molalla River at Milk Creek location, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 Molalla River at Ressel location, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 Moline, Ill. (NCR) 28-6, 28-11, 28-14 Moline Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 29-8 Monongahela River, Pa. and W. Va. Locks and Dams (ORP) 26-2, 26-14, 26-17, 26-25, 26-26 Monoosnoc Brook, Mass. (NED) 1-50 Monoosnoc Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-50, 1-59 Monroe, La., floodwall extension (LMK) 12-15 Monroe Bay and Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-6, 4-22, 4-29 1-26 INDEX Monroe County, Iowa, Highway Bridges (NCR) 28-6, 28-11, 28-14 Monroe Floodwall, La. (LMK) 12-6, 12-9, 12-11, 12-15 Monroe Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-19, 31-42, 31-59 Monroe Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-10, 24-17, 24-30 Montcalm, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Monterey Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-10 Montgomery Locks and Dam, Pa. (ORD) 22-1, 22-7 Montour Falls, N.Y. (NCB) 32-36 Moore Haven Lock, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Moorefield, W. Va. (NAB) 4-37 Moores Ferry, Va. (ORH) 25-19 Moorhead, Minn. (NCS) 27-22 Mooring for Battleship Oregon, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Moosabec Bar, Maine (NED) 1-46 Morattico Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-10 Morehead, Ky. (ORL) 24-33 Morehead City Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-6, 6-21 Morgan City and Vicinity, La. (LMN) 11-42 Morgan Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 Morgantown Lock and Dam, W. Va. (ORP) 26-25 Morganza Floodway, La. (MR + T) 42-48 Moriches Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-5, 2-21, 2-25 Mormon Slough, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 Morrison, Colo. (MRO) 21-17 Morrison Creek Stream Group, Calif. (SPK) 35-14 Morristown Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-34 Morro Bay Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-5, 33-24 Moscow, Ohio (ORL) 24-25, 24-28 Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio (ORP) 26-9, 26-15, 26-19 Moss Bluff Lock, Fla. (SAJ) 9-56 Moss Landing Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-6 Mott, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-17 Mound City Locks and Dam, Ill. (ORD) 22-10 Mounds and Mound City, Ill. (LMM) 13-10 Moundsville, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Mount Clemens, Clinton River, Mich. (NCE) 31-72 Mountain Brook Dam, N.H. (NED) 1-52 Mountain Park (Tom Steed Lake), Okla. (SWT) 19-13 Mouth of Yazoo River, Miss. (LMK) 12-14 Moyock Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Mt. Baldy, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Ind. (NCC) 30-6, 30-11, 30-14 Mt. Carmel, Ill. (ORL) 24-22, 24-32 Mt. Holly, N.J. (NAP) 3-29 Mt. Morris Lake, N.Y. (NCB) 32-15, 32-22 Mud and Basket Slough, Rickreall Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 Mud Creek, Broken Bow, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-21 Mud Creek Channel Improvement, Okla. (SWT) 19-26 Mud Lake, Idaho (NPW) 39-14, 39-16 Mud Lake Pumping Station, Tenn. (MR + T) 42-27 Mud Mountain Dam, Wash. (NAS) 38-9, 38-17, 38-22 Mud River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Muddy Creek Dam, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Muddy Hook and Tyler Coves, Md. (NAB) 4-6, 4-22, 4-29 Mulberry Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Mullet Key, Fla. (SAJ) 9-51 Multnomah Channel, Oreg. (NPP) 37-7, 37-25, 37-34, 37-40 Multnomah Drainage District 1, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41, 37-43, 37-49 Muncie, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-32 Munday Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-24 Murder Creek, East Brewton, Ala. (SAM) 10-14, 10-26, 10-35 Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, Ala. (SAM) 10-39 Murderkill River, Del. (NAP) 3-9, 3-21 Murfreesboro Dam and Lake (LMK) 12-15 Murray Lock & Dam (No. 7), Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-15 Murrells Inlet, S.C. (SAN) 7-5, 7-9, 7-12 Muscatatuck River, Crothersville, Ind. (ORL) 24-33 Muscatine, Iowa (NCR) 28-6, 28-11, 28-15 Muscatine, Iowa, (Mad Creek) (NCR) 28-16 Muscatine Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 29-9 Muscatine Island L. and D. D., Louisa D. D. No. 13, Iowa (NCR) 28-16, 28-19 Muskegon Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-19, 31-42, 31-59 Muskingum River, Ohio (ORH) 25-18 Muskingum River Lakes, Ohio (ORH) 25-6, 25-13, 25-16 Mustinka River, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Myers Chuck Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Myrtle Beach, S.C. (SAN) 7-16 Mystic, Conn. (NED) 1-52 Mystic River, Conn. (NED) 1-46 Mystic River, Mass. (NED) 1-9, 1-31 N Naches River, Naches, Wash. (NPS) 38-9, 38-17, 38-22 Nagel Drainage District, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 Nahunta Swamp, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Naknek River, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Namo River, Territory of Guam (POD) 36-6, 36-9 Nan Cove, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Nandua Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Nansemond River, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Nantasket Beach, Mass. (NED) 1-49 Nanticoke River, Md. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 Nanticoke River at Bivalve, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Nanticoke River (including Northwest Fork), Del. and Md. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), Mass. (NED) 1-46 Napa River, Calif. (SPN) 34-6 Napa River Basin, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-11, 35-23 Napatree Breach, R.I. (NED) 1-52 Narragansett Pier, R.I. (NED) 1-53 Narraguagus River, Maine (NED) 1-46 Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Ark. (LMK) 12-5, 12-9, 12-15 Narrows of Lake Champlain, N.Y. and Vt. (NAN) 2-6, 2-21, 2-25 Nashua, N.H. (NED) 1-26, 1-50, 1-59 Natchez Port Area, Miss. (LMK) 12-15 Natchitoches Parish, La. (LMN) 11-41, 11-42 Navajo Reservoir, N. Mex. (SPK) 35-22 Navarro Mills Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-10, 16-18, 16-22 1-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Navasota Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-24 Navigation Locks and Dams, Ark. (SWL) 18-10 Navigation Work under Special Authorization (NAO) 5-10 Navigation Work under Special Authorization (Calcasieu Pass Channel in Old River Bend at Cameron, La.) (LMN) 11-38 Nawiliwili Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-3, 36-9, 36-10 Nawiliwili Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12, 36-14 Neabsco Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Neah Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-6, 38-15, 38-21 Neale Sound, Md. (NAB) 4-7, 4-22, 4-29 Near Dardanelle, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-21 Near Springfield on Sangamon River, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 Neavitt Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Neches River and Tributaries, Salt Water Barrier at Beaumont, Tex. (SWG) 15-13 Needles, Calif. (SPL) 33-26, 33-31 Nehalem Bay, Oreg. (NPP) 37-7, 37-25, 37-34 Nemaha River, Elk Creek, Nebr. (MRK) 20-9 Neodesha Lake, Kans. (SWL) (SWT) 18-18, 19-23, 19-26 Neon-Fleming, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-33 Neshaminy State Park Harbor (NAP) 3-27 Nestucca River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Neuse River, N.C. (SAW) 6-7, 6-21, 6-29 Neuse River Basin, N.C. (SAW) 6-15, 6-31 Neva and Olga Straits, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Nevile Island, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 New Albany, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-27, 24-32 New Amsterdam, Ind. (ORL) 24-25, 24-28 New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, Mass. (NED) 1-46 New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-37 New Boston Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 29-9 New Buffalo Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-20, 31-42, 31-60 New Bullards Bar, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 New Cumberland, W. Va. (ORP) 26-23 New Cumberland Locks and Dam, Stratton, Ohio (ORD) 22-1, 22-7 New Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-46 New Harmony, Ind. (ORL) 24-25, 24-28, 24-33 New Harmony Bridge, Ill. and Ind. (ORL) 24-23, 24-27 New Haven Breakwater, Conn. (NED) 1-46 New Haven Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-9, 1-32 New Hope Lake (B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake), N.C. (SAW) 6-12, 6-22 New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway (NAP) 3-10, 3-21 New Kensington and Parnassus, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 New Lock and Dam 26, Ill. (NCD) 29-7 New London, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-26, 1-37, 1-44 New London Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-46 New Madrid Harbor, Mo. (LMM) 13-2, 13-6, 13-8 New Martinsville, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 New Matamoras, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 New Melones Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-13 New Orleans to Venice, La. Hurricane Protection (LMN) 11-21, 11-28, 11-33 New Pass, Sarasota, Fla. (SAJ) 9-10, 9-30, 9-38 New Richmond, Ohio (ORL) 24-25, 24-28 New River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 New River, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 New River, Onslow County, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 New River, Va. and W. Va. (OJH) 25-18 New Rochelle Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 New York and New Jersey Channels, (NAN) 2-7, 2-21, 2-26, 2-30 New York Harbor-Collection and Removal of Drift (NAN) 2-8, 2-21, 2-26 New York Harbor-Entrance Channels and Anchorage Areas (NAN) 2-8, 2-21, 2-26 New York Harbor, Supervisor of (NAN) 2-10, 2-22, 2-29, 2-30 Newark, Ohio (ORH) 25-7, 25-13, 25-16, 25-21 Newark Bay, N.J. (NAN) 2-30 Newark Bay, Hackensack and Passaic Rivers, N.J. (NAN) 2-7, 2-21, 2-25 Newaukum River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Newbegun Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Newburgh, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-33 Newburgh Locks and Dam, Ind. (ORD) 22-3, 22-9 Newburyport Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-46 Newhall Creek, Calif. (SPL) 33-31 Newmarket Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Newport, Ark. (SWL) 18-21 Newport, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-27, 24-32 Newport, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Newport Bay Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-3, 33-14, 33-20 Newport Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-46 Newport News, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Newport News Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Newry-Old Pickens Dam and Lake, S.C. (SAS) 8-17 Newt Graham Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-16, 19-23 Newtown Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-30, 2-31 Niagara Remedial Works, N.Y. (NCB) 32-34 Niagara River, N.Y. (NCB) 32-34, 32-38 Niantic Bay and Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-46 Niblack, Mason J., Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-4, 24-16, 24-22, 24-27, 24-32 Nicholasville, (Townfork) Vicinity, Ky. (ORL) 24-33 Nichols, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Nickajack Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-17 Nimrod Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-6, 18-11, 18-18 Ninilchik Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-4, 40-9, 40-11 Nishnabotna River at Hamburg, Iowa (MRO) 21-17, 21-21 Nisqually River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Nixon Creek, Tenn. (LMM) 13-10 Nolin Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-11, 24-18, 24-30 Nome Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-5, 40-9, 40-11 Nomini Bay and Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-34 Nonconnah Blvd., Nonconnah Creek, Tenn. (LMM) 13-4, 13-6, 13-8 Nookagee Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-50, 1-59 Nooksack River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Norfolk, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-21 Norfolk Floodwall, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Norfolk Harbor, Va. (NAO) 5-6, 5-15, 5-18 Norfork Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-8, 18-12, 18-20 Normal, Ky. (ORH) 25-19 I-28 INDEX Norman Reservoir (Lake Thunderbird), Okla. (SWT) 19-13 Norrell Lock & Dam (No. 1) & Entrance Channel, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-15 North Adams, Mass. (NAN) 2-33 North Alexander Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 North Andover and Lawrence, Mass. (NED) 1-53 North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-7, 25-13, 25-16 North Canaan, Conn. (NED) 1-26, 1-50, 1-58 North Ellenville, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33 North Fork of Pound River Lake, Va. (ROH) 25-7, 25-13, 25-16 North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, Calif. (SPK) 35-23 North Fork Skykomish River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 North Hampton Beach, North Hampton, N.H. (NED) 1-49 North Hartland Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-7, 1-34, 1-56 North Little Rock, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-21 North Middletown, Ky. (ORL) 24-33 North Nashua River, Lancaster, Mass. (NED) 1-36, 1-50, 1-59 North Platte River, Bank Stabilization, Minatare, Nebr. (MRO) 21-21 North River Dike, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 North Scituate Beach, Scituate Mass. (NED) 1-49 North Second St., Memphis, Tenn. (Wolf River Bridge) (LMM) 13-4, 13-7, 13-8 North Shore of Long Island, Suffolk County, N.Y. (NAN) 2-32 North Springfield Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-17, 1-34, 1-56 North Stratford, N.H. (NED) 1-57 North Wildwood, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 Northampton, Mass. (NED) 1-27, 1-50, 1-57 Northeast (Cape Fear) River, N.C. (SAW) 6-27, 6-28 Northeast Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-46 Northeast River, Md. (NAB) 4-7, 4-22, 4-29 Northfield Brook Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-20, 1-36, 1-58 Northport Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Northport Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-71 Norwalk, Conn. (NED) 1-26, 1-50 Norwalk Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-10, 1-32 Norwalk-Wilton, Conn. (NED) 1-53 Norwich, Conn. (NED) 1-50, 1-60 Norwich, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Nottoway River, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Noxubee River, Miss. (SAM) 10-38 Noyo River and Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-5, 34-6 Nutwood Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-6, 14-10, 14-12 O 0. C. Fisher Dam and Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-10, 16-18, 16-22 Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin S. Dak. and N. Dak. (MRO) 21-8, 21-12, 21-15 Oak Bluffs Town Beach, Mass. (NED) 1-49 Oak Orchard Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-8, 32-20 SOakdale, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Oakford Special Drainage District (NCR) 28-16, 28-19 Oakland Beach, Warwick, R.I. (NED) 1-12, 1-32, 1-42 Oakland Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-6, 34-11 Obey River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Obion River, Tenn. (LMM) 13-10 O'Brien, T.J., Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-21, 28-22 Occohannock Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Occoquan Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-34 Ocean Beach, Calif. (SPL) 33-25 Ocean City, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, Md. (NAB) 4-7, 4-22, 4-29 Oceana, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19 Oceanside, Calif. (SPL) 33-5, 33-15, 33-21 Oceanside Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-3, 33-14, 33-20 Ocholockonee (Ochlockney) River, Ga. and Fla. (SAM) 10-38 Oconto Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-70, 31-71 Ocracoke Inlet, N.C. (SAW) 6-7, 6-21 Ocracoke Island, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Ofu Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-12, 36-14 Ogdensburg Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-8, 32-20, 32-30 Ohio River, Ill. and Ky. (MR + T) 42-19 Ohio River Basin (Huntington District) (ORH) 25-7, 25-13 Ohio River Basin (Louisville Dist.) (ORL) 24-11, 24-18, 24-20, 24-27 Ohio River Basin (Nashville District) (ORN) 23-6, 23-12, 23-18 Ohio River Basin (Pittsburgh District) (ORP) 26-9, 26-15, 26-19, 26-26, 26-27 Ohio River, Locks and Dams (ORD) 22-1, 22-5, 22-7 Ohio River, Open Channel Work (ORD) 22-3, 22-5 Oil City, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Okabena Creek at Worthington, Minn. (NCR) 28-16 Okanogan and Pend Oreille Rivers (NPS) 38-25 Okanogan River, Wash. (NAS) 38-28 Okanogan River, Omak, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Okanogan River, Oroville, Wash. (NPS) 38-9, 38-17, 38-22 Okatibbee Lake, Miss. (SAM) 10-13, 10-26, 10-35 Okeechobee Waterway, Fla. (SAJ) 9-11, 9-31, 9-38, 9-48 Oklahoma City Floodway, Okla. (SWT) 19-25, 19-26 Oklawaha River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-11, 9-31, 9-39 Olcott Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-9, 32-20, 32-30 Old Field Swamp, N.C. (SAN) (SAW) 6-28 Old Harbor, Kodiak Island, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Old Hickory Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-14 Old River, Calif. (SPK) 35-22 Old River, La. (MR + T) 42-6, 42-27, 42-48 Old River, Standard Revetments (MR + T) 42-31 Old Town, Maine (NED) 1-50 Old Town Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-38 Oldmans Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-27, 3-30 Olean, N.Y. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Olean, N.Y. (Allegheny River) (ORP) 26-21 Olive Hill, Ky. (ORH) 25-21 Olympia Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-25, 38-32 1-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF, OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Omaha, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-21 Omaha Marina, Omaha, Nebr. (MRO) 21-2 Onaga Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-6, 20-12, 20-15 Onancock River, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Onondaga Creek, Nedrow, N.Y. (NCB) 32-36 Ontonagon Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-20, 31-42, 31-60 Oologah Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-18, 19-10, 19-20, 19-23 Oostanaula and Coosawatee River, Ga. (SAM) 10-38 Opekiska Lock and Dam, W. Va. (ORP) 26-25 Open Channel Work, Ohio River (ORD) 22-3, 22-5 Open River Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing (NPW) 39-22 Open River Pasco to Lewiston (NPW) 39-22 Optima Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-10, 19-20 Orange River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Oregon Slough (North Portland Harbor), Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Orleans, Ind. (ORL) 24-23 Oro Grande Wash Channel Improvements, Calif. (SPL) 33-26, 33-31 Orofino Creek and Clearwater River, Idaho (NPW) 39-14 Orowoc Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Orwell Reservoir (Ottertail River) (NCS) 27-24 Osage River, Mo., Lock and Dam (MRK) 20-18 Osawatomie, Kans. (MRK) 20-18, 20-23 Osceola Harbor, Ark. (LMM) 13-2, 13-6, 13-8 Oswego Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-9, 32-20, 32-31, 32-38 Ottawa, Kans. (MRK) 20-18, 20-23 Ottawa, Ohio (NCB) 32-36 Ottawa River Harbor, Mich. and Ohio (NCB) 32-34 Otter Brook Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-17, 1-34, 1-56 Otter Creek, Vt. (NAN) 2-31 Otter Creek Park, Ky. (ORL) 24-33 Otter Tail River, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Ottumwa, Iowa (NCR) 28-17 Ouachita and Black Rivers, Ark. and La. (Felsenthal Canal) (LMK) 12-14 Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, Ark. (LMK) 12-2, 12-8, 12-10, 12-12 Ouachita River and Tributaries, Ark. and La. (LMK) 12-4, 12-11 Ouachita River Levees, La. (LMK) 12-6, 12-9, 12-15 Overton-Red River Waterway, La. (LMN) 11-14, 11-26, 11-32 Owasco Inlet and Outlet, Montville and Dry Creek, State Ditch and Crane Brook, N.Y. (NCB) 32-36 Owego, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39 Owensboro, Ky. (ORL) 24-23, 24-27 Owl's Head Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-46 Oxford, Md. (NAB) 4-35 Oxford, N.Y. (NAB) 4-16, 4-25 Oyster Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Oyster Creek, Tex. (SWG) 15-29 Ozan Creek, Ark. (LMK) 12-15 Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock & Dam (No. 12), Ark. (SWL) 18-8, 18-12 Ozona, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 P Paducah, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-27, 24-32 Pagan River, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Pago Pago to Nuuuli, American Samoa (POD) 36-13 Paint Creek at Chillicothe, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Paint Creek at Washington Court House, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Paint Creek Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-8, 25-17 Paint Rock River, Ala. (ORN) 23-13, 23-19 Painted Post, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Painted Rock Dam, Ariz. (SPL) 33-6, 33-15, 33-21 Paintsville Lake, Ky. (ORH) 25-8, 25-17 Pajaro River, Calif. (SPN) 34-20 Pajaro River Basin, Calif. (SPN) 34-5, 34-8 Palm Beach, Fla. (SAJ) 9-50 Palm Beach County, Fla., from Lake Worth Inlet to South Lake Worth Inlet (SAJ) 9-51 Palm Beach County, Fla., from Martin County Line of Lake Worth Inlet and from South Lake Worth Inlet to Broward County Line (SAJ) 9-23, 9-33, 9-44 Palm Beach Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-12, 9-31, 9-39 Palouse River, Wash. (NPW) 39-14, 39-16 Pamlico and Tar Rivers, N.C. (SAW) 6-8, 6-21 Pamunkey River, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Panacea Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-38 Panama City Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-9, 10-25, 10-33 Pantego Creek and Cucklers Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Panther Creek, Curdsville, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-33 Panther Creek, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19 Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, Nebr. (MRO) 21-6, 21-11, 21-14 Parish Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Park River, Hartford, Conn. (NED) 1-17, 1-34, 1-43, 1-57 Parker Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Parkersburg, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19, 25-21 Parrotts Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Pascagoula Harbor, Miss. (SAM) 10-10, 10-25, 10-33 Pascagoula River, Miss. (SAM) 10-38 Pasquotank River, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Pass Christian, Miss. (SAM) 10-38 Pass Christian Harbor, Miss. (SAM) 10-38 Pass Manchac, La. (LMN) 11-38 Pass-a-Grille Pass, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Passaic River Basin, N.J. and N.Y.,, Phase I (NAN) 2-15, 2-22, 2-28 Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project, Maine (NED) 1-52 Pat Mayse Lake, Tex. (SWT) 19-10, 19-20 Pataha Creek, Wash. (NPW) 39-14 Patchogue River, Conn. (NED) 1-46 Patman, Wright, Dam and Lake, Tex. (LMN) (SWF) 11-43, 16-13, 16-19, 16-23 Patoka Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-11, 24-18, 24-30 Patoka River at Jasper, Ind. (ORL) 24-33 Patriot, Ind. (ORL) 24-25, 24-28 Pattonsburg Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-18 Patuxent River, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Pawcatuck, Conn. (NED) 1-26, 1-50 Pawcatuck River, R.I. and Conn. (NED) 1-46, 1-53 1-30 INDEX Pawtucket, R.I. (NED) 1-53 Pawtuxet Cove, R.I. (NED) 1-46 Pawtuxet River, Warwick, R.I. (NED) 1-13, 1-33, 1-43 Pax, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Payette River, Idaho (NPW) 39-14 Payette Valley, Idaho (NPW) 39-15, 39-16 Peacock Creek, Liberty County, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Pearl River, Miss. and La. (LMK) 12-3, 12-8, 12-10, 12-13 Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, Kans. (SWT) 19-10, 19-20, 19-22 Pebble Creek, Scribner, Nebr. (MRO) 21-22 Pecan Bayou Lake, Pecan Bayou, Tex. (SWF) 16-24 Pecatonica River at Darlington, Wis. (NCR) 28-18 Peconic River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Pecos, Texas (SWA) 17-13 Peekskill Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Pekin-LaMarsh Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-17, 28-19 Pelican Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Pembina, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-24, 27-24 Pembina River, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-10 Pembina River Lake, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-21 Pembroke Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Pendleton, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Pendleton Levees, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Peninsula Drainage District 1, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41, 37-45, 37-49 Peninsula Drainage District 2, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41, 37-43, 37-49 Penny Slough, Ill. (NCR) 28-17, 28-19 Penny Slough Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-7 Penobscot River, Maine (NED) 1-46 Pensacola Bay, Fla. to Mobile Bay, Ala: (SAM) 10-32 Pensacola Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-10, 10-26, 10-34 Pensacola Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-18, 19-21, 19-23 Pensacola Reservoir (Grand Lake), Okla. (SWT) 19-14 Pensaukee Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-20, 31-43, 31-60 Pentwater Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-21, 31-43, 31-60, 31-73 Peoria, Ill. (NCC) 28-17 Peoria Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-21, 28-22 Pepin Harbor, Wis. (NCD) 29-8 Pepper Creek, Del. (NAP) 3-27 Pepperell Cove, Maine (NED) 1-46 Perdido Pass Channel, Ala. (SAM) 10-11, 10-26, 10-34 Permanent International Association of Navigation Congress (Pianc) 46-1 Perquimans River, N.C. (SAW) 6-27, 6-28 Perry County Drainage and Levee Districts Nos. 1, 2, and 3, Mo. (LMS) 14-6, 14-10, 14-12 Perry Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-6, 20-12, 20-15, 20-23 Perry Lake Area (Road Improvements) Kans. (MRK) 20-6, 20-12, 20-15 Perth Amboy, N.J. (NAN) 2-32 Petaluma River, Calif. (SPN) 34-3, 34-6 Petersburg Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Petit Anse, Tigre, and Carlin Bayous, La. (LMN) 11-38 Petit Jean River, Ark. (SWL) 18-21 Petoskey Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-70, 31-71 Peyton Creek, Tex. (SWG) 15-29 Phillippi Creek Basin, Fla. (SAJ) 9-57 Phillips Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-37, 1-43, 1-59 Philpott Lake, Va. (SAW) 6-18, 6-23 Phoenix, Ariz., and Vicinity (including New River) (SPL) 33-7, 33-15, 33-21 Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Kansas City Dist) (MRK) 20-6, 20-12, 20-16 Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Omaha Dist) (MRO) 21-6, 21-14, 21-19 Pickwick Landing Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-17 Pierce, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-21 Pig Island Gut, Maine (NED) 1-46 Pike Island, Minn. 27-24 Pike Island Locks and Dam, W. Va. (ORD) 22-1, 22-7 Pilchuck River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Pilot Rock, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 Pinal Creek Channel Improvements (Globe), Ariz., (SPL) 33-26 Pine and Mathews Canyons Dams, Nev. (SPL) 33-9, 33-16, 33-22 Pine Bluff, Ark. (LMK) 12-15 Pine Creek, Angle Inlet, Minn. (NCS) 27-20 Pine Creek Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-11, 19-20, 19-25 Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, Calif. (SPK) 35-19, 35-18 Pine Ford Lake, Mo. (LMS) 14-5, 14-9 Pine Mountain Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-6, 18-11 Pine River, Mich. (NCE) 31-71 Pine River Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 27-23 Pine Run, Mich. (NCE) 31-70 Pinellas County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-23, 9-33, 9-44 Pineville, Ky. (ORN) 23-13, 23-19 Pineville, La. (LMN) 11-41, 11-42 Pinole Creek, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-11, 35-23 Pinon Canyon Dam, Trinidad, Colo. (SWA) 17-13 Pioneer Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-19 Pipestem Lake, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-6, 21-11, 21-15 Pithlachascotee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Pittsburgh, Pa. (Golden Triangle) (ORP) 26-23 Pittsburgh, Pa. (North Side) (ORP) 26-23 Pittsburgh, Pa. (The Strip) (ORP) 26-23 Pittsburgh Harbor, Pa. (ORP) 26-21 Pittsfield, Mass. (NED) 1-58 Placer Creek, Idaho (NPS) 38-9, 38-17, 38-23 Plainview Local Flood Protection Project (SWF) 16-24 Platte River, Mo., Channel Improvement (MRK) 20-18 Platte River and Lost Creek, Schuyler, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-21 Platte River and Tributaries, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17 Platte River, Bank Protection, Louisville, Nebr. (MRO) 21-21 Platte River, M.U.D. Protection, Cedar Island, Nebr. (MRO) 21-21 Platte River near Schuyler, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-21 Plattsburgh Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Pleasant Bay, Mass. (NED) 1-46 Pleasant River, Maine (NED) 1-46 Pleasanton Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-24 Plum Creek, Ky. (ORL) 24-33 1-31 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Plum Creek, Bank Stabilization, Aurora, Colo. (MRO) 21-21 Plum Island, Mass. (NED) 1-49 Plymouth, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Plymouth Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-46 Plymouth Town, Mass. (NED) 1-13 Poca, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Pocatello, Idaho (NPW) 39-17 Pocomoke River, Md. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 Pohoiki Bay, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Point Judith, R.I. (NED) 1-53 Point Lookout Harbor (Au Gres River), Mich. (NCE) 31-21, 31-43, 31-60 Point Place, Toledo, Ohio (NCB) 32-15, 32-22 Point Pleasant, W. Va. (ORL) 25-19, 25-21 Pokegama Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 27-23 Polecat Creek Channel Improvement, Okla. (SWT) 19-25 Pollock Rip Shoals, Nantucket Sound, Mass. (NED) 1-46 Poloa Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-13 Polson Bay, Flathead Lake, Mont. (NPS) 38-25 Pomeroy, Ohio (ORL) 25-20 Pomme De Terre Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-7, 20-12, 20-16, 20-23 Pomona Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-7, 20-12, 20-16, 20-23 Ponce, P.R. (SAJ) 9-45 Ponce De Leon Inlet, Fla. (SAJ) 9-12, 9-31, 9-39, 9-49 Ponce Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-13, 9-31, 9-39 Pontiac Diversion, R.I. (NED) 1-53 Port Alexander, Alaska (NPA) 40-12, 40-13 Port Allen Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12, 36-14 Port Angeles Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-25, 38-31, 38-32 Port Arthur and Vicinity, Tex. Hurricane-Flood Protection (SWG) 15-11, 15-16, 15-27 Port Austin Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-70, 31-71 Port Bay, N.Y. (NCB) 32-34 Port Clinton Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-19, 32-20, 32-31 Port Dickenson, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39 Port Everglades Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-13, 9-31, 9-40, 9-49 Port Gamble Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-25, 38-31 Port Henry Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Port Hueneme, Calif. (SPL) 33-5, 33-24 Port Jefferson Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Port Lions Small Boat Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-5, 40-9, 40-11 Port of Kalama, Wash. (NPP) 37-41 Port Ontario Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-9, 32-20 Port Orchard Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Port Orford, Oreg. (NPP) 37-7, 37-25, 37-34 Port Royal Harbor, S.C. (SAN) 7-5, 7-9, 7-12 Port San Luis, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 Port Sanilac Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-21, 31-43, 31-61 Port St. Joe Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-11, 10-26, 10-34 Port Townsend, Wash. (NPS) 38-25, 38-32 Port Washington Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-22, 31-44, 31-61 Port Wing Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-70, 31-71 Portage, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Portage Lake Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-21, 31-43, 31-60 Portchester Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Porter Bayou, Miss. (LMK) 12-6, 12-9, 12-11 Portland, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-33 Portland, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Portland Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-10, 1-32 Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-14, 39-15, 39-16 Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, Maine and N.H. (NED) 1-46 Portsmouth Harbor, Va. Channel to Nansemond Ordnance Depot (NAO) 5-23 Portsmouth-New Boston, Ohio (ORH) 25-19, 25-21 Portugues and Bucana Rivers, P.R. (SAJ) 9-27, 9-33, 9-45 Portville, N.Y. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Posten Bayou, Ark. and La. (LMN) 11-40, 11-42 Poteau River Navigation, Ark. and Okla. (SWT) 19-4, 19-18, 19-22 Poteet Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-24 Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, D.C., Collection and Removal of Drift (NAB) 4-8, 4-22, 4-30 Potomac Estuary Pilot Water Treatment Plant, D.C. (NAB) 4-19, 4-26, 4-33 Potomac River and Tributaries at and below Washington, D.C., Elimination of Waterchestnut (NAB) 4-34 Potomac River at Alexandria, Va. (NAB) 4-34 Potomac River at Lower Cedar Point, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Potomac River at Mount Vernon, Va. (NAB) 4-34 Potomac River below Washington, D.C. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 Potomac River North Side of Washington Channel, D.C. (NAB) 4-34 Potowomut River, R.I. (NED) 1-46 Pottstown and Vicinity, Pa. (NAP) 3-17, 3-22 Powell County High School, Mont. (NPS) 38-28 Powhatan Point, Ohio (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Prairie and Silver Creek, Grand Island, Nebr. (MRO) 21-22 Prairie Du Chien, Wis. (NCS) 27-10, 27-17 Prairie Du Chien Harbor, Wis. (NCD) 29-8 Prairie du Pont Levee and Sanitary District, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Prairie du Rocher and Vicinity, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Prattville, Ala. (SAM) 10-39 Pre-Authorization Studies for Beach Erosion Control Activities Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-7 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 30-7 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 31-29 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-24 New England Division (NED) 1-54 New York, N.Y., District (NAN) 2-35 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-5 Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP) 3-13 Pre-Authorization Studies for Flood Control Activities Alaska District (NPA) 40-6 Albuquerque, N. Mex., District (SWA) 17-9 Baltimore, Md., District (NAB) 4-19 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-37 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-14 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 31-32 Fort Worth, Tex., District (SWF) 16-14, 16-25 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 15-13 1-32 Huntington, W. Va., District (ORH) 25-10 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-57 Little Rock, Ark., District (SWL) 18-7 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL) 33-31 Louisville, Ky., District (ORL) 24-15, 24-34 Memphis, Tenn., District (LMM) 13-5 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-40 Nashville, Tenn., District (ORN) 23-6 New England Division (NED) 1-55 New Orleans, La., District (LMN) 11-24 New York, N.Y., District (NAN) 2-19, 2-36 Omaha, Nebr., District (NRO) 21-22 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-6 Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP) 3-14 Pittsburgh, Pa., District (ORP) 26-29 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-14 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR) 28-20 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-13 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN) 34-4 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS) 8-7 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-32 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS) 14-7 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 27-25 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 19-27 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK) 12-7 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW) 39-2 Wilmington, N.C., District (SAW) 6-32 Pre-Authorization Studies for Navigation Activities Alaska District (NPA) 40-14 Baltimore, Md., District (NAB) 4-11 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-35 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-16 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 30-6 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 31-29 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 15-10 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-19 Memphis, Tenn., District (LMM) 13-3 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-39 New England Division (NED) 1-54 New Orleans, La., District (LMN) 11-16, 11-38 New York, N.Y., District (NAN) 2-12 Omaha, Nebr., District (MRO) 21-2 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-5 Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP) 3-9 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-47 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR) 28-3 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN) 34-3 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS) 8-6 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-5 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS) 14-7 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 27-24 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK) 12-4 Wilmington, N.C., District (SAW) 6-30 Prescott Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 Presque Isle Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-22, 31-44, 31-61 Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, Pa. (NCB) 32-12, 32-21, 32-33 Prestile Stream, Blaine, Maine (NED) 1-50 Preston Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Prestonburg, Ky. (ORH) 25-21 Prestonville, Ky. (ORL) 24-25, 24-28 DEX Priest, J. Percy, Dam and Reservoir, Tenn. (ORN) 23-7, 23-9, 23-18 Priest Rapids Dam, Wash. (NPS) 38-30 Princeton, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19, 25-21 Prineville Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-46 Proctor, Vt. (NAN) 2-35 Proctor, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Proctor Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-10, 16-18, 16-22 Proctorville, Ohio (ORH) 25-19 Prompton Lake, Pa. (NAP) 3-17, 3-22 Prospect Beach, West Haven, Conn. (NED) 1-49 Providence River and Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-46 Provincetown Beach (Herring Cove), Mass. (NED) 1-53 Provincetown Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-46, 1-53 Pudding River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-46 Pueblo Arkansas River, Colo. (Floodway Levee Extension) (SWA) 17-13 Puget Sound and Its Tributary Waters, Wash. (NPS) 38-6, 38-15, 38-21 Pullman, Palouse, Wash. (NPW) 39-14 Pultneyville Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-34 Pungo Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Pungo River, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Punta Salinas, P.R. (SAJ) 9-24, 9-33, 9-44 Punxsutawney, Pa. (ORP) 26-5, 26-14, 26-18, 26-26 Punxsutawney, Pa. (Allegheny River Basin) (ORP) 26-26 Put In Bay, Ohio (NCB) 32-34 Pysht River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Q Quail Wash Levee, Joshua Tree, Calif. (SPL) 33-26, 33-31 Queens Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Queenstown Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Queets River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Quillayute River, Wash. (NPS) 38-21, 38-28 Quinault River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Quinby Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-7, 5-15, 5-20 Quincy, Ill., Harbor Access Channel (NCR) 28-15 Quincy Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 29-9 Quincy Shore Beach, Quincy, Mass. (NED) 1-49 R R. D. Bailey Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-8, 25-13, 25-17 Raccoon Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-27 Raccoon Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-24, Racine, Ohio (ORH) 24-28 25-20 Racine Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-22, 31-44, 31-61 Racine Locks and Dam, Ohio (ORD) 22-2, 22-8 Rahway, N.J. (NAN) 2-33 Rahway, South Branch, N.J. (NAN) 2-33 Rahway River, N.J. (NAN) 2-35 Rainey, Henry T., Dam, Ill. (NCD) 29-7 1-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Rainier Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41, 37-43, 37-49 Ramapo River, Monroe, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 Rancocas Creek at Mt. Holly, N.J. (NAP) 3-16 Rancocas River, N.J. (NAP) 3-27, 3-30 Randleman Lake, N.C. (SAW) 6-13, 6-22 Rapid City, Cedar Canyon Dam, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-20 Rapid Creek, Rapid City, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-20 Rapide Croche Lock and Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-69 Rappahannock River, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Rappahannock River at Bowlers Wharf, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Rappahannock Shoal Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-2, 5-17 Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, N.J. (NAN) 2-33 Raritan River, N.J. (NAN) 2-30, 2-35 Raritan River to Arthur Kill Cutoff Channel, N.J. (NAN) 2-31 Rathbun Lake, Iowa (MRK) 20-7, 20-13, 20-17 Rathbun Lake Fish Hatchery (MRK) 20-18 Ravenswood, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19 Ray Roberts Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-11, 16-18, 16-22 Rayburn, Sam, Dam and Reservoir, Tex. (SWF) 16-15, 16-18, 16-22 Raystown Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-13, 4-24, 4-32 Red Bank and Fancher Creeks, Calif. (SPK) 35-15 Red Brook Harbor, Bourne, Mass. (NED) 1-46 Red Creek, N.Y. (NCB) 32-36 Red Lake and Red Lake River, Minn. (NCS) 27-20 Red Lake River, Minn. (NCS) 27-25 Red Lake River, Minn., including Clearwater River, Minn. (NCS) 27-10, 27-17 Red River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Red River at East Grand Forks, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Red River at Fargo, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-24 Red River at Grand Forks, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-24 Red River Backwater (MR + T) 42-44, 42-50 Red River below Denison Dam including Little River Basin, Okla. and Ark. (SWL) 18-14 Red River below Denison Dam, Levees and Bank Stabilization (New Orleans Dist.) (LMN) 11-22, 11-28, 11-35 Red River below Denison Dam (New Orleans Dist.) (LMN) 11-22, 11-40 Red River below Denison Dam (Tulsa District) (SWT) 19-11, 19-23, 19-25 Red River below Fulton, Ark. (LMN) 11-38 Red River Dikes (MR + T) 42-32 Red River Emergency Bank Protection (LMN) 11-14, 11-26, 11-32 Red River from Fulton, Ark., to Mouth of Washita River (SWT) 19-4 Red River in Vicinity of Shreveport, La. (LMN) 11-41, 11-42 Red River Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-23 Red River of the North, Minn. and N. Dak. (NCS) 27-20 Red River of the North, Argusville, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-25 Red River of the North at Oslo, Minn. (NCS) 27-12, 27-17 Red River of the North at Pembina, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-21 Red River of the North, Breckenridge, Minn. (NCS) 27-25 Red River of the North Drainage Basin, Minn., S. Dak. and N. Dak. (NCS) 27-11, 27-17, 27-24 Red River of the North, Halstad, Minn. (NCS) 27-25 Red River Parish, La. (LMN) 11-41, 11-42 Red River Plan, Okla. and Tex. (SWT) 19-24 Red River Standard Revetments (MR + T) 42-32 Red River Waterway, La., Ark., Okla., and Tex. (LMN) 11-38 Red River Waterway, La., Ark., Okla., and Tex., Index, Ark. to Denison Dam (Tulsa District) (SWT) 19-3, 19-18 Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, La. (LMN) 11-14, 11-26, 11-32 Red River Waterway, Shreveport, La., to Daingerfield, Tex. (LMN) 11-38 Red River Waterway-Shreveport, La., to Index, Ark. (LA) 11-22, 11-28, 11-35 Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, Iowa (NCR) 28-7, 28-11, 28-15 Red Run Drain-Lower Clinton River, Mich. (NCE) 31-29, 31-47, 31-65 Red Wing Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 29-8 Redbank Creek Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Reddies River Lake, N.C. (SAN) 7-15 Redmond, John, Dam and Reservoir, Kans. (SWT) 19-9, 19-19 Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), Calif. (SPL) 33-4, 33-14, 33-20 Redwater River and Hay Creek, S.D. (MRO) 21-17 Redwood City Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-6 Redwood Creek, Humboldt County, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-11, 35-23 Redwood River below Marshall, Minn. (NCS) 27-21 Reeds Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Reedsport Levees, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 Reedy River, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, Tenn. and Ky. (MR + T) 42-10, 42-18, 42-27 Reese River, Battle Mountain, Nev. (SPK) 35-23 Reevesville, Ill. (ORL) 24-22, 24-27, 24-32 Regulation of Hydraulic Mining and Preparation of Plans (CDC) 44-1, 44-5, 44-6 Regulatory and Sunken Vessel Removal Activities 48-1 Rehoboth Beach to Indian River Inlet, Del. (NAP) 3-28 Removal of Aquatic Growth from Navigable Waters in the State of Florida (SAJ) 9-14, 9-31, 9-40, 9-49 Removal of Sunken Vessels 48-1 Removing Snags and Wrecks from Mississippi River below Mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers (LMK) (LMM) 12-14, 13-10 Removing Water-Hyacinth, La. (LMN) 11-15, 11-27, 11-32 Removing Water Hyacinths, Mobile District (SAM) 10-12, 10-26, 10-35 Rend Lake, Ill. (LMS) 14-6, 14-10, 14-12 Reno Beach-Howard Farms Area, Ohio (NCB) 32-16, 32-22, 32-36 Research Institute, 51-1 1-34 INDEX Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, Minn. (NCS) 27-2, 27-16, 27-19, 27-23 Restoration of Indian Fishing Grounds, Bonneville, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 Revere Beach, Mass. (NED) 1-13, 1-49 Reynoldsville, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Rheem Creek, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-11, 35-23 Rhodes Point to Tylerton, Md. (NAB) 4-8, 4-22, 4-30 Rice Creek, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, Ga. and S.C. (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake) (SAS) 8-9, 8-12, 8-15 Richland Creek, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Richland Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-19 Richmond Filtration Plant, Va. (NAO) 5-12, 5-16, 5-21 Richmond Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-7 Richmond Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-46 Richmond's Island Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-46 Iichwood and Fenwick, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Ridgecrest, Calif. (SPL) 33-26 Ridgway, Pa. (Allegheny River Basin) (ORP) 26-26 Ridgway, Pa. (Elk Creek) (ORP) 26-22 Ridgway and Vicinity, Pa. (On Clarion River) (ORP) 26-22 Right and Left Forks of Beaver Creek, Ky. (ORH) 25-21 Rio Grande Basin, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-4, 17-10, 17-12 Rio Grande Floodway, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-5, 17-10, 17-12, 17-13 Ripley, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Ripley, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Ririe Lake, Idaho (NPW) 39-3, 39-9, 39-11 Rising Sun, Ind. (ORL) 24-25, 24-28 River Rouge, Mich. (NCE) 31-72 Riverdale, Mass. (NED) 1-50, 1-57 Riverland Levee District, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Riverside Area, Pasco, Wash. (NPW) 39-14 Riverside Levees, Calif. (SPL) 33-31 Riverview, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Roanoak Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-24 Roanoke Island, N.C. (SAW) 6-32 Roanoke River, N.C. (SAW) 6-8, 6-21 Roanoke River Basin, Va. and N.C., John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir (SAW) 6-17, 6-31 Roanoke River Basin, Va. and N.C., Philpott Lake, Va. (SAW) 6-17, 6-31 Roaring River, N.C. (SAN) 7-15 Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam, Ala. (SAM) 10-17, 10-27 Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-16, 19-15, 19-21, 19-23 Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, Sallisaw, Okla. (SWT) 19-23 Roberts, Ray, Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-11, 16-18, 16-22 Rochester and McCleary's Bluff Levee, Ill. (ORL) 24-22, 24-27, 29-32 Rochester, Minn. (NCS) 27-12, 27-17 Rochester, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Rochester Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-10, 32-20, 32-31 Rochester Lake, Iowa (NCR) 28-18 Rock Creek, Mont. (NPS) 38-28 Rock Hall Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-9, 4-23, 4-30, 4-38 Rock Island, Ill. (NCR) 28-17, 28-19 Rock Island District (NCD) 29-5 Rock Island Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 29-8 Rock River Agricultural Levees, Ill. (NCR) 28-7, 28-11, 28-15 Rockfish Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Rockford, Ill. (NCR) 28-7, 28-11, 28-15 Rockland Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-46 Rockland Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-15, 16-22 Rockport, Ind. (ORL) 24-25, 24-28, 24-33 Rockport Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-47 Rockport Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-46 Rocky Ford Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-17 Rocky Fork, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Rocky Pass, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Rocky River Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-10, 32-20, 32-32 Rodeo Creek, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-11, 35-23 Rogers City Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-73 Rogue River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Rogue River Harbor at Gold Beach, Oreg. (NPP) 37-8, 37-25, 37-34 Roland Drainage District, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-21 Rollinson Channel, N.C. (SAW) 6-8, 6-21, 6-29 Rome, Ga. (SAM) 10-39 Rome, Ind. (ORL) 24-25, 24-28 Rome, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Rondout Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Root Creek, Bolivar, N.Y. (ORP) 26-5, 26-14 Rose Creek Channel Improvements, San Diego, Calif. (SPL) 33-26, 33-31 Roseau River, Minn. (NCS) 27-12, 27-18 Rosedale Harbor, Miss. (LMK) 12-3, 12-8, 12-10 Rosendale, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33 Roseville, Ohio (ORH) 25-8, 25-13, 25-17, 25-21 Rosiclare, Ill. (ORL) 24-22, 24-32 Rossview Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. and Ky. (ORN) 23-13 Rota Harbor, Northern Marianas (POD) 36-4, 36-9 Rouge River, Mich. (NCE) 31-23, 31-44, 31-61, 31-73 Rough River, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-27 Rough River Lake and Channel Improvements, Ky. (ORL) 24-12, 24-18, 24-30 Rouses Point, Lake Champlain, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Rouseville, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Rowlesburg Lake, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22 Royal River, Maine (NED) 1-47 Ruby River, Wheatly Bridge, near Twin Bridges, Mont. (MRO) 21-20 Ruffy Brook, Minn. (NCS) 27-22 Rufus Woods Lake, Wash. (NPS) 38-11, 38-17, 38-23 Rush River, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-24 Rushford, Minn. (NCS) 27-21 Russell, Ky. (ORH) 25-19, 25-21 Russell and Allison Levee, Ill. (ORL) 24-22, 24-27 Russell, Richard B., Dam and Lake, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-9, 8-12, 8-15 Russian River Basin, Calif. (SPN) 34-3, 34-8, 34-9, 34-12 Rutland, Otter Creek, Vt. (NAN) 2-33 Rutledge Hollow Creek Channel Improvement, Poteet, Tex. (SWF) 16-24 1-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Rye Creek, Mont. (NPS) 38-28 Rye Harbor, N.H. (NED) 1-47 S Sabine-Neches Waterway, Tex. (SWG) 15-7, 15-15, 15-24, 15-30, 15-32, 15-36 Sabine River and Tributaries, Tex. (Echo to Morgan Bluff) (SWG) 15-29 Sabula, Iowa (NCR) 28-17, 28-19 Sackets Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-10, 32-20, 32-32, 32-38 Saco, Mont. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Saco River, Maine (NED) 1-10, 1-32, 1-53 Sacramento River, Calif. (CDC) 44-3, 44-6, 44-7 Sacramento River, Calif. (SPK) 35-1, 35-17, 35-20, 35-25 Sacramento River and Tributaries, Calif. (CDC) 44-2, 44-5 Sacramento River and Tributaries, Calif., from Collinsville to Shasta Dam (SPK) 35-10, 35-18, 35-21, 35-26, 35-27 Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, Calif. (SPK) 35-15- Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Sag Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Saginaw River, Mich. (NCE) 31-23, 31-30, 31-44, 31-62, 31-47, 31-65 Saint John River Basin, Maine (NED) 1-24 Saipan Small Boat Harbor, Northern Marianas (POD) 36-4, 36-9 Sakonnet Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-11, 1-32, 1-42, 1-53 Sakonnet River, R.I. (NED) 1-47 Salamanca, N.Y. (ORP) 26-22 Salamonie Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-12, 24-18 Salem Church Lake, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Salem Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-47 Salem River, N.J. (NAP) 3-27, 3-28 Salina, Kans. (MRK) 20-18, 20-23 Salinas River, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-11, 35-23 Saline Point, La. (LMN) 11-41, 11-42 Saline River, Ark. (LMK) 12-14 Saline River and Tributaries, Ill. (ORL) 24-22, 24-33 Salisbury, Conn. (NED) 1-26, 1-58 Salkahatchie River, S.C. (SAN) 7-14 Salmon Creek at Oakridge, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Salmon River, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Salmon River, Colchester, Conn. (NED) 1-18, 1-35, 1-43, 1-57 Salmon River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Salt Creek, Barnard, Kans. (MRK) 20-18 Salt Creek, Ohio (ORH) 25-19 Salt Creek and Tributaries, Nebr. (MRO) 21-6, 21-11, 21-15 Salt Lake City, Jordan River, Utah (SPK) 35-23 Saluda River, S.C. (SAN) 7-7, 7-15 Salyersville, Ky. (ORL) 24-23 Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, Tex. (SWF) 16-15, 16-18, 16-22 Sammamish River, Wash. (NAS) 38-28 San Antonio Channel Improvement, Tex. (SWF) 16-11, 16-19, 16-22 San Antonio Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-24 San Diego (Sunset Cliffs), Calif. (SPL) 33-25 San Diego Creek, Alice, Tex. (SWG) 15-29 San Diego Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 San Diego River and Mission Bay, Calif. (SPL) 33-4, 33-14, 33-20 San Diego River Channel and Levees, Calif. (SPL) 33-29 San Diego River (Mission Valley), Calif. (SPL) 33-26 San Francisco Bay and Delta Model, Calif. (SPN) 34-2, 34-7 San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) (SPK) (SPN) 34-2, 34-7, 35-2, 35-17 San Francisco Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-7, 34-10 San Francisco Harbor and Bay (Removal of Drift), Calif. (SPN) 34-7 San Francisco Marina (Gas House Cove), Calif. (SPN) 34-10 San Gabriel River, Tex. (SWF) 16-11, 16-19, 16-22 San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Calif. (SPL) 33-25 San Jacinto River Levee and Bautista Creek Channel, Calif. (SPL) 33-31 San Joaquin River, Calif. (SPK) 35-3, 35-17, 35-25, 35-26 San Juan, P.R. (SAJ) 9-51 San Juan Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-30 San Juan Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-17, 9-32, 9-41 San Leandro Creek, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-11, 35-23 San Leandro Marina, Calif. (SPN) 34-7 San Leandro Marina (Breakwater), Calif. (SPN) 34-10 San Lorenzo Creek, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-11, 35-23 San Lorenzo River, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-11, 35-23 San Luis Rey River, Calif. (SPL) 33-9, 33-13, 33-16, 33-22 San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, Calif. (SPN) 34-7, 34-11 San Rafael Creek, Calif. (SPN) 34-10 Sand Creek Channel Improvement, Kans. (SWT) 19-25, 19-26 Sand Hill Cove Beach, R.I. (NED) 1-49 Sand Hill River, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Sand Island, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Sand Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-26 Sandburg Creek, Spring Glen, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33 Sandusky Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-10, 32-20, 32-32 Sandusky River, Ohio (NCB) 32-34 Sandy Bay, Cape Ann, Mass. (NED) 1-53 Sandy Bay (Harbor of Refuge), Cape Ann, Mass. (NED) 1-47 Sandy Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43, 37-49 Sandy Hook Bay, N.J. (NAN) 2-30, 2-31 Sandy Hook Bay at Leonardo, N.J. (NAN) 2-31 Sandy Lake Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 27-23 Sandy River and Sleepy Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 Sanford Reservoir (Lake Meredith), Okla. (SWT) 19-13, 19-25 Sangamon River (Mouth), Ill. (NCR) 28-17 1-36 INDEX Sanitary District of Beardstown, Ill. (NCR) 28-19 Santa Ana River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-9, 33-16, 33-22 Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), Calif. (SPL) 33-10, 33-16, 33-22, 33-26, 33-30 Santa Ana River Basin, Calif.: Devil, East Twin, and Warm Creeks Channel Improvements (SPL) 33-26 Santa Ana River Main Stem, Calif. (SPL) 33-12 Santa Barbara Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-4, 33-14, 33-20 Santa Clara River Levee Improvement, Calif. (SPL) 33-26, 33-31 Santa Cruz County, Calif. (SPN) 34-10 Santa Cruz Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-7 Santa Fe River and Arroyo Mascaras, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-6, 17-10, 17-12 Santa Maria Valley Levees, Calif. (SPL) 33-10, 33-17, 33-23, 33-29 Santa Paula Creek Channel and Debris Basins (including Mud Creek), Calif. (SPL) 33-10, 33-17, 33-23 Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-6, 17-10 Santa Rosa Wash (at Momolikot Dam and Lake St. Clair), Ariz. (SPL) 33-7, 33-16, 33-21, 33-29 Santee River, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-14 Sapelo Harbor, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Sardis, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Sardis Lake, Miss. (MR + T) 42-20, 42-56 Sardis Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-11, 19-20 Sasanoa River, Maine (NED) 1-47 Sasco Hill Beach, Fairfield, Conn. (NED) 1-49 Satilla River, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Saugatuck Harbor and Kalamazoo River, Mich. (NCE) 31-26, 31-45, 31-64 Saugerties Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Sauk Rapids, Minn., Benton County Ditch No. 3 (NCS) 27-25 Sauk River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Sauvie Island Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41, 37-43, 37-49 Savage River Dam, Md. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Savanna Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 29-8 Savannah Harbor, Ga. (SAS) 8-4, 8-11, 8-14 Savannah River above Augusta, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Savannah River at Augusta, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Savannah River Basin, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-8, 8-17 Savannah River below Augusta, Ga. (SAS) 8-5, 8-14, 8-11, 8-15 Saw Mill River at Elmsford and Greenburgh, N.Y. (NAN) 2-16, 2-22, 2-28 Sawmill Branch, S.C. (SAN) 7-7, 7-15 Saxon Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-71 Saxonville, Mass. (NED) 1-27, 1-37, 1-50, 1-59 Sayers, Foster Joseph, Dam, Pa. (NAB) 4-18, 4-26 Saylorville Lake, Iowa (NCR) 28-7, 28-11, 28-15 Scajaquada Creek, N.Y. (NCB) 32-16, 32-22 Scappoose Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-16, 37-28, 37-37, 37-49 Scarboro River, Maine (NED) 1-47 Schuyler, Nebr. (MRO) 21-21 Schuylkill River, Pa. (NAP) 3-11, 3-21, 3-25 Schuylkill River above Fairmount Dam, Pa. (NAP) 3-27 Scioto River at Portsmouth, Ohio (ORH) 25-18 Sciotoville, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Scituate, Mass. (NED) 1-27 Scituate Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-47 Scott, W. Kerr, Dam and Reservoir, N.C. (SAW) 6-17, 6-23 Scott County Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Scotts Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Scottsville, Va. (NAO) 5-12 Scranton, Buffalo, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-20 Scranton, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Scuppernong River, N.C. (SAW) 6-16, 6-23, 6-27 Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-17, 28-19 Searsport Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-47 Seaside Park, Conn. (NED) 1-49 Seattle Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-7, 38-16, 38-21 Sebasticook River, Hartland, Maine (NED) 1-24, 1-37 Sebewaing, Mich. (NCE) 31-31, 31-47, 31-66 Sebewaing River, Mich. (NCE) 31-26, 31-45, 31-64 Seekonk River, R.I. (NED) 1-47 Seldovia Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Selkirk Shore State Park, N.Y. (NCB) 32-36 Sergius Whitestone, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Sespe Creek at Fillmore, Calif. (SPL) 33-11, 33-17, 33-23 Sesuit Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-11, 1-32, 1-42 Sevier River near Redmond, Utah (SPK) 35-23 Sewage Treatment Plant, Missoula, Mont. (NPS) 38-28 Seward, Nebr. (MRK) 20-18 Seward Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Sewells Point Anchorage, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Shad Landing State Park, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Shallotte River, N.C. (SAW) 6-8, 6-21, 6-29 Shark River, N.J. (NAN) 2-9, 2-21, 2-27, 2-30 Shawneetown, Ill. (ORL) 24-23, 24-27, 24-32 Sheboygan Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-26, 31-46, 31-64 Sheepshead Bay, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31, 2-35 Sheffield, Mass. (NED) 1-27, 1-58 Sheffield Lake Community Park, Ohio (NCB) 32-38 Shelburne, N.H. (NED) 1-27, 1-50 Shell Creek, Nebr. (MRO) 21-18 Shelley Area, Idaho (NPW) 39-14, 39-16, 39-17 Shelton Creek, Wash. (NAS) 38-28 Shelton Ditch, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 Shenango River Lake, Pa. and Ohio (ORP) 26-9, 26-15, 26-20 Sherburne, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39 Sheridan, Wyo. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Sherwood Island State Park, Conn. (NED) 1-12, 1-33, 1-42 Sheyenne River, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-13, 27-18, 27-22 Shidler Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-11, 19-20, 19-23 Shields River, near Clyde Park, Mont. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Shilshole Bay, Seattle, Wash. (NPS) 38-25, 38-32 Shinnecock Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Shipyard River, S.C. (SAN) 7-6, 7-9, 7-12 Shoal Harbor and Compton Creek, N.J. (NAN) 2-30, 2-31 Shoals, Ind. (ORL) 24-23 Shobe Canyon, Oreg. (NPW) 39-14 Shooters Island, N.Y. and N.J. (NAN) 2-10, 2-22, 2-27 1-37 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration, Philadelphia, Pa. (NAP) 3-12 Shoreline Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 31-29 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-25 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-13 Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP) 3-13 Pittsburgh, Pa., District (ORP) 26-29 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-7 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-5 Short Beach, Conn. (NED) 1-49 Shoshone River, Lovell, Wyo. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Shoshone River, Bank Protection, Lovell, Wyo. (MRO) 21-20 Shot Pouch Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-7, 7-15 Shrewsbury River, N.J. (NAN) 2-30, 2-31 Shufflebarger Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-25, 24-28 Sid Simpson Project, Ill. (NCR) 28-17 Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, Conn. (NED) 1-49 Silver Lake Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-9, 6-21, 6-26 Simmons Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Simpson Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-7, 7-15 Sioux City, Iowa (MRO) 21-16, 21-21 Sioux Falls, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Sistersville, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Sitka Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Siuslaw River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-8, 37-23, 37-26, 37-34, 37-44 Six Runs Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Sixes Bridge Lake, Md. and Pa. (N) 4-37 Skaggs Ferry, Black River, Ark. (SWL) 18-21 Skagit River, Wash. (NPS) 38-25, 38-29, 38-31 Skagit River, Wash. (Avon By-Pass) (NAS) 38-28 Skagit River, Wash. (Levee and Channel Improvements) (NPS) 38-10, 38-17, 38-23 Skagway Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Skagway River, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Skamokawa Creek, Wash. (NPP) 37-9, 37-26, 37-34, 37-46 Skamokawa Creek Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-41 Skiatook Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-11, 19-20, 19-23 Skiffes Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Skipanon Channel, Oreg. (NPP) 37-9, 37-26, 37-34 Slaughter Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-9, 4-23, 4-31 Slovan, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Small Boat Harbor Opposite Chester, Ill. (LMS) 14-13 Small Boat Harbor Opposite Hamburg, Ill. (LMS) 14-13 Small Navigation Project at Sioux City, Iowa (MRO) 21-16 Smelt Brook, Mass. (NED) 1-27, 1-50 Smith Creek, Colo. (SWA) 17-7, 17-11, 17-12 Smith Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 Smith River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Smithfield, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Smithland, Ky. (ORL) 24-23, 24-27 Smithland Locks and Dam, Ky. (ORD) 22-3, 22-9 Smiths Creek (Wilmington), N.C. (SAW) 6-9, 6-27 Smiths Creek, Pamlico County, N.C. (SAW) 6-21 Smiths Ferry, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Smithville Channel, Little Platte River, Mo. (MRK) 20-18 Smithville Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-8, 20-13, 20-17 Smyrna River, Del. (NAP) 3-27, 3-30 Snagging and Clearing Activities Albuquerque, N. Mex. District (SWA) 17-9 * Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-35, 32-37 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-6 Louisville, Ky., District (ORL) 24-15, 24-34 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-16 New England Division (NE) 1-28 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR) 28-20 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-13 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN) 34-4 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK) 12-7 Snake River, Idaho (NPW) 39-14 Snake River, below Warren, Minn. (NCS) 27-25 Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, Oreg., Wash., and Idaho (NPW) 39-8, 39-10, 39-12, 39-22 Snettisham, Alaska (NPA) 40-6, 40-10, 40-12 Snohomish River, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Snoqualmie River, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Sny Basin, Ill. (NCR) 28-17, 28-19 Sny Island Levee Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-17, 28-19 Soap Creek, Wash. (NPP) 37-46 Socastee Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-14 Socorro Diversion Channel, Tributaries of Rio Grande, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-13 Soleduck River Bridge, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Somerville Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-12, 16-19, 16-23 Sonoma Creek, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-11, 35-23 Souris River, Velva, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-25 South Amsterdam, Mohawk River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33 South Bank Arkansas River, (Head Fourche Island to Pennington Bayou), Ark. (SWL) 18-21 South Bank Arkansas River, Little Rock to Pine Bluff, Ark. Tucker Lakes (SWL) 18-21 South Bank White River, Petersburg, Ind. (ORL) 24-33 South Beardstown and Valley Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-17 South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-17, 28-19 South Beloit, Ill. (NCR) 28-17 South Bristol Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-47 South Coventry Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-53 South Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 South Deer Creek Levee, Okla. (SWT) 19-25 South Ellenville, N.Y. (NAN) 2-16, 2-22, 2-28 South Fabius River, Mo. (NCR) 28-8, 28-11, 28-15 South Fork, Clearwater River, Idaho (NPW) 39-14, 39-16 South Fork of Cumberland River, Ky. (ORN) 23-13 South Haven Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-27, 31-46, 31-64 South Milwaukee Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-73 South Orange, N.J. (NAN) 2-33 South Platte River, Bank Protection, Denver, Colo. (MRO) 21-21 South Platte River Basin, Colo. (MRO) 21-7, 21-15 1-38 INDEX South Platte River Levees and Channel Improvements, Chatfield Lake to Ft. Morgan Colo. (MRO) 21-17 South Plymouth Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-37 South Point, Ohio (ORH) 25-19 South Portsmouth, Ky. (ORH) 25-19 South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-17, 28-19 South River, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 South River Drainage District, Mo. (NCR) 28-17, 28-19 South Slough (Charleston), Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 South Tunbridge Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-53 South Williamson, Ky. (ORH) 25-21 South Williamsport, Pa. (NAB) 4-39 Southern Branch, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Southern New York Flood Control Projects (NAB) 4-13, 4-32 Southport Beach, Conn. (NED) 1-49 Southport Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-47 Southwest Harbor, Maine (NEO) 1-47 Southwestern Jefferson County, Ky. (ORL) 24-5, 24-16 Sowashee Creek, Meridian, Miss. (SAM) 10-39 Spanish Fork River, Utah (SPK) 35-25 Spewrell Bluff Lake, Ga. (SAM) 10-22, 10-28, 10-36 Spirit Lake, Wash. (NPO) 37-15 Spokane, Wash. (NAS) 38-29 Spring City, Tenn. (ORN) 23-19 Spring Creek Channel Improvement, Springdale, Ark. (SWT) 19-26 Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-17, 28-19 Springdale, Mass. (NED) 1-50, 1-57 Springdale Levee, Ark. (SWT) 19-25 Springer, William L. Lake, Ill. (NCR) 28-17 Springfield, Mass. (NED) 1-27, 1-51, 1-57 Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, Conn. (NED) 1-21, 1-36, 1-43, 1-58 Squaw Chute at Quincy, Ill. (NCR) 28-15 St. Albans Harbor, Lake Champlain, Vt. (NAN) 2-31 St. Anthony Falls, Lower Lock and Dam, Minn. (NCD) 29-6, 29-10 St. Anthony Falls, Upper Lock, Minn. (NCD) 29-6 St. Augustine Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-14, 9-31, 9-40, 9-49 St. Catherines Sound, Md. (NAB) 4-34 St. Clair River, Mich. (NCE) 31-24, 31-45, 31-62, 31-67, 31-73 St. Croix River, Maine (NED) 1-47 St. Croix River, Minn. and Wis. (NCS) 27-2, 27-16, 27-19 St. Francis and L'Anguille Rivers and Blackfish Bayou, Ark. (LMM) 13-10 St. Francis Basin, Ark. and Mo. (MR + T) 42-9, 42-27 St. Francis River and Basin, Ark. and Mo. (MR + T) 42-18, 42-51 St. Francis River Levees (MR + T) 42-46 St. George Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 St. James, Beaver Island, Mich. (NCE) 31-71 St. James Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-70 St. Jeromes Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-9, 4-23, 4-31 St. Johns River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-37 St. Johns River, Fla., Jacksonville to Lake Harney (SAJ) 9-15, 9-31, 9-40, 9-49 St. Johns River, Fla., Jacksonville to the Ocean (SAJ) 9-37 St. Johns River, Fla., Opposite the City of Jacksonville (SAJ) 9-37 St. Jones River, Del. (NAP) 3-27, 3-28 St. Joseph Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-45, 31-62 St. Joseph River, Mich. (NCE) 31-24, 31-71 St. Louis County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 St. Louis District (NCD) 29-5 St. Lucie Inlet, Fla. (SAJ) 9-15, 9-31, 9-40, 9-49 St. Maries, Idaho (NAS) 38-28 St. Marks River, Fla. (SAM) 10-38 St. Marys, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 St. Marys, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 St. Marys River, Ga. and Fla., and North River, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 St. Marys River, Mich. (NCE) 31-25, 31-45, 31-63, 31-68, 31-73 St. Michael Canal, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 St. Michaels Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-34 St. Patricks Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 St. Paul and South St. Paul, Minn. (NCS) 27-21 St. Paul District (NCD) 29-5 St. Paul Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 29-8 St. Peters Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 St. Petersburg Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-16, 9-32, 9-41, 9-49 St. Thomas Harbor, V.I. (SAJ) 9-50 Ste. Genevieve County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Stamford, Conn. (NED) 1-25, 1-26, 1-37, 1-44 Stamford Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-47, 1-53 Starlings Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Startup, Wash. (NAS) 38-29 Starved Rock Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-21, 28-22 State Road and Ebner Coulees, Wis. (NCS) 27-13, 27-18 Staten Island, N.Y. (NAN) 2-17, 2-22, 2-28 Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co. Bridge Across Arthur Kill, N.Y. 2-31 Steinhatchee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Stewart Canyon Debris Basin and Channel, Calif. (SPL) 33-26, 33-31 Stikine River, Alaska (NPA) 40-5, 40-9, 40-11 Stillaguamish River, Wash. (NPS) 38-10, 38-17, 38-23, 38-25, 38-29 Stillhouse Hollow Dam, Tex. (SWF) 16-12, 16-19, 16-23 Stillwater Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-16, 4-25, 4-33 Stillwater River, Mont. (NPS) 38-29 Stillwell Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Stockton and Mormon Channels, Calif. (SPK) 35-22 Stockton Harbor, Maine (NE) 1-47 Stockton Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-9, 20-13, 20-17, 20-23 Stone Harbor, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 Stonehouse Creek, Kans. (MRK) 20-19 Stonewall Jackson Lake, W. Va. (ORP) 26-9, 26-16, 26-20 Stonington Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-47 Stonington Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-53 Stony Brook, Wilton, N.H. (NED) 1-51 1-39 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Stony Creek, Branford, Conn. (NED) 1-47 Straits of Mackinac, Mich. (NCE) 31-70 Stratford, Conn. (NED) 1-53 Streambank Erosion Control Evaluation and Demonstration Project Huntington, W. Va., District (ORH) 25-10 Louisville, Ky., District (ORL) 24-15 New England Division (NED) 1-28 Omaha, Nebr., District (MRO) 21-9, 21-12, 21-15 Pittsburgh, Pa., District (ORP) 26-29 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-7 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR) 28-9 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-5 Strington, Ft. Chartres and Ivy Landing, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Strong Creek, Idaho (NPS) 38-29 Strube Lake & Cougar Additional Unit, (South Fork McKenzie) (Modification to Cougar Lake) Oreg. 37-50 Stuart Gulch Dam, Boise, Idaho (NPW) 39-15 Stumpy Point Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-9, 6-22 Sturgeon Bay and Lake Michigan Ship Canal, Wis. (NCE) 31-27, 31-46, 31-64 Sturgis, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-27, 24-32 Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage Union No. 1 and Bay Island Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Ill. (NCR) 28-17, 28-19 Sucker Brook, Conn. (NED) 1-26, 1-50, 1-56 Sugar Creek Basin, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-16 Sugar Creek Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-25, 24-28 Sugar Hill Reservoir, N.H. (NED) 1-53 Suisun Bay Channel, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-7, 34-14, 35-22 Suisun Channel, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-8, 35-22 Suisun Point Channel, Calif. (SPK) 35-22 Sullivan Falls Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-47 Sulphur River, Ark. and Tex. (LMN) 11-38 Summersville Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-9, 25-14, 25-17 Sumner Parker Airport, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Sumpawanus (Babylon Creek) Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Sunbury, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Sunken Vessel Removal 48-1 Supervision of the Harbor of Hampton Roads (Prevention of Obstructive and Injurious Deposits) (NAO) 5-8, 5-15 Supervisor of New York Harbor (NAN) 2-10, 2-22, 2-29 Surry Mountain Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-18, 1-35, 1-56 Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters (NCE) 31-32, 31-47 Susquehanna River above and below Havre De Grace, Md. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 Susquehanna River at Williamsport, Pa. (NAB) 4-35 Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects, N.Y. and Pa. (NAB) 4-17, 4-33 Sutton Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-9, 25-14, 25-17 Suwannee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Swanquarter Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-30 Swanton Harbor, Vt. (NAN) 2-35 Sweetwater Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Sweetwater River, Calif. (SPL) 33-11, 33-17, 33-23 Swift Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Swiftcreek, Pitt and Craven Counties, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Swinomish Channel, Wash. (NPS) 38-7, 38-16, 38-21 Swoyersville, and Forty Fort, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Sykesville, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Syracuse, N.Y. (NCB) 32-36 Syracuse, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 T T. J. O'Brien Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-21, 28-22 Table Rock Lake, Mo. (SWL) 18-8, 18-12, 18-20 Tacoma, Wash. (NPS) 38-10, 38-17, 38-23 Tacoma Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-7, 38-16, 38-22 Tahchevah Creek Detention Basin and Channel Improvements, Calif. (SPL) 33-27, 33-31 Tahola, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Tahquitz Creek, Calif. (SPL) 33-27 Talkeetna River, Alaska (NPA) 40-6, 40-13 Tallahala Creek Lake, Miss. (SAM) 10-13, 10-26, 10-35 Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers, Miss. (LMK) 12-14 Tallapoosa River, Ala. (SAM) 10-38 Tallow Hill, Ga. (SAS) 8-17 Tamaqua, Pa. (NAP) 3-18, 3-22 Tampa and Hillsborough Bays, Fla. (SAJ) 9-42 Tampa Bay, Fla. (SAJ) 9-41 Tampa Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-17, 9-32, 9-42 Tangeman, Nebr. (MRO) 21-21 Tangier Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-9, 5-15, 5-20 Tangipahoa River, La. (LMN) 11-15, 11-27, 11-32 Tar River, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Tar River and Tributaries, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Tar River, Princeville, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Tarentum, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Tarrytown Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-30, 2-31 Taskinas Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-4, 36-9 Taunton River, Mass. (NED) 1-47 Tawas Bay Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-70, 31-71 Taylors Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-12, 15-16, 15-27 Taylorsville Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-13, 24-18 Taylorsville, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-27, 24-32 Teche-Vermilion Basins, La. (Water Supply) (MR + T) 42-7, 42-14, 42-27, 42-48 Tell City, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-27, 24-32 Tenants Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-47 Tenasillahe Island, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Tenkiller Ferry Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-18, 19-16, 19-21, 19-23 Tenmile Creek at Marianna, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Tennessee River, Tenn., Ala., and Ky. (ORN) 23-3, 23-9, 23-11, 23-17, 23-18 Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, Ala. and Miss. (ORN) 23-4, 23-9, 23-12 Tensas Basin, Ark. and La. (MR + T) 42-7, 42-15, 42-27 Tensas River and Bayou Macon, La. (LMK) 12-14 1-40 INDEX Tensas River National Wildlife Refuge (MR + T) 42-27 Terrain Analysis Center 51-1 Terre Haute (Conover Levee), Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-32 Terre Noire Creek, Ark. (LMK) 12-15 Terry, David D., Lock and Dam, Ark. (SWL) 18-2, 18-15 Teton River, Idaho (NPW) 39-14, 39-16 Texas City and Vicinity, Tex., Hurricane-Flood Protection (SWG) 15-12, 15-16, 15-27 Texas City Channel, Tex. (SWG) 15-8, 15-15, 15-26, 15-30, 15-37 Thames River, Conn. (NED) 1-47 Thames River Basin, Conn., R.I., and Mass. (NED) 1-25, 1-27, 1-60 The Cascades Canal, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 The Dalles-Celilo Canal, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-40 The Dalles Lock and Dam-Lake Celilo, Wash. and Oreg. (NPP) 37-22, 37-29, 37-39, 37-52 The Island Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-53 Thimble Shoal Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-9, 5-16, 5-20 Thomaston Dam, Conn. (NED) 1-21, 1-36, 1-58 Thoroughfare Swamp, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Three Forks, Mont. (MRO) 21-20 Three Islands Reservoir, Tenn. (ORN) 23-14 Three Rivers, Mass. (NED) 1-27, 1-51, 1-57 Three Rivers, Tex. (SWF) 16-13, 16-19, 16-23 Thumpertown Beach, Eastham, Mass. (NED) 1-53 Tickfaw, Natalbany, Ponchatoula, and Blood Rivers, La. (LMN) 11-39 Ticonderoga River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Tijuana River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-26 Tilghman Island Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-9, 4-23, 4-31 Tillamook Bay and Bar, Oreg. (NPP) 37-9, 37-26, 37-34 Tioga-Hammond Lakes, Pa. (NAB) 4-17, 4-26 Tionesta Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-10, 26-16, 26-20 Toad Suck Ferry Lock & Dam (No. 8), Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-15 Tocks Island (Relocation of U.S. Route 209 Only) Pa. (NAP) 3-29 Tocks Island Lake, Pa., and N.Y. (NAP) 3-29 Todd Swamp, S.C. (SAN) 7-7, 7-15 Toledo Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-11, 32-21, 32-32 Tolovana River, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Tolu, Ky. (ORL) 24-23, 24-27 Tom Jenkins Dam, Ohio (ORH) 25-14, 25-17 Tom Jenkins Reservoir, Ohio (ORH) 25-9 Tomahawk Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-19 Tomanovich-Salmon City, Idaho (NPW) 39-14, 39-17 Tombigbee River, Miss. and Ala. (SAM) 10-15, 10-26, 10-35 Tombigbee River Tributaries, Miss. and Ala. (SAM) 10-15, 10-27, 10-36 Toms River, N.J. (NAP) 3-27, 3-30 Tongue River Lake, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-21 Topeka, Kans. (MRK) 20-23 Topographic Laboratory 51-1 Topsoil Beach, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Toronto Lake, Kans. (SWL) (SWT) 18-18, 19-12, 19-20, 19-23 Torrington, Conn. (NED) 1-26, 1-51, 1-58 Totuskey Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Touchet River, Wash. (NPW) 39-14, 39-15, 39-16 Toutle River, Wash. (NPP) 37-15 Towanda Lake, Kans. (SWT) 19-26 Town Beach, Plymouth, Mass. (NED) 1-49 Town Bluff Dam-B. A. Steinhagen Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-15, 16-19, 16-23 Town Creek, Americus, Ga. (SAM) 10-39 Town Creek, Harrodsburg, Ky. (ORL) 24-22 Town Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-35 Town Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-6, 7-9, 7-13 Town Neck Beach, Sandwich, Mass. (NED) 1-49 Townshend Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-18, 1-35, 1-56 Trabuco Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-30 Tradewater River, Ky. (ORL) 24-21 Tranquitas Creek, Kingsville, Tex. (SWG) 15-29 Tranters Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Traverse City Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-70, 31-71 Treasure Island, Mo. (LMM) 13-10 Treatment of Yuba River Debris Situation-Restraining Barriers, Calif. (CDC) 44-2, 44-5 Tred Avon River, Md. (NAB) 4-35 Trempealeau, Wis. (NCS) 27-24 Trent River, N.C. (SAW) 6-27, 6-28, 6-29 Trenton Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-19 Trinidad Lake, Colo. (SWA) 17-7, 17-11 Trinity River and Tributaries, Tex. (SWG) 15-8, 15-15, 15-26, 15-30, 15-37 Trinity River Project, Tex. (SWF) 16-2, 16-17, 16-23 Triplett Creek, Morehead, Ky. (ORL) 24-22 Tri-Pond Levee, Ill. (ORL) 24-25, 24-28 Trotters Shoals Lake (SAS) 8-9, 8-12, 8-15 Troublesome Creek, Hindman, Ky. (ORL) 24-33 Troy, Ind. (ORL) 24-25, 24-28, 24-33 Truckee River and Tributaries, Calif. and Nev. (SPK) 35-23 Truman, Harry S., Dam and Reservoir, Mo. (MRK) 20-9, 20-13, 20-17, 20-23 Trumbull Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-50 Trussville, Ala. (SAM) 10-39 Truth or Consequences (Hot Springs) Unit, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-6, 17-12, 17-13 Tucannon River, Camp Wooten, Wash. (NPW) 39-14 Tuckahoe River, Md. (NAB) 4-35 Tuckerton Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-11, 3-21, 3-27 Tucson Diversion Channel, Ariz. (SPL) 33-7, 33-16, 33-21 Tug and Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, W. Va., Va., and Ky. (ORN) 23-5, 23-9 Tully Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-19, 1-35, 1-56 Tulsa and West Tulsa Levee, Okla. (SWT) 19-25, 19-26 Turkey Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-7, 7-15 Turner Prairie, Mill Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-46 Turtle Creek, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Turtle Creek Channel Improvement, Yukon, Okla. (SWT) 19-26 Tuskahoma Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-25, 19-26 Tuttle Creek Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-8, 20-13, 20-17, 20-23 Tuttle Creek Lake (Road Improvement), Kans. (MRK) 20-23 1-41 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Twelvemile Bayou, La. (LMN) 11-42 Twin Valley Lake, Wild Rice River, Minn. (NCS) 27-13, 27-18 Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare, Md. (NAB) 4-10, 4-23, 4-31 Two Harbors, Minn. (NCE) 31-27, 31-46, 31-65 Two Rivers Dam, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-8, 17-11 Two Rivers Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-28, 31-47, 31-65 Tyaskin Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-35 Tybee Island, Ga. (SAS) 8-6, 8-11, 8-15 Tygart Lake, W. Va. (ORP) 26-3, 26-14, 26-18 Tylers Beach, Va. (NAO) 5-9, 5-16, 5-20 Tyrone, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 U U.S. Highway 51, Tenn. (LMM) 13-4, 13-7, 13-9 Umatilla Harbor, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Umatilla River (ECHO), Oreg. (NPP) (NPW) 37-46, 39-14 Umpqua River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-9, 37-26, 37-35, 37-44 Umpqua River and Tributaries, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Unadilla, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Union City Dam, Pa. (ORP) 26-11, 26-16, 26-20 Union Lake, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Union River, Maine (NED) 1-47 Union Township Drainage District, Mo. (NCR) 28-17, 28-19 Union Village Dam, Vt. (NED) 1-19, 1-35, 1-56 Uniontown, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-27, 24-32 Uniontown, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Uniontown Locks and Dam, Ky. (ORL) 22-3, 22-9 University Wash and Spring Brook, Riverside, Calif. (SPL) 33-26 Upper Chipola River, Fla., from Mariana to its mouth (SAM) 10-38 Upper Grand River, Mo. (MRK) 20-19 Upper Grays River Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-42 Upper Iowa River, Iowa (NCS) 27-21 Upper Machodoc Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-35 Upper Marlboro, Md. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Upper Puyallup River, Wash. (NAS) 38-29 Upper River Road, Jefferson Co., Ky. (ORL) 24-33 Upper River Rouge, Mich. (NCE) 31-72 Upper Thorofare, Deal Island, Md. (NAB) 4-35, 4-38 Upper White Oak Bayou and Tributaries, Tex. (SWG) 15-13 Upper White River, Ark. (SWL) 18-19 Urban Areas at Alton, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Urbanna Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23, 5-25 Utica, Ind. (ORL) 24-23, 24-27 Utica, Ohio (ORH) 25-19, 25-21 V Valdez Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Vale, Oreg. (NPW) 39-17 Valley City Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Valley Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-19 Van Buren, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-21 Van Meter, Iowa (NCR) 28-17, 28-19 Vanceburg, Ky. (ORH) 25-19 Vancouver Lake Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-43 Vatia Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-13 Vaughn, Mont. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Velva, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-21 Ventnor, Margate and Longport, N.J. (NAP) 3-28 Ventura Marina (Ventura Harbor), Calif. (SPL) 33-4, 33-14, 33-20 Ventura River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-26 Ventura-Pierpont Area, Calif. (SPL) 33-25 Vermilion Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 33-11, 32-21, 32-33 Vermilion Lock, La. (Replacement of Lock) (LMN) 11-10, 11-26, 11-31 Vermillion River, Hastings, Minn. (NCS) 27-21 Vermillion River, S.D. (MRO) 21-18 Verona Lake, Va. (NAB) 4-36 Vevay, Ind. (ORL) 24-25, 24-28 Vicinity of Nehalem, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Vicksburg Harbor, Miss. (MR + T) 42-28 Victory Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-53 Villa Park Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-27, 33-30 Village Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-6, 7-9, 7-13 Village Creek, Jackson & Lawrence Counties, Ark. (SWL) 18-20, 18-21 Village Creek, White River, and Mayberry Levee District, Ark. (SWL) 18-14, 18-21 Village of New Athens, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Vince and Little Vince Bayous, Tex. (SWG) 15-12, 15-16, 15-28 Vincennes, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-27, 24-32 Vineyard Haven, Mass. (NED) 1-47 Vinton Waterway, La. (LMN) 11-39 Virginia Beach, Va. (NAO) 5-11, 5-16, 5-21 Virginia Beach Streams Canal Number 2, Va. (NAO) 5-12, 5-16, 5-21 Virginia Key and Key Biscayne, Fla. (SAJ) 9-51 w W W. D. Mayo Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWT) 19-23 W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, N.C. (SAW) 6-17, 6-23 W. P. Franklin Lock and Dam, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Wabash Railroad Bridges, Illinois River, Meredosia, and Valley City, Ill. (LMS) 14-13 Wabash River Basin, Ind., Ill., and Ohio (ORL) 24-13, 24-21, 24-33 Wabasha Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 29-8 Waccamaw River, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-14, 7-16 Waccamaw River and Seven Creeks, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) (SAW) 6-28, 7-15 Waco Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-13, 16-19, 16-23 Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District No. 1, Wash. (NPP) 37-17, 37-28, 37-37, 37-49 1-42 INDEX Wahkiakum County Diking District 4, Wash. (NPP) 37-43, 37-49 Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12, 36-14 Waikiki Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Wailoa Stream and Tributaries, Hawaii (POD) 36-6, 36-13 Waimea Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Wake Island Harbor, Wake Island (POD) 36-12 Waldo Lake Tunnel and Reregulating Works, Oreg. (NPP) 37-46, 37-50 Walla Walla, Wash. (NPW) 36-17 Wallabout Channel, N.Y. (NAN) 2-30, 2-31 Wallace, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22 Wallace Channel, Pamlico Sound, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Wallace Lake, La. (LMN) 11-23, 11-28, 11-34, 11-39, 11-41 Wallis Sands State Beach, N.H. (NED) 1-49 Wallisville Lake, Tex. (SWG) 15-9 Wallowa River, Oreg. (NPW) 39-14 Walluski River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Walnut Bayou Channel Improvement, Ark. (SWT) 19-25 Walnut Creek, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-4, 34-15, 35-2, 35-8 Walter, Francis E., Dam, Pa. (NAP) 3-15, 3-22 Walter F. George Lock and Dam, Ala. and Ga. (SAM) 10-22, 10-28, 10-37 Wappapello Lake, Mo. (MR + T) 42-20, 42-56 Wappinger Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-31 Wappinger Creek at Pleasant Valley, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33 Ware, Mass. (NED) 1-27, 1-51, 1-57 Wareham Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-47 Wareham-Marion, Mass. (NED) 1-53 Warren River, R.I. (NED) 1-47 Warrenton Diking Districts 1, 2, and 3, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Warroad Harbor, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Warroad Harbor and River, Minn. (NCS) 27-3, 27-16, 27-19, 27-22 Warroad River and Bull Dog Creek, Minn. (NCS) 27-21 Warsaw, N.Y. (NCB) 32-36 Warsaw Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 29-9 Warwick Cove, R.I. (NED) 1-47 Warwick River, Md. (NAB) 4-35 Warwood, W. Va. (OPR) 26-22, 26-26 Washington, D.C. and Vicinity (NAB) 4-36 Washington, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Washington Aqueduct (NAB) 4-19 Washington Canal and South River, N.J. (NAN) 2-31 Washington Harbor, D.C. (NAB) 4-10, 4-23, 4-31 Washington Island, Wis. (NCE) 31-70, 31-71 Washougal Area Levees, Wash. (NPP) 37-43 Wassagusset Beach, Weymouth, Mass. (NED) 1-49 Water Resources Support Center (WRSC) 53-1 Waterbury, Vt. (NAN) 2-35 Waterbury Reservoir, Vt. (NAN) 2-33 Waterbury-Watertown, Conn. (NED) 1-26, 1-51, 1-58 Wateree River, S.C. (SAN) 7-14 Waterford, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Waterloo, Iowa (NCR) 28-8, 28-11, 28-15 Waterloo, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-21 Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, S.C. (SAW) 6-10, 6-22, 6-29 Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Waterway Connecting Swanquarter Bay with Deep Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-10, 6-21 Waterway Connecting Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers, Ala. and Miss. (SAM) 10-12, 10-26, 10-35 Waterway from Empire, La., to Gulf of Mexico (LMN) 11-39 Waterway from Intracoastal Waterway to Bayou Dulac, La. (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, La.) (LMN) 11-16, 11-27, 11-32 Waterway from Little Choptank River to Choptank River, Md. (NAB) 4-38 Waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, La. (LMN) 11-39 Waterway-Norfolk, Va. to Sounds of N.C. (SAW) 6-27, 6-29 Waterway on the Coast of Virginia (NAO) 5-10, 5-16, 5-20 Waterways Experiment Station (WES) 45-1 Watkins Glen, N.Y. (NCB) 32-38 Watts Bar Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-17 Waukegan Harbor, Ill. (NCC) 30-5, 30-11, 30-14, 30-16 Waurika Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-12, 19-20, 19-23 Waverly, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Wax Lake Outlet, La. (MR + T) 42-48 Waycake Creek, N.J. (NAN) 2-31 Webb District Improvement Co., Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-16, 19-16, 19-21, 19-23 Weber River and Tributaries, Utah (SPK) 35-25 Weiser River, Weiser Area, Idaho (NPW) 39-14, 39-15, 39-16 Wellfleet Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-47 Wells Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-47 Wells Harbor, Territory of Guam (POD) 36-12 Wellsburg, W. Va. (ORP) 26-23 Wellsville, N.Y. (NCB) 32-36 Wellsville, Ohio, Sec. I (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Wellsville, Ohio, Sec. II (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Wenatchee, Canyons 1 and 2, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Wessagussett Beach, Weymouth, Mass. (NED) 1-49 West, Herbert G., Lake, Wash. (NPW) 39-6 West Agurs, La. (LMN) 11-24, 11-28, 11-34 West Atchalafaya Floodway, La. (MR + T) 42-14 West Branch Chisholm Creek Channel Improvement, Kans. (SWT) 19-26 West Branch of Susquehanna River, Pa. (NAB) 4-17, 4-33 West Bridgewater, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 West Brookfield Reservoir, Mass. (NED) 1-53 West Canaan Lake, N.H. (NED) 153 West Fork, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19 West Fork, Foster Creek, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 West Fork, Grand River, Mo. (MRK) 20-11 West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, Ohio (ORL) 24-13, 24-18, 24-30 West Glendive, Mont. (MRO) 21-20 1-43 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 West Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-11, 32-21 West Hickman Area, Hickman, Ky. (LMM) 13-3, 13-6, 13-8 West Hill Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-14, 1-33 West Kentucky Tributaries, Ky. (MR + T) 42-10, 42-19, 42-27, 42-51 West Matanzas Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-19 West Muddy Creek and Marys River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-46 West Nishnabotna River, Mills Co. Bridge, near Hastings, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 West Nishnabotna River, Mills Co. Bridge, near Malvern, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 West Nishnabotna River, near Hancock, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 West of Morrilton, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-21 West Oneonta Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-38 West Point, Ga. (SAM) 10-39 West Point, Ky. (ORL) 24-23, 24-27 West Point, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-21 West Point Lake, Ga. and Ala. (SAM) (SAS) 8-9, 10-22, 10-28, 10-37 West Richland, Wash. (NPW) 39-17 West Springfield, Mass. (NED) 1-27, 1-51, 1-57 West Stewartstown, N.H. (NED) 1-27 West Tennessee Tributaries, Tenn. (MR + T) 42-10, 42-18, 42-27, 42-51 West Terre Haute, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-27, 24-32 West Thompson Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-26, 1-38, 1-60 West Union, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 West Warren, Mass. (NED) 1-27, 1-51, 1-57 Westchester Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Westcott Cove, Conn. (NED) 1-47 Westerly, R.I. (NED) 1-51 Western Branch, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Westfield, Mass. (NED) 1-53 Westhaven Cove Small Boat Basin (Westport Marina), Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Westland District Improvement Co., Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Weston, Vt. (NED) 1-26, 1-51, 1-57 Westport, Conn. (NED) 1-53 Westport, Ky. (ORL) 24-25, 24-28 Westport District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, Conn. (NED) 1-47, 1-53 Westport River, Mass. (NED) 1-47 Westport Slough, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40, 37-46 Westville Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-26, 1-38, 1-60 Wethersfield, Conn. (NED) 1-26 Weymouth Back River, Mass. (NED) 1-47 Weymouth-Fore & Town Rivers, Boston Hbr., Mass. (NED) 1-47 Whale Creek, N.J. (NAN) 2-35 Wheeler, General Joe, Lock and Dam, Ala. (ORN) 23-17 Wheeling, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Wheeling, W. Va. (North Wheeling) (ORP) 26-22, 26-27 Wheeling, W. Va. (Wheeling Island) (ORP) 26-22, 26-27 White Lake Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-28, 31-47, 31-65 White Oak Creek, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 White River, Ark. (above Peach Orchard Bluff) (SWL) 18-19 White River, Ark. (below Newport) (LMM) 13-3, 13-6, 13-8 White River, Ind. (ORL) 24-21 White River Basin (Little Rock District) (SWL) 18-4, 18-10, 18-14, 18-20 White River Fish Hatchery, Ark. (SWL) 18-20 Whitebird Creek, Idaho (NPW) 38-15, 39-16 Whitefish Point Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-70, 31-71 Whitesburg, Ky. (ORL) 24-33 Whitewater River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-26 Whiting, Maine (NED) 1-26 Whitings Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Whitlow Ranch Dam, Ariz. (SPL) 33-8, 33-16, 33-21 Whitmanville Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-51, 1-59 Whitney Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-15, 16-19, 16-23 Whitney Point Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-16, 4-25 Whitney Point Village, N.Y. (NAB) 4-16, 4-25 Wichita and Valley Center Channel Improvement, Kans. (SWT) 19-26 Wickford Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-47 Wicomico River, Md. (NAB) 4-10, 4-23, 4-31 Wiedmer Chemical Drainage and Levee District, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Wilcox, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Wild Rice and Marsh Rivers, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Wild Rice River, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Wild Rice River, South Branch and Felton Ditch, Minn. 27-14, 27-18 Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-11, 35-23 Wilders, Ky. (ORL) 24-27 Wiley Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-46 Wilkes-Barre, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Willamette Falls Fishladder, Oreg. (NPP) 37-46 Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-10, 37-26, 37-35 Willamette River at Willamette Falls, Oreg. (NPP) 37-11, 37-26, 37-36, 37-47 Willamette River Basin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-17, 37-38, 37-50 Willamette River Basin, Oreg.-Bank Protection (NPP) 37-17, 37-28, 37-38, 37-50 Willamette River Basin Channel Clearing and Snagging (NPP) 37-43 Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, Wash. (NPS) 38-8, 38-16, 38-22 Willapa River at Raymond, Wash. (NPS) 38-10, 38-17, 38-23 William H. Harsha Lake, Ohio (ORL) 24-14, 24-18, 24-30 William L. Springer Lake, Ill. (NCR) 28-17 Williamson, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19, 25-21 Williamsport, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Williamstown, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Williamsville Reservoir, Vt. (NED) 1-53 Willoughby Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-23 1-44 INDEX Willow Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-15 Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, Oreg. (NPW) 39-3, 39-9, 39-11 Willow Island Locks and Dam, W. Va. (ORD) 22-1, 22-7 Wilmington Harbor, Del. (NAP) 3-12, 3-21, 3-25 Wilmington Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-10, 6-22 Wilmore, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Wilson Branch, Cheraw, S.C. (SAN) 7-14 Wilson Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-12, 32-21, 32-33 Wilson Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-8, 20-13, 20-17, 20-23 Wilson Lock and Dam, Ala. (ORN) 23-17 Wilson Point Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-47 Wilson River, Oreg. (NPD) 37-44 Wilton, N.H. (NED) 1-26 Winchester Bay, Oreg. (NPP) 37-11, 37-27, 37-36 Winfield Levee, Kans. (SWT) 19-26 Winfield Levee Modification, Kans. (SWT) 19-26 Winnibigoshish Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 27-23 Winnipesaukee Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-47 Winona, Minn. (NCS) 27-14, 27-18 Winona Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 29-8 Winooski River, Vt. (NAN) 2-33 Winslow (Tributaries of Little Colorado River), Ariz. (SPL) 33-26, 33-30 Winsted, Conn. (NED) 1-26, 1-51, 1-57 Winter Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-47 Winter Harbor, Va. (NAO) 5-23, 5-24 Winthrop Beach, Mass. (NED) 1-49 Winthrop Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-47 Wisconsin River, Wis. (NCS) 27-20 Wishart Point Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Wister Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-18, 19-12, 19-20, 19-23 Withlacoochee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49, 9-50 Wolf and Jordan Rivers, Miss. (SAM) 10-38 Wolf Creek Dam-Lake Cumberland, Ohio River Basin, Ky. (ORN) 23-8, 23-10 Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), Tenn. (LMM) 13-3, 13-6, 13-8 Wolf-Coffee Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-19 Wood Island Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-47 Wood River Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-7, 14-10, 14-12 Woodbridge Creek, N.J. (NAN) 2-31 Woodbury Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-27 Woodcock Creek Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-11, 26-16, 26-20 Woodland St. bridge, Tenn. (ORN) 23-4 Woodlands, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22, 26-27 Woodmont Shore, Milford, Conn. (NED) 1-49 Woodruff, Jim, Lock and Dam, Ga. and Fla. (SAM) 10-21, 10-27, 10-36 Woods Hole Channel, Mass. (NED) 1-47 Woodson Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42, 37-43, 37-49 Woonsocket, R.I. (NED) 1-26, 1-51, 1-55 Worcester, Mass. (NED) 1-27, 1-51, 1-55 Wrangell Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Wrangell Narrows, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Wright Patman Dam and Lake, Tex. (LMN) (SWF) 11-42, 16-13, 16-19, 16-23 Wright's Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-11, 6-22 Wrightsville Beach, N.C. (SAW) 6-16, 6-23 Wrightsville Dam, Vt. (NAN) 2-33 Wynoochee Lake, Wash. (NPS) 38-11, 38-17, 38-23 Wynoochee River, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Wyoming Valley, Pa. (NAB) 4-18, 4-26, 4-33 Y Yadkin River Basin, N.C. & S.C. (SAW) 6-16, 6-31 Yakima, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Yakima River, Cle Elum, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Yakima River, West Richland, Wash. (NPS) (NPW) 38-30, 39-15 Yalobusha River, Miss. (LMR) 12-14 Yaquina Bay and Harbor, Oreg. (NPP) 37-11, 37-27, 37-36 Yaquina Bay and Harbor Small Boat Basin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Yaquina River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-12, 37-27, 37-36, 37-40 Yatesville Lake, Ky. (ORH) 25-9, 25-14, 25-17 Yazoo River, Miss. (LMK) 12-4, 12-8, 12-10 Yazoo River Backwater Area (MR + T) 42-49 Yazoo River Basin, Miss. (MR + T) 42-8, 42-16, 42-27, 42-49 Yazoo River Basin Project Levees (MR + T) 42-44 Yellow Jacket Creek, Hogansville, Ga. (SAM) 10-39 Yellowstone River, Bank Protection, Billings, Mont. (MRO) 21-20 Yellowstone River, Greycliff Bridge, Mont. (MRO) 21-20 Yellowstone River, near Miles City, Mont., Water Intake and Sewage Lagoon (MRO) 21-20 Yellowstone River, Reedpoint Bridge, Mont. (MRO) 21-20 Yellowstone River, Springdale Bridge, Mont. (MRO) 21-20 Yellowstone River, Voges Bridge, near Big Timber, Mont. (MRO) 21-20 Yellowstone River, W. Glendive, Mont. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Yellowstone River, Water Plant, Livingston, Mont. (MRO) 21-20 Yellowstone River, Yellowstone Co. Bridge, near Billings, Mont. (MRO) 21-20 Yonkers, N.Y. (NAN) 2-18, 2-22, 2-28 York, Pa. (NAB) 4-18, 4-26, 4-33 York Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-47 York River, Va. (NAO) 5-23, 5-25 York Spit Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-3, 5-17 Youghiogheny River, Pa. and Md. (ORP) 26-21 Youghiogheny River Lake, Pa. and Md. (ORP) 26-12, 26-16, 26-20 Youngs and Klaskanine River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Youngs Bay and Youngs River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Youngs River Dikes, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Youngstown, Ohio (ORP) 26-22 1-45 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1982 Z Zacate Creek Channel 16-14, 16-20, 16-23 Improvement, Tex. (SWF) Zanesville, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Zintel Canyon Dam, Wash. (NPW) 39-4, 39-9, 39-11 Zippel Bay, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Zippel Bay Harbor, Minn. (NCS) 27-20 Zumbro River, Minn. (NCS) 27-21 * U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1983-408-928 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. UA2 4 .A13 1982 Annual report of the Chief of Engineers... 1-46 DIVISIONS AND DISTRICTS FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES NORTH PACIFIC NORTH CENTRAL MISSOURI RIVER I--- - - NORFOLK WILMINGTON The Alaska District Headquarters, Anchorage, Alaska, is included in the North Pacific Division. MISSISSIPPI VALLEY The State of Hawaii and Islands in the Pacific are included in Pacific Ocean Division, with Headquarters at Honolulu, Hawaii Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands are included in Jacksonville District, South Atlantic Division. DISTRICT BOUNDARIES SDIVISION HEADQUARTERS SDISTRICT HEADQUARTERS DIVISION AND DISTRICT HEADQUARTERS NEW i N MPHREY8 ENOIN ER X364 00016Cl2 3